National Security Information Regulations, 35935-35940 [2014-14879]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
scheduling and conduct of your hearing.
You will also be told if your appearance
or that of any other party or witness is
scheduled to be made in person, by
video teleconferencing, or by telephone.
If we have scheduled you to appear at
the hearing by video teleconferencing,
the notice of hearing will tell you that
the scheduled place for the hearing is a
video teleconferencing site and explain
what it means to appear at your hearing
by video teleconferencing.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–14793 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 9
[Public Notice 8776]
RIN 1400–AC75
National Security Information
Regulations
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State
revises its regulations governing the
classification of national security
information that is under the control of
the Department in order to reflect the
provisions of a new executive order on
national security information, E.O.
13526 and its implementing directive in
Information Security Oversight Office
regulations. This revision also reflects
consequent changes in the Department’s
procedures since the last revision of the
Department’s regulations on this subject
in 2004. These changes include some
changes in the classification categories,
in the rules governing the sharing of
other-agency classified information, and
in granting access to classified
information to certain former
government personnel. This regulation
does not apply to information classified
as Restricted Data (RD) or Formerly
Restricted Data (FRD). Requirements for
classifying and declassifying RD and
FRD can be found in Department of
Energy regulations on Nuclear
Classification and Declassification, or in
a Department of State regulation or
internal order implementing those
regulations.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 25, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Kottmyer, Attorney-Adviser,
Department of State (L/M), 2201 C Street
NW., Washington, DC 20520, or at
kottmyeram@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
executive order governing classification
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
of national security information, E.O.
12958, has been superseded by E.O.
13526, effective December 29, 2009. In
Section 1.4, the new order makes some
minor changes in classification
categories, such as eliminating reference
to transnational terrorism and adding a
qualifier to the term ‘‘weapons of mass
destruction.’’ That section also requires
that the damage to national security be
identifiable and describable. These
changes are reflected in Section 9.4 of
the rule.
While the basis for classification and
the classification levels in E.O. 13526
are basically the same as those in
predecessor orders, the new executive
order contains several provisions not
present in its immediate predecessors,
such as the training of classifiers,
particularly derivative classifiers (not
covered in this rule); and, in Section
4.1(i)(1), the sharing with another
agency, with certain U.S. entities, or
with foreign governments of classified
information that was originated by
another agency after the effective date of
the executive order (covered in Section
9.12 of the rule). Section 4.4 of the new
executive order changes a limitation in
E.O. 12958 on access to classified
information by former government
personnel but adds a limitation that the
positions that they held be senior
government positions. These changes
are included in Section 9.13 of this rule.
This section is among several from 22
CFR Part 171 pertaining to
declassification that have been
transferred to Part 9 and revised.
Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act. The
Department of State is publishing this
rulemaking as a final rule. 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) provides that a ‘‘general notice
of proposed rulemaking’’ need not be
published in the Federal Register
‘‘when the agency for good cause finds
(and incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the
rules issued) that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ The Department of State finds
good cause to issue this rule without
advance notice and public comment
because it has determined such
procedures are unnecessary. As we note
above, this rulemaking incorporates into
existing Department regulations the
provisions of Executive Order 13526.
The Executive Order is a directive that
must be implemented throughout the
executive branch without significant
modification; otherwise, there could be
significant confusion among the public,
when different agencies adopt different
classification standards. Because of this,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35935
the Department determined that
soliciting public comment was
unnecessary.
In addition, this rulemaking involves
matters of internal Department
management and organization;
specifically, the internal procedures for
the classification and handling of
classified national security information;
therefore, the Department has
determined that this rulemaking is
exempt from notice-and-comment
requirements under 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2).
Finally, the Department has determined
that this final rule should be effective
immediately pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). The Department finds ‘‘good
cause’’ in the need to immediately align
the Department’s national security
regulations with those of the White
House and other agencies, thus
eliminating the confusion that might be
caused by conflicting regulations in
such a sensitive area.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Since the
Department is not required to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking
for this rulemaking, a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995. This
rule will not result in the expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million or more in any year and
it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under
the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Information Quality Act. The
Department intends to disseminate
information under this rulemaking in
compliance with the Information
Quality Act, Public Law 106–554, and
the Department of State Information
Quality Guidelines, dated October 1,
2002, located at https://www.state.gov/
misc/13864.htm.
Congressional Review Act. This rule is
not a major rule as defined by the
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804.
This rule will not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more; a major increase in costs or
prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and
import markets. The rule is being
submitted to both Houses of Congress
and the Comptroller General. Since it is
not a major rule, the proposed effective
date is the date of publication.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
35936
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ although not
economically significant, under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget. This rule imposes no additional
costs on the public or on the
Department of State, and provides the
benefit of providing additional clarity
for the public and Department
personnel with respect to Executive
Order 13526 and its effect on
Department regulations, thus
eliminating the confusion that might be
caused by conflicting regulations in
such a sensitive area.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform. The Department has reviewed
this regulation in light of sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13563—Periodic
Review of Existing Significant
Regulations. The Department has
considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563, dated January
18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation
is consistent with the guidance therein.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132—
Federalism. This regulation will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this regulation.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments. The Department has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
National Environmental Policy Act.
The Department has analyzed this
regulation for the purpose of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347) and has
determined that it will not have any
effect on the quality of the environment.
Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule
does not impose or revise any reporting
or record-keeping requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 9
Administrative practice and
procedure, Classified information.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of State
revises 22 CFR part 9 to read as follows:
■
PART 9—SECURITY INFORMATION
REGULATIONS
Sec.
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
9.10
9.11
9.12
Basis.
Objective.
Senior agency official.
Original classification.
Original classification authority.
Derivative classification.
Identification and marking.
Classification challenges.
Declassification and downgrading.
Mandatory declassification review.
Systematic declassification review.
Sharing other-agency classified
information.
9.13 Access to classified information by
historical researchers and certain former
government personnel.
9.14 Pre-publication review of writings by
former Department personnel.
9.15 Assistance to the Historian’s Office.
9.16 Safeguarding.
Authority: E.O. 13526 (75 FR 707, January
5, 2010); Information Security Oversight
Office Directive 32 CFR Part 2001 (75 FR
37254, June 28, 2010).
§ 9.1
Basis.
The regulations in this part, taken
together with 32 CFR part 2001 and
Volume 5 of the Department’s Foreign
Affairs Manual, provide the basis for the
security classification program of the
U.S. Department of State (‘‘the
Department’’) implementing Executive
Order 13526 on Classified National
Security Information (‘‘the Executive
Order’’ or ‘‘the Order’’).
§ 9.2
Objective.
The objective of the Department’s
classification program is to ensure that
national security information is
protected from unauthorized disclosure,
but that it remains classified only to the
extent and for such a period as is
necessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 9.3
Senior agency official.
The Executive Order requires that
each agency that originates or handles
classified information designate a
Senior Agency Official to direct and
administer its information security
program. The Department’s senior
agency official is the Under Secretary of
State for Management. The Senior
Agency Official is assisted in carrying
out the provisions of the Executive
Order and the Department’s information
security program by the Assistant
Secretary for Diplomatic Security, the
Assistant Secretary for Administration,
and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Global Information Services.
§ 9.4
Original classification.
(a) Definition. Original classification
is the initial determination that certain
information requires protection against
unauthorized disclosure in the interest
of national security (i.e., national
defense or foreign relations of the
United States), together with a
designation of the level of classification.
(b) Classification levels. (1) Top Secret
shall be applied to information the
unauthorized disclosure of which
reasonably could be expected to cause
exceptionally grave damage to the
national security that the original
classification authority is able to
identify or describe.
(2) Secret shall be applied to
information the unauthorized disclosure
of which reasonably could be expected
to cause serious damage to the national
security that the original classification
authority is able to identify or describe.
(3) Confidential shall be applied to
information the unauthorized disclosure
of which reasonably could be expected
to cause damage to the national security
that the original classification authority
is able to identify or describe.
(c) Classification requirements and
considerations. (1) Information may not
be considered for classification unless
its unauthorized disclosure could
reasonably be expected to cause
identifiable or describable damage to the
national security in accordance with
section 1.2 of the Executive Order, and
it pertains to one or more of the
following:
(i) Military plans, weapons systems,
or operations;
(ii) Foreign government information;
(iii) Intelligence activities (including
covert action), intelligence sources or
methods, or cryptology;
(iv) Foreign relations or foreign
activities of the United States, including
confidential sources;
(v) Scientific, technological, or
economic matters relating to the
national security;
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(vi) United States Government
programs for safeguarding nuclear
materials or facilities;
(vii) Vulnerabilities or capabilities of
systems, installations, infrastructures,
projects, plans, or protection services
relating to the national security; or
(viii) The development, production,
or use of weapons of mass destruction.
(2) In classifying information, the
public’s interest in access to government
information must be balanced against
the need to protect national security
information.
(3) The unauthorized disclosure of
foreign government information is
presumed to cause damage to national
security.
(d) Classification limitations and
prohibitions. (1) In no case shall
information be classified in order to
conceal violations of law, inefficiency,
or administrative error, or to prevent
embarrassment to a person,
organization, or agency, to restrain
competition, or to prevent or delay the
release of information that does not
require protection in the interest of the
national security.
(2) A reference to classified
documents that does not directly or
indirectly disclose classified
information may not be classified or
used as a basis for classification.
(3) Only information owned by,
produced by or for, or under the control
of the U.S. Government may be
originally classified.
(e) Duration of classification. (1)
Information shall be classified for as
long as is required by national security
considerations, subject to the limitations
set forth in section 1.5 of the Executive
Order. When it can be determined, a
specific date or event for
declassification in less than 10 years
shall be set by the original classification
authority at the time the information is
originally classified. If a specific date or
event for declassification cannot be
determined, information shall be
marked for declassification 10 years
from the date of the original decision,
unless the original classification
authority determines that the sensitivity
of the information requires that it be
marked for declassification for up to 25
years from the date of the original
decision except for:
(i) Information that would reveal the
identity of a confidential human source
or a human intelligence source, or key
design concepts of weapons of mass
destruction, in which case the duration
of classification shall be up to 75 years
and shall be designated with the
markings ‘‘50X1–HUM’’ and ‘‘50X2–
WMD,’’ respectively; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
(ii) Specific information incorporated
into the classification guide under
section 2.2(e) of the Executive Order
relating to exemptions from automatic
declassification.
(2) An original classification authority
may extend the duration of
classification up to 25 years from the
date of origin of the document, change
the level of classification, or reclassify
specific information only when the
standards and procedures for classifying
information under the Executive Order
are met.
(3) No information may remain
classified indefinitely. Information
marked for an indefinite duration of
classification under predecessor orders,
such as ‘‘Originating Agency’s
Determination Required’’ (OADR) or
classified information that contains
incomplete declassification instructions
or lacks declassification instructions,
shall be declassified in accordance with
Part 3 of the Order.
§ 9.5
Original classification authority.
(a) Authority for original classification
of information as Top Secret may be
exercised by the Secretary and those
officials delegated this authority in
writing by the Secretary. Such authority
has been delegated to the Deputy
Secretaries, the Under Secretaries, the
Counselor, Assistant Secretaries and
equivalents; Chiefs of Mission and U.S.
representatives to international
organizations; and certain other officers
within the Department and at posts
abroad.
(b) Authority for original
classification of information as Secret or
Confidential may be exercised only by
the Secretary, the Senior Agency
Official, and those officials delegated
this authority in writing by the
Secretary or the Senior Agency Official.
Such authority has been delegated to
Deputy Assistant Secretaries, Principal
Officers at consulates general and
consulates abroad, and certain other
officers within the Department and at
posts abroad. In the absence of the
Secret or Confidential classification
authority, the person designated to act
for that official may exercise that
authority.
§ 9.6
Derivative classification.
(a) Definition. Derivative classification
is: the incorporating, paraphrasing,
restating, or generating in new form
information that is already classified
and the marking of the new material
consistent with the classification of the
source material, or the marking of the
information in accordance with an
authorized classification guide.
Duplication or reproduction of existing
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35937
classified information is not derivative
classification. Persons who apply
classification markings derived from
source material or as directed by a
classification guide need not possess
original classification authority.
(b) Responsibility. Information
classified derivatively from other
classified information shall be classified
and marked in accordance with
instructions from an authorized
classifier or in accordance with an
authorized classification guide and shall
comply with the standards set forth in
sections 2.1–2.2 of the Executive Order
and 32 CFR 2001.22. The duration of
classification of a document classified
by a derivative classifier using a
classification guide shall not exceed 25
years except for:
(1) Information that would reveal the
identity of a confidential human source
or a human intelligence source (50X1–
HUM) or key design concepts of
weapons of mass destruction (50X2–
WMD), and
(2) Specific information incorporated
into the classification guide under
section 2.2(e) of the Executive Order
relating to exemptions from automatic
declassification.
(c) Department of State Classification
Guide. The Department of State
Classification Guide (DSCG) is the
primary authority for the classification
of information in documents created by
Department of State personnel. The
Guide is classified ‘‘Confidential’’ and is
found on the Department of State’s
classified Web site.
§ 9.7
Identification and marking.
(a) Classified information shall be
marked pursuant to the standards set
forth in section 1.6 of the Executive
Order, 32 CFR part 2001, subpart C, and
internal Department guidance in 5
Foreign Affairs Manual.
(b) Foreign government information
shall retain its original classification
markings or be marked and classified at
a U.S. classification level that provides
a degree of protection at least equivalent
to that required by the entity that
furnished the information. Foreign
government information retaining its
original classification markings need not
be assigned a U.S. classification marking
provided the responsible agency
determines that the foreign government
markings are adequate to meet the
purposes served by U.S. classification
markings.
(c) Information assigned a level of
classification under predecessor
executive orders shall be considered as
classified at that level of classification
despite the omission of other required
markings.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
35938
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Prior to public release, all
declassified records shall be
appropriately marked to reflect their
declassification.
§ 9.8
Classification challenges.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) Challenges. Authorized holders of
information pertaining to the
Department of State who believe that its
classification status is improper are
expected and encouraged to challenge
the classification status of the
information. Such persons making
challenges to the classification status of
information shall not be subject to
retribution for such action. Informal,
usually oral, challenges are encouraged.
Formal challenges to classification
actions shall be in writing to an original
classification authority (OCA) with
jurisdiction over the information and a
copy of the challenge shall be sent to the
Office of Information Programs and
Services (IPS) of the Department of
State, SA–2, 515 22nd St. NW.,
Washington, DC 20522–8100. The
Department (either the OCA or IPS)
shall provide an initial response in
writing within 60 calendar days.
(b) Appeal procedures and time
limits. A negative response may be
appealed to the Department’s Appeals
Review Panel (ARP) and should be sent
to: Chairman, Appeals Review Panel,
c/o Director, Office of Information
Programs and Services/Appeals Officer,
at the IPS address given above. The
appeal shall include a copy of the
original challenge, the response, and
any additional information the
appellant believes would assist the ARP
in reaching its decision. The ARP shall
respond within 90 calendar days of
receipt of the appeal. A negative
decision by the ARP may be appealed to
the Interagency Security Classification
Appeals Panel (ISCAP) referenced in
section 5.3 of Executive Order 13526. If
the Department fails to respond to a
formal challenge within 120 calendar
days or if the ARP fails to respond to an
appeal within 90 calendar days, the
challenge may be sent directly to the
ISCAP.
(c) Pre-publication review materials.
The provisions for classification
challenges do not apply to material
required to be submitted for prepublication review, or other
administrative action, pursuant to a
non-disclosure agreement.
§ 9.9
Declassification and downgrading.
(a) Declassification processes.
Declassification of classified
information may occur:
(1) After review of material in
response to a Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) request, mandatory
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
declassification review request,
discovery request, subpoena,
classification challenge, or other
information access or declassification
request;
(2) After review as part of the
Department’s systematic declassification
review program;
(3) As a result of the elapse of the time
or the occurrence of the event specified
at the time of classification;
(4) By operation of the automatic
declassification provisions of section 3.3
of the Executive Order with respect to
material more than 25 years old.
(b) Downgrading. When material
classified at the Top Secret level is
reviewed for declassification and it is
determined that classification continues
to be warranted, a determination shall
be made whether downgrading to a
lower level of classification is
appropriate. If downgrading is
determined to be warranted, the
classification level of the material shall
be changed to the appropriate lower
level.
(c) Authority to downgrade and
declassify. (1) Classified information
may be downgraded or declassified by:
(i) The official who originally
classified the information if that official
is still serving in the same position and
has original classification authority;
(ii) A successor in that capacity if that
individual has original classification
authority;
(iii) A supervisory official of either if
the supervisory official has original
classification authority;
(iv) Other Department officials
specifically delegated declassification
authority in writing by the Secretary or
the Senior Agency Official; or
(v) The Director of the Information
Security Oversight Office pursuant to
Sec. 3.1(a) of E.O. 13526.
(2) The Department shall maintain a
record of Department officials
specifically designated as
declassification and downgrading
authorities.
(d) Declassification in the public
interest. Although information that
continues to meet the classification
criteria of the Executive Order or a
predecessor order normally requires
continued protection, in some
exceptional cases the need to protect
information may be outweighed by the
public interest in disclosure of the
information. When such a question
arises, it shall be referred to the
Secretary or the Senior Agency Official
for decision on whether, as an exercise
of discretion, the information should be
declassified and disclosed. This
provision does not amplify or modify
the substantive criteria or procedures for
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
classification or create any substantive
or procedural right subject to judicial
review.
(e) Public disclosure of declassified
information. Declassification of
information is not, by itself,
authorization for its public disclosure.
Previously classified information that is
declassified may be exempt from public
disclosure under the FOIA, the Privacy
Act, or various statutory confidentiality
provisions. There also may be treaties or
other international agreements that
would preclude public disclosure of
declassified information.
§ 9.10
Mandatory declassification review
(a) Scope. All information classified
under E.O. 13526 or predecessor orders
shall be subject to mandatory
declassification review upon request by
a member of the public or a U.S.
government employee or agency with
the following exceptions:
(1) Information originated by the
incumbent President or the incumbent
Vice President; the incumbent
President’s White House staff or the
incumbent Vice President’s staff;
committees, commissions, or boards
appointed by the incumbent President;
other entities within the Executive
Office of the President that solely advise
and assist the incumbent President;
(2) Information that is the subject of
pending litigation; and
(3) Information that has been
reviewed for declassification within the
past two years which need not be
reviewed again, but the requester shall
be given appeal rights.
(b) Requests. Requests for mandatory
declassification review should be
addressed to the Office of Information
Programs and Services, U.S. Department
of State, SA–2, 515 22nd St. NW.,
Washington, DC 20522–8100.
(c) Description of information. In
order to be processed, a request for
mandatory declassification review must
describe the document or the material
containing the information sought with
sufficient specificity to enable the
Department to locate the document or
material with a reasonable amount of
effort. Whenever a request does not
sufficiently describe the material, the
Department shall notify the requester
that no further action will be taken
unless additional description of the
information sought is provided.
(d) Refusal to confirm or deny
existence of information. The
Department may refuse to confirm or
deny the existence or nonexistence of
requested information whenever the fact
of existence or nonexistence is itself
classified.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(e) Processing. In responding to
mandatory declassification review
requests, the Department shall make a
review determination as promptly as
possible, but in no case more than one
year from the date of receipt of the
request, and notify the requester
accordingly. When the requested
information cannot be declassified in its
entirety, the Department shall release all
meaningful portions that can be
declassified and that are not exempt
from disclosure on other grounds.
(f) Other agency information. When
the Department receives a request for
information in its possession that was
originally classified by another agency,
it shall refer the request and the
pertinent information to the other
agency unless that agency has agreed
that the Department may review such
information for declassification on
behalf of that agency. In any case, the
Department is responsible for
responding to the requester with regard
to any responsive information,
including other-agency information,
unless a prior arrangement has been
made with the originating agency.
(g) Foreign government information.
In the case of a request for material
containing foreign government
information, the Department shall
determine whether the information may
be declassified and may, if appropriate,
consult with the relevant foreign
government on that issue. If the
Department is not the agency that
initially received the foreign
government information, it may consult
with the original receiving agency.
(h) Documents or material containing
RD or Transclassified Foreign Nuclear
Information (TFNI). Documents or
material containing RD or TFNI will be
submitted to DOE for review.
Documents containing FRD will be
submitted to DOE or DoD for review.
(i) Appeals. Any denial of a
mandatory declassification review
request may be appealed to the ARP. A
denial by the ARP of a mandatory
declassification review appeal may be
further appealed to the ISCAP. A failure
of the Department to make a
determination on a mandatory
declassification review request within
one year from the date of its receipt or
to respond to an appeal of a denial by
the ARP within 180 calendar days of its
receipt may be appealed directly to the
ISCAP.
§ 9.11
Systematic declassification review.
The Director of the Office of
Information Programs and Services shall
be responsible for conducting a program
for systematic declassification review of
historically valuable records that: were
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
exempted from the automatic
declassification provisions of section 3.3
of the Executive Order; or will soon
become subject to the automatic
declassification provisions of section 3.3
of the Order. The Director shall
prioritize such review in accordance
with priorities established by the
National Declassification Center.
§ 9.12 Sharing other-agency classified
information.
The long-standing third-agency rule
has required prior originating agency
approval before a receiving agency
could further disseminate classified
information. Under the Executive Order,
unless the originating agency indicates
on the material that prior approval is
required and provided that the criteria
for access under section 4.1(a) of the
Order are met, a receiving agency may
further disseminate classified
information in documents created
subsequent to the effective date of the
Order to another agency or U.S. entity
without consultation with the
originating agency. ‘‘U.S. entity’’
includes cleared state, local, tribal, and
private sector entities. Similarly, under
certain circumstances, receiving
agencies may pass such classified
information to foreign governments.
§ 9.13 Access to classified information by
historical researchers and certain former
government personnel.
(a) The restriction in E.O. 13526 and
predecessor orders on limiting access to
classified information to individuals
who have a need-to-know the
information may be waived, under the
conditions set forth below, for persons
who: are engaged in historical research
projects; have served as President or
Vice President; have occupied senior
policy-making positions in the
Department of State or other U.S.
government agencies to which they
were appointed or designated by the
President or the Vice President. It does
not include former Foreign Service
Officers as a class or persons who
merely received assignment
commissions as Foreign Service
Officers, Foreign Service Reserve
Officers, Foreign Service Staff Officers,
and employees.
(b) Requests by such persons must be
submitted in writing to the Office of
Information Programs and Services at
the address set forth above and must
include a general description of the
records sought, the time period covered
by the records that are the subject of the
request, and an explanation why access
is sought. Requests for access by such
requesters may be granted if:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35939
(1) The Secretary or the Senior
Agency Official determines in writing
that access is consistent with the
interests of national security;
(2) The requester agrees in writing to
safeguard the information from
unauthorized disclosure or compromise;
(3) The requester submits a statement
in writing authorizing the Department to
review any notes and manuscripts
created as a result of access;
(4) The requester submits a statement
in writing that any information obtained
from review of the records will not be
disseminated without the express
written permission of the Department;
(c) If a requester uses a research
assistant, the requester and the research
assistant must both submit a statement
in writing acknowledging that the same
access conditions set forth in paragraphs
(b)(2) through (b)(4) of this section apply
to the research assistant. Such a
research assistant must be working for
the applicant and not gathering
information for publication on his or her
own behalf.
(d) Access granted under this section
shall be limited to items the official
originated, reviewed, signed, or received
while serving as a Presidential or Vice
Presidential appointee or designee or as
President or Vice President.
(e) Such requesters may seek
declassification and release of material
to which they have been granted access
under this section through either the
FOIA or the mandatory declassification
review provisions of E.O. 13526. Such
requests shall be processed in the order
received, along with other FOIA and
mandatory declassification review
requests, and shall be subject to the fees
applicable to FOIA requests.
§ 9.14 Pre-publication review of writings
by former Department personnel.
The Department provides prepublication review of writings on
foreign relations topics by former
Department personnel, including
contractors and detailees, who had
security clearances to try to ensure that
former personnel do not violate their
agreements on non-disclosure of
classified national security information
in such writings. Manuscripts
(including articles, speeches, books,
etc.) should be sent to the Director,
Office of Information Programs and
Services, 515 22nd St. NW.,
Washington, DC 20522–8100. Questions
about pre-publication clearance may be
sent to Classification@state.gov.
§ 9.15
Assistance to the Historian’s Office.
All elements of the Department shall
assist the Historian’s Office in its
preparation of the Foreign Relations of
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
35940
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the United States (FRUS) series such as
by providing prompt access to and,
when possible, declassification of
information deemed appropriate for
inclusion in the FRUS.
§ 9.16
Safeguarding.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Specific controls on the use,
processing, storage, reproduction, and
transmittal of classified information
within the Department to provide
protection for such information and to
prevent access by unauthorized persons
are contained in Volume 12 of the
Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual.
DC 20410; telephone number 202–402–
4059 (this is not a toll-free number). For
questions regarding the multifamily
programs, contact Claire Brolin, 451 7th
Street SW., Suite 6138, Washington, DC
20410 at 202–402–6634 (this is not a
toll-free number). Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access
either of these numbers through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The general provisions of the 2014
Appropriations Act 1 include five
Dated: May 29, 2014.
statutory changes to the United States
Margaret P. Grafeld,
Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 et
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of
seq.) (1937 Act) that are designed to
State.
reduce administrative burdens on PHAs,
[FR Doc. 2014–14879 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]
enable PHAs to better target assistance
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
to families in need of such assistance,
and reduce Federal costs.2 Expediting
the implementation of these provisions
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
through notice will help PHAs to benefit
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
from the changes in the law sooner than
if implementation was accomplished
24 CFR Parts 5, 943, and 982
solely through public rulemaking. The
[Docket No. FR–5778–N–01]
only statutory change that is applicable
to multifamily project-based section 8
HUD Implementation of Fiscal Year
programs is the added definition of
2014 Appropriations Provisions on
‘‘extremely low-income’’ in section 238.
Public Housing Agency Consortia,
For all other statutory changes, the
Biennial Inspections, Extremely Lowchanges provided in this notice apply
Income Definition, and Utility
only to the public housing and section
Allowances
8 voucher programs.
Section 212 of the 2014
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Appropriations Act amends the
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
definition of a PHA to include a
Commissioner and Office of the
consortium of such entities.
Assistant Secretary for Public and
Section 220 allows PHAs to comply
Indian Housing, HUD.
with the requirement to inspect assisted
ACTION: Notice of statutory changes.
dwelling units during the term of a
SUMMARY: Section 243 of the Department housing assistance payment (HAP)
contract by conducting biennial housing
of Housing and Urban Development
quality inspections instead of annual
Appropriations Act, 2014 (2014
inspections. PHAs are also able to
Appropriations Act) authorizes HUD to
utilize alternative inspection methods to
implement certain statutory changes to
demonstrate that housing meets the
the United States Housing Act of 1937
housing quality requirements under the
made by the 2014 Appropriations Act
voucher program.
through notice followed by notice and
Section 238 creates a statutory
comment rulemaking. This notice
definition of ‘‘extremely low-income
establishes the terms and conditions by
families,’’ which is defined as very lowwhich HUD will implement changes to
income families whose incomes do not
the statutory definition of a ‘‘public
exceed the higher of the Federal poverty
housing agency’’ (PHA), the frequency
level or 30 percent of Area Median
of housing inspections, the statutory
Income.
definition of ‘‘extremely low-income,’’
Section 242 establishes a cap on the
and utility allowances for tenant-paid
utility allowance for families leasing
utilities.
1 HUD’s 2014 Appropriations Act is Title II of
DATES: Effective Date: July 1, 2014.
Division L of Public Law 113–76, 128 Stat. 5,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
approved January 17, 2014. See Public Law 113–76
Public Housing and Voucher program
at 128 Stat. 604.
2 The five general provisions are sections 210,
questions, contact Michael Dennis,
212, 220, 238, and 242. This notice addresses
Director of the Office of Housing
sections 212, 220, 238, and 242. Section 210, which
Voucher Programs, Department of
pertains to flat rents is addressed separately PIH
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Notice 2014–12, available at https://portal.hud.gov/
7th Street SW., Room 4228, Washington, hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=14-12pihn.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
oversized units. The cap is set at an
amount based on family size rather than
the size of the unit leased, with the
ability to set a higher amount to provide
a reasonable accommodation to the
family of a person with disabilities,
harmonizing the utility allowance
standard with the payment standard
requirement.
In order to allow PHAs to receive, as
quickly as possible, the benefit of the
reduced burden that these provisions
are designed to achieve, the 2014
Appropriations Act authorizes HUD to
implement the changes through notice,
provided that HUD follows with notice
and comment rulemaking within six
months of the issuance of the notice.
II. Implementation Requirements
A. PHA Consortia
Section 212 of the 2014
Appropriations Act amends the
definition of ‘‘public housing agency’’ at
subparagraph (A) of section 3(b)(6) of
the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(6)(A))
to include in its general definition ‘‘a
consortium of such entities or bodies as
approved by the Secretary.’’ PHAs may
follow 24 CFR part 943 to form,
participate in, and utilize consortia.
PHAs may request a waiver of any
current provision related to consortium
organization, elements of the agreement,
the relationship between HUD and the
consortium, and the responsibilities of
the consortium.
The Secretary will not approve any
consortium of PHAs for administration
of multifamily project-based section 8
program contracts.
B. Biennial Inspections
Section 220 of the 2014
Appropriations Act allows PHAs to
comply with the requirement to inspect
assisted dwelling units during the term
of a HAP contract by inspecting such
units not less than biennially instead of
annually and to rely upon alternative
inspection methods to meet this
requirement. However, a PHA may not
use the alternative inspection method in
lieu of the initial unit or any interim
inspection. PHAs are still required to
conduct an initial inspection, prior to
entering into a HAP contract, and
interim inspections, if a family or
government official notifies the PHA of
a unit’s failure to comply with housing
quality standards, in accordance with
the housing quality standards (HQS) of
the HCV program.
1. In General
In order to bring relief to PHAs and
owners as expeditiously as possible,
HUD is implementing certain elements
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35935-35940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14879]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 9
[Public Notice 8776]
RIN 1400-AC75
National Security Information Regulations
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State revises its regulations governing the
classification of national security information that is under the
control of the Department in order to reflect the provisions of a new
executive order on national security information, E.O. 13526 and its
implementing directive in Information Security Oversight Office
regulations. This revision also reflects consequent changes in the
Department's procedures since the last revision of the Department's
regulations on this subject in 2004. These changes include some changes
in the classification categories, in the rules governing the sharing of
other-agency classified information, and in granting access to
classified information to certain former government personnel. This
regulation does not apply to information classified as Restricted Data
(RD) or Formerly Restricted Data (FRD). Requirements for classifying
and declassifying RD and FRD can be found in Department of Energy
regulations on Nuclear Classification and Declassification, or in a
Department of State regulation or internal order implementing those
regulations.
DATES: This final rule is effective on June 25, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Kottmyer, Attorney-Adviser,
Department of State (L/M), 2201 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20520, or
at kottmyeram@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The executive order governing classification
of national security information, E.O. 12958, has been superseded by
E.O. 13526, effective December 29, 2009. In Section 1.4, the new order
makes some minor changes in classification categories, such as
eliminating reference to transnational terrorism and adding a qualifier
to the term ``weapons of mass destruction.'' That section also requires
that the damage to national security be identifiable and describable.
These changes are reflected in Section 9.4 of the rule.
While the basis for classification and the classification levels in
E.O. 13526 are basically the same as those in predecessor orders, the
new executive order contains several provisions not present in its
immediate predecessors, such as the training of classifiers,
particularly derivative classifiers (not covered in this rule); and, in
Section 4.1(i)(1), the sharing with another agency, with certain U.S.
entities, or with foreign governments of classified information that
was originated by another agency after the effective date of the
executive order (covered in Section 9.12 of the rule). Section 4.4 of
the new executive order changes a limitation in E.O. 12958 on access to
classified information by former government personnel but adds a
limitation that the positions that they held be senior government
positions. These changes are included in Section 9.13 of this rule.
This section is among several from 22 CFR Part 171 pertaining to
declassification that have been transferred to Part 9 and revised.
Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act. The Department of State is publishing
this rulemaking as a final rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) provides that a
``general notice of proposed rulemaking'' need not be published in the
Federal Register ``when the agency for good cause finds (and
incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in
the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' The
Department of State finds good cause to issue this rule without advance
notice and public comment because it has determined such procedures are
unnecessary. As we note above, this rulemaking incorporates into
existing Department regulations the provisions of Executive Order
13526. The Executive Order is a directive that must be implemented
throughout the executive branch without significant modification;
otherwise, there could be significant confusion among the public, when
different agencies adopt different classification standards. Because of
this, the Department determined that soliciting public comment was
unnecessary.
In addition, this rulemaking involves matters of internal
Department management and organization; specifically, the internal
procedures for the classification and handling of classified national
security information; therefore, the Department has determined that
this rulemaking is exempt from notice-and-comment requirements under 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(2). Finally, the Department has determined that this
final rule should be effective immediately pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). The Department finds ``good cause'' in the need to
immediately align the Department's national security regulations with
those of the White House and other agencies, thus eliminating the
confusion that might be caused by conflicting regulations in such a
sensitive area.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Since the Department is not required to
publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking for this rulemaking, a
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995. This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Information Quality Act. The Department intends to disseminate
information under this rulemaking in compliance with the Information
Quality Act, Public Law 106-554, and the Department of State
Information Quality Guidelines, dated October 1, 2002, located at
https://www.state.gov/misc/13864.htm.
Congressional Review Act. This rule is not a major rule as defined
by the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and import markets. The rule is being
submitted to both Houses of Congress and the Comptroller General. Since
it is not a major rule, the proposed effective date is the date of
publication.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if
[[Page 35936]]
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. This rule imposes no additional costs
on the public or on the Department of State, and provides the benefit
of providing additional clarity for the public and Department personnel
with respect to Executive Order 13526 and its effect on Department
regulations, thus eliminating the confusion that might be caused by
conflicting regulations in such a sensitive area.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform. The Department has
reviewed this regulation in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation,
establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13563--Periodic Review of Existing Significant
Regulations. The Department has considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563, dated January 18, 2011, and affirms that this
regulation is consistent with the guidance therein.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132--Federalism. This regulation will
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, it is
determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not apply to this regulation.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments. The Department has determined that this rulemaking
will not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt
tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this rulemaking.
National Environmental Policy Act. The Department has analyzed this
regulation for the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347) and has determined that it will not have any
effect on the quality of the environment.
Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule does not impose or revise any
reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 9
Administrative practice and procedure, Classified information.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of State
revises 22 CFR part 9 to read as follows:
PART 9--SECURITY INFORMATION REGULATIONS
Sec.
9.1 Basis.
9.2 Objective.
9.3 Senior agency official.
9.4 Original classification.
9.5 Original classification authority.
9.6 Derivative classification.
9.7 Identification and marking.
9.8 Classification challenges.
9.9 Declassification and downgrading.
9.10 Mandatory declassification review.
9.11 Systematic declassification review.
9.12 Sharing other-agency classified information.
9.13 Access to classified information by historical researchers and
certain former government personnel.
9.14 Pre-publication review of writings by former Department
personnel.
9.15 Assistance to the Historian's Office.
9.16 Safeguarding.
Authority: E.O. 13526 (75 FR 707, January 5, 2010); Information
Security Oversight Office Directive 32 CFR Part 2001 (75 FR 37254,
June 28, 2010).
Sec. 9.1 Basis.
The regulations in this part, taken together with 32 CFR part 2001
and Volume 5 of the Department's Foreign Affairs Manual, provide the
basis for the security classification program of the U.S. Department of
State (``the Department'') implementing Executive Order 13526 on
Classified National Security Information (``the Executive Order'' or
``the Order'').
Sec. 9.2 Objective.
The objective of the Department's classification program is to
ensure that national security information is protected from
unauthorized disclosure, but that it remains classified only to the
extent and for such a period as is necessary.
Sec. 9.3 Senior agency official.
The Executive Order requires that each agency that originates or
handles classified information designate a Senior Agency Official to
direct and administer its information security program. The
Department's senior agency official is the Under Secretary of State for
Management. The Senior Agency Official is assisted in carrying out the
provisions of the Executive Order and the Department's information
security program by the Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security,
the Assistant Secretary for Administration, and the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Global Information Services.
Sec. 9.4 Original classification.
(a) Definition. Original classification is the initial
determination that certain information requires protection against
unauthorized disclosure in the interest of national security (i.e.,
national defense or foreign relations of the United States), together
with a designation of the level of classification.
(b) Classification levels. (1) Top Secret shall be applied to
information the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be
expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security
that the original classification authority is able to identify or
describe.
(2) Secret shall be applied to information the unauthorized
disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious
damage to the national security that the original classification
authority is able to identify or describe.
(3) Confidential shall be applied to information the unauthorized
disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the
national security that the original classification authority is able to
identify or describe.
(c) Classification requirements and considerations. (1) Information
may not be considered for classification unless its unauthorized
disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause identifiable or
describable damage to the national security in accordance with section
1.2 of the Executive Order, and it pertains to one or more of the
following:
(i) Military plans, weapons systems, or operations;
(ii) Foreign government information;
(iii) Intelligence activities (including covert action),
intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology;
(iv) Foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States,
including confidential sources;
(v) Scientific, technological, or economic matters relating to the
national security;
[[Page 35937]]
(vi) United States Government programs for safeguarding nuclear
materials or facilities;
(vii) Vulnerabilities or capabilities of systems, installations,
infrastructures, projects, plans, or protection services relating to
the national security; or
(viii) The development, production, or use of weapons of mass
destruction.
(2) In classifying information, the public's interest in access to
government information must be balanced against the need to protect
national security information.
(3) The unauthorized disclosure of foreign government information
is presumed to cause damage to national security.
(d) Classification limitations and prohibitions. (1) In no case
shall information be classified in order to conceal violations of law,
inefficiency, or administrative error, or to prevent embarrassment to a
person, organization, or agency, to restrain competition, or to prevent
or delay the release of information that does not require protection in
the interest of the national security.
(2) A reference to classified documents that does not directly or
indirectly disclose classified information may not be classified or
used as a basis for classification.
(3) Only information owned by, produced by or for, or under the
control of the U.S. Government may be originally classified.
(e) Duration of classification. (1) Information shall be classified
for as long as is required by national security considerations, subject
to the limitations set forth in section 1.5 of the Executive Order.
When it can be determined, a specific date or event for
declassification in less than 10 years shall be set by the original
classification authority at the time the information is originally
classified. If a specific date or event for declassification cannot be
determined, information shall be marked for declassification 10 years
from the date of the original decision, unless the original
classification authority determines that the sensitivity of the
information requires that it be marked for declassification for up to
25 years from the date of the original decision except for:
(i) Information that would reveal the identity of a confidential
human source or a human intelligence source, or key design concepts of
weapons of mass destruction, in which case the duration of
classification shall be up to 75 years and shall be designated with the
markings ``50X1-HUM'' and ``50X2-WMD,'' respectively; and
(ii) Specific information incorporated into the classification
guide under section 2.2(e) of the Executive Order relating to
exemptions from automatic declassification.
(2) An original classification authority may extend the duration of
classification up to 25 years from the date of origin of the document,
change the level of classification, or reclassify specific information
only when the standards and procedures for classifying information
under the Executive Order are met.
(3) No information may remain classified indefinitely. Information
marked for an indefinite duration of classification under predecessor
orders, such as ``Originating Agency's Determination Required'' (OADR)
or classified information that contains incomplete declassification
instructions or lacks declassification instructions, shall be
declassified in accordance with Part 3 of the Order.
Sec. 9.5 Original classification authority.
(a) Authority for original classification of information as Top
Secret may be exercised by the Secretary and those officials delegated
this authority in writing by the Secretary. Such authority has been
delegated to the Deputy Secretaries, the Under Secretaries, the
Counselor, Assistant Secretaries and equivalents; Chiefs of Mission and
U.S. representatives to international organizations; and certain other
officers within the Department and at posts abroad.
(b) Authority for original classification of information as Secret
or Confidential may be exercised only by the Secretary, the Senior
Agency Official, and those officials delegated this authority in
writing by the Secretary or the Senior Agency Official. Such authority
has been delegated to Deputy Assistant Secretaries, Principal Officers
at consulates general and consulates abroad, and certain other officers
within the Department and at posts abroad. In the absence of the Secret
or Confidential classification authority, the person designated to act
for that official may exercise that authority.
Sec. 9.6 Derivative classification.
(a) Definition. Derivative classification is: the incorporating,
paraphrasing, restating, or generating in new form information that is
already classified and the marking of the new material consistent with
the classification of the source material, or the marking of the
information in accordance with an authorized classification guide.
Duplication or reproduction of existing classified information is not
derivative classification. Persons who apply classification markings
derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide
need not possess original classification authority.
(b) Responsibility. Information classified derivatively from other
classified information shall be classified and marked in accordance
with instructions from an authorized classifier or in accordance with
an authorized classification guide and shall comply with the standards
set forth in sections 2.1-2.2 of the Executive Order and 32 CFR
2001.22. The duration of classification of a document classified by a
derivative classifier using a classification guide shall not exceed 25
years except for:
(1) Information that would reveal the identity of a confidential
human source or a human intelligence source (50X1-HUM) or key design
concepts of weapons of mass destruction (50X2-WMD), and
(2) Specific information incorporated into the classification guide
under section 2.2(e) of the Executive Order relating to exemptions from
automatic declassification.
(c) Department of State Classification Guide. The Department of
State Classification Guide (DSCG) is the primary authority for the
classification of information in documents created by Department of
State personnel. The Guide is classified ``Confidential'' and is found
on the Department of State's classified Web site.
Sec. 9.7 Identification and marking.
(a) Classified information shall be marked pursuant to the
standards set forth in section 1.6 of the Executive Order, 32 CFR part
2001, subpart C, and internal Department guidance in 5 Foreign Affairs
Manual.
(b) Foreign government information shall retain its original
classification markings or be marked and classified at a U.S.
classification level that provides a degree of protection at least
equivalent to that required by the entity that furnished the
information. Foreign government information retaining its original
classification markings need not be assigned a U.S. classification
marking provided the responsible agency determines that the foreign
government markings are adequate to meet the purposes served by U.S.
classification markings.
(c) Information assigned a level of classification under
predecessor executive orders shall be considered as classified at that
level of classification despite the omission of other required
markings.
[[Page 35938]]
(d) Prior to public release, all declassified records shall be
appropriately marked to reflect their declassification.
Sec. 9.8 Classification challenges.
(a) Challenges. Authorized holders of information pertaining to the
Department of State who believe that its classification status is
improper are expected and encouraged to challenge the classification
status of the information. Such persons making challenges to the
classification status of information shall not be subject to
retribution for such action. Informal, usually oral, challenges are
encouraged. Formal challenges to classification actions shall be in
writing to an original classification authority (OCA) with jurisdiction
over the information and a copy of the challenge shall be sent to the
Office of Information Programs and Services (IPS) of the Department of
State, SA-2, 515 22nd St. NW., Washington, DC 20522-8100. The
Department (either the OCA or IPS) shall provide an initial response in
writing within 60 calendar days.
(b) Appeal procedures and time limits. A negative response may be
appealed to the Department's Appeals Review Panel (ARP) and should be
sent to: Chairman, Appeals Review Panel, c/o Director, Office of
Information Programs and Services/Appeals Officer, at the IPS address
given above. The appeal shall include a copy of the original challenge,
the response, and any additional information the appellant believes
would assist the ARP in reaching its decision. The ARP shall respond
within 90 calendar days of receipt of the appeal. A negative decision
by the ARP may be appealed to the Interagency Security Classification
Appeals Panel (ISCAP) referenced in section 5.3 of Executive Order
13526. If the Department fails to respond to a formal challenge within
120 calendar days or if the ARP fails to respond to an appeal within 90
calendar days, the challenge may be sent directly to the ISCAP.
(c) Pre-publication review materials. The provisions for
classification challenges do not apply to material required to be
submitted for pre-publication review, or other administrative action,
pursuant to a non-disclosure agreement.
Sec. 9.9 Declassification and downgrading.
(a) Declassification processes. Declassification of classified
information may occur:
(1) After review of material in response to a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request, mandatory declassification review
request, discovery request, subpoena, classification challenge, or
other information access or declassification request;
(2) After review as part of the Department's systematic
declassification review program;
(3) As a result of the elapse of the time or the occurrence of the
event specified at the time of classification;
(4) By operation of the automatic declassification provisions of
section 3.3 of the Executive Order with respect to material more than
25 years old.
(b) Downgrading. When material classified at the Top Secret level
is reviewed for declassification and it is determined that
classification continues to be warranted, a determination shall be made
whether downgrading to a lower level of classification is appropriate.
If downgrading is determined to be warranted, the classification level
of the material shall be changed to the appropriate lower level.
(c) Authority to downgrade and declassify. (1) Classified
information may be downgraded or declassified by:
(i) The official who originally classified the information if that
official is still serving in the same position and has original
classification authority;
(ii) A successor in that capacity if that individual has original
classification authority;
(iii) A supervisory official of either if the supervisory official
has original classification authority;
(iv) Other Department officials specifically delegated
declassification authority in writing by the Secretary or the Senior
Agency Official; or
(v) The Director of the Information Security Oversight Office
pursuant to Sec. 3.1(a) of E.O. 13526.
(2) The Department shall maintain a record of Department officials
specifically designated as declassification and downgrading
authorities.
(d) Declassification in the public interest. Although information
that continues to meet the classification criteria of the Executive
Order or a predecessor order normally requires continued protection, in
some exceptional cases the need to protect information may be
outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information.
When such a question arises, it shall be referred to the Secretary or
the Senior Agency Official for decision on whether, as an exercise of
discretion, the information should be declassified and disclosed. This
provision does not amplify or modify the substantive criteria or
procedures for classification or create any substantive or procedural
right subject to judicial review.
(e) Public disclosure of declassified information. Declassification
of information is not, by itself, authorization for its public
disclosure. Previously classified information that is declassified may
be exempt from public disclosure under the FOIA, the Privacy Act, or
various statutory confidentiality provisions. There also may be
treaties or other international agreements that would preclude public
disclosure of declassified information.
Sec. 9.10 Mandatory declassification review
(a) Scope. All information classified under E.O. 13526 or
predecessor orders shall be subject to mandatory declassification
review upon request by a member of the public or a U.S. government
employee or agency with the following exceptions:
(1) Information originated by the incumbent President or the
incumbent Vice President; the incumbent President's White House staff
or the incumbent Vice President's staff; committees, commissions, or
boards appointed by the incumbent President; other entities within the
Executive Office of the President that solely advise and assist the
incumbent President;
(2) Information that is the subject of pending litigation; and
(3) Information that has been reviewed for declassification within
the past two years which need not be reviewed again, but the requester
shall be given appeal rights.
(b) Requests. Requests for mandatory declassification review should
be addressed to the Office of Information Programs and Services, U.S.
Department of State, SA-2, 515 22nd St. NW., Washington, DC 20522-8100.
(c) Description of information. In order to be processed, a request
for mandatory declassification review must describe the document or the
material containing the information sought with sufficient specificity
to enable the Department to locate the document or material with a
reasonable amount of effort. Whenever a request does not sufficiently
describe the material, the Department shall notify the requester that
no further action will be taken unless additional description of the
information sought is provided.
(d) Refusal to confirm or deny existence of information. The
Department may refuse to confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence
of requested information whenever the fact of existence or nonexistence
is itself classified.
[[Page 35939]]
(e) Processing. In responding to mandatory declassification review
requests, the Department shall make a review determination as promptly
as possible, but in no case more than one year from the date of receipt
of the request, and notify the requester accordingly. When the
requested information cannot be declassified in its entirety, the
Department shall release all meaningful portions that can be
declassified and that are not exempt from disclosure on other grounds.
(f) Other agency information. When the Department receives a
request for information in its possession that was originally
classified by another agency, it shall refer the request and the
pertinent information to the other agency unless that agency has agreed
that the Department may review such information for declassification on
behalf of that agency. In any case, the Department is responsible for
responding to the requester with regard to any responsive information,
including other-agency information, unless a prior arrangement has been
made with the originating agency.
(g) Foreign government information. In the case of a request for
material containing foreign government information, the Department
shall determine whether the information may be declassified and may, if
appropriate, consult with the relevant foreign government on that
issue. If the Department is not the agency that initially received the
foreign government information, it may consult with the original
receiving agency.
(h) Documents or material containing RD or Transclassified Foreign
Nuclear Information (TFNI). Documents or material containing RD or TFNI
will be submitted to DOE for review. Documents containing FRD will be
submitted to DOE or DoD for review.
(i) Appeals. Any denial of a mandatory declassification review
request may be appealed to the ARP. A denial by the ARP of a mandatory
declassification review appeal may be further appealed to the ISCAP. A
failure of the Department to make a determination on a mandatory
declassification review request within one year from the date of its
receipt or to respond to an appeal of a denial by the ARP within 180
calendar days of its receipt may be appealed directly to the ISCAP.
Sec. 9.11 Systematic declassification review.
The Director of the Office of Information Programs and Services
shall be responsible for conducting a program for systematic
declassification review of historically valuable records that: were
exempted from the automatic declassification provisions of section 3.3
of the Executive Order; or will soon become subject to the automatic
declassification provisions of section 3.3 of the Order. The Director
shall prioritize such review in accordance with priorities established
by the National Declassification Center.
Sec. 9.12 Sharing other-agency classified information.
The long-standing third-agency rule has required prior originating
agency approval before a receiving agency could further disseminate
classified information. Under the Executive Order, unless the
originating agency indicates on the material that prior approval is
required and provided that the criteria for access under section 4.1(a)
of the Order are met, a receiving agency may further disseminate
classified information in documents created subsequent to the effective
date of the Order to another agency or U.S. entity without consultation
with the originating agency. ``U.S. entity'' includes cleared state,
local, tribal, and private sector entities. Similarly, under certain
circumstances, receiving agencies may pass such classified information
to foreign governments.
Sec. 9.13 Access to classified information by historical researchers
and certain former government personnel.
(a) The restriction in E.O. 13526 and predecessor orders on
limiting access to classified information to individuals who have a
need-to-know the information may be waived, under the conditions set
forth below, for persons who: are engaged in historical research
projects; have served as President or Vice President; have occupied
senior policy-making positions in the Department of State or other U.S.
government agencies to which they were appointed or designated by the
President or the Vice President. It does not include former Foreign
Service Officers as a class or persons who merely received assignment
commissions as Foreign Service Officers, Foreign Service Reserve
Officers, Foreign Service Staff Officers, and employees.
(b) Requests by such persons must be submitted in writing to the
Office of Information Programs and Services at the address set forth
above and must include a general description of the records sought, the
time period covered by the records that are the subject of the request,
and an explanation why access is sought. Requests for access by such
requesters may be granted if:
(1) The Secretary or the Senior Agency Official determines in
writing that access is consistent with the interests of national
security;
(2) The requester agrees in writing to safeguard the information
from unauthorized disclosure or compromise;
(3) The requester submits a statement in writing authorizing the
Department to review any notes and manuscripts created as a result of
access;
(4) The requester submits a statement in writing that any
information obtained from review of the records will not be
disseminated without the express written permission of the Department;
(c) If a requester uses a research assistant, the requester and the
research assistant must both submit a statement in writing
acknowledging that the same access conditions set forth in paragraphs
(b)(2) through (b)(4) of this section apply to the research assistant.
Such a research assistant must be working for the applicant and not
gathering information for publication on his or her own behalf.
(d) Access granted under this section shall be limited to items the
official originated, reviewed, signed, or received while serving as a
Presidential or Vice Presidential appointee or designee or as President
or Vice President.
(e) Such requesters may seek declassification and release of
material to which they have been granted access under this section
through either the FOIA or the mandatory declassification review
provisions of E.O. 13526. Such requests shall be processed in the order
received, along with other FOIA and mandatory declassification review
requests, and shall be subject to the fees applicable to FOIA requests.
Sec. 9.14 Pre-publication review of writings by former Department
personnel.
The Department provides pre-publication review of writings on
foreign relations topics by former Department personnel, including
contractors and detailees, who had security clearances to try to ensure
that former personnel do not violate their agreements on non-disclosure
of classified national security information in such writings.
Manuscripts (including articles, speeches, books, etc.) should be sent
to the Director, Office of Information Programs and Services, 515 22nd
St. NW., Washington, DC 20522-8100. Questions about pre-publication
clearance may be sent to Classification@state.gov.
Sec. 9.15 Assistance to the Historian's Office.
All elements of the Department shall assist the Historian's Office
in its preparation of the Foreign Relations of
[[Page 35940]]
the United States (FRUS) series such as by providing prompt access to
and, when possible, declassification of information deemed appropriate
for inclusion in the FRUS.
Sec. 9.16 Safeguarding.
Specific controls on the use, processing, storage, reproduction,
and transmittal of classified information within the Department to
provide protection for such information and to prevent access by
unauthorized persons are contained in Volume 12 of the Department's
Foreign Affairs Manual.
Dated: May 29, 2014.
Margaret P. Grafeld,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-14879 Filed 6-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P