Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho: Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter and 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 40662-40664 [2014-16299]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
40662
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
We are issuing these final priorities,
requirements, and definitions only on a
reasoned determination that their
benefits justify their costs. In choosing
among alternative regulatory
approaches, we selected those
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Based on the analysis that follows, the
Department believes that this regulatory
action is consistent with the principles
in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and Tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action. The potential costs
are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
does not require you to respond to a
collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number.
The collection of information is
approved under OMB control number
1855–0026.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program. Accessible
Format: Individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document in an
accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to either of the program contact
persons listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jul 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: July 9, 2014.
Nadya Chinoy Dabby,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2014–16462 Filed 7–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2011–0715, FRL–9913–28–
Region–10]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Infrastructure Requirements for the
1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter
and 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Clean Air Act (CAA)
requires that each state, after a new or
revised National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) is promulgated,
review their State Implementation Plan
(SIP) to ensure that it meets the
infrastructure requirements necessary to
implement the new or revised standard.
The Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) finds that the Idaho SIP meets the
infrastructure requirements of the CAA
for the NAAQS promulgated for fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) on July 18,
1997 and October 17, 2006, and for
ozone on March 12, 2008. The EPA also
finds that the Idaho SIP meets the
interstate transport requirements of the
CAA related to prevention of significant
deterioration and visibility for the 2006
PM2.5 and 2008 ozone NAAQS.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 13, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R10–OAR–
2011–0715. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information
may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or
other information the disclosure of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste,
and Toxics, AWT–107, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The
EPA requests that you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall at: (206) 553–6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA,
Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
Information is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comment
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On September 15, 2008, June 28,
2010, and August 10, 2011, Idaho made
submissions to the EPA demonstrating
that the Idaho SIP meets the
infrastructure requirements of the CAA
for the 1997 PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, and 2008
ozone NAAQS. On March 26, 2014, we
proposed action on these submissions
(79 FR 16711). On April 15, 2014, we
made a correction to our proposal
because we supplied an incorrect docket
number in our proposed action (79 FR
21179). However, any commenter
wishing to submit comments did not
need to resubmit them, because we
routed the comments to the correct
docket.
An explanation of the CAA
requirements and implementing
regulations that are met by these SIP
submissions, a detailed explanation of
the submissions, and the EPA’s reasons
for the proposed action were provided
in the notice of proposed rulemaking on
March 26, 2014, and will not be restated
here (79 FR 16711). The public
comment period for our proposed action
ended on April 25, 2014, and we
received one comment.
II. Response to Comment
Comment: We received the following
anonymous comment through the
www.regulations.gov Web site: ‘‘When
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the EPA can stop all the toxic emissions
from the multitudes of volcanos on the
earth, then and only then will I give up
my wood stove!! You people need to
stop telling us how to live. My taxes pay
your wages and I think your
organization needs to be dismantled!’’
Response: Under section 110 of the
CAA, states are responsible for
developing provisions to address air
pollution for incorporation into the SIP.
The EPA’s role is to evaluate these state
choices to determine if the revisions
meet the requirements of the CAA.
Furthermore, under section 116 of the
CAA, states have authority to adopt or
enforce standards or requirements for
the control or abatement of air pollution
(except as specifically limited by the
CAA). The EPA must approve state
submissions so long as they meet the
minimum requirements established by
the CAA. Union Electric Co. v. EPA, 427
U.S. 246 (1976). To the extent that the
commenter wants to influence these
state choices, the comments are best
submitted during the state public
comment period, rather than as part of
the EPA’s approval or disapproval
process. We have determined that the
provisions selected by Idaho for
inclusion in its SIP meet the CAA
infrastructure requirements for the 1997
and 2006 fine particulate matter and
2008 ozone standards. We provided a
copy of the comment to Idaho
Department of Environmental Quality
for consideration during future state
rulemaking, but we are otherwise taking
no further action on the comment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Final Action
The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP
meets the following CAA section
110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the
1997 PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, and 2008 ozone
NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We also find
that the Idaho SIP meets the
requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) as it applies to
prevention of significant deterioration
and visibility for the 2006 PM2.5 and
2008 ozone NAAQS. This action is
being taken under section 110 of the
CAA.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jul 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and the EPA notes
that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40663
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 12, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Particulate matter,
and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 16, 2014.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N—Idaho
2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding three entries
at the end of the table for ‘‘Section
110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS,’’ ‘‘Section
110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS,’’ and
‘‘Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2008 Ozone
NAAQS.’’
The additions read as follows:
■
§ 52.670
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
*
*
40664
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable
geographic or
non-attainment area
State submittal date
EPA approval date
Comments
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS.
*
*
State-wide .........................
*
9/15/2008; 6/28/2010 ........
*
*
7/14/2014 [Insert page
number where the document begins].
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS.
State-wide .........................
6/28/2010; 8/10/2011 ........
7/14/2014 [Insert page
number where the document begins].
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 2008 Ozone
NAAQS.
State-wide .........................
6/28/2010 ..........................
7/14/2014 [Insert page
number where the document begins].
*
This action addresses the
following CAA elements
or portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C),
(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H),
(J), (K), (L), and (M).
This action addresses the
following CAA elements
or portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C),
(D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L),
and (M).
This action addresses the
following CAA elements
or portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C),
(D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L),
and (M).
Name of SIP
provision
Maryland has made a submittal
addressing the infrastructure
requirements for the 2010 nitrogen
dioxide (NO2) NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2014–16299 Filed 7–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0649; FRL–9913–41–
Region–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Whenever new or revised National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) are promulgated, the CAA
requires states to submit a plan for the
implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of such NAAQS. The plan
is required to address basic program
elements, including, but not limited to
regulatory structure, monitoring,
modeling, legal authority, and adequate
resources necessary to assure attainment
and maintenance of the standards.
These elements are referred to as
infrastructure requirements. The State of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jul 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
I. Background
On February 9, 2010 (75 FR 6474),
EPA established a new 1-hour primary
NAAQS for NO2 at a level of 100 parts
per billion (ppb), based on a 3-year
DATES: This final rule is effective on
average of the 98th percentile of the
August 13, 2014.
yearly distribution of 1-hour daily
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
maximum concentrations. Section
docket for this action under Docket ID
110(a) of the CAA requires states to
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0649. All submit SIPs to provide for the
documents in the docket are listed in
implementation, maintenance, and
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
enforcement of a new or revised
Although listed in the electronic docket, NAAQS. Specifically, section 110(a)(1)
some information is not publicly
requires states to submit SIPs meeting
available, i.e., confidential business
the applicable requirements of section
information (CBI) or other information
110(a)(2) within three years following
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. the promulgation of such NAAQS, or
within such shorter period as EPA may
Certain other material, such as
prescribe, and section 110(a)(2) requires
copyrighted material, is not placed on
states to address specific elements for
the Internet and will be publicly
monitoring, basic program requirements
available only in hard copy form.
and legal authority that are designed to
Publicly available docket materials are
assure attainment and maintenance of
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for the newly established or revised
NAAQS.
public inspection during normal
The contents of a SIP submission may
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection vary depending upon the data and
analytical tools available to the state, as
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
well as the provisions already contained
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
in the state’s SIP at the time in which
Copies of the State submittal are
the state develops and submits the
available at the Maryland Department of
submission for a new or revised
the Environment, 1800 Washington
NAAQS. States were required to submit
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
such SIPs for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS to
Maryland 21230.
EPA no later than January 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Ruth Knapp, (215) 814–2191, or by
On April 15, 2014 (79 FR 21173), EPA
email at knapp.ruth@epa.gov.
published a notice of proposed
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 134 (Monday, July 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40662-40664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16299]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0715, FRL-9913-28-Region-10]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate
Matter and 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that each state, after a new
or revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) is
promulgated, review their State Implementation Plan (SIP) to ensure
that it meets the infrastructure requirements necessary to implement
the new or revised standard. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
finds that the Idaho SIP meets the infrastructure requirements of the
CAA for the NAAQS promulgated for fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) on July 18, 1997 and October 17, 2006, and for ozone
on March 12, 2008. The EPA also finds that the Idaho SIP meets the
interstate transport requirements of the CAA related to prevention of
significant deterioration and visibility for the 2006 PM2.5
and 2008 ozone NAAQS.
DATES: This final rule is effective on August 13, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket Identification No. EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0715. All documents in the
docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 10, Office of Air,
Waste, and Toxics, AWT-107, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. The EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall at: (206) 553-6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.
Information is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comment
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On September 15, 2008, June 28, 2010, and August 10, 2011, Idaho
made submissions to the EPA demonstrating that the Idaho SIP meets the
infrastructure requirements of the CAA for the 1997 PM2.5,
2006 PM2.5, and 2008 ozone NAAQS. On March 26, 2014, we
proposed action on these submissions (79 FR 16711). On April 15, 2014,
we made a correction to our proposal because we supplied an incorrect
docket number in our proposed action (79 FR 21179). However, any
commenter wishing to submit comments did not need to resubmit them,
because we routed the comments to the correct docket.
An explanation of the CAA requirements and implementing regulations
that are met by these SIP submissions, a detailed explanation of the
submissions, and the EPA's reasons for the proposed action were
provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking on March 26, 2014, and
will not be restated here (79 FR 16711). The public comment period for
our proposed action ended on April 25, 2014, and we received one
comment.
II. Response to Comment
Comment: We received the following anonymous comment through the
www.regulations.gov Web site: ``When
[[Page 40663]]
the EPA can stop all the toxic emissions from the multitudes of
volcanos on the earth, then and only then will I give up my wood
stove!! You people need to stop telling us how to live. My taxes pay
your wages and I think your organization needs to be dismantled!''
Response: Under section 110 of the CAA, states are responsible for
developing provisions to address air pollution for incorporation into
the SIP. The EPA's role is to evaluate these state choices to determine
if the revisions meet the requirements of the CAA. Furthermore, under
section 116 of the CAA, states have authority to adopt or enforce
standards or requirements for the control or abatement of air pollution
(except as specifically limited by the CAA). The EPA must approve state
submissions so long as they meet the minimum requirements established
by the CAA. Union Electric Co. v. EPA, 427 U.S. 246 (1976). To the
extent that the commenter wants to influence these state choices, the
comments are best submitted during the state public comment period,
rather than as part of the EPA's approval or disapproval process. We
have determined that the provisions selected by Idaho for inclusion in
its SIP meet the CAA infrastructure requirements for the 1997 and 2006
fine particulate matter and 2008 ozone standards. We provided a copy of
the comment to Idaho Department of Environmental Quality for
consideration during future state rulemaking, but we are otherwise
taking no further action on the comment.
III. Final Action
The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP meets the following CAA section
110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the 1997 PM2.5, 2006
PM2.5, and 2008 ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We also find that the Idaho SIP
meets the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) as it applies
to prevention of significant deterioration and visibility for the 2006
PM2.5 and 2008 ozone NAAQS. This action is being taken under
section 110 of the CAA.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and the EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 12, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Particulate matter, and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 16, 2014.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding
three entries at the end of the table for ``Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS,''
``Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS,'' and ``Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS.''
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 40664]]
EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of SIP provision geographic or non- State submittal EPA approval date Comments
attainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure State-wide........ 9/15/2008; 6/28/ 7/14/2014 [Insert This action
Requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 2010. page number where addresses the
NAAQS. the document following CAA
begins]. elements or
portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A),
(B), (C),
(D)(ii), (E),
(F), (G), (H),
(J), (K), (L),
and (M).
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure State-wide........ 6/28/2010; 8/10/ 7/14/2014 [Insert This action
Requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 2011. page number where addresses the
NAAQS. the document following CAA
begins]. elements or
portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A),
(B), (C),
(D)(i)(II),
(D)(ii), (E),
(F), (G), (H),
(J), (K), (L),
and (M).
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure State-wide........ 6/28/2010......... 7/14/2014 [Insert This action
Requirements for the 2008 Ozone page number where addresses the
NAAQS. the document following CAA
begins]. elements or
portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A),
(B), (C),
(D)(i)(II),
(D)(ii), (E),
(F), (G), (H),
(J), (K), (L),
and (M).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2014-16299 Filed 7-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
