Office of Inspector General; Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 36857-36858 [2014-15315]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Notices
regulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 18 requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
clearing agency be designed to achieve
several goals, including (i) promoting
the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions
and, to the extent applicable, derivative
agreements, contracts, and transactions,
(ii) assuring the safeguarding of
securities and funds that are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency
or for which it is responsible, and (iii)
protecting investors and the public
interest.
The Commission concludes that
extending the 2013 Pilot Program for
one additional year is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder. The
2013 Pilot Program furthers the Act’s
goals because it helps attenuate the
substantial risks confronting the triparty repo market, particularly those
risks associated with the provision of
intraday credit to market participants.19
The Commission believes that extending
the 2013 Pilot Program will ensure that
these risks remain subject to more
stringent controls and that this, in turn,
will help promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions. The Commission
further believes that, by requiring triparty repos to remain collateralized for
a longer period each day, the 2013 Pilot
Program helps to assure the safety of the
securities and funds within FICC’s
control, or for which it is responsible.20
III. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, particularly
those set forth in Section 17A,21 and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,22 that the
proposed rule change (SR–FICC–2014–
02) be, and hereby is, approved.23
18 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
TPR characterized the ‘‘practical
elimination’’ of this intraday credit as its ‘‘first and
most significant . . . recommendation.’’ Tri-Party
Repo Infrastructure Reform Task Force Final
Report, 4 (February 15, 2012), available at https://
www.newyorkfed.org/tripartyrepo/pdf/report_
120215.pdf.
20 See 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
21 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
23 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19 The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–15203 Filed 6–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2014–0102]
Office of Inspector General; Proposed
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request
Office of the Inspector General
(OIG), Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Transportation (DOT) invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval for a new information
collection. The collection involves the
nation’s large and medium hub airports
and their participation in hiring
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
(DBEs), and what has led to airports’
successes and failures in achieving their
goals in regards to the DBE program.
The information to be collected will be
used to inform the Office of Inspector
General and the Department of
Transportation on factors that led to the
successful hiring of DBE’s at airports
around the nation. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction
act of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Docket Number DOT–OST–
2014–0102 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 1 (202) 493–2251
• Mail: Docket Management System,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building,
Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590
• Hand Deliver: West building,
Ground Floor, Room 12–140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC,
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Berks, Office of Legal Counsel,
Office of Inspector General, Department
SUMMARY:
24 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36857
of Transportation, 202–366–7165, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC
20590.
Title: OIG
Data Collection for DBE Participation at
Large and Medium Hub Airports.
Form Numbers: N/A.
Type of Review: New Information
Collection.
Background: Under section 140(c) of
the FAA Modernization and Reform Act
of 2012, the Office of Inspector General,
Department of Transportation has been
directed to report on the nation’s large
and medium hub airports regarding
their ability to hire new DBEs, assess the
reasons why the most successful
airports have been able to provide such
opportunities, and to give
recommendations to the FAA and
Congress on methods for other airports
to achieve results similar to those of the
top airports. The information to be
collected will help OIG establish which
airports have been successful in the DBE
hiring process and factors that led to
their success.
OIG plans to collect information from
large and medium hub airports on DBE
programs and DBE participation. The
respondents consist of the
approximately 65 large and medium
hub airports that receive funding from
the FAA and are required to have a DBE
program. Large hub airports are defined
as commercial airports that have at least
1.0 percent of passenger boardings.
Medium hub airports are defined as
commercial airports that have at least
.25 percent but less than 1.0 percent of
passenger boardings. OIG plans to
collect the information primarily by
conducting interviews. OIG will send
out a questionnaire in advance to the
airports, to allow the airports to collect
responsive information and documents
and prepare for the interview.
Respondents: Large and medium hub
airports.
Number of Respondents:
Approximately 65.
Frequency: Annually.
Number of Responses: One per
annum.
Estimated Time per Response: Total
information collection: 8 hours per
respondent; subsequent interview
process: 4 hours per respondent.
Total Annual Burden: Approximately
780 hours. Approximately 65
respondents with 12 total burden hours
per respondent.
Public Comments are Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the OIG’s functions,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36858
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Notices
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the estimated burden of the proposed
information collection; (3) ways for the
OIG to enhance the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the collected information;
and (4) ways that the burden could be
minimized on respondents, including
the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology without reducing the quality
of the collected information. The agency
will summarize or include your
comments in the request for OMB’s
clearance of this information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1:48. Issued in Washington, DC,
on June 24th, 2014.
Dated: June 24, 2014.
´
Joseph Come,
Deputy Principal Assistant Inspector General
for Auditing and Evaluation, Office of
Inspector General.
[FR Doc. 2014–15315 Filed 6–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket Number DOT–OST–2014–0073]
Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Business Utilization (OSDBU) Mentor
´ ´
Protege Pilot Program
Notice and request for
comments.
ACTION:
The Department of
Transportation (DOT) invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to approve an information
collection regarding the DOT’s existing
´ ´
small business Mentor-Protege pilot
program. If approved by OMB, this
information collection would request
program participants to submit their
´ ´
mentor-protege relationship agreements
for review, and file a joint report on an
annual basis documenting the assistance
they have provided or received. In
addition, program participants would be
asked to complete an evaluation form at
the end of their participation in the
´ ´
program, and proteges would be asked
to update OSDBU annually for 2 years
after they exit the program.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by on or before August 11,
2014.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
[identified by Docket No. DOT–OST–
2014–0073] through one of the
following methods:
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 1 (202) 493–2251.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
´
´ ´
Leonardo San Roman, Mentor-Protege
pilot program, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366–1930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In April
2012,1 the DOT launched a Mentor´ ´
Protege pilot program to enhance the
capability of disadvantaged and small
business owners to compete for federal
procurement opportunities. The Mentor´ ´
Protege pilot program is designed to
assist small businesses in developing
the necessary tools and relationships to
compete and perform in DOT and other
federal procurement programs. Small
businesses include small disadvantaged
businesses, women owned businesses,
HUBZone small businesses, veteranowned-businesses and service disabled
veteran-owned small businesses. The
program is designed to improve the
performance of DOT contractors and
subcontractors by fostering the
establishment of long-term business
relationships between small businesses
and prime contractors.
Eligible businesses who are prime
contractors may agree to mentor eligible
´ ´
proteges. The mentors would provide
appropriate developmental assistance to
´ ´
enhance the capabilities of proteges to
perform as contractors and/or
subcontractors.
Since the inception of the program,
small business concerns participating in
the program have been able to develop
their core capabilities, enabling them to
compete and perform in federal
contracts. Therefore, DOT is continuing
´ ´
the Mentor Protege program, allowing
increased participation as indicated
below.
Information Collection
Under this new proposed information
collection, we request that participants
1 Although The National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013, Public Law 112–239,
§ 1641, prohibits Federal agencies from establishing
new programs, this provision does not apply to
programs in existence on the date of the Act.
Rather, agencies with existing programs in place as
of the date of the Act may continue to implement
and make modifications to their programs, as is the
case here.
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
´ ´
submit their mentor-protege agreements
for review. We request that only one
copy of the joint agreement be
submitted to OSDBU. In addition, once
the agreement is reviewed, we would
request that the participants submit
annual report to the OSDBU describing
their progress. The report may be
developed jointly by the mentor and
´ ´
protege, so only one annual report per
´ ´
mentor-protege relationship would be
submitted. If the relationship extends
beyond the first year, we would request
that the participants submit an annual
update. The annual report would
include information about the action
taken or suggested by the mentor to
´ ´
increase the participation of the protege
in federal procurement programs;
actions taken or suggested to develop
´ ´
the technical capabilities of the protege;
´ ´
and the degree to which the protege has
been able to implement those actions or
recommendations. Once the mentor´ ´
protege relationship has ended, we
would also request that each program
participant complete a program
evaluation and submit it to the OSDBU.
The purpose of the evaluation form is to
provide feedback to the OSDBU on the
program, with suggestions for
improvement. In addition, we would
´ ´
ask proteges, once they have exited the
program, to continue to provide annual
updates to OSDBU for up to two years,
describing their progress in
participating in federal procurement
programs.
The estimated burden for this
proposed collection is as follows:
´ ´
(1) Form: Mentor Protege agreement.
Type of Review: New Information
Collection.
Affected Public: Prime contractors
and small businesses interested in
´ ´
participating in DOT’s Mentor Protege
Program.
Estimated Annual Number of
Responses: Approximately 8.
Frequency: One-time.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 4 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 32 hours.
´ ´
(2) Form: Mentor Protege program
annual report.
Type of Review: New Information
Collection.
Affected Public: Prime contractors
and small businesses participating in
´ ´
DOT’s Mentor Protege Program.
Estimated Annual Number of
Responses: 8
Frequency: One-time.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 8 hours.
´ ´
(3) Form: Mentor Protege program
evaluation form.
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 125 (Monday, June 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36857-36858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15315]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. DOT-OST-2014-0102]
Office of Inspector General; Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment Request
AGENCY: Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation (DOT) invites public comments
about our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval for a new information collection. The collection
involves the nation's large and medium hub airports and their
participation in hiring Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs), and
what has led to airports' successes and failures in achieving their
goals in regards to the DBE program. The information to be collected
will be used to inform the Office of Inspector General and the
Department of Transportation on factors that led to the successful
hiring of DBE's at airports around the nation. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal Register by the Paperwork Reduction
act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Docket Number DOT-OST-2014-0102 using any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 1 (202) 493-2251
Mail: Docket Management System, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, Room
W12-140, Washington, DC 20590
Hand Deliver: West building, Ground Floor, Room
12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Berks, Office of Legal Counsel,
Office of Inspector General, Department of Transportation, 202-366-
7165, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: OIG Data Collection for DBE
Participation at Large and Medium Hub Airports.
Form Numbers: N/A.
Type of Review: New Information Collection.
Background: Under section 140(c) of the FAA Modernization and
Reform Act of 2012, the Office of Inspector General, Department of
Transportation has been directed to report on the nation's large and
medium hub airports regarding their ability to hire new DBEs, assess
the reasons why the most successful airports have been able to provide
such opportunities, and to give recommendations to the FAA and Congress
on methods for other airports to achieve results similar to those of
the top airports. The information to be collected will help OIG
establish which airports have been successful in the DBE hiring process
and factors that led to their success.
OIG plans to collect information from large and medium hub airports
on DBE programs and DBE participation. The respondents consist of the
approximately 65 large and medium hub airports that receive funding
from the FAA and are required to have a DBE program. Large hub airports
are defined as commercial airports that have at least 1.0 percent of
passenger boardings. Medium hub airports are defined as commercial
airports that have at least .25 percent but less than 1.0 percent of
passenger boardings. OIG plans to collect the information primarily by
conducting interviews. OIG will send out a questionnaire in advance to
the airports, to allow the airports to collect responsive information
and documents and prepare for the interview.
Respondents: Large and medium hub airports.
Number of Respondents: Approximately 65.
Frequency: Annually.
Number of Responses: One per annum.
Estimated Time per Response: Total information collection: 8 hours
per respondent; subsequent interview process: 4 hours per respondent.
Total Annual Burden: Approximately 780 hours. Approximately 65
respondents with 12 total burden hours per respondent.
Public Comments are Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect
of this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the OIG's functions,
[[Page 36858]]
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of the estimated burden of the proposed information
collection; (3) ways for the OIG to enhance the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that the burden
could be minimized on respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology without
reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will
summarize or include your comments in the request for OMB's clearance
of this information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48. Issued in Washington, DC,
on June 24th, 2014.
Dated: June 24, 2014.
Joseph Com[eacute],
Deputy Principal Assistant Inspector General for Auditing and
Evaluation, Office of Inspector General.
[FR Doc. 2014-15315 Filed 6-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P