Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 34532-34535 [2014-14083]
Download as PDF
34532
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Notices
assistance, such as sign language
interpretation or other reasonable
accommodations, should notify the
designated contact person at least
fourteen (14) business days prior to the
meeting. Members of the public will
have an opportunity to provide
comments at the meeting. Public
comments will be limited to three
minutes per speaker. Individuals who
would like to submit written statements
should mail or fax their comments to
the Office of Minority Health at least
seven (7) business days prior to the
meeting. Any members of the public
who wish to have printed material
distributed to ACMH committee
members should submit their materials
to the Designated Federal Officer,
ACMH, Tower Building, 1101 Wootton
Parkway, Suite 600, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, prior to close of
business Tuesday, July 1, 2014.
Dated: June 11, 2014.
J. Nadine Gracia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority
Health, Office of Minority Health, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–14066 Filed 6–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Preparedness and Response
Science Board (previously known as
the ‘‘National Biodefense Science
Board’’) Call for Nominees
Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of the Secretary.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The deadline for all
application submissions to the National
Preparedness and Response Science
Board (NPRSB), previously known as
the National Biodefense Science Board,
is extended from June 15, 2014, to June
29, 2014, at 11:59 p.m.. The Office of
the Secretary is accepting application
submissions from qualified individuals
who wish to be considered for
membership on the NPRSB; seven
members have membership expiration
dates of December 31, 2014; therefore,
seven new voting members will be
selected for the Board. Nominees are
being accepted in the following
categories: Industry, academia,
practicing health care, pediatrics, and
organizations representing other
appropriate stakeholders. Please visit
the NPRSB Web site at www.phe.gov/
nprsb for all application submission
information and instructions. All
members of the public are encouraged to
apply.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
The deadline for all application
submissions is June 29, 2014, at 11:59
p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please submit any inquiries to CAPT
Charlotte Spires, DVM, MPH, DACVPM,
Executive Director and Designated
Federal Official, National Preparedness
and Response Science Board, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness
and Response, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, Thomas P.
O’Neill Federal Building, Room Number
14F18, 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC
20024; Office: 202–260–0627, Email
address: charlotte.spires@hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
NPRSB is authorized under Section
319M of the Public Health Service (PHS)
Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–7f) as added by
Section 402 of the Pandemic and AllHazards Preparedness Act of 2006 and
amended by Section 404 of the
Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness
Reauthorization Act and Section 222 of
the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. § 217a). The
Board provides expert advice and
guidance to the Secretary on scientific,
technical, and other matters of special
interest to the Department of Health and
Human Services regarding current and
future chemical, biological, nuclear, and
radiological agents, whether naturally
occurring, accidental, or deliberate. The
Board also provides advice and
guidance to the Secretary and/or the
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness
and Response (ASPR) on other matters
related to public health emergency
preparedness and response.
Description of Duties: The Board shall
advise the Secretary and/or ASPR on
current and future trends, challenges,
and opportunities presented by
advances in biological and life sciences,
biotechnology, and genetic engineering
with respect to threats posed by
naturally occurring infectious diseases
and chemical, biological, radiological,
and nuclear agents. At the request of the
Secretary and/or ASPR, the Board shall
review and consider any information
and findings received from the working
groups established under 42 U.S.C.
247d–7f(b). At the request of the
Secretary and/or ASPR, the Board shall
provide recommendations and findings
for expanded, intensified, and
coordinated biodefense research and
development activities. The Board shall
also provide any recommendation,
finding, or report provided to the
Secretary on these matters to the
appropriate committees of Congress.
Additional advisory duties concerning
public health emergency preparedness
and response may be assigned at the
discretion of the Secretary and/or ASPR.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Structure: The Board shall consist of
13 voting members, including the
Chairperson; additionally, there may be
non-voting ex officio members. Pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 247d–7f(a), members and
the Chairperson shall be appointed by
the Secretary from among the nation’s
preeminent scientific, public health,
and medical experts as follows: (a) Such
federal officials as the Secretary
determines are necessary to support the
functions of the Board; (b) four
individuals from the pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, and device industries; (c)
four individuals representing academia;
and (d) five other members as
determined appropriate by the
Secretary, one of whom must be a
practicing health care professional; one
of whom shall be an individual from an
organization representing health care
consumers; one of whom shall be an
individual with pediatric subject matter
expertise; and one of whom shall be a
state, tribal, territorial, or local public
health official. Nothing in the
membership requirements shall
preclude a member of the Board from
satisfying two or more of these
requirements described in item (d). A
member of the Board described in (b),
(c), and (d) shall serve for a term of three
years, and may serve not more than two
consecutive terms.
Members who are not full-time or
permanent part-time federal employees
shall be appointed by the Secretary as
Special Government Employees.
Dated: June 11, 2014.
Nicole Lurie,
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and
Response.
[FR Doc. 2014–14173 Filed 6–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–37–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality Agency Information Collection
Activities:
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project:
‘‘Evaluation of the Educating the
Educator (EtE) Workshop.’’ In
accordance with the Paperwork
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Notices
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), AHRQ
invites the public to comment on this
proposed information collection.
This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on March 28th, 2014 and
allowed 60 days for public comment. No
comments were received. The purpose
of this notice is to allow an additional
30 days for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by July 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Letkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by
email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Evaluation of the Educating the
Educator (EtE) Workshop
AHRQ’s Educating the Educator (EtE)
workshop training project is an Agency
knowledge translation and
dissemination project that aims to
increase knowledge about and use of
AHRQ’s EHC Program products among
health care professionals. For the EtE
project, AHRQ is sponsoring the
development of an accredited, inperson, train-the-trainer workshop
program for health care professionals to
educate them on how to use AHRQ’s
EHC Program materials and resources in
shared decision making (SDM) with
patients/caregivers. As a train-thetrainer program, the workshop also
provides education on effectively
training other health care professionals
to facilitate the dissemination of the key
competencies taught by the program.
Additionally, as part of the EtE project,
a collection of new stand-alone tools are
being developed to facilitate the
implementation and use of AHRQ EHC
Program materials. The new tools will
be integrated into the EtE workshop
training program and made available to
workshop participants. These new tools
also will be publicly-accessible through
the AHRQ Web site for easy referral,
access, and use by both workshop
participants and other health care
professionals. Ten EtE workshops, with
25–50 participants each, will be held
each year for four years around the
United States. Primary trainees will
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
then be able to go back to their home
institutions or organizations to train
other secondary trainees.
AHRQ recognizes the importance of
ensuring that its dissemination activities
are useful, well implemented, and
effective in achieving their intended
goals. Therefore, an evaluation is
associated with the EtE project. The EtE
evaluation is comprised of two key
components. One component has been
designed to support both a processoriented formative evaluation and a
summative (impact) evaluation of the
EtE train-the-trainer workshop program.
The other component is designed to
assess the impact of new tools
developed through this project in
supporting the implementation of
AHRQ EHC Program materials.
The specific goals of the EtE train-thetrainer workshop evaluation
(component 1) are to examine the
following:
• Who is participating in both the
primary train-the-trainer sessions, and
in subsequent, secondary trainings
offered by primary trainees?
• The uptake of and confidence
among primary trainees in training
others on the key competencies of the
curriculum
• How the workshop implementation
or course content should be modified to
improve the quality of the training (e.g.,
instructor, materials, modules, etc.)?
• The extent to which workshop
participants have been able to conduct
additional trainings, start new PCOR
education programs based on the
workshop curriculum, or integrate the
workshop curriculum into existing
training programs in their local settings.
• What the results of subsequent
trainings by workshop participants were
among secondary participants (i.e.,
individuals who received training from
a workshop participant) in terms of their
use of PCOR information and the
practice of SDM with patients?
• Whether workshop participants
have participated in other project
activities, such as ongoing webinars or
the learning network that are planned as
part of the EtE project.
• How workshop participants are
using what they have learned from the
training program in their own practice?
The specific goals of the EtE new tools
evaluation (component 2) are to
examine the following:
• If and how workshop trainees and
other health care professionals are using
the new tools developed during this
project to support their implementation
of AHRQ EHC Program resources?
• How useful clinicians find AHRQ
EHC Program resources to be in their
practice?
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34533
• How frequently new tools are being
accessed and used by workshop trainees
and other health care professionals?
• Suggestions for improving tools to
meet health care professionals’ needs
when serving their patients?
This study is being conducted by
AHRQ through its contractor, AFYA,
Inc., and The Lewin Group, pursuant to
AHRQ’s statutory authority to support
the agency’s dissemination of
comparative clinical effectiveness
research findings. 42 U.S.C. 299b–37(a)–
(c).
Method of Collection
To achieve the goals of this project the
following data collections will be
implemented:
(1) Pre-Training Survey of Primary
Participants. This pen and paper survey
will be administered to train-the-trainer
workshop participants (also referred to
as Primary Workshop Participants)
immediately prior to the start of the inperson train-the-trainer workshop
sessions. Information collected includes
(1) non-identifying demographic
information about respondents (e.g.,
type of clinician; practice setting); (2)
participants knowledge of core concepts
and objectives of the workshop; and (3)
their confidence in training others. This
instrument will also collect information
about participants’ use of and exposure
to AHRQ EHC Program products for
comparison at later time points.
(2) Post-Training Survey of Primary
Participants. This pen and paper survey
will be administered to train-the-trainer
workshop participants immediately
following the conclusion of the inperson train-the-trainer workshop
sessions. Information collected includes
(1) post-training knowledge of core
concepts presented in workshop; and (2)
post-training confidence in training
others. The post-training instrument
will also collect information about
participants’ reaction to the training
(e.g., instructor, the content, the
presentation style, the schedule, etc.), a
requirement for accreditation purposes.
(3) Six-Month Post-Training Survey of
Primary Participants. This survey will
be administered to primary workshop
participants six months following their
participation in the train-the-trainer
workshop. The survey will be Webenabled, and a link to the survey will be
emailed to participants. Information to
be collected includes (1) behaviors and
experiences of primary workshop
participants in training others (i.e.,
secondary participants); (2) the numbers
of individuals they have trained; and (3)
barriers they have encountered in
training others. This instrument will
also collect (4) data on primary
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
34534
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Notices
participants’ early experiences in
applying what they learned in the
workshop training in their own clinical
practice with patients; and (5) their use
of AHRQ EHC resources and tools
which will be compared to baseline
measures.
(4) One-Year Post-Training Survey of
Primary Participants. This survey will
be administered to primary workshop
participants one year following their
participation in the train-the-trainer
workshop. The survey will be Webenabled, and a link to the survey will be
emailed to participants. This survey will
collect the same information as
collected in the 6-month survey. This
instrument will also collect new
information from participants about
their use/participation in continued
training that will be offered (e.g.,
participating in training and technical
assistance webinars and the learning
network that will be created).
(5) One-Year Post Survey of
Secondary Workshop Participants. This
survey will be administered to
secondary workshop participants one
year following their receipt of
continuing education (CE) credits for
participating in locally-delivered
workshops by primary workshop
participants. The questions of interest
include (1) non-identifying
demographic information about
respondents (e.g., type of clinician;
practice setting); (2) their use of AHRQ
EHC program products; (3) how useful
they thought the training they received
was in developing their patient
engagement and SDM skills; (4) barriers
they have encountered when
implementing what they learned in
practice; (5) the types of changes they or
their organization have made related to
involving patients in health care
decision making and their use of
decision support tools, since
participating in the workshop; and (6)
any changes that they have observed in
their patients since they participated in
the training.
(6) New Tool Users. This survey will
be deployed on the AHRQ Web site on
a quarterly basis. More specifically, it
will be made available on the new tools
Web landing page on the AHRQ Web
site so that it targets users of the new
tools from this project. Information to be
collected includes (1) non-identifying
demographic information about
respondents (e.g., type of clinician;
practice setting); (2) whether or not they
have participated in the workshop
training associated with this project; (3)
how often respondents use tools on the
AHRQ tools landing page; and (4) how
useful respondents find the tools to be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
and new tools that they would like to
see added.
AHRQ and the EHC Program staff will
use the information collected through
this Information Collection Request to
assess the short- and long-term progress
in achieving the dissemination and
implementation aims of the EtE project.
The information collected will facilitate
real-time adjustments in the strategies
and tactics that are used to promote and
deliver the new tools and workshop
training. The summative evaluation will
assess the impact of this EtE workshop
training program and new tools on
increased awareness, understanding,
and use of AHRQ’s EHC Program
products in clinical practice with
patients. The specific purpose and use
of each of the data collection
instruments is described below.
(1) Pre- and Post-Training Surveys of
Primary Workshop Participants—These
data collections will be used to assess
the effectiveness of the training in
transferring course concepts to train-thetrainer participants. They will be used
to measure what participants learned
during the training relative to their
knowledge of core concepts and
objectives of the workshop, and their
confidence in training others as assessed
prior to the training (pre-training
survey). The pre-training survey also
will establish a baseline level regarding
workshop participants’ use and
exposure to AHRQ EHC Program
products for comparison at later time
points. The post-training assessment
also will be used to assess workshop
participants’ reaction to the training.
This is important for the process
evaluation component of this project as
it will provide information on
participants’ reactions to specific
components of the program (e.g.,
instructor, the content, the presentation
style, the schedule, etc.), a requirement
for accreditation purposes, and help to
identify where minor tweaking of the
program may be needed to better meet
participants’ needs.
(2) Six-Month Post-Training Survey,
of Primary Participants—This data
collection will be used to assess the
behaviors and experiences of workshop
participants in training others (i.e.,
secondary participants), and whether
the training has promoted changes to
participants’ use of PCOR resources in
SDM with their patients. This survey
will also be used to assess whether the
use of AHRQ EHC Program products has
increased since participating in the
survey.
(3) One-Year Post-Training Survey of
Primary Participants—This data
collection will be used to assess the
long-term impact of the train-the-trainer
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
workshop on participants’ use of PCOR
resources in SDM with patients in
clinical practice. The assessment will
determine if the training results in or
contributes to changes in participants’
continued use of key training concepts
relative to baseline and 6-month
assessments. This assessment also will
provide information on the numbers of
other individuals (i.e., secondary
participants) who have received training
at subsequent time points by the trainthe-trainer workshop participants and
the impact of training those secondary
participants on their organizational
practices regarding using AHRQ EHC
Program products in SDM with their
patients.
(4) One-Year Post Training Survey of
Secondary Workshop Participants—This
data collection will be used to assess the
effectiveness of the train-the-trainer
format on disseminating knowledge
among the health care community. The
questions of interest include the
following:
Æ Are participants from the train-thetrainer workshop able to effectively
transfer or share key competencies from
their training to other locally-based
health care professionals (i.e., secondary
participants)?
Æ Do secondary participants taught by
AHRQ-sponsored train-the-trainer
workshop participants increase their use
of AHRQ EEC Program products in SDM
with their patients?
(5) New Tool Survey—This data
collection will be used to gather
information on AHRQ Web site users
experiences with the available new tools
including who uses these tools and if
they are useful.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated
annualized burden hours for the
respondents’ time to participate in this
evaluation. For the longitudinal
evaluation, four questionnaires will be
completed by approximately 1,500
primary trainees who participate in the
AHRQ-sponsored EtE train-the-trainer
workshop, at the specified intervals, and
each will require 10 or 15 minutes to
complete. The annual survey of
secondary participants will be
completed by 3,000 secondary trainees
(individuals who receive training from
primary trainees) over the 3 years. Based
on previous experience with
convenience-based Web-based surveys,
we estimate that the quarterly Webbased survey of new tool users will be
completed by approximately 1,200
respondents over the 3-year period.
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated
annualized cost burden based on the
respondents’ time to participate in this
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
34535
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Notices
project. The total cost burden is
estimated to be $91,668.
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Form name
Number of
responses per
respondent
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
Pre-training survey (primary trainees) (time point #1) .....................................
Post-training survey (time point #2) .................................................................
6-month post training survey (time point #3) ...................................................
12-month post training survey (time point #4) .................................................
Annual survey (one-time survey of secondary trainees) .................................
Quarterly survey of new tool users ..................................................................
* 1500
* 1500
* 1500
* 1500
3000
1200
1
1
1
1
1
1
15/60
15/60
10/60
10/60
10/60
5/60
375
375
250
250
500
100
Total ..........................................................................................................
** 5,700
NA
NA
1850
* These individuals are the same 1500 individuals (primary trainees) and will be assessed at four different time points.
** Estimated total number of unique respondents.
EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Form name
Total burden
hours
Average
hourly wage
rate *
($)
Total cost
burden
($)
Pre-training survey (primary trainees) (time point #1) .....................................
Post-training survey (time point #2) .................................................................
6-month post training survey (time point #3) ...................................................
12-month post training survey (time point #4) .................................................
Annual survey (one-time survey of secondary trainees) .................................
Quarterly survey of new tool users ..................................................................
1500
1500
1500
1500
3000
1200
375
375
250
250
500
100
* 49.55
* 49.55
* 49.55
* 49.55
* 49.55
* 49.55
18,581
18,581
12,388
12,388
24,775
4,955
Total ..........................................................................................................
** 5,700
1,850
NA
91,668
* Average hourly wage based on the weighted average of wages for 1 Family and General Practitioner (29–1062, $81.78), 1 Internist (29–
1063, $86.20), 1 Physician Assistant (29–1071, $44.96), 1 Psychiatrist (29–1066, $95.33), 1 Nurse Practitioner (29–1171, $44.48), 3 Registered
Nurses (29–1141, $34.23), 1 Pharmacist (29–1051, $59.87), 1 Licensed Practical or Licensed Vocational Nurse (29–2061, $21.17), 1 Health Educator (21–1091, $20.52), and 1 Administrative Services Manager (11–3011, $37.61). Data Source: National Occupational Employment and
Wage Estimates in the United States, May 2012, ‘‘U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics’’ (available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4 621400.htm).
** Estimated total number of unique respondents.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Comments
In accordance with the above-cited
Paperwork Reduction Act legislation,
comments on AHRQ’s information
collection are requested with regard to
any of the following: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
AHRQ health care research and
information dissemination functions,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including
hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the Agency’s subsequent
request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: June 6, 2014.
Richard Kronick,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2014–14083 Filed 6–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project: ‘‘The
Agency for Healthcare Research and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Quality (AHRQ) Health Care
Innovations Exchange Innovator
Interview and Innovator Email
Submission Guidelines.’’ In accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501–3521, AHRQ invites the
public to comment on this proposed
information collection.
This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on March 28th, 2014 and
allowed 60 days for public comment. No
comments were received. The purpose
of this notice is to allow an additional
30 days for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by July 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by
email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Agencies
- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency Information Collection Activities:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 116 (Tuesday, June 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34532-34535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14083]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency Information
Collection Activities:
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection
project: ``Evaluation of the Educating the Educator (EtE) Workshop.''
In accordance with the Paperwork
[[Page 34533]]
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)),
AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed information
collection.
This proposed information collection was previously published in
the Federal Register on March 28th, 2014 and allowed 60 days for public
comment. No comments were received. The purpose of this notice is to
allow an additional 30 days for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by July 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: Doris Letkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by email at
doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection
instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be
obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by email at
doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
Evaluation of the Educating the Educator (EtE) Workshop
AHRQ's Educating the Educator (EtE) workshop training project is an
Agency knowledge translation and dissemination project that aims to
increase knowledge about and use of AHRQ's EHC Program products among
health care professionals. For the EtE project, AHRQ is sponsoring the
development of an accredited, in-person, train-the-trainer workshop
program for health care professionals to educate them on how to use
AHRQ's EHC Program materials and resources in shared decision making
(SDM) with patients/caregivers. As a train-the-trainer program, the
workshop also provides education on effectively training other health
care professionals to facilitate the dissemination of the key
competencies taught by the program. Additionally, as part of the EtE
project, a collection of new stand-alone tools are being developed to
facilitate the implementation and use of AHRQ EHC Program materials.
The new tools will be integrated into the EtE workshop training program
and made available to workshop participants. These new tools also will
be publicly-accessible through the AHRQ Web site for easy referral,
access, and use by both workshop participants and other health care
professionals. Ten EtE workshops, with 25-50 participants each, will be
held each year for four years around the United States. Primary
trainees will then be able to go back to their home institutions or
organizations to train other secondary trainees.
AHRQ recognizes the importance of ensuring that its dissemination
activities are useful, well implemented, and effective in achieving
their intended goals. Therefore, an evaluation is associated with the
EtE project. The EtE evaluation is comprised of two key components. One
component has been designed to support both a process-oriented
formative evaluation and a summative (impact) evaluation of the EtE
train-the-trainer workshop program. The other component is designed to
assess the impact of new tools developed through this project in
supporting the implementation of AHRQ EHC Program materials.
The specific goals of the EtE train-the-trainer workshop evaluation
(component 1) are to examine the following:
Who is participating in both the primary train-the-trainer
sessions, and in subsequent, secondary trainings offered by primary
trainees?
The uptake of and confidence among primary trainees in
training others on the key competencies of the curriculum
How the workshop implementation or course content should
be modified to improve the quality of the training (e.g., instructor,
materials, modules, etc.)?
The extent to which workshop participants have been able
to conduct additional trainings, start new PCOR education programs
based on the workshop curriculum, or integrate the workshop curriculum
into existing training programs in their local settings.
What the results of subsequent trainings by workshop
participants were among secondary participants (i.e., individuals who
received training from a workshop participant) in terms of their use of
PCOR information and the practice of SDM with patients?
Whether workshop participants have participated in other
project activities, such as ongoing webinars or the learning network
that are planned as part of the EtE project.
How workshop participants are using what they have learned
from the training program in their own practice?
The specific goals of the EtE new tools evaluation (component 2)
are to examine the following:
If and how workshop trainees and other health care
professionals are using the new tools developed during this project to
support their implementation of AHRQ EHC Program resources?
How useful clinicians find AHRQ EHC Program resources to
be in their practice?
How frequently new tools are being accessed and used by
workshop trainees and other health care professionals?
Suggestions for improving tools to meet health care
professionals' needs when serving their patients?
This study is being conducted by AHRQ through its contractor, AFYA,
Inc., and The Lewin Group, pursuant to AHRQ's statutory authority to
support the agency's dissemination of comparative clinical
effectiveness research findings. 42 U.S.C. 299b-37(a)-(c).
Method of Collection
To achieve the goals of this project the following data collections
will be implemented:
(1) Pre-Training Survey of Primary Participants. This pen and paper
survey will be administered to train-the-trainer workshop participants
(also referred to as Primary Workshop Participants) immediately prior
to the start of the in-person train-the-trainer workshop sessions.
Information collected includes (1) non-identifying demographic
information about respondents (e.g., type of clinician; practice
setting); (2) participants knowledge of core concepts and objectives of
the workshop; and (3) their confidence in training others. This
instrument will also collect information about participants' use of and
exposure to AHRQ EHC Program products for comparison at later time
points.
(2) Post-Training Survey of Primary Participants. This pen and
paper survey will be administered to train-the-trainer workshop
participants immediately following the conclusion of the in-person
train-the-trainer workshop sessions. Information collected includes (1)
post-training knowledge of core concepts presented in workshop; and (2)
post-training confidence in training others. The post-training
instrument will also collect information about participants' reaction
to the training (e.g., instructor, the content, the presentation style,
the schedule, etc.), a requirement for accreditation purposes.
(3) Six-Month Post-Training Survey of Primary Participants. This
survey will be administered to primary workshop participants six months
following their participation in the train-the-trainer workshop. The
survey will be Web-enabled, and a link to the survey will be emailed to
participants. Information to be collected includes (1) behaviors and
experiences of primary workshop participants in training others (i.e.,
secondary participants); (2) the numbers of individuals they have
trained; and (3) barriers they have encountered in training others.
This instrument will also collect (4) data on primary
[[Page 34534]]
participants' early experiences in applying what they learned in the
workshop training in their own clinical practice with patients; and (5)
their use of AHRQ EHC resources and tools which will be compared to
baseline measures.
(4) One-Year Post-Training Survey of Primary Participants. This
survey will be administered to primary workshop participants one year
following their participation in the train-the-trainer workshop. The
survey will be Web-enabled, and a link to the survey will be emailed to
participants. This survey will collect the same information as
collected in the 6-month survey. This instrument will also collect new
information from participants about their use/participation in
continued training that will be offered (e.g., participating in
training and technical assistance webinars and the learning network
that will be created).
(5) One-Year Post Survey of Secondary Workshop Participants. This
survey will be administered to secondary workshop participants one year
following their receipt of continuing education (CE) credits for
participating in locally-delivered workshops by primary workshop
participants. The questions of interest include (1) non-identifying
demographic information about respondents (e.g., type of clinician;
practice setting); (2) their use of AHRQ EHC program products; (3) how
useful they thought the training they received was in developing their
patient engagement and SDM skills; (4) barriers they have encountered
when implementing what they learned in practice; (5) the types of
changes they or their organization have made related to involving
patients in health care decision making and their use of decision
support tools, since participating in the workshop; and (6) any changes
that they have observed in their patients since they participated in
the training.
(6) New Tool Users. This survey will be deployed on the AHRQ Web
site on a quarterly basis. More specifically, it will be made available
on the new tools Web landing page on the AHRQ Web site so that it
targets users of the new tools from this project. Information to be
collected includes (1) non-identifying demographic information about
respondents (e.g., type of clinician; practice setting); (2) whether or
not they have participated in the workshop training associated with
this project; (3) how often respondents use tools on the AHRQ tools
landing page; and (4) how useful respondents find the tools to be and
new tools that they would like to see added.
AHRQ and the EHC Program staff will use the information collected
through this Information Collection Request to assess the short- and
long-term progress in achieving the dissemination and implementation
aims of the EtE project. The information collected will facilitate
real-time adjustments in the strategies and tactics that are used to
promote and deliver the new tools and workshop training. The summative
evaluation will assess the impact of this EtE workshop training program
and new tools on increased awareness, understanding, and use of AHRQ's
EHC Program products in clinical practice with patients. The specific
purpose and use of each of the data collection instruments is described
below.
(1) Pre- and Post-Training Surveys of Primary Workshop
Participants--These data collections will be used to assess the
effectiveness of the training in transferring course concepts to train-
the-trainer participants. They will be used to measure what
participants learned during the training relative to their knowledge of
core concepts and objectives of the workshop, and their confidence in
training others as assessed prior to the training (pre-training
survey). The pre-training survey also will establish a baseline level
regarding workshop participants' use and exposure to AHRQ EHC Program
products for comparison at later time points. The post-training
assessment also will be used to assess workshop participants' reaction
to the training. This is important for the process evaluation component
of this project as it will provide information on participants'
reactions to specific components of the program (e.g., instructor, the
content, the presentation style, the schedule, etc.), a requirement for
accreditation purposes, and help to identify where minor tweaking of
the program may be needed to better meet participants' needs.
(2) Six-Month Post-Training Survey, of Primary Participants--This
data collection will be used to assess the behaviors and experiences of
workshop participants in training others (i.e., secondary
participants), and whether the training has promoted changes to
participants' use of PCOR resources in SDM with their patients. This
survey will also be used to assess whether the use of AHRQ EHC Program
products has increased since participating in the survey.
(3) One-Year Post-Training Survey of Primary Participants--This
data collection will be used to assess the long-term impact of the
train-the-trainer workshop on participants' use of PCOR resources in
SDM with patients in clinical practice. The assessment will determine
if the training results in or contributes to changes in participants'
continued use of key training concepts relative to baseline and 6-month
assessments. This assessment also will provide information on the
numbers of other individuals (i.e., secondary participants) who have
received training at subsequent time points by the train-the-trainer
workshop participants and the impact of training those secondary
participants on their organizational practices regarding using AHRQ EHC
Program products in SDM with their patients.
(4) One-Year Post Training Survey of Secondary Workshop
Participants--This data collection will be used to assess the
effectiveness of the train-the-trainer format on disseminating
knowledge among the health care community. The questions of interest
include the following:
[cir] Are participants from the train-the-trainer workshop able to
effectively transfer or share key competencies from their training to
other locally-based health care professionals (i.e., secondary
participants)?
[cir] Do secondary participants taught by AHRQ-sponsored train-the-
trainer workshop participants increase their use of AHRQ EEC Program
products in SDM with their patients?
(5) New Tool Survey--This data collection will be used to gather
information on AHRQ Web site users experiences with the available new
tools including who uses these tools and if they are useful.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the
respondents' time to participate in this evaluation. For the
longitudinal evaluation, four questionnaires will be completed by
approximately 1,500 primary trainees who participate in the AHRQ-
sponsored EtE train-the-trainer workshop, at the specified intervals,
and each will require 10 or 15 minutes to complete. The annual survey
of secondary participants will be completed by 3,000 secondary trainees
(individuals who receive training from primary trainees) over the 3
years. Based on previous experience with convenience-based Web-based
surveys, we estimate that the quarterly Web-based survey of new tool
users will be completed by approximately 1,200 respondents over the 3-
year period.
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annualized cost burden based on the
respondents' time to participate in this
[[Page 34535]]
project. The total cost burden is estimated to be $91,668.
Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Form name Number of responses per Hours per Total burden
respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-training survey (primary trainees) (time * 1500 1 15/60 375
point 1)..............................
Post-training survey (time point 2).... * 1500 1 15/60 375
6-month post training survey (time point 3)...........................................
12-month post training survey (time point 4)...........................................
Annual survey (one-time survey of secondary 3000 1 10/60 500
trainees)......................................
Quarterly survey of new tool users.............. 1200 1 5/60 100
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... ** 5,700 NA NA 1850
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* These individuals are the same 1500 individuals (primary trainees) and will be assessed at four different time
points.
** Estimated total number of unique respondents.
Exhibit 2--Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Form name Number of Total burden hourly wage Total cost
respondents hours rate * ($) burden ($)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-training survey (primary trainees) (time 1500 375 * 49.55 18,581
point 1)..............................
Post-training survey (time point 2).... 1500 375 * 49.55 18,581
6-month post training survey (time point 3)...........................................
12-month post training survey (time point 4)...........................................
Annual survey (one-time survey of secondary 3000 500 * 49.55 24,775
trainees)......................................
Quarterly survey of new tool users.............. 1200 100 * 49.55 4,955
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... ** 5,700 1,850 NA 91,668
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Average hourly wage based on the weighted average of wages for 1 Family and General Practitioner (29-1062,
$81.78), 1 Internist (29-1063, $86.20), 1 Physician Assistant (29-1071, $44.96), 1 Psychiatrist (29-1066,
$95.33), 1 Nurse Practitioner (29-1171, $44.48), 3 Registered Nurses (29-1141, $34.23), 1 Pharmacist (29-1051,
$59.87), 1 Licensed Practical or Licensed Vocational Nurse (29-2061, $21.17), 1 Health Educator (21-1091,
$20.52), and 1 Administrative Services Manager (11-3011, $37.61). Data Source: National Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates in the United States, May 2012, ``U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics'' (available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4 621400.htm).
** Estimated total number of unique respondents.
Request for Comments
In accordance with the above-cited Paperwork Reduction Act
legislation, comments on AHRQ's information collection are requested
with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
AHRQ health care research and information dissemination functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of AHRQ's estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of
the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information upon
the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: June 6, 2014.
Richard Kronick,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-14083 Filed 6-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M