Environmental Impact Statement for the California High-Speed Rail System Palmdale to Burbank Section, CA, 43122-43125 [2014-17385]
Download as PDF
43122
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 142 / Thursday, July 24, 2014 / Notices
to give users additional ways to search
for carriers on the Web site.
Response
In response to this feedback, the
Agency will provide a carrier’s DBA
name to improve the search
functionality on the site.
IV. Implementation
The SMS display enhancements
explained in this notice will be
implemented in August 2014. The
Agency is developing outreach materials
and plans to host several educational
webinars for the public addressing the
enhancements to the public SMS Web
site. The webinars will address the
enhancements to the public SMS Web
site, as well as MCMIS changes to
improve uniformity in the treatment of
violations data that was announced in
79 FR 32491.These webinars will take
place after the implementation of the
display changes to give stakeholders
time to familiarize themselves with the
enhanced SMS Web site and identify
any questions they may have. The
scheduled dates and times of the
educational webinars are below:
Wednesday, August 20, 2014 10:00–
11:30 a.m. Eastern Time
Wednesday, August 20, 2014 2:00–3:30
p.m. Eastern Time
Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:00–3:30
p.m. Eastern Time
All the webinars will have closed
captioning available, and all
stakeholders are encouraged to
participate. Interested parties can
register for the webinars through the
FMCSA’s National Training Center at
https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety/
overview-fmcsa-safety-measurementsystem-display-enhancements-industrywebinar. A copy of the webinar will also
be available on the Agency’s Web site at
www.fmcsa.dot.gov.
Issued on: July 21, 2014.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–17489 Filed 7–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for
the California High-Speed Rail System
Palmdale to Burbank Section, CA
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:03 Jul 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
FRA is issuing this notice to
advise other Federal, state, and local
agencies and the public that FRA and
the California High-Speed Rail
Authority (Authority) are amending the
existing 2007 Notice of Intent for the
Palmdale to Los Angeles Section and
will jointly prepare an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) and Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Palmdale
to Burbank Section of the California
High-Speed Rail (HSR) System in
compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA). FRA is publishing this
notice to solicit additional public and
agency input into the development of
the scope of the EIS and to advise the
public that outreach activities
conducted by the FRA and the
Authority and their representatives will
be considered in the preparation of the
EIR/EIS. Federal cooperating agencies
for the EIS are the Surface
Transportation Board (STB), the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
In March 2007, FRA and the
Authority respectively issued a Notice
of Preparation and a Notice of Intent for
the preparation of an EIR/EIS for the
Palmdale to Los Angeles Section of the
Authority’s proposed California HSR
System. Because the Palmdale to Los
Angeles Section of the HSR System will
be implemented in two parts consistent
with Authority’s Business Plan that
prioritizes an Initial Operating Section
(IOS) with a southern temporary
terminus in the San Fernando Valley,
the FRA and Authority have determined
that there are two sections of the HSR
System between Palmdale and Los
Angeles and they will be better
evaluated in two separate EIR/EISs:
Palmdale to Burbank and Burbank to
Los Angeles. Each of these sections has
logical termini and independent utility,
as discussed further below. This notice
provides information regarding the
Project EIR/EIS for the Palmdale to
Burbank Section of the California HSR
System (proposed action). The Burbank
to Los Angeles Section of the California
HSR System is the subject of a separate
Notice of Intent, which is being
published concurrently with this notice.
The preparation of the Palmdale to
Burbank Section EIR/EIS will involve a
robust public outreach process; the
development of preliminary engineering
designs; and the assessment of potential
environmental effects associated with
the construction, operation, and
maintenance of the HSR System.
DATES: Written comments on the scope
of the Palmdale to Burbank EIR/EIS
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
should be provided to the address below
by August 25, 2014. Public scoping
meetings are scheduled from August 5,
2014 to August 19, 2014 as noted below
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section. Scoping materials and
information concerning the scoping
meetings is available through the
Authority’s Web site: https://hsr.ca.gov/
Programs/Statewide_Rail_
Modernization/project_sections/
palmdale_burbank.html.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
scope should be sent to Mark A.
McLoughlin, Director of Environmental
Services, Attention: Palmdale to
Burbank Section EIR/EIS, California
High-Speed Rail Authority, 700 North
Alameda Street, Room 3–532, Los
Angeles, CA 90012, or via email with
subject line ‘‘Palmdale to Burbank
Section EIR/EIS’’ to:
palmdale_burbank@hsr.ca.gov.
Comments may also be provided
orally or in writing at scoping meetings.
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for meeting times and addresses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Stephanie Perez, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Office of Program
Delivery, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., (Mail Stop 20),
Washington, DC 20590, telephone: (202)
493–0388, email:
stephanie.perez@dot.gov; or Mr. Mark
A. McLoughlin, Director of
Environmental Services, California
High-Speed Rail Authority, 700 North
Alameda Street, Room 3–532, Los
Angeles, CA 90012, telephone: (800)
630–1039, email:
palmdale_burbank@hsr.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FRA is an
operating administration of the U.S.
Department of Transportation and has
responsibility for overseeing the safety
of railroad operations, including the
safety of any proposed high-speed
ground transportation system. FRA is
also authorized to provide, subject to
appropriations, Federal funding for
intercity passenger rail capital
investments including high-speed rail.
Federal cooperating agencies for the EIS
are BLM, STB, and USACE. BLM has
approval authority over the use of
public lands under their control. STB
has exclusive jurisdiction, pursuant to
49 U.S.C. 10501(b), over the
construction, acquisition, operation, and
abandonment of rail lines, railroad rates,
and services and rail carrier
consolidations and mergers. The
construction and operation of the
proposed California HSR System is
subject to STB’s approval authority
under 49 U.S.C. 10901. USACE has
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 142 / Thursday, July 24, 2014 / Notices
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act.
The Authority was established in
1996 and is authorized and directed by
statute to undertake the planning and
development of a proposed statewide
HSR network that is fully coordinated
with other public transportation
services. In 2005, FRA and the
Authority completed the California HSR
Program EIR/EIS (Statewide Program
EIR/EIS), as the first phase of a tiered
environmental review process. The
Authority certified the Statewide
Program EIR under CEQA and approved
the proposed HSR System, and FRA
issued a Record of Decision under
NEPA for the Statewide Program EIS.
This Statewide Program EIR/EIS
established the purpose and need for the
HSR System, analyzed an HSR System,
and compared the HSR System with a
No Action Alternative and a Modal
Alternative.
In approving the Statewide Program
EIR/EIS, FRA and the Authority selected
the HSR Alternative for intercity
passenger travel in California between
the major metropolitan centers of
Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay
Area in the north, through the Central
Valley, to the cities of Los Angeles and
San Diego in the south; selected general
corridors/alignments and general station
locations for further study; incorporated
mitigation strategies and design
practices; and specified further
measures to guide the development of
the HSR System during the site-specific,
project-level environmental review to
avoid and minimize potential adverse
environmental impacts. The approved
HSR System would be approximately
800 miles long, with electric propulsion
and steel-wheel-on-steel-rail trains
capable of operating speeds of 220 miles
per hour (mph) on a dedicated system
of fully grade-separated, accesscontrolled steel tracks with state-of-theart safety, signaling, communication,
and automated train control systems.
The HSR Alternative as described in
the Statewide Program EIR/EIS provides
a broad planning and conceptual outline
of the proposed train system. The
Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS
will allow for the consideration of
alternatives for this section at a greater
level of detail. The Palmdale to Burbank
Section EIR/EIS will tier from the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS in
accordance with Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations, (40 CFR 1508.28) and State
CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of
Regulations 15168(b)). The Palmdale to
Burbank Section EIR/EIS will build
upon all previous work prepared for,
and incorporated in, the Statewide
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:03 Jul 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
Program EIR/EIS, including the state
planning process incorporated into the
Authority’s Business Plans. In addition,
the selection of alternatives to be
included in the Palmdale to Burbank
EIR/EIS will consider comments
received from the agencies and the
public during the alternatives analyses
process. All comments received during
the scoping period will receive equal
consideration as comments received
during the March to April 2007 scoping
period for the Palmdale to Los Angeles
Section EIR/EIS.
In approving the HSR System, FRA
and the Authority also selected
corridors/general alignments and station
location options throughout most of the
System, including a corridor between
Palmdale and Los Angeles. The
Statewide Program EIR/EIS generally
selected the Soledad Canyon Corridor
and the Metro/Metrolink right-of-way
for the HSR route from Palmdale to Los
Angeles with stations in the City of
Palmdale, the San Fernando Valley, and
the vicinity of Los Angeles Union
Station.
In addition to the NEPA and CEQA
process, as required by state law, the
Authority adopted its first Business Plan
in June 2000, which reviewed the
economic feasibility of an 800-mile-long
HSR System capable of operating speeds
in excess of 200 mph on a dedicated,
fully grade-separated state-of-the-art
track. The Authority released updated
Business Plans in November 2008,
December 2009 (addendum in April
2010), April 2012, and April 2014.
These Business Plans, which are subject
to public review, are an important part
of the statewide planning process for
HSR.
Pursuant to state law, the Authority
must prepare Business Plans biannually, which are subject to public
review and comment and must include
information describing the type of
service to be developed and the
proposed chronology for the
construction of the Statewide HSR
system.
On April 30, 2014, the Authority
released its 2014 Business Plan, which
builds on the Authority’s 2012 Plan.
Like the 2012 Revised Business Plan,
the 2014 Business Plan describes the
phased implementation of the California
HSR System, including a 300-mile
Initial Operating Section (IOS). This IOS
is intended to provide a one-seat ride
from Merced to the San Fernando
Valley, closing a north-south intercity
passenger rail gap. Initially, the IOS is
proposed to begin with the construction
of up to 130 miles of high-speed rail
track and structures in the Central
Valley. It would terminate in the San
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43123
Fernando Valley and would connect
with the San Francisco Bay Area and
the Los Angeles Basin (referred to as the
‘‘bookends’’) through a ‘‘blended’’
system. The blended operations would
rely on connections with regional and
local rail for an interim period prior to
initiation of full HSR service.
In addition to the refinement of the
types of service and the likely
chronology in the Business Plans,
several alternatives analyses have been
conducted to refine the project
alignments and station locations. The
Preliminary Alternatives Analysis and
all Supplemental Alternative Analyses
(SAA) included public outreach
activities, including community
meetings, stakeholder meetings, and
public official outreach. The
Preliminary Alternatives Analysis and
SAA documents include a description
of public outreach activities conducted.
These documents are available at https://
www.hsr.ca.gov/Programs/Statewide_
Rail_Modernization/Project_Sections/
palmdale_losangeles.html.
The Preliminary Alternatives Analysis
was published in July 2010 and
addressed alignment alternatives and
station options throughout the Palmdale
to Los Angeles Section. Three
Supplemental Alternatives Analyses
(‘‘SAA’’) have subsequently been
prepared. The first SAA (March 2011)
addressed supplemental alignment
alternatives and station options for the
Los Angeles to Sylmar subsection. The
second SAA (April 2012) addressed
supplemental alignment alternatives for
the Sylmar to Palmdale subsection and
redefined the subsection into two new
subsections: the Santa Clarita
subsection, extending from Sylmar to
two miles east of Lang Station Road, and
the Palmdale subsection, extending
from two miles east of Lang Station
Road to Palmdale.
The third SAA (May 2014) reflects the
2012 and 2014 Business Plans by
introducing phased implementation of
the project with a 300-mile IOS. With
the introduction of the IOS, this SAA
also discusses the concept of evaluating
Palmdale to Burbank and Burbank to
Los Angeles as two sections. The May
2014 SAA refined the alignment
alternatives and station options,
including withdrawing one alignment
alternative and three station options,
and recommending the Palmdale
Transportation Center Station and the
Burbank Airport Station for further
analysis.
As discussed further in the May 2014
SAA, it would be beneficial to address
the environmental effects of the HSR
System from Palmdale to Burbank in
one EIR/EIS and from Burbank to Los
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
43124
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 142 / Thursday, July 24, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Angeles in a separate EIR/EIS. This
would provide for more effective
planning and public outreach in these
highly populated areas. These two
sections are of sufficient length to
address environmental matters. They
have logical termini, which means that
their end points are rational for
transportation improvements and for the
review of environmental impacts. Each
section has independent utility, which
means that the HSR System will
function properly within each section,
independent of additional
improvements elsewhere.
The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/
EIS will describe site-specific
environmental impacts, identify specific
mitigation measures to address those
impacts, and incorporate design features
to avoid and minimize potential adverse
environmental impacts. The site
characteristics, size, nature, and timing
of the proposed action will be described
as a basis for determining whether the
impacts are potentially significant and
whether impacts can be avoided,
minimized, or mitigated. The Palmdale
to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will identify
and evaluate reasonable and feasible
alignment alternatives along the
corridor selected in the Program EIR/
EIS, as well as addressing alternatives
that may meet project objectives while
potentially reducing environmental
effects as identified during the
alternatives analysis process and the
scoping process. The Palmdale to
Burbank Section EIR/EIS will also
identify and evaluate station options
and evaluate the impacts of
construction, operation, and
maintenance of the proposed HSR
System. Information and documents
regarding this HSR environmental
review process will be made available
through the Authority’s Internet site:
www.hsr.ca.gov.
there will be negative effects on the
economy, quality of life, and air quality
in and around California’s metropolitan
areas from an increasingly congested
transportation system that will become
less reliable as travel demand increases.
The intercity highway system,
commercial airports, and conventional
passenger rail serving the intercity
travel market are currently operating at
or near capacity, and will require large
public investments for maintenance and
expansion to meet existing demand and
future growth. The proposed HSR
System is designed to address some of
the social, economic and environmental
problems associated with transportation
congestion in California.
The Palmdale to Burbank Section
meets this purpose and need by:
• Connecting the major metropolitan
areas in Central and Northern California
to the San Fernando Valley;
• Incorporating HSR into the
intermodal transportation hubs at
Palmdale and Burbank, thereby
providing interfaces with airports (Bob
Hope Airport), mass transit (Metro,
Metrolink, and Amtrak), and highways,
resulting in local and regional transit
and transportation hubs;
• Capturing a large base of riders in
the densely populated San Fernando
Valley and the Los Angeles Basin; and
• Providing station locations with
existing and planned transit oriented
development potential.
The scoping process will allow the
public and agencies to provide input
and comments on purpose and need as
it relates to the Palmdale to Burbank
Section.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed HSR
System is to provide a new mode of
high-speed intercity travel that would
link major metropolitan areas of the
state; interface with airports, mass
transit, and highways; and provide
added capacity to meet increases in
intercity travel demand in California in
a manner sensitive to, and protective of,
California’s unique natural resources.
The need for an HSR System is
directly related to the expected growth
in population, and increases in intercity
travel demand in California over the
next 20 years and beyond. With the
growth in travel demand, there will be
an increase in travel delays arising from
the growing congestion on California’s
highways and at airports. In addition,
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative (No Project
or No Build) represents the conditions
in the Palmdale to Burbank Section as
they exist in 2014, and as they would
exist based on programmed and funded
improvements to the intercity
transportation system and other
reasonably foreseeable projects through
2040, taking into account the following
sources of information: the State
Transportation Improvement Program,
Regional Transportation Plans for all
modes of travel, airport plans, intercity
passenger rail plans, and city and
county plans.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:03 Jul 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
Alternatives
The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/
EIS will consider a No Action
Alternative and one or more HSR
Alternatives.
HSR Alternative
The Authority proposes to construct,
operate and maintain an electric-
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
powered steel- wheel-on-steel-rail HSR
System, approximately 800 miles long,
capable of operating speeds of 220 mph
on dedicated, fully grade-separated
tracks, with state-of-the-art safety,
signaling, and automated train control
systems.
The Palmdale to Los Angeles HSR
Corridor that was selected by FRA and
the Authority in the Statewide Program
EIR/EIS follows Soledad Canyon from
the City of Palmdale to the community
of Sylmar in the City of Los Angeles and
then along the Metro/Metrolink Railroad
line to Los Angeles Union Station. The
corridor is relatively wide in the area
that includes both the State Route 14
and Union Pacific Railroad alignments
between the Antelope Valley and Santa
Clarita.
Alternatives analyses conducted
subsequent to completion of the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS have
examined alignments within and
outside of the selected corridor,
including in Palmdale, Santa Clarita,
and the San Fernando Valley. The May
2014 SAA concluded that Burbank
Airport would provide the most benefits
and fewest impacts of the station
locations in the San Fernando Valley,
because intermodal connectivity (rail,
bus, air) is strongest and existing land
uses (primarily industrial and
commercial) would be most compatible
with the development of transit oriented
uses. The May 2014 SAA was available
for public review and comment as part
of the alternatives analysis process.
In response to this information and to
stakeholder and public feedback on the
2014 Business Plan and the 2014 SAA,
requesting the Authority to consider a
more direct route between Palmdale and
Burbank, the Palmdale to Burbank
Section EIR/EIS will address potential
alignment alternatives that provide a
more direct connection between the
Palmdale station and the Burbank
Airport station. Engineering studies will
be continued as part of this EIR/EIS
process and will examine potential new
alignments and refine studied
alignments in order to better meet
purpose and need, respond to
stakeholder comments and concerns,
and reduce environmental impacts. All
alignment alternatives would be grade
separated from existing roadways.
Station location options were selected
with the Statewide Program EIR/EIS
based on travel time, train speed, cost,
local access times, potential connections
with other modes of transportation,
ridership potential and the distribution
of population and major destinations
along the route, and local planning
constraints and conditions. The
identification of station sites and
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 142 / Thursday, July 24, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
configuration will be further refined and
evaluated in the Palmdale to Burbank
Section EIR/EIS to reflect the evolution
of statewide planning for HSR, as
outlined in the 2014 Business Plan, as
well as public and agency comments
and concerns. To assist in the
development of the IOS, station area
development policies to encourage
transit-friendly development near and
around HSR stations that would have
the potential to promote multi-modal
uses, higher density, mixed-use,
pedestrian-oriented development
around the stations will guide the
selection of the station alternatives. In
addition, station option selection will
evaluate sites for potential to function as
a terminal station in the IOS. Potential
sites for terminal storage and
maintenance facilities will also be
evaluated in the Palmdale to Burbank
Section EIR/EIS.
Probable Effects
The purpose of the EIR/EIS process is
to explore, in a public setting, the effects
of the proposed action on the physical,
human, and natural environment. FRA
and the Authority will continue the
tiered evaluation of all significant
environmental, social, and economic
impacts of the construction and
operation of the HSR System. Impact
areas to be addressed include
transportation impacts; safety and
security; land use and zoning; land
acquisition, displacements, and
relocations; agricultural land impacts;
cumulative and secondary impacts;
cultural resource impacts, including
impacts on historical and archaeological
resources and parklands/recreation
areas; neighborhood compatibility and
environmental justice; and natural
resource impacts including air quality,
wetlands, water resources, noise,
vibration, energy, wildlife and
ecosystems, including endangered
species. Measures to avoid, minimize,
and mitigate adverse impacts will be
identified and evaluated.
The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/
EIS will be prepared in accordance with
FRA’s Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts (64 FR 28545,
May 26, 1999) and will follow the
Integration Process for the California
High-Speed Train Program as set forth
in the Memorandum of Understanding
(Integration MOU) among FRA, the
Authority, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and the USACE.
Consistent with the Integration MOU,
the Burbank to Los Angeles Section EIR/
EIS will evaluate alignment alternatives,
and station and maintenance facility
location options. This analysis will
occur in coordination with the analysis
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:03 Jul 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
required under the Integration MOU
necessary to make a determination of
the Least Environmentally Damaging
Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) by the
USACE, as required by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act.
The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/
EIS will also address, as necessary,
other applicable statutes, regulations,
and executive orders, including (but not
limited to) the Clean Air Act, Clean
Water Act, Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act, the Endangered
Species Act, and Executive Order 12898
on Environmental Justice.
Implementation of the Palmdale to
Burbank Section is a federal
undertaking with the potential to affect
historic properties. As such, it is subject
to the requirements of Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 (16 U.S.C. 470f). In accordance
with regulations issued by the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, 36
CFR part 800, FRA intends to coordinate
compliance with Section 106 of this Act
with the preparation of the Palmdale to
Burbank Section EIR/EIS, beginning
with the identification of consulting
parties in a manner consistent with the
standards set out in 36 CFR 800.8.
Pursuant to a Programmatic Agreement
among FRA, the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation, the California
State Historic Preservation Officer, and
the Authority, phased review of effects
on historic properties is being
conducted as provided by 36 CFR
800.4(b)(2). Public comment is sought
with respect to the effects of potential
alternatives within the Palmdale to
Burbank Section on historic properties.
Scoping and Comments
FRA encourages broad participation
in the EIS process during scoping and
review of the resulting environmental
documents. Comments and suggestions
are invited from all interested agencies,
Native American Tribes, and the public
at large to ensure that the full range of
issues related to the proposed action
and all reasonable alternatives are
addressed and that all significant issues
are identified. In particular, FRA is
interested in determining whether there
are areas of environmental concern
where there might be a potential for
significant impacts identifiable at a
project level. Comments are also sought
regarding purpose and need as it relates
to the Palmdale to Burbank Section and
the selection of alternatives, including
alternatives addressed in the
Preliminary Alternatives Analysis and
the SAAs. Public agencies with
jurisdiction are requested to advise FRA
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43125
and Authority of the applicable permit
and environmental review requirements
of each agency, and the scope and
content of the environmental
information that is germane to the
agency’s statutory responsibilities in
connection with the proposed project.
Public agencies are requested to advise
FRA if they anticipate taking a major
action in connection with the proposed
project and if they wish to cooperate in
the preparation of the project-level
Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS.
Public scoping meetings have been
scheduled as an important component
of the scoping process for both the State
and Federal environmental review. The
scoping meetings described in this
Notice will also be advertised locally
and included in additional public
notification. The scoping meetings will
be held from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at
the following locations:
• Santa Clarita: Tuesday, August 5,
William S. Hart Regional Park, 24151
Newhall Avenue, Newhall, CA 91321
• Burbank: Wednesday, August 6,
Buena Vista Branch Library, 300 N.
Buena Vista Street, Burbank, CA 91505
• Palmdale: Thursday, August 7,
Chimbole Cultural Center, 38350 Sierra
Highway, Palmdale, CA 93550
• Acton/Agua Dulce: Monday, August
11, Acton-Agua Dulce Library, 33792
Crown Valley Road, Acton, CA 93510
• Sylmar: Tuesday, August 12,
Sylmar Public Library, 14561 Polk
Street, Sylmar, CA 91342
• Lake View Terrace: Thursday,
August 14, Lakeview Terrace Recreation
Center, 11075 Foothill Boulevard, Lake
View Terrace, CA 91342
• Downtown LA: Tuesday, August 19,
Los Angeles Union Station Fred Harvey
Room, 800 N. Alameda Street, Los
Angeles, CA 90012
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 18,
2014.
Corey Hill,
Director, Office of Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 2014–17385 Filed 7–23–14; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for
the California High-Speed Rail System
Burbank to Los Angeles Section, CA
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
FRA is issuing this notice to
advise other Federal, state, and local
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 142 (Thursday, July 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43122-43125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17385]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for the California High-Speed Rail
System Palmdale to Burbank Section, CA
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to advise other Federal, state, and
local agencies and the public that FRA and the California High-Speed
Rail Authority (Authority) are amending the existing 2007 Notice of
Intent for the Palmdale to Los Angeles Section and will jointly prepare
an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Palmdale to Burbank Section of the California High-Speed
Rail (HSR) System in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA). FRA is publishing this notice to solicit additional public and
agency input into the development of the scope of the EIS and to advise
the public that outreach activities conducted by the FRA and the
Authority and their representatives will be considered in the
preparation of the EIR/EIS. Federal cooperating agencies for the EIS
are the Surface Transportation Board (STB), the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
In March 2007, FRA and the Authority respectively issued a Notice
of Preparation and a Notice of Intent for the preparation of an EIR/EIS
for the Palmdale to Los Angeles Section of the Authority's proposed
California HSR System. Because the Palmdale to Los Angeles Section of
the HSR System will be implemented in two parts consistent with
Authority's Business Plan that prioritizes an Initial Operating Section
(IOS) with a southern temporary terminus in the San Fernando Valley,
the FRA and Authority have determined that there are two sections of
the HSR System between Palmdale and Los Angeles and they will be better
evaluated in two separate EIR/EISs: Palmdale to Burbank and Burbank to
Los Angeles. Each of these sections has logical termini and independent
utility, as discussed further below. This notice provides information
regarding the Project EIR/EIS for the Palmdale to Burbank Section of
the California HSR System (proposed action). The Burbank to Los Angeles
Section of the California HSR System is the subject of a separate
Notice of Intent, which is being published concurrently with this
notice. The preparation of the Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will
involve a robust public outreach process; the development of
preliminary engineering designs; and the assessment of potential
environmental effects associated with the construction, operation, and
maintenance of the HSR System.
DATES: Written comments on the scope of the Palmdale to Burbank EIR/EIS
should be provided to the address below by August 25, 2014. Public
scoping meetings are scheduled from August 5, 2014 to August 19, 2014
as noted below in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. Scoping
materials and information concerning the scoping meetings is available
through the Authority's Web site: https://hsr.ca.gov/Programs/Statewide_Rail_Modernization/project_sections/palmdale_burbank.html.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope should be sent to Mark A.
McLoughlin, Director of Environmental Services, Attention: Palmdale to
Burbank Section EIR/EIS, California High-Speed Rail Authority, 700
North Alameda Street, Room 3-532, Los Angeles, CA 90012, or via email
with subject line ``Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS'' to:
palmdale_burbank@hsr.ca.gov.
Comments may also be provided orally or in writing at scoping
meetings. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for meeting times
and addresses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Stephanie Perez, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Office of Program Delivery, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., (Mail Stop 20), Washington,
DC 20590, telephone: (202) 493-0388, email: stephanie.perez@dot.gov; or
Mr. Mark A. McLoughlin, Director of Environmental Services, California
High-Speed Rail Authority, 700 North Alameda Street, Room 3-532, Los
Angeles, CA 90012, telephone: (800) 630-1039, email: palmdale_burbank@hsr.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FRA is an operating administration of the
U.S. Department of Transportation and has responsibility for overseeing
the safety of railroad operations, including the safety of any proposed
high-speed ground transportation system. FRA is also authorized to
provide, subject to appropriations, Federal funding for intercity
passenger rail capital investments including high-speed rail. Federal
cooperating agencies for the EIS are BLM, STB, and USACE. BLM has
approval authority over the use of public lands under their control.
STB has exclusive jurisdiction, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10501(b), over
the construction, acquisition, operation, and abandonment of rail
lines, railroad rates, and services and rail carrier consolidations and
mergers. The construction and operation of the proposed California HSR
System is subject to STB's approval authority under 49 U.S.C. 10901.
USACE has
[[Page 43123]]
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
The Authority was established in 1996 and is authorized and
directed by statute to undertake the planning and development of a
proposed statewide HSR network that is fully coordinated with other
public transportation services. In 2005, FRA and the Authority
completed the California HSR Program EIR/EIS (Statewide Program EIR/
EIS), as the first phase of a tiered environmental review process. The
Authority certified the Statewide Program EIR under CEQA and approved
the proposed HSR System, and FRA issued a Record of Decision under NEPA
for the Statewide Program EIS. This Statewide Program EIR/EIS
established the purpose and need for the HSR System, analyzed an HSR
System, and compared the HSR System with a No Action Alternative and a
Modal Alternative.
In approving the Statewide Program EIR/EIS, FRA and the Authority
selected the HSR Alternative for intercity passenger travel in
California between the major metropolitan centers of Sacramento and the
San Francisco Bay Area in the north, through the Central Valley, to the
cities of Los Angeles and San Diego in the south; selected general
corridors/alignments and general station locations for further study;
incorporated mitigation strategies and design practices; and specified
further measures to guide the development of the HSR System during the
site-specific, project-level environmental review to avoid and minimize
potential adverse environmental impacts. The approved HSR System would
be approximately 800 miles long, with electric propulsion and steel-
wheel-on-steel-rail trains capable of operating speeds of 220 miles per
hour (mph) on a dedicated system of fully grade-separated, access-
controlled steel tracks with state-of-the-art safety, signaling,
communication, and automated train control systems.
The HSR Alternative as described in the Statewide Program EIR/EIS
provides a broad planning and conceptual outline of the proposed train
system. The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will allow for the
consideration of alternatives for this section at a greater level of
detail. The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will tier from the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS in accordance with Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) regulations, (40 CFR 1508.28) and State CEQA Guidelines
(14 California Code of Regulations 15168(b)). The Palmdale to Burbank
Section EIR/EIS will build upon all previous work prepared for, and
incorporated in, the Statewide Program EIR/EIS, including the state
planning process incorporated into the Authority's Business Plans. In
addition, the selection of alternatives to be included in the Palmdale
to Burbank EIR/EIS will consider comments received from the agencies
and the public during the alternatives analyses process. All comments
received during the scoping period will receive equal consideration as
comments received during the March to April 2007 scoping period for the
Palmdale to Los Angeles Section EIR/EIS.
In approving the HSR System, FRA and the Authority also selected
corridors/general alignments and station location options throughout
most of the System, including a corridor between Palmdale and Los
Angeles. The Statewide Program EIR/EIS generally selected the Soledad
Canyon Corridor and the Metro/Metrolink right-of-way for the HSR route
from Palmdale to Los Angeles with stations in the City of Palmdale, the
San Fernando Valley, and the vicinity of Los Angeles Union Station.
In addition to the NEPA and CEQA process, as required by state law,
the Authority adopted its first Business Plan in June 2000, which
reviewed the economic feasibility of an 800-mile-long HSR System
capable of operating speeds in excess of 200 mph on a dedicated, fully
grade-separated state-of-the-art track. The Authority released updated
Business Plans in November 2008, December 2009 (addendum in April
2010), April 2012, and April 2014. These Business Plans, which are
subject to public review, are an important part of the statewide
planning process for HSR.
Pursuant to state law, the Authority must prepare Business Plans
bi-annually, which are subject to public review and comment and must
include information describing the type of service to be developed and
the proposed chronology for the construction of the Statewide HSR
system.
On April 30, 2014, the Authority released its 2014 Business Plan,
which builds on the Authority's 2012 Plan. Like the 2012 Revised
Business Plan, the 2014 Business Plan describes the phased
implementation of the California HSR System, including a 300-mile
Initial Operating Section (IOS). This IOS is intended to provide a one-
seat ride from Merced to the San Fernando Valley, closing a north-south
intercity passenger rail gap. Initially, the IOS is proposed to begin
with the construction of up to 130 miles of high-speed rail track and
structures in the Central Valley. It would terminate in the San
Fernando Valley and would connect with the San Francisco Bay Area and
the Los Angeles Basin (referred to as the ``bookends'') through a
``blended'' system. The blended operations would rely on connections
with regional and local rail for an interim period prior to initiation
of full HSR service.
In addition to the refinement of the types of service and the
likely chronology in the Business Plans, several alternatives analyses
have been conducted to refine the project alignments and station
locations. The Preliminary Alternatives Analysis and all Supplemental
Alternative Analyses (SAA) included public outreach activities,
including community meetings, stakeholder meetings, and public official
outreach. The Preliminary Alternatives Analysis and SAA documents
include a description of public outreach activities conducted. These
documents are available at https://www.hsr.ca.gov/Programs/Statewide_Rail_Modernization/Project_Sections/palmdale_losangeles.html.
The Preliminary Alternatives Analysis was published in July 2010
and addressed alignment alternatives and station options throughout the
Palmdale to Los Angeles Section. Three Supplemental Alternatives
Analyses (``SAA'') have subsequently been prepared. The first SAA
(March 2011) addressed supplemental alignment alternatives and station
options for the Los Angeles to Sylmar subsection. The second SAA (April
2012) addressed supplemental alignment alternatives for the Sylmar to
Palmdale subsection and redefined the subsection into two new
subsections: the Santa Clarita subsection, extending from Sylmar to two
miles east of Lang Station Road, and the Palmdale subsection, extending
from two miles east of Lang Station Road to Palmdale.
The third SAA (May 2014) reflects the 2012 and 2014 Business Plans
by introducing phased implementation of the project with a 300-mile
IOS. With the introduction of the IOS, this SAA also discusses the
concept of evaluating Palmdale to Burbank and Burbank to Los Angeles as
two sections. The May 2014 SAA refined the alignment alternatives and
station options, including withdrawing one alignment alternative and
three station options, and recommending the Palmdale Transportation
Center Station and the Burbank Airport Station for further analysis.
As discussed further in the May 2014 SAA, it would be beneficial to
address the environmental effects of the HSR System from Palmdale to
Burbank in one EIR/EIS and from Burbank to Los
[[Page 43124]]
Angeles in a separate EIR/EIS. This would provide for more effective
planning and public outreach in these highly populated areas. These two
sections are of sufficient length to address environmental matters.
They have logical termini, which means that their end points are
rational for transportation improvements and for the review of
environmental impacts. Each section has independent utility, which
means that the HSR System will function properly within each section,
independent of additional improvements elsewhere.
The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will describe site-specific
environmental impacts, identify specific mitigation measures to address
those impacts, and incorporate design features to avoid and minimize
potential adverse environmental impacts. The site characteristics,
size, nature, and timing of the proposed action will be described as a
basis for determining whether the impacts are potentially significant
and whether impacts can be avoided, minimized, or mitigated. The
Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will identify and evaluate
reasonable and feasible alignment alternatives along the corridor
selected in the Program EIR/EIS, as well as addressing alternatives
that may meet project objectives while potentially reducing
environmental effects as identified during the alternatives analysis
process and the scoping process. The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/
EIS will also identify and evaluate station options and evaluate the
impacts of construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed HSR
System. Information and documents regarding this HSR environmental
review process will be made available through the Authority's Internet
site: www.hsr.ca.gov.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed HSR System is to provide a new mode of
high-speed intercity travel that would link major metropolitan areas of
the state; interface with airports, mass transit, and highways; and
provide added capacity to meet increases in intercity travel demand in
California in a manner sensitive to, and protective of, California's
unique natural resources.
The need for an HSR System is directly related to the expected
growth in population, and increases in intercity travel demand in
California over the next 20 years and beyond. With the growth in travel
demand, there will be an increase in travel delays arising from the
growing congestion on California's highways and at airports. In
addition, there will be negative effects on the economy, quality of
life, and air quality in and around California's metropolitan areas
from an increasingly congested transportation system that will become
less reliable as travel demand increases. The intercity highway system,
commercial airports, and conventional passenger rail serving the
intercity travel market are currently operating at or near capacity,
and will require large public investments for maintenance and expansion
to meet existing demand and future growth. The proposed HSR System is
designed to address some of the social, economic and environmental
problems associated with transportation congestion in California.
The Palmdale to Burbank Section meets this purpose and need by:
Connecting the major metropolitan areas in Central and
Northern California to the San Fernando Valley;
Incorporating HSR into the intermodal transportation hubs
at Palmdale and Burbank, thereby providing interfaces with airports
(Bob Hope Airport), mass transit (Metro, Metrolink, and Amtrak), and
highways, resulting in local and regional transit and transportation
hubs;
Capturing a large base of riders in the densely populated
San Fernando Valley and the Los Angeles Basin; and
Providing station locations with existing and planned
transit oriented development potential.
The scoping process will allow the public and agencies to provide
input and comments on purpose and need as it relates to the Palmdale to
Burbank Section.
Alternatives
The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will consider a No Action
Alternative and one or more HSR Alternatives.
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative (No Project or No Build) represents the
conditions in the Palmdale to Burbank Section as they exist in 2014,
and as they would exist based on programmed and funded improvements to
the intercity transportation system and other reasonably foreseeable
projects through 2040, taking into account the following sources of
information: the State Transportation Improvement Program, Regional
Transportation Plans for all modes of travel, airport plans, intercity
passenger rail plans, and city and county plans.
HSR Alternative
The Authority proposes to construct, operate and maintain an
electric-powered steel- wheel-on-steel-rail HSR System, approximately
800 miles long, capable of operating speeds of 220 mph on dedicated,
fully grade-separated tracks, with state-of-the-art safety, signaling,
and automated train control systems.
The Palmdale to Los Angeles HSR Corridor that was selected by FRA
and the Authority in the Statewide Program EIR/EIS follows Soledad
Canyon from the City of Palmdale to the community of Sylmar in the City
of Los Angeles and then along the Metro/Metrolink Railroad line to Los
Angeles Union Station. The corridor is relatively wide in the area that
includes both the State Route 14 and Union Pacific Railroad alignments
between the Antelope Valley and Santa Clarita.
Alternatives analyses conducted subsequent to completion of the
Statewide Program EIR/EIS have examined alignments within and outside
of the selected corridor, including in Palmdale, Santa Clarita, and the
San Fernando Valley. The May 2014 SAA concluded that Burbank Airport
would provide the most benefits and fewest impacts of the station
locations in the San Fernando Valley, because intermodal connectivity
(rail, bus, air) is strongest and existing land uses (primarily
industrial and commercial) would be most compatible with the
development of transit oriented uses. The May 2014 SAA was available
for public review and comment as part of the alternatives analysis
process.
In response to this information and to stakeholder and public
feedback on the 2014 Business Plan and the 2014 SAA, requesting the
Authority to consider a more direct route between Palmdale and Burbank,
the Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will address potential
alignment alternatives that provide a more direct connection between
the Palmdale station and the Burbank Airport station. Engineering
studies will be continued as part of this EIR/EIS process and will
examine potential new alignments and refine studied alignments in order
to better meet purpose and need, respond to stakeholder comments and
concerns, and reduce environmental impacts. All alignment alternatives
would be grade separated from existing roadways.
Station location options were selected with the Statewide Program
EIR/EIS based on travel time, train speed, cost, local access times,
potential connections with other modes of transportation, ridership
potential and the distribution of population and major destinations
along the route, and local planning constraints and conditions. The
identification of station sites and
[[Page 43125]]
configuration will be further refined and evaluated in the Palmdale to
Burbank Section EIR/EIS to reflect the evolution of statewide planning
for HSR, as outlined in the 2014 Business Plan, as well as public and
agency comments and concerns. To assist in the development of the IOS,
station area development policies to encourage transit-friendly
development near and around HSR stations that would have the potential
to promote multi-modal uses, higher density, mixed-use, pedestrian-
oriented development around the stations will guide the selection of
the station alternatives. In addition, station option selection will
evaluate sites for potential to function as a terminal station in the
IOS. Potential sites for terminal storage and maintenance facilities
will also be evaluated in the Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS.
Probable Effects
The purpose of the EIR/EIS process is to explore, in a public
setting, the effects of the proposed action on the physical, human, and
natural environment. FRA and the Authority will continue the tiered
evaluation of all significant environmental, social, and economic
impacts of the construction and operation of the HSR System. Impact
areas to be addressed include transportation impacts; safety and
security; land use and zoning; land acquisition, displacements, and
relocations; agricultural land impacts; cumulative and secondary
impacts; cultural resource impacts, including impacts on historical and
archaeological resources and parklands/recreation areas; neighborhood
compatibility and environmental justice; and natural resource impacts
including air quality, wetlands, water resources, noise, vibration,
energy, wildlife and ecosystems, including endangered species. Measures
to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse impacts will be identified and
evaluated.
The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will be prepared in
accordance with FRA's Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts
(64 FR 28545, May 26, 1999) and will follow the Integration Process for
the California High-Speed Train Program as set forth in the Memorandum
of Understanding (Integration MOU) among FRA, the Authority, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency and the USACE. Consistent with the
Integration MOU, the Burbank to Los Angeles Section EIR/EIS will
evaluate alignment alternatives, and station and maintenance facility
location options. This analysis will occur in coordination with the
analysis required under the Integration MOU necessary to make a
determination of the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable
Alternative (LEDPA) by the USACE, as required by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act.
The Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/EIS will also address, as
necessary, other applicable statutes, regulations, and executive
orders, including (but not limited to) the Clean Air Act, Clean Water
Act, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, the Endangered
Species Act, and Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice.
Implementation of the Palmdale to Burbank Section is a federal
undertaking with the potential to affect historic properties. As such,
it is subject to the requirements of Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470f). In accordance with
regulations issued by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36
CFR part 800, FRA intends to coordinate compliance with Section 106 of
this Act with the preparation of the Palmdale to Burbank Section EIR/
EIS, beginning with the identification of consulting parties in a
manner consistent with the standards set out in 36 CFR 800.8. Pursuant
to a Programmatic Agreement among FRA, the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and
the Authority, phased review of effects on historic properties is being
conducted as provided by 36 CFR 800.4(b)(2). Public comment is sought
with respect to the effects of potential alternatives within the
Palmdale to Burbank Section on historic properties.
Scoping and Comments
FRA encourages broad participation in the EIS process during
scoping and review of the resulting environmental documents. Comments
and suggestions are invited from all interested agencies, Native
American Tribes, and the public at large to ensure that the full range
of issues related to the proposed action and all reasonable
alternatives are addressed and that all significant issues are
identified. In particular, FRA is interested in determining whether
there are areas of environmental concern where there might be a
potential for significant impacts identifiable at a project level.
Comments are also sought regarding purpose and need as it relates to
the Palmdale to Burbank Section and the selection of alternatives,
including alternatives addressed in the Preliminary Alternatives
Analysis and the SAAs. Public agencies with jurisdiction are requested
to advise FRA and Authority of the applicable permit and environmental
review requirements of each agency, and the scope and content of the
environmental information that is germane to the agency's statutory
responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Public
agencies are requested to advise FRA if they anticipate taking a major
action in connection with the proposed project and if they wish to
cooperate in the preparation of the project-level Palmdale to Burbank
Section EIR/EIS.
Public scoping meetings have been scheduled as an important
component of the scoping process for both the State and Federal
environmental review. The scoping meetings described in this Notice
will also be advertised locally and included in additional public
notification. The scoping meetings will be held from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30
p.m. at the following locations:
Santa Clarita: Tuesday, August 5, William S. Hart Regional
Park, 24151 Newhall Avenue, Newhall, CA 91321
Burbank: Wednesday, August 6, Buena Vista Branch Library,
300 N. Buena Vista Street, Burbank, CA 91505
Palmdale: Thursday, August 7, Chimbole Cultural Center,
38350 Sierra Highway, Palmdale, CA 93550
Acton/Agua Dulce: Monday, August 11, Acton-Agua Dulce
Library, 33792 Crown Valley Road, Acton, CA 93510
Sylmar: Tuesday, August 12, Sylmar Public Library, 14561
Polk Street, Sylmar, CA 91342
Lake View Terrace: Thursday, August 14, Lakeview Terrace
Recreation Center, 11075 Foothill Boulevard, Lake View Terrace, CA
91342
Downtown LA: Tuesday, August 19, Los Angeles Union Station
Fred Harvey Room, 800 N. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 18, 2014.
Corey Hill,
Director, Office of Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 2014-17385 Filed 7-23-14; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P