Asset Securitization, 36264-36269 [2014-14926]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
36264
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
activity required in furtherance of the
securitization or, if acting as servicer,
the conservator or liquidating agent
performs such servicing activities in
accordance with the terms of the
applicable servicing agreements, with
respect to the financial assets included
in securitizations that meet the
requirements applicable to that
securitization as set forth in paragraphs
(b) and (c) of this section.
(f) Notice for consent. Any party
requesting the NCUA Board’s consent as
conservator or liquidating agent under
12 U.S.C. 1787(c)(13)(C) pursuant to
paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section must
provide notice to the President, NCUA
Asset Management & Assistance Center,
4807 Spicewood Springs Road, Suite
5100, Austin, TX 78759–8490, and a
statement of the basis upon which such
request is made, and copies of all
documentation supporting such request,
including without limitation a copy of
the applicable agreements and of any
applicable notices under the contract.
(g) Contemporaneous requirement.
The NCUA Board as conservator or
liquidating agent will not seek to avoid
an otherwise legally enforceable
agreement that is executed by an
insured credit union in connection with
a securitization or in the form of a
participation solely because the
agreement does not meet the
‘‘contemporaneous’’ requirement of 12
U.S.C.1787(b)(9) and 1788(a)(3).
(h) Limitations. The consents set forth
in this section do not act to waive or
relinquish any rights granted to NCUA
in any capacity, including the NCUA
Board as conservator or liquidating
agent, pursuant to any other applicable
law or any agreement or contract except
as specifically set forth herein. Nothing
contained in this section alters the
claims priority of the securitized
obligations.
(i) No waiver. This section does not
authorize the attachment of any
involuntary lien upon the property of
the NCUA Board as conservator or
liquidating agent. Nor does this section
waive, limit, or otherwise affect the
rights or powers of NCUA in any
capacity, including the NCUA Board as
conservator or liquidating agent, to take
any action or to exercise any power not
specifically mentioned, including but
not limited to any rights, powers or
remedies of the NCUA Board as
conservator or liquidating agent
regarding transfers or other conveyances
taken in contemplation of the credit
union’s insolvency or with the intent to
hinder, delay or defraud the credit
union or the creditors of such credit
union, or that is a fraudulent transfer
under applicable law.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
(j) No assignment. The right to
consent under 12 U.S.C. 1787(c)(13)(C)
may not be assigned or transferred to
any purchaser of property from the
NCUA Board as conservator or
liquidating agent, other than to a
conservator or bridge credit union.
(k) Repeal. This section may be
repealed by NCUA upon 30 days’ notice
provided in the Federal Register, but
any repeal does not apply to any
issuance made in accordance with this
section before such repeal.
[FR Doc. 2014–14919 Filed 6–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 721 and 741
RIN 3133–AE29
Asset Securitization
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The NCUA Board (Board)
proposes to amend its regulations to
clarify that a natural person federal
credit union (FCU) is authorized to
securitize loans that it has originated, as
an activity incidental to the business for
which an FCU is chartered, provided
the transaction meets certain
requirements. The proposed rule would
also apply those requirements to
federally insured, state-chartered credit
unions (FISCUs) that are permitted by
state law to securitize their assets.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (Please
send comments by one method only):
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• NCUA Web site: https://
www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/proposed_
regs/proposed_regs.html. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: Address to regcomments@
ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your name]—
Comments on Proposed Rule—Asset
Securitization’’ in the email subject line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for email.
• Mail: Address to Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mail address.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Dale
Klein, Senior Capital Markets Specialist,
Office of Examination and Insurance, at
the above address or telephone (703)
518–6360; Jeremy Taylor, Senior Capital
Markets Specialist, Office of National
Examinations and Supervision, at the
above address or telephone (703) 518–
6640; or Lisa Henderson, Staff Attorney,
Office of General Counsel, at the above
address or telephone (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Table of Contents
I. Background
1. Federal Credit Union Authority To
Securitize Assets
2. Why is NCUA proposing this rule?
II. Proposed Rule
1. Part 721—Incidental Powers
2. Asset Securitization Activities
3. Loans the FCU Has Originated
4. Authority To Create Issuing Entities
5. Other Minimum Requirements
6. Residual Interests and Retained Interests
7. Implicit Recourse Prohibited
8. Federally Insured, State-Chartered Credit
Unions
III. Safe Harbor
IV. Regulatory Procedures
1. Regulatory Flexibility Act
2. Paperwork Reduction Act
3. Executive Order 13132
4. Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
I. Background
1. Federal Credit Union Authority To
Securitize Assets
For purposes of this rule,
‘‘securitizing assets’’ means acting as a
sponsor of a securitization, i.e.,
organizing and initiating a securitization
transaction by transferring financial
assets to an entity that will issue
obligations supported by such assets.
While the Federal Credit Union Act (the
Act) explicitly authorizes an FCU to sell
its loans,1 it provides no express
authority to securitize them. The Act
does, however, authorize an FCU to
‘‘exercise such incidental powers as
shall be necessary or requisite to enable
it to carry on effectively the business for
which it is incorporated.’’ 2 Under
NCUA regulations, an activity meets the
definition of an incidental power
activity if it meets a three-part test.3 As
discussed below, the Board has
determined that securitizing assets
meets that test as long as the assets
being securitized are in the form of
loans originated by the sponsoring FCU
to its members.
Under the first prong of the test, an
activity must be convenient or useful in
1 12
U.S.C. 1757(13).
U.S.C. 1757(17).
3 12 CFR 721.2.
2 12
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
carrying out the mission or business of
credit unions consistent with the Act.
One of the fundamental purposes of
credit unions is making loans to
members.4 Credit unions must have
sufficient liquidity to make loans, and
the Act provides a number of means for
FCUs to obtain cash to fund lending,
including receiving shares, investing
excess funds, borrowing, and selling
eligible obligations.5 Securitizing assets
is another means of obtaining cash to
fund lending. As such, it is convenient
and useful in carrying out a credit
union’s central mission.
Under the second part of the test, the
activity must be the functional
equivalent or logical outgrowth of
activities that are part of the mission or
business of credit unions. FCUs already
make loans and either hold them on
their books or sell them, or sell a
participation interest in them, into the
secondary market. Selling loans by
repackaging them as securities is a
logical outgrowth of an FCU’s mission
and business.
Finally, the activity must involve
risks similar in nature to those already
assumed as part of the business of credit
unions. Risk is fundamental to the
operation of a credit union, and credit
unions must balance risk and reward
responsibly. Making and selling loans
present FCUs with, at a minimum,
reputation risk, strategic risk, credit risk,
transaction risk, liquidity risk, and
compliance risk. While securitizing
loans introduces more complex legal
and operational risks, these risk types
are inherent in other credit union
activities and are thus similar in nature
to those already assumed as part of the
business of credit unions. Accordingly,
NCUA has concluded that FCUs have
the incidental power to securitize assets.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Why is NCUA proposing this rule?
The Board proposes to amend its
regulations to clarify that, under certain
circumstances, an FCU has the
incidental authority to securitize loans
that it has originated. The Board
believes that there are a number of
potential benefits of securitization. First,
securitization provides originators with
an additional source of funding or
liquidity to meet members’ needs.
Second, securitization may be used to
reduce interest rate risk by converting
fixed-rate assets into cash. Finally, the
sale of assets may reduce an FCU’s
regulatory costs by allowing it to
optimize its capital management. The
details of how an FCU may operate an
4 12
5 12
U.S.C. 1752(1).
U.S.C. 1757(6), (7), (9), and (13).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
asset securitization program are
discussed in more detail below.
II. Proposed Rule
1. Part 721—Incidental Powers
The proposed rule adds a new
provision to Part 721 of NCUA’s
regulations, which addresses the
incidental powers of FCUs. Section
721.3 enumerates the categories of
activities that are preapproved as
incidental powers of an FCU. The
proposed rule adds a new paragraph (n)
to § 721.3 to establish securitizing loans
as a preapproved incidental power.
2. Asset Securitization Activities
Paragraph (1) of the proposed rule
labels the newly approved category
‘‘asset securitization activities’’ in
which an FCU acts as the sponsor of an
asset-backed security. Paragraph (2)
defines ‘‘sponsor,’’ ‘‘asset-backed
security,’’ and other relevant terms.
3. Loans the FCU Has Originated
Paragraph (3) of the proposed rule
provides that an FCU may securitize
and sell loans it has originated. As
discussed above, securitizing loans
presents more complex risks than
simply making and selling loans.
Allowing FCUs to purchase loans for the
purpose of issuing asset-backed
securities would add an additional layer
of risk, in an area that is uncharted for
both FCUs and NCUA. Accordingly, for
safety and soundness reasons, the
proposed rule limits FCUs to
securitizing only loans it has
originated.6 To avoid confusion, the
proposed rule clarifies that the purchase
and re-underwriting of a loan does not
meet the origination requirement.
4. Authority To Create Issuing Entities
To securitize assets, a sponsor must
be able to create an issuing entity,
commonly known as a special purpose
vehicle or special purpose entity, to
hold the assets collateralizing the assetbacked security. The Board considers an
FCU’s authority to create such entities
to be included within the general
incidental power to securitize assets,
but has made that authority explicit in
paragraph (4) of the proposed rule to
avoid confusion.7 An issuing entity can
take the form of a corporation, trust,
6 The Board notes that this limitation does not
prevent FCUs from purchasing loans to complete a
pool to be sold on the secondary market, other than
through a securitization. 12 CFR 701.23(b).
7 The Board notes that NCUA’s regulations
governing credit union service organizations
(CUSOs) do not apply to the creation of issuing
entities. 12 CFR 712. Further, acting as an issuing
entity is not a preapproved CUSO activity. 12 CFR
712.5.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36265
partnership, or limited liability
company, and is a vehicle whose
operations are typically limited to the
acquisition and financing of specific
assets. The proposed rule requires that
any issuing entity created by an FCU be
bankruptcy remote from the FCU, which
means the issuing entity’s assets are
isolated from any creditors of the FCU
should the FCU become insolvent. This
can be achieved through a variety of
methods, including limiting the issuing
entity’s purpose, indebtedness, assets,
and other liabilities, as well as by
ensuring through its corporate
governance process that decisions
regarding bankruptcy will be made from
the point of view of the issuing entity
itself, not the FCU.
5. Other Minimum Requirements
Paragraph (5) of the proposed rule
establishes the following seven
minimum safety and soundness
requirements for an FCU engaging in
securitizing assets:
a. Compliance With All Federal and
State Laws and Regulations
An FCU engaged in securitizing
transactions may be subject to numerous
registration, disclosure, filing, reporting,
and other legal requirements. The
complexity of asset securitization
transactions requires an FCU that
participates in securitization activities
to fully investigate all applicable laws
and regulations, to establish policies
and procedures to assure legal review of
all securitization activities, and to take
steps to protect itself from liability in
the case of problems with particular
asset-backed securitization transactions.
b. Independent Risk Management
An FCU engaged in securitizations
must have in place independent risk
management controls commensurate
with the complexity and volume of its
securitizations and its overall risk
exposures. The risk management
controls must ensure that securitization
policies and operating procedures,
including clearly articulated risk limits,
are in place and appropriate for the
FCU.
c. Annual Audit
As an added measure of safety and
soundness, the proposed rule requires
an FCU engaged in securitization
transactions to have an annual audit of
its financial statements performed in
accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards by an independent
licensed auditor. The proposed rule
further requires that the financial
statements include all aspects of
accounting and disclosure for sponsored
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
36266
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
securitizations in accordance with
generally accepted accounting
principles.
d. Board Knowledge
The board of directors of an FCU
engaged in securitizations must have a
general understanding of the risks and
benefits of securitization activities and
how those activities fit into the credit
union’s strategic and business plans.
e. Management Expertise
Senior management responsible for an
FCU’s securitization activities must
possess sufficient expertise to oversee
those activities. Unlike many other
credit union activities, an FCU engaged
in securitizing assets is likely to engage
outside parties for much of the required
procedures. It is not necessary for the
FCU to possess all of the required skills
in house. However, senior FCU
management must have sufficient
understanding and familiarity with the
process to competently select and
oversee parties hired or engaged to
support the activities.
f. Board Approved Policy
An FCU engaged in securitizations
must have a credit union board
approved asset securitization policy that
includes or addresses, at a minimum,
the following items:
• A statement of the business purpose
for engaging in securitization activities,
including the general scope of the
activities and the level of acceptable
risk.
• The governance of securitization
activities;
• A written and consistently applied
accounting methodology;
• Regulatory reporting requirements;
• Valuation methods, including those
applicable to the FCU’s residual
interests and retained interests in the
securitization transaction, and
procedures to formally approve changes
to those assumptions;
• The management reporting process;
and
• Exposure limits and requirements
for both aggregate and individual
transaction monitoring.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
g. Internal Controls
Effective internal controls are
essential to an FCU’s management of the
risks associated with securitization.
When properly designed and
consistently enforced, a sound system of
internal controls will help management
safeguard the FCUs resources, ensure
that financial information and reports
are reliable, and comply with
contractual obligations, including
securitization covenants. It will also
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
reduce the possibility of significant
errors and irregularities, as well as assist
in their timely detection when they do
occur. Internal controls typically: (1)
Limit authorities, (2) safeguard access to
and use of records, (3) separate and
rotate duties, and (4) ensure both regular
and unscheduled reviews, including
testing.
6. Residual Interests and Retained
Interests
The sponsor of an asset-backed
security typically retains an interest in
a securitization. Except in certain
limited circumstances, NCUA
regulations prohibit an FCU from
investing in stripped mortgage backed
securities and residual interests in
collateralized mortgage obligations.8
Paragraph (6)(a) of the proposed rule
clarifies that those prohibitions do not
apply to interests retained in the course
of sponsoring a securitization
transaction.
Paragraph (6)(b) of the proposed rule
requires an FCU to use reasonable and
supportable assumptions and modeling
methodologies to assign values to
residual interests and retained interests.
These assumptions and methodologies
must be fully documented. The key
assumptions in all valuation analyses
include prepayment or payment rates,
default rates, loss severity factors, and
discount rates. Paragraph 6(b) also
requires an FCU to recognize credit
impairment for all residual interests and
retained interests in accordance with
generally accepted accounting
principles.
Residual interests and retained
interests concentrate risks to support
investor interests. Therefore their value
is more susceptible to credit and market
risks than the underlying pool of assets.
Because of these heightened risks,
paragraph (6)(c) of the proposed rule
limits the amount of residual interests
and retained interests that an FCU may
carry to 25% of the FCU’s net worth.
Residual interests and retained interests
in pass-through securities, which
generally have the same profile of risk
as the underlying assets, are not
included in this limitation. The Board
specifically requests comment on the
appropriateness of this limit, including
a detailed rationale for any
recommended higher limit.
7. Implicit Recourse Prohibited
Sponsors of asset-backed securities
may provide contract-based support for
a securitization through, among other
things, overcollateralization,
maintaining a seller’s or transferor’s
8 12
PO 00000
CFR 703.16(c) and (d).
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
interest, and issuing stand-by letters of
credit for cash flow purposes. In
addition to these legal obligations, in
certain circumstances, an originator may
wish to provide post-sale credit support
to poorly performing asset pools,
commonly referred to as ‘‘implicit’’
recourse. To limit risk, however,
paragraph (7) of the proposed rule
prohibits FCUs from providing implicit
recourse to a securitization.
8. Federally Insured, State-Chartered
Credit Unions
The proposed rule amends Part 741
by adding a new § 741.226 to extend the
proposed securitization requirements to
FISCUs. The Board believes that there
could be a risk to the National Credit
Union Share Insurance Fund if state law
permits a FISCU to sponsor a
securitization and the state’s associated
safety and soundness requirements vary
from those applicable to FCUs.
III. Safe Harbor
This proposal is related to a
companion proposal to amend § 709.10,
published elsewhere in today’s Federal
Register. Section 709.10 governs the
authority of the Board, when acting as
conservator or liquidating agent of any
federally insured credit union (FICU), to
disaffirm or repudiate transfers of
financial assets by a FICU in connection
with a securitization or participation.
Section 709.10 was issued to provide a
‘‘safe harbor’’ by confirming ‘‘legal
isolation’’ if all other standards for off
balance sheet accounting treatment were
met by the transfer in connection with
a securitization or a participation. In
2000, when current § 709.10 was
adopted, satisfaction of legal isolation
was vital to securitization transactions
because of the risk that the pool of
financial assets transferred into the
securitization trust could be recovered
in bankruptcy or in a credit union
liquidation. If the transfer satisfied this
condition, the regulation confirmed that
the transferred assets were legally
isolated from the FICU in an NCUA
conservatorship or liquidation.
In 2009, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board finalized modifications
to generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) that affected whether
an issuing entity must be consolidated
for financial reporting purposes, thereby
subjecting many issuing entities to
GAAP consolidation requirements. As a
result of the modifications, legal and
accounting treatment of a securitization
transaction may no longer be aligned,
and the safe harbor provision of current
§ 709.10 may not apply to a transfer in
connection with a securitization that
does not qualify for off balance sheet
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
treatment. The companion proposal
would amend § 709.10 to provide safe
harbor for transfers in connection with
securitizations under the revised
accounting standards. The Board
requests comment on whether the
proposed safe harbor requirements
should be included in any final rule that
addresses FCU authority to securitize
assets.
IV. Regulatory Procedures
1. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis of
any significant economic impact any
proposed regulation may have on a
substantial number of small entities
(primarily those under $50 million in
assets).9 This proposed rule will only
apply to the largest credit unions, as
securitizing assets requires significant
infrastructure and resources.
Accordingly, it will not have a
significant economic impact on a
significant number of small credit
unions.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) applies to rulemakings in which
an agency by rule creates a new
paperwork burden on regulated entities
or increases an existing burden.10 For
purposes of the PRA, a paperwork
burden may take the form of a reporting
or recordkeeping requirement, both
referred to as information collections.
The proposed changes to part 721
impose one new information collection
requirement. As required by the PRA,
NCUA is submitting a copy of this
proposal to OMB for its review and
approval. Persons interested in
submitting comments with respect to
the information collection aspects of the
proposed rule should submit them to
OMB at the address noted below.
a. Estimated PRA Burden
The information collection
requirement is found in section
721.3(n)(5)(iii) of the proposed rule.
That provision requires an FCU that
undertakes securitization activities to
have a credit union board approved
policy stating the purpose and
governance of securitization activities.
NCUA estimates that it will take 50
hours to develop a securitization policy
initially and 10 hours to maintain the
policy annually. As NCUA further
estimates that only one FCU will
undertake asset securitization activities,
the initial paperwork burden is 50 hours
and ongoing burden is 10 hours.
95
U.S.C. 603(a); 12 U.S.C. 1787(c)(1).
U.S.C. 3507(d); 5 CFR part 1320.
10 44
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
b. Submission of Comments
NCUA considers comments by the
public on this proposed collection of
information in:
• Evaluating whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of NCUA, including whether
the information will have a practical
use;
• Evaluating the accuracy of NCUA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
OMB will make a decision concerning
the collection of information contained
in the proposed regulation between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment to OMB is best
assured of having its full effect if OMB
receives it within 30 days of
publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment to
NCUA on the substantive aspects of the
proposed regulation.
Comments on the proposed
information collection requirements
should be sent to: Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; Attention: NCUA Desk
Officer, with a copy to Tracy Crews at
the National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314–3428.
3. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. NCUA, an
independent regulatory agency as
defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily
complies with the executive order to
adhere to fundamental federalism
principles. The proposed rule does not
have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has,
therefore, determined that this proposal
does not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of
the executive order.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36267
4. Assessment of Federal Regulations
and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this
proposed rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of § 654
of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999,
Public Law 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681
(1998).
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 721
Credit unions, Functions, Implied
powers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
12 CFR Part 741
Credit, Credit unions, Reporting and
Recordkeeping requirements, Share
insurance.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board, on June 19, 2014.
Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons discussed above, the
National Credit Union Administration
proposes to amend parts 721 and 741 as
follows:
PART 721—INCIDENTAL POWERS
1. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757(17), 1766, 1789.
2. In § 721.3, add paragraph (n) to read
as follows:
■
§ 721.3 What categories of activities are
preapproved as incidental powers
necessary or requisite to carry on a credit
union’s business?
*
*
*
*
*
(n)(1) Asset securitization activities.
Asset securitization activities are
activities in which a federal credit
union acts as the sponsor of an assetbacked security.
(i) Purpose. This section authorizes
federal credit unions to offer and sell
loans they have originated into
securitization vehicles and sets
minimum safety and soundness
standards for securitization transactions.
(ii) Scope. This section applies to
natural person federal credit unions.
(2) Definitions.
As used in this paragraph (n):
Asset-backed security has the same
meaning as in section 3(a)(79) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78c(a)(79).
Bankruptcy remote means insulated
from the consequences of any related
party’s insolvency.
Financial asset means cash or a
contract or instrument that conveys to
one entity a contractual right to receive
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
36268
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
cash or another financial instrument
from another entity.
Issuing entity means an entity that
owns a financial asset or financial assets
transferred by the sponsor and issues
obligations supported by such asset or
assets. Issuing entities may include, but
are not limited to, corporations,
partnerships, trusts, and limited liability
companies and are commonly referred
to as special purpose vehicles or special
purpose entities. To the extent a
securitization is structured as a multistep transfer, the term issuing entity
would include both the issuer of the
obligations and any intermediate
entities that may be a transferee.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a
Specified GSE or an entity established
or guaranteed by a Specified GSE does
not constitute an issuing entity.
Obligation means a debt or equity (or
mixed) beneficial interest or security
that is primarily serviced by the cash
flows of one or more financial assets or
financial asset pools, either fixed or
revolving, that by their terms convert
into cash within a finite time period, or
upon the disposition of the underlying
financial assets, and by any rights or
other assets designed to assure the
servicing or timely distributions of
proceeds to the security holders issued
by an issuing entity. The term may
include beneficial interests in a grantor
trust, common law trust or similar
issuing entity to the extent that such
interests satisfy the criteria set forth in
the preceding sentence, but does not
include LLC interests, partnership
interests, common or preferred equity,
or similar instruments evidencing
ownership of the issuing entity.
Originate means to make an extension
of credit.
Recourse means an arrangement in
which a credit union retains, in form or
in substance, any credit risk directly or
indirectly associated with an asset it has
sold (in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles) that
exceeds a pro rata share of the credit
union’s claim on the asset.
Residual interest means any onbalance sheet asset that represents an
interest created by a transfer of financial
assets through a securitization that
exposes a federal credit union to credit
risk directly or indirectly associated
with the transferred assets that exceeds
a pro rata share of the credit union’s
claim on the assets, whether through
subordination provisions or other credit
enhancement techniques.
Retained interest means an interest in
a securitization held by the sponsor or
issuing entity.
Securitize means to sponsor a
securitization.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Securitization means the issuance by
an issuing entity of obligations for
which the investors are relying on the
cash flow or market value
characteristics and the credit quality of
transferred financial assets (together
with any external credit support
permitted by this section) to repay the
obligations.
Seller’s interest means the ownership
interest in the issuing entity’s assets that
have not been allocated to any
investment certificate holder.
Specified GSE means each of the
following: (i) The Federal National
Mortgage Association and any affiliate
thereof; (ii) Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation and any affiliate
thereof; (iii) the Government National
Mortgage Association; and (iv) any
federal or state sponsored mortgage
finance agency.
Sponsor means a person or entity that
organizes and initiates a securitization
transaction by transferring financial
assets, either directly or indirectly,
including through an affiliate, to an
issuing entity, whether or not such
person owns an interest in the issuing
entity or owns any of the obligations
issued by the issuing entity.
Transfer means (i) the conveyance of
a financial asset or financial assets to an
issuing entity; or (ii) the creation of a
security interest in such asset or assets
for the benefit of the issuing entity.
(3) Securitization. As a part of its
business, a federal credit union may
securitize and sell loans that it has
originated. The purchase and reunderwriting of a loan does not
constitute origination within the
meaning of this paragraph.
(4) Authority to create issuing entities.
A federal credit union is authorized to
create issuing entities for the purpose of
securitizing loans that it has originated.
Any issuing entity created under this
authority must be bankruptcy remote or
otherwise isolated for insolvency
purposes from the federal credit union.
(5) Other minimum requirements. A
federal credit union engaged in
securitization transactions, as
authorized in paragraph (n)(3) of this
section, must meet the following
requirements.
(i) The federal credit union must with
all applicable federal and state laws and
regulations.
(ii) The federal credit union must put
in place a risk management process that
is independent of the securitization
process to monitor securitization pool
performance on an aggregate and
individual transaction level.
(iii) The federal credit union’s
supervisory committee must obtain an
annual audit of the credit union’s
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
financial statements performed in
accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards by an independent
licensed auditor. The financial
statements subject to audit must include
all aspects of accounting and disclosure
for sponsored securitizations in
accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
(iv) The federal credit union’s board
of directors must possess a general
understanding of asset securitization.
(v) The federal credit union’s senior
executive officers responsible for
securitization activities must possess
sufficient expertise to oversee those
activities.
(vi) The federal credit union must
have a credit union board approved
policy, stating the purpose of
securitization activities and establishing
principles for their governance.
(vii) The federal credit union’s
internal audit or internal risk review
function must periodically review data
integrity, model algorithms, key
underlying assumptions, and the
appropriateness of the valuation and
modeling process for the securitized
assets retained by the federal credit
union, and report the findings of such
reviews directly to the federal credit
union’s board or an appropriate board
member.
(6) Residual interests and retained
interests.
(i) Any provision in part 703 of this
chapter that limits a federal credit
union’s ability to hold a stripped
mortgage backed security or residual
interest in a collateralized mortgage
obligation does not apply to such an
instrument retained in the course of
sponsoring a securitization transaction.
(ii) A federal credit union must
employ reasonable and supportable
valuation assumptions and modeling
methodologies to establish, evaluate,
and adjust the carrying value of residual
interests and retained interests on a
regular and timely basis and must
recognize credit impairment for all
residual interests and retained interests
in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
(iii) A federal credit union must limit
the maximum amount of all residual
interests and retained interests to 25
percent of net worth. Residual interests
and retained interests in pass-through
securities, which assume a pro-rata
share of risk, are not included in this
limitation.
(7) Implicit recourse prohibited. A
federal credit union may not provide
post-sale credit support beyond the
contractual obligations entered into at
the time of issuance of a securitization
transaction.
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
PART 741—REQUIREMENTS FOR
INSURANCE
■
3. Add § 741.226 to read as follows:
§ 741.226
Asset securitization.
Any credit union that is insured
pursuant to Title II of the Act must
adhere to the requirements stated in
§ 721.3(n) of this chapter.
[FR Doc. 2014–14926 Filed 6–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Part 40
[Docket No. RM14–7–000]
Modeling, Data, and Analysis
Reliability Standards
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal Power
Act, the Commission proposes to
approve Modeling, Data, and Analysis
Reliability Standard MOD–001–2
developed by the North American
Electric Reliability Corporation, which
the Commission has certified as the
Electric Reliability Organization
responsible for developing and
enforcing mandatory Reliability
Standards.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Comments are due August 25,
2014.
Comments, identified by
docket number, may be filed in the
following ways:
• Electronic Filing through https://
www.ferc.gov. Documents created
electronically using word processing
software should be filed in native
applications or print-to-PDF format and
not in a scanned format.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Those unable
to file electronically may mail or handdeliver comments to: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Comment Procedures Section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Gandolfo (Technical
Information), Office of Electric
Reliability, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, Telephone:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jun 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
(202) 502–6817, Michael.Gandolfo@
ferc.gov
Robert T. Stroh (Legal Information),
Office of the General Counsel, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426, Telephone: (202) 502–8473,
Robert.Stroh@ferc.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Pursuant to section 215(d) of the
Federal Power Act (FPA),1 the
Commission proposes to approve
Reliability Standard MOD–001–2
(Modeling, Data, and Analysis)
developed by the North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC),
which the Commission has certified as
the Electric Reliability Organization
(ERO) responsible for developing and
enforcing mandatory Reliability
Standards. Reliability Standard MOD–
001–2 addresses the reliability issues
associated with determinations of
available transfer capability (ATC) and
available flowgate capability (AFC). The
Commission also proposes to approve
the associated violation risk factors and
violation severity levels and NERC’s
proposed retirement of the currently
effective Reliability Standards MOD–
001–1a, MOD–004–1, MOD–008–1,
MOD–028–2, MOD–029–1a, and MOD–
030–2.
I. Background
2. Section 215 of the FPA requires a
Commission-certified ERO to develop
mandatory and enforceable Reliability
Standards, which are subject to
Commission review and approval. Once
approved, the Reliability Standards are
enforced by the ERO, subject to
Commission oversight, or by the
Commission independently.
Development of ATC and AFC in Order
Nos. 888, 889 and 890
3. NERC developed the currentlyeffective Reliability Standards MOD–
001–1a, MOD–004–1, MOD–008–1,
MOD–028–2, MOD–029–1a, and MOD–
030–2 (Existing MOD A Standards)
based on the obligation for transmission
service providers to determine ATC and
AFC, as those terms were introduced in
Order Nos. 888 and 889.2 Although
1 16
U.S.C. 824o(d) (2012).
Wholesale Competition Through
Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission
Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded
Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities,
Order No. 888, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,036 (1996),
order on reh’g, Order No. 888–A, FERC Stats. &
Regs. ¶ 31,048, order on reh’g, Order No. 888–B, 81
FERC ¶ 61,248 (1997), order on reh’g, Order No.
888–C, 82 FERC ¶ 61,046 (1998), aff’d in relevant
part sub nom. Transmission Access Policy Study
Group v. FERC, 225 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2000), aff’d
sub nom. New York v. FERC, 535 U.S. 1 (2002).
Open Access Same-Time Information System
2 Promoting
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36269
Order Nos. 888 and 889 obligated each
public utility to calculate and post ATC,
formal methods for calculating ATC or
AFC did not exist, nor did the
Commission mandate the use of specific
methodologies.
4. In February 2007 the Commission
issued Order No. 890 and, among other
things, sought to standardize the
manner in which ATC/AFC was
calculated.3 The Commission also noted
that ATC/AFC calculations raise
reliability issues, namely, the need for a
transmission provider to know of its
neighbors’ system conditions affecting
its own ATC values. As a result of this
reliability concern, the Commission
found that the proposed ATC reforms
were also supported by FPA section
215, through which the Commission has
the authority to direct the ERO to
submit a Reliability Standard that
addresses a specific matter.4 Thus, the
Commission in Order No. 890 directed
the development of Reliability
Standards, using the ERO’s Reliability
Standards development process, that
provide for consistency and
transparency in the methodologies used
by transmission owners to calculate
ATC. The Commission found that, if all
of the ATC components and certain data
inputs and certain assumptions are
consistent, the ATC calculation
methodologies would produce
predictable and sufficiently accurate,
consistent, equivalent and replicable
results.5
Order Nos. 693 and 729
5. On March 16, 2007, the
Commission issued Order No. 693,
approving 83 of the 107 Reliability
Standards filed by NERC in April 2006.6
Of the 83 approved Reliability
Standards, the Commission approved
ten MOD Reliability Standards. In
addition, the Commission directed
NERC to prospectively modify nine of
the ten approved MOD Reliability
(Formerly Real-Time Information Networks) and
Standards of Conduct, Order No. 889, 61 FR 21737
(May 10, 1996), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,035, at
31,749 (1996), order on reh’g, Order No. 889–A,
FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,049, order on reh’g, Order
No. 889–B, 81 FERC ¶ 61,253 (1997).
3 Preventing Undue Discrimination and
Preference in Transmission Service, Order No. 890,
FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,241, at P 68, order on
reh’g, Order No. 890–A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶
31,261 (2007), order on reh’g, Order No. 890–B, 123
FERC ¶ 61,299 (2008), order on reh’g, Order No.
890–C, 126 FERC ¶ 61,228, order on clarification,
Order No. 890–D, 129 FERC ¶ 61,126 (2009).
4 See 16 U.S.C. 824o(d)(5).
5 Order No. 890, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,241 at
P 210.
6 Mandatory Reliability Standards for the BulkPower System, Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs.
¶ 31,242, order on reh’g, Order No. 693–A, 120
FERC ¶ 61,053 (2007).
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 123 (Thursday, June 26, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36264-36269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14926]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 721 and 741
RIN 3133-AE29
Asset Securitization
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NCUA Board (Board) proposes to amend its regulations to
clarify that a natural person federal credit union (FCU) is authorized
to securitize loans that it has originated, as an activity incidental
to the business for which an FCU is chartered, provided the transaction
meets certain requirements. The proposed rule would also apply those
requirements to federally insured, state-chartered credit unions
(FISCUs) that are permitted by state law to securitize their assets.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(Please send comments by one method only):
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
NCUA Web site: https://www.ncua.gov/RegulationsOpinionsLaws/proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Address to regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ``[Your
name]--Comments on Proposed Rule--Asset Securitization'' in the email
subject line.
Fax: (703) 518-6319. Use the subject line described above
for email.
Mail: Address to Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314-3428.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Klein, Senior Capital Markets
Specialist, Office of Examination and Insurance, at the above address
or telephone (703) 518-6360; Jeremy Taylor, Senior Capital Markets
Specialist, Office of National Examinations and Supervision, at the
above address or telephone (703) 518-6640; or Lisa Henderson, Staff
Attorney, Office of General Counsel, at the above address or telephone
(703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
1. Federal Credit Union Authority To Securitize Assets
2. Why is NCUA proposing this rule?
II. Proposed Rule
1. Part 721--Incidental Powers
2. Asset Securitization Activities
3. Loans the FCU Has Originated
4. Authority To Create Issuing Entities
5. Other Minimum Requirements
6. Residual Interests and Retained Interests
7. Implicit Recourse Prohibited
8. Federally Insured, State-Chartered Credit Unions
III. Safe Harbor
IV. Regulatory Procedures
1. Regulatory Flexibility Act
2. Paperwork Reduction Act
3. Executive Order 13132
4. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
I. Background
1. Federal Credit Union Authority To Securitize Assets
For purposes of this rule, ``securitizing assets'' means acting as
a sponsor of a securitization, i.e., organizing and initiating a
securitization transaction by transferring financial assets to an
entity that will issue obligations supported by such assets. While the
Federal Credit Union Act (the Act) explicitly authorizes an FCU to sell
its loans,\1\ it provides no express authority to securitize them. The
Act does, however, authorize an FCU to ``exercise such incidental
powers as shall be necessary or requisite to enable it to carry on
effectively the business for which it is incorporated.'' \2\ Under NCUA
regulations, an activity meets the definition of an incidental power
activity if it meets a three-part test.\3\ As discussed below, the
Board has determined that securitizing assets meets that test as long
as the assets being securitized are in the form of loans originated by
the sponsoring FCU to its members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(13).
\2\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(17).
\3\ 12 CFR 721.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the first prong of the test, an activity must be convenient
or useful in
[[Page 36265]]
carrying out the mission or business of credit unions consistent with
the Act. One of the fundamental purposes of credit unions is making
loans to members.\4\ Credit unions must have sufficient liquidity to
make loans, and the Act provides a number of means for FCUs to obtain
cash to fund lending, including receiving shares, investing excess
funds, borrowing, and selling eligible obligations.\5\ Securitizing
assets is another means of obtaining cash to fund lending. As such, it
is convenient and useful in carrying out a credit union's central
mission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 12 U.S.C. 1752(1).
\5\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(6), (7), (9), and (13).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the second part of the test, the activity must be the
functional equivalent or logical outgrowth of activities that are part
of the mission or business of credit unions. FCUs already make loans
and either hold them on their books or sell them, or sell a
participation interest in them, into the secondary market. Selling
loans by repackaging them as securities is a logical outgrowth of an
FCU's mission and business.
Finally, the activity must involve risks similar in nature to those
already assumed as part of the business of credit unions. Risk is
fundamental to the operation of a credit union, and credit unions must
balance risk and reward responsibly. Making and selling loans present
FCUs with, at a minimum, reputation risk, strategic risk, credit risk,
transaction risk, liquidity risk, and compliance risk. While
securitizing loans introduces more complex legal and operational risks,
these risk types are inherent in other credit union activities and are
thus similar in nature to those already assumed as part of the business
of credit unions. Accordingly, NCUA has concluded that FCUs have the
incidental power to securitize assets.
2. Why is NCUA proposing this rule?
The Board proposes to amend its regulations to clarify that, under
certain circumstances, an FCU has the incidental authority to
securitize loans that it has originated. The Board believes that there
are a number of potential benefits of securitization. First,
securitization provides originators with an additional source of
funding or liquidity to meet members' needs. Second, securitization may
be used to reduce interest rate risk by converting fixed-rate assets
into cash. Finally, the sale of assets may reduce an FCU's regulatory
costs by allowing it to optimize its capital management. The details of
how an FCU may operate an asset securitization program are discussed in
more detail below.
II. Proposed Rule
1. Part 721--Incidental Powers
The proposed rule adds a new provision to Part 721 of NCUA's
regulations, which addresses the incidental powers of FCUs. Section
721.3 enumerates the categories of activities that are preapproved as
incidental powers of an FCU. The proposed rule adds a new paragraph (n)
to Sec. 721.3 to establish securitizing loans as a preapproved
incidental power.
2. Asset Securitization Activities
Paragraph (1) of the proposed rule labels the newly approved
category ``asset securitization activities'' in which an FCU acts as
the sponsor of an asset-backed security. Paragraph (2) defines
``sponsor,'' ``asset-backed security,'' and other relevant terms.
3. Loans the FCU Has Originated
Paragraph (3) of the proposed rule provides that an FCU may
securitize and sell loans it has originated. As discussed above,
securitizing loans presents more complex risks than simply making and
selling loans. Allowing FCUs to purchase loans for the purpose of
issuing asset-backed securities would add an additional layer of risk,
in an area that is uncharted for both FCUs and NCUA. Accordingly, for
safety and soundness reasons, the proposed rule limits FCUs to
securitizing only loans it has originated.\6\ To avoid confusion, the
proposed rule clarifies that the purchase and re-underwriting of a loan
does not meet the origination requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Board notes that this limitation does not prevent FCUs
from purchasing loans to complete a pool to be sold on the secondary
market, other than through a securitization. 12 CFR 701.23(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Authority To Create Issuing Entities
To securitize assets, a sponsor must be able to create an issuing
entity, commonly known as a special purpose vehicle or special purpose
entity, to hold the assets collateralizing the asset-backed security.
The Board considers an FCU's authority to create such entities to be
included within the general incidental power to securitize assets, but
has made that authority explicit in paragraph (4) of the proposed rule
to avoid confusion.\7\ An issuing entity can take the form of a
corporation, trust, partnership, or limited liability company, and is a
vehicle whose operations are typically limited to the acquisition and
financing of specific assets. The proposed rule requires that any
issuing entity created by an FCU be bankruptcy remote from the FCU,
which means the issuing entity's assets are isolated from any creditors
of the FCU should the FCU become insolvent. This can be achieved
through a variety of methods, including limiting the issuing entity's
purpose, indebtedness, assets, and other liabilities, as well as by
ensuring through its corporate governance process that decisions
regarding bankruptcy will be made from the point of view of the issuing
entity itself, not the FCU.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Board notes that NCUA's regulations governing credit
union service organizations (CUSOs) do not apply to the creation of
issuing entities. 12 CFR 712. Further, acting as an issuing entity
is not a preapproved CUSO activity. 12 CFR 712.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Other Minimum Requirements
Paragraph (5) of the proposed rule establishes the following seven
minimum safety and soundness requirements for an FCU engaging in
securitizing assets:
a. Compliance With All Federal and State Laws and Regulations
An FCU engaged in securitizing transactions may be subject to
numerous registration, disclosure, filing, reporting, and other legal
requirements. The complexity of asset securitization transactions
requires an FCU that participates in securitization activities to fully
investigate all applicable laws and regulations, to establish policies
and procedures to assure legal review of all securitization activities,
and to take steps to protect itself from liability in the case of
problems with particular asset-backed securitization transactions.
b. Independent Risk Management
An FCU engaged in securitizations must have in place independent
risk management controls commensurate with the complexity and volume of
its securitizations and its overall risk exposures. The risk management
controls must ensure that securitization policies and operating
procedures, including clearly articulated risk limits, are in place and
appropriate for the FCU.
c. Annual Audit
As an added measure of safety and soundness, the proposed rule
requires an FCU engaged in securitization transactions to have an
annual audit of its financial statements performed in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards by an independent licensed
auditor. The proposed rule further requires that the financial
statements include all aspects of accounting and disclosure for
sponsored
[[Page 36266]]
securitizations in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
d. Board Knowledge
The board of directors of an FCU engaged in securitizations must
have a general understanding of the risks and benefits of
securitization activities and how those activities fit into the credit
union's strategic and business plans.
e. Management Expertise
Senior management responsible for an FCU's securitization
activities must possess sufficient expertise to oversee those
activities. Unlike many other credit union activities, an FCU engaged
in securitizing assets is likely to engage outside parties for much of
the required procedures. It is not necessary for the FCU to possess all
of the required skills in house. However, senior FCU management must
have sufficient understanding and familiarity with the process to
competently select and oversee parties hired or engaged to support the
activities.
f. Board Approved Policy
An FCU engaged in securitizations must have a credit union board
approved asset securitization policy that includes or addresses, at a
minimum, the following items:
A statement of the business purpose for engaging in
securitization activities, including the general scope of the
activities and the level of acceptable risk.
The governance of securitization activities;
A written and consistently applied accounting methodology;
Regulatory reporting requirements;
Valuation methods, including those applicable to the FCU's
residual interests and retained interests in the securitization
transaction, and procedures to formally approve changes to those
assumptions;
The management reporting process; and
Exposure limits and requirements for both aggregate and
individual transaction monitoring.
g. Internal Controls
Effective internal controls are essential to an FCU's management of
the risks associated with securitization. When properly designed and
consistently enforced, a sound system of internal controls will help
management safeguard the FCUs resources, ensure that financial
information and reports are reliable, and comply with contractual
obligations, including securitization covenants. It will also reduce
the possibility of significant errors and irregularities, as well as
assist in their timely detection when they do occur. Internal controls
typically: (1) Limit authorities, (2) safeguard access to and use of
records, (3) separate and rotate duties, and (4) ensure both regular
and unscheduled reviews, including testing.
6. Residual Interests and Retained Interests
The sponsor of an asset-backed security typically retains an
interest in a securitization. Except in certain limited circumstances,
NCUA regulations prohibit an FCU from investing in stripped mortgage
backed securities and residual interests in collateralized mortgage
obligations.\8\ Paragraph (6)(a) of the proposed rule clarifies that
those prohibitions do not apply to interests retained in the course of
sponsoring a securitization transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 12 CFR 703.16(c) and (d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (6)(b) of the proposed rule requires an FCU to use
reasonable and supportable assumptions and modeling methodologies to
assign values to residual interests and retained interests. These
assumptions and methodologies must be fully documented. The key
assumptions in all valuation analyses include prepayment or payment
rates, default rates, loss severity factors, and discount rates.
Paragraph 6(b) also requires an FCU to recognize credit impairment for
all residual interests and retained interests in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Residual interests and retained interests concentrate risks to
support investor interests. Therefore their value is more susceptible
to credit and market risks than the underlying pool of assets. Because
of these heightened risks, paragraph (6)(c) of the proposed rule limits
the amount of residual interests and retained interests that an FCU may
carry to 25% of the FCU's net worth. Residual interests and retained
interests in pass-through securities, which generally have the same
profile of risk as the underlying assets, are not included in this
limitation. The Board specifically requests comment on the
appropriateness of this limit, including a detailed rationale for any
recommended higher limit.
7. Implicit Recourse Prohibited
Sponsors of asset-backed securities may provide contract-based
support for a securitization through, among other things,
overcollateralization, maintaining a seller's or transferor's interest,
and issuing stand-by letters of credit for cash flow purposes. In
addition to these legal obligations, in certain circumstances, an
originator may wish to provide post-sale credit support to poorly
performing asset pools, commonly referred to as ``implicit'' recourse.
To limit risk, however, paragraph (7) of the proposed rule prohibits
FCUs from providing implicit recourse to a securitization.
8. Federally Insured, State-Chartered Credit Unions
The proposed rule amends Part 741 by adding a new Sec. 741.226 to
extend the proposed securitization requirements to FISCUs. The Board
believes that there could be a risk to the National Credit Union Share
Insurance Fund if state law permits a FISCU to sponsor a securitization
and the state's associated safety and soundness requirements vary from
those applicable to FCUs.
III. Safe Harbor
This proposal is related to a companion proposal to amend Sec.
709.10, published elsewhere in today's Federal Register. Section 709.10
governs the authority of the Board, when acting as conservator or
liquidating agent of any federally insured credit union (FICU), to
disaffirm or repudiate transfers of financial assets by a FICU in
connection with a securitization or participation. Section 709.10 was
issued to provide a ``safe harbor'' by confirming ``legal isolation''
if all other standards for off balance sheet accounting treatment were
met by the transfer in connection with a securitization or a
participation. In 2000, when current Sec. 709.10 was adopted,
satisfaction of legal isolation was vital to securitization
transactions because of the risk that the pool of financial assets
transferred into the securitization trust could be recovered in
bankruptcy or in a credit union liquidation. If the transfer satisfied
this condition, the regulation confirmed that the transferred assets
were legally isolated from the FICU in an NCUA conservatorship or
liquidation.
In 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board finalized
modifications to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that
affected whether an issuing entity must be consolidated for financial
reporting purposes, thereby subjecting many issuing entities to GAAP
consolidation requirements. As a result of the modifications, legal and
accounting treatment of a securitization transaction may no longer be
aligned, and the safe harbor provision of current Sec. 709.10 may not
apply to a transfer in connection with a securitization that does not
qualify for off balance sheet
[[Page 36267]]
treatment. The companion proposal would amend Sec. 709.10 to provide
safe harbor for transfers in connection with securitizations under the
revised accounting standards. The Board requests comment on whether the
proposed safe harbor requirements should be included in any final rule
that addresses FCU authority to securitize assets.
IV. Regulatory Procedures
1. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires NCUA to prepare an analysis
of any significant economic impact any proposed regulation may have on
a substantial number of small entities (primarily those under $50
million in assets).\9\ This proposed rule will only apply to the
largest credit unions, as securitizing assets requires significant
infrastructure and resources. Accordingly, it will not have a
significant economic impact on a significant number of small credit
unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 5 U.S.C. 603(a); 12 U.S.C. 1787(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) applies to rulemakings in
which an agency by rule creates a new paperwork burden on regulated
entities or increases an existing burden.\10\ For purposes of the PRA,
a paperwork burden may take the form of a reporting or recordkeeping
requirement, both referred to as information collections. The proposed
changes to part 721 impose one new information collection requirement.
As required by the PRA, NCUA is submitting a copy of this proposal to
OMB for its review and approval. Persons interested in submitting
comments with respect to the information collection aspects of the
proposed rule should submit them to OMB at the address noted below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d); 5 CFR part 1320.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Estimated PRA Burden
The information collection requirement is found in section
721.3(n)(5)(iii) of the proposed rule. That provision requires an FCU
that undertakes securitization activities to have a credit union board
approved policy stating the purpose and governance of securitization
activities. NCUA estimates that it will take 50 hours to develop a
securitization policy initially and 10 hours to maintain the policy
annually. As NCUA further estimates that only one FCU will undertake
asset securitization activities, the initial paperwork burden is 50
hours and ongoing burden is 10 hours.
b. Submission of Comments
NCUA considers comments by the public on this proposed collection
of information in:
Evaluating whether the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of NCUA,
including whether the information will have a practical use;
Evaluating the accuracy of NCUA's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
OMB will make a decision concerning the collection of information
contained in the proposed regulation between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a
comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment to NCUA on the substantive aspects
of the proposed regulation.
Comments on the proposed information collection requirements should
be sent to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; Attention: NCUA Desk
Officer, with a copy to Tracy Crews at the National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428.
3. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests.
NCUA, an independent regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive order to adhere to fundamental
federalism principles. The proposed rule does not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has,
therefore, determined that this proposal does not constitute a policy
that has federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
4. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this proposed rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of Sec. 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681
(1998).
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 721
Credit unions, Functions, Implied powers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 741
Credit, Credit unions, Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements,
Share insurance.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board, on June 19,
2014.
Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons discussed above, the National Credit Union
Administration proposes to amend parts 721 and 741 as follows:
PART 721--INCIDENTAL POWERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757(17), 1766, 1789.
0
2. In Sec. 721.3, add paragraph (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 721.3 What categories of activities are preapproved as
incidental powers necessary or requisite to carry on a credit union's
business?
* * * * *
(n)(1) Asset securitization activities. Asset securitization
activities are activities in which a federal credit union acts as the
sponsor of an asset-backed security.
(i) Purpose. This section authorizes federal credit unions to offer
and sell loans they have originated into securitization vehicles and
sets minimum safety and soundness standards for securitization
transactions.
(ii) Scope. This section applies to natural person federal credit
unions.
(2) Definitions.
As used in this paragraph (n):
Asset-backed security has the same meaning as in section 3(a)(79)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(79).
Bankruptcy remote means insulated from the consequences of any
related party's insolvency.
Financial asset means cash or a contract or instrument that conveys
to one entity a contractual right to receive
[[Page 36268]]
cash or another financial instrument from another entity.
Issuing entity means an entity that owns a financial asset or
financial assets transferred by the sponsor and issues obligations
supported by such asset or assets. Issuing entities may include, but
are not limited to, corporations, partnerships, trusts, and limited
liability companies and are commonly referred to as special purpose
vehicles or special purpose entities. To the extent a securitization is
structured as a multi-step transfer, the term issuing entity would
include both the issuer of the obligations and any intermediate
entities that may be a transferee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a
Specified GSE or an entity established or guaranteed by a Specified GSE
does not constitute an issuing entity.
Obligation means a debt or equity (or mixed) beneficial interest or
security that is primarily serviced by the cash flows of one or more
financial assets or financial asset pools, either fixed or revolving,
that by their terms convert into cash within a finite time period, or
upon the disposition of the underlying financial assets, and by any
rights or other assets designed to assure the servicing or timely
distributions of proceeds to the security holders issued by an issuing
entity. The term may include beneficial interests in a grantor trust,
common law trust or similar issuing entity to the extent that such
interests satisfy the criteria set forth in the preceding sentence, but
does not include LLC interests, partnership interests, common or
preferred equity, or similar instruments evidencing ownership of the
issuing entity.
Originate means to make an extension of credit.
Recourse means an arrangement in which a credit union retains, in
form or in substance, any credit risk directly or indirectly associated
with an asset it has sold (in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles) that exceeds a pro rata share of the credit
union's claim on the asset.
Residual interest means any on-balance sheet asset that represents
an interest created by a transfer of financial assets through a
securitization that exposes a federal credit union to credit risk
directly or indirectly associated with the transferred assets that
exceeds a pro rata share of the credit union's claim on the assets,
whether through subordination provisions or other credit enhancement
techniques.
Retained interest means an interest in a securitization held by the
sponsor or issuing entity.
Securitize means to sponsor a securitization.
Securitization means the issuance by an issuing entity of
obligations for which the investors are relying on the cash flow or
market value characteristics and the credit quality of transferred
financial assets (together with any external credit support permitted
by this section) to repay the obligations.
Seller's interest means the ownership interest in the issuing
entity's assets that have not been allocated to any investment
certificate holder.
Specified GSE means each of the following: (i) The Federal National
Mortgage Association and any affiliate thereof; (ii) Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation and any affiliate thereof; (iii) the Government
National Mortgage Association; and (iv) any federal or state sponsored
mortgage finance agency.
Sponsor means a person or entity that organizes and initiates a
securitization transaction by transferring financial assets, either
directly or indirectly, including through an affiliate, to an issuing
entity, whether or not such person owns an interest in the issuing
entity or owns any of the obligations issued by the issuing entity.
Transfer means (i) the conveyance of a financial asset or financial
assets to an issuing entity; or (ii) the creation of a security
interest in such asset or assets for the benefit of the issuing entity.
(3) Securitization. As a part of its business, a federal credit
union may securitize and sell loans that it has originated. The
purchase and re-underwriting of a loan does not constitute origination
within the meaning of this paragraph.
(4) Authority to create issuing entities. A federal credit union is
authorized to create issuing entities for the purpose of securitizing
loans that it has originated. Any issuing entity created under this
authority must be bankruptcy remote or otherwise isolated for
insolvency purposes from the federal credit union.
(5) Other minimum requirements. A federal credit union engaged in
securitization transactions, as authorized in paragraph (n)(3) of this
section, must meet the following requirements.
(i) The federal credit union must with all applicable federal and
state laws and regulations.
(ii) The federal credit union must put in place a risk management
process that is independent of the securitization process to monitor
securitization pool performance on an aggregate and individual
transaction level.
(iii) The federal credit union's supervisory committee must obtain
an annual audit of the credit union's financial statements performed in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards by an independent
licensed auditor. The financial statements subject to audit must
include all aspects of accounting and disclosure for sponsored
securitizations in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
(iv) The federal credit union's board of directors must possess a
general understanding of asset securitization.
(v) The federal credit union's senior executive officers
responsible for securitization activities must possess sufficient
expertise to oversee those activities.
(vi) The federal credit union must have a credit union board
approved policy, stating the purpose of securitization activities and
establishing principles for their governance.
(vii) The federal credit union's internal audit or internal risk
review function must periodically review data integrity, model
algorithms, key underlying assumptions, and the appropriateness of the
valuation and modeling process for the securitized assets retained by
the federal credit union, and report the findings of such reviews
directly to the federal credit union's board or an appropriate board
member.
(6) Residual interests and retained interests.
(i) Any provision in part 703 of this chapter that limits a federal
credit union's ability to hold a stripped mortgage backed security or
residual interest in a collateralized mortgage obligation does not
apply to such an instrument retained in the course of sponsoring a
securitization transaction.
(ii) A federal credit union must employ reasonable and supportable
valuation assumptions and modeling methodologies to establish,
evaluate, and adjust the carrying value of residual interests and
retained interests on a regular and timely basis and must recognize
credit impairment for all residual interests and retained interests in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
(iii) A federal credit union must limit the maximum amount of all
residual interests and retained interests to 25 percent of net worth.
Residual interests and retained interests in pass-through securities,
which assume a pro-rata share of risk, are not included in this
limitation.
(7) Implicit recourse prohibited. A federal credit union may not
provide post-sale credit support beyond the contractual obligations
entered into at the time of issuance of a securitization transaction.
[[Page 36269]]
PART 741--REQUIREMENTS FOR INSURANCE
0
3. Add Sec. 741.226 to read as follows:
Sec. 741.226 Asset securitization.
Any credit union that is insured pursuant to Title II of the Act
must adhere to the requirements stated in Sec. 721.3(n) of this
chapter.
[FR Doc. 2014-14926 Filed 6-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P