Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes, 41108-41111 [2014-15802]
Download as PDF
41108
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(71 FR 15323, March 28, 2006)), using
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R–
27–144, including Appendix A, dated
September 15, 2005, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using a
service bulletin identified in paragraph
(l)(2)(i) or (l)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A601R–27–144, Revision C, dated July 21,
2008, including Appendix A, dated
December 20, 2006, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(ii) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A601R–27–144, Revision D, dated December
22, 2011, including Appendix A, dated
December 20, 2006, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(3) This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before March
27, 2006 (the effective date of AD 2006–05–
11 R1, Amendment 39–14528 (71 FR 15323,
March 28, 2006)), using Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A601R–27–144, Revision B,
dated December 20, 2006, including
Appendix A, Revision A, dated December 20,
2006.
(4) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraph (i) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before May
19, 2008 (the effective date of AD 2008–08–
09, Amendment 39–15461 (73 FR 19979,
April 14, 2008)), using Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A601R–27–144, Revision B,
dated December 20, 2006, including
Appendix A, Revision A, dated December 20,
2006.
(5) This paragraph provides credit for
replacement of the PFS units required by
paragraph (k) of this AD, if those actions
were performed before the effective date of
this AD using Bombardier Service Bulletin
601R–27–139, dated December 22, 2011,
which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD.
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. Send information to
ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax
516–794–5531. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD. AMOCs
approved previously in accordance with AD
2008–08–09, Amendment 39–15461 (73 FR
19979, April 14, 2008), are approved as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
AMOCs for the corresponding actions
specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(n) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2005–41R1,
dated May 10, 2012, for related information.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA2013-0296.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference may
be obtained at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (o)(3) and (o)(4) of this AD.
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A601R–27–144, Revision E, dated October 2,
2012, including Appendix A, Revision A,
dated December 20, 2006.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–27–
139, Revision A, dated May 28, 2012.
(3) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; email thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com.
(4) You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 27,
2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–15655 Filed 7–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–1070; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–175–AD; Amendment
39–17892; AD 2014–13–16]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702),
CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705),
CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900),
and CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series
1000) airplanes. This AD was prompted
by the finding of an uncertified main
landing gear (MLG) inboard retraction
actuator bracket pin installed on an inservice airplane. This AD requires
inspection of the MLG inboard
retraction actuator bracket for a part
number, and replacement if necessary.
We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct uncertified pins in the MLG
inboard retraction actuator bracket,
which could result in pin failure,
leading to an MLG extension without
damping, and a potential for MLG
structural damage and possible collapse
during landing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 19, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 19, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-1070; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400
ˆ
´
Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–
5000; fax 514–855–7401; email thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Luke Walker, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7363; fax
516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Bombardier, Inc. Model
CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702), CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705), CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet
Series 900), and CL–600–2E25 (Regional
Jet Series 1000) airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
January 2, 2014 (79 FR 72).
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–23,
dated August 13, 2013 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
An uncertified main landing gear (MLG)
inboard retraction actuator bracket pin, part
number (P/N) 49131–1, was found installed
on an in-service aeroplane. Five other
uncertified pins were also returned to the
manufacturer. The uncertified pin, P/N
49131–1, is weaker than the approved pin,
P/N 49131–3. An MLG inboard retraction
actuator bracket pin failure could result in an
MLG extension without damping, and a
potential for MLG structural damage and
possible collapse during landing.
This [Canadian] AD mandates the
inspection for and removal of the uncertified
pins.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-10700002.
Comments
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM (79
FR 72, January 2, 2014) or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer’’
Paragraph in This AD
Since late 2006, we have included a
standard paragraph titled ‘‘Airworthy
Product’’ in all MCAI ADs in which the
FAA develops an AD based on a foreign
authority’s AD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
The MCAI or referenced service
information in an FAA AD often directs
the owner/operator to contact the
manufacturer for corrective actions,
such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy
Product paragraph allowed owners/
operators to use corrective actions
provided by the manufacturer if those
actions were FAA-approved. In
addition, the paragraph stated that any
actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are
considered to be FAA-approved.
In the NPRM (79 FR 72, January 2,
2014), we proposed to prevent the use
of repairs that were not specifically
developed to correct the unsafe
condition, by requiring that the repair
approval provided by the State of
Design Authority or its delegated agent
specifically refer to this FAA AD. This
change was intended to clarify the
method of compliance and to provide
operators with better visibility of repairs
that are specifically developed and
approved to correct the unsafe
condition. In addition, we proposed to
change the phrase ‘‘its delegated agent’’
to include a design approval holder
(DAH) with State of Design Authority
design organization approval (DOA), as
applicable, to refer to a DAH authorized
to approve required repairs for the
proposed AD.
No comments were provided to the
NPRM (79 FR 72, January 2, 2014) about
these proposed changes. However, a
comment was provided for another
NPRM, Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–
101–AD (78 FR 78285, December 26,
2013). The commenter stated the
following: ‘‘The proposed wording,
being specific to repairs, eliminates the
interpretation that Airbus messages are
acceptable for approving minor
deviations (corrective actions) needed
during accomplishment of an AD
mandated Airbus service bulletin.’’
This comment has made the FAA
aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the
Airworthy Product paragraph to allow
the owner/operator to use messages
provided by the manufacturer as
approval of deviations during the
accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product
paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the
manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated
actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the
requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified
unsafe condition and does not cover
deviations from other AD requirements.
However, deviations to AD-required
actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41109
and anyone may request the approval
for an alternative method of compliance
to the AD-required actions using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and
misinterpretation of the Airworthy
Product paragraph, we have changed
that paragraph and retitled it
‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer.’’ This
paragraph now clarifies that for any
requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer,
the action must be accomplished using
a method approved by the FAA, TCCA,
or Bombardier’s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). Where necessary
throughout this AD, we also replaced
any reference to approvals of corrective
actions with a reference to the
Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph.
The Contacting the Manufacturer
paragraph also clarifies that, if approved
by the DAO, the approval must include
the DAO-authorized signature. The DAO
signature indicates that the data and
information contained in the document
are TCCA-approved, which is also FAAapproved. Messages and other
information provided by the
manufacturer that do not contain the
DAO-authorized signature approval are
not TCCA-approved, unless TCCA
directly approves the manufacturer’s
message or other information.
This clarification does not remove
flexibility previously afforded by the
Airworthy Product paragraph.
Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never
intended for required actions. This is
also consistent with the
recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation
Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by
identifying those actions in
manufacturers’ service instructions that
are ‘‘Required for Compliance’’ with
ADs. We continue to work with
manufacturers to implement this
recommendation. But once we
determine that an action is required, any
deviation from the requirement must be
approved as an alternative method of
compliance.
Other commenters to the NPRM
discussed previously, Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–101–AD (78 FR
78285, December 26, 2013), pointed out
that in many cases the foreign
manufacturer’s service bulletin and the
foreign authority’s MCAI might have
been issued some time before the FAA
AD. Therefore, the DOA might have
provided U.S. operators with an
approved repair, developed with full
awareness of the unsafe condition,
before the FAA AD is issued. Under
these circumstances, to comply with the
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
41110
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
FAA AD, the operator would be
required to go back to the
manufacturer’s DOA and obtain a new
approval document, adding time and
expense to the compliance process with
no safety benefit.
Based on these comments, we
removed the requirement that the DAHprovided repair specifically refer to this
AD. Before adopting such a
requirement, the FAA will coordinate
with affected DAHs and verify they are
prepared to implement means to ensure
that their repair approvals consider the
unsafe condition addressed in this AD.
Any such requirements will be adopted
through the normal AD rulemaking
process, including notice-and-comment
procedures, when appropriate. We also
have decided not to include a generic
reference to either the ‘‘delegated agent’’
or ‘‘DAH with State of Design Authority
design organization approval,’’ but
instead we have provided the specific
delegation approval granted by the State
of Design Authority for the DAH in the
Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph
of this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 72,
January 2, 2014) for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 72,
January 2, 2014).
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 416
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take
about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this AD. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Required parts will cost
$0 per product. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $35,360, or $85 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions will take
about 1 work-hour and require parts
costing $0, for a cost of $85 per product.
We have no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need these
actions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-1070; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2014–13–16 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment
39–17892. Docket No. FAA–2013–1070;
Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–175–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective August 19,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes identified
in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this
AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702)
airplanes, serial numbers (S/N) 10002 and
subsequent.
(2) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705) and CL–600–2D24
(Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, S/Ns
15001 and subsequent.
(3) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2E25
(Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes, S/Ns
19001 and subsequent.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32, Landing Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the finding of
an uncertified main landing gear (MLG)
inboard retraction actuator bracket pin
installed on an in-service airplane. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
uncertified pins in the MLG inboard
retraction actuator bracket, which could
result in pin failure, leading to an MLG
extension without damping, and a potential
for MLG structural damage and possible
collapse during landing.
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection for Uncertified Bracket Pins
Within 6,600 flight hours or 36 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, do an inspection of the MLG
inboard retraction actuator bracket for any
uncertified pin having part number (P/N)
49131–1, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA–32–044, dated May
29, 2013.
(h) Replacement of Uncertified Pins
If any uncertified pin having P/N 49131–
1 is found during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, before further flight,
replace all uncertified pins, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–32–044,
dated May 29, 2013.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, ANE–170, FAA,
New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the New York ACO, send it to
ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax
516–794–5531. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA; or
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO,
the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature.
(j) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–23, dated
August 13, 2013, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2013–1070.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–32–
044, dated May 29, 2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; email thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 25,
2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–15802 Filed 7–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0980; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–129–AD; Amendment
39–17891; AD 2014–13–15]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; EADS CASA
(Type Certificate Previously Held by
Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.)
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
EADS CASA (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Construcciones
Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model CN–235–300
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of reduced thickness of the
center fuselage lower skin panel. This
AD requires a detailed inspection to
determine the presence of panel
thickness reduction; and repetitive
nondestructive testing (NDT)
inspections and repair if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
reduced thickness of lower panel joints,
which could result in reduced fatigue
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41111
and damage tolerant characteristics of
the lower panel joint to the adjacent
side panels and failure of the center
fuselage lower skin panel, resulting in
loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 19, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 19, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0980; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact EADS–CASA, Military
Transport Aircraft Division (MTAD),
Integrated Customer Services (ICS),
´
Technical Services, Avenida de Aragon
404, 28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone
+34 91 585 55 84; fax +34 91 585 55 05;
email MTA.TechnicalService@
casa.eads.net; Internet https://
www.eads.net. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
425–227–1112; fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain EADS CASA (Type
Certificate Previously Held by
Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.)
Model CN–235–300 airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on December 9, 2013 (78 FR
73742).
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0131,
dated June 25, 2013 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 135 (Tuesday, July 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41108-41111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15802]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-1070; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-175-AD;
Amendment 39-17892; AD 2014-13-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, &
702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet
Series 900), and CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. This
AD was prompted by the finding of an uncertified main landing gear
(MLG) inboard retraction actuator bracket pin installed on an in-
service airplane. This AD requires inspection of the MLG inboard
retraction actuator bracket for a part number, and replacement if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct uncertified
pins in the MLG inboard retraction actuator bracket, which could result
in pin failure, leading to an MLG extension without damping, and a
potential for MLG structural damage and possible collapse during
landing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 19, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 19,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-1070; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier,
Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the
[[Page 41109]]
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luke Walker, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7363; fax 516-794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705), CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900), and
CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on January 2, 2014 (79 FR 72).
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2013-23, dated August 13, 2013 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
An uncertified main landing gear (MLG) inboard retraction
actuator bracket pin, part number (P/N) 49131-1, was found installed
on an in-service aeroplane. Five other uncertified pins were also
returned to the manufacturer. The uncertified pin, P/N 49131-1, is
weaker than the approved pin, P/N 49131-3. An MLG inboard retraction
actuator bracket pin failure could result in an MLG extension
without damping, and a potential for MLG structural damage and
possible collapse during landing.
This [Canadian] AD mandates the inspection for and removal of
the uncertified pins.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-1070-0002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 72, January 2,
2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.
``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This AD
Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
In the NPRM (79 FR 72, January 2, 2014), we proposed to prevent the
use of repairs that were not specifically developed to correct the
unsafe condition, by requiring that the repair approval provided by the
State of Design Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to
this FAA AD. This change was intended to clarify the method of
compliance and to provide operators with better visibility of repairs
that are specifically developed and approved to correct the unsafe
condition. In addition, we proposed to change the phrase ``its
delegated agent'' to include a design approval holder (DAH) with State
of Design Authority design organization approval (DOA), as applicable,
to refer to a DAH authorized to approve required repairs for the
proposed AD.
No comments were provided to the NPRM (79 FR 72, January 2, 2014)
about these proposed changes. However, a comment was provided for
another NPRM, Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR 78285,
December 26, 2013). The commenter stated the following: ``The proposed
wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the interpretation that
Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor deviations
(corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD mandated
Airbus service bulletin.''
This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed that paragraph and
retitled it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now
clarifies that for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a
method approved by the FAA, TCCA, or Bombardier's TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). Where necessary throughout this AD, we also
replaced any reference to approvals of corrective actions with a
reference to the Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph.
The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature. The DAO signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are TCCA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DAO-authorized signature approval are not TCCA-
approved, unless TCCA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.
Other commenters to the NPRM discussed previously, Directorate
Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013), pointed out
that in many cases the foreign manufacturer's service bulletin and the
foreign authority's MCAI might have been issued some time before the
FAA AD. Therefore, the DOA might have provided U.S. operators with an
approved repair, developed with full awareness of the unsafe condition,
before the FAA AD is issued. Under these circumstances, to comply with
the
[[Page 41110]]
FAA AD, the operator would be required to go back to the manufacturer's
DOA and obtain a new approval document, adding time and expense to the
compliance process with no safety benefit.
Based on these comments, we removed the requirement that the DAH-
provided repair specifically refer to this AD. Before adopting such a
requirement, the FAA will coordinate with affected DAHs and verify they
are prepared to implement means to ensure that their repair approvals
consider the unsafe condition addressed in this AD. Any such
requirements will be adopted through the normal AD rulemaking process,
including notice-and-comment procedures, when appropriate. We also have
decided not to include a generic reference to either the ``delegated
agent'' or ``DAH with State of Design Authority design organization
approval,'' but instead we have provided the specific delegation
approval granted by the State of Design Authority for the DAH in the
Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph of this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 72, January 2, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 72, January 2, 2014).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 416 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost $0 per product. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be
$35,360, or $85 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions will
take about 1 work-hour and require parts costing $0, for a cost of $85
per product. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need these actions.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-1070; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2014-13-16 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-17892. Docket No. FAA-
2013-1070; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-175-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective August 19, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702) airplanes, serial numbers (S/N) 10002 and subsequent.
(2) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)
and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, S/Ns 15001 and
subsequent.
(3) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series
1000) airplanes, S/Ns 19001 and subsequent.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the finding of an uncertified main
landing gear (MLG) inboard retraction actuator bracket pin installed
on an in-service airplane. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct uncertified pins in the MLG inboard retraction actuator
bracket, which could result in pin failure, leading to an MLG
extension without damping, and a potential for MLG structural damage
and possible collapse during landing.
[[Page 41111]]
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection for Uncertified Bracket Pins
Within 6,600 flight hours or 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, do an inspection of the MLG
inboard retraction actuator bracket for any uncertified pin having
part number (P/N) 49131-1, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-044, dated May
29, 2013.
(h) Replacement of Uncertified Pins
If any uncertified pin having P/N 49131-1 is found during the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD, before further
flight, replace all uncertified pins, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-
044, dated May 29, 2013.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, ANE-
170, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the New York ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; fax
516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA; or Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2013-23, dated August 13, 2013,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2013-1070.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-044, dated May 29,
2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-
7401; email thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 25, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-15802 Filed 7-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P