Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Status for Physaria globosa (Short's Bladderpod), Helianthus verticillatus (Whorled sunflower), and Leavenworthia crassa (Fleshy-Fruit Gladecress), 44712-44718 [2014-18103]
Download as PDF
44712
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
38501; telephone 931–528–6481;
facsimile 931–528–7075.
Dated: July 11, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary E. Jennings, Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Tennessee
Ecological Services Field Office, (see
ADDRESSES above). Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2014–18291 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
Executive Summary
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–
0087;4500030113]
RIN 1018–AZ11
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Endangered Status for
Physaria globosa (Short’s
Bladderpod), Helianthus verticillatus
(Whorled sunflower), and
Leavenworthia crassa (Fleshy-Fruit
Gladecress)
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
Final rule.
ACTION:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), determine
endangered species status under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act),
as amended, for Physaria globosa
(Short’s bladderpod), Helianthus
verticillatus (whorled sunflower), and
Leavenworthia crassa (fleshy-fruit
gladecress). Short’s bladderpod occurs
in Indiana, Kentucky, and Tennessee.
Whorled sunflower occurs in Alabama,
Georgia, and Tennessee. Fleshy-fruit
gladecress occurs only in Alabama. The
effect of this regulation will be to add
these species to the List of Endangered
and Threatened Plants.
DATES: This rule is effective September
2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: This final rule is available
on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov and https://
www.fws.gov/cookeville. Comments and
materials we received, as well as
supporting documentation we used in
preparing this rule, are available for
public inspection at https://
www.regulations.gov. All of the
comments, materials, and
documentation that we considered in
this rulemaking are available by
appointment during normal business
hours at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Tennessee Ecological Services Field
Office, 446 Neal Street, Cookeville, TN
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Why we need to publish a rule. Under
the Act, a species may warrant
protection through listing if it is
endangered or threatened throughout all
or a significant portion of its range.
Listing a species as an endangered or
threatened species can only be
completed by issuing a rule.
This rule will finalize the listing of
Physaria globosa (Short’s bladderpod),
Helianthus verticillatus (whorled
sunflower), and Leavenworthia crassa
(fleshy-fruit gladecress) as endangered
species.
The basis for our action. Under the
Act, we can determine that a species is
an endangered or threatened species
based on any of five factors: (A) The
present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (C) disease or
predation; (D) the inadequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E)
other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence. We
have determined that listing is
warranted for these species, which are
currently at risk throughout all of their
respective ranges due to threats related
to:
• For Short’s bladderpod, potential
future construction and ongoing
maintenance of transportation rights-ofway; prolonged inundation and soil
erosion due to flooding and water level
manipulation; overstory shading due to
forest succession and shading and
competition from invasive, nonnative
plant species; and small population
sizes.
• For whorled sunflower, mechanical
or chemical vegetation management for
industrial forestry, right-of-way
maintenance, or agriculture; shading
and competition resulting from
vegetation succession; limited
distribution and small population sizes.
• For fleshy-fruit gladecress, loss of
habitat due to residential and industrial
development; conversion of agricultural
sites for use as pasture; maintenance of
road rights-of-way via mowing and
herbicide treatment prior to seed
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
production; shading due to natural
forest succession; competition from
invasive nonnative plants; off-road
vehicles and dumping; limited
distribution; and small sizes and limited
genetic variation of some populations.
Peer review and public comment. We
sought comments from independent
specialists to ensure that our
designation is based on scientifically
sound data, assumptions, and analyses.
We invited these peer reviewers to
comment on our listing proposal. We
also considered all comments and
information received during the
comment period.
Previous Federal Action
Please refer to the proposed listing
rule for Short’s bladderpod, whorled
sunflower, and fleshy-fruit gladecress
(78 FR 47109; August 2, 2013) for a
detailed description of previous Federal
actions concerning this species.
We will also be finalizing critical
habitat designations for the Short’s
bladderpod, whorled sunflower, and
fleshy-fruit gladecress under the Act in
the near future.
Summary of Comments and
Recommendations
In the proposed rule published on
August 2, 2013 (78 FR 47109), we
requested that all interested parties
submit written comments on the
proposal by October 1, 2013. We also
contacted appropriate Federal and State
agencies, scientific experts and
organizations, and other interested
parties and invited them to comment on
the proposal. Newspaper notices
inviting general public comment were
published in the Cherokee County
Herald, The Birmingham News, and The
Decatur Daily in Alabama; the Rome
News Tribune in Georgia; The Posey
County News in Indiana; the Lexington
Herald-Leader and The State Journal in
Kentucky; and the Jackson County
Sentinel, The Tennessean, The Leaf
Chronicle, Carthage Courier, and
Hartsville Vidette in Tennessee. We did
not receive any requests for a public
hearing. All substantive information
provided during comment periods has
either been incorporated directly into
this final determination or addressed in
our responses to the comments below.
Peer Reviewer Comments
In accordance with our peer review
policy published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR
34270), we solicited expert opinion
from 15 knowledgeable individuals with
scientific expertise that included
familiarity with one or more of these
species and their habitats, biological
needs, and threats. We received
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
responses from five of the peer
reviewers.
We reviewed all comments received
from the peer reviewers for substantive
issues and new information regarding
the listing of Short’s bladderpod,
whorled sunflower, and fleshy-fruit
gladecress. The peer reviewers generally
concurred with our methods and
conclusions, and one of the peer
reviewers provided additional
information, clarifications, and
suggestions to improve the final rule.
Peer reviewer comments are addressed
in the following summary and
incorporated into the final rule as
appropriate.
(1) Comment: One peer reviewer
informed us about preliminary results
from a research project studying
germination ecology of Short’s
bladderpod seeds, which has been
initiated since the publication of the
proposed rule. Preliminary results from
this research indicate that seed viability
is high in the population studied and
that when pretreated with gibberellic
acid, Short’s bladderpod seeds
germinate at greater proportions under
conditions approximating mean diurnal
temperatures that occur during late
spring/early autumn and summer,
versus those approximating conditions
that occur during early spring/late
autumn.
Our Response: We have incorporated
this information in the Background
section for Short’s bladderpod.
(2) Comment: One peer reviewer
brought to our attention a journal article
(Ooi 2012) reporting results from
research indicating that increasing
summer temperatures could raise soil
temperatures and increase loss of soil
moisture in open habitats, which could
accelerate loss of viable seeds from the
soil because seedling mortality due to
desiccation (drying out of a living
organism) could increase following
germination events. The reviewer
suggested that this change could reduce
the ability of species like Short’s
bladderpod to maintain soil seed banks,
which provide resilience for
populations to rebound from declines
by recruiting new individuals when
favorable conditions for germination
and establishment are present.
Our Response: We agree and have
incorporated this information into this
rule in the Summary of the Biological
Status and Threats for Short’s
bladderpod.
(3) Comment: One peer reviewer
brought to our attention studies
examining the influence of the species’
mating system on genetic variation and
structure in fleshy-fruit gladecress and
on the potential for the species to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
hybridize with the closely related
Leavenworthia alabamica (Koelling et
al. 2011, Koelling and Mauricio 2010).
The reviewer suggested that these data
do not alter conclusions concerning the
level of endangerment of fleshy-fruit
gladecress, but that they are relevant to
the analysis under Factor E.
Our Response: We concur and have
incorporated this information into this
rule in the Summary of the Biological
Status and Threats for fleshy-fruit
gladecress.
(4) Comment: One peer reviewer
informed us of published data on
germination phenology in fleshy-fruit
gladecress (Caudle and Baskin 1968, p.
334) and a congener (an organism
belonging to the same taxonomic genus
as another organism), Leavenworthia
stylosa (Baskin and Baskin 1972), which
demonstrated the influence of ambient
temperature on germination phenology
in these species.
Our Response: We concur with the
data and have incorporated the
information into this rule in the
Summary of the Biological Status and
Threats for fleshy-fruit gladecress.
Public Comments
(5) Comment: Among other comments
received, a comment from Plum Creek,
a land and timber company, informed
us that in April 2013 it acquired
properties in Cherokee County,
Alabama, and Floyd County, Georgia,
where the whorled sunflower occurs.
These properties were previously
owned by The Campbell Group. Plum
Creek acknowledged that the Coosa
Valley Prairie property in Floyd County,
Georgia, is protected by a conservation
easement held by The Nature
Conservancy, and expressed its intent to
continue to manage that property under
an adaptive management framework
designed to benefit the natural
community, including whorled
sunflower. Plum Creek also expressed
its intent to manage whorled sunflower
where it occurs on their lands outside
of the conservation easement.
Our Response: We have included this
new information concerning ownership
of the lands where two whorled
sunflower populations are located into
this rule. The Service appreciates Plum
Creek’s commitment to work with the
conservation community to provide
sound management for whorled
sunflower and its habitat on the
company’s lands where the species
occurs in Alabama and Georgia. The
Service will work with Plum Creek and
State conservation agencies in Alabama
to develop a conservation agreement for
the Alabama subpopulation located on
Plum Creek lands.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44713
Summary of Changes From Proposed
Rule
The changes to this rule are limited to
the addition of new information in the
Background and Summary of Biological
Status and Threats sections, which were
brought to our attention by peer
reviewers, the public, and the
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) (see
Background—Fleshy-fruit gladecress,
below). The most substantive change is
the addition of one known extant
population of fleshy-fruit gladecress that
was not reported in the proposed listing
rule, which brings the total number of
known extant occurrences of this
species to seven. The existence of this
additional occurrence, which is located
in a TVA transmission line right-of-way
and is potentially threatened by
maintenance activities, does not change
the determination reached in the
proposed listing rule that fleshy-fruit
gladecress should be listed as
endangered.
Background
Short’s Bladderpod
Physaria globosa is a member of the
mustard family (Brassicaceae) known
from Posey County, Indiana; Clark,
Franklin, and Woodford Counties,
Kentucky; and Cheatham, Davidson,
Dickson, Jackson, Montgomery, Smith,
and Trousdale Counties, Tennessee.
Short’s bladderpod typically grows on
steep, rocky, wooded slopes and talus
(sloping mass of rock fragments below a
bluff or ledge) areas. It also occurs along
tops, bases, and ledges of bluffs. The
species usually is found in these
habitats near rivers or streams and on
south- to west-facing slopes. Most
populations are closely associated with
calcareous outcrops (Shea 1993, p. 16).
The Short’s bladderpod site in Indiana,
where the species is found in a narrow
strip of herbaceous vegetation between
a road and forested bank of a cypress
slough (M. Homoya, Natural Heritage
Program Botanist, Indiana Department
of Natural Resources, December 2012),
is unique among populations of the
species.
Short’s bladderpod is an upright
biennial or perennial (lives for 2 years
or longer) with several stems, some
branched at the base, reaching heights
up to 50 centimeters (cm) (20 inches
(in.)), and which are leafy to the base of
the inflorescence (a group or cluster of
flowers arranged on a stem that is
composed of a main branch or a
complicated arrangement of branches).
Preliminary results from research at the
Missouri Botanical Garden indicate that
seed viability is high in one of the
Tennessee populations they studied and
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44714
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
that seeds germinated at higher rates
under greenhouse conditions
approximating mean diurnal
temperatures that occur during late
spring/early autumn and summer,
versus those approximating conditions
that occur during early spring/late
autumn. Further studies are under way
to develop a protocol for propagating
seedlings to reproductive maturity (M.
Albrecht, Assistant Curator of
Conservation Biology, Center for
Conservation and Sustainable
Development at Missouri Botanical
Garden, September 30, 2013).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Whorled Sunflower
Helianthus verticillatus is a member
of the sunflower family known from
Cherokee County, Alabama; Floyd
County, Georgia; and McNairy and
Madison Counties, Tennessee. It is
found in moist, prairie-like remnants,
which in a more natural condition exist
as openings in woodlands and adjacent
to creeks. The Alabama and Georgia
populations are located on flat to gently
rolling uplands and along stream
terraces in the headwaters of Mud
Creek, a tributary to the Coosa River. In
Tennessee, the Madison County
population occurs along Turk Creek, a
tributary to the South Fork Forked Deer
River, and in adjacent uplands. The
McNairy County population occurs
along Prairie Branch, a headwater
tributary to Muddy Creek in the
Tuscumbia River drainage. It is a
perennial arising from horizontal,
tuberous-thickened roots with slender
rhizomes. The stems are slender, erect,
and up to 2 meters (m) (6 feet (ft)) tall.
The leaves are opposite on the lower
stem, verticillate (whorled) in groups of
3 to 4 at the mid-stem, and alternate or
opposite in the inflorescence at the end.
Individual leaves are firm in texture and
have a prominent mid-vein, but lack
prominent lateral veins found in many
members of the genus. The flowers are
arranged in a branched inflorescence
typically consisting of 3 to 7 heads.
Fleshy-Fruit Gladecress
Fleshy-fruit gladecress is an annual,
spring-flowering member of the mustard
family (Brassicaceae) that is endemic to
a 21-km (13-mi) radius area in north
central Alabama (Rollins 1963, p. 63). It
is a glabrous (morphological feature is
smooth, glossy, having no trichomes
(bristles or hair-like structures)) winter
annual known from Lawrence and
Morgan Counties, Alabama. It is a
component of glade flora and occurs in
association with limestone
outcroppings. Populations of fleshy-fruit
gladecress are now located in glade-like
remnants exhibiting various degrees of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
disturbance, including pastures,
roadside rights-of-way, and cultivated or
plowed fields (Hilton 1997, p. 5). As
with most of the cedar glade endemics,
fleshy-fruit gladecress exhibits weedy
tendencies, and it is not uncommon to
find the species growing in altered
habitats. It usually grows from 10 to 30
cm (4 to 12 in) tall. The leaves are
mostly basal, forming a rosette, and
entire to very deeply, pinnately
(multiple leaflets attached in rows along
a central stem) lobed or divided, to 8 cm
(3.1 in) long. Flowers are on elongating
stems, and the petals are approximately
0.8 to 1.5 cm (0.3 to 0.6 in.) long,
obovate (ovate with the narrower end
basal) to spatulate (having a broad,
rounded end), and emarginate (notched
at the tip).
The proposed listing rule reported
that there were only six extant fleshyfruit gladecress occurrences. After
publication of the proposed rule, the
TVA informed us of the existence of one
additional occurrence that was
discovered in 2008, but not included in
the proposed listing rule. As a result,
there are currently seven known extant
occurrences of fleshy-fruit gladecress
documented, three in Morgan and four
in Lawrence Counties, Alabama. One of
these occurs on U.S. Forest Service
lands, where it is formally protected.
The occurrence that TVA informed us
about is located in a TVA transmission
line right-of-way. A 1961 record from
Lauderdale County has never been
confirmed (McDaniel and Lyons 1987,
p. 6).
Please refer to the proposed listing
rule for Short’s bladderpod, whorled
sunflower, and fleshy-fruit gladecress
(78 FR 47109; August 2, 2013) for a
summary of species information.
Summary of Biological Status and
Threats
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533),
and its implementing regulations at 50
CFR part 424, set forth the procedures
for adding species to the Federal Lists
of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants. Under section 4(a)(1) of the
Act, we may list a species based on any
of the following five factors: (A) The
present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (C) disease or
predation; (D) the inadequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms; and (E)
other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence. Listing
may be warranted based on any of the
above threat factors, singly or in
combination. Each of these factors is
discussed below.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Short’s Bladderpod
The most significant threats to Short’s
bladderpod were described in the
proposed listing rule (78 FR 47109;
August 2, 2013) under Listing Factors A
(the present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range) and E (other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence). Based on the Factor A
analysis, we concluded that the loss and
degradation of habitat represents the
greatest threat to Short’s bladderpod.
The main causes for habitat loss and
degradation are potential future
construction and ongoing maintenance
of transportation rights-of-way;
prolonged inundation and soil erosion
due to flooding and water level
manipulation; and overstory shading
due to forest succession and shading
and competition from invasive,
nonnative plant species.
Road construction has caused the loss
of habitat and all Short’s bladderpod
plants at five occurrences, and roadside
maintenance or road widening could
adversely affect nearly 40 percent of the
extant occurrences of the species due to
their position in roadside habitats.
Future development of a proposed
commuter rail project to improve
intercity commute options between the
cities of Nashville and Clarksville,
Tennessee (Nashville Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization 2010, p. 98),
could affect 27 percent of known extant
occurrences, including some locations
where the species is most abundant.
Prolonged inundation and soil erosion
due to flooding and water level
fluctuations threaten 19 percent of
extant Short’s bladderpod occurrences,
most notably the single Indiana
occurrence, where the species has been
present in large numbers but recently
experienced a reduction in numbers due
to prolonged flooding. The remaining
occurrences threatened by prolonged
inundation and soil erosion are located
along reaches of the Cumberland River
that are impounded by Army Corps of
Engineers dam projects used for flood
control and navigation. Overstory
shading due to natural forest succession,
combined with shading and competition
due to invasive, nonnative shrubs and
herbaceous species presents the most
widespread, imminent threat to Short’s
bladderpod, and has been implicated in
the loss of several historic occurrences.
Due to these threats, which are expected
to continue into the foreseeable future,
the geographic range of Short’s
bladderpod has been reduced to 26
extant occurrences out of 55 that have
been tracked by State conservation
agencies.
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The Factor E analysis in the proposed
listing rule demonstrated that Short’s
bladderpod is vulnerable to adverse
effects of small population size,
including potential for reduced genetic
variation, low numbers of compatible
mates, increased likelihood of
inbreeding depression, and reduced
resilience to recover from acute
demographic effects of other threats to
the species and its habitat. Fewer than
100 plants have ever been observed at
one time at 12 (46 percent) of the 26
extant occurrences, and many of these
occurrences are distantly isolated from
other occurrences. Existing threats may
be exacerbated by the effects of ongoing
and future climate change, especially
projected increases in temperature and
increased frequency and severity of
droughts in the Southeast and projected
increases in flooding in the Midwest. As
noted above, increases in soil
temperatures and soil moisture
evaporation in response to predicted
ambient warming could accelerate rates
of soil seed bank depletion by
increasing the seedling mortality rate
(Ooi 2012, pp. S54–S55) and diminish
the resilience of Short’s bladderpod
populations by reducing the species’
ability to maintain soil seed banks.
A peer reviewer brought to our
attention a publication by Ooi (2012, pp.
S54–S55) indicating that increasing
summer temperatures could raise soil
temperatures in open habitats, which
could lead to increased evaporation of
soil moisture and potentially higher
rates of seedling mortality following
germination events. Given the species’
preference for open-canopy habitats that
are often located on south- to westfacing slopes where solar irradiance is
high, we agree with the commenter that
accelerated loss of viable seeds in the
soil due to increasing soil temperatures
could reduce the resilience of Short’s
bladderpod populations by reducing the
suitability of the species’ habitat for
maintaining soil seed banks. A reduced
ability to maintain soil seed banks
would reduce the capacity for
populations to rebound from declines,
which could occur during periods of
adverse environmental conditions such
as drought or disturbance, by recruiting
new individuals when favorable
conditions for germination and
recruitment are restored.
Based on our review of the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude that adverse
effects associated with small and often
isolated populations, as described in the
Factor E analysis, both alone and in
conjunction with the widespread threats
described under Factor A, constitute
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
44715
significant threats to Short’s
bladderpod.
under Factor A, constitute significant
threats to whorled sunflower.
Whorled Sunflower
Fleshy-Fruit Gladecress
The most significant threats to
whorled sunflower were described in
the proposed listing rule (78 FR 47109;
August 2, 2013) under Listing Factors A
(the present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range) and E (other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence). Based on the Factor A
analysis, we concluded that the loss and
degradation of habitat represents the
greatest threat to whorled sunflower.
Past and ongoing risk of adverse effects
from mechanical or chemical vegetation
management for industrial forestry,
right-of-way maintenance, or agriculture
is a threat to three of the four extant
populations of this species.
Modification of the remnant prairie
habitats that the species occupies due to
shading and competition resulting from
vegetation succession also threatens
these three populations, limiting growth
and reproductive output of whorled
sunflower. These threats are expected to
continue in the foreseeable future. A
conservation easement and suitable
habitat management currently alleviates
these threats that otherwise would
adversely affect the Georgia population.
The Factor E analysis in the proposed
listing rule demonstrated that whorled
sunflower is vulnerable to localized
extinction because of its extremely
restricted distribution and small
population sizes at most known
locations. There are only four extant
populations, and a fifth historical
population has not been observed at the
species’ type locality since its collection
there in 1892. Small population size
could be affecting reproductive fitness
of whorled sunflower by limiting
availability of compatible mates or by
causing higher rates of inbreeding
among closely related individuals. Both
of these could be contributing to
reduced achene production and
viability rates, which limit the species’
ability to recover from acute
demographic effects of habitat loss or
modification. The species’ dependence
on remnant prairie habitats, which are
isolated on the landscape, limits the
potential for recolonization in the event
that localized extinction events occur.
Based on our review of the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude that adverse
effects associated with extremely
restricted distribution and small and
isolated populations, as described in the
Factor E analysis, both alone and in
conjunction with the threats described
The most significant threats to fleshyfruit gladecress were described in the
proposed listing rule (78 FR 47109;
August 2, 2013) under Listing Factors A
(the present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range) and E (other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence). Based on the Factor A
analysis, we concluded that the loss and
degradation of habitat represents the
greatest threat to fleshy-fruit gladecress.
The species’ geographic range has been
reduced from 21 occurrences to 7 extant
occurrences. The threats to the species
from habitat destruction and
modification are occurring throughout
the entire range of the species. These
threats include agricultural conversion
from row-crop production to pasture,
incompatible agricultural practices
including poorly timed herbicide
application or plowing, maintenance of
transportation rights-of-way including
mowing and herbicide treatment prior
to seed set along roadsides, off-road
vehicles, dumping, residential and
industrial development, and shading
and competition. In addition to these
threats, the occurrence located in the
TVA transmission line right-of-way
could face threats associated with
incompatible right-of-way maintenance,
similar to those occurrences located in
transportation rights-of-way. Converting
row-crop fields to pastures eliminates
periodic disturbance from plowing that,
when well timed, arrests succession and
creates favorable conditions for
germination and seedling establishment.
Conservation efforts of the U.S. Forest
Service have removed threats associated
with off-road vehicle use and
encroachment of invasive species at one
site; however, maintenance of
transportation or electrical transmission
line rights-of-way and use of off-road
vehicles could adversely affect the other
six extant populations. Shading due to
natural forest succession and
competition from nonnative invasive
plants presents a significant threat to
fleshy-fruit gladecress, and has been
implicated in the loss of five historic
occurrences. One site, reported to be
widely open in 1968, is now partially
shaded due to closing of the canopy and
the presence of nonnative plants,
including Ligustrum vulgare (common
privet) and Lonicera maackii (bush
honeysuckle). These species are
significant threats in many glades.
These threats are expected to continue
into the foreseeable future.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
44716
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The Factor E analysis in the proposed
listing rule demonstrated that fleshyfruit gladecress is vulnerable to
localized extinction because of the small
number of occurrences and the small
sizes of many of the extant populations
within its limited range. Small
population sizes could decrease the
resilience of some fleshy-fruit gladecress
occurrences to recover from effects of
other threats affecting the species’
habitat. There are only seven remaining
fleshy-fruit gladecress occurrences, and
only one of these is protected. The loss
of any occurrences would significantly
impact the species’ viability by reducing
its redundancy on the landscape, which
would increase its vulnerability to
stochastic environmental stressors and
reduce the species’ resilience to recover
from effects of threats discussed in the
above sections. The loss of any
occurrences could significantly erode
the species’ overall genetic variation,
given the high levels of structuring and
apparent low levels of gene flow among
populations (Koelling et al. 2011, pp.
315–316).
In addition to the threats discussed in
the Factor E analysis in the proposed
listing rule, data brought to our
attention by a peer reviewer indicate
that genetic variation is low in selfcompatible populations of fleshy-fruit
gladecress (Koelling et al., pp. 315–316),
which could limit their adaptive
potential to respond to environmental
change (Primack 1998, p. 283). Habitat
disturbance or unintentional human
movement resulting in contact between
populations of fleshy-fruit gladecress
and Leavenworthia alabamica could
also present the threat of hybridization;
though, at this time these species do not
occur together in the wild and the
potential for hybridization is reduced by
incompatibility between them (Koelling
and Mauricio 2010, pp. 417–419).
Based on our review of the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude that adverse
effects associated with limited
distribution and small size and limited
genetic variation of some populations,
as described here and in the Factor E
analysis in the proposed listing rule,
both alone and in conjunction with the
threats described under Factor A,
constitute significant threats to fleshyfruit gladecress.
Please refer to Summary of Factors
Affecting the Species section of the
proposed listing rule for a more detailed
discussion of the factors affecting
Physaria globosa (Short’s bladderpod),
Helianthus verticillatus (whorled
sunflower), and Leavenworthia crassa
(fleshy-fruit gladecress). Our assessment
evaluated the biological status of these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
species and threats affecting their
continued existence. The assessment
was based upon the best available
scientific and commercial data.
Determination
The Act defines an endangered
species as any species that is ‘‘in danger
of extinction throughout all or a
significant portion of its range’’ and a
threatened species as any species ‘‘that
is likely to become endangered
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range within the foreseeable future.’’
We find that Short’s bladderpod,
whorled sunflower, and fleshy-fruit
gladecress are presently in danger of
extinction throughout their entire ranges
based on the severity and immediacy of
threats currently impacting these
species. The overall ranges of Short’s
bladderpod and fleshy-fruit gladecress
have been significantly reduced, the
range of whorled sunflower
encompasses only four known
populations, and the remaining habitat
and populations of all three species are
threatened by a variety of factors acting
in combination to reduce their overall
viability. The risk of extinction is high
because the remaining populations are
in many cases small, isolated, and have
limited potential for recolonization.
Therefore, on the basis of the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we are listing Short’s
bladderpod, whorled sunflower, and
fleshy-fruit gladecress as endangered in
accordance with sections 3(6) and
4(a)(1) of the Act. We find that a
threatened species status is not
appropriate for these three plants
because of their reduced and restricted
ranges, because the threats are occurring
rangewide and are not localized, and
because the threats are ongoing and
expected to continue into the future.
Under the Act and our implementing
regulations, a species may warrant
listing if it is endangered or threatened
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range. The threats to the survival of
the species occur throughout their
ranges and are not restricted to any
particular significant portion of those
ranges. Accordingly, our assessment and
proposed determination applies to the
species throughout their entire ranges.
Available Conservation Measures
Conservation measures provided to
species listed as endangered or
threatened under the Act include
recognition, recovery actions,
requirements for Federal protection, and
prohibitions against certain practices.
The Act encourages cooperation with
the States and requires that recovery
actions be carried out for all listed
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
species. The protection required by
Federal agencies and the prohibitions
against certain activities are discussed,
in part, below.
The primary purpose of the Act is the
conservation of endangered and
threatened species and the ecosystems
upon which they depend. The ultimate
goal of such conservation efforts is the
recovery of these listed species, so that
they no longer need the protective
measures of the Act. Subsection 4(f) of
the Act requires the Service to develop
and implement recovery plans for the
conservation of endangered and
threatened species. The recovery
planning process involves the
identification of actions that are
necessary to halt or reverse the species’
decline by addressing the threats to its
survival and recovery. The goal of this
process is to restore listed species to a
point where they are secure, selfsustaining, and functioning components
of their ecosystems.
Recovery planning includes the
development of a recovery outline
shortly after a species is listed and
preparation of a draft and final recovery
plan. The recovery outline guides the
immediate implementation of urgent
recovery actions and describes the
process to be used to develop a recovery
plan. Revisions of the plan may be done
to address continuing or new threats to
the species, as new substantive
information becomes available. The
recovery plan identifies site-specific
management actions that set a trigger for
review of the five factors that control
whether a species remains endangered
or may be downlisted or delisted, and
methods for monitoring recovery
progress. Recovery plans also establish
a framework for agencies to coordinate
their recovery efforts and provide
estimates of the cost of implementing
recovery tasks. Recovery teams
(composed of species experts, Federal
and State agencies, nongovernmental
organizations, and stakeholders) are
often established to develop recovery
plans. When completed, the recovery
outlines, draft recovery plans, and the
final recovery plans will be available on
our Web site (https://www.fws.gov/
endangered), or from our Tennessee
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Implementation of recovery actions
generally requires the participation of a
broad range of partners, including other
Federal agencies, States, Tribes,
nongovernmental organizations,
businesses, and private landowners.
Examples of recovery actions include
habitat restoration (e.g., restoration of
native vegetation), research, captive
propagation and reintroduction, and
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
outreach and education. The recovery of
many listed species cannot be
accomplished solely on Federal lands
because their range may occur primarily
or solely on non-Federal lands. To
achieve recovery of these species
requires cooperative conservation efforts
on private, State, and Tribal lands.
Following publication of this final
listing rule, funding for recovery actions
will be available from a variety of
sources, including Federal budgets,
State programs, and cost-share grants for
non-Federal landowners, the academic
community, and nongovernmental
organizations. In addition, pursuant to
section 6 of the Act, the States of
Georgia, Indiana, and Tennessee and the
Commonwealth of Kentucky will be
eligible for Federal funds to implement
management actions that promote the
protection or recovery of Short’s
bladderpod and/or whorled sunflower.
The State of Alabama has not entered
into a cooperative agreement with the
Service to establish eligibility for
receiving Federal funds to implement
management actions that promote the
protection or recovery of plant species
listed as threatened or endangered
under the Act. Information on our grant
programs that are available to aid
species recovery can be found at:
https://www.fws.gov/grants.
Please let us know if you are
interested in participating in recovery
efforts for Short’s bladderpod, whorled
sunflower, or fleshy-fruit gladecress.
Additionally, we invite you to submit
any new information on these species
whenever it becomes available and any
information you may have for recovery
planning purposes (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Section 7(a) of the Act requires
Federal agencies to evaluate their
actions with respect to any species that
is proposed or listed as an endangered
or threatened species and with respect
to its critical habitat, if any is
designated. Regulations implementing
this interagency cooperation provision
of the Act are codified at 50 CFR part
402. Section 7(a)(4) of the Act requires
Federal agencies to confer with the
Service on any action that is likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of a
species proposed for listing or result in
destruction or adverse modification of
proposed critical habitat. If a species is
listed subsequently, section 7(a)(2) of
the Act requires Federal agencies to
ensure that activities they authorize,
fund, or carry out are not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
the species or destroy or adversely
modify its critical habitat. If a Federal
action may affect a listed species or its
critical habitat, the responsible Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
agency must enter into consultation
with the Service.
Federal agency actions within the
species’ habitat that may require
conference or consultation or both as
described in the preceding paragraph
include management and any other
landscape-altering activities on Federal
lands administered by the Army Corps
of Engineers or U.S. Forest Service;
issuance of section 10 Rivers and
Harbors Act or section 404 Clean Water
Act permits by the Army Corps of
Engineers; herbicide registration by the
Environmental Protection Agency;
interstate pipeline construction or
maintenance projects authorized by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
technical and financial assistance for
projects provided by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service; railway
projects by the Federal Railroad
Administration; and construction and
maintenance of roads or highways by
the Federal Highway Administration.
With respect to endangered plants,
prohibitions outlined at 50 CFR 17.61
make it illegal for any person subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States to
import or export, transport in interstate
or foreign commerce in the course of a
commercial activity, sell or offer for sale
in interstate or foreign commerce, or to
remove and reduce to possession any
such plant species from areas under
Federal jurisdiction. In addition, for
endangered plants, the Act prohibits
malicious damage or destruction of any
such species on any area under Federal
jurisdiction, and the removal, cutting,
digging up, or damaging or destroying of
any such species on any other area in
knowing violation of any State law or
regulation, or in the course of any
violation of a State criminal trespass
law. Exceptions to these prohibitions
are outlined in 50 CFR 17.62.
We may issue permits to carry out
otherwise prohibited activities
involving endangered plants under
certain circumstances. Regulations
governing permits are codified at 50
CFR 17.62. With regard to endangered
plants, the Service may issue a permit
authorizing any activity otherwise
prohibited by 50 CFR 17.61 for scientific
purposes or for enhancing the
propagation or survival of endangered
plants.
It is our policy, as published in the
Federal Register on July 1, 1994 (59 FR
34272), to identify to the maximum
extent practicable at the time a species
is listed, those activities that would or
would not constitute a violation of
section 9 of the Act. The intent of this
policy is to increase public awareness of
the effect of a listing on proposed and
ongoing activities within the range of
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44717
listed species. Based on the best
available information, the following
actions are unlikely to result in a
violation of section 9, if these activities
are carried out in accordance with
existing regulations and permit
requirements:
(1) Normal agricultural and
silvicultural practices, including
herbicide and pesticide use, which are
carried out in accordance with any
existing regulations, permit and label
requirements, and best management
practices; and
(2) Normal residential landscape
activities.
Activities that the Service believes
could potentially harm the Short’s
bladderpod, whorled sunflower, or
fleshy-fruit gladecress and result in
‘‘take,’’ include, but are not limited to:
(1) Unauthorized collecting, handling,
possessing, selling, delivering, carrying,
or transporting of the species, including
import or export across State lines and
international boundaries, except for
properly documented antique
specimens of these taxa at least 100
years old, as defined by section 10(h)(1)
of the Act;
(2) Removing and reducing to
possession any of the three plant species
from areas under Federal jurisdiction;
maliciously damaging or destroying any
of the species on any such area; or
removing, cutting, digging up, or
damaging or destroying any of the
species on any other area in knowing
violation of any law or regulation of any
State or in the course of any violation
of a State criminal trespass law;
(3) Introducing any unauthorized
nonnative wildlife or plant species to
States where Short’s bladderpod,
whorled sunflower, or fleshy-fruit
gladecress occur that compete with or
prey upon these three plant species;
(4) Releasing any unauthorized
biological control agents into States
where Short’s bladderpod, whorled
sunflower, or fleshy-fruit gladecress
occur that attack any life stage of these
three plant species; and
(5) Modifying the habitat of Short’s
bladderpod, whorled sunflower, or
fleshy-fruit gladecress on Federal lands
without authorization or coverage under
the Act for impacts to these species.
Questions regarding whether specific
activities would constitute a violation of
section 9 of the Act should be directed
to the Tennessee Ecological Services
Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44718
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Required Determinations
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
We have determined that
environmental assessments and
environmental impact statements, as
defined under the authority of the
National Environmental Policy Act,
need not be prepared in connection
with listing a species as an endangered
or threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act. We published
a notice outlining our reasons for this
determination in the Federal Register
on October 25, 1983 (48 FR 49244).
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
recognized Federal Tribes on a
government-to-government basis. In
accordance with Secretarial Order 3206
of June 5, 1997 (American Indian Tribal
Rights, Federal-Tribal Trust
Responsibilities, and the Endangered
Species Act), we readily acknowledge
our responsibilities to work directly
with tribes in developing programs for
healthy ecosystems, to acknowledge that
tribal lands are not subject to the same
controls as Federal public lands, to
remain sensitive to Indian culture, and
to make information available to tribes.
There are no known instances of these
three plant species on Tribal lands.
References Cited
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994
(Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments; 59 FR 22951), Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments), and the Department of
the Interior’s manual at 512 DM 2, we
readily acknowledge our responsibility
to communicate meaningfully with
A complete list of references cited in
this rulemaking is available on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
and upon request from the Tennessee
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this final rule
are the staff members of the Tennessee
and Alabama Ecological Services Field
Offices.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we amend part 17,
subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 17—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531–
1544; and 4201–4245; unless otherwise
noted.
2. Amend § 17.12(h) by adding entries
to the List of Endangered and
Threatened Plants for Helianthus
verticillatus, Leavenworthia crassa, and
Physaria globosa, in alphabetical order
under Flowering Plants, to read as
follows:
■
§ 17.12
Endangered and threatened plants.
*
*
*
(h) * * *
Status
When
listed
Species
*
*
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
Historic range
Scientific name
Family
*
whorled sunflower ..
*
U.S.A. (AL, GA, TN)
*
Asteraceae .............
*
E
*
842
NA
NA
fleshy-fruit
gladecress.
Short’s bladderpod
U.S.A. (AL) .............
Brassicaceae ..........
E
842
NA
NA
U.S.A. (IN, KY, TN)
Brassicaceae ..........
E
842
NA
NA
*
*
Common name
FLOWERING PLANTS
*
Helianthus
verticillatus.
Leavenworthia
crassa.
Physaria globosa .....
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 24, 2014.
Stephen Guertin,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
*
[FR Doc. 2014–18103 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44712-44718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18103]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2013-0087;4500030113]
RIN 1018-AZ11
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Status
for Physaria globosa (Short's Bladderpod), Helianthus verticillatus
(Whorled sunflower), and Leavenworthia crassa (Fleshy-Fruit Gladecress)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), determine
endangered species status under the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(Act), as amended, for Physaria globosa (Short's bladderpod),
Helianthus verticillatus (whorled sunflower), and Leavenworthia crassa
(fleshy-fruit gladecress). Short's bladderpod occurs in Indiana,
Kentucky, and Tennessee. Whorled sunflower occurs in Alabama, Georgia,
and Tennessee. Fleshy-fruit gladecress occurs only in Alabama. The
effect of this regulation will be to add these species to the List of
Endangered and Threatened Plants.
DATES: This rule is effective September 2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: This final rule is available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov and https://www.fws.gov/cookeville. Comments and
materials we received, as well as supporting documentation we used in
preparing this rule, are available for public inspection at https://www.regulations.gov. All of the comments, materials, and documentation
that we considered in this rulemaking are available by appointment
during normal business hours at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Tennessee Ecological Services Field Office, 446 Neal Street,
Cookeville, TN 38501; telephone 931-528-6481; facsimile 931-528-7075.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary E. Jennings, Field Supervisor,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Tennessee Ecological Services Field
Office, (see ADDRESSES above). Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Why we need to publish a rule. Under the Act, a species may warrant
protection through listing if it is endangered or threatened throughout
all or a significant portion of its range. Listing a species as an
endangered or threatened species can only be completed by issuing a
rule.
This rule will finalize the listing of Physaria globosa (Short's
bladderpod), Helianthus verticillatus (whorled sunflower), and
Leavenworthia crassa (fleshy-fruit gladecress) as endangered species.
The basis for our action. Under the Act, we can determine that a
species is an endangered or threatened species based on any of five
factors: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C)
disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting its
continued existence. We have determined that listing is warranted for
these species, which are currently at risk throughout all of their
respective ranges due to threats related to:
For Short's bladderpod, potential future construction and
ongoing maintenance of transportation rights-of-way; prolonged
inundation and soil erosion due to flooding and water level
manipulation; overstory shading due to forest succession and shading
and competition from invasive, nonnative plant species; and small
population sizes.
For whorled sunflower, mechanical or chemical vegetation
management for industrial forestry, right-of-way maintenance, or
agriculture; shading and competition resulting from vegetation
succession; limited distribution and small population sizes.
For fleshy-fruit gladecress, loss of habitat due to
residential and industrial development; conversion of agricultural
sites for use as pasture; maintenance of road rights-of-way via mowing
and herbicide treatment prior to seed production; shading due to
natural forest succession; competition from invasive nonnative plants;
off-road vehicles and dumping; limited distribution; and small sizes
and limited genetic variation of some populations.
Peer review and public comment. We sought comments from independent
specialists to ensure that our designation is based on scientifically
sound data, assumptions, and analyses. We invited these peer reviewers
to comment on our listing proposal. We also considered all comments and
information received during the comment period.
Previous Federal Action
Please refer to the proposed listing rule for Short's bladderpod,
whorled sunflower, and fleshy-fruit gladecress (78 FR 47109; August 2,
2013) for a detailed description of previous Federal actions concerning
this species.
We will also be finalizing critical habitat designations for the
Short's bladderpod, whorled sunflower, and fleshy-fruit gladecress
under the Act in the near future.
Summary of Comments and Recommendations
In the proposed rule published on August 2, 2013 (78 FR 47109), we
requested that all interested parties submit written comments on the
proposal by October 1, 2013. We also contacted appropriate Federal and
State agencies, scientific experts and organizations, and other
interested parties and invited them to comment on the proposal.
Newspaper notices inviting general public comment were published in the
Cherokee County Herald, The Birmingham News, and The Decatur Daily in
Alabama; the Rome News Tribune in Georgia; The Posey County News in
Indiana; the Lexington Herald-Leader and The State Journal in Kentucky;
and the Jackson County Sentinel, The Tennessean, The Leaf Chronicle,
Carthage Courier, and Hartsville Vidette in Tennessee. We did not
receive any requests for a public hearing. All substantive information
provided during comment periods has either been incorporated directly
into this final determination or addressed in our responses to the
comments below.
Peer Reviewer Comments
In accordance with our peer review policy published on July 1, 1994
(59 FR 34270), we solicited expert opinion from 15 knowledgeable
individuals with scientific expertise that included familiarity with
one or more of these species and their habitats, biological needs, and
threats. We received
[[Page 44713]]
responses from five of the peer reviewers.
We reviewed all comments received from the peer reviewers for
substantive issues and new information regarding the listing of Short's
bladderpod, whorled sunflower, and fleshy-fruit gladecress. The peer
reviewers generally concurred with our methods and conclusions, and one
of the peer reviewers provided additional information, clarifications,
and suggestions to improve the final rule. Peer reviewer comments are
addressed in the following summary and incorporated into the final rule
as appropriate.
(1) Comment: One peer reviewer informed us about preliminary
results from a research project studying germination ecology of Short's
bladderpod seeds, which has been initiated since the publication of the
proposed rule. Preliminary results from this research indicate that
seed viability is high in the population studied and that when
pretreated with gibberellic acid, Short's bladderpod seeds germinate at
greater proportions under conditions approximating mean diurnal
temperatures that occur during late spring/early autumn and summer,
versus those approximating conditions that occur during early spring/
late autumn.
Our Response: We have incorporated this information in the
Background section for Short's bladderpod.
(2) Comment: One peer reviewer brought to our attention a journal
article (Ooi 2012) reporting results from research indicating that
increasing summer temperatures could raise soil temperatures and
increase loss of soil moisture in open habitats, which could accelerate
loss of viable seeds from the soil because seedling mortality due to
desiccation (drying out of a living organism) could increase following
germination events. The reviewer suggested that this change could
reduce the ability of species like Short's bladderpod to maintain soil
seed banks, which provide resilience for populations to rebound from
declines by recruiting new individuals when favorable conditions for
germination and establishment are present.
Our Response: We agree and have incorporated this information into
this rule in the Summary of the Biological Status and Threats for
Short's bladderpod.
(3) Comment: One peer reviewer brought to our attention studies
examining the influence of the species' mating system on genetic
variation and structure in fleshy-fruit gladecress and on the potential
for the species to hybridize with the closely related Leavenworthia
alabamica (Koelling et al. 2011, Koelling and Mauricio 2010). The
reviewer suggested that these data do not alter conclusions concerning
the level of endangerment of fleshy-fruit gladecress, but that they are
relevant to the analysis under Factor E.
Our Response: We concur and have incorporated this information into
this rule in the Summary of the Biological Status and Threats for
fleshy-fruit gladecress.
(4) Comment: One peer reviewer informed us of published data on
germination phenology in fleshy-fruit gladecress (Caudle and Baskin
1968, p. 334) and a congener (an organism belonging to the same
taxonomic genus as another organism), Leavenworthia stylosa (Baskin and
Baskin 1972), which demonstrated the influence of ambient temperature
on germination phenology in these species.
Our Response: We concur with the data and have incorporated the
information into this rule in the Summary of the Biological Status and
Threats for fleshy-fruit gladecress.
Public Comments
(5) Comment: Among other comments received, a comment from Plum
Creek, a land and timber company, informed us that in April 2013 it
acquired properties in Cherokee County, Alabama, and Floyd County,
Georgia, where the whorled sunflower occurs. These properties were
previously owned by The Campbell Group. Plum Creek acknowledged that
the Coosa Valley Prairie property in Floyd County, Georgia, is
protected by a conservation easement held by The Nature Conservancy,
and expressed its intent to continue to manage that property under an
adaptive management framework designed to benefit the natural
community, including whorled sunflower. Plum Creek also expressed its
intent to manage whorled sunflower where it occurs on their lands
outside of the conservation easement.
Our Response: We have included this new information concerning
ownership of the lands where two whorled sunflower populations are
located into this rule. The Service appreciates Plum Creek's commitment
to work with the conservation community to provide sound management for
whorled sunflower and its habitat on the company's lands where the
species occurs in Alabama and Georgia. The Service will work with Plum
Creek and State conservation agencies in Alabama to develop a
conservation agreement for the Alabama subpopulation located on Plum
Creek lands.
Summary of Changes From Proposed Rule
The changes to this rule are limited to the addition of new
information in the Background and Summary of Biological Status and
Threats sections, which were brought to our attention by peer
reviewers, the public, and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) (see
Background--Fleshy-fruit gladecress, below). The most substantive
change is the addition of one known extant population of fleshy-fruit
gladecress that was not reported in the proposed listing rule, which
brings the total number of known extant occurrences of this species to
seven. The existence of this additional occurrence, which is located in
a TVA transmission line right-of-way and is potentially threatened by
maintenance activities, does not change the determination reached in
the proposed listing rule that fleshy-fruit gladecress should be listed
as endangered.
Background
Short's Bladderpod
Physaria globosa is a member of the mustard family (Brassicaceae)
known from Posey County, Indiana; Clark, Franklin, and Woodford
Counties, Kentucky; and Cheatham, Davidson, Dickson, Jackson,
Montgomery, Smith, and Trousdale Counties, Tennessee. Short's
bladderpod typically grows on steep, rocky, wooded slopes and talus
(sloping mass of rock fragments below a bluff or ledge) areas. It also
occurs along tops, bases, and ledges of bluffs. The species usually is
found in these habitats near rivers or streams and on south- to west-
facing slopes. Most populations are closely associated with calcareous
outcrops (Shea 1993, p. 16). The Short's bladderpod site in Indiana,
where the species is found in a narrow strip of herbaceous vegetation
between a road and forested bank of a cypress slough (M. Homoya,
Natural Heritage Program Botanist, Indiana Department of Natural
Resources, December 2012), is unique among populations of the species.
Short's bladderpod is an upright biennial or perennial (lives for 2
years or longer) with several stems, some branched at the base,
reaching heights up to 50 centimeters (cm) (20 inches (in.)), and which
are leafy to the base of the inflorescence (a group or cluster of
flowers arranged on a stem that is composed of a main branch or a
complicated arrangement of branches). Preliminary results from research
at the Missouri Botanical Garden indicate that seed viability is high
in one of the Tennessee populations they studied and
[[Page 44714]]
that seeds germinated at higher rates under greenhouse conditions
approximating mean diurnal temperatures that occur during late spring/
early autumn and summer, versus those approximating conditions that
occur during early spring/late autumn. Further studies are under way to
develop a protocol for propagating seedlings to reproductive maturity
(M. Albrecht, Assistant Curator of Conservation Biology, Center for
Conservation and Sustainable Development at Missouri Botanical Garden,
September 30, 2013).
Whorled Sunflower
Helianthus verticillatus is a member of the sunflower family known
from Cherokee County, Alabama; Floyd County, Georgia; and McNairy and
Madison Counties, Tennessee. It is found in moist, prairie-like
remnants, which in a more natural condition exist as openings in
woodlands and adjacent to creeks. The Alabama and Georgia populations
are located on flat to gently rolling uplands and along stream terraces
in the headwaters of Mud Creek, a tributary to the Coosa River. In
Tennessee, the Madison County population occurs along Turk Creek, a
tributary to the South Fork Forked Deer River, and in adjacent uplands.
The McNairy County population occurs along Prairie Branch, a headwater
tributary to Muddy Creek in the Tuscumbia River drainage. It is a
perennial arising from horizontal, tuberous-thickened roots with
slender rhizomes. The stems are slender, erect, and up to 2 meters (m)
(6 feet (ft)) tall. The leaves are opposite on the lower stem,
verticillate (whorled) in groups of 3 to 4 at the mid-stem, and
alternate or opposite in the inflorescence at the end. Individual
leaves are firm in texture and have a prominent mid-vein, but lack
prominent lateral veins found in many members of the genus. The flowers
are arranged in a branched inflorescence typically consisting of 3 to 7
heads.
Fleshy-Fruit Gladecress
Fleshy-fruit gladecress is an annual, spring-flowering member of
the mustard family (Brassicaceae) that is endemic to a 21-km (13-mi)
radius area in north central Alabama (Rollins 1963, p. 63). It is a
glabrous (morphological feature is smooth, glossy, having no trichomes
(bristles or hair-like structures)) winter annual known from Lawrence
and Morgan Counties, Alabama. It is a component of glade flora and
occurs in association with limestone outcroppings. Populations of
fleshy-fruit gladecress are now located in glade-like remnants
exhibiting various degrees of disturbance, including pastures, roadside
rights-of-way, and cultivated or plowed fields (Hilton 1997, p. 5). As
with most of the cedar glade endemics, fleshy-fruit gladecress exhibits
weedy tendencies, and it is not uncommon to find the species growing in
altered habitats. It usually grows from 10 to 30 cm (4 to 12 in) tall.
The leaves are mostly basal, forming a rosette, and entire to very
deeply, pinnately (multiple leaflets attached in rows along a central
stem) lobed or divided, to 8 cm (3.1 in) long. Flowers are on
elongating stems, and the petals are approximately 0.8 to 1.5 cm (0.3
to 0.6 in.) long, obovate (ovate with the narrower end basal) to
spatulate (having a broad, rounded end), and emarginate (notched at the
tip).
The proposed listing rule reported that there were only six extant
fleshy-fruit gladecress occurrences. After publication of the proposed
rule, the TVA informed us of the existence of one additional occurrence
that was discovered in 2008, but not included in the proposed listing
rule. As a result, there are currently seven known extant occurrences
of fleshy-fruit gladecress documented, three in Morgan and four in
Lawrence Counties, Alabama. One of these occurs on U.S. Forest Service
lands, where it is formally protected. The occurrence that TVA informed
us about is located in a TVA transmission line right-of-way. A 1961
record from Lauderdale County has never been confirmed (McDaniel and
Lyons 1987, p. 6).
Please refer to the proposed listing rule for Short's bladderpod,
whorled sunflower, and fleshy-fruit gladecress (78 FR 47109; August 2,
2013) for a summary of species information.
Summary of Biological Status and Threats
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533), and its implementing
regulations at 50 CFR part 424, set forth the procedures for adding
species to the Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
Plants. Under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, we may list a species based
on any of the following five factors: (A) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B)
overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms; and (E) other natural or manmade
factors affecting its continued existence. Listing may be warranted
based on any of the above threat factors, singly or in combination.
Each of these factors is discussed below.
Short's Bladderpod
The most significant threats to Short's bladderpod were described
in the proposed listing rule (78 FR 47109; August 2, 2013) under
Listing Factors A (the present or threatened destruction, modification,
or curtailment of its habitat or range) and E (other natural or manmade
factors affecting its continued existence). Based on the Factor A
analysis, we concluded that the loss and degradation of habitat
represents the greatest threat to Short's bladderpod. The main causes
for habitat loss and degradation are potential future construction and
ongoing maintenance of transportation rights-of-way; prolonged
inundation and soil erosion due to flooding and water level
manipulation; and overstory shading due to forest succession and
shading and competition from invasive, nonnative plant species.
Road construction has caused the loss of habitat and all Short's
bladderpod plants at five occurrences, and roadside maintenance or road
widening could adversely affect nearly 40 percent of the extant
occurrences of the species due to their position in roadside habitats.
Future development of a proposed commuter rail project to improve
intercity commute options between the cities of Nashville and
Clarksville, Tennessee (Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization 2010, p. 98), could affect 27 percent of known extant
occurrences, including some locations where the species is most
abundant. Prolonged inundation and soil erosion due to flooding and
water level fluctuations threaten 19 percent of extant Short's
bladderpod occurrences, most notably the single Indiana occurrence,
where the species has been present in large numbers but recently
experienced a reduction in numbers due to prolonged flooding. The
remaining occurrences threatened by prolonged inundation and soil
erosion are located along reaches of the Cumberland River that are
impounded by Army Corps of Engineers dam projects used for flood
control and navigation. Overstory shading due to natural forest
succession, combined with shading and competition due to invasive,
nonnative shrubs and herbaceous species presents the most widespread,
imminent threat to Short's bladderpod, and has been implicated in the
loss of several historic occurrences. Due to these threats, which are
expected to continue into the foreseeable future, the geographic range
of Short's bladderpod has been reduced to 26 extant occurrences out of
55 that have been tracked by State conservation agencies.
[[Page 44715]]
The Factor E analysis in the proposed listing rule demonstrated
that Short's bladderpod is vulnerable to adverse effects of small
population size, including potential for reduced genetic variation, low
numbers of compatible mates, increased likelihood of inbreeding
depression, and reduced resilience to recover from acute demographic
effects of other threats to the species and its habitat. Fewer than 100
plants have ever been observed at one time at 12 (46 percent) of the 26
extant occurrences, and many of these occurrences are distantly
isolated from other occurrences. Existing threats may be exacerbated by
the effects of ongoing and future climate change, especially projected
increases in temperature and increased frequency and severity of
droughts in the Southeast and projected increases in flooding in the
Midwest. As noted above, increases in soil temperatures and soil
moisture evaporation in response to predicted ambient warming could
accelerate rates of soil seed bank depletion by increasing the seedling
mortality rate (Ooi 2012, pp. S54-S55) and diminish the resilience of
Short's bladderpod populations by reducing the species' ability to
maintain soil seed banks.
A peer reviewer brought to our attention a publication by Ooi
(2012, pp. S54-S55) indicating that increasing summer temperatures
could raise soil temperatures in open habitats, which could lead to
increased evaporation of soil moisture and potentially higher rates of
seedling mortality following germination events. Given the species'
preference for open-canopy habitats that are often located on south- to
west-facing slopes where solar irradiance is high, we agree with the
commenter that accelerated loss of viable seeds in the soil due to
increasing soil temperatures could reduce the resilience of Short's
bladderpod populations by reducing the suitability of the species'
habitat for maintaining soil seed banks. A reduced ability to maintain
soil seed banks would reduce the capacity for populations to rebound
from declines, which could occur during periods of adverse
environmental conditions such as drought or disturbance, by recruiting
new individuals when favorable conditions for germination and
recruitment are restored.
Based on our review of the best available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude that adverse effects associated with small and
often isolated populations, as described in the Factor E analysis, both
alone and in conjunction with the widespread threats described under
Factor A, constitute significant threats to Short's bladderpod.
Whorled Sunflower
The most significant threats to whorled sunflower were described in
the proposed listing rule (78 FR 47109; August 2, 2013) under Listing
Factors A (the present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range) and E (other natural or manmade
factors affecting its continued existence). Based on the Factor A
analysis, we concluded that the loss and degradation of habitat
represents the greatest threat to whorled sunflower. Past and ongoing
risk of adverse effects from mechanical or chemical vegetation
management for industrial forestry, right-of-way maintenance, or
agriculture is a threat to three of the four extant populations of this
species. Modification of the remnant prairie habitats that the species
occupies due to shading and competition resulting from vegetation
succession also threatens these three populations, limiting growth and
reproductive output of whorled sunflower. These threats are expected to
continue in the foreseeable future. A conservation easement and
suitable habitat management currently alleviates these threats that
otherwise would adversely affect the Georgia population.
The Factor E analysis in the proposed listing rule demonstrated
that whorled sunflower is vulnerable to localized extinction because of
its extremely restricted distribution and small population sizes at
most known locations. There are only four extant populations, and a
fifth historical population has not been observed at the species' type
locality since its collection there in 1892. Small population size
could be affecting reproductive fitness of whorled sunflower by
limiting availability of compatible mates or by causing higher rates of
inbreeding among closely related individuals. Both of these could be
contributing to reduced achene production and viability rates, which
limit the species' ability to recover from acute demographic effects of
habitat loss or modification. The species' dependence on remnant
prairie habitats, which are isolated on the landscape, limits the
potential for recolonization in the event that localized extinction
events occur.
Based on our review of the best available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude that adverse effects associated with extremely
restricted distribution and small and isolated populations, as
described in the Factor E analysis, both alone and in conjunction with
the threats described under Factor A, constitute significant threats to
whorled sunflower.
Fleshy-Fruit Gladecress
The most significant threats to fleshy-fruit gladecress were
described in the proposed listing rule (78 FR 47109; August 2, 2013)
under Listing Factors A (the present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range) and E (other
natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence). Based on
the Factor A analysis, we concluded that the loss and degradation of
habitat represents the greatest threat to fleshy-fruit gladecress. The
species' geographic range has been reduced from 21 occurrences to 7
extant occurrences. The threats to the species from habitat destruction
and modification are occurring throughout the entire range of the
species. These threats include agricultural conversion from row-crop
production to pasture, incompatible agricultural practices including
poorly timed herbicide application or plowing, maintenance of
transportation rights-of-way including mowing and herbicide treatment
prior to seed set along roadsides, off-road vehicles, dumping,
residential and industrial development, and shading and competition. In
addition to these threats, the occurrence located in the TVA
transmission line right-of-way could face threats associated with
incompatible right-of-way maintenance, similar to those occurrences
located in transportation rights-of-way. Converting row-crop fields to
pastures eliminates periodic disturbance from plowing that, when well
timed, arrests succession and creates favorable conditions for
germination and seedling establishment.
Conservation efforts of the U.S. Forest Service have removed
threats associated with off-road vehicle use and encroachment of
invasive species at one site; however, maintenance of transportation or
electrical transmission line rights-of-way and use of off-road vehicles
could adversely affect the other six extant populations. Shading due to
natural forest succession and competition from nonnative invasive
plants presents a significant threat to fleshy-fruit gladecress, and
has been implicated in the loss of five historic occurrences. One site,
reported to be widely open in 1968, is now partially shaded due to
closing of the canopy and the presence of nonnative plants, including
Ligustrum vulgare (common privet) and Lonicera maackii (bush
honeysuckle). These species are significant threats in many glades.
These threats are expected to continue into the foreseeable future.
[[Page 44716]]
The Factor E analysis in the proposed listing rule demonstrated
that fleshy-fruit gladecress is vulnerable to localized extinction
because of the small number of occurrences and the small sizes of many
of the extant populations within its limited range. Small population
sizes could decrease the resilience of some fleshy-fruit gladecress
occurrences to recover from effects of other threats affecting the
species' habitat. There are only seven remaining fleshy-fruit
gladecress occurrences, and only one of these is protected. The loss of
any occurrences would significantly impact the species' viability by
reducing its redundancy on the landscape, which would increase its
vulnerability to stochastic environmental stressors and reduce the
species' resilience to recover from effects of threats discussed in the
above sections. The loss of any occurrences could significantly erode
the species' overall genetic variation, given the high levels of
structuring and apparent low levels of gene flow among populations
(Koelling et al. 2011, pp. 315-316).
In addition to the threats discussed in the Factor E analysis in
the proposed listing rule, data brought to our attention by a peer
reviewer indicate that genetic variation is low in self-compatible
populations of fleshy-fruit gladecress (Koelling et al., pp. 315-316),
which could limit their adaptive potential to respond to environmental
change (Primack 1998, p. 283). Habitat disturbance or unintentional
human movement resulting in contact between populations of fleshy-fruit
gladecress and Leavenworthia alabamica could also present the threat of
hybridization; though, at this time these species do not occur together
in the wild and the potential for hybridization is reduced by
incompatibility between them (Koelling and Mauricio 2010, pp. 417-419).
Based on our review of the best available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude that adverse effects associated with limited
distribution and small size and limited genetic variation of some
populations, as described here and in the Factor E analysis in the
proposed listing rule, both alone and in conjunction with the threats
described under Factor A, constitute significant threats to fleshy-
fruit gladecress.
Please refer to Summary of Factors Affecting the Species section of
the proposed listing rule for a more detailed discussion of the factors
affecting Physaria globosa (Short's bladderpod), Helianthus
verticillatus (whorled sunflower), and Leavenworthia crassa (fleshy-
fruit gladecress). Our assessment evaluated the biological status of
these species and threats affecting their continued existence. The
assessment was based upon the best available scientific and commercial
data.
Determination
The Act defines an endangered species as any species that is ``in
danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its
range'' and a threatened species as any species ``that is likely to
become endangered throughout all or a significant portion of its range
within the foreseeable future.'' We find that Short's bladderpod,
whorled sunflower, and fleshy-fruit gladecress are presently in danger
of extinction throughout their entire ranges based on the severity and
immediacy of threats currently impacting these species. The overall
ranges of Short's bladderpod and fleshy-fruit gladecress have been
significantly reduced, the range of whorled sunflower encompasses only
four known populations, and the remaining habitat and populations of
all three species are threatened by a variety of factors acting in
combination to reduce their overall viability. The risk of extinction
is high because the remaining populations are in many cases small,
isolated, and have limited potential for recolonization. Therefore, on
the basis of the best available scientific and commercial information,
we are listing Short's bladderpod, whorled sunflower, and fleshy-fruit
gladecress as endangered in accordance with sections 3(6) and 4(a)(1)
of the Act. We find that a threatened species status is not appropriate
for these three plants because of their reduced and restricted ranges,
because the threats are occurring rangewide and are not localized, and
because the threats are ongoing and expected to continue into the
future.
Under the Act and our implementing regulations, a species may
warrant listing if it is endangered or threatened throughout all or a
significant portion of its range. The threats to the survival of the
species occur throughout their ranges and are not restricted to any
particular significant portion of those ranges. Accordingly, our
assessment and proposed determination applies to the species throughout
their entire ranges.
Available Conservation Measures
Conservation measures provided to species listed as endangered or
threatened under the Act include recognition, recovery actions,
requirements for Federal protection, and prohibitions against certain
practices. The Act encourages cooperation with the States and requires
that recovery actions be carried out for all listed species. The
protection required by Federal agencies and the prohibitions against
certain activities are discussed, in part, below.
The primary purpose of the Act is the conservation of endangered
and threatened species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. The
ultimate goal of such conservation efforts is the recovery of these
listed species, so that they no longer need the protective measures of
the Act. Subsection 4(f) of the Act requires the Service to develop and
implement recovery plans for the conservation of endangered and
threatened species. The recovery planning process involves the
identification of actions that are necessary to halt or reverse the
species' decline by addressing the threats to its survival and
recovery. The goal of this process is to restore listed species to a
point where they are secure, self-sustaining, and functioning
components of their ecosystems.
Recovery planning includes the development of a recovery outline
shortly after a species is listed and preparation of a draft and final
recovery plan. The recovery outline guides the immediate implementation
of urgent recovery actions and describes the process to be used to
develop a recovery plan. Revisions of the plan may be done to address
continuing or new threats to the species, as new substantive
information becomes available. The recovery plan identifies site-
specific management actions that set a trigger for review of the five
factors that control whether a species remains endangered or may be
downlisted or delisted, and methods for monitoring recovery progress.
Recovery plans also establish a framework for agencies to coordinate
their recovery efforts and provide estimates of the cost of
implementing recovery tasks. Recovery teams (composed of species
experts, Federal and State agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and
stakeholders) are often established to develop recovery plans. When
completed, the recovery outlines, draft recovery plans, and the final
recovery plans will be available on our Web site (https://www.fws.gov/endangered), or from our Tennessee Ecological Services Field Office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Implementation of recovery actions generally requires the
participation of a broad range of partners, including other Federal
agencies, States, Tribes, nongovernmental organizations, businesses,
and private landowners. Examples of recovery actions include habitat
restoration (e.g., restoration of native vegetation), research, captive
propagation and reintroduction, and
[[Page 44717]]
outreach and education. The recovery of many listed species cannot be
accomplished solely on Federal lands because their range may occur
primarily or solely on non-Federal lands. To achieve recovery of these
species requires cooperative conservation efforts on private, State,
and Tribal lands.
Following publication of this final listing rule, funding for
recovery actions will be available from a variety of sources, including
Federal budgets, State programs, and cost-share grants for non-Federal
landowners, the academic community, and nongovernmental organizations.
In addition, pursuant to section 6 of the Act, the States of Georgia,
Indiana, and Tennessee and the Commonwealth of Kentucky will be
eligible for Federal funds to implement management actions that promote
the protection or recovery of Short's bladderpod and/or whorled
sunflower. The State of Alabama has not entered into a cooperative
agreement with the Service to establish eligibility for receiving
Federal funds to implement management actions that promote the
protection or recovery of plant species listed as threatened or
endangered under the Act. Information on our grant programs that are
available to aid species recovery can be found at: https://www.fws.gov/grants.
Please let us know if you are interested in participating in
recovery efforts for Short's bladderpod, whorled sunflower, or fleshy-
fruit gladecress. Additionally, we invite you to submit any new
information on these species whenever it becomes available and any
information you may have for recovery planning purposes (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Section 7(a) of the Act requires Federal agencies to evaluate their
actions with respect to any species that is proposed or listed as an
endangered or threatened species and with respect to its critical
habitat, if any is designated. Regulations implementing this
interagency cooperation provision of the Act are codified at 50 CFR
part 402. Section 7(a)(4) of the Act requires Federal agencies to
confer with the Service on any action that is likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of a species proposed for listing or result in
destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitat. If a
species is listed subsequently, section 7(a)(2) of the Act requires
Federal agencies to ensure that activities they authorize, fund, or
carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the
species or destroy or adversely modify its critical habitat. If a
Federal action may affect a listed species or its critical habitat, the
responsible Federal agency must enter into consultation with the
Service.
Federal agency actions within the species' habitat that may require
conference or consultation or both as described in the preceding
paragraph include management and any other landscape-altering
activities on Federal lands administered by the Army Corps of Engineers
or U.S. Forest Service; issuance of section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act
or section 404 Clean Water Act permits by the Army Corps of Engineers;
herbicide registration by the Environmental Protection Agency;
interstate pipeline construction or maintenance projects authorized by
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; technical and financial
assistance for projects provided by the Natural Resources Conservation
Service; railway projects by the Federal Railroad Administration; and
construction and maintenance of roads or highways by the Federal
Highway Administration.
With respect to endangered plants, prohibitions outlined at 50 CFR
17.61 make it illegal for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the
United States to import or export, transport in interstate or foreign
commerce in the course of a commercial activity, sell or offer for sale
in interstate or foreign commerce, or to remove and reduce to
possession any such plant species from areas under Federal
jurisdiction. In addition, for endangered plants, the Act prohibits
malicious damage or destruction of any such species on any area under
Federal jurisdiction, and the removal, cutting, digging up, or damaging
or destroying of any such species on any other area in knowing
violation of any State law or regulation, or in the course of any
violation of a State criminal trespass law. Exceptions to these
prohibitions are outlined in 50 CFR 17.62.
We may issue permits to carry out otherwise prohibited activities
involving endangered plants under certain circumstances. Regulations
governing permits are codified at 50 CFR 17.62. With regard to
endangered plants, the Service may issue a permit authorizing any
activity otherwise prohibited by 50 CFR 17.61 for scientific purposes
or for enhancing the propagation or survival of endangered plants.
It is our policy, as published in the Federal Register on July 1,
1994 (59 FR 34272), to identify to the maximum extent practicable at
the time a species is listed, those activities that would or would not
constitute a violation of section 9 of the Act. The intent of this
policy is to increase public awareness of the effect of a listing on
proposed and ongoing activities within the range of listed species.
Based on the best available information, the following actions are
unlikely to result in a violation of section 9, if these activities are
carried out in accordance with existing regulations and permit
requirements:
(1) Normal agricultural and silvicultural practices, including
herbicide and pesticide use, which are carried out in accordance with
any existing regulations, permit and label requirements, and best
management practices; and
(2) Normal residential landscape activities.
Activities that the Service believes could potentially harm the
Short's bladderpod, whorled sunflower, or fleshy-fruit gladecress and
result in ``take,'' include, but are not limited to:
(1) Unauthorized collecting, handling, possessing, selling,
delivering, carrying, or transporting of the species, including import
or export across State lines and international boundaries, except for
properly documented antique specimens of these taxa at least 100 years
old, as defined by section 10(h)(1) of the Act;
(2) Removing and reducing to possession any of the three plant
species from areas under Federal jurisdiction; maliciously damaging or
destroying any of the species on any such area; or removing, cutting,
digging up, or damaging or destroying any of the species on any other
area in knowing violation of any law or regulation of any State or in
the course of any violation of a State criminal trespass law;
(3) Introducing any unauthorized nonnative wildlife or plant
species to States where Short's bladderpod, whorled sunflower, or
fleshy-fruit gladecress occur that compete with or prey upon these
three plant species;
(4) Releasing any unauthorized biological control agents into
States where Short's bladderpod, whorled sunflower, or fleshy-fruit
gladecress occur that attack any life stage of these three plant
species; and
(5) Modifying the habitat of Short's bladderpod, whorled sunflower,
or fleshy-fruit gladecress on Federal lands without authorization or
coverage under the Act for impacts to these species.
Questions regarding whether specific activities would constitute a
violation of section 9 of the Act should be directed to the Tennessee
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
[[Page 44718]]
Required Determinations
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
We have determined that environmental assessments and environmental
impact statements, as defined under the authority of the National
Environmental Policy Act, need not be prepared in connection with
listing a species as an endangered or threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act. We published a notice outlining our reasons for
this determination in the Federal Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR
49244).
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994
(Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments; 59 FR 22951), Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments), and the Department of the
Interior's manual at 512 DM 2, we readily acknowledge our
responsibility to communicate meaningfully with recognized Federal
Tribes on a government-to-government basis. In accordance with
Secretarial Order 3206 of June 5, 1997 (American Indian Tribal Rights,
Federal-Tribal Trust Responsibilities, and the Endangered Species Act),
we readily acknowledge our responsibilities to work directly with
tribes in developing programs for healthy ecosystems, to acknowledge
that tribal lands are not subject to the same controls as Federal
public lands, to remain sensitive to Indian culture, and to make
information available to tribes. There are no known instances of these
three plant species on Tribal lands.
References Cited
A complete list of references cited in this rulemaking is available
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov and upon request from the
Tennessee Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this final rule are the staff members of the
Tennessee and Alabama Ecological Services Field Offices.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species, Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we amend part 17, subchapter B of chapter I, title 50
of the Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 17--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361-1407; 1531-1544; and 4201-4245;
unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.12(h) by adding entries to the List of Endangered and
Threatened Plants for Helianthus verticillatus, Leavenworthia crassa,
and Physaria globosa, in alphabetical order under Flowering Plants, to
read as follows:
Sec. 17.12 Endangered and threatened plants.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species
-------------------------------------------------------- Historic range Family Status When Critical Special
Scientific name Common name listed habitat rules
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flowering Plants
* * * * * * *
Helianthus verticillatus......... whorled sunflower... U.S.A. (AL, GA, TN) Asteraceae......... E 842 NA NA
Leavenworthia crassa............. fleshy-fruit U.S.A. (AL)........ Brassicaceae....... E 842 NA NA
gladecress.
Physaria globosa................. Short's bladderpod.. U.S.A. (IN, KY, TN) Brassicaceae....... E 842 NA NA
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: July 24, 2014.
Stephen Guertin,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-18103 Filed 7-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P