Regulated Navigation Area; South Bristol Gut Bridge Replacement, South Bristol, ME, 43332-43335 [2014-17606]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
43332
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
076°34′30″ W, and approximate position
latitude 39°15′40″ N, longitude
076°34′37″ W, located in the Northwest
Harbor (East Channel) at Baltimore,
Maryland. All coordinates refer to
datum NAD 1983.
(b) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
165.23 apply to the safety zone created
by this temporary section, § 165.T05–
0541.
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore or his designated
representative.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the safety zone must first obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Baltimore or his designated
representative. To seek permission to
transit the area, the Captain of the Port
Baltimore or his designated
representative can be contacted at
telephone number 410–576–2693 or on
Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF–
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel, or other Federal, State, or local
agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing
light, or other means, the operator of a
vessel shall proceed as directed. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Baltimore or his designated
representative and proceed at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means
the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to
assist in enforcing the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(d) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced:
(1) From 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. on
September 12, 2014, and
(2) From 7:30 p.m. to 11 p.m. on
September 13, 2014, and if necessary
due to inclement weather, from 7:30
p.m. to 11 p.m. on September 14, 2014.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Dated: July 10, 2014.
K. C. Kiefer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2014–17444 Filed 7–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0214]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; South
Bristol Gut Bridge Replacement, South
Bristol, ME
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Maine Department of
Transportation (MEDOT) has requested
the Coast Guard to establish a regulated
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable
waters of The Gut in South Bristol,
Maine. Sector Northern New England
received notice of a proposed
replacement of The Gut Bridge in South
Bristol, Maine between Rutherford
Island and Bristol Neck. A Bridge
Permit was awarded to MEDOT on April
15, 2014 to begin in accordance with
plans dated September 24, 2013. This
RNA would allow the Coast Guard to
enforce speed and wake restrictions and
prohibit all vessel traffic through the
RNA during bridge replacement
operations, both planned and
unforeseen, which could pose an
imminent hazard to persons and vessels
operating in the area. This rule is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on the navigable waters during bridge
structural repair operations.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
Lieutenant Junior Grade Elizabeth V.
Gunn, Waterways Management Division
at Coast Guard Sector Northern New
England, at 207–767–0398 or email at
Elizabeth.V.Gunn@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2013–0214] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–0214) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one August 1, 2014, using one of the
methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Regulatory History and Information
On January 24, 2014, Sector Northern
New England received notice of a
proposed replacement of The Gut Bridge
in South Bristol, Maine between
Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck. A
Bridge Permit was awarded to Maine
Department of Transportation (MEDOT)
on April 15, 2014 to begin in accordance
with Plans dated September 24, 2013.
MEDOT has held seven public
meetings between June 2009 and August
2013. Mariners have expressed no
significant concerns.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
43333
On November 8, 2013, Public Notice
1–132 was disseminated by the First
Coast Guard District Bridge Program
Manager. This notice included the
official plans being submitted for
approval of a bridge permit and
solicited comments from the public.
Twenty-five comments were received.
All comments were in support of
burying the existing overhead electrical
cables rather than allowing them to
remain in place above the water. There
were no comments received in
opposition of the proposed construction
project or potential closures to the
channel.
Island is approximately 20–60 minutes
for mariners.
Further, all closures will be limited to
specific hours of the day. Mariners will
be advised of all closure dates and times
via Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners in advance
of closure times.
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
to establish RNAs in defined water areas
that are determined to have hazardous
conditions and in which vessel traffic
can be regulated in the interest of safety.
See 33 U.S.C. 1231 46 U.S.C. Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1. The purpose of
this proposed rule is to ensure the safe
transit of vessels in the area, and to
protect all persons, vessels, construction
crews, and the marine environment
during bridge construction operations
on The Gut in South Bristol, ME,
between Rutherford Island and Bristol
Neck.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
MEDOT proposes to replace the
existing movable bobtail swing bridge
over The Gut, which carries State Route
129 from Bristol Neck to Rutherford
Island, with a movable trunnion-style
lift bridge on the same alignment. The
project is necessary to replace a
structurally and operationally deficient
bridge that has exceeded its useful life.
Before demolition of the existing bridge
commences, a temporary fixed detour
bridge will be constructed on the east
side of the existing bridge to provide for
vehicular and pedestrian traffic
throughout the project. This temporary
bridge will not be movable and will
have a fixed vertical clearance of 3 feet
11 inches. The existing bridge has a
vertical clearance of 4 feet 2 inches
when closed. It is proposed that marine
traffic will be restricted from the project
vicinity during the removal of the
existing bridge and construction of the
new bridge. This navigational channel
closure is expected to last
approximately seven months and
marine traffic will be detoured around
Rutherford Island during this time
frame. Transit time around Rutherford
2. Impact on Small Entities
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be minimal because
mariners are able to make a short transit
(approximately 20–60 minutes) around
Rutherford Island to reach any
destination on the other side of The Gut.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
under the South Bristol Gut Bridge who
cannot clear the fixed temporary bridge
of 3 feet 11 inches. The impact to these
entities would be minimal because
mariners are able to make a short transit
(approximately 20–60 minutes) around
Rutherford Island to reach any
destination on the other side of The Gut
and the temporary bridge is estimated to
only be in place for about seven months.
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
43334
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of an
RNA. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0214 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0214 Regulated Navigation
Area; South Bristol Gut Bridge
Replacement, South Bristol, ME.
(a) Location. The following area is a
Regulated Navigation Area (RNA): All
navigable waters of The Gut in South
Bristol, ME, from surface to bottom,
within a 300 yard radius of position
43°51′43″ N, 069°33′30″ W.
(b) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.10, 165.11, and 165.13
apply within the RNA.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations, entry into or movement
within this zone, during periods of
enforcement, is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Northern New England (COTP).
(3) Persons and vessels may request
permission to enter the RNA during
periods of enforcement by contacting
the COTP or the COTP’s on-scene
representative on VHF–16 or via phone
at 207–767–0303.
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(4) During periods of enforcement,
entry and movement within the RNA is
subject to a ‘‘Slow-No Wake’’ speed
limit. Vessels may not produce more
than a minimum wake and may not
attain speeds greater than five knots
unless a higher minimum speed is
necessary to maintain steerageway.
(5) During periods of enforcement,
vessels must comply with all directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s on-scene representative. The
‘‘on-scene representative’’ of the COTP
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on the
COTP’s behalf. The on-scene
representative may be on a Coast Guard
vessel; Maine State Police, Maine
Marine Patrol or other designated craft;
or may be on shore and communicating
with vessels via VHF–FM radio or
loudhailer. Members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(6) During periods of enforcement,
upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator of the vessel
must proceed as directed.
(7) All other relevant regulations,
including but not limited to the Rules of
the Road (33 CFR 84—Subchapter E,
Inland Navigational Rules) remain in
effect within the regulated area and
must be strictly followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement Period. This
regulation is enforceable 24 hours a day
from 12:01 a.m. on September 1, 2014
until 11:59 p.m. on June 30, 2017.
(1) Prior to commencing or
suspending enforcement of this
regulation, the COTP will give notice by
appropriate means to inform the
affected segments of the public, to
include dates and times. Such means of
notification will include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners.
(2) Violations of this RNA may be
reported to the COTP at 207–767–0303
or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: July 15, 2014.
L. L. Fagan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–17606 Filed 7–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0215]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Bridge 1
Structural Repairs at Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard, Kittery, ME
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Navy has requested
the Coast Guard to establish a regulated
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River
surrounding Bridge 1 between Kittery,
ME, and Seavey Island, ME. Sector
Northern New England received notice
of potential bridge work being
conducted on Bridge 1 between Kittery,
ME, and the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
on Seavey Island from September 1,
2014 through April 30, 2017. This RNA
would allow the Coast Guard to enforce
speed and wake restrictions and limit
vessel traffic through the RNA during
operations involving bridge structural
repairs, both planned and unforeseen,
which could pose an imminent hazard
to persons and vessels operating in the
area. This rule is necessary to provide
for the safety of life on the navigable
waters during bridge structural repair
operations.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43335
Lieutenant Junior Grade Elizabeth V.
Gunn, Waterways Management Division
at Coast Guard Sector Northern New
England, at 207–767–0398 or email at
Elizabeth.V.Gunn@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2013–0215] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43332-43335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17606]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2014-0214]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; South Bristol Gut Bridge Replacement,
South Bristol, ME
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Maine Department of Transportation (MEDOT) has requested
the Coast Guard to establish a regulated navigation area (RNA) on the
navigable waters of The Gut in South Bristol, Maine. Sector Northern
New England received notice of a proposed replacement of The Gut Bridge
in South Bristol, Maine between Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck. A
Bridge Permit was awarded to MEDOT on April 15, 2014 to begin in
accordance with plans dated September 24, 2013. This RNA would allow
the Coast Guard to enforce speed and wake restrictions and prohibit all
vessel traffic through the RNA during bridge replacement operations,
both planned and unforeseen, which could pose an imminent hazard to
persons and vessels operating in the area. This rule is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters during bridge
structural repair operations.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Lieutenant Junior Grade Elizabeth V. Gunn, Waterways Management
Division at Coast Guard Sector Northern New England, at 207-767-0398 or
email at Elizabeth.V.Gunn@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2013-0214] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an
[[Page 43333]]
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0214) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one August 1, 2014, using one of the methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would
be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On January 24, 2014, Sector Northern New England received notice of
a proposed replacement of The Gut Bridge in South Bristol, Maine
between Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck. A Bridge Permit was awarded
to Maine Department of Transportation (MEDOT) on April 15, 2014 to
begin in accordance with Plans dated September 24, 2013.
MEDOT has held seven public meetings between June 2009 and August
2013. Mariners have expressed no significant concerns.
On November 8, 2013, Public Notice 1-132 was disseminated by the
First Coast Guard District Bridge Program Manager. This notice included
the official plans being submitted for approval of a bridge permit and
solicited comments from the public. Twenty-five comments were received.
All comments were in support of burying the existing overhead
electrical cables rather than allowing them to remain in place above
the water. There were no comments received in opposition of the
proposed construction project or potential closures to the channel.
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. The purpose of this proposed
rule is to ensure the safe transit of vessels in the area, and to
protect all persons, vessels, construction crews, and the marine
environment during bridge construction operations on The Gut in South
Bristol, ME, between Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
MEDOT proposes to replace the existing movable bobtail swing bridge
over The Gut, which carries State Route 129 from Bristol Neck to
Rutherford Island, with a movable trunnion-style lift bridge on the
same alignment. The project is necessary to replace a structurally and
operationally deficient bridge that has exceeded its useful life.
Before demolition of the existing bridge commences, a temporary fixed
detour bridge will be constructed on the east side of the existing
bridge to provide for vehicular and pedestrian traffic throughout the
project. This temporary bridge will not be movable and will have a
fixed vertical clearance of 3 feet 11 inches. The existing bridge has a
vertical clearance of 4 feet 2 inches when closed. It is proposed that
marine traffic will be restricted from the project vicinity during the
removal of the existing bridge and construction of the new bridge. This
navigational channel closure is expected to last approximately seven
months and marine traffic will be detoured around Rutherford Island
during this time frame. Transit time around Rutherford Island is
approximately 20-60 minutes for mariners.
Further, all closures will be limited to specific hours of the day.
Mariners will be advised of all closure dates and times via Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners in advance of
closure times.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal because
mariners are able to make a short transit (approximately 20-60 minutes)
around Rutherford Island to reach any destination on the other side of
The Gut.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit under the South Bristol Gut Bridge who cannot
clear the fixed temporary bridge of 3 feet 11 inches. The impact to
these entities would be minimal because mariners are able to make a
short transit (approximately 20-60 minutes) around Rutherford Island to
reach any destination on the other side of The Gut and the temporary
bridge is estimated to only be in place for about seven months.
[[Page 43334]]
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of an RNA. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0214 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0214 Regulated Navigation Area; South Bristol Gut Bridge
Replacement, South Bristol, ME.
(a) Location. The following area is a Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA): All navigable waters of The Gut in South Bristol, ME, from
surface to bottom, within a 300 yard radius of position 43[deg]51'43''
N, 069[deg]33'30'' W.
(b) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10, 165.11, and
165.13 apply within the RNA.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations, entry into or
movement within this zone, during periods of enforcement, is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Northern New
England (COTP).
(3) Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the RNA
during periods of enforcement by contacting the COTP or the COTP's on-
scene representative on VHF-16 or via phone at 207-767-0303.
[[Page 43335]]
(4) During periods of enforcement, entry and movement within the
RNA is subject to a ``Slow-No Wake'' speed limit. Vessels may not
produce more than a minimum wake and may not attain speeds greater than
five knots unless a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain
steerageway.
(5) During periods of enforcement, vessels must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's on-scene
representative. The ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. The on-scene
representative may be on a Coast Guard vessel; Maine State Police,
Maine Marine Patrol or other designated craft; or may be on shore and
communicating with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. Members of
the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of
this regulation.
(6) During periods of enforcement, upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the
operator of the vessel must proceed as directed.
(7) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to
the Rules of the Road (33 CFR 84--Subchapter E, Inland Navigational
Rules) remain in effect within the regulated area and must be strictly
followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement Period. This regulation is enforceable 24 hours a
day from 12:01 a.m. on September 1, 2014 until 11:59 p.m. on June 30,
2017.
(1) Prior to commencing or suspending enforcement of this
regulation, the COTP will give notice by appropriate means to inform
the affected segments of the public, to include dates and times. Such
means of notification will include, but are not limited to, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners.
(2) Violations of this RNA may be reported to the COTP at 207-767-
0303 or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: July 15, 2014.
L. L. Fagan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014-17606 Filed 7-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P