Safety Zone; Water Ski Show, Fox River, Green Bay, WI, 40642-40644 [2014-16350]
Download as PDF
40642
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Captain of the Port representatives
include United States Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers.
(d) Information Broadcasts. The
Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a
designated representative will inform
the public through broadcast notices to
mariners of the enforcement period for
the safety zone as well as any changes
in the planned schedule.
Dated: June 10, 2014.
L. N. Weaver,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Pittsburgh.
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
[FR Doc. 2014–16335 Filed 7–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0536]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Water Ski Show, Fox
River, Green Bay, WI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Fox River in Green Bay, WI. This
safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Fox River
due to a water ski show. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the
hazards associated with the water ski
show.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective without
actual notice from July 14, 2014 until
7:30 p.m. August 27, 2014. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from 6 p.m. July 9, 2014,
until July 14, 2014. The eight specific
July and August dates of enforcement
are listed below in this rule.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2014–0536. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jul 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph
McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan, at 414–747–7148 or
Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 1–800–
647–5527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this rule because doing so
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest. The final details for
this event were not known to the Coast
Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an
NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date
of this rule to wait for a comment period
to run would be both impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because it
would inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability
to protect spectators and vessels from
the hazards associated with a water ski
show, which are discussed further
below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this temporary rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 160.5; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
For 4 days in July and 4 days in
August, 2014, the Coast Guard
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
anticipates that a ski team will perform
two 30-minute shows on the Fox River
between the Main Street Bridge and the
West Walnut Street Bridge in Green Bay,
WI. These water ski shows will consist
of 25 participants and three boats,
operating within the main channel of
the Fox River. The Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan, has determined that
these water ski shows will pose a
significant risk to public safety and
property. Such hazards include
collisions among the water ski show
participant vessels and passing traffic
on the Fox River.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in
mind, the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan, has determined that this
temporary safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels during the water ski shows in
Green Bay, WI. This rule is effective
from July 9, 2014 until August 27, 2014.
This rule will be enforced from 6 p.m.
until 6:30 p.m., and again from 7 p.m.
until 7:30 p.m. on each day of July 9, 16,
23, 30, and August 6, 13, 20, and 27,
2014. The safety zone will encompass
all waters of the Fox River in Green Bay,
WI from the Main Street Bridge in
position 44°31′5.7″ N 088°0′ 54.7″ W to
the West Walnut Street Bridge in
position 44°30′54.3″ N 088°1′5.3″ W
(NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan, or her designated
on-scene representative. The Captain of
the Port or her designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zone created by this rule will only
impact a small area and enforced for
only 30-minute intervals on 4 days in
July and 4 days in August, 2014. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels
may still transit through the safety zone
when permitted by the Captain of the
Port or her designated on-scene
representative.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this temporary rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of Fox River
during the times that this zone is
enforced in July and August, 2014.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the reasons cited in the Regulatory
Planning and Review section.
Additionally, before the enforcement of
the zone, we would issue local
Broadcast Notice to Mariners so vessel
owners and operators can plan
accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jul 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
40643
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
9. Civil Justice Reform
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
40644
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Dated: June 30, 2014.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
[FR Doc. 2014–16350 Filed 7–11–14; 8:45 am]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–1033]
2. Add § 165.T09–0536 to read as
follows:
■
Safety Zones; Annual Events
Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan Zone—Start
of the Chicago to Mackinac Race
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T09–0536 Safety Zone; Water Ski
Show, Fox River, Green Bay, WI.
(a) Location. All waters of the Fox
River in Green Bay, WI from the Main
Street Bridge in position 44°31′5.7″ N
88°0′54.7″ W to the West Walnut Street
Bridge in position 44°30′54.3″ N 088°1′
5.3″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement periods.
This section is effective from July 9,
2014, until 7:30 p.m. August 27, 2014.
This rule will be enforced from 6 p.m.
until 6:30 p.m., and again from 7 p.m.
until 7:30 p.m. on each day of July 9, 16,
23, 30, and August 6, 13, 20, and 27,
2014.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
her designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan or her designated onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan to act on her behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan or her on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
her on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
on-scene representative.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jul 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zone on Lake Michigan near
Chicago, IL for the start of the Chicago
to Mackinac Race. This zone will be
enforced on July 18, 2014, from 1:30
p.m. until 4 p.m., and on July 19, 2014,
from 10 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. This action
is necessary and intended to ensure
safety of life on navigable waters during
the start of the Chicago to Mackinac
Race. During the aforementioned
periods, the Coast Guard will enforce
restrictions upon, and control
movement of, vessels in the safety zone.
No person or vessel may enter the safety
zone while it is being enforced without
permission of the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.929 will be enforced for safety zone
(e)(45) in § 165.929, Table 165.929, on
July 18, 2014, from 1:30 p.m. until 4
p.m., and on July 19, 2014, from 10 a.m.
until 4:30 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this document,
call or email MST1 Joseph McCollum,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at
(414) 747–7148, email
joseph.p.mccollum@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the Start of Chicago
to Mackinac Race safety zone listed as
item (e)(45) in Table 165.929 of 33 CFR
165.929. Section 165.929 lists many
annual events requiring safety zones in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
zone. This zone will encompass all
waters of Lake Michigan in the vicinity
of the Navy Pier at Chicago IL, within
a rectangle that is approximately 1500
by 900 yards. The rectangle is bounded
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
by the coordinates beginning at
41°53′15.1″ N, 087°35′25.8″ W; then
south to 41°52′48.7″ N, 087°35′25.8″ W;
then east to 41°52′49.0″ N, 087°34′26.0″
W; then north to 41°53′15″ N,
087°34′26″ W; then west, back to point
of origin (NAD 83). This zone will be
enforced on July 18, 2014 from 1:30
p.m. until 4 p.m., and on July 19, 2014,
from 10 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.
All vessels must obtain permission
from the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or the on-scene representative
to enter, move within, or exit a safety
zone. Vessels and persons granted
permission to enter the safety zone must
obey all lawful orders or directions of
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or a designated representative. Vessels
that wish to transit through the safety
zone may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.
Requests must be made in advance and
approved by the Captain of the Port
before transits will be authorized.
Approvals will be granted on a case by
case basis.
This document is issued under
authority of 33 CFR 165.929, Safety
Zones; Annual events requiring safety
zones in the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan zone, and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In
addition to this publication in the
Federal Register, the Coast Guard will
provide the maritime community with
advance notification of this event via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local
Notice to Mariners that the regulation is
in effect. The Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan, or her on-scene
representative may be contacted via
Channel 16, VHF–FM.
Dated: June 30, 2014.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2014–16333 Filed 7–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0539]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; City of Menominee
Fireworks; Green Bay, Menominee, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of Green Bay near in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 134 (Monday, July 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40642-40644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16350]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0536]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Water Ski Show, Fox River, Green Bay, WI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Fox River in Green Bay, WI. This safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Fox River due to a water ski show. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the surrounding public
and vessels from the hazards associated with the water ski show.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from July 14, 2014
until 7:30 p.m. August 27, 2014. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from 6 p.m. July 9, 2014, until July 14,
2014. The eight specific July and August dates of enforcement are
listed below in this rule.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-0536. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, at 414-747-7148 or Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 1-800-647-5527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this event were
not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would
be both impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it
would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with a water ski show, which are
discussed further below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
For 4 days in July and 4 days in August, 2014, the Coast Guard
anticipates that a ski team will perform two 30-minute shows on the Fox
River between the Main Street Bridge and the West Walnut Street Bridge
in Green Bay, WI. These water ski shows will consist of 25 participants
and three boats, operating within the main channel of the Fox River.
The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, has determined that these water
ski shows will pose a significant risk to public safety and property.
Such hazards include collisions among the water ski show participant
vessels and passing traffic on the Fox River.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan, has determined that this temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the
water ski shows in Green Bay, WI. This rule is effective from July 9,
2014 until August 27, 2014. This rule will be enforced from 6 p.m.
until 6:30 p.m., and again from 7 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. on each day of
July 9, 16, 23, 30, and August 6, 13, 20, and 27, 2014. The safety zone
will encompass all waters of the Fox River in Green Bay, WI from the
Main Street Bridge in position 44[deg]31'5.7'' N 088[deg]0' 54.7'' W to
the West Walnut Street Bridge in position 44[deg]30'54.3'' N
088[deg]1'5.3'' W (NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
or her designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or
her designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of
[[Page 40643]]
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will only
impact a small area and enforced for only 30-minute intervals on 4 days
in July and 4 days in August, 2014. Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port or her designated on-scene representative.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this temporary rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in a portion of Fox River during the times that
this zone is enforced in July and August, 2014.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the
enforcement of the zone, we would issue local Broadcast Notice to
Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
[[Page 40644]]
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0536 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0536 Safety Zone; Water Ski Show, Fox River, Green Bay,
WI.
(a) Location. All waters of the Fox River in Green Bay, WI from the
Main Street Bridge in position 44[deg]31'5.7'' N 88[deg]0'54.7'' W to
the West Walnut Street Bridge in position 44[deg]30'54.3'' N 088[deg]1'
5.3'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement periods. This section is effective
from July 9, 2014, until 7:30 p.m. August 27, 2014. This rule will be
enforced from 6 p.m. until 6:30 p.m., and again from 7 p.m. until 7:30
p.m. on each day of July 9, 16, 23, 30, and August 6, 13, 20, and 27,
2014.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan or her designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan to
act on her behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or her on-
scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan or her on-scene representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate
in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her on-scene representative.
Dated: June 30, 2014.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2014-16350 Filed 7-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P