Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Justice, 44261-44263 [2014-18028]
Download as PDF
44261
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 147
Thursday, July 31, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
PART 1651—DEATH BENEFITS
1. The authority citation for part 1651
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8424(d), 8432d,
8432(j), 8433(e), 8435(c)(2), 8474(b)(5) and
8474(c)(1).
5 CFR Part 1651
2. Amend § 1651.3 by:
a. Removing the word ‘‘and’’ at the
end of paragraph (c)(7);
■ b. Removing the period at the end of
paragraph (c)(8) and adding in its place
‘‘; and’’; and
■ c. Adding paragraph (c)(9) to read as
follows:
Aged Beneficiary Designation Forms
§ 1651.3
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT
INVESTMENT BOARD
■
■
Designation of beneficiary.
*
Federal Retirement Thrift
Investment Board.
AGENCY:
Final rule; correcting
amendments.
ACTION:
The Federal Retirement Thrift
Investment Board (Agency) published in
the Federal Register of July 9, 2014, a
document amending its regulations to
provide that a beneficiary designation
form is valid only if it is received by the
TSP record-keeper not more than one
year after the date of the participant’s
signature. This document corrects the
authority citation and paragraph
designations provided in the July 9,
2014 publication.
SUMMARY:
The correcting amendments are
effective on July 31, 2014.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurissa Stokes at 202–942–1645.
The
Agency published a document (FR Doc.
2014–16043) in the Federal Register of
July 9, 2014, (79 FR 38747), amending
its regulations to provide that a
beneficiary designation form is valid
only if it is received by the TSP recordkeeper not more than one year after the
date of the participant’s signature. This
document simply corrects the authority
citation and paragraph designations
provided in FR Doc. 2014–16043.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1651
Claims, Government employees,
Pensions, Retirement.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Agency corrects 5 CFR
chapter VI by making the following
correcting amendments:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
*
(c)* * *
(9) Be received by the TSP recordkeeper not more than 365 calendar days
after the date of the participant’s most
recent signature.
*
*
*
*
*
Gregory T. Long,
Executive Director, Federal Retirement Thrift
Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2014–17905 Filed 7–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6760–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
5 CFR Part 3801
[2013R–4F]
Supplemental Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Justice
Department of Justice.
Final rule; amendments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), with the concurrence of the
Office of Government Ethics, is
amending its Supplemental Standards
of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Justice (Supplemental
Standards) to incorporate existing rules
for Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF)
employees that had initially been
adopted by the Department of the
Treasury (Treasury) when the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms was
within Treasury. These rules, which
have continued to be applicable to ATF
employees after the transfer of
authorities to DOJ, are being
incorporated without substantive
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
change into DOJ’s Supplemental
Standards. Additionally, this final rule
designates ATF as a separate agency for
purposes of applying the gifts and the
teaching, speaking, and writing
provisions of the Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the Executive
Branch.
DATES: This rule is effective July 31,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denise R. Brown, Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives, 99 New York
Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226,
(202) 648–7105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 7, 1992, the Office of
Government Ethics (OGE) published the
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch
(OGE Standards). See 57 FR 35006–
35067, as corrected at 57 FR 48557, 57
FR 52483, and 60 FR 51167, with
additional grace period extensions for
certain existing provisions at 59 FR
4779–4780, 60 FR 6390–6391, and 60
FR 66857–66858. The OGE Standards,
codified at 5 CFR part 2635, effective
February 3, 1993, established uniform
standards of ethical conduct that apply
to all executive branch personnel.
Section 2635.105 of the OGE Standards
authorizes an agency, with the
concurrence of OGE, to adopt agencyspecific supplemental regulations that
are necessary to properly implement its
ethics program. In 1995, the Department
of the Treasury (Treasury), with OGE’s
concurrence, established the
Supplemental Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the Treasury,
which included additional rules for
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms employees. See 60 FR 22249–
22255 (May 5, 1995), as codified at 5
CFR part 3101. In 1997, the Department
of Justice (DOJ), with OGE’s
concurrence, established the
Supplemental Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Justice (Supplemental
Standards). See 62 FR 23941–23943
(May 2, 1997), as codified at 5 CFR part
3801.
On November 25, 2002, the President
signed into law the Homeland Security
Act of 2002, Public Law 107–296, 116
Stat. 2135. Title XI, Subtitle B, Section
1111 of the Act which was effective
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
44262
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
January 24, 2003, transferred the
‘‘authorities, functions, personnel, and
assets’’ of the Treasury’s Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (the
Bureau), to DOJ, with the exception of
certain enumerated authorities retained
by Treasury. Section 1111 of the Act
(later transferred in relevant part and
codified at 28 U.S.C. 599A) further
provided that the Bureau retains its
identity as a distinct entity within DOJ
known as the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
(ATF). The authorities retained by
Treasury include the administration and
enforcement of chapters 51 and 52 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
sections 4181 and 4182 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, and title 27 of
the United States Code. The functions
retained by Treasury became the
responsibility of a new Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB).
As part of the separation, title 27 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
was reorganized into two chapters,
chapter I for TTB and chapter II for
ATF. Reorganization of Title 27, Code of
Federal Regulations, 68 FR 3744 (Jan.
24, 2003). The regulations were divided
between the two chapters based upon
the respective authorities of Treasury
and DOJ.
At that time, DOJ did not amend its
Supplemental Standards to incorporate
Treasury’s existing rules for employees
of the Bureau. However, pursuant to
section 1111(c)(1) of the Homeland
Security Act, and 28 U.S.C. 599A(c)(1),
the authorities and functions of the
Bureau that the Secretary of the
Treasury previously exercised when the
Bureau was part of Treasury have been
transferred to DOJ. Accordingly, the
restrictions of section 3101.105 have
continued to be applicable to ATF
employees pursuant to this transfer of
authorities. However, DOJ has now
determined that it is appropriate to
incorporate in its Supplemental
Standards Treasury’s existing regulatory
restrictions for ATF employees at 5 CFR
3101.105.
Final Rule
This final rule incorporates the
existing provisions of 5 CFR 3101.105
into the Supplemental Standards in a
new section 3801.107. This action
carries forward the prohibited financial
interests rule that had initially been
adopted when ATF was part of
Treasury, and that has continued to be
applicable to ATF employees after the
transfer of ATF to DOJ. Now that ATF
is part of DOJ, DOJ has determined that
continuing to prohibit ATF employees
from having financial interests in the
alcohol, tobacco, firearms, or explosives
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
industries is necessary for successful
implementation of its ethics program.
Prohibiting ATF employees from having
financial interests in entities that are
regulated or inspected by or closely
connected to the work of ATF is
important for three reasons: (1) To
maintain ATF’s appearance of
impartiality and objectivity in the
execution of its regulatory and law
enforcement functions; (2) to eliminate
a regulated entity’s concern that
sensitive information provided to ATF
might be misused for private gain; and
(3) to avoid the large-scale recusal of
employees from official matters
resulting in an inability of ATF to fulfill
its mission.
Accordingly, the final rule
incorporates those applicable ethics
standards directly into the DOJ
regulations. However, the new language
in section 3801.107(b) regarding the
granting of regulatory waivers omits
reference to a provision of the Internal
Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 7214(b)) that
no longer applies to ATF employees and
substitutes new clarifying language that
gives the agency designee authority to
grant a written waiver of the prohibition
in paragraph (a) based on a
determination that the waiver is not
inconsistent with law and the OGE
Standards, and otherwise meets the
waiver standard previously established
in section 3101.105(b).
Additionally, this final rule will
designate ATF as a separate agency for
purposes of applying the gifts and the
teaching, speaking, and writing
provisions of the OGE Standards.
Pursuant to section 2635.203(a) of the
OGE Standards, an executive
department, with the concurrence of
OGE, may designate any component that
exercises distinct and separate functions
as a separate agency for the purpose of
applying the rules governing the
solicitation or acceptance of gifts from
prohibited sources or given because of
official position. See 5 CFR 2635.201–
2635.205. Pursuant to section
2635.807(a)(2)(ii) of the OGE Standards,
any component so designated is also
considered a separate agency for the
purpose of applying the rules governing
the receipt of compensation by an
employee for teaching, speaking, and
writing. DOJ has determined that ATF
exercises distinct and separate functions
for purposes of applying sections
2635.201–2635.205 and section
2635.807(a)(2)(ii).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review’’ section 1(b), Principles of
Regulation and in accordance with
Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving
Regulations and Regulatory Review,’’
section 1(b) General Principles of
Regulation and section 6 Retrospective
Analyses of Existing Rules. This rule is
limited to agency organization,
management, or personnel matters as
described by Executive Order 12866,
section 3(d)(3) and, therefore, is not a
‘‘regulation’’ or ‘‘rule’’ as defined by that
Executive Order 12866.
This rule will not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more, nor will it adversely affect in
a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
government or communities.
Accordingly, this rule is not an
‘‘economically significant’’ rulemaking
as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Notice and comment rulemaking is
not required for this final rule. Under
the APA, ‘‘rules of agency organization,
procedure or practice,’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(A), that do not ‘‘affect
individual rights and obligations,’’
Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, 232
(1974), are exempt from the general
notice and comment requirements of
section 553. See JEM Broadcasting Co. v.
FCC, 22 F.3d 320, 326 (D.C. Cir. 1994)
(section 553(b)(3)(A) applies to ‘‘agency
actions that do not themselves alter the
rights or interests of parties, although
[they] may alter the manner in which
the parties present themselves or their
viewpoints to the agency’’). The
revisions to the regulations in 5 CFR
part 3801 are purely a matter of agency
organization, procedure, and practice
that will not affect individual rights and
obligations. Furthermore, internal
delegations of authority are subject to an
exception under the APA for ‘‘rules of
agency organization, procedure, or
practice.’’
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Attorney General, in accordance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 605(b), has reviewed this rule
and, by approving it, certifies that it will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because it pertains to personnel and
administrative matters affecting the
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Department. Further, a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required for
this final rule because the Department
was not required to publish a general
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
matter.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, the Department has
determined that this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C.
804. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
This action pertains to agency
management, personnel, and
organization and does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties. Accordingly, it is not a
rule for purposes of the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose
any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
Congressional Review Act
The Department of Justice has
determined that this action pertains to
agency management and, accordingly, is
not a ‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (CRA),
(Subtitle E of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act,
(SBREFA)). Therefore, the reports to
Congress and the General Accounting
Office specified by section 801 of
SBREFA are not required.
Drafting Information
The author of this document is Denise
R. Brown, Office of Regulatory Affairs,
Enforcement Programs and Services,
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 3801
Conflicts of interest.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for the reasons
discussed in the preamble, the
Department of Justice, with the
concurrence of the Office of
Government Ethics, is amending 5 CFR
part 3801 as follows:
PART 3801—SUPPLEMENTAL
STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT
FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
1. The authority citation for 5 CFR
part 3801 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7301; 5 U.S.C.
App.; E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989
Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55
FR 42547, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306; E.O.
12988, 61 FR 4739; 5 CFR 2635.105,
2635.203(a), 2635.403(a), 2635.701–2635.705,
2635.803, 2635.807(a)(2)(ii); and DOJ Order
1200.1, Chap 11–1.
§ 3801.103
[Amended]
§ 3801.107 Additional rules for Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
employees.
The following rules apply to the
employees of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and
are in addition to §§ 3801.101 through
3801.106:
(a) Prohibited financial interests.
Except as provided in this section, no
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
employee of ATF, or spouse or minor
child of an ATF employee, shall have,
directly or indirectly, any financial
interest, including compensated
employment, in the alcohol, tobacco,
firearms or explosives industries. The
term financial interest is defined in
§ 2635.403(c) of this title.
(b) Waiver. An agency designee, with
the advice and legal clearance of the
Deputy Designated Agency Ethics
Official, may grant a written waiver of
the prohibition in paragraph (a) of this
section on a determination that the
waiver is not inconsistent with part
2635 of this title or otherwise prohibited
by law and that, in the mind of a
reasonable person with knowledge of
the particular circumstances, the
financial interest will not create an
appearance of misuse of position or loss
of impartiality, or call into question the
impartiality and objectivity with which
ATF’s programs are administered. A
waiver under this paragraph (b) may
require appropriate conditions, such as
execution of a written disqualification.
Dated: July 23, 2014.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for
Administration.
Dated: July 24, 2014.
Walter M. Shaub, Jr.,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2014–18028 Filed 7–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–CW–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Parts 56, 145, 146, and 147
[Docket No. APHIS–2011–0101]
2. Section 3801.103(a) is amended by
adding ‘‘Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF)’’
between ‘‘Antitrust Division’’ and
‘‘Bureau of Prisons (including Federal
Prison Industries, Inc.)’’ on the list of
‘‘Designation of separate Departmental
components’’ within the Department of
Justice.
■ 3. Section 3801.107 is added to read
as follows:
■
PO 00000
44263
RIN 0579–AD83
National Poultry Improvement Plan and
Auxiliary Provisions
Correction
In rule document 2014–16037
appearing on pages 38752–38768 in the
issue of Wednesday, July 9, 2014, make
the following correction:
§ 147.21
[Corrected]
1. In section 147.21, on page 38766, in
the second column, the thirty-seventh
through fortieth lines should read:
‘‘Program Standards, as defined in
§ 147.51. Sanitation procedures may
also be approved by the Administrator
in accordance with § 147.53(d)(2).’’
■
[FR Doc. C1–2014–16037 Filed 7–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44261-44263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18028]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
5 CFR Part 3801
[2013R-4F]
Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Justice
AGENCY: Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule; amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), with the concurrence of the
Office of Government Ethics, is amending its Supplemental Standards of
Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Justice
(Supplemental Standards) to incorporate existing rules for Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) employees that had
initially been adopted by the Department of the Treasury (Treasury)
when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms was within Treasury.
These rules, which have continued to be applicable to ATF employees
after the transfer of authorities to DOJ, are being incorporated
without substantive change into DOJ's Supplemental Standards.
Additionally, this final rule designates ATF as a separate agency for
purposes of applying the gifts and the teaching, speaking, and writing
provisions of the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Executive Branch.
DATES: This rule is effective July 31, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise R. Brown, Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 99 New
York Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226, (202) 648-7105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 7, 1992, the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) published
the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch
(OGE Standards). See 57 FR 35006-35067, as corrected at 57 FR 48557, 57
FR 52483, and 60 FR 51167, with additional grace period extensions for
certain existing provisions at 59 FR 4779-4780, 60 FR 6390-6391, and 60
FR 66857-66858. The OGE Standards, codified at 5 CFR part 2635,
effective February 3, 1993, established uniform standards of ethical
conduct that apply to all executive branch personnel. Section 2635.105
of the OGE Standards authorizes an agency, with the concurrence of OGE,
to adopt agency-specific supplemental regulations that are necessary to
properly implement its ethics program. In 1995, the Department of the
Treasury (Treasury), with OGE's concurrence, established the
Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Treasury, which included additional rules for Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms employees. See 60 FR 22249-22255 (May 5, 1995), as
codified at 5 CFR part 3101. In 1997, the Department of Justice (DOJ),
with OGE's concurrence, established the Supplemental Standards of
Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Justice
(Supplemental Standards). See 62 FR 23941-23943 (May 2, 1997), as
codified at 5 CFR part 3801.
On November 25, 2002, the President signed into law the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135. Title XI,
Subtitle B, Section 1111 of the Act which was effective
[[Page 44262]]
January 24, 2003, transferred the ``authorities, functions, personnel,
and assets'' of the Treasury's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
(the Bureau), to DOJ, with the exception of certain enumerated
authorities retained by Treasury. Section 1111 of the Act (later
transferred in relevant part and codified at 28 U.S.C. 599A) further
provided that the Bureau retains its identity as a distinct entity
within DOJ known as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
Explosives (ATF). The authorities retained by Treasury include the
administration and enforcement of chapters 51 and 52 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, sections 4181 and 4182 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, and title 27 of the United States Code. The functions
retained by Treasury became the responsibility of a new Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB).
As part of the separation, title 27 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) was reorganized into two chapters, chapter I for TTB
and chapter II for ATF. Reorganization of Title 27, Code of Federal
Regulations, 68 FR 3744 (Jan. 24, 2003). The regulations were divided
between the two chapters based upon the respective authorities of
Treasury and DOJ.
At that time, DOJ did not amend its Supplemental Standards to
incorporate Treasury's existing rules for employees of the Bureau.
However, pursuant to section 1111(c)(1) of the Homeland Security Act,
and 28 U.S.C. 599A(c)(1), the authorities and functions of the Bureau
that the Secretary of the Treasury previously exercised when the Bureau
was part of Treasury have been transferred to DOJ. Accordingly, the
restrictions of section 3101.105 have continued to be applicable to ATF
employees pursuant to this transfer of authorities. However, DOJ has
now determined that it is appropriate to incorporate in its
Supplemental Standards Treasury's existing regulatory restrictions for
ATF employees at 5 CFR 3101.105.
Final Rule
This final rule incorporates the existing provisions of 5 CFR
3101.105 into the Supplemental Standards in a new section 3801.107.
This action carries forward the prohibited financial interests rule
that had initially been adopted when ATF was part of Treasury, and that
has continued to be applicable to ATF employees after the transfer of
ATF to DOJ. Now that ATF is part of DOJ, DOJ has determined that
continuing to prohibit ATF employees from having financial interests in
the alcohol, tobacco, firearms, or explosives industries is necessary
for successful implementation of its ethics program. Prohibiting ATF
employees from having financial interests in entities that are
regulated or inspected by or closely connected to the work of ATF is
important for three reasons: (1) To maintain ATF's appearance of
impartiality and objectivity in the execution of its regulatory and law
enforcement functions; (2) to eliminate a regulated entity's concern
that sensitive information provided to ATF might be misused for private
gain; and (3) to avoid the large-scale recusal of employees from
official matters resulting in an inability of ATF to fulfill its
mission.
Accordingly, the final rule incorporates those applicable ethics
standards directly into the DOJ regulations. However, the new language
in section 3801.107(b) regarding the granting of regulatory waivers
omits reference to a provision of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.
7214(b)) that no longer applies to ATF employees and substitutes new
clarifying language that gives the agency designee authority to grant a
written waiver of the prohibition in paragraph (a) based on a
determination that the waiver is not inconsistent with law and the OGE
Standards, and otherwise meets the waiver standard previously
established in section 3101.105(b).
Additionally, this final rule will designate ATF as a separate
agency for purposes of applying the gifts and the teaching, speaking,
and writing provisions of the OGE Standards. Pursuant to section
2635.203(a) of the OGE Standards, an executive department, with the
concurrence of OGE, may designate any component that exercises distinct
and separate functions as a separate agency for the purpose of applying
the rules governing the solicitation or acceptance of gifts from
prohibited sources or given because of official position. See 5 CFR
2635.201-2635.205. Pursuant to section 2635.807(a)(2)(ii) of the OGE
Standards, any component so designated is also considered a separate
agency for the purpose of applying the rules governing the receipt of
compensation by an employee for teaching, speaking, and writing. DOJ
has determined that ATF exercises distinct and separate functions for
purposes of applying sections 2635.201-2635.205 and section
2635.807(a)(2)(ii).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' section 1(b),
Principles of Regulation and in accordance with Executive Order 13563,
``Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review,'' section 1(b) General
Principles of Regulation and section 6 Retrospective Analyses of
Existing Rules. This rule is limited to agency organization,
management, or personnel matters as described by Executive Order 12866,
section 3(d)(3) and, therefore, is not a ``regulation'' or ``rule'' as
defined by that Executive Order 12866.
This rule will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, nor will it adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
government or communities. Accordingly, this rule is not an
``economically significant'' rulemaking as defined in Executive Order
12866.
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Notice and comment rulemaking is not required for this final rule.
Under the APA, ``rules of agency organization, procedure or practice,''
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), that do not ``affect individual rights and
obligations,'' Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, 232 (1974), are exempt
from the general notice and comment requirements of section 553. See
JEM Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 22 F.3d 320, 326 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (section
553(b)(3)(A) applies to ``agency actions that do not themselves alter
the rights or interests of parties, although [they] may alter the
manner in which the parties present themselves or their viewpoints to
the agency''). The revisions to the regulations in 5 CFR part 3801 are
purely a matter of agency organization, procedure, and practice that
will not affect individual rights and obligations. Furthermore,
internal delegations of authority are subject to an exception under the
APA for ``rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice.''
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Attorney General, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), has reviewed this rule and, by approving it,
certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it pertains to personnel
and administrative matters affecting the
[[Page 44263]]
Department. Further, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required
for this final rule because the Department was not required to publish
a general notice of proposed rulemaking for this matter.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132, Federalism, the Department has determined that this rule does
not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact statement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions are necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
This action pertains to agency management, personnel, and
organization and does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties. Accordingly, it is not a rule for
purposes of the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose any new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Congressional Review Act
The Department of Justice has determined that this action pertains
to agency management and, accordingly, is not a ``rule'' as that term
is used by the Congressional Review Act (CRA), (Subtitle E of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, (SBREFA)). Therefore, the
reports to Congress and the General Accounting Office specified by
section 801 of SBREFA are not required.
Drafting Information
The author of this document is Denise R. Brown, Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Enforcement Programs and Services, Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 3801
Conflicts of interest.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the preamble, the
Department of Justice, with the concurrence of the Office of Government
Ethics, is amending 5 CFR part 3801 as follows:
PART 3801--SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
0
1. The authority citation for 5 CFR part 3801 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7301; 5 U.S.C. App.; E.O. 12674, 54 FR
15159, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR
42547, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12988, 61 FR 4739; 5 CFR
2635.105, 2635.203(a), 2635.403(a), 2635.701-2635.705, 2635.803,
2635.807(a)(2)(ii); and DOJ Order 1200.1, Chap 11-1.
Sec. 3801.103 [Amended]
0
2. Section 3801.103(a) is amended by adding ``Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF)'' between ``Antitrust
Division'' and ``Bureau of Prisons (including Federal Prison
Industries, Inc.)'' on the list of ``Designation of separate
Departmental components'' within the Department of Justice.
0
3. Section 3801.107 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 3801.107 Additional rules for Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives employees.
The following rules apply to the employees of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and are in addition to
Sec. Sec. 3801.101 through 3801.106:
(a) Prohibited financial interests. Except as provided in this
section, no employee of ATF, or spouse or minor child of an ATF
employee, shall have, directly or indirectly, any financial interest,
including compensated employment, in the alcohol, tobacco, firearms or
explosives industries. The term financial interest is defined in Sec.
2635.403(c) of this title.
(b) Waiver. An agency designee, with the advice and legal clearance
of the Deputy Designated Agency Ethics Official, may grant a written
waiver of the prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section on a
determination that the waiver is not inconsistent with part 2635 of
this title or otherwise prohibited by law and that, in the mind of a
reasonable person with knowledge of the particular circumstances, the
financial interest will not create an appearance of misuse of position
or loss of impartiality, or call into question the impartiality and
objectivity with which ATF's programs are administered. A waiver under
this paragraph (b) may require appropriate conditions, such as
execution of a written disqualification.
Dated: July 23, 2014.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
Dated: July 24, 2014.
Walter M. Shaub, Jr.,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2014-18028 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-CW-P