Adjustment of Passenger Civil Aviation Security Service Fee; Interim Final Rule; Correction, 36432-36433 [2014-15162]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
36432
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
costs plus the fully loaded costs—that
is, including an appropriate share of
indirect costs, such as fixed and
overhead expenses—reasonably
allocated, borne by the self-insured plan
for such services).’’ Accordingly, we are
revising the definition to include the
correct word.
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and Delay in Effective Date
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 153
Administrative practice and
procedure, Adverse selection, Health
care, Health insurance, Health records,
Organization and functions
(Government agencies), Premium
stabilization, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Reinsurance, Risk adjustment, Risk
corridors, Risk mitigation, State and
local governments.
13:21 Jun 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PART 153—STANDARDS RELATED TO
REINSURANCE, RISK CORRIDORS,
AND RISK ADJUSTMENT UNDER THE
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
49 CFR Part 1510
[Docket No. TSA–2001–11120; Amendment
No. 1510–4]
1. The authority citation for part 153
continues to read as follows:
RIN 1652–AA68
Authority: Secs. 1311, 1321, 1341–1343,
Pub. L. 111–148, 24 Stat. 119.
Adjustment of Passenger Civil Aviation
Security Service Fee; Interim Final
Rule; Correction
■
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register to provide a period for public
comment before the provisions of a rule
take effect in accordance with section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However,
we can waive this notice and comment
procedure if the Secretary finds, for
good cause, that the notice and
comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, and incorporates a statement of
the finding and the reasons therefore in
the notice.
Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily
requires a 30-day delay in the effective
date of final rules after the date of their
publication in the Federal Register.
This 30-day delay in effective date can
be waived, however, if an agency finds
for good cause that the delay is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, and the agency
incorporates a statement of the findings
and its reasons in the rule issued.
This document merely corrects a
technical error in the regulation text and
does not change the policy set forth in
the 2015 Payment Notice. Therefore, we
believe that undertaking further notice
and comment procedures to incorporate
this correction and delay the effective
date for this change is unnecessary. In
addition, we believe it is important for
the public to have the correct
information as soon as possible, and
believe it is contrary to the public
interest to delay when they become
effective. For the reasons stated
previously, we find there is good cause
to waive notice and comment
procedures and the 30-day delay in the
effective date for this correcting
amendment.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Accordingly, 45 CFR is corrected by
making the following correcting
amendment to part 153:
§ 153.20
[Corrected]
Dated: June 17, 2014.
C’Reda Weeden,
Executive Secretary to the Department,
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–15099 Filed 6–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
45 CFR Part 160
General Administrative Requirements
CFR Correction
In Title 45 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 1 to 199, revised as of
October 1, 2013, on page 983, in
§ 160.103, a definition of Manifestation
or manifested is added in alphabetical
order to read as follows:
■
§ 160.103
Transportation Security
Administration (TSA), DHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for
comments; correction.
AGENCY:
2. In § 153.20, amend paragraph (2) of
the definition of ‘‘contributing entity’’
by removing the word ‘‘volume’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘value.’’
■
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Manifestation or manifested means,
with respect to a disease, disorder, or
pathological condition, that an
individual has been or could reasonably
be diagnosed with the disease, disorder,
or pathological condition by a health
care professional with appropriate
training and expertise in the field of
medicine involved. For purposes of this
subchapter, a disease, disorder, or
pathological condition is not manifested
if the diagnosis is based principally on
genetic information.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–15102 Filed 6–26–14; 8:45 am]
The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) is correcting an
interim final rule (IFR) published in the
Federal Register on June 20, 2014. This
IFR implements amendments to 49
U.S.C. 44940, which authorizes TSA to
impose fees to defray the government’s
costs for providing civil aviation
security services, such as those related
to screening personnel, screening
equipment, and other specified security
services.1 That document inadvertently
failed to note the proper citation in a
footnote in the Background section. This
document corrects the interim final rule
by revising this section.
DATES: Effective Date: This IFR is
effective at 12:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight
Time) on July 21, 2014.
Comment Date: Comments must be
received by August 19, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Gambone, Office of Revenue,
TSA–14, Transportation Security
Administration, 601 South 12th Street,
Arlington, VA 20598–6014; telephone
(571) 227–2323; email tsa-fees@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
2014–14488 appearing on page 35463 in
the Federal Register of Friday, June 20,
2014, the following correction is made:
SUMMARY:
Correction
In FR Doc. 2014–14488, published on
June 20, 2014 (79 FR 35461), make the
following correction:
1. On page 35463, in the first column,
footnote three is corrected to read as
follows:
‘‘ 3 Consistent with 49 U.S.C.
40102(a)(5), ‘‘air transportation’’ means
‘‘foreign air transportation, interstate air
transportation, or the transportation of
mail by aircraft.’’
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
PO 00000
1 See 49 U.S.C. 44940(a)(1) (enumerating specific
aviation security services intended to be funded at
least in part by the fee referenced herein).
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 24, 2014.
Traci Klemm,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Multi Modal
Security Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014–15162 Filed 6–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 140616507–4507–01]
RIN 0648–BE19
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Northeast
Multispecies Fishery; Unused Catch
Carryover; Emergency Action
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; emergency
action; request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS is changing the
accounting system and accountability
measures implemented last year for
fishing year 2012 Northeast
multispecies fishery sector annual catch
entitlement carryover used during
fishing year 2013. This change
implements a stock level pound-forpound payback accountability measure
if a sector uses its 2012 carryover and
both the sector sub-annual catch limit
and the overall annual catch limit are
exceeded. This rule is necessary to
comply with an April 4, 2014, ruling by
the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia that invalidated and vacated
the fishing year 2013 carryover
measures.
DATES: Effective June 27, 2014, except
for the amendment to § 648.87
(b)(1)(i)(C)(2)(i) which is effective June
27, 2014, through December 24, 2014.
Comments must be received on or
before July 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2014–0070,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20140070, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Paper, disk, or CD–ROM
comments should be sent to John K.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:21 Jun 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Bullard, Regional Administrator,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. Mark the outside of the
envelope, ‘‘Comments on the Court
remedy carryover emergency rule.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: Michael
Ruccio.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
A National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Supplemental Information
Report (SIR), including a Regulatory
Impact Review, has been prepared for
this action. Copies of the SIR prepared
for this action by NMFS are available
from John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. The SIR is
accessible via the Internet at https://
www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Ruccio, Fishery Policy Analyst,
phone: 978–281–9104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
to respond to a recent U.S. District Court
decision in Conservation Law
Foundation v. Pritzker, et al. (Case No.
1:13–CV–0821–JEB) provides
information in a question in response
format. The key questions are:
1. What action is being taken by this rule?
2. What are the events and background that
led to this rule becoming necessary?
3. What is the justification for taking this
action?
4. What are the next steps NMFS will take?
This section includes information on
the fishing year (FY) 2013 remedy and
information about carryover accounting
for FY 2014 and beyond. Additional
information on how this rule complies
with applicable law is provided in the
Classification section.
1. What action is being taken by this
rule?
As a result of the Court order and
remand in Conservation Law
Foundation v. Pritzker, et al., we are
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36433
implementing regulations that hold
sectors accountable for using carryover
of annual catch entitlement (ACE) from
FY 2012 in FY 2013. The Court
invalidated the carryover measures
implemented in association with
Framework Adjustment 50 (FW 50) to
the NE Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) because the
measures failed to prevent total
potential catches of certain stocks (ACEs
plus carryovers) from exceeding their
annual biological catches (ABCs). This
action implements revised carryover
measures for FY 2013 to comply with
the Court’s findings. The action does not
delete the specific regulations
invalidated by the Court at
§ 648.87(b)(1)(i)(C) because they were
already removed, inadvertently, when
FW 51 measures were implemented on
May 1, 2014. This action requires an
accountability measure for a sector that
harvests its carryover catch from FY
2012 of a stock in FY 2013 if the
cumulative sub-annual catch limit
(ACL) for all sectors, and, the overall
ACL of such stock is exceeded. The
accountability measure is a pound-forpound reduction (or ‘‘payback’’) of that
sector’s FY 2014 ACE for an applicable
stock equal to the amount of the
carryover used after deducting a de
minimis amount.
The following stepwise evaluation
process provides a detailed explanation
of when and how the payback
accountability measure would be
triggered and assessed:
Step 1: Has the total fishery-level ACL
for a stock been exceeded?
• No—There is no reduction in FY
2014 ACE for that stock required (i.e.,
no repayment required). Other
components of the fishery underutilized
their available catch limits for that stock
sufficient to offset any carryover used.
• Yes—Proceed to step 2.
Step 2: Has the sector sub-ACL (i.e.,
sum total of all sector ACE) been
exceeded?
• No—There is no reduction in FY
2014 ACE for that stock required (i.e.,
no repayment required). Even though
the total fishery-level ACL was
exceeded, sectors collectively did not
exceed their sub-ACL for that stock.
While some sectors may have used
carryover for that stock, other sectors
did not or underutilized available ACE
for that stock by enough to offset the
carryover used, resulting in total catch
less than the sub-ACL.
• Yes—Proceed to step 3.
Step 3: After sectors’ FY 2013 catch
reconciliation with NMFS has occurred,
determine which sectors used FY 2012
carryover ACE for a stock. For each of
those sectors, determine the amount of
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 124 (Friday, June 27, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36432-36433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15162]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
49 CFR Part 1510
[Docket No. TSA-2001-11120; Amendment No. 1510-4]
RIN 1652-AA68
Adjustment of Passenger Civil Aviation Security Service Fee;
Interim Final Rule; Correction
AGENCY: Transportation Security Administration (TSA), DHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comments; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is correcting
an interim final rule (IFR) published in the Federal Register on June
20, 2014. This IFR implements amendments to 49 U.S.C. 44940, which
authorizes TSA to impose fees to defray the government's costs for
providing civil aviation security services, such as those related to
screening personnel, screening equipment, and other specified security
services.\1\ That document inadvertently failed to note the proper
citation in a footnote in the Background section. This document
corrects the interim final rule by revising this section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 49 U.S.C. 44940(a)(1) (enumerating specific aviation
security services intended to be funded at least in part by the fee
referenced herein).
DATES: Effective Date: This IFR is effective at 12:00 a.m. (Eastern
Daylight Time) on July 21, 2014.
Comment Date: Comments must be received by August 19, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Gambone, Office of Revenue,
TSA-14, Transportation Security Administration, 601 South 12th Street,
Arlington, VA 20598-6014; telephone (571) 227-2323; email tsa-fees@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2014-14488 appearing on page
35463 in the Federal Register of Friday, June 20, 2014, the following
correction is made:
Correction
In FR Doc. 2014-14488, published on June 20, 2014 (79 FR 35461),
make the following correction:
1. On page 35463, in the first column, footnote three is corrected
to read as follows:
`` \3\ Consistent with 49 U.S.C. 40102(a)(5), ``air
transportation'' means ``foreign air transportation, interstate air
transportation, or the transportation of mail by aircraft.''
[[Page 36433]]
Dated: June 24, 2014.
Traci Klemm,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Multi Modal Security Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014-15162 Filed 6-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-05-P
