Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isle of Wight (Sinepuxent) Bay, Ocean City, MD, 35682-35683 [2014-14635]
Download as PDF
35682
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 121 / Tuesday, June 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and on-scene designated
representatives. If the COTP Charleston
determines that the regulated area need
not be enforced for the full duration
stated in this notice, he or she may use
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant
general permission to enter the
regulated area.
Dated: June 8, 2014.
R. R. Rodriguez,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Charleston.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2013–1021]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isle
of Wight (Sinepuxent) Bay, Ocean City,
MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is modifying
the operating schedule that governs the
US 50 Bridge, over Isle of Wight
(Sinepuxent) Bay, mile 0.5, Ocean City,
MD. This rule changes the language of
the regulation to reflect new closure
times to accommodate heavy volumes of
vehicular traffic following the annual
July 4th fireworks show.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 24,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2013–1021. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this final rule,
call or email Mrs. Traci Whitfield,
Bridge Management Assistant, Coast
Guard, telephone (757) 398–6629, email
Traci.G.Whitfield@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on reviewing the docket, call
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jun 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Regulatory History and Information
[FR Doc. 2014–14706 Filed 6–23–14; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, (202) 366–9826.
On April 1, 2014, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled, ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Isle of Wight (Sinepuxent)
Bay, Ocean City, MD’’ in the Federal
Register (79 FR 18243). The Coast Guard
received no comments on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 533(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective in less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. A 30-day delayed effective
date is impracticable and contrary to the
public interest. Since there were no
objections to this rule during notice and
comment and to accommodate the
approaching fireworks show scheduled
on July 4, 2014, which includes heavy
volumes of vehicular traffic following
the show, it would be impracticable and
contrary to public interest to delay the
effective date.
B. Basis and Purpose
The US 50 Bridge is a single-leaf
bascule bridge with a vertical clearance
of approximately 13 feet above mean
high water in the closed position and
unlimited in the open position.
The Ocean City Police Department, on
behalf of the Maryland Department of
Transportation, requested to change the
current operating regulation for the US
50 Bridge across Isle of Wight
(Sinepuxent) Bay, mile 0.5, at Ocean
City, MD to accommodate the annual
Ocean City July 4th fireworks show and
the heavy volumes of vehicular traffic
that transit across the drawbridge. The
Ocean City Police Department requested
that the bridge closure times be changed
from 9:30 p.m. until 10:30 p.m., to 10:00
p.m. until 11:00 p.m. Since the
fireworks show runs between 9:30 p.m.
and 10:00 p.m., there is very little traffic
crossing the bridge. However, there
remains a high volume of traffic
between 10:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. This
change will allow for a more orderly
process of transiting the heavy volumes
of vehicular traffic following the
fireworks show.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. As a result, no
changes have been made to this final
rule. Therefore, we revised the times in
117.559(c) from the current times of
9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. to new times of
10 p.m. to 11 p.m.
D. Regulatory Analyses
The Coast Guard developed this rule
after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below the Coast Guard summarizes our
analyses based on these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The
Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under those Orders. The
changes are expected to have minimal
impact on maritime traffic transiting the
bridge. Mariners can plan their trips in
accordance with the revised schedule to
minimize delays. While the times are
changing, mariners are familiar with
this bridge closure because for the past
12 years the Coast Guard has allowed
the bridge to remain in the closed
position for the fireworks event.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
This final rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels needing to transit
through the bridge from 10 p.m. until 11
p.m., on July 4th or July 5th of every
year. This action will not have
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 121 / Tuesday, June 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because the rule adds minimal
restrictions to the movement of
navigation and mariners who plan their
transits in accordance with the
scheduled bridge closure can minimize
delay. This event has occurred every
year for the past 12 years; therefore,
mariners should be familiar with
planning their transits accordingly.
Vessels that can safely transit under the
bridge may do so at any time.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairneww Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. The Coast
Guard have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jun 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
35683
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, Coast Guard did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference With Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
The Coast Guard has analyzed this
rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
9. Civil Justice Reform
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure,
Coast Guard does discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
The Coast Guard has analyzed this
rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.559(c), to read as
follows:
■
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
§ 117.559
12. Energy Effects
Dated: June 10, 2014.
Stephen P. Metruck,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Isle of Wight (Sinepuxent) Bay.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) On July 4, the draw need not open
from 10 p.m. until 11 p.m. to
accommodate the annual July 4th
fireworks show. Should inclement
weather prevent the fireworks event
from taking place as planned, the draw
need not open from 10 p.m. until 11
p.m. on July 5th to accommodate the
annual July 4th fireworks show.
[FR Doc. 2014–14635 Filed 6–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 121 (Tuesday, June 24, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35682-35683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14635]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2013-1021]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isle of Wight (Sinepuxent) Bay,
Ocean City, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is modifying the operating schedule that
governs the US 50 Bridge, over Isle of Wight (Sinepuxent) Bay, mile
0.5, Ocean City, MD. This rule changes the language of the regulation
to reflect new closure times to accommodate heavy volumes of vehicular
traffic following the annual July 4th fireworks show.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-1021. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this final
rule, call or email Mrs. Traci Whitfield, Bridge Management Assistant,
Coast Guard, telephone (757) 398-6629, email
Traci.G.Whitfield@uscg.mil. If you have questions on reviewing the
docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, (202)
366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Regulatory History and Information
On April 1, 2014, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled, ``Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isle of Wight
(Sinepuxent) Bay, Ocean City, MD'' in the Federal Register (79 FR
18243). The Coast Guard received no comments on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 533(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. A 30-day delayed effective date is
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Since there were no
objections to this rule during notice and comment and to accommodate
the approaching fireworks show scheduled on July 4, 2014, which
includes heavy volumes of vehicular traffic following the show, it
would be impracticable and contrary to public interest to delay the
effective date.
B. Basis and Purpose
The US 50 Bridge is a single-leaf bascule bridge with a vertical
clearance of approximately 13 feet above mean high water in the closed
position and unlimited in the open position.
The Ocean City Police Department, on behalf of the Maryland
Department of Transportation, requested to change the current operating
regulation for the US 50 Bridge across Isle of Wight (Sinepuxent) Bay,
mile 0.5, at Ocean City, MD to accommodate the annual Ocean City July
4th fireworks show and the heavy volumes of vehicular traffic that
transit across the drawbridge. The Ocean City Police Department
requested that the bridge closure times be changed from 9:30 p.m. until
10:30 p.m., to 10:00 p.m. until 11:00 p.m. Since the fireworks show
runs between 9:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., there is very little traffic
crossing the bridge. However, there remains a high volume of traffic
between 10:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. This change will allow for a more
orderly process of transiting the heavy volumes of vehicular traffic
following the fireworks show.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. As a result, no changes have been made to this
final rule. Therefore, we revised the times in 117.559(c) from the
current times of 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. to new times of 10 p.m. to 11
p.m.
D. Regulatory Analyses
The Coast Guard developed this rule after considering numerous
statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below the Coast
Guard summarizes our analyses based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. The changes are expected to
have minimal impact on maritime traffic transiting the bridge. Mariners
can plan their trips in accordance with the revised schedule to
minimize delays. While the times are changing, mariners are familiar
with this bridge closure because for the past 12 years the Coast Guard
has allowed the bridge to remain in the closed position for the
fireworks event.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This final rule would affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels needing to
transit through the bridge from 10 p.m. until 11 p.m., on July 4th or
July 5th of every year. This action will not have
[[Page 35683]]
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
because the rule adds minimal restrictions to the movement of
navigation and mariners who plan their transits in accordance with the
scheduled bridge closure can minimize delay. This event has occurred
every year for the past 12 years; therefore, mariners should be
familiar with planning their transits accordingly. Vessels that can
safely transit under the bridge may do so at any time.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairneww Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. The Coast Guard have analyzed this rule under that Order
and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, Coast Guard does discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, Coast Guard
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one of a category of actions which
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for drawbridges. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.559(c), to read as follows:
Sec. 117.559 Isle of Wight (Sinepuxent) Bay.
* * * * *
(c) On July 4, the draw need not open from 10 p.m. until 11 p.m. to
accommodate the annual July 4th fireworks show. Should inclement
weather prevent the fireworks event from taking place as planned, the
draw need not open from 10 p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 5th to
accommodate the annual July 4th fireworks show.
Dated: June 10, 2014.
Stephen P. Metruck,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014-14635 Filed 6-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P