Partnerships; Start-Up Expenditures; Organization and Syndication Fees, 42679-42680 [2014-17335]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
terminating partnership’’ has been
changed to ‘‘over the remaining portion
of the amortization period adopted by
the terminating partnership’’ to make
clear that the amortization period does
not restart. No substantive change is
intended.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9681]
RIN 1545–BL06
Special Analyses
Partnerships; Start-Up Expenditures;
Organization and Syndication Fees
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations concerning the deductibility
of start-up expenditures and
organizational expenses for
partnerships. The final regulations
provide guidance regarding the
deductibility of start-up expenditures
and organizational expenses for
partnerships following a termination of
a partnership under section 708(b)(1)(B).
These final regulations affect
partnerships that undergo section
708(b)(1)(B) terminations and their
partners.
DATES: These regulations are effective
on July 23, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel S. Smith, (202) 317–6852 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Background
This document contains final
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
section 708(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). On December 9, 2013,
proposed regulations (REG–126285–12,
78 FR 73753) were published in the
Federal Register. The proposed
regulations were intended to eliminate
uncertainty regarding whether a
partnership is entitled to immediately
deduct any unamortized start-up and
organizational expenses upon its
technical termination. Specifically, the
proposed regulations provided that the
new partnership was required to
continue to amortize those expenditures
using the same amortization period
adopted by the terminating partnership.
No written or electronic comments were
received in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. No requests for a
public hearing were received, and
accordingly, no hearing was held.
Explanation of Provisions
The Treasury decision adopts the
proposed regulations with one minor
change for clarity. Specifically, in
§ 1.708–1(b)(6)(i), ‘‘using the same
amortization period adopted by the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Jul 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It has also
been determined that section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these
regulations, and because these
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice
of proposed rulemaking preceding these
regulations was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small businesses. No
comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Rachel S. Smith, IRS
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries).
However, other personnel from the IRS
and the Treasury Department
participated in their development.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.195–2 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.195–2 Technical termination of a
partnership.
(a) In general. If a partnership that has
elected to amortize start-up
expenditures under section 195(b) and
§ 1.195–1 terminates in a transaction (or
a series of transactions) described in
section 708(b)(1)(B) or § 1.708–1(b)(2),
the termination shall not be treated as
resulting in a disposition of the
partnership’s trade or business for
purposes of section 195(b)(2). See
§ 1.708–1(b)(6) for rules concerning the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42679
treatment of these start-up expenditures
by the new partnership.
(b) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to a technical
termination of a partnership under
section 708(b)(1)(B) that occurs on or
after December 9, 2013.
■ Par. 3. Section 1.708–1 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(6) to read as
follows:
§ 1.708–1
Continuation of partnership.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) Treatment of certain start-up or
organizational expenses following a
technical termination—(i) In general. If
a partnership that has elected to
amortize start-up expenditures under
section 195(b) or organizational
expenses under section 709(b)(1)
terminates in a transaction (or a series
of transactions) described in section
708(b)(1)(B) or paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, the new partnership must
continue to amortize those expenditures
over the remaining portion of the
amortization period adopted by the
terminating partnership. See section 195
and § 1.195–1 for rules concerning the
amortization of start-up expenditures
and section 709 and § 1.709–1 for rules
concerning the amortization of
organizational expenses.
(ii) Effective/applicability date. This
paragraph (b)(6) applies to a technical
termination of a partnership under
section 708(b)(1)(B) that occurs on or
after December 9, 2013.
■ Par. 4. Section 1.709–1 is amended
by:
■ 1. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as
(b)(3)(i).
■ 2. Adding a heading to newly
designated paragraph (b)(3)(i).
■ 3. Adding paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
■ 4. Adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (b)(5).
The additions read as follows:
§ 1.709–1 Treatment of organization and
syndication costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Liquidation of partnership—(i) In
general. * * *
(ii) Technical termination of a
partnership. If a partnership that has
elected to amortize organizational costs
under section 709(b) terminates in a
transaction (or a series of transactions)
described in section 708(b)(1)(B) or
§ 1.708–1(b)(2), the termination shall
not be treated as resulting in a
liquidation of the partnership for
purposes of section 709(b)(2). See
§ 1.708–1(b)(6) for rules concerning the
E:\FR\FM\23JYR1.SGM
23JYR1
42680
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
treatment of these organizational costs
by the new partnership.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * * Paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this
section applies to a technical
termination of a partnership under
section 708(b)(1)(B) that occurs on or
after December 9, 2013.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: May 29, 2014.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
Effective Date: This priority is
effective August 22, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RoseAnn Ashby, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
room 5055, Potomac Center Plaza (PCP),
Washington, DC 20202–2800.
Telephone: (202) 245–7258 or by email:
roseann.ashby@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2014–17335 Filed 7–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[Docket ID ED–2014–OSERS–0068]
Final Priority; Rehabilitation Training:
Rehabilitation Long-Term Training
Program—Rehabilitation Specialty
Areas
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Final priority.
AGENCY:
[CFDA Numbers: 84.129C, E, F, H, J, P, Q,
R, and W.]
The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services announces a priority under the
Rehabilitation Training: Rehabilitation
Long-Term Training program. The
Assistant Secretary may use this priority
for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2014
and later years in order to fund any of
the rehabilitation specialty areas listed
in this notice. The specific
rehabilitation specialty areas to be
funded in a given year will be listed in
a notice inviting applications. This
priority is designed to ensure that the
Department funds high-quality
rehabilitation programs in the following
nine rehabilitation specialty areas of
national need: Rehabilitation
Administration (84.129C);
Rehabilitation Technology (84.129E);
Vocational Evaluation and Work
Adjustment (84.129F); Rehabilitation of
Individuals Who Are Mentally Ill
(84.129H); Rehabilitation Psychology
(84.129J); Rehabilitation of Individuals
Who are Blind or Have Vision
Impairments (84.129P); Rehabilitation of
Individuals Who are Deaf or Hard of
Hearing (84.129Q); Job Development
and Job Placement Services (84.129R);
and Comprehensive System of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Jul 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
Personnel Development (84.129W).
These programs must meet rigorous
standards in order to provide
rehabilitation professionals the training
and qualifications necessary to meet the
current challenges facing State
vocational rehabilitation (VR) agencies
and related agencies and assist
individuals with disabilities in
achieving high-quality employment
outcomes.
Purpose of
Program: The Rehabilitation Long-Term
Training program provides financial
assistance for projects that provide—
(1) Basic or advanced training leading
to an academic degree in areas of
personnel shortages in rehabilitation as
identified by the Secretary;
(2) A specified series of courses or
programs of study leading to the award
of a certificate in areas of personnel
shortages in rehabilitation as identified
by the Secretary; and
(3) Support for medical residents
enrolled in residency training programs
in the specialty of physical medicine
and rehabilitation.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 772(b).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR parts 385 and 386.
We published a notice of proposed
priority for this competition in the
Federal Register on May 13, 2014 (79
FR 27236). That notice contained
background information and our reasons
for proposing this particular priority.
There are no differences between the
proposed priority and this final priority.
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation in the notice of proposed
priority, 24 parties submitted comments
on the proposed priority.
Generally, we do not address
technical and other minor changes.
Analysis of Comments and Changes:
An analysis of the comments and of any
changes in the priority since publication
of the notice of proposed priority
follows.
Comment: The overwhelming
majority of commenters were supportive
of the priority. They pointed out that it
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is important to have rehabilitation
professionals trained in meeting the
needs of individuals with a variety of
disabilities. In particular, a number of
commenters discussed the value that
rehabilitation professionals trained in
vocational evaluation can add to the
field of rehabilitation. Professionals
trained in vocational evaluation have
particular expertise in assisting
individuals with disabilities in making
employment and career choices
consistent with their unique abilities,
thereby helping to ensure that
individuals with disabilities achieve
their employment goals.
Discussion: We appreciate the
commenters’ support for this priority.
Changes: None.
Comment: Two commenters
expressed concern regarding the
requirement for scholars to participate
in an internship in a State VR agency as
a requirement for program completion.
They stated that internships may not be
available in a State VR agency,
particularly for those pursuing a
rehabilitation program for serving
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing. Commenters stated that some
State VR agencies may not have
individuals qualified to supervise such
internships, whereas other related
agencies in the community may be able
to provide internship opportunities that
offer qualified supervisors and that
would ultimately be more beneficial for
scholars.
Discussion: We recognize that there
may be some instances in which an
institution of higher education receiving
funds under this priority will need to
develop internships in agencies other
than the State VR agency. For this
reason, paragraph (c)(5) of the priority
provides an exception to this
requirement in the event that a State VR
agency cannot provide an internship in
a scholar’s field of study or if applicants
demonstrate that it is otherwise not
feasible for all students to complete an
internship in a State VR agency. For
example, if an applicant demonstrates
that it is not feasible to provide the
scholar an internship in a State VR
agency because there are no staff able to
supervise the individual or because the
distance that the scholar would have to
travel to the State VR agency is too
great, then the scholar could be
provided an internship in a related
agency as defined in 34 CFR 386.4.
Changes: None.
Comment: Two commenters
discussed the importance of
coordination among professional
associations, long-term training
programs, and State VR agencies,
specifically in the field of vocational
E:\FR\FM\23JYR1.SGM
23JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 141 (Wednesday, July 23, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42679-42680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17335]
[[Page 42679]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9681]
RIN 1545-BL06
Partnerships; Start-Up Expenditures; Organization and Syndication
Fees
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations concerning the
deductibility of start-up expenditures and organizational expenses for
partnerships. The final regulations provide guidance regarding the
deductibility of start-up expenditures and organizational expenses for
partnerships following a termination of a partnership under section
708(b)(1)(B). These final regulations affect partnerships that undergo
section 708(b)(1)(B) terminations and their partners.
DATES: These regulations are effective on July 23, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel S. Smith, (202) 317-6852 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains final amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under section 708(b) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). On December 9, 2013, proposed regulations (REG-
126285-12, 78 FR 73753) were published in the Federal Register. The
proposed regulations were intended to eliminate uncertainty regarding
whether a partnership is entitled to immediately deduct any unamortized
start-up and organizational expenses upon its technical termination.
Specifically, the proposed regulations provided that the new
partnership was required to continue to amortize those expenditures
using the same amortization period adopted by the terminating
partnership. No written or electronic comments were received in
response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No requests for a public
hearing were received, and accordingly, no hearing was held.
Explanation of Provisions
The Treasury decision adopts the proposed regulations with one
minor change for clarity. Specifically, in Sec. 1.708-1(b)(6)(i),
``using the same amortization period adopted by the terminating
partnership'' has been changed to ``over the remaining portion of the
amortization period adopted by the terminating partnership'' to make
clear that the amortization period does not restart. No substantive
change is intended.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It has also been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations, and because these regulations do not
impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking
preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact
on small businesses. No comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Rachel S. Smith, IRS
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). However, other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury
Department participated in their development.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.195-2 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.195-2 Technical termination of a partnership.
(a) In general. If a partnership that has elected to amortize
start-up expenditures under section 195(b) and Sec. 1.195-1 terminates
in a transaction (or a series of transactions) described in section
708(b)(1)(B) or Sec. 1.708-1(b)(2), the termination shall not be
treated as resulting in a disposition of the partnership's trade or
business for purposes of section 195(b)(2). See Sec. 1.708-1(b)(6) for
rules concerning the treatment of these start-up expenditures by the
new partnership.
(b) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to a
technical termination of a partnership under section 708(b)(1)(B) that
occurs on or after December 9, 2013.
0
Par. 3. Section 1.708-1 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(6) to read
as follows:
Sec. 1.708-1 Continuation of partnership.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) Treatment of certain start-up or organizational expenses
following a technical termination--(i) In general. If a partnership
that has elected to amortize start-up expenditures under section 195(b)
or organizational expenses under section 709(b)(1) terminates in a
transaction (or a series of transactions) described in section
708(b)(1)(B) or paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the new partnership
must continue to amortize those expenditures over the remaining portion
of the amortization period adopted by the terminating partnership. See
section 195 and Sec. 1.195-1 for rules concerning the amortization of
start-up expenditures and section 709 and Sec. 1.709-1 for rules
concerning the amortization of organizational expenses.
(ii) Effective/applicability date. This paragraph (b)(6) applies to
a technical termination of a partnership under section 708(b)(1)(B)
that occurs on or after December 9, 2013.
0
Par. 4. Section 1.709-1 is amended by:
0
1. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as (b)(3)(i).
0
2. Adding a heading to newly designated paragraph (b)(3)(i).
0
3. Adding paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
0
4. Adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (b)(5).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.709-1 Treatment of organization and syndication costs.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Liquidation of partnership--(i) In general. * * *
(ii) Technical termination of a partnership. If a partnership that
has elected to amortize organizational costs under section 709(b)
terminates in a transaction (or a series of transactions) described in
section 708(b)(1)(B) or Sec. 1.708-1(b)(2), the termination shall not
be treated as resulting in a liquidation of the partnership for
purposes of section 709(b)(2). See Sec. 1.708-1(b)(6) for rules
concerning the
[[Page 42680]]
treatment of these organizational costs by the new partnership.
* * * * *
(5) * * * Paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section applies to a
technical termination of a partnership under section 708(b)(1)(B) that
occurs on or after December 9, 2013.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: May 29, 2014.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2014-17335 Filed 7-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P