Federal Acquisition Regulation; Contracting With Women-Owned Small Business Concerns, 35864-35865 [2014-14381]
Download as PDF
35864
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 121 / Tuesday, June 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Alternate I (Jun 2014). As prescribed
in 23.705(c)(2), substitute the following
paragraph (b) for paragraph (b) of the
basic clause:
(b) Under this contract, the Contractor
shall deliver, furnish for Government
use, or furnish for Contractor use at a
Federally controlled facility, only
televisions that, at the time of
submission of proposals and at the time
of award, were EPEAT® silver-registered
or gold-registered.
■ 13. Revise section 52.223–16 to reads
as follows:
52.223–16 Acquisition of EPEATRegistered Personal Computer Products.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
As prescribed in 23.705(d)(1), insert
the following clause:
Acquisition of Epeat®-Registered
Personal Computer Products (Jun 2014)
(a) Definitions. As used in this
clause—
Computer means a device that
performs logical operations and
processes data. Computers are
composed of, at a minimum:
(1) A central processing unit (CPU) to
perform operations;
(2) User input devices such as a
keyboard, mouse, digitizer, or game
controller; and
(3) A computer display screen to
output information. Computers include
both stationary and portable units,
including desktop computers, integrated
desktop computers, notebook
computers, thin clients, and
workstations. Although computers must
be capable of using input devices and
computer displays, as noted in (2) and
(3) above, computer systems do not
need to include these devices on
shipment to meet this definition. This
definition does not include server
computers, gaming consoles, mobile
telephones, portable hand-held
calculators, portable digital assistants
(PDAs), MP3 players, or any other
mobile computing device with displays
less than 4 inches, measured diagonally.
Computer display means a display
screen and its associated electronics
encased in a single housing or within
the computer housing (e.g., notebook or
integrated desktop computer) that is
capable of displaying output
information from a computer via one or
more inputs such as a VGA, DVI, USB,
DisplayPort, and/or IEEE 1394–2008TM,
Standard for High Performance Serial
Bus. Examples of computer display
technologies are the cathode-ray tube
(CRT) and liquid crystal display (LCD).
Desktop computer means a computer
where the main unit is intended to be
located in a permanent location, often
on a desk or on the floor. Desktops are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Jun 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
not designed for portability and utilize
an external computer display, keyboard,
and mouse. Desktops are designed for a
broad range of home and office
applications.
Integrated desktop computer means a
desktop system in which the computer
and computer display function as a
single unit that receives its AC power
through a single cable. Integrated
desktop computers come in one of two
possible forms:
(1) A system where the computer
display and computer are physically
combined into a single unit; or
(2) A system packaged as a single
system where the computer display is
separate but is connected to the main
chassis by a DC power cord and both the
computer and computer display are
powered from a single power supply. As
a subset of desktop computers,
integrated desktop computers are
typically designed to provide similar
functionality as desktop systems.
Notebook computer means a
computer designed specifically for
portability and to be operated for
extended periods of time either with or
without a direct connection to an AC
power source. Notebooks must utilize
an integrated computer display and be
capable of operation off of an integrated
battery or other portable power source.
In addition, most notebooks use an
external power supply and have an
integrated keyboard and pointing
device. Notebook computers are
typically designed to provide similar
functionality to desktops, including
operation of software similar in
functionality to that used in desktops.
Docking stations are considered
accessories for notebook computers, not
notebook computers. Tablet PCs, which
may use touch-sensitive screens along
with, or instead of, other input devices,
are considered notebook computers.
Personal computer product means a
computer, computer display, desktop
computer, integrated desktop computer,
or notebook computer.
(b) Under this contract, the Contractor
shall deliver, furnish for Government
use, or furnish for Contractor use at a
Federally controlled facility, only
personal computer products that, at the
time of submission of proposals and at
the time of award, were EPEAT®
bronze-registered or higher.
(c) For information about EPEAT, see
www.epa.gov/epeat.
(End of clause)
Alternate I (Jun 2014). As prescribed
in 23.705(d)(2), substitute the following
paragraph (b) for paragraph (b) of the
basic clause:
(b) Under this contract, the Contractor
shall deliver, furnish for Government
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
use, or furnish for Contractor use at a
Federally controlled facility, only
personal computer products that, at the
time of submission of proposals and at
the time of award, were EPEAT® silverregistered or gold-registered.
[FR Doc. 2014–14376 Filed 6–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 19
[FAC 2005–75; FAR Case 2013–010; Item
II; Docket 2013–0010, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM59
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Contracting With Women-Owned Small
Business Concerns
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA have
adopted as final, without change, an
interim rule amending the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to remove
the dollar limitation for set-asides to
economically disadvantaged womenowned small business concerns and to
women-owned small business concerns
eligible under the Women-Owned Small
Business Program.
DATES: Effective Date: June 24, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Karlos Morgan, Procurement Analyst, at
202–501–2364, for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at 202–501–
4755. Please cite FAC 2005–75, FAR
Case 2013–010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an
interim rule in the Federal Register at
78 FR 37692 on June 21, 2013, to
implement section 1697 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 (Pub. L. 112–239),
which amended section 8(m) of the
Small Business Act, (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).
Section 1697 of the NDAA for FY 2013
amended section 8(m) by removing the
dollar limitation for set-asides to
economically disadvantaged womenowned small business (EDWOSB)
E:\FR\FM\24JNR2.SGM
24JNR2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 121 / Tuesday, June 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
concerns, and eligible women-owned
small business (WOSB) concerns (see 13
CFR 127.200–13 and 127.305 for
eligibility and certification
requirements), in industries determined
by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) to be underrepresented or
substantially underrepresented by small
business concerns owned and
controlled by women, with respect to
Federal procurement.
Pursuant to this statutory change and
in conformance with the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA’s) revised
regulations at 13 CFR 127.503(a)(2) and
127.503(b)(2) (see SBA’s interim final
rule published in the Federal Register at
78 FR 26504 on May 7, 2013), an
interim FAR rule was published in the
Federal Register at 78 FR 37692 on June
21, 2013, removing the dollar
limitations for set-asides to EDWOSB
concerns or WOSB concerns eligible
under the WOSB Program. The interim
rule allows contracting officers to set
aside acquisitions for competition
restricted to EDWOSB concerns or
WOSB concerns eligible under the
WOSB Program at any dollar level above
the micro-purchase threshold, provided
the other requirements for a set-aside
under the WOSB Program are met.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
II. Discussion and Analysis
The comment period for the FAR
interim rule closed on August 20, 2013.
No public comments were received;
therefore DoD, GSA, and NASA are
finalizing the interim rule without
change.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared
a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The
FRFA is summarized as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Jun 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
The objective of this final rule is to finalize
the changes set forth in section 1697 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal
year 2013. Section 1697 eliminated the
statutory limitations (thresholds) at section
8(m) of the Small Business Act, (15 U.S.C.
637(m)), for set-asides to economically
disadvantaged women-owned small business
(EDWOSB) concerns and to women-owned
small business (WOSB) concerns eligible
under the WOSB Program in industries that
are underrepresented or substantially
underrepresented by WOSB concerns. This
final rule follows an interim rule that was
published in the Federal Register at 78 FR
37692 on June 21, 2013, which removed the
set-aside limitations set forth at FAR
19.1505(b)(2) and (c)(2), in keeping with the
statutory change and SBA’s revised
regulations.
There were no comments received in
response to the interim rule by its closing
date of August 20, 2013. Therefore, the
changes made in the interim rule will be
adopted as final, without change, allowing
contracting officers to set aside acquisitions
for competition restricted to EDWOSB
concerns or WOSB concerns eligible under
the WOSB Program at any dollar level above
the micro-purchase threshold, provided the
other requirements for a set-aside under the
WOSB Program are met.
Analysis of the Federal Procurement Data
System from April 1, 2011 (the
implementation date of the WOSB Program)
through January 1, 2013, revealed that there
were approximately 26,712 WOSB concerns,
including 131 EDWOSB concerns and 388
WOSB concerns eligible under the WOSB
Program, that received obligated funds from
Federal contract awards, task or delivery
orders, and modifications to existing
contracts. This final rule may have a
significant positive economic impact on
EDWOSB concerns competing for contracting
opportunities in industries determined by
SBA to be underrepresented by WOSB
concerns and may positively affect WOSB
concerns eligible under the WOSB Program
competing in industries determined by SBA
to be substantially underrepresented by
WOSB concerns, since removing the dollar
threshold for set-asides under the WOSB
Program will provide greater access to
Federal contracting opportunities. However,
this rule may have a negative effect on firms
that are women-owned but are not WOSB
Program participants and small businesses
that are not owned by women because those
firms may now be excluded from competition
on some acquisitions that previously could
not be set aside for EDWOSB concerns or
WOSB concerns eligible under the WOSB
Program due to the dollar thresholds and
now will be set aside.
This final rule does not impose new
recordkeeping or reporting requirements. The
rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with any other Federal rules. There are no
alternatives to the rule that would
accomplish the stated objectives of the
statute.
Interested parties may obtain a copy
of the FRFA from the Regulatory
Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
35865
has submitted a copy of the FRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 19
Government procurement.
Dated: June 13, 2014.
William Clark,
Acting Director, Office of Government-Wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without
Change
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 48 CFR part 19 which was
published in the Federal Register at 78
FR 37692 on June 21, 2013, is adopted
as a final rule without change.
■
[FR Doc. 2014–14381 Filed 6–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 31
[FAC 2005–75; FAR Case 2014–012; Item
III; Docket 2014–0012, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM75
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Limitation on Allowable Government
Contractor Compensation Costs
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Interim rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing an interim rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement section 702 of the Bipartisan
Budget Act of 2013. In accordance with
section 702, the interim rule revises the
allowable cost limit relative to the
compensation of contractor and
subcontractor employees. Also, in
accordance with section 702, this
interim rule implements the possible
exception to this allowable cost limit for
scientists, engineers, or other specialists
upon an agency determination that such
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JNR2.SGM
24JNR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 121 (Tuesday, June 24, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35864-35865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14381]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 19
[FAC 2005-75; FAR Case 2013-010; Item II; Docket 2013-0010, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM59
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Contracting With Women-Owned
Small Business Concerns
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA have adopted as final, without change, an
interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
remove the dollar limitation for set-asides to economically
disadvantaged women-owned small business concerns and to women-owned
small business concerns eligible under the Women-Owned Small Business
Program.
DATES: Effective Date: June 24, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Karlos Morgan, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-501-2364, for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-75, FAR Case 2013-
010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an interim rule in the Federal
Register at 78 FR 37692 on June 21, 2013, to implement section 1697 of
the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013
(Pub. L. 112-239), which amended section 8(m) of the Small Business
Act, (15 U.S.C. 637(m)). Section 1697 of the NDAA for FY 2013 amended
section 8(m) by removing the dollar limitation for set-asides to
economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB)
[[Page 35865]]
concerns, and eligible women-owned small business (WOSB) concerns (see
13 CFR 127.200-13 and 127.305 for eligibility and certification
requirements), in industries determined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) to be underrepresented or substantially
underrepresented by small business concerns owned and controlled by
women, with respect to Federal procurement.
Pursuant to this statutory change and in conformance with the Small
Business Administration's (SBA's) revised regulations at 13 CFR
127.503(a)(2) and 127.503(b)(2) (see SBA's interim final rule published
in the Federal Register at 78 FR 26504 on May 7, 2013), an interim FAR
rule was published in the Federal Register at 78 FR 37692 on June 21,
2013, removing the dollar limitations for set-asides to EDWOSB concerns
or WOSB concerns eligible under the WOSB Program. The interim rule
allows contracting officers to set aside acquisitions for competition
restricted to EDWOSB concerns or WOSB concerns eligible under the WOSB
Program at any dollar level above the micro-purchase threshold,
provided the other requirements for a set-aside under the WOSB Program
are met.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The comment period for the FAR interim rule closed on August 20,
2013. No public comments were received; therefore DoD, GSA, and NASA
are finalizing the interim rule without change.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq. The FRFA is summarized as follows:
The objective of this final rule is to finalize the changes set
forth in section 1697 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
fiscal year 2013. Section 1697 eliminated the statutory limitations
(thresholds) at section 8(m) of the Small Business Act, (15 U.S.C.
637(m)), for set-asides to economically disadvantaged women-owned
small business (EDWOSB) concerns and to women-owned small business
(WOSB) concerns eligible under the WOSB Program in industries that
are underrepresented or substantially underrepresented by WOSB
concerns. This final rule follows an interim rule that was published
in the Federal Register at 78 FR 37692 on June 21, 2013, which
removed the set-aside limitations set forth at FAR 19.1505(b)(2) and
(c)(2), in keeping with the statutory change and SBA's revised
regulations.
There were no comments received in response to the interim rule
by its closing date of August 20, 2013. Therefore, the changes made
in the interim rule will be adopted as final, without change,
allowing contracting officers to set aside acquisitions for
competition restricted to EDWOSB concerns or WOSB concerns eligible
under the WOSB Program at any dollar level above the micro-purchase
threshold, provided the other requirements for a set-aside under the
WOSB Program are met.
Analysis of the Federal Procurement Data System from April 1,
2011 (the implementation date of the WOSB Program) through January
1, 2013, revealed that there were approximately 26,712 WOSB
concerns, including 131 EDWOSB concerns and 388 WOSB concerns
eligible under the WOSB Program, that received obligated funds from
Federal contract awards, task or delivery orders, and modifications
to existing contracts. This final rule may have a significant
positive economic impact on EDWOSB concerns competing for
contracting opportunities in industries determined by SBA to be
underrepresented by WOSB concerns and may positively affect WOSB
concerns eligible under the WOSB Program competing in industries
determined by SBA to be substantially underrepresented by WOSB
concerns, since removing the dollar threshold for set-asides under
the WOSB Program will provide greater access to Federal contracting
opportunities. However, this rule may have a negative effect on
firms that are women-owned but are not WOSB Program participants and
small businesses that are not owned by women because those firms may
now be excluded from competition on some acquisitions that
previously could not be set aside for EDWOSB concerns or WOSB
concerns eligible under the WOSB Program due to the dollar
thresholds and now will be set aside.
This final rule does not impose new recordkeeping or reporting
requirements. The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
any other Federal rules. There are no alternatives to the rule that
would accomplish the stated objectives of the statute.
Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the
Regulatory Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy
of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 19
Government procurement.
Dated: June 13, 2014.
William Clark,
Acting Director, Office of Government-Wide Acquisition Policy, Office
of Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without Change
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR part 19 which was
published in the Federal Register at 78 FR 37692 on June 21, 2013, is
adopted as a final rule without change.
[FR Doc. 2014-14381 Filed 6-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P