Federal Employees Health Benefits Program Expansion of Eligibility to Certain Employees on Temporary Appointments and Certain Employees on Seasonal and Intermittent Schedules, 43969-43972 [2014-17806]
Download as PDF
43969
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 145
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 890
RIN 3206–AM86
Federal Employees Health Benefits
Program Expansion of Eligibility to
Certain Employees on Temporary
Appointments and Certain Employees
on Seasonal and Intermittent
Schedules
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The United States Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing
a proposed rule that would expand
eligibility for enrollment under the
Federal Employees Health Benefits
(FEHB) Program to certain temporary,
seasonal, and intermittent employees
who are identified as full-time
employees. This regulation would make
FEHB coverage available to these newly
eligible employees no later than January
2015.
DATES: OPM must receive comments on
or before August 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Louise Yinug, Senior Policy Analyst,
Planning and Policy Analysis, U.S.
Office of Personnel Management, Room
3415, 1900 E Street NW., Washington,
DC; or FAX to (202) 606–0036 Attn:
Louise Yinug. You may also submit
comments using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Louise Yinug, Senior Policy Analyst at
(202) 606–0004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is
proposing to expand eligibility for
coverage under the Federal Employees
Health Benefits (FEHB) Program to
certain temporary, seasonal, and
intermittent Federal employees who are
expected to work full-time schedules
within the meaning of section 4980H of
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) for at
least 90 days.
This proposed rule would expand
eligibility by authorizing enrollment in
a FEHB health plan for certain Federal
employees on temporary appointments
and certain employees working on
seasonal and intermittent schedules.
Currently, most employees on
temporary appointments become
eligible for FEHB coverage after
completing one year of current
continuous employment and, once
eligible for coverage, do not receive an
employer contribution to premium.
Employees working on seasonal
schedules for less than six months in a
year and those working intermittent
schedules are excluded from eligibility
regardless of the work hours for which
they are expected to be scheduled. Some
limited exceptions were made to these
exclusions for temporary firefighters
and emergency response workers in 5
CFR 890.102(h) and (i).
Under this proposed regulation,
employees on temporary appointments,
employees on seasonal schedules who
will be working less than six months per
year, and employees working
intermittent schedules would be eligible
to enroll in a FEHB health plan if the
employee is expected to work a fulltime schedule of 130 or more hours in
a calendar month. If the employing
office expects the employee to work at
least 90 days, the employee is eligible to
enroll upon notification of the
employee’s eligibility by the employing
office. If the employing office expects
the employee to work fewer than 90
days, the employee will be eligible to
enroll after the completion of a 90 day
waiting period. Temporary, seasonal,
and intermittent employees who are
expected to work a schedule of less than
130 hours in a calendar month would
not be eligible to enroll in a FEHB
health plan. Temporary, seasonal, and
intermittent employees for whom the
expectation of hours of employment
changes from less than 130 hours per
calendar month to 130 hours or more
per calendar month would become
eligible to enroll in an FEHB health plan
as described above.
The change in eligibility for coverage
set forth in this proposed regulation is
intended to ensure, to the greatest extent
practicable, that full-time employees,
within the meaning of section 4980H of
the IRC and Treasury regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
thereunder (79 FR 8544, February 12,
2014) are eligible to enroll in FEHB. IRC
section 4980H, enacted as part of the
Affordable Care Act, defines a full-time
employee as, with respect to any month,
an employee who is employed on
average at least 30 hours of service per
week (IRC section 4980H(c)(4)). Under
the IRC section 4980H regulations a fulltime employee means, with respect to
any calendar month, an employee who
is employed at least 130 hours of service
in that month.
This proposed rule would allow
newly eligible employees (employees on
an appointment limited to one year and
employees working on a seasonal or
intermittent schedule) to initially enroll
under the FEHB program with a
Government contribution to premium if
they are expected to be employed on a
full-time schedule and are expected to
work for at least 90 days.
Some temporary employees who have
completed one year of continuous
employment are already eligible for
FEHB coverage but without a
Government contribution to premium.
This proposed rule would allow these
employees to enroll in a FEHB plan
under 5 CFR 890.102(j) (with a
Government contribution to premium) if
the employee is determined by his or
her employing office to be newly
eligible for FEHB coverage under this
regulation.
Enrollments for employees newly
eligible pursuant to this rule would be
accepted during a 60-day period after
the employing office notifies employees
of their eligibility to enroll in a FEHB
health plan. Coverage will become
effective as provided for by 5 CFR
890.301. Employing offices must
promptly determine eligibility of new
and current employees and upon
determining eligibility, promptly offer
employees an opportunity to enroll in
the FEHB Program so that coverage
becomes effective no later than January
2015.
While this proposed regulation would
expand FEHB coverage to new
categories of Federal employees, there
are other employers who are entitled to
purchase FEHB coverage for their own
employees or whose employees are
otherwise entitled to enroll in FEHB
coverage. These other employers may
have made or are planning to make
other arrangements to provide health
insurance for their temporary, seasonal,
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
43970
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
and intermittent employees.
Accordingly, the OPM Director may
waive application of this proposed rule
when the employer of an individual not
covered by 5 U.S.C. 8901(1)(A)
demonstrates to OPM that these
expansion requirements would have an
adverse impact on the employer’s need
for self-governance. We expect such
instances to be rare.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because the regulation only adds to the
list of groups eligible to enroll under the
FEHB Program.
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866,
Regulatory Review
OPM has examined the impact of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 on Regulatory Planning and
Review (September 30, 1993) and
Executive Order 13563 on Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review
(January 18, 2011). Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). A regulatory impact analysis
must be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100
million or more in at least one year).
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as an action that is likely to result in a
rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more in at
least one year or adversely affect in a
material way a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal government or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in Executive Order 12866.
As shown in the analysis that follows,
the economic impact of this rule is
projected to fall below the $100 million
threshold. Although not economically
significant, this rule has been
determined to be a ‘‘significant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f)(4)
and thus has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with Executive Orders
13563 and 12866.
Baseline FEHB Eligibility and Federal
Government Employer Responsibility
If finalized, this proposed rule would
expand eligibility to enroll in a FEHB
plan to certain temporary, seasonal,
and/or intermittent employees who are
identified as working full-time. In order
to estimate rule-induced impacts, it is
necessary to assess the number of fulltime Federal employees who are not
currently eligible to participate in the
FEHB program or are not currently
eligible to have the government pay a
portion of their premium, and thus may
be affected by the proposed rule.
The following categories of Federal
employees are either excluded by
regulation from participating in the
FEHB Program or are not currently
eligible to have the government pay a
portion of their premium:
• Temporary employees with less
than a year of service. Per OPM
regulations, most of these individuals
are not eligible to enroll in FEHB. In
2012 OPM published a regulation
extending FEHB eligibility to certain
temporary firefighters and some
personnel performing emergency
response functions.
• Seasonal employees. Seasonal
employees working six months or fewer
are generally prohibited by regulation
from enrolling in FEHB.
• Intermittent employees. Intermittent
employees are generally prohibited by
regulation from enrolling in FEHB. In
2012, however, OPM published a
regulation extending FEHB eligibility to
certain intermittent employees engaged
in emergency response and recovery
work.
• Temporary employees with more
than a year of service. Per statute, these
employees can enroll in an FEHB plan
if they pay the entire premium with no
Government contribution.
OPM has worked with Federal payroll
providers to assess how many full-time
Federal employees are without access to
FEHB. The data show that all
responding executive agencies have a
small number of full-time employees (as
defined in Section 4980H of the IRC)
without access to FEHB. The number
without access varies from agency to
agency. Within agencies, the number
varies from month to month. Some large
departments hire full-time temporary or
seasonal employees only for a few
months of the year.
The agencies included in our data, in
aggregate, offer FEHB to at least 95
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
percent of full-time employees (and
their dependents) for all months. Across
civilian, non-Postal, executive agencies
and all months of the year, our data
indicate that there are 300,000 full-time
employee-months currently ineligible
for FEHB (0.9 to 2 percent of the Federal
workforce).
The Federal government and its
agencies are subject to employer shared
responsibility like other applicable large
employers. The employer shared
responsibility payments only apply if a
full-time employee (defined as an
employee with 130 hours of service in
a month) receives a premium tax credit
in connection with the purchase of
health insurance through an Exchange.
We do not know whether the full-time
Federal employees not yet eligible for
FEHB would, in the absence of this rule,
be eligible for premium tax credits in
connection with coverage purchased on
an Exchange because we lack
information on other available sources
of health coverage or household income.
Even in the extremely unlikely case that
all 300,000 employee-months without
FEHB are eligible to receive a premium
tax credit in connection with coverage
purchased on an Exchange, the total
assessable payment incurred by the
Federal agencies would be well below
the threshold for economic significance,
which is $100 million.1 While we
expect that agencies will be in
compliance with the employer shared
responsibility provision without this
proposed rule, we are undertaking the
FEHB expansion regardless to even out
rules across different types of workers.
Impacts of the Proposed Rule
Agencies may incur FEHB expansion
costs; a rough quantification of these
potential costs appears below.
We do not know how many
individuals without an offer of FEHB,
which varies widely from month to
month, would enroll in FEHB if it were
available. Our similar recent regulations
expanding FEHB coverage to certain
temporary firefighters and disaster
recovery workers resulted in very
limited take-up, ranging from
approximately 10 to 20 percent. We
estimate, using enrollment-weighted
averages, that FEHB coverage currently
costs the government about $700 per
full-time worker per month for affected
agencies.2 Given this average cost
1 The relevant employer payment would be $250
per month (or $3,000 per year), as indexed, only for
those full-time employees who receive a premium
tax credit in connection with coverage purchased
on an Exchange.
2 This estimate includes FEHB premium
payments but not administrative costs to employing
agencies.
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
estimate, if those currently without
FEHB eligibility become eligible and the
portion of newly eligible employees
who enroll is between 10 and 20
percent, this expansion would generate
costs to the Federal government of well
below the threshold for economic
significance, which is $100 million.
The premium payments newly made
by the Federal government are
appropriately categorized as costs to
society if rule-induced increases in
FEHB enrollment would be associated
with providing additional medical
services to newly-enrolled individuals.
To the extent that increases in
enrollment do not change how society
uses its resources, then premium
payments by the government would
instead be transfers between members of
society. Recipients of these transfers
could include newly-enrolled
individuals, if they would have paid (or
paid more) for medical services or for
health insurance premiums in the
absence of the rule, or providers and
charities, if the effect of the rule is a
decrease in uncompensated care.
We lack exact data to quantify ruleinduced public health benefits or to
refine our estimates of costs and
transfers. We therefore request
comments on any of this proposed rule’s
impacts.
Federalism
We have examined this rule in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, and have determined that
this rule will not have any negative
impact on the rights, roles and
responsibilities of State, local, or tribal
governments.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 890
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government employees,
Health facilities, Health insurance,
Health professions, Hostages, Iraq,
Kuwait, Lebanon, Military personnel,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Retirement.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Katherine Archuleta,
Director.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Accordingly, OPM proposes to amend
title 5, Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 890—FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 890
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8913; Sec. 890.301
also issued under sec. 311 of Pub. L. 111–03,
123 Stat. 64; Sec. 890.111 also issued under
section 1622(b) of Pub. L. 104–106, 110 Stat.
521; Sec. 890.112 also issued under section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
1 of Pub. L. 110–279, 122 Stat. 2604; 5 U.S.C.
8913; Sec. 890.803 also issued under 50
U.S.C. 403p, 22 U.S.C. 4069c and 4069c–1;
subpart L also issued under sec. 599C of Pub.
L. 101–513, 104 Stat. 2064, as amended; Sec.
890.102 also issued under sections 11202(f),
11232(e), 11246 (b) and (c) of Pub. L. 105–
33, 111 Stat. 251; and section 721 of Pub. L.
105–261, 112 Stat. 2061.
2. Section 890.102 is amended by
adding paragraphs (j) and (k) to read as
follows:
■
§ 890.102
Coverage.
*
*
*
*
*
(j)(1) Notwithstanding paragraphs
(c)(1), (2), and (3) of this section, an
employee working on a temporary
appointment, an employee working on a
seasonal schedule of less than six
months in a year, or an employee
working on an intermittent schedule, for
whom the employing office expects the
total hours in the regularly scheduled
administrative workweek plus hours of
irregular or occasional overtime work to
be at least 130 hours per calendar
month, is eligible to enroll in a health
benefits plan under this part as follows:
(i) If the employing office expects the
employee to work at least 90 days, the
employee is eligible to enroll upon
notification of the employee’s eligibility
by the employing office, and
(ii) If the employing office expects the
employee to work fewer than 90 days,
the employee will be eligible to enroll
after the completion of a 90 day waiting
period.
(2) An employee working on a
temporary appointment, an employee
working on a seasonal schedule of less
than six months in a year, or an
employee working on an intermittent
schedule for whom the employing office
expects the total hours in the regularly
scheduled administrative workweek
plus hours of irregular or occasional
overtime work to be less than 130 hours
per calendar month is generally
ineligible to enroll in a health benefits
plan under this part. If the expectation
of hours of employment changes to 130
hours or more per month, that employee
is eligible to enroll in a health benefits
plan under this part as described in
paragraph (j)(1) of this section.
(3) Once an employee is enrolled
under paragraph (j) of this section,
eligibility will not be revoked,
regardless of his or her actual work
schedule or employer expectations in
subsequent years, unless the employee
separates from Federal service or
receives a new appointment (in which
case eligibility will be determined by
the rules applicable to the new
appointment).
(4) For purposes of paragraph (j) of
this section, a regularly scheduled
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43971
administrative workweek includes
hours of paid leave and hours of leave
without pay for purposes of taking leave
under the Family Medical Leave Act
under 5 U.S.C. chapter 63, subchapter
V, for performance of duty in the
uniformed services under the
Uniformed Services Employment and
Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38
U.S.C. 4301 et seq., for receiving
medical treatment under Executive
Order 5396 (Jul. 17, 1930), and for
periods during which workers
compensation is received under the
Federal Employees Compensation Act, 5
U.S.C. chapter 81.
(5) Each temporary employee who is
initially eligible for FEHB coverage on
the basis of paragraph (j) of this section
is entitled to enroll in accordance with
§ 890.301(a). A temporary employee
who is currently eligible under 5 U.S.C.
8906a (with no Government
contribution) but who is not enrolled on
the effective date of paragraph (j), and
who would also meet eligibility
requirements on the basis of paragraph
(j), is entitled to enroll (with a
Government contribution) on the basis
of paragraph (j) in accordance with
§ 890.301(h)(4)(ii). A temporary
employee who is enrolled under 5
U.S.C. 8906a (with no Government
contribution) on the effective date of
paragraph (j), and who would also meet
eligibility requirements on the basis of
paragraph (j), is entitled to change
enrollment (with a Government
contribution) on the basis of paragraph
(j) in accordance with
§ 890.301(h)(4)(ii).
(k) The Director, upon written request
of an employer of employees other than
those covered by 5 U.S.C. 8901(1)(A),
may, in his or her sole discretion, waive
application of paragraph (j) of this
section to its employees when the
employer demonstrates to the Director
that the waiver is necessary to avoid an
adverse impact on the employer’s need
for self-governance.
■ 3. Amend § 890.301 by:
■ a. Revising the heading of paragraph
(h);
■ b. Redesignating paragraph (h)(4) as
paragraph (h)(4)(i); and
■ c. Adding paragraph (4)(ii) to read as
follows:
§ 890.301 Opportunities for employees
who are not participants in premium
conversion to enroll or change enrollment;
effective dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Change in employment status or
entitlement to Government contribution.
* * *
(ii) A change in entitlement to
Government contribution as a result of
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
43972
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
Room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Marc Phillips, Senior Regulatory
Coordination Specialist, Regulatory
Coordination and Compliance, PPQ,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 156,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 851–
2114.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
becoming eligible for coverage under
§ 890.102(j).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–17806 Filed 7–24–14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6325–63–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2013–0085]
RIN 0579–AD87
Importation of Two Hybrids of Unshu
Orange From the Republic of Korea
Into the Continental United States
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We are proposing to amend
the regulations concerning the
importation of citrus fruit to allow the
importation of commercial
consignments of two Unshu orange
hybrids from the Republic of Korea into
the continental United States. These
hybrids would be eligible for
importation into the continental United
States subject to the existing conditions
for the importation of Unshu oranges
from the Republic of Korea. We would
also make one minor change to the
existing regulations by adding an
explicit statement that only commercial
consignments of Unshu oranges would
be eligible for importation into the
continental United States. The proposed
changes would remove the prohibition
on the importation of Unshu orange
hybrids that can safely enter the United
States, provided that certain conditions
are met, and would codify an existing
requirement.
SUMMARY:
We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before September
29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0085.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2013–0085, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0085 or
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Jul 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR 319.28
govern the importation of citrus fruit
into the United States. These regulations
are intended to prevent the introduction
of citrus canker, among other citrus
diseases and pests, into the United
States via the importation of citrus from
affected foreign regions. Citrus canker is
a disease that affects citrus and is
caused by the infectious bacterium
Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri.
On October 12, 2010, we published in
the Federal Register (75 FR 62455–
62457, Docket No. APHIS–2010–0022) a
final rule 1 amending the regulations
concerning the importation of citrus
fruit in § 319.28 to remove certain
restrictions on the importation of Unshu
oranges from the Republic of Korea
(South Korea) that were no longer
necessary. Specifically, we removed
requirements for the fruit to be grown in
specified canker-free export areas and
for joint inspection in the groves and
packinghouses by the Government of
the Republic of Korea and the Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS). We also clarified that surface
sterilization of the fruit must be
conducted in accordance with 7 CFR
part 305 and expanded the area in the
continental United States where Unshu
oranges from the Republic of Korea
could be distributed. Finally, we
required that each shipment be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate containing an additional
declaration stating that the fruit was
given the required surface sterilization
and inspected and found free of Elsinoe
australis, the fungus that is the causal
agent of sweet orange scab.
Under the existing regulations, only
one species of Unshu orange, Citrus
reticulata Blanco var. unshu, Swingle
[Citrus unshiu Marcovitch, Tanaka], is
1 To view the rule, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS2010-0022-0007.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
eligible for importation into the
continental United States from the
Republic of Korea. The 2010 rulemaking
did not address that restriction.
In 2011, however, the national plant
protection organization (NPPO) of the
Republic of Korea submitted to APHIS
a request to allow exports to the
continental United States of two Unshu,
sweet, and mandarin orange hybrids:
Shiranuhi [(C. reticulata ssp. unshiu x
(C. x sinensis)) x C. reticulata] and
Setoka [(C. reticulata ssp. unshiu x (C.
x sinensis)) x C. reticulata] x C.
reticulata]. In response to that request,
we developed a pest risk analysis (PRA).
Copies of the PRA may be obtained from
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).2 The PRA,
titled ‘‘Importation of Two Fresh Fruit
Hybrids of Unshu, Sweet, and Mandarin
Oranges, Citrus spp., from Korea into
the Continental United States’’ (May
2013), identified two pests,
Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and
Elsinoe australis (the causal agents of
citrus canker and sweet orange scab,
respectively), as quarantine pests
associated with the two Unshu orange
hybrids. Those are the same quarantine
pests that an earlier PRA that supported
the 2010 rulemaking identified as being
associated with Unshu oranges
imported from the Republic of Korea.
The May 2013 PRA and the earlier
one each included a risk management
document (RMD) outlining the
conditions under which the
commodities under consideration could
safely be imported into the continental
United States. The 2013 RMD
determined the two Unshu orange
hybrids, being subject to infestation by
the same quarantine pests as Unshu
oranges imported from the Republic of
Korea, could safely be allowed entry to
the United States under the same
conditions. Those conditions include
surface treatment of the fruit in
accordance with 7 CFR part 305 prior to
packing, registration of the
packinghouse in which the treatment is
applied and the fruit is packed with the
NPPO of South Korea, and certification
that the fruit has been treated in
accordance with the regulations and has
been inspected and found to be free of
sweet orange scab (Elsinoe australis).
2 Instructions on accessing Regulations.gov and
information on the location and hours of the
reading room may be found at the beginning of this
document under ADDRESSES. You may also request
paper copies of the risk analysis by calling or
writing the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43969-43972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17806]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 29, 2014 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 43969]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 890
RIN 3206-AM86
Federal Employees Health Benefits Program Expansion of
Eligibility to Certain Employees on Temporary Appointments and Certain
Employees on Seasonal and Intermittent Schedules
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is
issuing a proposed rule that would expand eligibility for enrollment
under the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program to certain
temporary, seasonal, and intermittent employees who are identified as
full-time employees. This regulation would make FEHB coverage available
to these newly eligible employees no later than January 2015.
DATES: OPM must receive comments on or before August 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Louise Yinug, Senior Policy
Analyst, Planning and Policy Analysis, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management, Room 3415, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC; or FAX to
(202) 606-0036 Attn: Louise Yinug. You may also submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louise Yinug, Senior Policy Analyst at
(202) 606-0004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is proposing to expand eligibility for
coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program to
certain temporary, seasonal, and intermittent Federal employees who are
expected to work full-time schedules within the meaning of section
4980H of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) for at least 90 days.
This proposed rule would expand eligibility by authorizing
enrollment in a FEHB health plan for certain Federal employees on
temporary appointments and certain employees working on seasonal and
intermittent schedules. Currently, most employees on temporary
appointments become eligible for FEHB coverage after completing one
year of current continuous employment and, once eligible for coverage,
do not receive an employer contribution to premium. Employees working
on seasonal schedules for less than six months in a year and those
working intermittent schedules are excluded from eligibility regardless
of the work hours for which they are expected to be scheduled. Some
limited exceptions were made to these exclusions for temporary
firefighters and emergency response workers in 5 CFR 890.102(h) and
(i).
Under this proposed regulation, employees on temporary
appointments, employees on seasonal schedules who will be working less
than six months per year, and employees working intermittent schedules
would be eligible to enroll in a FEHB health plan if the employee is
expected to work a full-time schedule of 130 or more hours in a
calendar month. If the employing office expects the employee to work at
least 90 days, the employee is eligible to enroll upon notification of
the employee's eligibility by the employing office. If the employing
office expects the employee to work fewer than 90 days, the employee
will be eligible to enroll after the completion of a 90 day waiting
period. Temporary, seasonal, and intermittent employees who are
expected to work a schedule of less than 130 hours in a calendar month
would not be eligible to enroll in a FEHB health plan. Temporary,
seasonal, and intermittent employees for whom the expectation of hours
of employment changes from less than 130 hours per calendar month to
130 hours or more per calendar month would become eligible to enroll in
an FEHB health plan as described above.
The change in eligibility for coverage set forth in this proposed
regulation is intended to ensure, to the greatest extent practicable,
that full-time employees, within the meaning of section 4980H of the
IRC and Treasury regulations thereunder (79 FR 8544, February 12, 2014)
are eligible to enroll in FEHB. IRC section 4980H, enacted as part of
the Affordable Care Act, defines a full-time employee as, with respect
to any month, an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours
of service per week (IRC section 4980H(c)(4)). Under the IRC section
4980H regulations a full-time employee means, with respect to any
calendar month, an employee who is employed at least 130 hours of
service in that month.
This proposed rule would allow newly eligible employees (employees
on an appointment limited to one year and employees working on a
seasonal or intermittent schedule) to initially enroll under the FEHB
program with a Government contribution to premium if they are expected
to be employed on a full-time schedule and are expected to work for at
least 90 days.
Some temporary employees who have completed one year of continuous
employment are already eligible for FEHB coverage but without a
Government contribution to premium. This proposed rule would allow
these employees to enroll in a FEHB plan under 5 CFR 890.102(j) (with a
Government contribution to premium) if the employee is determined by
his or her employing office to be newly eligible for FEHB coverage
under this regulation.
Enrollments for employees newly eligible pursuant to this rule
would be accepted during a 60-day period after the employing office
notifies employees of their eligibility to enroll in a FEHB health
plan. Coverage will become effective as provided for by 5 CFR 890.301.
Employing offices must promptly determine eligibility of new and
current employees and upon determining eligibility, promptly offer
employees an opportunity to enroll in the FEHB Program so that coverage
becomes effective no later than January 2015.
While this proposed regulation would expand FEHB coverage to new
categories of Federal employees, there are other employers who are
entitled to purchase FEHB coverage for their own employees or whose
employees are otherwise entitled to enroll in FEHB coverage. These
other employers may have made or are planning to make other
arrangements to provide health insurance for their temporary, seasonal,
[[Page 43970]]
and intermittent employees. Accordingly, the OPM Director may waive
application of this proposed rule when the employer of an individual
not covered by 5 U.S.C. 8901(1)(A) demonstrates to OPM that these
expansion requirements would have an adverse impact on the employer's
need for self-governance. We expect such instances to be rare.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities because the regulation
only adds to the list of groups eligible to enroll under the FEHB
Program.
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866, Regulatory Review
OPM has examined the impact of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review (September 30, 1993) and
Executive Order 13563 on Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
(January 18, 2011). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A
regulatory impact analysis must be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100 million or more in at least one
year). Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a ``significant
regulatory action'' as an action that is likely to result in a rule
that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more in
at least one year or adversely affect in a material way a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal government or communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866.
As shown in the analysis that follows, the economic impact of this
rule is projected to fall below the $100 million threshold. Although
not economically significant, this rule has been determined to be a
``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f)(4) and thus has
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866.
Baseline FEHB Eligibility and Federal Government Employer
Responsibility
If finalized, this proposed rule would expand eligibility to enroll
in a FEHB plan to certain temporary, seasonal, and/or intermittent
employees who are identified as working full-time. In order to estimate
rule-induced impacts, it is necessary to assess the number of full-time
Federal employees who are not currently eligible to participate in the
FEHB program or are not currently eligible to have the government pay a
portion of their premium, and thus may be affected by the proposed
rule.
The following categories of Federal employees are either excluded
by regulation from participating in the FEHB Program or are not
currently eligible to have the government pay a portion of their
premium:
Temporary employees with less than a year of service. Per
OPM regulations, most of these individuals are not eligible to enroll
in FEHB. In 2012 OPM published a regulation extending FEHB eligibility
to certain temporary firefighters and some personnel performing
emergency response functions.
Seasonal employees. Seasonal employees working six months
or fewer are generally prohibited by regulation from enrolling in FEHB.
Intermittent employees. Intermittent employees are
generally prohibited by regulation from enrolling in FEHB. In 2012,
however, OPM published a regulation extending FEHB eligibility to
certain intermittent employees engaged in emergency response and
recovery work.
Temporary employees with more than a year of service. Per
statute, these employees can enroll in an FEHB plan if they pay the
entire premium with no Government contribution.
OPM has worked with Federal payroll providers to assess how many
full-time Federal employees are without access to FEHB. The data show
that all responding executive agencies have a small number of full-time
employees (as defined in Section 4980H of the IRC) without access to
FEHB. The number without access varies from agency to agency. Within
agencies, the number varies from month to month. Some large departments
hire full-time temporary or seasonal employees only for a few months of
the year.
The agencies included in our data, in aggregate, offer FEHB to at
least 95 percent of full-time employees (and their dependents) for all
months. Across civilian, non-Postal, executive agencies and all months
of the year, our data indicate that there are 300,000 full-time
employee-months currently ineligible for FEHB (0.9 to 2 percent of the
Federal workforce).
The Federal government and its agencies are subject to employer
shared responsibility like other applicable large employers. The
employer shared responsibility payments only apply if a full-time
employee (defined as an employee with 130 hours of service in a month)
receives a premium tax credit in connection with the purchase of health
insurance through an Exchange. We do not know whether the full-time
Federal employees not yet eligible for FEHB would, in the absence of
this rule, be eligible for premium tax credits in connection with
coverage purchased on an Exchange because we lack information on other
available sources of health coverage or household income. Even in the
extremely unlikely case that all 300,000 employee-months without FEHB
are eligible to receive a premium tax credit in connection with
coverage purchased on an Exchange, the total assessable payment
incurred by the Federal agencies would be well below the threshold for
economic significance, which is $100 million.\1\ While we expect that
agencies will be in compliance with the employer shared responsibility
provision without this proposed rule, we are undertaking the FEHB
expansion regardless to even out rules across different types of
workers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The relevant employer payment would be $250 per month (or
$3,000 per year), as indexed, only for those full-time employees who
receive a premium tax credit in connection with coverage purchased
on an Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impacts of the Proposed Rule
Agencies may incur FEHB expansion costs; a rough quantification of
these potential costs appears below.
We do not know how many individuals without an offer of FEHB, which
varies widely from month to month, would enroll in FEHB if it were
available. Our similar recent regulations expanding FEHB coverage to
certain temporary firefighters and disaster recovery workers resulted
in very limited take-up, ranging from approximately 10 to 20 percent.
We estimate, using enrollment-weighted averages, that FEHB coverage
currently costs the government about $700 per full-time worker per
month for affected agencies.\2\ Given this average cost
[[Page 43971]]
estimate, if those currently without FEHB eligibility become eligible
and the portion of newly eligible employees who enroll is between 10
and 20 percent, this expansion would generate costs to the Federal
government of well below the threshold for economic significance, which
is $100 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This estimate includes FEHB premium payments but not
administrative costs to employing agencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The premium payments newly made by the Federal government are
appropriately categorized as costs to society if rule-induced increases
in FEHB enrollment would be associated with providing additional
medical services to newly-enrolled individuals. To the extent that
increases in enrollment do not change how society uses its resources,
then premium payments by the government would instead be transfers
between members of society. Recipients of these transfers could include
newly-enrolled individuals, if they would have paid (or paid more) for
medical services or for health insurance premiums in the absence of the
rule, or providers and charities, if the effect of the rule is a
decrease in uncompensated care.
We lack exact data to quantify rule-induced public health benefits
or to refine our estimates of costs and transfers. We therefore request
comments on any of this proposed rule's impacts.
Federalism
We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order
13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any
negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State,
local, or tribal governments.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 890
Administrative practice and procedure, Government employees, Health
facilities, Health insurance, Health professions, Hostages, Iraq,
Kuwait, Lebanon, Military personnel, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Retirement.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Katherine Archuleta,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM proposes to amend title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 890--FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 890 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8913; Sec. 890.301 also issued under sec.
311 of Pub. L. 111-03, 123 Stat. 64; Sec. 890.111 also issued under
section 1622(b) of Pub. L. 104-106, 110 Stat. 521; Sec. 890.112 also
issued under section 1 of Pub. L. 110-279, 122 Stat. 2604; 5 U.S.C.
8913; Sec. 890.803 also issued under 50 U.S.C. 403p, 22 U.S.C. 4069c
and 4069c-1; subpart L also issued under sec. 599C of Pub. L. 101-
513, 104 Stat. 2064, as amended; Sec. 890.102 also issued under
sections 11202(f), 11232(e), 11246 (b) and (c) of Pub. L. 105-33,
111 Stat. 251; and section 721 of Pub. L. 105-261, 112 Stat. 2061.
0
2. Section 890.102 is amended by adding paragraphs (j) and (k) to read
as follows:
Sec. 890.102 Coverage.
* * * * *
(j)(1) Notwithstanding paragraphs (c)(1), (2), and (3) of this
section, an employee working on a temporary appointment, an employee
working on a seasonal schedule of less than six months in a year, or an
employee working on an intermittent schedule, for whom the employing
office expects the total hours in the regularly scheduled
administrative workweek plus hours of irregular or occasional overtime
work to be at least 130 hours per calendar month, is eligible to enroll
in a health benefits plan under this part as follows:
(i) If the employing office expects the employee to work at least
90 days, the employee is eligible to enroll upon notification of the
employee's eligibility by the employing office, and
(ii) If the employing office expects the employee to work fewer
than 90 days, the employee will be eligible to enroll after the
completion of a 90 day waiting period.
(2) An employee working on a temporary appointment, an employee
working on a seasonal schedule of less than six months in a year, or an
employee working on an intermittent schedule for whom the employing
office expects the total hours in the regularly scheduled
administrative workweek plus hours of irregular or occasional overtime
work to be less than 130 hours per calendar month is generally
ineligible to enroll in a health benefits plan under this part. If the
expectation of hours of employment changes to 130 hours or more per
month, that employee is eligible to enroll in a health benefits plan
under this part as described in paragraph (j)(1) of this section.
(3) Once an employee is enrolled under paragraph (j) of this
section, eligibility will not be revoked, regardless of his or her
actual work schedule or employer expectations in subsequent years,
unless the employee separates from Federal service or receives a new
appointment (in which case eligibility will be determined by the rules
applicable to the new appointment).
(4) For purposes of paragraph (j) of this section, a regularly
scheduled administrative workweek includes hours of paid leave and
hours of leave without pay for purposes of taking leave under the
Family Medical Leave Act under 5 U.S.C. chapter 63, subchapter V, for
performance of duty in the uniformed services under the Uniformed
Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C. 4301
et seq., for receiving medical treatment under Executive Order 5396
(Jul. 17, 1930), and for periods during which workers compensation is
received under the Federal Employees Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. chapter
81.
(5) Each temporary employee who is initially eligible for FEHB
coverage on the basis of paragraph (j) of this section is entitled to
enroll in accordance with Sec. 890.301(a). A temporary employee who is
currently eligible under 5 U.S.C. 8906a (with no Government
contribution) but who is not enrolled on the effective date of
paragraph (j), and who would also meet eligibility requirements on the
basis of paragraph (j), is entitled to enroll (with a Government
contribution) on the basis of paragraph (j) in accordance with Sec.
890.301(h)(4)(ii). A temporary employee who is enrolled under 5 U.S.C.
8906a (with no Government contribution) on the effective date of
paragraph (j), and who would also meet eligibility requirements on the
basis of paragraph (j), is entitled to change enrollment (with a
Government contribution) on the basis of paragraph (j) in accordance
with Sec. 890.301(h)(4)(ii).
(k) The Director, upon written request of an employer of employees
other than those covered by 5 U.S.C. 8901(1)(A), may, in his or her
sole discretion, waive application of paragraph (j) of this section to
its employees when the employer demonstrates to the Director that the
waiver is necessary to avoid an adverse impact on the employer's need
for self-governance.
0
3. Amend Sec. 890.301 by:
0
a. Revising the heading of paragraph (h);
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (h)(4) as paragraph (h)(4)(i); and
0
c. Adding paragraph (4)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 890.301 Opportunities for employees who are not participants in
premium conversion to enroll or change enrollment; effective dates.
* * * * *
(h) Change in employment status or entitlement to Government
contribution. * * *
(ii) A change in entitlement to Government contribution as a result
of
[[Page 43972]]
becoming eligible for coverage under Sec. 890.102(j).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-17806 Filed 7-24-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6325-63-P