Dicrotophos; Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment; Notice of Availability, 44169-44170 [2014-17955]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 146 / Wednesday, July 30, 2014 / Notices
respondents complete a questionnaire.
The information collection will utilize
separate questionnaires for contractors
that perform RRP activities in P&CBs;
lessors and managers of P&CBs that use
their own staff to perform RRP
activities; and building owners and
occupants of P&CBs that use their own
staff to perform RRP activities. The
survey asks for readily available
information, e.g., information known or
easily accessible by respondents.
Respondents/Affected Entities: RRP
contractors that work in P&CBs, lessors
and managers of P&CBs, and owners
and occupants of P&CBs.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Voluntary.
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 8,485.
Frequency of response: Once.
Estimated Total Burden: 564 hours.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Estimated Total Annual Costs:
$34,103. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $34,103 and an estimated
cost of $0 for capital investment or
maintenance and operational costs.
Changes in Burden Estimates: This is
a request for a new approval from OMB.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Spencer W. Clark,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–17957 Filed 7–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0440; FRL–9911–15]
Dicrotophos; Draft Human Health and
Ecological Risk Assessment; Notice of
Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s draft human health
and ecological risk assessment for the
registration review of Dicrotophos and
opens a public comment period on this
document. Registration review is EPA’s
periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each
pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that
is, the pesticide can perform its
intended function without unreasonable
adverse effects on human health or the
environment. As part of the registration
review process, the Agency has
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
completed a comprehensive draft
human health and ecological risk
assessment for all Dicrotophos uses.
After reviewing comments received
during the public comment period, EPA
will issue a revised risk assessment,
explain any changes to the draft risk
assessment, and respond to comments
and may request public input on risk
mitigation before completing a proposed
registration review decision for
Dictotophos. Through this program,
EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s
registration is based on current
scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment.
Comments must be received on
or before September 29, 2014.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0440, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
ADDRESSES:
For
pesticide specific information contact:
Rusty Wasem, Chemical Review
Manager, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 305–6979; email address:
wasem.russell@epa.gov.
For general questions on the
registration review program, contact:
Kevin Costello, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 305–5026; email address:
costello.kevin@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44169
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
Chemical Review Manager listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
44170
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 146 / Wednesday, July 30, 2014 / Notices
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to
achieve environmental justice, the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of any group, including minority and/or
low income populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice
issues, the Agency seeks information on
any groups or segments of the
population who, as a result of their
location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or
disproportionately high and adverse
human health impacts or environmental
effects from exposure to the pesticide
discussed in this document, compared
to the general population.
II. Authority
EPA is conducting its registration
review of Dicrotophos pursuant to
section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
and the Procedural Regulations for
Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155,
subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA
provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be
reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA,
a pesticide product may be registered or
remain registered only if it meets the
statutory standard for registration given
in FIFRA section 3(c)(5). When used in
accordance with widespread and
commonly recognized practice, the
pesticide product must perform its
intended function without unreasonable
adverse effects on the environment; that
is, without any unreasonable risk to
man or the environment, or a human
dietary risk from residues that result
from the use of a pesticide in or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. What action is the agency taking?
As directed by FIFRA section 3(g),
EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registration for Dicrotophos to ensure
that it continues to satisfy the FIFRA
standard for registration—that is, that
Dicrotophos can still be used without
unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. Dicrotophos
is a broad spectrum organophosphate
insecticide used on cotton and as a treeinjection for ornamental and non-food
producing trees. EPA has completed a
comprehensive draft human health and
a screening level ecological risk
assessment for all Dicrotophos uses.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is
providing an opportunity, through this
notice of availability, for interested
parties to provide comments and input
concerning the Agency’s draft human
health and ecological risk assessment
for Dicrotophos. Such comments and
input could address, among other
things, the Agency’s risk assessment
methodologies and assumptions, as
applied to this draft risk assessment.
The Agency will consider all comments
received during the public comment
period and make changes, as
appropriate, to the draft human health
and ecological risk assessment. EPA will
then issue a revised risk assessment,
explain any changes to the draft risk
assessment, and respond to comments.
In the Federal Register notice
announcing the availability of the
revised risk assessment, if the revised
risk assessment indicates risks of
concern, the Agency may provide a
comment period for the public to submit
suggestions for mitigating the risk
identified in the revised risk assessment
before developing a proposed
registration review decision on
Dicrotophos.
As described in detail in the
Dicrotophos Summary Document (see
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–
0440), the Agency believes that the
human health and ecological data sets
are complete, and no additional human
health or ecological data are needed for
this registration review or dicrotophos.
However, the Agency is interested in
additional information in the following
areas: Existing or planned water quality
monitoring data, where aerial
application of dicrotophos is important,
and suggestions for risk mitigation
measures that address the risks
identified in the draft human health and
ecological risk assessments for
dicrotophos.
1. Other related information.
Additional information on Dicrotophos
is available on the Pesticide Registration
Review Status Web page for this
pesticide, https://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/chemicalsearch/. Information
on the Agency’s registration review
program and its implementing
regulation is available at https://www.
epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review.
2. Information submission
requirements. Anyone may submit data
or information in response to this
document. To be considered during a
pesticide’s registration review, the
submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
• To ensure that EPA will consider
data or information submitted,
interested persons must submit the data
or information during the comment
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
period. The Agency may, at its
discretion, consider data or information
submitted at a later date.
• The data or information submitted
must be presented in a legible and
useable form. For example, an English
translation must accompany any
material that is not in English and a
written transcript must accompany any
information submitted as an
audiographic or videographic record.
Written material may be submitted in
paper or electronic form.
• Submitters must clearly identify the
source of any submitted data or
information.
• Submitters may request the Agency
to reconsider data or information that
the Agency rejected in a previous
review. However, submitters must
explain why they believe the Agency
should reconsider the data or
information in the pesticide’s
registration review.
As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the
registration review docket for each
pesticide case will remain publicly
accessible through the duration of the
registration review process; that is, until
all actions required in the final decision
on the registration review case have
been completed.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests, Dicrotophos.
Dated: July 15, 2014.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014–17955 Filed 7–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 012288.
Title: Hoegh/NYK Atlantic Space
Charter Agreement.
Parties: Hoegh Autoliners AS and
Nippon Yusen Kaisha.
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44169-44170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17955]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0440; FRL-9911-15]
Dicrotophos; Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment;
Notice of Availability
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's draft human
health and ecological risk assessment for the registration review of
Dicrotophos and opens a public comment period on this document.
Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide registrations
to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory
standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its
intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health
or the environment. As part of the registration review process, the
Agency has completed a comprehensive draft human health and ecological
risk assessment for all Dicrotophos uses. After reviewing comments
received during the public comment period, EPA will issue a revised
risk assessment, explain any changes to the draft risk assessment, and
respond to comments and may request public input on risk mitigation
before completing a proposed registration review decision for
Dictotophos. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each
pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and other
knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0440, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information
contact: Rusty Wasem, Chemical Review Manager, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-6979; email address:
wasem.russell@epa.gov.
For general questions on the registration review program, contact:
Kevin Costello, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 305-5026;
email address: costello.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
[[Page 44170]]
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticide
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.
II. Authority
EPA is conducting its registration review of Dicrotophos pursuant
to section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural Regulations for Registration Review at
40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other
things, that the registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every
15 years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain
registered only if it meets the statutory standard for registration
given in FIFRA section 3(c)(5). When used in accordance with widespread
and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the
environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the agency taking?
As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registration for Dicrotophos to ensure that it continues to satisfy the
FIFRA standard for registration--that is, that Dicrotophos can still be
used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the
environment. Dicrotophos is a broad spectrum organophosphate
insecticide used on cotton and as a tree-injection for ornamental and
non-food producing trees. EPA has completed a comprehensive draft human
health and a screening level ecological risk assessment for all
Dicrotophos uses.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is providing an opportunity,
through this notice of availability, for interested parties to provide
comments and input concerning the Agency's draft human health and
ecological risk assessment for Dicrotophos. Such comments and input
could address, among other things, the Agency's risk assessment
methodologies and assumptions, as applied to this draft risk
assessment. The Agency will consider all comments received during the
public comment period and make changes, as appropriate, to the draft
human health and ecological risk assessment. EPA will then issue a
revised risk assessment, explain any changes to the draft risk
assessment, and respond to comments. In the Federal Register notice
announcing the availability of the revised risk assessment, if the
revised risk assessment indicates risks of concern, the Agency may
provide a comment period for the public to submit suggestions for
mitigating the risk identified in the revised risk assessment before
developing a proposed registration review decision on Dicrotophos.
As described in detail in the Dicrotophos Summary Document (see
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0440), the Agency believes that the
human health and ecological data sets are complete, and no additional
human health or ecological data are needed for this registration review
or dicrotophos. However, the Agency is interested in additional
information in the following areas: Existing or planned water quality
monitoring data, where aerial application of dicrotophos is important,
and suggestions for risk mitigation measures that address the risks
identified in the draft human health and ecological risk assessments
for dicrotophos.
1. Other related information. Additional information on Dicrotophos
is available on the Pesticide Registration Review Status Web page for
this pesticide, https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/chemicalsearch/.
Information on the Agency's registration review program and its
implementing regulation is available at https://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review.
2. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or
information in response to this document. To be considered during a
pesticide's registration review, the submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
To ensure that EPA will consider data or information
submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information
during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider
data or information submitted at a later date.
The data or information submitted must be presented in a
legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must
accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript
must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or
videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or
electronic form.
Submitters must clearly identify the source of any
submitted data or information.
Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or
information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However,
submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider
the data or information in the pesticide's registration review.
As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for
each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the
duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions
required in the final decision on the registration review case have
been completed.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests, Dicrotophos.
Dated: July 15, 2014.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-17955 Filed 7-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P