Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Continental United States Interceptor Site (CIS), 41539 [2014-16629]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2014 / Notices
prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Concurrent with the publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
NMFS is forwarding copies of this
application to the Marine Mammal
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: July 10, 2014.
Julia Harrison,
Acting Chief, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–16666 Filed 7–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the Continental United States
Interceptor Site (CIS)
Missile Defense Agency,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Missile Defense Agency
(MDA) announces its intention to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969 and the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of NEPA. As required by the 2013
National Defense Authorization Act, the
MDA has selected possible additional
locations in the United States that
would be best suited for future
deployment of an interceptor capable of
protecting the homeland against threats
from nations, such as North Korea and
Iran. The MDA is preparing this EIS to
evaluate the potential environmental
impacts that could result from the future
deployment of the Continental United
States Interceptor Site (CIS). The
existing Ballistic Missile Defense
System (BMDS) provides protection of
the United States from a limited ballistic
missile attack, and the Department of
Defense has not made a decision to
deploy or construct the CIS.
DATES: The MDA invites public
comments on the scope of the CIS EIS
during a 60-day public scoping period
beginning with publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Comments will be accepted on or before
September 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments,
statements, and/or concerns regarding
the scope of the EIS or requests to be
added to the EIS distribution list should
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Jul 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
be addressed to MDA CIS EIS and sent
by email to MDA.CIS.EIS@BV.COM, by
facsimile 913–458–1091, or by U.S.
Postal Service to: Black & Veatch
Special Projects Corp Attn: MDACIS
EIS, 6601 College Boulevard, Overland
Park, KS 66211–1504. Electronic or
facsimile comments are preferred. If
sending comments by U.S. Postal
Service, please do not submit duplicate
electronic or facsimile comments. All
comments, including names and
addresses, will be submitted to the
administrative record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Rick Lehner, MDA Public Affairs, at
571–231–8210, or by email: mda.info@
mda.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 1501.6, an invitation
for cooperating agency status has been
extended to the U.S. Department of the
Army and Navy and National Guard for
consultation, review, and comment on
the EIS. Other cooperating agencies may
be identified during the scoping
process.
If deployed, the CIS would be an
extension of the existing Ground-based
Midcourse Defense (GMD) element of
the BMDS. Under the current proposed
action, the deployment of the CIS would
be as a contiguous Missile Defense
Complex, similar to that found at Fort
Greely, Alaska and would consist of an
initial deployment of 20 Ground-based
Interceptors (GBIs) with the ability to
expand upward to 60 GBIs. The GBIs
would not be fired from their
deployment site except in the Nation’s
defense and no test firing would be
conducted at the CIS. The overall
system architecture and baseline
requirements for a notional CIS include,
but are not limited to, the GBI fields,
Command Launch Equipment, In-Flight
Interceptor Communication System Data
Terminals, GMD Communication
Network, supporting facilities, such as
lodging and dining, recreation,
warehouse and bulk storage, vehicle
storage and maintenance, fire station,
hazardous materials/waste storage, and
roads and parking where necessary.
Alternatives to be analyzed include
the No-Action Alternative and sites at
the Combined Training Center Fort
Custer—Michigan Army National
Guard, Augusta, MI; Camp Ravenna
Joint Military Training Center—Ohio
Army National Guard, Portage and
Trumbull Counties, OH; Fort Drum
Army Base, Fort Drum, NY; and the
Center for Security Forces Detachment
Kittery Survival, Evasion, Resistance,
and Escape Facility (SERE East),
Redington Township, ME. At each site,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41539
impacts will be assessed for the
following resource categories—air
quality, air space, biological, cultural,
geology and soils, hazardous materials
and hazardous waste management,
health and safety, land use, noise,
socioeconomics, transportation,
utilities, water quality, wetlands, visual
and aesthetic, environmental justice,
and subsistence.
The MDA encourages all interested
members of the public, as well as
federal, state, and local agencies to
participate in the scoping process for
the preparation of this EIS. The scoping
process assists in determining the scope
of issues to be addressed and helps
identify significant environmental
issues to be analyzed in depth in the
EIS.
Scoping meetings will be held in the
local communities of Ravenna, OH;
Galesburg and Battle Creek, MI;
Carthage, NY; and Rangeley and
Farmington, ME, during July through
September 2014. Notification of the
meeting locations, dates, and times will
be published and announced in local
news media prior to public scoping
meetings.
Dated: July 10, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014–16629 Filed 7–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
[Docket Number DARS–2014–0030]
Information Collection Requirement;
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS);
Material Inspection and Receiving
Report
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments regarding a proposed
extension of an approved information
collection requirement.
AGENCY:
In compliance with section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), DoD announces the
proposed extension of a public
information collection requirement and
seeks public comment on the provisions
thereof. DoD invites comments on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of DoD,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 136 (Wednesday, July 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 41539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16629]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Continental United States Interceptor Site (CIS)
AGENCY: Missile Defense Agency, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) announces its intention to
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural
Provisions of NEPA. As required by the 2013 National Defense
Authorization Act, the MDA has selected possible additional locations
in the United States that would be best suited for future deployment of
an interceptor capable of protecting the homeland against threats from
nations, such as North Korea and Iran. The MDA is preparing this EIS to
evaluate the potential environmental impacts that could result from the
future deployment of the Continental United States Interceptor Site
(CIS). The existing Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) provides
protection of the United States from a limited ballistic missile
attack, and the Department of Defense has not made a decision to deploy
or construct the CIS.
DATES: The MDA invites public comments on the scope of the CIS EIS
during a 60-day public scoping period beginning with publication of
this notice in the Federal Register. Comments will be accepted on or
before September 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments, statements, and/or concerns regarding the
scope of the EIS or requests to be added to the EIS distribution list
should be addressed to MDA CIS EIS and sent by email to
MDA.CIS.EIS@BV.COM, by facsimile 913-458-1091, or by U.S. Postal
Service to: Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp Attn: MDACIS EIS, 6601
College Boulevard, Overland Park, KS 66211-1504. Electronic or
facsimile comments are preferred. If sending comments by U.S. Postal
Service, please do not submit duplicate electronic or facsimile
comments. All comments, including names and addresses, will be
submitted to the administrative record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rick Lehner, MDA Public Affairs,
at 571-231-8210, or by email: mda.info@mda.mil">mda.info@mda.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 1501.6, an invitation for cooperating agency status
has been extended to the U.S. Department of the Army and Navy and
National Guard for consultation, review, and comment on the EIS. Other
cooperating agencies may be identified during the scoping process.
If deployed, the CIS would be an extension of the existing Ground-
based Midcourse Defense (GMD) element of the BMDS. Under the current
proposed action, the deployment of the CIS would be as a contiguous
Missile Defense Complex, similar to that found at Fort Greely, Alaska
and would consist of an initial deployment of 20 Ground-based
Interceptors (GBIs) with the ability to expand upward to 60 GBIs. The
GBIs would not be fired from their deployment site except in the
Nation's defense and no test firing would be conducted at the CIS. The
overall system architecture and baseline requirements for a notional
CIS include, but are not limited to, the GBI fields, Command Launch
Equipment, In-Flight Interceptor Communication System Data Terminals,
GMD Communication Network, supporting facilities, such as lodging and
dining, recreation, warehouse and bulk storage, vehicle storage and
maintenance, fire station, hazardous materials/waste storage, and roads
and parking where necessary.
Alternatives to be analyzed include the No-Action Alternative and
sites at the Combined Training Center Fort Custer--Michigan Army
National Guard, Augusta, MI; Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training
Center--Ohio Army National Guard, Portage and Trumbull Counties, OH;
Fort Drum Army Base, Fort Drum, NY; and the Center for Security Forces
Detachment Kittery Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape Facility
(SERE East), Redington Township, ME. At each site, impacts will be
assessed for the following resource categories--air quality, air space,
biological, cultural, geology and soils, hazardous materials and
hazardous waste management, health and safety, land use, noise,
socioeconomics, transportation, utilities, water quality, wetlands,
visual and aesthetic, environmental justice, and subsistence.
The MDA encourages all interested members of the public, as well as
federal, state, and local agencies to participate in the scoping
process for the preparation of this EIS. The scoping process assists in
determining the scope of issues to be addressed and helps identify
significant environmental issues to be analyzed in depth in the EIS.
Scoping meetings will be held in the local communities of Ravenna,
OH; Galesburg and Battle Creek, MI; Carthage, NY; and Rangeley and
Farmington, ME, during July through September 2014. Notification of the
meeting locations, dates, and times will be published and announced in
local news media prior to public scoping meetings.
Dated: July 10, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-16629 Filed 7-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P