Request for Information: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); Retailer Transaction Data, 45175-45176 [2014-18288]
Download as PDF
45175
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 149
Monday, August 4, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Request for Information: Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP);
Retailer Transaction Data
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In light of a recent court
decision regarding the availability of
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) retailer transaction
data to the public, the USDA Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) is issuing this
Request for Information to help inform
FNS’ response to the recent court
decision and any future policy changes
regarding the release of SNAP retailer
transaction data. In moving forward,
USDA is interested in providing greater
transparency. However, the Department
also recognizes that any movement in
this arena needs to be done carefully,
after considering potential
consequences and the views of the
variety of stakeholders. As a result, this
notice requests information from any
and all interested parties, with a
particular focus on current and former
SNAP authorized retailers, as to
whether the disclosure of aggregated
SNAP redemption data at the individual
store level would improve the
administration and enforcement of the
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (the
Act) and whether such data is
confidential business information.
Background: Section 9(c) of the Act, 7
U.S.C. 2018(c), limits the use or
disclosure of information received from
applicant and participating SNAP
retailers. Use and disclosure of such
information is limited to purposes
directly connected with the
administration and enforcement of the
Act, or the regulations issued pursuant
to the Act, with limited exceptions for
law enforcement and use by the Special
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Aug 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
Supplemental Nutrition Program for
Women, Infants, and Children. Section
9(c) imposes criminal penalties for
disclosure of such information in a
manner not authorized by Federal law
or regulation.
Throughout the history of the
Program, Section 9(c) of the Act has
been interpreted as a withholding
statute that includes SNAP retailer
redemption information. On September
22, 1978, FNS published a final rule
codifying the interpretation that Section
9(c) prohibited the use or disclosure of
‘‘information furnished by firms,
including . . . their redemptions of
coupons, . . . except for purposes
directly connected with the
administration and enforcement of Food
Stamp Act and these regulations.’’ 43
FR. 43,272, 43,275 (Sept. 22, 1978)
(currently codified at 7 CFR 278.1(q)).
FNS has operated in accordance with its
interpretation of the Act and FNS
regulations that the Secretary did not
have authority to release this
information.
However, South Dakota’s Argus
Leader newspaper challenged this
interpretation of the Act. In February of
2011, through the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), the Argus
Leader requested annual SNAP retailer
redemption data for all SNAP
authorized retailers for the six-year
period spanning from 2005 through
2010. Though the initial FNS decision
to withhold this data was upheld by the
U.S. District Court for the District of
South Dakota, on January 28, 2014, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth
Circuit issued an opinion in favor of
Argus Leader. The appeals court
opinion contended that SNAP retailer
redemption information did not fall
within the withholding contemplated by
Section 9(c) of the Act and therefore
such information was not exempt from
disclosure under Exemption 3 of FOIA.
The Eighth Circuit decision did not
address Exemption 4 of FOIA, 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4), which exempts ‘‘trade secrets
and commercial or financial information
obtained from a person and privileged
or confidential’’ from release under
FOIA. FNS recognizes that, despite the
decision on Section 9(c) of the Act, the
Agency must also consider whether this
redemption data constitutes confidential
business information. To make a
determination in this regard, FNS is
required to solicit feedback from the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submitters of the retailer transaction
data.
Request for Information: FNS’
objective is twofold: (1) To meet FNS’
obligations to solicit feedback from the
submitters of retailer transaction data
which is the subject of the litigation
described above; and (2) to determine
how to provide greater transparency,
while remaining consistent with our
legal obligations and reflecting input
from the public. FNS will use this
public input to inform FNS’ response to
the court decision and consideration of
what, if any, adjustments should be
made to SNAP regulations in the future.
It is FNS’ intent that any regulatory
changes would govern the availability of
data after the effective date of those
regulations, and not be retroactive. FNS
is seeking public input on the following
questions:
1. Are aggregated annual SNAP
redemption data at the individual store
level confidential business information?
If yes, please explain why the disclosure
is likely to cause substantial competitive
harm and fully explain all other grounds
upon which you oppose the disclosure
of such information. Also, please
indicate whether the size of the retailer
affects any identified competitive harm.
2. Are aggregated monthly SNAP
redemption data at the individual store
level confidential business information?
If yes, please explain why the disclosure
is likely to cause substantial competitive
harm and fully explain all other grounds
upon which you oppose the disclosure
of such information. Also, please
indicate whether the size of the retailer
affects any identified competitive harm.
3. Should aggregated annual SNAP
redemption data at the individual store
level be released for transparency
purposes?
• If yes, describe in detail why this
data should be released for the purposes
of transparency and public
accountability, and specifically how this
data would assist in the administration
of the Food and Nutrition Act.
• If no, please provide details as to
how release of this data would be
counter to the administration and
enforcement provisions of the Act.
• When considering the impact of the
release of this data on the
administration and enforcement
provisions of the Act, please consider
the effect, if any, on SNAP recipients.
4. Should aggregated monthly SNAP
redemption data at the individual store
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
45176
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 149 / Monday, August 4, 2014 / Notices
level be released for transparency
purposes?
• If yes, describe in detail why this
data should be released for the purposes
of transparency and public
accountability, and specifically how this
data would assist in the administration
of the Food and Nutrition Act.
• If no, please provide details as to
how release of this data would be
counter to the administration and
enforcement provisions of the Act.
• When considering the impact of the
release of this data on the
administration and enforcement
provisions of the Act, please consider
the effect, if any, on SNAP recipients.
5. For each of the above questions,
how would answers differ if the
monthly or annual aggregated data were
for a retailer’s aggregated sales at all
stores within a state or nationally, as
opposed to per-store data? Should any
other aggregations be considered?
Commenters who were SNAPauthorized retailers from 2005 through
2010 should make that fact clear in their
comments.
DATES: To be assured of consideration,
written comments must be submitted on
or before September 8, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments
electronically.
All comments submitted in response
to this notice will be included in the
record and will be made available to the
public at www.regulations.gov. Please be
advised that the substance of the
comments, including any personal or
confidential business information, and
the identity of the individuals or entities
commenting will be subject to public
disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vicky T. Robinson, Acting Chief,
Retailer Management and Issuance
Branch, Food and Nutrition Service,
(703) 305–2476.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the end
of fiscal year (FY) 2013, over 250,000
retailers were authorized to redeem
SNAP benefits. According to the FY
2013 data, 82 percent of all benefits
redeemed were redeemed at
supermarkets, large grocers and
superstores. Approximately 18 percent
of benefits were redeemed at smaller
stores, including convenience stores,
small grocers and farmers’ markets. Less
than one percent were redeemed by
authorized treatment programs, group
homes, homeless meal providers,
communal dining facilities and shelters
as provided for in statute. A 2009 FNS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Aug 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
study on benefit use indicates that 96.3
percent of all SNAP beneficiaries
shopped at supermarkets or superstores
at least once each month.
Dated: July 28, 2014.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–18288 Filed 8–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Institute of Food and
Agriculture
Request for Public Comments on
Proposed Collection of Information
National Institute of Food and
Agriculture, USDA.
ACTION: Request for Public Comments on
Proposed Collection of Information.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended) and Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
implementing regulations (5 CFR part
1320), this notice announces the
National Institute of Food and
Agriculture’s (NIFA) proposed
collection of information for the
application for Non-Land Grant College
of Agriculture designation. NIFA
intends to submit the following
information collection request to OMB
for review and approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by October 3, 2014, to be
assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the docket number by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, docket number
NIFA–2014–0002. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: rmartin@nifa.usda.gov.
Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 202–720–0857.
• Mail: Robert Martin, Records
Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), NIFA, USDA, STOP
2216, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–2216.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Office of
Information Technology (OIT), National
Institute of Food and Agriculture,
USDA, 800 9th Street SW., STOP 2201
Washington, DC 20250–2201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Martin, Records Officer; Email:
rmartin@nifa.usda.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Application for Non-Land Grant
College of Agriculture certification.
OMB Number: 0524—New.
Type of Request: Notice; Request for
Public Comments on Proposed
Collection of Information.
Abstract: NIFA is responsible for
designating Non-Land Grant Colleges of
Agriculture (NLGCAs). Section 7101 of
the Agricultural Act of 2014 (Pub. L.
113–79) required NIFA to establish an
ongoing process allowing public
colleges and universities that offer 4year or higher degrees in the food and
agricultural sciences to apply for
designation as NLGCA Institutions. For
additional information see ‘‘Process for
Non-Land Grant College of Agriculture
(NLGCA) Designation’’ 79 FR 29398
(May 22, 2014).
Type of Information Collection: NIFA
will collect this information through
web-based data collection. Institutions
seeking designation as a NLGCA will
submit requested information about
their institution through a web-based
form. The information collected from
each institution will allow NIFA to
verify that the institution is a public
college or university, offers a
baccalaureate or higher degree in food
and agricultural sciences, as defined in
7 U.S.C. 3103(9), and is not otherwise
ineligible to be designated as an
NLGCA.
Frequency: Institutions seeking
designation as an NLGCA must apply
one time. Their designation will be
valid until September 30, 2018. Upon
expiration of their designation,
reapplication may be required.
Affected Public: Institutions that meet
the criteria for NLGCA designation;
public colleges and universities that
offer 4-year or higher degrees in the food
and agricultural sciences.
Estimate of Burden: NIFA estimates
that the time required to complete the
web-based application form will be
approximately 15 minutes. The
information that is required includes
minimal information about the
institution. The total annual burden for
the application to request designation as
a NLGCA is 18.75 hours for a projected
75 applicants.
Comment Request: Comments are
invited on whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45175-45176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18288]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 149 / Monday, August 4, 2014 /
Notices
[[Page 45175]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Request for Information: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP); Retailer Transaction Data
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In light of a recent court decision regarding the availability
of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) retailer
transaction data to the public, the USDA Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS) is issuing this Request for Information to help inform FNS'
response to the recent court decision and any future policy changes
regarding the release of SNAP retailer transaction data. In moving
forward, USDA is interested in providing greater transparency. However,
the Department also recognizes that any movement in this arena needs to
be done carefully, after considering potential consequences and the
views of the variety of stakeholders. As a result, this notice requests
information from any and all interested parties, with a particular
focus on current and former SNAP authorized retailers, as to whether
the disclosure of aggregated SNAP redemption data at the individual
store level would improve the administration and enforcement of the
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (the Act) and whether such data is
confidential business information.
Background: Section 9(c) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 2018(c), limits the
use or disclosure of information received from applicant and
participating SNAP retailers. Use and disclosure of such information is
limited to purposes directly connected with the administration and
enforcement of the Act, or the regulations issued pursuant to the Act,
with limited exceptions for law enforcement and use by the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.
Section 9(c) imposes criminal penalties for disclosure of such
information in a manner not authorized by Federal law or regulation.
Throughout the history of the Program, Section 9(c) of the Act has
been interpreted as a withholding statute that includes SNAP retailer
redemption information. On September 22, 1978, FNS published a final
rule codifying the interpretation that Section 9(c) prohibited the use
or disclosure of ``information furnished by firms, including . . .
their redemptions of coupons, . . . except for purposes directly
connected with the administration and enforcement of Food Stamp Act and
these regulations.'' 43 FR. 43,272, 43,275 (Sept. 22, 1978) (currently
codified at 7 CFR 278.1(q)). FNS has operated in accordance with its
interpretation of the Act and FNS regulations that the Secretary did
not have authority to release this information.
However, South Dakota's Argus Leader newspaper challenged this
interpretation of the Act. In February of 2011, through the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), the Argus Leader requested annual SNAP retailer
redemption data for all SNAP authorized retailers for the six-year
period spanning from 2005 through 2010. Though the initial FNS decision
to withhold this data was upheld by the U.S. District Court for the
District of South Dakota, on January 28, 2014, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued an opinion in favor of Argus
Leader. The appeals court opinion contended that SNAP retailer
redemption information did not fall within the withholding contemplated
by Section 9(c) of the Act and therefore such information was not
exempt from disclosure under Exemption 3 of FOIA.
The Eighth Circuit decision did not address Exemption 4 of FOIA, 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(4), which exempts ``trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a person and privileged or
confidential'' from release under FOIA. FNS recognizes that, despite
the decision on Section 9(c) of the Act, the Agency must also consider
whether this redemption data constitutes confidential business
information. To make a determination in this regard, FNS is required to
solicit feedback from the submitters of the retailer transaction data.
Request for Information: FNS' objective is twofold: (1) To meet
FNS' obligations to solicit feedback from the submitters of retailer
transaction data which is the subject of the litigation described
above; and (2) to determine how to provide greater transparency, while
remaining consistent with our legal obligations and reflecting input
from the public. FNS will use this public input to inform FNS' response
to the court decision and consideration of what, if any, adjustments
should be made to SNAP regulations in the future. It is FNS' intent
that any regulatory changes would govern the availability of data after
the effective date of those regulations, and not be retroactive. FNS is
seeking public input on the following questions:
1. Are aggregated annual SNAP redemption data at the individual
store level confidential business information? If yes, please explain
why the disclosure is likely to cause substantial competitive harm and
fully explain all other grounds upon which you oppose the disclosure of
such information. Also, please indicate whether the size of the
retailer affects any identified competitive harm.
2. Are aggregated monthly SNAP redemption data at the individual
store level confidential business information? If yes, please explain
why the disclosure is likely to cause substantial competitive harm and
fully explain all other grounds upon which you oppose the disclosure of
such information. Also, please indicate whether the size of the
retailer affects any identified competitive harm.
3. Should aggregated annual SNAP redemption data at the individual
store level be released for transparency purposes?
If yes, describe in detail why this data should be
released for the purposes of transparency and public accountability,
and specifically how this data would assist in the administration of
the Food and Nutrition Act.
If no, please provide details as to how release of this
data would be counter to the administration and enforcement provisions
of the Act.
When considering the impact of the release of this data on
the administration and enforcement provisions of the Act, please
consider the effect, if any, on SNAP recipients.
4. Should aggregated monthly SNAP redemption data at the individual
store
[[Page 45176]]
level be released for transparency purposes?
If yes, describe in detail why this data should be
released for the purposes of transparency and public accountability,
and specifically how this data would assist in the administration of
the Food and Nutrition Act.
If no, please provide details as to how release of this
data would be counter to the administration and enforcement provisions
of the Act.
When considering the impact of the release of this data on
the administration and enforcement provisions of the Act, please
consider the effect, if any, on SNAP recipients.
5. For each of the above questions, how would answers differ if the
monthly or annual aggregated data were for a retailer's aggregated
sales at all stores within a state or nationally, as opposed to per-
store data? Should any other aggregations be considered?
Commenters who were SNAP-authorized retailers from 2005 through
2010 should make that fact clear in their comments.
DATES: To be assured of consideration, written comments must be
submitted on or before September 8, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments electronically.
All comments submitted in response to this notice will be included
in the record and will be made available to the public at
www.regulations.gov. Please be advised that the substance of the
comments, including any personal or confidential business information,
and the identity of the individuals or entities commenting will be
subject to public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky T. Robinson, Acting Chief,
Retailer Management and Issuance Branch, Food and Nutrition Service,
(703) 305-2476.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the end of fiscal year (FY) 2013, over
250,000 retailers were authorized to redeem SNAP benefits. According to
the FY 2013 data, 82 percent of all benefits redeemed were redeemed at
supermarkets, large grocers and superstores. Approximately 18 percent
of benefits were redeemed at smaller stores, including convenience
stores, small grocers and farmers' markets. Less than one percent were
redeemed by authorized treatment programs, group homes, homeless meal
providers, communal dining facilities and shelters as provided for in
statute. A 2009 FNS study on benefit use indicates that 96.3 percent of
all SNAP beneficiaries shopped at supermarkets or superstores at least
once each month.
Dated: July 28, 2014.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-18288 Filed 8-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P