Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 44010-44011 [2014-17790]
Download as PDF
44010
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 29, 2014 / Notices
the final results of this review the
Department will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales to the total entered value of those
sales, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).7 Where an importer-(or
customer-specific per-unit rate is greater
than de minimis, the Department will
instruct CBP to collect the appropriate
duties at the time of liquidation. Where
either a respondent’s weighted average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis,
the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.8
In 2011, the Department announced a
refinement to its assessment practice in
NME cases.9 Pursuant to this refinement
in practice, for entries that were not
reported in the U.S. sales databases
submitted by companies individually
examined during this review, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the NME-wide
rate. In addition, if the Department
determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under that exporter’s case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the NME-wide rate.10
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for subject
merchandise exported by New-Tec,
which has a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be that established in
the final results of this review, except,
if the rate is zero or de minimis, then
zero cash deposit will be required; (2)
for any previously reviewed or
investigated PRC and non-PRC exporter
not listed above that received a separate
rate in a previous segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters
that have not been found to be entitled
to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7 See
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
8 See id.
9 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
10 See id.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:02 Jul 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
will be that for the PRC-wide entity (i.e.,
383.60 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied the non-PRC exporter. These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
Disclosure
The Department will disclose the
calculations performed within five days
of the date of publication of this notice
to parties in this proceeding in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). We
are issuing and publishing this
administrative review and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 22, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Comments Discussed in the
Accompanying Final Issues and Decision
Memorandum:
Summary
Scope of the Order
List of Comments
Discussion of Issues
Comment 1: Whether To Value Certain
Inputs Using Purchases from MarketEconomy Suppliers
Comment 2: Surrogate Country
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comment 3: Whether To Use Thai Trolley’s
Financial Statement
Comment 4: Whether To Use 2012 Thai
Financial Statements
Comment 5: Use of Jenbunjerd’s Financial
Statement
Comment 6: Omitted Factor of Production
value
Comment 7: Alternative Surrogate Values
for Factors of Production
Comment 8: Alternative Surrogate Freight
and Brokerage Methodologies
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–17872 Filed 7–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance the following
proposal for collection of information
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Title: Patent Petitions Related to
Application and Reexamination
Processing Fees.
Form Number(s): PTO/SB/17P, PTO/
SB/23, PTO/SB/24a, PTO/SB/28 (EFSWeb only), and PTO/SB/140 (EFS-Web
only).
Agency Approval Number: 0651–
0059.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Burden: 35,596 hours annually.
Number of Respondents: 33,119
responses per year.
Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO
estimates that it takes the public
approximately 5 minutes (0.08 hours) to
12 hours to complete items in this
collection, depending on the petition.
This includes the time to gather the
necessary information, prepare the
petitions and petition fee transmittals,
and submit them to the USPTO. The
USPTO estimates that it takes the same
amount of time (and possibly less time)
to gather the necessary information,
prepare the submission, and submit it
electronically as it does to submit the
information in paper form.
Needs and Uses: The public uses the
information in this collection to petition
for various actions under 37 CFR 1.17(f),
(g), and (h), such as petitioning for a
suspension of the rules, requesting
access to an assignment record, or
requesting the withdrawal of an
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 29, 2014 / Notices
application from issue either before or
after paying the issue fee. In addition,
the public uses these petitions to obtain
copies of documents that have been
submitted in a form other than that
provided by the rules of practice, to
request accelerated examination, to
request abandonment of an application
to avoid publication of said application,
and to request an extension of time. The
public uses the transmittal form to remit
the required fees for the various
petitions. The USPTO uses the
information collected from the petitions
and transmittal form to determine
whether to grant the various requests
and to ensure that the proper fees have
been remitted and are processed
accordingly.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser,
email: Nicholas_A._Fraser@
omb.eop.gov.
Once submitted, the request will be
publicly available in electronic format
through the Information Collection
Review page at www.reginfo.gov.
Paper copies can be obtained by:
• Email:InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0059 copy
request’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Margaret McElrath, Deputy
Director, Office of Information
Management Services, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent on
or before August 28, 2014 to Nicholas A.
Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via email to
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov, or by
fax to 202–395–5167, marked to the
attention of Nicholas A. Fraser.
Dated: July 22, 2014.
Margaret McElrath,
Deputy Director, Office of Information
Management Services, United States Patent
and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2014–17790 Filed 7–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Patent and Trademark Office
Submission for OMB Review
United States Patent and
Trademark Office.
ACTION: Notice and comment request.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:02 Jul 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance the following
proposal for collection of information
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Agency: United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO).
Title: Submissions Regarding
Correspondence and Regarding Attorney
Representation (Trademarks).
Form Number(s): PTO Forms 2196
and 2201.
Agency Approval Number: 0651–
0056.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Burden: 10,540 hours annually.
Number of Respondents: 108,940
responses per year. Of this total, the
USPTO estimates that 103,751
responses will be submitted through
TEAS.
Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO
estimates that it takes the public
approximately 5 to 30 minutes (0.084 to
0.50 hours) to complete this
information, depending on the
document being submitted. This
includes the time to gather the
necessary information, prepare the
requests, and submit them to the
USPTO. The time estimates shown for
the electronic forms in this collection
are based on the average amount of time
needed to complete and electronically
file the associated form.
Needs and Uses: The public uses the
information in this collection to appoint
attorneys and domestic representatives
to act on their behalf in the prosecution
of their applications, to revoke those
same appointments, to request
permission to withdraw as the attorney
of record or domestic representative,
and to request replacement of the
attorney of record with another alreadyappointed attorney. The USPTO uses
the collected information to process the
requests.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit organizations.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser,
email: Nicholas_A._Fraser@
omb.eop.gov.
Once submitted, the request will be
publicly available in electronic format
through the Information Collection
Review page at www.reginfo.gov.
Paper copies can be obtained by:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0056 copy
request’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Margaret McElrath, Deputy
Director, Office of Information
Management Services, United States
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44011
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent on
or before August 28, 2014 to Nicholas A.
Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via email to
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov, or by
fax to 202–395–5167, marked to the
attention of Nicholas A. Fraser.
Dated: July 23, 2014.
Margaret McElrath,
Deputy Director, Office of Information
Management Services, United States Patent
and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2014–17870 Filed 7–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2010–0056]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request—Safety
Standard for Bicycle Helmets
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (Commission or
CPSC) announces that the Commission
has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), a
request for extension of approval of a
collection of information associated
with the CPSC’s Safety Standard for
Bicycle Helmets (OMB No. 3041–0127).
In the Federal Register of May 8, 2014
(78 FR 26416), the CPSC published a
notice to announce the agency’s
intention to seek extension of approval
of the collection of information. The
Commission received one comment.
The commenter supported the record
keeping requirements for ensuring the
safety of bicycle helmets. The
commenter also stated that two
revisions to the test method (impact
ceiling and positional stability) should
be made to the standard. The request to
revise the test method of the standard is
outside the scope of the proposed
renewal request. The renewal request
sought comments on the burden hours
associated with recordkeeping
requirements in the safety standard.
However, the comment has been
forwarded to the CPSC’s Office of
Hazard Identification and Reduction.
Therefore, by publication of this notice,
the Commission announces that CPSC
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44010-44011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17790]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will
submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Title: Patent Petitions Related to Application and Reexamination
Processing Fees.
Form Number(s): PTO/SB/17P, PTO/SB/23, PTO/SB/24a, PTO/SB/28 (EFS-
Web only), and PTO/SB/140 (EFS-Web only).
Agency Approval Number: 0651-0059.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Burden: 35,596 hours annually.
Number of Respondents: 33,119 responses per year.
Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO estimates that it takes the
public approximately 5 minutes (0.08 hours) to 12 hours to complete
items in this collection, depending on the petition. This includes the
time to gather the necessary information, prepare the petitions and
petition fee transmittals, and submit them to the USPTO. The USPTO
estimates that it takes the same amount of time (and possibly less
time) to gather the necessary information, prepare the submission, and
submit it electronically as it does to submit the information in paper
form.
Needs and Uses: The public uses the information in this collection
to petition for various actions under 37 CFR 1.17(f), (g), and (h),
such as petitioning for a suspension of the rules, requesting access to
an assignment record, or requesting the withdrawal of an
[[Page 44011]]
application from issue either before or after paying the issue fee. In
addition, the public uses these petitions to obtain copies of documents
that have been submitted in a form other than that provided by the
rules of practice, to request accelerated examination, to request
abandonment of an application to avoid publication of said application,
and to request an extension of time. The public uses the transmittal
form to remit the required fees for the various petitions. The USPTO
uses the information collected from the petitions and transmittal form
to determine whether to grant the various requests and to ensure that
the proper fees have been remitted and are processed accordingly.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser, email: Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov.
Once submitted, the request will be publicly available in
electronic format through the Information Collection Review page at
www.reginfo.gov.
Paper copies can be obtained by:
Email:InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-0059
copy request'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Margaret McElrath, Deputy Director, Office of
Information Management Services, United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent on or before August 28, 2014 to Nicholas A.
Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via email to Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to 202-395-5167, marked to the attention
of Nicholas A. Fraser.
Dated: July 22, 2014.
Margaret McElrath,
Deputy Director, Office of Information Management Services, United
States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-17790 Filed 7-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P