Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Annual Eligibility Redeterminations for Exchange Participation and Insurance Affordability Programs; Health Insurance Issuer Standards Under the Affordable Care Act, Including Standards Related to Exchanges, 37262-37269 [2014-15362]
Download as PDF
37262
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Dated: May 22, 2014.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2014–15268 Filed 6–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Parts 155 and 156
[CMS–9941–P]
RIN 0938–AS32
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act; Annual Eligibility
Redeterminations for Exchange
Participation and Insurance
Affordability Programs; Health
Insurance Issuer Standards Under the
Affordable Care Act, Including
Standards Related to Exchanges
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
specify additional options for annual
eligibility redeterminations and renewal
and re-enrollment notice requirements
for qualified health plans offered
through the Exchange, beginning with
annual redeterminations for coverage for
plan year 2015. In particular, this
proposed rule would provide additional
flexibility for Marketplaces, including
the ability for Marketplaces to propose
unique approaches that meet the
specific needs of their State, while
streamlining the consumer experience.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on July 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–9941–P. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–9941–P, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore,
MD 21244–8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address only: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–9941–P, Mail
Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments only to the
following addresses prior to the close of
the comment period:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments
to the Baltimore address, call telephone
number (410) 786–7195 in advance to
schedule your arrival with one of our
staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the
addresses indicated as appropriate for
hand or courier delivery may be delayed
and received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin Walker, (301) 492–4430.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
Electronic Access
This Federal Register document is
also available from the Federal Register
online database through Federal Digital
System (FDsys), a service of the U.S.
Government Printing Office. This
database can be accessed via the
internet at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Legislative Overview
B. Stakeholder Consultation and Input
C. Structure of the Proposed Rule
II. Provisions of the Proposed Rule
A. Part 155—Exchange Establishment
Standards and Other Related Standards
Under the Affordable Care Act; Subpart
D—Exchange Functions in the
Individual Market: Eligibility
Determinations for Exchange
Participation and Insurance Affordability
Programs
B. Part 156—Health Insurance Issuer
Standards Under the Affordable Care
Act, Including Standards Related to
Exchanges; Subpart M—Qualified Health
Plan Issuer Responsibilities
III. Response to Comments
IV. Collection of Information Requirements
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
I. Background
A. Legislative Overview
The Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (Pub. L. 111–148) was enacted
on March 23, 2010. The Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111–152), which amended and
revised several provisions of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act, was
enacted on March 30, 2010. In this
proposed rule, we refer to the two
statutes collectively as the ‘‘Affordable
Care Act.’’ Subtitles A and C of Title I
of the Affordable Care Act reorganized,
amended, and added to the provisions
of part A of Title XXVII of the Public
Health Service Act (PHS Act) relating to
group health plans and health insurance
issuers in the group and individual
markets.
Starting on October 1, 2013 for
coverage starting as soon as January 1,
2014, qualified individuals and
qualified employers have been able to
purchase qualified health plans
(QHPs)—private health insurance that
has been certified as meeting certain
standards—through competitive
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
marketplaces called Exchanges or
Health Insurance Marketplaces. The
word ‘‘Exchanges’’ refers to both State
Exchanges, also called State-based
Exchanges, and Federally-facilitated
Exchanges (FFEs). In this proposed rule,
we use the terms ‘‘State Exchange’’ or
‘‘FFE’’ when we are referring to a
particular type of Exchange. When we
refer to ‘‘FFEs,’’ we are also referring to
State Partnership Exchanges, which are
a form of FFE.
Section 1411(f)(1)(B) of the Affordable
Care Act directs the Secretary of Health
and Human Services (the Secretary) to
establish procedures to redetermine the
eligibility of individuals on a periodic
basis in appropriate circumstances.
Section 1321(a) of the Affordable Care
Act provides authority for the Secretary
to establish standards and regulations to
implement the statutory requirements
related to Exchanges, QHPs and other
components of title I of the Affordable
Care Act. Under section 2703 of the PHS
Act, as added by the Affordable Care
Act, health insurance issuers in the
group and individual markets must
guarantee the renewability of coverage
unless an exception applies.
B. Stakeholder Consultation and Input
HHS has consulted with stakeholders
on a number of polices related to the
operation of Exchanges, including
eligibility redetermination. HHS has
held a number of listening sessions with
consumers, providers, employers, health
plans, and State representatives to
gather public input. HHS consulted
with stakeholders through regular
meetings with the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC),
regular contact with States through the
Exchange grant process, and meetings
with tribal leaders and representatives,
health insurance issuers, trade groups,
consumer advocates, employers, and
other interested parties. We considered
all of the public input as we developed
the policies in this proposed rule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Structure of the Proposed Rule
The regulations outlined in this
proposed rule would be codified in 45
CFR parts 155 and 156. Part 155
specifies standards relative to the
establishment, operation, and minimum
functionality of Exchanges, including
annual eligibility redeterminations. Part
156 specifies standards for health
insurance issuers with respect to
participation in an Exchange.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
II. Provisions of the Proposed
Regulations
A. Part 155—Exchange Establishment
Standards and Other Related Standards
Under the Affordable Care Act; Subpart
D—Exchange Functions in the
Individual Market: Eligibility
Determinations for Exchange
Participation and Insurance
Affordability Programs
Section 1411(f)(1)(B) of the Affordable
Care Act directs the Secretary to
establish procedures to redetermine the
eligibility of individuals on a periodic
basis in appropriate circumstances.
Section 1321(a) of the Affordable Care
Act provides authority for the Secretary
to establish standards and regulations to
implement the statutory requirements
related to Exchanges, QHPs and other
components of title I of the Affordable
Care Act.
On March 27, 2012, we published a
final rule entitled Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act; Establishment of
Exchanges and Qualified Health Plans;
Exchange Standards for Employers (77
FR 18310). The final rule added 45 CFR
155.335, which, together with the
provisions in 45 CFR 155.330 on
eligibility redeterminations during a
benefit year, implements section
1411(f)(1)(B) of the Affordable Care Act.
On July 15, 2013, we amended § 155.335
in a final rule entitled Medicaid and
Children’s Health Insurance Programs:
Essential Health Benefits in Alternative
Benefit Plans, Eligibility Notices, Fair
Hearing and Appeal Processes, and
Premiums and Cost Sharing; Exchanges:
Eligibility and Enrollment (78 FR 42160,
42319).
Under the process currently defined
in § 155.335, the Exchange will provide
a notice to all individuals who have
been determined eligible for enrollment
in a QHP through the Exchange
(qualified individuals) in advance of the
annual open enrollment period,
consistent with § 155.335(c). For 2015,
current regulations in § 155.335(d)(1)
specify that this notice and the annual
open enrollment period notice
described in § 155.410(d) be provided as
a single, coordinated notice. For an
individual who requested an eligibility
determination for insurance
affordability programs and who
authorized the Exchange to obtain the
most recent tax return information
available from the Secretary of the
Treasury for the purposes of annual
redetermination, this notice will include
a projected eligibility determination for
insurance affordability programs for the
following year that is computed based
on the updated income and family size
information, all other eligibility
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37263
information currently on file with the
Exchange, and plan premiums for the
following year. Specifically, if advance
payments of the premium tax credit
(APTC) are being paid on such an
enrollee’s behalf and the tax filer
authorized the Exchange to obtain
updated tax data for the purposes of
annual redetermination, the Exchange
will recalculate advance payments of
the premium tax credit and cost-sharing
reductions (CSR) for the upcoming year
in accordance with updated income and
family size information and premium
data for the applicable benchmark plan,
as defined in 26 CFR 1.36B–3(f),
calculated using premiums for the
upcoming year. Consistent with
§ 155.335(e), the Exchange will require
qualified individuals to report changes.
The process currently established in
regulation allows an individual who is
enrolled in a QHP through the Exchange
and whose QHP remains available to
renew coverage for the following year
without reapplying or having to take
other actions. This is a key element of
the redetermination process, since it
enables a streamlined renewal process
for enrollees and also reduces
administrative costs for States and the
Federal government.
Based on the authority in sections
1411(f)(1)(B) and 1321(a) of the
Affordable Care Act, we propose to
modify § 155.335(a) to allow for an
Exchange to choose one of three
methods for conducting annual
redeterminations. To accommodate
proposed new paragraph (a)(2), we
propose to renumber existing paragraph
(a) as paragraph (a)(1). Then, in
proposed paragraph (a)(2), we propose
that the Exchange must conduct annual
redeterminations using one of the sets of
procedures described in proposed
paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), or
(a)(2)(iii). First, in proposed paragraph
(a)(2)(i), we propose that the Exchange
may utilize the existing procedures
described in § 155.335(b) through (m).
Second, in paragraph (a)(2)(ii), we
propose that the Exchange may utilize
alternative procedures specified by the
Secretary for the applicable plan year.
We note that, contemporaneously with
this proposed rule, the Secretary is
providing guidance describing
alternative procedures that would be
available to Exchanges under paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) for annual redeterminations for
coverage for plan year 2015 if this
proposal is finalized. We are providing
this guidance at the same time as this
proposed rule given the limited amount
of time available for Exchanges and
issuers to develop and test the systems
and processes that will be needed to
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37264
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
implement the annual redetermination
process. If this proposal is finalized,
Federally-facilitated Exchanges will
adopt the alternative procedures
specified in this guidance for plan year
2015. Also, if this proposal is finalized,
we expect that updated guidance under
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) may be provided on
an annual basis. Third, in proposed
paragraph (a)(2)(iii), we propose that the
Exchange may utilize alternative
procedures approved by the Secretary
based on a showing by the Exchange
that the alternative procedures would
facilitate continued enrollment in
coverage for which the enrollee remains
eligible, provide clear information about
the process to the qualified individual
or enrollee (including any action by the
qualified individual or enrollee
necessary to obtain the most accurate
redetermination of eligibility), and
provide adequate program integrity
protections. We note that paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) is designed to enable
Exchanges to propose annual
redetermination procedures that would
deliver on the key goals of the annual
redetermination process, including
those specified in this paragraph. We
solicit comment regarding standards for
approving alternative procedures, and
on other elements of the annual
redetermination process, as well as how
it affects renewal for individuals who
are enrolled in a QHP through the
Exchange. We also note that special
procedures may be needed for an
Exchange that is transitioning the
eligibility and enrollment functions
from Federal to State operation, or vice
versa. We will work closely with
affected States to facilitate these
transitions.
In addition to the proposal to allow
Exchanges to choose one of three
options for performing annual
redeterminations, we propose to make
three amendments to the detailed
procedures described in § 155.335 and
one corresponding amendment to
§ 155.330, which governs eligibility
redetermination during a benefit year.
First, in § 155.335(e), we propose to
revise the language regarding change
reporting to generally align with the
standards in § 155.330(b), so that
§ 155.335(e) would specify that, except
as specified in proposed paragraph (e),
the Exchange must require a qualified
individual to report any change with
respect to the eligibility standards
specified in § 155.305 within 30 days of
any such change. Under proposed
paragraph (e)(1), the Exchange would
not be permitted to require a qualified
individual who did not request an
eligibility determination for insurance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
affordability programs to report changes
that affect eligibility for insurance
affordability programs. Unlike
§ 155.330, we do not propose to allow
the Exchange to establish a reasonable
threshold for changes in income, such
that a qualified individual who
experiences a change in income that is
below the threshold would not be
required to report such change, since we
believe that reporting of all income
changes is important at the time of
annual redetermination. With this
exception, the proposed standards are
identical to those currently established
in 45 CFR § 155.330(b). We propose
these changes to paragraph (e) because
the existing text refers to reporting
changes with respect to the information
included in the annual redetermination
notice, which is not required to include
a summary of the qualified individual’s
application information on file,
although an Exchange may opt to
include this information. These
proposed changes would align reporting
requirements with the notice and ensure
that Exchanges require relevant changes
to be reported in a timely manner,
consistently throughout the year.
Second, in proposed § 155.335(e)(2),
we propose to amend the existing
provision which specifies that the
Exchange must allow a qualified
individual, or an application filer, on
behalf of the qualified individual, to
report changes via the channels
available for submission of an
application, as described in
§ 155.405(c)(2). We propose that this
requirement would continue to apply,
except that the Exchange would no
longer be required to allow a qualified
individual, or an application filer, on
behalf of the qualified individual, to
report changes via mail. We also
propose the same change to
§ 155.330(b)(4), which addresses the
reporting of changes in the context of
eligibility redetermination during a
benefit year. Accepting changes via mail
would frequently require follow-up
telephone contact with individuals
attempting to report changes in order to
obtain answers to questions that may be
triggered by the reported changes. We
propose this because of the dynamic
nature of the eligibility process, under
which, for example, the Exchange
should only ask questions about an
individual’s access to qualifying
coverage in an eligible employersponsored plan for an individual who
has a level of income for his or her
family size that would qualify him or
her for advance payments of the
premium tax credit or cost-sharing
reductions, if he or she is otherwise
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
eligible. With a paper process, under
this example, it frequently would not be
possible to know in advance whether
information about an individual’s access
to qualifying coverage in an eligible
employer-sponsored plan would need to
be collected based on a reported change
in income or family size. Since change
reporting via mail would frequently
trigger subsequent telephone contact,
we believe it would promote
administrative efficiency to eliminate
the requirement to accept change
reporting via mail while encouraging
use of the telephone option, during
which a call center representative can
use the dynamic application to ask the
qualified individual any follow-up
questions that may arise from the
change report. We note that our
proposed policy would continue to
require that an Exchange must permit
change reporting online, via telephone,
and in person with the assistance of
Navigators, certified application
counselors, and other in-person
assistance personnel, and that an
Exchange could choose to permit
change reporting via mail. If this
proposal is finalized, we anticipate that
the Federally-facilitated Exchange
would not accept changes reported via
mail for the foreseeable future. We also
note that this rule does not propose to
modify 42 CFR 435.916(a)(3)(B) or (c),
which specify that a Medicaid agency
must allow an individual to respond to
an annual redetermination or report
changes via mail.
Third, we propose to modify the
standards for re-enrollment in coverage
in paragraph (j). First, in paragraph
(j)(1), we propose that if an enrollee
remains eligible for enrollment in a QHP
through the Exchange upon annual
redetermination, and the product under
which the QHP in which he or she was
enrolled remains available for renewal,
consistent with 45 CFR 147.106, such
enrollee will have his or her enrollment
in a QHP under the product renewed
unless he or she terminates coverage,
including termination of coverage in
connection with voluntarily selecting a
different QHP, in accordance with
§ 155.430. In this situation, we propose
that the QHP in which the enrollee will
be renewed will be selected according to
the following order of priority: First, in
the same plan as the enrollee’s current
QHP, unless the current QHP is not
available; second, if the enrollee’s
current QHP is not available, the
enrollee’s coverage will be renewed in
a plan at the same metal level as the
enrollee’s current QHP; third, if the
enrollee’s current QHP is not available
and the enrollee’s product no longer
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
includes a plan at the same metal level
as the enrollee’s current QHP, the
enrollee’s coverage will be renewed in
a plan that is one metal level higher or
lower than the enrollee’s current QHP;
and fourth, if the enrollee’s current QHP
is not available and the enrollee’s
product no longer includes a plan that
is at the same metal level as, or one
metal level higher or lower than the
enrollee’s current QHP, the enrollee’s
coverage will be renewed in any other
plan offered under the product in which
the enrollee’s current QHP is offered in
which the enrollee is eligible to enroll.
In paragraph (j)(2), we propose
standards to address re-enrollment in
situations in which the product under
which an enrollee’s QHP is offered is
not available through the Exchange for
renewal, consistent with 45 CFR
147.106. In this situation, the QHP
issuer may still re-enroll the enrollee in
a different product offered by the same
QHP issuer, to the extent permitted by
applicable State law, unless the enrollee
terminates coverage. To the extent that
an issuer is re-enrolling such an
enrollee, we propose that the plan in
which the enrollee will be renewed will
be selected according to the following
order of priority: First, in a plan through
the Exchange at the same metal level as
the enrollee’s current QHP in the
product offered by the issuer that is the
most similar to the enrollee’s current
product; second, if the issuer does not
offer another plan through the Exchange
at the same metal level as the enrollee’s
current QHP, the enrollee will be reenrolled in a plan through the Exchange
that is one metal level higher or lower
than the enrollee’s current QHP in the
product offered by the issuer through
the Exchange that is the most similar to
the enrollee’s current product; third, if
the issuer does not offer another plan
through the Exchange at the same metal
level as, or one metal level higher or
lower than the enrollee’s current QHP,
the enrollee will be re-enrolled in any
other plan offered through the Exchange
by the QHP issuer in which the enrollee
is eligible to enroll; and fourth, if the
issuer does not offer any plan through
the Exchange in which the enrollee is
eligible to enroll, the enrollee may be reenrolled in a plan offered outside the
Exchange by the QHP issuer under the
product that is the most similar to the
enrollee’s current product, in which the
enrollee is eligible to enroll. We note
that the Exchange would not send an
enrollment transaction for an
enrollment outside the Exchange, and
that premium tax credits and costsharing reductions are not available for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
enrollment that is not through the
Exchange.
The proposed changes to this
provision include minor changes to
improve clarity, amendments to reflect
that renewal of coverage in a QHP
through the Exchange intersects with
§ 147.106, which provides market-wide
standards for guaranteed renewability of
coverage offered both through and
outside the Exchange, and a specific
order of priority to ensure that renewal
of and re-enrollment in coverage in a
plan through the Exchange occurs
through the Exchange, and is in
products that are as similar to the
enrollee’s existing product as possible,
in order to minimize disruption, enable
consumers to continue with advance
payments of the premium tax credit and
cost-sharing reductions (which are only
available for enrollment through the
Exchange) and limit consumer
confusion. Further, the current text of
paragraph (j), if read separately from
§ 147.106, could give the incorrect
impression that a QHP enrollee would
have his or her coverage in a QHP
renewed even if the product under
which the QHP was offered was no
longer available for renewal, consistent
with § 147.106. Accordingly, the
proposed language is designed to clarify
the dependency of renewal of coverage
in a QHP through the Exchange on the
continuing availability of the product
under which the QHP is offered in
accordance with market-wide standards.
We solicit comments on these proposed
standards and on the proposed order in
which plans would be selected for
renewal of and re-enrollment in
coverage. In particular, we solicit
comment regarding whether paragraphs
(j)(1)(iii) and (j)(2)(ii) should only
prioritize a plan with a lower metal
level, and whether in general, priority
should be placed on plans that have a
premium that is closest to the plan in
which an enrollee is currently enrolled.
B. Part 156—Health Insurance Issuer
Standards Under the Affordable Care
Act, Including Standards Related to
Exchanges; Subpart M—Qualified
Health Plan Issuer Responsibilities
In 45 CFR 147.106(f)(1) of the final
rule entitled, ‘‘Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act; Exchange and
Insurance Market Standards for 2015
and Beyond,’’ published on May 27,
2014 (79 FR 30240) (Market Standards
Rule), we specified that health
insurance issuers of non-grandfathered
plans in the individual market will
provide written notice of renewals
before the first day of the next annual
open enrollment period in a form and
manner specified by the Secretary.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37265
Under 45 CFR 147.106(c)(1), health
insurance issuers of non-grandfathered
plans in the individual market also will
provide written notices of product
discontinuances.
We propose adding to subpart M a
new § 156.1255, which would require a
health insurance issuer in the
individual market that is renewing an
enrollment group’s coverage in a
qualified health plan offered through
the Exchange (including a renewal with
modifications), or that is discontinuing
a product that includes plans offered
through the Exchange and automatically
enrolling an enrollee in a QHP under a
different product offered by the same
QHP issuer through the Exchange, to
include certain information in the
renewal or discontinuation notices, as
applicable. We propose that the
additional information include the
following: (1) Premium and premium
tax credit information sufficient to
notify the enrollment group of its
expected monthly premium payment
under the renewed coverage, in a form
and manner specified by the Exchange,
provided that if the Exchange does not
provide this information to enrollees
and does not require issuers to provide
this information to enrollees, consistent
with this section, such information must
be provided in a form and manner
specified by HHS; (2) an explanation of
the requirement to report changes to the
Exchange, the timeframe and channels
through which changes can be reported,
and the implications of not reporting
changes; (3) for an enrollment group
that includes an enrollee on whose
behalf advance payments of the
premium tax credit are being provided,
a description of the reconciliation
process for advance payments of the
premium tax credit; and (4) for an
enrollment group that includes an
enrollee whose coverage includes costsharing reductions, if the enrollment
group’s coverage is being renewed in a
QHP at a different (non-silver) metal
level, an explanation that, unless the
enrollment group changes its enrollment
to select a new silver-level plan, costsharing reductions will not be provided
for the upcoming year. In accordance
with § 147.106(f)(1), renewal notices
would need to be provided no later than
the first day of the open enrollment
period for the upcoming plan year. An
issuer also may provide this notice
along with the applicable summary of
benefits and coverage notice that is
provided at renewal in accordance with
45 CFR 147.200. We seek comment on
this proposal.
Contemporaneously with the issuance
of this proposed rule, we are specifying
the form and manner of the notices
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37266
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
described in 45 CFR 146.152, 147.106,
and 148.122 by providing standard
notices for issuers to use when
discontinuing or renewing coverage.
These notices take into account the
feedback we received on the draft
notices issued contemporaneously with
the proposed Market Standards Rule.1
We believe that adding the information
that would be specified pursuant to
§ 156.1255 to the renewal notices
required under § 147.106 would best
assure that qualified individuals
receive, in a single notice, the relevant
information that they need to make
informed decisions about whether to
keep their current plan or examine other
QHP options. Further, this approach
potentially would reduce burden on
health insurance issuers. As noted
above, the Market Standards Rule
requires that notices be provided in a
form and manner specified by the
Secretary. The guidance accompanying
the standard notices that we are
releasing for public comment
contemporaneously with this proposed
rule specifies that the form and manner
may consist of standard notices
developed by States that are enforcing
the requirements of the Affordable Care
Act, provided the State-developed
notices are at least as protective as the
standard Federal notices.
We recognize that the current notice
requirements do not cover every
situation in which an issuer may nonrenew or discontinue coverage,
consistent with the guaranteed
renewability statute and regulations. For
example, an issuer whose product no
longer covers the service area of
enrollees may non-renew those
enrollees’ coverage under that product.
But, as long as the issuer’s product
continues to cover a majority of the
same service area, the service area
reduction would not trigger a product
discontinuation and corresponding
notice to affected enrollees under the
current regulations. We also propose
establishing a notice requirement that
would apply to all plans subject to the
guaranteed renewability requirements
that non-renew coverage based on
continued coverage not being available
in the enrollee’s service area as a result
of changes that do not result in product
discontinuances. These notices would
be provided in a form and manner
specified by HHS. We solicit comments
on this proposal, including the
1 CMS Insurance Standards Bulletin, Draft
Notices When Discontinuing or Renewing a Product
in the Group or Individual Market (March 14, 2014),
https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/Regulationsand-Guidance/Downloads/draft-discontinuancerenewal-notices-03-14-14.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
appropriate timeframe for providing the
notice.
III. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
IV. Collection of Information
Requirements
Emergency Clearance: Public
Information Collection Requirements
Submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB)
In compliance with section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS),
Department of Health and Human
Services, is publishing a summary of
this proposed information collection for
public comment. Interested persons are
invited to send comments regarding this
collection’s proposed burden estimates
or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including any of the
following subjects: (1) The necessity and
utility of the proposed information
collection for the proper performance of
the agency’s functions; (2) the accuracy
of the estimated burden; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
In compliance with section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we have also
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) the proposed
information collection for their
emergency review. While the collection
is necessary to ensure compliance with
an initiative of the Administration, we
are requesting emergency review under
5 CFR 1320(a)(2)(i) because public harm
is reasonably likely to result if the
regular clearance procedures are
followed. The approval of this data
collection process is essential to
ensuring that renewal notices associated
with the 2015 plan year are provided to
consumers in a timely manner prior to
the 2015 open enrollment period.
Consumers will need the information in
these notices in order to make decisions
regarding their coverage for the 2015
plan year.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ICRs Regarding Renewal and ReEnrollment Notice Requirements
(§ 156.1255)
Proposed § 156.1255 would require
that a health insurance issuer in the
individual market that is renewing an
enrollment group’s coverage in a
qualified health plan offered through
the Exchange (including a renewal with
modifications), or that is discontinuing
a product offered through the Exchange
and automatically enrolling an enrollee
in a QHP under a different product
offered by the same QHP issuer through
the Exchange include certain
information in the written notice
specified in § 147.106(c)(1) or (f)(1).
Since there are existing requirements
for issuers to send renewal and
discontinuance notices, we only
estimate the burden for QHP issuers to
revise current notices to comply with
the proposed provisions of this
proposed rule. We estimate that there
are 575 QHP issuers and assume that
they would all revise their existing
notices to comply with the requirements
in this proposed rule.
For renewal notices, we estimate that,
for each issuer, it would require three
hours of clerical labor (at a cost of
$33.67 per hour) to prepare the notice
and one hour for a senior manager (at
a cost of $75.34 per hour) to review it.
We also estimate that it would take a
computer programmer 20 hours (at a
cost of $52.53 per hour) to write and test
a program to automate the notices. The
total burden for each issuer to prepare
the notice would be 24 hours with an
equivalent cost of approximately $1,277.
For all 575 QHP issuers, the total
burden would be 13,800 hours with an
equivalent cost of approximately
$705,479.
For re-enrollment (or discontinuance)
notices, which could also be used in
cases of other terminations or nonrenewals, we estimate that, for each
issuer, it would require three hours of
clerical labor (at a cost of $33.67 per
hour) to prepare the notice and one hour
for a senior manager (at a cost of $75.34
per hour) to review the notice. We also
estimate that it would take a computer
programmer 9 hours (at a cost of $52.53
per hour) to write and test a program to
automate the notices. The total annual
burden for each issuer to prepare the
notice would be 13 hours with an
equivalent cost of approximately $649.
For all 575 QHP issuers, the total annual
burden would be 7,475 hours with an
equivalent cost of approximately
$373,237.
States that are enforcing the
Affordable Care Act may develop their
own standard notices. However, we
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
anticipate that fewer than 10 States
would opt for this alternative. Under 5
CFR 1320.3(c)(4), this requirement is not
subject to the PRA as it would affect
fewer than 10 entities in a 12-month
period.
We are requesting emergency OMB
review with a 180-day approval period.
Written comments and
recommendations for this emergency
request only will be considered from the
public if received by the date and
address noted below.
The proposed information collection
requirement at § 156.1255 is but one
component of a broader information
collection request. We are also soliciting
comments for the aforementioned
information collection request in a
notice published elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register. The notice
provides the public with 30 days to
submit comments. Copies of the
supporting statement for this
information collection request and any
related forms can be found at: https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/
PaperworkReductionActof1995 or can
be obtained by emailing your request,
including your address, phone number,
OMB number, and CMS document
identifier, to: Paperwork@cms.hhs.gov,
or by calling the Reports Clearance
Office at: 410–786–1326.
When commenting on this proposed
information collection, please reference
the CMS document identifier and the
OMB control number. To be assured
consideration, comments and
recommendations must be received in
one of the following ways by July 28,
2014:
1. Electronically. You may submit
your comments electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for ‘‘Comment or
Submission’’ or ‘‘More Search Options’’
to find the information collection
document(s) accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address:
CMS, Office of Strategic Operations and
Regulatory Affairs, Division of
Regulations Development, Attention:
Document Identifier (CMS–10527),
Room C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland
21244–1850;
and,
OMB Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention: CMS
Desk Officer, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235, Washington,
DC 20503, Fax Number: 202–395–
6974.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
A. Summary
We are publishing this proposed rule
to implement the protections intended
by the Congress in the most
economically efficient manner possible.
We have examined the effects of this
rule as required by Executive Order
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011),
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
September 1993, Regulatory Planning
and Review), the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L.
96–354), the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4),
Executive Order 13132 on Federalism,
and the Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 804(2)).
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735)
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects; distributive impacts; and
equity). Executive Order 13563 (76 FR
3821, January 21, 2011) is supplemental
to and reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing
regulatory review as established in
Executive Order 12866.
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as an action that is likely to result in a
proposed rule—(1) having an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more in any one year, or adversely
and materially affecting a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local or tribal
governments or communities (also
referred to as ‘‘economically
significant’’); (2) creating a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfering
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially altering
the budgetary impacts of entitlement
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or
policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
A regulatory impact analysis (RIA)
must be prepared for rules with
economically significant effects (for
example, $100 million or more in any 1
year), and a ‘‘significant’’ regulatory
action is subject to review by the OMB.
We have concluded that this proposed
rule is not likely to have economic
impacts of $100 million or more in any
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37267
one year, and therefore does not meet
the definition of ‘‘economically
significant rule’’ under Executive Order
12866.
1. Need for Regulatory Action
This proposed rule specifies
additional options for annual eligibility
redeterminations and renewal and reenrollment notice requirements for
QHPs in the Exchange beginning with
annual redeterminations for coverage for
plan year 2015.
2. Summary of Impacts
It is expected that Exchanges will
adopt an alternative method for annual
eligibility redeterminations only if the
related costs are no more than those
associated with the process currently
defined in § 155.335. Therefore, we do
not expect that there would be
additional costs related to these
provisions.
QHP issuers would incur costs to
prepare and send renewal notices to
comply with the proposed provisions,
as detailed in section IV. States that
choose to develop their own renewal
notices would incur costs to do so.
Providing consumers with information
such as benefit changes and premium
amounts will enable them to make
decisions regarding their coverage for
the next plan year.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires agencies that issue a regulation
to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses if a rule has a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The RFA
generally defines a ‘‘small entity’’ as: (1)
A proprietary firm meeting the size
standards of the Small Business
Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit
organization that is not dominant in its
field; or (3) a small government
jurisdiction with a population of less
than 50,000 (States and individuals are
not included in the definition of ‘‘small
entity’’). HHS uses as its measure of
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities a
change in revenues of more than 3 to 5
percent. We do not believe that this
threshold will be reached by the
provisions of this proposed rule.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule that includes a federal mandate that
could result in expenditure in any one
year by State, local or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
37268
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
and to the Comptroller General a report
containing a copy of the rule along with
other specified information, and has
been transmitted to Congress and the
Comptroller General for review.
E. Federalism
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a rule
that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
States are the primary regulators of
health insurance coverage, and State
laws will continue to apply to health
insurance coverage and the business of
insurance. However, if any State law or
requirement prevents the application of
a Federal standard, then that particular
State law or requirement would be
preempted. State requirements that are
more stringent than the Federal
requirements would not be preempted
by this proposed rule. Accordingly,
States have significant latitude to
impose requirements with respect to
health insurance coverage that are more
restrictive than the Federal law.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
private sector, of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
In 2014, that threshold level is
approximately $141 million.
UMRA does not address the total cost
of a rule. Rather, it focuses on certain
categories of cost, mainly those ‘‘Federal
mandate’’ costs resulting from: (1)
Imposing enforceable duties on State,
local, or tribal governments, or on the
private sector; or (2) increasing the
stringency of conditions in, or
decreasing the funding of, State, local,
or tribal governments under entitlement
programs.
This proposed rule would allow
States to choose one of three methods
for conducting annual redeterminations.
We assume that States would choose an
alternative method only if it is less
costly than the current method. It would
also require QHP issuers to include
specific information in renewal and reenrollment notices sent to enrollees and
issuers would incur costs to comply
with this requirement. States that
choose to develop their own notices
would incur costs to do so. Consistent
with policy embodied in UMRA, this
proposed rule has been designed to be
the least burdensome alternative for
State, local and tribal governments, and
the private sector while achieving the
objectives of the Affordable Care Act.
■
F. Congressional Review Act
This proposed rule is subject to the
Congressional Review Act provisions of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801, et seq.), which specifies that
before a rule can take effect, the federal
agency promulgating the rule shall
submit to each House of the Congress
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
List of Subjects
45 CFR Part 155
Administrative practice and
procedure, Health care access, Health
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, State and local
governments, Cost-sharing reductions,
Advance payments of premium tax
credit, Administration and calculation
of advance payments of the premium
tax credit
45 CFR Part 156
Administrative practice and
procedure, Health care, Health
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Health and
Human Services proposes to amend 45
CFR parts 155 and 156 as set forth
below:
PART 155—EXCHANGE
ESTABLISHMENT STANDARDS AND
OTHER RELATED STANDARDS
UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
1. The authority citation for part 155
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Title I of the Affordable Care
Act, sections 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, 1311,
1312, 1313, 1321, 1322, 1331, 1332, 1334,
1402, 1411, 1412, 1413, Pub. L. 111–148, 124
Stat. 119 (42 U.S.C. 18021–18024, 18031–
18033, 18041–18042, 18051, 18054, 18071,
and 18081–18083).
2. Amend § 155.330 to revise
paragraph (b)(4) as follows:
■
§ 155.330 Eligibility redetermination during
a benefit year.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) The Exchange must allow an
enrollee, or an application filer on
behalf of the enrollee, to report changes
via the channels available for the
submission of an application, as
described in § 155.405(c)(2), except that
the Exchange is permitted but not
required to allow an enrollee, or an
application filer, on behalf of the
enrollee, to report changes via mail.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 155.335 to revise
paragraphs (a), (e), and (j) as follows:
§ 155.335 Annual eligibility
redetermination.
(a) General requirement. (1) Except as
specified in paragraphs (l) and (m) of
this section, the Exchange must
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
redetermine the eligibility of a qualified
individual on an annual basis.
(2) The Exchange must conduct
annual redeterminations required under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section using
one of the following:
(i) The procedures described in
paragraphs (b) through (m) of this
section;
(ii) Alternative procedures specified
by the Secretary for the applicable plan
year; or
(iii) Alternative procedures approved
by the Secretary based on a showing by
the Exchange that the alternative
procedures would facilitate continued
enrollment in coverage for which the
enrollee remains eligible, provide clear
information about the process to the
qualified individual or enrollee
(including regarding any action by the
qualified individual or enrollee
necessary to obtain the most accurate
redetermination of eligibility), and
provide adequate program integrity
protections.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Changes reported by qualified
individuals. Except as specified in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the
Exchange must require a qualified
individual to report any change with
respect to the eligibility standards
specified in § 155.305 within 30 days of
such change.
(1) The Exchange must not require a
qualified individual who did not
request an eligibility determination for
insurance affordability programs to
report changes that affect eligibility for
insurance affordability programs.
(2) The Exchange must allow a
qualified individual, or an application
filer, on behalf of the qualified
individual, to report changes via the
channels available for the submission of
an application, as described in
§ 155.405(c)(2), except that the
Exchange is permitted but not required
to allow a qualified individual, or an
application filer, on behalf of the
qualified individual, to report changes
via mail.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Re-enrollment. If an enrollee
remains eligible for enrollment in a QHP
through the Exchange upon annual
redetermination—
(1) And the product under which the
QHP in which he or she is enrolled
remains available through the Exchange
for renewal, consistent with § 147.106 of
this subchapter, such enrollee will have
his or her enrollment through the
Exchange in a QHP under that product
renewed, unless he or she terminates
coverage, including termination of
coverage in connection with voluntarily
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules
selecting a different QHP, in accordance
with § 155.430. The Exchange will
ensure that re-enrollment in coverage
under this paragraph (j)(1) occurs under
the same product in which the enrollee
was enrolled, as follows:
(i) The enrollee’s coverage will be
renewed in the same plan as the
enrollee’s current QHP, unless the
current QHP is not available.
(ii) If the enrollee’s current QHP is not
available, the enrollee’s coverage will be
renewed in a plan at the same metal
level as the enrollee’s current QHP;
(iii) If the enrollee’s current QHP is
not available and the enrollee’s product
no longer includes a plan at the same
metal level as the enrollee’s current
QHP, the enrollee’s coverage will be
renewed in a plan that is one metal level
higher or lower than the enrollee’s
current QHP; or
(iv) If the enrollee’s current QHP is
not available and the enrollee’s product
no longer includes a plan that is at the
same metal level as, or one metal level
higher or lower than the enrollee’s
current QHP, the enrollee’s coverage
will be renewed in any other plan
offered under the product in which the
enrollee’s current QHP is offered in
which the enrollee is eligible to enroll.
(2) And the product under which the
QHP in which he or she is enrolled is
not available through the Exchange for
renewal, consistent with § 147.106 of
this subchapter, such enrollee may be
enrolled in a plan under a different
product offered by the same QHP issuer,
to the extent permitted by applicable
State law, unless he or she terminates
coverage, including termination of
coverage in connection with voluntarily
selecting a different QHP, in accordance
with § 155.430. The Exchange will
ensure that re-enrollment in coverage
under this paragraph (j)(2) occurs as
follows:
(i) The enrollee will be re-enrolled in
a plan through the Exchange at the same
metal level as the enrollee’s current
QHP in the product offered by the issuer
that is the most similar to the enrollee’s
current product;
(ii) If the issuer does not offer another
plan through the Exchange at the same
metal level as the enrollee’s current
QHP, the enrollee will be re-enrolled in
a plan through the Exchange that is one
metal level higher or lower than the
enrollee’s current QHP in the product
offered by the issuer through the
Exchange that is the most similar to the
enrollee’s current product;
(iii) If the issuer does not offer another
plan through the Exchange at the same
metal level as, or one metal level higher
or lower than the enrollee’s current
QHP, the enrollee will be re-enrolled in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Jun 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
any other plan offered through the
Exchange by the QHP issuer in which
the enrollee is eligible to enroll.
(iv) If the issuer does not offer any
plan through the Exchange in which the
enrollee is eligible to enroll, the enrollee
will be re-enrolled in a plan offered
outside the Exchange by the QHP issuer
under the product that is the most
similar to the enrollee’s current product,
in which the enrollee is eligible to
enroll.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 156—HEALTH INSURANCE
ISSUER STANDARDS UNDER THE
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, INCLUDING
STANDARDS RELATED TO
EXCHANGES
4. The authority citation for part 156
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Title I of the Affordable Care
Act, sections 1301–1304, 1311–1313, 1321–
1322, 1324, 1334, 1342–1343, 1401–1402,
Pub. L. 111–148, 124 Stat. 119 (42 U.S.C.
18021–18024, 18031–18032, 18041–18042,
18044, 18054, 18061, 18063, 18071, 18082,
26 U.S.C. 36B, and 31 U.S.C. 9701).
■
37269
and the implications of not reporting
changes;
(c) For an enrollment group that
includes an enrollee on whose behalf
advance payments of the premium tax
credit are being provided, an
explanation of the reconciliation
process for advance payments of the
premium tax credit established in
accordance with 26 CFR 1.36B–4; and
(d) For an enrollment group that
includes an enrollee with cost-sharing
reductions, but for whom no QHP under
the product remains available for
renewal at the silver level, an
explanation that unless the enrollment
group selects a silver-level QHP through
the Exchange, no cost-sharing
reductions will be provided.
Dated: June 19, 2014.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
Approved: June 24, 2014.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–15362 Filed 6–26–14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–28–P
5. Add § 156.1255 to read as follows:
§ 156.1255
notices.
Renewal and re-enrollment
A health insurance issuer that is
renewing an enrollment group’s
coverage in an individual market QHP
offered through the Exchange (including
a renewal with modifications) in
accordance with § 147.106 of this
subchapter, or that is discontinuing a
product offered through the Exchange
and automatically enrolling an enrollee
in a QHP under a different product
offered by the same QHP issuer through
the Exchange in accordance with
§ 155.335 of this subchapter, must
include the following information in the
applicable notice described in
§ 147.106(c)(1) or (f)(1) of this
subchapter:
(a) Premium and premium tax credit
information sufficient to notify the
enrollment group of its expected
monthly premium payment under the
renewed coverage, in a form and
manner specified by the Exchange,
provided that if the Exchange does not
provide this information to enrollees
and does not require issuers to provide
this information to enrollees, consistent
with this section, such information must
be provided in a form and manner
specified by HHS;
(b) An explanation of the requirement
to report changes to the Exchange, as
specified in § 155.335(e) of this
subchapter, the timeframe and channels
through which changes can be reported,
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
RIN 0648–BD81
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico and South Atlantic;
Amendment 8 to the Fishery
Management Plan for Coral, Coral
Reefs, and Live/Hardbottom Habitats
of the South Atlantic Region;
Correction
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability;
correction.
AGENCY:
NMFS published a notice of
availability (NOA) for Amendment 8 to
the Fishery Management Plan for Coral,
Coral Reefs, and Live/Hardbottom
Habitats of the South Atlantic Region
(FMP) (Amendment 8) on May 20, 2014.
Amendment 8, in part, would expand
portions of the northern and western
boundaries of the Oculina Bank habitat
area of particular concern (HAPC)
(Oculina Bank HAPC). The NOA stated
‘‘Amendment 8 would increase the size
of the Oculina Bank HAPC by 405.42
square miles (1,050 square km), for a
total area of 694.42 square miles
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 1, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37262-37269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15362]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Parts 155 and 156
[CMS-9941-P]
RIN 0938-AS32
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Annual Eligibility
Redeterminations for Exchange Participation and Insurance Affordability
Programs; Health Insurance Issuer Standards Under the Affordable Care
Act, Including Standards Related to Exchanges
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would specify additional options for annual
eligibility redeterminations and renewal and re-enrollment notice
requirements for qualified health plans offered through the Exchange,
beginning with annual redeterminations for coverage for plan year 2015.
In particular, this proposed rule would provide additional flexibility
for Marketplaces, including the ability for Marketplaces to propose
unique approaches that meet the specific needs of their State, while
streamlining the consumer experience.
DATES: To be assured consideration, comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on July 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-9941-P. Because
of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a
comment'' instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-9941-P, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-9941-P, Mail
Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments only to the following addresses prior to
the close of the comment period:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address, call
telephone number (410) 786-7195 in advance to schedule your arrival
with one of our staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the addresses indicated as
appropriate for hand or courier delivery may be delayed and received
after the comment period.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin Walker, (301) 492-4430.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
Electronic Access
This Federal Register document is also available from the Federal
Register online database through Federal Digital System (FDsys), a
service of the U.S. Government Printing Office. This database can be
accessed via the internet at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Legislative Overview
B. Stakeholder Consultation and Input
C. Structure of the Proposed Rule
II. Provisions of the Proposed Rule
A. Part 155--Exchange Establishment Standards and Other Related
Standards Under the Affordable Care Act; Subpart D--Exchange
Functions in the Individual Market: Eligibility Determinations for
Exchange Participation and Insurance Affordability Programs
B. Part 156--Health Insurance Issuer Standards Under the
Affordable Care Act, Including Standards Related to Exchanges;
Subpart M--Qualified Health Plan Issuer Responsibilities
III. Response to Comments
IV. Collection of Information Requirements
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
I. Background
A. Legislative Overview
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148)
was enacted on March 23, 2010. The Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-152), which amended and revised
several provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
was enacted on March 30, 2010. In this proposed rule, we refer to the
two statutes collectively as the ``Affordable Care Act.'' Subtitles A
and C of Title I of the Affordable Care Act reorganized, amended, and
added to the provisions of part A of Title XXVII of the Public Health
Service Act (PHS Act) relating to group health plans and health
insurance issuers in the group and individual markets.
Starting on October 1, 2013 for coverage starting as soon as
January 1, 2014, qualified individuals and qualified employers have
been able to purchase qualified health plans (QHPs)--private health
insurance that has been certified as meeting certain standards--through
competitive
[[Page 37263]]
marketplaces called Exchanges or Health Insurance Marketplaces. The
word ``Exchanges'' refers to both State Exchanges, also called State-
based Exchanges, and Federally-facilitated Exchanges (FFEs). In this
proposed rule, we use the terms ``State Exchange'' or ``FFE'' when we
are referring to a particular type of Exchange. When we refer to
``FFEs,'' we are also referring to State Partnership Exchanges, which
are a form of FFE.
Section 1411(f)(1)(B) of the Affordable Care Act directs the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to establish
procedures to redetermine the eligibility of individuals on a periodic
basis in appropriate circumstances. Section 1321(a) of the Affordable
Care Act provides authority for the Secretary to establish standards
and regulations to implement the statutory requirements related to
Exchanges, QHPs and other components of title I of the Affordable Care
Act. Under section 2703 of the PHS Act, as added by the Affordable Care
Act, health insurance issuers in the group and individual markets must
guarantee the renewability of coverage unless an exception applies.
B. Stakeholder Consultation and Input
HHS has consulted with stakeholders on a number of polices related
to the operation of Exchanges, including eligibility redetermination.
HHS has held a number of listening sessions with consumers, providers,
employers, health plans, and State representatives to gather public
input. HHS consulted with stakeholders through regular meetings with
the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), regular
contact with States through the Exchange grant process, and meetings
with tribal leaders and representatives, health insurance issuers,
trade groups, consumer advocates, employers, and other interested
parties. We considered all of the public input as we developed the
policies in this proposed rule.
C. Structure of the Proposed Rule
The regulations outlined in this proposed rule would be codified in
45 CFR parts 155 and 156. Part 155 specifies standards relative to the
establishment, operation, and minimum functionality of Exchanges,
including annual eligibility redeterminations. Part 156 specifies
standards for health insurance issuers with respect to participation in
an Exchange.
II. Provisions of the Proposed Regulations
A. Part 155--Exchange Establishment Standards and Other Related
Standards Under the Affordable Care Act; Subpart D--Exchange Functions
in the Individual Market: Eligibility Determinations for Exchange
Participation and Insurance Affordability Programs
Section 1411(f)(1)(B) of the Affordable Care Act directs the
Secretary to establish procedures to redetermine the eligibility of
individuals on a periodic basis in appropriate circumstances. Section
1321(a) of the Affordable Care Act provides authority for the Secretary
to establish standards and regulations to implement the statutory
requirements related to Exchanges, QHPs and other components of title I
of the Affordable Care Act.
On March 27, 2012, we published a final rule entitled Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of Exchanges and
Qualified Health Plans; Exchange Standards for Employers (77 FR 18310).
The final rule added 45 CFR 155.335, which, together with the
provisions in 45 CFR 155.330 on eligibility redeterminations during a
benefit year, implements section 1411(f)(1)(B) of the Affordable Care
Act. On July 15, 2013, we amended Sec. 155.335 in a final rule
entitled Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs: Essential
Health Benefits in Alternative Benefit Plans, Eligibility Notices, Fair
Hearing and Appeal Processes, and Premiums and Cost Sharing; Exchanges:
Eligibility and Enrollment (78 FR 42160, 42319).
Under the process currently defined in Sec. 155.335, the Exchange
will provide a notice to all individuals who have been determined
eligible for enrollment in a QHP through the Exchange (qualified
individuals) in advance of the annual open enrollment period,
consistent with Sec. 155.335(c). For 2015, current regulations in
Sec. 155.335(d)(1) specify that this notice and the annual open
enrollment period notice described in Sec. 155.410(d) be provided as a
single, coordinated notice. For an individual who requested an
eligibility determination for insurance affordability programs and who
authorized the Exchange to obtain the most recent tax return
information available from the Secretary of the Treasury for the
purposes of annual redetermination, this notice will include a
projected eligibility determination for insurance affordability
programs for the following year that is computed based on the updated
income and family size information, all other eligibility information
currently on file with the Exchange, and plan premiums for the
following year. Specifically, if advance payments of the premium tax
credit (APTC) are being paid on such an enrollee's behalf and the tax
filer authorized the Exchange to obtain updated tax data for the
purposes of annual redetermination, the Exchange will recalculate
advance payments of the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reductions
(CSR) for the upcoming year in accordance with updated income and
family size information and premium data for the applicable benchmark
plan, as defined in 26 CFR 1.36B-3(f), calculated using premiums for
the upcoming year. Consistent with Sec. 155.335(e), the Exchange will
require qualified individuals to report changes. The process currently
established in regulation allows an individual who is enrolled in a QHP
through the Exchange and whose QHP remains available to renew coverage
for the following year without reapplying or having to take other
actions. This is a key element of the redetermination process, since it
enables a streamlined renewal process for enrollees and also reduces
administrative costs for States and the Federal government.
Based on the authority in sections 1411(f)(1)(B) and 1321(a) of the
Affordable Care Act, we propose to modify Sec. 155.335(a) to allow for
an Exchange to choose one of three methods for conducting annual
redeterminations. To accommodate proposed new paragraph (a)(2), we
propose to renumber existing paragraph (a) as paragraph (a)(1). Then,
in proposed paragraph (a)(2), we propose that the Exchange must conduct
annual redeterminations using one of the sets of procedures described
in proposed paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), or (a)(2)(iii). First, in
proposed paragraph (a)(2)(i), we propose that the Exchange may utilize
the existing procedures described in Sec. 155.335(b) through (m).
Second, in paragraph (a)(2)(ii), we propose that the Exchange may
utilize alternative procedures specified by the Secretary for the
applicable plan year. We note that, contemporaneously with this
proposed rule, the Secretary is providing guidance describing
alternative procedures that would be available to Exchanges under
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) for annual redeterminations for coverage for plan
year 2015 if this proposal is finalized. We are providing this guidance
at the same time as this proposed rule given the limited amount of time
available for Exchanges and issuers to develop and test the systems and
processes that will be needed to
[[Page 37264]]
implement the annual redetermination process. If this proposal is
finalized, Federally-facilitated Exchanges will adopt the alternative
procedures specified in this guidance for plan year 2015. Also, if this
proposal is finalized, we expect that updated guidance under paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) may be provided on an annual basis. Third, in proposed
paragraph (a)(2)(iii), we propose that the Exchange may utilize
alternative procedures approved by the Secretary based on a showing by
the Exchange that the alternative procedures would facilitate continued
enrollment in coverage for which the enrollee remains eligible, provide
clear information about the process to the qualified individual or
enrollee (including any action by the qualified individual or enrollee
necessary to obtain the most accurate redetermination of eligibility),
and provide adequate program integrity protections. We note that
paragraph (a)(2)(iii) is designed to enable Exchanges to propose annual
redetermination procedures that would deliver on the key goals of the
annual redetermination process, including those specified in this
paragraph. We solicit comment regarding standards for approving
alternative procedures, and on other elements of the annual
redetermination process, as well as how it affects renewal for
individuals who are enrolled in a QHP through the Exchange. We also
note that special procedures may be needed for an Exchange that is
transitioning the eligibility and enrollment functions from Federal to
State operation, or vice versa. We will work closely with affected
States to facilitate these transitions.
In addition to the proposal to allow Exchanges to choose one of
three options for performing annual redeterminations, we propose to
make three amendments to the detailed procedures described in Sec.
155.335 and one corresponding amendment to Sec. 155.330, which governs
eligibility redetermination during a benefit year. First, in Sec.
155.335(e), we propose to revise the language regarding change
reporting to generally align with the standards in Sec. 155.330(b), so
that Sec. 155.335(e) would specify that, except as specified in
proposed paragraph (e), the Exchange must require a qualified
individual to report any change with respect to the eligibility
standards specified in Sec. 155.305 within 30 days of any such change.
Under proposed paragraph (e)(1), the Exchange would not be permitted to
require a qualified individual who did not request an eligibility
determination for insurance affordability programs to report changes
that affect eligibility for insurance affordability programs. Unlike
Sec. 155.330, we do not propose to allow the Exchange to establish a
reasonable threshold for changes in income, such that a qualified
individual who experiences a change in income that is below the
threshold would not be required to report such change, since we believe
that reporting of all income changes is important at the time of annual
redetermination. With this exception, the proposed standards are
identical to those currently established in 45 CFR Sec. 155.330(b). We
propose these changes to paragraph (e) because the existing text refers
to reporting changes with respect to the information included in the
annual redetermination notice, which is not required to include a
summary of the qualified individual's application information on file,
although an Exchange may opt to include this information. These
proposed changes would align reporting requirements with the notice and
ensure that Exchanges require relevant changes to be reported in a
timely manner, consistently throughout the year.
Second, in proposed Sec. 155.335(e)(2), we propose to amend the
existing provision which specifies that the Exchange must allow a
qualified individual, or an application filer, on behalf of the
qualified individual, to report changes via the channels available for
submission of an application, as described in Sec. 155.405(c)(2). We
propose that this requirement would continue to apply, except that the
Exchange would no longer be required to allow a qualified individual,
or an application filer, on behalf of the qualified individual, to
report changes via mail. We also propose the same change to Sec.
155.330(b)(4), which addresses the reporting of changes in the context
of eligibility redetermination during a benefit year. Accepting changes
via mail would frequently require follow-up telephone contact with
individuals attempting to report changes in order to obtain answers to
questions that may be triggered by the reported changes. We propose
this because of the dynamic nature of the eligibility process, under
which, for example, the Exchange should only ask questions about an
individual's access to qualifying coverage in an eligible employer-
sponsored plan for an individual who has a level of income for his or
her family size that would qualify him or her for advance payments of
the premium tax credit or cost-sharing reductions, if he or she is
otherwise eligible. With a paper process, under this example, it
frequently would not be possible to know in advance whether information
about an individual's access to qualifying coverage in an eligible
employer-sponsored plan would need to be collected based on a reported
change in income or family size. Since change reporting via mail would
frequently trigger subsequent telephone contact, we believe it would
promote administrative efficiency to eliminate the requirement to
accept change reporting via mail while encouraging use of the telephone
option, during which a call center representative can use the dynamic
application to ask the qualified individual any follow-up questions
that may arise from the change report. We note that our proposed policy
would continue to require that an Exchange must permit change reporting
online, via telephone, and in person with the assistance of Navigators,
certified application counselors, and other in-person assistance
personnel, and that an Exchange could choose to permit change reporting
via mail. If this proposal is finalized, we anticipate that the
Federally-facilitated Exchange would not accept changes reported via
mail for the foreseeable future. We also note that this rule does not
propose to modify 42 CFR 435.916(a)(3)(B) or (c), which specify that a
Medicaid agency must allow an individual to respond to an annual
redetermination or report changes via mail.
Third, we propose to modify the standards for re-enrollment in
coverage in paragraph (j). First, in paragraph (j)(1), we propose that
if an enrollee remains eligible for enrollment in a QHP through the
Exchange upon annual redetermination, and the product under which the
QHP in which he or she was enrolled remains available for renewal,
consistent with 45 CFR 147.106, such enrollee will have his or her
enrollment in a QHP under the product renewed unless he or she
terminates coverage, including termination of coverage in connection
with voluntarily selecting a different QHP, in accordance with Sec.
155.430. In this situation, we propose that the QHP in which the
enrollee will be renewed will be selected according to the following
order of priority: First, in the same plan as the enrollee's current
QHP, unless the current QHP is not available; second, if the enrollee's
current QHP is not available, the enrollee's coverage will be renewed
in a plan at the same metal level as the enrollee's current QHP; third,
if the enrollee's current QHP is not available and the enrollee's
product no longer
[[Page 37265]]
includes a plan at the same metal level as the enrollee's current QHP,
the enrollee's coverage will be renewed in a plan that is one metal
level higher or lower than the enrollee's current QHP; and fourth, if
the enrollee's current QHP is not available and the enrollee's product
no longer includes a plan that is at the same metal level as, or one
metal level higher or lower than the enrollee's current QHP, the
enrollee's coverage will be renewed in any other plan offered under the
product in which the enrollee's current QHP is offered in which the
enrollee is eligible to enroll.
In paragraph (j)(2), we propose standards to address re-enrollment
in situations in which the product under which an enrollee's QHP is
offered is not available through the Exchange for renewal, consistent
with 45 CFR 147.106. In this situation, the QHP issuer may still re-
enroll the enrollee in a different product offered by the same QHP
issuer, to the extent permitted by applicable State law, unless the
enrollee terminates coverage. To the extent that an issuer is re-
enrolling such an enrollee, we propose that the plan in which the
enrollee will be renewed will be selected according to the following
order of priority: First, in a plan through the Exchange at the same
metal level as the enrollee's current QHP in the product offered by the
issuer that is the most similar to the enrollee's current product;
second, if the issuer does not offer another plan through the Exchange
at the same metal level as the enrollee's current QHP, the enrollee
will be re-enrolled in a plan through the Exchange that is one metal
level higher or lower than the enrollee's current QHP in the product
offered by the issuer through the Exchange that is the most similar to
the enrollee's current product; third, if the issuer does not offer
another plan through the Exchange at the same metal level as, or one
metal level higher or lower than the enrollee's current QHP, the
enrollee will be re-enrolled in any other plan offered through the
Exchange by the QHP issuer in which the enrollee is eligible to enroll;
and fourth, if the issuer does not offer any plan through the Exchange
in which the enrollee is eligible to enroll, the enrollee may be re-
enrolled in a plan offered outside the Exchange by the QHP issuer under
the product that is the most similar to the enrollee's current product,
in which the enrollee is eligible to enroll. We note that the Exchange
would not send an enrollment transaction for an enrollment outside the
Exchange, and that premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions are
not available for enrollment that is not through the Exchange.
The proposed changes to this provision include minor changes to
improve clarity, amendments to reflect that renewal of coverage in a
QHP through the Exchange intersects with Sec. 147.106, which provides
market-wide standards for guaranteed renewability of coverage offered
both through and outside the Exchange, and a specific order of priority
to ensure that renewal of and re-enrollment in coverage in a plan
through the Exchange occurs through the Exchange, and is in products
that are as similar to the enrollee's existing product as possible, in
order to minimize disruption, enable consumers to continue with advance
payments of the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reductions (which
are only available for enrollment through the Exchange) and limit
consumer confusion. Further, the current text of paragraph (j), if read
separately from Sec. 147.106, could give the incorrect impression that
a QHP enrollee would have his or her coverage in a QHP renewed even if
the product under which the QHP was offered was no longer available for
renewal, consistent with Sec. 147.106. Accordingly, the proposed
language is designed to clarify the dependency of renewal of coverage
in a QHP through the Exchange on the continuing availability of the
product under which the QHP is offered in accordance with market-wide
standards. We solicit comments on these proposed standards and on the
proposed order in which plans would be selected for renewal of and re-
enrollment in coverage. In particular, we solicit comment regarding
whether paragraphs (j)(1)(iii) and (j)(2)(ii) should only prioritize a
plan with a lower metal level, and whether in general, priority should
be placed on plans that have a premium that is closest to the plan in
which an enrollee is currently enrolled.
B. Part 156--Health Insurance Issuer Standards Under the Affordable
Care Act, Including Standards Related to Exchanges; Subpart M--
Qualified Health Plan Issuer Responsibilities
In 45 CFR 147.106(f)(1) of the final rule entitled, ``Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act; Exchange and Insurance Market
Standards for 2015 and Beyond,'' published on May 27, 2014 (79 FR
30240) (Market Standards Rule), we specified that health insurance
issuers of non-grandfathered plans in the individual market will
provide written notice of renewals before the first day of the next
annual open enrollment period in a form and manner specified by the
Secretary. Under 45 CFR 147.106(c)(1), health insurance issuers of non-
grandfathered plans in the individual market also will provide written
notices of product discontinuances.
We propose adding to subpart M a new Sec. 156.1255, which would
require a health insurance issuer in the individual market that is
renewing an enrollment group's coverage in a qualified health plan
offered through the Exchange (including a renewal with modifications),
or that is discontinuing a product that includes plans offered through
the Exchange and automatically enrolling an enrollee in a QHP under a
different product offered by the same QHP issuer through the Exchange,
to include certain information in the renewal or discontinuation
notices, as applicable. We propose that the additional information
include the following: (1) Premium and premium tax credit information
sufficient to notify the enrollment group of its expected monthly
premium payment under the renewed coverage, in a form and manner
specified by the Exchange, provided that if the Exchange does not
provide this information to enrollees and does not require issuers to
provide this information to enrollees, consistent with this section,
such information must be provided in a form and manner specified by
HHS; (2) an explanation of the requirement to report changes to the
Exchange, the timeframe and channels through which changes can be
reported, and the implications of not reporting changes; (3) for an
enrollment group that includes an enrollee on whose behalf advance
payments of the premium tax credit are being provided, a description of
the reconciliation process for advance payments of the premium tax
credit; and (4) for an enrollment group that includes an enrollee whose
coverage includes cost-sharing reductions, if the enrollment group's
coverage is being renewed in a QHP at a different (non-silver) metal
level, an explanation that, unless the enrollment group changes its
enrollment to select a new silver-level plan, cost-sharing reductions
will not be provided for the upcoming year. In accordance with Sec.
147.106(f)(1), renewal notices would need to be provided no later than
the first day of the open enrollment period for the upcoming plan year.
An issuer also may provide this notice along with the applicable
summary of benefits and coverage notice that is provided at renewal in
accordance with 45 CFR 147.200. We seek comment on this proposal.
Contemporaneously with the issuance of this proposed rule, we are
specifying the form and manner of the notices
[[Page 37266]]
described in 45 CFR 146.152, 147.106, and 148.122 by providing standard
notices for issuers to use when discontinuing or renewing coverage.
These notices take into account the feedback we received on the draft
notices issued contemporaneously with the proposed Market Standards
Rule.\1\ We believe that adding the information that would be specified
pursuant to Sec. 156.1255 to the renewal notices required under Sec.
147.106 would best assure that qualified individuals receive, in a
single notice, the relevant information that they need to make informed
decisions about whether to keep their current plan or examine other QHP
options. Further, this approach potentially would reduce burden on
health insurance issuers. As noted above, the Market Standards Rule
requires that notices be provided in a form and manner specified by the
Secretary. The guidance accompanying the standard notices that we are
releasing for public comment contemporaneously with this proposed rule
specifies that the form and manner may consist of standard notices
developed by States that are enforcing the requirements of the
Affordable Care Act, provided the State-developed notices are at least
as protective as the standard Federal notices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CMS Insurance Standards Bulletin, Draft Notices When
Discontinuing or Renewing a Product in the Group or Individual
Market (March 14, 2014), https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/Regulations-and-Guidance/Downloads/draft-discontinuance-renewal-notices-03-14-14.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We recognize that the current notice requirements do not cover
every situation in which an issuer may non-renew or discontinue
coverage, consistent with the guaranteed renewability statute and
regulations. For example, an issuer whose product no longer covers the
service area of enrollees may non-renew those enrollees' coverage under
that product. But, as long as the issuer's product continues to cover a
majority of the same service area, the service area reduction would not
trigger a product discontinuation and corresponding notice to affected
enrollees under the current regulations. We also propose establishing a
notice requirement that would apply to all plans subject to the
guaranteed renewability requirements that non-renew coverage based on
continued coverage not being available in the enrollee's service area
as a result of changes that do not result in product discontinuances.
These notices would be provided in a form and manner specified by HHS.
We solicit comments on this proposal, including the appropriate
timeframe for providing the notice.
III. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
IV. Collection of Information Requirements
Emergency Clearance: Public Information Collection Requirements
Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS),
Department of Health and Human Services, is publishing a summary of
this proposed information collection for public comment. Interested
persons are invited to send comments regarding this collection's
proposed burden estimates or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity
and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper
performance of the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (4) the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection burden.
In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, we have also submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) the proposed information collection for their emergency
review. While the collection is necessary to ensure compliance with an
initiative of the Administration, we are requesting emergency review
under 5 CFR 1320(a)(2)(i) because public harm is reasonably likely to
result if the regular clearance procedures are followed. The approval
of this data collection process is essential to ensuring that renewal
notices associated with the 2015 plan year are provided to consumers in
a timely manner prior to the 2015 open enrollment period. Consumers
will need the information in these notices in order to make decisions
regarding their coverage for the 2015 plan year.
ICRs Regarding Renewal and Re-Enrollment Notice Requirements (Sec.
156.1255)
Proposed Sec. 156.1255 would require that a health insurance
issuer in the individual market that is renewing an enrollment group's
coverage in a qualified health plan offered through the Exchange
(including a renewal with modifications), or that is discontinuing a
product offered through the Exchange and automatically enrolling an
enrollee in a QHP under a different product offered by the same QHP
issuer through the Exchange include certain information in the written
notice specified in Sec. 147.106(c)(1) or (f)(1).
Since there are existing requirements for issuers to send renewal
and discontinuance notices, we only estimate the burden for QHP issuers
to revise current notices to comply with the proposed provisions of
this proposed rule. We estimate that there are 575 QHP issuers and
assume that they would all revise their existing notices to comply with
the requirements in this proposed rule.
For renewal notices, we estimate that, for each issuer, it would
require three hours of clerical labor (at a cost of $33.67 per hour) to
prepare the notice and one hour for a senior manager (at a cost of
$75.34 per hour) to review it. We also estimate that it would take a
computer programmer 20 hours (at a cost of $52.53 per hour) to write
and test a program to automate the notices. The total burden for each
issuer to prepare the notice would be 24 hours with an equivalent cost
of approximately $1,277. For all 575 QHP issuers, the total burden
would be 13,800 hours with an equivalent cost of approximately
$705,479.
For re-enrollment (or discontinuance) notices, which could also be
used in cases of other terminations or non-renewals, we estimate that,
for each issuer, it would require three hours of clerical labor (at a
cost of $33.67 per hour) to prepare the notice and one hour for a
senior manager (at a cost of $75.34 per hour) to review the notice. We
also estimate that it would take a computer programmer 9 hours (at a
cost of $52.53 per hour) to write and test a program to automate the
notices. The total annual burden for each issuer to prepare the notice
would be 13 hours with an equivalent cost of approximately $649. For
all 575 QHP issuers, the total annual burden would be 7,475 hours with
an equivalent cost of approximately $373,237.
States that are enforcing the Affordable Care Act may develop their
own standard notices. However, we
[[Page 37267]]
anticipate that fewer than 10 States would opt for this alternative.
Under 5 CFR 1320.3(c)(4), this requirement is not subject to the PRA as
it would affect fewer than 10 entities in a 12-month period.
We are requesting emergency OMB review with a 180-day approval
period. Written comments and recommendations for this emergency request
only will be considered from the public if received by the date and
address noted below.
The proposed information collection requirement at Sec. 156.1255
is but one component of a broader information collection request. We
are also soliciting comments for the aforementioned information
collection request in a notice published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register. The notice provides the public with 30 days to submit
comments. Copies of the supporting statement for this information
collection request and any related forms can be found at: https://www.cms.hhs.gov/PaperworkReductionActof1995 or can be obtained by
emailing your request, including your address, phone number, OMB
number, and CMS document identifier, to: Paperwork@cms.hhs.gov, or by
calling the Reports Clearance Office at: 410-786-1326.
When commenting on this proposed information collection, please
reference the CMS document identifier and the OMB control number. To be
assured consideration, comments and recommendations must be received in
one of the following ways by July 28, 2014:
1. Electronically. You may submit your comments electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for ``Comment or
Submission'' or ``More Search Options'' to find the information
collection document(s) accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address:
CMS, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs, Division of
Regulations Development, Attention: Document Identifier (CMS-10527),
Room C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850;
and,
OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: CMS Desk
Officer, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503, Fax Number: 202-395-6974.
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
A. Summary
We are publishing this proposed rule to implement the protections
intended by the Congress in the most economically efficient manner
possible. We have examined the effects of this rule as required by
Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review),
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96-
354), the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4),
Executive Order 13132 on Federalism, and the Congressional Review Act
(5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735) directs agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive
Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011) is supplemental to and
reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing
regulatory review as established in Executive Order 12866.
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a ``significant
regulatory action'' as an action that is likely to result in a proposed
rule--(1) having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more in any one year, or adversely and materially affecting a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local or tribal governments or communities
(also referred to as ``economically significant''); (2) creating a
serious inconsistency or otherwise interfering with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raising novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for rules with
economically significant effects (for example, $100 million or more in
any 1 year), and a ``significant'' regulatory action is subject to
review by the OMB. We have concluded that this proposed rule is not
likely to have economic impacts of $100 million or more in any one
year, and therefore does not meet the definition of ``economically
significant rule'' under Executive Order 12866.
1. Need for Regulatory Action
This proposed rule specifies additional options for annual
eligibility redeterminations and renewal and re-enrollment notice
requirements for QHPs in the Exchange beginning with annual
redeterminations for coverage for plan year 2015.
2. Summary of Impacts
It is expected that Exchanges will adopt an alternative method for
annual eligibility redeterminations only if the related costs are no
more than those associated with the process currently defined in Sec.
155.335. Therefore, we do not expect that there would be additional
costs related to these provisions.
QHP issuers would incur costs to prepare and send renewal notices
to comply with the proposed provisions, as detailed in section IV.
States that choose to develop their own renewal notices would incur
costs to do so. Providing consumers with information such as benefit
changes and premium amounts will enable them to make decisions
regarding their coverage for the next plan year.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires agencies that issue a
regulation to analyze options for regulatory relief of small businesses
if a rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The RFA generally defines a ``small entity'' as: (1) A
proprietary firm meeting the size standards of the Small Business
Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit organization that is not dominant
in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction with a population
of less than 50,000 (States and individuals are not included in the
definition of ``small entity''). HHS uses as its measure of significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities a change in
revenues of more than 3 to 5 percent. We do not believe that this
threshold will be reached by the provisions of this proposed rule.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that includes a federal mandate that could result in
expenditure in any one year by State, local or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the
[[Page 37268]]
private sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for
inflation. In 2014, that threshold level is approximately $141 million.
UMRA does not address the total cost of a rule. Rather, it focuses
on certain categories of cost, mainly those ``Federal mandate'' costs
resulting from: (1) Imposing enforceable duties on State, local, or
tribal governments, or on the private sector; or (2) increasing the
stringency of conditions in, or decreasing the funding of, State,
local, or tribal governments under entitlement programs.
This proposed rule would allow States to choose one of three
methods for conducting annual redeterminations. We assume that States
would choose an alternative method only if it is less costly than the
current method. It would also require QHP issuers to include specific
information in renewal and re-enrollment notices sent to enrollees and
issuers would incur costs to comply with this requirement. States that
choose to develop their own notices would incur costs to do so.
Consistent with policy embodied in UMRA, this proposed rule has been
designed to be the least burdensome alternative for State, local and
tribal governments, and the private sector while achieving the
objectives of the Affordable Care Act.
E. Federalism
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that imposes substantial
direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State
law, or otherwise has Federalism implications.
States are the primary regulators of health insurance coverage, and
State laws will continue to apply to health insurance coverage and the
business of insurance. However, if any State law or requirement
prevents the application of a Federal standard, then that particular
State law or requirement would be preempted. State requirements that
are more stringent than the Federal requirements would not be preempted
by this proposed rule. Accordingly, States have significant latitude to
impose requirements with respect to health insurance coverage that are
more restrictive than the Federal law.
F. Congressional Review Act
This proposed rule is subject to the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801, et seq.), which specifies that before a rule can
take effect, the federal agency promulgating the rule shall submit to
each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General a report
containing a copy of the rule along with other specified information,
and has been transmitted to Congress and the Comptroller General for
review.
List of Subjects
45 CFR Part 155
Administrative practice and procedure, Health care access, Health
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, State and local
governments, Cost-sharing reductions, Advance payments of premium tax
credit, Administration and calculation of advance payments of the
premium tax credit
45 CFR Part 156
Administrative practice and procedure, Health care, Health
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Health
and Human Services proposes to amend 45 CFR parts 155 and 156 as set
forth below:
PART 155--EXCHANGE ESTABLISHMENT STANDARDS AND OTHER RELATED
STANDARDS UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 155 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Title I of the Affordable Care Act, sections 1301,
1302, 1303, 1304, 1311, 1312, 1313, 1321, 1322, 1331, 1332, 1334,
1402, 1411, 1412, 1413, Pub. L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (42 U.S.C.
18021-18024, 18031-18033, 18041-18042, 18051, 18054, 18071, and
18081-18083).
0
2. Amend Sec. 155.330 to revise paragraph (b)(4) as follows:
Sec. 155.330 Eligibility redetermination during a benefit year.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) The Exchange must allow an enrollee, or an application filer on
behalf of the enrollee, to report changes via the channels available
for the submission of an application, as described in Sec.
155.405(c)(2), except that the Exchange is permitted but not required
to allow an enrollee, or an application filer, on behalf of the
enrollee, to report changes via mail.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 155.335 to revise paragraphs (a), (e), and (j) as
follows:
Sec. 155.335 Annual eligibility redetermination.
(a) General requirement. (1) Except as specified in paragraphs (l)
and (m) of this section, the Exchange must redetermine the eligibility
of a qualified individual on an annual basis.
(2) The Exchange must conduct annual redeterminations required
under paragraph (a)(1) of this section using one of the following:
(i) The procedures described in paragraphs (b) through (m) of this
section;
(ii) Alternative procedures specified by the Secretary for the
applicable plan year; or
(iii) Alternative procedures approved by the Secretary based on a
showing by the Exchange that the alternative procedures would
facilitate continued enrollment in coverage for which the enrollee
remains eligible, provide clear information about the process to the
qualified individual or enrollee (including regarding any action by the
qualified individual or enrollee necessary to obtain the most accurate
redetermination of eligibility), and provide adequate program integrity
protections.
* * * * *
(e) Changes reported by qualified individuals. Except as specified
in paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the Exchange must require a
qualified individual to report any change with respect to the
eligibility standards specified in Sec. 155.305 within 30 days of such
change.
(1) The Exchange must not require a qualified individual who did
not request an eligibility determination for insurance affordability
programs to report changes that affect eligibility for insurance
affordability programs.
(2) The Exchange must allow a qualified individual, or an
application filer, on behalf of the qualified individual, to report
changes via the channels available for the submission of an
application, as described in Sec. 155.405(c)(2), except that the
Exchange is permitted but not required to allow a qualified individual,
or an application filer, on behalf of the qualified individual, to
report changes via mail.
* * * * *
(j) Re-enrollment. If an enrollee remains eligible for enrollment
in a QHP through the Exchange upon annual redetermination--
(1) And the product under which the QHP in which he or she is
enrolled remains available through the Exchange for renewal, consistent
with Sec. 147.106 of this subchapter, such enrollee will have his or
her enrollment through the Exchange in a QHP under that product
renewed, unless he or she terminates coverage, including termination of
coverage in connection with voluntarily
[[Page 37269]]
selecting a different QHP, in accordance with Sec. 155.430. The
Exchange will ensure that re-enrollment in coverage under this
paragraph (j)(1) occurs under the same product in which the enrollee
was enrolled, as follows:
(i) The enrollee's coverage will be renewed in the same plan as the
enrollee's current QHP, unless the current QHP is not available.
(ii) If the enrollee's current QHP is not available, the enrollee's
coverage will be renewed in a plan at the same metal level as the
enrollee's current QHP;
(iii) If the enrollee's current QHP is not available and the
enrollee's product no longer includes a plan at the same metal level as
the enrollee's current QHP, the enrollee's coverage will be renewed in
a plan that is one metal level higher or lower than the enrollee's
current QHP; or
(iv) If the enrollee's current QHP is not available and the
enrollee's product no longer includes a plan that is at the same metal
level as, or one metal level higher or lower than the enrollee's
current QHP, the enrollee's coverage will be renewed in any other plan
offered under the product in which the enrollee's current QHP is
offered in which the enrollee is eligible to enroll.
(2) And the product under which the QHP in which he or she is
enrolled is not available through the Exchange for renewal, consistent
with Sec. 147.106 of this subchapter, such enrollee may be enrolled in
a plan under a different product offered by the same QHP issuer, to the
extent permitted by applicable State law, unless he or she terminates
coverage, including termination of coverage in connection with
voluntarily selecting a different QHP, in accordance with Sec.
155.430. The Exchange will ensure that re-enrollment in coverage under
this paragraph (j)(2) occurs as follows:
(i) The enrollee will be re-enrolled in a plan through the Exchange
at the same metal level as the enrollee's current QHP in the product
offered by the issuer that is the most similar to the enrollee's
current product;
(ii) If the issuer does not offer another plan through the Exchange
at the same metal level as the enrollee's current QHP, the enrollee
will be re-enrolled in a plan through the Exchange that is one metal
level higher or lower than the enrollee's current QHP in the product
offered by the issuer through the Exchange that is the most similar to
the enrollee's current product;
(iii) If the issuer does not offer another plan through the
Exchange at the same metal level as, or one metal level higher or lower
than the enrollee's current QHP, the enrollee will be re-enrolled in
any other plan offered through the Exchange by the QHP issuer in which
the enrollee is eligible to enroll.
(iv) If the issuer does not offer any plan through the Exchange in
which the enrollee is eligible to enroll, the enrollee will be re-
enrolled in a plan offered outside the Exchange by the QHP issuer under
the product that is the most similar to the enrollee's current product,
in which the enrollee is eligible to enroll.
* * * * *
PART 156--HEALTH INSURANCE ISSUER STANDARDS UNDER THE AFFORDABLE
CARE ACT, INCLUDING STANDARDS RELATED TO EXCHANGES
0
4. The authority citation for part 156 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Title I of the Affordable Care Act, sections 1301-
1304, 1311-1313, 1321-1322, 1324, 1334, 1342-1343, 1401-1402, Pub.
L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (42 U.S.C. 18021-18024, 18031-18032,
18041-18042, 18044, 18054, 18061, 18063, 18071, 18082, 26 U.S.C.
36B, and 31 U.S.C. 9701).
0
5. Add Sec. 156.1255 to read as follows:
Sec. 156.1255 Renewal and re-enrollment notices.
A health insurance issuer that is renewing an enrollment group's
coverage in an individual market QHP offered through the Exchange
(including a renewal with modifications) in accordance with Sec.
147.106 of this subchapter, or that is discontinuing a product offered
through the Exchange and automatically enrolling an enrollee in a QHP
under a different product offered by the same QHP issuer through the
Exchange in accordance with Sec. 155.335 of this subchapter, must
include the following information in the applicable notice described in
Sec. 147.106(c)(1) or (f)(1) of this subchapter:
(a) Premium and premium tax credit information sufficient to notify
the enrollment group of its expected monthly premium payment under the
renewed coverage, in a form and manner specified by the Exchange,
provided that if the Exchange does not provide this information to
enrollees and does not require issuers to provide this information to
enrollees, consistent with this section, such information must be
provided in a form and manner specified by HHS;
(b) An explanation of the requirement to report changes to the
Exchange, as specified in Sec. 155.335(e) of this subchapter, the
timeframe and channels through which changes can be reported, and the
implications of not reporting changes;
(c) For an enrollment group that includes an enrollee on whose
behalf advance payments of the premium tax credit are being provided,
an explanation of the reconciliation process for advance payments of
the premium tax credit established in accordance with 26 CFR 1.36B-4;
and
(d) For an enrollment group that includes an enrollee with cost-
sharing reductions, but for whom no QHP under the product remains
available for renewal at the silver level, an explanation that unless
the enrollment group selects a silver-level QHP through the Exchange,
no cost-sharing reductions will be provided.
Dated: June 19, 2014.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Approved: June 24, 2014.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-15362 Filed 6-26-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-28-P