Dam Safety Modifications at Cherokee, Fort Loudoun, Tellico, and Watts Bar Dams, 42393-42394 [2014-17038]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 139 / Monday, July 21, 2014 / Notices
following proposed information
collection. Comments are invited on: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Carolyn Hum,
Administrative Officer. All comments
received will be available for public
inspection during regular business
hours at the same address.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by September 19, 2014 to be
assured of consideration.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Carolyn Hum, Administrative
Officer, Attn: PRA, U.S. Trade and
Development Agency, 1000 Wilson
Blvd., Suite 1600, Arlington, VA 22209–
3901; Tel.: (703) 875–4357, Fax: (703)
875–4009; Email: PRA@ustda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Summary Collection Under Review
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Expiration Date of Previous Approval:
12/31/2014.
Title: Evaluation of USTDA
Performance.
Form Number: USTDA 1000E–2011a.
Frequency of Use: annually for
duration of project.
Type of Respondents: Business or
other for profit; Not-for-profit
institutions; Farms; Federal
Government.
Estimated Number of Responses:
1,840 to 2,200 per year.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 613 to 733 hours per year.
Federal Cost: $369,699.
Authority for Information Collection:
Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993 103 Public Law 62; 107 Stat.
285.
Abstract: USTDA and contractors will
collect information from various
stakeholders on USTDA-funded
activities regarding development impact
and/or commercial objectives as well as
evaluate success regarding GPRA
objectives.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Jul 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
Dated: July 16, 2014.
Carolyn Hum,
Administrative Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–17070 Filed 7–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8040–01–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Dam Safety Modifications at Cherokee,
Fort Loudoun, Tellico, and Watts Bar
Dams
Tennessee Valley Authority.
Amended Record of Decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) is amending its July 2,
2013, Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Final Environmental Impact Statement
for Dam Safety Modifications at
Cherokee, Fort Loudoun, Tellico, and
Watts Bar Dams. In the 2013 ROD, TVA
decided to implement the dam safety
modifications described in the preferred
Alternative B, Permanent Modifications
of Dam Structures: Combination of
Concrete Floodwalls and Earthen
Embankments. Based on the results of
subsequent engineering and feasibility
studies, TVA has revised its approach
for the permanent modifications to
incorporate the use of roller-compacted
concrete (RCC) at Cherokee and Fort
Loudoun Dams and increases in the
elevations of modifications at Fort
Loudoun, Tellico, and Watts Bar Dams.
In May, 2014, TVA completed a
Supplemental Analysis (SA) of the
potential impacts of the proposed
revisions to the dam safety
modifications. Based on the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and the SA, TVA now amends the July
2013 ROD to incorporate the revised
approach.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles P. Nicholson, NEPA
Compliance Manager, Tennessee Valley
Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive,
WT 11D, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902–
1499; telephone 865–632–3582, or email
cpnicholson@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is provided in accordance with
the Council on Environmental Quality’s
regulations (40 CFR 1500 to 1508) and
TVA’s procedures for implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). TVA is an agency and
instrumentality of the United States,
established by an act of Congress in
1933, to foster the social and economic
welfare of the people of the Tennessee
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42393
Valley region and to promote the proper
use and conservation of the region’s
natural resources. A fundamental part of
this mission was the construction and
operation of an integrated system of
dams and reservoirs. As directed by the
TVA Act, TVA uses this system to
manage the water resources of the
Tennessee River for the purposes of
navigation, flood control, and power
production. Consistent with these
purposes, TVA operates the system to
provide a wide range of other benefits.
As the Federal agency responsible for
the operation of numerous dams, and
consistent with the Federal Guidelines
for Dam Safety issued by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, TVA
prepares for the worst case flooding
event in order to protect against dam
failure, loss of life, major property
damage, and impacts to critical
facilities. This worst case flooding event
is known as the PMF, defined as the
flood that may be expected from the
most severe combination of critical
meteorological and hydrological
conditions that are reasonably possible
in a particular area. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) nuclear plant
operating regulations also require that
nuclear plants be protected against the
adverse effects of the PMF. TVA
periodically reviews and revises its
calculations of PMF elevations. During
the most recent review (completed in
2008), TVA determined that the updated
PMF elevations at Cherokee, Fort
Loudoun, Tellico, and Watts Bar Dams,
as well as at TVA’s Watts Bar and
Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, were higher
than previously calculated.
The differences in PMF elevations are
sufficient to indicate that a PMF event
could cause water to flow over the top
of the dams, even with the floodgates
wide open, possibly resulting in dam
failure. Failure of one or more of these
dams would result in extensive damage
to buildings, infrastructure, property,
and natural resources, as well as
potential personal injury and loss of life.
In 2009, TVA implemented temporary
measures at the four dams to remain
consistent with Federal guidelines and
to comply with nuclear operating
regulations for safe operations of the
river and reservoir system, and to
minimize the potential effects of the
PMF. These temporary measures
consisted of raising the heights of the
four dams by installing interconnected,
fabric lined HESCO Concertainer® units
filled with crushed stone on top of the
earthen embankments of each dam. In a
January 25, 2012 letter from NRC to
TVA, NRC stated that the HESCO
barriers were not capable of resisting
impacts from large debris during a flood
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
42394
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 139 / Monday, July 21, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
and are not acceptable as a long-term
solution to protecting the dams, and
downstream nuclear plants, during the
PMF. At the time the NRC letter was
received, TVA had not made any
decisions about whether or how to
replace the HESCO barriers. After
receiving the letter, TVA made the
commitment to NRC to develop and
implement permanent dam safety
modifications to replace the temporary
measures at the four dams.
TVA issued the Final EIS for the
permanent dam safety modifications in
May 2013. In the July 2013 ROD, TVA
announced its decision to implement
Alternative B—Permanent
Modifications of Dam Structures:
Combination of Concrete Floodwalls
and Earthen Embankments, and has
begun constructing the permanent
modifications.
Supplemental Analysis
The SA addresses Revised Alternative
B—Permanent Modifications of Dam
Structures: Combination of Concrete
Floodwalls, Earthen Embankments, and
Roller-Compacted Concrete. Under
Revised Alternative B, TVA would
construct the permanent modifications
at Cherokee Dam with RCC or a
combination of RCC and earthen
embankment. The 40-foot increase in
the height of the south spillway training
wall and associated backfill have been
determined to be unnecessary and
would not be constructed. At Fort
Loudoun Dam, TVA would increase the
elevation of the permanent
modifications by 1.0 foot and the 2,600foot FTL–3 concrete floodwall would be
replaced with a 1,400-foot section of
RCC located on the current roadbed of
US Highway 321 between the south end
of the US Highway 321 bridge over Fort
Loudoun Dam and the US Highway
321—Tellico Parkway intersection. This
segment would be constructed after the
Tennessee Department of
Transportation completes the new US
Highway 321 bridge located
downstream of the dam and relocates
traffic onto the new bridge and
connecting roadway. A 250-foot section
of earthen embankment would be
constructed near the intersection of US
Highway 321 and Tellico Parkway.
Flood protection in the remainder of the
original FTL–3 segment would be
provided by the increased elevation of
the reconstructed US Highway 321 and
Tellico Parkway; the entrance road into
the Tellico Recreation Area would be
modified to match this increased
elevation. The elevation of Tellico
Segment T–1 would be increased by 1.1
foot. The permanent modifications to
the other segments at Tellico Dam
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Jul 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
would be the same as described in the
selected Alternative B. At Watts Bar
Dam, the elevation of the earthen
embankments would be increased by 0.1
foot and the elevation of the WB–3
concrete floodwall would be increased
by 1.5 foot. TVA is also considering
increasing the height of the earthen
embankments at Watts Bar Dam by an
additional 1.5 to 2.5 feet, and increasing
the height of the WB–3 concrete
floodwall by 0.5 to 3.5 feet. These
proposed actions are not among those
included in this Record of Decision and
are currently undergoing additional
environmental analyses.
As described in the SA, available at
https://www.tva.com/environment/
reports/dam_safety/index.htm, the
proposed revisions to Alternative B
would have no effect on most
environmental resources. They do have
the potential to affect cultural and
historic resources, transportation, visual
resources, recreation, and public safety.
TVA has determined that these impacts
would be short-term and minor and
similar to or less than the impacts
assessed for those resources in the Final
EIS for Alternative B. Revised
Alternative B would result in beneficial
impacts to transportation at Fort
Loudoun and Cherokee Dams and to
public safety at Fort Loudoun compared
to Alternative B due to reduced
interference with traffic. Revised
Alternative B would also reduce the
impacts to visual resources at Cherokee
and Fort Loudoun Dams.
Amended Decision
TVA has decided to implement the
Revised Alternative B—Permanent
Modifications of Dam Structures:
Combination of Concrete Floodwalls,
Earthen Embankments, and RollerCompacted Concrete. Revised
Alternative B would result in fewer
transportation and public safety impacts
and minor beneficial impacts to visual
resources in comparison to the
previously selected Alternative B.
Revised Alternative B would also result
in a shorter overall construction period.
Mitigation Measures
The July 2013 ROD lists mitigation
measures associated with the selected
Alternative B. These mitigation
measures remain in effect and TVA has
not identified the need for additional
mitigation measures associated with
Revised Alternative B.
Dated: July 7, 2014.
John J. McCormick, Jr.,
Vice President, River Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–17038 Filed 7–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of
Information Collection: Mitsubishi MU–
2B Series Airplane Special Training,
Experience, and Operating Procedures
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our
intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collection of
information was published on May 2,
2014, vol. 79, no. 85, page 25171–25172.
This collection of information request is
for Mitsubishi MU–2B Series Airplane
Special Training, Experience, and
Operating Requirements Special Federal
Aviation Regulation. The pilot training
requires a logbook endorsement and
documentation of a training-course
completion record.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by August 20, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy DePaepe at (405) 954–9362, or by
email at: Kathy.DePaepe@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 2120–0725.
Title: Mitsubishi MU–2B Series
Airplane Special Training, Experience,
and Operating Procedures.
Form Numbers: There are no FAA
forms associated with this collection.
Type of Review: Renewal of an
information collection.
Background: In response to the
increasing number of accidents and
incidents involving the Mitsubishi MU–
2B series airplane, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) began a safety
evaluation of the MU–2B in July of
2005. As a result of this safety
evaluation, the FAA published a Special
Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) on
February 6, 2008 (73 FR 7033) that
established a standardized pilot training
program. The collection of information
is necessary to document participation,
completion, and compliance with the
pilot training program.
Respondents: Approximately 600
MU–2B pilots.
Frequency: Information is collected
on occasion.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 3 minutes.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 139 (Monday, July 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42393-42394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17038]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Dam Safety Modifications at Cherokee, Fort Loudoun, Tellico, and
Watts Bar Dams
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
ACTION: Amended Record of Decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is amending its July 2,
2013, Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for Dam Safety Modifications at Cherokee, Fort Loudoun,
Tellico, and Watts Bar Dams. In the 2013 ROD, TVA decided to implement
the dam safety modifications described in the preferred Alternative B,
Permanent Modifications of Dam Structures: Combination of Concrete
Floodwalls and Earthen Embankments. Based on the results of subsequent
engineering and feasibility studies, TVA has revised its approach for
the permanent modifications to incorporate the use of roller-compacted
concrete (RCC) at Cherokee and Fort Loudoun Dams and increases in the
elevations of modifications at Fort Loudoun, Tellico, and Watts Bar
Dams. In May, 2014, TVA completed a Supplemental Analysis (SA) of the
potential impacts of the proposed revisions to the dam safety
modifications. Based on the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and the SA, TVA now amends the July 2013 ROD to incorporate the revised
approach.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles P. Nicholson, NEPA Compliance
Manager, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT
11D, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499; telephone 865-632-3582, or email
cpnicholson@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided in accordance with
the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR 1500 to
1508) and TVA's procedures for implementing the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). TVA is an agency and instrumentality of the United
States, established by an act of Congress in 1933, to foster the social
and economic welfare of the people of the Tennessee Valley region and
to promote the proper use and conservation of the region's natural
resources. A fundamental part of this mission was the construction and
operation of an integrated system of dams and reservoirs. As directed
by the TVA Act, TVA uses this system to manage the water resources of
the Tennessee River for the purposes of navigation, flood control, and
power production. Consistent with these purposes, TVA operates the
system to provide a wide range of other benefits.
As the Federal agency responsible for the operation of numerous
dams, and consistent with the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety issued
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, TVA prepares for the worst
case flooding event in order to protect against dam failure, loss of
life, major property damage, and impacts to critical facilities. This
worst case flooding event is known as the PMF, defined as the flood
that may be expected from the most severe combination of critical
meteorological and hydrological conditions that are reasonably possible
in a particular area. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) nuclear plant
operating regulations also require that nuclear plants be protected
against the adverse effects of the PMF. TVA periodically reviews and
revises its calculations of PMF elevations. During the most recent
review (completed in 2008), TVA determined that the updated PMF
elevations at Cherokee, Fort Loudoun, Tellico, and Watts Bar Dams, as
well as at TVA's Watts Bar and Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, were higher
than previously calculated.
The differences in PMF elevations are sufficient to indicate that a
PMF event could cause water to flow over the top of the dams, even with
the floodgates wide open, possibly resulting in dam failure. Failure of
one or more of these dams would result in extensive damage to
buildings, infrastructure, property, and natural resources, as well as
potential personal injury and loss of life.
In 2009, TVA implemented temporary measures at the four dams to
remain consistent with Federal guidelines and to comply with nuclear
operating regulations for safe operations of the river and reservoir
system, and to minimize the potential effects of the PMF. These
temporary measures consisted of raising the heights of the four dams by
installing interconnected, fabric lined HESCO Concertainer[supreg]
units filled with crushed stone on top of the earthen embankments of
each dam. In a January 25, 2012 letter from NRC to TVA, NRC stated that
the HESCO barriers were not capable of resisting impacts from large
debris during a flood
[[Page 42394]]
and are not acceptable as a long-term solution to protecting the dams,
and downstream nuclear plants, during the PMF. At the time the NRC
letter was received, TVA had not made any decisions about whether or
how to replace the HESCO barriers. After receiving the letter, TVA made
the commitment to NRC to develop and implement permanent dam safety
modifications to replace the temporary measures at the four dams.
TVA issued the Final EIS for the permanent dam safety modifications
in May 2013. In the July 2013 ROD, TVA announced its decision to
implement Alternative B--Permanent Modifications of Dam Structures:
Combination of Concrete Floodwalls and Earthen Embankments, and has
begun constructing the permanent modifications.
Supplemental Analysis
The SA addresses Revised Alternative B--Permanent Modifications of
Dam Structures: Combination of Concrete Floodwalls, Earthen
Embankments, and Roller-Compacted Concrete. Under Revised Alternative
B, TVA would construct the permanent modifications at Cherokee Dam with
RCC or a combination of RCC and earthen embankment. The 40-foot
increase in the height of the south spillway training wall and
associated backfill have been determined to be unnecessary and would
not be constructed. At Fort Loudoun Dam, TVA would increase the
elevation of the permanent modifications by 1.0 foot and the 2,600-foot
FTL-3 concrete floodwall would be replaced with a 1,400-foot section of
RCC located on the current roadbed of US Highway 321 between the south
end of the US Highway 321 bridge over Fort Loudoun Dam and the US
Highway 321--Tellico Parkway intersection. This segment would be
constructed after the Tennessee Department of Transportation completes
the new US Highway 321 bridge located downstream of the dam and
relocates traffic onto the new bridge and connecting roadway. A 250-
foot section of earthen embankment would be constructed near the
intersection of US Highway 321 and Tellico Parkway. Flood protection in
the remainder of the original FTL-3 segment would be provided by the
increased elevation of the reconstructed US Highway 321 and Tellico
Parkway; the entrance road into the Tellico Recreation Area would be
modified to match this increased elevation. The elevation of Tellico
Segment T-1 would be increased by 1.1 foot. The permanent modifications
to the other segments at Tellico Dam would be the same as described in
the selected Alternative B. At Watts Bar Dam, the elevation of the
earthen embankments would be increased by 0.1 foot and the elevation of
the WB-3 concrete floodwall would be increased by 1.5 foot. TVA is also
considering increasing the height of the earthen embankments at Watts
Bar Dam by an additional 1.5 to 2.5 feet, and increasing the height of
the WB-3 concrete floodwall by 0.5 to 3.5 feet. These proposed actions
are not among those included in this Record of Decision and are
currently undergoing additional environmental analyses.
As described in the SA, available at https://www.tva.com/environment/reports/dam_safety/index.htm, the proposed revisions to
Alternative B would have no effect on most environmental resources.
They do have the potential to affect cultural and historic resources,
transportation, visual resources, recreation, and public safety. TVA
has determined that these impacts would be short-term and minor and
similar to or less than the impacts assessed for those resources in the
Final EIS for Alternative B. Revised Alternative B would result in
beneficial impacts to transportation at Fort Loudoun and Cherokee Dams
and to public safety at Fort Loudoun compared to Alternative B due to
reduced interference with traffic. Revised Alternative B would also
reduce the impacts to visual resources at Cherokee and Fort Loudoun
Dams.
Amended Decision
TVA has decided to implement the Revised Alternative B--Permanent
Modifications of Dam Structures: Combination of Concrete Floodwalls,
Earthen Embankments, and Roller-Compacted Concrete. Revised Alternative
B would result in fewer transportation and public safety impacts and
minor beneficial impacts to visual resources in comparison to the
previously selected Alternative B. Revised Alternative B would also
result in a shorter overall construction period.
Mitigation Measures
The July 2013 ROD lists mitigation measures associated with the
selected Alternative B. These mitigation measures remain in effect and
TVA has not identified the need for additional mitigation measures
associated with Revised Alternative B.
Dated: July 7, 2014.
John J. McCormick, Jr.,
Vice President, River Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-17038 Filed 7-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P