Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Darby Creek, Essington, PA, 44724-44727 [2014-18267]
Download as PDF
44724
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Amend § 39.13 by removing
Amendment 39–17761 (79 FR 10344,
February 25, 2014), and adding the
following new AD:
■
Pacific Aerospace Limited: Docket No. FAA–
2014–0516; Directorate Identifier 2014–
CE–021–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by September
15, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2014–04–03,
Amendment 39–17761 (79 FR 10344,
February 25, 2014).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Pacific Aerospace
Limited Model 750XL airplanes, all serial
numbers, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 27: Flight Controls.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as control
column attachment bolts failing in service.
We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of
the control column attachment bolt, which
could result in control column detachment
and cause loss of control.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, do the following
actions in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this
AD:
(1) As of February 24, 2014 (the effective
date of AD 2014–04–03, Amendment 39–
17761 (79 FR 10344, February 25, 2014)), if
the left hand and the right hand control
column attachment bolts have been replaced
following the ACCOMPLISHMENT
INSTRUCTIONS in Pacific Aerospace
Limited Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/
XL/070, Issue 1, dated January 24, 2014, then
within the next 150 hours time-in-service
(TIS) after the effective date of this AD,
replace the left hand and the right hand
control column attachment bolts following
the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS in
Pacific Aerospace Limited Mandatory Service
Bulletin PACSB/XL/070, Issue 2, dated June
3, 2014.
(2) As of February 24, 2014 (the effective
date of AD 2014–04–03, Amendment 39–
17761 (79 FR 10344, February 25, 2014)), if
the left hand and the right hand control
column attachment bolts have not been
replaced following the ACCOMPLISHMENT
INSTRUCTIONS in Pacific Aerospace
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Limited Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/
XL/070, Issue 1, dated January 24, 2014, then
within the next 10 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD, replace the left
hand and the right hand control column
attachment bolts following the
ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS in
Pacific Aerospace Limited Mandatory Service
Bulletin PACSB/XL/070, Issue 2, dated June
3, 2014.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Darby Creek, Essington, PA
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs):
(i) The Manager, Standards Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4123; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov.
(ii) AMOCS approved for AD 2014–04–03,
Amendment 39–17761 (79 FR 10344,
February 25, 2014) are not approved as
AMOCs for this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA) AD DCA/750XL/15A, dated June 26,
2014, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–0516.
For service information related to this AD,
contact Pacific Aerospace Limited, Hamilton
Airport, Private Bag 3027 Hamilton 3240,
New Zealand; telephone: +64 7 843 6144; fax:
+64 7 843 6134; email: pacific@
aerospace.co.nz; Internet: https://
www.aerospace.co.nz/. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 28,
2014.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–18144 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0367]
RIN 1625–AA09
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the operating regulation that
governs the Conrail railroad bridge over
Darby Creek in Essington, PA. The
bridge owner, Conrail, is modifying the
existing remote operating system which
controls the bridge operations. Cameras
will be installed and the remote
operating site will move from its current
location in Delair, NJ to Mt. Laurel, NJ.
Train crews will no longer be required
to stop and check the waterway for
approaching vessel traffic prior to
initiating a bridge closure, and mariners
requesting an opening for the bridge
will have to contact the new remote
location.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2014–0367 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of these methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mrs. Jessica Shea,
Fifth Coast Guard District Bridge
Administration Division, Coast Guard;
telephone 757–398–6422, email
jessica.c.shea2@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–0367) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Conrail Consolidated Rail Corporation
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this proposed rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
proposed rulemaking (USCG–2014–
0367), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2014–0367 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The bridge owner, Conrail, requested
a change to 33 CFR § 117.903 due to
their intent to modify the current sensor
equipment on site at their bridge across
Darby Creek and to relocate the remote
operation station to a new location. The
proposed regulation changes will
change two aspects of the bridge
operation. Specifically, the location of
the remote operator and the installation
of cameras to verify whether any vessels
are transiting the waterway before a
bridge closure is initiated. This
proposed rule will not change the
operating schedule of the bridge.
The scope of the waterway inspection
is different between the current on-site
train crewmember inspection process
and the range of the proposed camera
installation. There is also a difference in
the time it takes between the inspection
and the initiation of the bridge closure
operations. Currently the regulation
requires an on-site train crewmember to
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44725
conduct an inspection of the waterway
for vessels by stopping the train
approximately 200 feet north of the
bridge site when approached from the
north and 300 feet south of the bridge
site when approached from the south.
Once the train is stopped, the train
crewmember walks to the bridge site
and physically looks up and down the
channel. The time it takes to stop the
train, walk to the bridge, conduct the
inspection, walk back to the train, and
re-start the train takes 15–20 minutes.
The proposed regulation allows the
remote operating station to inspect the
waterway with cameras without first
stopping the train which permits a more
efficient operating system.
The closer the vessels are to the
bridge, the more likely it is that the train
crewmember will see them using the
process required by the current
regulation. Under the proposed
regulations, the camera inspection of the
waterway has the capability to zoom up
and down stream allowing for easier
detection of a smaller vessel
approaching the bridge. After inspection
of the waterway, using the cameras, the
bridge closing operations would then
occur from a remote location at the Mt.
Laurel remote operating station.
Currently, the bridge is in the open to
navigation position between April 1 and
October 31 and operated by the bridge
controller at the remote operating
station in Delair, NJ. The shift from the
Delair, NJ to the Mt. Laurel, NJ operating
station enables Conrail to consolidate its
control of the train line and Darby Creek
Bridge. By controlling the track as well
as the bridge operating mechanism at
the Mt. Laurel station, the remote
operator has access to more information
regarding the anticipated arrival time for
when the trains will be at the bridge
site. Information such as train speed and
location directly contribute to when the
bridge will need to be closed. The
proposed shift of the remote operating
location to the Mt. Laurel location may
shorten the duration of the bridge
closures due to the higher accuracy of
information on train speed and
anticipated arrival time at the bridge
site.
The average tidal range for Darby
Creek is 5 feet. Currents run on average
between 1–2 knots. The actual depth at
the bridge ranges between 15 and 20
feet. Darby Creek is used by several
recreational vessels during the summer
boating season. There is no commercial
vessel traffic on Darby Creek.
From April 1 to October 31, the bridge
is left in the open to navigation position
and will only be lowered for the passage
of train and maintenance. Train activity
in this location requires the bridge to
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
44726
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
close to navigation four times a day
Monday thru Friday. On Saturday and
Sunday, the bridge is used twice each
day.
From November 1 through March 31,
the bridge is in the closed to navigation
position but will open if 24 hours notice
is given.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Under the proposed regulation, the
responsibility to conduct a visual
examination of the waterway to confirm
whether or not any vessels are present
will shift from the train crew to the Mt.
Laurel remote operating station. The
train crew will not be required to stop
and check the waterway prior to the
remote operating station closing or
opening the bridge. A new requirement
for the remote operating station is being
proposed that mandates they use
cameras to confirm whether any vessels
are navigating Darby Creek prior to
closing the bridge.
From the controls at the Mt. Laurel
remote operating station, the timeframe
to initiate the bridge closure is not more
than 15 minutes before a train will
arrive at the bridge location. The system
currently in place at the Delair remote
operating system operates with a similar
timeframe. At the Mt. Laurel remote
operating station, the cameras will be
used continuously during the bridge
closure operations to monitor the
waterway for the presence of vessels.
The current system does not have the
capability to continuously visually
monitor the waterway.
The bridge is currently being operated
remotely. The location of the remote
operation will move from its current site
in Delair, NJ to Mt. Laurel, NJ. Under
the proposed regulation, the bridge will
continue to remain in the closed to
navigation from November 1 through
March 31. During this timeframe, the
bridge will open if 24 hours notice is
given. Shifting the remote operating
location to Mt. Laurel also changes the
phone number to request an opening to
(856) 231–2282. This telephone number
will be manned 24 hours a day
throughout the year.
Under the current regulation, the
remote operating site monitors infrared
sensors. These sensors will continue to
be used as a means to detect vessel
traffic. The sensor protocol will be
amended to include the camera system
as part of the equipment failure
protocols. The protocol for actions in
the event of a sensor failure or detection
of an obstruction in the channel is not
changed by the proposed regulation.
The requirement for the owner to
provide a vertical clearance gage for
waters discharging into the Atlantic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Ocean south of Delaware Bay is stated
in 33 CFR § 117.47. Since this
requirement is already stated it is not
necessary to restate it in 33 CFR
§ 117.903(a)(1) and will be removed
from that regulation. The Coast Guard
will still require the bridge owner to
maintain two board gages on the bridge
such that they are plainly visible to the
operators of vessels approaching the
bridge either up or downstream, as
described in 33 CFR § 118.160.
The description of the flashing lights
and sound signals which indicate bridge
movement are not being changed by this
regulation. The bridge will still use
flashing green and red lights along with
sounding the horn to notify waterway
users that the bridge is changing
position.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders. The changes proposed by
this NPRM impact the methods used to
operate the drawbridge. There are no
changes proposed to the drawbridge
operating schedule.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. There are no changes
proposed to the drawbridge operating
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
schedule. Vessels that can safely transit
under the bridge may do so at any time.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.903 paragraph(a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 117.903
Broad Creek
(a) The draw of the Conrail Railroad
Bridge, mile 0.3, at Essington, will
operate as follows:
(1) Trains shall be controlled so that
any delay in opening of the draw shall
not exceed ten minutes except as
provided in § 117.31(b). However, if a
train moving toward the bridge has
crossed the home signal for the bridge
before the signal requesting opening of
the bridge is given, the train may
continue across the bridge and must
clear the bridge interlocks before
stopping.
(2) From April 1 through October 31,
the draw shall be left in the open
position at all times and will only be
lowered for the passage of trains and to
perform periodic maintenance
authorized in accordance with subpart
A of this part.
(3) The bridge will be operated
remotely by the South Jersey Train
Dispatcher located in Mt. Laurel, NJ.
(4) The bridge will be equipped with
cameras and channel sensors to visually
and electronically ensure the waterway
is clear before the bridge closes. The
video will be located at the remote
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
44727
operating location in Mt. Laurel, NJ. The
channel sensors will be a direct input to
the bridge control system.
(5) While the Conrail Railroad Bridge
is moving from the full open to the full
closed position, the off-site bridge/train
controller will maintain constant
surveillance of the video and
navigational channel using channel
sensors to ensure no conflict with
maritime traffic exists. In the event of
video failure the bridge will remain in
the full open position. In the event of
failure or obstruction of the infrared
channel sensors, the bridge will
automatically stop closing and the
South Jersey Train Dispatcher will
return the bridge to the open position.
(6) When the draw cannot be operated
from the remote site, a bridge tender
must be called to operate the bridge in
the traditional manner. Personnel shall
be dispatched to arrive at the bridge as
soon as possible, but not more than one
hour after malfunction or disability of
the remote system.
(7) The Conrail Railroad channel
traffic lights will change from flashing
green to flashing red anytime the bridge
is not in the full open position.
(8) During downward span
movement, the channel traffic lights
will change from flashing green to
flashing red, the horn will sound two
times, followed by a pause, and then
two repeat blasts until the bridge is
seated and locked down.
(9) When the rail traffic has cleared,
the off-site bridge and train controller at
Mt. Laurel will sound the horn five
times to signal the draw of the Conrail
Railroad Bridge is about to return to its
full open position.
(10) During upward span movement,
the horn will sound two times, followed
by a pause, and then sound repeat blasts
until the bridge is in the full open
position. In the full open position, the
channel traffic lights will then turn from
flashing red to flashing green.
(11) From November 1 through March
31, the draw shall open on signal if at
least 24 hours notice is given by
telephone at (856) 231–2282.
Operational information will be
provided 24 hours a day by telephone
at (856) 231–2282.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 17, 2014.
Stephen P. Metruck,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–18267 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44724-44727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18267]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0367]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Darby Creek, Essington, PA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating regulation
that governs the Conrail railroad bridge over Darby Creek in Essington,
PA. The bridge owner, Conrail, is modifying the existing remote
operating system which controls the bridge operations. Cameras will be
installed and the remote operating site will move from its current
location in Delair, NJ to Mt. Laurel, NJ. Train crews will no longer be
required to stop and check the waterway for approaching vessel traffic
prior to initiating a bridge closure, and mariners requesting an
opening for the bridge will have to contact the new remote location.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2014-0367 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mrs. Jessica Shea, Fifth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administration Division, Coast Guard; telephone 757-398-6422,
email jessica.c.shea2@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
[[Page 44725]]
Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Conrail Consolidated Rail Corporation
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this proposed rulemaking by
submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will
be posted, without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will
include any personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
proposed rulemaking (USCG-2014-0367), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2014-0367 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail
and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0367) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The bridge owner, Conrail, requested a change to 33 CFR Sec.
117.903 due to their intent to modify the current sensor equipment on
site at their bridge across Darby Creek and to relocate the remote
operation station to a new location. The proposed regulation changes
will change two aspects of the bridge operation. Specifically, the
location of the remote operator and the installation of cameras to
verify whether any vessels are transiting the waterway before a bridge
closure is initiated. This proposed rule will not change the operating
schedule of the bridge.
The scope of the waterway inspection is different between the
current on-site train crewmember inspection process and the range of
the proposed camera installation. There is also a difference in the
time it takes between the inspection and the initiation of the bridge
closure operations. Currently the regulation requires an on-site train
crewmember to conduct an inspection of the waterway for vessels by
stopping the train approximately 200 feet north of the bridge site when
approached from the north and 300 feet south of the bridge site when
approached from the south. Once the train is stopped, the train
crewmember walks to the bridge site and physically looks up and down
the channel. The time it takes to stop the train, walk to the bridge,
conduct the inspection, walk back to the train, and re-start the train
takes 15-20 minutes. The proposed regulation allows the remote
operating station to inspect the waterway with cameras without first
stopping the train which permits a more efficient operating system.
The closer the vessels are to the bridge, the more likely it is
that the train crewmember will see them using the process required by
the current regulation. Under the proposed regulations, the camera
inspection of the waterway has the capability to zoom up and down
stream allowing for easier detection of a smaller vessel approaching
the bridge. After inspection of the waterway, using the cameras, the
bridge closing operations would then occur from a remote location at
the Mt. Laurel remote operating station.
Currently, the bridge is in the open to navigation position between
April 1 and October 31 and operated by the bridge controller at the
remote operating station in Delair, NJ. The shift from the Delair, NJ
to the Mt. Laurel, NJ operating station enables Conrail to consolidate
its control of the train line and Darby Creek Bridge. By controlling
the track as well as the bridge operating mechanism at the Mt. Laurel
station, the remote operator has access to more information regarding
the anticipated arrival time for when the trains will be at the bridge
site. Information such as train speed and location directly contribute
to when the bridge will need to be closed. The proposed shift of the
remote operating location to the Mt. Laurel location may shorten the
duration of the bridge closures due to the higher accuracy of
information on train speed and anticipated arrival time at the bridge
site.
The average tidal range for Darby Creek is 5 feet. Currents run on
average between 1-2 knots. The actual depth at the bridge ranges
between 15 and 20 feet. Darby Creek is used by several recreational
vessels during the summer boating season. There is no commercial vessel
traffic on Darby Creek.
From April 1 to October 31, the bridge is left in the open to
navigation position and will only be lowered for the passage of train
and maintenance. Train activity in this location requires the bridge to
[[Page 44726]]
close to navigation four times a day Monday thru Friday. On Saturday
and Sunday, the bridge is used twice each day.
From November 1 through March 31, the bridge is in the closed to
navigation position but will open if 24 hours notice is given.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Under the proposed regulation, the responsibility to conduct a
visual examination of the waterway to confirm whether or not any
vessels are present will shift from the train crew to the Mt. Laurel
remote operating station. The train crew will not be required to stop
and check the waterway prior to the remote operating station closing or
opening the bridge. A new requirement for the remote operating station
is being proposed that mandates they use cameras to confirm whether any
vessels are navigating Darby Creek prior to closing the bridge.
From the controls at the Mt. Laurel remote operating station, the
timeframe to initiate the bridge closure is not more than 15 minutes
before a train will arrive at the bridge location. The system currently
in place at the Delair remote operating system operates with a similar
timeframe. At the Mt. Laurel remote operating station, the cameras will
be used continuously during the bridge closure operations to monitor
the waterway for the presence of vessels. The current system does not
have the capability to continuously visually monitor the waterway.
The bridge is currently being operated remotely. The location of
the remote operation will move from its current site in Delair, NJ to
Mt. Laurel, NJ. Under the proposed regulation, the bridge will continue
to remain in the closed to navigation from November 1 through March 31.
During this timeframe, the bridge will open if 24 hours notice is
given. Shifting the remote operating location to Mt. Laurel also
changes the phone number to request an opening to (856) 231-2282. This
telephone number will be manned 24 hours a day throughout the year.
Under the current regulation, the remote operating site monitors
infrared sensors. These sensors will continue to be used as a means to
detect vessel traffic. The sensor protocol will be amended to include
the camera system as part of the equipment failure protocols. The
protocol for actions in the event of a sensor failure or detection of
an obstruction in the channel is not changed by the proposed
regulation.
The requirement for the owner to provide a vertical clearance gage
for waters discharging into the Atlantic Ocean south of Delaware Bay is
stated in 33 CFR Sec. 117.47. Since this requirement is already stated
it is not necessary to restate it in 33 CFR Sec. 117.903(a)(1) and
will be removed from that regulation. The Coast Guard will still
require the bridge owner to maintain two board gages on the bridge such
that they are plainly visible to the operators of vessels approaching
the bridge either up or downstream, as described in 33 CFR Sec.
118.160.
The description of the flashing lights and sound signals which
indicate bridge movement are not being changed by this regulation. The
bridge will still use flashing green and red lights along with sounding
the horn to notify waterway users that the bridge is changing position.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. The changes proposed by this
NPRM impact the methods used to operate the drawbridge. There are no
changes proposed to the drawbridge operating schedule.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. There
are no changes proposed to the drawbridge operating schedule. Vessels
that can safely transit under the bridge may do so at any time.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of
[[Page 44727]]
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though
this proposed rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.903 paragraph(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.903 Broad Creek
(a) The draw of the Conrail Railroad Bridge, mile 0.3, at
Essington, will operate as follows:
(1) Trains shall be controlled so that any delay in opening of the
draw shall not exceed ten minutes except as provided in Sec.
117.31(b). However, if a train moving toward the bridge has crossed the
home signal for the bridge before the signal requesting opening of the
bridge is given, the train may continue across the bridge and must
clear the bridge interlocks before stopping.
(2) From April 1 through October 31, the draw shall be left in the
open position at all times and will only be lowered for the passage of
trains and to perform periodic maintenance authorized in accordance
with subpart A of this part.
(3) The bridge will be operated remotely by the South Jersey Train
Dispatcher located in Mt. Laurel, NJ.
(4) The bridge will be equipped with cameras and channel sensors to
visually and electronically ensure the waterway is clear before the
bridge closes. The video will be located at the remote operating
location in Mt. Laurel, NJ. The channel sensors will be a direct input
to the bridge control system.
(5) While the Conrail Railroad Bridge is moving from the full open
to the full closed position, the off-site bridge/train controller will
maintain constant surveillance of the video and navigational channel
using channel sensors to ensure no conflict with maritime traffic
exists. In the event of video failure the bridge will remain in the
full open position. In the event of failure or obstruction of the
infrared channel sensors, the bridge will automatically stop closing
and the South Jersey Train Dispatcher will return the bridge to the
open position.
(6) When the draw cannot be operated from the remote site, a bridge
tender must be called to operate the bridge in the traditional manner.
Personnel shall be dispatched to arrive at the bridge as soon as
possible, but not more than one hour after malfunction or disability of
the remote system.
(7) The Conrail Railroad channel traffic lights will change from
flashing green to flashing red anytime the bridge is not in the full
open position.
(8) During downward span movement, the channel traffic lights will
change from flashing green to flashing red, the horn will sound two
times, followed by a pause, and then two repeat blasts until the bridge
is seated and locked down.
(9) When the rail traffic has cleared, the off-site bridge and
train controller at Mt. Laurel will sound the horn five times to signal
the draw of the Conrail Railroad Bridge is about to return to its full
open position.
(10) During upward span movement, the horn will sound two times,
followed by a pause, and then sound repeat blasts until the bridge is
in the full open position. In the full open position, the channel
traffic lights will then turn from flashing red to flashing green.
(11) From November 1 through March 31, the draw shall open on
signal if at least 24 hours notice is given by telephone at (856) 231-
2282. Operational information will be provided 24 hours a day by
telephone at (856) 231-2282.
* * * * *
Dated: July 17, 2014.
Stephen P. Metruck,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2014-18267 Filed 7-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P