Hearing and Re-Petition Authorization Processes Concerning Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes, 35129-35140 [2014-13817]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
information that is already in the public
domain, in either the same or a
substantially-identical form, does not
add anything new to the public’s
understanding of Government activities.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Your expertise or understanding of
the requested records as well as your
ability and intention to effectively
convey information to the public. NARA
ordinarily presumes that a
representative of the news media
satisfies this consideration.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Requesters should ask for waiver
or reduction of fees when they first
submit their requests to NARA, and
should address the criteria referenced
above. A requester may ask for a fee
waiver at a later time while the
underlying record request is still
pending or during an administrative
appeal.
(e) NARA may also waive (either
partially or in full) or reduce fees for
operational records in additional
circumstances as a matter of
administrative discretion.
§ 1250.74
[Amended]
9. Amend § 1250.74(a) by removing
the phrase ‘‘, and your right to judicial
review of the decision if information is
denied under a FOIA exemption’’.
■ 10. Amend § 1250.82 as follows:
■ a. Redesignate paragraphs (b) through
(g) as paragraphs (c) through (h); and
■ b. Revise paragraph (a);
■ c. Add a new paragraph (b); and
■ d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraphs (f) and (h).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 1250.82 How does NARA process FOIA
requests for confidential commercial
information?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(a) If the records are less than 10 years
old, NARA reviews the records in
response to a FOIA request. If NARA
then believes that it should release the
records under FOIA, it makes
reasonable efforts to inform the
submitter. The notice to the submitter
describes the business information
requested or includes copies of the
requested records. NARA does not
notify the submitter when it determines
that:
(1) It must withhold the information
under FOIA’s exemptions;
(2) The information has been
published or made available to the
public; or
(3) It is required by a statute (other
than the FOIA), or by a regulation
issued in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 12600,
to disclose the information.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
(b) If the records are 10 or more years
old, NARA reviews the records in
response to a FOIA request as it would
any other records, and at its discretion,
informs the submitter. NARA releases
the records if it determines that neither
Exemption 4 nor any other exemption
applies.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) NARA reviews and considers all
objections to release that it receives
within the time limit. Any information
provided by a submitter under this
provision may itself be subject to
disclosure under FOIA. NARA
considers a submitter who fails to
respond within the time period
specified in the notice to have no
objection to disclosure of the
information. If NARA decides to release
the records, it informs the submitter in
writing, along with NARA’s reasons for
deciding to release. NARA includes
with the notice copies of the records as
it intends to release them. NARA also
informs the submitter that it intends to
release the records within a reasonable
time after the date of the notice unless
a U.S. District Court forbids disclosure.
NARA will not consider any
information it receives after the date of
a disclosure decision.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) NARA notifies the requester in
three circumstances:
(1) When it notifies the submitter of
the opportunity to object to disclosure,
or to extend the time for objecting;
(2) When it notifies the submitter of
its intent to disclose the requested
information; and
(3) When a submitter files a lawsuit to
prevent the disclosure of the
information.
Dated: June 10, 2014.
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2014–14114 Filed 6–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 4
[K00103 12/13 A3A10; 134D0102DR–
DS5A300000–DR.5A311.IA000113]
RIN 1094–AA54
Hearing and Re-Petition Authorization
Processes Concerning
Acknowledgment of American Indian
Tribes
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35129
This proposed rule revises the
process and criteria for Federal
acknowledgment of Indian tribes. This
rulemaking would establish procedures
for a new category of expedited hearing
for petitioners who receive a negative
proposed finding for Federal
acknowledgment and request a hearing.
This rule would also establish
procedures for a new re-petition
authorization process for petitioners
whose petitions have been denied. This
proposed rule is related to a Bureau of
Indian Affairs proposed rule that would
revise processing of petitions for Federal
acknowledgment of Indian tribes.
DATES: Comments on this rule must be
received by August 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
—Federal rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
—Email: karl_johnson@oha.doi.gov.
Include the number 1094–AA54 in
the subject line.
—Mail or hand delivery: Karl Johnson,
Office of Hearings and Appeals,
Departmental Cases Hearings
Division, U.S. Department of the
Interior, 351 S. West Temple, Suite
6.300, Salt Lake City, UT 84101.
Include the number 1094–AA54 on
the envelope.
Please note that we will not consider
or include in the docket for this
rulemaking any comments received after
the close of the comment period (see
DATES) or any comments sent to an
address other than those listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Johnson, Senior Attorney, Office of
Hearings and Appeals, Departmental
Cases Hearings Division, (801) 524–
5344; karl_johnson@oha.doi.gov. You
may review the information collection
request online at https://
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the
instructions to review Department of the
Interior collections under review by
OMB.
SUMMARY:
This
proposed rule is being published in
connection with a Bureau of Indian
Affairs proposed rule that would
comprehensively revise 25 CFR part 83
to improve the processing of petitions
for Federal acknowledgment of Indian
tribes. The BIA proposed rule published
on May 29, 2014 (79 FR 30766). These
improvements include granting the
petitioner the ability to request a
hearing before an Office of Hearings and
Appeals (OHA) judge if the petitioner
receives a negative proposed finding on
Federal acknowledgment from the
Office of Federal Acknowledgment
(OFA). The hearing process culminates
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35130
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
in the judge’s issuance of a
recommended decision on Federal
acknowledgment for consideration by
the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
This proposed rule would not change
the ‘‘reasonable likelihood’’ burden of
proof standard in 25 CFR 83.10(a) for
determining whether the facts claimed
by the petitioner are valid and that the
criteria for Federal acknowledgment
have been met. In the acknowledgment
context, courts have examined whether
the Department correctly applied the
‘‘reasonable likelihood’’ standard but
have not articulated what the standard
actually requires. Muwekma Ohlone
Tribe v. Salazar, 708 F.3d 209, 220–21
(D.C. Cir. 2013). Instead, they have only
stated that ‘‘conclusive proof’’ or
‘‘conclusive evidence’’ is not required.
Id. at 212. The proposed rule would
incorporate the Supreme Court’s
clarification—arising from criminal
cases in which jury instructions are
challenged—that satisfaction of the
‘‘reasonable likelihood’’ standard does
not require proof that a claimed fact is
‘‘more likely than not’’ to be true. Boyde
v. California, 494 U.S. 370, 380 (1990).
This proposed rule is patterned to a
large extent after the procedural
regulations at 43 CFR part 45, which
contain very strict time constraints on
procedures and unusual procedural
requirements to expedite the process to
comply with a statutory time limit.
Compliance with these procedures can
be onerous for the parties and the judge.
The proposed rule would employ
similar but less strict time constraints to
achieve a proper balance between speed
and adequate development and
consideration of the issues.
One of the unusual procedures
incorporated into the proposed rule is
the requirement to submit direct
testimony in writing before the hearing
to shorten the length of the hearing. See
proposed § 4.1042(a). The hearing
would generally be limited to crossexamination of witnesses (and any redirect and re-cross examination).
While there is no statutory time limit
governing the proposed hearing process
for petitions for Federal
acknowledgment, there is still a
substantial need to resolve those
petitions expeditiously. Therefore,
issuance of a recommended decision
completing the hearing process would
be required within 180 days of initiation
of the process unless the judge finds
good cause for extending this deadline.
In our experience, full administrative
adjudications involving prehearing
conferences, discovery, motions, an
evidentiary hearing, briefing, and a
decision often take over a year to
complete, especially if the case involves
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
multiple parties and complex issues.
Shortening this process to 180 days will
be a substantial challenge for the parties
and the judge, and will require
adherence to fairly stringent procedural
limits and deadlines.
Comments are welcome on any
revisions to these regulations that might
better balance the parties’ need for an
adequate opportunity to prepare and
present their cases and the substantial
need to resolve each petition as
expeditiously as possible. More
particularly, comments are invited
addressing the propriety of requiring
direct testimony to be submitted in
writing before the hearing and setting a
180-day time limit for completion of the
hearing process and issuance of a
recommended decision.
Under this proposed rule, the 180-day
period for the hearing process would
commence when we issue the docketing
notice after receiving the referral notice
and record from OFA, and would end
when the judge issues a recommended
decision. During that period, at least one
prehearing conference would be held;
discovery would be conducted as
approved by the judge or agreed to by
the parties; evidence, including direct
written testimony and oral crossexamination, would be presented at a
hearing; post-hearing briefs would be
filed; and a recommended decision
would be issued by the judge. Any
person or organization may file a motion
to intervene in the hearing process.
Upon a proper showing of interest or
other factors, the judge may grant
intervention.
This proposed rule also includes
summary decision procedures, i.e.,
procedures for issuing a recommended
decision without a hearing based on the
absence of any genuine disputed issue
of material fact in the record. We invite
comments on whether the final rule
should include summary decision
procedures.
We also request comments on the
following questions: (1) Who is an
appropriate OHA judge to preside over
the hearing process and issue a
recommended decision on Federal
acknowledgment or over the re-petition
authorization process and issue a final
decision on whether re-petitioning is
authorized—an administrative law
judge appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105, an
administrative judge with OHA, or an
attorney designated by the OHA
Director to serve as the OHA judge (the
proposed rule defines ‘‘OHA judge’’
broadly to include all three); (2) whether
the factual basis for the OHA judge’s
decision should be limited to the
hearing record; and (3) whether the
hearing record should include all
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
evidence in OFA’s administrative record
for the petition or be limited to
testimony and exhibits specifically
identified by the petitioner and OFA.
Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the nation’s regulatory
system to promote predictability, to
reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory ends. The
E.O. directs agencies to consider
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It
will not result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year.
The rule’s requirements will not result
in a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. Nor will
this rule have significant adverse effects
on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of the U.S.-based enterprises
to compete with foreign-based
enterprises because the rule is limited to
Federal acknowledgment of Indian
tribes.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
country in July and August 2013.
Several federally recognized Indian
tribes submitted written comments on
that rule. The Department considered
each tribe’s comments and concerns and
has addressed them, where possible.
The Department will continue to
consult on that rule during the public
comment period and tribes are
encouraged to provide feedback on this
proposed rule during those sessions as
well.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this rule does not affect
individual property rights protected by
the Fifth Amendment nor does it
involves a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A
takings implication assessment is
therefore not required.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements are subject to an exception
under 25 CFR part 1320 and therefore
are not covered by the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13132, this rule has no substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule has been reviewed
to eliminate errors and ambiguity and
written to minimize litigation; and is
written in clear language and contains
clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175)
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments,’’ 59 FR 22951 (May 4,
1994), supplemented by Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, 65 FR 67249 (Nov. 6,
2000), and 512 DM 2, the Department
has assessed the impact of this rule on
Tribal trust resources and has
determined that it does not directly
affect Tribal resources. The rules are
procedural and administrative in nature.
However, the Department has consulted
with federally recognized Indian tribes
regarding the companion proposed rule
being published concurrently by the
BIA. That rule is an outgrowth of the
‘‘Discussion Draft’’ of the Federal
acknowledgment rule, which the
Department distributed to federally
recognized Indian tribes in June 2013,
and on which the Department hosted
five consultation sessions with federally
recognized Indian tribes throughout the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment
because it is of an administrative,
technical, and procedural nature. See 43
CFR 46.210(i). No extraordinary
circumstances exist that would require
greater review under the National
Environmental Policy Act.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
L. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the
‘‘COMMENTS’’ section. To better help
us revise the rule, your comments
should be as specific as possible. For
example, you should tell us the
numbers of the sections or paragraphs
that are unclearly written, which
sections or sentences are too long, the
sections where you believe lists or
tables would be useful, etc.
M. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35131
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 4,
Subpart K
Administrative practice and
procedure, Hearing and re-petition
authorization procedures, Indians-tribal
government.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Office of the Secretary,
proposes to amend 43 CFR part 4 as
follows:
PART 4—DEPARTMENT HEARINGS
AND APPEALS PROCEDURES
1. The authority for part 4 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 503–504; 25
U.S.C. 9, 372–74, 410, 2201 et seq.; 43 U.S.C.
1201, 1457; Pub. L. 99–264, 100 Stat. 61, as
amended.
■
2. Add Subpart K to read as follows:
Subpart K—Hearing and Re-Petition
Authorization Processes Concerning
Acknowledgment of American Indian
Tribes
General Provisions
Sec.
4.1001 What terms are used in this subpart?
4.1002 What is the purpose of this subpart?
4.1003 Which general rules of procedure
and practice do not apply?
4.1004 How are time periods computed?
Representatives
4.1010 Who may represent a party, and
what requirements apply to a
representative?
Document Filing and Service
4.1011 What are the form and content
requirements for documents under this
subpart?
4.1012 Where and how must documents be
filed?
4.1013 How must documents be served?
Judge’s Powers, Unavailability,
Disqualification, and Communications
4.1014 What are the powers of the judge?
4.1015 What happens if the judge becomes
unavailable?
4.1016 When can a judge be disqualified?
4.1017 Are ex parte communications
allowed?
Motions
4.1018 What are the requirements for
motions?
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
35132
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Hearing Process
Docketing, Intervention, Prehearing
Conferences, and Summary Decision
4.1020 What will OHA do upon receiving
the record from OFA?
4.1021 What are the requirements for
motions for intervention?
4.1022 How are prehearing conferences
conducted?
4.1023 What are the requirements for
motions for summary decision and
responses thereto?
Information Disclosure and Discovery
4.1030 What are the requirements for OFA’s
witness and exhibit list?
4.1031 How may parties obtain discovery of
information needed for the case?
4.1032 When must a party supplement or
amend information it has previously
provided?
4.1033 What are the requirements for
written interrogatories?
4.1034 What are the requirements for
depositions?
4.1035 How can parties request documents,
tangible things, or entry on land?
4.1036 What sanctions may the judge
impose for failure to comply with
discovery?
4.1037 What are the requirements for
subpoenas and witness fees?
Hearing, Briefing, and Decision
4.1040 When and where will the hearing be
held?
4.1041 What are the parties’ rights during
the hearing?
4.1042 What are the requirements for
presenting testimony?
4.1043 How may a party use a deposition in
the hearing?
4.1044 What are the requirements for
exhibits, official notice, and stipulations?
4.1045 What evidence is admissible at the
hearing?
4.1046 What are the requirements for
transcription of the hearing?
4.1047 What is the standard of proof?
4.1048 When will the hearing record close?
4.1049 What are the requirements for posthearing briefs?
4.1050 What are the requirements for the
judge’s recommended decision?
Re-Petition Authorization Process
4.1060 How does an unsuccessful petitioner
request authorization to re-petition for
Federal acknowledgment?
4.1061 What will OHA do with a request?
4.1062 What can the judge do?
4.1063 When will the judge allow a repetition?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9,
479a–1.
General Provisions
§ 4.1001 What terms are used in this
subpart?
As used in this subpart:
Assistant Secretary means the
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs
within the Department of the Interior, or
that officer’s authorized representative,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
but does not include representatives of
the Office of Federal Acknowledgment.
Day means a calendar day.
Department means the Department of
the Interior, including the Assistant
Secretary and OFA.
Discovery means a prehearing process
for obtaining facts or information to
assist a party in preparing or presenting
its case.
Ex parte communication means an
oral or written communication to the
judge that is made without providing all
parties reasonable notice and an
opportunity to participate.
Full intervenor means a person
granted leave by the judge to intervene
as a full party under § 4.1021.
Hearing process means the process by
which OHA handles a case forwarded to
OHA by OFA pursuant to 25 CFR
83.39(a), from receipt to issuance of a
recommended decision as to whether
the petitioner should be acknowledged
as a federally recognized Indian tribe for
purposes of federal law.
Judge means an administrative law
judge appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105, an
administrative judge, or an attorneyadvisor with the Office of Hearings and
Appeals assigned to preside over the
hearing process under this subpart by
the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
OFA means the Office of Federal
Acknowledgment within the Office of
the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs,
Department of the Interior.
OHA means the Office of Hearings
and Appeals, Department of the Interior.
Party means the petitioner or
unsuccessful petitioner (as appropriate),
OFA, or a full intervenor.
Person means an individual; a
partnership, corporation, association, or
other legal entity; an unincorporated
organization; and any federal, state,
tribal, county, district, territorial, or
local government or agency.
Petitioner means an entity that has
submitted a documented petition to
OFA requesting Federal
acknowledgment as a federally
recognized Indian tribe under 25 CFR
part 83 and has elected to have a
hearing under 25 CFR 83.38.
Re-petition authorization process
means the process by which OHA
handles a request for re-petitioning filed
with OHA by an unsuccessful petitioner
under 25 CFR 83.4(b), from receipt to
issuance of a decision as to whether the
unsuccessful petitioner is authorized to
re-petition for acknowledgment as a
federally recognized Indian tribe.
Representative means a person who:
(1) Is authorized by a party to
represent the party in a hearing process
or re-petition authorization process
under this subpart; and
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) Has filed an appearance under
§ 4.1010.
Secretary means the Secretary of the
Interior or his or her designee.
Senior Department employee has the
same meaning as the term ‘‘senior
employee’’ in 5 CFR 2637.211(a).
Unsuccessful petitioner means an
entity that was denied Federal
acknowledgment after petitioning under
a version of the acknowledgment
regulations at part 54 or part 83 of title
25 in effect prior to [EFFECTIVE DATE
OF FINAL RULE].
§ 4.1002 What is the purpose of this
subpart?
(a) To obtain acknowledgment as an
Indian tribe for purposes of Federal law
and therefore entitlement to a
government-to-government relationship
with the United States, an entity may
file a petition with the OFA under 25
CFR 83.20. If OFA issues a negative
proposed finding, the petitioner may
elect to have a hearing under 25 CFR
83.38(a) before a judge who will issue a
recommended decision under 25 CFR
83.39(d). These regulations contain
rules of practice and procedure
applicable to the hearing process
referred to in 25 CFR 83.38(a) and 83.39.
(b) Under 25 CFR 83.4(b), an
unsuccessful petitioner may seek
authorization from a judge to re-petition
for acknowledgment. These regulations
also contain rules of practice and
procedure applicable to the re-petition
authorization process.
(c) This subpart will be construed and
applied to each hearing process or repetition authorization process to
achieve a just and speedy
determination, consistent with adequate
consideration of the issues involved.
§ 4.1003 Which rules of procedure and
practice apply?
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of
§ 4.20, the general rules in 43 CFR part
4, subpart B, do not apply to the hearing
process or the re-petition authorization
process under this subpart.
(b) The provisions of §§ 4.1001,
4.1002, and 4.1004 through 4.1018
apply to both the hearing process and
the re-petition authorization process.
(c) The provisions of §§ 4.1020
through 4.1050 apply to:
(1) The hearing process; and
(2) The re-petition authorization
process to the extent, if any, that the
judge determines that they apply in
whole or in part.
(d) The provisions of §§ 4.1060
through 4.1063 apply to the re-petition
authorization process.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 4.1004
How are time periods computed?
(a) General. Time periods are
computed as follows:
(1) The day of the act or event from
which the period begins to run is not
included.
(2) The last day of the period is
included.
(i) If that day is a Saturday, Sunday,
or other day on which the Federal
government is closed for business, the
period is extended to the next business
day.
(ii) The last day of the period ends at
5 p.m. at the place where the filing or
other action is due.
(3) If the period is less than 7 days,
any Saturday, Sunday, or other day on
which the Federal government is closed
for business that falls within the period
is not included.
(b) Extensions of time. (1) No
extension of time can be granted to file
a motion for intervention under
§ 4.1021.
(2) An extension of time to file any
other document under this subpart may
be granted only upon a showing of good
cause.
(i) To request an extension of time, a
party must file a motion under § 4.1018
stating how much additional time is
needed and the reasons for the request.
(ii) The party must file the motion
before the applicable time period
expires, unless the party demonstrates
extraordinary circumstances that justify
a delay in filing.
(iii) The judge may grant the
extension only if:
(A) It would not unduly prejudice
other parties; and
(B) It would not delay the
recommended decision under § 4.1050.
Representatives
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4.1010 Who may act as a party’s
representative, and what requirements
apply to a representative?
(a) Individuals. A party who is an
individual may either act as his or her
own representative in the hearing
process or re-petition authorization
process under this subpart or authorize
an attorney to act as his or her
representative.
(b) Organizations. A party that is an
organization or other entity may
authorize one of the following to act as
its representative:
(1) An attorney;
(2) A partner, if the entity is a
partnership;
(3) An officer or full-time employee,
if the entity is a corporation,
association, or unincorporated
organization;
(4) A receiver, administrator,
executor, or similar fiduciary, if the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
entity is a receivership, trust, or estate;
or
(5) An elected or appointed official or
an employee, if the entity is a federal,
state, tribal, county, district, territorial,
or local government or component.
(c) OFA. OFA’s representative will be
an attorney from the Office of the
Solicitor.
(d) Appearance. A representative
must file a notice of appearance. The
notice must:
(1) Meet the form and content
requirements for documents under
§ 4.1011;
(2) Include the name and address of
the person on whose behalf the
appearance is made;
(3) If the representative is an attorney
(except for an attorney with the Office
of the Solicitor), include a statement
that he or she is a member in good
standing of the bar of the highest court
of a state, the District of Columbia, or
any territory or commonwealth of the
United States (identifying which one);
and
(4) If the representative is not an
attorney, include a statement explaining
his or her authority to represent the
entity.
(d) Disqualification. The judge may
disqualify any representative for
misconduct or other good cause.
Document Filing and Service
§ 4.1011 What are the form and content
requirements for documents under this
subpart?
(a) Form. Each document filed in a
case under this subpart must:
(1) Measure 81⁄2 by 11 inches, except
that a table, chart, diagram, or other
attachment may be larger if folded to
81⁄2 by 11 inches and attached to the
document;
(2) Be printed on just one side of the
page;
(3) Be clearly typewritten, printed, or
otherwise reproduced by a process that
yields legible and permanent copies;
(4) Use 12-point font size or larger;
(5) Be double-spaced except for
footnotes and long quotations, which
may be single-spaced;
(6) Have margins of at least 1 inch;
and
(7) Be bound on the left side, if
bound.
(b) Caption. Each document must
begin with a caption that includes:
(1) The name of the case under this
subpart and the docket number, if one
has been assigned;
(2) The name and docket number of
the proceeding to which the case under
this subpart relates; and
(3) A descriptive title for the
document, indicating the party for
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35133
whom it is filed and the nature of the
document.
(c) Signature. The original of each
document must be signed by the
representative of the person for whom
the document is filed. The signature
constitutes a certification by the
representative that:
(1) He or she has read the document;
(2) The statements in the document
are true to the best of his or her
knowledge, information, and belief; and
(3) The document is not being filed
for the purpose of causing delay.
(d) Contact information. Below the
representative’s signature, the document
must provide the representative’s name,
mailing address, street address (if
different), telephone number, facsimile
number (if any), and electronic mail
address (if any).
§ 4.1012 Where and how must documents
be filed?
(a) Place of filing. Any documents
relating to a case under this subpart
must be filed with the Office of the
Director, OHA. The OHA Director’s
Office’s address, telephone number, and
facsimile number are set forth at
www.doi.gov/oha/about-ohadirector.cfm.
(b) Method of filing. (1) A document
must be filed with OHA using one of the
following methods:
(i) By hand delivery of the original
document;
(ii) By sending the original document
by express mail or courier service for
delivery on the next business day; or
(iii) By sending the document by
facsimile if:
(A) The document is 20 pages or less,
including all attachments;
(B) The sending facsimile machine
confirms that the transmission was
successful; and
(C) The original of the document is
sent by regular mail on the same day.
(2) Parties are encouraged, but not
required, to supplement any filing by
providing the appropriate office with an
electronic copy of the document on
compact disc.
(c) Date of filing. A document under
this subpart is considered filed on the
date it is received. However, any
document received by OHA after 5 p.m.
is considered filed on the next regular
business day.
(d) Nonconforming documents. If any
document submitted for filing under
this subpart does not comply with the
requirements of this subpart or any
applicable order, it may be rejected. If
the defect is minor, the filer may be
notified of the defect and given a chance
to correct it.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
35134
§ 4.1013
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
How must documents be served?
(a) Filed documents. Any document
related to a case under this subpart must
be served at the same time the
document is delivered or sent for filing.
Copies must be served on each party,
using one of the methods of service in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Documents issued by OHA or the
judge. A complete copy of any notice,
order, decision, or other document
issued by OHA or the judge under this
subpart must be served on each party,
using one of the methods of service in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) Method of service. Service must be
accomplished by one of the following
methods:
(1) By hand delivery of the document;
(2) By sending the document by
express mail or courier service for
delivery on the next business day; or
(3) By sending the document by
facsimile if:
(i) The document is 20 pages or less,
including all attachments;
(ii) The sending facsimile machine
confirms that the transmission was
successful; and
(iii) The document is sent by regular
mail on the same day.
(d) Certificate of service. A certificate
of service must be attached to each
document filed under this subpart. The
certificate must be signed by the serving
party’s representative and include the
following information:
(1) The name, address, and other
contact information of each party’s
representative on whom the document
was served;
(2) The means of service, including
information indicating compliance with
paragraph (c)(3) or (c)(4) of this section,
if applicable; and
(3) The date of service.
Judge’s Powers, Unavailability,
Disqualification, and Communications
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4.1014
judge?
What are the powers of the
The judge has all powers necessary to
conduct the hearing process or the repetition authorization process in a fair,
orderly, expeditious, and impartial
manner, including the powers to:
(a) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(b) Issue subpoenas to the extent
authorized by law;
(c) Rule on motions;
(d) Authorize discovery as provided
for in this subpart;
(e) Hold hearings and conferences;
(f) Regulate the course of hearings;
(g) Call and question witnesses;
(h) Exclude any person from a hearing
or conference for misconduct or other
good cause;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
(i) Issue a recommended decision for
the hearing process or a final decision
for the re-petition authorization process;
and
(j) Take any other action authorized
by law.
§ 4.1015 What happens if the judge
becomes unavailable?
(a) If the judge becomes unavailable or
otherwise unable to perform the duties
described in § 4.1014, OHA will
designate a successor.
(b) If a hearing has commenced and
the judge cannot proceed with it, a
successor judge may do so. At the
request of a party, the successor judge
may recall any witness whose testimony
is material and disputed, and who is
available to testify again without undue
burden. The successor judge may,
within his or her discretion, recall any
other witness.
§ 4.1016 When can a judge be
disqualified?
(a) The judge may withdraw from a
case at any time the judge deems
himself or herself disqualified.
(b) At any time before issuance of the
judge’s decision, any party may move
that the judge disqualify himself or
herself for personal bias or other valid
cause.
(1) The party must file the motion
promptly after discovering facts or other
reasons allegedly constituting cause for
disqualification.
(2) The party must file with the
motion an affidavit or declaration
setting forth the facts or other reasons in
detail.
(c) The judge must rule upon the
motion, stating the grounds for the
ruling.
(1) If the judge concludes that the
motion is timely and meritorious, he or
she must disqualify himself or herself
and withdraw from the case.
(2) If the judge does not disqualify
himself or herself and withdraw from
the case, the judge must continue with
the hearing process or re-petition
authorization process and issue a
decision.
§ 4.1017 Are ex parte communications
allowed?
(a) Ex parte communications with the
judge or his or her staff are prohibited
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 554(d).
(b) This section does not prohibit ex
parte inquiries concerning case status or
procedural requirements, unless the
inquiry involves an area of controversy
in the hearing process or re-petition
authorization process.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 4.1018 What are the requirements for
motions?
(a) General. Any party may apply for
an order or ruling on any matter related
to the hearing process or re-petition
authorization process by presenting a
motion to the judge. A motion may be
presented any time after OHA issues the
docketing notice.
(1) A motion made at a hearing may
be stated orally on the record, unless the
judge directs that it be written.
(2) Any other motion must:
(i) Be in writing;
(ii) Comply with the requirements of
this subpart with respect to form,
content, filing, and service; and
(iii) Not exceed 10 pages.
(b) Content. (1) Each motion must
state clearly and concisely:
(i) Its purpose and the relief sought;
(ii) The facts constituting the grounds
for the relief sought; and
(iii) Any applicable statutory or
regulatory authority.
(2) A proposed order must accompany
the motion.
(c) Response. Except as otherwise
required by this subpart or by order of
the judge, any other party may file a
response to a written motion within 14
days after service of the motion. When
a party presents a motion at a hearing,
any other party may present a response
orally on the record.
(d) Reply. Unless the judge orders
otherwise, no reply to a response may
be filed.
(e) Effect of filing. Unless the judge
orders otherwise, the filing of a motion
does not stay the hearing process.
(f) Ruling. The judge will rule on the
motion as soon as feasible, either orally
on the record or in writing. The judge
may summarily deny any dilatory,
repetitive, or frivolous motion.
Hearing Process
Docketing, Intervention, Prehearing
Conferences, and Summary Decision
§ 4.1020 What will OHA do upon receiving
the record from OFA?
Within 5 days after issuance of the
referral notice under 25 CFR 83.39(a)
the actions required by this section must
be taken.
(a) OHA must:
(1) Docket the case;
(2) Assign a judge to preside over the
hearing process and issue a
recommended decision; and
(3) Issue a docketing notice that
informs the parties of the docket
number and the judge assigned to the
case.
(b) The judge assigned under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section must
issue a notice setting the time, place,
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
and method for conducting an initial
prehearing conference under
§ 4.1022(a). This notice may be
combined with the docketing notice
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4.1021 What are the requirements for
motions for intervention and responses?
(a) General. A person may file a
motion for intervention within 15 days
after issuance of the referral notice
under 25 CFR 83.39(a).
(b) Content of the motion. The motion
for intervention must contain the
following:
(1) A statement setting forth the
interest of the person and, if the person
seeks intervention under paragraph (d)
of this section, a showing of why that
interest may be adversely affected by the
final determination of the Assistant
Secretary under 25 CFR 83.43;
(2) An explanation of the person’s
position with respect to the issues of
material fact raised in the election of
hearing in no more than two pages; and
(3) A list of the witnesses and exhibits
the person intends to present at the
hearing, other than solely for
impeachment purposes, including:
(A) For each witness listed, his or her
name, address, telephone number, and
qualifications and a brief narrative
summary of his or her expected
testimony; and
(B) For each exhibit listed, a statement
specifying whether the exhibit is in the
administrative record reviewed by OFA.
(c) Timing of response to a motion.
Any response to a motion for
intervention must be filed by a party
within 7 days after service of the
motion.
(d) Intervention of right. The judge
will grant intervention where the person
has an interest that may be adversely
affected by the Assistant Secretary’s
final determination under 25 CFR 83.43.
(e) Permissive Intervention. If
paragraph (d) of this section does not
apply, the judge will consider the
following in determining whether
intervention is appropriate:
(1) The nature of the issues;
(2) The adequacy of representation of
the person’s interest which is provided
by the existing parties to the proceeding;
(3) The ability of the person to present
relevant evidence and argument; and
(4) The effect of intervention on the
Department’s implementation of its
statutory mandates.
(f) How an intervenor may participate.
(1) A person granted leave to intervene
under paragraph (d) of this section may
participate as a full party or in a
capacity less than that of a full party.
(2) If the intervenor wishes to
participate in a limited capacity or if the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
intervenor is granted leave to intervene
under paragraph (e) of this section, the
extent and the terms of the participation
will be determined by the judge.
(3) An intervenor may not raise issues
of material fact beyond those raised in
the election of hearing under 25 CFR
83.38(a)(1).
§ 4.1022 How are prehearing conferences
conducted?
(a) Initial prehearing conference. The
judge will conduct an initial prehearing
conference with the parties at the time
specified in the docketing notice under
§ 4.1020, within 35 days after issuance
of the docketing notice.
(1) The initial prehearing conference
will be used:
(i) To identify, narrow, and clarify the
disputed issues of material fact and
exclude issues that do not qualify for
review as factual, material, and
disputed;
(ii) To consider the parties’ motions
for discovery under § 4.1031 and to set
a deadline for the completion of
discovery;
(iii) To discuss the evidence on which
each party intends to rely at the hearing;
(iv) To set the deadline for submission
of written testimony under § 4.1042; and
(v) To set the date, time, and place of
the hearing.
(2) The initial prehearing conference
may also be used:
(i) To discuss limiting and grouping
witnesses to avoid duplication;
(ii) To discuss stipulations of fact and
of the content and authenticity of
documents;
(iii) To consider requests that the
judge take official notice of public
records or other matters;
(iv) To discuss the submission of
written testimony, briefs, or other
documents in electronic form; and
(v) To consider any other matters that
may aid in the disposition of the case.
(b) Other conferences. The judge may
direct the parties to attend one or more
other prehearing conferences, if
consistent with the need to complete the
hearing process within 180 days. Any
party may by motion request a
conference.
(c) Notice. The judge must give the
parties reasonable notice of the time and
place of any conference. A conference
will ordinarily be held by telephone,
unless the judge orders otherwise.
(d) Representatives’ preparation and
authority. Each party’s representative
must be fully prepared during the
prehearing conference for a discussion
of all procedural and substantive issues
properly raised. The representative must
be authorized to commit the party that
he or she represents respecting those
issues.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35135
(e) Parties’ Meeting. Before the initial
prehearing conference, the parties’
representatives must make a good faith
effort:
(1) To meet in person, by telephone,
or by other appropriate means; and
(2) To reach agreement on discovery
and the schedule of remaining steps in
the hearing process.
(f) Failure to attend. Unless the judge
orders otherwise, a party that fails to
attend or participate in a conference,
after being served with reasonable
notice of its time and place, waives all
objections to any agreements reached in
the conference and to any consequent
orders or rulings.
(g) Scope. During a conference, the
judge may dispose of any procedural
matters related to the case.
(h) Order. Within 3 days after the
conclusion of each conference, the judge
must issue an order that recites any
agreements reached at the conference
and any rulings made by the judge
during or as a result of the conference.
§ 4.1023 What are the requirements for
motions for summary decision and
responses?
(a) Timing of motion. At any time
after OHA issues a docketing notice
under § 4.1020, a party may file a
motion for summary decision on all or
part of the proceeding.
(b) Motion requirements. The party
filing a motion for summary decision
must:
(1) Concisely state the material facts
that the party contends are undisputed;
(2) Verify those facts with supporting
affidavits or declarations, depositions,
answers to interrogatories, admissions,
documents produced on request, or
other documentation;
(3) Include references to the specific
portions of the record that verify those
facts; and
(4) State why the party is entitled to
summary decision as a matter of law.
(c) Response requirements. If a motion
for summary decision is properly made
and supported, an opposing party may
not rely merely on allegations or denials
in its own pleading; rather, its response
must either:
(1) State why the moving party is not
entitled to summary decision as a matter
of law; or
(2) Do all of the following:
(i) Concisely state the material facts
which the opposing party contends are
disputed;
(ii) Verify that those facts are disputed
with supporting affidavits or
declarations, depositions, answers to
interrogatories, admissions, documents
produced on request, or other
documentation; and
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35136
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Include references to the specific
portions of the record that verify that
those facts are disputed.
(d) Establishing facts. All material
facts set forth by the moving party and
properly supported by an accurate
reference to the record will be taken as
true for the purpose of summary
decision unless specifically
controverted by the opposing party’s
response. Alternatively, the material
facts for the purpose of summary
decision may be established by an
agreement of the parties enumerating
those facts.
(e) Affidavits. A supporting or
opposing affidavit must be made on
personal knowledge, set out facts that
would be admissible in evidence, and
show that the affiant is competent to
testify on the matters stated. If a
document or part of a document is
referred to in an affidavit, a copy must
be filed with the affidavit unless the
document is longer than 10 pages, the
document is already in the record, and
the affidavit specifies the location of the
document in the record.
(f) When affidavits are unavailable. If
a party opposing the motion shows by
affidavit that, for specified reasons, it
cannot present facts essential to justify
its opposition, the judge may:
(1) Deny the motion for summary
decision;
(2) Order a continuance to enable
affidavits to be obtained, depositions to
be taken, or other discovery to be
undertaken; or
(3) Issue any other just order.
(g) Standards for decision. The judge
may grant summary decision under this
section if the record (including the
pleadings, affidavits or declarations,
depositions, answers to interrogatories,
admissions, documents produced on
request, and other documentation)
shows that:
(1) There is no genuine disputed issue
as to any material fact; and
(2) The moving party is entitled to
summary decision as a matter of law.
(h) Proceeding not fully adjudicated
on the motion. If summary decision is
not rendered on the whole proceeding,
the judge should, to the extent feasible,
determine and specify by order what
material facts are not genuinely
disputed. The facts so specified must be
treated as established in the proceeding.
Information Disclosure and Discovery
§ 4.1030 What are the requirements for
OFA’s witness and exhibit list?
Within 14 days after issuance of the
referral notice under 25 CFR 83.39(a),
OFA must file a list of the witnesses and
exhibits it intends to present at the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
hearing, other than solely for
impeachment purposes, including:
(a) For each witness listed, his or her
name, address, telephone number,
qualifications, and a brief narrative
summary of his or her expected
testimony; and
(b) For each exhibit listed, a statement
specifying whether the exhibit is in the
administrative record reviewed by OFA.
§ 4.1031 How may parties obtain discovery
of information?
(a) General. By agreement of the
parties or with the permission of the
judge, a party may obtain discovery of
information to assist in preparing or
presenting its case. Available methods
of discovery are:
(1) Written interrogatories;
(2) Depositions as provided in
paragraph (h) of this section; and
(3) Requests for production of
designated documents or tangible things
or for entry on designated land for
inspection or other purposes.
(b) Criteria. Discovery may occur only
as agreed to by the parties or as
authorized by the judge in a written
order or during a prehearing conference.
The judge may authorize discovery only
if the party requesting discovery
demonstrates:
(1) That the discovery will not
unreasonably delay the hearing process;
(2) That the scope of the discovery is
not unduly burdensome;
(3) That the method to be used is the
least burdensome method available;
(4) That any trade secrets or
proprietary information can be
adequately safeguarded;
(5) That the standards for discovery
under paragraphs (f) through (h) of this
section have been met, if applicable;
and
(6) That the information sought:
(i) Will be admissible at the hearing
or appears reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence;
(ii) Is not otherwise obtainable by the
party;
(iii) Is not cumulative or repetitious;
and
(iv) Is not privileged or protected from
disclosure by applicable law.
(c) Motions. A party may initiate
discovery:
(1) Pursuant to an agreement of the
parties; or
(2) By filing a motion that:
(i) Briefly describes the proposed
methodology, purpose, and scope of the
discovery;
(ii) Explains how the discovery meets
the criteria in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(b)(6) of this section; and
(iii) Attaches a copy of any proposed
discovery request (written
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
interrogatories, notice of deposition, or
request for production of designated
documents or tangible things or for
entry on designated land).
(d) Timing of motions. Any discovery
motion under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section must be filed:
(1) Within 20 days after issuance of
the docketing notice under § 4.1020 if
the discovery sought is between the
petitioner and OFA; and
(2) Within 30 days after issuance of
the docketing notice under § 4.1020 if
the discovery sought is between a full
intervenor and another party.
(e) Objections. (1) A party must file
any objections to a discovery motion or
to specific portions of a proposed
discovery request within 10 days after
service of the motion.
(2) An objection must explain how, in
the objecting party’s view, the discovery
sought does not meet the criteria in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) of this
section.
(f) Materials prepared for hearing. A
party generally may not obtain
discovery of documents and tangible
things otherwise discoverable under
paragraph (b) of this section if they were
prepared in anticipation of or for the
hearing by or for another party’s
representative (including the party’s
attorney, expert, or consultant).
(1) If a party wants to discover these
materials, it must show:
(i) That it has substantial need of the
materials in preparing its own case; and
(ii) That the party is unable without
undue hardship to obtain the substantial
equivalent of the materials by other
means.
(2) In ordering discovery of these
materials when the required showing
has been made, the judge must protect
against disclosure of the mental
impressions, conclusions, opinions, or
legal theories of an attorney.
(g) Experts. Unless restricted by the
judge, a party may discover any facts
known or opinions held by an expert
concerning any relevant matters that are
not privileged. Such discovery will be
permitted only if:
(1) The expert is expected to be a
witness at the hearing; or
(2) The expert is relied on by another
expert who is expected to be a witness
at the hearing, and the party shows:
(i) That it has a compelling need for
the information; and
(ii) That it cannot feasibly obtain the
information by other means.
(h) Limitations on depositions. (1) A
party may depose a witness only if the
party shows that the witness:
(i) Will be unable to attend the
hearing because of age, illness, or other
incapacity; or
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Is unwilling to attend the hearing
voluntarily, and the party is unable to
compel the witness’s attendance at the
hearing by subpoena.
(2) Paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section
does not apply to any person employed
by or under contract with the party
seeking the deposition.
(3) A party may depose a senior
Department employee of OFA if the
party shows:
(i) That the employee’s testimony is
necessary in order to provide
significant, unprivileged information
that is not available from any other
source or by less burdensome means;
and
(ii) That the deposition would not
significantly interfere with the
employee’s ability to perform his or her
official duties.
(i) Completion of discovery. All
discovery must be completed within 35
days after the initial prehearing
conference, unless the judge sets a
different deadline.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4.1032 When must a party supplement or
amend information?
(a) Discovery. A party must promptly
supplement or amend any prior release
given in response to a discovery request
if it learns that the response:
(1) Was incomplete or incorrect when
made; or
(2) Though complete and correct
when made, is now incomplete or
incorrect in any material respect.
(b) Witnesses and exhibits. (1) Within
10 days after the date set for completion
of discovery, each party must file an
updated version of the list of witnesses
and exhibits required under 25 CFR
83.38(a)(1)(B), § 4.1021(b)(3), or
§ 4.1030(a).
(2) If a party wishes to include any
new witness or exhibit on its updated
list, it must provide an explanation of
why it was not feasible for the party to
include the witness or exhibit on its list
under 25 CFR 83.38(a)(1)(ii),
§ 4.1021(b)(3), or § 4.1030(a).
(c) Failure to disclose. (1) A party that
fails to disclose information required
under 25 CFR 83.38(a)(1)(ii),
§ 4.1021(b)(3), § 4.1030(a), or paragraphs
(a) or (b) of this section will not be
permitted to introduce as evidence at
the hearing testimony from a witness or
other information that it failed to
disclose.
(2) Paragraph (c)(1) of this section
does not apply if the failure to disclose
was substantially justified or is
harmless.
(3) Before or during the hearing, a
party may object under paragraph (c)(1)
of this section to the admission of
evidence.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
(4) The judge will consider the
following in determining whether to
exclude evidence under paragraphs
(c)(1) through (c)(3) of this section:
(i) The prejudice to the objecting
party;
(ii) The ability of the objecting party
to cure any prejudice;
(iii) The extent to which presentation
of the evidence would disrupt the
orderly and efficient hearing of the case;
(iv) The importance of the evidence;
and
(v) The reason for the failure to
disclose, including any bad faith or
willfulness regarding the failure.
§ 4.1033 What are the requirements for
written interrogatories?
(a) Motion required. A party wishing
to propound interrogatories must file a
motion under § 4.1031(c), unless the
parties agree otherwise.
(b) Judge’s order. During or promptly
after the initial prehearing conference,
the judge will issue an order under
§ 4.1031(b) with respect to any
discovery motion requesting the use of
written interrogatories. The order will
either grant the motion and approve the
use of some or all of the proposed
interrogatories or deny the motion.
(c) Answers to interrogatories. Except
upon agreement of the parties, the party
to whom the proposed interrogatories
are directed must file its answers to any
interrogatories approved by the judge
within 15 days after issuance of the
order under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(1) Each approved interrogatory must
be answered separately and fully in
writing.
(2) The party or its representative
must sign the answers to interrogatories
under oath or affirmation.
(d) Access to records. A party’s
answer to an interrogatory is sufficient
when:
(1) The information may be obtained
from an examination of records, or from
a compilation, abstract, or summary
based on records;
(2) The burden of obtaining the
information from the records is
substantially the same for all parties;
(3) The answering party specifically
identifies the individual records from
which the requesting party may obtain
the information and where the records
are located; and
(4) The answering party provides the
requesting party with reasonable
opportunity to examine the records and
make a copy, compilation, abstract, or
summary.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35137
§ 4.1034 What are the requirements for
depositions?
(a) Motion and notice. A party
wishing to take a deposition must file a
motion under § 4.1031(c), unless the
parties agree otherwise. Any notice of
deposition filed with the motion must
state:
(1) The time and place that the
deposition is to be taken;
(2) The name and address of the
person before whom the deposition is to
be taken;
(3) The name and address of the
witness whose deposition is to be taken;
and
(4) Any documents or materials that
the witness is to produce.
(b) Judge’s order. During or promptly
after the initial prehearing conference,
the judge will issue an order under
§ 4.1031(b) with respect to any
discovery motion requesting the taking
of a deposition. The order will either
grant the motion and approve the taking
of the deposition, subject to any
conditions or restrictions the judge may
impose or deny the motion.
(c) Required arrangements. If the
parties agree to or the judge approves
the taking of the deposition, the party
requesting the deposition must make
appropriate arrangements for necessary
facilities and personnel.
(1) The deposition will be taken at the
time and place agreed to by the parties
or indicated in the judge’s order.
(2) The deposition may be taken
before any disinterested person
authorized to administer oaths in the
place where the deposition is to be
taken.
(3) Any party that objects to the taking
of a deposition because of the
disqualification of the person before
whom it is to be taken must do so either:
(i) Before the deposition begins; or
(ii) As soon as the disqualification
becomes known or could have been
discovered with reasonable diligence.
(4) A deposition may be taken by
telephone conference call, if agreed to
by the parties or approved in the judge’s
order.
(d) Testimony. Each witness deposed
must be placed under oath or
affirmation, and the other parties must
be given an opportunity for crossexamination.
(e) Representation of witness. The
witness being deposed may have
counsel or another representative
present during the deposition.
(f) Recording and transcript. Except as
provided in paragraph (g) of this
section, the deposition must be
stenographically recorded and
transcribed at the expense of the party
that requested the deposition.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
35138
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(1) Any other party may obtain a copy
of the transcript at its own expense.
(2) Unless waived by the deponent,
the deponent will have 3 days after
receiving the transcript to read and sign
it.
(3) The person before whom the
deposition was taken must certify the
transcript following receipt of the
signed transcript from the deponent or
expiration of the 3-day review period,
whichever occurs first.
(g) Video recording allowed. The
testimony at a deposition may be video
recorded, subject to any conditions or
restrictions that the parties may agree to
or the judge may impose, at the expense
of the party requesting the recording.
(1) The video recording may be in
conjunction with an oral examination
by telephone conference held under
paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
(2) After the deposition has been
taken, the person recording the
deposition must:
(i) Provide a copy of the recording to
any party that requests it, at the
requesting party’s expense; and
(ii) Attach to the recording a
statement identifying the case and the
deponent and certifying the authenticity
of the recording.
(h) Use of deposition. A deposition
may be used at the hearing as provided
in § 4.1043.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4.1035 How can parties request
documents, tangible things, or entry on
land?
(a) Motion required. A party wishing
to request the production of designated
documents or tangible things or entry on
designated land must file a motion
under § 4.1031(c), unless the parties
agree otherwise. A request may include
any of the following that are in the
possession, custody, or control of
another party:
(1) The production of designated
documents for inspection and copying;
(2) The production of designated
tangible things for inspection, copying,
testing, or sampling; or
(3) Entry on designated land or other
property for inspection and measuring,
surveying, photographing, testing, or
sampling either the property or any
designated object or operation on the
property.
(b) Judge’s order. During or promptly
after the initial prehearing conference,
the judge will issue an order under
§ 4.1031(b) with respect to any
discovery motion requesting the
production of documents or tangible
things or entry on land for inspection,
copying, or other purposes. The order
will:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
(1) Grant the motion and approve the
use of some or all of the proposed
requests; or
(2) Deny the motion.
(c) Compliance with order. Except
upon agreement of the parties, the party
to whom any approved request for
production is directed must permit the
approved inspection and other activities
within 15 days after issuance of the
order under paragraph (a) of this
section.
§ 4.1036 What sanctions may the judge
impose?
(a) Upon motion of a party, the judge
may impose sanctions under paragraph
(b) of this section if any party:
(1) Fails to comply with an order
approving discovery; or
(2) Fails to supplement or amend a
response to discovery under § 4.1032(a).
(b) The judge may impose one or more
of the following sanctions:
(1) Infer that the information,
testimony, document, or other evidence
withheld would have been adverse to
the party;
(2) Order that, for the purposes of the
hearing, designated facts are
established;
(3) Order that the party not introduce
into evidence, or otherwise rely on to
support its case, any information,
testimony, document, or other evidence:
(i) That the party improperly
withheld; or
(ii) That the party obtained from
another party in discovery;
(4) Allow another party to use
secondary evidence to show what the
information, testimony, document, or
other evidence withheld would have
shown; or
(5) Take other appropriate action to
remedy the party’s failure to comply.
§ 4.1037 What are the requirements for
subpoenas and witness fees?
(a) Request for subpoena. (1) Except
as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, any party may file a motion
requesting the judge to issue a subpoena
to the extent authorized by law for the
attendance of a person, the giving of
testimony, or the production of
documents or other relevant evidence
during discovery or for the hearing.
(2) A party may subpoena a senior
Department employee of the OFA only
if the party shows:
(i) That the employee’s testimony is
necessary in order to provide
significant, unprivileged information
that is not available from any other
source or by less burdensome means;
and
(ii) That the employee’s attendance
would not significantly interfere with
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the ability to perform his or her
government duties.
(b) Service. (1) A subpoena may be
served by any person who is not a party
and is 18 years of age or older.
(2) Service must be made by hand
delivering a copy of the subpoena to the
person named therein.
(3) The person serving the subpoena
must:
(i) Prepare a certificate of service
setting forth the date, time, and manner
of service or the reason for any failure
of service; and
(ii) Swear to or affirm the certificate,
attach it to a copy of the subpoena, and
return it to the party on whose behalf
the subpoena was served.
(c) Witness fees. (1) A party who
subpoenas a witness who is not a party
must pay him or her the same fees and
mileage expenses that are paid
witnesses in the district courts of the
United States.
(2) A witness who is not a party and
who attends a deposition or hearing at
the request of any party without having
been subpoenaed to do so is entitled to
the same fees and mileage expenses as
if he or she had been subpoenaed.
However, this paragraph does not apply
to federal employees who are called as
witnesses by OFA.
(d) Motion to quash. (1) A person to
whom a subpoena is directed may
request by motion that the judge quash
or modify the subpoena.
(2) The motion must be filed:
(i) Within 5 days after service of the
subpoena; or
(ii) At or before the time specified in
the subpoena for compliance, if that is
less than 5 days after service of the
subpoena.
(3) The judge may quash or modify
the subpoena if it:
(i) Is unreasonable;
(ii) Requires evidence during
discovery that is not discoverable; or
(iii) Requires evidence during a
hearing that is privileged or irrelevant.
(e) Enforcement. For good cause
shown, the judge may apply to the
appropriate United States District Court
for the issuance of an order compelling
the appearance and testimony of a
witness or the production of evidence as
set forth in a subpoena that has been
duly issued and served.
Hearing, Briefing, and Decision
§ 4.1040 When and where will the hearing
be held?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, the hearing will be
held at the time and place set at the
initial prehearing conference under
§ 4.1022(a)(1)(v), generally within 20
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
days after the date set for completion of
discovery.
(b) On motion by a party or on the
judge’s initiative, the judge may change
the date, time, or place of the hearing if
he or she finds:
(1) That there is good cause for the
change; and
(2) That the change will not unduly
prejudice the parties and witnesses.
§ 4.1041 What are the parties’ rights
during the hearing?
Consistent with the provisions of this
subpart, and as necessary to ensure full
and accurate disclosure of the facts, the
parties have the following rights during
the hearing:
(a) Each party may:
(1) Present direct and rebuttal
evidence;
(2) Make objections, motions, and
arguments; and
(3) Cross-examine witnesses and
conduct re-direct and re-cross
examination as permitted by the judge.
(b) The petitioner may conduct oral
cross-examination of OFA staff who
participated in the preparation of the
proposed finding.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4.1042 What are the requirements for
presenting testimony?
(a) Written direct testimony. Unless
otherwise ordered by the judge, all
direct hearing testimony must be
prepared and submitted in written form.
(1) Prepared written testimony must:
(i) Have line numbers inserted in the
left-hand margin of each page;
(ii) Be authenticated by an affidavit or
declaration of the witness;
(iii) Be filed within 15 days after the
date set for completion of discovery,
unless the judge sets a different
deadline; and
(iv) Be offered as an exhibit during the
hearing.
(2) Any witness submitting written
testimony must be available for crossexamination at the hearing.
(b) Oral testimony. Oral examination
of a witness in a hearing, including on
cross-examination or redirect, must be
conducted under oath and in the
presence of the judge, with an
opportunity for all parties to question
the witness.
(c) Telephonic testimony. The judge
may by order allow a witness to testify
by telephonic conference call.
(1) The arrangements for the call must
let each party listen to and speak to the
witness and each other within the
hearing of the judge.
(2) The judge will ensure the full
identification of each speaker so the
reporter can create a proper record.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
(3) The judge may issue a subpoena
under § 4.1037 directing a witness to
testify by telephonic conference call.
§ 4.1043 How may a party use a deposition
in the hearing?
(a) In general. Subject to the
provisions of this section, a party may
use in the hearing any part or all of a
deposition taken under § 4.1034 against
any party who:
(1) Was present or represented at the
taking of the deposition; or
(2) Had reasonable notice of the taking
of the deposition.
(b) Admissibility. (1) No part of a
deposition will be included in the
hearing record, unless received in
evidence by the judge.
(2) The judge will exclude from
evidence any question and response to
which an objection:
(i) Was noted at the taking of the
deposition; and
(ii) Would have been sustained if the
witness had been personally present
and testifying at a hearing.
(3) If a party offers only part of a
deposition in evidence:
(i) An adverse party may require the
party to introduce any other part that
ought in fairness to be considered with
the part introduced; and
(ii) Any other party may introduce
any other parts.
(c) Video-recorded deposition. If the
deposition was video recorded and is
admitted into evidence, relevant
portions will be played during the
hearing and transcribed into the record
by the reporter.
§ 4.1044 What are the requirements for
exhibits, official notice, and stipulations?
(a) General. (1) Except as provided in
paragraphs (b) through (e) of this
section, any material offered in
evidence, other than oral testimony,
must be offered in the form of an
exhibit.
(2) Each exhibit offered by a party
must be marked for identification.
(3) Any party who seeks to have an
exhibit admitted into evidence must
provide:
(i) The original of the exhibit to the
reporter, unless the judge permits the
substitution of a copy; and
(ii) A copy of the exhibit to the judge.
(b) Material not offered. If a document
offered as an exhibit contains material
not offered as evidence:
(1) The party offering the exhibit
must:
(i) Designate the matter offered as
evidence;
(ii) Segregate and exclude the material
not offered in evidence, to the extent
feasible; and
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35139
(iii) Provide copies of the entire
document to the other parties appearing
at the hearing.
(2) The judge must give the other
parties an opportunity to inspect the
entire document and offer in evidence
any other portions of the document.
(c) Official notice. (1) At the request
of any party at the hearing, the judge
may take official notice of any matter of
which the courts of the United States
may take judicial notice, including the
public records of any Department party.
(2) The judge must give the other
parties appearing at the hearing an
opportunity to show the contrary of an
officially noticed fact.
(3) Any party requesting official
notice of a fact after the conclusion of
the hearing must show good cause for
its failure to request official notice
during the hearing.
(d) Stipulations. (1) The parties may
stipulate to any relevant facts or to the
authenticity of any relevant documents.
(2) If received in evidence at the
hearing, a stipulation is binding on the
stipulating parties.
(3) A stipulation may be written or
made orally at the hearing.
§ 4.1045 What evidence is admissible at
the hearing?
(a) General. (1) Subject to the
provisions of § 4.1032(b), the judge may
admit any written, oral, documentary, or
demonstrative evidence that is:
(i) Relevant, reliable, and probative;
and
(ii) Not privileged or unduly
repetitious or cumulative.
(2) The judge may exclude evidence if
its probative value is substantially
outweighed by the risk of undue
prejudice, confusion of the issues, or
delay.
(3) Hearsay evidence is admissible.
The judge may consider the fact that
evidence is hearsay when determining
its probative value.
(4) The Federal Rules of Evidence do
not directly apply to the hearing, but
may be used as guidance by the judge
and the parties in interpreting and
applying the provisions of this section.
(b) Objections. Any party objecting to
the admission or exclusion of evidence
shall concisely state the grounds. A
ruling on every objection must appear in
the record.
§ 4.1046 What are the requirements for
transcription of the hearing?
(a) Transcript and reporter’s fees. The
hearing must be transcribed verbatim.
(1) OHA will secure the services of a
reporter and pay the reporter’s fees to
provide an original transcript to OHA
on an expedited basis.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
35140
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(2) Each party must pay the reporter
for any copies of the transcript obtained
by that party.
(b) Transcript Corrections. (1) Any
party may file a motion proposing
corrections to the transcript. The motion
must be filed within 5 days after receipt
of the transcript, unless the judge sets a
different deadline.
(2) Unless a party files a timely
motion under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, the transcript will be presumed
to be correct and complete, except for
obvious typographical errors.
(3) As soon as feasible after the close
of the hearing and after consideration of
any motions filed under paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, the judge will issue an
order making any corrections to the
transcript that the judge finds are
warranted.
§ 4.1047
What is the standard of proof?
(a) Reasonable likelihood standard.
The judge will consider a criterion to be
met if the evidence establishes a
reasonable likelihood that the facts
claimed by the petitioner are true and
that those facts demonstrate that the
petitioner meets the criterion.
(b) Meaning of standard. To prove a
‘‘reasonable likelihood’’ that a claimed
fact is true, the petitioner must show
that there is more than a mere
possibility that it is true, but need not
show that it is more likely than not to
be true.
§ 4.1048
close?
When will the hearing record
(a) The hearing record will close
when the judge closes the hearing,
unless he or she directs otherwise.
(b) Evidence may not be added after
the hearing record is closed, but the
transcript may be corrected under
§ 4.1046(b).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4.1049 What are the requirements for
post-hearing briefs?
(a) General. (1) Each party may file a
post-hearing brief within 20 days after
the close of the hearing, unless the judge
sets a different deadline.
(2) A party may file a reply brief only
if requested by the judge. The deadline
for filing a reply brief, if any, will be set
by the judge.
(3) The judge may limit the length of
the briefs to be filed under this section.
(b) Content. (1) An initial brief must
include:
(i) A concise statement of the case;
(ii) A separate section containing
proposed findings regarding the issues
of material fact, with supporting
citations to the hearing record;
(iii) Arguments in support of the
party’s position; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Jun 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
(iv) Any other matter required by the
judge.
(2) A reply brief, if requested by the
judge, must be limited to any issues
identified by the judge.
(c) Form. (1) An exhibit admitted in
evidence or marked for identification in
the record may not be reproduced in the
brief.
(i) Such an exhibit may be
reproduced, within reasonable limits, in
an appendix to the brief.
(ii) Any pertinent analysis of an
exhibit may be included in a brief.
(2) If a brief exceeds 30 pages, it must
contain:
(i) A table of contents and of points
made, with page references; and
(ii) An alphabetical list of citations to
legal authority, with page references.
§ 4.1050 What are the requirements for the
judge’s recommended decision?
(a) Timing. The judge must issue a
recommended decision within 180 days
after issuance of the docketing notice
under § 4.1020(a)(3), unless the judge
issues an Order finding good cause to
issue the recommended decision at a
later date.
(b) Content. (1) The recommended
decision must contain all of the
following.
(i) Recommended findings of fact on
all disputed issues of material fact.
(ii) Recommended conclusions of law:
(A) Necessary to make the findings of
fact (such as rulings on materiality and
on the admissibility of evidence); and
(B) As to whether the applicable
criteria for Federal acknowledgment
have been met.
(iii) Reasons for the findings and
conclusions.
(2) The judge may adopt any of the
findings of fact proposed by one or more
of the parties.
(c) Service. Promptly after issuing a
recommended decision, the judge must:
(1) Serve the decision on each party
to the hearing; and
(2) Forward the complete record to
the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs,
including the recommended decision
and hearing record.
Re-Petition Authorization Process
§ 4.1060 How does an unsuccessful
petitioner request authorization to repetition?
(a) To request authorization to repetition for Federal acknowledgment, an
unsuccessful petitioner must submit to
OHA a certification that:
(1) Is signed and dated by the
unsuccessful petitioner’s governing
body;
(2) States that it is the unsuccessful
petitioner’s official request for repetitioning; and
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(3) Explains how it meets the
conditions of 25 CFR 83.4(b)(1).
(b) The unsuccessful petitioner need
not re-submit materials previously
submitted to the Department but may
supplement its petition.
§ 4.1061
What will OHA do with a request?
After receiving the request for repetitioning, OHA will:
(a) Docket the case;
(b) Assign a judge to preside over the
re-petition authorization process and
issue a decision; and
(c) Issue a docketing notice that
informs the parties of the docket
number and the judge assigned to the
case.
§ 4.1062
What can the judge do?
In addition to the powers in § 4.1014,
the judge has the powers to:
(a) Request evidence from OFA and
the unsuccessful petitioner; and
(b) Determine the extent, if any, to
which §§ 4.1020 through 4.1050 will
apply in whole or in part.
§ 4.1063 When will the judge allow a repetition?
The judge will issue a decision
allowing the unsuccessful petitioner to
re-petition if:
(a) Any third parties that participated
as a party in an administrative
reconsideration or Federal Court appeal
concerning the unsuccessful petitioner
have consented in writing to the repetitioning; and
(b) The unsuccessful petitioner
proves, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that either:
(1) A change from the previous
version of the regulations to the current
version of the regulations warrants
reconsideration of the final
determination; or
(2) The ‘‘reasonable likelihood’’
standard was misapplied in the final
denial.
Dated: June 9, 2014.
Rhea Suh,
Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management
and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2014–13817 Filed 6–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 118 (Thursday, June 19, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35129-35140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13817]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 4
[K00103 12/13 A3A10; 134D0102DR-DS5A300000-DR.5A311.IA000113]
RIN 1094-AA54
Hearing and Re-Petition Authorization Processes Concerning
Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule revises the process and criteria for
Federal acknowledgment of Indian tribes. This rulemaking would
establish procedures for a new category of expedited hearing for
petitioners who receive a negative proposed finding for Federal
acknowledgment and request a hearing. This rule would also establish
procedures for a new re-petition authorization process for petitioners
whose petitions have been denied. This proposed rule is related to a
Bureau of Indian Affairs proposed rule that would revise processing of
petitions for Federal acknowledgment of Indian tribes.
DATES: Comments on this rule must be received by August 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
--Federal rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
--Email: karl_johnson@oha.doi.gov. Include the number 1094-AA54 in the
subject line.
--Mail or hand delivery: Karl Johnson, Office of Hearings and Appeals,
Departmental Cases Hearings Division, U.S. Department of the Interior,
351 S. West Temple, Suite 6.300, Salt Lake City, UT 84101. Include the
number 1094-AA54 on the envelope.
Please note that we will not consider or include in the docket for
this rulemaking any comments received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or any comments sent to an address other than those
listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Johnson, Senior Attorney, Office
of Hearings and Appeals, Departmental Cases Hearings Division, (801)
524-5344; karl_johnson@oha.doi.gov. You may review the information
collection request online at https://www.reginfo.gov. Follow the
instructions to review Department of the Interior collections under
review by OMB.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is being published in
connection with a Bureau of Indian Affairs proposed rule that would
comprehensively revise 25 CFR part 83 to improve the processing of
petitions for Federal acknowledgment of Indian tribes. The BIA proposed
rule published on May 29, 2014 (79 FR 30766). These improvements
include granting the petitioner the ability to request a hearing before
an Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) judge if the petitioner
receives a negative proposed finding on Federal acknowledgment from the
Office of Federal Acknowledgment (OFA). The hearing process culminates
[[Page 35130]]
in the judge's issuance of a recommended decision on Federal
acknowledgment for consideration by the Assistant Secretary--Indian
Affairs.
This proposed rule would not change the ``reasonable likelihood''
burden of proof standard in 25 CFR 83.10(a) for determining whether the
facts claimed by the petitioner are valid and that the criteria for
Federal acknowledgment have been met. In the acknowledgment context,
courts have examined whether the Department correctly applied the
``reasonable likelihood'' standard but have not articulated what the
standard actually requires. Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Salazar, 708 F.3d
209, 220-21 (D.C. Cir. 2013). Instead, they have only stated that
``conclusive proof'' or ``conclusive evidence'' is not required. Id. at
212. The proposed rule would incorporate the Supreme Court's
clarification--arising from criminal cases in which jury instructions
are challenged--that satisfaction of the ``reasonable likelihood''
standard does not require proof that a claimed fact is ``more likely
than not'' to be true. Boyde v. California, 494 U.S. 370, 380 (1990).
This proposed rule is patterned to a large extent after the
procedural regulations at 43 CFR part 45, which contain very strict
time constraints on procedures and unusual procedural requirements to
expedite the process to comply with a statutory time limit. Compliance
with these procedures can be onerous for the parties and the judge. The
proposed rule would employ similar but less strict time constraints to
achieve a proper balance between speed and adequate development and
consideration of the issues.
One of the unusual procedures incorporated into the proposed rule
is the requirement to submit direct testimony in writing before the
hearing to shorten the length of the hearing. See proposed Sec.
4.1042(a). The hearing would generally be limited to cross-examination
of witnesses (and any re-direct and re-cross examination).
While there is no statutory time limit governing the proposed
hearing process for petitions for Federal acknowledgment, there is
still a substantial need to resolve those petitions expeditiously.
Therefore, issuance of a recommended decision completing the hearing
process would be required within 180 days of initiation of the process
unless the judge finds good cause for extending this deadline.
In our experience, full administrative adjudications involving
prehearing conferences, discovery, motions, an evidentiary hearing,
briefing, and a decision often take over a year to complete, especially
if the case involves multiple parties and complex issues. Shortening
this process to 180 days will be a substantial challenge for the
parties and the judge, and will require adherence to fairly stringent
procedural limits and deadlines.
Comments are welcome on any revisions to these regulations that
might better balance the parties' need for an adequate opportunity to
prepare and present their cases and the substantial need to resolve
each petition as expeditiously as possible. More particularly, comments
are invited addressing the propriety of requiring direct testimony to
be submitted in writing before the hearing and setting a 180-day time
limit for completion of the hearing process and issuance of a
recommended decision.
Under this proposed rule, the 180-day period for the hearing
process would commence when we issue the docketing notice after
receiving the referral notice and record from OFA, and would end when
the judge issues a recommended decision. During that period, at least
one prehearing conference would be held; discovery would be conducted
as approved by the judge or agreed to by the parties; evidence,
including direct written testimony and oral cross-examination, would be
presented at a hearing; post-hearing briefs would be filed; and a
recommended decision would be issued by the judge. Any person or
organization may file a motion to intervene in the hearing process.
Upon a proper showing of interest or other factors, the judge may grant
intervention.
This proposed rule also includes summary decision procedures, i.e.,
procedures for issuing a recommended decision without a hearing based
on the absence of any genuine disputed issue of material fact in the
record. We invite comments on whether the final rule should include
summary decision procedures.
We also request comments on the following questions: (1) Who is an
appropriate OHA judge to preside over the hearing process and issue a
recommended decision on Federal acknowledgment or over the re-petition
authorization process and issue a final decision on whether re-
petitioning is authorized--an administrative law judge appointed under
5 U.S.C. 3105, an administrative judge with OHA, or an attorney
designated by the OHA Director to serve as the OHA judge (the proposed
rule defines ``OHA judge'' broadly to include all three); (2) whether
the factual basis for the OHA judge's decision should be limited to the
hearing record; and (3) whether the hearing record should include all
evidence in OFA's administrative record for the petition or be limited
to testimony and exhibits specifically identified by the petitioner and
OFA.
Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The E.O. directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with
regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking
process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of
ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent with these
requirements.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. The
rule's requirements will not result in a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic regions. Nor will this rule have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of the U.S.-based enterprises
to compete with foreign-based enterprises because the rule is limited
to Federal acknowledgment of Indian tribes.
[[Page 35131]]
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rule does not
affect individual property rights protected by the Fifth Amendment nor
does it involves a compensable ``taking.'' A takings implication
assessment is therefore not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, this rule has no
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule has been reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and written to minimize litigation; and is written in clear
language and contains clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments,'' 59 FR 22951 (May 4, 1994), supplemented by Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, 65 FR 67249 (Nov. 6, 2000), and 512 DM 2, the Department
has assessed the impact of this rule on Tribal trust resources and has
determined that it does not directly affect Tribal resources. The rules
are procedural and administrative in nature. However, the Department
has consulted with federally recognized Indian tribes regarding the
companion proposed rule being published concurrently by the BIA. That
rule is an outgrowth of the ``Discussion Draft'' of the Federal
acknowledgment rule, which the Department distributed to federally
recognized Indian tribes in June 2013, and on which the Department
hosted five consultation sessions with federally recognized Indian
tribes throughout the country in July and August 2013. Several
federally recognized Indian tribes submitted written comments on that
rule. The Department considered each tribe's comments and concerns and
has addressed them, where possible. The Department will continue to
consult on that rule during the public comment period and tribes are
encouraged to provide feedback on this proposed rule during those
sessions as well.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements are subject to an exception
under 25 CFR part 1320 and therefore are not covered by the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment because it is of an
administrative, technical, and procedural nature. See 43 CFR 46.210(i).
No extraordinary circumstances exist that would require greater review
under the National Environmental Policy Act.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
L. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ``COMMENTS'' section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences
are too long, the sections where you believe lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
M. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart K
Administrative practice and procedure, Hearing and re-petition
authorization procedures, Indians-tribal government.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Office of the Secretary, proposes to amend 43 CFR part 4 as
follows:
PART 4--DEPARTMENT HEARINGS AND APPEALS PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority for part 4 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 503-504; 25 U.S.C. 9, 372-74, 410, 2201
et seq.; 43 U.S.C. 1201, 1457; Pub. L. 99-264, 100 Stat. 61, as
amended.
0
2. Add Subpart K to read as follows:
Subpart K--Hearing and Re-Petition Authorization Processes
Concerning Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes
General Provisions
Sec.
4.1001 What terms are used in this subpart?
4.1002 What is the purpose of this subpart?
4.1003 Which general rules of procedure and practice do not apply?
4.1004 How are time periods computed?
Representatives
4.1010 Who may represent a party, and what requirements apply to a
representative?
Document Filing and Service
4.1011 What are the form and content requirements for documents
under this subpart?
4.1012 Where and how must documents be filed?
4.1013 How must documents be served?
Judge's Powers, Unavailability, Disqualification, and Communications
4.1014 What are the powers of the judge?
4.1015 What happens if the judge becomes unavailable?
4.1016 When can a judge be disqualified?
4.1017 Are ex parte communications allowed?
Motions
4.1018 What are the requirements for motions?
[[Page 35132]]
Hearing Process
Docketing, Intervention, Prehearing Conferences, and Summary Decision
4.1020 What will OHA do upon receiving the record from OFA?
4.1021 What are the requirements for motions for intervention?
4.1022 How are prehearing conferences conducted?
4.1023 What are the requirements for motions for summary decision
and responses thereto?
Information Disclosure and Discovery
4.1030 What are the requirements for OFA's witness and exhibit list?
4.1031 How may parties obtain discovery of information needed for
the case?
4.1032 When must a party supplement or amend information it has
previously provided?
4.1033 What are the requirements for written interrogatories?
4.1034 What are the requirements for depositions?
4.1035 How can parties request documents, tangible things, or entry
on land?
4.1036 What sanctions may the judge impose for failure to comply
with discovery?
4.1037 What are the requirements for subpoenas and witness fees?
Hearing, Briefing, and Decision
4.1040 When and where will the hearing be held?
4.1041 What are the parties' rights during the hearing?
4.1042 What are the requirements for presenting testimony?
4.1043 How may a party use a deposition in the hearing?
4.1044 What are the requirements for exhibits, official notice, and
stipulations?
4.1045 What evidence is admissible at the hearing?
4.1046 What are the requirements for transcription of the hearing?
4.1047 What is the standard of proof?
4.1048 When will the hearing record close?
4.1049 What are the requirements for post-hearing briefs?
4.1050 What are the requirements for the judge's recommended
decision?
Re-Petition Authorization Process
4.1060 How does an unsuccessful petitioner request authorization to
re-petition for Federal acknowledgment?
4.1061 What will OHA do with a request?
4.1062 What can the judge do?
4.1063 When will the judge allow a re-petition?
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9, 479a-1.
General Provisions
Sec. 4.1001 What terms are used in this subpart?
As used in this subpart:
Assistant Secretary means the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs
within the Department of the Interior, or that officer's authorized
representative, but does not include representatives of the Office of
Federal Acknowledgment.
Day means a calendar day.
Department means the Department of the Interior, including the
Assistant Secretary and OFA.
Discovery means a prehearing process for obtaining facts or
information to assist a party in preparing or presenting its case.
Ex parte communication means an oral or written communication to
the judge that is made without providing all parties reasonable notice
and an opportunity to participate.
Full intervenor means a person granted leave by the judge to
intervene as a full party under Sec. 4.1021.
Hearing process means the process by which OHA handles a case
forwarded to OHA by OFA pursuant to 25 CFR 83.39(a), from receipt to
issuance of a recommended decision as to whether the petitioner should
be acknowledged as a federally recognized Indian tribe for purposes of
federal law.
Judge means an administrative law judge appointed under 5 U.S.C.
3105, an administrative judge, or an attorney-advisor with the Office
of Hearings and Appeals assigned to preside over the hearing process
under this subpart by the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
OFA means the Office of Federal Acknowledgment within the Office of
the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior.
OHA means the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of the
Interior.
Party means the petitioner or unsuccessful petitioner (as
appropriate), OFA, or a full intervenor.
Person means an individual; a partnership, corporation,
association, or other legal entity; an unincorporated organization; and
any federal, state, tribal, county, district, territorial, or local
government or agency.
Petitioner means an entity that has submitted a documented petition
to OFA requesting Federal acknowledgment as a federally recognized
Indian tribe under 25 CFR part 83 and has elected to have a hearing
under 25 CFR 83.38.
Re-petition authorization process means the process by which OHA
handles a request for re-petitioning filed with OHA by an unsuccessful
petitioner under 25 CFR 83.4(b), from receipt to issuance of a decision
as to whether the unsuccessful petitioner is authorized to re-petition
for acknowledgment as a federally recognized Indian tribe.
Representative means a person who:
(1) Is authorized by a party to represent the party in a hearing
process or re-petition authorization process under this subpart; and
(2) Has filed an appearance under Sec. 4.1010.
Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior or his or her
designee.
Senior Department employee has the same meaning as the term
``senior employee'' in 5 CFR 2637.211(a).
Unsuccessful petitioner means an entity that was denied Federal
acknowledgment after petitioning under a version of the acknowledgment
regulations at part 54 or part 83 of title 25 in effect prior to
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE].
Sec. 4.1002 What is the purpose of this subpart?
(a) To obtain acknowledgment as an Indian tribe for purposes of
Federal law and therefore entitlement to a government-to-government
relationship with the United States, an entity may file a petition with
the OFA under 25 CFR 83.20. If OFA issues a negative proposed finding,
the petitioner may elect to have a hearing under 25 CFR 83.38(a) before
a judge who will issue a recommended decision under 25 CFR 83.39(d).
These regulations contain rules of practice and procedure applicable to
the hearing process referred to in 25 CFR 83.38(a) and 83.39.
(b) Under 25 CFR 83.4(b), an unsuccessful petitioner may seek
authorization from a judge to re-petition for acknowledgment. These
regulations also contain rules of practice and procedure applicable to
the re-petition authorization process.
(c) This subpart will be construed and applied to each hearing
process or re-petition authorization process to achieve a just and
speedy determination, consistent with adequate consideration of the
issues involved.
Sec. 4.1003 Which rules of procedure and practice apply?
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of Sec. 4.20, the general rules
in 43 CFR part 4, subpart B, do not apply to the hearing process or the
re-petition authorization process under this subpart.
(b) The provisions of Sec. Sec. 4.1001, 4.1002, and 4.1004 through
4.1018 apply to both the hearing process and the re-petition
authorization process.
(c) The provisions of Sec. Sec. 4.1020 through 4.1050 apply to:
(1) The hearing process; and
(2) The re-petition authorization process to the extent, if any,
that the judge determines that they apply in whole or in part.
(d) The provisions of Sec. Sec. 4.1060 through 4.1063 apply to the
re-petition authorization process.
[[Page 35133]]
Sec. 4.1004 How are time periods computed?
(a) General. Time periods are computed as follows:
(1) The day of the act or event from which the period begins to run
is not included.
(2) The last day of the period is included.
(i) If that day is a Saturday, Sunday, or other day on which the
Federal government is closed for business, the period is extended to
the next business day.
(ii) The last day of the period ends at 5 p.m. at the place where
the filing or other action is due.
(3) If the period is less than 7 days, any Saturday, Sunday, or
other day on which the Federal government is closed for business that
falls within the period is not included.
(b) Extensions of time. (1) No extension of time can be granted to
file a motion for intervention under Sec. 4.1021.
(2) An extension of time to file any other document under this
subpart may be granted only upon a showing of good cause.
(i) To request an extension of time, a party must file a motion
under Sec. 4.1018 stating how much additional time is needed and the
reasons for the request.
(ii) The party must file the motion before the applicable time
period expires, unless the party demonstrates extraordinary
circumstances that justify a delay in filing.
(iii) The judge may grant the extension only if:
(A) It would not unduly prejudice other parties; and
(B) It would not delay the recommended decision under Sec. 4.1050.
Representatives
Sec. 4.1010 Who may act as a party's representative, and what
requirements apply to a representative?
(a) Individuals. A party who is an individual may either act as his
or her own representative in the hearing process or re-petition
authorization process under this subpart or authorize an attorney to
act as his or her representative.
(b) Organizations. A party that is an organization or other entity
may authorize one of the following to act as its representative:
(1) An attorney;
(2) A partner, if the entity is a partnership;
(3) An officer or full-time employee, if the entity is a
corporation, association, or unincorporated organization;
(4) A receiver, administrator, executor, or similar fiduciary, if
the entity is a receivership, trust, or estate; or
(5) An elected or appointed official or an employee, if the entity
is a federal, state, tribal, county, district, territorial, or local
government or component.
(c) OFA. OFA's representative will be an attorney from the Office
of the Solicitor.
(d) Appearance. A representative must file a notice of appearance.
The notice must:
(1) Meet the form and content requirements for documents under
Sec. 4.1011;
(2) Include the name and address of the person on whose behalf the
appearance is made;
(3) If the representative is an attorney (except for an attorney
with the Office of the Solicitor), include a statement that he or she
is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a
state, the District of Columbia, or any territory or commonwealth of
the United States (identifying which one); and
(4) If the representative is not an attorney, include a statement
explaining his or her authority to represent the entity.
(d) Disqualification. The judge may disqualify any representative
for misconduct or other good cause.
Document Filing and Service
Sec. 4.1011 What are the form and content requirements for documents
under this subpart?
(a) Form. Each document filed in a case under this subpart must:
(1) Measure 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, except that a table, chart,
diagram, or other attachment may be larger if folded to 8\1/2\ by 11
inches and attached to the document;
(2) Be printed on just one side of the page;
(3) Be clearly typewritten, printed, or otherwise reproduced by a
process that yields legible and permanent copies;
(4) Use 12-point font size or larger;
(5) Be double-spaced except for footnotes and long quotations,
which may be single-spaced;
(6) Have margins of at least 1 inch; and
(7) Be bound on the left side, if bound.
(b) Caption. Each document must begin with a caption that includes:
(1) The name of the case under this subpart and the docket number,
if one has been assigned;
(2) The name and docket number of the proceeding to which the case
under this subpart relates; and
(3) A descriptive title for the document, indicating the party for
whom it is filed and the nature of the document.
(c) Signature. The original of each document must be signed by the
representative of the person for whom the document is filed. The
signature constitutes a certification by the representative that:
(1) He or she has read the document;
(2) The statements in the document are true to the best of his or
her knowledge, information, and belief; and
(3) The document is not being filed for the purpose of causing
delay.
(d) Contact information. Below the representative's signature, the
document must provide the representative's name, mailing address,
street address (if different), telephone number, facsimile number (if
any), and electronic mail address (if any).
Sec. 4.1012 Where and how must documents be filed?
(a) Place of filing. Any documents relating to a case under this
subpart must be filed with the Office of the Director, OHA. The OHA
Director's Office's address, telephone number, and facsimile number are
set forth at www.doi.gov/oha/about-oha-director.cfm.
(b) Method of filing. (1) A document must be filed with OHA using
one of the following methods:
(i) By hand delivery of the original document;
(ii) By sending the original document by express mail or courier
service for delivery on the next business day; or
(iii) By sending the document by facsimile if:
(A) The document is 20 pages or less, including all attachments;
(B) The sending facsimile machine confirms that the transmission
was successful; and
(C) The original of the document is sent by regular mail on the
same day.
(2) Parties are encouraged, but not required, to supplement any
filing by providing the appropriate office with an electronic copy of
the document on compact disc.
(c) Date of filing. A document under this subpart is considered
filed on the date it is received. However, any document received by OHA
after 5 p.m. is considered filed on the next regular business day.
(d) Nonconforming documents. If any document submitted for filing
under this subpart does not comply with the requirements of this
subpart or any applicable order, it may be rejected. If the defect is
minor, the filer may be notified of the defect and given a chance to
correct it.
[[Page 35134]]
Sec. 4.1013 How must documents be served?
(a) Filed documents. Any document related to a case under this
subpart must be served at the same time the document is delivered or
sent for filing. Copies must be served on each party, using one of the
methods of service in paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Documents issued by OHA or the judge. A complete copy of any
notice, order, decision, or other document issued by OHA or the judge
under this subpart must be served on each party, using one of the
methods of service in paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) Method of service. Service must be accomplished by one of the
following methods:
(1) By hand delivery of the document;
(2) By sending the document by express mail or courier service for
delivery on the next business day; or
(3) By sending the document by facsimile if:
(i) The document is 20 pages or less, including all attachments;
(ii) The sending facsimile machine confirms that the transmission
was successful; and
(iii) The document is sent by regular mail on the same day.
(d) Certificate of service. A certificate of service must be
attached to each document filed under this subpart. The certificate
must be signed by the serving party's representative and include the
following information:
(1) The name, address, and other contact information of each
party's representative on whom the document was served;
(2) The means of service, including information indicating
compliance with paragraph (c)(3) or (c)(4) of this section, if
applicable; and
(3) The date of service.
Judge's Powers, Unavailability, Disqualification, and Communications
Sec. 4.1014 What are the powers of the judge?
The judge has all powers necessary to conduct the hearing process
or the re-petition authorization process in a fair, orderly,
expeditious, and impartial manner, including the powers to:
(a) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(b) Issue subpoenas to the extent authorized by law;
(c) Rule on motions;
(d) Authorize discovery as provided for in this subpart;
(e) Hold hearings and conferences;
(f) Regulate the course of hearings;
(g) Call and question witnesses;
(h) Exclude any person from a hearing or conference for misconduct
or other good cause;
(i) Issue a recommended decision for the hearing process or a final
decision for the re-petition authorization process; and
(j) Take any other action authorized by law.
Sec. 4.1015 What happens if the judge becomes unavailable?
(a) If the judge becomes unavailable or otherwise unable to perform
the duties described in Sec. 4.1014, OHA will designate a successor.
(b) If a hearing has commenced and the judge cannot proceed with
it, a successor judge may do so. At the request of a party, the
successor judge may recall any witness whose testimony is material and
disputed, and who is available to testify again without undue burden.
The successor judge may, within his or her discretion, recall any other
witness.
Sec. 4.1016 When can a judge be disqualified?
(a) The judge may withdraw from a case at any time the judge deems
himself or herself disqualified.
(b) At any time before issuance of the judge's decision, any party
may move that the judge disqualify himself or herself for personal bias
or other valid cause.
(1) The party must file the motion promptly after discovering facts
or other reasons allegedly constituting cause for disqualification.
(2) The party must file with the motion an affidavit or declaration
setting forth the facts or other reasons in detail.
(c) The judge must rule upon the motion, stating the grounds for
the ruling.
(1) If the judge concludes that the motion is timely and
meritorious, he or she must disqualify himself or herself and withdraw
from the case.
(2) If the judge does not disqualify himself or herself and
withdraw from the case, the judge must continue with the hearing
process or re-petition authorization process and issue a decision.
Sec. 4.1017 Are ex parte communications allowed?
(a) Ex parte communications with the judge or his or her staff are
prohibited in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 554(d).
(b) This section does not prohibit ex parte inquiries concerning
case status or procedural requirements, unless the inquiry involves an
area of controversy in the hearing process or re-petition authorization
process.
Sec. 4.1018 What are the requirements for motions?
(a) General. Any party may apply for an order or ruling on any
matter related to the hearing process or re-petition authorization
process by presenting a motion to the judge. A motion may be presented
any time after OHA issues the docketing notice.
(1) A motion made at a hearing may be stated orally on the record,
unless the judge directs that it be written.
(2) Any other motion must:
(i) Be in writing;
(ii) Comply with the requirements of this subpart with respect to
form, content, filing, and service; and
(iii) Not exceed 10 pages.
(b) Content. (1) Each motion must state clearly and concisely:
(i) Its purpose and the relief sought;
(ii) The facts constituting the grounds for the relief sought; and
(iii) Any applicable statutory or regulatory authority.
(2) A proposed order must accompany the motion.
(c) Response. Except as otherwise required by this subpart or by
order of the judge, any other party may file a response to a written
motion within 14 days after service of the motion. When a party
presents a motion at a hearing, any other party may present a response
orally on the record.
(d) Reply. Unless the judge orders otherwise, no reply to a
response may be filed.
(e) Effect of filing. Unless the judge orders otherwise, the filing
of a motion does not stay the hearing process.
(f) Ruling. The judge will rule on the motion as soon as feasible,
either orally on the record or in writing. The judge may summarily deny
any dilatory, repetitive, or frivolous motion.
Hearing Process
Docketing, Intervention, Prehearing Conferences, and Summary Decision
Sec. 4.1020 What will OHA do upon receiving the record from OFA?
Within 5 days after issuance of the referral notice under 25 CFR
83.39(a) the actions required by this section must be taken.
(a) OHA must:
(1) Docket the case;
(2) Assign a judge to preside over the hearing process and issue a
recommended decision; and
(3) Issue a docketing notice that informs the parties of the docket
number and the judge assigned to the case.
(b) The judge assigned under paragraph (a)(2) of this section must
issue a notice setting the time, place,
[[Page 35135]]
and method for conducting an initial prehearing conference under Sec.
4.1022(a). This notice may be combined with the docketing notice under
paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
Sec. 4.1021 What are the requirements for motions for intervention
and responses?
(a) General. A person may file a motion for intervention within 15
days after issuance of the referral notice under 25 CFR 83.39(a).
(b) Content of the motion. The motion for intervention must contain
the following:
(1) A statement setting forth the interest of the person and, if
the person seeks intervention under paragraph (d) of this section, a
showing of why that interest may be adversely affected by the final
determination of the Assistant Secretary under 25 CFR 83.43;
(2) An explanation of the person's position with respect to the
issues of material fact raised in the election of hearing in no more
than two pages; and
(3) A list of the witnesses and exhibits the person intends to
present at the hearing, other than solely for impeachment purposes,
including:
(A) For each witness listed, his or her name, address, telephone
number, and qualifications and a brief narrative summary of his or her
expected testimony; and
(B) For each exhibit listed, a statement specifying whether the
exhibit is in the administrative record reviewed by OFA.
(c) Timing of response to a motion. Any response to a motion for
intervention must be filed by a party within 7 days after service of
the motion.
(d) Intervention of right. The judge will grant intervention where
the person has an interest that may be adversely affected by the
Assistant Secretary's final determination under 25 CFR 83.43.
(e) Permissive Intervention. If paragraph (d) of this section does
not apply, the judge will consider the following in determining whether
intervention is appropriate:
(1) The nature of the issues;
(2) The adequacy of representation of the person's interest which
is provided by the existing parties to the proceeding;
(3) The ability of the person to present relevant evidence and
argument; and
(4) The effect of intervention on the Department's implementation
of its statutory mandates.
(f) How an intervenor may participate. (1) A person granted leave
to intervene under paragraph (d) of this section may participate as a
full party or in a capacity less than that of a full party.
(2) If the intervenor wishes to participate in a limited capacity
or if the intervenor is granted leave to intervene under paragraph (e)
of this section, the extent and the terms of the participation will be
determined by the judge.
(3) An intervenor may not raise issues of material fact beyond
those raised in the election of hearing under 25 CFR 83.38(a)(1).
Sec. 4.1022 How are prehearing conferences conducted?
(a) Initial prehearing conference. The judge will conduct an
initial prehearing conference with the parties at the time specified in
the docketing notice under Sec. 4.1020, within 35 days after issuance
of the docketing notice.
(1) The initial prehearing conference will be used:
(i) To identify, narrow, and clarify the disputed issues of
material fact and exclude issues that do not qualify for review as
factual, material, and disputed;
(ii) To consider the parties' motions for discovery under Sec.
4.1031 and to set a deadline for the completion of discovery;
(iii) To discuss the evidence on which each party intends to rely
at the hearing;
(iv) To set the deadline for submission of written testimony under
Sec. 4.1042; and
(v) To set the date, time, and place of the hearing.
(2) The initial prehearing conference may also be used:
(i) To discuss limiting and grouping witnesses to avoid
duplication;
(ii) To discuss stipulations of fact and of the content and
authenticity of documents;
(iii) To consider requests that the judge take official notice of
public records or other matters;
(iv) To discuss the submission of written testimony, briefs, or
other documents in electronic form; and
(v) To consider any other matters that may aid in the disposition
of the case.
(b) Other conferences. The judge may direct the parties to attend
one or more other prehearing conferences, if consistent with the need
to complete the hearing process within 180 days. Any party may by
motion request a conference.
(c) Notice. The judge must give the parties reasonable notice of
the time and place of any conference. A conference will ordinarily be
held by telephone, unless the judge orders otherwise.
(d) Representatives' preparation and authority. Each party's
representative must be fully prepared during the prehearing conference
for a discussion of all procedural and substantive issues properly
raised. The representative must be authorized to commit the party that
he or she represents respecting those issues.
(e) Parties' Meeting. Before the initial prehearing conference, the
parties' representatives must make a good faith effort:
(1) To meet in person, by telephone, or by other appropriate means;
and
(2) To reach agreement on discovery and the schedule of remaining
steps in the hearing process.
(f) Failure to attend. Unless the judge orders otherwise, a party
that fails to attend or participate in a conference, after being served
with reasonable notice of its time and place, waives all objections to
any agreements reached in the conference and to any consequent orders
or rulings.
(g) Scope. During a conference, the judge may dispose of any
procedural matters related to the case.
(h) Order. Within 3 days after the conclusion of each conference,
the judge must issue an order that recites any agreements reached at
the conference and any rulings made by the judge during or as a result
of the conference.
Sec. 4.1023 What are the requirements for motions for summary
decision and responses?
(a) Timing of motion. At any time after OHA issues a docketing
notice under Sec. 4.1020, a party may file a motion for summary
decision on all or part of the proceeding.
(b) Motion requirements. The party filing a motion for summary
decision must:
(1) Concisely state the material facts that the party contends are
undisputed;
(2) Verify those facts with supporting affidavits or declarations,
depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, documents produced
on request, or other documentation;
(3) Include references to the specific portions of the record that
verify those facts; and
(4) State why the party is entitled to summary decision as a matter
of law.
(c) Response requirements. If a motion for summary decision is
properly made and supported, an opposing party may not rely merely on
allegations or denials in its own pleading; rather, its response must
either:
(1) State why the moving party is not entitled to summary decision
as a matter of law; or
(2) Do all of the following:
(i) Concisely state the material facts which the opposing party
contends are disputed;
(ii) Verify that those facts are disputed with supporting
affidavits or declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories,
admissions, documents produced on request, or other documentation; and
[[Page 35136]]
(iii) Include references to the specific portions of the record
that verify that those facts are disputed.
(d) Establishing facts. All material facts set forth by the moving
party and properly supported by an accurate reference to the record
will be taken as true for the purpose of summary decision unless
specifically controverted by the opposing party's response.
Alternatively, the material facts for the purpose of summary decision
may be established by an agreement of the parties enumerating those
facts.
(e) Affidavits. A supporting or opposing affidavit must be made on
personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence,
and show that the affiant is competent to testify on the matters
stated. If a document or part of a document is referred to in an
affidavit, a copy must be filed with the affidavit unless the document
is longer than 10 pages, the document is already in the record, and the
affidavit specifies the location of the document in the record.
(f) When affidavits are unavailable. If a party opposing the motion
shows by affidavit that, for specified reasons, it cannot present facts
essential to justify its opposition, the judge may:
(1) Deny the motion for summary decision;
(2) Order a continuance to enable affidavits to be obtained,
depositions to be taken, or other discovery to be undertaken; or
(3) Issue any other just order.
(g) Standards for decision. The judge may grant summary decision
under this section if the record (including the pleadings, affidavits
or declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions,
documents produced on request, and other documentation) shows that:
(1) There is no genuine disputed issue as to any material fact; and
(2) The moving party is entitled to summary decision as a matter of
law.
(h) Proceeding not fully adjudicated on the motion. If summary
decision is not rendered on the whole proceeding, the judge should, to
the extent feasible, determine and specify by order what material facts
are not genuinely disputed. The facts so specified must be treated as
established in the proceeding.
Information Disclosure and Discovery
Sec. 4.1030 What are the requirements for OFA's witness and exhibit
list?
Within 14 days after issuance of the referral notice under 25 CFR
83.39(a), OFA must file a list of the witnesses and exhibits it intends
to present at the hearing, other than solely for impeachment purposes,
including:
(a) For each witness listed, his or her name, address, telephone
number, qualifications, and a brief narrative summary of his or her
expected testimony; and
(b) For each exhibit listed, a statement specifying whether the
exhibit is in the administrative record reviewed by OFA.
Sec. 4.1031 How may parties obtain discovery of information?
(a) General. By agreement of the parties or with the permission of
the judge, a party may obtain discovery of information to assist in
preparing or presenting its case. Available methods of discovery are:
(1) Written interrogatories;
(2) Depositions as provided in paragraph (h) of this section; and
(3) Requests for production of designated documents or tangible
things or for entry on designated land for inspection or other
purposes.
(b) Criteria. Discovery may occur only as agreed to by the parties
or as authorized by the judge in a written order or during a prehearing
conference. The judge may authorize discovery only if the party
requesting discovery demonstrates:
(1) That the discovery will not unreasonably delay the hearing
process;
(2) That the scope of the discovery is not unduly burdensome;
(3) That the method to be used is the least burdensome method
available;
(4) That any trade secrets or proprietary information can be
adequately safeguarded;
(5) That the standards for discovery under paragraphs (f) through
(h) of this section have been met, if applicable; and
(6) That the information sought:
(i) Will be admissible at the hearing or appears reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;
(ii) Is not otherwise obtainable by the party;
(iii) Is not cumulative or repetitious; and
(iv) Is not privileged or protected from disclosure by applicable
law.
(c) Motions. A party may initiate discovery:
(1) Pursuant to an agreement of the parties; or
(2) By filing a motion that:
(i) Briefly describes the proposed methodology, purpose, and scope
of the discovery;
(ii) Explains how the discovery meets the criteria in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (b)(6) of this section; and
(iii) Attaches a copy of any proposed discovery request (written
interrogatories, notice of deposition, or request for production of
designated documents or tangible things or for entry on designated
land).
(d) Timing of motions. Any discovery motion under paragraph (c)(2)
of this section must be filed:
(1) Within 20 days after issuance of the docketing notice under
Sec. 4.1020 if the discovery sought is between the petitioner and OFA;
and
(2) Within 30 days after issuance of the docketing notice under
Sec. 4.1020 if the discovery sought is between a full intervenor and
another party.
(e) Objections. (1) A party must file any objections to a discovery
motion or to specific portions of a proposed discovery request within
10 days after service of the motion.
(2) An objection must explain how, in the objecting party's view,
the discovery sought does not meet the criteria in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (b)(6) of this section.
(f) Materials prepared for hearing. A party generally may not
obtain discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise
discoverable under paragraph (b) of this section if they were prepared
in anticipation of or for the hearing by or for another party's
representative (including the party's attorney, expert, or consultant).
(1) If a party wants to discover these materials, it must show:
(i) That it has substantial need of the materials in preparing its
own case; and
(ii) That the party is unable without undue hardship to obtain the
substantial equivalent of the materials by other means.
(2) In ordering discovery of these materials when the required
showing has been made, the judge must protect against disclosure of the
mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an
attorney.
(g) Experts. Unless restricted by the judge, a party may discover
any facts known or opinions held by an expert concerning any relevant
matters that are not privileged. Such discovery will be permitted only
if:
(1) The expert is expected to be a witness at the hearing; or
(2) The expert is relied on by another expert who is expected to be
a witness at the hearing, and the party shows:
(i) That it has a compelling need for the information; and
(ii) That it cannot feasibly obtain the information by other means.
(h) Limitations on depositions. (1) A party may depose a witness
only if the party shows that the witness:
(i) Will be unable to attend the hearing because of age, illness,
or other incapacity; or
[[Page 35137]]
(ii) Is unwilling to attend the hearing voluntarily, and the party
is unable to compel the witness's attendance at the hearing by
subpoena.
(2) Paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section does not apply to any
person employed by or under contract with the party seeking the
deposition.
(3) A party may depose a senior Department employee of OFA if the
party shows:
(i) That the employee's testimony is necessary in order to provide
significant, unprivileged information that is not available from any
other source or by less burdensome means; and
(ii) That the deposition would not significantly interfere with the
employee's ability to perform his or her official duties.
(i) Completion of discovery. All discovery must be completed within
35 days after the initial prehearing conference, unless the judge sets
a different deadline.
Sec. 4.1032 When must a party supplement or amend information?
(a) Discovery. A party must promptly supplement or amend any prior
release given in response to a discovery request if it learns that the
response:
(1) Was incomplete or incorrect when made; or
(2) Though complete and correct when made, is now incomplete or
incorrect in any material respect.
(b) Witnesses and exhibits. (1) Within 10 days after the date set
for completion of discovery, each party must file an updated version of
the list of witnesses and exhibits required under 25 CFR
83.38(a)(1)(B), Sec. 4.1021(b)(3), or Sec. 4.1030(a).
(2) If a party wishes to include any new witness or exhibit on its
updated list, it must provide an explanation of why it was not feasible
for the party to include the witness or exhibit on its list under 25
CFR 83.38(a)(1)(ii), Sec. 4.1021(b)(3), or Sec. 4.1030(a).
(c) Failure to disclose. (1) A party that fails to disclose
information required under 25 CFR 83.38(a)(1)(ii), Sec. 4.1021(b)(3),
Sec. 4.1030(a), or paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section will not be
permitted to introduce as evidence at the hearing testimony from a
witness or other information that it failed to disclose.
(2) Paragraph (c)(1) of this section does not apply if the failure
to disclose was substantially justified or is harmless.
(3) Before or during the hearing, a party may object under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section to the admission of evidence.
(4) The judge will consider the following in determining whether to
exclude evidence under paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) of this
section:
(i) The prejudice to the objecting party;
(ii) The ability of the objecting party to cure any prejudice;
(iii) The extent to which presentation of the evidence would
disrupt the orderly and efficient hearing of the case;
(iv) The importance of the evidence; and
(v) The reason for the failure to disclose, including any bad faith
or willfulness regarding the failure.
Sec. 4.1033 What are the requirements for written interrogatories?
(a) Motion required. A party wishing to propound interrogatories
must file a motion under Sec. 4.1031(c), unless the parties agree
otherwise.
(b) Judge's order. During or promptly after the initial prehearing
conference, the judge will issue an order under Sec. 4.1031(b) with
respect to any discovery motion requesting the use of written
interrogatories. The order will either grant the motion and approve the
use of some or all of the proposed interrogatories or deny the motion.
(c) Answers to interrogatories. Except upon agreement of the
parties, the party to whom the proposed interrogatories are directed
must file its answers to any interrogatories approved by the judge
within 15 days after issuance of the order under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(1) Each approved interrogatory must be answered separately and
fully in writing.
(2) The party or its representative must sign the answers to
interrogatories under oath or affirmation.
(d) Access to records. A party's answer to an interrogatory is
sufficient when:
(1) The information may be obtained from an examination of records,
or from a compilation, abstract, or summary based on records;
(2) The burden of obtaining the information from the records is
substantially the same for all parties;
(3) The answering party specifically identifies the individual
records from which the requesting party may obtain the information and
where the records are located; and
(4) The answering party provides the requesting party with
reasonable opportunity to examine the records and make a copy,
compilation, abstract, or summary.
Sec. 4.1034 What are the requirements for depositions?
(a) Motion and notice. A party wishing to take a deposition must
file a motion under Sec. 4.1031(c), unless the parties agree
otherwise. Any notice of deposition filed with the motion must state:
(1) The time and place that the deposition is to be taken;
(2) The name and address of the person before whom the deposition
is to be taken;
(3) The name and address of the witness whose deposition is to be
taken; and
(4) Any documents or materials that the witness is to produce.
(b) Judge's order. During or promptly after the initial prehearing
conference, the judge will issue an order under Sec. 4.1031(b) with
respect to any discovery motion requesting the taking of a deposition.
The order will either grant the motion and approve the taking of the
deposition, subject to any conditions or restrictions the judge may
impose or deny the motion.
(c) Required arrangements. If the parties agree to or the judge
approves the taking of the deposition, the party requesting the
deposition must make appropriate arrangements for necessary facilities
and personnel.
(1) The deposition will be taken at the time and place agreed to by
the parties or indicated in the judge's order.
(2) The deposition may be taken before any disinterested person
authorized to administer oaths in the place where the deposition is to
be taken.
(3) Any party that objects to the taking of a deposition because of
the disqualification of the person before whom it is to be taken must
do so either:
(i) Before the deposition begins; or
(ii) As soon as the disqualification becomes known or could have
been discovered with reasonable diligence.
(4) A deposition may be taken by telephone conference call, if
agreed to by the parties or approved in the judge's order.
(d) Testimony. Each witness deposed must be placed under oath or
affirmation, and the other parties must be given an opportunity for
cross-examination.
(e) Representation of witness. The witness being deposed may have
counsel or another representative present during the deposition.
(f) Recording and transcript. Except as provided in paragraph (g)
of this section, the deposition must be stenographically recorded and
transcribed at the expense of the party that requested the deposition.
[[Page 35138]]
(1) Any other party may obtain a copy of the transcript at its own
expense.
(2) Unless waived by the deponent, the deponent will have 3 days
after receiving the transcript to read and sign it.
(3) The person before whom the deposition was taken must certify
the transcript following receipt of the signed transcript from the
deponent or expiration of the 3-day review period, whichever occurs
first.
(g) Video recording allowed. The testimony at a deposition may be
video recorded, subject to any conditions or restrictions that the
parties may agree to or the judge may impose, at the expense of the
party requesting the recording.
(1) The video recording may be in conjunction with an oral
examination by telephone conference held under paragraph (c)(3) of this
section.
(2) After the deposition has been taken, the person recording the
deposition must:
(i) Provide a copy of the recording to any party that requests it,
at the requesting party's expense; and
(ii) Attach to the recording a statement identifying the case and
the deponent and certifying the authenticity of the recording.
(h) Use of deposition. A deposition may be used at the hearing as
provided in Sec. 4.1043.
Sec. 4.1035 How can parties request documents, tangible things, or
entry on land?
(a) Motion required. A party wishing to request the production of
designated documents or tangible things or entry on designated land
must file a motion under Sec. 4.1031(c), unless the parties agree
otherwise. A request may include any of the following that are in the
possession, custody, or control of another party:
(1) The production of designated documents for inspection and
copying;
(2) The production of designated tangible things for inspection,
copying, testing, or sampling; or
(3) Entry on designated land or other property for inspection and
measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling either the
property or any designated object or operation on the property.
(b) Judge's order. During or promptly after the initial prehearing
conference, the judge will issue an order under Sec. 4.1031(b) with
respect to any discovery motion requesting the production of documents
or tangible things or entry on land for inspection, copying, or other
purposes. The order will:
(1) Grant the motion and approve the use of some or all of the
proposed requests; or
(2) Deny the motion.
(c) Compliance with order. Except upon agreement of the parties,
the party to whom any approved request for production is directed must
permit the approved inspection and other activities within 15 days
after issuance of the order under paragraph (a) of this section.
Sec. 4.1036 What sanctions may the judge impose?
(a) Upon motion of a party, the judge may impose sanctions under
paragraph (b) of this section if any party:
(1) Fails to comply with an order approving discovery; or
(2) Fails to supplement or amend a response to discovery under
Sec. 4.1032(a).
(b) The judge may impose one or more of the following sanctions:
(1) Infer that the information, testimony, document, or other
evidence withheld would have been adverse to the party;
(2) Order that, for the purposes of the hearing, designated facts
are established;
(3) Order that the party not introduce into evidence, or otherwise
rely on to support its case, any information, testimony, document, or
other evidence:
(i) That the party improperly withheld; or
(ii) That the party obtained from another party in discovery;
(4) Allow another party to use secondary evidence to show what the
information, testimony, document, or other evidence withheld would have
shown; or
(5) Take other appropriate action to remedy the party's failure to
comply.
Sec. 4.1037 What are the requirements for subpoenas and witness fees?
(a) Request for subpoena. (1) Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, any party may file a motion requesting the
judge to issue a subpoena to the extent authorized by law for the
attendance of a person, the giving of testimony, or the production of
documents or other relevant evidence during discovery or for the
hearing.
(2) A party may subpoena a senior Department employee of the OFA
only if the party shows:
(i) That the employee's testimony is necessary in order to provide
significant, unprivileged information that is not available from any
other source or by less burdensome means; and
(ii) That the employee's attendance would not significantly
interfere with the ability to perform his or her government duties.
(b) Service. (1) A subpoena may be served by any person who is not
a party and is 18 years of age or older.
(2) Service must be made by hand delivering a copy of the subpoena
to the person named therein.
(3) The person serving the subpoena must:
(i) Prepare a certificate of service setting forth the date, time,
and manner of service or the reason for any failure of service; and
(ii) Swear to or affirm the certificate, attach it to a copy of the
subpoena, and return it to the party on whose behalf the subpoena was
served.
(c) Witness fees. (1) A party who subpoenas a witness who is not a
party must pay him or her the same fees and mileage expenses that are
paid witnesses in the district courts of the United States.
(2) A witness who is not a party and who attends a deposition or
hearing at the request of any party without having been subpoenaed to
do so is entitled to the same fees and mileage expenses as if he or she
had been subpoenaed. However, this paragraph does not apply to federal
employees who are called as witnesses by OFA.
(d) Motion to quash. (1) A person to whom a subpoena is directed
may request by motion that the judge quash or modify the subpoena.
(2) The motion must be filed:
(i) Within 5 days after service of the subpoena; or
(ii) At or before the time specified in the subpoena for
compliance, if that is less than 5 days after service of the subpoena.
(3) The judge may quash or modify the subpoena if it:
(i) Is unreasonable;
(ii) Requires evidence during discovery that is not discoverable;
or
(iii) Requires evidence during a hearing that is privileged or
irrelevant.
(e) Enforcement. For good cause shown, the judge may apply to the
appropriate United States District Court for the issuance of an order
compelling the appearance and testimony of a witness or the production
of evidence as set forth in a subpoena that has been duly issued and
served.
Hearing, Briefing, and Decision
Sec. 4.1040 When and where will the hearing be held?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the
hearing will be held at the time and place set at the initial
prehearing conference under Sec. 4.1022(a)(1)(v), generally within 20
[[Page 35139]]
days after the date set for completion of discovery.
(b) On motion by a party or on the judge's initiative, the judge
may change the date, time, or place of the hearing if he or she finds:
(1) That there is good cause for the change; and
(2) That the change will not unduly prejudice the parties and
witnesses.
Sec. 4.1041 What are the parties' rights during the hearing?
Consistent with the provisions of this subpart, and as necessary to
ensure full and accurate disclosure of the facts, the parties have the
following rights during the hearing:
(a) Each party may:
(1) Present direct and rebuttal evidence;
(2) Make objections, motions, and arguments; and
(3) Cross-examine witnesses and conduct re-direct and re-cross
examination as permitted by the judge.
(b) The petitioner may conduct oral cross-examination of OFA staff
who participated in the preparation of the proposed finding.
Sec. 4.1042 What are the requirements for presenting testimony?
(a) Written direct testimony. Unless otherwise ordered by the
judge, all direct hearing testimony must be prepared and submitted in
written form.
(1) Prepared written testimony must:
(i) Have line numbers inserted in the left-hand margin of each
page;
(ii) Be authenticated by an affidavit or declaration of the
witness;
(iii) Be filed within 15 days after the date set for completion of
discovery, unless the judge sets a different deadline; and
(iv) Be offered as an exhibit during the hearing.
(2) Any witness submitting written testimony must be available for
cross-examination at the hearing.
(b) Oral testimony. Oral examination of a witness in a hearing,
including on cross-examination or redirect, must be conducted under
oath and in the presence of the judge, with an opportunity for all
parties to question the witness.
(c) Telephonic testimony. The judge may by order allow a witness to
testify by telephonic conference call.
(1) The arrangements for the call must let each party listen to and
speak to the witness and each other within the hearing of the judge.
(2) The judge will ensure the full identification of each speaker
so the reporter can create a proper record.
(3) The judge may issue a subpoena under Sec. 4.1037 directing a
witness to testify by telephonic conference call.
Sec. 4.1043 How may a party use a deposition in the hearing?
(a) In general. Subject to the provisions of this section, a party
may use in the hearing any part or all of a deposition taken under
Sec. 4.1034 against any party who:
(1) Was present or represented at the taking of the deposition; or
(2) Had reasonable notice of the taking of the deposition.
(b) Admissibility. (1) No part of a deposition will be included in
the hearing record, unless received in evidence by the judge.
(2) The judge will exclude from evidence any question and response
to which an objection:
(i) Was noted at the taking of the deposition; and
(ii) Would have been sustained if the witness had been personally
present and testifying at a hearing.
(3) If a party offers only part of a deposition in evidence:
(i) An adverse party may require the party to introduce any other
part that ought in fairness to be considered with the part introduced;
and
(ii) Any other party may introduce any other parts.
(c) Video-recorded deposition. If the deposition was video recorded
and is admitted into evidence, relevant portions will be played during
the hearing and transcribed into the record by the reporter.
Sec. 4.1044 What are the requirements for exhibits, official notice,
and stipulations?
(a) General. (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (e)
of this section, any material offered in evidence, other than oral
testimony, must be offered in the form of an exhibit.
(2) Each exhibit offered by a party must be marked for
identification.
(3) Any party who seeks to have an exhibit admitted into evidence
must provide:
(i) The original of the exhibit to the reporter, unless the judge
permits the substitution of a copy; and
(ii) A copy of the exhibit to the judge.
(b) Material not offered. If a document offered as an exhibit
contains material not offered as evidence:
(1) The party offering the exhibit must:
(i) Designate the matter offered as evidence;
(ii) Segregate and exclude the material not offered in evidence, to
the extent feasible; and
(iii) Provide copies of the entire document to the other parties
appearing at the hearing.
(2) The judge must give the other parties an opportunity to inspect
the entire document and offer in evidence any other portions of the
document.
(c) Official notice. (1) At the request of any party at the
hearing, the judge may take official notice of any matter of which the
courts of the United States may take judicial notice, including the
public records of any Department party.
(2) The judge must give the other parties appearing at the hearing
an opportunity to show the contrary of an officially noticed fact.
(3) Any party requesting official notice of a fact after the
conclusion of the hearing must show good cause for its failure to
request official notice during the hearing.
(d) Stipulations. (1) The parties may stipulate to any relevant
facts or to the authenticity of any relevant documents.
(2) If received in evidence at the hearing, a stipulation is
binding on the stipulating parties.
(3) A stipulation may be written or made orally at the hearing.
Sec. 4.1045 What evidence is admissible at the hearing?
(a) General. (1) Subject to the provisions of Sec. 4.1032(b), the
judge may admit any written, oral, documentary, or demonstrative
evidence that is:
(i) Relevant, reliable, and probative; and
(ii) Not privileged or unduly repetitious or cumulative.
(2) The judge may exclude evidence if its probative value is
substantially outweighed by the risk of undue prejudice, confusion of
the issues, or delay.
(3) Hearsay evidence is admissible. The judge may consider the fact
that evidence is hearsay when determining its probative value.
(4) The Federal Rules of Evidence do not directly apply to the
hearing, but may be used as guidance by the judge and the parties in
interpreting and applying the provisions of this section.
(b) Objections. Any party objecting to the admission or exclusion
of evidence shall concisely state the grounds. A ruling on every
objection must appear in the record.
Sec. 4.1046 What are the requirements for transcription of the
hearing?
(a) Transcript and reporter's fees. The hearing must be transcribed
verbatim.
(1) OHA will secure the services of a reporter and pay the
reporter's fees to provide an original transcript to OHA on an
expedited basis.
[[Page 35140]]
(2) Each party must pay the reporter for any copies of the
transcript obtained by that party.
(b) Transcript Corrections. (1) Any party may file a motion
proposing corrections to the transcript. The motion must be filed
within 5 days after receipt of the transcript, unless the judge sets a
different deadline.
(2) Unless a party files a timely motion under paragraph (b)(1) of
this section, the transcript will be presumed to be correct and
complete, except for obvious typographical errors.
(3) As soon as feasible after the close of the hearing and after
consideration of any motions filed under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, the judge will issue an order making any corrections to the
transcript that the judge finds are warranted.
Sec. 4.1047 What is the standard of proof?
(a) Reasonable likelihood standard. The judge will consider a
criterion to be met if the evidence establishes a reasonable likelihood
that the facts claimed by the petitioner are true and that those facts
demonstrate that the petitioner meets the criterion.
(b) Meaning of standard. To prove a ``reasonable likelihood'' that
a claimed fact is true, the petitioner must show that there is more
than a mere possibility that it is true, but need not show that it is
more likely than not to be true.
Sec. 4.1048 When will the hearing record close?
(a) The hearing record will close when the judge closes the
hearing, unless he or she directs otherwise.
(b) Evidence may not be added after the hearing record is closed,
but the transcript may be corrected under Sec. 4.1046(b).
Sec. 4.1049 What are the requirements for post-hearing briefs?
(a) General. (1) Each party may file a post-hearing brief within 20
days after the close of the hearing, unless the judge sets a different
deadline.
(2) A party may file a reply brief only if requested by the judge.
The deadline for filing a reply brief, if any, will be set by the
judge.
(3) The judge may limit the length of the briefs to be filed under
this section.
(b) Content. (1) An initial brief must include:
(i) A concise statement of the case;
(ii) A separate section containing proposed findings regarding the
issues of material fact, with supporting citations to the hearing
record;
(iii) Arguments in support of the party's position; and
(iv) Any other matter required by the judge.
(2) A reply brief, if requested by the judge, must be limited to
any issues identified by the judge.
(c) Form. (1) An exhibit admitted in evidence or marked for
identification in the record may not be reproduced in the brief.
(i) Such an exhibit may be reproduced, within reasonable limits, in
an appendix to the brief.
(ii) Any pertinent analysis of an exhibit may be included in a
brief.
(2) If a brief exceeds 30 pages, it must contain:
(i) A table of contents and of points made, with page references;
and
(ii) An alphabetical list of citations to legal authority, with
page references.
Sec. 4.1050 What are the requirements for the judge's recommended
decision?
(a) Timing. The judge must issue a recommended decision within 180
days after issuance of the docketing notice under Sec. 4.1020(a)(3),
unless the judge issues an Order finding good cause to issue the
recommended decision at a later date.
(b) Content. (1) The recommended decision must contain all of the
following.
(i) Recommended findings of fact on all disputed issues of material
fact.
(ii) Recommended conclusions of law:
(A) Necessary to make the findings of fact (such as rulings on
materiality and on the admissibility of evidence); and
(B) As to whether the applicable criteria for Federal
acknowledgment have been met.
(iii) Reasons for the findings and conclusions.
(2) The judge may adopt any of the findings of fact proposed by one
or more of the parties.
(c) Service. Promptly after issuing a recommended decision, the
judge must:
(1) Serve the decision on each party to the hearing; and
(2) Forward the complete record to the Assistant Secretary--Indian
Affairs, including the recommended decision and hearing record.
Re-Petition Authorization Process
Sec. 4.1060 How does an unsuccessful petitioner request authorization
to re-petition?
(a) To request authorization to re-petition for Federal
acknowledgment, an unsuccessful petitioner must submit to OHA a
certification that:
(1) Is signed and dated by the unsuccessful petitioner's governing
body;
(2) States that it is the unsuccessful petitioner's official
request for re-petitioning; and
(3) Explains how it meets the conditions of 25 CFR 83.4(b)(1).
(b) The unsuccessful petitioner need not re-submit materials
previously submitted to the Department but may supplement its petition.
Sec. 4.1061 What will OHA do with a request?
After receiving the request for re-petitioning, OHA will:
(a) Docket the case;
(b) Assign a judge to preside over the re-petition authorization
process and issue a decision; and
(c) Issue a docketing notice that informs the parties of the docket
number and the judge assigned to the case.
Sec. 4.1062 What can the judge do?
In addition to the powers in Sec. 4.1014, the judge has the powers
to:
(a) Request evidence from OFA and the unsuccessful petitioner; and
(b) Determine the extent, if any, to which Sec. Sec. 4.1020
through 4.1050 will apply in whole or in part.
Sec. 4.1063 When will the judge allow a re-petition?
The judge will issue a decision allowing the unsuccessful
petitioner to re-petition if:
(a) Any third parties that participated as a party in an
administrative reconsideration or Federal Court appeal concerning the
unsuccessful petitioner have consented in writing to the re-
petitioning; and
(b) The unsuccessful petitioner proves, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that either:
(1) A change from the previous version of the regulations to the
current version of the regulations warrants reconsideration of the
final determination; or
(2) The ``reasonable likelihood'' standard was misapplied in the
final denial.
Dated: June 9, 2014.
Rhea Suh,
Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2014-13817 Filed 6-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P