Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 41090-41093 [2014-15506]
Download as PDF
41090
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a review of the
tail strobe light installation, which revealed
that the tail strobe light is not electrically
bonded to primary structure of the airplane.
We are issuing this AD to prevent, in case of
a direct lightning strike to the tail strobe
light, damage to the operation of other
critical airplane systems due to
electromagnetic coupling and large transient
voltages, and damage to the control
mechanisms or surfaces due to a fire, which
could result in loss of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(g) Tail Strobe Light Installation for Model
737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900, and
–900ER Series Airplanes
For Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800,
–900, and –900ER series airplanes on which
the actions specified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–33–1146,
dated November 2, 2011, have not been done
before the effective date of this AD: Within
72 months after the effective date of this AD,
install a new tail strobe light housing, install
a new disconnect bracket, and change the
wire bundles, in accordance with Part 1 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–33–
1146, Revision 1, dated July 9, 2013, except
as required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of
this AD.
(1) Where Figure 8, Flag Note 3, of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–33–
1146, Revision 1, dated July 9, 2013, refers
to solder sleeve BACS13CT3C, the shield
splice contained in splice kit D–150–0168
may be used in lieu of solder sleeve
(BACS13CT3C), provided a ground wire is
used.
Note 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD:
Guidance for wire-type information for the
ground wires may be found in Boeing
Standard Wiring Practices Manual (SWPM)
D6–54446, Section 20–10–15.
(2) Where the second sentence of note (c)
of Figure 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–33–1146, Revision 1,
dated July 9, 2013, specifies to ‘‘Maintain a
minimum of 1.7 Dimensions fastener edge
margin on the disconnect bracket and the
stiffener,’’ instead ‘‘Maintain a minimum of
1.7 diameter fastener edge margin on the
disconnect bracket and the stiffener.’’
(h) Inspection and Corrective Actions for
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900, and
–900ER Series Airplanes
For Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800,
–900, and –900ER series airplanes, on which
the actions specified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–33–1146,
dated November 2, 2011, have been done
before the effective date of this AD: Within
72 months after the effective date of this AD,
do a general visual inspection to ensure there
is fillet sealant between the disconnect
bracket and the receptacle connector
D44582J, and on the fasteners, and do all
applicable corrective actions, in accordance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
with Part 2 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–33–1146, Revision 1,
dated July 9, 2013. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(i) Tail Strobe Light Installation for Model
737–300, –400, and –500 Series Airplanes
For Model 737–300, –400, and –500 series
airplanes: Within 72 months after the
effective date of this AD, install a new tail
strobe light housing, install a new disconnect
bracket, and change the wire bundles, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–33–1149, dated April
13, 2012.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, FAA, ANM–
130S, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6418; fax: 425–917–
6590; email: marie.hogestad@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD that is not incorporated by reference
in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–33–1146, Revision 1, dated July
9, 2013.
(ii) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–33–1149, dated April 13, 2012.
(3) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 19,
2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–15382 Filed 7–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–1027; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–121–AD; Amendment
39–17886; AD 2014–13–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737–600,
–700, –700C, –800, –900, and –900ER
series airplanes. This AD was prompted
by a report of installation of incorrect
wire support clamps within the bay area
of the left and right environmental
control systems (ECS) during
production; the ECS bay area is a
flammable fluid leakage zone. Use of
incorrect wire support clamps that are
not fully cushioned could allow
electrical power wiring to come in
contact with the exposed metal of the
improper clamp, causing a short circuit
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
and subsequent electrical arcing. This
AD requires inspecting to identify the
part number of the wire support clamp,
and related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to prevent electrical arcing and a
potential ignition source, which, in
combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion, and consequent loss of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective August 19,
2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 19, 2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on December 12, 2013 (78 FR
75512). The NPRM was prompted by a
report of installation of incorrect wire
support clamps within the bay area of
the left and right ECS during
production; the ECS bay area is a
flammable leakage zone. Use of
incorrect wire support clamps that are
not fully cushioned could allow
electrical power wiring to come in
contact with the exposed metal of the
improper clamp, causing a short circuit
and subsequent electrical arcing. The
NPRM proposed to require inspecting to
identify the part number of the wire
support clamp, and related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to prevent electrical
arcing and a potential ignition source,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion, and consequent loss of the
airplane.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2013–
1027; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Georgios Roussos, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–
130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6482;
fax: 425–917–6590; email:
georgios.roussos@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Requests To Remove Certain Language
in ‘‘Relevant Service Information’’
Section
Boeing, All Nippon Airways (ANA),
and American Airlines (AA) asked that
the third sentence in the ‘‘Relevant
Service Information’’ section of the
NPRM (78 FR 75512, December 12,
2013) be removed. That sentence
specified ‘‘The related investigative
actions include an eddy current
inspection of the wing front spar for
cracking and a detailed inspection of the
bolt forward of the wing front spar
upper chord for cracking or missing
bolts.’’ Boeing stated that those actions
seem unrelated to the intent of the AD.
ANA stated that the eddy current
inspection is not specified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–
28–1312, dated April 19, 2013. AA
stated that those actions are not
included in the referenced service
information, and asked that those
actions be clarified or that the ‘‘Relevant
Service Information’’ section be
corrected by removing those actions.
We agree that the ‘‘Relevant Service
Information’’ section in the NPRM (78
FR 75512, December 12, 2013) should
not have stated that the related
investigative actions include an eddy
current inspection of the wing front spar
for cracking; that inspection is not
related to the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD. However, the
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800,
–900, and –900ER series airplanes. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the proposal (78 FR 75512,
December 12, 2013) and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41091
‘‘Relevant Service Information’’ section
of the NPRM is not carried over into this
final rule; therefore, no change to this
final rule is necessary in this regard.
Request To Include Equivalent Parts
AA asked that we add ‘‘equivalent
fully cushioned wire clamps’’ to the
approved part numbers (P/Ns) identified
in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD (78
FR 75512, December 12, 2013)
(redesignated as paragraph (i) of this
AD). AA stated that paragraph (h) of the
proposed AD prohibits the installation
of a wire support clamp within the ECS
bay area, unless the clamp has P/N
TA0930034–10, TA0930034–10P,
TA0930034–11, or TA0930034–12P. AA
noted that adding ‘‘equivalent fully
cushioned wire clamps’’ would account
for future part number changes and
future availability issues of the included
part numbers. AA also asserted that
including the equivalent clamps also
would reduce the potential for airplanes
becoming noncompliant during future
maintenance.
We do not agree to add ‘‘equivalent
fully cushioned wire clamps’’ to the
approved part numbers identified in
paragraph (i) of this AD (designated as
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD). AA
did not submit any data to show how
equivalency of the wire support clamp
is to be established, maintained, and
controlled. However, under the
provisions of paragraph (j) of this AD,
we may consider requests to use
alternate clamps if sufficient data are
submitted to substantiate that these
clamps meet the standards for the
environmental (temperature, vibration,
fluid resistance) and performance
requirements necessary to provide an
acceptable level of safety. We have not
changed this final rule in this regard.
Request To Change Costs of Compliance
Section
AA asked that we change the
inspection estimate in the ‘‘Costs of
Compliance’’ section in the NPRM (78
FR 75512, December 12, 2013) from 6 to
24 work-hours, as specified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–
28–1312, dated April 19, 2013.
We agree to change the work-hour
estimate for the inspection specified in
the ‘‘Costs of Compliance’’ section. After
further review of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–
1312, dated April 19, 2013, we have
determined that the work-hour estimate
of 24 hours is based on correct
installation of the wire clamps and does
not include repairs to the wiring.
Therefore, we have increased the work
hour estimate for the inspection
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
41092
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
specified in the ‘‘Costs of Compliance’’
section of this final rule.
Changes to This Final Rule
Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR
75512, December 12, 2013), Boeing has
issued Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–28–1312, Revision 1, dated
April 21, 2014. No additional work is
necessary on airplanes that were
changed using Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–28–1312, dated
April 19, 2013. We have added Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–
28–1312, Revision 1, dated April 21,
2014, to paragraphs (c) and (g) of this
AD, and added a new credit paragraph
(h) to this AD giving credit for Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–
28–1312, dated April 19, 2013.
Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR
75512, December 12, 2013), we have
determined that the language used in
the ‘‘Parts Installation Limitations’’
paragraph of the AD needs clarification.
As written, the language could be
interpreted as applying to ‘‘all’’ clamps
located in the ECS bay area; however,
the limitation only applies to certain
clamps. We have changed paragraph (h)
of the the proposed AD (redesignated as
paragraph (i) of this AD) to provide that
clarification.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously.
We also determined that these changes
will not increase the economic burden
on any operator or increase the scope of
this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 519
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Inspection ................................
24 work-hours × $85 per hour = $2,040 ................................
$0
$2,040
$1,058,760
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary related investigative and
corrective actions that would be
required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these actions.
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Related investigative and corrective
actions.
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ............................................................
$3
$88
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition repair of
chafed or damaged wiring specified in
this AD.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
Adoption of the Amendment
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2014–13–10 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–17886; Docket No.
FAA–2013–1027; Directorate Identifier
2013–NM–121–AD.
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective August 19, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900,
and –900ER series airplanes, certificated in
any category, having a variable number
identified in paragraph 1.A.1., Effectivity, of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737–28–1312, Revision 1, dated April 21,
2014.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28, Fuel System.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of
installation of incorrect wire support clamps
within the bay area of the left and right
environmental control systems (ECS) during
production; the ECS bay area is a flammable
fluid leakage zone. Use of incorrect wire
support clamps that are not fully cushioned
could allow electrical power wiring to come
in contact with the exposed metal of the
improper clamp, causing a short circuit and
subsequent electrical arcing. We are issuing
this AD to prevent electrical arcing and a
potential ignition source, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in a fuel tank explosion, and
consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection and Related Investigative and
Corrective Actions
Within 60 months after the effective date
of this AD: Do a detailed inspection to
determine if a wire support clamp having
part number (P/N) TA0930034–10,
TA0930034–10P, TA0930034–11, or
TA0930034–12P is installed, and do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–28–1312, Revision 1,
dated April 21, 2014.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–1312,
dated April 19, 2013.
(i) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a wire support clamp on
any airplane at the locations identified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–
1312, Revision 1, dated April 21, 2014,
unless the wire support clamp has P/N
TA0930034–10, TA0930034–10P,
TA0930034–11, or TA0930034–12P.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Jul 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
41093
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO–AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
Federal Aviation Administration
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Georgios Roussos, Aerospace
Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch,
ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–
6482; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
georgios.roussos@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–28–1312, Revision 1, dated
April 21, 2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 25,
2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–15506 Filed 7–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0009; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–123–AD; Amendment
39–17887; AD 2014–13–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 707 airplanes,
and Model 720 and 720B series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of scribe-line-related fatigue
cracks on Model 727 airplanes, which
are similar in design to Model 707
airplanes, and Model 720 and 720B
series airplanes. This AD requires
inspections for scribe lines in the skin
lap joints, external approved repairs,
external features, skin butt joints, and
decals; and related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. This AD
also requires surface finish restoration.
We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct scribe lines, which can develop
into fatigue cracks in the skin and cause
rapid decompression of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective August 19,
2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 19, 2014.
DATES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0009; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 135 (Tuesday, July 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41090-41093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15506]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-1027; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-121-AD;
Amendment 39-17886; AD 2014-13-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER
series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of installation of
incorrect wire support clamps within the bay area of the left and right
environmental control systems (ECS) during production; the ECS bay area
is a flammable fluid leakage zone. Use of incorrect wire support clamps
that are not fully cushioned could allow electrical power wiring to
come in contact with the exposed metal of the improper clamp, causing a
short circuit
[[Page 41091]]
and subsequent electrical arcing. This AD requires inspecting to
identify the part number of the wire support clamp, and related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to prevent electrical arcing and a potential ignition source, which,
in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion, and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective August 19, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 19,
2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
1027; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Georgios Roussos, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
phone: 425-917-6482; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
georgios.roussos@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on December 12, 2013 (78 FR
75512). The NPRM was prompted by a report of installation of incorrect
wire support clamps within the bay area of the left and right ECS
during production; the ECS bay area is a flammable leakage zone. Use of
incorrect wire support clamps that are not fully cushioned could allow
electrical power wiring to come in contact with the exposed metal of
the improper clamp, causing a short circuit and subsequent electrical
arcing. The NPRM proposed to require inspecting to identify the part
number of the wire support clamp, and related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent
electrical arcing and a potential ignition source, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion, and consequent loss of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(78 FR 75512, December 12, 2013) and the FAA's response to each
comment.
Requests To Remove Certain Language in ``Relevant Service Information''
Section
Boeing, All Nippon Airways (ANA), and American Airlines (AA) asked
that the third sentence in the ``Relevant Service Information'' section
of the NPRM (78 FR 75512, December 12, 2013) be removed. That sentence
specified ``The related investigative actions include an eddy current
inspection of the wing front spar for cracking and a detailed
inspection of the bolt forward of the wing front spar upper chord for
cracking or missing bolts.'' Boeing stated that those actions seem
unrelated to the intent of the AD. ANA stated that the eddy current
inspection is not specified in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-28-1312, dated April 19, 2013. AA stated that those
actions are not included in the referenced service information, and
asked that those actions be clarified or that the ``Relevant Service
Information'' section be corrected by removing those actions.
We agree that the ``Relevant Service Information'' section in the
NPRM (78 FR 75512, December 12, 2013) should not have stated that the
related investigative actions include an eddy current inspection of the
wing front spar for cracking; that inspection is not related to the
unsafe condition addressed by this AD. However, the ``Relevant Service
Information'' section of the NPRM is not carried over into this final
rule; therefore, no change to this final rule is necessary in this
regard.
Request To Include Equivalent Parts
AA asked that we add ``equivalent fully cushioned wire clamps'' to
the approved part numbers (P/Ns) identified in paragraph (h) of the
proposed AD (78 FR 75512, December 12, 2013) (redesignated as paragraph
(i) of this AD). AA stated that paragraph (h) of the proposed AD
prohibits the installation of a wire support clamp within the ECS bay
area, unless the clamp has P/N TA0930034-10, TA0930034-10P, TA0930034-
11, or TA0930034-12P. AA noted that adding ``equivalent fully cushioned
wire clamps'' would account for future part number changes and future
availability issues of the included part numbers. AA also asserted that
including the equivalent clamps also would reduce the potential for
airplanes becoming noncompliant during future maintenance.
We do not agree to add ``equivalent fully cushioned wire clamps''
to the approved part numbers identified in paragraph (i) of this AD
(designated as paragraph (h) of the proposed AD). AA did not submit any
data to show how equivalency of the wire support clamp is to be
established, maintained, and controlled. However, under the provisions
of paragraph (j) of this AD, we may consider requests to use alternate
clamps if sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that these
clamps meet the standards for the environmental (temperature,
vibration, fluid resistance) and performance requirements necessary to
provide an acceptable level of safety. We have not changed this final
rule in this regard.
Request To Change Costs of Compliance Section
AA asked that we change the inspection estimate in the ``Costs of
Compliance'' section in the NPRM (78 FR 75512, December 12, 2013) from
6 to 24 work-hours, as specified in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-28-1312, dated April 19, 2013.
We agree to change the work-hour estimate for the inspection
specified in the ``Costs of Compliance'' section. After further review
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-28-1312, dated April
19, 2013, we have determined that the work-hour estimate of 24 hours is
based on correct installation of the wire clamps and does not include
repairs to the wiring. Therefore, we have increased the work hour
estimate for the inspection
[[Page 41092]]
specified in the ``Costs of Compliance'' section of this final rule.
Changes to This Final Rule
Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR 75512, December 12, 2013), Boeing
has issued Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-28-1312, Revision 1,
dated April 21, 2014. No additional work is necessary on airplanes that
were changed using Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-28-
1312, dated April 19, 2013. We have added Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-28-1312, Revision 1, dated April 21, 2014, to
paragraphs (c) and (g) of this AD, and added a new credit paragraph (h)
to this AD giving credit for Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-28-1312, dated April 19, 2013.
Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR 75512, December 12, 2013), we have
determined that the language used in the ``Parts Installation
Limitations'' paragraph of the AD needs clarification. As written, the
language could be interpreted as applying to ``all'' clamps located in
the ECS bay area; however, the limitation only applies to certain
clamps. We have changed paragraph (h) of the the proposed AD
(redesignated as paragraph (i) of this AD) to provide that
clarification.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that
these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 519 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection........................ 24 work-hours x $85 per $0 $2,040 $1,058,760
hour = $2,040.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary related
investigative and corrective actions that would be required based on
the results of the inspection. We have no way of determining the number
of aircraft that might need these actions.
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related investigative and corrective 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85.. $3 $88
actions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition repair of chafed or damaged wiring
specified in this AD.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2014-13-10 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17886; Docket No. FAA-
2013-1027; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-121-AD.
[[Page 41093]]
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective August 19, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category, having a variable number identified in paragraph 1.A.1.,
Effectivity, of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-28-
1312, Revision 1, dated April 21, 2014.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel System.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of installation of incorrect
wire support clamps within the bay area of the left and right
environmental control systems (ECS) during production; the ECS bay
area is a flammable fluid leakage zone. Use of incorrect wire
support clamps that are not fully cushioned could allow electrical
power wiring to come in contact with the exposed metal of the
improper clamp, causing a short circuit and subsequent electrical
arcing. We are issuing this AD to prevent electrical arcing and a
potential ignition source, which, in combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion, and consequent loss
of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection and Related Investigative and Corrective Actions
Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection to determine if a wire support clamp having part
number (P/N) TA0930034-10, TA0930034-10P, TA0930034-11, or
TA0930034-12P is installed, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-28-1312, Revision 1, dated April 21,
2014.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
28-1312, dated April 19, 2013.
(i) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
wire support clamp on any airplane at the locations identified in
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-28-1312, Revision 1, dated April 21, 2014, unless the
wire support clamp has P/N TA0930034-10, TA0930034-10P, TA0930034-
11, or TA0930034-12P.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Georgios Roussos,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6482; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
georgios.roussos@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-28-1312,
Revision 1, dated April 21, 2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 25, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-15506 Filed 7-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P