Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 40794-40795 [2014-16357]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
40794
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 / Notices
For Additional Information or
Comments: Contact Suzanne Plimpton,
the NSF Reports Clearance Officer,
phone (703) 292–7556, or send email to
splimpto@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title of
Collection: Evaluation of National
Science Foundation’s Partnerships for
International Research and Education
Program.
OMB Control Number: 3145–NEW.
Abstract. This is a request that the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approve, under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, a three year
clearance for Abt Associates Inc. to
conduct data collection efforts for an
outcome evaluation of the National
Science Foundation’s Partnerships for
International Research and Education
(PIRE) Program. The PIRE program
offers researchers an opportunity to
forge collaborative relationships with
foreign scientists and engineers and
provides educational and professional
development opportunities for U.S.based postdoctoral fellows, graduate
and undergraduate students to acquire
on-site research experience at an
international laboratory, institution or
research site, whether university-,
industry- or government-based. The
PIRE program funds projects across a
broad array of scientific and engineering
disciplines in an effort to catalyze longterm, sustainable international
partnerships for collaborative research.
Across its first four award cohorts in
2005, 2007, 2010 and 2012, PIRE has
made a total of 59 awards. PIRE grant
awards range from $2.5 million to $5
million and typically last five years.
These projects range from relatively
small, bi-national consortia (e.g., two
U.S. and two non-U.S. institutions in
one foreign country) to large, multinational, multi-institutional awards
(e.g., a dozen U.S. institutions and 11
non-U.S. institutions representing eight
foreign nations). Many are multidisciplinary, combining, for example,
the expertise of econometricians with
researchers in fluid dynamics; and,
notably, many feature partnerships
between academic and industrial or
non-profit institutions. Collectively,
these 59 PIRE projects have provided
research and educational opportunities
for more than 100 postdoctoral fellows,
more than 625 graduate students and
approximately 600 undergraduates.
More than 600 U.S.-based and over 400
foreign-based faculty and researchers at
university and non-academic
institutions have participated in one or
more PIRE-funded collaborations.
To assess the program’s outcomes,
NSF plans to collect data to explore the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:25 Jul 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
number and quality of publications
produced by PIRE projects and
participants, the international
experiences of participants, their
educational and career outcomes, the
extent to which program participants
establish and maintain collaborations
with foreign researchers, and what effect
the PIRE program has on policies and
practices at U.S. and foreign
institutions. The primary methods of
data collection will include analyses of
NSF program records and bibliometric
data, and web-based surveys of
principal investigators, postdoctoral and
student participants, foreign senior
investigators, and administrative
officials at U.S. institutions.
Expected Respondents. Include PIRE
principal and co-principal investigators;
postdoctoral, graduate student and
undergraduate PIRE participants;
foreign senior investigators (individuals
with whom PIRE principal investigators
have formed partnerships);
administrative officials within
international affairs and/or study abroad
offices at U.S. institutions of the lead
PIRE principal investigators; and
principal or co-principal investigators,
postdoctoral and graduate student
participants in NSF-funded projects
other than PIRE, selected for similarity
to PIRE based on award year, amount,
and duration, research fields, and
degree of emphasis on international
collaboration.
Use of the Information. The purpose
of these studies is to provide NSF with
outcome data on the PIRE program.
These data will be used for internal
program management and for reporting
to stakeholders within and outside of
NSF.
Burden on the Public. NSF estimates
3,102 survey responses collected one
time at an average of 26 minutes per
response for a total of 1,417 hours.
Consult With Other Agencies and the
Public
NSF has not consulted with other
agencies. However, the contractor
conducting the evaluation has gathered
information from an external working
group of subject matter experts on the
study design and data collection plan.
Dated: July 9, 2014.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2014–16399 Filed 7–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC–2014–0135]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request to the Office of Management of
Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) invites public
comment about our intention to request
the OMB’s approval for renewal of an
existing information collection that is
summarized below. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal
Register under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the
requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information
collection: 48 CFR 20, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission Acquisition
Regulation (NRCAR).
2. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0169.
3. How often the collection is
required: On occasion; one time.
4. Who is required or asked to report:
NRC contractors and potential
contractors.
5. The number of annual respondents:
2,473 respondents.
6. The number of hours needed
annually to complete the requirement or
request: 20,095 (18,750 reporting plus
1,345 recordkeeping).
7. Abstract: The mandatory
requirements of the NRCAR implement
and supplement the Government-wide
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR),
and ensure that the regulations
governing the procurement of goods and
services within the NRC satisfy the
particular needs of the agency. Because
of differing statutory authorities among
Federal agencies, the FAR authorizes
agencies to issue regulations to
implement FAR policies and procedures
internally to satisfy the specific need of
the agency.
Submit, by September 12, 2014,
comments that address the following
questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 / Notices
AGENCY:
to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.60, ‘‘Design
Response Spectra for Seismic Design of
Nuclear Power Plants.’’ The NRC is
issuing this revision without a publiccomment period because there are only
minor modifications with no
substantive changes in the staff
regulatory positions. This guide
describes an approach that the NRC staff
considers acceptable for defining
response spectra for the seismic design
of nuclear power plants.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2014–0166 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this action by the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2014–0166. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual(s) listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Revision
2 of RG 1.60 is available in ADAMS
under Accession No. ML13210A432.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21, One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and NRC approval is not
required to reproduce them.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Tabatabai, Office of New Reactors,
telephone: 301–415–1381, email:
Sarah.Tabatabai@nrc.gov; or Edward
O’Donnell, Office of Nuclear Regulatory
Research, telephone: 301–251–7455,
email: Edward.ODonnell@nrc.gov. Both
are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing Revision 2
I. Introduction
The NRC is issuing a revision to an
existing guide in the NRC’s ‘‘Regulatory
Guide’’ series. Regulatory guides were
4. How can the burden of the
information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
The public may examine and have
copied for a fee, publicly-available
documents, including the draft
supporting statement, at the NRC’s
Public Document Room, Room O1–F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The
OMB clearance requests are available at
the NRC’s Web site: https://www.nrc.gov/
public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the
NRC’s home page site for 60 days after
the signature date of this notice.
Comments submitted in writing or in
electronic form will be made available
for public inspection. Because your
comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information,
the NRC cautions you against including
any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed. Comments submitted should
reference Docket No. NRC–2014–0135.
You may submit your comments by any
of the following methods: Electronic
comments go to https://
www.regulations.gov and search for
Docket No. RC–2014–0135. Mail
comments to Acting NRC Clearance
Officer, Kristen Benney (T–5 F50), U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
Questions about the information
collection requirements may be directed
to the Acting NRC Clearance Officer,
Kristen Benney, (T5 F50), U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 2055–0001; telephone: 301–415–
6355, or by email to INFOCOLLECTS.
Resource@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of July, 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Kristen Benney,
Acting NRC Clearance Officer, Office of
Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–16357 Filed 7–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[NRC–2014–0166]
Design Response Spectra for Seismic
Design of Nuclear Power Plants
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Regulatory guide; issuance.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:25 Jul 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40795
developed to describe and make
available to the public information
methods that are acceptable to the NRC
staff for implementing specific parts of
the agency’s regulations, techniques that
the staff uses in evaluating specific
problems or postulated accidents, and
data that the staff needs in its review of
applications for permits and licenses.
The NRC typically seeks public
comment on a draft version of a
regulatory guide by announcing its
availability for comment in the Federal
Register. However, as explained in
section III F of the Handbook for NRC
Management Directive 6.6, ‘‘Regulatory
Guides,’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML110330475) the NRC may directly
issue a final regulatory guide without a
draft version or public comment period
if the changes to the regulatory guide are
non-substantive.
The NRC is issuing Revision 2 of RG
1.60 directly as a final regulatory guide
because the changes between Revision 1
and Revision 2 are non-substantive. The
main reason for this revision was to
update the reference materials, along
with adding the ADAMS accession
numbers, for the key technical basis
documents in the reference section to
facilitate public access to those
documents.
II. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Issuance of this final regulatory guide
does not constitute backfitting as
defined in 10 CFR 50.109 (the Backfit
Rule) and is not otherwise inconsistent
with the issue finality provisions in 10
CFR part 52. The changes in Revision 2
of RG 1.60 are limited to editorial
changes to improve clarity, to update
references, and to facilitate public
access to key technical basis documents.
These changes do not fall within the
kinds of agency actions that constitute
backfitting or are subject to limitations
in the issue finality provisions of part
52. Accordingly, the NRC did not
address the Backfit Rule or issue finality
provisions of part 52.
III. Congressional Review Act
This action is not a rule as defined in
the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
801–808).
IV. Submitting Suggestions for
Improvement of Regulatory Guides
Revision 2 of RG 1.60 is being issued
without public comment. However, you
may at any time submit suggestions to
the NRC for improvement of existing
regulatory guides or for the
development of new regulatory guides
to address new issues. Suggestions can
be submitted by the form available
online at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 134 (Monday, July 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40794-40795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16357]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC-2014-0135]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to submit an information
collection request to the Office of Management of Budget (OMB) and
solicitation of public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public
comment about our intention to request the OMB's approval for renewal
of an existing information collection that is summarized below. We are
required to publish this notice in the Federal Register under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35).
Information pertaining to the requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information collection: 48 CFR 20, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission Acquisition Regulation (NRCAR).
2. Current OMB approval number: 3150-0169.
3. How often the collection is required: On occasion; one time.
4. Who is required or asked to report: NRC contractors and
potential contractors.
5. The number of annual respondents: 2,473 respondents.
6. The number of hours needed annually to complete the requirement
or request: 20,095 (18,750 reporting plus 1,345 recordkeeping).
7. Abstract: The mandatory requirements of the NRCAR implement and
supplement the Government-wide Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR),
and ensure that the regulations governing the procurement of goods and
services within the NRC satisfy the particular needs of the agency.
Because of differing statutory authorities among Federal agencies, the
FAR authorizes agencies to issue regulations to implement FAR policies
and procedures internally to satisfy the specific need of the agency.
Submit, by September 12, 2014, comments that address the following
questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC
to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical
utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected?
[[Page 40795]]
4. How can the burden of the information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
The public may examine and have copied for a fee, publicly-
available documents, including the draft supporting statement, at the
NRC's Public Document Room, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The OMB clearance requests
are available at the NRC's Web site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The document will be available on the NRC's home page
site for 60 days after the signature date of this notice.
Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be made
available for public inspection. Because your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC
cautions you against including any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly disclosed. Comments submitted should
reference Docket No. NRC-2014-0135. You may submit your comments by any
of the following methods: Electronic comments go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket No. RC-2014-0135. Mail
comments to Acting NRC Clearance Officer, Kristen Benney (T-5 F50),
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Questions about the information collection requirements may be
directed to the Acting NRC Clearance Officer, Kristen Benney, (T5 F50),
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 2055-0001;
telephone: 301-415-6355, or by email to INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of July, 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Kristen Benney,
Acting NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2014-16357 Filed 7-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P