Regulated Navigation Area; Bridge 1 Structural Repairs at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, ME, 43335-43338 [2014-17599]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(4) During periods of enforcement,
entry and movement within the RNA is
subject to a ‘‘Slow-No Wake’’ speed
limit. Vessels may not produce more
than a minimum wake and may not
attain speeds greater than five knots
unless a higher minimum speed is
necessary to maintain steerageway.
(5) During periods of enforcement,
vessels must comply with all directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s on-scene representative. The
‘‘on-scene representative’’ of the COTP
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on the
COTP’s behalf. The on-scene
representative may be on a Coast Guard
vessel; Maine State Police, Maine
Marine Patrol or other designated craft;
or may be on shore and communicating
with vessels via VHF–FM radio or
loudhailer. Members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(6) During periods of enforcement,
upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator of the vessel
must proceed as directed.
(7) All other relevant regulations,
including but not limited to the Rules of
the Road (33 CFR 84—Subchapter E,
Inland Navigational Rules) remain in
effect within the regulated area and
must be strictly followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement Period. This
regulation is enforceable 24 hours a day
from 12:01 a.m. on September 1, 2014
until 11:59 p.m. on June 30, 2017.
(1) Prior to commencing or
suspending enforcement of this
regulation, the COTP will give notice by
appropriate means to inform the
affected segments of the public, to
include dates and times. Such means of
notification will include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners.
(2) Violations of this RNA may be
reported to the COTP at 207–767–0303
or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: July 15, 2014.
L. L. Fagan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–17606 Filed 7–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0215]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Bridge 1
Structural Repairs at Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard, Kittery, ME
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Navy has requested
the Coast Guard to establish a regulated
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River
surrounding Bridge 1 between Kittery,
ME, and Seavey Island, ME. Sector
Northern New England received notice
of potential bridge work being
conducted on Bridge 1 between Kittery,
ME, and the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
on Seavey Island from September 1,
2014 through April 30, 2017. This RNA
would allow the Coast Guard to enforce
speed and wake restrictions and limit
vessel traffic through the RNA during
operations involving bridge structural
repairs, both planned and unforeseen,
which could pose an imminent hazard
to persons and vessels operating in the
area. This rule is necessary to provide
for the safety of life on the navigable
waters during bridge structural repair
operations.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43335
Lieutenant Junior Grade Elizabeth V.
Gunn, Waterways Management Division
at Coast Guard Sector Northern New
England, at 207–767–0398 or email at
Elizabeth.V.Gunn@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2013–0215] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
43336
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–0215) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before August 1, 2014
using one of the methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On September 11, 2013, Sector
Northern New England received notice
of potential bridge work being
conducted on Bridge 1 between Kittery,
ME, and the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
on Seavey Island from September 1,
2014 through April 30, 2017. A
Construction Approval Letter will be
issued once a contractor is awarded the
contract to perform needed repairs.
On February 26, 2014, the U. S. Navy
posted a notice in the Portsmouth
Herald advising the public of the intent
to file applications for approval of
structural repairs to be made to Bridge
1. No comments or requests for public
meeting were made.
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
to establish RNAs in defined water areas
that are determined to have hazardous
conditions and in which vessel traffic
can be regulated in the interest of safety.
See 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1. The purpose of
this proposed rule is to ensure the safe
transit of vessels in the area, and to
protect all persons, vessels, and the
marine environment during structural
repairs made to the Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard, Bridge 1.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing to
establish an RNA on the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River
surrounding Bridge 1 which spans from
Kittery, Maine, to Seavey Island, Maine
from September 1, 2014 to April 30,
2017. The Portsmouth Naval Shipyard is
the bridge owner and is contracting the
structural repairs. This bridge is the
main entrance to the Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard. The existing bridge is a steel
girder structure approximately 300 feet
long and 50 feet 7 inches wide. Existing
vertical clearance is 7 feet at MLW; the
proposed vertical clearance is also 7 feet
at MLW. Horizontal clearance is
currently 57 feet and the proposed
clearance would be 56 feet 6 inches.
Existing granite block and steel
reinforced abutments and piers will
remain in place but will be reinforced
with cladding around the abutments. As
a result, the horizontal clearance would
be reduced by six inches.
This proposed RNA would allow the
Captain of the Port Sector Northern New
England (COTP) to establish speed and
wake restrictions and to prohibit vessel
traffic on this portion of the river for
limited periods when necessary for the
safety of vessels and workers during
construction work in the channel. The
Coast Guard would enforce a five knot
speed limit as well as a ‘‘NO WAKE’’
zone and would be able to close the
designated area to all vessel traffic
under any circumstances, planned or
unforeseen, that pose an imminent
threat to waterway users or construction
operations in the area. At this time, only
partial closures of the waterway are
anticipated.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be minimal because this
regulated navigation area only requires
vessels to reduce speed through a
limited portion of the Piscataqua River,
therefore causing only a nominal delay
to a vessel’s transit.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the vicinity of Bridge 1
from September 1, 2014 to April 30,
2017. These entities would only be
required to reduce their speed through
a limited portion of the Piscataqua River
outside of the main channel.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
6. Protest Activities
12. Energy Effects
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
43337
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of an
RNA. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0215 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0215 Regulated Navigation
Area; Bridge 1 structural repairs at
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, ME
(a) Location. The following area is a
Regulated Navigation Area (RNA): All
navigable waters of Piscataqua River
between Kittery, ME and Seavey Island,
ME, from surface to bottom, within a
300 yard radius of position 44°05′06″ N,
070°44′29″ W.
(b) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10,
165.11, and 165.13 apply within the
RNA.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations, entry into or movement
within this zone, during periods of
enforcement, is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Northern New England (COTP).
(3) Persons and vessels may request
permission to enter the RNA during
periods of enforcement by contacting
the COTP or the COTP’s on-scene
representative on VHF–16 or via phone
at 207–767–0303.
(4) During periods of enforcement,
entry and movement within the RNA is
subject to a ‘‘Slow-No Wake’’ speed
limit. Vessels may not produce more
than a minimum wake and may not
attain speeds greater than five knots
unless a higher minimum speed is
necessary to maintain steerageway.
(5) During periods of enforcement,
vessels must comply with all directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s on-scene representative. The
‘‘on-scene representative’’ of the COTP
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on the
COTP’s behalf. The on-scene
representative may be on a Coast Guard
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
43338
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
vessel; Maine State Police, Maine
Marine Patrol or other designated craft;
or may be on shore and communicating
with vessels via VHF–FM radio or
loudhailer. Members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(6) During periods of enforcement,
upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator of the vessel
must proceed as directed.
(7) All other relevant regulations,
including but not limited to the Rules of
the Road (33 CFR § 84—Subchapter E,
Inland Navigational Rules) remain in
effect within the regulated area and
must be strictly followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement Period. This
regulation is enforceable 24 hours a day
from 12:01 a.m. on September 1, 2014
until 11:59 p.m. on April 30, 2017.
(1) Prior to commencing or
suspending enforcement of this
regulation, the COTP will give notice by
appropriate means to inform the
affected segments of the public, to
include dates and times. Such means of
notification will include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners.
(2) Violations of this RNA may be
reported to the COTP at 207–767–0303
or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: July 15, 2014.
L. L. Fagan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–17599 Filed 7–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0888; EPA–R05–
OAR–2011–0969; EPA–R05–OAR–2012–
0991; EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0435; FRL–
9914–21–Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Infrastructure SIP Requirements for
the 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2,
and 2010 SO2 NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
elements of state implementation plan
(SIP) submissions from Ohio regarding
the infrastructure requirements of
section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for the 2008 lead (Pb), 2008 ozone, 2010
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and 2010 sulfur
dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS). The
infrastructure requirements are designed
to ensure that the structural components
of each state’s air quality management
program are adequate to meet the state’s
responsibilities under the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2011–0888 (2008 Pb infrastructure
elements), EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0969
(2008 ozone infrastructure elements),
EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0991 (2010 NO2
infrastructure elements), or EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0435 (2010 SO2
infrastructure elements) by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 408–2279.
4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano,
Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0888
(2008 Pb infrastructure elements), EPA–
R05–OAR–2011–0969 (2008 ozone
infrastructure elements), EPA–R05–
OAR–2012–0991 (2010 NO2
infrastructure elements), or EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0435 (2010 SO2
infrastructure elements). EPA’s policy is
that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through
www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that
you telephone Andy Chang,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886–
0258 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0258,
chang.andy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
II. What is the background of these SIP
submissions?
A. What state SIP submissions does this
rulemaking address?
B. Why did the state make these SIP
submissions?
C. What is the scope of this rulemaking?
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43335-43338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17599]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2014-0215]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Bridge 1 Structural Repairs at
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, ME
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Navy has requested the Coast Guard to establish a
regulated navigation area (RNA) on the navigable waters of the
Piscataqua River surrounding Bridge 1 between Kittery, ME, and Seavey
Island, ME. Sector Northern New England received notice of potential
bridge work being conducted on Bridge 1 between Kittery, ME, and the
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on Seavey Island from September 1, 2014
through April 30, 2017. This RNA would allow the Coast Guard to enforce
speed and wake restrictions and limit vessel traffic through the RNA
during operations involving bridge structural repairs, both planned and
unforeseen, which could pose an imminent hazard to persons and vessels
operating in the area. This rule is necessary to provide for the safety
of life on the navigable waters during bridge structural repair
operations.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Lieutenant Junior Grade Elizabeth V. Gunn, Waterways Management
Division at Coast Guard Sector Northern New England, at 207-767-0398 or
email at Elizabeth.V.Gunn@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2013-0215] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider
[[Page 43336]]
all comments and material received during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0215) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before August 1, 2014 using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On September 11, 2013, Sector Northern New England received notice
of potential bridge work being conducted on Bridge 1 between Kittery,
ME, and the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on Seavey Island from September
1, 2014 through April 30, 2017. A Construction Approval Letter will be
issued once a contractor is awarded the contract to perform needed
repairs.
On February 26, 2014, the U. S. Navy posted a notice in the
Portsmouth Herald advising the public of the intent to file
applications for approval of structural repairs to be made to Bridge 1.
No comments or requests for public meeting were made.
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. The purpose of this proposed
rule is to ensure the safe transit of vessels in the area, and to
protect all persons, vessels, and the marine environment during
structural repairs made to the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Bridge 1.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing to establish an RNA on the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River surrounding Bridge 1 which spans from
Kittery, Maine, to Seavey Island, Maine from September 1, 2014 to April
30, 2017. The Portsmouth Naval Shipyard is the bridge owner and is
contracting the structural repairs. This bridge is the main entrance to
the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. The existing bridge is a steel girder
structure approximately 300 feet long and 50 feet 7 inches wide.
Existing vertical clearance is 7 feet at MLW; the proposed vertical
clearance is also 7 feet at MLW. Horizontal clearance is currently 57
feet and the proposed clearance would be 56 feet 6 inches. Existing
granite block and steel reinforced abutments and piers will remain in
place but will be reinforced with cladding around the abutments. As a
result, the horizontal clearance would be reduced by six inches.
This proposed RNA would allow the Captain of the Port Sector
Northern New England (COTP) to establish speed and wake restrictions
and to prohibit vessel traffic on this portion of the river for limited
periods when necessary for the safety of vessels and workers during
construction work in the channel. The Coast Guard would enforce a five
knot speed limit as well as a ``NO WAKE'' zone and would be able to
close the designated area to all vessel traffic under any
circumstances, planned or unforeseen, that pose an imminent threat to
waterway users or construction operations in the area. At this time,
only partial closures of the waterway are anticipated.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal because
this regulated navigation area only requires vessels to reduce speed
through a limited portion of the Piscataqua River, therefore causing
only a nominal delay to a vessel's transit.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the vicinity of Bridge 1 from
September 1, 2014 to April 30, 2017. These entities would only be
required to reduce their speed through a limited portion of the
Piscataqua River outside of the main channel.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for
[[Page 43337]]
compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the For Further
Information Contact section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
establishment of an RNA. This rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0215 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0215 Regulated Navigation Area; Bridge 1 structural
repairs at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, ME
(a) Location. The following area is a Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA): All navigable waters of Piscataqua River between Kittery, ME and
Seavey Island, ME, from surface to bottom, within a 300 yard radius of
position 44[deg]05'06'' N, 070[deg]44'29'' W.
(b) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.10, 165.11, and 165.13 apply within the RNA.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations, entry into or
movement within this zone, during periods of enforcement, is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Northern New
England (COTP).
(3) Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the RNA
during periods of enforcement by contacting the COTP or the COTP's on-
scene representative on VHF-16 or via phone at 207-767-0303.
(4) During periods of enforcement, entry and movement within the
RNA is subject to a ``Slow-No Wake'' speed limit. Vessels may not
produce more than a minimum wake and may not attain speeds greater than
five knots unless a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain
steerageway.
(5) During periods of enforcement, vessels must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's on-scene
representative. The ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. The on-scene
representative may be on a Coast Guard
[[Page 43338]]
vessel; Maine State Police, Maine Marine Patrol or other designated
craft; or may be on shore and communicating with vessels via VHF-FM
radio or loudhailer. Members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be
present to inform vessel operators of this regulation.
(6) During periods of enforcement, upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the
operator of the vessel must proceed as directed.
(7) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to
the Rules of the Road (33 CFR Sec. 84--Subchapter E, Inland
Navigational Rules) remain in effect within the regulated area and must
be strictly followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement Period. This regulation is enforceable 24 hours a
day from 12:01 a.m. on September 1, 2014 until 11:59 p.m. on April 30,
2017.
(1) Prior to commencing or suspending enforcement of this
regulation, the COTP will give notice by appropriate means to inform
the affected segments of the public, to include dates and times. Such
means of notification will include, but are not limited to, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners.
(2) Violations of this RNA may be reported to the COTP at 207-767-
0303 or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: July 15, 2014.
L. L. Fagan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014-17599 Filed 7-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P