Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Mukilteo Ferry Terminal Construction Work, 43424-43429 [2014-17524]
Download as PDF
43424
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Notices
Please include with your comments any
supporting data or literature citations to
help inform our final decision on the
Port’s request for an MMPA
authorization.
Dated: July 21, 2014.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–17446 Filed 7–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC863
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; Mukilteo Ferry
Terminal Construction Work
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
take authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) regulations, notification is
hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization
(IHA) to the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
to take, by harassment, small numbers
of eight species of marine mammals
incidental to construction activities at
the Mukilteo Multimodal Ferry
Terminal in Mukilteo, Snohomish
County, Washington, between
September 2014 and August 2015.
DATES: Effective September 1, 2014,
through August 31, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Requests for information on
the incidental take authorization should
be addressed to Jolie Harrison,
Supervisor, Incidental Take Program,
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910. A copy of the application
containing a list of the references used
in this document, NMFS’
Environmental Assessment (EA),
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI), and the IHA may be obtained
by writing to the address specified
above or visiting the Internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization for incidental
takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s), will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘. . . an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the U.S. can apply for
a one-year authorization to incidentally
take small numbers of marine mammals
by harassment, provided that there is no
potential for serious injury or mortality
to result from the activity. Section
101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time
limit for NMFS review of an application
followed by a 30-day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of marine mammals. Within
45 days of the close of the comment
period, NMFS must either issue or deny
the authorization.
Summary of Request
On August 30, 2013, WSF submitted
a request to NMFS requesting an IHA for
the possible harassment of small
numbers of eight marine mammal
species incidental to construction work
associated with the Mukilteo Ferry
Terminal replacement project in
Mukilteo, Snohomish County,
Washington. The new terminal will be
located to the east of the existing
location at the site of the former U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department of Defense Fuel Supply
Point facility, known as the Tank Farm
property, which includes a large pier
extending into Possession Sound
(Figure 1–3 of the WSF IHA
application). Completion of the entire
project will occur over 4 consecutive
years. WSF plans to submit an IHA
request for each consecutive year of
construction. The current IHA
application is for the first year of
construction, which is limited to
removing the Tank Farm Pier.
After receiving NMFS’s comment, on
October 17, 2013, WSF submitted a
revised IHA application. The action
discussed in this document is based on
WSF’s October 17, 2013, IHA
application.
Description of the Specified Activity
Detailed description of the WSDOT’s
Mukilteo Ferry Terminal construction
activities is provided in the Federal
Register notice for the proposed IHA (78
FR 72643; December 3, 2013). Since that
time, no changes have been made to the
proposed construction activities at the
Mukilteo Ferry Terminal. Therefore, a
detailed description is not provided
here. Please refer to that Federal
Register notice for the description of the
specific activity.
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS’ proposal to issue
an IHA to WSDOT was published in the
Federal Register on December 3, 2013.
That notice described, in detail,
WSDOT’s activity, the marine mammal
species that may be affected by the
activity, and the anticipated effects on
marine mammals. During the 30-day
public comment period, NMFS received
comments from the Marine Mammal
Commission (Commission). The
Commission recommends NMFS issue
the IHA to WSDOT, subject to inclusion
of the proposed mitigation and
monitoring measures described in the
proposed IHA. NMFS agrees with the
Commission’s recommendation and
issued the IHA with mitigation and
monitoring measures described below.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species under
NMFS jurisdiction most likely to occur
in the construction area include Pacific
harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardsi),
California sea lion (Zalophus
californianus), Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus), harbor porpoise
(Phocoena phocoena), Dall’s porpoise
(Phocoenoides dalli), killer whale
(Orcinus orca), gray whale (Eschrichtius
robustus), and humpback whale
(Megaptera novaeangliae).
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Notices
General information on the marine
mammal species found in the vicinity of
the project area in Washington waters
can be found in Caretta et al. (2011),
which is available at the following URL:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/
po2011.pdf. Specific information
concerning these species in the vicinity
of the action area is provided in the
Federal Register notice for the proposed
IHA and in WSDOT’s IHA application.
Therefore, it is not repeated here.
Potential Effects of the Specified
Activity on Marine Mammals
The effects of underwater noise from
in-water vibratory pile removal
associated with the Mukilteo Ferry
Terminal Tank Farm removal has the
potential to result in behavioral
harassment of marine mammal species
and stocks in the vicinity of the action
area. The Notice of Proposed IHA
included a discussion of the effects of
anthropogenic noise on marine
mammals, which is not repeated here.
No instances of hearing threshold shifts,
injury, serious injury, or mortality are
expected as a result of WSDOT’s
activities given the strong likelihood
that marine mammals would avoid the
immediate vicinity of the pile driving
area.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammal
Habitat
The primary potential impacts to
marine mammals and other marine
species are associated with elevated
sound levels, but the project may also
result in additional effects to marine
mammal prey species and short-term
local water turbidity caused by in-water
construction due to pile removal and
pile driving. These potential effects are
discussed in detail in the Federal
Register notice for the proposed IHA
and are not repeated here.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Potential Impacts on Availability of
Affected Species or Stocks for Taking
for Subsistence Uses
No subsistence harvest of marine
mammals occurs in the action area.
Mitigation Measures
In order to issue an incidental take
authorization under Section 101(a)(5)(D)
of the MMPA, NMFS must prescribe,
where applicable, the permissible
methods of taking pursuant to such
activity, and other means of effecting
the least practicable adverse impact on
such species or stock and its habitat,
paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of
such species or stock for taking for
certain subsistence uses.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
For WSDOT’s Mukilteo Ferry
Terminal construction work, NMFS is
requiring WSDOT to implement the
following mitigation measures to
minimize the potential impacts to
marine mammals in the project vicinity
as a result of the in-water construction
activities.
Since the measured source levels (at
16 m) of the vibratory hammer involved
in pile removal are below NMFS current
thresholds for Level A takes, i.e., below
180 dB re 1 mPa (rms), no exclusion
zone would be established, and there
would be no required power-down and
shutdown measures. In addition, as
discussed in the Federal Register notice
for the proposed IHA, the ambient noise
level at the proposed work site is
approximately 122 dB re 1 mPa. WSF
would establish and monitor a zone of
influence (ZOI) where the received level
falls to this ambient noise level.
One major mitigation measure for
WSDOT’s proposed pile removal
activities at the Mukilteo Tank Farm
Pier is ramping up, or soft start, of
vibratory pile hammers. The purpose of
this procedure is to reduce the startling
behavior of marine mammals in the
vicinity of the proposed construction
activity from sudden loud noise.
Soft start requires contractors to
initiate noise from vibratory hammers
for 15 seconds at reduced energy
followed by a 1-minute waiting period.
The procedure will be repeated two
additional times. Each day, WSF will
use the soft-start technique at the
beginning of pile removal, or if pile
removal has ceased for more than one
hour.
To ensure that marine mammal takes
will not exceed the authorized levels,
monitoring for marine mammal
presence will take place 30 minutes
before, during and 30 minutes after pile
driving to ensure that marine mammals
takes will not exceed the authorized
levels.
If the number of any allotted marine
mammal takes (see Estimated Take by
Incidental Harassment section below)
reaches the limit under the IHA (if
issued), WSDOT would implement
shutdown and power down measures if
such species/stock of animal approaches
the Level B harassment zone.
Especially, to ensure that the Level B
takes of Southern Resident killer whales
(SRKW) does not exceed 5% of its
population, shutdown measures will be
taken when SRKW approach the ZOI
during vibratory pile removal. Pile
removal will not resume until the
SRKW exit the ZOI.
If killer whales approach the ZOI
during vibratory pile removal, and it is
unknown whether they are SRKW or
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43425
transient, it shall be assumed they are
SRKW and work will be paused until
the whales exit the ZOI.
If a SRKW or an unidentified killer
whale enters the ZOI undetected, up to
4 ‘unintentional’ Level B harassment
takes will be allowed. Work will be
paused until the killer whale exits the
ZOI to avoid further Level B harassment
take.
Furthermore, the contractor shall
regularly check fuel hoses, oil drums,
oil or fuel transfers valves, fittings, etc.
for leaks, and shall maintain and store
materials properly to prevent spills.
Mitigation Conclusions
Based on our evaluation of the
prescribed mitigation measures, NMFS
has determined the measures provide
the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on marine mammal
species or stocks and their habitat,
paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
Monitoring Measures
Any ITA issued under Section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA is required to
prescribe, where applicable,
‘‘requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such
taking’’. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13)
state that requests for ITAs must include
the suggested means of accomplishing
the necessary monitoring and reporting
that will result in increased knowledge
of the species and of the level of taking
or impacts on populations of marine
mammals that are expected to be
present in the action area.
(1) Marine Mammal Monitoring
Coordination
WSF will conduct briefings with the
construction supervisors and the crew,
and marine mammal observer(s) prior to
the start of pier removal to discuss
marine mammal monitoring protocol
and requirement to halt work.
Prior to the start of pile driving, the
Orca Network and/or Center for Whale
Research would be contacted to find out
the location of the nearest marine
mammal sightings. The Orca Sightings
Network consists of a list of over 600
(and growing) residents, scientists, and
government agency personnel in the
U.S. and Canada. Sightings are called or
emailed into the Orca Network and
immediately distributed to other
sighting networks including: The
Northwest Fisheries Science Center of
NMFS, the Center for Whale Research,
Cascadia Research, the Whale Museum
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
43426
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Hotline and the British Columbia
Sightings Network.
Sightings information collected by the
Orca Network includes detection by
hydrophone. The SeaSound Remote
Sensing Network is a system of
interconnected hydrophones installed
in the marine environment of Haro
Strait (west side of San Juan Island) to
study orca communication, in-water
noise, bottomfish ecology and local
climatic conditions. A hydrophone at
the Port Townsend Marine Science
Center measures average in-water sound
levels and automatically detects
unusual sounds. These passive acoustic
devices allow researchers to hear when
different marine mammals come into
the region. This acoustic network,
combined with the volunteer
(incidental) visual sighting network
allows researchers to document
presence and location of various marine
mammal species.
With this level of coordination in the
region of activity, WSF would be able to
get real-time information on the
presence or absence of whales before
starting any pile removal or driving.
(2) Protected Species Observers (PSOs)
WSDOT will employ qualified PSOs
to monitor the 120 dBrms re 1 mPa for
marine mammals. Qualifications for
marine mammal observers include:
• Visual acuity in both eyes
(correction is permissible) sufficient for
discernment of moving targets at the
water’s surface with ability to estimate
target size and distance. Use of
binoculars will be necessary to correctly
identify the target.
• Experience or training in the field
identification of marine mammals
(cetaceans and pinnipeds).
• Sufficient training, orientation or
experience with the construction
operation to provide for personal safety
during observations.
• Ability to communicate orally, by
radio or in person, with project
personnel to provide real time
information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
• Experience and ability to conduct
field observations and collect data
according to assigned protocols (this
may include academic experience).
• Writing skills sufficient to prepare a
report of observations that would
include such information as the number
and type of marine mammals observed;
the behavior of marine mammals in the
project area during construction, dates
and times when observations were
conducted; dates and times when inwater construction activities were
conducted; and dates and times when
marine mammals were present at or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
within the defined ZOI; dates and times
when pile removal was paused due to
the presence of marine mammals.
comments are received from NMFS, the
draft report will be considered to be the
final report.
(3) Monitoring Protocols
PSOs will be present on site at all
times during pile removal. Marine
mammal behavior, overall numbers of
individuals observed, frequency of
observation, and the time corresponding
to the daily tidal cycle would be
recorded.
WSF proposes the following
methodology to estimate marine
mammals that were taken as a result of
the proposed Mukilteo Multimodal
Tank Farm Pier removal project:
• During vibratory pile removal, two
land-based biologists will monitor the
area from the best observation points
available. If weather conditions prevent
adequate land-based observations, boatbased monitoring may be implemented.
• To verify the required monitoring
distance, the vibratory Level B
behavioral harassment ZOI will be
determined by using a range finder or
hand-held global positioning system
device.
• The vibratory Level B acoustical
harassment ZOI will be monitored for
the presence of marine mammals 30
minutes before, during, and 30 minutes
after any pile removal activity.
• Monitoring will be continuous
unless the contractor takes a significant
break, in which case, monitoring will be
required 30 minutes prior to restarting
pile removal.
• If marine mammals are observed,
their location within the ZOI, and their
reaction (if any) to pile-driving activities
will be documented.
NMFS has determined that the
monitoring measures described above
are adequate, particularly as they relate
to assessing the level of taking or
impacts to affected species. The landbased PSO is expected to be positioned
in a location that will maximize his/her
ability to detect marine mammals and
will also utilize binoculars to improve
detection rates.
Notification of Injured or Dead Marine
Mammals
In addition to the reporting measures
listed above, NMFS will require that
WSDOT notify NMFS’ Office of
Protected Resources and NMFS’
Stranding Network of sighting an
injured or dead marine mammal in the
vicinity of marine operations.
Depending on the circumstance of the
incident, WSDOT shall take one of the
following reporting protocols when an
injured or dead marine mammal is
discovered in the vicinity of the action
area.
(A) In the unanticipated event that the
construction activities clearly cause the
take of a marine mammal in a manner
prohibited by this Authorization, such
as an injury, serious injury or mortality
(e.g., ship-strike, gear interaction, and/or
entanglement), WSDOT shall
immediately cease all operations and
immediately report the incident to the
Supervisor of Incidental Take Program,
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
and the West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinators. The report must include
the following information:
(i) Time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident;
(ii) description of the incident;
(iii) status of all sound source use in
the 24 hours preceding the incident;
(iv) environmental conditions (e.g.,
wind speed and direction, Beaufort sea
state, cloud cover, visibility, and water
depth);
(v) description of marine mammal
observations in the 24 hours preceding
the incident;
(vi) species identification or
description of the animal(s) involved;
(vii) the fate of the animal(s); and
(viii) photographs or video footage of
the animal (if equipment is available).
Activities shall not resume until
NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take.
NMFS shall work with WSDOT to
determine what is necessary to
minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA
compliance. WSDOT may not resume
their activities until notified by NMFS
via letter, email, or telephone.
(B) In the event that WSDOT
discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines
that the cause of the injury or death is
unknown and the death is relatively
recent (i.e., in less than a moderate state
of decomposition as described in the
next paragraph), WSDOT will
Reporting Measures
WSF will provide NMFS with a draft
monitoring report within 90 days of the
conclusion of the proposed construction
work. This report will detail the
monitoring protocol, summarize the
data recorded during monitoring, and
estimate the number of marine
mammals that may have been harassed.
If comments are received from the
NMFS West Coast Regional
Administrator or NMFS Office of
Protected Resources on the draft report,
a final report will be submitted to NMFS
within 30 days thereafter. If no
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
43427
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Notices
immediately report the incident to the
Supervisor of the Incidental Take
Program, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, and the West Coast Regional
Stranding Coordinators. The report must
include the same information identified
above. Activities may continue while
NMFS reviews the circumstances of the
incident. NMFS will work with WSDOT
to determine whether modifications in
the activities are appropriate.
(C) In the event that WSDOT
discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines
that the injury or death is not associated
with or related to the activities
authorized in the IHA (e.g., previously
wounded animal, carcass with moderate
to advanced decomposition, or
scavenger damage), WSDOT shall report
the incident to the Supervisor of the
Incidental Take Program, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, and the
West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinators, within 24 hours of the
discovery. WSDOT shall provide
photographs or video footage (if
available) or other documentation of the
stranded animal sighting to NMFS and
the Marine Mammal Stranding Network.
WSDOT can continue its operations
under such a case.
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
As mentioned in the Federal Register
notice for the proposed IHA, a worstcase scenario for Year One pile removal
assumes that it may take 516 hours over
90 days in Year One to remove 1,835
piles. The actual number of hours,
however, is expected to be less.
Also, as described earlier, for nonimpulse noise, NMFS uses 120 dB re 1
mPa (rms) as the threshold for Level B
behavioral harassment. However, the
underwater ambient noise
measurements conducted at the
proposed project site indicate that the
nominal noise level is around 122 dB re
1 mPa. Therefore, the distance to the 122
dB (ambient level) contour is used for
Level B behavioral harassment. The
distance to the 122 dB contour Level B
acoustical harassment threshold due to
vibratory pile removal extends a
maximum of 1.6 km (1 mile), and
determines the ZOI. The ZOI would be
monitored during pile removal to
estimate actual harassment take of
marine mammals.
Airborne noises can affect pinnipeds,
especially resting seals hauled out on
rocks or sand spits. The airborne 90 dB
Level B threshold for hauled out harbor
seals was estimated at 37 m (123 ft), and
the airborne 100 dB Level B threshold
for all other pinnipeds is estimated at 12
m (39 ft).
The closest documented harbor seal
haul-out is the Naval Station Everett
floating security fence, and the Port
Gardner log booms, both approximately
4.5 miles to the northeast of the project
site). The closest documented California
sea lion haul out site are the Everett
Harbor navigation buoys, located
approximately 3 miles to the northeast
of the project site. In-air disturbance
will be limited to those animals moving
on the surface through the immediate
pier area, within approximately 37 m
(123 ft) and 12 m (39 ft) of vibratory pile
removal.
Incidental take for each species is
estimated by determining the likelihood
of a marine mammal being present
within a ZOI during active pile removal.
Expected marine mammal presence is
determined by past observations and
general abundance near the Tank Farm
Pier during the construction window.
Typically, potential take is estimated by
multiplying the area of the ZOI by the
local animal density. This provides an
estimate of the number of animals that
might occupy the ZOI at any given
moment. However, there are no density
estimates for any Puget Sound
population of marine mammal. As a
result, the take requests were estimated
using local marine mammal data sets
(e.g., Orca Network, state and federal
agencies), opinions from state and
federal agencies, and observations from
Navy biologists.
Based on the estimates, approximately
1,170 Pacific harbor seals, 540
California sea lions, 180 Steller sea
lions, 720 harbor porpoises, 270 Dall’s
porpoises, 39 killer whales (35 transient,
4 Southern Resident killer whales), 70
gray whales, and 28 humpback whales
could be exposed to received sound
levels above 122 dB re 1 mPa (rms) from
the proposed Mukilteo Multimodal
Project Tank Farm Pier removal project.
A summary of the estimated takes is
presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED NUMBERS OF MARINE MAMMALS THAT MAY BE EXPOSED TO RECEIVED PILE REMOVAL LEVELS
ABOVE 122 dB re 1 μPa (rms)
Estimated
marine
mammal
takes
Species
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pacific harbor seal ...................................................................................................................................................
California sea lion ....................................................................................................................................................
Steller sea lion .........................................................................................................................................................
Harbor porpoise .......................................................................................................................................................
Dall’s porpoise .........................................................................................................................................................
Killer whale, transient ..............................................................................................................................................
Killer whale, Southern Resident ..............................................................................................................................
Gray whale ...............................................................................................................................................................
Humpback whale .....................................................................................................................................................
The requested takes represent 4.0% of
the Inland Washington stock harbor
seals (estimated at 32,000), 0.2% of the
U.S. stock California sea lion (estimated
at 296,750), 0.3% of the eastern stock
Steller sea lion (estimated at 52,847),
7.0% of the Washington Inland Water
stock harbor porpoise (estimated at
10,682), 0.6% of the California, Oregon,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
and Washington stock Dall’s porpoise
(estimated at 42,000), 9.8% of the West
Coast transient killer whale (estimated
at 354), 5.0% of Southern Resident
killer whale (estimated at 82), 0.4% of
the Eastern North Pacific stock gray
whale (estimated at 18,017), and 1.0%
of the Eastern North Pacific stock
humpback whale (estimated at 2,043).
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1,170
540
180
720
270
35
4
70
20
Percentage
4.0
0.2
0.3
7.0
0.6
9.8
5.0
0.4
1.0
Negligible Impact and Small Numbers
Analysis and Determination
Pursuant to NMFS’ regulations
implementing the MMPA, an applicant
is required to estimate the number of
animals that will be ‘‘taken’’ by the
specified activities (i.e., takes by
harassment only, or takes by
harassment, injury, and/or death). This
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
43428
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Notices
estimate informs the analysis that NMFS
must perform to determine whether the
activity will have a ‘‘negligible impact’’
on the species or stock. Level B
(behavioral) harassment occurs at the
level of the individual(s) and does not
assume any resulting population-level
consequences, though there are known
avenues through which behavioral
disturbance of individuals can result in
population-level effects. A negligible
impact finding is based on the lack of
likely adverse effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival (i.e., populationlevel effects). An estimate of the number
of Level B harassment takes alone is not
enough information on which to base an
impact determination.
In addition to considering estimates of
the number of marine mammals that
might be ‘‘taken’’ through behavioral
harassment, NMFS considers other
factors, such as the likely nature of any
responses (their intensity, duration,
etc.), the context of any responses
(critical reproductive time or location,
migration, etc.), as well as the number
and nature of estimated Level A takes,
the number of estimated mortalities, and
effects on habitat.
The WSF’s Mukilteo Tank Farm Pier
removal project would conduct
vibratory pile removal activities.
Elevated underwater noises are
expected to be generated as a result of
pile removal. However, noise levels
from the machinery and activities are
not expected to reach to the level that
may cause TTS, injury (PTS included),
or mortality to marine mammals.
Therefore, NMFS does not expect that
any animals would experience Level A
harassment or Level B harassment in the
form of TTS from being exposed to inwater pile driving and pile removal
associated with WSF construction
project.
Based on long-term marine mammal
monitoring and studies in the vicinity of
the construction areas, it is estimated
that approximately 1,170 Pacific harbor
seals, 540 California sea lions, 180
Steller sea lions, 720 harbor porpoises,
270 Dall’s porpoises, 39 killer whales
(35 transient, 4 Southern Resident killer
whales), 70 gray whales, and 20
humpback whales could be exposed to
received noise levels above 122 dBrms re
1 mPa from the proposed construction
work at the Mukilteo Multimodal Ferry
Terminal. These numbers represent
approximately 0.2%–9.8% of the stocks
and populations of these species that
could be affected by Level B behavioral
harassment. These percentages are small
relative to the overall size of each
species or stock. As mentioned earlier in
this document, the worst case scenario
for the proposed pile removal work
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
would only take a total of 516 hours
over 90 days.
In addition, these low intensity,
localized, and short-term noise
exposures may cause brief startle
reactions or short-term behavioral
modification by the animals. These
reactions and behavioral changes are
expected to subside quickly when the
exposures cease. Additionally, no
important feeding and/or reproductive
areas for marine mammals are known to
be near the proposed action area.
Therefore, the take resulting from the
proposed Mukilteo Tank Farm Pier
removal project is not reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the marine mammal
species or stocks through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
The maximum estimated 122 dB
isopleths from vibratory pile driving is
approximately 1.6 km from the pile
before being blocked by landmass.
The closest documented harbor seal
haul-out is the Naval Station Everett
floating security fence, and the Port
Gardner log booms, both approximately
4.5 miles to the northeast of the project
area. The closest documented California
sea lion haul-out sites are the Everett
Harbor navigation buoys, located
approximately 3 miles to the northeast
of the project site. However, it is
estimated that airborne noise from
vibratory pile removal would fall below
90 dB and 100 dB re 1 20 mPa at 37 m
and 12 m from the pile, respectively.
Therefore, pinnipeds hauled out in the
vicinity of the project area will not be
affected.
For the reasons discussed in this
document, NMFS has determined that
the vibratory pile removal associated
with the Mukilteo Tank Farm Pier
Removal Project would result, at worst,
in the Level B harassment of small
numbers of eight marine mammal
species that inhabit or visit the area.
While behavioral modifications,
including temporarily vacating the area
around the project site, may be made by
these species to avoid the resultant
visual and acoustic disturbance, the
availability of alternate areas within
Washington coastal waters and haul-out
sites has led NMFS to determine that
this action will have a negligible impact
on these species in the vicinity of the
proposed project area.
In addition, no take by TTS, Level A
harassment (injury) or death is
anticipated and harassment takes
should be at the lowest level practicable
due to incorporation of the mitigation
and monitoring measures mentioned
previously in this document.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) and analyzed the
potential impacts to marine mammals
that would result from WSDOT’s
Mukilteo Ferry Terminal construction
work. A Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) was signed on February
28, 2014. A copy of the EA and FONSI
is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES).
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The humpback whale and Southern
Resident stock of killer whale are the
only marine mammal species currently
listed under the ESA that could occur in
the vicinity of WSF’s proposed
construction projects. Under section 7 of
the ESA, the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and WSDOT have
consulted with NMFS Northwest
Regional Office (NWRO) on the
proposed WSF Mukilteo Ferry Terminal
Multimodal Project. NWRO issued a
Biological Opinion on July 31, 2013,
which concludes that the proposed
Mukilteo Ferry Terminal Multimodal
Project may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect the listed marine
mammal species and stocks.
The issuance of an IHA to WSF
constitutes an agency action that
authorizes an activity that may affect
ESA-listed species and, therefore, is
subject to section 7 of the ESA. As the
effects of the activities on listed marine
mammals were analyzed during a
formal consultation between the FTA
and NMFS, and as the underlying action
has not changed from that considered in
the consultation, the discussion of
effects that are contained in the
Biological Opinion and accompanying
memo issued to the FTA on July 31,
2013, pertains also to this action.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that
issuance of an IHA for this activity
would not lead to any effects to listed
marine mammal species apart from
those that were considered in the
consultation on FTA’s action.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to WSDOT
for the potential harassment of small
numbers of eight marine mammal
species incidental to construction work
at the Mukilteo Ferry Terminal in
Washington State, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2014 / Notices
Dated: March 19, 2014.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–17524 Filed 7–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD282
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to a Wharf
Construction Project
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as
amended, notification is hereby given
that we have issued an incidental
harassment authorization (IHA) to the
U.S. Navy (Navy) to incidentally harass,
by Level B harassment only, five species
of marine mammals during construction
activities associated with a wharf
construction project in Hood Canal,
Washington.
SUMMARY:
This authorization is effective
from July 16, 2014, through February 15,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben
Laws, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Availability
An electronic copy of the Navy’s
application and supporting documents,
as well as a list of the references cited
in this document, may be obtained by
visiting the Internet at:
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm. A memorandum
describing our adoption of the Navy’s
Environmental Impact Statement (2011)
and our associated Record of Decision,
prepared pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act, are also
available at the same site. In case of
problems accessing these documents,
please call the contact listed above (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Jul 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
upon request by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
area, the incidental, but not intentional,
taking of small numbers of marine
mammals, providing that certain
findings are made and the necessary
prescriptions are established.
The incidental taking of small
numbers of marine mammals may be
allowed only if NMFS (through
authority delegated by the Secretary)
finds that the total taking by the
specified activity during the specified
time period will (i) have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s) and (ii)
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant). Further, the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such taking must be set
forth, either in specific regulations or in
an authorization.
The allowance of such incidental
taking under section 101(a)(5)(A), by
harassment, serious injury, death, or a
combination thereof, requires that
regulations be established.
Subsequently, a Letter of Authorization
may be issued pursuant to the
prescriptions established in such
regulations, providing that the level of
taking will be consistent with the
findings made for the total taking
allowable under the specific regulations.
Under section 101(a)(5)(D), NMFS may
authorize such incidental taking by
harassment only, for periods of not more
than one year, pursuant to requirements
and conditions contained within an
IHA. The establishment of prescriptions
through either specific regulations or an
authorization requires notice and
opportunity for public comment.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘. . . an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’ Except with
respect to certain activities not pertinent
here, section 3(18) of the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as: ‘‘. . . any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild; or (ii) has the potential to disturb
a marine mammal or marine mammal
stock in the wild by causing disruption
of behavioral patterns, including, but
not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering.’’ The former is termed Level
A harassment and the latter is termed
Level B harassment.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43429
Summary of Request
On January 10, 2014, we received a
request from the Navy for authorization
to take marine mammals incidental to
pile driving associated with the
construction of an explosives handling
wharf (EHW–2) in the Hood Canal at
Naval Base Kitsap in Bangor, WA
(NBKB). The Navy submitted a revised
version of the request on April 11, 2014,
which we deemed adequate and
complete. The Navy plans to continue
this multi-year project, involving impact
and vibratory pile driving conducted
within the approved in-water work
window. This IHA covers only the third
year (in-water work window) of the
project, from July 16, 2014, through
February 15, 2015.
The use of both vibratory and impact
pile driving is expected to produce
underwater sound at levels that have the
potential to result in behavioral
harassment of marine mammals. Species
with the expected potential to be
present during all or a portion of the inwater work window include the Steller
sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus
monteriensis), California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus), harbor seal
(Phoca vitulina richardii), killer whale
(transient only; Orcinus orca), and
harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena
vomerina). These species may occur
year-round in the Hood Canal, with the
exception of the Steller sea lion, which
is present only from fall to late spring
(approximately late September to early
May), and the California sea lion, which
is only present from late summer to late
spring (approximately late August to
early June).
This is the third IHA issued to the
Navy for this project. The Navy received
IHAs, effective from July 16–February
15, in 2012–13 (77 FR 42279) and 2013–
14 (78 FR 43148). Additional IHAs were
issued to the Navy in recent years for
marine construction projects on the
NBKB waterfront. These projects
include the Test Pile Project (TPP),
conducted in 2011–12 in the proposed
footprint of the EHW–2 to collect
geotechnical data and test methodology
in advance of EHW–2 (76 FR 38361); a
two-year maintenance project on the
existing explosives handling wharf
(EHW–1) conducted in 2011–12 and
2012–13 (76 FR 30130 and 77 FR
43049); and a minor project to install a
new mooring for an existing research
barge, conducted in 2013–14 (78 FR
43165). In-water work associated with
all projects was conducted only during
the approved in-water work window
(July 16–February 15). Monitoring
reports for all of these projects are
available on the Internet at
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43424-43429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17524]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XC863
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Mukilteo Ferry Terminal Construction Work
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental take authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)
regulations, notification is hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to take, by harassment, small
numbers of eight species of marine mammals incidental to construction
activities at the Mukilteo Multimodal Ferry Terminal in Mukilteo,
Snohomish County, Washington, between September 2014 and August 2015.
DATES: Effective September 1, 2014, through August 31, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Requests for information on the incidental take
authorization should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Supervisor,
Incidental Take Program, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. A copy of the application containing
a list of the references used in this document, NMFS' Environmental
Assessment (EA), Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), and the IHA
may be obtained by writing to the address specified above or visiting
the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ``. . . an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the U.S. can apply for a one-year authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment,
provided that there is no potential for serious injury or mortality to
result from the activity. Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day
time limit for NMFS review of an application followed by a 30-day
public notice and comment period on any proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of
the comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On August 30, 2013, WSF submitted a request to NMFS requesting an
IHA for the possible harassment of small numbers of eight marine mammal
species incidental to construction work associated with the Mukilteo
Ferry Terminal replacement project in Mukilteo, Snohomish County,
Washington. The new terminal will be located to the east of the
existing location at the site of the former U.S. Department of Defense
Fuel Supply Point facility, known as the Tank Farm property, which
includes a large pier extending into Possession Sound (Figure 1-3 of
the WSF IHA application). Completion of the entire project will occur
over 4 consecutive years. WSF plans to submit an IHA request for each
consecutive year of construction. The current IHA application is for
the first year of construction, which is limited to removing the Tank
Farm Pier.
After receiving NMFS's comment, on October 17, 2013, WSF submitted
a revised IHA application. The action discussed in this document is
based on WSF's October 17, 2013, IHA application.
Description of the Specified Activity
Detailed description of the WSDOT's Mukilteo Ferry Terminal
construction activities is provided in the Federal Register notice for
the proposed IHA (78 FR 72643; December 3, 2013). Since that time, no
changes have been made to the proposed construction activities at the
Mukilteo Ferry Terminal. Therefore, a detailed description is not
provided here. Please refer to that Federal Register notice for the
description of the specific activity.
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS' proposal to issue an IHA to WSDOT was published
in the Federal Register on December 3, 2013. That notice described, in
detail, WSDOT's activity, the marine mammal species that may be
affected by the activity, and the anticipated effects on marine
mammals. During the 30-day public comment period, NMFS received
comments from the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission). The Commission
recommends NMFS issue the IHA to WSDOT, subject to inclusion of the
proposed mitigation and monitoring measures described in the proposed
IHA. NMFS agrees with the Commission's recommendation and issued the
IHA with mitigation and monitoring measures described below.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species under NMFS jurisdiction most likely to
occur in the construction area include Pacific harbor seal (Phoca
vitulina richardsi), California sea lion (Zalophus californianus),
Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus), harbor porpoise (Phocoena
phocoena), Dall's porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli), killer whale (Orcinus
orca), gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), and humpback whale
(Megaptera novaeangliae).
[[Page 43425]]
General information on the marine mammal species found in the
vicinity of the project area in Washington waters can be found in
Caretta et al. (2011), which is available at the following URL: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/po2011.pdf. Specific information
concerning these species in the vicinity of the action area is provided
in the Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA and in WSDOT's IHA
application. Therefore, it is not repeated here.
Potential Effects of the Specified Activity on Marine Mammals
The effects of underwater noise from in-water vibratory pile
removal associated with the Mukilteo Ferry Terminal Tank Farm removal
has the potential to result in behavioral harassment of marine mammal
species and stocks in the vicinity of the action area. The Notice of
Proposed IHA included a discussion of the effects of anthropogenic
noise on marine mammals, which is not repeated here. No instances of
hearing threshold shifts, injury, serious injury, or mortality are
expected as a result of WSDOT's activities given the strong likelihood
that marine mammals would avoid the immediate vicinity of the pile
driving area.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat
The primary potential impacts to marine mammals and other marine
species are associated with elevated sound levels, but the project may
also result in additional effects to marine mammal prey species and
short-term local water turbidity caused by in-water construction due to
pile removal and pile driving. These potential effects are discussed in
detail in the Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA and are not
repeated here.
Potential Impacts on Availability of Affected Species or Stocks for
Taking for Subsistence Uses
No subsistence harvest of marine mammals occurs in the action area.
Mitigation Measures
In order to issue an incidental take authorization under Section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA, NMFS must prescribe, where applicable, the
permissible methods of taking pursuant to such activity, and other
means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on such species
or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the
availability of such species or stock for taking for certain
subsistence uses.
For WSDOT's Mukilteo Ferry Terminal construction work, NMFS is
requiring WSDOT to implement the following mitigation measures to
minimize the potential impacts to marine mammals in the project
vicinity as a result of the in-water construction activities.
Since the measured source levels (at 16 m) of the vibratory hammer
involved in pile removal are below NMFS current thresholds for Level A
takes, i.e., below 180 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms), no exclusion zone would be
established, and there would be no required power-down and shutdown
measures. In addition, as discussed in the Federal Register notice for
the proposed IHA, the ambient noise level at the proposed work site is
approximately 122 dB re 1 [mu]Pa. WSF would establish and monitor a
zone of influence (ZOI) where the received level falls to this ambient
noise level.
One major mitigation measure for WSDOT's proposed pile removal
activities at the Mukilteo Tank Farm Pier is ramping up, or soft start,
of vibratory pile hammers. The purpose of this procedure is to reduce
the startling behavior of marine mammals in the vicinity of the
proposed construction activity from sudden loud noise.
Soft start requires contractors to initiate noise from vibratory
hammers for 15 seconds at reduced energy followed by a 1-minute waiting
period. The procedure will be repeated two additional times. Each day,
WSF will use the soft-start technique at the beginning of pile removal,
or if pile removal has ceased for more than one hour.
To ensure that marine mammal takes will not exceed the authorized
levels, monitoring for marine mammal presence will take place 30
minutes before, during and 30 minutes after pile driving to ensure that
marine mammals takes will not exceed the authorized levels.
If the number of any allotted marine mammal takes (see Estimated
Take by Incidental Harassment section below) reaches the limit under
the IHA (if issued), WSDOT would implement shutdown and power down
measures if such species/stock of animal approaches the Level B
harassment zone.
Especially, to ensure that the Level B takes of Southern Resident
killer whales (SRKW) does not exceed 5% of its population, shutdown
measures will be taken when SRKW approach the ZOI during vibratory pile
removal. Pile removal will not resume until the SRKW exit the ZOI.
If killer whales approach the ZOI during vibratory pile removal,
and it is unknown whether they are SRKW or transient, it shall be
assumed they are SRKW and work will be paused until the whales exit the
ZOI.
If a SRKW or an unidentified killer whale enters the ZOI
undetected, up to 4 `unintentional' Level B harassment takes will be
allowed. Work will be paused until the killer whale exits the ZOI to
avoid further Level B harassment take.
Furthermore, the contractor shall regularly check fuel hoses, oil
drums, oil or fuel transfers valves, fittings, etc. for leaks, and
shall maintain and store materials properly to prevent spills.
Mitigation Conclusions
Based on our evaluation of the prescribed mitigation measures, NMFS
has determined the measures provide the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and
areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
Monitoring Measures
Any ITA issued under Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA is required
to prescribe, where applicable, ``requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking''. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13) state that requests for ITAs must
include the suggested means of accomplishing the necessary monitoring
and reporting that will result in increased knowledge of the species
and of the level of taking or impacts on populations of marine mammals
that are expected to be present in the action area.
(1) Marine Mammal Monitoring Coordination
WSF will conduct briefings with the construction supervisors and
the crew, and marine mammal observer(s) prior to the start of pier
removal to discuss marine mammal monitoring protocol and requirement to
halt work.
Prior to the start of pile driving, the Orca Network and/or Center
for Whale Research would be contacted to find out the location of the
nearest marine mammal sightings. The Orca Sightings Network consists of
a list of over 600 (and growing) residents, scientists, and government
agency personnel in the U.S. and Canada. Sightings are called or
emailed into the Orca Network and immediately distributed to other
sighting networks including: The Northwest Fisheries Science Center of
NMFS, the Center for Whale Research, Cascadia Research, the Whale
Museum
[[Page 43426]]
Hotline and the British Columbia Sightings Network.
Sightings information collected by the Orca Network includes
detection by hydrophone. The SeaSound Remote Sensing Network is a
system of interconnected hydrophones installed in the marine
environment of Haro Strait (west side of San Juan Island) to study orca
communication, in-water noise, bottomfish ecology and local climatic
conditions. A hydrophone at the Port Townsend Marine Science Center
measures average in-water sound levels and automatically detects
unusual sounds. These passive acoustic devices allow researchers to
hear when different marine mammals come into the region. This acoustic
network, combined with the volunteer (incidental) visual sighting
network allows researchers to document presence and location of various
marine mammal species.
With this level of coordination in the region of activity, WSF
would be able to get real-time information on the presence or absence
of whales before starting any pile removal or driving.
(2) Protected Species Observers (PSOs)
WSDOT will employ qualified PSOs to monitor the 120
dBrms re 1 [mu]Pa for marine mammals. Qualifications for
marine mammal observers include:
Visual acuity in both eyes (correction is permissible)
sufficient for discernment of moving targets at the water's surface
with ability to estimate target size and distance. Use of binoculars
will be necessary to correctly identify the target.
Experience or training in the field identification of
marine mammals (cetaceans and pinnipeds).
Sufficient training, orientation or experience with the
construction operation to provide for personal safety during
observations.
Ability to communicate orally, by radio or in person, with
project personnel to provide real time information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
Experience and ability to conduct field observations and
collect data according to assigned protocols (this may include academic
experience).
Writing skills sufficient to prepare a report of
observations that would include such information as the number and type
of marine mammals observed; the behavior of marine mammals in the
project area during construction, dates and times when observations
were conducted; dates and times when in-water construction activities
were conducted; and dates and times when marine mammals were present at
or within the defined ZOI; dates and times when pile removal was paused
due to the presence of marine mammals.
(3) Monitoring Protocols
PSOs will be present on site at all times during pile removal.
Marine mammal behavior, overall numbers of individuals observed,
frequency of observation, and the time corresponding to the daily tidal
cycle would be recorded.
WSF proposes the following methodology to estimate marine mammals
that were taken as a result of the proposed Mukilteo Multimodal Tank
Farm Pier removal project:
During vibratory pile removal, two land-based biologists
will monitor the area from the best observation points available. If
weather conditions prevent adequate land-based observations, boat-based
monitoring may be implemented.
To verify the required monitoring distance, the vibratory
Level B behavioral harassment ZOI will be determined by using a range
finder or hand-held global positioning system device.
The vibratory Level B acoustical harassment ZOI will be
monitored for the presence of marine mammals 30 minutes before, during,
and 30 minutes after any pile removal activity.
Monitoring will be continuous unless the contractor takes
a significant break, in which case, monitoring will be required 30
minutes prior to restarting pile removal.
If marine mammals are observed, their location within the
ZOI, and their reaction (if any) to pile-driving activities will be
documented.
NMFS has determined that the monitoring measures described above
are adequate, particularly as they relate to assessing the level of
taking or impacts to affected species. The land-based PSO is expected
to be positioned in a location that will maximize his/her ability to
detect marine mammals and will also utilize binoculars to improve
detection rates.
Reporting Measures
WSF will provide NMFS with a draft monitoring report within 90 days
of the conclusion of the proposed construction work. This report will
detail the monitoring protocol, summarize the data recorded during
monitoring, and estimate the number of marine mammals that may have
been harassed.
If comments are received from the NMFS West Coast Regional
Administrator or NMFS Office of Protected Resources on the draft
report, a final report will be submitted to NMFS within 30 days
thereafter. If no comments are received from NMFS, the draft report
will be considered to be the final report.
Notification of Injured or Dead Marine Mammals
In addition to the reporting measures listed above, NMFS will
require that WSDOT notify NMFS' Office of Protected Resources and NMFS'
Stranding Network of sighting an injured or dead marine mammal in the
vicinity of marine operations. Depending on the circumstance of the
incident, WSDOT shall take one of the following reporting protocols
when an injured or dead marine mammal is discovered in the vicinity of
the action area.
(A) In the unanticipated event that the construction activities
clearly cause the take of a marine mammal in a manner prohibited by
this Authorization, such as an injury, serious injury or mortality
(e.g., ship-strike, gear interaction, and/or entanglement), WSDOT shall
immediately cease all operations and immediately report the incident to
the Supervisor of Incidental Take Program, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, and the West Coast
Regional Stranding Coordinators. The report must include the following
information:
(i) Time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the incident;
(ii) description of the incident;
(iii) status of all sound source use in the 24 hours preceding the
incident;
(iv) environmental conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction,
Beaufort sea state, cloud cover, visibility, and water depth);
(v) description of marine mammal observations in the 24 hours
preceding the incident;
(vi) species identification or description of the animal(s)
involved;
(vii) the fate of the animal(s); and
(viii) photographs or video footage of the animal (if equipment is
available).
Activities shall not resume until NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take. NMFS shall work with WSDOT to
determine what is necessary to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA compliance. WSDOT may not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS via letter, email, or telephone.
(B) In the event that WSDOT discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines that the cause of the injury or
death is unknown and the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less than
a moderate state of decomposition as described in the next paragraph),
WSDOT will
[[Page 43427]]
immediately report the incident to the Supervisor of the Incidental
Take Program, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, and the West Coast Regional Stranding Coordinators.
The report must include the same information identified above.
Activities may continue while NMFS reviews the circumstances of the
incident. NMFS will work with WSDOT to determine whether modifications
in the activities are appropriate.
(C) In the event that WSDOT discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines that the injury or death is not
associated with or related to the activities authorized in the IHA
(e.g., previously wounded animal, carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage), WSDOT shall report the incident to
the Supervisor of the Incidental Take Program, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, and the West Coast
Regional Stranding Coordinators, within 24 hours of the discovery.
WSDOT shall provide photographs or video footage (if available) or
other documentation of the stranded animal sighting to NMFS and the
Marine Mammal Stranding Network. WSDOT can continue its operations
under such a case.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
As mentioned in the Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA, a
worst-case scenario for Year One pile removal assumes that it may take
516 hours over 90 days in Year One to remove 1,835 piles. The actual
number of hours, however, is expected to be less.
Also, as described earlier, for non-impulse noise, NMFS uses 120 dB
re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) as the threshold for Level B behavioral harassment.
However, the underwater ambient noise measurements conducted at the
proposed project site indicate that the nominal noise level is around
122 dB re 1 [mu]Pa. Therefore, the distance to the 122 dB (ambient
level) contour is used for Level B behavioral harassment. The distance
to the 122 dB contour Level B acoustical harassment threshold due to
vibratory pile removal extends a maximum of 1.6 km (1 mile), and
determines the ZOI. The ZOI would be monitored during pile removal to
estimate actual harassment take of marine mammals.
Airborne noises can affect pinnipeds, especially resting seals
hauled out on rocks or sand spits. The airborne 90 dB Level B threshold
for hauled out harbor seals was estimated at 37 m (123 ft), and the
airborne 100 dB Level B threshold for all other pinnipeds is estimated
at 12 m (39 ft).
The closest documented harbor seal haul-out is the Naval Station
Everett floating security fence, and the Port Gardner log booms, both
approximately 4.5 miles to the northeast of the project site). The
closest documented California sea lion haul out site are the Everett
Harbor navigation buoys, located approximately 3 miles to the northeast
of the project site. In-air disturbance will be limited to those
animals moving on the surface through the immediate pier area, within
approximately 37 m (123 ft) and 12 m (39 ft) of vibratory pile removal.
Incidental take for each species is estimated by determining the
likelihood of a marine mammal being present within a ZOI during active
pile removal. Expected marine mammal presence is determined by past
observations and general abundance near the Tank Farm Pier during the
construction window. Typically, potential take is estimated by
multiplying the area of the ZOI by the local animal density. This
provides an estimate of the number of animals that might occupy the ZOI
at any given moment. However, there are no density estimates for any
Puget Sound population of marine mammal. As a result, the take requests
were estimated using local marine mammal data sets (e.g., Orca Network,
state and federal agencies), opinions from state and federal agencies,
and observations from Navy biologists.
Based on the estimates, approximately 1,170 Pacific harbor seals,
540 California sea lions, 180 Steller sea lions, 720 harbor porpoises,
270 Dall's porpoises, 39 killer whales (35 transient, 4 Southern
Resident killer whales), 70 gray whales, and 28 humpback whales could
be exposed to received sound levels above 122 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) from
the proposed Mukilteo Multimodal Project Tank Farm Pier removal
project. A summary of the estimated takes is presented in Table 1.
Table 1--Estimated Numbers of Marine Mammals That May Be Exposed to
Received Pile Removal Levels Above 122 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Species marine mammal Percentage
takes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific harbor seal..................... 1,170 4.0
California sea lion..................... 540 0.2
Steller sea lion........................ 180 0.3
Harbor porpoise......................... 720 7.0
Dall's porpoise......................... 270 0.6
Killer whale, transient................. 35 9.8
Killer whale, Southern Resident......... 4 5.0
Gray whale.............................. 70 0.4
Humpback whale.......................... 20 1.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The requested takes represent 4.0% of the Inland Washington stock
harbor seals (estimated at 32,000), 0.2% of the U.S. stock California
sea lion (estimated at 296,750), 0.3% of the eastern stock Steller sea
lion (estimated at 52,847), 7.0% of the Washington Inland Water stock
harbor porpoise (estimated at 10,682), 0.6% of the California, Oregon,
and Washington stock Dall's porpoise (estimated at 42,000), 9.8% of the
West Coast transient killer whale (estimated at 354), 5.0% of Southern
Resident killer whale (estimated at 82), 0.4% of the Eastern North
Pacific stock gray whale (estimated at 18,017), and 1.0% of the Eastern
North Pacific stock humpback whale (estimated at 2,043).
Negligible Impact and Small Numbers Analysis and Determination
Pursuant to NMFS' regulations implementing the MMPA, an applicant
is required to estimate the number of animals that will be ``taken'' by
the specified activities (i.e., takes by harassment only, or takes by
harassment, injury, and/or death). This
[[Page 43428]]
estimate informs the analysis that NMFS must perform to determine
whether the activity will have a ``negligible impact'' on the species
or stock. Level B (behavioral) harassment occurs at the level of the
individual(s) and does not assume any resulting population-level
consequences, though there are known avenues through which behavioral
disturbance of individuals can result in population-level effects. A
negligible impact finding is based on the lack of likely adverse
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (i.e., population-
level effects). An estimate of the number of Level B harassment takes
alone is not enough information on which to base an impact
determination.
In addition to considering estimates of the number of marine
mammals that might be ``taken'' through behavioral harassment, NMFS
considers other factors, such as the likely nature of any responses
(their intensity, duration, etc.), the context of any responses
(critical reproductive time or location, migration, etc.), as well as
the number and nature of estimated Level A takes, the number of
estimated mortalities, and effects on habitat.
The WSF's Mukilteo Tank Farm Pier removal project would conduct
vibratory pile removal activities. Elevated underwater noises are
expected to be generated as a result of pile removal. However, noise
levels from the machinery and activities are not expected to reach to
the level that may cause TTS, injury (PTS included), or mortality to
marine mammals. Therefore, NMFS does not expect that any animals would
experience Level A harassment or Level B harassment in the form of TTS
from being exposed to in-water pile driving and pile removal associated
with WSF construction project.
Based on long-term marine mammal monitoring and studies in the
vicinity of the construction areas, it is estimated that approximately
1,170 Pacific harbor seals, 540 California sea lions, 180 Steller sea
lions, 720 harbor porpoises, 270 Dall's porpoises, 39 killer whales (35
transient, 4 Southern Resident killer whales), 70 gray whales, and 20
humpback whales could be exposed to received noise levels above 122
dBrms re 1 [mu]Pa from the proposed construction work at the
Mukilteo Multimodal Ferry Terminal. These numbers represent
approximately 0.2%-9.8% of the stocks and populations of these species
that could be affected by Level B behavioral harassment. These
percentages are small relative to the overall size of each species or
stock. As mentioned earlier in this document, the worst case scenario
for the proposed pile removal work would only take a total of 516 hours
over 90 days.
In addition, these low intensity, localized, and short-term noise
exposures may cause brief startle reactions or short-term behavioral
modification by the animals. These reactions and behavioral changes are
expected to subside quickly when the exposures cease. Additionally, no
important feeding and/or reproductive areas for marine mammals are
known to be near the proposed action area. Therefore, the take
resulting from the proposed Mukilteo Tank Farm Pier removal project is
not reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the marine mammal species or stocks through effects on annual
rates of recruitment or survival. The maximum estimated 122 dB
isopleths from vibratory pile driving is approximately 1.6 km from the
pile before being blocked by landmass.
The closest documented harbor seal haul-out is the Naval Station
Everett floating security fence, and the Port Gardner log booms, both
approximately 4.5 miles to the northeast of the project area. The
closest documented California sea lion haul-out sites are the Everett
Harbor navigation buoys, located approximately 3 miles to the northeast
of the project site. However, it is estimated that airborne noise from
vibratory pile removal would fall below 90 dB and 100 dB re 1 20 [mu]Pa
at 37 m and 12 m from the pile, respectively. Therefore, pinnipeds
hauled out in the vicinity of the project area will not be affected.
For the reasons discussed in this document, NMFS has determined
that the vibratory pile removal associated with the Mukilteo Tank Farm
Pier Removal Project would result, at worst, in the Level B harassment
of small numbers of eight marine mammal species that inhabit or visit
the area. While behavioral modifications, including temporarily
vacating the area around the project site, may be made by these species
to avoid the resultant visual and acoustic disturbance, the
availability of alternate areas within Washington coastal waters and
haul-out sites has led NMFS to determine that this action will have a
negligible impact on these species in the vicinity of the proposed
project area.
In addition, no take by TTS, Level A harassment (injury) or death
is anticipated and harassment takes should be at the lowest level
practicable due to incorporation of the mitigation and monitoring
measures mentioned previously in this document.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) and analyzed the
potential impacts to marine mammals that would result from WSDOT's
Mukilteo Ferry Terminal construction work. A Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) was signed on February 28, 2014. A copy of the EA and
FONSI is available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The humpback whale and Southern Resident stock of killer whale are
the only marine mammal species currently listed under the ESA that
could occur in the vicinity of WSF's proposed construction projects.
Under section 7 of the ESA, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
and WSDOT have consulted with NMFS Northwest Regional Office (NWRO) on
the proposed WSF Mukilteo Ferry Terminal Multimodal Project. NWRO
issued a Biological Opinion on July 31, 2013, which concludes that the
proposed Mukilteo Ferry Terminal Multimodal Project may affect, but is
not likely to adversely affect the listed marine mammal species and
stocks.
The issuance of an IHA to WSF constitutes an agency action that
authorizes an activity that may affect ESA-listed species and,
therefore, is subject to section 7 of the ESA. As the effects of the
activities on listed marine mammals were analyzed during a formal
consultation between the FTA and NMFS, and as the underlying action has
not changed from that considered in the consultation, the discussion of
effects that are contained in the Biological Opinion and accompanying
memo issued to the FTA on July 31, 2013, pertains also to this action.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that issuance of an IHA for this
activity would not lead to any effects to listed marine mammal species
apart from those that were considered in the consultation on FTA's
action.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to WSDOT for the potential harassment of
small numbers of eight marine mammal species incidental to construction
work at the Mukilteo Ferry Terminal in Washington State, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
[[Page 43429]]
Dated: March 19, 2014.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-17524 Filed 7-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P