Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace, Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11; Composite Wing and Fuel Tank Structure Post-Crash Fire Survivability, 41457-41459 [2014-16645]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules 20024. Phone: (202) 287–1692 Email: asrac@ee.doe.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Membership: The members of the Manufactured Housing Working Group were chosen from nominations submitted in response to the Department of Energy’s call for nominations published in the Federal Register on June 13, 2014 in 79 FR 33873. The selections are designed to ensure a broad and balanced array of stakeholder interests and expertise on the negotiating working group for the purpose of developing a rule that is legally and economically justified, technically sound, fair to all parties, and in the public interest. All meetings are open to all stakeholders and the public, and participation by all is welcome within boundaries as required by the orderly conduct of business. The members of the Manufactured Housing Working Group are as follows: DOE and ASRAC Representatives • Joseph Hagerman (DOE) • John Caskey (ASRAC, National Electrical Manufacturers Association) tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Other Selected Members • Bert Kessler, Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. • David Tompos, NTA, Inc. • Emanuel Levy, Systems Building Research Alliance • Eric Lacey, Responsible Energy Codes Alliance • Ishbel Dickens, National Manufactured Home Owners Association (NMHOA) • Keith Dennis, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association • Lois Starkey, Manufactured Housing Institute • Lowell Ungar, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy • Manuel Santana, Cavco Industries • Mark Ezzo, Clayton Homes, Inc. • Mark Weiss, Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform • Michael Lubliner, Washington State University Extension Energy Program • Michael Wade, Cavalier Home Builders • Peter Schneider, Efficiency Vermont • Richard Hanger, Housing Technology and Standards • Richard Potts, Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development • Rob Luter, Lippert Components, Inc. • Robin Roy, Natural Resources Defense Council • Scott Drake, East Kentucky Power Cooperative • Stacey Epperson, Next Step Network Docket: The docket is available for review at www.regulations.gov, VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:37 Jul 15, 2014 Jkt 232001 including Federal Register notices, public meeting attendee lists and transcripts, comments, and other supporting documents/materials. All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. However, not all documents listed in the index may be publicly available, such as information that is exempt from public disclosure. The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of today’s notice of proposed rulemaking. Issued in Washington, DC, on July 8, 2014. Kathleen B. Hogan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. [FR Doc. 2014–16708 Filed 7–15–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 25 [Docket No. FAA–2014–0434; Notice No. 25– 14–08–SC] Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace, Models BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11; Composite Wing and Fuel Tank Structure Post-Crash Fire Survivability Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions. AGENCY: This action proposes special conditions for the Bombardier Aerospace, Models BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11 series airplanes. These airplanes will have novel or unusual design features when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. These design features are associated with the composite materials used in the construction of the fuel tank skin and structure, which may behave differently in a post-crash fire than traditional aluminum construction. These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. DATES: Send your comments on or before September 2, 2014. ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA–2014–0434 using any of the following methods: • Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 41457 the online instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590–0001. • Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays. • Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202–493–2251. Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot .gov/. Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Sinclair, FAA, Airframe and Cabin Safety Branch, ANM–115 Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone 425–227–2195; facsimile 425–227–1232. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments we receive. E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM 16JYP1 41458 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules Background On December 10, 2009, Bombardier Aerospace applied for a type certificate for their new Models BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11 series airplanes (hereafter collectively referred to as ‘‘CSeries’’). The CSeries airplanes are swept-wing monoplanes with an aluminum alloy fuselage sized for 5-abreast seating. Passenger capacity is designated as 110 for the Model BD–500–1A10 and 125 for the Model BD–500–1A11. Maximum takeoff weight is 131,000 pounds for the Model BD–500–1A10 and 144,000 pounds for the Model BD–500–1A11. Conventional airplanes with aluminum skin and structure provide a well-understood level of safety during post-crash fire scenarios with respect to fuel tanks. This is based on service history and extensive full-scale fire testing. The CSeries airplanes will not be fabricated primarily with aluminum for the fuel tank structure. Instead, they will be fabricated using predominantly composite structure and skin for the wings and fuel tanks. Composites may or may not have the equivalent capability of aluminum, and current regulations do not provide objective performance requirements for wing and fuel tank structure with respect to postcrash fire safety. Because the use of composite structure is novel and unusual with respect to the designs envisioned when the applicable regulations were promulgated, additional tests and analyses substantiation will be required to show that the CSeries airplanes will provide an acceptable level of safety with respect to the performance of the wings and fuel tanks during an external fuelfed fire. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Type Certification Basis Under the provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Bombardier Aerospace must show that the CSeries airplanes meet the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 25 as amended by Amendments 25–1 through 25–129. If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the CSeries airplanes because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of § 21.16. Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar novel or unusual design feature, the special VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:37 Jul 15, 2014 Jkt 232001 conditions would also apply to the other model under § 21.101. In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special conditions, the CSeries airplanes must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92– 574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’ The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance with § 11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2). Novel or Unusual Design Features The CSeries airplanes will incorporate the following novel or unusual design features: The structural elements and skin of the wings and fuel tanks will be fabricated using predominantly composite materials rather than conventional aluminum. Discussion Transport category airplanes in operation today have traditionally been designed with aluminum materials. Conventional airplanes with aluminum skin and structure provide a wellunderstood level of safety during postcrash fires with respect to fuel tanks. Current regulations were developed and have evolved under the assumption that wing construction would be of aluminum materials. Aluminum has the following properties with respect to fuel tanks and fuel-fed external fires: • Aluminum is highly thermally conductive and readily transmits the heat of a fuel-fed external fire to fuel in the tank. This has the benefit of rapidly driving the fuel tank ullage to exceed the upper flammability limit of fuel vapors prior to fuel tank skin burnthrough or heating of the wing upper surface above the auto-ignition temperature, thus greatly reducing the threat of fuel tank explosion. • Aluminum panels at thicknesses previously used in wing lower surfaces of large transport category airplanes have been fire resistant as defined in 14 CFR 1.1 and AC 20–135, Powerplant Installation and Propulsion System Component Fire Protection Test Methods, Standards, and Criteria • Heat absorption capacity of aluminum and fuel prevent burnthrough or wing collapse for a time interval that generally exceed the passenger evacuation time. The ability of aluminum wing surfaces to withstand post-crash fire PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 conditions when wetted by fuel on their interior surface has been demonstrated by tests conducted at the FAA Technical Center. Results of these tests have verified adequate dissipation of heat across wetted aluminum fuel tank surfaces so that localized hot spots do not occur, thus minimizing the threat of explosion. This inherent capability of aluminum to dissipate heat also allows the wing lower surface to retain its loadcarrying characteristics during a fuel-fed ground fire and significantly delay wing collapse or burn-through for a time interval that usually exceeds evacuation times. In addition, as an aluminum fuel tank is heated with significant quantities of fuel inside, fuel vapor accumulates in the ullage space, exceeding the upper flammability limit relatively quickly and thus reducing the threat of a fuel tank explosion prior to fuel tank burn-through. Fuel tanks constructed with composite materials may or may not have equivalent properties. Advisory Circular (AC) 20–107B (Change 1), Composite Aircraft Structure, section 11b, ‘‘Fire Protection, Flammability and Thermal Issues,’’ states: ‘‘Wing and fuselage applications should consider the effects of composite design and construction on the resulting passenger safety in the event of in-flight fires or emergency landing conditions, which combine with subsequent egress when a fuel-fed fire is possible.’’ Pertinent to the wing structure, post-crash fire passenger survivability is dependent on the time available for passenger evacuation prior to fuel tank breach or structural failure. Structural failure can be a result of degradation in loadcarrying capability in the upper or lower wing surface caused by a fuel-fed ground fire and also as a result of overpressurization caused by ignition of fuel vapors in the fuel tank. For the CSeries airplanes, composite materials will be used to fabricate the majority of wing fuel tank. Hence, the current regulations may not be adequate for the certification of the CSeries airplanes featuring wing fuel tanks fabricated with composite material. Therefore, Bombardier must present additional confirmation by test and analysis that the CSeries airplanes’ design provides an acceptable level of safety with respect to the performance of the wing fuel tanks when exposed to the direct effects of post-crash ground fire or under-wing fuel-fed fires. These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM 16JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules Applicability DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the Models BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11 series airplanes. Should Bombardier Aerospace apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well. Federal Aviation Administration Conclusion AGENCY: This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on two model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability. SUMMARY: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704. The Proposed Special Conditions Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the following special conditions as part of the type certification basis for Bombardier Aerospace Models BD–500– 1A10 and BD–500–1A11 series airplanes. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Composite Wing and Fuel Tank PostCrash Fire Survivability 1. The wing fuel tank structure must withstand an external fuel-fed pool fire for a minimum of 5 minutes. 2. The integrity of the wing fuel tank structure must be demonstrated at: • Minimum fuel load, not less than reserve fuel level; • Maximum fuel load equal to the maximum range fuel quantity; and • Any other critical fuel loads. 3. The demonstration must consider fuel tank flammability, burn-through resistance, wing structural strength retention properties, and auto-ignition threats from localized heating of composite structure, fasteners, or any other feature that may produce an ignition source during a ground fire event for the required time duration. Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 19, 2014. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate. [FR Doc. 2014–16645 Filed 7–15–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:37 Jul 15, 2014 Jkt 232001 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2014–0448; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–055–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes; Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4–605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300–600 series airplanes); and Airbus Model A310 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of early ruptures on the levers of the nose landing gear (NLG) sequence valve. This proposed AD would require a onetime inspection for damage of the landing gear sequence valve levers and pin shearing indicating areas on the NLG and the main landing gears (MLGs); and depending on findings, replacing the sequence valve and lever, or doing a one-time inspection to detect interference between control rods and sequence valves and corrective actions if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct interference between a landing gear leg and door, which could result in failure of that landing gear to extend and could damage the airplane and injure occupants. We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 2, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS, DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 41459 Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 0448; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425–227–2125; fax 425–227–1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2014–0448; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–055–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013–0058, dated March 11, 2013 (referred to after E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM 16JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 136 (Wednesday, July 16, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41457-41459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16645]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0434; Notice No. 25-14-08-SC]


Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace, Models BD-500-1A10 and 
BD-500-1A11; Composite Wing and Fuel Tank Structure Post-Crash Fire 
Survivability

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Bombardier 
Aerospace, Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series airplanes. These 
airplanes will have novel or unusual design features when compared to 
the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for 
transport category airplanes. These design features are associated with 
the composite materials used in the construction of the fuel tank skin 
and structure, which may behave differently in a post-crash fire than 
traditional aluminum construction. These proposed special conditions 
contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator 
considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that 
established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: Send your comments on or before September 2, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2014-0434 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending 
your comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S. 
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room 
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket 
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without 
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal 
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the 
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all 
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the 
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an 
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act 
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at 
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions 
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Alan Sinclair, FAA, Airframe and 
Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-115 Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-2195; facsimile 425-227-1232.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by 
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments 
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the 
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
    We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing 
date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the 
comments we receive.

[[Page 41458]]

Background

    On December 10, 2009, Bombardier Aerospace applied for a type 
certificate for their new Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series 
airplanes (hereafter collectively referred to as ``CSeries''). The 
CSeries airplanes are swept-wing monoplanes with an aluminum alloy 
fuselage sized for 5-abreast seating. Passenger capacity is designated 
as 110 for the Model BD-500-1A10 and 125 for the Model BD-500-1A11. 
Maximum takeoff weight is 131,000 pounds for the Model BD-500-1A10 and 
144,000 pounds for the Model BD-500-1A11.
    Conventional airplanes with aluminum skin and structure provide a 
well-understood level of safety during post-crash fire scenarios with 
respect to fuel tanks. This is based on service history and extensive 
full-scale fire testing. The CSeries airplanes will not be fabricated 
primarily with aluminum for the fuel tank structure. Instead, they will 
be fabricated using predominantly composite structure and skin for the 
wings and fuel tanks. Composites may or may not have the equivalent 
capability of aluminum, and current regulations do not provide 
objective performance requirements for wing and fuel tank structure 
with respect to post-crash fire safety. Because the use of composite 
structure is novel and unusual with respect to the designs envisioned 
when the applicable regulations were promulgated, additional tests and 
analyses substantiation will be required to show that the CSeries 
airplanes will provide an acceptable level of safety with respect to 
the performance of the wings and fuel tanks during an external fuel-fed 
fire.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 
CFR) 21.17, Bombardier Aerospace must show that the CSeries airplanes 
meet the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 25 as amended by 
Amendments 25-1 through 25-129.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness 
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or 
appropriate safety standards for the CSeries airplanes because of a 
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed 
under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which 
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended 
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar 
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also 
apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special 
conditions, the CSeries airplanes must comply with the fuel vent and 
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise 
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a 
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec.  611 of Public Law 92-574, 
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in 
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type-
certification basis under Sec.  21.17(a)(2).

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The CSeries airplanes will incorporate the following novel or 
unusual design features: The structural elements and skin of the wings 
and fuel tanks will be fabricated using predominantly composite 
materials rather than conventional aluminum.

Discussion

    Transport category airplanes in operation today have traditionally 
been designed with aluminum materials. Conventional airplanes with 
aluminum skin and structure provide a well-understood level of safety 
during post-crash fires with respect to fuel tanks. Current regulations 
were developed and have evolved under the assumption that wing 
construction would be of aluminum materials.
    Aluminum has the following properties with respect to fuel tanks 
and fuel-fed external fires:
     Aluminum is highly thermally conductive and readily 
transmits the heat of a fuel-fed external fire to fuel in the tank. 
This has the benefit of rapidly driving the fuel tank ullage to exceed 
the upper flammability limit of fuel vapors prior to fuel tank skin 
burn-through or heating of the wing upper surface above the auto-
ignition temperature, thus greatly reducing the threat of fuel tank 
explosion.
     Aluminum panels at thicknesses previously used in wing 
lower surfaces of large transport category airplanes have been fire 
resistant as defined in 14 CFR 1.1 and AC 20-135,

Powerplant Installation and Propulsion System Component Fire Protection 
Test Methods, Standards, and Criteria

     Heat absorption capacity of aluminum and fuel prevent 
burn-through or wing collapse for a time interval that generally exceed 
the passenger evacuation time.
    The ability of aluminum wing surfaces to withstand post-crash fire 
conditions when wetted by fuel on their interior surface has been 
demonstrated by tests conducted at the FAA Technical Center. Results of 
these tests have verified adequate dissipation of heat across wetted 
aluminum fuel tank surfaces so that localized hot spots do not occur, 
thus minimizing the threat of explosion. This inherent capability of 
aluminum to dissipate heat also allows the wing lower surface to retain 
its load-carrying characteristics during a fuel-fed ground fire and 
significantly delay wing collapse or burn-through for a time interval 
that usually exceeds evacuation times. In addition, as an aluminum fuel 
tank is heated with significant quantities of fuel inside, fuel vapor 
accumulates in the ullage space, exceeding the upper flammability limit 
relatively quickly and thus reducing the threat of a fuel tank 
explosion prior to fuel tank burn-through.
    Fuel tanks constructed with composite materials may or may not have 
equivalent properties. Advisory Circular (AC) 20-107B (Change 1), 
Composite Aircraft Structure, section 11b, ``Fire Protection, 
Flammability and Thermal Issues,'' states: ``Wing and fuselage 
applications should consider the effects of composite design and 
construction on the resulting passenger safety in the event of in-
flight fires or emergency landing conditions, which combine with 
subsequent egress when a fuel-fed fire is possible.'' Pertinent to the 
wing structure, post-crash fire passenger survivability is dependent on 
the time available for passenger evacuation prior to fuel tank breach 
or structural failure. Structural failure can be a result of 
degradation in load-carrying capability in the upper or lower wing 
surface caused by a fuel-fed ground fire and also as a result of over-
pressurization caused by ignition of fuel vapors in the fuel tank.
    For the CSeries airplanes, composite materials will be used to 
fabricate the majority of wing fuel tank. Hence, the current 
regulations may not be adequate for the certification of the CSeries 
airplanes featuring wing fuel tanks fabricated with composite material. 
Therefore, Bombardier must present additional confirmation by test and 
analysis that the CSeries airplanes' design provides an acceptable 
level of safety with respect to the performance of the wing fuel tanks 
when exposed to the direct effects of post-crash ground fire or under-
wing fuel-fed fires.
    These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety 
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a 
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing 
airworthiness standards.

[[Page 41459]]

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the 
Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series airplanes. Should Bombardier 
Aerospace apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to 
include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design 
feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features 
on two model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general 
applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Proposed Special Conditions

    Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the 
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis 
for Bombardier Aerospace Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series 
airplanes.

Composite Wing and Fuel Tank Post-Crash Fire Survivability

    1. The wing fuel tank structure must withstand an external fuel-fed 
pool fire for a minimum of 5 minutes.
    2. The integrity of the wing fuel tank structure must be 
demonstrated at:
     Minimum fuel load, not less than reserve fuel level;
     Maximum fuel load equal to the maximum range fuel 
quantity; and
     Any other critical fuel loads.
    3. The demonstration must consider fuel tank flammability, burn-
through resistance, wing structural strength retention properties, and 
auto-ignition threats from localized heating of composite structure, 
fasteners, or any other feature that may produce an ignition source 
during a ground fire event for the required time duration.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 19, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate.
[FR Doc. 2014-16645 Filed 7-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.