Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Chinook Salmon Bycatch Management in the Gulf of Alaska Non-Pollock Trawl Fisheries; Amendment 97, 35971-35987 [2014-14726]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Susan Monroe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA; phone: 425–917–6457; fax:
425–917–6590; email: susan.l.monroe@
faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 17,
2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–14813 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 130710606–4491–01]
RIN 0648–BD48
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Chinook Salmon
Bycatch Management in the Gulf of
Alaska Non-Pollock Trawl Fisheries;
Amendment 97
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations to
implement Amendment 97 to the
Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP).
If approved, Amendment 97 would limit
Chinook salmon prohibited species
catch (PSC) in Western and Central Gulf
of Alaska (GOA) non-pollock trawl
catcher/processor (C/P) and catcher
vessel (CV) fisheries. This action would
establish separate annual Chinook
salmon PSC limits for trawl catcher/
processors (Trawl C/P Sector), trawl
catcher vessels participating in the
Central GOA Rockfish Program
(Rockfish Program CV Sector), and trawl
catcher vessels not participating in the
Central GOA Rockfish Program (Non-
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Rockfish Program CV Sector) fishing for
groundfish species other than pollock. If
a sector reaches its Chinook salmon PSC
limit, NMFS would prohibit further
fishing for non-pollock groundfish by
vessels in that sector. This action also
would establish and clarify Chinook
salmon retention and discard
requirements for vessels, shoreside
processors, and stationary floating
processors participating in both the
GOA pollock and non-pollock
groundfish trawl fisheries. This action is
necessary to minimize the catch of
Chinook salmon to the extent
practicable in the GOA non-pollock
trawl fisheries. Amendment 97 is
intended to promote the goals and
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the FMP,
and other applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2013–0077, by either of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130077, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Electronic copies of the
Environmental Assessment/Regulatory
Impact Review/Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (collectively,
Analysis) prepared for this action are
available from https://
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35971
www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS
Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. An electronic
copy of the Biological Opinion on the
effects of the Alaska groundfish fisheries
on Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed
species is available at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/
protectedresources/stellers/plb/
default.htm. Written comments
regarding the approved collection-ofinformation requirements referenced in
this proposed rule may be submitted to
NMFS at the above address and by
email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to 202–395–7285.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at https://www.cio.noaa.gov/
services_programs/prasubs.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hartman, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fisheries in the
U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of
the GOA under the FMP. The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) prepared, and NMFS
approved, the FMP under the authority
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and
implementing the FMP appear at 50
CFR parts 600 and 679.
The Council has submitted
Amendment 97 for review by the
Secretary of Commerce, and a notice of
availability of the FMP amendment was
published in the Federal Register on
June 5, 2014 (79 FR 32525), with written
comments on the FMP amendment
invited through August 4, 2014. All
relevant written comments received by
the end of the applicable comment
period, whether specifically directed to
the FMP amendment, this proposed
rule, or both, will be considered in the
approval/disapproval decision for
Amendment 97 and addressed in the
response to comments in the final
decision.
The following sections of the
preamble describe: (1) General
management of groundfish and PSC in
the GOA; (2) the management areas and
groundfish fisheries affected by this
proposed action—the non-pollock trawl
fisheries in the Central and Western
GOA; (3) the non-pollock trawl fisheries
in the Central and Western GOA and the
three sectors active in those fisheries—
the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV,
and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors;
(4) Chinook salmon PSC use in the nonpollock trawl fisheries; (5) the history
and goals of this proposed rule—
limiting Chinook salmon PSC in the
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
35972
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
non-pollock trawl fisheries in the
Central and Western GOA; and (6)
provisions of the proposed action that
would establish limits on the maximum
amount of Chinook salmon PSC
permitted to be taken on an annual basis
by the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV,
and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors
and requirements necessary to account
for and adequately sample Chinook
salmon PSC.
General Management of Groundfish
and PSC Limits in the GOA
The FMP and its implementing
regulations at § 679.20(c) require that
the Council recommend and NMFS
specify an overfishing level (OFL), an
acceptable biological catch (ABC), and a
total allowable catch (TAC) for each
stock or stock complex (i.e., each
species or species group) of groundfish
on an annual basis. The OFL is the level
above which overfishing is occurring for
a species or species group. The ABC is
the level of a species or species group’s
annual catch that accounts for the
scientific uncertainty in the estimate of
OFL and any other scientific
uncertainty. The ABC is set below the
OFL. The TAC is the annual catch target
for a species or species group, derived
from the ABC by considering social and
economic factors and management
uncertainty. The TAC must be set lower
than or equal to the ABC.
The OFLs, ABCs, and TACs for GOA
groundfish are specified through the
annual harvest specification process. A
detailed description of the annual
harvest specification process is
provided in the final 2014 and 2015
harvest specifications for groundfish of
the GOA (79 FR 12890, March 6, 2014)
and is briefly summarized here. The
Council’s Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC) establishes the OFL
and ABC for each species or species
group. Based on the ABC established for
each species or species group, the
Council recommends a TAC. The TAC
for some species and species groups are
subject to further allocation on a
seasonal basis and allocation among
vessels using specific types of gear and
vessel categories in the GOA (see
regulations at § 679.20(a)).
To ensure that OFLs, ABCs, and TACs
are not exceeded, NMFS requires that
vessel operators participating in
groundfish fisheries in the GOA comply
with a range of monitoring requirements
and restrictions. NMFS uses a range of
area, time, gear, and operation-specific
fishery closures to maintain catch
within specified TACs and associated
sector and seasonal allocations. NMFS
closes directed fisheries when a TAC is
reached, and restricts fishing in other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
fisheries that may incidentally take a
species or species group approaching its
OFL. Regulations at §§ 679.20(d)(1),
(d)(2), and (d)(3) describe the range of
management measures that NMFS uses
to maintain total catch at or below the
OFL, ABC, and TAC for a species or
species group.
In addition to these measures to limit
total catch of groundfish species, the
Council and NMFS have adopted
various measures intended to control
the catch of species taken incidentally
in groundfish fisheries. Certain species
are designated as ‘‘prohibited species
catch’’ (PSC) in the FMP because they
are the target of other, fully utilized
domestic fisheries. The FMP and
regulations at § 679.21 require that catch
of PSC must be avoided while fishing
for groundfish, and when incidentally
caught, these PSC species must be
immediately returned to the sea with a
minimum of injury. The PSC species
include Pacific halibut, Pacific herring,
Pacific salmon, steelhead trout, king
crab, and Tanner crab.
PSC must not be sold or kept for
personal use and are required to be
discarded (see regulations at § 679.21),
or retained but not sold under the
Prohibited Species Donation (PSD)
Program (see regulations at § 679.26). In
an effort to minimize waste of salmon
incidentally caught and killed, NMFS
established the PSD Program for the
donation of incidentally caught salmon.
The PSD Program reduces the amount of
edible protein discarded under PSC
regulatory requirements (see regulations
at § 679.21). The PSD Program allows
permitted participants to retain salmon
for distribution to economically
disadvantaged individuals through taxexempt hunger relief organizations.
The Council has recommended, and
NMFS has implemented, measures to (1)
close groundfish fishing in areas with a
high occurrence of prohibited species,
or where there is a relatively high level
of PSC; (2) require the use of gear
specifically modified to minimize PSC;
and (3) establish PSC limits in specific
Alaska groundfish fisheries in the GOA.
One of the prohibited species of
greatest concern to the Council and
NMFS is Chinook salmon. Chinook
salmon is a prohibited species in the
groundfish fisheries because of its value
in salmon fisheries. Chinook salmon is
a culturally and economically valuable
species that is fully allocated and for
which State and Federal managers seek
to conservatively manage harvests. The
Council and NMFS have established a
range of management measures to
constrain the impact of groundfish
fisheries in the Bering Sea/Aleutian
Islands Management Area (BSAI) and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the GOA on Chinook salmon. A
summary of these measures for the GOA
is provided in Section 1.5 of the
Analysis.
Management Areas and Fisheries
Affected by This Proposed Action
This proposed rule would apply to
Federally-permitted vessels fishing in
the Central and Western Reporting
Areas of the GOA (referred to in the
remainder of the preamble as either the
Western and Central GOA or the Central
and Western GOA). The Western and
Central Reporting Areas, defined at
§ 679.2 and shown in Figure 3 to 50 CFR
part 679, consist of the Central and
Western Regulatory Areas in the EEZ
(Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630) and
the adjacent State of Alaska (State)
waters. The EEZ includes Federal
waters that generally occur from 3
nautical miles (nm) to 200 nm from
shore. State waters generally occur from
shore to 3 nm from shore. The specific
boundaries between State and Federal
waters are provided on the NMFS
Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/maps/
reporting_areas/index.pdf.
This proposed rule would not apply
to Federally-permitted vessels fishing in
the Eastern Reporting Area of the GOA,
which consists of Statistical Areas 640,
649, 650, and 659 in the EEZ and the
adjacent State waters. Although all
species of Pacific salmon are taken
incidentally in the groundfish fisheries
within the GOA, the Eastern Reporting
Area is not included because it contains
a large area (Statistical Area 650) closed
to fishing with trawl gear, and Chinook
salmon PSC in the Eastern Reporting
Area accounts for less than 2 percent of
total GOA Chinook salmon PSC (see
Section 1.2 of the Analysis for
additional detail).
This proposed rule would apply
Chinook salmon PSC limits to owners
and operators of trawl vessels that are
directed fishing for groundfish species
other than pollock (non-pollock trawl
vessels) in the Central and Western
GOA. Directed fishing is defined at
§ 679.2. Vessels that are directed fishing
for pollock in the Central and Western
GOA are subject to management under
a separate Chinook salmon PSC limit
defined at § 679.21(h) and would not be
affected by this proposed action, with
the exception of a proposed clarification
to the current salmon retention
requirements explained later in this
preamble.
This proposed action would apply to
Federally-permitted trawl vessels
fishing for non-pollock groundfish that
are managed under TAC limits in
Federal waters and under the State’s
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
parallel groundfish fisheries in State
waters. Parallel groundfish fisheries are
fisheries that occur in State waters
where the catch of groundfish is debited
from the TAC. Parallel groundfish
fisheries are opened and closed by the
State concurrently with adjacent Federal
fisheries. Parallel fisheries are managed
by the State under rules similar to those
that apply in the Federal fisheries. The
parallel fisheries that would be affected
by this action include the GOA State
parallel trawl fisheries for groundfish
species, other than pollock, that occur
in State waters in the Central and
Western GOA. Additional detail on
State parallel fisheries is provided in
Section 4.5.1 of the Analysis.
This proposed rule would not apply
to non-pollock trawl vessels fishing in a
State-managed guideline harvest level
(GHL) groundfish fishery in the Western
or Central GOA should such a fishery be
authorized by the State. Currently, GHL
non-pollock trawl fisheries are not
authorized by the State in the Central or
Western GOA. As general background,
GHL fisheries are established and
managed by the State for harvest
exclusively within State waters and
catch occurring in a GHL fishery is not
deducted from the TAC. Additional
detail on State GHL fishery management
is provided in Section 4.5.1 of the
Analysis.
This proposed action would not apply
to non-trawl fisheries (i.e., fisheries
using pot, hook-and-line or jig gear).
The purpose and need for this action is
to address Chinook salmon PSC that is
known to occur in trawl fisheries. The
Council and NMFS could consider
subsequent action to limit Chinook
salmon PSC in non-trawl fisheries
through subsequent action if such action
were determined to be warranted.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Non-Pollock Trawl Fisheries in the
Central and Western GOA
The non-pollock trawl fisheries in the
Western and Central GOA include
fisheries for sablefish, several rockfish
species, arrowtooth flounder, Pacific
cod, shallow water flatfish, rex sole,
flathead sole, deep-water flatfish, and
other groundfish, except pollock. Many
of the non-pollock trawl fisheries are
multi-species fisheries, in which vessels
catch and retain multiple groundfish
species in a single fishing trip.
Additional detail on the species and
amounts harvested in the non-pollock
trawl fisheries in the Western and
Central GOA are provided in Sections
3.2 and 4.4 of the Analysis and in the
final 2014 and 2015 harvest
specifications for the GOA groundfish
fisheries (79 FR 12890, March 6, 2014).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Participants in the Western and
Central GOA non-pollock trawl fisheries
include C/Ps and CVs. In developing
Amendment 97, the Council decided to
group these vessels into three sectors
which are described in greater detail in
the following sections of this preamble:
(1) The Trawl C/P Sector; (2) the
Rockfish Program CV Sector; and (3) the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector.
Trawl C/P Sector
Trawl C/Ps in the Central and
Western GOA participate in a range of
non-pollock groundfish fisheries. Trawl
C/Ps primarily fish for rockfish (i.e.,
dusky rockfish, northern rockfish, and
Pacific ocean perch) and sablefish in the
Central and Western GOA, and
arrowtooth flounder, deep-water
flatfish, flathead sole, and rex sole in the
Central GOA. Trawl C/Ps occasionally
fish for arrowtooth flounder and
shallow water flatfish in the Central and
Western GOA. Trawl C/Ps do not fish
for Pacific cod in the Central or Western
GOA. Section 4.4 of the Analysis
describes the harvesting activities by
trawl C/Ps in greater detail.
Harvests of non-pollock groundfish by
trawl C/Ps in the Central and Western
GOA are governed primarily by two
management programs, the Amendment
80 Program and the Central GOA
Rockfish Program. All of the vessels that
would be within the Trawl C/P Sector
under this proposed rule are subject to
management under the Amendment 80
Program. Most of the vessels that would
be within the Trawl C/P Sector under
this proposed rule also are subject to
management under the Central GOA
Rockfish Program. The relevant
provisions of the Amendment 80
Program and the Central GOA Rockfish
Program are briefly described in the
following paragraphs.
In June 2006, the Council adopted
Amendment 80 to the BSAI Fishery
Management Plan, which was
implemented by NMFS in 2008. The
suite of management measures that
implement Amendment 80 is commonly
known as the Amendment 80 Program.
The key provisions of Amendment 80
relevant for this proposed action are
briefly described here; additional detail
is available in the final rule
implementing the Amendment 80
Program (72 FR 52668, September 14,
2007).
The Amendment 80 Program is
intended primarily to improve retention
and utilization of fishery resources;
encourage fishing practices with lower
discard rates; and improve the
opportunity for increasing the value of
harvested species while lowering
operational costs for groundfish fishing
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35973
in the BSAI. The Amendment 80
Program accomplishes these goals by
encouraging the formation of
cooperatives and the development of
cooperative fishing practices among all
persons who are issued Amendment 80
quota share permits. Amendment 80
cooperatives are eligible to receive
cooperative quota, which represents an
exclusive harvest privilege for a portion
of the TAC for each Amendment 80
species annually. The allocation of an
exclusive harvest privilege to a person
for a specific portion of the TAC is more
commonly known as a catch share.
Trawl C/Ps within an Amendment 80
cooperative cannot exceed the amount
of cooperative quota allocated to their
Amendment 80 cooperative (see
regulations at § 679.7(n)). Participants
who form cooperatives in the
Amendment 80 Program are able to
receive a catch share in the BSAI and
are not engaged in a ‘‘race for fish’’ that
can occur in fisheries that are not
subject to catch share management. This
allows participants within an
Amendment 80 cooperative to make
operational choices to improve fishery
returns, reduce bycatch, and reduce fish
discards. However, the allocation of
catch shares could allow Amendment
80 cooperative participants to expand
into fisheries not managed under a catch
share program. Specifically, many of the
trawl C/Ps eligible under the
Amendment 80 Program are also active
in groundfish fisheries in the GOA that
are not subject to catch share
management.
To address the potential expansion of
fishing effort into the GOA that could
result from the implementation of catch
share management in the BSAI, the
Amendment 80 Program limits the
ability of trawl C/Ps managed under the
Amendment 80 Program to expand their
harvest efforts in the GOA. These
limitations are commonly known as
‘‘sideboards’’ because they constrain
harvests in specific fisheries. The
Amendment 80 Program established
GOA groundfish and halibut PSC
sideboard limits for Amendment 80
Program participants.
Regulations at § 679.92 establish
groundfish harvesting sideboard limits
on all vessels eligible for the
Amendment 80 program, other than the
F/V Golden Fleece, for pollock and
Pacific cod in the Western and Central
GOA, and Pacific ocean perch, dusky
rockfish, and northern rockfish in the
Western GOA. Regulations at
§ 679.92(b)(2) establish halibut PSC
sideboard limits in the Central and
Western GOA for vessels eligible under
the Amendment 80 Program other than
the F/V Golden Fleece. Halibut PSC
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35974
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
sideboards establish the maximum
amount of halibut PSC that may be
taken while Amendment 80 trawl C/Ps
are fishing for groundfish in the GOA.
Halibut PSC sideboard limits are
allocated by fishery complexes and
seasons as described in Table 31 to part
679.
In addition to these groundfish and
halibut PSC sideboard limits, other
limitations apply to trawl C/Ps eligible
for the Amendment 80 Program.
Regulations in Table 39 to 50 CFR part
679 allow only specific trawl C/Ps
eligible under the Amendment 80
Program to conduct directed fishing for
flatfish in the GOA. Regulations at
§ 679.92(d) prohibit one vessel in the
Amendment 80 Program, the F/V
Golden Fleece, from directed fishing for
pollock, Pacific cod, Pacific ocean
perch, dusky rockfish, and northern
rockfish in the Central and Western
GOA, effectively limiting that vessel to
the flatfish fisheries in the Central and
Western GOA. These specific sideboard
measures were established for the F/V
Golden Fleece in recognition of the
unique catch patterns of the F/V Golden
Fleece described in detail in the final
rule implementing the Amendment 80
Program (72 FR 52668, September 14,
2007).
Because the trawl C/Ps operating in
the Central and Western GOA are
subject to the sideboard limits imposed
by the Amendment 80 Program, the
vessel operators have established
voluntary cooperative relationships to
ensure that sideboard limits are not
exceeded. These voluntary
arrangements have resulted in improved
communication and coordination
among trawl C/P operators in the GOA.
In addition to the Amendment 80
Program, some trawl C/Ps that would be
within the Trawl C/P Sector under this
proposed rule are eligible to participate
in the Central GOA Rockfish Program
(76 FR 81248, December 27, 2011). The
Central GOA Rockfish Program was first
implemented in 2007 and had a fiveyear duration ending on December 31,
2011 (71 FR 67210, November 20, 2006).
Prior to the expiration of the Central
GOA Rockfish Program, the Council
revised and renewed the Central GOA
Rockfish Program (76 FR 81248,
December 27, 2011). Additional detail
on the Central GOA Rockfish Program is
provided in the final rule implementing
the program (76 FR 81248, December 27,
2011) and relevant provisions are briefly
summarized here.
The Central GOA Rockfish Program,
like the Amendment 80 Program,
allocates catch shares. The Central GOA
Rockfish Program provides catch shares
to eligible trawl C/Ps for Central GOA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
dusky rockfish, northern rockfish,
Pacific ocean perch, rougheye rockfish,
shortraker rockfish, and sablefish. The
Central GOA Rockfish Program also
limits the amount of halibut PSC that
may be used by eligible trawl C/Ps. As
with the Amendment 80 Program, trawl
C/Ps that are active in the Central GOA
Rockfish Program can receive a catch
share allocation only if they participate
in a cooperative. Trawl C/Ps cannot
exceed their cooperative’s Central GOA
Rockfish Program catch share
allocations (see regulations at
§ 679.7(o)). In addition to this catch
share allocation, trawl C/Ps that are
eligible for the Central GOA Rockfish
Program are subject to sideboard limits
that constrain their ability to expand
effort into other fisheries in the GOA
that are not subject to catch share
management. The Central GOA Rockfish
Program establishes sideboard limits on
the types of groundfish fisheries, the
amount of Central and Western GOA
groundfish, and the amount of halibut
PSC that may be harvested by trawl C/
Ps eligible for the Central GOA Rockfish
Program (see regulations at § 679.82).
These provisions have resulted in
coordination among those participants
active in the Central GOA Rockfish
Program and who would be within the
Trawl C/P Sector under this proposed
rule.
The management measures
implemented under the Amendment 80
Program and the Central GOA Rockfish
Program have resulted in uniform
management of trawl C/P vessels in the
Central and Western GOA. This uniform
management has also resulted in similar
harvest patterns, and coordination
among fishery participants. Sections
4.4.2 and 4.4.11 of the Analysis describe
the fishing dynamics within the Trawl
C/P Sector in greater detail.
This proposed rule would not apply
to trawl C/Ps that are managed under
authority of the American Fisheries Act
(AFA). Regulations implementing the
AFA prohibit AFA trawl C/Ps from
harvesting any species of groundfish in
the GOA (see regulations at
§ 679.7(k)(1)(ii)). Therefore, they would
not be subject to the provisions of this
proposed action.
Rockfish Program CV Sector
Trawl CVs in the Central and Western
GOA participate in a range of nonpollock groundfish fisheries. Trawl CVs
primarily fish for Pacific cod in the
Central and Western GOA. Trawl CVs
also fish for rockfish (i.e., dusky
rockfish, northern rockfish, and Pacific
ocean perch) and sablefish in the
Central and Western GOA, and
arrowtooth flounder, flathead sole, and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
shallow water flatfish in the Central
GOA. Trawl CVs rarely fish for other
flatfish species in the Central GOA.
Trawl CVs do not fish for flatfish or
rockfish in the Western GOA. Section
4.4.2.2 of the Analysis describes the
harvesting activities by trawl CVs in
greater detail.
There is a distinct division in the
management of trawl CVs that separates
trawl CVs participating in the Central
GOA Rockfish Program from trawl CVs
that are not participating in the Central
GOA Rockfish Program. Trawl CVs
participating in the Central GOA
Rockfish Program are subject to catch
share management; trawl CVs
participating in fisheries other than the
Central GOA Rockfish Program are not.
These conditions create two distinct
management regimes that
fundamentally affect the way vessels
within each sector fish for non-pollock
groundfish and avoid PSC. Therefore,
this proposed action recognizes trawl
CVs that are participating in the Central
GOA Rockfish Program (Rockfish
Program CVs) as a sector that is separate
and distinct from trawl CVs that are not
participating in the Central GOA
Rockfish Program (Non-Rockfish
Program CVs).
The Central GOA Rockfish Program
provides catch shares to eligible trawl
CVs for Central GOA dusky rockfish,
northern rockfish, Pacific Ocean perch,
Pacific cod, rougheye rockfish, and
sablefish. The Central GOA Rockfish
Program also limits the amount of
halibut PSC that may be used by eligible
trawl CVs. Rockfish Program CVs can
receive a catch share allocation only if
they participate in a cooperative.
Rockfish Program cooperatives cannot
exceed the amount of their Central GOA
Rockfish Program catch share
allocations (see regulations at
§ 679.7(o)). Rockfish Program CVs are
subject to sideboard limits that
constrain the ability of Rockfish
Program CVs from expanding their
fishing effort into other fisheries in the
GOA not subject to catch share
management (see regulations at
§ 679.82(d)).
In the Central GOA, directed rockfish
fishing is permitted from May 1 to
December 31, with the majority of
groundfish harvested in May and June.
In 2012, thirty-five trawl CVs in the
GOA were fishing under the authority of
a Rockfish Program Cooperative Quota
(CQ) permit out of a total of 62 trawl
CVs that were active in the Central GOA
groundfish fisheries. Rockfish Program
CVs can ‘‘check in’’ to fish under the
authority of a Central GOA Rockfish
Program CQ Permit, and ‘‘check out’’ to
fish in other fisheries in the GOA (see
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
regulations at § 679.5(r)(8)). When
Rockfish Program CVs are checked in,
they are fishing under the authority of
a Rockfish Program CQ Permit and their
harvest is limited to the cooperative’s
catch share allocations. However, the
catch share allocations are limiting only
when trawl CVs are checked in and
fishing under the authority of a Rockfish
Program CQ Permit. Conversely,
sideboard limitations applicable to
eligible Rockfish Program CVs apply
during a portion of the year to Rockfish
Program CVs that are checked out of the
Central GOA Rockfish Program (see
regulations at § 679.82(d)). The net
effect of these provisions is that when
trawl CVs are ‘‘checked in’’ and fishing
under the authority of a Rockfish
Program CQ Permit, they are
participating in a cooperative catch
share management program, and when
they are ‘‘checked out,’’ they no longer
have an exclusive harvest privilege and
must compete or ‘‘race’’ with other CVs
in harvesting the fish. These conditions
indicated to the Council that it would be
appropriate to apply separate Chinook
salmon PSC limits for trawl CV vessels
when ‘‘checked in’’ and operating under
the authority of a Rockfish Program CQ
Permit and for trawl CV vessels not
operating under the authority of a
Rockfish Program CQ Permit (see the
‘‘Provisions of the Proposed Action’’
Section of this preamble for additional
detail). Section 4.4.2 of the Analysis
describes the fishing dynamics within
the Rockfish Program CV Sector in
greater detail.
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
CVs that are not eligible to participate
in the Central GOA Rockfish Program or
that are not ‘‘checked in’’ and fishing
under the authority of a Rockfish
Program CQ Permit would be in the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector. This
sector fishes primarily for Pacific cod in
the Central and Western GOA,
arrowtooth flounder, flathead sole, and
shallow water flatfish in the Central
GOA, and rockfish in the Eastern GOA
(an area not subject to the provisions of
this proposed action). As noted earlier,
some trawl CVs do not participate in the
Rockfish Program at any time during a
year, while some participate in the
Central GOA Rockfish Program for part
of the year, and then participate in other
Central or Western GOA non-pollock
fisheries that are outside of the Central
GOA Rockfish Program. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
participants who would be within the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector under
this proposed rule participate in
fisheries that are not subject to catch
share management and are less likely to
be able to coordinate fishing operations
in comparison with participants who
are subject to catch share management,
such as those in the Trawl C/P and
Rockfish CV Program Sectors. Section
4.4.2 of the Analysis describes the
fishing dynamics within the NonRockfish Program CV Sector in greater
detail.
Chinook Salmon PSC in the NonPollock Trawl Fisheries
Information is currently unavailable
for NMFS to assess the specific
proportion of individual stocks of
Chinook salmon that are incidentally
caught in the GOA non-pollock trawl
fisheries. Coded wire tag recoveries and
genetic analysis of Chinook salmon
caught in the GOA non-pollock trawl
fisheries show that Chinook salmon
stocks originate from Oregon,
Washington, British Columbia, and
Alaska. Current regulations do not
facilitate stock of origin analysis of
Chinook salmon incidentally caught in
the Western or Central GOA nonpollock trawl fisheries. Section 4.7.2 of
the Analysis concludes that it is not
possible at this time to estimate how
Chinook salmon removals by trawl
fisheries impact the proportion of
Chinook salmon forgone by other users
or impact Chinook salmon escapement.
Regulations require participants in the
non-pollock trawl fisheries to avoid
Chinook salmon when possible and
return them to the water immediately
with a minimum of injury after observer
sampling. However, salmon caught
incidentally in trawl nets often die as a
result of trauma incurred during
capture. It can be difficult for nonpollock trawl vessels to avoid Chinook
salmon PSC because Chinook salmon
and non-pollock groundfish occur in the
same locations in the Western and
Central GOA.
Although non-pollock trawl fisheries
incidentally take Chinook salmon, the
pollock directed fishery in the Western
and Central GOA typically takes the
majority of Chinook salmon PSC in the
GOA groundfish fisheries (see Section
4.4 of the Analysis for additional detail
on total Chinook salmon PSC use). In
2012, NMFS issued a final rule to
implement Amendment 93 to the FMP
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35975
(77 FR 42629, July 20, 2012).
Amendment 93 established separate
Chinook salmon PSC limits in the
Western and Central GOA for the
pollock directed fishery. These limits
require NMFS to close the pollock
directed fishery in the Western or
Central GOA if the applicable limit is
reached (see regulations at
§ 679.21(h)(6)). The annual Chinook
salmon PSC limits in the pollock
directed fishery of 6,684 salmon in the
Western GOA and 18,316 salmon in the
Central GOA are set in regulation at
§ 679.21(h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii). In
addition, all salmon (regardless of
species) taken in the pollock directed
fishery in the Western and Central GOA
must be retained until an observer at the
processing facility that receives delivery
of the catch is provided an opportunity
to count the number of salmon and to
collect any scientific data or biological
samples from the salmon (see
regulations at § 679.21(h)(4)).
There are currently no specific
management measures to limit Chinook
salmon PSC in the GOA non-pollock
trawl fisheries. From 1997 through 2013
(a broad range of years encompassing
reliable historic estimates and the most
recent available data), the non-pollock
trawl fisheries accounted for
approximately 27 percent of the total
trawl fishery Chinook salmon PSC in
the Western and Central GOA
groundfish fisheries. The pollock trawl
fisheries accounted for the remainder of
the Chinook salmon PSC. Chinook
salmon PSC for the non-pollock trawl
fisheries averaged 5,770 salmon
annually from 1997 through 2013, with
a maximum annual PSC of 10,877 in
2003 and a minimum annual PSC of
2,739 in 1998.
Chinook salmon PSC for GOA nonpollock trawl fisheries varies by year
and among the Trawl C/P, Rockfish
Program CV, and Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sectors. Table 1 provides the
average, the minimum, and the
maximum amount of Chinook salmon
PSC for all three sectors. Table 1
provides this information since the
implementation of the Central GOA
Rockfish Program in 2007, the first year
that all three sectors could be defined,
through 2013, the most recent year for
which data are available. Section 4.4 of
the Analysis provides additional detail
on the distribution of Chinook salmon
PSC.
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
35976
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—TOTAL, AVERAGE, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM CHINOOK SALMON PSC IN THE TRAWL C/P, ROCKFISH CV, AND
NON-ROCKFISH CV SECTORS FROM 2007 THROUGH 2013
Sector
Average
Maximum
Minimum
Trawl C/P .....................................................................................................................................
Rockfish CV .................................................................................................................................
Non-Rockfish CV .........................................................................................................................
3,143
903
2,526
4,631
1,649
4,531
1,890
368
857
Total (All three sectors) ........................................................................................................
5,979
9,748
3,664
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
History and Goals of This Proposed
Rule
In December 2010, the Council
initiated two sequential amendments to
address GOA Chinook salmon PSC. The
first amendment addressed Chinook
salmon PSC in the GOA pollock
fisheries through the implementation of
a PSC limit for those target fisheries in
the Western and Central GOA. At the
same time, a longer-term amendment
package was initiated to address
comprehensive Chinook salmon PSC
management in GOA non-pollock trawl
fisheries.
In June 2011, the Council took final
action on the first amendment,
Amendment 93 to the GOA Groundfish
FMP, which established an overall PSC
limit of 25,000 Chinook salmon for the
Central and Western GOA pollock
fisheries. The Central GOA annual PSC
limit was set at 18,316 Chinook salmon,
and the Western GOA PSC limit was set
at 6,684 Chinook salmon. Also, the
Council required full retention of all
salmon taken in the pollock trawl
fishery, in order to allow NMFS to
implement a robust sampling protocol
for Chinook salmon, and allow for
genetic stock identification of Chinook
salmon taken as PSC. The final rule to
implement Amendment 93 became
effective on August 25, 2012 (77 FR
42629).
In February 2012, the Council
reviewed a discussion paper on the
second amendment to consider and
evaluate a range of alternatives for
Chinook salmon PSC limits in the GOA
non-pollock trawl fisheries, and other
alternatives for controlling and
sampling Chinook salmon PSC in GOA
trawl fisheries. In June 2013, the
Council took final action on the
Chinook salmon PSC limits for the nonpollock trawl fishery by selecting a longterm average annual PSC limit that
would be divided between CVs and C/
Ps, an incentive buffer for trawl C/Ps
and Non-Rockfish Program CVs,
separate Chinook PSC apportionments
for the Rockfish Program CV sector and
the Non-Rockfish Program CV sector,
and salmon retention requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
In June 2013, the Council initiated
review of an additional PSC measure to
examine whether or not the June 2013
recommendation on Chinook salmon
PSC in the GOA non-pollock trawl
fishery could be modified to include an
inseason reallocation of Chinook salmon
PSC from the Rockfish Program CV
Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sector. The Council recommended an
inseason reallocation on December
2013. The measures adopted by the
Council at its June and December
meetings comprise Amendment 97 and
are described in detail in the analysis
and in the following section of this
proposed rule.
The goals of this proposed action are
consistent with the 10 National
Standards established under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. The proposed
action addresses the MSA National
Standards and would balance a number
of competing objectives for fishery
conservation and management. These
include National Standard 1, National
Standard 8, and National Standard 9.
The Council and NMFS recognize the
need to balance and be consistent with
both National Standard 1 and National
Standard 9. National Standard 9
requires that conservation and
management measures shall, to the
extent practicable, minimize bycatch.
National Standard 1 requires that
conservation and management measures
shall prevent overfishing while
achieving, on a continuing basis, the
optimum yield from each fishery for the
U.S. fishing industry. The ability to
harvest the entire TAC for each
groundfish fishery in any given year
may not be the single factor, or the most
important factor, in determining
whether the GOA groundfish fishery
achieves optimum yield. Providing the
opportunity for the fleet to harvest its
TAC is one aspect of achieving optimum
yield in the long term. National
Standard 8 requires considering the
importance of fishery resources to
fishing communities and minimizing
adverse economic impacts on such
communities. This action would
provide maximum benefit to fishermen
and communities that depend on
Chinook salmon and groundfish
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
resources, and comply with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable federal law. National
Standard 9 emphasizes the need to
minimize bycatch in the non-pollock
trawl fisheries in the Central and
Western GOA to the extent practicable.
The action would be practicable because
it does not over constrain harvest of
available TACs in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries. By minimizing Chinook
salmon bycatch, this action would
maintain a healthy marine ecosystem for
the long-term conservation and
abundance of Chinook salmon.
In determining whether to impose a
Chinook salmon PSC limit for the nonpollock trawl fisheries, the Council and
NMFS considered the importance of
equity among user groups in this
proposed action. In addition to
providing an equitable allocation of the
total GOA-wide PSC limit between the
Western and Central GOA non-pollock
trawl fisheries, the Council and NMFS
also considered the needs of Chinook
salmon users. The Chinook salmon
resource is of value to many
stakeholders, including but not limited
to commercial, recreational, and
subsistence user groups, and it is a
resource that is currently fully utilized.
By instituting a PSC limit that would
prevent harvest of Chinook salmon in
excess of that limit, thereby reducing
Chinook salmon bycatch in years of
high abundance, the Council and NMFS
also are considering the needs of these
other user groups in recommending this
proposed action.
The Council and NMFS determined
that the imposition of a Chinook salmon
PSC limit for the non-pollock trawl
fisheries in the Western and Central
GOA would achieve three broad goals,
that are addressed in the Purpose and
Need and in the Council’s problem
statement (see Analysis Section 1.1),
and discussed below. The first goal is to
avoid exceeding the annual Chinook
salmon threshold of 40,000 Chinook
salmon that was identified in the
incidental take statement accompanying
the November 30, 2000, Biological
Opinion on the effects of the Alaska
groundfish fisheries on ESA-listed
salmon of the Pacific Northwest (see
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Chapter 5) (see ADDRESSES).
Management of the GOA groundfish
fisheries should prevent Chinook
salmon bycatch from exceeding the
incidental take statement. Establishing a
limit on the amount of Chinook salmon
PSC that may be taken on an annual
basis in the non-pollock trawl fisheries
in the Central and Western GOA would
accomplish that goal. This proposed
action would, on average, limit the
annual Chinook salmon PSC in the nonpollock trawl fisheries to 7,500 salmon
each year. This would provide great
assurance that the total Chinook salmon
PSC in the GOA from all sources would
not exceed 40,000 salmon on an annual
basis. The second goal is to minimize
Chinook salmon bycatch to the extent
practicable, consistent with the MSA
and National Standard 9. Under
Amendment 93 to the FMP, NMFS
implemented regulations to limit the
annual Chinook salmon PSC in the
Central and Western GOA pollock
fishery to 25,000 Chinook salmon (77
FR 42629, July 20, 2012). Limits on
Chinook salmon PSC in the non-pollock
trawl fisheries would complement those
regulations, and further the second goal
of conservation of Chinook salmon
resources that occur in the GOA
regardless of the stock of origin. The
implementation of Chinook salmon PSC
limits for non-pollock trawl fisheries
would prevent unusually high levels of
PSC of Chinook salmon from occurring
in the non-pollock trawl fisheries in the
future, such as occurred in 2003 and
2010 (see Section 4.4 of the Analysis for
additional information on annual
Chinook salmon PSC use in the nonpollock trawl fisheries). Consistent with
National Standard 9, Chinook salmon
PSC limits that would be implemented
by this program include incentives that
in some years, may reduce Chinook
salmon PSC to levels below the
proposed limits, thereby minimizing
bycatch to the extent practicable. The
third broad goal is to establish
monitoring measures that would aid
NMFS in proper accounting of Chinook
salmon PSC and improve sampling of
Chinook salmon so that stock of origin
of Chinook salmon PSC could be
determined. This would be
accomplished by revising retention
requirements for all salmon PSC,
regardless of species, to enable accurate
reporting, ensure adequate accounting
of Chinook salmon PSC, and obtain
information that could help define the
stock of origin of Chinook salmon
bycatch, thereby improving the
understanding of the potential impact of
Chinook salmon PSC on Chinook
salmon resources and fisheries.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Provisions of the Proposed Action
In order to achieve the goals
identified by the Council, this proposed
action would: (1) Establish annual
Chinook salmon PSC limits for the
Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV, and
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors; (2)
establish an ‘‘incentive buffer’’ that
would allow the annual Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the Trawl C/P and
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors to
vary depending on the amount of
Chinook salmon PSC taken by those
sectors in the previous year; (3)
establish a seasonal limit on the amount
of Chinook salmon PSC that could be
taken in the Trawl C/P Sector prior to
June 1 of each year; (4) allow the
reallocation of unused Chinook salmon
PSC from the Rockfish Program CV
Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sector on October 1 and November 15
of each year; and (5) establish salmon
retention requirements to ensure
adequate accounting of Chinook salmon
PSC, and to improve the collection of
biological samples that could aid in the
determination of stock of origin of
Chinook salmon PSC in the non-pollock
trawl fisheries. A description of and
rationale for these proposed measures
are provided in the following
paragraphs.
Chinook Salmon PSC Limits
This proposed rule would implement
a long-term average annual Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 7,500 Chinook
salmon for non-pollock trawl fisheries
in the Central and Western GOA. The
proposed rule would implement the
long-term average annual limit by
establishing three separate Chinook
salmon PSC limits for the Trawl C/P,
Rockfish Program CV, and Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sectors. During the first
year of implementation, this proposed
rule would establish an annual Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 3,600 Chinook
salmon for the Trawl C/P Sector, 1,200
Chinook salmon for the Rockfish
Program CV Sector, and 2,700 Chinook
salmon for the Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sector. The total Chinook salmon
PSC limit in the first year of
implementation for all three sectors
would be 7,500 Chinook salmon. Under
the proposed action, if a sector reaches,
or is projected to reach, its Chinook
salmon PSC limit, NMFS would close
directed fishing for all non-pollock
trawl fisheries for vessels in that sector
for the remainder of the calendar year.
Each sector would be subject to its own
annual Chinook salmon PSC limit, and
NMFS would manage each sector
separately.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35977
The Council recommended the
proposed long-term average annual limit
after considering a range of PSC limits
to minimize Chinook salmon bycatch to
the extent practicable while preserving
the potential for the full harvest of nonpollock groundfish TACs. The Council’s
selection of this long-term average limit
also reflects the trade-offs between
Chinook salmon saved and the forgone
non-pollock catch for the range of PSC
limits. Section 4.4.9 of the Analysis
shows that Western and Central GOA
non-pollock trawl fisheries averaged
approximately 6,000 Chinook salmon
per year between 2003 and 2011, but
that actual annual PSC varies widely (a
high of 10,877 in 2003 and a low of
3,060 in 2006). According to the
Analysis (section 2.5), the non-pollock
trawl fisheries would have been
constrained in two out of nine years
between 2003 and 2011 if the proposed
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 7,500 had
been in place, but these closures would
have resulted in 40% less Chinook
salmon PSC being taken in these
fisheries (see the Analysis, Table 4–69).
The Council considered alternatives
that would have established a Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 5,000, 10,000 and
12,500 in the non-pollock trawl fishery
in the Central and Western GOA. The
Council and NMFS recognize that the
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 7,500
proposed in this action could constrain
groundfish harvests and impose costs on
non-pollock trawl fishery participants
(see Section 4.9 of the Analysis).
However, based on a review of past
fishery performance provided in
Sections 4.7 and 4.9 of the Analysis, the
Council determined and NMFS agrees
that a Chinook salmon PSC limit less
than 7,500 would result in considerable
amounts of foregone harvest in the nonpollock trawl fisheries, and relatively
high costs (in terms of foregone revenue)
per salmon saved. A Chinook salmon
PSC limit lower than 7,500 would be
expected to impose greater costs and
burdens on participants in the nonpollock trawl fisheries in future years by
constraining fishing to a greater degree
than the PSC limit proposed in this
action. Using the 2003 to 2011 period,
the non-pollock trawl fisheries would
have been constrained in six of these
years under a 5,000 Chinook salmon
PSC limit. Given the considerable costs
per salmon saved at PSC limits less than
7,500 and the uncertainty over the
added benefits to individual Chinook
stocks with such limits, the Council
determined and NMFS agrees that a
Chinook salmon PSC limit lower than
7,500 would burden fishery participants
to a greater extent than the proposed
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35978
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
limit, and is not considered practicable
for minimizing Chinook salmon bycatch
because it would be unnecessarily
constraining to the non-pollock
fisheries. The Analysis at section 2.5
also shows that non-pollock trawl
fisheries would have been constrained
in only one year between 2003 and 2011
with an average annual PSC limit equal
to or greater than 10,000 Chinook
salmon. While a PSC limit of 10,000
Chinook salmon would have resulted in
approximately 17 percent less Chinook
salmon PSC using the 2003 to 2011 time
period, the Council determined, and
NMFS agrees, that a 17 percent savings
of Chinook salmon PSC (approximately
1,000 Chinook salmon) was inadequate
savings of Chinook salmon considering
the importance of salmon to target
fisheries and conservation needs and
would not minimize Chinook salmon
bycatch to the extent practicable.
After selecting the long-term average
annual Chinook salmon PSC limit of
7,500, the Council recommended that
the average annual PSC limit be
implemented by establishing separate
Chinook salmon PSC limits for the
Trawl C/P, the Rockfish Program CV,
and the Non-Rockfish Program CV
sectors. The Council and NMFS
recommend allocating Chinook salmon
PSC to the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program
CV, and Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sectors in recognition of the specific
groundfish fisheries, and patterns of
Chinook salmon PSC use by these
sectors as described in the ‘‘Non-Pollock
Trawl Fisheries in the Central and
Western GOA’’ and ‘‘Chinook Salmon
PSC in the Non-Pollock Trawl
Fisheries’’ sections of this preamble and
detailed in Section 4.4 of the Analysis.
As explained earlier in this preamble
and in the Analysis, each of these three
sectors participates in different
groundfish fisheries, and is subject to
different management measures that
allow these three sectors to respond
differently to the Chinook salmon PSC
limits being proposed in this action. The
following description provides the
rationale for the specific Chinook
salmon PSC limits selected and the
potential effects based on a review of
historic and recent trends of groundfish
harvests and Chinook salmon PSC use.
In determining the specific Chinook
salmon PSC limit that each sector would
receive, the Council recommended that
the average annual PSC limit be
apportioned between the catcher
processor fleet (i.e., the Trawl C/P
Sector) and the catcher vessel fleet (i.e.,
the Rockfish Program CV Sector and the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
combined) based on each fleet’s five-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
year historic average percentage of
Chinook salmon bycatch. From 2007 to
2011, the catcher processor fleet’s
average use of Chinook salmon
represented 48% of the total average use
of Chinook salmon bycatch in the nonpollock trawl fisheries. During this same
period, the catcher vessel fleet’s average
use of Chinook salmon represented 52
percent of the total average use of
Chinook salmon bycatch in the nonpollock trawl fisheries. Applying these
percentages to the PSC limit of 7,500,
the Council recommended a Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 3,600 Chinook
salmon for the catcher processor fleet
(i.e. the Trawl C/P Sector) and a
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 3,900
Chinook salmon for the catcher vessel
fleet (i.e. the Rockfish Program CV
Sector and the Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sector combined). The Council
determined, and NMFS agrees, that the
five-year historic average best captures
the time period that is most reflective of
the current management regime in the
non-pollock trawl fisheries of the
Western and Central GOA. The period
encompasses the time in which the
Central GOA Rockfish Program and
Amendment 80 were implemented.
The Council determined and NMFS
agrees that the 3,600 Chinook salmon
PSC limit for the Trawl C/P Sector is
appropriate because the sector’s
groundfish harvests are tightly
constrained by sideboard measures,
informal cooperative arrangements that
exist within the Trawl C/P Sector can
provide the necessary communication
for avoiding Chinook salmon PSC, and
regulations applicable to trawl C/Ps
operating in the Central GOA Rockfish
Program allow those trawl C/Ps to better
coordinate activities and take actions to
reduce Chinook salmon PSC.
Collectively, these conditions are
expected to minimize the sector’s
Chinook salmon PSC to the extent
practicable while providing an
opportunity to harvest groundfish in the
GOA. The proposed Chinook salmon
PSC limit of 3,600 salmon is
approximately 14 percent greater than
the average amount of Chinook salmon
PSC that has been used in Trawl C/P
Sector (3,105 salmon) from 2007 (the
first year that the Central GOA Rockfish
Program) through 2011 (the most recent
year for which complete data was
available at the time the Council took
final action on Amendment 97). Based
on a review provided in Section 4.4 of
the Analysis, the proposed 3,600
Chinook salmon PSC limit would have
been constraining in one out of five
years during the 2007 through 2011
period analyzed. The 3,600 Chinook
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
salmon PSC limit also would be slightly
higher than the sector’s average Chinook
salmon PSC use (3,143 salmon) from
2007, the first year that all three sectors
could be defined, through 2013, the
most recent year for which data are
available (see Table 1 of this preamble).
The Council and NMFS anticipate that,
given the existing management structure
of the Trawl C/P Sector and the ability
of the Trawl C/P Sector to coordinate
fishing activities in the GOA, the Trawl
C/P Sector is likely to be able to harvest
non-pollock groundfish in the Central
and Western GOA in most years without
being constrained by the Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 3,600 salmon.
After recommending a Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 3,900 for the
catcher vessel fleet (i.e., the Rockfish
Program CV Sector and the NonRockfish Program CV Sector combined),
the Council then determined that this
PSC limit should be further apportioned
and recommended that 1,200 Chinook
salmon be apportioned to the Rockfish
Program CV Sector and the remainder
(2,700 Chinook salmon) be apportioned
to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector.
The Council recognized that vessels
within the Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sector could have unpredictable high
PSC events during the spring, prior to
the May opening of the Central GOA
Rockfish Program, which could
preclude or severely curtail the Central
GOA Rockfish Program’s season,
thereby eliminating an opportunity to
prosecute a valuable fishery in which
the prospects for effective PSC
avoidance are promising. The Council
determined, and NMFS agrees, that a
separate Chinook salmon PSC limit for
the Rockfish Program CV Sector is
appropriate because a separate
allocation would preserve important
and valuable fishing opportunities in
the Rockfish Program. In determining
the Chinook salmon PSC limit for the
Rockfish Program CV Sector, the
Council considered the sector’s annual
average Chinook salmon PSC from 2007
through 2011 of approximately 800
Chinook salmon per year, as well as
annual Chinook salmon PSC, which
exceeded 1,200 Chinook salmon in one
year (2008) during this period. The
Council determined, and NMFS agrees,
that a Chinook salmon PSC limit of
1,200 for the Rockfish Program CV
Sector is appropriate because (1) it
should provide the greatest assurance
that the Central GOA Rockfish Program
quota can be fully harvested given the
sector’s average annual use, (2) the
sector is managed through cooperatives
that have additional tools available to
aid in mitigating Chinook salmon PSC
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
encounters, and (3) the one year in
which the sector’s PSC use exceeded the
proposed limit, cooperative fishing
under the Central GOA Rockfish
Program was new and management
priorities emphasized halibut
avoidance. The Chinook salmon PSC
limit of 1,200 salmon is approximately
29 percent greater than the average
amount of Chinook salmon PSC that has
been used in Rockfish Program CV
Sector (847 salmon) during a
representative five-year period analyzed
by the Council and NMFS from 2007
through 2011. Based on a review
provided in Sections 4.7 and 4.9 of the
Analysis, the 1,200 Chinook salmon
PSC limit would have been constraining
in one out of five years during the 2007
through 2011 period analyzed. The
1,200 Chinook salmon PSC limit is also
greater than the sector’s average
Chinook salmon PSC use (903 salmon)
from 2007 through 2013 (see Table 1 of
this preamble). The Council and NMFS
anticipate that given the existing
management structure of the Rockfish
Program CV Sector, the sector is likely
to be able to harvest groundfish fisheries
in the Central and Western GOA in most
years without being constrained by the
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 1,200
salmon. The Council also determined,
and NMFS agrees, that the
apportionment to the sector is
appropriate because although the
allocation is larger than the sector’s
average annual use, the sector has an
incentive to minimize its use of Chinook
salmon PSC. This proposed action also
includes a provision that would allow
NMFS to reallocate unused Chinook
salmon PSC from the Rockfish Program
CV Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sector on October 1 and November
15 of each year as described later in this
preamble. This provision would ensure
that unused amounts of the Chinook
salmon PSC limit allocated to the
Rockfish Program CV Sector would be
made available to catcher vessels that
may still be fishing in the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector towards the end of
the fishing year. On average, 87 percent
of the CVs that are active in the Rockfish
Program CV Sector participate in the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector for fall
non-pollock trawl fisheries. Therefore,
the Council determined and NMFS
agrees that participants in the Rockfish
Program CV Sector would have ample
incentive to minimize Chinook salmon
PSC within that sector in order to
maximize the amount of Chinook
salmon PSC available to prosecute
important fall fisheries, such as fall
Pacific cod and flatfish fisheries.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
The Rockfish Program CV Sector
Chinook salmon PSC limit would apply
to trawl catcher vessels that are checked
in and fishing under the authority of a
Rockfish Program CQ Permit (see
regulations at § 679.5(r)(8)). Trawl
catcher vessels that are not checked in
and fishing under the authority of a
Rockfish Program CQ Permit would be
in the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector.
Under the proposed action, a trawl CV
vessel could operate in both the
Rockfish Program CV Sector and the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector during
the course of a fishing year, but would
only be in one or the other sector at any
given time during a fishing year
depending on whether the vessel was
checked in and fishing under the
authority of a Rockfish Program CQ
Permit.
The proposed Chinook salmon PSC
limit for the Rockfish Program CV
Sector would not be further allocated
among the specific cooperatives within
the sector. The Council did not
recommend that the 1,200 Chinook
salmon PSC limit be further apportioned
among fishery cooperatives in the
Rockfish Program CV Sector because
allocating the Chinook salmon PSC limit
among cooperatives would result in
relatively small allocations among the
cooperatives that could unnecessarily
constrain non-pollock harvests by the
cooperatives. Chinook salmon PSC
varies from year to year and that
variability could limit the ability of a
cooperative to predict and undertake
fishing operations in a way that could
ensure the cooperative would maintain
catch below its Chinook salmon PSC
limit. A cooperative-specific Chinook
salmon PSC limit would be expected to
increase the administrative burden and
costs to establish cooperative-specific
allocations, particularly if cooperativespecific Chinook salmon PSC limits
could be traded among cooperatives.
The Council determined and NMFS
agrees that inter-cooperative
arrangements that exist among the
Rockfish Program CV Sector would be
able to provide coordination and
communication among participants,
reduce the risk that a specific
cooperative would be constrained
within the overall Rockfish Program CV
Sector, and would not impose the
additional burdens and costs associated
with cooperative-specific Chinook
salmon PSC limits. Sections 4.7.1 and
4.9 of the Analysis provide additional
detail on the allocation of the Chinook
salmon PSC limit to the Rockfish
Program CV Sector.
The Council and NMFS recommend
the 2,700 Chinook salmon PSC limit for
the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector to
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35979
accommodate groundfish harvests in
most years. Unlike the Trawl C/P and
Rockfish Program CV Sectors, the NonRockfish Program CV Sector is not
circumscribed by sideboard regulations,
governed by informal cooperative
arrangements, or managed under a catch
share program that allows the sector to
optimize the use of its Chinook salmon
PSC as it participates in non-pollock
trawl fisheries. The Council considered
these factors when establishing the
proposed Chinook salmon PSC limit.
The proposed Chinook salmon PSC
limit of 2,700 salmon is approximately
8 percent greater than the average
amount of Chinook salmon PSC that has
been used in Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sector (2,489 salmon) during a
representative five-year period analyzed
by the Council and NMFS from 2007
through 2011. Based on a review
provided in Sections 4.7 and 4.9 of the
Analysis, the 2,700 Chinook salmon
PSC limit would have been constraining
in two out of five years during the 2007
through 2011 period analyzed. The
proposed 2,700 Chinook salmon PSC
limit is also slightly greater than the
sector’s average Chinook salmon PSC
use (2,562 salmon) from 2007 through
2013 (see Table 1 of this preamble). This
proposed action also includes a
provision that would allow NMFS to
reallocate unused Chinook salmon PSC
from the Rockfish Program CV Sector to
the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector on
October 1 and November 15 of each year
as described later in this preamble. This
provision would be likely to provide
additional Chinook salmon PSC to the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector in
most years (see Section 4.9 of the
Analysis for additional detail).
As previously discussed, the Council
considered establishing Chinook salmon
PSC limits that would have provided a
single Chinook salmon PSC limit for all
non-pollock trawl fisheries, as well as a
single Chinook salmon PSC limit for
trawl C/Ps and trawl CVs participating
in the Central GOA Rockfish Program.
The Council considered alternatives for
Chinook salmon PSC limits for each of
the three sectors that would, on average,
result in Chinook salmon PSC limits
ranging from 5,000 salmon to 12,500
salmon annually in the Central and
Western GOA. The Council considered
a range of methods for defining and
allocating the Chinook PSC between the
three sectors using average Chinook
salmon PSC use by each sector over
five-year and ten-year periods. Finally,
the Council considered alternatives to
allocate separate Central GOA and
Western GOA Chinook salmon PSC
limits for each sector.
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35980
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
The Council considered but did not
select alternatives that would have
assigned a single Chinook salmon PSC
limit to all fisheries because such an
allocation would not recognize the
distinct operational differences, and
differing patterns of Chinook salmon
PSC use, among the three sectors active
in the GOA (see Section 4.7 of the
Analysis for additional detail). The
Council determined that such an
allocation method would have reduced
the incentives for a specific sector to
maintain Chinook salmon PSC use
within its historic limits. This could
result in one sector engaging in fishing
patterns that lead to relatively high
Chinook salmon PSC which in turn
could result in the closure of nonpollock fisheries to all vessels,
including those vessels that have
relatively low Chinook salmon PSC
rates. Such a result would have adverse
effects on fishing operations
disproportionate to their actual Chinook
salmon PSC use. Additionally, the
Council did not select alternatives that
would have assigned a single Chinook
salmon PSC limit to the trawl CV and
trawl C/P vessels participating in the
Central GOA Rockfish Program. The
Council determined that such an
allocation did not appear to be
consistent with the operations of trawl
C/P vessels and the stated desire by
representatives of trawl C/P vessels to
establish a single Chinook salmon PSC
limit applicable to all trawl C/Ps.
As previously discussed, the Council
considered but did not select Chinook
salmon PSC limits that that would have
established Chinook salmon PSC limits
greater than 7,500 salmon (10,000 and
12,500 salmon) in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries of the Central and Western
GOA. The Council reviewed these limits
and determined that although they
would establish Chinook salmon PSC
limits and constrain total Chinook
salmon PSC, they would not have
minimized bycatch of Chinook salmon
to the extent practicable. The Council
determined and NMFS agrees that
Chinook salmon PSC limits higher than
7,500 would result in a greater potential
for increased use of Chinook salmon
PSC. The Council and NMFS consider
the proposed Chinook salmon PSC limit
of 7,500 to appropriately balance the
goals of minimizing bycatch to the
extent practicable while providing
harvest opportunities among the sectors.
The Council and NMFS reached these
conclusions based on a review of the
historic and recent trends in Chinook
salmon PSC use, the ability of the Trawl
C/P and Rockfish Program CV Sectors to
use their existing management structure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
and cooperative arrangements to further
minimize bycatch, and incentive
provisions contained within this
proposed action would provide
additional harvest flexibility to the
Trawl C/P and to a greater extent, the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector.
Finally, the Council also considered
but did not select alternatives to allocate
separate Central GOA and Western GOA
Chinook salmon PSC limits for each
sector. As noted in Section 4.7 of the
Analysis, allocating Chinook salmon
PSC separately to the Western and
Central GOA, or by sector within the
Central and Western GOA, would have
been likely to create small allocations
that would have been limiting to the
non-pollock trawl fishery in more years
given the highly variable nature of
Chinook salmon PSC rates and use
between the Central and Western GOA.
The Council determined that these
small, and likely restrictive allocations
would have constrained fishing
operations, without necessarily
resulting in practicable minimization of
Chinook salmon bycatch. These small
restrictions also would be challenging
for NMFS to adequately monitor and
administer to ensure that these
relatively small Chinook salmon PSC
limits could not be exceeded.
Incentive Buffer
This proposed rule would allow the
annual Chinook salmon PSC limit for
the Trawl C/P and Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sectors to vary depending
on the amount of Chinook salmon PSC
taken by those sectors in the previous
year. This proposed provision is termed
an ‘‘incentive buffer’’ because it would
provide an incentive for participants in
the Trawl C/P and Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sectors to minimize PSC
below their allocations, 3,600 and 2,700
Chinook salmon respectively, each year
in order to receive additional Chinook
salmon PSC in the following year. It is
important to note that the proposed
incentive buffer would not result in the
total available Chinook salmon PSC
limit in the non-pollock trawl fisheries
to exceed 7,500 salmon over the long
term annual average.
Under the proposed incentive buffer,
a sector that uses less than or equal to
its proportional share of 6,500 Chinook
salmon in one year would be able to
access its base PSC limit plus its
proportional share of 1,000 additional
Chinook salmon in the following year.
To illustrate, the proposed base Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the Trawl C/P
Sector is 3,600 (48 percent of the
average annual Chinook salmon PSC
limit of 7,500) and this limit would be
available to the Trawl C/P Sector during
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the first year of Amendment 97 if
approved. If, during the first year, the
Trawl C/P Sector was able to maintain
its use of Chinook salmon PSC to no
more than 3,120 salmon (48 percent of
6,500 Chinook salmon), the incentive
buffer would apply to the sector in the
following year. In the following year,
the Trawl C/P Sector would receive a
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 4,080
Chinook salmon, which represents the
sum of the sector’s base PSC limit
(3,600) and its proportional share (48
percent) of 1,000 (480). If, during the
first year, the Trawl C/P Sector’s
Chinook salmon use exceeds 3,120
Chinook salmon, then the incentive
buffer would not apply to the sector and
its Chinook salmon PSC limit in the
following year would be set at its base
PSC limit of 3,600 Chinook salmon.
Similarly, the proposed base PSC limit
for the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
is 2,700 (36 percent of the proposed
Chinook salmon limit of 7,500) and this
limit would be available to the NonRockfish Program CV Sector during the
first year of Amendment 97 if approved.
If, during the first year, the NonRockfish Program CV Sector was able to
maintain its use of Chinook salmon PSC
to no more than 2,340 salmon (36
percent of 6,500 Chinook salmon), the
incentive buffer would apply to the
sector in the following year. In the
following year, the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector would receive a
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 3,060
salmon, which represents the sum of the
sector’s base PSC limit (2,700) and its
proportional share (36 percent) of 1,000
(360). If, during the first year, the NonRockfish Program CV Sector’s Chinook
salmon use exceeds 2,340 Chinook
salmon, then the incentive buffer would
not apply to the sector and its Chinook
salmon PSC limit in the following year
would be set at its base PSC limit of
2,700 salmon.
The Council believes and NMFS
agrees that this mechanism would act as
an incentive for these sectors to keep
Chinook salmon bycatch well below
each sector’s base PSC limit in most
years, in order to provide each sector
with a slightly higher Chinook salmon
PSC limit that may be needed in an
unusual year of Chinook salmon
migration patterns or unanticipated
higher abundance that may make it
difficult to avoid Chinook salmon PSC.
The specific buffers selected would
provide approximately 12 percent more
Chinook salmon PSC for the Trawl C/P
and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors
in a year if the Chinook salmon use for
that sector was maintained at an amount
approximately 12 percent below the
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Chinook salmon PSC limits initially
established for those sectors. The
amount of the proposed incentive buffer
is intended to provide some additional
flexibility, but not so large an increase
in a sector’s Chinook salmon PSC limit
from year-to-year as to result in highly
variable or substantial increases in
Chinook salmon PSC.
This proposed action would not apply
an incentive buffer to the Rockfish
Program CV Sector. As noted in the
previous section of this preamble, the
Chinook Salmon PSC limit for the
Rockfish Program CV Sector is thought
to be sufficient to support the Rockfish
Program CV Sector in most years. In
addition, any unused Chinook salmon
PSC from the Rockfish Program CV
Sector would be reallocated to the NonRockfish Program CV Sector in the fall
of each year as described later in this
preamble. Establishing an incentive
buffer for the Rockfish Program CV
Sector and allowing a reallocation of
unused Chinook salmon PSC would be
administratively burdensome and was
determined by the Council and NMFS
as unnecessary to provide flexibility to
the Rockfish Program CV Sector (see
Section 4.9 of the Analysis for
additional detail).
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Seasonal Allocation of the Chinook
Salmon PSC Limit for Trawl Catcher/
Processors
This proposed rule would establish a
seasonal limit on the maximum amount
of Chinook salmon PSC that could be
used by the Trawl C/P Sector prior to
June 1 of each year. Each year, the Trawl
C/P Sector would be limited to using no
more than 66 percent of its annual
Chinook salmon PSC limit prior to June
1. If NMFS determined that the Trawl C/
P Sector’s seasonal Chinook PSC limit
would not be exceeded, no action would
be necessary. If, prior to June 1, NMFS
determines that the Trawl C/P Sector
would catch the seasonal allocation of
the sector’s Chinook salmon PSC limit
prior to June 1, NMFS would prohibit
directed fishing for non-pollock
fisheries by the Trawl C/P Sector until
June 1. NMFS would determine the
amount of the sector’s annual limit that
remains available for use and directed
fishing for non-pollock fisheries would
be open for the Trawl C/P Sector on
June 1, provided there is adequate
Chinook salmon PSC to allow the Trawl
C/P Sector to fish and not exceed its
annual Chinook salmon PSC limit. No
additional notice to re-open the
groundfish fishery for non-pollock trawl
C/Ps would be necessary, because
proposed regulations at § 679.21(i)(3)(ii)
state the date (June 1), that defines the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
end and start of the Trawl C/P Sector’s
seasonal Chinook PSC limits.
NMFS, as part of the implementation
of this action, would establish Chinook
salmon PSC accounts for the nonpollock trawl groundfish fishery in the
NMFS regional catch accounting system
(CAS). NMFS also would develop
publically-available reports about the
catch of Chinook in the non-pollock
groundfish fishery (at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov), including
annual PSC limits, current catch, and
remaining limits. These reports, which
would be an extension of existing NMFS
reports about current and historic
groundfish and PSC catch in the GOA,
would include a Chinook PSC category
for the non-pollock Trawl C/P Sector as
defined at § 679.21(i)(2)(ii). The agency
would add the residual January 1 to
June 1 Chinook salmon PSC limit to the
June 1 to December 31 Chinook salmon
PSC limit. This information would be
publically available from the nonpollock Chinook PSC limit report.
Because the seasonal limit would be
set at 66 percent of the annual Chinook
salmon PSC limit, the specific amount
could vary depending on whether or not
the Trawl C/P Sector receives an
incentive buffer for a year. During the
first year of implementation, the Trawl
C/P Sector would be allocated a
seasonal Chinook salmon PSC limit of
2,376 Chinook salmon for use prior to
June 1 (i.e., 66 percent of the 3,600
Chinook salmon PSC annual limit).
During the second year, the seasonal
Chinook salmon PSC limit for the Trawl
C/P Sector prior to June 1 would be set
at 2,376 Chinook salmon if the Trawl C/
P Sector did not receive the incentive
buffer, or would be set at 2,693 Chinook
salmon (i.e., 66 percent of the 4,080
Chinook salmon PSC annual limit) if the
sector received the incentive buffer.
This proposed action would establish
a seasonal allocation to the Trawl C/P
Sector to reduce the potential for a
disproportionate amount of the Chinook
salmon PSC limit being used early in
the year which could result in nonpollock harvest restrictions to Trawl C/
P Sector participants later in the year.
Section 4.7.1 of the Analysis contains
data showing that the Trawl C/P Sector
typically uses approximately 70 percent
of its Chinook salmon PSC before June
1. The Council determined and NMFS
agrees that the proposed 66 percent
allocation prior to June 1 is an
appropriate limitation to allow the
Trawl C/P Sector to prosecute nonpollock trawl fisheries consistent with
historic use of Chinook salmon PSC,
while also ensuring that some portion of
the PSC is available to support other
non-pollock trawl fisheries, specifically
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35981
the rockfish fisheries that typically are
harvested after June 1. Many of the
vessels in the Trawl C/P Sector
participate in Central GOA Rockfish
Program fisheries that open on May 1 of
each year. However, trawl C/Ps fishing
in the Central GOA Rockfish Program
typically start to fish after June 1. The
Council and NMFS propose June 1 as
the end date of the seasonal allocation
to ensure that sufficient Chinook salmon
PSC will be left for the Trawl C/P Sector
to participate in the Central GOA
Rockfish Program, as well as to support
other non-pollock trawl fisheries
occurring later in the year. The Council
and NMFS also considered
recommendations provided to the
Council from participants in the Trawl
C/P Sector that a seasonal limit of
Chinook salmon PSC would help ensure
that participants in the Trawl C/P Sector
monitor catch early in the year to ensure
adequate Chinook salmon PSC remains
later in the year. The Council
considered but did not select a PSC
limit for the trawl C/Ps of 50 percent of
the annual limit, choosing the higher
percentage based on supportive
testimony of the trawl C/P
representatives for applying 66 percent
of the annual PSC limit. Additionally,
the proposed seasonal apportionment
would exceed the Trawl C/P Sector’s
annual average use of Chinook salmon
PSC prior to June 1 by the Trawl C/P
Sector from 2008 to 2012 of 2,057
Chinook salmon. NMFS determined that
the annual average of 2,376 Chinook
salmon or 66 percent of the annual PSC
limit, represents a compromise between
providing the long-term average catch
for the Trawl C/P Sector of 71% or 2,564
fish.
The Council and NMFS considered
but did not select alternatives that
would have established seasonal
allocations to the Rockfish Program CV
and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors.
These alternatives were not selected
because Section 4.7.1 of the Analysis
indicates that the Rockfish Program CV
and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors
typically have a more even distribution
of Chinook salmon PSC use throughout
the year. Therefore, the Council
determined and NMFS agrees that it
would not be necessary to constrain
Chinook salmon PSC early in the year
to ensure adequate Chinook salmon PSC
remains later in the year.
Reallocation of Unused Chinook
Salmon PSC From the Rockfish Program
CV Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sector
As noted earlier in this preamble, it is
likely that the proposed Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the Rockfish
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35982
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Program CV Sector would not constrain
the sector’s non-pollock harvests in
most years. In contrast, the proposed
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 2,700 for
the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
would have constrained the sector’s
non-pollock harvests during three of the
seven years between 2007 and 2013 (see
Table 1 and Section 4.7.1 in the
Analysis) had the proposed PSC limit
been in place. This proposed action
would provide the opportunity for
reallocations of unused Chinook salmon
PSC to the Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sector at two periods during the year.
Under this proposed action, NMFS
would reallocate all but 150 of the
salmon that remain of the unused
Chinook salmon PSC limit in the
Rockfish Program CV Sector to the NonRockfish Program CV Sector on October
1. Depending on the amount reallocated,
the additional Chinook salmon could
allow Non-Rockfish Program CVs to
continue fishing for an extended period
of time if the Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sector would have otherwise been
constrained by its Chinook salmon PSC
limit of 2,700 Chinook salmon. The
Council selected this alternative to
provide additional Chinook salmon PSC
to address unanticipated events of high
PSC encounters, for which the NonRockfish Program CVs would generally
be unable to mitigate before reaching
their PSC limit. The Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector does not operate
under authority of the Rockfish Program
and is not as likely to be able to
voluntarily control or organize fleet
behavior to adjust fishing patterns for
avoiding Chinook salmon PSC.
The Council selected October 1 for
reallocating Chinook salmon PSC to the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
because of the timing and the value of
the Pacific cod fall season fishery to the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector. In
some years, the Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sector has high Chinook salmon PSC
prior to May 1, which would reduce the
amount of Chinook salmon PSC limit
available from September through
November, when most CVs have
checked out of the Rockfish Program CR
fishery. Also, the Council determined
that by establishing a fixed annual date
to reallocate unused Chinook salmon
PSC, participants in the Rockfish
Program CV Sector would have certainty
regarding the timing of each
reallocation, and would be able to focus
on more important coordination of
cooperative measures such as avoidance
of Chinook salmon PSC.
The Council and NMFS
recommended retaining a balance of 150
Chinook salmon for the Rockfish
Program CV Sector on October 1 after
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
considering the catch of Chinook
salmon by Rockfish Program CVs after
October 1. Based on the first seven years
of the Central GOA Rockfish Program
(2007 through 2013), 150 Chinook
salmon would have been sufficient to
support the sector’s activity from
October 1 through November 15, the last
date that fishing is permitted under the
Central GOA Rockfish Program (see
Section 4.9 of the Analysis for
additional information). Although 150
Chinook salmon may be more than the
sector would need in most years, the
Council determined and NMFS agrees
that changing trends in Chinook salmon
PSC use or groundfish fishing patterns
could increase the demand for Chinook
salmon PSC in this sector. Additionally,
while the number of Rockfish Program
CVs operating after October 1 is usually
small, managing that fishery with less
than 150 Chinook salmon PSC could
close the sector. NMFS determined that
the agency may be unable to open the
directed fisheries for the Rockfish
Program CV Sector if the postreallocation Chinook salmon PSC for the
Sector is set at less than 150 fish,
particularly if the number of
participating Rockfish Program CVs is
uncertain or anticipated to increase
beyond historical numbers.
This proposed rule would provide a
final reallocation of any unused
Chinook salmon PSC from the Rockfish
Program CV Sector to the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector on November 15.
The Central GOA Rockfish Program
closes by regulation on November 15.
This final reallocation could provide
some additional harvest opportunity to
the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector,
depending on the amount reallocated,
from November 15 through the end of
the year (December 31). Reallocations to
the non-Rockfish Program CV Sector,
would not change (add to or subtract
from) the incentive buffers proposed at
§ 679.21(i)(3)(i)(A) and (i)(3)(i)(C).
Section 4.9 of the Analysis provides
additional detail on the reallocation of
Chinook salmon PSC.
Salmon Retention and the Prohibited
Species Donation Program
This proposed rule would establish
salmon retention requirements for the
non-pollock trawl sectors, and would
establish and modify existing salmon
retention requirements for shoreside
processors and stationary floating
processors (SFPs) receiving non-pollock
and pollock deliveries. To implement
these proposed provisions, trawl CVs
and tender vessels, shoreside processors
or SFPs, and trawl C/Ps would each be
subject to different salmon retention
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This proposed action would require
the operators of all CVs (i.e., the
Rockfish Program CV and Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sectors) and tender vessels
to retain all salmon caught in the nonpollock trawl fisheries in the Western
and Central GOA until those salmon are
offloaded to a shoreside processor or
SFP. This proposed action would also
require shoreside processors and SFPs
receiving non-pollock deliveries to
retain all salmon until the number of
salmon by species has been accurately
recorded in the eLandings groundfish
landing report. The combination of
these two retention requirements will
enable accurate reporting of salmon in
eLandings at the processor. Salmon
accounting at a processor may assist the
industry in tracking and cooperatively
managing its Chinook salmon PSC. At
this time, observers are not available to
collect data from salmon delivered with
non-pollock groundfish to shoreside
processors or SFPs. However, scientific
data from salmon delivered with nonpollock groundfish to processors may be
collected opportunistically for further
study to assist with scientific research
on the origin of salmon in the Western
and Central GOA non-pollock trawl
fisheries.
This proposed action would require
the operators of vessels in the Trawl C/
P Sector to retain all salmon until an
observer has had the opportunity to
collect scientific data or biological
samples, and the number of salmon by
species has been accurately recorded in
the eLandings At-sea production report.
This proposed requirement emphasizes
the responsibility for an operator of a C/
P to accommodate observer sampling
tasks prior to discard. Data collected
from observers onboard C/Ps would be
used for stock of origin determinations
(see Section 3.3.3 of the Analysis for
additional detail on stock of origin
sampling).
The salmon retention requirements in
this proposed rule are intended to
enable the collection of salmon genetic
data in the non-pollock trawl fisheries
and facilitate reporting of salmon
bycatch at the processor. The proposed
retention requirements for salmon in the
non-pollock trawl fisheries would not
modify the observer duties or the
method by which NMFS calculates
fleet-wide Chinook salmon PSC
estimates. NMFS would continue to
calculate Chinook salmon PSC numbers,
and would manage PSC limits for
Chinook salmon, using the existing
system of extrapolating catch rates from
observed vessels to the unobserved
portion of the non-pollock trawl fleet
(see Section 5.2.2 of the Analysis for
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
additional detail on determining
Chinook salmon PSC use).
This proposed action would also
amend regulations at § 679.21(h)(4) and
(h)(5) governing salmon retention and
discards for vessels directed fishing for
pollock with trawl gear in the Western
and Central GOA, and tender vessels,
and processors taking deliveries from
these vessels. The proposed changes are
intended to clarify responsibilities and
to avoid confusion, and to be consistent
with the organization of salmon
retention and discard regulations for the
non-pollock trawl fisheries. The
requirements for CVs and tender vessels
in the pollock fishery are unchanged
from the current retention requirements.
Many of the CVs that participate in the
non-pollock trawl fisheries also
participate in the GOA directed pollock
fishery. Current regulations at
§ 679.21(h)(4) combine requirements for
vessel operators and processing
operations. These combined
requirements have caused some
confusion for vessel operators delivering
groundfish with regard to the
responsibilities that apply to them
versus the responsibilities that apply to
shoreside processors and SFPs. Vessel
operators are required only to deliver all
salmon to a processor, however
processors must accommodate
provisions for observer sampling at the
processing facility. Because NMFS has
been informed by industry that these
regulations are confusing, the proposed
action would separate the
responsibilities for vessel operators and
processors in the pollock trawl fisheries
to provide greater clarity.
The proposed rule also would
separate the requirement for a processor
to retain salmon until an observer has
the opportunity to count the number of
salmon, from the requirement to retain
salmon until the shoreside processor or
SFP has recorded the number of salmon
by species in the eLandings groundfish
landing report. The proposed
organization of the retention
requirements would apply to vessels
directed fishing for pollock with trawl
gear in the Western and Central GOA,
and the tender vessels and processors
taking deliveries from these vessels.
Salmon retained under this proposed
action could not be kept for sale or
personal use, and must be discarded or
donated to the PSD program. Once
salmon are counted and sampled at the
processing plant, they may be donated
to the PSD program, or they must be
discarded. A list of participants in the
salmon PSD program in the GOA is
available from the NMFS Alaska Region
Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/ram/psd.htm.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Currently, the PSD program is available
to participants in pollock and nonpollock groundfish fisheries. This
proposed rule continues to provide the
opportunity for non-pollock and pollock
trawl fisheries to participate in the PSD
program. See Section 2.3 of the Analysis
for additional detail on the PSD
program.
Implementation
The Council recommended that
NMFS implement the proposed PSC
limits by the start of the 2015 nonpollock trawl fishery (January 20, 2015).
NMFS advised the Council that any new
annual PSC accounting should be in
place prior to January 20, 2015, for
NMFS to apply annual catch accounting
of Chinook salmon PSC to all sectors
impacted by this action.
NMFS will publish the annual
Chinook salmon PSC limits for the NonRockfish Program CV Sector, and Trawl
C/P Sector in the proposed groundfish
harvest specifications for the GOA after
determining the amounts of Chinook
salmon PSC used and whether the
incentive buffer applies. If the incentive
buffer thresholds for the Non-Rockfish
Program CV or Trawl C/P Sectors at
§ 679.21(i)(3)(i)(A) and (i)(3)(i)(C) have
been exceeded prior to publishing the
proposed groundfish harvest
specifications for the GOA, NMFS
would propose the Chinook salmon PSC
limits that will be available to each
sector for the following year. If the
incentive buffer thresholds have not
been exceeded prior to publishing the
proposed groundfish harvest
specifications for the GOA, NMFS
would propose Chinook salmon PSC
limits of 3,600 or 4,080 for the Trawl C/
P Sector, and 2,700 or 3,060 for the NonRockfish Program CV Sector and would
establish the PSC limit for each sector
in the final specifications.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304(b) and 305(d)
of the MSA, the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with
Amendment 97, other provisions of the
MSA, and other applicable law, subject
to further consideration after the public
comment period.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.)
12866.
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for this
action, as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The IRFA for
this proposed rule describes the
economic impact this proposed rule, if
adopted, would have on small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35983
A description of the proposed action,
why it is being considered, and the legal
basis for this action are contained earlier
in this preamble and are not repeated
here. A summary of the IRFA follows.
A copy of the IRFA is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
The entities directly regulated by this
proposed action are those federally
permitted or licensed entities that
participate in harvesting groundfish
from the Federal or State-managed
parallel non-pollock trawl fisheries of
the Western and Central GOA. Fishing
vessels are considered small entities if
their total annual gross receipts, from all
their activities combined, are less than
$19.0 million. The analysis identified 70
CVs and C/Ps in 2011 that would be
directly regulated by this action, 18 of
which are small entities (all CVs). All C/
Ps are either large entities or are
affiliated with at least one of the
following fishing cooperatives, all of
which are defined as large entities: the
AFA C/P cooperative for Bering Sea
pollock, a Rockfish Program C/P
cooperative in the GOA, an Amendment
80 cooperative, or a Bering Sea crab
cooperative.
Although this action would modify
regulations that directly regulate CVs
and processors that participate in
harvesting and processing groundfish
from the Federal or State-managed
parallel pollock trawl fisheries of the
Western and Central GOA, the actions
proposed are minor clarifications of
existing regulatory requirements, and do
not impose new or additional
requirements that have not previously
been analyzed and considered in the
FRFA prepared for measures that
implemented those requirements (77 FR
42629, July 20, 2012).
Shoreside processors or SFPs
receiving groundfish caught by GOA
trawl vessels would be required to
retain salmon until the manager has
recorded the number of salmon by
species in the eLandings groundfish
landing report (§ 679.21(h)(4)(ii)(B) and
§ 679.21(i)(5)(iii)). Based on the number
of FPPs listed in the GOA and the BSAI
(the best available data for groundfish
processors receiving deliveries from
these fisheries), as many as 100
processors receiving landings from
either pollock or non-pollock
groundfish trips could be regulated by
this proposed regulation. Of these 100
processors, only 64 are estimated to be
small entities. The estimate of the
number of small entities is based on
published data on employment and
affiliations of each company and the
address of the processing plant listed in
each FPP. The address, indicating if the
processing plant is located in a
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35984
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
community adjacent to the GOA, is used
as a proxy for those processors that
could receive deliveries of groundfish
from GOA trawl fisheries. A seafood
processor is considered to be a small
entity if it has less than 500 employees;
and that criteria was applied to the
processors holding an FFP. This
proposed amendment would have no
effect or minimal effect on small
processing entities, because it is
clarifying existing reporting regulations
for proper completion of the eLandings
groundfish landing report.
An IRFA requires a description of any
significant alternatives to the proposed
action(s) that accomplish the stated
objectives, are consistent with
applicable statutes, and that would
minimize any significant economic
impact of the proposed rule on small
entities. The preferred alternative
chosen by the Council and proposed by
NMFS has several elements: (1) Annual
Chinook salmon PSC limits for the
Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV, and
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors; (2)
an incentive buffer that would allow the
annual Chinook salmon PSC limit for
the Trawl C/P and Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sectors to vary depending
on the amount of Chinook salmon PSC
taken in those fisheries in the previous
year; (3) a seasonal limit on the amount
of Chinook salmon PSC that could be
taken in the Trawl C/P Sector prior to
June 1 of each year; (4) the reallocation
of unused Chinook salmon PSC from the
Rockfish Program CV Sector to the NonRockfish Program CV Sector on October
1 and November 15 of each year; and (5)
retention requirements to enable
accurate reporting, ensure adequate
catch accounting of Chinook salmon
PSC, and to improve the collection of
biological samples that could aid in the
determination of stock of origin of
Chinook salmon PSC in the non-pollock
trawl fisheries.
During consideration of this action,
the Council evaluated a number of
alternatives to the preferred alternative,
including: (1) No action; (2) a variety of
different allocations of Chinook salmon
PSC limits among the three sectors that
were more and less restrictive than the
alternative proposed in the this action;
(3) PSC limits split between the Western
and Central GOA; (4) no incentive
buffer; (5) no reallocation between the
Rockfish Program CV Sector to the NonRockfish Program CV Sector; and (6) no
change in retention and discard
requirements for all sectors in the
Western and Central GOA non-pollock
trawl fisheries. None of these
alternatives met both the objectives of
the action, and had a smaller impact on
small entities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
The no action alternative would not
have limited the Chinook salmon PSC
for the non-pollock trawl fisheries,
which would have failed to meet the
principal objective of the proposed
action. The GOA-wide limits of 10,000
and 12,500 would likewise have failed
to significantly control Chinook salmon
PSC, and therefore failed to balance the
benefits of the action to the targeted
Chinook salmon fisheries with the
needs of non-pollock trawlers. The limit
of 5,000 Chinook salmon would have
imposed a greater burden on small
entities by resulting in constraints on
non-pollock trawl fishing beyond the
preferred alternative. The Council
recommended the preferred alternative
because lower Chinook salmon PSC
limits were unnecessarily constraining
to the non-pollock trawl fisheries while
larger Chinook salmon PSC limits did
not provide the incentive to minimize
Chinook salmon PSC to the extent
practicable.
An alternative that would have
assigned 51 percent of the total Chinook
salmon PSC limit to trawl C/Ps and 49
percent to the trawl CVs was based on
the 10-year historical use of PSC from
these to operational types. This
alternative was not selected because it
did not reflect fishing conditions
representative of the more recent 5-year
historical period that included
implementation of the Central GOA
Rockfish Program, and the Amendment
80 Program. The alternative for lower
Chinook salmon PSC limits to trawl CVs
from applying the 10-year historical
period of Chinook PSC (mostly small
entities that operate in the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector) would have caused
a greater burden on directly regulated
small entities than the preferred
alternative. Dividing the Chinook
salmon PSC limits between the Western
GOA and Central GOA was rejected
because this allocation method could
result in small annual Chinook PSC
limits that would be more likely to
constrain fishing operations, and
adversely affect directly regulated small
entities more than the preferred
alternative.
The Council and NMFS also
considered not implementing an
incentive buffer for the Trawl C/P and
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors. The
preferred alternative would provide an
incentive buffer to directly regulated
small entities in the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector that would allow for
the incentive buffer to apply to this
sector’s PSC limit in the following year.
Without the incentive buffer, these
operations would not be able to benefit
from a higher PSC limit in the following
year, which would result in greater
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
potential for adverse impacts on directly
regulated small entities than the
preferred alternative.
In addition to the no action
alternative, the Council considered two
alternatives for reallocation of unused
Chinook salmon PSC from the Rockfish
Program CV Sector for use in the NonRockfish Program CV sector. These
alternatives include (1) reallocation of
all of the unused Chinook salmon PSC
limit except for a range of 104 through
208 salmon by October 1; and (2)
reallocating all unused Chinook salmon
PSC limit remaining for the Rockfish
Program CV Sector when the Central
GOA Rockfish Program closes by
regulation on November 15. The
preferred alternative is a combination of
reallocation alternatives that would
allow a reallocation of all but 150 of the
Chinook salmon PSC limit from the
Rockfish Program CV Sector by October
1, and the remaining Rockfish Program
CV Chinook salmon PSC limit by
November 15.
Alternatives that did not permit a
reallocation of Chinook salmon PSC
would not allow unused amounts of the
PSC limit to be made available to the
directly regulated small entities in the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector after
October 1. Alternatives for reallocating
Chinook salmon PSC considered by the
Council and NMFS, other than the
preferred alternative lacked the
flexibility for all of the available PSC
limit to be reallocated, or in sufficient
amounts to prosecute the Central GOA
Rockfish Program fisheries. Without the
capability for reallocating Chinook
salmon PSC as provided in this
proposed rule, directly regulated small
entities in the Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sector may be subject to more frequent
fishery closures.
The proposed action includes
establishment of and modifications to
salmon retention and discard
requirements for pollock and nonpollock trawl vessels that would
improve the quality of data collected on
Chinook salmon PSC. The proposed
salmon retention and discard
requirements for trawl vessels would
not be expected to adversely affect the
small entities regulated by this action
because they clarify existing regulatory
requirements.
No new recordkeeping and reporting
requirements have been identified for
this action.
No duplication, overlap, or conflict
between this proposed action and
existing Federal rules has been
identified.
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Tribal Consultation
Executive Order (E.O.) 13175 of
November 6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450 note),
the Executive Memorandum of April 29,
1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), and the
American Indian and Alaska Native
Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the
responsibilities of NMFS in matters
affecting tribal interests. Section 161 of
Public Law 108–199 (188 Stat. 452), as
amended by section 518 of Public Law
109–447 (118 Stat. 3267), extends the
consultation requirements of E.O. 13175
to Alaska Native corporations.
NMFS is obligated to consult and
coordinate with federally recognized
tribal governments and Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act regional and
village corporations on a government-togovernment basis pursuant to E.O.
13175, which establishes several
requirements for NMFS, including (1) to
provide regular and meaningful
consultation and collaboration with
Indian tribal governments and Alaska
Native corporations in the development
of Federal regulatory practices that
significantly or uniquely affect their
communities, (2) to reduce the
imposition of unfunded mandates on
Indian tribal governments, and (3) to
streamline the applications process for
and increase the availability of waivers
to Indian tribal governments. This
Executive Order requires Federal
agencies to have an effective process to
involve and consult with
representatives of Indian tribal
governments in developing regulatory
policies and prohibits regulations that
impose substantial, direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal communities.
Due to the expedited time frame of
this action, NMFS will mail letters to all
Alaska tribal governments, Alaska
Native corporations, and related
organizations when the Notice of
Availability for Amendment 97 is
published in the Federal Register to
notify them of the opportunity to
comment or request a consultation on
this action.
Section 5(b)(2)(B) of E.O. 13175
requires NMFS to prepare a tribal
summary impact statement as part of the
final rule. This statement must contain
(1) a description of the extent of the
agency’s prior consultation with tribal
officials, (2) a summary of the nature of
their concerns, (3) the agency’s position
supporting the need to issue the
regulation, and (4) a statement of the
extent to which the concerns of tribal
officials have been met. If the Secretary
of Commerce approves this proposed
action, a tribal impact summary
statement that summarizes and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
responds to issues raised on the
proposed action—and describes the
extent to which the concerns of tribal
officials have been met—will be
included in the final rule.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This proposed rule contains
references to collection-of-information
requirements that have been reviewed
and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The collections are listed below by OMB
control number.
OMB 0648–0316
The Alaska PSC Program is
mentioned in this proposed rule;
however, the public reporting burden
for this collection-of-information is not
directly affected by this proposed rule.
OMB 0648–0515
The Alaska Interagency Electronic
Report System is mentioned in this
proposed rule; however, the public
reporting burden for this collection-ofinformation is not directly affected by
this proposed rule.
Send comments on these or any other
aspects of the collection of information
to NMFS at the ADDRESSES above, and
by email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of
the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at https://www.cio.noaa.gov/
services_programs/prasubs.html.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 18, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; and Pub. L. 108–447.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35985
2. In § 679.7, revise paragraph (b)(8) to
read as follows:
■
§ 679.7
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) Prohibitions specific to salmon
discard in the Western and Central
Reporting Areas of the GOA directed
fisheries for groundfish. Fail to comply
with any requirements of §§ 679.21(h)
and 679.21(i).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 679.21,
■ a. Revise paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (h)
heading, and (h)(1), (4), and (5); and
■ b. Add paragraph (i) to read as
follows:
§ 679.21 Prohibited species bycatch
management.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) After allowing for sampling by an
observer, if an observer is aboard, sort
its catch immediately after retrieval of
the gear and, except for salmon
prohibited species catch in the BS
pollock fisheries and GOA groundfish
fisheries under paragraphs (c), (h), or (i)
of this section, or any prohibited species
catch as provided (in permits issued)
under the PSD program at § 679.26,
return all prohibited species, or parts
thereof, to the sea immediately, with a
minimum of injury, regardless of its
condition.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) GOA Chinook Salmon PSC
Management for pollock fisheries—(1)
Applicability. Regulations in this
paragraph apply to vessels directed
fishing for pollock with trawl gear in the
Western and Central reporting areas of
the GOA and processors receiving
deliveries from these vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Salmon retention. (i) The operator
of a vessel, including but not limited to
a catcher vessel or tender, must retain
all salmon until offload to a processing
facility that takes the delivery.
(ii) The owner and the manager of a
shoreside processor or SFP receiving
pollock deliveries must retain all
salmon until:
(A) The manager of a shoreside
processor or SFP has accurately
recorded the number of salmon by
species in the eLandings groundfish
landing report; and
(B) If an observer is present, the
observer is provided the opportunity to
count the number of salmon and to
collect any scientific data or biological
samples from the salmon.
(5) Salmon discard. Except for salmon
under the PSD program at § 679.26, all
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
35986
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
salmon must be discarded after the
requirements at paragraph (h)(4)(ii) of
this section have been met.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) GOA Chinook Salmon PSC
Management for non-pollock trawl
fisheries—(1) Applicability. Regulations
in this paragraph apply to vessels
directed fishing for groundfish species,
other than pollock, with trawl gear in
the Western and Central reporting areas
of the GOA and processors receiving
deliveries of groundfish, other than
pollock, from catcher vessels.
(2) Non-pollock trawl sectors. The
sectors identified in paragraph (i) of this
section are:
(i) Rockfish Program catcher vessel
Sector. For the purpose of accounting
for the Chinook salmon PSC limit at
paragraph (i)(3)(i)(B) of this section, the
Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector
is any catcher vessel fishing for
groundfish, other than pollock, with
trawl gear in the Western or Central
reporting areas of the GOA and
operating under the authority of a
Central GOA Rockfish Program CQ
permit assigned to the catcher vessel
sector;
(ii) Trawl catcher/processor Sector.
For the purpose of accounting for the
Chinook salmon PSC limits at
paragraphs (i)(3)(i)(A) and (i)(3)(ii) of
this section, the Trawl catcher/processor
Sector is any catcher processor vessel
fishing for groundfish, other than
pollock, with trawl gear in the Western
or Central GOA reporting areas and
processing that groundfish at sea; and
(iii) Non-Rockfish Program catcher
vessel Sector. For the purpose of
accounting for the Chinook salmon PSC
limit at paragraph (i)(3)(i)(C) of this
section, the Non-Rockfish Program
catcher vessel Sector is any catcher
vessel fishing for groundfish, other than
pollock, with trawl gear in the Western
or Central reporting areas of the GOA
and not operating under the authority of
a Central GOA Rockfish Program CQ
permit assigned to the catcher vessel
sector.
(3) GOA non-pollock trawl Chinook
salmon PSC limits. (i) NMFS establishes
annual Chinook salmon PSC limits in
the Central and Western reporting areas
of the GOA for the sectors defined in
paragraph (i)(2) of this section as
follows:
The total Chinook
salmon PSC limit
in each calendar
year is . . .
For the following sectors defined at § 679.21(i)(2) . . .
3,600
(B) Rockfish Program catcher vessel sector .............................................................
1,200
(C) Non-Rockfish Program catcher vessel sector .....................................................
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(A) Trawl catcher/processor sector ...........................................................................
Unless, the use of
the Chinook salmon PSC limit for
that sector in a
calendar year
does not exceed
. . .
2,700
(ii) For the Trawl catcher/processor
Sector defined at § 679.21(i)(2)(ii):
(A) NMFS establishes a seasonal limit
within the sector’s annual Chinook
salmon PSC limit that is available to the
sector prior to June 1. If the Trawl
catcher/processor Sector defined at
§ 679.21(i)(2)(ii) has an annual Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 3,600 Chinook
salmon, then the sector’s seasonal limit
prior to June 1 is 2,376 Chinook salmon.
If the Trawl catcher/processor Sector
defined at § 679.21(i)(2)(ii) has an
annual Chinook salmon PSC limit of
4,080 Chinook salmon, then the sector’s
seasonal limit prior to June 1 is 2,693
Chinook salmon.
(B) The amount of Chinook salmon
PSC available to the Trawl catcher/
processor Sector defined at
§ 679.21(i)(2) on June 1 through the
remainder of the calendar year will be
the annual Chinook salmon PSC limit
specified for the Trawl catcher/
processor Sector minus the number of
Chinook salmon used by that sector
prior to June 1.
(4) Rockfish Program catcher vessel
Sector reallocation of Chinook salmon
PSC. (i) If, on October 1 of each year, the
Regional Administrator determines that
more than 150 Chinook salmon are
available in the Rockfish Program
catcher vessel Sector Chinook PSC limit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
specified at paragraph (i)(3)(i)(B) of this
section, the Regional Administrator will
reallocate all Chinook salmon PSC
available to the Rockfish Program
catcher vessel Sector except for 150
Chinook salmon to the Non-Rockfish
Program catcher vessel Sector Chinook
salmon PSC limit specified at paragraph
(i)(3)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) On November 15 of each year, the
Regional Administrator will reallocate
all of the remaining Chinook salmon
available in the Rockfish Program
catcher vessel Sector Chinook PSC limit
specified at paragraph (i)(3)(i)(B) of this
section to the Non-Rockfish Program
catcher vessel Sector Chinook PSC limit
specified at paragraph (i)(3)(i)(C) of this
section.
(5) Salmon retention. (i) The operator
of a catcher vessel or tender must retain
all salmon until offload to a processing
facility that takes the delivery.
(ii) The owner and manager of a
shoreside processor or SFP receiving
non-pollock fishery deliveries must
retain all salmon until the number of
salmon by species has been accurately
recorded in the eLandings groundfish
landing report.
(iii) The operator of a catcher/
processor must retain all salmon until
an observer is provided the opportunity
to collect scientific data or biological
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If so, in the following calendar
year, the Chinook
salmon PSC limit
for that sector will
be . . .
3,120
4,080
N/A
2,340
3,060
samples, and the number of salmon by
species has been accurately recorded in
the eLandings At-sea production report.
(6) Salmon discard. Except for salmon
under the PSD program defined at
§ 679.26, all salmon must be discarded
after the requirements at paragraph
(i)(5)(ii) or (iii) of this section have been
met.
(7) Chinook salmon PSC closures in
non-pollock trawl gear fisheries. If,
during the fishing year, the Regional
Administrator determines that:
(i) Vessels in a sector defined at
§ 679.21(i)(2) will catch the applicable
Chinook salmon PSC limit specified at
paragraph (i)(3)(i) of this section for that
sector, NMFS will publish notification
in the Federal Register closing directed
fishing for all groundfish species, other
than pollock, with trawl gear in the
Western and Central reporting areas of
the GOA for that sector; or
(ii) Vessels in the Trawl catcher/
processor Sector defined at
§ 679.21(i)(2) will catch the seasonal
Chinook salmon PSC limit specified
under paragraph (i)(3)(ii)(A) of this
section prior to June 1, NMFS will
publish notification in the Federal
Register closing directed fishing for
groundfish species, other than pollock,
with trawl gear in the Western and
Central reporting areas of the GOA for
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
all vessels in the Trawl catcher/
processor Sector defined at
§ 679.21(i)(2) until June 1. Directed
fishing for groundfish species, other
than pollock, with trawl gear in the
Western and Central reporting areas of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:17 Jun 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
the GOA for vessels in the Trawl
catcher/processor Sector defined at
§ 679.21(i)(2) will reopen on June 1 with
the Chinook salmon PSC limit
determined under paragraph (i)(3)(ii)(B)
of this section unless NMFS determines
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
35987
that the amount of Chinook salmon PSC
available to the sector is insufficient to
allow the sector to fish and not exceed
its annual Chinook salmon PSC limit.
[FR Doc. 2014–14726 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35971-35987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14726]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 130710606-4491-01]
RIN 0648-BD48
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Chinook
Salmon Bycatch Management in the Gulf of Alaska Non-Pollock Trawl
Fisheries; Amendment 97
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement Amendment 97 to the
Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP). If
approved, Amendment 97 would limit Chinook salmon prohibited species
catch (PSC) in Western and Central Gulf of Alaska (GOA) non-pollock
trawl catcher/processor (C/P) and catcher vessel (CV) fisheries. This
action would establish separate annual Chinook salmon PSC limits for
trawl catcher/processors (Trawl C/P Sector), trawl catcher vessels
participating in the Central GOA Rockfish Program (Rockfish Program CV
Sector), and trawl catcher vessels not participating in the Central GOA
Rockfish Program (Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector) fishing for
groundfish species other than pollock. If a sector reaches its Chinook
salmon PSC limit, NMFS would prohibit further fishing for non-pollock
groundfish by vessels in that sector. This action also would establish
and clarify Chinook salmon retention and discard requirements for
vessels, shoreside processors, and stationary floating processors
participating in both the GOA pollock and non-pollock groundfish trawl
fisheries. This action is necessary to minimize the catch of Chinook
salmon to the extent practicable in the GOA non-pollock trawl
fisheries. Amendment 97 is intended to promote the goals and objectives
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), the FMP, and other applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2013-0077, by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0077, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802-1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word,
Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact
Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (collectively, Analysis)
prepared for this action are available from https://www.regulations.gov
or from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. An electronic copy of the Biological Opinion
on the effects of the Alaska groundfish fisheries on Endangered Species
Act (ESA)-listed species is available at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/protectedresources/stellers/plb/default.htm.
Written comments regarding the approved collection-of-information
requirements referenced in this proposed rule may be submitted to NMFS
at the above address and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or
fax to 202-395-7285. All currently approved NOAA collections of
information may be viewed at https://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hartman, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the groundfish fisheries in the
U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the GOA under the FMP. The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared, and NMFS
approved, the FMP under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and implementing the FMP appear at
50 CFR parts 600 and 679.
The Council has submitted Amendment 97 for review by the Secretary
of Commerce, and a notice of availability of the FMP amendment was
published in the Federal Register on June 5, 2014 (79 FR 32525), with
written comments on the FMP amendment invited through August 4, 2014.
All relevant written comments received by the end of the applicable
comment period, whether specifically directed to the FMP amendment,
this proposed rule, or both, will be considered in the approval/
disapproval decision for Amendment 97 and addressed in the response to
comments in the final decision.
The following sections of the preamble describe: (1) General
management of groundfish and PSC in the GOA; (2) the management areas
and groundfish fisheries affected by this proposed action--the non-
pollock trawl fisheries in the Central and Western GOA; (3) the non-
pollock trawl fisheries in the Central and Western GOA and the three
sectors active in those fisheries--the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV,
and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors; (4) Chinook salmon PSC use in the
non-pollock trawl fisheries; (5) the history and goals of this proposed
rule--limiting Chinook salmon PSC in the
[[Page 35972]]
non-pollock trawl fisheries in the Central and Western GOA; and (6)
provisions of the proposed action that would establish limits on the
maximum amount of Chinook salmon PSC permitted to be taken on an annual
basis by the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV, and Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sectors and requirements necessary to account for and adequately
sample Chinook salmon PSC.
General Management of Groundfish and PSC Limits in the GOA
The FMP and its implementing regulations at Sec. 679.20(c) require
that the Council recommend and NMFS specify an overfishing level (OFL),
an acceptable biological catch (ABC), and a total allowable catch (TAC)
for each stock or stock complex (i.e., each species or species group)
of groundfish on an annual basis. The OFL is the level above which
overfishing is occurring for a species or species group. The ABC is the
level of a species or species group's annual catch that accounts for
the scientific uncertainty in the estimate of OFL and any other
scientific uncertainty. The ABC is set below the OFL. The TAC is the
annual catch target for a species or species group, derived from the
ABC by considering social and economic factors and management
uncertainty. The TAC must be set lower than or equal to the ABC.
The OFLs, ABCs, and TACs for GOA groundfish are specified through
the annual harvest specification process. A detailed description of the
annual harvest specification process is provided in the final 2014 and
2015 harvest specifications for groundfish of the GOA (79 FR 12890,
March 6, 2014) and is briefly summarized here. The Council's Scientific
and Statistical Committee (SSC) establishes the OFL and ABC for each
species or species group. Based on the ABC established for each species
or species group, the Council recommends a TAC. The TAC for some
species and species groups are subject to further allocation on a
seasonal basis and allocation among vessels using specific types of
gear and vessel categories in the GOA (see regulations at Sec.
679.20(a)).
To ensure that OFLs, ABCs, and TACs are not exceeded, NMFS requires
that vessel operators participating in groundfish fisheries in the GOA
comply with a range of monitoring requirements and restrictions. NMFS
uses a range of area, time, gear, and operation-specific fishery
closures to maintain catch within specified TACs and associated sector
and seasonal allocations. NMFS closes directed fisheries when a TAC is
reached, and restricts fishing in other fisheries that may incidentally
take a species or species group approaching its OFL. Regulations at
Sec. Sec. 679.20(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) describe the range of
management measures that NMFS uses to maintain total catch at or below
the OFL, ABC, and TAC for a species or species group.
In addition to these measures to limit total catch of groundfish
species, the Council and NMFS have adopted various measures intended to
control the catch of species taken incidentally in groundfish
fisheries. Certain species are designated as ``prohibited species
catch'' (PSC) in the FMP because they are the target of other, fully
utilized domestic fisheries. The FMP and regulations at Sec. 679.21
require that catch of PSC must be avoided while fishing for groundfish,
and when incidentally caught, these PSC species must be immediately
returned to the sea with a minimum of injury. The PSC species include
Pacific halibut, Pacific herring, Pacific salmon, steelhead trout, king
crab, and Tanner crab.
PSC must not be sold or kept for personal use and are required to
be discarded (see regulations at Sec. 679.21), or retained but not
sold under the Prohibited Species Donation (PSD) Program (see
regulations at Sec. 679.26). In an effort to minimize waste of salmon
incidentally caught and killed, NMFS established the PSD Program for
the donation of incidentally caught salmon. The PSD Program reduces the
amount of edible protein discarded under PSC regulatory requirements
(see regulations at Sec. 679.21). The PSD Program allows permitted
participants to retain salmon for distribution to economically
disadvantaged individuals through tax-exempt hunger relief
organizations.
The Council has recommended, and NMFS has implemented, measures to
(1) close groundfish fishing in areas with a high occurrence of
prohibited species, or where there is a relatively high level of PSC;
(2) require the use of gear specifically modified to minimize PSC; and
(3) establish PSC limits in specific Alaska groundfish fisheries in the
GOA.
One of the prohibited species of greatest concern to the Council
and NMFS is Chinook salmon. Chinook salmon is a prohibited species in
the groundfish fisheries because of its value in salmon fisheries.
Chinook salmon is a culturally and economically valuable species that
is fully allocated and for which State and Federal managers seek to
conservatively manage harvests. The Council and NMFS have established a
range of management measures to constrain the impact of groundfish
fisheries in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI) and
the GOA on Chinook salmon. A summary of these measures for the GOA is
provided in Section 1.5 of the Analysis.
Management Areas and Fisheries Affected by This Proposed Action
This proposed rule would apply to Federally-permitted vessels
fishing in the Central and Western Reporting Areas of the GOA (referred
to in the remainder of the preamble as either the Western and Central
GOA or the Central and Western GOA). The Western and Central Reporting
Areas, defined at Sec. 679.2 and shown in Figure 3 to 50 CFR part 679,
consist of the Central and Western Regulatory Areas in the EEZ
(Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630) and the adjacent State of Alaska
(State) waters. The EEZ includes Federal waters that generally occur
from 3 nautical miles (nm) to 200 nm from shore. State waters generally
occur from shore to 3 nm from shore. The specific boundaries between
State and Federal waters are provided on the NMFS Alaska Region Web
site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/maps/reporting_areas/index.pdf.
This proposed rule would not apply to Federally-permitted vessels
fishing in the Eastern Reporting Area of the GOA, which consists of
Statistical Areas 640, 649, 650, and 659 in the EEZ and the adjacent
State waters. Although all species of Pacific salmon are taken
incidentally in the groundfish fisheries within the GOA, the Eastern
Reporting Area is not included because it contains a large area
(Statistical Area 650) closed to fishing with trawl gear, and Chinook
salmon PSC in the Eastern Reporting Area accounts for less than 2
percent of total GOA Chinook salmon PSC (see Section 1.2 of the
Analysis for additional detail).
This proposed rule would apply Chinook salmon PSC limits to owners
and operators of trawl vessels that are directed fishing for groundfish
species other than pollock (non-pollock trawl vessels) in the Central
and Western GOA. Directed fishing is defined at Sec. 679.2. Vessels
that are directed fishing for pollock in the Central and Western GOA
are subject to management under a separate Chinook salmon PSC limit
defined at Sec. 679.21(h) and would not be affected by this proposed
action, with the exception of a proposed clarification to the current
salmon retention requirements explained later in this preamble.
This proposed action would apply to Federally-permitted trawl
vessels fishing for non-pollock groundfish that are managed under TAC
limits in Federal waters and under the State's
[[Page 35973]]
parallel groundfish fisheries in State waters. Parallel groundfish
fisheries are fisheries that occur in State waters where the catch of
groundfish is debited from the TAC. Parallel groundfish fisheries are
opened and closed by the State concurrently with adjacent Federal
fisheries. Parallel fisheries are managed by the State under rules
similar to those that apply in the Federal fisheries. The parallel
fisheries that would be affected by this action include the GOA State
parallel trawl fisheries for groundfish species, other than pollock,
that occur in State waters in the Central and Western GOA. Additional
detail on State parallel fisheries is provided in Section 4.5.1 of the
Analysis.
This proposed rule would not apply to non-pollock trawl vessels
fishing in a State-managed guideline harvest level (GHL) groundfish
fishery in the Western or Central GOA should such a fishery be
authorized by the State. Currently, GHL non-pollock trawl fisheries are
not authorized by the State in the Central or Western GOA. As general
background, GHL fisheries are established and managed by the State for
harvest exclusively within State waters and catch occurring in a GHL
fishery is not deducted from the TAC. Additional detail on State GHL
fishery management is provided in Section 4.5.1 of the Analysis.
This proposed action would not apply to non-trawl fisheries (i.e.,
fisheries using pot, hook-and-line or jig gear). The purpose and need
for this action is to address Chinook salmon PSC that is known to occur
in trawl fisheries. The Council and NMFS could consider subsequent
action to limit Chinook salmon PSC in non-trawl fisheries through
subsequent action if such action were determined to be warranted.
Non-Pollock Trawl Fisheries in the Central and Western GOA
The non-pollock trawl fisheries in the Western and Central GOA
include fisheries for sablefish, several rockfish species, arrowtooth
flounder, Pacific cod, shallow water flatfish, rex sole, flathead sole,
deep-water flatfish, and other groundfish, except pollock. Many of the
non-pollock trawl fisheries are multi-species fisheries, in which
vessels catch and retain multiple groundfish species in a single
fishing trip. Additional detail on the species and amounts harvested in
the non-pollock trawl fisheries in the Western and Central GOA are
provided in Sections 3.2 and 4.4 of the Analysis and in the final 2014
and 2015 harvest specifications for the GOA groundfish fisheries (79 FR
12890, March 6, 2014).
Participants in the Western and Central GOA non-pollock trawl
fisheries include C/Ps and CVs. In developing Amendment 97, the Council
decided to group these vessels into three sectors which are described
in greater detail in the following sections of this preamble: (1) The
Trawl C/P Sector; (2) the Rockfish Program CV Sector; and (3) the Non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector.
Trawl C/P Sector
Trawl C/Ps in the Central and Western GOA participate in a range of
non-pollock groundfish fisheries. Trawl C/Ps primarily fish for
rockfish (i.e., dusky rockfish, northern rockfish, and Pacific ocean
perch) and sablefish in the Central and Western GOA, and arrowtooth
flounder, deep-water flatfish, flathead sole, and rex sole in the
Central GOA. Trawl C/Ps occasionally fish for arrowtooth flounder and
shallow water flatfish in the Central and Western GOA. Trawl C/Ps do
not fish for Pacific cod in the Central or Western GOA. Section 4.4 of
the Analysis describes the harvesting activities by trawl C/Ps in
greater detail.
Harvests of non-pollock groundfish by trawl C/Ps in the Central and
Western GOA are governed primarily by two management programs, the
Amendment 80 Program and the Central GOA Rockfish Program. All of the
vessels that would be within the Trawl C/P Sector under this proposed
rule are subject to management under the Amendment 80 Program. Most of
the vessels that would be within the Trawl C/P Sector under this
proposed rule also are subject to management under the Central GOA
Rockfish Program. The relevant provisions of the Amendment 80 Program
and the Central GOA Rockfish Program are briefly described in the
following paragraphs.
In June 2006, the Council adopted Amendment 80 to the BSAI Fishery
Management Plan, which was implemented by NMFS in 2008. The suite of
management measures that implement Amendment 80 is commonly known as
the Amendment 80 Program. The key provisions of Amendment 80 relevant
for this proposed action are briefly described here; additional detail
is available in the final rule implementing the Amendment 80 Program
(72 FR 52668, September 14, 2007).
The Amendment 80 Program is intended primarily to improve retention
and utilization of fishery resources; encourage fishing practices with
lower discard rates; and improve the opportunity for increasing the
value of harvested species while lowering operational costs for
groundfish fishing in the BSAI. The Amendment 80 Program accomplishes
these goals by encouraging the formation of cooperatives and the
development of cooperative fishing practices among all persons who are
issued Amendment 80 quota share permits. Amendment 80 cooperatives are
eligible to receive cooperative quota, which represents an exclusive
harvest privilege for a portion of the TAC for each Amendment 80
species annually. The allocation of an exclusive harvest privilege to a
person for a specific portion of the TAC is more commonly known as a
catch share. Trawl C/Ps within an Amendment 80 cooperative cannot
exceed the amount of cooperative quota allocated to their Amendment 80
cooperative (see regulations at Sec. 679.7(n)). Participants who form
cooperatives in the Amendment 80 Program are able to receive a catch
share in the BSAI and are not engaged in a ``race for fish'' that can
occur in fisheries that are not subject to catch share management. This
allows participants within an Amendment 80 cooperative to make
operational choices to improve fishery returns, reduce bycatch, and
reduce fish discards. However, the allocation of catch shares could
allow Amendment 80 cooperative participants to expand into fisheries
not managed under a catch share program. Specifically, many of the
trawl C/Ps eligible under the Amendment 80 Program are also active in
groundfish fisheries in the GOA that are not subject to catch share
management.
To address the potential expansion of fishing effort into the GOA
that could result from the implementation of catch share management in
the BSAI, the Amendment 80 Program limits the ability of trawl C/Ps
managed under the Amendment 80 Program to expand their harvest efforts
in the GOA. These limitations are commonly known as ``sideboards''
because they constrain harvests in specific fisheries. The Amendment 80
Program established GOA groundfish and halibut PSC sideboard limits for
Amendment 80 Program participants.
Regulations at Sec. 679.92 establish groundfish harvesting
sideboard limits on all vessels eligible for the Amendment 80 program,
other than the F/V Golden Fleece, for pollock and Pacific cod in the
Western and Central GOA, and Pacific ocean perch, dusky rockfish, and
northern rockfish in the Western GOA. Regulations at Sec. 679.92(b)(2)
establish halibut PSC sideboard limits in the Central and Western GOA
for vessels eligible under the Amendment 80 Program other than the F/V
Golden Fleece. Halibut PSC
[[Page 35974]]
sideboards establish the maximum amount of halibut PSC that may be
taken while Amendment 80 trawl C/Ps are fishing for groundfish in the
GOA. Halibut PSC sideboard limits are allocated by fishery complexes
and seasons as described in Table 31 to part 679.
In addition to these groundfish and halibut PSC sideboard limits,
other limitations apply to trawl C/Ps eligible for the Amendment 80
Program. Regulations in Table 39 to 50 CFR part 679 allow only specific
trawl C/Ps eligible under the Amendment 80 Program to conduct directed
fishing for flatfish in the GOA. Regulations at Sec. 679.92(d)
prohibit one vessel in the Amendment 80 Program, the F/V Golden Fleece,
from directed fishing for pollock, Pacific cod, Pacific ocean perch,
dusky rockfish, and northern rockfish in the Central and Western GOA,
effectively limiting that vessel to the flatfish fisheries in the
Central and Western GOA. These specific sideboard measures were
established for the F/V Golden Fleece in recognition of the unique
catch patterns of the F/V Golden Fleece described in detail in the
final rule implementing the Amendment 80 Program (72 FR 52668,
September 14, 2007).
Because the trawl C/Ps operating in the Central and Western GOA are
subject to the sideboard limits imposed by the Amendment 80 Program,
the vessel operators have established voluntary cooperative
relationships to ensure that sideboard limits are not exceeded. These
voluntary arrangements have resulted in improved communication and
coordination among trawl C/P operators in the GOA.
In addition to the Amendment 80 Program, some trawl C/Ps that would
be within the Trawl C/P Sector under this proposed rule are eligible to
participate in the Central GOA Rockfish Program (76 FR 81248, December
27, 2011). The Central GOA Rockfish Program was first implemented in
2007 and had a five-year duration ending on December 31, 2011 (71 FR
67210, November 20, 2006). Prior to the expiration of the Central GOA
Rockfish Program, the Council revised and renewed the Central GOA
Rockfish Program (76 FR 81248, December 27, 2011). Additional detail on
the Central GOA Rockfish Program is provided in the final rule
implementing the program (76 FR 81248, December 27, 2011) and relevant
provisions are briefly summarized here.
The Central GOA Rockfish Program, like the Amendment 80 Program,
allocates catch shares. The Central GOA Rockfish Program provides catch
shares to eligible trawl C/Ps for Central GOA dusky rockfish, northern
rockfish, Pacific ocean perch, rougheye rockfish, shortraker rockfish,
and sablefish. The Central GOA Rockfish Program also limits the amount
of halibut PSC that may be used by eligible trawl C/Ps. As with the
Amendment 80 Program, trawl C/Ps that are active in the Central GOA
Rockfish Program can receive a catch share allocation only if they
participate in a cooperative. Trawl C/Ps cannot exceed their
cooperative's Central GOA Rockfish Program catch share allocations (see
regulations at Sec. 679.7(o)). In addition to this catch share
allocation, trawl C/Ps that are eligible for the Central GOA Rockfish
Program are subject to sideboard limits that constrain their ability to
expand effort into other fisheries in the GOA that are not subject to
catch share management. The Central GOA Rockfish Program establishes
sideboard limits on the types of groundfish fisheries, the amount of
Central and Western GOA groundfish, and the amount of halibut PSC that
may be harvested by trawl C/Ps eligible for the Central GOA Rockfish
Program (see regulations at Sec. 679.82). These provisions have
resulted in coordination among those participants active in the Central
GOA Rockfish Program and who would be within the Trawl C/P Sector under
this proposed rule.
The management measures implemented under the Amendment 80 Program
and the Central GOA Rockfish Program have resulted in uniform
management of trawl C/P vessels in the Central and Western GOA. This
uniform management has also resulted in similar harvest patterns, and
coordination among fishery participants. Sections 4.4.2 and 4.4.11 of
the Analysis describe the fishing dynamics within the Trawl C/P Sector
in greater detail.
This proposed rule would not apply to trawl C/Ps that are managed
under authority of the American Fisheries Act (AFA). Regulations
implementing the AFA prohibit AFA trawl C/Ps from harvesting any
species of groundfish in the GOA (see regulations at Sec.
679.7(k)(1)(ii)). Therefore, they would not be subject to the
provisions of this proposed action.
Rockfish Program CV Sector
Trawl CVs in the Central and Western GOA participate in a range of
non-pollock groundfish fisheries. Trawl CVs primarily fish for Pacific
cod in the Central and Western GOA. Trawl CVs also fish for rockfish
(i.e., dusky rockfish, northern rockfish, and Pacific ocean perch) and
sablefish in the Central and Western GOA, and arrowtooth flounder,
flathead sole, and shallow water flatfish in the Central GOA. Trawl CVs
rarely fish for other flatfish species in the Central GOA. Trawl CVs do
not fish for flatfish or rockfish in the Western GOA. Section 4.4.2.2
of the Analysis describes the harvesting activities by trawl CVs in
greater detail.
There is a distinct division in the management of trawl CVs that
separates trawl CVs participating in the Central GOA Rockfish Program
from trawl CVs that are not participating in the Central GOA Rockfish
Program. Trawl CVs participating in the Central GOA Rockfish Program
are subject to catch share management; trawl CVs participating in
fisheries other than the Central GOA Rockfish Program are not. These
conditions create two distinct management regimes that fundamentally
affect the way vessels within each sector fish for non-pollock
groundfish and avoid PSC. Therefore, this proposed action recognizes
trawl CVs that are participating in the Central GOA Rockfish Program
(Rockfish Program CVs) as a sector that is separate and distinct from
trawl CVs that are not participating in the Central GOA Rockfish
Program (Non-Rockfish Program CVs).
The Central GOA Rockfish Program provides catch shares to eligible
trawl CVs for Central GOA dusky rockfish, northern rockfish, Pacific
Ocean perch, Pacific cod, rougheye rockfish, and sablefish. The Central
GOA Rockfish Program also limits the amount of halibut PSC that may be
used by eligible trawl CVs. Rockfish Program CVs can receive a catch
share allocation only if they participate in a cooperative. Rockfish
Program cooperatives cannot exceed the amount of their Central GOA
Rockfish Program catch share allocations (see regulations at Sec.
679.7(o)). Rockfish Program CVs are subject to sideboard limits that
constrain the ability of Rockfish Program CVs from expanding their
fishing effort into other fisheries in the GOA not subject to catch
share management (see regulations at Sec. 679.82(d)).
In the Central GOA, directed rockfish fishing is permitted from May
1 to December 31, with the majority of groundfish harvested in May and
June. In 2012, thirty-five trawl CVs in the GOA were fishing under the
authority of a Rockfish Program Cooperative Quota (CQ) permit out of a
total of 62 trawl CVs that were active in the Central GOA groundfish
fisheries. Rockfish Program CVs can ``check in'' to fish under the
authority of a Central GOA Rockfish Program CQ Permit, and ``check
out'' to fish in other fisheries in the GOA (see
[[Page 35975]]
regulations at Sec. 679.5(r)(8)). When Rockfish Program CVs are
checked in, they are fishing under the authority of a Rockfish Program
CQ Permit and their harvest is limited to the cooperative's catch share
allocations. However, the catch share allocations are limiting only
when trawl CVs are checked in and fishing under the authority of a
Rockfish Program CQ Permit. Conversely, sideboard limitations
applicable to eligible Rockfish Program CVs apply during a portion of
the year to Rockfish Program CVs that are checked out of the Central
GOA Rockfish Program (see regulations at Sec. 679.82(d)). The net
effect of these provisions is that when trawl CVs are ``checked in''
and fishing under the authority of a Rockfish Program CQ Permit, they
are participating in a cooperative catch share management program, and
when they are ``checked out,'' they no longer have an exclusive harvest
privilege and must compete or ``race'' with other CVs in harvesting the
fish. These conditions indicated to the Council that it would be
appropriate to apply separate Chinook salmon PSC limits for trawl CV
vessels when ``checked in'' and operating under the authority of a
Rockfish Program CQ Permit and for trawl CV vessels not operating under
the authority of a Rockfish Program CQ Permit (see the ``Provisions of
the Proposed Action'' Section of this preamble for additional detail).
Section 4.4.2 of the Analysis describes the fishing dynamics within the
Rockfish Program CV Sector in greater detail.
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
CVs that are not eligible to participate in the Central GOA
Rockfish Program or that are not ``checked in'' and fishing under the
authority of a Rockfish Program CQ Permit would be in the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector. This sector fishes primarily for Pacific cod in the
Central and Western GOA, arrowtooth flounder, flathead sole, and
shallow water flatfish in the Central GOA, and rockfish in the Eastern
GOA (an area not subject to the provisions of this proposed action). As
noted earlier, some trawl CVs do not participate in the Rockfish
Program at any time during a year, while some participate in the
Central GOA Rockfish Program for part of the year, and then participate
in other Central or Western GOA non-pollock fisheries that are outside
of the Central GOA Rockfish Program. The participants who would be
within the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector under this proposed rule
participate in fisheries that are not subject to catch share management
and are less likely to be able to coordinate fishing operations in
comparison with participants who are subject to catch share management,
such as those in the Trawl C/P and Rockfish CV Program Sectors. Section
4.4.2 of the Analysis describes the fishing dynamics within the Non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector in greater detail.
Chinook Salmon PSC in the Non-Pollock Trawl Fisheries
Information is currently unavailable for NMFS to assess the
specific proportion of individual stocks of Chinook salmon that are
incidentally caught in the GOA non-pollock trawl fisheries. Coded wire
tag recoveries and genetic analysis of Chinook salmon caught in the GOA
non-pollock trawl fisheries show that Chinook salmon stocks originate
from Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, and Alaska. Current
regulations do not facilitate stock of origin analysis of Chinook
salmon incidentally caught in the Western or Central GOA non-pollock
trawl fisheries. Section 4.7.2 of the Analysis concludes that it is not
possible at this time to estimate how Chinook salmon removals by trawl
fisheries impact the proportion of Chinook salmon forgone by other
users or impact Chinook salmon escapement.
Regulations require participants in the non-pollock trawl fisheries
to avoid Chinook salmon when possible and return them to the water
immediately with a minimum of injury after observer sampling. However,
salmon caught incidentally in trawl nets often die as a result of
trauma incurred during capture. It can be difficult for non-pollock
trawl vessels to avoid Chinook salmon PSC because Chinook salmon and
non-pollock groundfish occur in the same locations in the Western and
Central GOA.
Although non-pollock trawl fisheries incidentally take Chinook
salmon, the pollock directed fishery in the Western and Central GOA
typically takes the majority of Chinook salmon PSC in the GOA
groundfish fisheries (see Section 4.4 of the Analysis for additional
detail on total Chinook salmon PSC use). In 2012, NMFS issued a final
rule to implement Amendment 93 to the FMP (77 FR 42629, July 20, 2012).
Amendment 93 established separate Chinook salmon PSC limits in the
Western and Central GOA for the pollock directed fishery. These limits
require NMFS to close the pollock directed fishery in the Western or
Central GOA if the applicable limit is reached (see regulations at
Sec. 679.21(h)(6)). The annual Chinook salmon PSC limits in the
pollock directed fishery of 6,684 salmon in the Western GOA and 18,316
salmon in the Central GOA are set in regulation at Sec.
679.21(h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii). In addition, all salmon (regardless of
species) taken in the pollock directed fishery in the Western and
Central GOA must be retained until an observer at the processing
facility that receives delivery of the catch is provided an opportunity
to count the number of salmon and to collect any scientific data or
biological samples from the salmon (see regulations at Sec.
679.21(h)(4)).
There are currently no specific management measures to limit
Chinook salmon PSC in the GOA non-pollock trawl fisheries. From 1997
through 2013 (a broad range of years encompassing reliable historic
estimates and the most recent available data), the non-pollock trawl
fisheries accounted for approximately 27 percent of the total trawl
fishery Chinook salmon PSC in the Western and Central GOA groundfish
fisheries. The pollock trawl fisheries accounted for the remainder of
the Chinook salmon PSC. Chinook salmon PSC for the non-pollock trawl
fisheries averaged 5,770 salmon annually from 1997 through 2013, with a
maximum annual PSC of 10,877 in 2003 and a minimum annual PSC of 2,739
in 1998.
Chinook salmon PSC for GOA non-pollock trawl fisheries varies by
year and among the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV, and Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sectors. Table 1 provides the average, the minimum, and the
maximum amount of Chinook salmon PSC for all three sectors. Table 1
provides this information since the implementation of the Central GOA
Rockfish Program in 2007, the first year that all three sectors could
be defined, through 2013, the most recent year for which data are
available. Section 4.4 of the Analysis provides additional detail on
the distribution of Chinook salmon PSC.
[[Page 35976]]
Table 1--Total, Average, Maximum, and Minimum Chinook Salmon PSC in the Trawl C/P, Rockfish CV, and Non-Rockfish
CV Sectors From 2007 Through 2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector Average Maximum Minimum
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trawl C/P....................................................... 3,143 4,631 1,890
Rockfish CV..................................................... 903 1,649 368
Non-Rockfish CV................................................. 2,526 4,531 857
-----------------------------------------------
Total (All three sectors)................................... 5,979 9,748 3,664
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History and Goals of This Proposed Rule
In December 2010, the Council initiated two sequential amendments
to address GOA Chinook salmon PSC. The first amendment addressed
Chinook salmon PSC in the GOA pollock fisheries through the
implementation of a PSC limit for those target fisheries in the Western
and Central GOA. At the same time, a longer-term amendment package was
initiated to address comprehensive Chinook salmon PSC management in GOA
non-pollock trawl fisheries.
In June 2011, the Council took final action on the first amendment,
Amendment 93 to the GOA Groundfish FMP, which established an overall
PSC limit of 25,000 Chinook salmon for the Central and Western GOA
pollock fisheries. The Central GOA annual PSC limit was set at 18,316
Chinook salmon, and the Western GOA PSC limit was set at 6,684 Chinook
salmon. Also, the Council required full retention of all salmon taken
in the pollock trawl fishery, in order to allow NMFS to implement a
robust sampling protocol for Chinook salmon, and allow for genetic
stock identification of Chinook salmon taken as PSC. The final rule to
implement Amendment 93 became effective on August 25, 2012 (77 FR
42629).
In February 2012, the Council reviewed a discussion paper on the
second amendment to consider and evaluate a range of alternatives for
Chinook salmon PSC limits in the GOA non-pollock trawl fisheries, and
other alternatives for controlling and sampling Chinook salmon PSC in
GOA trawl fisheries. In June 2013, the Council took final action on the
Chinook salmon PSC limits for the non-pollock trawl fishery by
selecting a long-term average annual PSC limit that would be divided
between CVs and C/Ps, an incentive buffer for trawl C/Ps and Non-
Rockfish Program CVs, separate Chinook PSC apportionments for the
Rockfish Program CV sector and the Non-Rockfish Program CV sector, and
salmon retention requirements.
In June 2013, the Council initiated review of an additional PSC
measure to examine whether or not the June 2013 recommendation on
Chinook salmon PSC in the GOA non-pollock trawl fishery could be
modified to include an inseason reallocation of Chinook salmon PSC from
the Rockfish Program CV Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector.
The Council recommended an inseason reallocation on December 2013. The
measures adopted by the Council at its June and December meetings
comprise Amendment 97 and are described in detail in the analysis and
in the following section of this proposed rule.
The goals of this proposed action are consistent with the 10
National Standards established under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The
proposed action addresses the MSA National Standards and would balance
a number of competing objectives for fishery conservation and
management. These include National Standard 1, National Standard 8, and
National Standard 9. The Council and NMFS recognize the need to balance
and be consistent with both National Standard 1 and National Standard
9. National Standard 9 requires that conservation and management
measures shall, to the extent practicable, minimize bycatch. National
Standard 1 requires that conservation and management measures shall
prevent overfishing while achieving, on a continuing basis, the optimum
yield from each fishery for the U.S. fishing industry. The ability to
harvest the entire TAC for each groundfish fishery in any given year
may not be the single factor, or the most important factor, in
determining whether the GOA groundfish fishery achieves optimum yield.
Providing the opportunity for the fleet to harvest its TAC is one
aspect of achieving optimum yield in the long term. National Standard 8
requires considering the importance of fishery resources to fishing
communities and minimizing adverse economic impacts on such
communities. This action would provide maximum benefit to fishermen and
communities that depend on Chinook salmon and groundfish resources, and
comply with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable federal law.
National Standard 9 emphasizes the need to minimize bycatch in the non-
pollock trawl fisheries in the Central and Western GOA to the extent
practicable. The action would be practicable because it does not over
constrain harvest of available TACs in the non-pollock trawl fisheries.
By minimizing Chinook salmon bycatch, this action would maintain a
healthy marine ecosystem for the long-term conservation and abundance
of Chinook salmon.
In determining whether to impose a Chinook salmon PSC limit for the
non-pollock trawl fisheries, the Council and NMFS considered the
importance of equity among user groups in this proposed action. In
addition to providing an equitable allocation of the total GOA-wide PSC
limit between the Western and Central GOA non-pollock trawl fisheries,
the Council and NMFS also considered the needs of Chinook salmon users.
The Chinook salmon resource is of value to many stakeholders, including
but not limited to commercial, recreational, and subsistence user
groups, and it is a resource that is currently fully utilized. By
instituting a PSC limit that would prevent harvest of Chinook salmon in
excess of that limit, thereby reducing Chinook salmon bycatch in years
of high abundance, the Council and NMFS also are considering the needs
of these other user groups in recommending this proposed action.
The Council and NMFS determined that the imposition of a Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the non-pollock trawl fisheries in the Western and
Central GOA would achieve three broad goals, that are addressed in the
Purpose and Need and in the Council's problem statement (see Analysis
Section 1.1), and discussed below. The first goal is to avoid exceeding
the annual Chinook salmon threshold of 40,000 Chinook salmon that was
identified in the incidental take statement accompanying the November
30, 2000, Biological Opinion on the effects of the Alaska groundfish
fisheries on ESA-listed salmon of the Pacific Northwest (see
[[Page 35977]]
Chapter 5) (see ADDRESSES). Management of the GOA groundfish fisheries
should prevent Chinook salmon bycatch from exceeding the incidental
take statement. Establishing a limit on the amount of Chinook salmon
PSC that may be taken on an annual basis in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries in the Central and Western GOA would accomplish that goal.
This proposed action would, on average, limit the annual Chinook salmon
PSC in the non-pollock trawl fisheries to 7,500 salmon each year. This
would provide great assurance that the total Chinook salmon PSC in the
GOA from all sources would not exceed 40,000 salmon on an annual basis.
The second goal is to minimize Chinook salmon bycatch to the extent
practicable, consistent with the MSA and National Standard 9. Under
Amendment 93 to the FMP, NMFS implemented regulations to limit the
annual Chinook salmon PSC in the Central and Western GOA pollock
fishery to 25,000 Chinook salmon (77 FR 42629, July 20, 2012). Limits
on Chinook salmon PSC in the non-pollock trawl fisheries would
complement those regulations, and further the second goal of
conservation of Chinook salmon resources that occur in the GOA
regardless of the stock of origin. The implementation of Chinook salmon
PSC limits for non-pollock trawl fisheries would prevent unusually high
levels of PSC of Chinook salmon from occurring in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries in the future, such as occurred in 2003 and 2010 (see Section
4.4 of the Analysis for additional information on annual Chinook salmon
PSC use in the non-pollock trawl fisheries). Consistent with National
Standard 9, Chinook salmon PSC limits that would be implemented by this
program include incentives that in some years, may reduce Chinook
salmon PSC to levels below the proposed limits, thereby minimizing
bycatch to the extent practicable. The third broad goal is to establish
monitoring measures that would aid NMFS in proper accounting of Chinook
salmon PSC and improve sampling of Chinook salmon so that stock of
origin of Chinook salmon PSC could be determined. This would be
accomplished by revising retention requirements for all salmon PSC,
regardless of species, to enable accurate reporting, ensure adequate
accounting of Chinook salmon PSC, and obtain information that could
help define the stock of origin of Chinook salmon bycatch, thereby
improving the understanding of the potential impact of Chinook salmon
PSC on Chinook salmon resources and fisheries.
Provisions of the Proposed Action
In order to achieve the goals identified by the Council, this
proposed action would: (1) Establish annual Chinook salmon PSC limits
for the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV, and Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sectors; (2) establish an ``incentive buffer'' that would allow the
annual Chinook salmon PSC limit for the Trawl C/P and Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sectors to vary depending on the amount of Chinook salmon
PSC taken by those sectors in the previous year; (3) establish a
seasonal limit on the amount of Chinook salmon PSC that could be taken
in the Trawl C/P Sector prior to June 1 of each year; (4) allow the
reallocation of unused Chinook salmon PSC from the Rockfish Program CV
Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector on October 1 and November
15 of each year; and (5) establish salmon retention requirements to
ensure adequate accounting of Chinook salmon PSC, and to improve the
collection of biological samples that could aid in the determination of
stock of origin of Chinook salmon PSC in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries. A description of and rationale for these proposed measures
are provided in the following paragraphs.
Chinook Salmon PSC Limits
This proposed rule would implement a long-term average annual
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 7,500 Chinook salmon for non-pollock trawl
fisheries in the Central and Western GOA. The proposed rule would
implement the long-term average annual limit by establishing three
separate Chinook salmon PSC limits for the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program
CV, and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors. During the first year of
implementation, this proposed rule would establish an annual Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 3,600 Chinook salmon for the Trawl C/P Sector,
1,200 Chinook salmon for the Rockfish Program CV Sector, and 2,700
Chinook salmon for the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector. The total
Chinook salmon PSC limit in the first year of implementation for all
three sectors would be 7,500 Chinook salmon. Under the proposed action,
if a sector reaches, or is projected to reach, its Chinook salmon PSC
limit, NMFS would close directed fishing for all non-pollock trawl
fisheries for vessels in that sector for the remainder of the calendar
year. Each sector would be subject to its own annual Chinook salmon PSC
limit, and NMFS would manage each sector separately.
The Council recommended the proposed long-term average annual limit
after considering a range of PSC limits to minimize Chinook salmon
bycatch to the extent practicable while preserving the potential for
the full harvest of non-pollock groundfish TACs. The Council's
selection of this long-term average limit also reflects the trade-offs
between Chinook salmon saved and the forgone non-pollock catch for the
range of PSC limits. Section 4.4.9 of the Analysis shows that Western
and Central GOA non-pollock trawl fisheries averaged approximately
6,000 Chinook salmon per year between 2003 and 2011, but that actual
annual PSC varies widely (a high of 10,877 in 2003 and a low of 3,060
in 2006). According to the Analysis (section 2.5), the non-pollock
trawl fisheries would have been constrained in two out of nine years
between 2003 and 2011 if the proposed Chinook salmon PSC limit of 7,500
had been in place, but these closures would have resulted in 40% less
Chinook salmon PSC being taken in these fisheries (see the Analysis,
Table 4-69).
The Council considered alternatives that would have established a
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 5,000, 10,000 and 12,500 in the non-pollock
trawl fishery in the Central and Western GOA. The Council and NMFS
recognize that the Chinook salmon PSC limit of 7,500 proposed in this
action could constrain groundfish harvests and impose costs on non-
pollock trawl fishery participants (see Section 4.9 of the Analysis).
However, based on a review of past fishery performance provided in
Sections 4.7 and 4.9 of the Analysis, the Council determined and NMFS
agrees that a Chinook salmon PSC limit less than 7,500 would result in
considerable amounts of foregone harvest in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries, and relatively high costs (in terms of foregone revenue) per
salmon saved. A Chinook salmon PSC limit lower than 7,500 would be
expected to impose greater costs and burdens on participants in the
non-pollock trawl fisheries in future years by constraining fishing to
a greater degree than the PSC limit proposed in this action. Using the
2003 to 2011 period, the non-pollock trawl fisheries would have been
constrained in six of these years under a 5,000 Chinook salmon PSC
limit. Given the considerable costs per salmon saved at PSC limits less
than 7,500 and the uncertainty over the added benefits to individual
Chinook stocks with such limits, the Council determined and NMFS agrees
that a Chinook salmon PSC limit lower than 7,500 would burden fishery
participants to a greater extent than the proposed
[[Page 35978]]
limit, and is not considered practicable for minimizing Chinook salmon
bycatch because it would be unnecessarily constraining to the non-
pollock fisheries. The Analysis at section 2.5 also shows that non-
pollock trawl fisheries would have been constrained in only one year
between 2003 and 2011 with an average annual PSC limit equal to or
greater than 10,000 Chinook salmon. While a PSC limit of 10,000 Chinook
salmon would have resulted in approximately 17 percent less Chinook
salmon PSC using the 2003 to 2011 time period, the Council determined,
and NMFS agrees, that a 17 percent savings of Chinook salmon PSC
(approximately 1,000 Chinook salmon) was inadequate savings of Chinook
salmon considering the importance of salmon to target fisheries and
conservation needs and would not minimize Chinook salmon bycatch to the
extent practicable.
After selecting the long-term average annual Chinook salmon PSC
limit of 7,500, the Council recommended that the average annual PSC
limit be implemented by establishing separate Chinook salmon PSC limits
for the Trawl C/P, the Rockfish Program CV, and the Non-Rockfish
Program CV sectors. The Council and NMFS recommend allocating Chinook
salmon PSC to the Trawl C/P, Rockfish Program CV, and Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sectors in recognition of the specific groundfish fisheries,
and patterns of Chinook salmon PSC use by these sectors as described in
the ``Non-Pollock Trawl Fisheries in the Central and Western GOA'' and
``Chinook Salmon PSC in the Non-Pollock Trawl Fisheries'' sections of
this preamble and detailed in Section 4.4 of the Analysis. As explained
earlier in this preamble and in the Analysis, each of these three
sectors participates in different groundfish fisheries, and is subject
to different management measures that allow these three sectors to
respond differently to the Chinook salmon PSC limits being proposed in
this action. The following description provides the rationale for the
specific Chinook salmon PSC limits selected and the potential effects
based on a review of historic and recent trends of groundfish harvests
and Chinook salmon PSC use. In determining the specific Chinook salmon
PSC limit that each sector would receive, the Council recommended that
the average annual PSC limit be apportioned between the catcher
processor fleet (i.e., the Trawl C/P Sector) and the catcher vessel
fleet (i.e., the Rockfish Program CV Sector and the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector combined) based on each fleet's five-year historic
average percentage of Chinook salmon bycatch. From 2007 to 2011, the
catcher processor fleet's average use of Chinook salmon represented 48%
of the total average use of Chinook salmon bycatch in the non-pollock
trawl fisheries. During this same period, the catcher vessel fleet's
average use of Chinook salmon represented 52 percent of the total
average use of Chinook salmon bycatch in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries. Applying these percentages to the PSC limit of 7,500, the
Council recommended a Chinook salmon PSC limit of 3,600 Chinook salmon
for the catcher processor fleet (i.e. the Trawl C/P Sector) and a
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 3,900 Chinook salmon for the catcher vessel
fleet (i.e. the Rockfish Program CV Sector and the Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sector combined). The Council determined, and NMFS agrees, that the
five-year historic average best captures the time period that is most
reflective of the current management regime in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries of the Western and Central GOA. The period encompasses the
time in which the Central GOA Rockfish Program and Amendment 80 were
implemented.
The Council determined and NMFS agrees that the 3,600 Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the Trawl C/P Sector is appropriate because the
sector's groundfish harvests are tightly constrained by sideboard
measures, informal cooperative arrangements that exist within the Trawl
C/P Sector can provide the necessary communication for avoiding Chinook
salmon PSC, and regulations applicable to trawl C/Ps operating in the
Central GOA Rockfish Program allow those trawl C/Ps to better
coordinate activities and take actions to reduce Chinook salmon PSC.
Collectively, these conditions are expected to minimize the sector's
Chinook salmon PSC to the extent practicable while providing an
opportunity to harvest groundfish in the GOA. The proposed Chinook
salmon PSC limit of 3,600 salmon is approximately 14 percent greater
than the average amount of Chinook salmon PSC that has been used in
Trawl C/P Sector (3,105 salmon) from 2007 (the first year that the
Central GOA Rockfish Program) through 2011 (the most recent year for
which complete data was available at the time the Council took final
action on Amendment 97). Based on a review provided in Section 4.4 of
the Analysis, the proposed 3,600 Chinook salmon PSC limit would have
been constraining in one out of five years during the 2007 through 2011
period analyzed. The 3,600 Chinook salmon PSC limit also would be
slightly higher than the sector's average Chinook salmon PSC use (3,143
salmon) from 2007, the first year that all three sectors could be
defined, through 2013, the most recent year for which data are
available (see Table 1 of this preamble). The Council and NMFS
anticipate that, given the existing management structure of the Trawl
C/P Sector and the ability of the Trawl C/P Sector to coordinate
fishing activities in the GOA, the Trawl C/P Sector is likely to be
able to harvest non-pollock groundfish in the Central and Western GOA
in most years without being constrained by the Chinook salmon PSC limit
of 3,600 salmon.
After recommending a Chinook salmon PSC limit of 3,900 for the
catcher vessel fleet (i.e., the Rockfish Program CV Sector and the Non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector combined), the Council then determined that
this PSC limit should be further apportioned and recommended that 1,200
Chinook salmon be apportioned to the Rockfish Program CV Sector and the
remainder (2,700 Chinook salmon) be apportioned to the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector. The Council recognized that vessels within the Non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector could have unpredictable high PSC events
during the spring, prior to the May opening of the Central GOA Rockfish
Program, which could preclude or severely curtail the Central GOA
Rockfish Program's season, thereby eliminating an opportunity to
prosecute a valuable fishery in which the prospects for effective PSC
avoidance are promising. The Council determined, and NMFS agrees, that
a separate Chinook salmon PSC limit for the Rockfish Program CV Sector
is appropriate because a separate allocation would preserve important
and valuable fishing opportunities in the Rockfish Program. In
determining the Chinook salmon PSC limit for the Rockfish Program CV
Sector, the Council considered the sector's annual average Chinook
salmon PSC from 2007 through 2011 of approximately 800 Chinook salmon
per year, as well as annual Chinook salmon PSC, which exceeded 1,200
Chinook salmon in one year (2008) during this period. The Council
determined, and NMFS agrees, that a Chinook salmon PSC limit of 1,200
for the Rockfish Program CV Sector is appropriate because (1) it should
provide the greatest assurance that the Central GOA Rockfish Program
quota can be fully harvested given the sector's average annual use, (2)
the sector is managed through cooperatives that have additional tools
available to aid in mitigating Chinook salmon PSC
[[Page 35979]]
encounters, and (3) the one year in which the sector's PSC use exceeded
the proposed limit, cooperative fishing under the Central GOA Rockfish
Program was new and management priorities emphasized halibut avoidance.
The Chinook salmon PSC limit of 1,200 salmon is approximately 29
percent greater than the average amount of Chinook salmon PSC that has
been used in Rockfish Program CV Sector (847 salmon) during a
representative five-year period analyzed by the Council and NMFS from
2007 through 2011. Based on a review provided in Sections 4.7 and 4.9
of the Analysis, the 1,200 Chinook salmon PSC limit would have been
constraining in one out of five years during the 2007 through 2011
period analyzed. The 1,200 Chinook salmon PSC limit is also greater
than the sector's average Chinook salmon PSC use (903 salmon) from 2007
through 2013 (see Table 1 of this preamble). The Council and NMFS
anticipate that given the existing management structure of the Rockfish
Program CV Sector, the sector is likely to be able to harvest
groundfish fisheries in the Central and Western GOA in most years
without being constrained by the Chinook salmon PSC limit of 1,200
salmon. The Council also determined, and NMFS agrees, that the
apportionment to the sector is appropriate because although the
allocation is larger than the sector's average annual use, the sector
has an incentive to minimize its use of Chinook salmon PSC. This
proposed action also includes a provision that would allow NMFS to
reallocate unused Chinook salmon PSC from the Rockfish Program CV
Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector on October 1 and November
15 of each year as described later in this preamble. This provision
would ensure that unused amounts of the Chinook salmon PSC limit
allocated to the Rockfish Program CV Sector would be made available to
catcher vessels that may still be fishing in the Non-Rockfish Program
CV Sector towards the end of the fishing year. On average, 87 percent
of the CVs that are active in the Rockfish Program CV Sector
participate in the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector for fall non-pollock
trawl fisheries. Therefore, the Council determined and NMFS agrees that
participants in the Rockfish Program CV Sector would have ample
incentive to minimize Chinook salmon PSC within that sector in order to
maximize the amount of Chinook salmon PSC available to prosecute
important fall fisheries, such as fall Pacific cod and flatfish
fisheries.
The Rockfish Program CV Sector Chinook salmon PSC limit would apply
to trawl catcher vessels that are checked in and fishing under the
authority of a Rockfish Program CQ Permit (see regulations at Sec.
679.5(r)(8)). Trawl catcher vessels that are not checked in and fishing
under the authority of a Rockfish Program CQ Permit would be in the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector. Under the proposed action, a trawl CV
vessel could operate in both the Rockfish Program CV Sector and the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector during the course of a fishing year, but
would only be in one or the other sector at any given time during a
fishing year depending on whether the vessel was checked in and fishing
under the authority of a Rockfish Program CQ Permit.
The proposed Chinook salmon PSC limit for the Rockfish Program CV
Sector would not be further allocated among the specific cooperatives
within the sector. The Council did not recommend that the 1,200 Chinook
salmon PSC limit be further apportioned among fishery cooperatives in
the Rockfish Program CV Sector because allocating the Chinook salmon
PSC limit among cooperatives would result in relatively small
allocations among the cooperatives that could unnecessarily constrain
non-pollock harvests by the cooperatives. Chinook salmon PSC varies
from year to year and that variability could limit the ability of a
cooperative to predict and undertake fishing operations in a way that
could ensure the cooperative would maintain catch below its Chinook
salmon PSC limit. A cooperative-specific Chinook salmon PSC limit would
be expected to increase the administrative burden and costs to
establish cooperative-specific allocations, particularly if
cooperative-specific Chinook salmon PSC limits could be traded among
cooperatives. The Council determined and NMFS agrees that inter-
cooperative arrangements that exist among the Rockfish Program CV
Sector would be able to provide coordination and communication among
participants, reduce the risk that a specific cooperative would be
constrained within the overall Rockfish Program CV Sector, and would
not impose the additional burdens and costs associated with
cooperative-specific Chinook salmon PSC limits. Sections 4.7.1 and 4.9
of the Analysis provide additional detail on the allocation of the
Chinook salmon PSC limit to the Rockfish Program CV Sector.
The Council and NMFS recommend the 2,700 Chinook salmon PSC limit
for the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector to accommodate groundfish
harvests in most years. Unlike the Trawl C/P and Rockfish Program CV
Sectors, the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector is not circumscribed by
sideboard regulations, governed by informal cooperative arrangements,
or managed under a catch share program that allows the sector to
optimize the use of its Chinook salmon PSC as it participates in non-
pollock trawl fisheries. The Council considered these factors when
establishing the proposed Chinook salmon PSC limit. The proposed
Chinook salmon PSC limit of 2,700 salmon is approximately 8 percent
greater than the average amount of Chinook salmon PSC that has been
used in Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector (2,489 salmon) during a
representative five-year period analyzed by the Council and NMFS from
2007 through 2011. Based on a review provided in Sections 4.7 and 4.9
of the Analysis, the 2,700 Chinook salmon PSC limit would have been
constraining in two out of five years during the 2007 through 2011
period analyzed. The proposed 2,700 Chinook salmon PSC limit is also
slightly greater than the sector's average Chinook salmon PSC use
(2,562 salmon) from 2007 through 2013 (see Table 1 of this preamble).
This proposed action also includes a provision that would allow NMFS to
reallocate unused Chinook salmon PSC from the Rockfish Program CV
Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector on October 1 and November
15 of each year as described later in this preamble. This provision
would be likely to provide additional Chinook salmon PSC to the Non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector in most years (see Section 4.9 of the
Analysis for additional detail).
As previously discussed, the Council considered establishing
Chinook salmon PSC limits that would have provided a single Chinook
salmon PSC limit for all non-pollock trawl fisheries, as well as a
single Chinook salmon PSC limit for trawl C/Ps and trawl CVs
participating in the Central GOA Rockfish Program. The Council
considered alternatives for Chinook salmon PSC limits for each of the
three sectors that would, on average, result in Chinook salmon PSC
limits ranging from 5,000 salmon to 12,500 salmon annually in the
Central and Western GOA. The Council considered a range of methods for
defining and allocating the Chinook PSC between the three sectors using
average Chinook salmon PSC use by each sector over five-year and ten-
year periods. Finally, the Council considered alternatives to allocate
separate Central GOA and Western GOA Chinook salmon PSC limits for each
sector.
[[Page 35980]]
The Council considered but did not select alternatives that would
have assigned a single Chinook salmon PSC limit to all fisheries
because such an allocation would not recognize the distinct operational
differences, and differing patterns of Chinook salmon PSC use, among
the three sectors active in the GOA (see Section 4.7 of the Analysis
for additional detail). The Council determined that such an allocation
method would have reduced the incentives for a specific sector to
maintain Chinook salmon PSC use within its historic limits. This could
result in one sector engaging in fishing patterns that lead to
relatively high Chinook salmon PSC which in turn could result in the
closure of non-pollock fisheries to all vessels, including those
vessels that have relatively low Chinook salmon PSC rates. Such a
result would have adverse effects on fishing operations
disproportionate to their actual Chinook salmon PSC use. Additionally,
the Council did not select alternatives that would have assigned a
single Chinook salmon PSC limit to the trawl CV and trawl C/P vessels
participating in the Central GOA Rockfish Program. The Council
determined that such an allocation did not appear to be consistent with
the operations of trawl C/P vessels and the stated desire by
representatives of trawl C/P vessels to establish a single Chinook
salmon PSC limit applicable to all trawl C/Ps.
As previously discussed, the Council considered but did not select
Chinook salmon PSC limits that that would have established Chinook
salmon PSC limits greater than 7,500 salmon (10,000 and 12,500 salmon)
in the non-pollock trawl fisheries of the Central and Western GOA. The
Council reviewed these limits and determined that although they would
establish Chinook salmon PSC limits and constrain total Chinook salmon
PSC, they would not have minimized bycatch of Chinook salmon to the
extent practicable. The Council determined and NMFS agrees that Chinook
salmon PSC limits higher than 7,500 would result in a greater potential
for increased use of Chinook salmon PSC. The Council and NMFS consider
the proposed Chinook salmon PSC limit of 7,500 to appropriately balance
the goals of minimizing bycatch to the extent practicable while
providing harvest opportunities among the sectors. The Council and NMFS
reached these conclusions based on a review of the historic and recent
trends in Chinook salmon PSC use, the ability of the Trawl C/P and
Rockfish Program CV Sectors to use their existing management structure
and cooperative arrangements to further minimize bycatch, and incentive
provisions contained within this proposed action would provide
additional harvest flexibility to the Trawl C/P and to a greater
extent, the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector.
Finally, the Council also considered but did not select
alternatives to allocate separate Central GOA and Western GOA Chinook
salmon PSC limits for each sector. As noted in Section 4.7 of the
Analysis, allocating Chinook salmon PSC separately to the Western and
Central GOA, or by sector within the Central and Western GOA, would
have been likely to create small allocations that would have been
limiting to the non-pollock trawl fishery in more years given the
highly variable nature of Chinook salmon PSC rates and use between the
Central and Western GOA. The Council determined that these small, and
likely restrictive allocations would have constrained fishing
operations, without necessarily resulting in practicable minimization
of Chinook salmon bycatch. These small restrictions also would be
challenging for NMFS to adequately monitor and administer to ensure
that these relatively small Chinook salmon PSC limits could not be
exceeded.
Incentive Buffer
This proposed rule would allow the annual Chinook salmon PSC limit
for the Trawl C/P and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors to vary depending
on the amount of Chinook salmon PSC taken by those sectors in the
previous year. This proposed provision is termed an ``incentive
buffer'' because it would provide an incentive for participants in the
Trawl C/P and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors to minimize PSC below
their allocations, 3,600 and 2,700 Chinook salmon respectively, each
year in order to receive additional Chinook salmon PSC in the following
year. It is important to note that the proposed incentive buffer would
not result in the total available Chinook salmon PSC limit in the non-
pollock trawl fisheries to exceed 7,500 salmon over the long term
annual average.
Under the proposed incentive buffer, a sector that uses less than
or equal to its proportional share of 6,500 Chinook salmon in one year
would be able to access its base PSC limit plus its proportional share
of 1,000 additional Chinook salmon in the following year. To
illustrate, the proposed base Chinook salmon PSC limit for the Trawl C/
P Sector is 3,600 (48 percent of the average annual Chinook salmon PSC
limit of 7,500) and this limit would be available to the Trawl C/P
Sector during the first year of Amendment 97 if approved. If, during
the first year, the Trawl C/P Sector was able to maintain its use of
Chinook salmon PSC to no more than 3,120 salmon (48 percent of 6,500
Chinook salmon), the incentive buffer would apply to the sector in the
following year. In the following year, the Trawl C/P Sector would
receive a Chinook salmon PSC limit of 4,080 Chinook salmon, which
represents the sum of the sector's base PSC limit (3,600) and its
proportional share (48 percent) of 1,000 (480). If, during the first
year, the Trawl C/P Sector's Chinook salmon use exceeds 3,120 Chinook
salmon, then the incentive buffer would not apply to the sector and its
Chinook salmon PSC limit in the following year would be set at its base
PSC limit of 3,600 Chinook salmon. Similarly, the proposed base PSC
limit for the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector is 2,700 (36 percent of
the proposed Chinook salmon limit of 7,500) and this limit would be
available to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector during the first year
of Amendment 97 if approved. If, during the first year, the Non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector was able to maintain its use of Chinook
salmon PSC to no more than 2,340 salmon (36 percent of 6,500 Chinook
salmon), the incentive buffer would apply to the sector in the
following year. In the following year, the Non-Rockfish Program CV
Sector would receive a Chinook salmon PSC limit of 3,060 salmon, which
represents the sum of the sector's base PSC limit (2,700) and its
proportional share (36 percent) of 1,000 (360). If, during the first
year, the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector's Chinook salmon use exceeds
2,340 Chinook salmon, then the incentive buffer would not apply to the
sector and its Chinook salmon PSC limit in the following year would be
set at its base PSC limit of 2,700 salmon.
The Council believes and NMFS agrees that this mechanism would act
as an incentive for these sectors to keep Chinook salmon bycatch well
below each sector's base PSC limit in most years, in order to provide
each sector with a slightly higher Chinook salmon PSC limit that may be
needed in an unusual year of Chinook salmon migration patterns or
unanticipated higher abundance that may make it difficult to avoid
Chinook salmon PSC. The specific buffers selected would provide
approximately 12 percent more Chinook salmon PSC for the Trawl C/P and
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors in a year if the Chinook salmon use for
that sector was maintained at an amount approximately 12 percent below
the
[[Page 35981]]
Chinook salmon PSC limits initially established for those sectors. The
amount of the proposed incentive buffer is intended to provide some
additional flexibility, but not so large an increase in a sector's
Chinook salmon PSC limit from year-to-year as to result in highly
variable or substantial increases in Chinook salmon PSC.
This proposed action would not apply an incentive buffer to the
Rockfish Program CV Sector. As noted in the previous section of this
preamble, the Chinook Salmon PSC limit for the Rockfish Program CV
Sector is thought to be sufficient to support the Rockfish Program CV
Sector in most years. In addition, any unused Chinook salmon PSC from
the Rockfish Program CV Sector would be reallocated to the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector in the fall of each year as described later in this
preamble. Establishing an incentive buffer for the Rockfish Program CV
Sector and allowing a reallocation of unused Chinook salmon PSC would
be administratively burdensome and was determined by the Council and
NMFS as unnecessary to provide flexibility to the Rockfish Program CV
Sector (see Section 4.9 of the Analysis for additional detail).
Seasonal Allocation of the Chinook Salmon PSC Limit for Trawl Catcher/
Processors
This proposed rule would establish a seasonal limit on the maximum
amount of Chinook salmon PSC that could be used by the Trawl C/P Sector
prior to June 1 of each year. Each year, the Trawl C/P Sector would be
limited to using no more than 66 percent of its annual Chinook salmon
PSC limit prior to June 1. If NMFS determined that the Trawl C/P
Sector's seasonal Chinook PSC limit would not be exceeded, no action
would be necessary. If, prior to June 1, NMFS determines that the Trawl
C/P Sector would catch the seasonal allocation of the sector's Chinook
salmon PSC limit prior to June 1, NMFS would prohibit directed fishing
for non-pollock fisheries by the Trawl C/P Sector until June 1. NMFS
would determine the amount of the sector's annual limit that remains
available for use and directed fishing for non-pollock fisheries would
be open for the Trawl C/P Sector on June 1, provided there is adequate
Chinook salmon PSC to allow the Trawl C/P Sector to fish and not exceed
its annual Chinook salmon PSC limit. No additional notice to re-open
the groundfish fishery for non-pollock trawl C/Ps would be necessary,
because proposed regulations at Sec. 679.21(i)(3)(ii) state the date
(June 1), that defines the end and start of the Trawl C/P Sector's
seasonal Chinook PSC limits.
NMFS, as part of the implementation of this action, would establish
Chinook salmon PSC accounts for the non-pollock trawl groundfish
fishery in the NMFS regional catch accounting system (CAS). NMFS also
would develop publically-available reports about the catch of Chinook
in the non-pollock groundfish fishery (at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov), including annual PSC limits, current catch,
and remaining limits. These reports, which would be an extension of
existing NMFS reports about current and historic groundfish and PSC
catch in the GOA, would include a Chinook PSC category for the non-
pollock Trawl C/P Sector as defined at Sec. 679.21(i)(2)(ii). The
agency would add the residual January 1 to June 1 Chinook salmon PSC
limit to the June 1 to December 31 Chinook salmon PSC limit. This
information would be publically available from the non-pollock Chinook
PSC limit report.
Because the seasonal limit would be set at 66 percent of the annual
Chinook salmon PSC limit, the specific amount could vary depending on
whether or not the Trawl C/P Sector receives an incentive buffer for a
year. During the first year of implementation, the Trawl C/P Sector
would be allocated a seasonal Chinook salmon PSC limit of 2,376 Chinook
salmon for use prior to June 1 (i.e., 66 percent of the 3,600 Chinook
salmon PSC annual limit). During the second year, the seasonal Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the Trawl C/P Sector prior to June 1 would be set
at 2,376 Chinook salmon if the Trawl C/P Sector did not receive the
incentive buffer, or would be set at 2,693 Chinook salmon (i.e., 66
percent of the 4,080 Chinook salmon PSC annual limit) if the sector
received the incentive buffer.
This proposed action would establish a seasonal allocation to the
Trawl C/P Sector to reduce the potential for a disproportionate amount
of the Chinook salmon PSC limit being used early in the year which
could result in non-pollock harvest restrictions to Trawl C/P Sector
participants later in the year. Section 4.7.1 of the Analysis contains
data showing that the Trawl C/P Sector typically uses approximately 70
percent of its Chinook salmon PSC before June 1. The Council determined
and NMFS agrees that the proposed 66 percent allocation prior to June 1
is an appropriate limitation to allow the Trawl C/P Sector to prosecute
non-pollock trawl fisheries consistent with historic use of Chinook
salmon PSC, while also ensuring that some portion of the PSC is
available to support other non-pollock trawl fisheries, specifically
the rockfish fisheries that typically are harvested after June 1. Many
of the vessels in the Trawl C/P Sector participate in Central GOA
Rockfish Program fisheries that open on May 1 of each year. However,
trawl C/Ps fishing in the Central GOA Rockfish Program typically start
to fish after June 1. The Council and NMFS propose June 1 as the end
date of the seasonal allocation to ensure that sufficient Chinook
salmon PSC will be left for the Trawl C/P Sector to participate in the
Central GOA Rockfish Program, as well as to support other non-pollock
trawl fisheries occurring later in the year. The Council and NMFS also
considered recommendations provided to the Council from participants in
the Trawl C/P Sector that a seasonal limit of Chinook salmon PSC would
help ensure that participants in the Trawl C/P Sector monitor catch
early in the year to ensure adequate Chinook salmon PSC remains later
in the year. The Council considered but did not select a PSC limit for
the trawl C/Ps of 50 percent of the annual limit, choosing the higher
percentage based on supportive testimony of the trawl C/P
representatives for applying 66 percent of the annual PSC limit.
Additionally, the proposed seasonal apportionment would exceed the
Trawl C/P Sector's annual average use of Chinook salmon PSC prior to
June 1 by the Trawl C/P Sector from 2008 to 2012 of 2,057 Chinook
salmon. NMFS determined that the annual average of 2,376 Chinook salmon
or 66 percent of the annual PSC limit, represents a compromise between
providing the long-term average catch for the Trawl C/P Sector of 71%
or 2,564 fish.
The Council and NMFS considered but did not select alternatives
that would have established seasonal allocations to the Rockfish
Program CV and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors. These alternatives were
not selected because Section 4.7.1 of the Analysis indicates that the
Rockfish Program CV and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors typically have
a more even distribution of Chinook salmon PSC use throughout the year.
Therefore, the Council determined and NMFS agrees that it would not be
necessary to constrain Chinook salmon PSC early in the year to ensure
adequate Chinook salmon PSC remains later in the year.
Reallocation of Unused Chinook Salmon PSC From the Rockfish Program CV
Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
As noted earlier in this preamble, it is likely that the proposed
Chinook salmon PSC limit for the Rockfish
[[Page 35982]]
Program CV Sector would not constrain the sector's non-pollock harvests
in most years. In contrast, the proposed Chinook salmon PSC limit of
2,700 for the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector would have constrained the
sector's non-pollock harvests during three of the seven years between
2007 and 2013 (see Table 1 and Section 4.7.1 in the Analysis) had the
proposed PSC limit been in place. This proposed action would provide
the opportunity for reallocations of unused Chinook salmon PSC to the
Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector at two periods during the year. Under
this proposed action, NMFS would reallocate all but 150 of the salmon
that remain of the unused Chinook salmon PSC limit in the Rockfish
Program CV Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector on October 1.
Depending on the amount reallocated, the additional Chinook salmon
could allow Non-Rockfish Program CVs to continue fishing for an
extended period of time if the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector would
have otherwise been constrained by its Chinook salmon PSC limit of
2,700 Chinook salmon. The Council selected this alternative to provide
additional Chinook salmon PSC to address unanticipated events of high
PSC encounters, for which the Non-Rockfish Program CVs would generally
be unable to mitigate before reaching their PSC limit. The Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector does not operate under authority of the Rockfish
Program and is not as likely to be able to voluntarily control or
organize fleet behavior to adjust fishing patterns for avoiding Chinook
salmon PSC.
The Council selected October 1 for reallocating Chinook salmon PSC
to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector because of the timing and the
value of the Pacific cod fall season fishery to the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector. In some years, the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
has high Chinook salmon PSC prior to May 1, which would reduce the
amount of Chinook salmon PSC limit available from September through
November, when most CVs have checked out of the Rockfish Program CR
fishery. Also, the Council determined that by establishing a fixed
annual date to reallocate unused Chinook salmon PSC, participants in
the Rockfish Program CV Sector would have certainty regarding the
timing of each reallocation, and would be able to focus on more
important coordination of cooperative measures such as avoidance of
Chinook salmon PSC.
The Council and NMFS recommended retaining a balance of 150 Chinook
salmon for the Rockfish Program CV Sector on October 1 after
considering the catch of Chinook salmon by Rockfish Program CVs after
October 1. Based on the first seven years of the Central GOA Rockfish
Program (2007 through 2013), 150 Chinook salmon would have been
sufficient to support the sector's activity from October 1 through
November 15, the last date that fishing is permitted under the Central
GOA Rockfish Program (see Section 4.9 of the Analysis for additional
information). Although 150 Chinook salmon may be more than the sector
would need in most years, the Council determined and NMFS agrees that
changing trends in Chinook salmon PSC use or groundfish fishing
patterns could increase the demand for Chinook salmon PSC in this
sector. Additionally, while the number of Rockfish Program CVs
operating after October 1 is usually small, managing that fishery with
less than 150 Chinook salmon PSC could close the sector. NMFS
determined that the agency may be unable to open the directed fisheries
for the Rockfish Program CV Sector if the post-reallocation Chinook
salmon PSC for the Sector is set at less than 150 fish, particularly if
the number of participating Rockfish Program CVs is uncertain or
anticipated to increase beyond historical numbers.
This proposed rule would provide a final reallocation of any unused
Chinook salmon PSC from the Rockfish Program CV Sector to the Non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector on November 15. The Central GOA Rockfish
Program closes by regulation on November 15. This final reallocation
could provide some additional harvest opportunity to the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector, depending on the amount reallocated, from November
15 through the end of the year (December 31). Reallocations to the non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector, would not change (add to or subtract from)
the incentive buffers proposed at Sec. 679.21(i)(3)(i)(A) and
(i)(3)(i)(C). Section 4.9 of the Analysis provides additional detail on
the reallocation of Chinook salmon PSC.
Salmon Retention and the Prohibited Species Donation Program
This proposed rule would establish salmon retention requirements
for the non-pollock trawl sectors, and would establish and modify
existing salmon retention requirements for shoreside processors and
stationary floating processors (SFPs) receiving non-pollock and pollock
deliveries. To implement these proposed provisions, trawl CVs and
tender vessels, shoreside processors or SFPs, and trawl C/Ps would each
be subject to different salmon retention requirements.
This proposed action would require the operators of all CVs (i.e.,
the Rockfish Program CV and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors) and tender
vessels to retain all salmon caught in the non-pollock trawl fisheries
in the Western and Central GOA until those salmon are offloaded to a
shoreside processor or SFP. This proposed action would also require
shoreside processors and SFPs receiving non-pollock deliveries to
retain all salmon until the number of salmon by species has been
accurately recorded in the eLandings groundfish landing report. The
combination of these two retention requirements will enable accurate
reporting of salmon in eLandings at the processor. Salmon accounting at
a processor may assist the industry in tracking and cooperatively
managing its Chinook salmon PSC. At this time, observers are not
available to collect data from salmon delivered with non-pollock
groundfish to shoreside processors or SFPs. However, scientific data
from salmon delivered with non-pollock groundfish to processors may be
collected opportunistically for further study to assist with scientific
research on the origin of salmon in the Western and Central GOA non-
pollock trawl fisheries.
This proposed action would require the operators of vessels in the
Trawl C/P Sector to retain all salmon until an observer has had the
opportunity to collect scientific data or biological samples, and the
number of salmon by species has been accurately recorded in the
eLandings At-sea production report. This proposed requirement
emphasizes the responsibility for an operator of a C/P to accommodate
observer sampling tasks prior to discard. Data collected from observers
onboard C/Ps would be used for stock of origin determinations (see
Section 3.3.3 of the Analysis for additional detail on stock of origin
sampling).
The salmon retention requirements in this proposed rule are
intended to enable the collection of salmon genetic data in the non-
pollock trawl fisheries and facilitate reporting of salmon bycatch at
the processor. The proposed retention requirements for salmon in the
non-pollock trawl fisheries would not modify the observer duties or the
method by which NMFS calculates fleet-wide Chinook salmon PSC
estimates. NMFS would continue to calculate Chinook salmon PSC numbers,
and would manage PSC limits for Chinook salmon, using the existing
system of extrapolating catch rates from observed vessels to the
unobserved portion of the non-pollock trawl fleet (see Section 5.2.2 of
the Analysis for
[[Page 35983]]
additional detail on determining Chinook salmon PSC use).
This proposed action would also amend regulations at Sec.
679.21(h)(4) and (h)(5) governing salmon retention and discards for
vessels directed fishing for pollock with trawl gear in the Western and
Central GOA, and tender vessels, and processors taking deliveries from
these vessels. The proposed changes are intended to clarify
responsibilities and to avoid confusion, and to be consistent with the
organization of salmon retention and discard regulations for the non-
pollock trawl fisheries. The requirements for CVs and tender vessels in
the pollock fishery are unchanged from the current retention
requirements. Many of the CVs that participate in the non-pollock trawl
fisheries also participate in the GOA directed pollock fishery. Current
regulations at Sec. 679.21(h)(4) combine requirements for vessel
operators and processing operations. These combined requirements have
caused some confusion for vessel operators delivering groundfish with
regard to the responsibilities that apply to them versus the
responsibilities that apply to shoreside processors and SFPs. Vessel
operators are required only to deliver all salmon to a processor,
however processors must accommodate provisions for observer sampling at
the processing facility. Because NMFS has been informed by industry
that these regulations are confusing, the proposed action would
separate the responsibilities for vessel operators and processors in
the pollock trawl fisheries to provide greater clarity.
The proposed rule also would separate the requirement for a
processor to retain salmon until an observer has the opportunity to
count the number of salmon, from the requirement to retain salmon until
the shoreside processor or SFP has recorded the number of salmon by
species in the eLandings groundfish landing report. The proposed
organization of the retention requirements would apply to vessels
directed fishing for pollock with trawl gear in the Western and Central
GOA, and the tender vessels and processors taking deliveries from these
vessels.
Salmon retained under this proposed action could not be kept for
sale or personal use, and must be discarded or donated to the PSD
program. Once salmon are counted and sampled at the processing plant,
they may be donated to the PSD program, or they must be discarded. A
list of participants in the salmon PSD program in the GOA is available
from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/ram/psd.htm. Currently, the PSD program is
available to participants in pollock and non-pollock groundfish
fisheries. This proposed rule continues to provide the opportunity for
non-pollock and pollock trawl fisheries to participate in the PSD
program. See Section 2.3 of the Analysis for additional detail on the
PSD program.
Implementation
The Council recommended that NMFS implement the proposed PSC limits
by the start of the 2015 non-pollock trawl fishery (January 20, 2015).
NMFS advised the Council that any new annual PSC accounting should be
in place prior to January 20, 2015, for NMFS to apply annual catch
accounting of Chinook salmon PSC to all sectors impacted by this
action.
NMFS will publish the annual Chinook salmon PSC limits for the Non-
Rockfish Program CV Sector, and Trawl C/P Sector in the proposed
groundfish harvest specifications for the GOA after determining the
amounts of Chinook salmon PSC used and whether the incentive buffer
applies. If the incentive buffer thresholds for the Non-Rockfish
Program CV or Trawl C/P Sectors at Sec. 679.21(i)(3)(i)(A) and
(i)(3)(i)(C) have been exceeded prior to publishing the proposed
groundfish harvest specifications for the GOA, NMFS would propose the
Chinook salmon PSC limits that will be available to each sector for the
following year. If the incentive buffer thresholds have not been
exceeded prior to publishing the proposed groundfish harvest
specifications for the GOA, NMFS would propose Chinook salmon PSC
limits of 3,600 or 4,080 for the Trawl C/P Sector, and 2,700 or 3,060
for the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector and would establish the PSC
limit for each sector in the final specifications.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304(b) and 305(d) of the MSA, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with Amendment 97, other provisions of the MSA, and other
applicable law, subject to further consideration after the public
comment period.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for
this action, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. The IRFA for this proposed rule describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description
of the proposed action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis
for this action are contained earlier in this preamble and are not
repeated here. A summary of the IRFA follows. A copy of the IRFA is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
The entities directly regulated by this proposed action are those
federally permitted or licensed entities that participate in harvesting
groundfish from the Federal or State-managed parallel non-pollock trawl
fisheries of the Western and Central GOA. Fishing vessels are
considered small entities if their total annual gross receipts, from
all their activities combined, are less than $19.0 million. The
analysis identified 70 CVs and C/Ps in 2011 that would be directly
regulated by this action, 18 of which are small entities (all CVs). All
C/Ps are either large entities or are affiliated with at least one of
the following fishing cooperatives, all of which are defined as large
entities: the AFA C/P cooperative for Bering Sea pollock, a Rockfish
Program C/P cooperative in the GOA, an Amendment 80 cooperative, or a
Bering Sea crab cooperative.
Although this action would modify regulations that directly
regulate CVs and processors that participate in harvesting and
processing groundfish from the Federal or State-managed parallel
pollock trawl fisheries of the Western and Central GOA, the actions
proposed are minor clarifications of existing regulatory requirements,
and do not impose new or additional requirements that have not
previously been analyzed and considered in the FRFA prepared for
measures that implemented those requirements (77 FR 42629, July 20,
2012).
Shoreside processors or SFPs receiving groundfish caught by GOA
trawl vessels would be required to retain salmon until the manager has
recorded the number of salmon by species in the eLandings groundfish
landing report (Sec. 679.21(h)(4)(ii)(B) and Sec. 679.21(i)(5)(iii)).
Based on the number of FPPs listed in the GOA and the BSAI (the best
available data for groundfish processors receiving deliveries from
these fisheries), as many as 100 processors receiving landings from
either pollock or non-pollock groundfish trips could be regulated by
this proposed regulation. Of these 100 processors, only 64 are
estimated to be small entities. The estimate of the number of small
entities is based on published data on employment and affiliations of
each company and the address of the processing plant listed in each
FPP. The address, indicating if the processing plant is located in a
[[Page 35984]]
community adjacent to the GOA, is used as a proxy for those processors
that could receive deliveries of groundfish from GOA trawl fisheries. A
seafood processor is considered to be a small entity if it has less
than 500 employees; and that criteria was applied to the processors
holding an FFP. This proposed amendment would have no effect or minimal
effect on small processing entities, because it is clarifying existing
reporting regulations for proper completion of the eLandings groundfish
landing report.
An IRFA requires a description of any significant alternatives to
the proposed action(s) that accomplish the stated objectives, are
consistent with applicable statutes, and that would minimize any
significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. The
preferred alternative chosen by the Council and proposed by NMFS has
several elements: (1) Annual Chinook salmon PSC limits for the Trawl C/
P, Rockfish Program CV, and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors; (2) an
incentive buffer that would allow the annual Chinook salmon PSC limit
for the Trawl C/P and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors to vary depending
on the amount of Chinook salmon PSC taken in those fisheries in the
previous year; (3) a seasonal limit on the amount of Chinook salmon PSC
that could be taken in the Trawl C/P Sector prior to June 1 of each
year; (4) the reallocation of unused Chinook salmon PSC from the
Rockfish Program CV Sector to the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector on
October 1 and November 15 of each year; and (5) retention requirements
to enable accurate reporting, ensure adequate catch accounting of
Chinook salmon PSC, and to improve the collection of biological samples
that could aid in the determination of stock of origin of Chinook
salmon PSC in the non-pollock trawl fisheries.
During consideration of this action, the Council evaluated a number
of alternatives to the preferred alternative, including: (1) No action;
(2) a variety of different allocations of Chinook salmon PSC limits
among the three sectors that were more and less restrictive than the
alternative proposed in the this action; (3) PSC limits split between
the Western and Central GOA; (4) no incentive buffer; (5) no
reallocation between the Rockfish Program CV Sector to the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector; and (6) no change in retention and discard
requirements for all sectors in the Western and Central GOA non-pollock
trawl fisheries. None of these alternatives met both the objectives of
the action, and had a smaller impact on small entities.
The no action alternative would not have limited the Chinook salmon
PSC for the non-pollock trawl fisheries, which would have failed to
meet the principal objective of the proposed action. The GOA-wide
limits of 10,000 and 12,500 would likewise have failed to significantly
control Chinook salmon PSC, and therefore failed to balance the
benefits of the action to the targeted Chinook salmon fisheries with
the needs of non-pollock trawlers. The limit of 5,000 Chinook salmon
would have imposed a greater burden on small entities by resulting in
constraints on non-pollock trawl fishing beyond the preferred
alternative. The Council recommended the preferred alternative because
lower Chinook salmon PSC limits were unnecessarily constraining to the
non-pollock trawl fisheries while larger Chinook salmon PSC limits did
not provide the incentive to minimize Chinook salmon PSC to the extent
practicable.
An alternative that would have assigned 51 percent of the total
Chinook salmon PSC limit to trawl C/Ps and 49 percent to the trawl CVs
was based on the 10-year historical use of PSC from these to
operational types. This alternative was not selected because it did not
reflect fishing conditions representative of the more recent 5-year
historical period that included implementation of the Central GOA
Rockfish Program, and the Amendment 80 Program. The alternative for
lower Chinook salmon PSC limits to trawl CVs from applying the 10-year
historical period of Chinook PSC (mostly small entities that operate in
the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector) would have caused a greater burden
on directly regulated small entities than the preferred alternative.
Dividing the Chinook salmon PSC limits between the Western GOA and
Central GOA was rejected because this allocation method could result in
small annual Chinook PSC limits that would be more likely to constrain
fishing operations, and adversely affect directly regulated small
entities more than the preferred alternative.
The Council and NMFS also considered not implementing an incentive
buffer for the Trawl C/P and Non-Rockfish Program CV Sectors. The
preferred alternative would provide an incentive buffer to directly
regulated small entities in the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector that
would allow for the incentive buffer to apply to this sector's PSC
limit in the following year. Without the incentive buffer, these
operations would not be able to benefit from a higher PSC limit in the
following year, which would result in greater potential for adverse
impacts on directly regulated small entities than the preferred
alternative.
In addition to the no action alternative, the Council considered
two alternatives for reallocation of unused Chinook salmon PSC from the
Rockfish Program CV Sector for use in the Non-Rockfish Program CV
sector. These alternatives include (1) reallocation of all of the
unused Chinook salmon PSC limit except for a range of 104 through 208
salmon by October 1; and (2) reallocating all unused Chinook salmon PSC
limit remaining for the Rockfish Program CV Sector when the Central GOA
Rockfish Program closes by regulation on November 15. The preferred
alternative is a combination of reallocation alternatives that would
allow a reallocation of all but 150 of the Chinook salmon PSC limit
from the Rockfish Program CV Sector by October 1, and the remaining
Rockfish Program CV Chinook salmon PSC limit by November 15.
Alternatives that did not permit a reallocation of Chinook salmon
PSC would not allow unused amounts of the PSC limit to be made
available to the directly regulated small entities in the Non-Rockfish
Program CV Sector after October 1. Alternatives for reallocating
Chinook salmon PSC considered by the Council and NMFS, other than the
preferred alternative lacked the flexibility for all of the available
PSC limit to be reallocated, or in sufficient amounts to prosecute the
Central GOA Rockfish Program fisheries. Without the capability for
reallocating Chinook salmon PSC as provided in this proposed rule,
directly regulated small entities in the Non-Rockfish Program CV Sector
may be subject to more frequent fishery closures.
The proposed action includes establishment of and modifications to
salmon retention and discard requirements for pollock and non-pollock
trawl vessels that would improve the quality of data collected on
Chinook salmon PSC. The proposed salmon retention and discard
requirements for trawl vessels would not be expected to adversely
affect the small entities regulated by this action because they clarify
existing regulatory requirements.
No new recordkeeping and reporting requirements have been
identified for this action.
No duplication, overlap, or conflict between this proposed action
and existing Federal rules has been identified.
[[Page 35985]]
Tribal Consultation
Executive Order (E.O.) 13175 of November 6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450
note), the Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note),
and the American Indian and Alaska Native Policy of the U.S. Department
of Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the responsibilities of NMFS in
matters affecting tribal interests. Section 161 of Public Law 108-199
(188 Stat. 452), as amended by section 518 of Public Law 109-447 (118
Stat. 3267), extends the consultation requirements of E.O. 13175 to
Alaska Native corporations.
NMFS is obligated to consult and coordinate with federally
recognized tribal governments and Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
regional and village corporations on a government-to-government basis
pursuant to E.O. 13175, which establishes several requirements for
NMFS, including (1) to provide regular and meaningful consultation and
collaboration with Indian tribal governments and Alaska Native
corporations in the development of Federal regulatory practices that
significantly or uniquely affect their communities, (2) to reduce the
imposition of unfunded mandates on Indian tribal governments, and (3)
to streamline the applications process for and increase the
availability of waivers to Indian tribal governments. This Executive
Order requires Federal agencies to have an effective process to involve
and consult with representatives of Indian tribal governments in
developing regulatory policies and prohibits regulations that impose
substantial, direct compliance costs on Indian tribal communities.
Due to the expedited time frame of this action, NMFS will mail
letters to all Alaska tribal governments, Alaska Native corporations,
and related organizations when the Notice of Availability for Amendment
97 is published in the Federal Register to notify them of the
opportunity to comment or request a consultation on this action.
Section 5(b)(2)(B) of E.O. 13175 requires NMFS to prepare a tribal
summary impact statement as part of the final rule. This statement must
contain (1) a description of the extent of the agency's prior
consultation with tribal officials, (2) a summary of the nature of
their concerns, (3) the agency's position supporting the need to issue
the regulation, and (4) a statement of the extent to which the concerns
of tribal officials have been met. If the Secretary of Commerce
approves this proposed action, a tribal impact summary statement that
summarizes and responds to issues raised on the proposed action--and
describes the extent to which the concerns of tribal officials have
been met--will be included in the final rule.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This proposed rule contains references to collection-of-information
requirements that have been reviewed and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The collections are listed below by OMB control number.
OMB 0648-0316
The Alaska PSC Program is mentioned in this proposed rule; however,
the public reporting burden for this collection-of-information is not
directly affected by this proposed rule.
OMB 0648-0515
The Alaska Interagency Electronic Report System is mentioned in
this proposed rule; however, the public reporting burden for this
collection-of-information is not directly affected by this proposed
rule.
Send comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of
information to NMFS at the ADDRESSES above, and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202-395-7285. Notwithstanding any
other provision of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor
shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA,
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
control number. All currently approved NOAA collections of information
may be viewed at https://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 18, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
and Pub. L. 108-447.
0
2. In Sec. 679.7, revise paragraph (b)(8) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) Prohibitions specific to salmon discard in the Western and
Central Reporting Areas of the GOA directed fisheries for groundfish.
Fail to comply with any requirements of Sec. Sec. 679.21(h) and
679.21(i).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 679.21,
0
a. Revise paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (h) heading, and (h)(1), (4), and (5);
and
0
b. Add paragraph (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.21 Prohibited species bycatch management.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) After allowing for sampling by an observer, if an observer is
aboard, sort its catch immediately after retrieval of the gear and,
except for salmon prohibited species catch in the BS pollock fisheries
and GOA groundfish fisheries under paragraphs (c), (h), or (i) of this
section, or any prohibited species catch as provided (in permits
issued) under the PSD program at Sec. 679.26, return all prohibited
species, or parts thereof, to the sea immediately, with a minimum of
injury, regardless of its condition.
* * * * *
(h) GOA Chinook Salmon PSC Management for pollock fisheries--(1)
Applicability. Regulations in this paragraph apply to vessels directed
fishing for pollock with trawl gear in the Western and Central
reporting areas of the GOA and processors receiving deliveries from
these vessels.
* * * * *
(4) Salmon retention. (i) The operator of a vessel, including but
not limited to a catcher vessel or tender, must retain all salmon until
offload to a processing facility that takes the delivery.
(ii) The owner and the manager of a shoreside processor or SFP
receiving pollock deliveries must retain all salmon until:
(A) The manager of a shoreside processor or SFP has accurately
recorded the number of salmon by species in the eLandings groundfish
landing report; and
(B) If an observer is present, the observer is provided the
opportunity to count the number of salmon and to collect any scientific
data or biological samples from the salmon.
(5) Salmon discard. Except for salmon under the PSD program at
Sec. 679.26, all
[[Page 35986]]
salmon must be discarded after the requirements at paragraph (h)(4)(ii)
of this section have been met.
* * * * *
(i) GOA Chinook Salmon PSC Management for non-pollock trawl
fisheries--(1) Applicability. Regulations in this paragraph apply to
vessels directed fishing for groundfish species, other than pollock,
with trawl gear in the Western and Central reporting areas of the GOA
and processors receiving deliveries of groundfish, other than pollock,
from catcher vessels.
(2) Non-pollock trawl sectors. The sectors identified in paragraph
(i) of this section are:
(i) Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector. For the purpose of
accounting for the Chinook salmon PSC limit at paragraph (i)(3)(i)(B)
of this section, the Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector is any
catcher vessel fishing for groundfish, other than pollock, with trawl
gear in the Western or Central reporting areas of the GOA and operating
under the authority of a Central GOA Rockfish Program CQ permit
assigned to the catcher vessel sector;
(ii) Trawl catcher/processor Sector. For the purpose of accounting
for the Chinook salmon PSC limits at paragraphs (i)(3)(i)(A) and
(i)(3)(ii) of this section, the Trawl catcher/processor Sector is any
catcher processor vessel fishing for groundfish, other than pollock,
with trawl gear in the Western or Central GOA reporting areas and
processing that groundfish at sea; and
(iii) Non-Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector. For the purpose
of accounting for the Chinook salmon PSC limit at paragraph
(i)(3)(i)(C) of this section, the Non-Rockfish Program catcher vessel
Sector is any catcher vessel fishing for groundfish, other than
pollock, with trawl gear in the Western or Central reporting areas of
the GOA and not operating under the authority of a Central GOA Rockfish
Program CQ permit assigned to the catcher vessel sector.
(3) GOA non-pollock trawl Chinook salmon PSC limits. (i) NMFS
establishes annual Chinook salmon PSC limits in the Central and Western
reporting areas of the GOA for the sectors defined in paragraph (i)(2)
of this section as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless, the use If so, in the
The total Chinook of the Chinook following
salmon PSC limit salmon PSC limit calendar year,
For the following sectors defined at Sec. in each calendar for that sector the Chinook
679.21(i)(2) . . . year is . . . in a calendar salmon PSC limit
year does not for that sector
exceed . . . will be . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Trawl catcher/processor sector..................... 3,600 3,120 4,080
��������������������������������������������������������
(B) Rockfish Program catcher vessel sector............. 1,200 N/A
��������������������������������������������������������
(C) Non-Rockfish Program catcher vessel sector......... 2,700 2,340 3,060
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) For the Trawl catcher/processor Sector defined at Sec.
679.21(i)(2)(ii):
(A) NMFS establishes a seasonal limit within the sector's annual
Chinook salmon PSC limit that is available to the sector prior to June
1. If the Trawl catcher/processor Sector defined at Sec.
679.21(i)(2)(ii) has an annual Chinook salmon PSC limit of 3,600
Chinook salmon, then the sector's seasonal limit prior to June 1 is
2,376 Chinook salmon. If the Trawl catcher/processor Sector defined at
Sec. 679.21(i)(2)(ii) has an annual Chinook salmon PSC limit of 4,080
Chinook salmon, then the sector's seasonal limit prior to June 1 is
2,693 Chinook salmon.
(B) The amount of Chinook salmon PSC available to the Trawl
catcher/processor Sector defined at Sec. 679.21(i)(2) on June 1
through the remainder of the calendar year will be the annual Chinook
salmon PSC limit specified for the Trawl catcher/processor Sector minus
the number of Chinook salmon used by that sector prior to June 1.
(4) Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector reallocation of Chinook
salmon PSC. (i) If, on October 1 of each year, the Regional
Administrator determines that more than 150 Chinook salmon are
available in the Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector Chinook PSC
limit specified at paragraph (i)(3)(i)(B) of this section, the Regional
Administrator will reallocate all Chinook salmon PSC available to the
Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector except for 150 Chinook salmon to
the Non-Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector Chinook salmon PSC limit
specified at paragraph (i)(3)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) On November 15 of each year, the Regional Administrator will
reallocate all of the remaining Chinook salmon available in the
Rockfish Program catcher vessel Sector Chinook PSC limit specified at
paragraph (i)(3)(i)(B) of this section to the Non-Rockfish Program
catcher vessel Sector Chinook PSC limit specified at paragraph
(i)(3)(i)(C) of this section.
(5) Salmon retention. (i) The operator of a catcher vessel or
tender must retain all salmon until offload to a processing facility
that takes the delivery.
(ii) The owner and manager of a shoreside processor or SFP
receiving non-pollock fishery deliveries must retain all salmon until
the number of salmon by species has been accurately recorded in the
eLandings groundfish landing report.
(iii) The operator of a catcher/processor must retain all salmon
until an observer is provided the opportunity to collect scientific
data or biological samples, and the number of salmon by species has
been accurately recorded in the eLandings At-sea production report.
(6) Salmon discard. Except for salmon under the PSD program defined
at Sec. 679.26, all salmon must be discarded after the requirements at
paragraph (i)(5)(ii) or (iii) of this section have been met.
(7) Chinook salmon PSC closures in non-pollock trawl gear
fisheries. If, during the fishing year, the Regional Administrator
determines that:
(i) Vessels in a sector defined at Sec. 679.21(i)(2) will catch
the applicable Chinook salmon PSC limit specified at paragraph
(i)(3)(i) of this section for that sector, NMFS will publish
notification in the Federal Register closing directed fishing for all
groundfish species, other than pollock, with trawl gear in the Western
and Central reporting areas of the GOA for that sector; or
(ii) Vessels in the Trawl catcher/processor Sector defined at Sec.
679.21(i)(2) will catch the seasonal Chinook salmon PSC limit specified
under paragraph (i)(3)(ii)(A) of this section prior to June 1, NMFS
will publish notification in the Federal Register closing directed
fishing for groundfish species, other than pollock, with trawl gear in
the Western and Central reporting areas of the GOA for
[[Page 35987]]
all vessels in the Trawl catcher/processor Sector defined at Sec.
679.21(i)(2) until June 1. Directed fishing for groundfish species,
other than pollock, with trawl gear in the Western and Central
reporting areas of the GOA for vessels in the Trawl catcher/processor
Sector defined at Sec. 679.21(i)(2) will reopen on June 1 with the
Chinook salmon PSC limit determined under paragraph (i)(3)(ii)(B) of
this section unless NMFS determines that the amount of Chinook salmon
PSC available to the sector is insufficient to allow the sector to fish
and not exceed its annual Chinook salmon PSC limit.
[FR Doc. 2014-14726 Filed 6-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P