Certain Tires and Products Containing Same: Commission Determination To Issue a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders Against Respondents Found in Default; Termination of Investigation, 44194-44195 [2014-17911]
Download as PDF
44194
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 146 / Wednesday, July 30, 2014 / Notices
community leaders and secure their
approval. The addition of a
remuneration provides additional
incentive for participation.
Public Availability of Comments:
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: July 3, 2014.
Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka,
Chief, Office of Policy, Regulations, and
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2014–17929 Filed 7–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[14XR0687NA, RX.18527901.3000000,
RR02054000]
Central Valley Project Improvement
Act, Water Management Plans
AGENCY:
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
Notice of availability.
ACTION:
The following Water
Management Plans are available for
review:
• Patterson Irrigation District
• Central San Joaquin Water
Conservation District
• Madera Irrigation District
• Panoche Water District
• Sacramento County Water Agency
• City of Redding
• Sacramento Municipal Utility District
• Stockton East Water District
To meet the requirements of the
Central Valley Project Improvement Act
of 1992 and the Reclamation Reform Act
of 1982, the Bureau of Reclamation
developed and published the Criteria for
Evaluating Water Management Plans
(Criteria). For the purpose of this
announcement, Water Management
Plans (Plans) are considered the same as
Water Conservation Plans. The above
entities have each developed a Plan,
which Reclamation has evaluated and
preliminarily determined to meet the
requirements of these Criteria.
Reclamation is publishing this notice in
order to allow the public to review the
Plans and comment on the preliminary
determinations. Public comment on
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
Reclamation’s preliminary (i.e., draft)
determination of Plan adequacy is
invited at this time.
DATES: All public comments must be
received by August 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to
Ms. Melissa Crandell, Bureau of
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP–
410, Sacramento, California 95825, or
email at mcrandell@usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
be placed on a mailing list for any
subsequent information, please contact
Ms. Crandell at the email address above
or 916–978–5208 (TDD 978–5608).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
inviting the public to comment on our
preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of
Plan adequacy. Section 3405(e) of the
Central Valley Project Improvement Act
(Title 34 Pub. L. 102–575), requires the
Secretary of the Interior to establish and
administer an office on Central Valley
Project water conservation best
management practices that shall
‘‘develop criteria for evaluating the
adequacy of all water conservation
plans developed by project contractors,
including those plans required by
section 210 of the Reclamation Reform
Act of 1982.’’ Also, according to Section
3405(e)(1), these criteria must be
developed ‘‘with the purpose of
promoting the highest level of water use
efficiency reasonably achievable by
project contractors using best available
cost-effective technology and best
management practices.’’ These criteria
state that all parties (Contractors) that
contract with Reclamation for water
supplies (municipal and industrial
contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and
agricultural contracts over 2,000
irrigable acres) must prepare a Plan that
contains the following information:
1. Description of the District;
2. Inventory of Water Resources;
3. Best Management Practices (BMPs)
for Agricultural Contractors;
4. BMPs for Urban Contractors;
5. Plan Implementation;
6. Exemption Process;
7. Regional Criteria; and
8. Five-Year Revisions.
Reclamation evaluates Plans based on
these criteria. A copy of these Plans will
be available for review at Reclamation’s
Mid-Pacific Regional Office, 2800
Cottage Way, MP–410, Sacramento,
California 95825. Our practice is to
make comments, including names and
home addresses of respondents,
available for public review. If you wish
to review a copy of these Plans, please
contact Ms. Crandell.
Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: July 22, 2014.
Richard J. Woodley,
Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific
Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 2014–17948 Filed 7–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–894]
Certain Tires and Products Containing
Same: Commission Determination To
Issue a Limited Exclusion Order and
Cease and Desist Orders Against
Respondents Found in Default;
Termination of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has issued (1) a limited
exclusion order against infringing
products of respondents previously
found in default, i.e., WestKY Customs,
LLC of Benton, Kentucky (‘‘WestKY’’);
Tire & Wheel Master, Inc. of Stockton,
California (‘‘Tire & Wheel Master’’);
Vittore Wheel & Tire of Asheboro, North
Carolina (‘‘Vittore’’); RTM Wheel & Tire
of Asheboro, North Carolina (‘‘RTM’’);
Turbo Wholesale Tires, Inc. of
Irwindale, California (‘‘Turbo’’); Lexani
Tires Worldwide, Inc. of Irwindale,
California (‘‘Lexani’’); WTD Inc. of
Cerritos, California (‘‘WTD’’); and
Simple Tire of Cookeville, Tennessee
(‘‘Simple Tire’’) (collectively,
‘‘Defaulting Respondents’’); and (2)
cease and desist orders directed against
each of the Defaulting Respondents. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3115. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 146 / Wednesday, July 30, 2014 / Notices
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
under section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on
September 20, 2013, based on a
complaint filed by Toyo Tire & Rubber
Co., Ltd. of Japan; Toyo Tire Holdings
of Americas Inc. of Cypress, California;
Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. of Cypress,
California; Nitto Tire U.S.A. Inc. of
Cypress, California; and Toyo Tire
North America Manufacturing Inc. of
White, Georgia (collectively, ‘‘Toyo’’).
The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violation of section 337 by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Design Patent Nos. D487,424
(‘‘the ‘424 patent’’); D610,975; D610,976
(‘‘the ‘976 patent’’); D610,977 (‘‘the ‘977
patent’’); D615,031; D626,913 (‘‘the ‘913
patent’’); D458,214 (‘‘the ‘214 patent’’);
and D653,200 by numerous
respondents. 78 FR 57882–83 (Sept. 20,
2013). Subsequently, the complaint and
notice of investigation were amended to
add Shandong Hengyu Science &
Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shandong
Hengyu’’) as a respondent. Several
respondents were terminated from the
investigation based on settlement
agreements and consent orders.
On November 18, 2013, the ALJ
ordered certain respondents, including
WestKY, Tire & Wheel Master, Vittore,
and RTM, to show cause by December
4, 2013, why they should not be held in
default for failing to respond to the
Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
See Order No. 10 (Nov. 18, 2013). No
submissions were filed on behalf of
WestKY, Tire & Wheel Master, Vittore,
or RTM in response to ALJ Order No.
10. On December 5, 2013, the ALJ
issued an ID finding respondents
WestKY, Tire & Wheel Master, Vittore,
and RTM to be in default. See ALJ Order
17 (Dec. 5, 2013) (not reviewed on
December 27, 2013).
On December 24, 2013, the ALJ
ordered respondents Turbo, Lexani, and
WTD to show cause by January 10,
2014, why they should not be held in
default for failing to respond to the
Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
See Order No. 24 (Dec. 24, 2013). No
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
submissions were filed in response to
ALJ Order No. 24. On February 3, 2014,
the ALJ issued an ID finding
respondents Turbo, Lexani, and WTD to
be in default. See ALJ Order 30 (Feb. 3,
2014) (not reviewed on March 6, 2014).
On January 28, 2014, the ALJ ordered
respondent Simple Tire to show cause
by February 12, 2014, why it should not
be held in default for failing to respond
to the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation. See Order No. 29 (Jan. 28,
2014). No submissions were filed in
response to ALJ Order No. 29. On
February 18, 2014, the ALJ issued an ID
finding respondent Simple Tire to be in
default. See ALJ Order 34 (Feb. 18,
2014) (not reviewed on March 20, 2014).
The Commission found that the
statutory requirements of section
337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and
Commission rule 210.16(a) (19 CFR
210.16(a)) are met with respect to the
Defaulting Respondents. 79 FR 21484–
86 (Apr. 16, 2014). Accordingly,
pursuant to section 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(g)(1)) and Commission rule
210.16(c) (19 CFR 210.16(c)), the
Commission presumes the facts alleged
in the· complaint to be true and finds
that Defaulting Respondents are in
violation of section 337.
The Commission requested briefing
from the parties and the public on the
issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding. 79 FR at 21484–85.
Complainant Toyo and the Commission
investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed timely
opening submissions. The IA further
filed a timely responsive submission on
May 2, 2014. Also, two submissions,
both dated May 2, 2014, were filed on
behalf of certain of Defaulting
Respondents: A ‘‘Reply Submission of
Katana Racing, Inc. d/b/a WTD
Respecting Remedy, the Public Interest
and Bonding,’’ and a ‘‘Reply Submission
of Turbo Tire Corporation Respecting
Remedy, the Public Interest, and
Bonding.’’ On May 7, 2014, complainant
Toyo filed ‘‘Complainants’ Response to
the Reply Submissions of Katana
Racing, Inc. d/b/a WTD, TURBO Tire
Corp., and LEXANI, Inc.’’ No other
submissions in response to the
Commission notice were received.
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate form of relief in this
investigation is a limited exclusion
order prohibiting the unlicensed entry
of certain tires and products containing
same that are manufactured abroad by
or on behalf of, or imported by or on
behalf of, the Defaulting Respondents by
reason of infringement of one or more of
the ‘424 patent; the ‘976 patent; the ‘977
patent; the ‘913 patent; and the ‘214
patent. The Commission has also
determined to issue cease and desist
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44195
orders directed against each of the
Defaulting Respondents which prohibit,
inter alia, the importation, sale,
advertising, marketing, and distribution
of covered products in the United States
by the Defaulting Respondents. The
Commission has further determined that
the public interest factors enumerated in
section 337(g)(l) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(l))
do not preclude issuance of the
remedial orders. Finally, the
Commission has determined that the
bond for importation during the period
of Presidential review shall be in the
amount of 100 percent of the entered
value of the imported subject articles of
the Defaulting Respondents. The
Commission’s orders were delivered to
the President and the United States
Trade Representative on the day of their
issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 24, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–17911 Filed 7–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Meeting of the Judicial Conference
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure
Judicial Conference of the
United States Advisory Committee on
Rules of Appellate Procedure.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice of open meeting.
The Advisory Committee on
Rules of Appellate Procedure will hold
a one-day meeting. The meeting will be
open to public observation but not
participation.
SUMMARY:
October 20, 2014.
Time: 8:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.
DATES:
Thurgood Marshall Federal
Judiciary Building, Mecham Conference
Center, One Columbus Circle NE.,
Washington, DC 20544.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief
Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support
Office, Administrative Office of the
United States Courts, Washington, DC
20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44194-44195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17911]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-894]
Certain Tires and Products Containing Same: Commission
Determination To Issue a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist
Orders Against Respondents Found in Default; Termination of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has issued (1) a limited exclusion order against infringing
products of respondents previously found in default, i.e., WestKY
Customs, LLC of Benton, Kentucky (``WestKY''); Tire & Wheel Master,
Inc. of Stockton, California (``Tire & Wheel Master''); Vittore Wheel &
Tire of Asheboro, North Carolina (``Vittore''); RTM Wheel & Tire of
Asheboro, North Carolina (``RTM''); Turbo Wholesale Tires, Inc. of
Irwindale, California (``Turbo''); Lexani Tires Worldwide, Inc. of
Irwindale, California (``Lexani''); WTD Inc. of Cerritos, California
(``WTD''); and Simple Tire of Cookeville, Tennessee (``Simple Tire'')
(collectively, ``Defaulting Respondents''); and (2) cease and desist
orders directed against each of the Defaulting Respondents. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
[[Page 44195]]
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing
its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on September 20, 2013, based on a complaint filed by Toyo Tire &
Rubber Co., Ltd. of Japan; Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas Inc. of
Cypress, California; Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. of Cypress, California;
Nitto Tire U.S.A. Inc. of Cypress, California; and Toyo Tire North
America Manufacturing Inc. of White, Georgia (collectively, ``Toyo'').
The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violation of section 337 by
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Design Patent Nos.
D487,424 (``the `424 patent''); D610,975; D610,976 (``the `976
patent''); D610,977 (``the `977 patent''); D615,031; D626,913 (``the
`913 patent''); D458,214 (``the `214 patent''); and D653,200 by
numerous respondents. 78 FR 57882-83 (Sept. 20, 2013). Subsequently,
the complaint and notice of investigation were amended to add Shandong
Hengyu Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (``Shandong Hengyu'') as a
respondent. Several respondents were terminated from the investigation
based on settlement agreements and consent orders.
On November 18, 2013, the ALJ ordered certain respondents,
including WestKY, Tire & Wheel Master, Vittore, and RTM, to show cause
by December 4, 2013, why they should not be held in default for failing
to respond to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation. See Order No.
10 (Nov. 18, 2013). No submissions were filed on behalf of WestKY, Tire
& Wheel Master, Vittore, or RTM in response to ALJ Order No. 10. On
December 5, 2013, the ALJ issued an ID finding respondents WestKY, Tire
& Wheel Master, Vittore, and RTM to be in default. See ALJ Order 17
(Dec. 5, 2013) (not reviewed on December 27, 2013).
On December 24, 2013, the ALJ ordered respondents Turbo, Lexani,
and WTD to show cause by January 10, 2014, why they should not be held
in default for failing to respond to the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation. See Order No. 24 (Dec. 24, 2013). No submissions were
filed in response to ALJ Order No. 24. On February 3, 2014, the ALJ
issued an ID finding respondents Turbo, Lexani, and WTD to be in
default. See ALJ Order 30 (Feb. 3, 2014) (not reviewed on March 6,
2014).
On January 28, 2014, the ALJ ordered respondent Simple Tire to show
cause by February 12, 2014, why it should not be held in default for
failing to respond to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation. See
Order No. 29 (Jan. 28, 2014). No submissions were filed in response to
ALJ Order No. 29. On February 18, 2014, the ALJ issued an ID finding
respondent Simple Tire to be in default. See ALJ Order 34 (Feb. 18,
2014) (not reviewed on March 20, 2014).
The Commission found that the statutory requirements of section
337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and Commission rule 210.16(a) (19 CFR
210.16(a)) are met with respect to the Defaulting Respondents. 79 FR
21484-86 (Apr. 16, 2014). Accordingly, pursuant to section 337(g)(1)
(19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and Commission rule 210.16(c) (19 CFR
210.16(c)), the Commission presumes the facts alleged in the[middot]
complaint to be true and finds that Defaulting Respondents are in
violation of section 337.
The Commission requested briefing from the parties and the public
on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. 79 FR at
21484-85. Complainant Toyo and the Commission investigative attorney
(``IA'') filed timely opening submissions. The IA further filed a
timely responsive submission on May 2, 2014. Also, two submissions,
both dated May 2, 2014, were filed on behalf of certain of Defaulting
Respondents: A ``Reply Submission of Katana Racing, Inc. d/b/a WTD
Respecting Remedy, the Public Interest and Bonding,'' and a ``Reply
Submission of Turbo Tire Corporation Respecting Remedy, the Public
Interest, and Bonding.'' On May 7, 2014, complainant Toyo filed
``Complainants' Response to the Reply Submissions of Katana Racing,
Inc. d/b/a WTD, TURBO Tire Corp., and LEXANI, Inc.'' No other
submissions in response to the Commission notice were received.
The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief
in this investigation is a limited exclusion order prohibiting the
unlicensed entry of certain tires and products containing same that are
manufactured abroad by or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of,
the Defaulting Respondents by reason of infringement of one or more of
the `424 patent; the `976 patent; the `977 patent; the `913 patent; and
the `214 patent. The Commission has also determined to issue cease and
desist orders directed against each of the Defaulting Respondents which
prohibit, inter alia, the importation, sale, advertising, marketing,
and distribution of covered products in the United States by the
Defaulting Respondents. The Commission has further determined that the
public interest factors enumerated in section 337(g)(l) (19 U.S.C.
1337(g)(l)) do not preclude issuance of the remedial orders. Finally,
the Commission has determined that the bond for importation during the
period of Presidential review shall be in the amount of 100 percent of
the entered value of the imported subject articles of the Defaulting
Respondents. The Commission's orders were delivered to the President
and the United States Trade Representative on the day of their
issuance.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 24, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-17911 Filed 7-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P