Special Conditions: Airbus Model A350-900 Airplanes; Lateral-Trim Function Through Differential Flap Setting, 43236-43237 [2014-17578]
Download as PDF
43236
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(e) In straight, steady sideslips over
the range of sideslip angles appropriate
to the operation of the airplane, but not
less than those obtained with one-half of
the available rudder-control movement
(but not exceeding a rudder-control
force of 180 pounds), rudder-control
movements and forces must be
substantially proportional to the angle
of sideslip in a stable sense; and the
factor of proportionality must lie
between limits found necessary for safe
operation. This requirement must be
met for the configurations and speeds
specified in paragraph (c) of this
section.
(f) For sideslip angles greater than
those prescribed by paragraph (e) of this
section, up to the angle at which full
rudder control is used or a ruddercontrol force of 180 pounds is obtained,
the rudder-control forces may not
reverse, and increased rudder deflection
must be needed for increased angles of
sideslip. Compliance with this
requirement must be shown using
straight, steady sideslips, unless full
lateral-control input is achieved before
reaching either full rudder-control input
or a rudder-control force of 180 pounds;
a straight, steady sideslip need not be
maintained after achieving full lateralcontrol input.
This requirement must be met at all
approved landing-gear and wing-flap
positions for the range of operating
speeds and power conditions
appropriate to each landing-gear and
wing-flap position with all engines
operating.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 9,
2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–17575 Filed 7–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0911; Special
Conditions No. 25–539–SC]
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A350–900 Airplanes; Lateral-Trim
Function Through Differential Flap
Setting
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for Airbus Model A350–900
airplanes. These airplanes will have a
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
novel or unusual design feature
associated with a lateral-trim function
that deploys flaps asymmetrically for
airplane lateral-trim control. This
function replaces the traditional method
of providing airplane lateral trim over a
small range through flap and aileron
mechanical rigging. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: August 25, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert C. Jones, FAA, Propulsion and
Mechanical Systems, ANM–112,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1234; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied
for a type certificate for their new Model
A350–900 airplane. Later, Airbus
requested, and the FAA approved, an
extension to the application for FAA
type certification to November 15, 2009.
The Model A350–900 airplane has a
conventional layout with twin wingmounted Rolls-Royce Trent XWB
engines. It features a twin-aisle, 9abreast, economy-class layout, and
accommodates side-by-side placement
of LD–3 containers in the cargo
compartment. The basic Model A350–
900 airplane configuration
accommodates 315 passengers in a
standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with
a maximum take-off weight of 602,000
lbs.
On conventional airplanes, small,
lateral, airplane asymmetries typically
have been addressed through flap and
aileron rigging (e.g., using shims). On
Model A350–900 airplanes, an order for
asymmetric flap deployment will be
computed by the primary flight-control
system as a function of the aileron
position. The current airworthiness
standards do not contain adequate
safety standards for asymmetric use of
the flaps for Airbus Model A350–900
airplanes. Special conditions are needed
to account for the aspects of a function
used to command an intended flap
asymmetry. The lateral-trim function is
intended to be performed once during
climb and once during cruise to
compensate for airplane small lateral
asymmetries.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The lateral-trim function is not a trimcontrol system in the conventional
sense as it has no pilot interface and is
not governed by Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.677.
Some fly-by-wire airplanes have no
pilot-operated lateral trim at all. The
lateral-trim function is simply an
additional fly-by-wire flight-control
function that nulls small roll
asymmetries in certain flight phases
with small, asymmetric flap
deployments. Although the function
operates under normal conditions
within the small range of the traditional
rigging, failure cases may result in a
significant out-of-range asymmetric flap
condition. An asymmetry threshold
protects the system against excessive
flap asymmetry.
Type Certification Basis
Under 14 CFR 21.17, Airbus must
show that the Model A350–900 airplane
meets the applicable provisions of 14
CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–129.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model A350–900 airplane
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model A350–900
airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34, and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36. The FAA must issue a finding
of regulatory adequacy under § 611 of
Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise Control
Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, under § 11.38,
and they become part of the typecertification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350–900 airplane
incorporates the following novel or
unusual design features: The
asymmetric use of flaps to address
lateral trim, which is not adequately
addressed by § 25.701.
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Discussion
Section 25.701(a) requires that, unless
the airplane has safe-flight
characteristics with the flaps or slats
retracted on one side and extended on
the other, flap and slat surfaces must be
synchronized by either a mechanical
interconnection or any equivalent
means that has the same integrity.
Synchronization is interpreted to mean
that flap movement is symmetrical
throughout the full range of flap motion.
Because the lateral-trim function
intentionally creates asymmetric flap
motions, the flap-system installation of
the Model A350–900 airplane does not
meet the requirement of § 25.701(a) and
(d).
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions
no. 25–13–22–SC for Airbus Model
A350–900 airplanes was published in
the Federal Register on January 8, 2014
(79 FR 1339). No comments were
received, and the special conditions are
adopted as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions apply to Airbus Model
A350–900 airplanes. Should Airbus
apply later for a change to the type
certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would apply to that model as well.
Lateral-Trim Function Through
Differential Flap Setting
Current airworthiness standards,
specifically § 25.701, do not contain
adequate safety standards for this
airplane design. In lieu of the
requirements of § 25.701(a) and (d) for
the lateral-trim function, the following
special condition are issued:
1. Airbus must demonstrate that an
unsafe condition is not created by using
the flaps asymmetrically.
2. The degree of acceptable
asymmetry must be defined and
justified for all flight phases with
respect to:
a. Section 25.701(b) and (c), with the
worst-case asymmetric flap
configurations, and
b. Providing equivalent protection
against excess asymmetry in the same
manner as § 25.701 provides to systems
that are synchronized, or use another
equivalent means to prevent asymmetry.
3. This lateral-trim function is a flightcontrol system and therefore must be
shown to comply with both general
system requirements as well as general
flight-control requirements. Therefore,
the function must be demonstrated not
to have significant latent failures, where
practicable.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 9,
2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–17578 Filed 7–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Conclusion
14 CFR Part 25
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on the Airbus
Model A350–900 airplanes. It is not a
rule of general applicability.
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0892; Special
Conditions No. 25–537–SC]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the typecertification basis for Airbus Model
A350–900 airplanes:
15:26 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
These special conditions are
issued for Airbus Model A350–900
airplanes. These airplanes have a novel
or unusual design feature associated
with crashworthiness of carbon-fiberreinforced plastic used in the
construction of the fuselage. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
SUMMARY:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Special Conditions: Airbus A350–900
Airplane; Crashworthiness, Emergency
Landing Conditions
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43237
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: August 25, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Martin, FAA, Airframe/Cabin
Safety, ANM–115, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1178; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied
for a type certificate for their new Model
A350–900 airplane. Later, Airbus
requested, and the FAA approved, an
extension to the application for FAA
type certification to November 15, 2009.
The Model A350–900 airplane has a
conventional layout with twin wingmounted Rolls-Royce Trent XWB
engines. It features a twin-aisle, 9abreast, economy-class layout, and
accommodates side-by-side placement
of LD–3 containers in the cargo
compartment. The basic Model A350–
900 airplane configuration
accommodates 315 passengers in a
standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with
a maximum take-off weight of 602,000
lbs.
Changes in the structural behavior of
the Airbus Model A350–900 airplane,
compared to currently certificated
designs, could degrade the survivability
of the Model A350–900 airplane
occupants in crash conditions that are
within the limits of survivability for
other designs.
The airworthiness regulations specify
no aircraft-level survivable crash
condition, and metallic aircraft have not
been designed specifically against
survivable impact conditions. However,
the structural behavior of previously
certificated aircraft in a survivable crash
event, and the associated limits, are
considered generally acceptable. It is
therefore reasonable to expect that a
design using new materials, such as the
Model A350–900 airplanes use, should
be assessed to ensure that the material
meets the currently accepted level of
safety.
The FAA and industry have collected
a significant amount of experimental
data, as well as data from crashes of
transport-category airplanes, that show a
high occupant-survival rate at verticaldescent velocities up to 30 ft/sec. Based
on this information, the FAA finds it
appropriate and necessary for an
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43236-43237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17578]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0911; Special Conditions No. 25-539-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model A350-900 Airplanes; Lateral-Trim
Function Through Differential Flap Setting
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Airbus Model A350-900
airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with a lateral-trim function that deploys flaps
asymmetrically for airplane lateral-trim control. This function
replaces the traditional method of providing airplane lateral trim over
a small range through flap and aileron mechanical rigging. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: August 25, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert C. Jones, FAA, Propulsion and
Mechanical Systems, ANM-112, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 227-1234; facsimile (425) 227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied for a type certificate for their
new Model A350-900 airplane. Later, Airbus requested, and the FAA
approved, an extension to the application for FAA type certification to
November 15, 2009. The Model A350-900 airplane has a conventional
layout with twin wing-mounted Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engines. It
features a twin-aisle, 9-abreast, economy-class layout, and
accommodates side-by-side placement of LD-3 containers in the cargo
compartment. The basic Model A350-900 airplane configuration
accommodates 315 passengers in a standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with a maximum take-off weight of
602,000 lbs.
On conventional airplanes, small, lateral, airplane asymmetries
typically have been addressed through flap and aileron rigging (e.g.,
using shims). On Model A350-900 airplanes, an order for asymmetric flap
deployment will be computed by the primary flight-control system as a
function of the aileron position. The current airworthiness standards
do not contain adequate safety standards for asymmetric use of the
flaps for Airbus Model A350-900 airplanes. Special conditions are
needed to account for the aspects of a function used to command an
intended flap asymmetry. The lateral-trim function is intended to be
performed once during climb and once during cruise to compensate for
airplane small lateral asymmetries.
The lateral-trim function is not a trim-control system in the
conventional sense as it has no pilot interface and is not governed by
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.677. Some fly-by-wire
airplanes have no pilot-operated lateral trim at all. The lateral-trim
function is simply an additional fly-by-wire flight-control function
that nulls small roll asymmetries in certain flight phases with small,
asymmetric flap deployments. Although the function operates under
normal conditions within the small range of the traditional rigging,
failure cases may result in a significant out-of-range asymmetric flap
condition. An asymmetry threshold protects the system against excessive
flap asymmetry.
Type Certification Basis
Under 14 CFR 21.17, Airbus must show that the Model A350-900
airplane meets the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended
by Amendments 25-1 through 25-129.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model A350-900 airplane because of
a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model A350-900 airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the noise-
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19,
under Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis
under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350-900 airplane incorporates the following novel
or unusual design features: The asymmetric use of flaps to address
lateral trim, which is not adequately addressed by Sec. 25.701.
[[Page 43237]]
Discussion
Section 25.701(a) requires that, unless the airplane has safe-
flight characteristics with the flaps or slats retracted on one side
and extended on the other, flap and slat surfaces must be synchronized
by either a mechanical interconnection or any equivalent means that has
the same integrity. Synchronization is interpreted to mean that flap
movement is symmetrical throughout the full range of flap motion.
Because the lateral-trim function intentionally creates asymmetric flap
motions, the flap-system installation of the Model A350-900 airplane
does not meet the requirement of Sec. 25.701(a) and (d).
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions no. 25-13-22-SC for Airbus
Model A350-900 airplanes was published in the Federal Register on
January 8, 2014 (79 FR 1339). No comments were received, and the
special conditions are adopted as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions apply to Airbus Model
A350-900 airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a change to the type
certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on the Airbus Model A350-900 airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type-certification basis for Airbus Model A350-900 airplanes:
Lateral-Trim Function Through Differential Flap Setting
Current airworthiness standards, specifically Sec. 25.701, do not
contain adequate safety standards for this airplane design. In lieu of
the requirements of Sec. 25.701(a) and (d) for the lateral-trim
function, the following special condition are issued:
1. Airbus must demonstrate that an unsafe condition is not created
by using the flaps asymmetrically.
2. The degree of acceptable asymmetry must be defined and justified
for all flight phases with respect to:
a. Section 25.701(b) and (c), with the worst-case asymmetric flap
configurations, and
b. Providing equivalent protection against excess asymmetry in the
same manner as Sec. 25.701 provides to systems that are synchronized,
or use another equivalent means to prevent asymmetry.
3. This lateral-trim function is a flight-control system and
therefore must be shown to comply with both general system requirements
as well as general flight-control requirements. Therefore, the function
must be demonstrated not to have significant latent failures, where
practicable.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 9, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-17578 Filed 7-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P