Tongass National Forest: Alaska, Kake to Petersburg Transmission Line Intertie, 43707-43709 [2014-17669]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Notices
during disaster situations, ensure
integrity and reimburse States
appropriately for their disaster relief
efforts.
Description of Respondents: State,
Local, or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 55.
Frequency of Responses:
Recordkeeping; On occasion.
Total Burden Hours: 9.
Dated: July 18, 2014.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
Tongass National Forest: Alaska, Kake
to Petersburg Transmission Line
Intertie
[FR Doc. 2014–17623 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2014–17683 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Forest Service, USDA.
Corrected Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement; Correction
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National School Lunch, Special Milk,
and School Breakfast Programs:
National Average Payments/Maximum
Reimbursement Rates
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
This document contains a
correction to the notice published in the
Federal Register on July 16, 2014
entitled, ‘‘National School Lunch,
Special Milk, and School Breakfast
Programs: National Average Payments/
Maximum Reimbursement Rates.’’
DATES: Effective Date: These rates are
effective from July 1, 2014 through June
30, 2015.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Food
and Nutrition Service published a
document in the Federal Register (79
FR 41532) on July 16, 2014. The third
sentence in the Background section
regarding the Special Milk Program for
Children states that for the period July
1, 2014 through June 30, 2015, the rate
of reimbursement for a half-pint of milk
served to a non-needy child in a school
or institution which participates in the
Special Milk Program is 20.30 cents.
This number is a typographical error
and should state the Special Milk
Program reimbursement rate is 23.00
cents. It should be noted that this
number is correct in the table on page
41535. This document corrects the error.
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Correction
In notice document 2014–16719,
published on July 16, 2014 at 79 FR
41532, make the following correction:
On page 41533, in the first column, in
the third sentence under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION,
Background, Special Milk Program for
Children, change ‘‘20.30’’ to ‘‘23.00’’.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:53 Jul 25, 2014
The Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare
an environmental impact statement
(EIS) on a proposal to construct, operate
and maintain a new electrical
transmission line intertie that would
extend west across the Tongass National
Forest from the Petersburg area to the
community of Kake. The proposed
action is to construct a new
transmission line, and associated
features, that would transmit power at
either 69 or 138 kilovolt (kV) and
consist of single wood-pole structures
with horizontal post insulators, with
average span of lengths between poles of
350 to 400 feet. The proposed project
would also include a 24-strand fiber
optic communication cable.
Construction access would be via
existing roads, temporary shovel trails
and matting panels, and temporary
access spurs, with helicopter support as
needed. The proposed project would
cross National Forest System (NFS)
lands in the Petersburg Ranger District
of the Tongass National Forest. The
length of the proposed electrical
transmission line is approximately 60
miles and would follow a route
identified as a Transportation and
Utility Systems (TUS) land use
designation (LUD) corridor; labeled
‘‘Potential Power Transmission
Corridor’’ on the 2008 Tongass National
Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan (Forest Plan) LUD map. An
estimated 59 percent, or 35.2 miles, of
the overhead portion of the proposed
transmission line would follow existing
roads. No new road segments would be
built; existing roads would be used for
long-term maintenance access where
possible.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
August 27, 2014. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected September 2014 and the final
SUMMARY:
Food and Nutrition Service
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43707
environmental impact statement is
expected May 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may comment on the
project in the following ways: Send
written comments to Petersburg Ranger
District, Tongass National Forest, P.O.
Box 1328, Petersburg, AK. 99833 ATTN:
Kake-Petersburg Intertie Project or handdelivered to 12 N. Nordic Drive,
Petersburg, AK. Comments may also be
sent via email to comments-alaskatongass-petersburg@fs.fed.us, with
‘‘Kake-Petersburg Intertie Project’’ in the
subject line. Comments can be sent via
facsimile to 907–772–5995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposal and EIS
should be directed to Tom Parker,
Petersburg Ranger District, Tongass
National Forest, P.O. Box 1328,
Petersburg, AK 99833 or (907) 772–
5974. Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Southeast Alaska
Power Agency (SEAPA), the project
proponent, is a joint action agency
organized and existing pursuant to the
laws of the State of Alaska. SEAPA’s
member utilities (Ketchikan, Wrangell
and Petersburg) provide electric utility
services to their respective service areas
utilizing power generated by SEAPA’s
facilities. These three communities are
part of SEAPA’s interconnected
network, which include the Swan Lake
and Lake Tyee hydroelectric projects
and approximately 175 miles of
transmission line that span from
Ketchikan to Petersburg. The proposed
Kake to Petersburg Intertie (KPI) project
would connect Kake to SEAPA’s
interconnected network and provide
relatively low cost electricity to the
community of Kake.
Purpose and Need for Action
The community of Kake is presently
served by an isolated electric system
that depends upon high-cost, diesel
generation. This isolated system is
served by a diesel plant that consists of
three diesel generators. High operation
and maintenance expenses and high
fuel costs make diesel generators costly
to operate. In 2011, the full retail cost
of power in Kake was more than five
times the rate in the larger communities
of Petersburg, Ketchikan, and Wrangell,
and is currently subsidized for
residential customers and public
facilities through the State of Alaska’s
Power Cost Equalization (PCE) program,
which is funded on an annual basis by
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
43708
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the State legislature. Commercial
customers are not eligible to participate
in the PCE program, who pay the full
retail cost for power in Kake. The cost
of electricity in Kake negatively affects
the economic well-being of the
community and is a disincentive to
economic development.
The need for this action is established
by the Forest Service’s responsibility
under the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA) to respond to
an application for a right-of-way (43
U.S.C. 1701).
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to issue
a special use permit to authorize SEAPA
to construct, operate, and maintain the
proposed KPI Project across NFS lands.
The Proposed Action would construct,
operate and maintain a new electric
transmission line and associated
facilities to connect the community of
Kake with the existing SEAPA
interconnected network in Petersburg,
AK. The transmission line would extend
north and then west for approximately
60 miles. The line would be built to
transmit either 69 or 138 kV and consist
of single wood-pole structures with
horizontal post insulators, with an
average span length of 350 to 400 feet
between poles. The proposed
transmission line would originate at the
existing SEAPA substation south of
Petersburg, and extend north and
northeast toward Frederick Sound. The
transmission line would cross Frederick
Sound and the mouth of the Wrangell
Narrows via a 1.2 mile horizontal
directional bore that would place the
cable below the seafloor. Once on
Kupreanof Island, the transmission line
would follow the TUS LUD Potential
Power Transmission Corridor north
through Inventoried Roadless Area 213
(Five Mile) and then west through
Inventoried Roadless Areas 212
(Missionary) and 211 (North
Kupreanof). From Inventoried Roadless
Area 211, the transmission line would
continue west and northwest to Kake
where it would terminate at a new
substation located near the existing
powerhouse. The majority of the route
is on NFS lands, the route also crosses
lands owned by the Alaska Department
of Natural Resources, the Sealaska
Corporation, Kake Tribal Corporation,
the City of Kake, and Petersburg
Borough.
Possible Alternatives
The previous Notice of Intent (NOI)
for the Kake-Petersburg Intertie
Transmission Line (May 7, 2010;
Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 88, pg.
25195–25197) identified a Center-South
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:53 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
route as one of two alternatives to the
Proposed Action. This route would
connect to the existing Tyee
transmission line, approximately 8
miles south of Petersburg, and requires
a tap or switch yard. This route crosses
Wrangell Narrows, proceeds west across
the Lindenberg Peninsula, crosses
Duncan Canal and continues northwest
to terminate in Kake at a new substation
located near the existing powerhouse.
As with the Proposed Action, the
majority of the project would fall on
National Forest System lands but would
also cross over lands owned and
managed by the Borough of Petersburg,
Sealaska Corporation, Kake Tribal
Corporation, and the city of Kake.
In addition to the Center-South route,
the previous NOI identified two
Northern Route options: Options 1 and
2. The Northern Route, Option 1 started
at the existing SEAPA substation south
of Petersburg and followed an existing
gravel road 3.5 miles east-northeast to
Frederick Sound, near Sandy Beach
Park. From there, Option 1 crossed
Frederick Sound via a 3.1-mile-long
submarine cable that would come
ashore near Prolewy Point on the east
shore of Kupreanof Island. This
proposed crossing is the only difference
between this option and the Proposed
Action. Like the Center-South route, this
option is being considered as an
alternative to the Proposed Action.
The Northern Route, Option 2
originated at the same existing SEAPA
substation, but proceeded north along
Mitkof Highway to near the narrowest
point of the Wrangell Narrows. Crossing
the Wrangell Narrows, via a horizontal
directional bore or buried cable that
would extend approximately 1,400 feet,
this option then continued north
overhead, past the city of Petersburg and
across Petersburg Creek. This route has
been eliminated from further
consideration due to the potential
impacts on the unroaded character of
the city of Kupreanof, and potential
impacts to Petersburg Creek, an
important area for fish and wildlife,
recreation and tourism and subsistence.
Responsible Official
Forrest Cole, Forest Supervisor,
Tongass National Forest, Federal
Building, Ketchikan, AK 99901.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor is the
responsible official for this action and
will decide whether or not to permit the
construction of the proposed electric
transmission line across NFS lands, as
well as the route that will be followed,
and any mitigation measures and/or
monitoring, as appropriate. The
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
decision will be based on the
information disclosed in the EIS. The
responsible official will consider
comments, responses, the disclosure of
environmental consequences, and
applicable laws, regulations and
policies in making the decision and will
state the rationale in the Record of
Decision.
Preliminary Issues
The Proposed Action and the CenterSouth route both cross through
inventoried roadless areas. Road
building is not anticipated. However, if
the construction of the transmission line
is allowed, it will reduce the
inventoried acres and could affect
roadless values. Preliminary issues
identified through scoping for this
project included concerns that the
unroaded character of the city of
Kupreanof would be affected by the
presence of a nearby electric
transmission line which could have
impacts on the quality of life for the
residents. Concerns were also expressed
about potential impacts to Petersburg
Creek, an important area for fish and
wildlife, recreation and tourism, and
subsistence activities. These two issues
have been mitigated by dropping the
Northern Route, Option 2 as an
alternative.
Permits or Licenses Required
Forest Service: Special use permit to
construct, operate and maintain the
proposed transmission line across NFS
lands. Permits to survey the authorized
right-of-way.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:
Approval of discharge of dredged or fill
material into the waters of the United
States (404 of the Clean Water Act).
Approval of construction or work in
navigable of the United States which
includes Wrangell Narrows and Duncan
Canal, depending on the alternative
selected.
EPA: Stormwater discharge permits.
U.S. Coast Guard: Coordination to
ensure appropriate clearance for lines
over water; generally handled through
the Corps’ permitting authority.
Federal Aviation Administration:
Notice of proposed construction.
Alaska DNR: Authorization for
occupancy and use of tidelands and
submerged lands. Right-of-way to
construct the proposed transmission
line. ANILCA 906(k) compliance.
ADEC: Certificate of Reasonsable
Assurance. Certification of compliance
with the Alaska Water Qualtiy
Standards. Solid Waste Disposal Permit.
ADF&G: Habitat protection permits
addressing conditions and timing of
stream crossings and maintenance of
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Notices
ARCHITECTURAL AND
TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS
COMPLIANCE BOARD
Scoping Process
[Docket No. ATBCB–2014–0002]
This NOI re-initiates the scoping
process, which guides the development
of the EIS. Public participation will be
especially important at several points
during the analysis. The Petersburg
Ranger District is seeking information
and comments from Federal, State, and
local agencies, tribal organizations,
individuals, businesses and
organizations that may be interesed in,
or affected by, the proposed project.
This project was originally scoped
under the NOI on May 7, 2010. This
correction notice is filed since the
Proposed Action has changed.
Additionally the project was originally
scoped under the 36 CFR 215 Notice,
Comment and Appeal Procedures. The
215 appeal procedures have been
replaced by the Project-Level Predecisional Administrative Review
Process, 36 CFR Part 218 as of March 27,
2013. The ‘‘objection process’’ allows
parties who have submitted timely,
specific written comments during Forest
Service-announced public comment
periods, such as this scoping period or
when the Draft EIS goes out for public
comment, to object to the decision being
drafted. No public meetings are to be
held with the release of this NOI. Public
meetings will be held in Petersburg and
Kake in conjunction with the release of
the Draft EIS in September.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. Comments received in
response to this solicitation, including
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be part of the public
record for this proposed action.
Comments submitted during the earlier
scoping period are part of the project
record and do not need to be resubmitted.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
vegetation. Title 16 fish habitat permit
for any disturbance of anadromous fish
streams.
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of
Information Collection: Generic
Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency
Service Delivery
Dated: July 18, 2014.
Forrest Cole,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014–17669 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:53 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), the
Architectural and Transportation
Barriers Compliance Board (Access
Board) invites public comments about
our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
approval to renew a generic information
collection. As part of a federal
government-wide effort to streamline
the process for seeking feedback from
the public on service delivery, the
Access Board has an approved Generic
Information Collection Request (Generic
ICR) entitled ‘‘Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery.’’
A copy of the draft supporting
statement is available at https://
www.regulations.gov (see Docket ID
ATBCB–2014–0002).
DATES: Submit comments by September
26, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Regulations.gov ID for this docket is
ATBCB–2014–0002.
• Email: damiani@access-board.gov.
Include docket number ATBCB–2014–
0002 in the subject line of the message.
• Fax: 202–272–0081.
• Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier:
Office of the General Counsel, U.S.
Access Board, 1331 F Street NW., Suite
1000, Washington, DC 20004–1111.
All comments received, including any
personal information provided, will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and are available
for public viewing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mario Damiani, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Access Board, 1331 F
Street NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC
20004–1111. Telephone number: 202–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43709
272–0050 (voice); 202–272–0064 (TTY);
202–272–0081 (FAX). Electronic mail
address: damiani@access-board.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3014–0011.
Title: Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery.
Type of Review: Renewal of a generic
information collection.
Background: The proposed
information collection activity provides
a means to gather qualitative customer
and stakeholder feedback in an efficient,
timely manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery. By
qualitative feedback we mean
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions,
but are not statistical surveys that yield
quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study.
This feedback will provide insights into
customer or stakeholder perceptions,
experiences and expectations, provide
an early warning of issues with service,
or focus attention on areas where
communication, training, or changes in
operations might improve delivery of
products or services. These collections
will allow for ongoing, collaborative,
and actionable communications
between the Access Board and its
customers and stakeholders. It will also
allow feedback to contribute directly to
the improvement of program
management.
Feedback collected under this generic
clearance provides useful information,
but it does not yield data that can be
generalized to the overall population.
This type of generic clearance for
qualitative information will not be used
for quantitative information collections
that are designed to yield reliably
actionable results, such as monitoring
trends over time or documenting
program performance. Such data uses
require more rigorous designs that
address: the target population to which
generalizations will be made, the
sampling frame, the sample design
(including stratification and clustering),
the precision requirements or power
calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate,
methods for assessing potential nonresponse bias, the protocols for data
collection, and any testing procedures
that were or will be undertaken prior to
fielding the study. Depending on the
degree of influence the results are likely
to have, such collections may still be
eligible for submission for other generic
mechanisms that are designed to yield
quantitative results.
Respondents: Average annual
estimate of approximately 1,100
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43707-43709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17669]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Tongass National Forest: Alaska, Kake to Petersburg Transmission
Line Intertie
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Corrected Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement; Correction
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) on a proposal to construct,
operate and maintain a new electrical transmission line intertie that
would extend west across the Tongass National Forest from the
Petersburg area to the community of Kake. The proposed action is to
construct a new transmission line, and associated features, that would
transmit power at either 69 or 138 kilovolt (kV) and consist of single
wood-pole structures with horizontal post insulators, with average span
of lengths between poles of 350 to 400 feet. The proposed project would
also include a 24-strand fiber optic communication cable. Construction
access would be via existing roads, temporary shovel trails and matting
panels, and temporary access spurs, with helicopter support as needed.
The proposed project would cross National Forest System (NFS) lands in
the Petersburg Ranger District of the Tongass National Forest. The
length of the proposed electrical transmission line is approximately 60
miles and would follow a route identified as a Transportation and
Utility Systems (TUS) land use designation (LUD) corridor; labeled
``Potential Power Transmission Corridor'' on the 2008 Tongass National
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) LUD map. An
estimated 59 percent, or 35.2 miles, of the overhead portion of the
proposed transmission line would follow existing roads. No new road
segments would be built; existing roads would be used for long-term
maintenance access where possible.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by August 27, 2014. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected September 2014 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected May 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may comment on the project in the following ways: Send
written comments to Petersburg Ranger District, Tongass National
Forest, P.O. Box 1328, Petersburg, AK. 99833 ATTN: Kake-Petersburg
Intertie Project or hand-delivered to 12 N. Nordic Drive, Petersburg,
AK. Comments may also be sent via email to comments-alaska-tongass-petersburg@fs.fed.us, with ``Kake-Petersburg Intertie Project'' in the
subject line. Comments can be sent via facsimile to 907-772-5995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposal and EIS
should be directed to Tom Parker, Petersburg Ranger District, Tongass
National Forest, P.O. Box 1328, Petersburg, AK 99833 or (907) 772-5974.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA), the project
proponent, is a joint action agency organized and existing pursuant to
the laws of the State of Alaska. SEAPA's member utilities (Ketchikan,
Wrangell and Petersburg) provide electric utility services to their
respective service areas utilizing power generated by SEAPA's
facilities. These three communities are part of SEAPA's interconnected
network, which include the Swan Lake and Lake Tyee hydroelectric
projects and approximately 175 miles of transmission line that span
from Ketchikan to Petersburg. The proposed Kake to Petersburg Intertie
(KPI) project would connect Kake to SEAPA's interconnected network and
provide relatively low cost electricity to the community of Kake.
Purpose and Need for Action
The community of Kake is presently served by an isolated electric
system that depends upon high-cost, diesel generation. This isolated
system is served by a diesel plant that consists of three diesel
generators. High operation and maintenance expenses and high fuel costs
make diesel generators costly to operate. In 2011, the full retail cost
of power in Kake was more than five times the rate in the larger
communities of Petersburg, Ketchikan, and Wrangell, and is currently
subsidized for residential customers and public facilities through the
State of Alaska's Power Cost Equalization (PCE) program, which is
funded on an annual basis by
[[Page 43708]]
the State legislature. Commercial customers are not eligible to
participate in the PCE program, who pay the full retail cost for power
in Kake. The cost of electricity in Kake negatively affects the
economic well-being of the community and is a disincentive to economic
development.
The need for this action is established by the Forest Service's
responsibility under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)
to respond to an application for a right-of-way (43 U.S.C. 1701).
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to issue a special use permit to
authorize SEAPA to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed KPI
Project across NFS lands. The Proposed Action would construct, operate
and maintain a new electric transmission line and associated facilities
to connect the community of Kake with the existing SEAPA interconnected
network in Petersburg, AK. The transmission line would extend north and
then west for approximately 60 miles. The line would be built to
transmit either 69 or 138 kV and consist of single wood-pole structures
with horizontal post insulators, with an average span length of 350 to
400 feet between poles. The proposed transmission line would originate
at the existing SEAPA substation south of Petersburg, and extend north
and northeast toward Frederick Sound. The transmission line would cross
Frederick Sound and the mouth of the Wrangell Narrows via a 1.2 mile
horizontal directional bore that would place the cable below the
seafloor. Once on Kupreanof Island, the transmission line would follow
the TUS LUD Potential Power Transmission Corridor north through
Inventoried Roadless Area 213 (Five Mile) and then west through
Inventoried Roadless Areas 212 (Missionary) and 211 (North Kupreanof).
From Inventoried Roadless Area 211, the transmission line would
continue west and northwest to Kake where it would terminate at a new
substation located near the existing powerhouse. The majority of the
route is on NFS lands, the route also crosses lands owned by the Alaska
Department of Natural Resources, the Sealaska Corporation, Kake Tribal
Corporation, the City of Kake, and Petersburg Borough.
Possible Alternatives
The previous Notice of Intent (NOI) for the Kake-Petersburg
Intertie Transmission Line (May 7, 2010; Federal Register Vol. 75, No.
88, pg. 25195-25197) identified a Center-South route as one of two
alternatives to the Proposed Action. This route would connect to the
existing Tyee transmission line, approximately 8 miles south of
Petersburg, and requires a tap or switch yard. This route crosses
Wrangell Narrows, proceeds west across the Lindenberg Peninsula,
crosses Duncan Canal and continues northwest to terminate in Kake at a
new substation located near the existing powerhouse. As with the
Proposed Action, the majority of the project would fall on National
Forest System lands but would also cross over lands owned and managed
by the Borough of Petersburg, Sealaska Corporation, Kake Tribal
Corporation, and the city of Kake.
In addition to the Center-South route, the previous NOI identified
two Northern Route options: Options 1 and 2. The Northern Route, Option
1 started at the existing SEAPA substation south of Petersburg and
followed an existing gravel road 3.5 miles east-northeast to Frederick
Sound, near Sandy Beach Park. From there, Option 1 crossed Frederick
Sound via a 3.1-mile-long submarine cable that would come ashore near
Prolewy Point on the east shore of Kupreanof Island. This proposed
crossing is the only difference between this option and the Proposed
Action. Like the Center-South route, this option is being considered as
an alternative to the Proposed Action.
The Northern Route, Option 2 originated at the same existing SEAPA
substation, but proceeded north along Mitkof Highway to near the
narrowest point of the Wrangell Narrows. Crossing the Wrangell Narrows,
via a horizontal directional bore or buried cable that would extend
approximately 1,400 feet, this option then continued north overhead,
past the city of Petersburg and across Petersburg Creek. This route has
been eliminated from further consideration due to the potential impacts
on the unroaded character of the city of Kupreanof, and potential
impacts to Petersburg Creek, an important area for fish and wildlife,
recreation and tourism and subsistence.
Responsible Official
Forrest Cole, Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, Federal
Building, Ketchikan, AK 99901.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor is the responsible official for this action
and will decide whether or not to permit the construction of the
proposed electric transmission line across NFS lands, as well as the
route that will be followed, and any mitigation measures and/or
monitoring, as appropriate. The decision will be based on the
information disclosed in the EIS. The responsible official will
consider comments, responses, the disclosure of environmental
consequences, and applicable laws, regulations and policies in making
the decision and will state the rationale in the Record of Decision.
Preliminary Issues
The Proposed Action and the Center-South route both cross through
inventoried roadless areas. Road building is not anticipated. However,
if the construction of the transmission line is allowed, it will reduce
the inventoried acres and could affect roadless values. Preliminary
issues identified through scoping for this project included concerns
that the unroaded character of the city of Kupreanof would be affected
by the presence of a nearby electric transmission line which could have
impacts on the quality of life for the residents. Concerns were also
expressed about potential impacts to Petersburg Creek, an important
area for fish and wildlife, recreation and tourism, and subsistence
activities. These two issues have been mitigated by dropping the
Northern Route, Option 2 as an alternative.
Permits or Licenses Required
Forest Service: Special use permit to construct, operate and
maintain the proposed transmission line across NFS lands. Permits to
survey the authorized right-of-way.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Approval of discharge of dredged or
fill material into the waters of the United States (404 of the Clean
Water Act). Approval of construction or work in navigable of the United
States which includes Wrangell Narrows and Duncan Canal, depending on
the alternative selected.
EPA: Stormwater discharge permits.
U.S. Coast Guard: Coordination to ensure appropriate clearance for
lines over water; generally handled through the Corps' permitting
authority.
Federal Aviation Administration: Notice of proposed construction.
Alaska DNR: Authorization for occupancy and use of tidelands and
submerged lands. Right-of-way to construct the proposed transmission
line. ANILCA 906(k) compliance.
ADEC: Certificate of Reasonsable Assurance. Certification of
compliance with the Alaska Water Qualtiy Standards. Solid Waste
Disposal Permit.
ADF&G: Habitat protection permits addressing conditions and timing
of stream crossings and maintenance of
[[Page 43709]]
vegetation. Title 16 fish habitat permit for any disturbance of
anadromous fish streams.
Scoping Process
This NOI re-initiates the scoping process, which guides the
development of the EIS. Public participation will be especially
important at several points during the analysis. The Petersburg Ranger
District is seeking information and comments from Federal, State, and
local agencies, tribal organizations, individuals, businesses and
organizations that may be interesed in, or affected by, the proposed
project. This project was originally scoped under the NOI on May 7,
2010. This correction notice is filed since the Proposed Action has
changed. Additionally the project was originally scoped under the 36
CFR 215 Notice, Comment and Appeal Procedures. The 215 appeal
procedures have been replaced by the Project-Level Pre-decisional
Administrative Review Process, 36 CFR Part 218 as of March 27, 2013.
The ``objection process'' allows parties who have submitted timely,
specific written comments during Forest Service-announced public
comment periods, such as this scoping period or when the Draft EIS goes
out for public comment, to object to the decision being drafted. No
public meetings are to be held with the release of this NOI. Public
meetings will be held in Petersburg and Kake in conjunction with the
release of the Draft EIS in September.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the EIS. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of
the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer's
concerns and contentions. Comments received in response to this
solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments
submitted during the earlier scoping period are part of the project
record and do not need to be re-submitted.
Dated: July 18, 2014.
Forrest Cole,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014-17669 Filed 7-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P