Addition of Certain Persons to the Entity List; and Removal of Person From the Entity List Based on Removal Request, 36199-36203 [2014-14935]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0013; Airspace
Docket No. 13–ASW–33]
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Taylor, TX
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends Class E
airspace at Taylor, TX. Controlled
airspace is necessary to accommodate
new Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures at
Taylor Municipal Airport. The FAA is
taking this action to enhance the safety
and management of Instrument Flight
Rule (IFR) operations at the airport.
Airport coordinates also are adjusted.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC,
September 18, 2014. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul
Garza, Jr., Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817–321–
7654.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
On April 7, 2014, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify
Class E airspace at Taylor Municipal
Airport, Taylor, TX (79 FR 19030)
Docket No. FAA–2014–0013. Interested
parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. No comments were received. Class
E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9X
dated August 7, 2013, and effective
September 15, 2013, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by
amending Class E airspace by creating a
segment extending from the 6.4-mile
radius of Taylor Municipal Airport,
Taylor, TX, to 10.7 miles north of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
airport, for new RNAV standard
instrument approach procedures
developed at the airport. Controlled
airspace is needed for the safety and
management of IFR operations at the
airport. The geographic coordinates of
the airport are adjusted to be in concert
with the FAAs aeronautical database.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it amends
controlled airspace at Taylor Municipal
Airport, Taylor, TX.
Environmental Review
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 7, 2013, and effective
September 15, 2013, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW TX E5 Taylor, TX [Amended]
Taylor Municipal Airport, TX
(Lat. 30°34′22″ N., long. 97°26′36″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile
radius of Taylor Municipal Airport, and
within 1.6 miles each side of the 039° bearing
from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile
radius to 11.2 miles northeast of the airport,
and within 3.9 miles each side of 021°
bearing from the airport extending from the
6.4-mile radius to 7.3 miles northeast of the
airport, and within 2 miles each side of the
359° bearing from the airport extending from
the 6.4-mile radius to 10.7 miles north of the
airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 17,
2014.
Kent M. Wheeler,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2014–14904 Filed 6–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–14–P
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
PO 00000
36199
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 744
[Docket No. 140522446–4446–01]
RIN 0694–AG19
Addition of Certain Persons to the
Entity List; and Removal of Person
From the Entity List Based on Removal
Request
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
36200
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule.
This rule amends the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) by
adding four persons under five entries
to the Entity List. The persons who are
added to the Entity List have been
determined by the U.S. Government to
be acting contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States. These persons will be
listed on the Entity List under the
destinations of China and Hong Kong.
There are five entries for four persons
because one person is listed under
multiple countries, resulting in one
additional entry. Specifically, the one
additional entry covers one person in
China who also has an address in Hong
Kong.
In addition, this rule removes one
person from the Entity List, as the result
of a request for removal submitted by
the person, a review of information
provided in the removal request in
accordance with the EAR, and further
review conducted by the End-User
Review Committee (ERC).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective June 26, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User
Review Committee, Office of the
Assistant Secretary, Export
Administration, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce,
Phone: (202) 482–5991, Fax: (202) 482–
3911, Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to
Part 744) notifies the public about
entities that have engaged in activities
that could result in an increased risk of
the diversion of exported, reexported or
transferred (in-country) items to
weapons of mass destruction (WMD)
programs. Since its initial publication,
grounds for inclusion on the Entity List
have expanded to include activities
sanctioned by the State Department and
activities contrary to U.S. national
security or foreign policy interests,
including terrorism and export control
violations involving abuse of human
rights. Certain exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country) to entities
identified on the Entity List require
licenses from BIS and are usually
subject to a policy of denial. The
availability of license exceptions in
such transactions is very limited. The
license review policy for each entity is
identified in the license review policy
column on the Entity List and the
availability of license exceptions is
noted in the Federal Register notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
adding persons to the Entity List. BIS
places entities on the Entity List based
on certain sections of part 744 (Control
Policy: End-User and End-Use Based) of
the EAR.
The End-user Review Committee
(ERC), composed of representatives of
the Departments of Commerce (Chair),
State, Defense, Energy and, where
appropriate, the Treasury, makes all
decisions regarding additions to,
removals from, or other modifications to
the Entity List. The ERC makes all
decisions to add an entry to the Entity
List by majority vote and all decisions
to remove or modify an entry by
unanimous vote.
ERC Entity List Decisions
Additions to the Entity List
This rule implements the decision of
the ERC to add four persons under five
entries to the Entity List on the basis of
§ 744.11 (License requirements that
apply to entities acting contrary to the
national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States) of the
EAR. The five entries added to the
Entity List consist of four entries in
China, and one entry in Hong Kong.
The ERC reviewed § 744.11(b)
(Criteria for revising the Entity List) in
making the determination to add these
four persons to the Entity List. Under
that paragraph, persons for whom there
is reasonable cause to believe, based on
specific and articulable facts, have been
involved, are involved, or pose a
significant risk of being or becoming
involved in, activities that are contrary
to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States and those
acting on behalf of such persons may be
added to the Entity List. Paragraphs
(b)(1) through (b)(5) of § 744.11 include
an illustrative list of activities that could
be contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United
States.
The four persons being added have
been determined by the ERC to be
involved in activities that are contrary
to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States, including
the activities described under paragraph
(b)(2) and (b)(5) of § 744.11.
The ERC determined that Poly
Technologies Inc., Xinshidai Company
(New Era Group), and Panda
International Information Technology
Company, all located in China, and
HWA Create, located in China and Hong
Kong, be added to the Entity List on the
basis of their attempts to procure items,
including U.S.-origin items, for
activities contrary to the national
security and foreign policy interests of
the United States. The ERC determined
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that these persons’ activities have
included the activities described under
paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(5) of § 744.11 of
the EAR. Specifically, these companies
have attempted to supply items to the
People’s Liberation Army and/or to
export items to destinations sanctioned
by the United States. The Department of
State sanctioned Poly Technologies Inc.
under the Iran, North Korea and Syria
Nonproliferation Act (INKSNA) in
February 2013. Xinshidai Company was
sanctioned in 2004 by the Departments
of State and the Treasury under
Executive Order 12938, and again by the
State Department under INKSNA in
2008.
Pursuant to § 744.11(b)(2) and (b)(5) of
the EAR, the ERC determined that the
conduct of these four persons raises
sufficient concern that prior review of
exports, reexports, or transfers (incountry) of items subject to the EAR
involving these persons, and the
possible imposition of license
conditions or license denials on
shipments to the persons, will enhance
BIS’s ability to prevent violations of the
EAR.
For the four persons recommended for
addition, the ERC specified a license
requirement for all items subject to the
EAR and a license review policy of
presumption of denial. The license
requirements apply to any transaction in
which items are to be exported,
reexported, or transferred (in-country) to
any of the persons or in which such
persons act as purchaser, intermediate
consignee, ultimate consignee, or enduser. In addition, no license exceptions
are available for exports, reexports, or
transfers (in-country) to the persons
being added to the Entity List in this
rule.
This final rule adds the following four
persons under five entries to the Entity
List:
China
(1) China Xinshidai Company, a.k.a.,
the following one alias:
—China New Era Group, Xinshidai
Plaza, Plaza No. 7 Huayuan Rd., Beijing,
China;
(2) HWA Create, 5/F, Xinshidai
Building/New Era Mansion, 7 Huayuan
Rd., Beijing, China; and
No. B3 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China
(See alternate addresses under Hong
Kong);
(3) Panda International Information
Technology Company, Ltd., 7/F, B
Tower, Yingwu Conference Center, No.
6. Huayuan Road, Haidian District,
Beijing, China; and
Rm 606 Block B, Beijing Agricultural
Science Building, Shugang Garden
Haidian Middle Rd, Beijing, China; and
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Poly Technologies Inc., 11F Poly
Plaza, 14 Dongzhimen Nandajie, Beijing
China; and
27 Wanshoulu, Haidian district,
Beijing, China.
Hong Kong
(1) HWA Create, Unit 1001–1002, 10F,
Chinachem Building, 34–37 Connaught
Rd., Hong Kong; and
Unit A 5th Floor, Cheong Commercial
Building, 19–25 Jervois St, Hong Kong;
and
Unit B, 6/F, Dah Sing Life Building,
99—1–5 Des Voeux Rd, Hong Kong (See
alternate addresses under China).
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Removal From the Entity List
This rule implements a decision of
the ERC to remove one person, Masoud
Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies,
located in Jordan, from the Entity List as
a result of the person’s request for
removal from the Entity List. Based
upon the review of the information
provided in the removal request in
accordance with § 744.16 (Procedure for
requesting removal or modification of
an Entity List entity), and after review
by the ERC’s member agencies, the ERC
determined that this person should be
removed from the Entity List.
The ERC decision to remove this
person took into account this person’s
cooperation with the U.S. Government
during the appeal process. In
accordance with § 744.16(c), the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration has sent written
notification to this person, informing
this entity of the ERC’s decision to
remove it from the Entity List. This final
rule implements the decision to remove
the following person located in Jordan
from the Entity List:
Jordan
(1) Masoud Est. for Medical and
Scientific Supplies, 74 First Floor, Tla’a
Al Ali Khali Al Salim Street, Amman,
Jordan 11118.
The removal of the one entity
referenced above, which was made on
the basis of a § 744.16 removal request
and was approved by the ERC,
eliminates the existing license
requirements in Supplement No. 4 to
part 744 for exports, reexports and
transfers (in-country) to the entity.
However, the removal of this entity from
the Entity List does not relieve persons
of other obligations under part 744 of
the EAR or under other parts of the
EAR. Neither the removal of an entity
from the Entity List nor the removal of
Entity List-based license requirements
relieves persons of their obligations
under General Prohibition 5 in
§ 736.2(b)(5) of the EAR which provides
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
that, ‘‘you may not, without a license,
knowingly export or reexport any item
subject to the EAR to an end-user or
end-use that is prohibited by part 744 of
the EAR.’’ Additionally this removal
does not relieve persons of their
obligation to apply for export, reexport
or in-country transfer licenses required
by other provisions of the EAR. BIS
strongly urges the use of Supplement
No. 3 to part 732 of the EAR, ‘‘BIS’s
‘Know Your Customer’ Guidance and
Red Flags,’’ when persons are involved
in transactions that are subject to the
EAR.
Savings Clause
Shipments of items removed from
eligibility for a License Exception or
export or reexport without a license
(NLR) as a result of this regulatory
action that were en route aboard a
carrier to a port of export or reexport, on
June 26, 2014, pursuant to actual orders
for export or reexport to a foreign
destination, may proceed to that
destination under the previous
eligibility for a License Exception or
export or reexport without a license
(NLR).
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration
Act expired on August 20, 2001, the
President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by
Executive Order 13637 of March 8,
2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and
as extended by the Notice of August 8,
2013, 78, 2013, 78 FR 49107(August 12,
2013), has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to
carry out the provisions of the Export
Administration Act, as appropriate and
to the extent permitted by law, pursuant
to Executive Order 13222 as amended
by Executive Order 13637.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36201
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to nor be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This regulation
involves collections previously
approved by OMB under control
number 0694–0088, Simplified Network
Application Processing System, which
includes, among other things, license
applications and carries a burden
estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or
electronic submission. Total burden
hours associated with the PRA and
OMB control number 0694–0088 are not
expected to increase as a result of this
rule. You may send comments regarding
the collection of information associated
with this rule, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K.
Seehra, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), by email to Jasmeet_K._
Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202)
395–7285.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
4. For the four persons added under
five entries to the Entity List in this final
rule, the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed
rulemaking, the opportunity for public
comment and a delay in effective date
are inapplicable because this regulation
involves a military or foreign affairs
function of the United States. (See 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this
rule to protect U.S. national security or
foreign policy interests by preventing
items from being exported, reexported,
or transferred (in country) to the persons
being added to the Entity List. If this
rule were delayed to allow for notice
and comment and a delay in effective
date, then entities being added to the
Entity List by this action would
continue to be able to receive items
without a license and to conduct
activities contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States. In addition, because these
parties may receive notice of the U.S.
Government’s intention to place these
entities on the Entity List if a proposed
rule is published, doing so would create
an incentive for these persons to either
accelerate receiving items subject to the
EAR to conduct activities that are
contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United
States, or to take steps to set up
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
36202
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
additional aliases, change addresses,
and other measures to try to limit the
impact of the listing on the Entity List
once a final rule was published. Further,
no other law requires that a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
given for this rule. Because a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required to be given for this rule by 5
U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the
analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is
required and none has been prepared.
5. For the one removal from the Entity
List in this final rule, pursuant to the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), BIS finds good
cause to waive requirements that this
rule be subject to notice and the
opportunity for public comment
because it would be contrary to the
public interest.
In determining whether to grant
removal requests from the Entity List, a
committee of U.S. Government agencies
(the End-user Review Committee (ERC))
evaluates information about and
commitments made by listed persons
requesting removal from the Entity List,
the nature and terms of which are set
forth in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement
No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b). The
information, commitments, and criteria
for this extensive review were all
established through the notice of
proposed rulemaking and public
comment process (72 FR 31005 (June 5,
2007) (proposed rule), and 73 FR 49311
(August 21, 2008) (final rule)). This
removal has been made within the
established regulatory framework of the
Entity List. If the rule were to be
delayed to allow for public comment,
U.S. exporters may face unnecessary
economic losses as they turn away
potential sales because the customer
remained a listed person on the Entity
List even after the ERC approved the
removal pursuant to the rule published
at 73 FR 49311 on August 21, 2008. By
publishing without prior notice and
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Country
VerDate Mar<15>2010
License
requirement
Entity
*
CHINA, PEOPLE’S
REPUBLIC OF
*
comment, BIS allows the applicant to
receive U.S. exports immediately since
the applicant already has received
approval by the ERC pursuant to 15 CFR
part 744, Supplement No. 5, as noted in
15 CFR 744.16(b).
The removals from the Entity List
granted by the ERC involve interagency
deliberation and result from review of
public and non-public sources,
including sensitive law enforcement
information and classified information,
and the measurement of such
information against the Entity List
removal criteria. This information is
extensively reviewed according to the
criteria for evaluating removal requests
from the Entity List, as set out in 15 CFR
part 744, Supplement No. 5 and 15 CFR
744.16(b). For reasons of national
security, BIS is not at liberty to provide
to the public the information on which
the ERC relied to make the decision to
remove this entity. In addition, the
information included in the removal
request is specific to information
exchanged between the applicant and
the ERC, which by law (section 12(c) of
the Export Administration Act), BIS is
restricted from sharing with the public.
The removal requests from the Entity
List contain confidential business
information, which is necessary for the
extensive review conducted by the U.S.
Government in assessing such removal
requests.
Section 553(d) of the APA generally
provides that rules may not take effect
earlier than thirty (30) days after they
are published in the Federal Register.
BIS finds good cause to waive the 30day delay in effectiveness under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(1) because this rule is a
substantive rule which relieves a
restriction. This rule removes a
requirement (the Entity-List-based
license requirement and limitation on
use of license exceptions) on this one
person being removed from the Entity
List. The rule does not impose a
requirement on any other person for this
one removal from the Entity List.
No other law requires that a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
*
*
*
*
*
China Xinshidai Company, a.k.a.,
the following one alias: -China
New Era Group.
14:44 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Fmt 4700
List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Terrorism.
Accordingly, part 744 of the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
parts 730–774) is amended as follows:
PART 744—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 744 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181,
3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O.
12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p.
356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996
Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3
CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR
44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O.
13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
786; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107
(August 12, 2013); Notice of September 18,
2013, 78 FR 58151 (September 20, 2013);
Notice of November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289
(November 12, 2013); Notice of January 21,
2014, 79 FR 3721 (January 22, 2014).
2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is
amended:
■ a. By adding under China, in
alphabetical order, four Chinese entities;
and
■ b. By adding under Hong Kong, in
alphabetical order, one Hong Kong
entity.
■ c. By removing the heading ‘‘Jordan,’’
and one Jordanian entity, ‘‘Masoud Est.
for Medical and Scientific Supplies, 74
First Floor, Tla’a Al Ali Khali Al Salim
Street, Amman, Jordan 11118.’’
The additions read as follows:
■
Supplement No. 4 to Part 744—Entity
List
License
review policy
*
*
*
For all items subject to the EAR.
(See § 744.11 of the EAR).
Frm 00020
given for this final rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required under the APA or by any other
law, the analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) are not applicable. As a result,
no final regulatory flexibility analysis is
required and none has been prepared.
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Presumption of
denial.
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Federal
Register
citation
*
*
79 FR [INSERT FR
PAGE NUMBER 6–
26–14].
36203
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Country
License
requirement
Entity
Xinshidai Plaza, Plaza No.
Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China.
Federal
Register
citation
License
review policy
7
*
*
*
HWA Create, 5/F, Xinshidai Building/New Era Mansion, 7 Huayuan
Rd., Beijing, China; and No. B3
Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China (See
alternate addresses under Hong
Kong).
*
*
For all items subject to the EAR.
(See § 744.11 of the EAR).
*
Presumption of
denial.
*
79 FR [INSERT FR
PAGE NUMBER 6–
26–14].
*
*
*
Panda
International
Information
Technology Company, Ltd., 7/F, B
Tower, Yingwu Conference Center, No. 6. Huayuan Road,
Haidian District, Beijing, China;
and Rm 606 Block B, Beijing Agricultural
Science
Building,
Shugang Garden Haidian Middle
Rd, Beijing, China.
Poly Technologies Inc., 11F Poly
Plaza, 14 Dongzhimen Nandajie,
Beijing China; and 27 Wanshoulu,
Haidian district, Beijing, China.
*
*
For all items subject to the EAR.
(See § 744.11 of the EAR).
*
Presumption of
denial.
*
79 FR [INSERT FR
PAGE NUMBER 6–
26–14].
For all items subject to the EAR.
(See § 744.11 of the EAR).
Presumption of
denial.
79 FR [INSERT FR
PAGE NUMBER 6–
26–14].
*
HONG KONG
*
*
*
*
*
HWA Create, Unit 1001—1002, 10F,
Chinachem
Building,
34–37
Connaught Rd., Hong Kong; and
Unit A 5th Floor, Cheong Commercial Building, 19–25 Jervois
St, Hong Kong; and Unit B, 6/F,
Dah Sing Life Building, 99—1–5
Des Voeux Rd, Hong Kong (See
alternate addresses under China).
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–14935 Filed 6–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Part 416
[Docket No. SSA–2009–0027]
RIN 0960–AH02
Electronic Substitutions for SSA–538
Social Security Administration.
Final rules.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
This final rule adopts,
without change, the final rule with
request for comments we published in
the Federal Register (76 FR 41685) on
July 15, 2011. We are revising our
regulations to reflect our use of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
For all items subject to the EAR.
(See § 744.11 of the EAR).
*
Dated: June 20, 2014.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
ACTION:
*
*
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
*
Presumption of
denial.
*
electronic case processing at the initial
and reconsideration levels of our
administrative review process. We are
not changing the requirement that State
agency medical and psychological
consultants must affirm the accuracy
and completeness of their findings of
fact and discussion of the supporting
evidence, only the manner in which
they may provide the required findings
and affirmation. This revision will
improve our efficiency by increasing our
use of electronic resources.
DATES: These final rules are effective
June 26, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl Williams, Office of Medical
Listings Improvement, Social Security
Administration, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235–
6401, (410) 965–1020. For information
on eligibility or filing for benefits, call
our national toll-free number, 1–800–
772–1213, or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or
visit our Internet site, Social Security
PO 00000
*
Sfmt 4700
*
*
79 FR [INSERT FR
PAGE NUMBER 6–
26–14].
*
*
Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We are making final the rules for
using electronic substitutions for the
Childhood Disability Evaluation Form
(SSA–538) we published as a final rule
with request for comments in the
Federal Register on July 15, 2011. We
previously required adjudicators at the
initial and reconsideration levels to
complete Form SSA–538 in all cases of
children alleging disability or
continuing disability under title XVI of
the Social Security Act. We now
provide a Web-based tool that assists
our adjudicators in making disability
determinations at the initial and
reconsideration levels. We use the new
tool in electronic cases but do not use
it for cases that we do not process
electronically. The final rule permits
our adjudicators to substitute the Web-
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 123 (Thursday, June 26, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36199-36203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14935]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 744
[Docket No. 140522446-4446-01]
RIN 0694-AG19
Addition of Certain Persons to the Entity List; and Removal of
Person From the Entity List Based on Removal Request
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
[[Page 36200]]
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)
by adding four persons under five entries to the Entity List. The
persons who are added to the Entity List have been determined by the
U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States. These persons will be
listed on the Entity List under the destinations of China and Hong
Kong. There are five entries for four persons because one person is
listed under multiple countries, resulting in one additional entry.
Specifically, the one additional entry covers one person in China who
also has an address in Hong Kong.
In addition, this rule removes one person from the Entity List, as
the result of a request for removal submitted by the person, a review
of information provided in the removal request in accordance with the
EAR, and further review conducted by the End-User Review Committee
(ERC).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective June 26, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User
Review Committee, Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export
Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of
Commerce, Phone: (202) 482-5991, Fax: (202) 482-3911, Email:
ERC@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to Part 744) notifies the public
about entities that have engaged in activities that could result in an
increased risk of the diversion of exported, reexported or transferred
(in-country) items to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. Since
its initial publication, grounds for inclusion on the Entity List have
expanded to include activities sanctioned by the State Department and
activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy
interests, including terrorism and export control violations involving
abuse of human rights. Certain exports, reexports, and transfers (in-
country) to entities identified on the Entity List require licenses
from BIS and are usually subject to a policy of denial. The
availability of license exceptions in such transactions is very
limited. The license review policy for each entity is identified in the
license review policy column on the Entity List and the availability of
license exceptions is noted in the Federal Register notices adding
persons to the Entity List. BIS places entities on the Entity List
based on certain sections of part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and
End-Use Based) of the EAR.
The End-user Review Committee (ERC), composed of representatives of
the Departments of Commerce (Chair), State, Defense, Energy and, where
appropriate, the Treasury, makes all decisions regarding additions to,
removals from, or other modifications to the Entity List. The ERC makes
all decisions to add an entry to the Entity List by majority vote and
all decisions to remove or modify an entry by unanimous vote.
ERC Entity List Decisions
Additions to the Entity List
This rule implements the decision of the ERC to add four persons
under five entries to the Entity List on the basis of Sec. 744.11
(License requirements that apply to entities acting contrary to the
national security or foreign policy interests of the United States) of
the EAR. The five entries added to the Entity List consist of four
entries in China, and one entry in Hong Kong.
The ERC reviewed Sec. 744.11(b) (Criteria for revising the Entity
List) in making the determination to add these four persons to the
Entity List. Under that paragraph, persons for whom there is reasonable
cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts, have been
involved, are involved, or pose a significant risk of being or becoming
involved in, activities that are contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States and those acting on
behalf of such persons may be added to the Entity List. Paragraphs
(b)(1) through (b)(5) of Sec. 744.11 include an illustrative list of
activities that could be contrary to the national security or foreign
policy interests of the United States.
The four persons being added have been determined by the ERC to be
involved in activities that are contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States, including the activities
described under paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(5) of Sec. 744.11.
The ERC determined that Poly Technologies Inc., Xinshidai Company
(New Era Group), and Panda International Information Technology
Company, all located in China, and HWA Create, located in China and
Hong Kong, be added to the Entity List on the basis of their attempts
to procure items, including U.S.-origin items, for activities contrary
to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United
States. The ERC determined that these persons' activities have included
the activities described under paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(5) of Sec.
744.11 of the EAR. Specifically, these companies have attempted to
supply items to the People's Liberation Army and/or to export items to
destinations sanctioned by the United States. The Department of State
sanctioned Poly Technologies Inc. under the Iran, North Korea and Syria
Nonproliferation Act (INKSNA) in February 2013. Xinshidai Company was
sanctioned in 2004 by the Departments of State and the Treasury under
Executive Order 12938, and again by the State Department under INKSNA
in 2008.
Pursuant to Sec. 744.11(b)(2) and (b)(5) of the EAR, the ERC
determined that the conduct of these four persons raises sufficient
concern that prior review of exports, reexports, or transfers (in-
country) of items subject to the EAR involving these persons, and the
possible imposition of license conditions or license denials on
shipments to the persons, will enhance BIS's ability to prevent
violations of the EAR.
For the four persons recommended for addition, the ERC specified a
license requirement for all items subject to the EAR and a license
review policy of presumption of denial. The license requirements apply
to any transaction in which items are to be exported, reexported, or
transferred (in-country) to any of the persons or in which such persons
act as purchaser, intermediate consignee, ultimate consignee, or end-
user. In addition, no license exceptions are available for exports,
reexports, or transfers (in-country) to the persons being added to the
Entity List in this rule.
This final rule adds the following four persons under five entries
to the Entity List:
China
(1) China Xinshidai Company, a.k.a., the following one alias:
--China New Era Group, Xinshidai Plaza, Plaza No. 7 Huayuan Rd.,
Beijing, China;
(2) HWA Create, 5/F, Xinshidai Building/New Era Mansion, 7 Huayuan
Rd., Beijing, China; and
No. B3 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China (See alternate addresses under
Hong Kong);
(3) Panda International Information Technology Company, Ltd., 7/F,
B Tower, Yingwu Conference Center, No. 6. Huayuan Road, Haidian
District, Beijing, China; and
Rm 606 Block B, Beijing Agricultural Science Building, Shugang
Garden Haidian Middle Rd, Beijing, China; and
[[Page 36201]]
(4) Poly Technologies Inc., 11F Poly Plaza, 14 Dongzhimen Nandajie,
Beijing China; and
27 Wanshoulu, Haidian district, Beijing, China.
Hong Kong
(1) HWA Create, Unit 1001-1002, 10F, Chinachem Building, 34-37
Connaught Rd., Hong Kong; and
Unit A 5th Floor, Cheong Commercial Building, 19-25 Jervois St,
Hong Kong; and
Unit B, 6/F, Dah Sing Life Building, 99--1-5 Des Voeux Rd, Hong
Kong (See alternate addresses under China).
Removal From the Entity List
This rule implements a decision of the ERC to remove one person,
Masoud Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies, located in Jordan,
from the Entity List as a result of the person's request for removal
from the Entity List. Based upon the review of the information provided
in the removal request in accordance with Sec. 744.16 (Procedure for
requesting removal or modification of an Entity List entity), and after
review by the ERC's member agencies, the ERC determined that this
person should be removed from the Entity List.
The ERC decision to remove this person took into account this
person's cooperation with the U.S. Government during the appeal
process. In accordance with Sec. 744.16(c), the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration has sent written notification to
this person, informing this entity of the ERC's decision to remove it
from the Entity List. This final rule implements the decision to remove
the following person located in Jordan from the Entity List:
Jordan
(1) Masoud Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies, 74 First
Floor, Tla'a Al Ali Khali Al Salim Street, Amman, Jordan 11118.
The removal of the one entity referenced above, which was made on
the basis of a Sec. 744.16 removal request and was approved by the
ERC, eliminates the existing license requirements in Supplement No. 4
to part 744 for exports, reexports and transfers (in-country) to the
entity. However, the removal of this entity from the Entity List does
not relieve persons of other obligations under part 744 of the EAR or
under other parts of the EAR. Neither the removal of an entity from the
Entity List nor the removal of Entity List-based license requirements
relieves persons of their obligations under General Prohibition 5 in
Sec. 736.2(b)(5) of the EAR which provides that, ``you may not,
without a license, knowingly export or reexport any item subject to the
EAR to an end-user or end-use that is prohibited by part 744 of the
EAR.'' Additionally this removal does not relieve persons of their
obligation to apply for export, reexport or in-country transfer
licenses required by other provisions of the EAR. BIS strongly urges
the use of Supplement No. 3 to part 732 of the EAR, ``BIS's `Know Your
Customer' Guidance and Red Flags,'' when persons are involved in
transactions that are subject to the EAR.
Savings Clause
Shipments of items removed from eligibility for a License Exception
or export or reexport without a license (NLR) as a result of this
regulatory action that were en route aboard a carrier to a port of
export or reexport, on June 26, 2014, pursuant to actual orders for
export or reexport to a foreign destination, may proceed to that
destination under the previous eligibility for a License Exception or
export or reexport without a license (NLR).
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of
August 8, 2013, 78, 2013, 78 FR 49107(August 12, 2013), has continued
the Export Administration Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the
provisions of the Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the
extent permitted by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended
by Executive Order 13637.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
collections previously approved by OMB under control number 0694-0088,
Simplified Network Application Processing System, which includes, among
other things, license applications and carries a burden estimate of
43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission. Total burden hours
associated with the PRA and OMB control number 0694-0088 are not
expected to increase as a result of this rule. You may send comments
regarding the collection of information associated with this rule,
including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K. Seehra,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202) 395-7285.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
4. For the four persons added under five entries to the Entity List
in this final rule, the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity
for public comment and a delay in effective date are inapplicable
because this regulation involves a military or foreign affairs function
of the United States. (See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this
rule to protect U.S. national security or foreign policy interests by
preventing items from being exported, reexported, or transferred (in
country) to the persons being added to the Entity List. If this rule
were delayed to allow for notice and comment and a delay in effective
date, then entities being added to the Entity List by this action would
continue to be able to receive items without a license and to conduct
activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States. In addition, because these parties may
receive notice of the U.S. Government's intention to place these
entities on the Entity List if a proposed rule is published, doing so
would create an incentive for these persons to either accelerate
receiving items subject to the EAR to conduct activities that are
contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the
United States, or to take steps to set up
[[Page 36202]]
additional aliases, change addresses, and other measures to try to
limit the impact of the listing on the Entity List once a final rule
was published. Further, no other law requires that a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this
rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C.
553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been
prepared.
5. For the one removal from the Entity List in this final rule,
pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), BIS finds good cause to waive requirements that this rule
be subject to notice and the opportunity for public comment because it
would be contrary to the public interest.
In determining whether to grant removal requests from the Entity
List, a committee of U.S. Government agencies (the End-user Review
Committee (ERC)) evaluates information about and commitments made by
listed persons requesting removal from the Entity List, the nature and
terms of which are set forth in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5, as
noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b). The information, commitments, and criteria
for this extensive review were all established through the notice of
proposed rulemaking and public comment process (72 FR 31005 (June 5,
2007) (proposed rule), and 73 FR 49311 (August 21, 2008) (final rule)).
This removal has been made within the established regulatory framework
of the Entity List. If the rule were to be delayed to allow for public
comment, U.S. exporters may face unnecessary economic losses as they
turn away potential sales because the customer remained a listed person
on the Entity List even after the ERC approved the removal pursuant to
the rule published at 73 FR 49311 on August 21, 2008. By publishing
without prior notice and comment, BIS allows the applicant to receive
U.S. exports immediately since the applicant already has received
approval by the ERC pursuant to 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5, as
noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b).
The removals from the Entity List granted by the ERC involve
interagency deliberation and result from review of public and non-
public sources, including sensitive law enforcement information and
classified information, and the measurement of such information against
the Entity List removal criteria. This information is extensively
reviewed according to the criteria for evaluating removal requests from
the Entity List, as set out in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5 and 15
CFR 744.16(b). For reasons of national security, BIS is not at liberty
to provide to the public the information on which the ERC relied to
make the decision to remove this entity. In addition, the information
included in the removal request is specific to information exchanged
between the applicant and the ERC, which by law (section 12(c) of the
Export Administration Act), BIS is restricted from sharing with the
public. The removal requests from the Entity List contain confidential
business information, which is necessary for the extensive review
conducted by the U.S. Government in assessing such removal requests.
Section 553(d) of the APA generally provides that rules may not
take effect earlier than thirty (30) days after they are published in
the Federal Register. BIS finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) because this rule is a
substantive rule which relieves a restriction. This rule removes a
requirement (the Entity-List-based license requirement and limitation
on use of license exceptions) on this one person being removed from the
Entity List. The rule does not impose a requirement on any other person
for this one removal from the Entity List.
No other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be given for this final rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are
not required under the APA or by any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
are not applicable. As a result, no final regulatory flexibility
analysis is required and none has been prepared.
List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.
Accordingly, part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730-774) is amended as follows:
PART 744--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 744 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179;
E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR,
1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222,
66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107
(August 12, 2013); Notice of September 18, 2013, 78 FR 58151
(September 20, 2013); Notice of November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289
(November 12, 2013); Notice of January 21, 2014, 79 FR 3721 (January
22, 2014).
0
2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is amended:
0
a. By adding under China, in alphabetical order, four Chinese entities;
and
0
b. By adding under Hong Kong, in alphabetical order, one Hong Kong
entity.
0
c. By removing the heading ``Jordan,'' and one Jordanian entity,
``Masoud Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies, 74 First Floor,
Tla'a Al Ali Khali Al Salim Street, Amman, Jordan 11118.''
The additions read as follows:
Supplement No. 4 to Part 744--Entity List
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Entity License requirement License review policy Federal Register citation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF
* * * * * * *
China Xinshidai Company, For all items subject to Presumption of denial 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6-26-
a.k.a., the following one the EAR. (See Sec. 14].
alias: -China New Era 744.11 of the EAR).
Group.
[[Page 36203]]
Xinshidai Plaza, Plaza No.
7 Huayuan Rd., Beijing,
China.
* * * * * * *
HWA Create, 5/F, Xinshidai For all items subject to Presumption of denial 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6-26-
Building/New Era Mansion, the EAR. (See Sec. 14].
7 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, 744.11 of the EAR).
China; and No. B3 Huayuan
Rd., Beijing, China (See
alternate addresses under
Hong Kong).
* * * * * * *
Panda International For all items subject to Presumption of denial 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6-26-
Information Technology the EAR. (See Sec. 14].
Company, Ltd., 7/F, B 744.11 of the EAR).
Tower, Yingwu Conference
Center, No. 6. Huayuan
Road, Haidian District,
Beijing, China; and Rm 606
Block B, Beijing
Agricultural Science
Building, Shugang Garden
Haidian Middle Rd,
Beijing, China.
Poly Technologies Inc., 11F For all items subject to Presumption of denial 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6-26-
Poly Plaza, 14 Dongzhimen the EAR. (See Sec. 14].
Nandajie, Beijing China; 744.11 of the EAR).
and 27 Wanshoulu, Haidian
district, Beijing, China.
* * * * * * *
HONG KONG
* * * * * * *
HWA Create, Unit 1001-- For all items subject to Presumption of denial 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6-26-
1002, 10F, Chinachem the EAR. (See Sec. 14].
Building, 34-37 Connaught 744.11 of the EAR).
Rd., Hong Kong; and Unit A
5th Floor, Cheong
Commercial Building, 19-25
Jervois St, Hong Kong; and
Unit B, 6/F, Dah Sing Life
Building, 99--1-5 Des
Voeux Rd, Hong Kong (See
alternate addresses under
China).
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: June 20, 2014.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-14935 Filed 6-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P