Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Proposed Approval of Revisions to PSD Program, 36689-36692 [2014-15284]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Fountaingrove District.’’ For purposes
of part 4 of this chapter, ‘‘Fountaingrove
District’’ is a term of viticultural
significance.
(b) Approved maps. The four United
States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to
determine the boundary of the
Fountaingrove District viticultural area
are titled:
(1) Mark West Springs, CA; 1993;
(2) Calistoga, CA; 1997;
(3) Kenwood, CA; 1954; photorevised
1980; and
(4) Santa Rosa, CA; 1994.
(c) Boundary. The Fountaingrove
District viticultural area is located in
Sonoma County, California. The
boundary of the Fountaingrove District
viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the
Mark West Springs map at the
intersection of the shared Sonoma–Napa
County line with Petrified Forest Road,
section 3, T8N/R7W.
(2) From the beginning point, proceed
southeasterly along the Sonoma–Napa
County line, crossing onto the Calistoga
map and then the Kenwood map, to the
marked 2,530-peak of an unnamed
mountain, section 9, T7N/R6W; then
(3) Proceed west-southwest in a
straight line to the marked 2,730-foot
summit of Mt. Hood, section 8, T7N/
R6W; then
(4) Proceed west-northwest in a
straight line to the marked 1,542-foot
summit of Buzzard Peak, section 11,
T7N/R7W; then
(5) Proceed west-southwest in a
straight line, crossing onto the Santa
Rosa map, to the intersection of State
Highway 12 and Los Alamos Road; then
(6) Proceed due north in a straight
line to the southern boundary of section
9, T7N/R7W; then
(7) Proceed west-northwest along the
southern boundaries of sections 9, 4,
and 5, T7N/R7W, to the western
boundary of the Los Guilicos Land
Grant; then
(8) Proceed west-southwest along the
southern boundaries of sections 5, 6,
and 7, T7N/R7W; then continue westsouthwest along the southern
boundaries of sections 12 and 11, T7N/
R8W, to the point where the section 11
boundary becomes concurrent with an
unnamed light-duty road known locally
as Lewis Road; and then continue westsouthwest along Lewis Road to the
road’s intersection with Mendocino
Avenue in Santa Rosa; then
(9) Proceed north-northwesterly along
Mendocino Avenue to the road’s
intersection with an unnamed road
known locally as Bicentennial Way;
then
(10) Proceed north in a straight line,
crossing through the marked 906-foot
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:59 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
elevation peak in section 35, T8N/R8W,
and, crossing on to the Mark West
Springs map, continue to the line’s
intersection with Mark West Springs
Road, section 26, T8N/R8W; then
(11) Proceed northerly along Mark
West Springs Road, which turns easterly
and becomes Porter Creek Road, to the
road’s intersection with Franz Valley
Road, section 12, T8N/R8W; then
(12) Proceed northeasterly along
Franz Valley Road to the western
boundary of section 6, T8N/R7W; then
(13) Proceed south along the western
boundary of section 6, T8N/R7W, to the
southwest corner of section 6; then
(14) Proceed east, then east-northeast
along the southern boundaries of
sections 6, 5, and 4, T8N/R7W, to the
southeast corner of section 4; then
(15) Proceed north along the eastern
boundary of section 4, T8N/R7W, to the
Sonoma–Napa County line; then
(16) Proceed easterly along the
Sonoma–Napa County line to the
beginning point.
Dated: June 23, 2014.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–15212 Filed 6–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0242; FRL–9912–86Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Proposed Approval of
Revisions to PSD Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted
by the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) to EPA on March 12,
2014, for parallel processing. The
submittal modifies Wisconsin’s
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) program to identify precursors for
particulate matter of less than 2.5
micrometers (PM2.5), includes the
significant emissions rates for PM2.5 and
revises its definitions of PM2.5 emissions
and emissions of particulate matter of
less than 10 micrometers (PM10). WDNR
requested these revisions to address
disapprovals of two submissions meant
to address requirements of the 2008
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36689
Implementation of New Source Review
(NSR) Program for PM2.5 and to address
a partial disapproval, under section 110
of the Clean Air Act (CAA), of what is
commonly referred to as an
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. EPA is proposing
approval of Wisconsin’s March 12,
2014, SIP revision because the Agency
has made the preliminary determination
that this SIP revision is in accordance
with the CAA and applicable EPA
regulations regarding PSD.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2014–0242, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 385–5501.
4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air
Permits Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico,
Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014–
0242. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
36690
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to section I of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Andrea
Morgan, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353–6058 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Morgan, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–6058,
Morgan.andrea@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
II. What is the background for this proposed
action?
III. Wisconsin’s Submittal for Parallel
Processing
IV. What is EPA’s analysis of Wisconsin’s
proposed SIP Revision?
V. What action is EPA taking?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
When submitting comments,
remember to:
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:59 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions—EPA may ask
you to respond to specific questions or
organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline.
II. What is the background for this
proposed action?
In May 2008, EPA finalized
regulations to implement the NSR
Implementation Rule for PM2.5 in the
PSD and Nonattainment NSR (NNSR)
programs (2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule). The
regulation included the creation of the
major source threshold, significant
emissions rate and offset ratios for PM2.5
and the identification of PM2.5
precursors. Additionally, the rule
required states to consider emissions
which may condense to form particulate
matter at ambient temperatures, known
as condensables, in permitting decisions
by January 1, 2011.
WDNR submitted revisions to its PSD
and NNSR programs that were intended
to address the 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule in
October 2010. On October 29, 2012, EPA
finalized a narrow disapproval of
provisions of Wisconsin’s infrastructure
SIP submittal that were intended to
identify precursors to PM2.5 and identify
PM2.5 and PM10 condensables (see 77 FR
65478), because the submittal lacked
specific references to condensables for
PM2.5 and PM10 for applicability
determinations and permitting
emissions limits, consistent with the
2008 NSR Rule.
On May 12, 2011, and on March 5,
2012, WDNR submitted revisions to its
SIP to comply with the 2008 PM2.5 NSR
Rule. On July 25, 2013, EPA finalized
disapproval of Wisconsin’s submissions
because the submissions did not
explicitly define the precursors of PM2.5,
nor did they contain the prescribed
language to ensure that condensables
are to be regulated within the PM2.5 and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PM10 emission limits in Wisconsin’s
PSD and NNSR programs. (see 78 FR
44881)
The infrastructure SIP requirements
contained in sections 110(a)(1) and (2)
of the CAA are designed to ensure that
the structural components of each
state’s air quality management program
are adequate to meet the state’s
responsibilities under the CAA. States
are required to submit infrastructure
SIPs to ensure that their SIPs provide for
implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Under section 110(a)(2)(C), states are
required to include a program for the
regulation of construction of new or
modified stationary sources to meet new
NSR requirements under the PSD and
NNSR programs, and EPA evaluates, in
determining whether states have
satisfied these requirements, the
following: (i) Provisions that explicitly
identify oxides of nitrogen (NOX) as a
precursor to ozone in the PSD program;
(ii) identification of precursors to PM2.5
and the identification of PM2.5 and PM10
condensables in the PSD program; (iii)
PM2.5 increments in the PSD program;
and, (iv) greenhouse gas permitting and
the ‘‘Tailoring Rule.’’ This section also
requires states to demonstrate that their
existing SIPs meet current EPA
requirements with respect to the NSR
program. For example, states must adopt
definitions that are identical to, or more
stringent than, EPA’s definitions. Of the
structural PSD elements in the context
of infrastructure SIPs, today’s
rulemaking only addresses Wisconsin’s
satisfaction of provisions that explicitly
identify precursors to PM2.5, and the
identification of PM2.5 and PM10
condensables.
The final disapproval of the
submission to address the 2008 PM2.5
NSR Rule and the final partial
disapproval of the infrastructure SIP
triggered the requirement under section
110(c) that EPA promulgate a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) no later than
two years from the effective dates of the
disapprovals, unless the state corrects
the deficiencies and the Administrator
approves the plan or plan revision
before the Administrator promulgates
such FIP.
III. Wisconsin’s Submittal for Parallel
Processing
On March 12, 2014, WDNR submitted
a draft SIP revision request to EPA to
revise portions of its PSD and NNSR
programs to address deficiencies
identified in EPA’s previous partial
infrastructure SIP disapproval. On April
15, 2014, WDNR submitted a
supplement to its request with
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules
additional information to support its
submittal. Since the rules WDNR
submitted on March 12, 2014, are
consistent with the Federal PSD rules,
final approval of this SIP revision will
resolve the deficiencies previously
identified by EPA in its October 29,
2012, partial disapproval and July 25,
2013, disapproval. Wisconsin submitted
revisions to its rules NR 400, 405, and
408 of the Wisconsin Administrative
Code. The submittal requests that EPA
approve the following revised rules into
Wisconsin’s SIP: (1) NR 400.02(123m)
and (124); (2) NR 405.02(21)(b)5.a. and
b. and 6; (3) NR 405.02(25i)(a), (ag) and
(ar); (4) 405.02(27)(a)5m; and (5) NR
408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b. and 6. At this
time EPA is only proposing to take
action on the portions that pertain to the
identification of precursors to PM2.5 and
identification of PM2.5 and PM10
condensables. Specifically, today’s
proposed rulemaking is limited to the
following provisions: (1) NR
400.02(123m) and (124); (2) NR
405.02(25i)(ag); (3) NR 405.02(25i)(ar)2.
and 3.; and, (4) 405.02(27)(a)5m. EPA
proposed approval of the remainder of
WDNR’s submission as it pertains to
NOX as a precursor to ozone and the
definition of major modification in a
May 2, 2014 proposed approval (79 FR
25063).
Because portions of this draft SIP
revision are not yet state-effective,
Wisconsin requested that EPA ‘‘parallel
process’’ the SIP revision. Under this
procedure, the EPA Regional Office
works closely with the state while
developing new or revised regulations.
Generally, the state submits a copy of
the proposed regulation or other
revisions to EPA before concluding its
rulemaking process. EPA reviews this
proposed state action and prepares a
proposed rulemaking action. EPA
publishes this proposed rulemaking in
the Federal Register and solicits public
comment in approximately the same
timeframe during which the state
finalizes its rulemaking process.
After Wisconsin submits the formal
state-effective SIP revision request, EPA
will prepare a final rulemaking action
for the SIP revision. If changes are made
to the SIP revision after EPA’s proposed
rulemaking, such changes must be
acknowledged in EPA’s final
rulemaking action. If the changes are
significant, then EPA may be obliged to
repropose the action.
IV. What is EPA’s analysis of
Wisconsin’s proposed SIP revision?
EPA has evaluated WDNR’s proposed
revision to the Wisconsin SIP in
accordance with the Federal
requirements governing state permitting
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:59 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
programs. The revisions described in
section III above are intended to update
the Wisconsin SIP to comply with the
current rules and address deficiencies
identified by EPA in the its previous SIP
disapprovals. As discussed below, EPA
is proposing to approve these revisions
because they meet Federal
requirements.
The 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule finalized
several new requirements for SIPS to
address sources that emit direct PM2.5
and other pollutants that contribute to
secondary PM2.5 formation. One of these
requirements is for PSD permits to
address pollutants responsible for the
secondary formation of PM2.5, otherwise
known as precursors. In the 2008 PM2.5
NSR Rule, EPA identified precursors to
PM2.5 for the PSD program to be sulfur
dioxide (SO2) and NOX (unless the state
demonstrates to the Administrator’s
satisfaction or EPA demonstrates that
NOX emissions in an area are not a
significant contributor to that area’s
ambient PM2.5 concentrations). The
2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule also specifies that
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are
not considered to be precursors to PM2.5
in the PSD program unless the state
demonstrates to the Administrator’s
satisfaction or EPA demonstrates that
emissions of VOCs in an area are
significant contributors to that area’s
ambient PM2.5 concentrations.
The explicit references to SO2, NOX,
and VOCs as they pertain to secondary
PM2.5 formation are codified at 40 CFR
51.166(b)(49)(i)(b) and 40 CFR
52.21(b)(50)(i)(b). As part of identifying
pollutants that are precursors to PM2.5,
the 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule also required
states to revise the definition of
‘‘significant’’ as it relates to a net
emissions increase or the potential of a
source to emit pollutants. Specifically,
40 CFR 51.166(b)(23)(i) and 40 CFR
52.21(b)(23)(i) define ‘‘significant’’ for
PM2.5 to mean the following emissions
rates: 10 tons per year (tpy) of direct
PM2.5; 40 tpy of SO2; and 40 tpy of NOX
(unless the state demonstrates to the
Administrator’s satisfaction or EPA
demonstrates that NOX emissions in an
area are not a significant contributor to
that area’s ambient PM2.5
concentrations). WDNR has revised the
definition of ‘‘regulated NSR air
contaminant’’ for the PSD program in
405.02(25i)(ar)2. and 3., consistent with
EPA’s own PSD regulations. WDNR has
also revised its PSD significant emission
rates to include PM2.5 and its precursors
in NR 405.02(27)(a)5m, consistent with
EPA’s PSD regulations.
The 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule did not
require states to immediately account
for gases that could condense to form
particulate matter, known as
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36691
condensables, in PM2.5 and PM10
emission limits in PSD permits. Instead,
EPA determined that states had to
account for PM2.5 and PM10
condensables for applicability
determinations and in establishing
emissions limitations for PM2.5 and
PM10 in PSD permits beginning on or
after January 1, 2011. This requirement
is codified in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(i)(a)
and 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50)(i)(a). WDNR’s
revisions, specifically at NR
400.02(123m) and (124) and NR
405.02(25i)(ag), are consistent with the
PSD requirements obligated by the 2008
PM2.5 NSR Rule as they relate to PM2.5
and PM10 condensables.
The 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule also
codified requirements for PM2.5 in the
NNSR program. When WDNR initially
submitted revisions to its SIP meant to
address the 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule, the
Milwaukee-Racine area was designated
as nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 24hour NAAQS, and WDNR submitted
rules pertaining to NNSR in addition to
PSD. Thus, EPA’s disapproval of this
submission created an obligation for
WDNR to address the deficiencies
identified in both the PSD and NNSR
programs. On April 22, 2014, EPA
finalized approval of Wisconsin’s
request to redesignate the MilwaukeeRacine PM2.5 area to attainment for the
2006 PM2.5 24-hour NAAQS. As a result
there are no areas designated as
nonattainment for PM2.5 located in
Wisconsin. Since there are no areas
designated as nonattainment for PM2.5
in Wisconsin, Wisconsin is no longer
obligated to submit a NNSR plan for
PM2.5 and there is no longer a FIP
obligation for nonattainment NSR.
Should an area be designated as
nonattainment for PM2.5, Wisconsin will
be required to revise its rules to include
a plan to address PM2.5 in NNSR.
Wisconsin’s requested revisions are
consistent with the applicable
requirements found in Federal
regulations; therefore EPA is proposing
to approve the requested revisions.
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve the
revisions to Wisconsin rules NR 400,
and NR 405 submitted by the State on
March 12, 2014, and April 15, 2014, for
approval into the SIP. The revisions
submitted, described in section III,
above, are consistent with Federal
regulations governing state permitting
programs. See section IV, above. EPA is
also soliciting comment on this
proposed approval. If EPA finalizes this
proposed approval of WDNR’s requested
revisions, the FIP clocks started by
EPA’s October 29, 2012, narrow
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
36692
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
disapproval and July 25, 2013,
disapproval will stop.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:59 Jun 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: June 17, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2014–15284 Filed 6–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0989; FRL–9912–88Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Designation
of Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; Indiana; Redesignation of
Lake and Porter Counties to
Attainment of the 2008 Eight-Hour
Ozone Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) proposes to disapprove a
December 5, 2012, request from the state
of Indiana to redesignate Lake and
Porter Counties to attainment of the
2008 eight-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS
or standard) because Indiana has not
demonstrated that the ChicagoNaperville, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin
(IL–IN–WI) ozone nonattainment area
(Chicago nonattainment area), which
includes Lake and Porter Counties, has
attained this NAAQS. EPA proposes to
take no action on Indiana’s ozone
maintenance plan and Motor Vehicle
Emission Budgets (MVEBs), submitted
with Indiana’s ozone redesignation
request, since approval of these State
Implementation Plan (SIP) components
is contingent on the attainment of the
ozone standard.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–RO5–
OAR–2012–0989, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Email: Mooney.John@epa.gov.
• Fax: (312) 692–2551.
• Mail: John Mooney, Chief, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
• Hand Delivery: John Mooney, Air
Programs Branch, (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, 18th Floor,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Regional
Office’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012–
0989. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
and viruses. For additional instructions
on submitting comments, go to section
I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 125 (Monday, June 30, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36689-36692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15284]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0242; FRL-9912-86-Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Proposed Approval of Revisions to PSD Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP),
submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to
EPA on March 12, 2014, for parallel processing. The submittal modifies
Wisconsin's Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program to
identify precursors for particulate matter of less than 2.5 micrometers
(PM2.5), includes the significant emissions rates for
PM2.5 and revises its definitions of PM2.5
emissions and emissions of particulate matter of less than 10
micrometers (PM10). WDNR requested these revisions to
address disapprovals of two submissions meant to address requirements
of the 2008 Implementation of New Source Review (NSR) Program for
PM2.5 and to address a partial disapproval, under section
110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), of what is commonly referred to as an
``infrastructure'' SIP. EPA is proposing approval of Wisconsin's March
12, 2014, SIP revision because the Agency has made the preliminary
determination that this SIP revision is in accordance with the CAA and
applicable EPA regulations regarding PSD.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2014-0242, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 385-5501.
4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2014-0242. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you
[[Page 36690]]
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting
comments, go to section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you telephone Andrea Morgan, Environmental Engineer,
at (312) 353-6058 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Morgan, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 353-6058, Morgan.andrea@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
II. What is the background for this proposed action?
III. Wisconsin's Submittal for Parallel Processing
IV. What is EPA's analysis of Wisconsin's proposed SIP Revision?
V. What action is EPA taking?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
When submitting comments, remember to:
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions--EPA may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline.
II. What is the background for this proposed action?
In May 2008, EPA finalized regulations to implement the NSR
Implementation Rule for PM2.5 in the PSD and Nonattainment
NSR (NNSR) programs (2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule). The regulation
included the creation of the major source threshold, significant
emissions rate and offset ratios for PM2.5 and the
identification of PM2.5 precursors. Additionally, the rule
required states to consider emissions which may condense to form
particulate matter at ambient temperatures, known as condensables, in
permitting decisions by January 1, 2011.
WDNR submitted revisions to its PSD and NNSR programs that were
intended to address the 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule in October 2010.
On October 29, 2012, EPA finalized a narrow disapproval of provisions
of Wisconsin's infrastructure SIP submittal that were intended to
identify precursors to PM2.5 and identify PM2.5
and PM10 condensables (see 77 FR 65478), because the
submittal lacked specific references to condensables for
PM2.5 and PM10 for applicability determinations
and permitting emissions limits, consistent with the 2008 NSR Rule.
On May 12, 2011, and on March 5, 2012, WDNR submitted revisions to
its SIP to comply with the 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule. On July 25,
2013, EPA finalized disapproval of Wisconsin's submissions because the
submissions did not explicitly define the precursors of
PM2.5, nor did they contain the prescribed language to
ensure that condensables are to be regulated within the
PM2.5 and PM10 emission limits in Wisconsin's PSD
and NNSR programs. (see 78 FR 44881)
The infrastructure SIP requirements contained in sections 110(a)(1)
and (2) of the CAA are designed to ensure that the structural
components of each state's air quality management program are adequate
to meet the state's responsibilities under the CAA. States are required
to submit infrastructure SIPs to ensure that their SIPs provide for
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Under section 110(a)(2)(C), states are required to include a
program for the regulation of construction of new or modified
stationary sources to meet new NSR requirements under the PSD and NNSR
programs, and EPA evaluates, in determining whether states have
satisfied these requirements, the following: (i) Provisions that
explicitly identify oxides of nitrogen (NOX) as a precursor
to ozone in the PSD program; (ii) identification of precursors to
PM2.5 and the identification of PM2.5 and
PM10 condensables in the PSD program; (iii) PM2.5
increments in the PSD program; and, (iv) greenhouse gas permitting and
the ``Tailoring Rule.'' This section also requires states to
demonstrate that their existing SIPs meet current EPA requirements with
respect to the NSR program. For example, states must adopt definitions
that are identical to, or more stringent than, EPA's definitions. Of
the structural PSD elements in the context of infrastructure SIPs,
today's rulemaking only addresses Wisconsin's satisfaction of
provisions that explicitly identify precursors to PM2.5, and
the identification of PM2.5 and PM10
condensables.
The final disapproval of the submission to address the 2008
PM2.5 NSR Rule and the final partial disapproval of the
infrastructure SIP triggered the requirement under section 110(c) that
EPA promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) no later than two
years from the effective dates of the disapprovals, unless the state
corrects the deficiencies and the Administrator approves the plan or
plan revision before the Administrator promulgates such FIP.
III. Wisconsin's Submittal for Parallel Processing
On March 12, 2014, WDNR submitted a draft SIP revision request to
EPA to revise portions of its PSD and NNSR programs to address
deficiencies identified in EPA's previous partial infrastructure SIP
disapproval. On April 15, 2014, WDNR submitted a supplement to its
request with
[[Page 36691]]
additional information to support its submittal. Since the rules WDNR
submitted on March 12, 2014, are consistent with the Federal PSD rules,
final approval of this SIP revision will resolve the deficiencies
previously identified by EPA in its October 29, 2012, partial
disapproval and July 25, 2013, disapproval. Wisconsin submitted
revisions to its rules NR 400, 405, and 408 of the Wisconsin
Administrative Code. The submittal requests that EPA approve the
following revised rules into Wisconsin's SIP: (1) NR 400.02(123m) and
(124); (2) NR 405.02(21)(b)5.a. and b. and 6; (3) NR 405.02(25i)(a),
(ag) and (ar); (4) 405.02(27)(a)5m; and (5) NR 408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b.
and 6. At this time EPA is only proposing to take action on the
portions that pertain to the identification of precursors to
PM2.5 and identification of PM2.5 and
PM10 condensables. Specifically, today's proposed rulemaking
is limited to the following provisions: (1) NR 400.02(123m) and (124);
(2) NR 405.02(25i)(ag); (3) NR 405.02(25i)(ar)2. and 3.; and, (4)
405.02(27)(a)5m. EPA proposed approval of the remainder of WDNR's
submission as it pertains to NOX as a precursor to ozone and
the definition of major modification in a May 2, 2014 proposed approval
(79 FR 25063).
Because portions of this draft SIP revision are not yet state-
effective, Wisconsin requested that EPA ``parallel process'' the SIP
revision. Under this procedure, the EPA Regional Office works closely
with the state while developing new or revised regulations. Generally,
the state submits a copy of the proposed regulation or other revisions
to EPA before concluding its rulemaking process. EPA reviews this
proposed state action and prepares a proposed rulemaking action. EPA
publishes this proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register and solicits
public comment in approximately the same timeframe during which the
state finalizes its rulemaking process.
After Wisconsin submits the formal state-effective SIP revision
request, EPA will prepare a final rulemaking action for the SIP
revision. If changes are made to the SIP revision after EPA's proposed
rulemaking, such changes must be acknowledged in EPA's final rulemaking
action. If the changes are significant, then EPA may be obliged to
repropose the action.
IV. What is EPA's analysis of Wisconsin's proposed SIP revision?
EPA has evaluated WDNR's proposed revision to the Wisconsin SIP in
accordance with the Federal requirements governing state permitting
programs. The revisions described in section III above are intended to
update the Wisconsin SIP to comply with the current rules and address
deficiencies identified by EPA in the its previous SIP disapprovals. As
discussed below, EPA is proposing to approve these revisions because
they meet Federal requirements.
The 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule finalized several new
requirements for SIPS to address sources that emit direct
PM2.5 and other pollutants that contribute to secondary
PM2.5 formation. One of these requirements is for PSD
permits to address pollutants responsible for the secondary formation
of PM2.5, otherwise known as precursors. In the 2008
PM2.5 NSR Rule, EPA identified precursors to
PM2.5 for the PSD program to be sulfur dioxide
(SO2) and NOX (unless the state demonstrates to
the Administrator's satisfaction or EPA demonstrates that
NOX emissions in an area are not a significant contributor
to that area's ambient PM2.5 concentrations). The 2008
PM2.5 NSR Rule also specifies that volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) are not considered to be precursors to
PM2.5 in the PSD program unless the state demonstrates to
the Administrator's satisfaction or EPA demonstrates that emissions of
VOCs in an area are significant contributors to that area's ambient
PM2.5 concentrations.
The explicit references to SO2, NOX, and VOCs
as they pertain to secondary PM2.5 formation are codified at
40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(i)(b) and 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50)(i)(b). As part of
identifying pollutants that are precursors to PM2.5, the
2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule also required states to revise the
definition of ``significant'' as it relates to a net emissions increase
or the potential of a source to emit pollutants. Specifically, 40 CFR
51.166(b)(23)(i) and 40 CFR 52.21(b)(23)(i) define ``significant'' for
PM2.5 to mean the following emissions rates: 10 tons per
year (tpy) of direct PM2.5; 40 tpy of SO2; and 40
tpy of NOX (unless the state demonstrates to the
Administrator's satisfaction or EPA demonstrates that NOX
emissions in an area are not a significant contributor to that area's
ambient PM2.5 concentrations). WDNR has revised the
definition of ``regulated NSR air contaminant'' for the PSD program in
405.02(25i)(ar)2. and 3., consistent with EPA's own PSD regulations.
WDNR has also revised its PSD significant emission rates to include
PM2.5 and its precursors in NR 405.02(27)(a)5m, consistent
with EPA's PSD regulations.
The 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule did not require states to
immediately account for gases that could condense to form particulate
matter, known as condensables, in PM2.5 and PM10
emission limits in PSD permits. Instead, EPA determined that states had
to account for PM2.5 and PM10 condensables for
applicability determinations and in establishing emissions limitations
for PM2.5 and PM10 in PSD permits beginning on or
after January 1, 2011. This requirement is codified in 40 CFR
51.166(b)(49)(i)(a) and 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50)(i)(a). WDNR's revisions,
specifically at NR 400.02(123m) and (124) and NR 405.02(25i)(ag), are
consistent with the PSD requirements obligated by the 2008
PM2.5 NSR Rule as they relate to PM2.5 and
PM10 condensables.
The 2008 PM2.5 NSR Rule also codified requirements for
PM2.5 in the NNSR program. When WDNR initially submitted
revisions to its SIP meant to address the 2008 PM2.5 NSR
Rule, the Milwaukee-Racine area was designated as nonattainment for the
2006 PM2.5 24-hour NAAQS, and WDNR submitted rules
pertaining to NNSR in addition to PSD. Thus, EPA's disapproval of this
submission created an obligation for WDNR to address the deficiencies
identified in both the PSD and NNSR programs. On April 22, 2014, EPA
finalized approval of Wisconsin's request to redesignate the Milwaukee-
Racine PM2.5 area to attainment for the 2006
PM2.5 24-hour NAAQS. As a result there are no areas
designated as nonattainment for PM2.5 located in Wisconsin.
Since there are no areas designated as nonattainment for
PM2.5 in Wisconsin, Wisconsin is no longer obligated to
submit a NNSR plan for PM2.5 and there is no longer a FIP
obligation for nonattainment NSR. Should an area be designated as
nonattainment for PM2.5, Wisconsin will be required to
revise its rules to include a plan to address PM2.5 in NNSR.
Wisconsin's requested revisions are consistent with the applicable
requirements found in Federal regulations; therefore EPA is proposing
to approve the requested revisions.
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to Wisconsin rules NR
400, and NR 405 submitted by the State on March 12, 2014, and April 15,
2014, for approval into the SIP. The revisions submitted, described in
section III, above, are consistent with Federal regulations governing
state permitting programs. See section IV, above. EPA is also
soliciting comment on this proposed approval. If EPA finalizes this
proposed approval of WDNR's requested revisions, the FIP clocks started
by EPA's October 29, 2012, narrow
[[Page 36692]]
disapproval and July 25, 2013, disapproval will stop.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: June 17, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2014-15284 Filed 6-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P