Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Business Systems Compliance (DFARS Case 2012-D042), 41172-41185 [2014-16390]
Download as PDF
41172
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
FIPS#
Lake Michigan ........................................................................................................................................................................
Lake Huron .............................................................................................................................................................................
Lake St. Clair ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Lake Erie ................................................................................................................................................................................
Lake Ontario ...........................................................................................................................................................................
St. Lawrence River above St. Regis ......................................................................................................................................
92
93
94
96
97
98
1 Effective May 16, 2002, analog radio and television broadcast stations, analog cable systems and wireless cable systems may upgrade their
existing EAS equipment to add these marine area location codes on a voluntary basis until the equipment is replaced. All models of EAS equipment manufactured after August 1, 2003, must be capable of receiving and transmitting these marine area location codes. EAS Participants that
install or replace their EAS equipment after February 1, 2004, must install equipment that is capable of receiving and transmitting these location
codes.
4. Amend § 11.51 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 11.51 EAS code and attention signal
transmission requirements.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Analog and digital television
broadcast stations shall transmit a visual
message containing the Originator,
Event, Location and the valid time
period of an EAS message. Effective
June 30, 2012, visual messages derived
from CAP-formatted EAS messages shall
contain the Originator, Event, Location
and the valid time period of the message
and shall be constructed in accordance
with section 3.6 of the ‘‘ECIG
Recommendations for a CAP EAS
Implementation Guide, Version 1.0’’
(May 17, 2010), except that if the EAS
Participant has deployed an
Intermediary Device to meet its CAPrelated obligations, this requirement
shall be effective June 30, 2015, and
until such date shall be subject to the
general requirement to transmit a visual
message containing the Originator,
Event, Location and the valid time
period of the EAS message. If the
message is a video crawl, it shall be
displayed:
(1) At the top of the television screen
or where it will not interfere with other
visual messages or otherwise block
other important visual content on the
screen,
(2) At a speed that can be read by
viewers,
(3) Continuously throughout the
duration of any EAS activation,
(4) In a font sized appropriately for
legibility,
(5) In a manner where lines of any
video crawl not overlap with one
another, and are adequately positioned
so they do not run off the edge of the
video screen.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 11.61 by revising
paragraph (a)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
§ 11.61
*
Tests of EAS procedures.
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
(iv) Test results as required by the
Commission shall be logged by all EAS
Participants into the EAS Test Reporting
System (ETRS) as follows.
(A) EAS Participants shall provide the
identifying information required by
Form One initially no later than 60 days
after the effective date of this
Subsection, and shall renew the Form
One information on a yearly basis or as
required by any revision of the EAS
Participant’s State EAS Plan filed
pursuant to § 11.21.
(B) ‘‘Day of test’’ data as required by
Form Two shall be filed in the ETRS
within 24 hours of any nationwide test
or as otherwise required by the Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
(C) Detailed post-test data as required
by Form Three shall be filed in the
ETRS within forty five (45) days
following any nationwide test or as
otherwise required by the Public Safety
and Homeland Security Bureau.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–16417 Filed 7–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 215, 242, and 252
RIN 0750–AI20
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Business
Systems Compliance (DFARS Case
2012–D042)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
ensure appropriate contractor
accountability for adequate contractor
business systems. In addition to the
request for written comments on this
proposed rule, DoD will hold a public
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
meeting to hear the views of interested
parties.
DATES: Comment Date: Comments on
the proposed rule should be submitted
in writing to the address shown below
on or before September 15, 2014, to be
considered in the formation of a final
rule.
Public Meeting Date: The public
meeting will be held at the Mark Center
Auditorium, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3603, on August
18, 2014, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., local
time.
Submission of comments:
You may submit comments, identified
by DFARS Case 2012–D042, using any
of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
inserting ‘‘DFARS Case 2012–D042’’
under the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or
ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the
link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘DFARS Case 2012–
D042.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘DFARS Case 2012–
D042’’ on your attached document.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2012–D042 in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: 571–372–6094.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Mr. Mark Gomersall,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room
3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark Gomersall, Defense Acquisition
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Regulations System,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room
3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Telephone 571–372–6099.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
Contractor business systems and
internal controls are the first line of
defense against waste, fraud, and abuse.
Weak control systems increase the risk
of unallowable and unreasonable costs
on Government contracts. In response to
a U.S. Government Accountability
Office report (GAO–12–83) issued on
November 3, 2011, Defense Contract
Management Agency: Amid Ongoing
Efforts to Rebuild Capacity, Several
Factors Present Challenges in Meeting
Its Mission, DoD agreed to consider
alternative approaches to audit
contractor business systems.
II. Discussion and Analysis
To improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of auditing contractor
business systems, DoD is proposing to
amend the DFARS to entrust contractors
with the capability to demonstrate
compliance with DFARS system criteria
for contractors’ accounting systems,
estimating systems, and material
management and accounting systems,
based on contractors’ self-evaluations
and audits by independent Certified
Public Accountants (CPAs) of their
choosing. Government auditors will
perform overviews of the results of
contractor self-evaluations and CPA
audits.
Individuals wishing to attend the
public meeting should register by
August 11, 2014, to ensure adequate
room accommodations and to facilitate
entry into the Mark Center building.
Interested parties may register at the
Web site, https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/
dars/business_systems_
compliance.html by providing the
following information:
• Company or organization name.
• Names and email addresses of
persons planning to attend.
• Identify if desiring to make a
presentation; limited to a 10-minute
presentation per company or
organization.
One valid government-issued photo
identification card will be required in
order to enter the building. Non-U.S.
citizens may use their valid passport as
photo identification. Attendees are
encouraged to arrive at least one hour
early to accommodate security
procedures.
Transportation information for the
Mark Center may be obtained at https://
www.whs.mil/our-services/
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
transportation/getting-mark-center.
Accommodations for parking at the
Mark Center will not be available, but
may be found in the surrounding areas.
If you wish to make a presentation,
please submit an electronic copy of your
presentation to osd.dfars@mail.mil no
later than August 13, 2014. Files must
not exceed 19MB. Please cite ‘‘Public
Meeting—Contractor Business Systems
Compliance’’ in all correspondence
related to this public meeting. When
submitting presentations, provide the
presenter’s name, organization
affiliation, telephone number, and email
address on the cover page. There will be
no transcription of the public meeting.
Submitted presentations will be the
only record.
Special accommodations: The public
meeting is physically accessible to
people with disabilities. Requests for
reasonable accommodations, sign
language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to
Mark Gomersall at 571–372–6099, at
least 10 working days prior to the
meeting date.
The TTY number for further
information is: 1–800–877–8339. When
the operator answers the call, let them
know the agency is the Department of
Defense; the point of contact is Mark
Gomersall at 571–372–6099.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD has prepared an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis consistent with 5
U.S.C. 603. A copy of the analysis may
be obtained from the point of contact
specified herein. The analysis is
summarized as follows:
The objective of the rule is to improve
the efficiency and effectiveness of
auditing contractor business systems by
entrusting contractors with the
capability to demonstrate compliance
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41173
with the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) system
criteria for contractors’ accounting
systems, estimating systems, and
material management and accounting
systems, based on contractors’ selfevaluations and audits by independent
Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) of
their choosing. The requirements of the
rule will apply to solicitations and
contracts that include the contract
clause for the applicable defined
contractor business system.
The rule will apply to solicitations
and contracts that are with large
businesses for the purposes of reporting
for estimating systems, and material
management and accounting systems.
For reporting on accounting systems,
the rule will apply to contractors who
are subject to the Cost Accounting
Standards (CAS) under 41 U.S.C.
chapter 15, as implemented in
regulations found at 48 CFR 9903.201–
1 (see the FAR Appendix), other than
for contracts with educational
institutions, Federally Funded Research
and Development Centers operated by
educational institutions, or University
Associated Research Centers. Since
contracts and subcontracts with small
businesses are exempt from CAS
requirements, DoD estimates that this
rule will have no impact on small
businesses. DoD, however, invites
comments from small business concerns
and other interested parties on the
expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2012–D042) in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 38) applies. The
proposed rule contains information
collection requirements. Accordingly,
DoD has submitted a request for
approval of a new information
collection requirement concerning
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement; Business Systems
Compliance (DFARS Case 2012–D042)
to the Office of Management and
Budget.
A. Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 2.87 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
41174
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
The annual reporting burden
estimated as follows:
Respondents: 2,953.
Responses per respondent: 1.
Total annual responses: 2,953.
Average hours per response: 2.87.
Total annual burden hours: 8,468.
B. Request for Comments Regarding
Paperwork Burden. Written comments
and recommendations on the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing this burden,
should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at
the Office of Management and Budget,
Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, or email Jasmeet_K._Seehra@
omb.eop.gov, with a copy to the Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, Attn:
Mark Gomersall, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/
DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments can be received from 30 to 60
days after the date of this notice, but
comments to OMB will be most useful
if received by OMB within 30 days after
the date of this notice.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the DFARS,
and will have practical utility; whether
our estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Mark
Gomersall, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060, or e-mail
osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS
Case 2012–D042 in the subject line of
the message.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215,
242, and 252
Government procurement.
Amy G. Williams,
Deputy, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 215, 242, and
252 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
1. The authority citation for parts 215,
242, and 252 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 215—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
2. Revise section 215.407–5–70 to
read as follows:
■
215.407–5–70 Disclosure, maintenance,
and review requirements.
(a) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Acceptable estimating system,
contractor, contractor’s certified public
accountant (CPA), CPA audit,
estimating system, and significant
deficiency are defined in the clause at
252.215–7002, Cost Estimating System
Requirements.
(b) Applicability. A contractor, other
than a small business concern, is subject
to the estimating system disclosure,
maintenance, review, annual reporting,
triennial CPA audit, and documentation
requirements in the clause at 252.215–
7002, Cost Estimating System
Requirements, if—
(1) In its preceding fiscal year, the
contractor received DoD prime contracts
or subcontracts totaling $50 million or
more for which certified cost or pricing
data were required; or
(2) In its preceding fiscal year, the
contractor received DoD prime contracts
or subcontracts totaling $10 million or
more (but less than $50 million) for
which certified cost or pricing data were
required and the contracting officer,
with concurrence or at the request of the
ACO, determines it to be in the best
interest of the Government (e.g.,
significant estimating problems are
believed to exist or the contractor’s sales
are predominantly Government).
(c) Policy. DoD policy is for all
contractors to have acceptable
estimating systems that consistently
produce well-supported proposals that
are acceptable as a basis for negotiation
of fair and reasonable prices.
(d) Procedures. (1) The contracting
officer shall—
(i) Through use of the clause at
252.215–7002, Cost Estimating System
Requirements, apply the disclosure,
maintenance, review, annual reporting,
triennial CPA audit, and documentation
requirements to contractors, other than
small business concerns, meeting the
criteria in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section;
(ii) Consider whether to apply the
disclosure, maintenance, review, annual
reporting, triennial CPA audit, and
documentation requirements to
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contractors, other than small business
concerns, under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section; and
(iii) Not apply the disclosure,
maintenance, review, annual reporting,
triennial CPA audit, and documentation
requirements to small business
concerns.
(2) The cognizant contracting officer,
in consultation with the Government
auditor, for contractors subject to
paragraph (b) of this section, shall—
(i) Determine the acceptability of the
contractor’s estimating system and
disclosure, and approve or disapprove
the system; and
(ii) Pursue correction of any
deficiencies.
(3) Triennial CPA audit requirement.
For contractors subject to paragraph (b)
of this section, and paragraph (d)(8) of
the clause at 252.215–7002, the
cognizant contracting officer shall—
(i) Upon receipt of the contractor’s
CPA’s audit strategy, risk assessment,
and audit plan (program), request a
review from the Government auditor,
and notify the contractor of any
potential issues identified by the
Government auditor regarding their
reasonableness. Early notification of
potential issues may decrease the
likelihood of the contractor incurring
unreasonable costs. However, review of
the contractor’s CPA’s audit strategy,
risk assessment, and audit plan
(program) does not constitute the
contracting officer’s approval; and
(ii) Upon receipt of the contractor’s
CPA audit report, request the
Government auditor’s assessment of the
CPA audit report and related
documentation.
(4) In evaluating the acceptability of a
contractor’s estimating system, the
contracting officer, in consultation with
the Government auditor, shall
determine whether the contractor’s
estimating system complies with the
system criteria for an acceptable
estimating system in the clause at
252.215–7002. In making that
determination, the contracting officer
shall consider—
(i) The contractor’s estimating system
disclosure, annual report on the
estimating system’s compliance with the
system criteria and the audit report by
the contractor’s CPA, as required in the
clause at 252.215–7002, if applicable;
and
(ii) Any other findings and
recommendations reported by the
Government auditor including the
assessment of the contractor’s CPA audit
report and related documentation, if
applicable.
(e) Accelerated audit requirement.
The contracting officer, in consultation
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
with the Government auditor, may
require contractors subject to the
triennial CPA audit requirement in the
clause at 252.215–7002 to provide an
out-of-cycle CPA audit report prior to
the triennial CPA audit period based on
a risk assessment of the contractor’s past
experience and current vulnerability.
(f) Disposition of findings—(1)
Reporting of findings by the Government
auditor. The Government auditor shall
document findings and
recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer regarding any
identified significant estimating system
deficiencies. The report shall describe
the deficiencies in sufficient detail to
allow the contracting officer to
understand the deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall review all
findings and recommendations from the
Government auditor and contractor and,
if there are no significant deficiencies
and the contractor as complied with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraphs (d)(5) and
(6) of the clause at 252.215–7002, shall
promptly notify the contractor, in
writing, that the contractor’s estimating
system is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more significant
deficiencies (as defined in the clause at
252.215–7002 due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
estimating system criteria in the clause
at 252.215–7002, or that the contractor
has failed to comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements in
accordance with the clause at 252.215–
7002, the contracting officer shall—
(A)(1) Promptly make an initial
written determination on any significant
deficiencies and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
significant deficiency in sufficient detail
to allow the contractor to understand
the deficiency; or
(2) Promptly make an initial written
determination on the contractor’s failure
to comply with the applicable reporting
and audit requirements and notify the
contractor, in writing, providing
sufficient information to allow the
contractor to understand what action
needs to be taken to comply;
(B) Request the contractor to respond,
in writing, to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor’s
responses to the initial determination,
in consultation with the Government
auditor or functional specialist, and
make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor,
in writing, that—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
(A) The contractor’s estimating system
is acceptable and approved, and no
significant deficiencies remain, and the
contractor has complied with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in accordance with the
clause at 252.215–7002; or
(B) Significant deficiencies remain, or
the contractor has failed to comply with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements. The notice shall identify
any remaining significant deficiencies
or noncompliance with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements, and
indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The
contracting officer shall—
(1) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
determination, either correct the
deficiencies or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
deficiencies and comply with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements;
(2) Disapprove the system in
accordance with the clause at 252.215–
7002; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005 if the
clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of significant
deficiencies in PGI 215.407–5–70(f).
(g) System approval. The contracting
officer shall promptly approve a
previously disapproved estimating
system and notify the contractor when
the contracting officer determines that
there are no remaining significant
deficiencies or noncompliance with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements.
(h) Contracting officer notifications.
The cognizant contracting officer shall
promptly distribute copies of a
determination to approve a system, to
disapprove a system and withhold
payments, or to approve a previously
disapproved system and release
withheld payments to the Government
auditor, payment office, affected
contracting officers at the buying
activities, and cognizant contracting
officers in contract administration
activities.
PART 242—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
242.7000 and 242.7001 [Redesignated as
242.7001 and 242.7003]
3. Redesignate sections 242.7000 and
242.7001 as sections 242.7001 and
242.7003, respectively.
■ 4. Revise newly redesignated section
242.7001 to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
242.7001
41175
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Acceptable contractor business
systems, contractor business systems,
contractor’s certified public accountant
(CPA), and CPA audit are defined in the
clause at 252.242–7005, Contractor
Business Systems.
Covered contract means a contract
that is subject to the Cost Accounting
Standards under 41 U.S.C. chapter 15,
as implemented in regulations found at
48 CFR 9903.201–1 (see the FAR
Appendix) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note, as
amended by section 816 of Public Law
112–81).
Significant deficiency is defined in
the clause at 252.242–7005, Contractor
Business Systems.
■ 5. Add section 242.7002 to read as
follows:
242.7002 Contractor business systems
deficiencies.
(a) Determination to withhold
payments. If the contracting officer
makes a final determination to
disapprove a contractor’s business
system in accordance with the clause at
252.242–7005, Contractor Business
Systems, the contracting officer shall—
(1) In accordance with agency
procedures, identify one or more
covered contracts containing the clause
at 252.242–7005 from which payments
will be withheld. When identifying the
covered contracts from which to
withhold payments, the contracting
officer shall ensure that the total amount
of payment withholding under 252.242–
7005 does not exceed 10 percent of
progress payments, performance-based
payments, and interim payments under
cost-reimbursement, labor-hour, and
time-and-materials contracts billed
under each of the identified covered
contracts. Similarly, the contracting
officer shall ensure that the total amount
of payment withholding under the
clause at 252.242–7005 for each
business system does not exceed five
percent of progress payments,
performance-based payments, and
interim payments under costreimbursement, labor-hour, and timeand-materials contracts billed under
each of the identified covered contracts.
The contracting officer has the sole
discretion to identify the covered
contracts from which to withhold
payments;
(2) Promptly notify the contractor, in
writing, of the contracting officer’s
determination to implement payment
withholding in accordance with the
clause at 252.242–7005. The notice of
payment withholding shall be included
in the contracting officer’s written final
determination for the contractor
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41176
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
business system and shall inform the
contractor that—
(i) Payments shall be withheld from
the contract or contracts identified in
the written determination in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005 until
the contracting officer determines that
there are no remaining significant
deficiencies and that the contractor has
complied with the applicable reporting
and audit requirements in accordance
with the applicable business system
clause identified in 242.7003(b); and
(ii) The contracting officer reserves
the right to take other actions within the
terms and conditions of the contract;
and
(3) Provide all contracting officers
administering the selected contracts
from which payments will be withheld,
a copy of the determination. The
contracting officer shall also provide a
copy of the determination to the
Government auditor; payment office;
affected contracting officers at the
buying activities; and cognizant
contracting officers in contract
administration activities.
(b) Monitoring contractor’s corrective
action. The contracting officer, in
consultation with the Government
auditor or functional specialist, shall
monitor the contractor’s progress in
correcting the deficiencies. The
contracting officer shall notify the
contractor of any decision to decrease or
increase the amount of payment
withholding in accordance with the
clause at 252.242–7005.
(c) Correction of significant
deficiencies and reporting.
(1) If the contractor notifies the
contracting officer that the contractor
has corrected the significant
deficiencies and, if applicable, provides
the contractor’s CPA audit report on the
effectiveness of the corrective actions,
the contracting officer shall review the
correction to verify that the deficiencies
have been corrected. If the contracting
officer determines that the contractor
has corrected all significant deficiencies
and provided the contractor’s report on
compliance with the system criteria,
including the CPA audit report, if
applicable, the contracting officer shall
discontinue the withholding of
payments, release any payments
previously withheld, and approve the
system, unless other significant
deficiencies remain.
(2) Prior to the determination that the
deficiencies have been corrected, the
contracting officer may discontinue
withholding payments pending the
determination, and release any
payments previously withheld, if the
contractor submits evidence that the
significant deficiencies have been
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
corrected, and the contracting officer, in
consultation with the Government
auditor or functional specialist,
determines that there is a reasonable
expectation that the corrective actions
have been implemented and are
expected to correct the significant
deficiencies.
(3) Within 90 days of receipt of the
contractor notification that the
contractor has corrected the significant
deficiencies and, if applicable, the
contractor’s CPA audit report on the
effectiveness of the corrective actions,
the contracting officer shall—
(i) Make a determination that—
(A) The contractor has corrected all
significant deficiencies as directed by
the contracting officer’s final
determination in accordance with
paragraph (c)(1) of this section;
(B) There is a reasonable expectation
that the corrective actions have been
implemented in accordance with
paragraph (c)(2) of this section; or
(C) The contractor has not corrected
all significant deficiencies as directed
by the contracting officer’s final
determination in accordance with
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, or there
is not a reasonable expectation that the
corrective actions have been
implemented in accordance with
paragraph (c)(2) of this section; and
(ii) Reduce withholding directly
related to the significant deficiencies
covered under the corrective action plan
by at least 50 percent of the amount
being withheld from progress payments
and performance-based payments, and
direct the contractor, in writing, to
reduce the percentage withheld on
interim cost vouchers by at least 50
percent, until the contracting officer
makes a determination in accordance
with paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section.
(4) If, at any time, the contracting
officer determines that the contractor
has failed to correct the significant
deficiencies identified in the
contractor’s notification, the contracting
officer will continue, reinstate, or
increase withholding from progress
payments and performance-based
payments, and direct the contractor, in
writing, to continue, reinstate, or
increase the percentage withheld on
interim cost vouchers to the percentage
initially withheld, until the contracting
officer determines that the contractor
has corrected all significant deficiencies
as directed by the contracting officer’s
final determination.
(d) For sample formats for written
notifications of contracting officer
determinations to initiate payment
withholding, reduce payment
withholding, and discontinue payment
withholding in accordance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
clause at 252.242–7005. See PGI
242.7002.
■ 6. In newly redsignated section
242.7003, revise paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
242.7003
Contract clause.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) The resulting contract will be a
covered contract as defined in 242.7001;
and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Revise sections 242.7201, 242.7202,
and 242.7203 to read as follows:
242.7201
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Acceptable material management and
accounting system, contractor,
contractor’s certified public accountant
(CPA), CPA audit, material management
and accounting system, qualifying sales,
significant deficiency, and valid timephased requirements are defined in the
clause at 252.242–7004, Material
Management and Accounting System.
242.7202
Policy.
(a) DoD policy is for its contractors to
have an MMAS that conforms to the
standards in paragraph (h) of the clause
at 252.242–7004, Material Management
and Accounting System, so that the
system—
(1) Reasonably forecasts material
requirements;
(2) Ensures the costs of purchased and
fabricated material charged or allocated
to a contract are based on valid timephased requirements; and
(3) Maintains a consistent, equitable,
and unbiased logic for costing of
material transactions.
(b) Criteria for conducting reviews.
Conduct an MMAS review in
accordance with paragraph (d) of the
clause at 252.242.7004, when—
(1) The contractor is a large business;
(2) Has $50 million in qualifying sales
to the Government; and
(3) The cognizant contracting officer,
with advice from the Government
auditor or cognizant functional
specialist, determines an MMAS review
is needed based on a risk assessment of
the contractor’s past experience, current
vulnerability, and the following risk
factors:
(i) FAR 42.302 surveillance activities
indicate the contractor has not complied
with the criteria in 252.242.7004.
(ii) There are changes to the
contractor’s MMAS system.
(iii) The contractor’s MMAS system is
new.
(iv) The contractor’s MMAS system
has not been reviewed within a 36month period.
(c) Contractors subject to the triennial
CPA audit requirement in the clause at
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
252.242–7004, may be required to
provide an out-of-cycle CPA audit
report prior to the triennial CPA audit
reporting period based on a risk
assessment of the contractor’s past
experience and current vulnerability.
(d) The cognizant contracting officer,
in consultation with the Government
auditor and cognizant functional
specialist, if appropriate, shall—
(1) Determine the acceptability of the
contractor’s MMAS and approve or
disapprove the system; and
(2) Pursue correction of any
deficiencies.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
242.7203
Procedures.
(a) Triennial CPA audit requirement.
For contractors subject to paragraph (f)
of the clause at 252.242–7004, Material
Management and Accounting System,
the cognizant contracting officer shall—
(1) Upon receipt of the contractor’s
CPA’s audit strategy, risk assessment,
and audit plan (program), request a
review from the Government auditor,
and notify the contractor of any
potential issues identified by the
Government auditor regarding their
reasonableness. Early notification of
potential issues may decrease the
likelihood of the contractor incurring
unreasonable costs. However, review of
the contractor’s CPA’s audit strategy,
risk assessment, and audit plan
(program) does not constitute the
contracting officer’s approval; and
(2) Upon receipt of the contractor’s
CPA audit report, request the
Government auditor’s assessment of the
CPA audit report and related
documentation.
(b) In evaluating the acceptability of
the contractor’s MMAS, the contracting
officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor and functional
specialist, if appropriate, shall
determine whether the contractor’s
MMAS complies with the system
criteria for an acceptable MMAS as
required in the clause at 252.242–7004.
In making that determination, the
contracting officer shall consider—
(1) The contractor’s report on the
MMAS’s compliance with the system
criteria and the audit report by the
contractor’s CPA, as required in the
clause at 252.242–7004; and
(2) Any other findings and
recommendations reported by the
Government auditor including the
assessment of the contractor’s CPA audit
report and related documentation, if
applicable.
(c) Disposition of findings—(1)
Reporting of findings by the Government
auditor. The Government auditor or
functional specialist shall document
findings and recommendations in a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
report to the contracting officer
regarding any identified significant
MMAS deficiencies. The report shall
describe the deficiencies in sufficient
detail to allow the contracting officer to
understand the deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall review all
findings and recommendations from the
Government auditor and contractor and,
if there are no significant deficiencies
and the contractor has complied with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraph (d) of the
clause at 252.242–7004, shall promptly
notify the contractor, in writing, that the
contractor’s MMAS is acceptable and
approved.
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more significant
deficiencies (as defined in the clause at
252.242–7004 due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
MMAS system criteria in the clause at
252.242–7004, or that the contractor has
failed to comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements in
accordance with the clause at 252.242–
7004, the contracting officer shall—
(A)(1) Promptly make an initial
written determination on any significant
deficiencies and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
significant deficiency in sufficient detail
to allow the contractor to understand
the deficiency; or
(2) Promptly make an initial written
determination on the contractor’s failure
to comply with the applicable reporting
and audit requirements and notify the
contractor, in writing, providing
sufficient information to allow the
contractor to understand what action
needs to be taken to comply;
(B) Request the contractor to respond,
in writing, to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor’s
response to the initial determination in
consultation with the Government
auditor or functional specialist, and
make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor
that—
(A) The contractor’s MMAS is
acceptable and approved, and no
deficiencies remain, and the contractor
has complied with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements in
accordance with the clause at 252.242–
7004; or
(B) Significant deficiencies remain, or
the contractor has failed to comply with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements. The notice shall identify
any remaining significant deficiencies
or noncompliance with the applicable
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41177
reporting and audit requirements and
indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The
contracting officer shall—
(1) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
determination, either correct the
deficiencies or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
deficiencies and comply with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements;
(2) Disapprove the system in
accordance with the clause at 252.242–
7004; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, if the
clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of significant
deficiencies in PGI 242.7203.
(d) System approval. The contracting
officer shall promptly approve a
previously disapproved MMAS and
notify the contractor when the
contracting officer determines that there
are no remaining significant deficiencies
or noncompliance with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements.
(e) Contracting officer notifications.
The cognizant contracting officer shall
promptly distribute copies of a
determination to approve a system, to
disapprove a system and withhold
payments, or to approve a previously
disapproved system and release
withheld payments to the Government
auditor, payment office, affected
contracting officers at the buying
activities, and cognizant contracting
officers in contract administration
activities.
■ 8. Revise sections 242.7501 and
242.7502 to read as follows:
242.7501
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Acceptable accounting system,
accounting system, contractor’s certified
public account (CPA), CPA audit, and
significant deficiency are defined in the
clause at 252.242–7006, Accounting
System Administration.
242.7502
Policy.
DoD policy is for contractors receiving
cost-reimbursement, incentive type,
time-and-materials, or labor-hour
contracts, or contracts which provide for
progress payments based on costs or on
a percentage or stage of completion, to—
(a) Maintain an acceptable accounting
system; and
(b) If applicable, comply with the
annual reporting, triennial CPA audit,
and documentation requirements
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
41178
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
required in the clause at 252.242–7006,
Accounting System Administration.
242.7503
[Redesignated as 242.7504]
9. Redesignate section 242.7503 as
section 242.7504.
■ 10. Add a new section 242.7503 to
read as follows:
■
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
242.7503
Procedures.
(a) The cognizant contracting officer,
in consultation with the Government
auditor or functional specialist, shall—
(1) Determine the acceptability of a
contractor’s accounting system and
approve or disapprove the system; and
(2) Pursue correction of any
deficiencies.
(b) Triennial CPA audit requirement.
For contractors subject to paragraph (h)
of the clause at 252.242–7006, the
cognizant contracting officer shall—
(1) Upon receipt of the contractor’s
CPA’s audit strategy, risk assessment,
and audit plan (program), request a
review from the Government auditor
and notify the contractor of any
potential issues identified by the
Government auditor regarding their
reasonableness. Early notification of
potential issues may decrease the
likelihood of the contractor incurring
unreasonable costs. However, review of
the contractor’s CPA’s audit strategy,
risk assessment, and audit plan
(program) does not constitute the
contracting officer’s approval; and
(2) Upon receipt of the contractor’s
CPA audit report, request the
Government auditor’s assessment of the
CPA audit report and related
documentation.
(c) In evaluating the acceptability of a
contractor’s accounting system, the
contracting officer, in consultation with
the Government auditor or functional
specialist, shall determine whether the
contractor’s accounting system complies
with the system criteria for an
acceptable accounting system in the
clause at 252.242–7006. In making that
determination the contracting officer
shall consider—
(1) The contractor’s annual report on
the accounting system’s compliance
with the system criteria and the audit
report by the contractor’s CPA as
required in the clause at 252.242–7006,
if applicable; and
(2) Any other findings and
recommendations reported by the
Government auditor including the
assessment of the contractor’s CPA audit
report and related documentation, if
applicable.
(d) Accelerated audit requirement.
The contracting officer, in consultation
with the Government auditor, may
require contractors subject to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
triennial CPA audit requirement in the
clause at 252.242–7006 to provide an
out-of-cycle CPA audit report prior to
the triennial CPA audit period based on
a risk assessment of the contractor’s past
experience and current vulnerability.
(e) Disposition of findings—(1)
Reporting of findings by the Government
auditor. The Government auditor shall
document findings and
recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer regarding any
identified significant accounting system
deficiencies. The report shall describe
the deficiencies in sufficient detail to
allow the contracting officer to
understand the deficiencies. Follow the
procedures at PGI 242.7503 for reporting
of deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall review all
findings and recommendations from the
Government auditor and contractor and,
if there are no significant deficiencies
and the contractor has complied with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f) of
the clause at 252.242–7006, shall
promptly notify the contractor, in
writing, that the accounting system is
acceptable and approved.
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more significant
deficiencies (as defined in the clause at
252.242–7006 due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
estimating system criteria in the clause
at 252.242–7006, or that the contractor
has failed to comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements in
accordance with the clause at 252.242–
7006, the contracting officer shall—
(A)(1) Promptly make an initial
written determination on any significant
deficiencies and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
significant deficiency in sufficient detail
to allow the contractor to understand
the deficiency; or
(2) Promptly make an initial written
determination on the contractor’s failure
to comply with the applicable reporting
and audit requirements and notify the
contractor, in writing, providing
sufficient information to allow the
contractor to understand what action
needs to be taken to comply;
(B) Request the contractor to respond,
in writing, to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor‘s
response to the initial determination, in
consultation with the Government
auditor or functional specialist, and
make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor,
in writing, that—
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(A) The contractor’s accounting
system is acceptable and approved, and
no significant deficiencies remain, and
the contractor has complied with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in accordance with the
clause at 252.242–7006, or
(B) Significant deficiencies remain, or
the contractor has failed to comply with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements. The notice shall identify
any remaining significant deficiencies
or noncompliance with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements, and
indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The
contracting officer shall—
(1) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
determination, either correct the
deficiencies or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
deficiencies and comply with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements;
(2) Disapprove the system in
accordance with the clause at 252.242–
7006; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, if the
clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of significant
deficiencies in PGI 242.7503.
(f) System approval. The contracting
officer shall promptly approve a
previously disapproved accounting
system and notify the contractor when
the contracting officer determines that
there are no remaining significant
deficiencies or noncompliance with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements.
(g) Contracting officer notifications.
The cognizant contracting officer shall
promptly distribute copies of a
determination to approve a system, to
disapprove a system and withhold
payments, or to approve a previously
disapproved system and release
withheld payments to the Government
auditor, payment office, affected
contracting officers at the buying
activities, and cognizant contracting
officers in contract administration
activities.
(h) Mitigating the risk of accounting
system deficiencies on specific
proposals. (1) Field pricing teams shall
discuss identified accounting system
deficiencies and their impact in all
reports on contractor proposals until the
deficiencies are resolved.
(2) The contracting officer responsible
for negotiation of a proposal generated
by an accounting system with an
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
identified deficiency shall evaluate
whether the deficiency impacts the
negotiations. If it does not, the
contracting officer should proceed with
negotiations. If it does, the contracting
officer should consider other
alternatives, for example—
(i) Allowing the contractor additional
time to correct the accounting system
deficiency and submit a corrected
proposal;
(ii) Considering another type of
contract;
(iii) Using additional cost analysis
techniques to determine the
reasonableness of the cost elements
affected by the accounting system’s
deficiency;
(iv) Reducing the negotiation
objective for profit or fee; or
(v) Including a contract (reopener)
clause that provides for adjustment of
the contract amount after award.
(3) The contracting officer who
incorporates a reopener clause into the
contract is responsible for negotiating
price adjustments required by the
clause. Any reopener clause
necessitated by an accounting system
deficiency should—
(i) Clearly identify the amounts and
items that are in question at the time of
negotiation;
(ii) Indicate a specific time or
subsequent event by which the
contractor will submit a supplemental
proposal, including certified cost or
pricing data, identifying the cost impact
adjustment necessitated by the deficient
accounting system;
(iii) Provide for the contracting officer
to adjust the contract price unilaterally
if the contractor fails to submit the
supplemental proposal; and
(iv) Provide that failure of the
Government and the contractor to agree
to the price adjustment shall be a
dispute under the Disputes clause.
242.7504
[Amended]
11. In newly redsignated section
242.7504, remove the bracket at the end
of paragraph (b).
■
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
12. Amend section 252.215–7002 by—
a. Removing the clause date ‘‘(DEC
2012)’’ and adding in its place
‘‘(DATE)’’;
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b);
■ c. Amending paragraph (c)
introductory text by removing ‘‘a large
business’’ and adding ‘‘other than a
small business concern’’ in its place;
■ d. Revising paragraph (d) heading and
adding paragraphs (d)(5) through (9);
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
e. Revising paragraphs (e) and (f); and
f. Amending paragraph (g) by
removing ‘‘252.242–7005,’’ and adding
‘‘DFARS 252.242–7005,’’ in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
252.215–7002 Cost Estimating System
Requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Definitions. As used in this
clause—
Acceptable estimating system means
an estimating system that complies with
the system criteria in paragraph (d) of
this clause, and provides for a system
that—
(i) Is maintained, reliable, and
consistently applied;
(ii) Produces verifiable, supportable,
documented, and timely cost estimates
that are an acceptable basis for
negotiation of fair and reasonable prices;
(iii) Is consistent with and integrated
with the Contractor’s related
management systems; and
(iv) Is subject to applicable financial
control systems.
Contractor means a business unit as
defined in FAR 2.101.
Contractor’s Certified Public
Accountant (CPA) means an
independent certified public
accountant, in public practice and not
directly employed as an employee by
the Contractor, performing audits for the
Contractor in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted government auditing
standards (GAGAS) as issued by the
Government Accountability Office.
CPA audit means an examination of
the Contractor’s compliance with the
applicable system criteria in paragraph
(d)(4) of this clause performed by the
Contractor’s CPA in accordance with
GAGAS for examination attestation
engagements.
Estimating system means the
Contractor’s policies, procedures, and
practices for budgeting and planning
controls, and generating estimates of
costs and other data included in
proposals submitted to customers in the
expectation of receiving contract
awards. Estimating system includes the
Contractor’s—
(i) Organizational structure;
(ii) Established lines of authority,
duties, and responsibilities;
(iii) Internal controls and managerial
reviews;
(iv) Flow of work, coordination, and
communication; and
(v) Budgeting, planning, estimating
methods, techniques, accumulation of
historical costs, and other analyses used
to generate cost estimates.
Significant deficiency means a
shortcoming in the system that
materially affects the ability of officials
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41179
of the Department of Defense to rely
upon information produced by the
system that is needed for management
purposes.
(b) General. The Contractor shall—
(1) Establish, maintain, and comply
with an acceptable estimating system;
and
(2) Make available to the Government,
upon request, the results of internal or
external reviews or monitoring that have
been conducted to ensure compliance
with the system criteria in (d)(4) of this
clause and established estimating
policies and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) System and reporting
requirements. * * *
(5) Annual reporting requirements. (i)
The Contractor shall provide to the
Contracting Officer and Government
auditor within the 6-month period
following the expiration of the
Contractor’s fiscal year, and annually
thereafter, a report regarding
compliance with the system criteria in
paragraph (d)(4) of this clause as of the
end of the Contractor’s most recent
fiscal year. The Contractor shall have
the report signed by an individual of the
Contractor’s organization at a level no
lower than a vice president or chief
financial officer of the reporting
business segment.
(ii) The report shall include—
(A) A statement that the Contractor
has evaluated the estimating system’s
compliance with the system criteria in
paragraph (d)(4) of this clause;
(B) The Contractor’s assessment of the
estimating system’s compliance with the
system criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of
this clause, including a statement as to
whether or not the system complies in
all material respects, and disclosure of
any significant deficiencies with
sufficient information for the
Government to understand the
deficiencies; and
(C) The status of any significant
deficiencies disclosed as part of the
Contractor’s assessment or, if
applicable, in the Contractor’s CPA
audit report as required in paragraph
(d)(6) of this clause, including a
corrective action plan with milestones
and actions to eliminate any significant
deficiencies that have not been
corrected as of the date of the
Contractor’s report.
(6) Triennial CPA audit requirement.
(i) In the first year in which the
Contractor is required to provide the
annual report as required in paragraph
(d)(5) of this clause, and every three
years thereafter, or more frequently if
directed by the Contracting Officer, in
addition to the items in paragraph
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41180
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(d)(5)(ii) of this clause, the Contractor’s
annual report shall include an audit
report on the Contractor’s CPA’s
examination of the Contractor’s
compliance with the system criteria in
paragraph (d)(4) of this clause as of the
end of the most recent fiscal year.
(ii) The examination shall be
performed in accordance with GAGAS
for examination attestation
engagements, and the CPA audit report
shall include sufficient information
regarding any reported significant
deficiencies for the Government to
understand the deficiencies.
(7) CPA selection. If paragraph (d)(6)
of this clause is applicable, the
Contractor shall reasonably ensure that
the CPA firm performing the audit is—
(i) Independent and objective with
respect to the audited entity by
obtaining and reviewing a written
representation from the firm that the
firm (and the assigned engagement
team)—
(A) Is independent and objective with
respect to the audited entity;
(B) Will remain independent
throughout the audit;
(C) Has not performed any nonaudit
services for the audited entity that
impair the auditors’ independence for
the subject audit; and
(D) Will disclose any independence
issues discovered; and
(ii) Qualified to perform the audit by
obtaining and reviewing—
(A) Information about key engagement
team members regarding professional
qualifications and experience, including
valid CPA licenses or certificates in
good standing, and current knowledge
and experience in the type of work to
be done; and
(B) The firm’s most recent peer review
report, in accordance with the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Peer Review Program, or
equivalent.
(8) Contractor submission of audit
plan. The Contractor shall provide the
Contractor’s CPA’s audit strategy, risk
assessment, and audit plan (program),
upon completion, for the audits
required in paragraphs (d)(6) and (f)(2)
of this clause, to the cognizant
contracting officer and Government
auditor for review if—
(i) The Contractor has received
Department of Defense (DoD) prime
contracts or subcontracts, totaling $100
million or more for which certified cost
or pricing data were required during the
fiscal year to which the Contractor’s
CPA audit report applies; or
(ii) Requested by the Contracting
Officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
(9) Documentation requirements. (i) If
paragraphs (d)(5) and (6) of this clause
are applicable, the Contractor shall
maintain and make available to the
Government upon request—
(A) Documentation to provide
reasonable support for the assessment of
the estimating system as required in
paragraphs (d)(5)(ii)(B) of this clause;
and
(B) Information considered in the
selection of a CPA as required in
paragraph (d)(7) of this clause, if
applicable.
(ii) The Contractor shall arrange for
Government access to the working
papers supporting the CPA audit reports
required in paragraphs (d)(6) and (f)(2)
of this clause, and documentation
supporting the Contractor’s CPA’s
independence, objectivity and
qualifications.
(e) Significant deficiencies or failure
to comply with applicable reporting and
audit requirements. (1) The Contracting
Officer will provide an initial
determination to the Contractor, in
writing, of any significant deficiencies
or the Contractor’s failure to comply
with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraphs (d)(5) and
(6) of this clause. The initial
determination will describe the
deficiency in sufficient detail to allow
the Contractor to understand the
deficiency and provide sufficient
information on the noncompliance with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements to allow the Contractor to
understand what action needs to be
taken to comply.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies significant
deficiencies in the Contractor’s
estimating system or the Contractor’s
failure to comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements in
paragraphs (d)(5) and (6) of this clause.
If the Contractor disagrees with the
initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for
disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining significant deficiencies;
(ii) Remaining noncompliance with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements;
(iii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(iv) System disapproval, if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more significant deficiencies remain
or the Contractor has failed to comply
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements.
(f) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of significant deficiencies or the
Contractor’s failure to comply with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in accordance with
paragraphs (d)(5) and (6) of this clause,
the Contractor shall—
(1) Within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
significant deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the significant deficiencies,
and comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements; and
(2) If the significant deficiencies were
reported in the Contractor’s annual
report, or the Contractor’s CPA audit
report, provide the Contractor’s CPA’s
opinion regarding the effectiveness of
the corrective actions—
(i) As a part of the triennial CPA audit
report as required in paragraph (d)(6) of
this clause; or
(ii) In a separate audit report on the
Contractor’s CPA’s examination of the
effectiveness of the corrective action
performed in accordance with GAGAS
for examination attestation
engagements.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Amend section 252.242–7004 by—
■ a. Removing the clause date ‘‘(MAY
2011)’’ and adding in its place
‘‘(DATE)’’;
■ b. Revising paragraph (a);
■ c. Amending paragraph (b)(2) by
removing ‘‘paragraph (e)’’ and adding
‘‘paragraph (h)’’ in its place;
■ d. Revising paragraph (c)(2);
■ e. Redesignating paragraphs (d)
through (g) as paragraphs (h) through
(k), respectively, and adding new
paragraphs (d) through (g); and
■ f. Revising the newly redesignated
paragraphs (i) and (j).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
252.242–7004 Material Management and
Accounting System.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Definitions. As used in this
clause—
Acceptable material management and
accounting system means a MMAS that
generally complies with the applicable
system criteria in paragraph (h) of this
clause.
Contractor means a business unit as
defined in FAR 2.101.
Contractor’s Certified Public
Accountant (CPA) means an
independent certified public
accountant, in public practice and not
directly employed as an employee by
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
the Contractor, performing audits for the
Contractor in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted government auditing
standards (GAGAS), as issued by the
Government Accountability Office.
CPA audit means an examination of
the Contractor’s compliance with the
applicable system criteria in paragraph
(h) of this clause performed by the
Contractor’s CPA in accordance with
GAGAS for examination attestation
engagements.
Material management and accounting
system (MMAS) means the Contractor’s
system or systems for planning,
controlling, and accounting for the
acquisition, use, issuing, and
disposition of material. Material
management and accounting systems
may be manual or automated. They may
be stand-alone systems or they may be
integrated with planning, engineering,
estimating, purchasing, inventory,
accounting, or other systems.
Qualifying sales means sales for
which cost or pricing data were required
under 10 U.S.C. 2306a, as implemented
in FAR 15.403, or that are contracts
priced on other than a firm-fixed-price
or fixed-price with economic price
adjustment basis. Sales include prime
contracts, subcontracts, and
modifications to such contracts and
subcontracts.
Significant deficiency means a
shortcoming in the system that
materially affects the ability of officials
of the Department of Defense to rely
upon information produced by the
system that is needed for management
purposes.
Valid time-phased requirements
means material that is—
(i) Needed to fulfill the production
plan, including reasonable quantities for
scrap, shrinkage, yield, etc.; and
(ii) Charged/billed to contracts or
other cost objectives in a manner
consistent with the need to fulfill the
production plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Provide to the Administrative
Contracting Officer (ACO), upon
request, the results of internal or
external reviews or monitoring that have
been conducted to ensure compliance
with the system criteria in paragraph (h)
of this clause and established MMAS
policies, procedures, and operating
instructions; and
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Triennial CPA reporting and audit
requirements. (1) If the Contractor is
other than small business concern, has
$50 million of qualifying sales to the
Government during the preceding fiscal
year, and the Contracting Officer
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
requests an MMAS review, the
Contractor shall—
(i) Provide to the Contracting Officer
and Government auditor within the 6month period following the expiration
of the Contractor’s fiscal year, a report
regarding the Contractor’s compliance
with the system criteria in paragraph (h)
of this clause as of the end of the
Contractor’s most recent fiscal year; and
(ii) Have the report signed by an
individual of the Contractor’s
organization at a level no lower than a
vice president or chief financial officer
of the reporting business segment.
(2) The report shall include—
(i) A statement that the Contractor has
evaluated the MMAS’s compliance with
the system criteria in paragraph (h) of
this clause;
(ii) The Contractor’s assessment of the
MMAS’s compliance with the system
criteria in paragraph (h) of this clause,
including a statement as to whether or
not the system complies in all material
respects and disclosure of any
significant deficiencies with sufficient
information for the Government to
understand the deficiencies;
(iii) An audit report on the
Contractor’s CPA’s examination of the
Contractor’s compliance with the
system criteria in paragraph (h) of this
clause as of the end of the most recent
fiscal year. The examination shall be
performed in accordance with GAGAS
for examination attestation
engagements. The CPA audit report
shall include sufficient information
regarding any reported significant
deficiencies for the Government to
understand the deficiencies; and
(iv) The status of any significant
deficiencies disclosed as part of the
Contractor’s assessment or in the
Contractor’s CPA audit report, including
a corrective action plan with milestones
and actions to eliminate any significant
deficiencies that have not been
corrected as of the date of the
Contractor’s report.
(e) CPA selection. If paragraph (d) of
this clause is applicable, the Contractor
shall reasonably ensure that the CPA
firm performing the audit is—
(1) Independent and objective with
respect to the audited entity by
obtaining and reviewing a written
representation from the firm that the
firm (and the assigned engagement
team)—
(i) Is independent and objective with
respect to the audited entity;
(ii) Will remain independent
throughout the audit;
(iii) Has not performed any nonaudit
services for the audited entity that
impair the auditors’ independence for
the subject audit; and
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41181
(iv) Will disclose any independence
issues discovered; and
(2) Qualified to perform the audit by
obtaining and reviewing—
(i) Information about key engagement
team members regarding professional
qualifications and experience, including
valid CPA licenses or certificates in
good standing, and current knowledge
and experience in the type of work to
be done; and
(ii) The firm’s most recent peer review
report, in accordance with the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Peer Review Program, or
equivalent.
(f) Contractor submission of audit
plan. The Contractor shall provide the
Contractor’s CPA’s audit strategy, risk
assessment, and audit plan (program),
upon completion, for the audits
required in paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) and
(j)(2) of this clause, to the cognizant
contracting officer and Government
auditor for review if—
(1) The Contractor has more than $100
million in qualifying sales to the
Government during the fiscal year to
which the Contractor’s CPA audit report
applies; or
(2) Requested by the Contracting
Officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor.
(g) Documentation requirements. (1) If
paragraph (d) of this clause is
applicable, the Contractor shall
maintain and make available to the
Government upon request—
(i) Documentation to provide
reasonable support for the assessment of
the MMAS as required in paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) of this clause; and
(ii) Information considered in the
selection of a CPA as required in
paragraph (e) of this clause.
(2) The Contractor shall arrange for
Government access to the working
papers supporting the CPA audit reports
as required in paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) and
(j)(2) of this clause, and documentation
supporting the CPA’s independence,
objectivity, and qualifications.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Significant deficiencies or failure to
comply with applicable reporting and
audit requirements. (1) The Contracting
Officer will provide an initial
determination to the Contractor, in
writing, of any significant deficiencies
or the Contractor’s failure to comply
with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraph (d) of this
clause. The initial determination will
describe the deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the deficiency and provide
sufficient information on the
noncompliance with the applicable
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41182
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
reporting and audit requirements to
allow the Contractor to understand what
action needs to be taken to comply.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies significant
deficiencies in the Contractor’s MMAS
or the Contractor’s failure to comply
with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraph (d) of this
clause. If the Contractor disagrees with
the initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for
disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining significant deficiencies;
(ii) Remaining noncompliance with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements;
(iii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(iv) System disapproval if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more significant deficiencies remain
or the Contractor has failed to comply
with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements.
(j) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of significant deficiencies or the
Contractor’s failure to comply with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this clause, the
Contractor shall—
(1) Within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
significant deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the significant deficiencies,
and comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements; and
(2) If the significant deficiencies were
reported in the Contractor’s annual
report, or the Contractor’s CPA audit
report as required in paragraph (d) of
this clause, provide the Contractor’s
CPA’s opinion regarding the
effectiveness of the corrective actions—
(i) As a part of the triennial CPA audit
report required in paragraph (d) of this
clause; or
(ii) In a separate audit report on the
Contractor’s CPA’s examination of the
effectiveness of the corrective action
performed in accordance with GAGAS
for examination attestation
engagements.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Amend section 252.242–7005 by—
■ a. In the introductory text, removing
‘‘242.7001’’ and adding ‘‘242.7003’’ in
its place;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
b. Removing the clause date ‘‘(FEB
2012)’’ and adding in its place
‘‘(DATE)’’;
■ c. Amending paragraph (b) by—
■ i. Revising the definition of
‘‘Contractor business systems’’; and
■ ii. Adding, in alphabetical order,
definitions for ‘‘Contractor’s Certified
Public Account (CPA)’’ and ‘‘CPA
audit’’.
■ d. Revising paragraph (d);
■ e. Revising paragraphs (e)(1) and (2);
■ f. Revising paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2)
introductory text, and (f)(2)(i);
■ g. Amending paragraph (f)(iv) by
removing ‘‘Contractor has corrected the
significant deficiencies’’ and adding
‘‘Contractor has corrected the significant
deficiencies and, if applicable, the
Contractor’s CPA audit report on the
effectiveness of the corrective actions’’
in its place; and
■ h. Adding paragraph (g).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
252.242–7005
Systems.
Contractor Business
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Contractor business systems means—
(i) Accounting system, if this contract
includes the clause at DFARS 252.242–
7006, Accounting System
Administration;
(ii) Earned value management system,
if this contract includes the clause at
DFARS 252.234–7002, Earned Value
Management System;
(iii) Estimating system, if this contract
includes the clause at DFARS 252.215–
7002, Cost Estimating System
Requirements;
(iv) Material management and
accounting system, if this contract
includes the clause at DFARS 252.242–
7004, Material Management and
Accounting System;
(v) Property management system, if
this contract includes the clause at
DFARS 252.245–7003, Contractor
Property Management System
Administration; and
(vi) Purchasing system, if this contract
includes the clause at DFARS 252.244–
7001, Contractor Purchasing System
Administration.
Contractor’s Certified Public
Accountant (CPA) means an
independent certified public
accountant, in public practice and not
directly employed as an employee by
the Contractor, performing audits for the
Contractor in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted government auditing
standards (GAGAS) as issued by the
Government Accountability Office.
CPA audit means an examination of
the Contractor’s compliance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applicable system criteria in the
applicable business system clause in
DFARS 242.7003(b) performed by the
Contractor’s CPA in accordance with
GAGAS for examination attestation
engagements.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Significant deficiencies or failure
to comply with reporting and audit
requirements. (1) The Contractor shall
respond, in writing, within 30 days to
an initial determination of—
(i) One or more significant
deficiencies in one or more of the
Contractor’s business systems; or
(ii) Failure to comply with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in the applicable business
system clause listed in the definition of
‘‘contractor business systems’’ in
paragraph (b) of this clause.
(2) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
final determination as to whether—
(i) The Contractor’s business system
contains significant deficiencies; or
(ii) The Contractor has failed to
comply with the applicable reporting
and audit requirements in the
applicable business system clause listed
in the definition of ‘‘contractor business
systems’’ in paragraph (b) of this clause.
(3) If the Contracting Officer
determines that the Contractor’s
business system contains significant
deficiencies or that the contractor has
failed to comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements, the
final determination will include a notice
to withhold payments.
(e) Withholding payments. (1) If the
Contracting Officer issues the final
determination with a notice to withhold
payments for significant deficiencies in
a contractor business system, or for the
Contractor’s failure to comply with the
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in the applicable business
system clause listed in the definition of
‘‘contractor business systems’’ in
paragraph (b) of this clause required
under this contract, the Contracting
Officer will withhold five percent of
amounts due from progress payments
and performance-based payments, and
direct the Contractor, in writing, to
withhold five percent from its billings
on interim cost vouchers on costreimbursement, labor-hour, and timeand-materials contracts until the
Contracting Officer has determined that
the Contractor has corrected all
significant deficiencies and complied
with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements as directed by the
Contracting Officer’s final
determination.
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(2) If the final determination with a
notice to withhold payments is for
significant deficiencies in a Contractor
business system—
(i) The Contractor shall, within 45
days of receipt of the notice, either
correct the deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the deficiencies; and
(ii)(A) If the Contractor submits an
acceptable corrective action plan within
45 days of receipt of a notice of the
Contracting Officer’s intent to withhold
payments, and the Contracting Officer,
in consultation with the Government
auditor or functional specialist,
determines that the Contractor is
effectively implementing such plan, the
Contracting Officer will reduce
withholding directly related to the
significant deficiencies covered under
the corrective action plan, to two
percent from progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct
the Contractor, in writing, to reduce the
percentage withheld on interim cost
vouchers to two percent until the
Contracting Officer determines the
Contractor has corrected all significant
deficiencies as directed by the
Contracting Officer’s final
determination.
(B) If at any time the Contracting
Officer determines that the Contractor
has failed to follow the accepted
corrective action plan, the Contracting
Officer will increase withholding from
progress payments and performancebased payments, and direct the
Contractor, in writing, to increase the
percentage withheld on interim cost
vouchers to the percentage initially
withheld, until the Contracting Officer
determines that the Contractor has
corrected all significant deficiencies as
directed by the Contracting Officer’s
final determination.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Correction of deficiencies. (1) The
Contractor shall notify the Contracting
Officer, in writing, when the Contractor
has corrected the business system’s
deficiencies, and shall provide the
Contractor’s CPA audit report on the
effectiveness of the corrective actions, if
required by the applicable business
system clause listed in the definition of
‘‘contractor business systems’’ in
paragraph (b) of this clause.
(2) Once the Contractor has notified
the Contracting Officer that all
deficiencies have been corrected and, if
applicable, provided the Contractor’s
CPA audit report on the effectiveness of
the corrective actions, the Contracting
Officer will take one of the following
actions:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
(i) If the Contracting Officer
determines that the Contractor has
corrected all significant deficiencies as
directed by the Contracting Officer’s
final determination, the Contracting
Officer will, as appropriate, discontinue
the withholding of progress payments
and performance-based payments, and
direct the Contractor, in writing, to
discontinue the payment withholding
from billings on interim cost vouchers
under this contract associated with the
Contracting Officer’s final
determination, and authorize the
Contractor to bill for any monies
previously withheld that are not also
being withheld due to other significant
deficiencies, or noncompliance with
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in the applicable business
system clause listed in the definition of
‘‘contractor business systems’’ in
paragraph (b) of this clause. Any
payment withholding under this
contract due to other significant
deficiencies or noncompliance with
applicable reporting and audit
requirements, will remain in effect until
the Contracting Officer determines that
those significant deficiencies and
noncompliances are corrected.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Compliance with applicable
reporting and audit requirements. When
the Contractor has, as directed by the
Contracting Officer’s final
determination, provided the
Contractor’s report on compliance with
the system criteria, including, if
applicable, the Contractor’s CPA audit
report as required in the applicable
business system clause listed in the
definition of ‘‘contractor business
systems’’ in paragraph (b) of this clause,
the Contracting Officer will, as
appropriate, discontinue the
withholding of progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct
the Contractor, in writing, to
discontinue the payment withholding
from billings on interim cost vouchers
under this contract associated with the
Contracting Officer’s final
determination, and authorize the
Contractor to bill for any monies
previously withheld that are not also
being withheld due to significant
deficiencies or other noncompliance
with applicable reporting and audit
requirements. Any payment
withholding under this contract due to
significant deficiencies or other
noncompliance with applicable
reporting and audit requirements, will
remain in effect until the Contracting
Officer determines that those significant
deficiencies and noncompliances are
corrected.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41183
15. Amend section 252.242–7006 by—
a. In the introductory text, removing
‘‘242.7503’’ and adding ‘‘242.7504’’ in
its place;
■ b. Removing the clause date ‘‘(FEB
2012)’’ and adding in its place
‘‘(DATE)’’;
■ c. In paragraph (a) removing the
numerical paragraph designations of (1)
through (3) for the definition
paragraphs, and adding, in alphabetical
order, definitions for ‘‘Contractor’s
Certified Public Account (CPA)’’ and
‘‘CPA audit’’;
■ d. Revising paragraph (b);
■ e. Redesignating paragraphs (d), (e)
and (f) as paragraphs (j), (k) and (l),
respectively;
■ f. Adding new paragraphs (d) through
(i);
■ g. Revising the newly redesignated
paragraphs (j) and (k); and
■ h. Amending the newly redesignated
paragraph (l) by removing ‘‘252.242–
7005’’ and adding ‘‘DFARS 252.242–
7005’’ in its place.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
252.242–7006 Accounting System
Administration.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
Contractor’s Certified Public
Accountant (CPA) means an
independent certified public
accountant, in public practice and not
directly employed as an employee by
the Contractor, performing audits for the
Contractor in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted government auditing
standards (GAGAS) as issued by the
Government Accountability Office.
CPA audit means an examination of
the Contractor’s compliance with the
applicable system criteria in paragraph
(c) of this clause performed by the
Contractor’s CPA in accordance with
GAGAS for examination attestation
engagements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) General. The Contractor shall—
(1) Establish and maintain an
acceptable accounting system; and
(2) Make available to the Government,
upon request, the results of internal or
external reviews or monitoring that have
been conducted to ensure compliance
with the system criteria in (c) and
established accounting system policies
and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Applicability. (1) Paragraph (e) of
this clause applies if, in the Contractor’s
fiscal year preceding the period in
which the annual report as required in
paragraph (e) is due to the Government,
the Contractor had a covered contract as
defined in DFARS 242.7001 (other than
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41184
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
contracts with educational institutions
or Federally Funded Research and
Development Centers (FFRDCs)
operated by educational institutions).
(2) Paragraph (f) of this clause applies
if, in the Contractor’s fiscal year
preceding the period in which the
Contractor’s CPA audit report as
required in paragraph (f) is due to the
Government, the Contractor had a
covered contract as defined in DFARS
242.7001 (other than contracts with
educational institutions or Federally
Funded Research and Development
Centers (FFRDCs) operated by
educational institutions).
(e) Annual reporting requirements. (1)
The Contractor shall provide to the
Contracting Officer and Government
auditor within the 6-month period
following the expiration of the
Contractor’s fiscal year, and annually
thereafter, a report regarding
compliance with the system criteria in
paragraph (c) of this clause as of the end
of the Contractor’s most recent fiscal
year. The Contractor shall have the
report signed by an individual of the
Contractor’s organization at a level no
lower than a vice president or chief
financial officer of the reporting
business segment.
(2) The report shall include—
(i) A statement that the Contractor has
evaluated the accounting system’s
compliance with the system criteria in
paragraph (c) of this clause;
(ii) The Contractor’s assessment of the
accounting system’s compliance with
the system criteria in paragraph (c) of
this clause, including a statement as to
whether or not the system complies in
all material respects, and disclosure of
any significant deficiencies with
sufficient information for the
Government to understand the
deficiencies; and
(iii) The status of any significant
deficiencies disclosed as part of the
Contractor’s assessment or, if
applicable, in the Contractor’s CPA
audit report required in paragraph (f) of
this clause, including a corrective action
plan with milestones and actions to
eliminate any significant deficiencies
that have not been corrected as of the
date of the Contractor’s report.
(f) Triennial CPA audit requirement.
(1) In the first year in which the
Contractor is required to provide the
annual report as required in paragraph
(e) of this clause, and every three years
thereafter, or more frequently if directed
by the Contracting Officer, in addition
to the items in paragraphs (e)(2)(i), (ii),
and (iii) of this clause, the Contractor’s
annual report shall include an audit
report on the Contractor’s CPA’s
examination of the Contractor’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
compliance with the system criteria in
paragraph (c) of this clause as of the end
of the Contractor’s most recent fiscal
year.
(2) The examination shall be
performed in accordance with GAGAS
for examination attestation
engagements, and the CPA audit report
shall include sufficient information
regarding any reported significant
deficiencies for the Government to
understand the deficiencies.
(g) CPA selection. If paragraph (f) of
this clause is applicable, the Contractor
shall reasonably ensure that the CPA
firm performing the audit is—
(1) Independent and objective with
respect to the audited entity by
obtaining and reviewing a written
representation from the firm that the
firm (and the assigned engagement
team)—
(i) Is independent and objective with
respect to the audited entity;
(ii) Will remain independent
throughout the audit;
(iii) Has not performed any nonaudit
services for the audited entity that
impair the auditors’ independence for
the subject audit; and
(iv) Will disclose any independence
issues discovered; and
(2) Qualified to perform the audit by
obtaining and reviewing—
(i) Information about key engagement
team members regarding professional
qualifications and experience, including
valid CPA licenses or certificates in
good standing, and current knowledge
and experience in the type of work to
be done; and
(ii) The firm’s most recent peer review
report, in accordance with the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Peer Review Program, or
equivalent.
(h) Contractor submission of audit
plan. The Contractor shall provide the
Contractor’s CPA’s audit strategy, risk
assessment, and audit plan (program),
upon completion, for the audits as
required in paragraphs (f) and (k)(2) of
this clause to the cognizant contracting
officer and Government auditor for
review if—
(1) The Contractor has more than $100
million in cost incurred on costreimbursement and incentive type
contracts, and amounts billed on time
and material and labor hour contracts
during the Contractor’s fiscal year to
which the Contractor’s CPA audit report
applies; or
(2) Requested by the Contracting
Officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor.
(i) Documentation requirements. (1) If
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this clause are
applicable, the Contractor shall
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
maintain and make available to the
Government upon request—
(i) Documentation to provide
reasonable support for the assessment of
the accounting system as required in
paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this clause; and
(ii) Information considered in the
selection of a CPA as required in
paragraph (g) of this clause, if
applicable.
(2) The Contractor shall arrange for
Government access to the working
papers supporting the CPA audit reports
as required in paragraphs (f) and (k)(2)
of this clause, and documentation
supporting the CPA’s independence,
objectivity, and qualifications.
(j) Significant deficiencies or failure to
comply with applicable reporting and
audit requirements. (1) The Contracting
Officer will provide an initial
determination to the Contractor, in
writing, of any significant deficiencies
or the Contractor’s failure to comply
with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f) of
this clause. The initial determination
will describe the deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the deficiency and provide
sufficient information on the
noncompliance with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements to
allow the Contractor to understand what
action needs to be taken to comply.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies significant
deficiencies in the Contractor’s
accounting system or the Contractor’s
failure to comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements in
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this clause. If
the Contractor disagrees with the initial
determination, the Contractor shall
state, in writing, its rationale for
disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining significant deficiencies;
(ii) Remaining noncompliance with
the applicable reporting and audit
requirements;
(iii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(v) System disapproval, if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more significant deficiencies remain
or the Contractor has failed to comply
with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements.
(k) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of significant deficiencies or the
Contractor’s failure to comply with the
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules
applicable reporting and audit
requirements in accordance with
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this clause, the
Contractor shall—
(1) Within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
significant deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the significant deficiencies,
and comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements; and
(2) If the significant deficiencies were
reported in the Contractor’s annual
report, or the Contractor’s CPA audit
report, provide the Contractor’s CPA’s
opinion regarding the effectiveness of
the corrective actions—
(i) As a part of the triennial CPA audit
report as required in paragraph (f) of
this clause; or
(ii) In a separate audit report on the
Contractor’s CPA’s examination of the
effectiveness of the corrective action
performed in accordance with GAGAS
for examination attestation
engagements.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–16390 Filed 7–11–14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 171, 172, 173, and 177
[Docket No. PHMSA–2011–0345 (HM–233D)]
RIN 2137–AE86
Hazardous Materials: Requirements for
the Safe Transportation of Bulk
Explosives (RRR)
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration is
proposing to amend the Hazardous
Materials Regulations by establishing
standards for the safe transportation of
bulk explosives. This rulemaking would
be responsive to two petitions for
rulemaking submitted by industry
representatives: P–1557 concerning the
continued use of renewal applications,
and P–1583 concerning the
incorporation of an industry standard
publication. Further, developing these
requirements would provide wider
access to the regulatory flexibility
currently only offered by special permit
and competent authorities.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
The requirements of this proposed
rule would mirror the majority of
provisions contained in nine widely
used or longstanding special permits
that have established safety records.
These proposed revisions are intended
to eliminate the need for future renewal
requests, thus reducing paperwork
burdens and facilitating commerce
while maintaining an appropriate level
of safety. As proposed, the requirements
would authorize the transportation of
certain explosives, ammonium nitrates,
ammonium nitrate emulsions, and other
specific hazardous materials in bulk
packagings, which are not otherwise
authorized under the regulations. These
hazardous materials are used in blasting
operations on specialized vehicles,
known as multipurpose bulk trucks,
which are used as mobile work
platforms to create blends of explosives
that are unique for each blast site.
Finally, this rulemaking addresses the
construction of new multipurpose bulk
trucks.
DATES: Comments must be submitted by
September 15, 2014. To the extent
possible, PHMSA will consider latefiled comments as a final rule is
developed.
You may submit comments
by identification of the docket number
(PHMSA–2011–0345 (HM–233D)) by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, Routing Symbol M–30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
• Hand Delivery: To Docket
Operations, Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice at the beginning
of the comment. All comments received
will be posted without change to the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS), including any personal
information.
Docket: For access to the dockets to
read background documents (including
the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA)) or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or DOT’s Docket
Operations Office (see ADDRESSES).
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41185
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Nickels, Standards and
Rulemaking Division, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, telephone (202) 366–
8553, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Summary Review of Proposed
Amendments
IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for this
Rulemaking
B. Executive Order 13610, Executive Order
13563, Executive Order 12866, and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
C. Executive Order 13132
D. Executive Order 13175
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13272, and DOT Procedures and
Policies
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
G. Regulatory Identifier Number (RIN)
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
I. Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact
J. Privacy Act
K. Executive Order 13609 and International
Trade Analysis
L. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
V. List of Subjects
I. Executive Summary
In this notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM), the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) proposes to amend the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR)
by establishing standards for the safe
transportation of bulk explosives. This
rulemaking would be responsive to two
petitions for rulemaking submitted by
industry representatives: P–1557,
concerning the continued use of
renewal applications, and P–1583,
concerning the incorporation of an
industry standard publication. Further,
developing these requirements would
provide wider access to the regulatory
flexibility currently offered only by
special permit and competent authority
approvals. These proposed revisions are
intended to eliminate the need for
future renewal requests of nine special
permits (the transportation of certain
explosives, ammonium nitrates,
ammonium nitrate emulsions, and other
specific hazardous materials in bulk
packaging) that have established safety
records. The revisions would reduce
paperwork burdens and facilitate
commerce while maintaining a
appropriate level of safety.
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 135 (Tuesday, July 15, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41172-41185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16390]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 215, 242, and 252
RIN 0750-AI20
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Business
Systems Compliance (DFARS Case 2012-D042)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to ensure appropriate contractor
accountability for adequate contractor business systems. In addition to
the request for written comments on this proposed rule, DoD will hold a
public meeting to hear the views of interested parties.
DATES: Comment Date: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted
in writing to the address shown below on or before September 15, 2014,
to be considered in the formation of a final rule.
Public Meeting Date: The public meeting will be held at the Mark
Center Auditorium, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-3603,
on August 18, 2014, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., local time.
ADDRESSES: Submission of comments: You may submit comments, identified
by DFARS Case 2012-D042, using any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via
the Federal eRulemaking portal by inserting ``DFARS Case 2012-D042''
under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.''
Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``DFARS Case
2012-D042.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``DFARS Case 2012-D042'' on your attached document. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS Case 2012-D042 in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: 571-372-6094.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Mark
Gomersall, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Gomersall, Defense
Acquisition
[[Page 41173]]
Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B941, 3060 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 571-372-6099.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Contractor business systems and internal controls are the first
line of defense against waste, fraud, and abuse. Weak control systems
increase the risk of unallowable and unreasonable costs on Government
contracts. In response to a U.S. Government Accountability Office
report (GAO-12-83) issued on November 3, 2011, Defense Contract
Management Agency: Amid Ongoing Efforts to Rebuild Capacity, Several
Factors Present Challenges in Meeting Its Mission, DoD agreed to
consider alternative approaches to audit contractor business systems.
II. Discussion and Analysis
To improve the efficiency and effectiveness of auditing contractor
business systems, DoD is proposing to amend the DFARS to entrust
contractors with the capability to demonstrate compliance with DFARS
system criteria for contractors' accounting systems, estimating
systems, and material management and accounting systems, based on
contractors' self-evaluations and audits by independent Certified
Public Accountants (CPAs) of their choosing. Government auditors will
perform overviews of the results of contractor self-evaluations and CPA
audits.
Individuals wishing to attend the public meeting should register by
August 11, 2014, to ensure adequate room accommodations and to
facilitate entry into the Mark Center building. Interested parties may
register at the Web site, https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/business_systems_compliance.html by providing the following information:
Company or organization name.
Names and email addresses of persons planning to attend.
Identify if desiring to make a presentation; limited to a
10-minute presentation per company or organization.
One valid government-issued photo identification card will be
required in order to enter the building. Non-U.S. citizens may use
their valid passport as photo identification. Attendees are encouraged
to arrive at least one hour early to accommodate security procedures.
Transportation information for the Mark Center may be obtained at
https://www.whs.mil/our-services/transportation/getting-mark-center.
Accommodations for parking at the Mark Center will not be available,
but may be found in the surrounding areas.
If you wish to make a presentation, please submit an electronic
copy of your presentation to osd.dfars@mail.mil no later than August
13, 2014. Files must not exceed 19MB. Please cite ``Public Meeting--
Contractor Business Systems Compliance'' in all correspondence related
to this public meeting. When submitting presentations, provide the
presenter's name, organization affiliation, telephone number, and email
address on the cover page. There will be no transcription of the public
meeting. Submitted presentations will be the only record.
Special accommodations: The public meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for reasonable accommodations,
sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed
to Mark Gomersall at 571-372-6099, at least 10 working days prior to
the meeting date.
The TTY number for further information is: 1-800-877-8339. When the
operator answers the call, let them know the agency is the Department
of Defense; the point of contact is Mark Gomersall at 571-372-6099.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD has prepared an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603. A copy of the analysis may be obtained
from the point of contact specified herein. The analysis is summarized
as follows:
The objective of the rule is to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of auditing contractor business systems by entrusting
contractors with the capability to demonstrate compliance with the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) system
criteria for contractors' accounting systems, estimating systems, and
material management and accounting systems, based on contractors' self-
evaluations and audits by independent Certified Public Accountants
(CPAs) of their choosing. The requirements of the rule will apply to
solicitations and contracts that include the contract clause for the
applicable defined contractor business system.
The rule will apply to solicitations and contracts that are with
large businesses for the purposes of reporting for estimating systems,
and material management and accounting systems. For reporting on
accounting systems, the rule will apply to contractors who are subject
to the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) under 41 U.S.C. chapter 15, as
implemented in regulations found at 48 CFR 9903.201-1 (see the FAR
Appendix), other than for contracts with educational institutions,
Federally Funded Research and Development Centers operated by
educational institutions, or University Associated Research Centers.
Since contracts and subcontracts with small businesses are exempt from
CAS requirements, DoD estimates that this rule will have no impact on
small businesses. DoD, however, invites comments from small business
concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2012-D042) in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 38) applies. The
proposed rule contains information collection requirements.
Accordingly, DoD has submitted a request for approval of a new
information collection requirement concerning Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Business Systems Compliance (DFARS
Case 2012-D042) to the Office of Management and Budget.
A. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 2.87 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
[[Page 41174]]
The annual reporting burden estimated as follows:
Respondents: 2,953.
Responses per respondent: 1.
Total annual responses: 2,953.
Average hours per response: 2.87.
Total annual burden hours: 8,468.
B. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden. Written
comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection,
including suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to Ms.
Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for
DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or email Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, with a copy to the Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Mark Gomersall, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/
DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments can be received from 30 to 60 days after the date of this
notice, but comments to OMB will be most useful if received by OMB
within 30 days after the date of this notice.
Public comments are particularly invited on: whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the DFARS, and will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
To request more information on this proposed information collection
or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection
instruments, please write to the Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Mark Gomersall, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, or e-mail
osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS Case 2012-D042 in the subject line of
the message.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215, 242, and 252
Government procurement.
Amy G. Williams,
Deputy, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 215, 242, and 252 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for parts 215, 242, and 252 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
0
2. Revise section 215.407-5-70 to read as follows:
215.407-5-70 Disclosure, maintenance, and review requirements.
(a) Definitions. As used in this section--
Acceptable estimating system, contractor, contractor's certified
public accountant (CPA), CPA audit, estimating system, and significant
deficiency are defined in the clause at 252.215-7002, Cost Estimating
System Requirements.
(b) Applicability. A contractor, other than a small business
concern, is subject to the estimating system disclosure, maintenance,
review, annual reporting, triennial CPA audit, and documentation
requirements in the clause at 252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System
Requirements, if--
(1) In its preceding fiscal year, the contractor received DoD prime
contracts or subcontracts totaling $50 million or more for which
certified cost or pricing data were required; or
(2) In its preceding fiscal year, the contractor received DoD prime
contracts or subcontracts totaling $10 million or more (but less than
$50 million) for which certified cost or pricing data were required and
the contracting officer, with concurrence or at the request of the ACO,
determines it to be in the best interest of the Government (e.g.,
significant estimating problems are believed to exist or the
contractor's sales are predominantly Government).
(c) Policy. DoD policy is for all contractors to have acceptable
estimating systems that consistently produce well-supported proposals
that are acceptable as a basis for negotiation of fair and reasonable
prices.
(d) Procedures. (1) The contracting officer shall--
(i) Through use of the clause at 252.215-7002, Cost Estimating
System Requirements, apply the disclosure, maintenance, review, annual
reporting, triennial CPA audit, and documentation requirements to
contractors, other than small business concerns, meeting the criteria
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
(ii) Consider whether to apply the disclosure, maintenance, review,
annual reporting, triennial CPA audit, and documentation requirements
to contractors, other than small business concerns, under paragraph
(b)(2) of this section; and
(iii) Not apply the disclosure, maintenance, review, annual
reporting, triennial CPA audit, and documentation requirements to small
business concerns.
(2) The cognizant contracting officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor, for contractors subject to paragraph (b) of this
section, shall--
(i) Determine the acceptability of the contractor's estimating
system and disclosure, and approve or disapprove the system; and
(ii) Pursue correction of any deficiencies.
(3) Triennial CPA audit requirement. For contractors subject to
paragraph (b) of this section, and paragraph (d)(8) of the clause at
252.215-7002, the cognizant contracting officer shall--
(i) Upon receipt of the contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk
assessment, and audit plan (program), request a review from the
Government auditor, and notify the contractor of any potential issues
identified by the Government auditor regarding their reasonableness.
Early notification of potential issues may decrease the likelihood of
the contractor incurring unreasonable costs. However, review of the
contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk assessment, and audit plan
(program) does not constitute the contracting officer's approval; and
(ii) Upon receipt of the contractor's CPA audit report, request the
Government auditor's assessment of the CPA audit report and related
documentation.
(4) In evaluating the acceptability of a contractor's estimating
system, the contracting officer, in consultation with the Government
auditor, shall determine whether the contractor's estimating system
complies with the system criteria for an acceptable estimating system
in the clause at 252.215-7002. In making that determination, the
contracting officer shall consider--
(i) The contractor's estimating system disclosure, annual report on
the estimating system's compliance with the system criteria and the
audit report by the contractor's CPA, as required in the clause at
252.215-7002, if applicable; and
(ii) Any other findings and recommendations reported by the
Government auditor including the assessment of the contractor's CPA
audit report and related documentation, if applicable.
(e) Accelerated audit requirement. The contracting officer, in
consultation
[[Page 41175]]
with the Government auditor, may require contractors subject to the
triennial CPA audit requirement in the clause at 252.215-7002 to
provide an out-of-cycle CPA audit report prior to the triennial CPA
audit period based on a risk assessment of the contractor's past
experience and current vulnerability.
(f) Disposition of findings--(1) Reporting of findings by the
Government auditor. The Government auditor shall document findings and
recommendations in a report to the contracting officer regarding any
identified significant estimating system deficiencies. The report shall
describe the deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow the contracting
officer to understand the deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The contracting officer shall review
all findings and recommendations from the Government auditor and
contractor and, if there are no significant deficiencies and the
contractor as complied with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraphs (d)(5) and (6) of the clause at 252.215-
7002, shall promptly notify the contractor, in writing, that the
contractor's estimating system is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
significant deficiencies (as defined in the clause at 252.215-7002 due
to the contractor's failure to meet one or more of the estimating
system criteria in the clause at 252.215-7002, or that the contractor
has failed to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in accordance with the clause at 252.215-7002, the
contracting officer shall--
(A)(1) Promptly make an initial written determination on any
significant deficiencies and notify the contractor, in writing,
providing a description of each significant deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the contractor to understand the deficiency; or
(2) Promptly make an initial written determination on the
contractor's failure to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements and notify the contractor, in writing, providing
sufficient information to allow the contractor to understand what
action needs to be taken to comply;
(B) Request the contractor to respond, in writing, to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor's responses to the initial
determination, in consultation with the Government auditor or
functional specialist, and make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The contracting officer shall make a
final determination and notify the contractor, in writing, that--
(A) The contractor's estimating system is acceptable and approved,
and no significant deficiencies remain, and the contractor has complied
with the applicable reporting and audit requirements in accordance with
the clause at 252.215-7002; or
(B) Significant deficiencies remain, or the contractor has failed
to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements. The
notice shall identify any remaining significant deficiencies or
noncompliance with the applicable reporting and audit requirements, and
indicate the adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action.
The contracting officer shall--
(1) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the deficiencies and comply with the applicable reporting and
audit requirements;
(2) Disapprove the system in accordance with the clause at 252.215-
7002; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-7005
if the clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of significant deficiencies in PGI
215.407-5-70(f).
(g) System approval. The contracting officer shall promptly approve
a previously disapproved estimating system and notify the contractor
when the contracting officer determines that there are no remaining
significant deficiencies or noncompliance with the applicable reporting
and audit requirements.
(h) Contracting officer notifications. The cognizant contracting
officer shall promptly distribute copies of a determination to approve
a system, to disapprove a system and withhold payments, or to approve a
previously disapproved system and release withheld payments to the
Government auditor, payment office, affected contracting officers at
the buying activities, and cognizant contracting officers in contract
administration activities.
PART 242--CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
242.7000 and 242.7001 [Redesignated as 242.7001 and 242.7003]
0
3. Redesignate sections 242.7000 and 242.7001 as sections 242.7001 and
242.7003, respectively.
0
4. Revise newly redesignated section 242.7001 to read as follows:
242.7001 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Acceptable contractor business systems, contractor business
systems, contractor's certified public accountant (CPA), and CPA audit
are defined in the clause at 252.242-7005, Contractor Business Systems.
Covered contract means a contract that is subject to the Cost
Accounting Standards under 41 U.S.C. chapter 15, as implemented in
regulations found at 48 CFR 9903.201-1 (see the FAR Appendix) (10
U.S.C. 2302 note, as amended by section 816 of Public Law 112-81).
Significant deficiency is defined in the clause at 252.242-7005,
Contractor Business Systems.
0
5. Add section 242.7002 to read as follows:
242.7002 Contractor business systems deficiencies.
(a) Determination to withhold payments. If the contracting officer
makes a final determination to disapprove a contractor's business
system in accordance with the clause at 252.242-7005, Contractor
Business Systems, the contracting officer shall--
(1) In accordance with agency procedures, identify one or more
covered contracts containing the clause at 252.242-7005 from which
payments will be withheld. When identifying the covered contracts from
which to withhold payments, the contracting officer shall ensure that
the total amount of payment withholding under 252.242-7005 does not
exceed 10 percent of progress payments, performance-based payments, and
interim payments under cost-reimbursement, labor-hour, and time-and-
materials contracts billed under each of the identified covered
contracts. Similarly, the contracting officer shall ensure that the
total amount of payment withholding under the clause at 252.242-7005
for each business system does not exceed five percent of progress
payments, performance-based payments, and interim payments under cost-
reimbursement, labor-hour, and time-and-materials contracts billed
under each of the identified covered contracts. The contracting officer
has the sole discretion to identify the covered contracts from which to
withhold payments;
(2) Promptly notify the contractor, in writing, of the contracting
officer's determination to implement payment withholding in accordance
with the clause at 252.242-7005. The notice of payment withholding
shall be included in the contracting officer's written final
determination for the contractor
[[Page 41176]]
business system and shall inform the contractor that--
(i) Payments shall be withheld from the contract or contracts
identified in the written determination in accordance with the clause
at 252.242-7005 until the contracting officer determines that there are
no remaining significant deficiencies and that the contractor has
complied with the applicable reporting and audit requirements in
accordance with the applicable business system clause identified in
242.7003(b); and
(ii) The contracting officer reserves the right to take other
actions within the terms and conditions of the contract; and
(3) Provide all contracting officers administering the selected
contracts from which payments will be withheld, a copy of the
determination. The contracting officer shall also provide a copy of the
determination to the Government auditor; payment office; affected
contracting officers at the buying activities; and cognizant
contracting officers in contract administration activities.
(b) Monitoring contractor's corrective action. The contracting
officer, in consultation with the Government auditor or functional
specialist, shall monitor the contractor's progress in correcting the
deficiencies. The contracting officer shall notify the contractor of
any decision to decrease or increase the amount of payment withholding
in accordance with the clause at 252.242-7005.
(c) Correction of significant deficiencies and reporting.
(1) If the contractor notifies the contracting officer that the
contractor has corrected the significant deficiencies and, if
applicable, provides the contractor's CPA audit report on the
effectiveness of the corrective actions, the contracting officer shall
review the correction to verify that the deficiencies have been
corrected. If the contracting officer determines that the contractor
has corrected all significant deficiencies and provided the
contractor's report on compliance with the system criteria, including
the CPA audit report, if applicable, the contracting officer shall
discontinue the withholding of payments, release any payments
previously withheld, and approve the system, unless other significant
deficiencies remain.
(2) Prior to the determination that the deficiencies have been
corrected, the contracting officer may discontinue withholding payments
pending the determination, and release any payments previously
withheld, if the contractor submits evidence that the significant
deficiencies have been corrected, and the contracting officer, in
consultation with the Government auditor or functional specialist,
determines that there is a reasonable expectation that the corrective
actions have been implemented and are expected to correct the
significant deficiencies.
(3) Within 90 days of receipt of the contractor notification that
the contractor has corrected the significant deficiencies and, if
applicable, the contractor's CPA audit report on the effectiveness of
the corrective actions, the contracting officer shall--
(i) Make a determination that--
(A) The contractor has corrected all significant deficiencies as
directed by the contracting officer's final determination in accordance
with paragraph (c)(1) of this section;
(B) There is a reasonable expectation that the corrective actions
have been implemented in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this
section; or
(C) The contractor has not corrected all significant deficiencies
as directed by the contracting officer's final determination in
accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section, or there is not a
reasonable expectation that the corrective actions have been
implemented in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section; and
(ii) Reduce withholding directly related to the significant
deficiencies covered under the corrective action plan by at least 50
percent of the amount being withheld from progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct the contractor, in writing, to
reduce the percentage withheld on interim cost vouchers by at least 50
percent, until the contracting officer makes a determination in
accordance with paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section.
(4) If, at any time, the contracting officer determines that the
contractor has failed to correct the significant deficiencies
identified in the contractor's notification, the contracting officer
will continue, reinstate, or increase withholding from progress
payments and performance-based payments, and direct the contractor, in
writing, to continue, reinstate, or increase the percentage withheld on
interim cost vouchers to the percentage initially withheld, until the
contracting officer determines that the contractor has corrected all
significant deficiencies as directed by the contracting officer's final
determination.
(d) For sample formats for written notifications of contracting
officer determinations to initiate payment withholding, reduce payment
withholding, and discontinue payment withholding in accordance with the
clause at 252.242-7005. See PGI 242.7002.
0
6. In newly redsignated section 242.7003, revise paragraph (a) to read
as follows:
242.7003 Contract clause.
* * * * *
(a) The resulting contract will be a covered contract as defined in
242.7001; and
* * * * *
0
7. Revise sections 242.7201, 242.7202, and 242.7203 to read as follows:
242.7201 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Acceptable material management and accounting system, contractor,
contractor's certified public accountant (CPA), CPA audit, material
management and accounting system, qualifying sales, significant
deficiency, and valid time-phased requirements are defined in the
clause at 252.242-7004, Material Management and Accounting System.
242.7202 Policy.
(a) DoD policy is for its contractors to have an MMAS that conforms
to the standards in paragraph (h) of the clause at 252.242-7004,
Material Management and Accounting System, so that the system--
(1) Reasonably forecasts material requirements;
(2) Ensures the costs of purchased and fabricated material charged
or allocated to a contract are based on valid time-phased requirements;
and
(3) Maintains a consistent, equitable, and unbiased logic for
costing of material transactions.
(b) Criteria for conducting reviews. Conduct an MMAS review in
accordance with paragraph (d) of the clause at 252.242.7004, when--
(1) The contractor is a large business;
(2) Has $50 million in qualifying sales to the Government; and
(3) The cognizant contracting officer, with advice from the
Government auditor or cognizant functional specialist, determines an
MMAS review is needed based on a risk assessment of the contractor's
past experience, current vulnerability, and the following risk factors:
(i) FAR 42.302 surveillance activities indicate the contractor has
not complied with the criteria in 252.242.7004.
(ii) There are changes to the contractor's MMAS system.
(iii) The contractor's MMAS system is new.
(iv) The contractor's MMAS system has not been reviewed within a
36-month period.
(c) Contractors subject to the triennial CPA audit requirement in
the clause at
[[Page 41177]]
252.242-7004, may be required to provide an out-of-cycle CPA audit
report prior to the triennial CPA audit reporting period based on a
risk assessment of the contractor's past experience and current
vulnerability.
(d) The cognizant contracting officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor and cognizant functional specialist, if appropriate,
shall--
(1) Determine the acceptability of the contractor's MMAS and
approve or disapprove the system; and
(2) Pursue correction of any deficiencies.
242.7203 Procedures.
(a) Triennial CPA audit requirement. For contractors subject to
paragraph (f) of the clause at 252.242-7004, Material Management and
Accounting System, the cognizant contracting officer shall--
(1) Upon receipt of the contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk
assessment, and audit plan (program), request a review from the
Government auditor, and notify the contractor of any potential issues
identified by the Government auditor regarding their reasonableness.
Early notification of potential issues may decrease the likelihood of
the contractor incurring unreasonable costs. However, review of the
contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk assessment, and audit plan
(program) does not constitute the contracting officer's approval; and
(2) Upon receipt of the contractor's CPA audit report, request the
Government auditor's assessment of the CPA audit report and related
documentation.
(b) In evaluating the acceptability of the contractor's MMAS, the
contracting officer, in consultation with the Government auditor and
functional specialist, if appropriate, shall determine whether the
contractor's MMAS complies with the system criteria for an acceptable
MMAS as required in the clause at 252.242-7004. In making that
determination, the contracting officer shall consider--
(1) The contractor's report on the MMAS's compliance with the
system criteria and the audit report by the contractor's CPA, as
required in the clause at 252.242-7004; and
(2) Any other findings and recommendations reported by the
Government auditor including the assessment of the contractor's CPA
audit report and related documentation, if applicable.
(c) Disposition of findings--(1) Reporting of findings by the
Government auditor. The Government auditor or functional specialist
shall document findings and recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer regarding any identified significant MMAS
deficiencies. The report shall describe the deficiencies in sufficient
detail to allow the contracting officer to understand the deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The contracting officer shall review
all findings and recommendations from the Government auditor and
contractor and, if there are no significant deficiencies and the
contractor has complied with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraph (d) of the clause at 252.242-7004, shall
promptly notify the contractor, in writing, that the contractor's MMAS
is acceptable and approved.
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
significant deficiencies (as defined in the clause at 252.242-7004 due
to the contractor's failure to meet one or more of the MMAS system
criteria in the clause at 252.242-7004, or that the contractor has
failed to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements
in accordance with the clause at 252.242-7004, the contracting officer
shall--
(A)(1) Promptly make an initial written determination on any
significant deficiencies and notify the contractor, in writing,
providing a description of each significant deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the contractor to understand the deficiency; or
(2) Promptly make an initial written determination on the
contractor's failure to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements and notify the contractor, in writing, providing
sufficient information to allow the contractor to understand what
action needs to be taken to comply;
(B) Request the contractor to respond, in writing, to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor's response to the initial
determination in consultation with the Government auditor or functional
specialist, and make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The contracting officer shall make a
final determination and notify the contractor that--
(A) The contractor's MMAS is acceptable and approved, and no
deficiencies remain, and the contractor has complied with the
applicable reporting and audit requirements in accordance with the
clause at 252.242-7004; or
(B) Significant deficiencies remain, or the contractor has failed
to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements. The
notice shall identify any remaining significant deficiencies or
noncompliance with the applicable reporting and audit requirements and
indicate the adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action.
The contracting officer shall--
(1) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the deficiencies and comply with the applicable reporting and
audit requirements;
(2) Disapprove the system in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7004; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7005, Contractor Business Systems, if the clause is included in the
contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of significant deficiencies in PGI
242.7203.
(d) System approval. The contracting officer shall promptly approve
a previously disapproved MMAS and notify the contractor when the
contracting officer determines that there are no remaining significant
deficiencies or noncompliance with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements.
(e) Contracting officer notifications. The cognizant contracting
officer shall promptly distribute copies of a determination to approve
a system, to disapprove a system and withhold payments, or to approve a
previously disapproved system and release withheld payments to the
Government auditor, payment office, affected contracting officers at
the buying activities, and cognizant contracting officers in contract
administration activities.
0
8. Revise sections 242.7501 and 242.7502 to read as follows:
242.7501 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Acceptable accounting system, accounting system, contractor's
certified public account (CPA), CPA audit, and significant deficiency
are defined in the clause at 252.242-7006, Accounting System
Administration.
242.7502 Policy.
DoD policy is for contractors receiving cost-reimbursement,
incentive type, time-and-materials, or labor-hour contracts, or
contracts which provide for progress payments based on costs or on a
percentage or stage of completion, to--
(a) Maintain an acceptable accounting system; and
(b) If applicable, comply with the annual reporting, triennial CPA
audit, and documentation requirements
[[Page 41178]]
required in the clause at 252.242-7006, Accounting System
Administration.
242.7503 [Redesignated as 242.7504]
0
9. Redesignate section 242.7503 as section 242.7504.
0
10. Add a new section 242.7503 to read as follows:
242.7503 Procedures.
(a) The cognizant contracting officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor or functional specialist, shall--
(1) Determine the acceptability of a contractor's accounting system
and approve or disapprove the system; and
(2) Pursue correction of any deficiencies.
(b) Triennial CPA audit requirement. For contractors subject to
paragraph (h) of the clause at 252.242-7006, the cognizant contracting
officer shall--
(1) Upon receipt of the contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk
assessment, and audit plan (program), request a review from the
Government auditor and notify the contractor of any potential issues
identified by the Government auditor regarding their reasonableness.
Early notification of potential issues may decrease the likelihood of
the contractor incurring unreasonable costs. However, review of the
contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk assessment, and audit plan
(program) does not constitute the contracting officer's approval; and
(2) Upon receipt of the contractor's CPA audit report, request the
Government auditor's assessment of the CPA audit report and related
documentation.
(c) In evaluating the acceptability of a contractor's accounting
system, the contracting officer, in consultation with the Government
auditor or functional specialist, shall determine whether the
contractor's accounting system complies with the system criteria for an
acceptable accounting system in the clause at 252.242-7006. In making
that determination the contracting officer shall consider--
(1) The contractor's annual report on the accounting system's
compliance with the system criteria and the audit report by the
contractor's CPA as required in the clause at 252.242-7006, if
applicable; and
(2) Any other findings and recommendations reported by the
Government auditor including the assessment of the contractor's CPA
audit report and related documentation, if applicable.
(d) Accelerated audit requirement. The contracting officer, in
consultation with the Government auditor, may require contractors
subject to the triennial CPA audit requirement in the clause at
252.242-7006 to provide an out-of-cycle CPA audit report prior to the
triennial CPA audit period based on a risk assessment of the
contractor's past experience and current vulnerability.
(e) Disposition of findings--(1) Reporting of findings by the
Government auditor. The Government auditor shall document findings and
recommendations in a report to the contracting officer regarding any
identified significant accounting system deficiencies. The report shall
describe the deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow the contracting
officer to understand the deficiencies. Follow the procedures at PGI
242.7503 for reporting of deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The contracting officer shall review
all findings and recommendations from the Government auditor and
contractor and, if there are no significant deficiencies and the
contractor has complied with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f) of the clause at 252.242-7006,
shall promptly notify the contractor, in writing, that the accounting
system is acceptable and approved.
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
significant deficiencies (as defined in the clause at 252.242-7006 due
to the contractor's failure to meet one or more of the estimating
system criteria in the clause at 252.242-7006, or that the contractor
has failed to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in accordance with the clause at 252.242-7006, the
contracting officer shall--
(A)(1) Promptly make an initial written determination on any
significant deficiencies and notify the contractor, in writing,
providing a description of each significant deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the contractor to understand the deficiency; or
(2) Promptly make an initial written determination on the
contractor's failure to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements and notify the contractor, in writing, providing
sufficient information to allow the contractor to understand what
action needs to be taken to comply;
(B) Request the contractor to respond, in writing, to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor`s response to the initial
determination, in consultation with the Government auditor or
functional specialist, and make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The contracting officer shall make a
final determination and notify the contractor, in writing, that--
(A) The contractor's accounting system is acceptable and approved,
and no significant deficiencies remain, and the contractor has complied
with the applicable reporting and audit requirements in accordance with
the clause at 252.242-7006, or
(B) Significant deficiencies remain, or the contractor has failed
to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements. The
notice shall identify any remaining significant deficiencies or
noncompliance with the applicable reporting and audit requirements, and
indicate the adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action.
The contracting officer shall--
(1) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the deficiencies and comply with the applicable reporting and
audit requirements;
(2) Disapprove the system in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7006; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7005, Contractor Business Systems, if the clause is included in the
contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of significant deficiencies in PGI
242.7503.
(f) System approval. The contracting officer shall promptly approve
a previously disapproved accounting system and notify the contractor
when the contracting officer determines that there are no remaining
significant deficiencies or noncompliance with the applicable reporting
and audit requirements.
(g) Contracting officer notifications. The cognizant contracting
officer shall promptly distribute copies of a determination to approve
a system, to disapprove a system and withhold payments, or to approve a
previously disapproved system and release withheld payments to the
Government auditor, payment office, affected contracting officers at
the buying activities, and cognizant contracting officers in contract
administration activities.
(h) Mitigating the risk of accounting system deficiencies on
specific proposals. (1) Field pricing teams shall discuss identified
accounting system deficiencies and their impact in all reports on
contractor proposals until the deficiencies are resolved.
(2) The contracting officer responsible for negotiation of a
proposal generated by an accounting system with an
[[Page 41179]]
identified deficiency shall evaluate whether the deficiency impacts the
negotiations. If it does not, the contracting officer should proceed
with negotiations. If it does, the contracting officer should consider
other alternatives, for example--
(i) Allowing the contractor additional time to correct the
accounting system deficiency and submit a corrected proposal;
(ii) Considering another type of contract;
(iii) Using additional cost analysis techniques to determine the
reasonableness of the cost elements affected by the accounting system's
deficiency;
(iv) Reducing the negotiation objective for profit or fee; or
(v) Including a contract (reopener) clause that provides for
adjustment of the contract amount after award.
(3) The contracting officer who incorporates a reopener clause into
the contract is responsible for negotiating price adjustments required
by the clause. Any reopener clause necessitated by an accounting system
deficiency should--
(i) Clearly identify the amounts and items that are in question at
the time of negotiation;
(ii) Indicate a specific time or subsequent event by which the
contractor will submit a supplemental proposal, including certified
cost or pricing data, identifying the cost impact adjustment
necessitated by the deficient accounting system;
(iii) Provide for the contracting officer to adjust the contract
price unilaterally if the contractor fails to submit the supplemental
proposal; and
(iv) Provide that failure of the Government and the contractor to
agree to the price adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes
clause.
242.7504 [Amended]
0
11. In newly redsignated section 242.7504, remove the bracket at the
end of paragraph (b).
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
12. Amend section 252.215-7002 by--
0
a. Removing the clause date ``(DEC 2012)'' and adding in its place
``(DATE)'';
0
b. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b);
0
c. Amending paragraph (c) introductory text by removing ``a large
business'' and adding ``other than a small business concern'' in its
place;
0
d. Revising paragraph (d) heading and adding paragraphs (d)(5) through
(9);
0
e. Revising paragraphs (e) and (f); and
0
f. Amending paragraph (g) by removing ``252.242-7005,'' and adding
``DFARS 252.242-7005,'' in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
252.215-7002 Cost Estimating System Requirements.
* * * * *
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Acceptable estimating system means an estimating system that
complies with the system criteria in paragraph (d) of this clause, and
provides for a system that--
(i) Is maintained, reliable, and consistently applied;
(ii) Produces verifiable, supportable, documented, and timely cost
estimates that are an acceptable basis for negotiation of fair and
reasonable prices;
(iii) Is consistent with and integrated with the Contractor's
related management systems; and
(iv) Is subject to applicable financial control systems.
Contractor means a business unit as defined in FAR 2.101.
Contractor's Certified Public Accountant (CPA) means an independent
certified public accountant, in public practice and not directly
employed as an employee by the Contractor, performing audits for the
Contractor in accordance with U.S. generally accepted government
auditing standards (GAGAS) as issued by the Government Accountability
Office.
CPA audit means an examination of the Contractor's compliance with
the applicable system criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of this clause
performed by the Contractor's CPA in accordance with GAGAS for
examination attestation engagements.
Estimating system means the Contractor's policies, procedures, and
practices for budgeting and planning controls, and generating estimates
of costs and other data included in proposals submitted to customers in
the expectation of receiving contract awards. Estimating system
includes the Contractor's--
(i) Organizational structure;
(ii) Established lines of authority, duties, and responsibilities;
(iii) Internal controls and managerial reviews;
(iv) Flow of work, coordination, and communication; and
(v) Budgeting, planning, estimating methods, techniques,
accumulation of historical costs, and other analyses used to generate
cost estimates.
Significant deficiency means a shortcoming in the system that
materially affects the ability of officials of the Department of
Defense to rely upon information produced by the system that is needed
for management purposes.
(b) General. The Contractor shall--
(1) Establish, maintain, and comply with an acceptable estimating
system; and
(2) Make available to the Government, upon request, the results of
internal or external reviews or monitoring that have been conducted to
ensure compliance with the system criteria in (d)(4) of this clause and
established estimating policies and procedures.
* * * * *
(d) System and reporting requirements. * * *
(5) Annual reporting requirements. (i) The Contractor shall provide
to the Contracting Officer and Government auditor within the 6-month
period following the expiration of the Contractor's fiscal year, and
annually thereafter, a report regarding compliance with the system
criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of this clause as of the end of the
Contractor's most recent fiscal year. The Contractor shall have the
report signed by an individual of the Contractor's organization at a
level no lower than a vice president or chief financial officer of the
reporting business segment.
(ii) The report shall include--
(A) A statement that the Contractor has evaluated the estimating
system's compliance with the system criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of
this clause;
(B) The Contractor's assessment of the estimating system's
compliance with the system criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of this clause,
including a statement as to whether or not the system complies in all
material respects, and disclosure of any significant deficiencies with
sufficient information for the Government to understand the
deficiencies; and
(C) The status of any significant deficiencies disclosed as part of
the Contractor's assessment or, if applicable, in the Contractor's CPA
audit report as required in paragraph (d)(6) of this clause, including
a corrective action plan with milestones and actions to eliminate any
significant deficiencies that have not been corrected as of the date of
the Contractor's report.
(6) Triennial CPA audit requirement. (i) In the first year in which
the Contractor is required to provide the annual report as required in
paragraph (d)(5) of this clause, and every three years thereafter, or
more frequently if directed by the Contracting Officer, in addition to
the items in paragraph
[[Page 41180]]
(d)(5)(ii) of this clause, the Contractor's annual report shall include
an audit report on the Contractor's CPA's examination of the
Contractor's compliance with the system criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of
this clause as of the end of the most recent fiscal year.
(ii) The examination shall be performed in accordance with GAGAS
for examination attestation engagements, and the CPA audit report shall
include sufficient information regarding any reported significant
deficiencies for the Government to understand the deficiencies.
(7) CPA selection. If paragraph (d)(6) of this clause is
applicable, the Contractor shall reasonably ensure that the CPA firm
performing the audit is--
(i) Independent and objective with respect to the audited entity by
obtaining and reviewing a written representation from the firm that the
firm (and the assigned engagement team)--
(A) Is independent and objective with respect to the audited
entity;
(B) Will remain independent throughout the audit;
(C) Has not performed any nonaudit services for the audited entity
that impair the auditors' independence for the subject audit; and
(D) Will disclose any independence issues discovered; and
(ii) Qualified to perform the audit by obtaining and reviewing--
(A) Information about key engagement team members regarding
professional qualifications and experience, including valid CPA
licenses or certificates in good standing, and current knowledge and
experience in the type of work to be done; and
(B) The firm's most recent peer review report, in accordance with
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Peer
Review Program, or equivalent.
(8) Contractor submission of audit plan. The Contractor shall
provide the Contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk assessment, and
audit plan (program), upon completion, for the audits required in
paragraphs (d)(6) and (f)(2) of this clause, to the cognizant
contracting officer and Government auditor for review if--
(i) The Contractor has received Department of Defense (DoD) prime
contracts or subcontracts, totaling $100 million or more for which
certified cost or pricing data were required during the fiscal year to
which the Contractor's CPA audit report applies; or
(ii) Requested by the Contracting Officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor.
(9) Documentation requirements. (i) If paragraphs (d)(5) and (6) of
this clause are applicable, the Contractor shall maintain and make
available to the Government upon request--
(A) Documentation to provide reasonable support for the assessment
of the estimating system as required in paragraphs (d)(5)(ii)(B) of
this clause; and
(B) Information considered in the selection of a CPA as required in
paragraph (d)(7) of this clause, if applicable.
(ii) The Contractor shall arrange for Government access to the
working papers supporting the CPA audit reports required in paragraphs
(d)(6) and (f)(2) of this clause, and documentation supporting the
Contractor's CPA's independence, objectivity and qualifications.
(e) Significant deficiencies or failure to comply with applicable
reporting and audit requirements. (1) The Contracting Officer will
provide an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any
significant deficiencies or the Contractor's failure to comply with the
applicable reporting and audit requirements in paragraphs (d)(5) and
(6) of this clause. The initial determination will describe the
deficiency in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand
the deficiency and provide sufficient information on the noncompliance
with the applicable reporting and audit requirements to allow the
Contractor to understand what action needs to be taken to comply.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
significant deficiencies in the Contractor's estimating system or the
Contractor's failure to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraphs (d)(5) and (6) of this clause. If the
Contractor disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining significant deficiencies;
(ii) Remaining noncompliance with the applicable reporting and
audit requirements;
(iii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(iv) System disapproval, if the Contracting Officer determines that
one or more significant deficiencies remain or the Contractor has
failed to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements.
(f) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of significant deficiencies or the Contractor's failure
to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements in
accordance with paragraphs (d)(5) and (6) of this clause, the
Contractor shall--
(1) Within 45 days of receipt of the final determination, either
correct the significant deficiencies or submit an acceptable corrective
action plan showing milestones and actions to eliminate the significant
deficiencies, and comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements; and
(2) If the significant deficiencies were reported in the
Contractor's annual report, or the Contractor's CPA audit report,
provide the Contractor's CPA's opinion regarding the effectiveness of
the corrective actions--
(i) As a part of the triennial CPA audit report as required in
paragraph (d)(6) of this clause; or
(ii) In a separate audit report on the Contractor's CPA's
examination of the effectiveness of the corrective action performed in
accordance with GAGAS for examination attestation engagements.
* * * * *
0
13. Amend section 252.242-7004 by--
0
a. Removing the clause date ``(MAY 2011)'' and adding in its place
``(DATE)'';
0
b. Revising paragraph (a);
0
c. Amending paragraph (b)(2) by removing ``paragraph (e)'' and adding
``paragraph (h)'' in its place;
0
d. Revising paragraph (c)(2);
0
e. Redesignating paragraphs (d) through (g) as paragraphs (h) through
(k), respectively, and adding new paragraphs (d) through (g); and
0
f. Revising the newly redesignated paragraphs (i) and (j).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
252.242-7004 Material Management and Accounting System.
* * * * *
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Acceptable material management and accounting system means a MMAS
that generally complies with the applicable system criteria in
paragraph (h) of this clause.
Contractor means a business unit as defined in FAR 2.101.
Contractor's Certified Public Accountant (CPA) means an independent
certified public accountant, in public practice and not directly
employed as an employee by
[[Page 41181]]
the Contractor, performing audits for the Contractor in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted government auditing standards (GAGAS), as
issued by the Government Accountability Office.
CPA audit means an examination of the Contractor's compliance with
the applicable system criteria in paragraph (h) of this clause
performed by the Contractor's CPA in accordance with GAGAS for
examination attestation engagements.
Material management and accounting system (MMAS) means the
Contractor's system or systems for planning, controlling, and
accounting for the acquisition, use, issuing, and disposition of
material. Material management and accounting systems may be manual or
automated. They may be stand-alone systems or they may be integrated
with planning, engineering, estimating, purchasing, inventory,
accounting, or other systems.
Qualifying sales means sales for which cost or pricing data were
required under 10 U.S.C. 2306a, as implemented in FAR 15.403, or that
are contracts priced on other than a firm-fixed-price or fixed-price
with economic price adjustment basis. Sales include prime contracts,
subcontracts, and modifications to such contracts and subcontracts.
Significant deficiency means a shortcoming in the system that
materially affects the ability of officials of the Department of
Defense to rely upon information produced by the system that is needed
for management purposes.
Valid time-phased requirements means material that is--
(i) Needed to fulfill the production plan, including reasonable
quantities for scrap, shrinkage, yield, etc.; and
(ii) Charged/billed to contracts or other cost objectives in a
manner consistent with the need to fulfill the production plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Provide to the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), upon
request, the results of internal or external reviews or monitoring that
have been conducted to ensure compliance with the system criteria in
paragraph (h) of this clause and established MMAS policies, procedures,
and operating instructions; and
* * * * *
(d) Triennial CPA reporting and audit requirements. (1) If the
Contractor is other than small business concern, has $50 million of
qualifying sales to the Government during the preceding fiscal year,
and the Contracting Officer requests an MMAS review, the Contractor
shall--
(i) Provide to the Contracting Officer and Government auditor
within the 6-month period following the expiration of the Contractor's
fiscal year, a report regarding the Contractor's compliance with the
system criteria in paragraph (h) of this clause as of the end of the
Contractor's most recent fiscal year; and
(ii) Have the report signed by an individual of the Contractor's
organization at a level no lower than a vice president or chief
financial officer of the reporting business segment.
(2) The report shall include--
(i) A statement that the Contractor has evaluated the MMAS's
compliance with the system criteria in paragraph (h) of this clause;
(ii) The Contractor's assessment of the MMAS's compliance with the
system criteria in paragraph (h) of this clause, including a statement
as to whether or not the system complies in all material respects and
disclosure of any significant deficiencies with sufficient information
for the Government to understand the deficiencies;
(iii) An audit report on the Contractor's CPA's examination of the
Contractor's compliance with the system criteria in paragraph (h) of
this clause as of the end of the most recent fiscal year. The
examination shall be performed in accordance with GAGAS for examination
attestation engagements. The CPA audit report shall include sufficient
information regarding any reported significant deficiencies for the
Government to understand the deficiencies; and
(iv) The status of any significant deficiencies disclosed as part
of the Contractor's assessment or in the Contractor's CPA audit report,
including a corrective action plan with milestones and actions to
eliminate any significant deficiencies that have not been corrected as
of the date of the Contractor's report.
(e) CPA selection. If paragraph (d) of this clause is applicable,
the Contractor shall reasonably ensure that the CPA firm performing the
audit is--
(1) Independent and objective with respect to the audited entity by
obtaining and reviewing a written representation from the firm that the
firm (and the assigned engagement team)--
(i) Is independent and objective with respect to the audited
entity;
(ii) Will remain independent throughout the audit;
(iii) Has not performed any nonaudit services for the audited
entity that impair the auditors' independence for the subject audit;
and
(iv) Will disclose any independence issues discovered; and
(2) Qualified to perform the audit by obtaining and reviewing--
(i) Information about key engagement team members regarding
professional qualifications and experience, including valid CPA
licenses or certificates in good standing, and current knowledge and
experience in the type of work to be done; and
(ii) The firm's most recent peer review report, in accordance with
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Peer
Review Program, or equivalent.
(f) Contractor submission of audit plan. The Contractor shall
provide the Contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk assessment, and
audit plan (program), upon completion, for the audits required in
paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) and (j)(2) of this clause, to the cognizant
contracting officer and Government auditor for review if--
(1) The Contractor has more than $100 million in qualifying sales
to the Government during the fiscal year to which the Contractor's CPA
audit report applies; or
(2) Requested by the Contracting Officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor.
(g) Documentation requirements. (1) If paragraph (d) of this clause
is applicable, the Contractor shall maintain and make available to the
Government upon request--
(i) Documentation to provide reasonable support for the assessment
of the MMAS as required in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this clause; and
(ii) Information considered in the selection of a CPA as required
in paragraph (e) of this clause.
(2) The Contractor shall arrange for Government access to the
working papers supporting the CPA audit reports as required in
paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) and (j)(2) of this clause, and documentation
supporting the CPA's independence, objectivity, and qualifications.
* * * * *
(i) Significant deficiencies or failure to comply with applicable
reporting and audit requirements. (1) The Contracting Officer will
provide an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any
significant deficiencies or the Contractor's failure to comply with the
applicable reporting and audit requirements in paragraph (d) of this
clause. The initial determination will describe the deficiency in
sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand the deficiency
and provide sufficient information on the noncompliance with the
applicable
[[Page 41182]]
reporting and audit requirements to allow the Contractor to understand
what action needs to be taken to comply.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
significant deficiencies in the Contractor's MMAS or the Contractor's
failure to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements
in paragraph (d) of this clause. If the Contractor disagrees with the
initial determination, the Contractor shall state, in writing, its
rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining significant deficiencies;
(ii) Remaining noncompliance with the applicable reporting and
audit requirements;
(iii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(iv) System disapproval if the Contracting Officer determines that
one or more significant deficiencies remain or the Contractor has
failed to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements.
(j) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of significant deficiencies or the Contractor's failure
to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this clause, the Contractor shall--
(1) Within 45 days of receipt of the final determination, either
correct the significant deficiencies or submit an acceptable corrective
action plan showing milestones and actions to eliminate the significant
deficiencies, and comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements; and
(2) If the significant deficiencies were reported in the
Contractor's annual report, or the Contractor's CPA audit report as
required in paragraph (d) of this clause, provide the Contractor's
CPA's opinion regarding the effectiveness of the corrective actions--
(i) As a part of the triennial CPA audit report required in
paragraph (d) of this clause; or
(ii) In a separate audit report on the Contractor's CPA's
examination of the effectiveness of the corrective action performed in
accordance with GAGAS for examination attestation engagements.
* * * * *
0
14. Amend section 252.242-7005 by--
0
a. In the introductory text, removing ``242.7001'' and adding
``242.7003'' in its place;
0
b. Removing the clause date ``(FEB 2012)'' and adding in its place
``(DATE)'';
0
c. Amending paragraph (b) by--
0
i. Revising the definition of ``Contractor business systems''; and
0
ii. Adding, in alphabetical order, definitions for ``Contractor's
Certified Public Account (CPA)'' and ``CPA audit''.
0
d. Revising paragraph (d);
0
e. Revising paragraphs (e)(1) and (2);
0
f. Revising paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2) introductory text, and (f)(2)(i);
0
g. Amending paragraph (f)(iv) by removing ``Contractor has corrected
the significant deficiencies'' and adding ``Contractor has corrected
the significant deficiencies and, if applicable, the Contractor's CPA
audit report on the effectiveness of the corrective actions'' in its
place; and
0
h. Adding paragraph (g).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
252.242-7005 Contractor Business Systems.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Contractor business systems means--
(i) Accounting system, if this contract includes the clause at
DFARS 252.242-7006, Accounting System Administration;
(ii) Earned value management system, if this contract includes the
clause at DFARS 252.234-7002, Earned Value Management System;
(iii) Estimating system, if this contract includes the clause at
DFARS 252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements;
(iv) Material management and accounting system, if this contract
includes the clause at DFARS 252.242-7004, Material Management and
Accounting System;
(v) Property management system, if this contract includes the
clause at DFARS 252.245-7003, Contractor Property Management System
Administration; and
(vi) Purchasing system, if this contract includes the clause at
DFARS 252.244-7001, Contractor Purchasing System Administration.
Contractor's Certified Public Accountant (CPA) means an independent
certified public accountant, in public practice and not directly
employed as an employee by the Contractor, performing audits for the
Contractor in accordance with U.S. generally accepted government
auditing standards (GAGAS) as issued by the Government Accountability
Office.
CPA audit means an examination of the Contractor's compliance with
the applicable system criteria in the applicable business system clause
in DFARS 242.7003(b) performed by the Contractor's CPA in accordance
with GAGAS for examination attestation engagements.
* * * * *
(d) Significant deficiencies or failure to comply with reporting
and audit requirements. (1) The Contractor shall respond, in writing,
within 30 days to an initial determination of--
(i) One or more significant deficiencies in one or more of the
Contractor's business systems; or
(ii) Failure to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in the applicable business system clause listed in the
definition of ``contractor business systems'' in paragraph (b) of this
clause.
(2) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the final determination as to
whether--
(i) The Contractor's business system contains significant
deficiencies; or
(ii) The Contractor has failed to comply with the applicable
reporting and audit requirements in the applicable business system
clause listed in the definition of ``contractor business systems'' in
paragraph (b) of this clause.
(3) If the Contracting Officer determines that the Contractor's
business system contains significant deficiencies or that the
contractor has failed to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements, the final determination will include a notice to withhold
payments.
(e) Withholding payments. (1) If the Contracting Officer issues the
final determination with a notice to withhold payments for significant
deficiencies in a contractor business system, or for the Contractor's
failure to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements
in the applicable business system clause listed in the definition of
``contractor business systems'' in paragraph (b) of this clause
required under this contract, the Contracting Officer will withhold
five percent of amounts due from progress payments and performance-
based payments, and direct the Contractor, in writing, to withhold five
percent from its billings on interim cost vouchers on cost-
reimbursement, labor-hour, and time-and-materials contracts until the
Contracting Officer has determined that the Contractor has corrected
all significant deficiencies and complied with the applicable reporting
and audit requirements as directed by the Contracting Officer's final
determination.
[[Page 41183]]
(2) If the final determination with a notice to withhold payments
is for significant deficiencies in a Contractor business system--
(i) The Contractor shall, within 45 days of receipt of the notice,
either correct the deficiencies or submit an acceptable corrective
action plan showing milestones and actions to eliminate the
deficiencies; and
(ii)(A) If the Contractor submits an acceptable corrective action
plan within 45 days of receipt of a notice of the Contracting Officer's
intent to withhold payments, and the Contracting Officer, in
consultation with the Government auditor or functional specialist,
determines that the Contractor is effectively implementing such plan,
the Contracting Officer will reduce withholding directly related to the
significant deficiencies covered under the corrective action plan, to
two percent from progress payments and performance-based payments, and
direct the Contractor, in writing, to reduce the percentage withheld on
interim cost vouchers to two percent until the Contracting Officer
determines the Contractor has corrected all significant deficiencies as
directed by the Contracting Officer's final determination.
(B) If at any time the Contracting Officer determines that the
Contractor has failed to follow the accepted corrective action plan,
the Contracting Officer will increase withholding from progress
payments and performance-based payments, and direct the Contractor, in
writing, to increase the percentage withheld on interim cost vouchers
to the percentage initially withheld, until the Contracting Officer
determines that the Contractor has corrected all significant
deficiencies as directed by the Contracting Officer's final
determination.
* * * * *
(f) Correction of deficiencies. (1) The Contractor shall notify the
Contracting Officer, in writing, when the Contractor has corrected the
business system's deficiencies, and shall provide the Contractor's CPA
audit report on the effectiveness of the corrective actions, if
required by the applicable business system clause listed in the
definition of ``contractor business systems'' in paragraph (b) of this
clause.
(2) Once the Contractor has notified the Contracting Officer that
all deficiencies have been corrected and, if applicable, provided the
Contractor's CPA audit report on the effectiveness of the corrective
actions, the Contracting Officer will take one of the following
actions:
(i) If the Contracting Officer determines that the Contractor has
corrected all significant deficiencies as directed by the Contracting
Officer's final determination, the Contracting Officer will, as
appropriate, discontinue the withholding of progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct the Contractor, in writing, to
discontinue the payment withholding from billings on interim cost
vouchers under this contract associated with the Contracting Officer's
final determination, and authorize the Contractor to bill for any
monies previously withheld that are not also being withheld due to
other significant deficiencies, or noncompliance with applicable
reporting and audit requirements in the applicable business system
clause listed in the definition of ``contractor business systems'' in
paragraph (b) of this clause. Any payment withholding under this
contract due to other significant deficiencies or noncompliance with
applicable reporting and audit requirements, will remain in effect
until the Contracting Officer determines that those significant
deficiencies and noncompliances are corrected.
* * * * *
(g) Compliance with applicable reporting and audit requirements.
When the Contractor has, as directed by the Contracting Officer's final
determination, provided the Contractor's report on compliance with the
system criteria, including, if applicable, the Contractor's CPA audit
report as required in the applicable business system clause listed in
the definition of ``contractor business systems'' in paragraph (b) of
this clause, the Contracting Officer will, as appropriate, discontinue
the withholding of progress payments and performance-based payments,
and direct the Contractor, in writing, to discontinue the payment
withholding from billings on interim cost vouchers under this contract
associated with the Contracting Officer's final determination, and
authorize the Contractor to bill for any monies previously withheld
that are not also being withheld due to significant deficiencies or
other noncompliance with applicable reporting and audit requirements.
Any payment withholding under this contract due to significant
deficiencies or other noncompliance with applicable reporting and audit
requirements, will remain in effect until the Contracting Officer
determines that those significant deficiencies and noncompliances are
corrected.
0
15. Amend section 252.242-7006 by--
0
a. In the introductory text, removing ``242.7503'' and adding
``242.7504'' in its place;
0
b. Removing the clause date ``(FEB 2012)'' and adding in its place
``(DATE)'';
0
c. In paragraph (a) removing the numerical paragraph designations of
(1) through (3) for the definition paragraphs, and adding, in
alphabetical order, definitions for ``Contractor's Certified Public
Account (CPA)'' and ``CPA audit'';
0
d. Revising paragraph (b);
0
e. Redesignating paragraphs (d), (e) and (f) as paragraphs (j), (k) and
(l), respectively;
0
f. Adding new paragraphs (d) through (i);
0
g. Revising the newly redesignated paragraphs (j) and (k); and
0
h. Amending the newly redesignated paragraph (l) by removing ``252.242-
7005'' and adding ``DFARS 252.242-7005'' in its place.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
252.242-7006 Accounting System Administration.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
Contractor's Certified Public Accountant (CPA) means an independent
certified public accountant, in public practice and not directly
employed as an employee by the Contractor, performing audits for the
Contractor in accordance with U.S. generally accepted government
auditing standards (GAGAS) as issued by the Government Accountability
Office.
CPA audit means an examination of the Contractor's compliance with
the applicable system criteria in paragraph (c) of this clause
performed by the Contractor's CPA in accordance with GAGAS for
examination attestation engagements.
* * * * *
(b) General. The Contractor shall--
(1) Establish and maintain an acceptable accounting system; and
(2) Make available to the Government, upon request, the results of
internal or external reviews or monitoring that have been conducted to
ensure compliance with the system criteria in (c) and established
accounting system policies and procedures.
* * * * *
(d) Applicability. (1) Paragraph (e) of this clause applies if, in
the Contractor's fiscal year preceding the period in which the annual
report as required in paragraph (e) is due to the Government, the
Contractor had a covered contract as defined in DFARS 242.7001 (other
than
[[Page 41184]]
contracts with educational institutions or Federally Funded Research
and Development Centers (FFRDCs) operated by educational institutions).
(2) Paragraph (f) of this clause applies if, in the Contractor's
fiscal year preceding the period in which the Contractor's CPA audit
report as required in paragraph (f) is due to the Government, the
Contractor had a covered contract as defined in DFARS 242.7001 (other
than contracts with educational institutions or Federally Funded
Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) operated by educational
institutions).
(e) Annual reporting requirements. (1) The Contractor shall provide
to the Contracting Officer and Government auditor within the 6-month
period following the expiration of the Contractor's fiscal year, and
annually thereafter, a report regarding compliance with the system
criteria in paragraph (c) of this clause as of the end of the
Contractor's most recent fiscal year. The Contractor shall have the
report signed by an individual of the Contractor's organization at a
level no lower than a vice president or chief financial officer of the
reporting business segment.
(2) The report shall include--
(i) A statement that the Contractor has evaluated the accounting
system's compliance with the system criteria in paragraph (c) of this
clause;
(ii) The Contractor's assessment of the accounting system's
compliance with the system criteria in paragraph (c) of this clause,
including a statement as to whether or not the system complies in all
material respects, and disclosure of any significant deficiencies with
sufficient information for the Government to understand the
deficiencies; and
(iii) The status of any significant deficiencies disclosed as part
of the Contractor's assessment or, if applicable, in the Contractor's
CPA audit report required in paragraph (f) of this clause, including a
corrective action plan with milestones and actions to eliminate any
significant deficiencies that have not been corrected as of the date of
the Contractor's report.
(f) Triennial CPA audit requirement. (1) In the first year in which
the Contractor is required to provide the annual report as required in
paragraph (e) of this clause, and every three years thereafter, or more
frequently if directed by the Contracting Officer, in addition to the
items in paragraphs (e)(2)(i), (ii), and (iii) of this clause, the
Contractor's annual report shall include an audit report on the
Contractor's CPA's examination of the Contractor's compliance with the
system criteria in paragraph (c) of this clause as of the end of the
Contractor's most recent fiscal year.
(2) The examination shall be performed in accordance with GAGAS for
examination attestation engagements, and the CPA audit report shall
include sufficient information regarding any reported significant
deficiencies for the Government to understand the deficiencies.
(g) CPA selection. If paragraph (f) of this clause is applicable,
the Contractor shall reasonably ensure that the CPA firm performing the
audit is--
(1) Independent and objective with respect to the audited entity by
obtaining and reviewing a written representation from the firm that the
firm (and the assigned engagement team)--
(i) Is independent and objective with respect to the audited
entity;
(ii) Will remain independent throughout the audit;
(iii) Has not performed any nonaudit services for the audited
entity that impair the auditors' independence for the subject audit;
and
(iv) Will disclose any independence issues discovered; and
(2) Qualified to perform the audit by obtaining and reviewing--
(i) Information about key engagement team members regarding
professional qualifications and experience, including valid CPA
licenses or certificates in good standing, and current knowledge and
experience in the type of work to be done; and
(ii) The firm's most recent peer review report, in accordance with
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Peer
Review Program, or equivalent.
(h) Contractor submission of audit plan. The Contractor shall
provide the Contractor's CPA's audit strategy, risk assessment, and
audit plan (program), upon completion, for the audits as required in
paragraphs (f) and (k)(2) of this clause to the cognizant contracting
officer and Government auditor for review if--
(1) The Contractor has more than $100 million in cost incurred on
cost-reimbursement and incentive type contracts, and amounts billed on
time and material and labor hour contracts during the Contractor's
fiscal year to which the Contractor's CPA audit report applies; or
(2) Requested by the Contracting Officer, in consultation with the
Government auditor.
(i) Documentation requirements. (1) If paragraphs (e) and (f) of
this clause are applicable, the Contractor shall maintain and make
available to the Government upon request--
(i) Documentation to provide reasonable support for the assessment
of the accounting system as required in paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this
clause; and
(ii) Information considered in the selection of a CPA as required
in paragraph (g) of this clause, if applicable.
(2) The Contractor shall arrange for Government access to the
working papers supporting the CPA audit reports as required in
paragraphs (f) and (k)(2) of this clause, and documentation supporting
the CPA's independence, objectivity, and qualifications.
(j) Significant deficiencies or failure to comply with applicable
reporting and audit requirements. (1) The Contracting Officer will
provide an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any
significant deficiencies or the Contractor's failure to comply with the
applicable reporting and audit requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f)
of this clause. The initial determination will describe the deficiency
in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand the
deficiency and provide sufficient information on the noncompliance with
the applicable reporting and audit requirements to allow the Contractor
to understand what action needs to be taken to comply.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
significant deficiencies in the Contractor's accounting system or the
Contractor's failure to comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this clause. If the
Contractor disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining significant deficiencies;
(ii) Remaining noncompliance with the applicable reporting and
audit requirements;
(iii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(v) System disapproval, if the Contracting Officer determines that
one or more significant deficiencies remain or the Contractor has
failed to comply with the applicable reporting and audit requirements.
(k) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of significant deficiencies or the Contractor's failure
to comply with the
[[Page 41185]]
applicable reporting and audit requirements in accordance with
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this clause, the Contractor shall--
(1) Within 45 days of receipt of the final determination, either
correct the significant deficiencies or submit an acceptable corrective
action plan showing milestones and actions to eliminate the significant
deficiencies, and comply with the applicable reporting and audit
requirements; and
(2) If the significant deficiencies were reported in the
Contractor's annual report, or the Contractor's CPA audit report,
provide the Contractor's CPA's opinion regarding the effectiveness of
the corrective actions--
(i) As a part of the triennial CPA audit report as required in
paragraph (f) of this clause; or
(ii) In a separate audit report on the Contractor's CPA's
examination of the effectiveness of the corrective action performed in
accordance with GAGAS for examination attestation engagements.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-16390 Filed 7-11-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P