Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 44660-44663 [2014-17782]
Download as PDF
44660
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
attitude, or high-speed conditions, are
acceptable as long as they allow at least
45 degrees of roll capability.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 11,
2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–18176 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0486; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–126–AD; Amendment
39–17918; AD 2014–15–16]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A319–111, –112, –115,
–132, and –133 airplanes; Model A320–
214, –232, and –233 airplanes; and
Model A321–211, –231, and –232
airplanes. This AD requires a detailed
inspection for missing fasteners on the
frame between certain stringers; for
certain airplanes, a rototest inspection
of the fastener holes for cracking; and
corrective actions if necessary. This AD
was prompted by a report that when the
cabin lining was removed during a
cabin conversion it was discovered that
fasteners were missing on the frame. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
missing fasteners which, if not
corrected, could affect the structural
integrity of the airframe and could result
in rapid decompression.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 18, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of August 18, 2014.
We must receive comments on this
AD by September 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0486; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1405;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0146,
dated June 11, 2014 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Airbus Model A319–111,
–112, –115, –132, and –133 airplanes;
Model A320–214, –232, and –233
airplanes; and Model A321–211, –231,
and –232 airplanes. The MCAI states:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
During cabin conversion of an A320
aeroplane, after removal of the cabin lining,
an area was discovered where fasteners were
missing at frame (FR) 24 between stringer
(STR) 17 and STR18. Investigation results
revealed that the available data concerning
installation on the final assembly line was
insufficient to pinpoint the exact MSN
[manufacturer serial number] on which the
affected assemblies were installed. However,
a ‘group’ of MSN suspected to be affected
was identified. Results of the static analysis
performed show that the structure is still able
to sustain Limit and Ultimate loads.
However, the fatigue aspects indicate that
long-term effects can be expected.
This condition, if not corrected, could
affect the structural integrity of the airframe.
Prompted by these findings, Airbus issued
Alert Operators Transmission (AOT)
A53N006–14 and Service Bulletin (SB)
A320–53–1285 to provide inspection
instructions.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires a one-time detailed
inspection (DET) [for missing fasteners] of
the aeroplane structure at FR24 and,
depending on findings, [a rototest inspection
of the fastener holes for cracking and]
accomplishment of applicable corrective
actions.
Corrective actions include repairing
cracking and installing fasteners.
You may examine the MCAI on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2014–0486.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued the following
service information. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
• Alert Operators Transmission
A53N006–14, dated May 13, 2014.
• Service Bulletin A320–53–1285, dated
January 29, 2014.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are issuing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of these same
type designs.
‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer’’
Paragraph in This AD
Since late 2006, we have included a
standard paragraph titled ‘‘Airworthy
Product’’ in all MCAI ADs in which the
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
FAA develops an AD based on a foreign
authority’s AD.
The MCAI or referenced service
information in an FAA AD often directs
the owner/operator to contact the
manufacturer for corrective actions,
such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy
Product paragraph allowed owners/
operators to use corrective actions
provided by the manufacturer if those
actions were FAA-approved. In
addition, the paragraph stated that any
actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are
considered to be FAA-approved.
In an NPRM having Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–101–AD (78 FR
78285, December 26, 2013), we
proposed to prevent the use of repairs
that were not specifically developed to
correct the unsafe condition, by
requiring that the repair approval
provided by the State of Design
Authority or its delegated agent
specifically refer to the FAA AD. This
change was intended to clarify the
method of compliance and to provide
operators with better visibility of repairs
that are specifically developed and
approved to correct the unsafe
condition. In addition, we proposed to
change the phrase ‘‘its delegated agent’’
to include a design approval holder
(DAH) with State of Design Authority
design organization approval (DOA), as
applicable, to refer to a DAH authorized
to approve required repairs for the
proposed AD.
One commenter to the NPRM having
Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–101–AD
(78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013),
stated the following: ‘‘The proposed
wording, being specific to repairs,
eliminates the interpretation that Airbus
messages are acceptable for approving
minor deviations (corrective actions)
needed during accomplishment of an
AD mandated Airbus service bulletin.’’
This comment has made the FAA
aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the
Airworthy Product paragraph to allow
the owner/operator to use messages
provided by the manufacturer as
approval of deviations during the
accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product
paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the
manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated
actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the
requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified
unsafe condition and does not cover
deviations from other AD requirements.
However, deviations to AD-required
actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
and anyone may request the approval
for an alternative method of compliance
to the AD-required actions using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and
misinterpretation of the Airworthy
Product paragraph, we have changed
that paragraph and retitled it
‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer.’’ This
paragraph now clarifies that for any
requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer,
the action must be accomplished using
a method approved by the FAA, the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), or Airbus’s EASA DOA.
The Contacting the Manufacturer
paragraph also clarifies that, if approved
by the DOA, the approval must include
the DOA-authorized signature. The DOA
signature indicates that the data and
information contained in the document
are EASA-approved, which is also FAAapproved. Messages and other
information provided by the
manufacturer that do not contain the
DOA-authorized signature approval are
not EASA-approved, unless EASA
directly approves the manufacturer’s
message or other information.
This clarification does not remove
flexibility previously afforded by the
Airworthy Product paragraph.
Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never
intended for required actions. This is
also consistent with the
recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation
Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by
identifying those actions in
manufacturers’ service instructions that
are ‘‘Required for Compliance’’ with
ADs. We continue to work with
manufacturers to implement this
recommendation. But once we
determine that an action is required, any
deviation from the requirement must be
approved as an alternative method of
compliance.
FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD. The FAA has found that the risk to
the flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule because missing fasteners on the
frame may affect the structural integrity
of the circumferential joint, which
might result in rapid decompression.
Therefore, we determined that notice
and opportunity for public comment
before issuing this AD are impracticable
and that good cause exists for making
this amendment effective in fewer than
30 days.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44661
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not precede it by notice and
opportunity for public comment. We
invite you to send any written relevant
data, views, or arguments about this AD.
Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–20**–*****;
Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–126–
AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this AD based on those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 7
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take
about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this AD. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $595, or $85 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions will take
about 39 work-hours and require parts
costing $0, for a cost of $3,315 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these actions.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition repair
specified in this AD.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44662
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
required by this AD is 2120–0056. The
paperwork cost associated with this AD
has been detailed in the Costs of
Compliance section of this document
and includes time for reviewing
instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to the FAA at 800
Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
DC 20591, ATTN: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority for This Rulemaking
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2014–15–16 Airbus: Amendment 39–17918.
Docket No. FAA–2014–0486; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–126–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective August 18,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes
identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and
(c)(3) of this AD, certificated in any category,
manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) 5230
through 5300 inclusive, except MSN 5255
and 5295.
(1) Model A319–111, –112, –115, –132, and
–133 airplanes.
(2) Model A320–214, –232, and –233
airplanes.
(3) Model A321–211, –231, and –232
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that
when the cabin lining was removed during
a cabin conversion it was discovered that
fasteners were missing on the frame. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct missing
fasteners which, if not corrected, could affect
the structural integrity of the airframe and
could result in rapid decompression.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Detailed Inspection
Within 60 flight cycles after the effective
date of this AD: Do a detailed inspection to
determine if any fasteners are missing on the
structure at frame (FR) 24 between stringer
(STR) 17 and STR 18 on the right side only,
in accordance with the instructions in Airbus
Alert Operators Transmission A53N006–14,
dated May 13, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(h) Rototest Inspection and Corrective
Actions
If, during the detailed inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, any fastener is
found missing: Before the accumulation of
3,300 flight cycles since the airplane’s first
flight, or within 60 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, do a rototest inspection of the fastener
holes for cracking and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–53–1285, dated
January 29, 2014, except as required by
paragraph (i) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(i) Repair
If any crack is found during any inspection
required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Before
further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus’s EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(j) Reporting Requirement
At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD, report
both positive and negative results of the
inspections required by paragraphs (g) and
(h) of this AD, as applicable, to Airbus,
Customer Services Engineering, Emeric
Mevel, Structure Engineer, Structure
Engineering Support—SEES1, Customer
Services; telephone +33(0)5 67–19 02 41; fax
+33(0) 5 61 93 36 14; email emeric.mevel@
airbus.com. The report must include the
information specified in Figure A–FRAAA of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1285,
dated January 29, 2014.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Within 30 days
after that inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after
the effective date of this AD.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
(l) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0146, dated
June 11, 2014, for related information. You
may examine the MCAI on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–0486.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Alert Operators Transmission
A53N006–14, dated May 13, 2014.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1285,
dated January 29, 2014.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 12,
2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–17782 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0228; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–216–AD; Amendment
39–17911; AD 2014–15–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A330–200 Freighter,
A330–200 and –300, and A340–200,
–300, –500, and –600 series airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reassessment
of an unsafe condition related to MZtype spoiler servo-controls (SSCs) that
did not remain locked in the retracted
position (hydraulic locking function)
after manual depressurization of the
corresponding hydraulic circuit. This
reassessment resulted in the
determination that performing repetitive
operational tests of all SSC types is
necessary. This AD requires repetitive
operational tests of the hydraulic
locking function on each SSC installed
on the blue or yellow hydraulic circuits,
and replacing any affected SSC with a
serviceable SSC. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct loss of the
hydraulic locking function during takeoff, which, in combination with one
inoperative engine, could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
September 5, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of September 5, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0228 or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44663
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1138;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all Airbus Model A330–200
Freighter, A330–200 and –300, and
A340–200, –300, –500, and –600 series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on April 14, 2014 (79
FR 20839).
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0251
dated October 15, 2013; Correction
dated October 16, 2013 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’); to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
During post-flight maintenance checks
accomplished on an A330 and on an A340
airplane, it was identified that seven spoiler
servo-controls MZ series had lost their
hydraulic locking function. The results of the
subsequent technical investigation
accomplished in-shop by the part supplier
confirmed the system failure was due to a
sheared seal on the blocking valve, ensuring
the blocking function of the spoiler. It is
suspected that the seal damage may have
occurred during accomplishment of a
modification to fit a new design of
maintenance cover on wing, required by
EASA AD 2008–0160 [https://
ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2008_
0160.pdf/AD_2008–0160], [which
corresponds to FAA AD 2009–18–20,
Amendment 39–16017 (74 FR 46313,
September 9, 2009)].
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44660-44663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17782]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0486; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-126-AD;
Amendment 39-17918; AD 2014-15-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -115, -132, and -133 airplanes; Model
A320-214, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-211, -231, and -232
airplanes. This AD requires a detailed inspection for missing fasteners
on the frame between certain stringers; for certain airplanes, a
rototest inspection of the fastener holes for cracking; and corrective
actions if necessary. This AD was prompted by a report that when the
cabin lining was removed during a cabin conversion it was discovered
that fasteners were missing on the frame. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct missing fasteners which, if not corrected, could
affect the structural integrity of the airframe and could result in
rapid decompression.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 18, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 18,
2014.
We must receive comments on this AD by September 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0486; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0146, dated June 11, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model
A319-111, -112, -115, -132, and -133 airplanes; Model A320-214, -232,
and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-211, -231, and -232 airplanes. The
MCAI states:
During cabin conversion of an A320 aeroplane, after removal of
the cabin lining, an area was discovered where fasteners were
missing at frame (FR) 24 between stringer (STR) 17 and STR18.
Investigation results revealed that the available data concerning
installation on the final assembly line was insufficient to pinpoint
the exact MSN [manufacturer serial number] on which the affected
assemblies were installed. However, a `group' of MSN suspected to be
affected was identified. Results of the static analysis performed
show that the structure is still able to sustain Limit and Ultimate
loads. However, the fatigue aspects indicate that long-term effects
can be expected.
This condition, if not corrected, could affect the structural
integrity of the airframe.
Prompted by these findings, Airbus issued Alert Operators
Transmission (AOT) A53N006-14 and Service Bulletin (SB) A320-53-1285
to provide inspection instructions.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time detailed inspection (DET) [for missing fasteners] of the
aeroplane structure at FR24 and, depending on findings, [a rototest
inspection of the fastener holes for cracking and] accomplishment of
applicable corrective actions.
Corrective actions include repairing cracking and installing fasteners.
You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0486.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued the following service information. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
Alert Operators Transmission A53N006-14, dated May 13, 2014.
Service Bulletin A320-53-1285, dated January 29, 2014.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.
``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This AD
Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the
[[Page 44661]]
FAA develops an AD based on a foreign authority's AD.
The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
In an NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR
78285, December 26, 2013), we proposed to prevent the use of repairs
that were not specifically developed to correct the unsafe condition,
by requiring that the repair approval provided by the State of Design
Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to the FAA AD. This
change was intended to clarify the method of compliance and to provide
operators with better visibility of repairs that are specifically
developed and approved to correct the unsafe condition. In addition, we
proposed to change the phrase ``its delegated agent'' to include a
design approval holder (DAH) with State of Design Authority design
organization approval (DOA), as applicable, to refer to a DAH
authorized to approve required repairs for the proposed AD.
One commenter to the NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-
101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013), stated the following: ``The
proposed wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the
interpretation that Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor
deviations (corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD
mandated Airbus service bulletin.''
This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed that paragraph and
retitled it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now
clarifies that for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a
method approved by the FAA, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA),
or Airbus's EASA DOA.
The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature. The DOA signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are EASA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DOA-authorized signature approval are not EASA-
approved, unless EASA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because
missing fasteners on the frame may affect the structural integrity of
the circumferential joint, which might result in rapid decompression.
Therefore, we determined that notice and opportunity for public comment
before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in fewer than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-20**-*****; Directorate
Identifier 2014-NM-126-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD based on
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 7 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $595, or $85 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions will
take about 39 work-hours and require parts costing $0, for a cost of
$3,315 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these actions.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition repair specified in this AD.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information
[[Page 44662]]
required by this AD is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost associated with
this AD has been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this
document and includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all
reporting associated with this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC
20591, ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2014-15-16 Airbus: Amendment 39-17918. Docket No. FAA-2014-0486;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-126-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective August 18, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in any category,
manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) 5230 through 5300 inclusive,
except MSN 5255 and 5295.
(1) Model A319-111, -112, -115, -132, and -133 airplanes.
(2) Model A320-214, -232, and -233 airplanes.
(3) Model A321-211, -231, and -232 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that when the cabin lining was
removed during a cabin conversion it was discovered that fasteners
were missing on the frame. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct missing fasteners which, if not corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of the airframe and could result in rapid
decompression.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Detailed Inspection
Within 60 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD: Do
a detailed inspection to determine if any fasteners are missing on
the structure at frame (FR) 24 between stringer (STR) 17 and STR 18
on the right side only, in accordance with the instructions in
Airbus Alert Operators Transmission A53N006-14, dated May 13, 2014.
(h) Rototest Inspection and Corrective Actions
If, during the detailed inspection required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, any fastener is found missing: Before the accumulation of
3,300 flight cycles since the airplane's first flight, or within 60
flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, do a rototest inspection of the fastener holes for cracking
and do all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1285,
dated January 29, 2014, except as required by paragraph (i) of this
AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
(i) Repair
If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD: Before further flight, repair using a
method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(j) Reporting Requirement
At the applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2)
of this AD, report both positive and negative results of the
inspections required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, as
applicable, to Airbus, Customer Services Engineering, Emeric Mevel,
Structure Engineer, Structure Engineering Support--SEES1, Customer
Services; telephone +33(0)5 67-19 02 41; fax +33(0) 5 61 93 36 14;
email emeric.mevel@airbus.com. The report must include the
information specified in Figure A-FRAAA of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1285, dated January 29, 2014.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Within 30 days after that inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-1405; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
[[Page 44663]]
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
(l) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0146, dated June 11, 2014, for
related information. You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2014-0486.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Alert Operators Transmission A53N006-14, dated May
13, 2014.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1285, dated January 29,
2014.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 12, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-17782 Filed 7-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P