Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Rockaway Delivery Lateral Project Off New York, June 2014 Through October 2014, 35526-35533 [2014-14563]
Download as PDF
35526
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 120 / Monday, June 23, 2014 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD180
Marine Mammals; File No. 18534
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
permit has been issued to the Alaska
SeaLife Center (Responsible Party, Tara
Reimer, Ph.D.) 301 Railway Avenue,
P.O. Box 1329, Seward, AK 99664 to
conduct research on captive Steller sea
lions (Eumetopias jubatus).
ADDRESSES: The permit and related
documents are available for review
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office:
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705,
Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone (301)
427–8401; fax (301)713–0376.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Sloan or Jennifer Skidmore, (301)
427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
27, 2014, notice was published in the
Federal Register (79 FR 17135) that a
request for a permit to conduct research
on captive Steller sea lions had been
submitted by the above-named
applicant. The requested permit has
been issued under the authority of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and
the regulations governing the taking and
importing of marine mammals (50 CFR
part 216).
Permit No. 18534–00 authorizes the
Alaska SeaLife Center to conduct
studies on captive Steller sea lions from
the Eastern Distinct Population Segment
to (1) investigate reproductive
physiology and survival, growth, and
physiology of captive-bred offspring;
and (2) deploy instruments to develop
and validate methods for monitoring
wild Steller sea lions. Research on up to
18 captive sea lions may include:
Anesthesia and sedation; administration
of Evan’s blue dye and deuterium oxide;
biological sampling; dietary
supplements; mass and morphometric
measurements; ultrasound and
radiographs; video and audio
recordings; and attachment and
proximity to instrumentation. Steller sea
lions may be transported to and from
approved facilities. The permit
authorizes four research-related
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Jun 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
mortalities over the course of the
permit. No research will occur on wild
populations. The permit expires May
31, 2019.
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final
determination has been made that the
activity proposed is categorically
excluded from the requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Dated: June 17, 2014.
Tammy C. Adams,
Acting Chief, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–14552 Filed 6–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC784
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Rockaway
Delivery Lateral Project Off New York,
June 2014 Through October 2014
National Marine Fisheries
Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an Incidental
Harassment Authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) to
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC (Transco) to take marine
mammals, by harassment, incidental to
expanding a natural gas pipeline system
off the coast of New York.
DATES: Effective June 1, 2014, through
October 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the
application, authorization, and
associated documents may be obtained
by visiting the internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Office of Protected Resources,
(301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine
Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as
amended (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.) directs the Secretary of Commerce
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to authorize, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals of a
species or population stock, by United
States citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region
if, after notice of a proposed
authorization to the public for review
and public comment: (1) We make
certain findings; and (2) the taking is
limited to harassment.
NMFS shall grant authorization for
the incidental taking of small numbers
of marine mammals if we find that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), and will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant). The
authorization must set forth the
permissible methods of taking; other
means of effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on the species or stock
and its habitat (i.e., mitigation); and
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
NMFS have defined ‘‘negligible impact’’
in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘an impact
resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is
not reasonably likely to, adversely affect
the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: Any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].
Summary of Request
On March 21, 2013, NMFS received
an application from Transco for the
taking of marine mammals incidental to
the Rockaway delivery lateral project
(Project) off the coast of New York over
a 1-year period beginning in April 2014.
We received a revised application from
Transco on May 13, 2013, which
reflected updates to the proposed
mitigation measures, proposed
monitoring measures, and incidental
take requests for marine mammals.
Further revisions were made to the
request in October 2013 due to a change
in the project schedule and the
application was considered complete
and adequate on November 9, 2013. On
April 14, Transco amended their take
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 120 / Monday, June 23, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
request based on a shift in the offshore
construction schedule.
Transco plans to expand its pipeline
system to meet immediate and future
demand for natural gas in the New York
City market area. This project will
provide an additional delivery point to
National Grid’s (an international
electricity and gas company) local
distribution companies, giving National
Grid the flexibility to redirect supplies
during peak demand periods. The inwater portion of the project, which will
require pile driving, may result in the
incidental taking of seven species of
marine mammals by behavioral
harassment.
Description of the Specified Activities
The specific Project activity will be to
install a sub-sea natural gas pipeline
extending from the existing Lower New
York Bay Lateral in the Atlantic Ocean
to an onshore delivery point on the
Rockaway Peninsula. The work will
include the following:
• Horizontal directional drilling
Æ Beginning onshore and exiting
offshore
Æ Includes excavation of the
horizontal directional drilling exit
pit and pile driving activities
• Offshore construction and support
vessels
Æ Various vessels would be used
throughout the in-water work
• Sub-sea dual hot-tap installation of
the existing Lower New York Bay
Lateral
Æ Includes use of diver-controlled
hand-jetting to clear sediment
around the existing pipeline
• Offshore pipeline construction
Æ Includes offshore pipe laying and
subsea jet-sled trenching
• Anode bed installation and cable
crossing
Æ Includes use of divers and handjetting to clear sediment around the
locations of the anode bed and
existing power cable crossing
• Hydrostatic test water withdrawal and
discharge
Æ Would occur four times during the
course of in-water construction.
• Post-installation and final (as-built)
hydrographic survey
Æ Includes the use of a multibeam
echo sounder and high resolution
side scan sonar
• Subsea trench and HDD exit pit
backfill
Æ Includes the use of a small-scale
crane-supported suction dredge for
the trench
Æ Includes the use of diver-controlled
hand jetting and/or clamshell
dredge for the HDD exit pit
• Operation and maintenance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Jun 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
Only the pile driving activities
associated with horizontal directional
drilling offshore construction are
expected to result in the take of marine
mammals by Level B harassment. Other
aspects of the project are discussed in
more detail in Transco’s IHA
application (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental.htm/
#applications). No vessels will use
dynamic positioning (a system to
maintain position and heading), and
only two vessels—a crew boat and
picket boat—will make weekly trips to
the Project area from shore. Elevated
sound levels that may result in
harassment are not expected from the
clamshell dredge because the dredge
will be anchored and dynamic
positioning will not be used. Dredging
and trenching may result in a
temporary, localized increase in
turbidity, but are not expected to rise to
the level of harassment. A complete
description of all in-water Project
activities is provided in Transco’s
application (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental.htm/
#applications).
Vibratory Hammer Installation and
Removal
Vibratory hammers are commonly
used in steel pile installation and
removal when the sediment conditions
allow for this method. Transco will
likely use the MKT V 52 model of
vibratory hammer for the Project. The
vibratory hammer is considered a
continuous sound source because it
continuously drives the pile into the
substrate until the desired depth is
reached. Transco will use a vibratory
hammer to install about 70 piles (5 sets
of temporary goal posts and up to 60
temporary fender piles). All piles will
be 14- to 16-inch diameter steel pipe
piles. Two vibratory hammers will be on
site, but only one hammer will be used
at a time. Each pile should take about
1 to 2 seconds to install per foot of
depth driven, with each pile driven to
a depth of about 25 to 30 feet below the
seafloor. Therefore, each pile will take
up to 60 seconds of continuous pile
driving to install. All piles should be
installed during a 1-week period, with
less than 12 hours of pile driving
operation. The goal posts and fenders
would remain in the offshore
environment for the duration of the
horizontal directional drilling portion of
construction (3 to 4 months). Extraction
of all piles at the end of the construction
period should take about as long as
installation.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35527
Location of the Specified Activity
The Project will be located mostly in
nearshore waters (within approximately
3 miles of the Atlantic Ocean), southeast
of the Rockaway Peninsula in Queens
County, New York. A linear segment of
underwater land measuring
approximately 2.15 miles will be
required for offshore pipe lay and
trenching activities from the
interconnect with Transco’s pipeline to
the proposed horizontal directional
drilling exit point in the nearshore area,
seaward of Jacob Riis Park (see Figure 1
of Transco’s application). The Project
area is located within the greater New
York Bight region, with construction
occurring within approximately 2.86
miles from the Jacob Riis Park shoreline.
Vessels associated with the Project will
travel between the pipe yard in
Elizabeth, New Jersey, to the offshore
construction site. The greater Project
area, therefore, is described as the
waters between the pipe yard and
construction site and the waters offshore
of Jacob Riis Park where construction
will occur. However, pile driving
activities will only take place around
the horizontal directional drilling exit
point in the nearshore area. All work
will occur in water depths between 25
and 50 feet.
Duration of the Specified Activity
Pile driving activities were originally
proposed to begin in April 2014 and
expected to be complete in August 2014.
However, Transco adjusted their
construction schedule so that pile
installation will begin in June 2014 and
pile removal will occur in September
2014. The IHA is valid through October
2014 to allow for construction delays.
Total installation time for all piles is
expected to total less than 1 day of
operation and would occur during a 1week period. Total operating time for
the extraction of all piles at the end of
the construction period is expected to
take a similar amount of time (1 day
total over a 1-week period).
Metrics Used in This Document
This section was included in the
notice of proposed IHA (78 FR 78824,
December 27, 2013) as a brief
explanation of the sound measurements
frequently used in the discussions of
acoustic effects in this document and
that information has not changed.
Predicted Sound Levels From Vibratory
Pile Driving
No source levels were available for
14- to 16-inch diameter steel pipe piles
at water depths of approximately 33
feet. The most applicable source levels
available are for 12-inch diameter steel
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
35528
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 120 / Monday, June 23, 2014 / Notices
pipe piles in water depths of
approximately 16 feet. In-water
measurements for the Mad River Slough
Project in Arcata, California, indicate
that installation of a 12-inch steel pipe
pile in about 16 feet of water measured
10 meters from the source generated 155
dB re 1 uPa RMS. To account for the
increased diameter of the piles planned
for use during the Project, a change in
water depth, and a different location
than where the reference levels were
recorded, Transco increased the source
levels from the Mad River Slough
Project by 5 dB. The 5 dB increase was
chosen due to an overall lack of current
information available for reference
levels of steel pipe piles of a similar size
being driven with a vibratory hammer in
similar water depths. Transco expects
that this increase overestimates the
actual source level from the vibratory
hammer.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of the Specified Activity
Thirteen marine mammal species
under our jurisdiction may occur in the
proposed Project area, including four
mysticetes (baleen whales), six
odontocetes (toothed cetaceans), and
three pinnipeds (seals). Three of these
species are listed as endangered under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including:
The humpback (Megaptera
novaeangliae), fin (Balaenoptera
physalus), and North Atlantic right
(Eubalaena glacialis) whales.
However, based on occurrence
information, stranding records, and
seasonal distribution, it is unlikely that
humpback whales, fin whales, minke
whales, Atlantic white-sided dolphins,
short-finned pilot whales, or longfinned pilot whales will be present in
the Project area during the winter inwater construction period. Each of these
species is discussed in detail in section
3 of Transco’s IHA application (https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm/#applications). In
summary, humpback whales are
typically found in other regions of the
east coast and there have been no
reported observations within the
vicinity of the Project area in recent
years; fin whales prefer deeper offshore
waters and there have been no reported
observations within the vicinity of the
Project area in recent years; minke
whales are prevalent in other regions
there have been no reported
observations within the vicinity of the
Project area in recent years; Atlantic
white-sided dolphins generally occur in
areas east and north of the Project area;
and short-finned and long-finned pilot
whales prefer deeper pelagic waters.
Accordingly, we did not consider these
species in greater detail and only
authorized take for the seven species
requested. After the proposed IHA was
published (78 FR 78824, December 27,
2013), Transco amended their
application due to a change in
construction schedule. Their new
schedule, which has pile installation
occurring in June 2014 and pile removal
occurring in September 2014, does not
overlap with North Atlantic right whale
season (November to April). Therefore,
after consultation with NMFS, Transco
amended their marine mammal take
request and eliminated the request for
incidental take of North Atlantic right
whales. NMFS further determined that
incidental take of harp seals from June
through September is also highly
unlikely because of its distribution.
Table 2 presents information on the
abundance, distribution, and
conservation status of the marine
mammals that may occur in the area
from June through September. While
harbor porpoise are most likely in the
project area during winter months, they
are dispersed as far south as New Jersey
during the spring and fall. Similarly,
short-beaked common dolphins are
most likely in the area from January to
May, but may still be passing through
the area during the summer and fall.
TABLE 2—ABUNDANCE ESTIMATES, MEAN DENSITY, AND ESA STATUS OF MARINE MAMMALS THAT MAY OCCUR IN THE
PROPOSED PROJECT AREA DURING JUNE THROUGH SEPTEMBER
Common name
Scientific name
Stock
ESA a
Time of year
most likely
expected in
region
Abundance
estimate
Odontocetes:
Harbor porpoise ....................
Bottlenose dolphin ................
Phocoena phocoena ...................
Tursiops truncatus .......................
...........
...........
Jan–March ..
July–Sept ....
89,054
7,147
Delphinus delphis ........................
Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy ........
Western North Atlantic Northern
Migratory.
Western North Atlantic ................
...........
Jan–May ......
52,893
Halichoerus grypus .....................
Phoca vitulina ..............................
Western North Atlantic ................
Western North Atlantic ................
...........
...........
Sept–May ....
Sept–May ....
348,900
99,340
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Short-beaked common dolphin.
Pinnipeds:
Gray seal ..............................
Harbor seal ...........................
Further information on the biology
and local distribution of these species
can be found in section 3 of Transco’s
application (see ADDRESSES), and the
NMFS Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports, which are available
online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
sars/.
Potential Effects of the Specified
Activity on Marine Mammals
This section of the proposed IHA (78
FR 78824, December 27, 2013) included
a summary and discussion of the ways
that the types of stressors associated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Jun 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
with the specified activity (pile driving
activities) have been observed to impact
marine mammals. That information has
not changed and is not repeated here. In
summary, the potential effects of sound
from the proposed activities may
include one or more of the following:
Tolerance; masking of natural sounds;
behavioral disturbance; non-auditory
physical effects; and temporary or
permanent hearing impairment
(Richardson et al., 1995). However, it is
unlikely that there would be any cases
of temporary or permanent hearing
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
impairment resulting from these
activities.
Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal
Habitat
This section of the proposed IHA (78
FR 78824, December 27, 2013) described
the anticipated effects of pile driving
activities on marine mammal habitat;
that information has not changed and is
not repeated here. In summary, because
of the short duration of the activity, the
impacts to marine mammals and the
food sources that they utilize are not
expected to cause significant or long-
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 120 / Monday, June 23, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
term consequences for individual
marine mammals or their populations.
Comments and Responses
NMFS published a proposed
authorization and request for public
comments in the Federal Register on
December 27, 2013 (78 FR 78824).
During the 30-day public comment
period, NMFS only received comments
from the Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission). All comments are
addressed below and have been
compiled and posted online at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Comment 1: The Commission
recommended that NMFS require
Transco to (1) provide estimated source
levels associated with other pipeline
construction activities (i.e., horizontal
directional drilling, pipe laying, and
pipe burial); and (2) estimate the
number of takes associated with those
activities based on the Level B
harassment threshold of 120 dB.
Response: Only two construction
elements involve noise as a concern for
marine mammals: Vibratory pile driving
and vessel operations. Both of these
activities were discussed in detail in
Transco’s application (see ADDRESSES)
and were addressed in the proposed
IHA (78 FR 78824, December 27, 2013).
Noise levels generated by activities such
as pipe laying and pipe burial are
generally very low (Richardson et al.,
1995) and do not reach the level set
forth in NMFS’ noise exposure criteria
that would result in take. There is no
underwater construction involved with
these activities and any noise generation
would be conducted on a vessel.
Horizontal directional drilling will
begin onshore and exit offshore, and
include excavation of the exit pit via
clamshell dredge and vibratory
installation and removal of piles. The
clamshell dredge will be anchored in
place and dynamic positioning will not
be used. Excavation does not involve a
sound source that has the potential to
result in incidental take of marine
mammals. No drilling will occur from
the offshore HDD location. Further
information on each project activity is
also provided in Transco’s application
(see ADDRESSES).
Comment 2: The Commission
recommended that NMFS require
Transco to estimate the number of takes
by accounting for the number of days
(i.e., seven days) that the proposed
activities would occur in summer (for
pile driving) and fall (for pile removal).
Response: NMFS agrees that the
number of days of pile driving should
be considered when estimating take. In
addition, only summer and fall densities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Jun 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
were considered to estimate take since
pile driving activities will no longer
take place during spring or winter
months. The take estimates,
summarized in Table 3 of this
document, have been adjusted to
account for the number of days of pile
installation in the summer and removal
in the fall.
Comment 3: The Commission
recommended that NMFS require
Transco to increase its estimated
numbers of takes for North Atlantic
right whales and short-beaked common
dolphins to the mean group size for
each season in which takes are expected
to occur.
Response: As noted in the Description
of Marine Mammals section of this
document, Transco amended their take
request after publication of the proposed
IHA and NMFS believes that take of
North Atlantic right whales is unlikely
considering the new construction
schedule. NMFS disagrees that
estimated numbers of takes for shortbeaked common dolphins should be
increased to reflect the mean group size
(which is in the hundreds) due to their
seasonal presence around the
construction area and the short duration
of pile driving activities. Short-beaked
common dolphins are most likely to be
found offshore New York between
January and May and prefer oceanic
waters. During summer and fall months
(when pile installation and removal will
occur), short-beaked common dolphins
are expected to be much further north
near Georges Bank. NMFS authorized
take of this species based on the
estimated density for summer and fall
months and does not expect large
aggregations of short-beaked common
dolphins in the area.
Mitigation
In order to issue an incidental take
authorization under section 101(a)(5)(D)
of the MMPA, we must set forth the
permissible methods of taking pursuant
to such activity, and other means of
effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on such species or stock and its
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and the availability
of such species or stock for taking for
certain subsistence uses (where
relevant).
To reduce the potential for
disturbance from acoustic stimuli
associated with the activities, Transco
will implement the following mitigation
measures for marine mammals:
(1) Vibratory pile driving only;
(2) Pile driving during daylight hours
only;
(3) Shutdown procedures;
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35529
(4) Soft-start (ramp-up) procedures;
and
(5) Discharge control.
Separately, Transco acknowledges the
vessel activity and speed restrictions
that are already in place along the east
coast for the north Atlantic right whale.
While the Seasonal Management Area is
in effect (November-April), vessel
operators will comply with the
established regulations. The change in
construction schedule (prompted by the
seasonal distribution of ESA-listed
Atlantic sturgeon) also reduces the
overlap of pile driving activities with
the North Atlantic right whale season
(November-April) and the likelihood of
harp seals in the area.
Vibratory Pile Driving Only
Transco will use a vibratory hammer
instead of an impact hammer for all pile
driving activities in order to reduce inwater sound levels while installing and
removing up to 70 temporary steel pipe
piles. The sound source level for the
vibratory hammer is less than the source
level for an impact hammer, and by
avoiding use of an impact hammer
Transco removes the potential for Level
A harassment of marine mammals.
Pile Driving During Daylight Hours Only
Pile driving installation and removal
will only be conducted when lighting
and weather conditions allow the
protected species observers to visually
monitor the entire Level B harassment
area through the use of binoculars or
other devices.
Soft-Start (Ramp-Up) Procedures
Transco will implement soft-start
procedures at the beginning of each pile
driving session (i.e., at the beginning of
each day and after a lapse of activity for
at least 30 minutes). Contractors will
initiate the vibratory hammer for 15
seconds at 40 to 60 percent reduced
energy, followed by a 1-minute waiting
period. This procedure will be repeated
two additional times before reach full
energy.
Shutdown Procedures
Protected species observers will
monitor the entire Level B harassment
area for marine mammals displaying
abnormal behavior. Such behavior may
include aggressive signals related to
noise exposure (e.g., tail/flipper
slapping or abrupt directed movement),
avoidance of the sound source, or an
obvious startle response (e.g., rapid
change in swimming speed, erratic
surface movements, or sudden diving
associated with the onset of a sound
source). At NMFS’ recommendation, if a
protected species observer sees any
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
35530
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 120 / Monday, June 23, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
abnormal behavior, this information
will be related to the construction
manager and the vibratory hammer will
be shutdown until the animal has
moved outside of the Level B
harassment area.
Control of Discharge
All in-water construction activities
will comply with federal regulations to
control the discharge of operational
waste such as bilge and ballast waters,
trash and debris, and sanitary and
domestic waste that could be generated
from all vessels associated with the
Project. All Project vessels will also
comply with the U.S. Coast Guard
requirements for the prevention and
control of oil and fuel spills (see
Transco’s application for more detail).
NMFS has carefully evaluated the
applicant’s proposed mitigation
measures and considered a range of
other measures in the context of
ensuring that NMFS prescribes the
means of effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on the affected marine
mammal species and stocks and their
habitat. Our evaluation of potential
measures included consideration of the
following factors in relation to one
another:
• The manner in which, and the
degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure is
expected to minimize adverse impacts
to marine mammals;
• The proven or likely efficacy of the
specific measure to minimize adverse
impacts as planned; and
• The practicability of the measure
for applicant implementation.
Any mitigation measure(s) prescribed
by NMFS should be able to accomplish,
have a reasonable likelihood of
accomplishing (based on current
science), or contribute to the
accomplishment of one or more of the
general goals listed below:
1. Avoidance or minimization of
injury or death of marine mammals
wherever possible (goals 2, 3, and 4 may
contribute to this goal).
2. A reduction in the numbers of
marine mammals (total number or
number at biologically important time
or location) exposed to received levels
of in-water pile driving activities, or
other activities expected to result in the
take of marine mammals (this goal may
contribute to 1, above, or to reducing
harassment takes only).
3. A reduction in the number of times
(total number or number at biologically
important time or location) individuals
would be exposed to received levels of
in-water pile driving activities, or other
activities expected to result in the take
of marine mammals (this goal may
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Jun 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
contribute to 1, above, or to reducing
harassment takes only).
4. A reduction in the intensity of
exposures (either total number or
number at biologically important time
or location) to received levels of inwater pile driving activity, or other
activities expected to result in the take
of marine mammals (this goal may
contribute to a, above, or to reducing the
severity of harassment takes only).
5. Avoidance or minimization of
adverse effects to marine mammal
habitat, paying special attention to the
food base, activities that block or limit
passage to or from biologically
important areas, permanent destruction
of habitat, or temporary destruction/
disturbance of habitat during a
biologically important time.
6. For monitoring directly related to
mitigation—an increase in the
probability of detecting marine
mammals, thus allowing for more
effective implementation of the
mitigation.
Based on our evaluation of the
applicant’s proposed measures, as well
as other measures considered by NMFS,
NMFS has determined that the
aforementioned mitigation measures
provide the means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on marine
mammal species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an incidental take
authorization for an activity, section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA states that we
must set forth ‘‘requirements pertaining
to the monitoring and reporting of such
taking.’’ The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13)
indicate that requests for an
authorization must include the
suggested means of accomplishing the
necessary monitoring and reporting that
would result in increased knowledge of
the species and our expectations of the
level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals present
in the proposed action area.
Monitoring measures prescribed by
NMFS should accomplish one or more
of the following general goals:
1. An increase in the probability of
detecting marine mammals, both within
the mitigation zone (thus allowing for
more effective implementation of the
mitigation) and in general to generate
more data to contribute to the analyses
mentioned below;
2. An increase in our understanding
of how many marine mammals are
likely to be exposed to levels of in-water
pile driving activity that we associate
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with specific adverse effects, such as
behavioral harassment, TTS, or PTS;
3. An increase in our understanding
of how marine mammals respond to
stimuli expected to result in take and
how anticipated adverse effects on
individuals (in different ways and to
varying degrees) may impact the
population, species, or stock
(specifically through effects on annual
rates of recruitment or survival) through
any of the following methods:
• Behavioral observations in the
presence of stimuli compared to
observations in the absence of stimuli
(need to be able to accurately predict
received level, distance from source,
and other pertinent information);
• Physiological measurements in the
presence of stimuli compared to
observations in the absence of stimuli
(need to be able to accurately predict
received level, distance from source,
and other pertinent information);
• Distribution and/or abundance
comparisons in times or areas with
concentrated stimuli versus times or
areas without stimuli;
4. An increased knowledge of the
affected species; and
5. An increase in our understanding
of the effectiveness of certain mitigation
and monitoring measures.
Visual Monitoring
Two NMFS-approved protected
species observers will survey the Level
B harassment area (∼3 miles) for marine
mammals 30 minutes before, during,
and 30 minutes after all vibratory pile
driving activities. The observers will be
stationed on a picket boat, located about
1.5 miles from the pile hammer. The
picket boat will circle the pile hammer
at a 1.5-mile distance so that the entire
Level B harassment area could be
surveyed. Information recorded during
each observation within the Level B
harassment area will be used to estimate
numbers of animals potentially taken
and will include the following:
• Numbers of individuals observed;
• Frequency of observation;
• Location within the Level B
harassment area (i.e., distance from the
sound source);
• Vibratory pile driving status (i.e.,
soft-start, active, post pile driving, etc.);
and
• Reaction of the animal(s) to pile
driving (if any) and observed behavior
within the Level B harassment area,
including bearing and direction of
travel.
If the Level B harassment area is
obscured by fog or poor lighting
conditions, vibratory pile driving will
be delayed until the area is visible. If the
Level B harassment area becomes
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 120 / Monday, June 23, 2014 / Notices
obscured by fog or poor lighting
conditions while pile driving activities
are occurring, pile driving will be shut
down until the area is visible again.
Reporting
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Transco will provide NMFS with a
draft monitoring report within 90 days
of the conclusion of monitoring. This
report will include the following:
• A summary of the activity and
monitoring plan (i.e., dates, times,
locations);
• A summary of mitigation
implementation;
• Monitoring results and a summary
that addresses the goals of the
monitoring plan, including the
following:
Æ Environmental conditions when
observations were made;
D Water conditions (i.e., Beaufort seastate, tidal state)
D Weather conditions (i.e., percent
cloud cover, visibility, percent
glare)
Æ Survey-specific data:
D Date and time survey initiated and
terminated;
Æ Date, time, number, species, and
any other relevant data regarding
marine mammals observed (for preactivity, during activity, and postactivity surveys);
Æ Description of the observed
behaviors (in both the presence and
absence of activities):
Æ If possible, the correlation to
underwater sound level occurring at
the time of any observable behavior
Æ Estimated exposure/take numbers
during activities
• An assessment of the implementation
and effectiveness of prescribed
mitigation and monitoring
measures.
Transco will submit a final report
within 30 days after receiving NMFS’
comments on the draft report. If NMFS
has no comments, the draft report will
be considered final.
In the unanticipated event that the
specified activity clearly causes the take
of a marine mammal in a manner not
permitted by the authorization (if
issued), such as an injury, serious
injury, or mortality (e.g., ship-strike,
gear interaction, and/or entanglement),
Transco shall immediately cease the
specified activities and immediately
report the incident to the Incidental
Take Program Supervisor, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, at 301–
427–8401 and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and the
Northeast Regional Stranding
Coordinator at 978–281–9300
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Jun 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
(Mendy.Garron@noaa.gov). The report
must include the following information:
• Time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident;
• Name and type of vessel involved;
• Vessel’s speed during and leading up
to the incident;
• Description of the incident;
• Status of all sound source use in the
24 hours preceding the incident;
• Water depth;
• Environmental conditions (e.g., wind
speed and direction, Beaufort sea
state, cloud cover, and visibility);
• Description of all marine mammal
observations in the 24 hours
preceding the incident;
• Species identification or description
of the animal(s) involved;
• Fate of the animal(s); and
• Photographs or video footage of the
animal(s) (if equipment is
available).
Transco shall not resume its activities
until we are able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take.
We will work with Transco to determine
what is necessary to minimize the
likelihood of further prohibited take and
ensure MMPA compliance. Transco may
not resume their activities until notified
by us via letter, email, or telephone.
In the event that Transco discovers an
injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead visual observer determines that
the cause of the injury or death is
unknown and the death is relatively
recent (i.e., in less than a moderate state
of decomposition as we describe in the
next paragraph), Transco shall
immediately report the incident to the
Incidental Take Program Supervisor,
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, at 301–
427–8401 and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and the
Northeast Regional Stranding
Coordinator at 978–281–9300
(Mendy.Garron@noaa.gov). The report
must include the same information
identified in the paragraph above this
section. Activities may continue while
we review the circumstances of the
incident. We would work with Transco
to determine whether modifications in
the activities are appropriate.
In the event that Transco discovers an
injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead visual observer determines that
the injury or death is not associated
with or related to the authorized
activities (e.g., previously wounded
animal, carcass with moderate to
advanced decomposition, or scavenger
damage), Transco would report the
incident to the Incidental Take Program
Supervisor, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35531
at 301–427–8401 and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and the
Northeast Regional Stranding
Coordinator at 978–281–9300
(Mendy.Garron@noaa.gov), within 24
hours of the discovery. Transco would
provide photographs or video footage (if
available) or other documentation of the
stranded animal sighting to us.
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: Any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].
This section of the proposed IHA (78
FR 78824, December 27, 2013) described
the methods used to estimate marine
mammal density; that information has
not changed except for the fact that pile
driving activities will no longer take
place during spring or winter months.
Therefore, the marine mammal densities
for the winter and spring seasons are no
longer applicable and only summer and
fall densities were considered. Transco
estimated potential take by multiplying
the area of the zone of influence (the
Level B harassment area) by the local
animal density. This provides an
estimate of the number of animals that
might occupy the Level B harassment
area at any given moment during
vibratory pile driving activities. Further
information on these calculations and
how they were applied to each species
is also provided in section 6.3 of
Transco’s application (see ADDRESSES).
Based on a comment from the Marine
Mammal Commission, the number of
days of pile driving was also considered
when estimating take.
NMFS’ current acoustic exposure
criteria are provided in Table 2 below.
Based on these thresholds, Transco
estimated the number of marine
mammals that may be exposed to noise
that rises to the level of take. Table 3
shows the authorized take for Transco’s
specified activity, based on the
estimated seasonal densities for pile
installation and removal and the
number of days of activity (up to seven
for installation and seven for removal).
Table 3 was adjusted from the proposed
IHA to account for the new construction
schedule and the Marine Mammal
Commission’s comment.
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
35532
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 120 / Monday, June 23, 2014 / Notices
Non-explosive sound
Criterion
Criterion definition
Threshold
Level A Harassment (injury) ...............................
Permanent Threshold Shift (PTS) (Any level
above that which is known to cause TTS).
Level B Harassment ...........................................
Level B Harassment ...........................................
Behavioral Disruption (for impulse noises) ......
Behavioral Disruption (for continuous noises)
180 dB re 1 microPa-m (cetaceans)/190 dB re
1 microPa-m (pinnipeds) root mean square
(rms).
160 dB re 1 microPa-m (rms).
120 dB re 1 microPa-m (rms).
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED DENSITIES AND AUTHORIZED MARINE MAMMAL TAKE FOR THE SPECIFIED ACTIVITY
Common species
name
Est. summer
density
(per 100
km2) 1
Gray seal ................
Harbor seal ............
Bottlenose dolphin
Short-beaked common dolphin.
Harbor porpoise .....
Est. daily
summer
take by
level B
harassment
Est. fall
density
(per 100
km2) 1
Est. daily
fall take by
level B
harassment
Total take
authorized
Abundance
of stock
% of stock
potentially
affected
Pop. trend
N/A
156.41
26.91
3.59
N/A
156.41
3.70
5.28
14
69
12
2
14
69
2
3
196
966
98
35
348,900
99,340
7,147
52,893
0.06
0.97
1.37
0.06
increasing.
N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
0.00
3.20
0
2
14
99,340
0.01
N/A.
1 Source:
Navy OPAREA Density Estimates (NODE) for the Northeast OPAREAS: Boston, Narragansett Bay, and Atlantic City (2007).
N/A = Not available
Analysis and Preliminary
Determinations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Negligible Impact
Negligible impact is ‘‘an impact
resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is
not reasonably likely to, adversely affect
the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival’’
(50 CFR 216.103). A negligible impact
finding is based on the lack of likely
adverse effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival (i.e., populationlevel effects). An estimate of the number
of Level B harassment takes, alone, is
not enough information on which to
base an impact determination. In
addition to considering estimates of the
number of marine mammals that might
be ‘‘taken’’ through behavioral
harassment, NMFS must consider other
factors, such as the likely nature of any
responses (their intensity, duration,
etc.), the context of any responses
(critical reproductive time or location,
migration, etc.), as well as the number
and nature of estimated Level A
harassment takes, the number of
estimated mortalities, and effects on
habitat.
We do not anticipate that any injuries,
serious injuries, or mortalities will
occur as a result of Transco’s Project,
and we are not authorizing injury,
serious injury, or mortality for this
Project. We have determined, provided
that the aforementioned mitigation and
monitoring measures are implemented,
that the impact of conducting pile
driving activities off Rockaway
Peninsula, from June 2014 through
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Jun 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
September 2014, may result, at worst, in
a modification in behavior and/or lowlevel physiological effects (Level B
harassment) of certain species of marine
mammals. There are no known
important feeding areas or haul-outs
within the project area. While these
species may make behavioral
modifications, including temporarily
vacating the area during the operation of
the pile hammer to avoid the resultant
acoustic disturbance, the availability of
similar habitat surrounding the project
area and the short and sporadic duration
of the specified activities, have led us to
determine that this action will not
adversely affect annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
Many animals perform vital functions,
such as feeding, resting, traveling, and
socializing, on a diel cycle (i.e., 24 hour
cycle). Behavioral reactions to noise
exposure (such as disruption of critical
life functions, displacement, or
avoidance of important habitat) are
more likely to be significant if they last
more than one diel cycle or recur on
subsequent days (Southall et al., 2007).
While vibratory pile driving will occur
over 2 consecutive days, this is still
considered a short overall duration and
it will only occur during daylight hours.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
required monitoring and mitigation
measures, NMFS finds that the total
marine mammal take from Transco’s
specified activity will have a negligible
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
impact on the affected marine mammal
species or stocks.
Small Numbers
The take numbers for each marine
mammal species we are authorizing are
small (all estimates are less than two
percent) relative to the affected stock
sizes. Accordingly, NMFS finds that
small numbers of marine mammals will
be taken.
Impact on Availability of Affected
Species for Taking for Subsistence Uses
There are no relevant subsistence uses
of marine mammals implicated by this
action. Therefore, NMFS has
determined that the total taking of
affected species or stocks will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of such species or stocks for
taking for subsistence purposes.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Transco originally requested, and
NMFS proposed, the incidental take of
North Atlantic right whale, which is
listed as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act. Under section
7 of the Act, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC; the
federal agency responsible for
permitting Transco’s construction)
initiated formal consultation with our
Northeast Regional Office on the Project.
We (i.e., National Marine Fisheries
Service, Office of Protected Resources,
Permits and Conservation Division),
also initiated formal consultation under
section 7 of the Act with the Northeast
Regional Office to obtain a Biological
Opinion (Opinion) evaluating the effects
of issuing an incidental harassment
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 120 / Monday, June 23, 2014 / Notices
authorization for threatened and
endangered marine mammals and, if
appropriate, authorizing incidental take.
However, following Transco’s
amendment to their request, the Permits
and Conservation Division and the
Northeast Regional Office concluded
that take of North Atlantic right whale
is unlikely. Therefore, the Project is not
expected to result in the take of any
threatened or endangered marine
mammal species.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS participated as a cooperating
agency on the FERC’s Rockaway
Delivery Lateral Project Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), which was
published on March 10, 2014 (79 FR
13295) and is available here: https://
www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/enviro/eis/
2014/02-28-14-eis.asp. NMFS
determined that the EIS is adequate and
appropriate to meet our responsibilities
under NEPA for the issuance of an IHA.
NMFS adopted FERC’s FEIS on May 27,
2014.
Dated: June 18, 2014.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–14563 Filed 6–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Substantive Submissions Made During
Prosecution of the Trademark
Application
ACTION:
Notice.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on the continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
§ 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 22, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0054
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Jun 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
comment’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of
Catherine Cain, Attorney Advisor,
Office of the Commissioner for
Trademarks, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1451,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1451, by
telephone at 571–272–8946, or by email
to Catherine.Cain@uspto.gov.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) administers
the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et
seq., which provides for the Federal
registration of trademarks, service
marks, collective trademarks and service
marks, collective membership marks,
and certification marks. Individuals and
businesses that use or intend to use
such marks in commerce may file an
application to register their mark with
the USPTO.
Such individuals and businesses may
also submit various communications to
the USPTO, including providing
additional information needed to
process a request to delete a particular
filing basis from an application or to
divide an application identifying
multiple goods and/or services into two
or more separate applications.
Applicants may seek a six-month
extension of time to file a statement that
the mark is in use in commerce or
submit a petition to revive an
application that abandoned for failure to
submit a timely response to an office
action or a timely statement of use or
extension request. In some
circumstances, an applicant may
expressly abandon an application by
filing a written request for withdrawal
of the application.
The rules implementing the Act are
set forth in 37 CFR Part 2. These rules
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35533
mandate that each register entry include
the mark, the goods and/or services in
connection with which the mark is
used, ownership information, dates of
use, and certain other information. The
USPTO also provides similar
information concerning pending
applications. The register and pending
application information may be
accessed by an individual or by
businesses to determine the availability
of a mark. By accessing the USPTO’s
information, parties may reduce the
possibility of initiating use of a mark
previously adopted by another. The
Federal trademark registration process
may thereby reduce the number of
filings between both litigating parties
and the courts.
II. Method of Collection
The forms in this collection are
available in electronic format through
the Trademark Electronic Application
System (TEAS), which may be accessed
on the USPTO Web site. TEAS Global
Forms are available for the items where
a TEAS form with dedicated data fields
is not yet available. Applicants may also
submit the information in paper form by
mail, fax, or hand delivery.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0054.
Form Number(s): PTO Forms 1553,
1581, 2194, 2195, 2200, and 2202.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits; not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
292,706 per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public from 5 minutes (0.083 hours) to
30 minutes (0.50 hours), depending on
the complexity of the situation, to gather
the necessary information, prepare the
appropriate documents, and submit the
information to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 63,981.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $24,888,609. The USPTO
expects that the information in this
collection will be prepared by attorneys
at an estimated rate of $389 per hour.
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the
respondent cost burden for this
collection will be approximately
$24,888,609 per year.
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 120 (Monday, June 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35526-35533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14563]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XC784
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Rockaway Delivery Lateral Project Off New York, June 2014 Through
October 2014
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an Incidental Harassment Authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA),
notification is hereby given that NMFS has issued an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) to Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC (Transco) to take marine mammals, by harassment,
incidental to expanding a natural gas pipeline system off the coast of
New York.
DATES: Effective June 1, 2014, through October 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the application, authorization, and
associated documents may be obtained by visiting the internet at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Guan, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Office of Protected Resources, (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) directs the Secretary of
Commerce to authorize, upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals of a species or
population stock, by United States citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if, after notice of a proposed authorization to the
public for review and public comment: (1) We make certain findings; and
(2) the taking is limited to harassment.
NMFS shall grant authorization for the incidental taking of small
numbers of marine mammals if we find that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or stock(s), and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where relevant). The authorization must
set forth the permissible methods of taking; other means of effecting
the least practicable adverse impact on the species or stock and its
habitat (i.e., mitigation); and requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking. NMFS have defined ``negligible
impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ``an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably
likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.''
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: Any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment].
Summary of Request
On March 21, 2013, NMFS received an application from Transco for
the taking of marine mammals incidental to the Rockaway delivery
lateral project (Project) off the coast of New York over a 1-year
period beginning in April 2014. We received a revised application from
Transco on May 13, 2013, which reflected updates to the proposed
mitigation measures, proposed monitoring measures, and incidental take
requests for marine mammals. Further revisions were made to the request
in October 2013 due to a change in the project schedule and the
application was considered complete and adequate on November 9, 2013.
On April 14, Transco amended their take
[[Page 35527]]
request based on a shift in the offshore construction schedule.
Transco plans to expand its pipeline system to meet immediate and
future demand for natural gas in the New York City market area. This
project will provide an additional delivery point to National Grid's
(an international electricity and gas company) local distribution
companies, giving National Grid the flexibility to redirect supplies
during peak demand periods. The in-water portion of the project, which
will require pile driving, may result in the incidental taking of seven
species of marine mammals by behavioral harassment.
Description of the Specified Activities
The specific Project activity will be to install a sub-sea natural
gas pipeline extending from the existing Lower New York Bay Lateral in
the Atlantic Ocean to an onshore delivery point on the Rockaway
Peninsula. The work will include the following:
Horizontal directional drilling
[cir] Beginning onshore and exiting offshore
[cir] Includes excavation of the horizontal directional drilling
exit pit and pile driving activities
Offshore construction and support vessels
[cir] Various vessels would be used throughout the in-water work
Sub-sea dual hot-tap installation of the existing Lower New
York Bay Lateral
[cir] Includes use of diver-controlled hand-jetting to clear
sediment around the existing pipeline
Offshore pipeline construction
[cir] Includes offshore pipe laying and subsea jet-sled trenching
Anode bed installation and cable crossing
[cir] Includes use of divers and hand-jetting to clear sediment
around the locations of the anode bed and existing power cable crossing
Hydrostatic test water withdrawal and discharge
[cir] Would occur four times during the course of in-water
construction.
Post-installation and final (as-built) hydrographic survey
[cir] Includes the use of a multibeam echo sounder and high
resolution side scan sonar
Subsea trench and HDD exit pit backfill
[cir] Includes the use of a small-scale crane-supported suction
dredge for the trench
[cir] Includes the use of diver-controlled hand jetting and/or
clamshell dredge for the HDD exit pit
Operation and maintenance
Only the pile driving activities associated with horizontal
directional drilling offshore construction are expected to result in
the take of marine mammals by Level B harassment. Other aspects of the
project are discussed in more detail in Transco's IHA application
(https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm/#applications). No
vessels will use dynamic positioning (a system to maintain position and
heading), and only two vessels--a crew boat and picket boat--will make
weekly trips to the Project area from shore. Elevated sound levels that
may result in harassment are not expected from the clamshell dredge
because the dredge will be anchored and dynamic positioning will not be
used. Dredging and trenching may result in a temporary, localized
increase in turbidity, but are not expected to rise to the level of
harassment. A complete description of all in-water Project activities
is provided in Transco's application (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm/#applications).
Vibratory Hammer Installation and Removal
Vibratory hammers are commonly used in steel pile installation and
removal when the sediment conditions allow for this method. Transco
will likely use the MKT V 52 model of vibratory hammer for the Project.
The vibratory hammer is considered a continuous sound source because it
continuously drives the pile into the substrate until the desired depth
is reached. Transco will use a vibratory hammer to install about 70
piles (5 sets of temporary goal posts and up to 60 temporary fender
piles). All piles will be 14- to 16-inch diameter steel pipe piles. Two
vibratory hammers will be on site, but only one hammer will be used at
a time. Each pile should take about 1 to 2 seconds to install per foot
of depth driven, with each pile driven to a depth of about 25 to 30
feet below the seafloor. Therefore, each pile will take up to 60
seconds of continuous pile driving to install. All piles should be
installed during a 1-week period, with less than 12 hours of pile
driving operation. The goal posts and fenders would remain in the
offshore environment for the duration of the horizontal directional
drilling portion of construction (3 to 4 months). Extraction of all
piles at the end of the construction period should take about as long
as installation.
Location of the Specified Activity
The Project will be located mostly in nearshore waters (within
approximately 3 miles of the Atlantic Ocean), southeast of the Rockaway
Peninsula in Queens County, New York. A linear segment of underwater
land measuring approximately 2.15 miles will be required for offshore
pipe lay and trenching activities from the interconnect with Transco's
pipeline to the proposed horizontal directional drilling exit point in
the nearshore area, seaward of Jacob Riis Park (see Figure 1 of
Transco's application). The Project area is located within the greater
New York Bight region, with construction occurring within approximately
2.86 miles from the Jacob Riis Park shoreline. Vessels associated with
the Project will travel between the pipe yard in Elizabeth, New Jersey,
to the offshore construction site. The greater Project area, therefore,
is described as the waters between the pipe yard and construction site
and the waters offshore of Jacob Riis Park where construction will
occur. However, pile driving activities will only take place around the
horizontal directional drilling exit point in the nearshore area. All
work will occur in water depths between 25 and 50 feet.
Duration of the Specified Activity
Pile driving activities were originally proposed to begin in April
2014 and expected to be complete in August 2014. However, Transco
adjusted their construction schedule so that pile installation will
begin in June 2014 and pile removal will occur in September 2014. The
IHA is valid through October 2014 to allow for construction delays.
Total installation time for all piles is expected to total less than 1
day of operation and would occur during a 1-week period. Total
operating time for the extraction of all piles at the end of the
construction period is expected to take a similar amount of time (1 day
total over a 1-week period).
Metrics Used in This Document
This section was included in the notice of proposed IHA (78 FR
78824, December 27, 2013) as a brief explanation of the sound
measurements frequently used in the discussions of acoustic effects in
this document and that information has not changed.
Predicted Sound Levels From Vibratory Pile Driving
No source levels were available for 14- to 16-inch diameter steel
pipe piles at water depths of approximately 33 feet. The most
applicable source levels available are for 12-inch diameter steel
[[Page 35528]]
pipe piles in water depths of approximately 16 feet. In-water
measurements for the Mad River Slough Project in Arcata, California,
indicate that installation of a 12-inch steel pipe pile in about 16
feet of water measured 10 meters from the source generated 155 dB re 1
uPa RMS. To account for the increased diameter of the piles planned for
use during the Project, a change in water depth, and a different
location than where the reference levels were recorded, Transco
increased the source levels from the Mad River Slough Project by 5 dB.
The 5 dB increase was chosen due to an overall lack of current
information available for reference levels of steel pipe piles of a
similar size being driven with a vibratory hammer in similar water
depths. Transco expects that this increase overestimates the actual
source level from the vibratory hammer.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity
Thirteen marine mammal species under our jurisdiction may occur in
the proposed Project area, including four mysticetes (baleen whales),
six odontocetes (toothed cetaceans), and three pinnipeds (seals). Three
of these species are listed as endangered under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973 (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including: The humpback
(Megaptera novaeangliae), fin (Balaenoptera physalus), and North
Atlantic right (Eubalaena glacialis) whales.
However, based on occurrence information, stranding records, and
seasonal distribution, it is unlikely that humpback whales, fin whales,
minke whales, Atlantic white-sided dolphins, short-finned pilot whales,
or long-finned pilot whales will be present in the Project area during
the winter in-water construction period. Each of these species is
discussed in detail in section 3 of Transco's IHA application (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm/#applications). In summary,
humpback whales are typically found in other regions of the east coast
and there have been no reported observations within the vicinity of the
Project area in recent years; fin whales prefer deeper offshore waters
and there have been no reported observations within the vicinity of the
Project area in recent years; minke whales are prevalent in other
regions there have been no reported observations within the vicinity of
the Project area in recent years; Atlantic white-sided dolphins
generally occur in areas east and north of the Project area; and short-
finned and long-finned pilot whales prefer deeper pelagic waters.
Accordingly, we did not consider these species in greater detail and
only authorized take for the seven species requested. After the
proposed IHA was published (78 FR 78824, December 27, 2013), Transco
amended their application due to a change in construction schedule.
Their new schedule, which has pile installation occurring in June 2014
and pile removal occurring in September 2014, does not overlap with
North Atlantic right whale season (November to April). Therefore, after
consultation with NMFS, Transco amended their marine mammal take
request and eliminated the request for incidental take of North
Atlantic right whales. NMFS further determined that incidental take of
harp seals from June through September is also highly unlikely because
of its distribution.
Table 2 presents information on the abundance, distribution, and
conservation status of the marine mammals that may occur in the area
from June through September. While harbor porpoise are most likely in
the project area during winter months, they are dispersed as far south
as New Jersey during the spring and fall. Similarly, short-beaked
common dolphins are most likely in the area from January to May, but
may still be passing through the area during the summer and fall.
Table 2--Abundance Estimates, Mean Density, and ESA Status of Marine Mammals That May Occur in the Proposed
Project Area During June Through September
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time of year most
Common name Scientific name Stock ESA \a\ likely expected Abundance
in region estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Odontocetes:
Harbor porpoise........... Phocoena phocoena Gulf of Maine/Bay .......... Jan-March........ 89,054
of Fundy.
Bottlenose dolphin........ Tursiops Western North .......... July-Sept........ 7,147
truncatus. Atlantic
Northern
Migratory.
Short-beaked common Delphinus delphis Western North .......... Jan-May.......... 52,893
dolphin. Atlantic.
Pinnipeds:
Gray seal................. Halichoerus Western North .......... Sept-May......... 348,900
grypus. Atlantic.
Harbor seal............... Phoca vitulina... Western North .......... Sept-May......... 99,340
Atlantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further information on the biology and local distribution of these
species can be found in section 3 of Transco's application (see
ADDRESSES), and the NMFS Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Reports, which
are available online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Potential Effects of the Specified Activity on Marine Mammals
This section of the proposed IHA (78 FR 78824, December 27, 2013)
included a summary and discussion of the ways that the types of
stressors associated with the specified activity (pile driving
activities) have been observed to impact marine mammals. That
information has not changed and is not repeated here. In summary, the
potential effects of sound from the proposed activities may include one
or more of the following: Tolerance; masking of natural sounds;
behavioral disturbance; non-auditory physical effects; and temporary or
permanent hearing impairment (Richardson et al., 1995). However, it is
unlikely that there would be any cases of temporary or permanent
hearing impairment resulting from these activities.
Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat
This section of the proposed IHA (78 FR 78824, December 27, 2013)
described the anticipated effects of pile driving activities on marine
mammal habitat; that information has not changed and is not repeated
here. In summary, because of the short duration of the activity, the
impacts to marine mammals and the food sources that they utilize are
not expected to cause significant or long-
[[Page 35529]]
term consequences for individual marine mammals or their populations.
Comments and Responses
NMFS published a proposed authorization and request for public
comments in the Federal Register on December 27, 2013 (78 FR 78824).
During the 30-day public comment period, NMFS only received comments
from the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission). All comments are
addressed below and have been compiled and posted online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Comment 1: The Commission recommended that NMFS require Transco to
(1) provide estimated source levels associated with other pipeline
construction activities (i.e., horizontal directional drilling, pipe
laying, and pipe burial); and (2) estimate the number of takes
associated with those activities based on the Level B harassment
threshold of 120 dB.
Response: Only two construction elements involve noise as a concern
for marine mammals: Vibratory pile driving and vessel operations. Both
of these activities were discussed in detail in Transco's application
(see ADDRESSES) and were addressed in the proposed IHA (78 FR 78824,
December 27, 2013). Noise levels generated by activities such as pipe
laying and pipe burial are generally very low (Richardson et al., 1995)
and do not reach the level set forth in NMFS' noise exposure criteria
that would result in take. There is no underwater construction involved
with these activities and any noise generation would be conducted on a
vessel. Horizontal directional drilling will begin onshore and exit
offshore, and include excavation of the exit pit via clamshell dredge
and vibratory installation and removal of piles. The clamshell dredge
will be anchored in place and dynamic positioning will not be used.
Excavation does not involve a sound source that has the potential to
result in incidental take of marine mammals. No drilling will occur
from the offshore HDD location. Further information on each project
activity is also provided in Transco's application (see ADDRESSES).
Comment 2: The Commission recommended that NMFS require Transco to
estimate the number of takes by accounting for the number of days
(i.e., seven days) that the proposed activities would occur in summer
(for pile driving) and fall (for pile removal).
Response: NMFS agrees that the number of days of pile driving
should be considered when estimating take. In addition, only summer and
fall densities were considered to estimate take since pile driving
activities will no longer take place during spring or winter months.
The take estimates, summarized in Table 3 of this document, have been
adjusted to account for the number of days of pile installation in the
summer and removal in the fall.
Comment 3: The Commission recommended that NMFS require Transco to
increase its estimated numbers of takes for North Atlantic right whales
and short-beaked common dolphins to the mean group size for each season
in which takes are expected to occur.
Response: As noted in the Description of Marine Mammals section of
this document, Transco amended their take request after publication of
the proposed IHA and NMFS believes that take of North Atlantic right
whales is unlikely considering the new construction schedule. NMFS
disagrees that estimated numbers of takes for short-beaked common
dolphins should be increased to reflect the mean group size (which is
in the hundreds) due to their seasonal presence around the construction
area and the short duration of pile driving activities. Short-beaked
common dolphins are most likely to be found offshore New York between
January and May and prefer oceanic waters. During summer and fall
months (when pile installation and removal will occur), short-beaked
common dolphins are expected to be much further north near Georges
Bank. NMFS authorized take of this species based on the estimated
density for summer and fall months and does not expect large
aggregations of short-beaked common dolphins in the area.
Mitigation
In order to issue an incidental take authorization under section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA, we must set forth the permissible methods of
taking pursuant to such activity, and other means of effecting the
least practicable adverse impact on such species or stock and its
habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and
areas of similar significance, and the availability of such species or
stock for taking for certain subsistence uses (where relevant).
To reduce the potential for disturbance from acoustic stimuli
associated with the activities, Transco will implement the following
mitigation measures for marine mammals:
(1) Vibratory pile driving only;
(2) Pile driving during daylight hours only;
(3) Shutdown procedures;
(4) Soft-start (ramp-up) procedures; and
(5) Discharge control.
Separately, Transco acknowledges the vessel activity and speed
restrictions that are already in place along the east coast for the
north Atlantic right whale. While the Seasonal Management Area is in
effect (November-April), vessel operators will comply with the
established regulations. The change in construction schedule (prompted
by the seasonal distribution of ESA-listed Atlantic sturgeon) also
reduces the overlap of pile driving activities with the North Atlantic
right whale season (November-April) and the likelihood of harp seals in
the area.
Vibratory Pile Driving Only
Transco will use a vibratory hammer instead of an impact hammer for
all pile driving activities in order to reduce in-water sound levels
while installing and removing up to 70 temporary steel pipe piles. The
sound source level for the vibratory hammer is less than the source
level for an impact hammer, and by avoiding use of an impact hammer
Transco removes the potential for Level A harassment of marine mammals.
Pile Driving During Daylight Hours Only
Pile driving installation and removal will only be conducted when
lighting and weather conditions allow the protected species observers
to visually monitor the entire Level B harassment area through the use
of binoculars or other devices.
Soft-Start (Ramp-Up) Procedures
Transco will implement soft-start procedures at the beginning of
each pile driving session (i.e., at the beginning of each day and after
a lapse of activity for at least 30 minutes). Contractors will initiate
the vibratory hammer for 15 seconds at 40 to 60 percent reduced energy,
followed by a 1-minute waiting period. This procedure will be repeated
two additional times before reach full energy.
Shutdown Procedures
Protected species observers will monitor the entire Level B
harassment area for marine mammals displaying abnormal behavior. Such
behavior may include aggressive signals related to noise exposure
(e.g., tail/flipper slapping or abrupt directed movement), avoidance of
the sound source, or an obvious startle response (e.g., rapid change in
swimming speed, erratic surface movements, or sudden diving associated
with the onset of a sound source). At NMFS' recommendation, if a
protected species observer sees any
[[Page 35530]]
abnormal behavior, this information will be related to the construction
manager and the vibratory hammer will be shutdown until the animal has
moved outside of the Level B harassment area.
Control of Discharge
All in-water construction activities will comply with federal
regulations to control the discharge of operational waste such as bilge
and ballast waters, trash and debris, and sanitary and domestic waste
that could be generated from all vessels associated with the Project.
All Project vessels will also comply with the U.S. Coast Guard
requirements for the prevention and control of oil and fuel spills (see
Transco's application for more detail).
NMFS has carefully evaluated the applicant's proposed mitigation
measures and considered a range of other measures in the context of
ensuring that NMFS prescribes the means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on the affected marine mammal species and
stocks and their habitat. Our evaluation of potential measures included
consideration of the following factors in relation to one another:
The manner in which, and the degree to which, the
successful implementation of the measure is expected to minimize
adverse impacts to marine mammals;
The proven or likely efficacy of the specific measure to
minimize adverse impacts as planned; and
The practicability of the measure for applicant
implementation.
Any mitigation measure(s) prescribed by NMFS should be able to
accomplish, have a reasonable likelihood of accomplishing (based on
current science), or contribute to the accomplishment of one or more of
the general goals listed below:
1. Avoidance or minimization of injury or death of marine mammals
wherever possible (goals 2, 3, and 4 may contribute to this goal).
2. A reduction in the numbers of marine mammals (total number or
number at biologically important time or location) exposed to received
levels of in-water pile driving activities, or other activities
expected to result in the take of marine mammals (this goal may
contribute to 1, above, or to reducing harassment takes only).
3. A reduction in the number of times (total number or number at
biologically important time or location) individuals would be exposed
to received levels of in-water pile driving activities, or other
activities expected to result in the take of marine mammals (this goal
may contribute to 1, above, or to reducing harassment takes only).
4. A reduction in the intensity of exposures (either total number
or number at biologically important time or location) to received
levels of in-water pile driving activity, or other activities expected
to result in the take of marine mammals (this goal may contribute to a,
above, or to reducing the severity of harassment takes only).
5. Avoidance or minimization of adverse effects to marine mammal
habitat, paying special attention to the food base, activities that
block or limit passage to or from biologically important areas,
permanent destruction of habitat, or temporary destruction/disturbance
of habitat during a biologically important time.
6. For monitoring directly related to mitigation--an increase in
the probability of detecting marine mammals, thus allowing for more
effective implementation of the mitigation.
Based on our evaluation of the applicant's proposed measures, as
well as other measures considered by NMFS, NMFS has determined that the
aforementioned mitigation measures provide the means of effecting the
least practicable adverse impact on marine mammal species or stocks and
their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating
grounds, and areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an incidental take authorization for an activity,
section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA states that we must set forth
``requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such
taking.'' The MMPA implementing regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13)
indicate that requests for an authorization must include the suggested
means of accomplishing the necessary monitoring and reporting that
would result in increased knowledge of the species and our expectations
of the level of taking or impacts on populations of marine mammals
present in the proposed action area.
Monitoring measures prescribed by NMFS should accomplish one or
more of the following general goals:
1. An increase in the probability of detecting marine mammals, both
within the mitigation zone (thus allowing for more effective
implementation of the mitigation) and in general to generate more data
to contribute to the analyses mentioned below;
2. An increase in our understanding of how many marine mammals are
likely to be exposed to levels of in-water pile driving activity that
we associate with specific adverse effects, such as behavioral
harassment, TTS, or PTS;
3. An increase in our understanding of how marine mammals respond
to stimuli expected to result in take and how anticipated adverse
effects on individuals (in different ways and to varying degrees) may
impact the population, species, or stock (specifically through effects
on annual rates of recruitment or survival) through any of the
following methods:
Behavioral observations in the presence of stimuli
compared to observations in the absence of stimuli (need to be able to
accurately predict received level, distance from source, and other
pertinent information);
Physiological measurements in the presence of stimuli
compared to observations in the absence of stimuli (need to be able to
accurately predict received level, distance from source, and other
pertinent information);
Distribution and/or abundance comparisons in times or
areas with concentrated stimuli versus times or areas without stimuli;
4. An increased knowledge of the affected species; and
5. An increase in our understanding of the effectiveness of certain
mitigation and monitoring measures.
Visual Monitoring
Two NMFS-approved protected species observers will survey the Level
B harassment area (~3 miles) for marine mammals 30 minutes before,
during, and 30 minutes after all vibratory pile driving activities. The
observers will be stationed on a picket boat, located about 1.5 miles
from the pile hammer. The picket boat will circle the pile hammer at a
1.5-mile distance so that the entire Level B harassment area could be
surveyed. Information recorded during each observation within the Level
B harassment area will be used to estimate numbers of animals
potentially taken and will include the following:
Numbers of individuals observed;
Frequency of observation;
Location within the Level B harassment area (i.e.,
distance from the sound source);
Vibratory pile driving status (i.e., soft-start, active,
post pile driving, etc.); and
Reaction of the animal(s) to pile driving (if any) and
observed behavior within the Level B harassment area, including bearing
and direction of travel.
If the Level B harassment area is obscured by fog or poor lighting
conditions, vibratory pile driving will be delayed until the area is
visible. If the Level B harassment area becomes
[[Page 35531]]
obscured by fog or poor lighting conditions while pile driving
activities are occurring, pile driving will be shut down until the area
is visible again.
Reporting
Transco will provide NMFS with a draft monitoring report within 90
days of the conclusion of monitoring. This report will include the
following:
A summary of the activity and monitoring plan (i.e.,
dates, times, locations);
A summary of mitigation implementation;
Monitoring results and a summary that addresses the goals
of the monitoring plan, including the following:
[cir] Environmental conditions when observations were made;
[ssquf] Water conditions (i.e., Beaufort sea-state, tidal state)
[ssquf] Weather conditions (i.e., percent cloud cover, visibility,
percent glare)
[cir] Survey-specific data:
[ssquf] Date and time survey initiated and terminated;
[cir] Date, time, number, species, and any other relevant data
regarding marine mammals observed (for pre-activity, during activity,
and post-activity surveys);
[cir] Description of the observed behaviors (in both the presence
and absence of activities):
[cir] If possible, the correlation to underwater sound level
occurring at the time of any observable behavior
[cir] Estimated exposure/take numbers during activities
An assessment of the implementation and effectiveness of
prescribed mitigation and monitoring measures.
Transco will submit a final report within 30 days after receiving
NMFS' comments on the draft report. If NMFS has no comments, the draft
report will be considered final.
In the unanticipated event that the specified activity clearly
causes the take of a marine mammal in a manner not permitted by the
authorization (if issued), such as an injury, serious injury, or
mortality (e.g., ship-strike, gear interaction, and/or entanglement),
Transco shall immediately cease the specified activities and
immediately report the incident to the Incidental Take Program
Supervisor, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, at 301-427-8401 and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and the Northeast Regional Stranding
Coordinator at 978-281-9300 (Mendy.Garron@noaa.gov). The report must
include the following information:
Time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the incident;
Name and type of vessel involved;
Vessel's speed during and leading up to the incident;
Description of the incident;
Status of all sound source use in the 24 hours preceding the
incident;
Water depth;
Environmental conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction,
Beaufort sea state, cloud cover, and visibility);
Description of all marine mammal observations in the 24 hours
preceding the incident;
Species identification or description of the animal(s)
involved;
Fate of the animal(s); and
Photographs or video footage of the animal(s) (if equipment is
available).
Transco shall not resume its activities until we are able to review
the circumstances of the prohibited take. We will work with Transco to
determine what is necessary to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA compliance. Transco may not resume
their activities until notified by us via letter, email, or telephone.
In the event that Transco discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead visual observer determines that the cause of the
injury or death is unknown and the death is relatively recent (i.e., in
less than a moderate state of decomposition as we describe in the next
paragraph), Transco shall immediately report the incident to the
Incidental Take Program Supervisor, Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, at 301-427-8401 and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and the Northeast Regional Stranding
Coordinator at 978-281-9300 (Mendy.Garron@noaa.gov). The report must
include the same information identified in the paragraph above this
section. Activities may continue while we review the circumstances of
the incident. We would work with Transco to determine whether
modifications in the activities are appropriate.
In the event that Transco discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead visual observer determines that the injury or
death is not associated with or related to the authorized activities
(e.g., previously wounded animal, carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage), Transco would report the incident
to the Incidental Take Program Supervisor, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources, at 301-427-8401 and/or by
email to Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and the Northeast Regional Stranding
Coordinator at 978-281-9300 (Mendy.Garron@noaa.gov), within 24 hours of
the discovery. Transco would provide photographs or video footage (if
available) or other documentation of the stranded animal sighting to
us.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: Any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment].
This section of the proposed IHA (78 FR 78824, December 27, 2013)
described the methods used to estimate marine mammal density; that
information has not changed except for the fact that pile driving
activities will no longer take place during spring or winter months.
Therefore, the marine mammal densities for the winter and spring
seasons are no longer applicable and only summer and fall densities
were considered. Transco estimated potential take by multiplying the
area of the zone of influence (the Level B harassment area) by the
local animal density. This provides an estimate of the number of
animals that might occupy the Level B harassment area at any given
moment during vibratory pile driving activities. Further information on
these calculations and how they were applied to each species is also
provided in section 6.3 of Transco's application (see ADDRESSES). Based
on a comment from the Marine Mammal Commission, the number of days of
pile driving was also considered when estimating take.
NMFS' current acoustic exposure criteria are provided in Table 2
below. Based on these thresholds, Transco estimated the number of
marine mammals that may be exposed to noise that rises to the level of
take. Table 3 shows the authorized take for Transco's specified
activity, based on the estimated seasonal densities for pile
installation and removal and the number of days of activity (up to
seven for installation and seven for removal). Table 3 was adjusted
from the proposed IHA to account for the new construction schedule and
the Marine Mammal Commission's comment.
[[Page 35532]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-explosive sound
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Criterion Criterion definition Threshold
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level A Harassment (injury). Permanent Threshold 180 dB re 1 microPa-
Shift (PTS) (Any m (cetaceans)/190
level above that dB re 1 microPa-m
which is known to (pinnipeds) root
cause TTS). mean square (rms).
Level B Harassment.......... Behavioral 160 dB re 1 microPa-
Disruption (for m (rms).
impulse noises).
Level B Harassment.......... Behavioral 120 dB re 1 microPa-
Disruption (for m (rms).
continuous noises).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--Estimated Densities and Authorized Marine Mammal Take for the Specified Activity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Est. daily Est. daily
Est. summer Est. fall summer take fall take Total take Abundance % of stock
Common species name density (per density (per by level B by level B authorized of stock potentially Pop. trend
100 km\2\) \1\ 100 km\2\) \1\ harassment harassment affected
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gray seal........................ N/A N/A 14 14 196 348,900 0.06 increasing.
Harbor seal...................... 156.41 156.41 69 69 966 99,340 0.97 N/A.
Bottlenose dolphin............... 26.91 3.70 12 2 98 7,147 1.37 N/A.
Short-beaked common dolphin...... 3.59 5.28 2 3 35 52,893 0.06 N/A.
Harbor porpoise.................. 0.00 3.20 0 2 14 99,340 0.01 N/A.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Source: Navy OPAREA Density Estimates (NODE) for the Northeast OPAREAS: Boston, Narragansett Bay, and Atlantic City (2007).
N/A = Not available
Analysis and Preliminary Determinations
Negligible Impact
Negligible impact is ``an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably
likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival'' (50 CFR 216.103). A
negligible impact finding is based on the lack of likely adverse
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (i.e., population-
level effects). An estimate of the number of Level B harassment takes,
alone, is not enough information on which to base an impact
determination. In addition to considering estimates of the number of
marine mammals that might be ``taken'' through behavioral harassment,
NMFS must consider other factors, such as the likely nature of any
responses (their intensity, duration, etc.), the context of any
responses (critical reproductive time or location, migration, etc.), as
well as the number and nature of estimated Level A harassment takes,
the number of estimated mortalities, and effects on habitat.
We do not anticipate that any injuries, serious injuries, or
mortalities will occur as a result of Transco's Project, and we are not
authorizing injury, serious injury, or mortality for this Project. We
have determined, provided that the aforementioned mitigation and
monitoring measures are implemented, that the impact of conducting pile
driving activities off Rockaway Peninsula, from June 2014 through
September 2014, may result, at worst, in a modification in behavior
and/or low-level physiological effects (Level B harassment) of certain
species of marine mammals. There are no known important feeding areas
or haul-outs within the project area. While these species may make
behavioral modifications, including temporarily vacating the area
during the operation of the pile hammer to avoid the resultant acoustic
disturbance, the availability of similar habitat surrounding the
project area and the short and sporadic duration of the specified
activities, have led us to determine that this action will not
adversely affect annual rates of recruitment or survival.
Many animals perform vital functions, such as feeding, resting,
traveling, and socializing, on a diel cycle (i.e., 24 hour cycle).
Behavioral reactions to noise exposure (such as disruption of critical
life functions, displacement, or avoidance of important habitat) are
more likely to be significant if they last more than one diel cycle or
recur on subsequent days (Southall et al., 2007). While vibratory pile
driving will occur over 2 consecutive days, this is still considered a
short overall duration and it will only occur during daylight hours.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the required monitoring and
mitigation measures, NMFS finds that the total marine mammal take from
Transco's specified activity will have a negligible impact on the
affected marine mammal species or stocks.
Small Numbers
The take numbers for each marine mammal species we are authorizing
are small (all estimates are less than two percent) relative to the
affected stock sizes. Accordingly, NMFS finds that small numbers of
marine mammals will be taken.
Impact on Availability of Affected Species for Taking for Subsistence
Uses
There are no relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals implicated
by this action. Therefore, NMFS has determined that the total taking of
affected species or stocks will not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of such species or stocks for taking for
subsistence purposes.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Transco originally requested, and NMFS proposed, the incidental
take of North Atlantic right whale, which is listed as endangered under
the Endangered Species Act. Under section 7 of the Act, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC; the federal agency responsible for
permitting Transco's construction) initiated formal consultation with
our Northeast Regional Office on the Project. We (i.e., National Marine
Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, Permits and
Conservation Division), also initiated formal consultation under
section 7 of the Act with the Northeast Regional Office to obtain a
Biological Opinion (Opinion) evaluating the effects of issuing an
incidental harassment
[[Page 35533]]
authorization for threatened and endangered marine mammals and, if
appropriate, authorizing incidental take. However, following Transco's
amendment to their request, the Permits and Conservation Division and
the Northeast Regional Office concluded that take of North Atlantic
right whale is unlikely. Therefore, the Project is not expected to
result in the take of any threatened or endangered marine mammal
species.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS participated as a cooperating agency on the FERC's Rockaway
Delivery Lateral Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which
was published on March 10, 2014 (79 FR 13295) and is available here:
https://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/enviro/eis/2014/02-28-14-eis.asp.
NMFS determined that the EIS is adequate and appropriate to meet our
responsibilities under NEPA for the issuance of an IHA. NMFS adopted
FERC's FEIS on May 27, 2014.
Dated: June 18, 2014.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-14563 Filed 6-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P