Rights-of-Way on Indian Land, 34455-34474 [2014-13964]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
V–416 [Amended]
From Rosewood, OH; INT Rosewood 041°
and Mansfield, OH, 262° radials; Mansfield;
to INT Mansfield 045° and Dryer, OH, 123°T/
129°M radials.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 11,
2014.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy & Regulations
Group.
[FR Doc. 2014–14142 Filed 6–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 169
[Docket ID: BIA–2014–0001;
DR.5B711.IA000814]
RIN 1076–AF20
Rights-of-Way on Indian Land
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
comprehensively update and streamline
the process for obtaining BIA grants of
rights-of-way on Indian land, while
supporting tribal self-determination and
self-governance. This proposed rule
would also further implement the policy
decisions and approaches established in
the leasing regulations, which BIA
finalized in December 2012, by applying
them to the rights-of-way context where
applicable. This publication also
announces the dates and locations for
tribal consultation sessions to discuss
this proposed rights-of-way rule.
DATES: Comments on this rule must be
received by August 18, 2014. Comments
on the information collections
contained in this proposed regulation
are separate from those on the
substance of the rule. Comments on the
information collection burden should be
received by July 17, 2014 to ensure
consideration, but must be received no
later than August 18, 2014. Please see
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice for dates of tribal
consultation sessions.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
—Federal rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The rule is
listed under the agency name ‘‘Bureau
of Indian Affairs.’’ The rule has been
assigned Docket ID: BIA–2014–0001.
—Email: consultation@bia.gov. Include
the number 1076–AF20 in the subject
line.
—Mail or Hand Delivery: Elizabeth
Appel, Office of Regulatory Affairs &
Collaborative Action, U.S. Department
of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., MS
4141, Washington, DC 20240. Include
the number 1076–AF20 on the
envelope.
Please note that we will not consider
or include in the docket for this
rulemaking comments received after the
close of the comment period (see DATES)
or comments sent to an address other
than those listed above.
Comments on the information
collections contained in this proposed
regulation are separate from those on
the substance of the rule. Send
comments on the information collection
burden to OMB by facsimile to (202)
395–5806 or email to the OMB Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Interior at OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov. Please send a copy of your
comments to the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice.
Please see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice for
addresses of tribal consultation sessions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative
Action, (202) 273–4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov. You may
review the information collection
request online at https://
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the
instructions to review Department of the
Interior collections under review by
OMB.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34455
I. Executive Summary of Rule
This is a proposed rule to
comprehensively update and streamline
the process for obtaining BIA grants of
rights-of-way on Indian land. The
current regulations were promulgated in
1968, and last updated in 1980. In
December 2012, the Department issued
final regulations comprehensively
reforming residential, business, and
wind and solar leasing on Indian land
and streamlining the leasing process.
Given the supportive response to the
leasing regulatory revisions, we are
updating 25 CFR 169 (Rights-of-Way) to
mirror those revisions to the extent
applicable in the rights-of-way context.
Highlights of the proposed rights-of-way
revisions include:
Æ Eliminating the need to obtain BIA
consent for surveying in preparation for
a right-of-way;
Æ Establishing timelines for BIA
review of rights-of-way requests;
Æ Clarifying processes for BIA review
of right-of-way documents;
Æ Allowing BIA disapproval only
where there is a stated compelling
reason;
Æ Providing greater deference to
Tribes on compensation for rights-ofway;
Æ Clarifying the authority by which
BIA approves rights-of-way; and
Æ Eliminating outdated requirements
specific to different types of rights-ofway.
Together, these revisions will
modernize the rights-of-way approval
process while better supporting Tribal
self-determination. This rule also
updates the regulations to be in a
question-and-answer format, in
compliance with ‘‘plain language’’
requirements.
II. Summary of All Revisions to 25 CFR
Part 169
The following table summarizes
revisions to part 169, by showing where
the substance of each section of the
current rule is in the proposed rule and
describing the changes.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34456
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Current provision
Proposed 25 CFR §
Description of change
169.1 ...........................
Definitions of ‘‘Secretary,’’ ‘‘individually owned
land,’’ ‘‘tribe’’, ‘‘tribal land,’’ and ‘‘Government owned land.’’.
169.002 .....................
169.2(a), (c) ................
Purpose and scope of regulations ...................
169.001 .....................
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.003–169.010 ......
169.2(b) ......................
Appeals ............................................................
169.011 .....................
169.3(a) ......................
169.3(b)–(c) ................
Tribal consent required ....................................
Individual Indian landowner consent required
169.106 .....................
169.107, 169.108 ......
169.4 ...........................
Permission to survey .......................................
169.101(b) .................
169.5 ...........................
Application for right-of-way ..............................
169.101–169.102,
169.121.
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.105 .....................
169.6 ...........................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Current 25 CFR §
Maps. Requires maps of definite location on
tracing linen or other ‘‘permanent and reproducible material.’’ Requires a separate
map for each 20 miles, a specific scale,
and the parcels, sections, townships, and
ranges affected.
Field notes. Requires field notes either on
map or submitted separately.
162.102(b) .................
Revises the definition of ‘‘tribe’’ to be ‘‘Indian
tribe’’ and to refer to the Federal List Act.
Simplifies the remaining definitions. Adds
definitions for ‘‘abandonment,’’ ‘‘assignment,’’ ‘‘avigation hazard easement,’’ ‘‘BIA,’’
‘‘compensation,’’
‘‘constructive
notice,’’
‘‘easement,’’ ‘‘fractional interest,’’ ‘‘grant,’’
‘‘grantee,’’ ‘‘immediate family,’’ ‘‘Indian,’’
‘‘Indian land,’’ ‘‘in-kind compensation,’’
‘‘legal description,’’ ‘‘LTRO,’’ ‘‘map of definite location,’’ ‘‘market value,’’ ‘‘right-ofway,’’ ‘‘right-of-way document,’’ ‘‘Section 17
corporation,’’ ‘‘service line,’’ ‘‘trespass,’’
‘‘tribal authorization,’’ ‘‘trust account,’’ ‘‘trust
account encumbrance,’’ ‘‘trust and restricted
status,’’ ‘‘Uniform Standards for Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP),’’ and
‘‘us/we/our.’’
Updates the purpose of the regulations to provide that BIA will use its general statutory
authority for granting rights-of-way.
New sections. Specify what land part 169 applies to, when a right-of-way is needed,
what types of rights-of-way are covered by
part 169, whether part 169 applies to rightsof-way applications submitted before this
version of the rule, that tribes may compact
or contract for certain BIA realty functions
related to rights-of-way, what laws apply to
rights-of-way, what taxes apply to rights-ofway, and how BIA provides notice of its actions related to rights-of-way.
Adds exceptions to part 2 appeals and clarifies ‘‘interested party’’ to make consistent
with availability of appeals in the leasing
context.
No substantive change.
Adds a requirement for BIA to provide 30-day
notice to landowners on whose behalf it will
consent. Reorganizes to establish whom
BIA can consent on behalf of. Updates to
comply with statutory authorities that have
been updated since the last regulatory revision.
Removes the requirement for BIA approval to
survey, but retains the requirement for obtaining landowner consent to survey.
Removes requirement for duplicate filing and
statutory citation. Consolidates provisions
and provides that they will be issued in the
grant, rather than requiring grantee to submit them in a stipulation with the application. Clarifies that application must identify
the affected tract, right-of-way location, purpose, and duration, and ownership of any
permanent improvements. Adds that the following must accompany the application:
legal description, bond, and information
necessary to comply with environmental
laws.
Establishes requirement for due diligence in
construction of permanent improvements.
Removes specific requirements for format of
map of definite location (e.g., tracing linen),
scale, etc. Adds requirement that map be
signed by a professional surveyor or engineer.
169.7 ...........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
N/A ............................
Sfmt 4702
Deleted.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
34457
Current 25 CFR §
Current provision
Proposed 25 CFR §
Description of change
169.8 ...........................
Public survey. Requires terminal of line of
route to be fixed to nearest corner of public
survey and, if terminal is on unsurveyed
land, be connected with corner of public
survey < 6 miles away.
Connection with natural objects. Requires
connection with natural object or permanent
monument if distance to an established corner of the public survey is > 6 miles.
Township and section lines. Requires map to
show distance to nearest corner if line of
survey crosses a township or section line of
public survey.
Affidavit and certificate. Requires map to include an affidavit by engineer and certificate by applicant on accuracy. Requires
BIA-built roads transferred to county or
State to include affidavit by BIA engineer
and State officer on accuracy.
169.002 .....................
Definition of map of definite location requires
it to include reference to a public survey.
N/A ............................
Deleted. Legal description and map make this
unnecessary.
169.002 .....................
Definition of map of definite location requires
it to include reference to a public survey
169.102(b)(2) .............
169.12 .........................
Consideration for right-of-way grants. Requires fair market value and requires the
Secretary to obtain and advise landowner
of appraisal information.
169.109–169.111 ......
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.112–169.117 ......
169.13 .........................
Other damages. Requires grantee to pay all
damages incident to the survey or construction or maintenance of the facility for which
the right-of-way is granted.
Deposit and disbursement of consideration
and damages. Requires applicant to deposit
total estimated consideration and damages
with application. Requires amounts to be
held in ‘‘special deposit’’ accounts.
169.118 .....................
Maintains the requirement for an engineer to
sign the map, but adds that a surveyor may
sign the map instead. Deletes requirement
for applicant to sign a certificate regarding
the map’s accuracy, because the rule otherwise requires that the map be accurate. Deletes the section on maps covering BIA
roads to be transferred to a county or State.
Provides that the Secretary will defer to the
tribe’s negotiated compensation for tribal
land. Maintains requirement for fair market
value and a valuation for individually owned
Indian land, but adds exceptions. Allows for
market value to be determined by several
methods (in addition to, or instead of, appraisals).
New sections. Clarify when compensation
payments may be due for a right-of-way, allowing for agreements to make payment at
times other than upon application, require
the right-of-way grant to specify how payment occurs (direct pay or to BIA) and put
limits on availability of direct pay, allow for
non-monetary (e.g., discount internet service) and varying types of compensation,
clarify whether BIA will notify when a payment is due, and clarify when right-of-way
grant must provide for compensation reviews or adjustments.
Adds other charges that grantee may be subject to.
169.119–169.120 ......
N/A ..............................
Action on application. Provides that Secretary
may grant right-of-way, with attached maps
of definite location. Allows Secretary to
issue one document for all tracts traversed
by the right-of-way, or separate documents.
Affidavit of Completion. Requires applicant to
file an affidavit of completion once a rightof-way is constructed.
N/A ...................................................................
161.122 .....................
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
161.123 .....................
169.17 .........................
Change of location. Requires a new right-ofway, including consent, amended maps,
etc., if a change from the location in the
grant is necessary due to engineering difficulties or otherwise.
169.124 .....................
169.9 ...........................
169.10 .........................
169.11 .........................
169.14 .........................
165.15 .........................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
169.16 .........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
169.103 .....................
N/A ............................
Sfmt 4702
Requires estimated damages payment to be
in the form of a bond or alternative security.
Deletes reference to ‘‘special deposit’’ accounts, because the specific accounts into
which compensation would be deposited is
outside the scope of this regulation.
Establishes the process and criteria by which
BIA will grant a right-of-way. Establishes
deadlines for BIA action. Maintains flexibility
for Secretary to issue one document or
separate documents for multiple tracts.
Deleted.
New section. Clarifies that a right-of-way grant
may include a preference for employment
of tribal members.
New section. Clarifies when a new right-ofway is required for a new use within or
overlapping an existing right-of-way.
Allows flexibility for BIA to determine whether
a new right-of-way and/or consent, amended maps, etc., are required based on
whether the use is provided for or is within
the same scope of use provided for in the
original grant.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34458
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Current 25 CFR §
Current provision
Proposed 25 CFR §
Description of change
169.18 .........................
169.201 .....................
Provides guidance to BIA staff for determining
appropriate duration of a right-of-way based
on purpose of the right-of-way. Eliminates
distinction between rights-of-way under the
1948 Act and others
169.202 .....................
Allows a renewal without consent if the original grant provides for it.
N/A ..............................
Tenure of approved right-of-way grants. Provides that rights-of-way under 1948 Act
may be without limitation as to term of
years, except as stated in the grant, but all
others may not exceed 50 years, as determined by BIA.
Renewal of right-of-way grants. Allows applications for renewal where no change in location or status, with consent and consideration. Requires new right-of-way application
if there is any change to the size, type, or
location.
N/A ...................................................................
169.203 .....................
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.204–169.206 ......
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.207–169.209 ......
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.210–169.212 ......
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.301–169.305 ......
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.401–169.402 ......
169.20 .........................
Termination of right-of-way grants. Provides
that the Secretary may terminate a right-ofway with 30-day notice for certain causes.
169.403–169.405 ......
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.406–169.407 ......
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.408–169.409 ......
N/A ..............................
N/A ...................................................................
169.410–169.412 ......
169.21 .........................
Condemnation actions involving individually
owned lands. Requires that BIA report condemnation actions to Interior.
Service lines. Requires execution of service
line agreements. Limits service lines to certain voltage. Requires tribe’s governing
body to consent to service line agreements
for tribal land. Requires only a plat or diagram showing location, size and extent of
line. Requires filing of agreement with Secretary within 30 days of execution.
Railroads. Lists specific statutory authorities
for railroads and other rights-of-way, and includes specific requirements for railroad
right-of-ways.
Railroads in Oklahoma. Lists specific statutory
authorities for railroad rights-of-way in Oklahoma.
N/A ............................
New section. Clarifies when a right-of-way
may be renewed multiple times.
New sections. Clarify the circumstances in
which a right-of-way may be amended, and
the process for amending.
New sections. Clarify the circumstances in
which a right-of-way may be assigned, and
the process for assigning.
New sections. Clarify the circumstances in
which a right-of-way may be mortgaged,
and the process for mortgaging.
New sections. Clarify when a right-of-way is
effective and must be recorded, what happens if BIA denies the right-of-way or does
not meet a deadline for issuing a decision
on a right-of-way, and whether appeal
bonds are required.
New sections. Clarify when BIA may investigate compliance with a right-of-way.
Allows landowners to provide for negotiated
remedies, including termination without BIA
concurrence (where tribe is landowner) or
with BIA concurrence (where individual Indians are landowners). Provides that BIA will
consult with the landowners before determining whether to cancel the grant.
New sections. Specify what late payment
charges and fees apply to delinquent payments and how payment rights will be allocated.
New sections. Specify the process by which
BIA will cancel a right-of-way and when
cancellation is effective.
New sections. Specify what BIA will do if a
grantee remains in possession after a rightof-way expires or is terminated or cancelled, what appeal bond regulations apply
to cancellation decisions, and what happens if someone uses Indian land without a
right-of-way or other proper authorization.
Deleted.
169.19 .........................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
169.22 .........................
169.23 .........................
169.24 .........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
169.002, 169.501–
169.505.
Clarifies in definition that a service line is only
a utility line running from a main line to provide landowners/occupants with utility service and deletes provisions restricting service lines to a specific voltage.
N/A ............................
Deleted. These provisions are unnecessary
because the general right-of-way authority
in 25 U.S.C. 323–328 is being relied upon,
rather than specific authorities.
Deleted. These provisions are unnecessary
because the general right-of-way authority
in 25 U.S.C. 323–328 is being relied upon,
rather than specific authorities.
N/A ............................
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
34459
Current 25 CFR §
Current provision
Proposed 25 CFR §
Description of change
169.25 .........................
Oil and gas pipelines. Lists specific statutory
authorities and requirements for oil and gas
pipeline rights-of-way.
N/A ............................
169.26 .........................
Telephone and telegraph lines; radio, television, and other communications facilities.
Lists specific statutory authorities and requirements for telephone and telegraph
lines, etc.
Power projects. Lists specific statutory authorities and requirements for power project
rights-of-way.
N/A ............................
Deleted. These provisions are unnecessary
because the general right-of-way authority
in 25 U.S.C. 323–328 is being relied upon,
rather than specific authorities. Specific requirements for oil and gas pipelines are unnecessary because they are already addressed in applicable State and Federal
laws.
Deleted. These provisions are unnecessary
because the general right-of-way authority
in 25 U.S.C. 323–328 is being relied upon,
rather than specific authorities.
Public highways. Allows State and local authorities to apply under these regulations for
rights-of-way for open public highways on
Indian land. Allows authorities in Nebraska
or Montana to open highways without rightof-way, under specific statutory authority.
Cross-references 25 CFR 256.
N/A ............................
169.27 .........................
169.28 .........................
The core processes for obtaining
landowner consent and BIA approval
are the same as for obtaining a lease.
The timelines this proposed rule would
establish for rights-of-way approvals
mirror those for business leases at 25
CFR subpart D, allowing for a 60-day
review of right-of-way applications, and
30-day review of amendments,
assignments, and mortgages. If BIA does
N/A ............................
not act within those established
deadlines, the parties could elevate the
application to the Regional Director or
Director of BIA, as appropriate, for
action.
We are interested in all comments
regarding this rule, but also would
specifically like comment on the
bonding provisions and whether the
proposed durations for different types of
Deleted. These provisions are unnecessary
because the general right-of-way authority
in 25 U.S.C. 323–328 is being relied upon,
rather than specific authorities.
Deleted. These provisions are unnecessary
because the general right-of-way authority
in 25 U.S.C. 323–328 is being relied upon,
rather than specific authorities.
rights-of-way set out in section 169.201
are appropriate.
III. Tribal Consultation Sessions
We will be hosting several tribal
consultation sessions throughout the
country to discuss this proposed rule.
The dates and locations for the
consultation sessions are as follows:
Date
Time
Location
Venue
Tuesday, August 5, 2014 ....
8 a.m.–12 p.m. (Local
time).
1 p.m.–5 p.m. (Local time)
Bismarck, North Dakota ....
Bismarck Civic Center, Prairie Rose, Room 101, 315
S. 5th Street, Bismarck, ND 58504.
Talking Stick Resort, 9800 E. Indian Bend Rd., Scottsdale, AZ 85256.
Call-in number: (888) 989–7589, Passcode: 208–
1244.
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
Thursday, August 7, 2014 ...
1 p.m.–4 p.m. Eastern
Time.
IV. Procedural Requirements
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the nation’s regulatory
system to promote predictability, to
reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory ends. The
E.O. directs agencies to consider
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
Scottsdale, Arizona ...........
Teleconference ..................
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements. This rule is also
part of the Department’s commitment
under the Executive Order to reduce the
number and burden of regulations and
provide greater notice and clarity to the
public.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It
will not result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year.
The rule’s requirements will not result
in a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. Nor will
this rule have significant adverse effects
on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of the U.S.-based enterprises
to compete with foreign-based
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34460
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this rule does not affect
individual property rights protected by
the Fifth Amendment nor does it
involves a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A
takings implication assessment is
therefore not required.
Brief Description of Collection: This
information collection requires
applicants for, and recipients of, rightof-way grants to cross Indian land to
submit information to the Bureau of
Indian Affairs.
Type of Review: Existing collection in
use without OMB control number.
Respondents: Individuals and entities.
Number of Respondents: 550 on
average (each year).
Number of Responses: 3,300 on
average (each year).
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour
(for applications); 0.5 hours (for
responses to notices of violation); 0.5
hours (for responses to trespass notices
of violations); and 0.25 hours (for filing
service line agreements).
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
2,500 hours.
Estimated Total Non-Hour Cost:
$2,200,000.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
J. National Environmental Policy Act
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13132, this rule has no substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This rule
only concerns BIA’s grant of rights-ofway on Indian land.
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment
because these are ‘‘regulations . . .
whose environmental effects are too
broad, speculative, or conjectural to
lend themselves to meaningful analysis
and will later be subject to the NEPA
process, either collectively or case-bycase.’’ 43 CFR 46.210(j). No
extraordinary circumstances exist that
would require greater NEPA review.
enterprises because the rule is limited to
rights-of-way on Indian land.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule has been reviewed
to eliminate errors and ambiguity and
written to minimize litigation; and is
written in clear language and contains
clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175)
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains information
collections requiring approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The Department is
seeking approval for a new OMB
Control Number.
OMB Control Number: 1076–NEW.
Title: Rights-of-Way on Indian Land.
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
L. Clarity of This Regulation
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments,’’ Executive Order 13175
(59 FR 22951, November 6, 2000), and
512 DM 2, we have evaluated the
potential effects on federally recognized
Indian tribes and Indian trust assets. We
will be consulting with Indian tribes
during the public comment period on
this rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the
‘‘COMMENTS’’ section. To better help
us revise the rule, your comments
should be as specific as possible. For
example, you should tell us the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
numbers of the sections or paragraphs
that are unclearly written, which
sections or sentences are too long, the
sections where you believe lists or
tables would be useful, etc.
M. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 169
Indians—lands, Rights-of-way.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
proposes to revise 25 CFR part 169 to
read as follows:
PART 169—RIGHTS-OF-WAY OVER
INDIAN LAND
Subpart A—Purpose, Definitions, General
Provisions
Sec.
169.001 What is the purpose of this part?
169.002 What terms do I need to know?
169.003 To what land does this part apply?
169.004 When do I need a right-of-way to
authorize possession over or across
Indian land?
169.005 What types of rights-of-way does
this part cover?
169.006 Does this part apply to right-of-way
grants I submitted for approval before
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS]?
169.007 May tribes administer this part on
BIA’s behalf?
169.008 What laws apply to rights-of-way
approved under this part?
169.009 What taxes apply to rights-of-way
approved under this part?
169.010 How does BIA provide notice to
the parties to a right-of-way?
169.011 May decisions under this part be
appealed?
169.012 How does the Paperwork
Reduction Act affect this part?
Subpart B—Obtaining a Right-of-Way
Application
169.101 How do I obtain a right-of-way
across tribal or individually owned
Indian land?
169.102 What must an application for a
right-of-way include?
169.103 What bond must accompany the
application?
169.104 What is the release process for a
performance bond or alternate form of
security?
169.105 What requirements for due
diligence must a right-of-way grant
include?
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Consent Requirements
169.106 Must I obtain tribal consent for a
right-of-way across tribal land?
169.107 Must I obtain individual Indian
landowners’ consent to a grant of rightof-way across individually owned land?
169.108 Who is authorized to consent to a
right-of-way?
Compensation Requirements
169.109 How much monetary compensation
must be paid for a right-of-way affecting
tribal land?
169.110 How much monetary compensation
must be paid for a right-of-way affecting
individually owned Indian land?
169.111 How will BIA determine market
value for a right-of-way?
169.112 When are monetary compensation
payments due under a right-of-way?
169.113 Must a right-of-way specify who
receives monetary compensation
payments?
169.114 What form of monetary
compensation payment is acceptable
under a right-of-way?
169.115 May the right-of-way provide for
non-monetary or varying types of
compensation?
169.116 Will BIA notify a grantee when a
payment is due for a right-of-way?
169.117 Must a right-of-way grant provide
for compensation reviews or
adjustments?
169.118 What other types of payments are
required for a right-of-way?
Grants of Rights-of-Way
169.119 What is the process for BIA to grant
a right-of-way?
169.120 How will BIA determine whether
to grant a right-of-way?
169.121 What will the grant of right-of-way
contain?
169.122 May a right-of-way contain a
preference consistent with tribal law for
employment of tribal members?
169.123 Is a new right-of-way grant
required for a new use within or
overlapping an existing right-of-way?
169.124 What is required if the location
described in the original application and
grant differs from the construction
location?
Subpart C—Term, Renewals, Amendments,
Assignments, Mortgages
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Term & Renewals
169.201 How long may the term of a rightof-way grant be?
169.202 Under what circumstances will a
grant of right-of-way be renewed?
169.203 May a right-of-way be renewed
multiple times?
169.208 What is the approval process for an
assignment of a right-of-way?
169.209 How will BIA decide whether to
approve an assignment of a right-of-way?
Subpart A—Purpose, Definitions,
General Provisions
Mortgages
(a) This part is intended to streamline
the procedures and conditions under
which we will approve (i.e., grant)
rights-of-way over and across tribal
lands, individually owned Indian lands,
and Government-owned lands, by
providing for the use of the broad
authority under 25 U.S.C. 323–328,
rather than the limited authorities under
other statutes.
(b) This part specifies:
(1) Conditions and authorities under
which we will approve rights-of-way on
or across Indian land;
(2) How to obtain a right-of-way;
(3) Terms and conditions required in
rights-of-way;
(4) How we administer and enforce
rights-of-ways;
(5) How to renew, amend, assign, and
mortgage rights-of-way; and
(6) Whether rights-of-way are required
for service line agreements.
(c) This part does not cover rights-ofway on or across tribal lands within a
reservation for the purpose of Federal
Power Act projects, such as
constructing, operating, or maintaining
dams, water conduits, reservoirs,
powerhouses, transmission lines or
other works which must constitute a
part of any project for which a license
is required by the Federal Power Act.
(1) The Federal Power Act provides
that any license that must be issued to
use tribal lands within a reservation
must be subject to and contain such
conditions as the Secretary deems
necessary for the adequate protection
and utilization of such lands (16 U.S.C.
797(e)).
(2) In the case of tribal lands
belonging to a tribe organized under the
Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 984), the
Federal Power Act requires that annual
charges for the use of such tribal lands
under any license issued by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission must be
subject to the approval of the tribe (16
U.S.C. 803(e)).
(d) This part does not apply to grants
of rights-of-way on tribal land under a
special act of Congress authorizing
grants without our approval under
certain conditions.
169.210 May a grantee mortgage a right-ofway?
169.211 What is the approval process for a
mortgage of a right-of-way?
169.212 How will BIA decide whether to
approve a mortgage of a right-of-way?
Subpart D—Effectiveness
169.301 When will a right-of-way document
be effective?
169.302 Must a right-of-way be recorded?
169.303 What happens if BIA denies a
right-of-way document?
169.304 What happens if BIA does not meet
a deadline for issuing a decision on a
right-of-way document?
169.305 Will BIA require an appeal bond
for an appeal of a decision on a right-ofway document?
Subpart E—Compliance and Enforcement
169.401 What is the purpose and scope of
this subpart?
169.402 May BIA investigate compliance
with a right-of-way?
169.403 May a right-of-way provide for
negotiated remedies if there is a
violation?
169.404 What will BIA do about a violation
of a right-of-way grant?
169.405 What will BIA do if the grantee
does not cure a violation of a right-ofway grant on time?
169.406 Will late payment charges or
special fees apply to delinquent
payments due under a right-of-way
grant?
169.407 How will payment rights relating to
a right-of-way grant be allocated?
169.408 What is the process for cancelling
a right-of-way?
169.409 When will a cancellation of a rightof-way grant be effective?
169.410 What will BIA do if a grantee
remains in possession after a right-ofway expires or is terminated or
cancelled?
169.411 Will BIA appeal bond regulations
apply to cancellation decisions involving
right-of-way grants?
169.412 What if an individual or entity
takes possession or uses Indian land
without a right-of-way or other proper
authorization?
Subpart F—Service Line Agreements
Amendments
169.204 May a grantee amend a right-ofway?
169.205 What is the approval process for an
amendment of a right-of-way?
169.206 How will BIA decide whether to
approve an amendment of a right-ofway?
169.501 Is a right-of-way required for
service lines?
169.502 What are the consent requirements
for service line agreements?
169.503 Is a valuation required for service
line agreements?
169.504 Must I file service line agreements
with the BIA?
Assignments
169.207 May a grantee assign a right-ofway?
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 62 Stat. 17 (25
U.S.C. 323–328), 25 U.S.C. 2218, and other
acts cited in the text.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
34461
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 169.001
§ 169.002
What is the purpose of this part?
What terms do I need to know?
Abandonment means the grantee has
affirmatively relinquished a right-of-way
(as opposed to relinquishing through
non-use).
Assignment means an agreement
between a grantee and an assignee,
whereby the assignee acquires all or part
of the grantee’s rights, and assumes all
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
34462
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
of the grantee’s obligations under a
grant.
Avigation hazard easement means the
right, acquired by government through
purchase or condemnation from the
owner of land adjacent to an airport, to
the use of the air space above a specific
height for the flight of aircraft.
BIA means the Secretary of the
Interior or the Bureau of Indian Affairs
within the Department of the Interior
and any tribe acting on behalf of the
Secretary or BIA under § 169.007 of this
part.
Compensation means something
bargained for that is fair and reasonable
under the circumstances of the
agreement.
Constructive notice means notice:
(1) Posted at the tribal government
office, tribal community building, and/
or the United States Post Office; and
(2) Published in the local
newspaper(s) nearest to the affected
land and/or announced on a local radio
station(s).
Easement means an interest in land
owned by another person, consisting of
the right to use or control, for a specific
limited purpose, the land, or an area
above or below it.
Encumbered account means a trust
fund account where some portion of the
proceeds are obligated to another party.
Fractional interest means an
undivided interest in Indian land
owned as tenancy in common by
individual Indian or tribal landowners
and/or fee owners.
Government land means any tract, or
interest therein, in which the surface
estate is owned and administered by the
United States, not including Indian
land.
Grant means the formal transfer of a
right-of-way interest by the Secretary’s
approval.
Grantee means a person or entity to
whom the Secretary grants a right-ofway.
Immediate family means, in the
absence of a definition under applicable
tribal law, a spouse, brother, sister, aunt,
uncle, niece, nephew, first cousin, lineal
ancestor, lineal descendant, or member
of the household.
Indian means:
(1) Any person who is a member of
any Indian tribe, is eligible to become a
member of any Indian tribe, or is an
owner as of October 27, 2004, of a trust
or restricted interest in land;
(2) Any person meeting the definition
of Indian under the Indian
Reorganization Act (25 U.S.C. 479) and
the regulations promulgated thereunder;
and
(3) With respect to the inheritance
and ownership of trust or restricted land
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
in the State of California under 25
U.S.C. 2206, any person described in
paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition or
any person who owns a trust or
restricted interest in a parcel of such
land in that State.
Indian land means any tract in which
any interest in the surface estate is
owned by a tribe or individual Indian in
trust or restricted status and includes
both individually owned Indian land
and tribal land.
Indian landowner means a tribe or
individual Indian who owns an interest
in Indian land.
Indian tribe or tribe means an Indian
tribe under section 102 of the Federally
Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of
1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a).
Individually owned Indian land
means any tract, or interest therein, in
which the surface estate is owned by an
individual Indian in trust or restricted
status.
In-kind compensation means payment
is in goods or services rather than
money.
Legal description means that part of
the conveyance document of land or
interest in land, which identifies the
land or interest to be affected.
LTRO means the Land Titles and
Records Office of BIA.
Map of definite location means a
survey plat showing the location, size,
and extent of the right-of-way and other
related parcels, with respect to each
affected parcel of individually owned
land, tribal land, or Government land
and with respect to the public surveys
under 25 U.S.C. 176, 43 U.S.C. 2, and
1764.
Market value means the amount of
compensation that a right-of-way would
most probably command in an open and
competitive market.
Right-of-way means a legal right to
cross tribal land, individually owned
Indian land, or Government land for a
specific purpose, including but not
limited to building and operating a line
or road. This term may also refer to the
land subject to the grant of right-of-way.
Right-of-way document means a rightof-way grant, renewal, amendment,
assignment, or mortgage of a right-ofway.
Secretary means the Secretary of the
Interior or an authorized representative.
Section 17 corporation means an
Indian corporation federally chartered
under section 17 of the Act of June 18,
1934, 25 U.S.C. 476.
Service line means a utility line
running from a main line that is used
only for supplying owners or authorized
occupants or users of land with
telephone, water, electricity, gas,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
internet service, or other home utility
service.
Trespass means any unauthorized
occupancy, use of, or action on tribal or
individually owned Indian land.
Tribal authorization means a duly
adopted tribal resolution, tribal
ordinance, or other appropriate tribal
document authorizing the specified
action.
Tribal land means any tract, or
interest therein, in which the surface
estate is owned by one or more tribes in
trust or restricted status, and includes
such lands reserved for BIA
administrative purposes. The term also
includes the surface estate of lands held
in trust for an Indian corporation
chartered under section 17 of the Act of
June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 988; 25 U.S.C.
477).
Trust account means a tribal account
or Individual Indian Money (IIM)
account for trust funds maintained by
the Secretary.
Trust or restricted status means:
(1) That the United States holds title
to the tract or interest in trust for the
benefit of one or more tribes or
individual Indians; or
(2) That one or more tribes or
individual Indians holds title to the
tract or interest, but can alienate or
encumber it only with the approval of
the United States because of limitations
in the conveyance instrument under
Federal law or limitations in Federal
law.
Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice (USPAP) means the
standards promulgated by the Appraisal
Standards Board of the Appraisal
Foundation to establish requirements
and procedures for professional real
property appraisal practice.
Us/we/our means the BIA.
§ 169.003
apply?
To what land does this part
(a) This part applies to Indian land
and Government land.
(1) We will not take any action on a
right-of-way across fee land or collect
compensation on behalf of fee interest
owners. We will not condition our grant
of a right-of-way across Indian land or
Government land on the applicant
having obtained a right-of-way from the
owners of any fee interests. The
applicant will be responsible for
negotiating directly with and making
any payments directly to the owners of
any fee interests that may exist in the
property on which the right-of-way is
granted.
(2) We will not include the fee
interests in a tract in calculating the
applicable percentage of interests
required for consent to a right-of-way.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(b) This paragraph (b) applies if there
is a life estate on the land proposed to
be subject to a right-of-way.
(1) Unless otherwise provided in a
will creating the life estate, when all of
the trust or restricted interests in a tract
are subject to the same life estate
(created by operation of law), the life
tenant may grant a right-of-way over the
land without the consent of the owners
of the remainder interests or our
approval, for the duration of the life
estate.
(i) The right-of-way will terminate
upon the expiration of the life estate.
(ii) The life tenant must record the
right-of-way in the LTRO.
(iii) The grantee must pay
compensation directly to the life tenant
under the terms of the right-of-way
unless the whereabouts of the life tenant
are unknown, in which case we may
collect compensation on behalf of the
life tenant.
(iv) We may monitor the use of the
land, as appropriate, and will enforce
the terms of the right-of-way on behalf
of the owners of the remainder interests,
but will not be responsible for enforcing
the right-of-way on behalf of the life
tenant.
(v) We will not grant a right-of-way on
behalf of the owners of the remainder
interests or join in a right-of-way
granted by the life tenant on behalf of
the owners of the remainder interests
except as needed to preserve the value
of the land.
(2) Unless otherwise provided in a
will creating the life estate, when less
than all of the trust or restricted
interests in a tract are subject to a
particular life estate (by operation of
law), the life tenant may grant a rightof-way for his or her interest without the
consent of the owners of the remainder
interests, for the duration of the life
estate, but the applicant must obtain the
consent of the co-owners and our
approval.
(i) The right-of-way over the life
interest will terminate upon the
expiration of the life estate.
(ii) We will not grant a right-of-way
on the life tenant’s behalf.
(iii) The right-of-way must provide
that the grantee pays the life tenant
directly, unless the life tenant’s
whereabouts are unknown in which
case we may collect compensation on
behalf of the life tenant.
(iv) The right-of-way must be
recorded in the LTRO.
(v) We may monitor the use of the
land, as appropriate, and will enforce
the terms of the right-of-way on behalf
of the owners of the remainder interests,
but will not be responsible for enforcing
the right-of-way on behalf of the life
tenant.
(3) We may grant a right-of-way for
longer than the duration of a life estate
34463
with the consent of a majority of the
owners of the remainder interests, and
may consent on behalf of undetermined
owners of remainder interests.
(4) Unless otherwise provided in a
will creating the life estate, where the
owners of the remainder interests and
the life tenant have not entered into a
right-of-way or other written agreement
approved by the Secretary providing for
the distribution of rent monies under
the right-of-way, the life tenant will
receive payment in accordance with the
distribution and calculation scheme set
forth in Part 179 of this chapter.
(5) The life tenant may not cause or
allow permanent injury to the land.
(6) The life tenant must provide a
copy of their right-of-way consent to us
and must record any right-of-way
granted under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section in the LTRO.
§ 169.004 When do I need a right-of-way to
authorize possession over or across Indian
land?
(a) You need an approved right-ofway under this part before crossing
Indian land if you meet one of the
criteria in the following table, unless
you are authorized by a land use
agreement not subject to this part (e.g.,
under 25 CFR part 84) or a lease under
25 CFR part 162, 211, 212, 225, or
similar, tribe-specific authority.
If you are . . .
then you must obtain a right-of-way under this part . . .
(1) A person or legal entity (including an independent legal entity
owned and operated by a tribe or Federal, State, or local governmental entity) who is not an owner of the Indian land.
(2) An Indian landowner of a fractional interest in the land .....................
from us, with the consent of the owners of the majority interest in the
land before crossing the land or any portion thereof.
(b) You do not need a right-of-way to
cross Indian land if:
from us, with the consent of the owners of other trust and restricted interests in the land, totaling at least a majority interest, unless all of
the owners have given you permission to cross without a right-ofway.
(1) You are an Indian landowner who
owns 100 percent of the trust or
restricted interests in the land; or
(2) You meet any of the criteria in the
following table.
You do not need a right-of-way if you are . . .
but the following conditions apply . . .
(i) A parent or guardian of a minor child who owns 100 percent of the
trust or restricted interests in the land.
We may require you to provide evidence of a direct benefit to the
minor child and when the child is no longer a minor, you must obtain
a right-of-way to authorize continued possession.
You must file the agreement with us under § 169.504.
You must comply with the requirements of the applicable statute, judicial order, or common law.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(ii) Authorized by a service line agreement to cross the land .................
(iii) Otherwise authorized by law (e.g., a statute, judicial order, or common law authorizes access).
§ 169.005 What types of rights-of-way
does this part cover?
(a) This part covers rights-of-way over
and across Indian or Government land,
for uses including but not limited to the
following:
(1) Railroads;
(2) Public roads and highways;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
(3) Access roads;
(4) Service roads and trails essential
to any other right-of-way purpose;
(5) Public and community water lines
(including pumping stations and
appurtenant facilities);
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(6) Public sanitary and storm sewer
lines (including sewage disposal and
treatment plant lines);
(7) Water control and use projects
(including but not limited to, flowage
easements, irrigation ditches and canals,
and water treatment plant lines);
(8) Oil and gas pipelines;
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34464
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(9) Electric transmission and
distribution lines (including poles,
towers, and appurtenant facilities);
(10) Telecommunications, broadband,
fiber optic lines;
(11) Avigation hazard easements; or
(12) Conservation easements not
covered by 25 CFR 84, Encumbrances of
Tribal Land—Contract Approvals, or 25
CFR 162, Leases and Permits.
(b) BIA will grant rights-of-way using
the authority in 25 U.S.C. 323–328, and
relying on supplementary authority
such as 25 U.S.C. 2218, where
appropriate, and this part covers all
rights-of-way granted under that
statutory authority. This part also covers
existing rights-of-way that were granted
under other statutory authorities prior to
the effective date of this rule, except
that if the provisions of the preexisting
right-of-way document conflict with this
part, the provisions of the preexisting
right-of-way document govern.
§ 169.006 Does this part apply to right-ofway grants I submitted for approval before
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS]?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
This part applies to all right-of-way
documents. If you submitted your rightof-way document to us for granting or
approval before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF
REGULATIONS], the qualifications in
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section
also apply.
(a) If we granted or approved your
right-of-way document before
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF
REGULATIONS], this part applies to
that right-of-way document; however, if
the provisions of the right-of-way
document conflict with this part, the
provisions of the right-of-way document
govern.
(b) If you submitted a right-of-way
document but we did not approve or
grant it before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF
REGULATIONS], then:
(1) We will review the right-of-way
document under the regulations in
effect at the time of your submission;
and
(2) Once we grant or approve the
right-of-way document, this part applies
to that right-of-way document; however,
if the provisions of the right-of-way
document conflict with this part, the
provisions of the right-of-way document
govern.
§ 169.007 May tribes administer this part
on BIA’s behalf?
A tribe or tribal organization may
contract or compact under the Indian
Self-Determination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450f et seq.)
to administer any portion of this part
that is not a grant, approval, or
disapproval of a right-of-way document,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
waiver of a requirement for right-of-way
grant or approval (including but not
limited to waivers of market value and
valuation), cancellation of a right-ofway, or an appeal.
§ 169.008 What laws apply to rights-of-way
approved under this part?
(a) In addition to the regulations in
this part, rights-of-way approved under
this part:
(1) Are subject to all applicable
Federal laws;
(2) Are subject to tribal law, subject to
paragraph (b) of this section; and
(3) Are not subject to State law or the
law of a political subdivision thereof
except that:
(i) State law or the law of a political
subdivision thereof may apply in the
specific areas and circumstances in
Indian country where the Indian tribe
with jurisdiction has made it expressly
applicable;
(ii) State law may apply in the
specific areas and circumstances in
Indian country where Congress has
made it expressly applicable; and
(iii) State law may apply where a
Federal court has expressly applied
State law to a specific area or
circumstance in Indian country in the
absence of Federal or tribal law.
(b) Tribal laws generally apply to land
under the jurisdiction of the tribe
enacting the laws, except to the extent
that those tribal laws are inconsistent
with these regulations or other
applicable Federal law. However, these
regulations may be superseded or
modified by tribal laws, as long as:
(1) The tribe has notified us of the
superseding or modifying effect of the
tribal laws;
(2) The superseding or modifying of
the regulation would not violate a
Federal statute or judicial decision, or
conflict with our general trust
responsibility under Federal law; and
(3) The superseding or modifying of
the regulation applies only to tribal
land.
(c) Unless prohibited by Federal law,
the parties to a right-of-way may subject
that right-of-way to State or local law in
the absence of Federal or tribal law, if
the Indian landowners expressly agree,
in writing, to the application of State or
local law.
(d) An agreement under paragraph (c)
of this section does not waive a tribe’s
sovereign immunity unless the tribe
expressly states its intention to waive
sovereign immunity in its consent to the
right-of-way on tribal land.
(e) A right-of-way is an interest in
land, but title does not pass to the
grantee. Unless otherwise expressly
stated in its consent to the right-of-way
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for tribal land, or in a tribal
authorization for a right-of-way for
individually-owned Indian land, the
Secretary’s grant of a right-of-way does
not diminish to any extent:
(1) The Indian tribe’s jurisdiction over
the land subject to the right-of-way;
(2) The power of the Indian tribe to
tax the land, any improvements on the
land, or any activity related to, and not
inconsistent with, the right-of-way;
(3) The Indian tribe’s authority to
enforce tribal law of general or
particular application on the land
subject to the right-of-way, as if there
were no grant of right-of-way;
(4) The Indian tribe’s inherent
sovereign power to exercise civil
jurisdiction over non-members on tribal
land by regulating, through taxation,
licensing, or other means, the activities
of non-members who enter into
consensual relationships with the
Indian tribe or its members; or
(5) The character of the land subject
to the right-of-way as Indian country
under 18 U.S.C. 1151.
§ 169.009 What taxes apply to rights-ofway approved under this part?
(a) Subject only to applicable Federal
law, permanent improvements in a
right-of-way, without regard to
ownership of those improvements, are
not subject to any fee, tax, assessment,
levy, or other charge imposed by any
State or political subdivision of a State.
Improvements may be subject to
taxation by the Indian tribe with
jurisdiction.
(b) Subject only to applicable Federal
law, activities under a right-of-way grant
are not subject to any fee, tax,
assessment, levy, or other charge (e.g.,
business use, privilege, public utility,
excise, gross revenue taxes) imposed by
any State or political subdivision of a
State. Activities may be subject to
taxation by the Indian tribe with
jurisdiction.
(c) Subject only to applicable Federal
law, the right-of-way or possessory
interest is not subject to any fee, tax,
assessment, levy, or other charge
imposed by any State or political
subdivision of a State. Possessory
interests may be subject to taxation by
the Indian tribe with jurisdiction.
§ 169.010 How does BIA provide notice to
the parties to a right-of-way?
(a) When this part requires us to
notify the parties of the status of our
review of a right-of-way document
(including but not limited to, providing
notice to the parties of the date of
receipt, informing the parties of the
need for additional review time, and
informing the parties that an application
package is not complete):
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(1) For rights-of-way affecting tribal
land, we will notify the grantee and the
tribe by mail; and
(2) For rights-of-way affecting
individually owned Indian land, we
will notify the grantee by mail and,
where feasible, the individual Indian
landowners by constructive notice or
mail.
(b) When this part requires us to
notify the parties of our determination
to approve or disapprove a right-of-way
document, and to provide any right of
appeal:
(1) For rights-of-way affecting tribal
land, we will notify the applicant and
the tribe by mail; and
(2) For rights-of-way affecting
individually owned Indian land, we
will notify the applicant by mail and the
individual Indian landowners by
constructive notice, mail, or electronic
mail.
§ 169.011 May decisions under this part be
appealed?
(a) Appeals from BIA decisions under
this part may be taken under part 2 of
this chapter, except:
(1) Our decision to disapprove a rightof-way may be appealed only by an
Indian landowner.
(2) Our decision to disapprove any
other right-of-way document may be
appealed only by the Indian landowners
or the applicant.
(b) For purposes of appeals from BIA
decisions under this part, ‘‘interested
party’’ is defined as any person whose
own direct economic interest is
adversely affected by an action or
decision.
§ 169.012 How does the Paperwork
Reduction Act affect this part?
The collections of information in this
part have been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget under 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and assigned OMB
Control Number 1076–NEW. Response
is required to obtain a benefit. A Federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
you are not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB Control
Number.
Subpart B—Obtaining a Right-of-Way
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Application
§ 169.101 How do I obtain a right-of-way
across tribal or individually owned Indian
land?
(a) To obtain a right-of-way across
tribal or individually owned Indian
land, you must submit a complete
application to the BIA office with
jurisdiction over the land covered by the
right-of-way.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
(b) If you must obtain access to Indian
land to prepare information required by
the application (e.g., to survey), you
must obtain the consent of the Indian
landowners in the following manner
before accessing the land, but our
approval to access is not required.
(1) For tribal land, you must obtain
written authorization or a permit from
the tribe.
(2) For individually owned Indian
land, you must notify all Indian
landowners and obtain the consent of
the Indian landowners of the majority
interest under § 169.107. Upon written
request, we will provide you with the
names, addresses, and percentage of
ownership of individual Indian
landowners, to allow you to obtain the
landowners’ consent to survey.
(3) If the BIA will be granting the
right-of-way across Indian land under
§ 169.107(b), then the BIA may grant
permission to access the land.
§ 169.102 What must an application for a
right-of-way include?
(a) An application for a right-of-way
must identify:
(1) The applicant;
(2) The tract(s) or parcel(s) affected by
the right-of-way;
(3) The general location of the rightof-way;
(4) The purpose of the right-of-way;
(5) The duration of the right-of-way:
and
(6) The ownership of permanent
improvements associated with the rightof-way and the responsibility for
constructing, operating, maintaining,
and managing permanent improvements
under § 169.105.
(b) The following must be submitted
with the application:
(1) An accurate legal description of
the right-of-way, its boundaries, and
parcels associated with the right-of-way;
(2) A map of definite location of the
right-of-way and existing facilities
adjacent to the proposed project, signed
by a professional surveyor or engineer
(this requirement does not apply to
easements covering the entire tract of
land);
(3) A bond meeting the requirements
of § 169.103;
(4) Record of consent for the right-ofway meeting the requirements of
§ 169.106 for tribal land, and § 169.107
for individually owned Indian land;
(5) If applicable, a valuation meeting
the requirements of § 169.111;
(6) If the applicant is a corporation,
limited liability company, partnership,
joint venture, or other legal entity,
except a tribal entity, information such
as organizational documents,
certificates, filing records, and
resolutions, demonstrating that:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34465
(i) The representative has authority to
execute the application;
(ii) The right-of-way will be
enforceable against the applicant; and
(iii) The legal entity is in good
standing and authorized to conduct
business in the jurisdiction where the
land is located;
(7) Environmental and archeological
reports, surveys, and site assessments,
as needed to facilitate compliance with
applicable Federal and tribal
environmental and land use
requirements.
(c) There is no standard application
form.
§ 169.103 What bond must accompany the
application?
(a) You must include payment of a
performance bond or alternative form of
security with your application for a
right-of-way in an amount that covers:
(1) The highest annual rental
specified in the grant, unless
compensation is a one-time payment;
(2) The estimated damages resulting
from the construction of any permanent
improvements;
(3) The operation and maintenance
charges for any land located within an
irrigation project; and
(4) The restoration and reclamation of
the premises to their condition at the
start of the right-of-way or some other
specified condition.
(b) The performance bond or other
security must be deposited with us and
made payable only to us, and may not
be modified without our approval,
except for tribal land in which case the
bond or security may be deposited with
and made payable to the tribe, and may
not be modified without the approval of
the tribe.
(c) The grant will specify the
conditions under which we may adjust
the security or performance bond
requirements to reflect changing
conditions, including consultation with
the tribal landowner for tribal land
before the adjustment.
(d) We may require that the surety
provide any supporting documents
needed to show that the performance
bond or alternative form of security will
be enforceable, and that the surety will
be able to perform the guaranteed
obligations.
(e) The performance bond or other
security instrument must require the
surety to provide notice to us at least 60
days before canceling a performance
bond or other security. This will allow
us to notify the grantee of its obligation
to provide a substitute performance
bond or other security before the
cancellation date. Failure to provide a
substitute performance bond or security
is a violation of the right-of-way.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34466
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(f) We may waive the requirement for
a performance bond or alternative form
of security if the Indian landowners of
the majority of the interests request it
and we determine a waiver is in the
Indian landowners’ best interest. For
tribal land, we will defer, to the
maximum extent possible, to the tribe’s
determination that a waiver of a
performance bond or alternative form of
security is in its best interest.
(g) We will accept a performance
bond only in one of the following forms:
(1) Certificates of deposit issued by a
federally insured financial institution
authorized to do business in the United
States;
(2) Irrevocable letters of credit issued
by a federally insured financial
institution authorized to do business in
the United States;
(3) Negotiable Treasury securities; or
(4) Surety bonds issued by a company
approved by the U.S. Department of the
Treasury.
(h) We may accept an alternative form
of security approved by us that provides
adequate protection for the Indian
landowners and us, including but not
limited to an escrow agreement and
assigned savings account.
(i) All forms of performance bonds or
alternative security must, if applicable:
(1) Indicate on their face that BIA
approval is required for redemption;
(2) Be accompanied by a statement
granting full authority to BIA to make an
immediate claim upon or sell them if
the grantee violates the right-of-way;
(3) Be irrevocable during the term of
the performance bond or alternative
security; and
(4) Be automatically renewable during
the term of the right-of-way.
(j) We will not accept cash bonds.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 169.104 What is the release process for
a performance bond or alternative form of
security?
Upon expiration, termination, or
cancellation of the right-of-way, the
grantee may ask BIA in writing to
release the performance bond or
alternative form of security. Upon
receiving the grantee’s request, BIA will:
(a) Confirm with the tribe, for tribal
land or, where feasible, with the Indian
landowners for individually owned
Indian land, that the grantee has
complied with all grant obligations; and
(b) Release the performance bond or
alternative form of security to the
grantee, unless we determine that the
bond or security must be redeemed to
fulfill the contractual obligations.
§ 169.105 What requirements for due
diligence must a right-of-way grant include?
(a) If permanent improvements are to
be constructed, the right-of-way grant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
must include due diligence
requirements that require the grantee to
complete construction of any permanent
improvements within the schedule
specified in the right-of-way grant or
general schedule of construction, and a
process for changing the schedule by
mutual consent of the parties. If
construction does not occur, or is not
expected to be completed, within the
time period specified in the grant, the
grantee must provide the Indian
landowners and BIA with an
explanation of good cause as to the
nature of any delay, the anticipated date
of construction of facilities, and
evidence of progress toward
commencement of construction.
(b) Failure of the grantee to comply
with the due diligence requirements of
the grant is a violation of the grant and
may lead to cancellation of the right-ofway under § 169.408.
(c) BIA may waive the requirements
in this section if such waiver is in the
best interest of the Indian landowners.
Consent Requirements
§ 169.106 Must I obtain tribal consent for
a right-of-way across tribal land?
The applicant must obtain tribal
consent, in the form of a tribal
authorization, to a grant of right-of-way
across tribal land.
§ 169.107 Must I obtain individual Indian
landowners’ consent to a grant of right-ofway across individually-owned land?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, the applicant must
notify all individual Indian landowners
and must obtain consent from the
owners of the majority interest in each
tract affected by the grant of right-ofway.
(b) We may issue the grant of right-ofway without the consent of any of the
individual Indian owners if:
(1) The owners of interests in the land
are so numerous that it would be
impracticable to obtain consent;
(2) We determine the grant will cause
no substantial injury to the land or any
landowner;
(3) We determine that all of the
landowners will be adequately
compensated for consideration and any
damages that may arise from a grant of
right-of-way; and
(4) We provide notice of our intent to
issue the grant of right-of-way to all of
the owners at least 30 days prior to the
date of the grant using the procedures in
§ 169.010.
(c) For the purposes of this section,
the owners of interests in the land are
so numerous that it would be
impracticable to obtain consent, where
there are:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(1) 50 or more, but less than 100, coowners of undivided trust or restricted
interests, and no one of such co-owners
holds a total undivided trust or
restricted interest in the parcel that is
greater than 10 percent of the entire
undivided ownership of the parcel; or
(2) 100 or more co-owners of
undivided trust or restricted interests.
(d) The right-of-way will not bind a
non-consenting Indian tribe, except
with respect to the tribally owned
fractional interest, and the nonconsenting Indian tribe will not be
treated as a party to the right-of-way.
Nothing in this paragraph affects the
sovereignty or sovereign immunity of
the Indian tribe.
(e) Successors are bound by consent
granted by their predecessors-ininterest.
§ 169.108 Who is authorized to consent to
a right-of-way?
(a) Indian tribes, adult Indian
landowners, and emancipated minors,
may consent to a right-of-way affecting
their land, including undivided
interests in fractionated tracts.
(b) The following individuals or
entities may consent on behalf of an
individual Indian landowner:
(1) An adult with legal custody acting
on behalf of his or her minor children;
(2) A guardian, conservator, or other
fiduciary appointed by a court of
competent jurisdiction to act on behalf
of an individual Indian landowner;
(3) Any person who is authorized to
practice before the Department of the
Interior under 43 CFR 1.3(b) and has
been retained by the Indian landowner
for this purpose;
(4) BIA, under the circumstances in
paragraph (c) of this section; or
(5) An adult or legal entity who has
been given a written power of attorney
that:
(i) Meets all of the formal
requirements of any applicable law
under § 169.008;
(ii) Identifies the attorney-in-fact; and
(iii) Describes the scope of the powers
granted, to include granting rights-ofway on land, and any limits on those
powers.
(c) BIA may give written consent to a
right-of-way, as long as we determine
that the grant will cause no substantial
injury to the land or any landowner, and
that consent must be counted in the
majority interest under § 169.107, on
behalf of:
(1) The individual owner, if the owner
is deceased, and the heirs to, or devisees
of, the interest of the deceased owner
have not been determined;
(2) An individual whose whereabouts
are unknown to us, after we make a
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
reasonable attempt to locate the
individual;
(3) An individual who is found to be
non compos mentis or determined to be
an adult in need of assistance who does
not have a guardian duly appointed by
a court of competent jurisdiction, or an
individual under legal disability as
defined in part 115 of this chapter;
(4) An orphaned minor who does not
have a guardian duly appointed by a
court of competent jurisdiction; and
(5) An individual who has given us a
written power of attorney to consent to
a right-of-way of their land.
Compensation Requirements
§ 169.109 How much monetary
compensation must be paid for a right-ofway affecting tribal land?
(a) A right-of-way affecting tribal land
may allow for any payment amount
negotiated by the tribe, and we will
defer to the tribe and not require a
valuation if the tribe submits a tribal
authorization expressly stating that it:
(1) Has negotiated compensation
satisfactory to the tribe;
(2) Waives valuation; and
(3) Has determined that accepting
such negotiated compensation and
waiving valuation is in its best interest.
(b) The tribe may request, in writing,
that we determine market value, in
which case we will use a valuation in
accordance with § 169.111. After
providing the tribe with the market
value, we will defer to a tribe’s decision
to allow for any compensation
negotiated by the tribe.
(c) If the conditions in paragraph (a)
or (b) of this section are not met, we will
require that the grantee provide for
market value based on a valuation in
accordance with § 169.111.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 169.110 How much monetary
compensation must be paid for a right-ofway affecting individually owned Indian
land?
(a) A right-of-way affecting
individually owned Indian land must
require payment of not less than market
value before any adjustments, based on
a fixed amount, a percentage of the
projected income, or some other
method, unless paragraphs (b) or (c) of
this section permit a lesser amount. The
grant must establish how the fixed
amount, percentage, or combination will
be calculated and the frequency at
which the payments will be made.
Compensation will include market
value and may include additional fees,
such as throughput fees, severance
damages, franchise fees, avoidance
value, bonuses, or other factors.
(b) We may approve a right-of-way
affecting individually owned Indian
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
land that provides for the payment of
nominal compensation, or less than a
market value, if:
(1) The Indian landowners execute a
written waiver of the right to receive
market value; and
(2) We determine it is in the Indian
landowners’ best interest, based on
factors including, but not limited to:
(i) The grantee is a member of the
immediate family, as defined in
§ 169.002, of an individual Indian
landowner;
(ii) The grantee is a co-owner in the
affected tract;
(iii) A special relationship or
circumstances exist that we believe
warrant approval of the right-of-way; or
(iv) We have waived the requirement
for a valuation under paragraph (d) of
this section.
(c) We will require a valuation,
unless:
(1) 100 percent of the Indian
landowners submit to us a written
request to waive the valuation
requirement; or
(2) We waive the requirement under
paragraph (d) of this section.
(d) The grant must provide that the
non-consenting Indian landowners, and
those on whose behalf we have
consented under § 169.108(c), or granted
the right-of-way without consent under
§ 169.107(b), receive market value, as
determined by a valuation, unless we
waive the requirement because the tribe
or grantee will construct infrastructure
improvements benefitting the Indian
landowners, and we determine it is in
the best interest of all the landowners.
§ 169.111 How will BIA determine market
value for a right-of-way?
(a) We will use a market analysis,
appraisal, or other appropriate valuation
method to determine the market value
before we grant a right-of-way affecting
individually owned Indian land or, at
the request of the tribe, for tribal land.
(b) We will either:
(1) Prepare, or have prepared, a
market analysis, appraisal, or other
appropriate valuation method; or
(2) Use an approved market analysis,
appraisal, or other appropriate valuation
method from the Indian landowners or
grantee.
(c) We will use or approve use of a
market analysis, appraisal, or other
appropriate valuation method only if it:
(1) Has been prepared in accordance
with USPAP or a valuation method
developed by the Secretary under 25
U.S.C. 2214 and complies with
Departmental policies regarding
appraisals, including third-party
appraisals; or
(2) Has been prepared by another
Federal agency.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34467
§ 169.112 When are monetary
compensation payments due under a rightof-way?
(a) If compensation is a one-time,
lump sum payment, the grantee must
make the payment within 10 days of our
grant of the right-of-way.
(b) If compensation is to be paid in
increments, the right-of-way grant must
specify the dates on which all payments
are due. Payments are due at the time
specified in the grant, regardless of
whether the grantee receives an advance
billing or other notice that a payment is
due. Increments may not be more
frequent than quarterly.
§ 169.113 Must a right-of-way specify who
receives monetary compensation
payments?
(a) A right-of-way grant must specify
whether the grantee will make payments
directly to the Indian landowners (direct
pay) or to us on their behalf.
(b) The grantee may make payments
directly to the Indian landowners if:
(1) The Indian landowners’ trust
accounts are encumbered accounts;
(2) There are 10 or fewer beneficial
owners; and
(3) One hundred percent of the
beneficial owners (including those on
whose behalf we have consented) agree
to receive payment directly from the
grantee at the start of the right-of-way.
(c) If the right-of-way document
provides that the grantee will directly
pay the Indian landowners, then:
(1) The right-of-way document must
include provisions for proof of payment
upon our request.
(2) When we consent on behalf of an
Indian landowner, the grantee must
make payment to us on behalf of that
landowner.
(3) The grantee must send direct
payments to the parties and addresses
specified in the right-of-way, unless the
grantee receives notice of a change of
ownership or address.
(4) Unless the right-of-way document
provides otherwise, payments may not
be made payable directly to anyone
other than the Indian landowners.
(5) Direct payments must continue
through the duration of the right-of-way,
except that:
(i) The grantee must make all Indian
landowners’ payments to us if 100
percent of the Indian landowners agree
to suspend direct pay and provide us
with documentation of their agreement;
and
(ii) The grantee must make an
individual Indian landowner’s payment
to us if that individual Indian
landowner dies, is declared non compos
mentis, owes a debt resulting in an
encumbered account, or his or her
whereabouts become unknown.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34468
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 169.114 What form of monetary
compensation is acceptable under a rightof-way?
(a) Our preferred method of payment
is electronic funds transfer payments.
We will also accept:
(1) Money orders;
(2) Personal checks;
(3) Certified checks; or
(4) Cashier’s checks.
(b) We will not accept cash or foreign
currency.
(c) We will accept third-party checks
only from financial institutions or
Federal agencies.
§ 169.115 May the right-of-way provide for
non-monetary or varying types of
compensation?
(a) A right-of-way grant may provide
for the following, subject to the
conditions in paragraphs (b) and (c) of
this section:
(1) Alternative forms of
compensation, including but not limited
to, in-kind consideration and payments
based on throughput or percentage of
income; or
(2) Varying types of compensation at
specific stages during the life of the
right-of-way grant, including but not
limited to, fixed annual payments
during construction, payments based on
income during an operational period,
and bonuses.
(b) For tribal land, we will defer to the
tribe’s determination that the
compensation under paragraph (a) of
this section is in its best interest, if the
tribe submits a signed certification or
tribal authorization stating that it has
determined the compensation under
paragraph (a) of this section to be in its
best interest.
(c) For individually owned land, we
may grant a right-of-way that provides
for compensation under paragraph (a) of
this section if we determine that it is in
the best interest of the Indian
landowners.
§ 169.116 Will BIA notify a grantee when a
payment is due for a right-of-way?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Upon request of the Indian
landowners, we may issue invoices to a
grantee in advance of the dates on
which payments are due under the
right-of-way. The grantee’s obligation to
make these payments in a timely
manner will not be excused if invoices
are not issued, delivered, or received.
§ 169.117 Must a right-of-way grant
provide for compensation reviews or
adjustments?
(a) For a right-of-way grant affecting
tribal land, no periodic review of the
adequacy of compensation or
adjustment is required, unless the tribe
negotiates for reviews or adjustments.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
(b) For a right-of-way grant of
individually owned Indian land, no
periodic review of the adequacy of
compensation or adjustment is required
if:
(1) Payment is a one-time lump sum;
(2) The term of the right-of-way grant
is 5 years or less;
(3) The grant provides for automatic
adjustments; or
(4) We determine it is in the best
interest of the Indian landowners not to
require a review or automatic
adjustment based on circumstances
including, but not limited to, the
following:
(i) The right-of-way grant provides for
payment of less than market value;
(ii) The right-of-way grant provides
for most or all of the compensation to
be paid during the first 5 years of the
grant term or before the date the review
would be conducted; or
(iii) The right-of-way grant provides
for graduated rent or non-monetary or
varying types of compensation.
(c) If the conditions in paragraph (b)
of this section are not met, a review of
the adequacy of compensation must
occur at least every fifth year, in the
manner specified in the grant. The grant
must specify:
(1) When adjustments take effect;
(2) Who can make adjustments;
(3) What the adjustments are based
on; and
(4) How to resolve disputes arising
from the adjustments.
(d) When a review results in the need
for adjustment of compensation, the
Indian landowners must consent to the
adjustment in accordance with
§ 169.107, unless the grant provides
otherwise.
§ 169.118 What other types of payments
are required for a right-of-way?
(a) The grantee may be required to pay
additional fees, taxes, and assessments
associated with the use of the land, as
determined by entities having
jurisdiction, except as provided in
§ 169.009. The grantee must pay these
amounts to the appropriate office.
(b) In addition to the compensation
for a right-of-way provided for in
paragraph (a) of this section, the
applicant for a right-of-way will be
required to pay all damages incident to
the survey of the right-of-way or
incident to the construction or
maintenance of the facility for which
the right-of-way is granted.
Grants of Rights-of-Way
§ 169.119 What is the process for BIA to
grant a right-of-way?
(a) Before we grant a right-of-way, we
must determine that the right-of-way is
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in the best interest of the Indian
landowners. In making that
determination, we will:
(1) Review the right-of-way
application and supporting documents;
(2) Identify potential environmental
impacts and ensure compliance with all
applicable environmental laws, land use
laws, and ordinances; and
(3) Require any modifications or
mitigation measures necessary to satisfy
any requirements including any other
Federal or tribal land use requirements.
(b) Upon receiving a right-of-way
application, we will promptly notify the
applicant whether the package is
complete. A complete package includes
all the information and supporting
documents required under this subpart,
including but not limited to, an accurate
legal description for each affected tract,
NEPA review documentation and
valuation documentation, where
applicable.
(1) If the right-of-way application
package is not complete, our letter will
identify the missing information or
documents required for a complete
package. If we do not respond to the
submission of an application package,
the parties may take action under
§ 169.304.
(2) If the right-of-way application
package is complete, we will notify the
parties of the date of our receipt of the
complete package. Within 60 days of
that receipt date, we will grant or deny
the right-of-way, return the package for
revision, or inform the applicant in
writing that we need additional review
time. If we inform the applicant in
writing that we need additional time,
then:
(i) Our letter informing the applicant
that we need additional review time
must identify our initial concerns and
invite the applicant to respond within
15 days of the date of the letter; and
(ii) We have 30 days from sending the
letter informing the applicant that we
need additional time to grant or deny
the right-of-way.
(c) If we do not meet the deadlines in
this section, then the applicant may take
appropriate action under § 169.304.
(d) We will provide any right-of-way
grant or denial and the basis for the
determination, along with notification
of any appeal rights under part 2 of this
chapter to the parties to the right-ofway. If the right-of-way is granted, we
will provide a copy of the right-of-way
to the tribal landowner and, upon
written request, make copies available
to the individual Indian landowners.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 169.120 How will BIA determine whether
to grant a right-of-way?
(a) We will grant a right-of-way
unless:
(1) The required consents have not
been obtained from the parties to the
right-of-way under § 169.106 and
§ 169.107;
(2) The requirements of this subpart
have not been met; or
(3) We find a compelling reason to
withhold the grant in order to protect
the best interests of the Indian
landowners.
(b) We will defer, to the maximum
extent possible, to the Indian
landowners’ determination that the
right-of-way is in their best interest.
(c) We may not unreasonably
withhold our grant of a right-of-way.
(d) We may grant one right-of-way for
all of the tracts traversed by the rightof-way, or we may issue separate grants
for one or more tracts traversed by the
right-of-way.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 169.121 What will the grant of right-ofway contain?
(a) The grant will incorporate the
conditions or restrictions set out in the
consents obtained pursuant to § 169.106
for tribal land and § 169.107 for
individually owned Indian land
(b) The grant will state that:
(1) The grantee has no right to any of
the products or resources of the land,
including but not limited to, timber,
forage, mineral, and animal resources,
unless otherwise provided for in the
grant;
(2) BIA may treat any provision of a
grant that violates Federal law as a
violation of the grant; and
(3) The grantee must:
(i) Construct and maintain the rightof-way in a professional manner
consistent with industry standards;
(ii) Pay promptly all damages and
compensation, in addition to the
performance bond or alternative form of
security made pursuant to § 169.103,
determined by the BIA to be due the
landowners and authorized users and
occupants of land as a result of the
granting, construction, and maintenance
of the right-of-way;
(iii) Restore the land as nearly as may
be possible to its original condition,
upon the completion of construction, to
the extent compatible with the purpose
for which the right-of-way was granted,
unless otherwise negotiated by the
parties;
(iv) Clear and keep clear the land
within the right-of-way, to the extent
compatible with the purpose of the
right-of-way, and dispose of all
vegetative and other material cut,
uprooted, or otherwise accumulated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
during the construction and
maintenance of the project;
(v) Comply with all applicable laws
and obtain all required permits;
(vi) Not commit waste;
(vii) Repair and maintain
improvements consistent with the rightof-way grant;
(viii) Build and maintain necessary
and suitable crossings for all roads and
trails that intersect the improvements
constructed, maintained, or operated
under the right-of-way;
(ix) Restore land to its original
condition, as much as reasonably
possible, upon revocation or
termination of the right-of-way, unless
otherwise negotiated by the parties;
(x) At all times keep the BIA informed
of the grantee’s address;
(xi) Refrain from interfering with the
landowner’s use of the land, provided
that the landowner’s use of the land is
not inconsistent with the right-of-way;
and
(xii) Comply with due diligence
requirements under § 169.105.
(4) Unless the grantee would be
prohibited by law from doing so, the
grantee must also:
(i) Hold the United States and the
Indian landowners harmless from any
loss, liability, or damages resulting from
the applicant’s use or occupation of the
premises; and
(ii) Indemnify the United States and
the Indian landowners against all
liabilities or costs relating to the use,
handling, treatment, removal, storage,
transportation, or disposal of hazardous
materials, or release or discharge of any
hazardous material from the premises
that occurs during the term of the grant,
regardless of fault, with the exception
that the applicant is not required to
indemnify the Indian landowners for
liability or cost arising from the Indian
landowners’ negligence or willful
misconduct.
(c) The grant must attach or
incorporate by reference maps of
definite location reviewed in
accordance with the Standards for
Indian Trust Land Boundary Evidence.
§ 169.122 May a right-of-way contain a
preference consistent with tribal law for
employment of tribal members?
A grant of right-of-way over Indian
land may include a provision,
consistent with tribal law, requiring the
grantee to give a preference to qualified
tribal members, based on their political
affiliation with the tribe.
§ 169.123 Is a new right-of-way grant
required for a new use within or
overlapping an existing right-of-way?
(a) If you propose to use all or a
portion of an existing right-of-way for a
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34469
use not specified in the original grant of
the existing right-of-way, or not within
the same scope of the use specified in
the original grant of the existing rightof-way, you must request a new right-ofway within or overlapping the existing
right-of-way for the new use.
(b) We may grant a new right-of-way
within or overlapping an existing rightof-way if it meets the following
conditions:
(1) The applicant follows the
procedures and requirements in this
part to obtain a new right-of-way.
(2) The new right-of-way does not
interfere with the use or purpose of the
existing right-of-way or the applicant
has obtained the consent of the existing
right-of-way grantee. The existing rightof-way grantee may not unreasonably
withhold consent.
(3) If the existing right-of-way was
granted under the Act of March 3, 1901,
25 U.S.C. 311, to a State or local
authority for public highways, before
the effective date of this part, we may
grant the new right-of-way only if it is
not prohibited by State law.
§ 169.124 What is required if the location
described in the original application and
grant of right-of-way differs from the
construction location?
(a) If there were engineering or other
complications that prevented
construction within the location
identified in the original application
and grant, we will determine whether
the change in location requires one or
more of the following:
(1) An amended map of definite
location;
(2) Landowner consent;
(3) A valuation;
(4) Additional compensation; and/or
(5) A new right-of-way grant.
(b) If we grant a right-of-way for the
new route or location, the applicant
must execute instruments to extinguish
the right-of-way at the original location
identified in the application.
(c) We will transmit the instruments
to extinguish the right-of-way to the
LTRO for recording.
Subpart C—Term, Renewals,
Amendments, Assignments,
Mortgages
§ 169.201 How long may the term of a
right-of-way grant be?
(a) All rights-of-way granted under
this part are limited to the time periods
stated in the grant.
(b) For tribal land, we will defer to the
tribe’s determination that the right-ofway term, including any renewal, is
reasonable.
(c) For individually owned Indian
land, we will review the right-of-way
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34470
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
term, including any renewal, to ensure
that it is reasonable, given the purpose
of the right-of-way. We will use the
following table as guidelines for what
terms are reasonable given the purpose
of the right-of-way:
Purpose
Term
Railroads ...........................................................................................................................................................
Public roads and highways ...............................................................................................................................
Access roads .....................................................................................................................................................
Service roads and trails essential to any other right-of-way purpose ..............................................................
Public and community water lines (including pumping stations and appurtenant facilities) ............................
Utility Gas Lines ................................................................................................................................................
Public sanitary and storm sewer lines including sewage disposal and treatment plants ................................
Water control and use projects (including but not limited to dams, reservoirs, flowage easements, irrigation/ditches and canals and water treatment plants).
Oil and gas pipelines ........................................................................................................................................
Electric power projects, generating plants, switchyards, electric transmission and distribution lines (including poles, towers, and appurtenant facilities).
Telecommunication lines ...................................................................................................................................
Broadband or fiber optic lines ...........................................................................................................................
Avigation hazard easements .............................................................................................................................
Conservation easements ..................................................................................................................................
(c) Unless the right-of-way grant
provides otherwise, a right-of-way may
not be extended by holdover.
§ 169.202 Under what circumstances will a
grant of right-of-way be renewed?
(a) The grantee may request a renewal
(an extension of term without any other
change) of an existing right-of-way grant
and we will renew the grant as long as:
(1) The original right-of-way grant
allows for renewal and specifies any
compensation;
(2) The grantee provides us with a
signed attestation that there is no
change in size, type, location, or
duration of the right-of-way; and
(3) The grantee provides us with
confirmation that landowner consent
has been obtained, unless it is not
required under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(b) Consent is not required if the
original right-of-way grant allows for
renewal without the owners’ consent.
(c) We will record any renewal of a
right-of-way grant in the LTRO.
(d) If the proposed renewal involves
a change in size, type, location, or
duration of the right-of-way, the grantee
must reapply for a new right-of-way, in
accordance with § 169.101, and we will
handle the application for renewal as an
original application for a right-of-way.
§ 169.203 May a right-of-way be renewed
multiple times?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
There is no prohibition on renewing
a right-of-way multiple times.
Amendments
§ 169.204
way?
May a grantee amend a right-of-
(a) A grantee may request that we
amend a right-of-way grant if the grantee
meets the consent requirements in
§ 169.106 for tribal land or § 169.107 for
individually owned Indian land and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
obtains our approval, except that a
grantee may request that we amend a
right-of-way to correct a legal
description or make other technical
corrections without meeting consent
requirements.
(b) An amendment is required to
change any provisions of a right-of-way
grant or to accommodate a change in the
location of permanent improvements to
previously unimproved land within the
right-of-way corridor.
§ 169.205 What is the approval process for
an amendment of a right-of-way?
(a) When we receive an amendment
for our approval, we will notify the
parties of the date we receive it. If our
approval is required, we have 30 days
from receipt of the executed
amendment, proof of required consents,
and required documentation (including
but not limited to a corrected legal
description, if any, and NEPA
compliance) to approve or disapprove
the amendment or inform the parties in
writing that we need additional review
time. Our determination whether to
approve the amendment will be in
writing and will state the basis for our
approval or disapproval.
(b) Our letter informing the parties
that we need additional review time
must identify our initial concerns and
invite the parties to respond within 15
days of the date of the letter. We have
30 days from sending the letter
informing the parties that we need
additional time to approve or
disapprove the amendment.
(c) If we do not meet the deadline in
paragraph (a) of this section, or
paragraph (b) of this section if
applicable, the grantee or Indian
landowners may take appropriate action
under § 169.304.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
In Perpetuity.
In Perpetuity.
25 years, with renewal option.
Consistent with use.
In Perpetuity.
In Perpetuity.
In Perpetuity.
In Perpetuity.
20 years.
50 years.
30 years.
30 years.
20 years.
Consistent with use.
§ 169.206 How will BIA decide whether to
approve an amendment of a right-of-way?
(a) We may disapprove a request for
an amendment of a right-of-way only if
at least one of the following is true:
(1) The Indian landowners have not
consented;
(2) The grantee’s sureties have not
consented;
(3) The grantee is in violation of the
right-of-way grant;
(4) The requirements of this subpart
have not been met; or
(5) We find a compelling reason to
withhold our approval in order to
protect the best interests of the Indian
landowners.
(b) We will defer, to the maximum
extent possible, to the Indian
landowners’ determination that the
amendment is in their best interest.
(c) We may not unreasonably
withhold approval of an amendment.
Assignments
§ 169.207
way?
May a grantee assign a right-of-
(a) A grantee may assign a right-ofway by meeting the consent
requirements in § 169.106 for tribal land
or § 169.107 for individually owned
Indian land and obtaining our approval,
or by meeting the conditions in
paragraph (b).
(b) A grantee may assign a right-ofway without BIA approval only if:
(1) The original right-of-way grant
allows for assignment without BIA
approval; and
(2) The assignee and grantee provide
a copy of the assignment and supporting
documentation to BIA for recording in
the LTRO.
§ 169.208 What is the approval process for
an assignment of a right-of-way?
(a) When we receive an assignment
for our approval, we will notify the
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
parties of the date we receive it. If our
approval is required, we have 30 days
from receipt of the executed assignment,
proof of required consents, and required
documentation to approve or
disapprove the assignment. Our
determination whether to approve the
assignment will be in writing and will
state the basis for our approval or
disapproval.
(b) If we do not meet the deadline in
this section, the grantee or Indian
landowners may take appropriate action
under § 169.304.
§ 169.209 How will BIA decide whether to
approve an assignment of a right-of-way?
(a) We may disapprove an assignment
of a right-of-way only if at least one of
the following is true:
(1) The Indian landowners have not
consented and their consent is required;
(2) The grantee’s sureties have not
consented;
(3) The grantee is in violation of the
right-of-way grant;
(4) The assignee does not agree to be
bound by the terms of the right-of-way
grant;
(5) The requirements of this subpart
have not been met; or
(6) We find a compelling reason to
withhold our approval in order to
protect the best interests of the Indian
landowners.
(b) We will defer, to the maximum
extent possible, to the Indian
landowners’ determination that the
assignment is in their best interest.
(c) We may not unreasonably
withhold approval of an assignment.
Mortgages
§ 169.210
of-way?
May a grantee mortgage a right-
A grantee may mortgage a right-ofway by meeting the consent
requirements in § 169.106 for tribal land
or § 169.107 for individually owned
Indian land and obtaining our approval.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 169.211 What is the approval process for
a mortgage of a right-of-way?
(a) When we receive a right-of-way
mortgage for our approval, we will
notify the parties of the date we receive
it. We have 30 days from receipt of the
executed mortgage, proof of required
consents, and required documentation
to approve or disapprove the mortgage.
Our determination whether to approve
the mortgage will be in writing and will
state the basis for our approval or
disapproval.
(b) If we do not meet the deadline in
this section, the grantee or Indian
landowners may take appropriate action
under § 169.304.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
34471
§ 169.212 How will BIA decide whether to
approve a mortgage of a right-of-way?
§ 169.303 What happens if BIA denies a
right-of-way document?
(a) We may disapprove a right-of-way
mortgage only if at least one of the
following is true:
(1) The Indian landowners have not
consented;
(2) The grantee’s mortgagees or
sureties have not consented;
(3) The requirements of this subpart
have not been met; or
(4) We find a compelling reason to
withhold our approval in order to
protect the best interests of the Indian
landowners.
(b) In making the finding required by
paragraph (a)(4) of this section, we may
consider whether:
(1) The mortgage proceeds would be
used for purposes unrelated to the rightof-way purpose; and
(2) The mortgage is limited to the
right-of-way.
(c) We will defer, to the maximum
extent possible, to the Indian
landowners’ determination that the
mortgage is in their best interest.
(d) We may not unreasonably
withhold approval of a right-of-way
mortgage.
If we deny the right-of-way grant,
renewal, amendment, assignment, or
mortgage, we will notify the parties
immediately and advise the landowners
of their right to appeal the decision
under part 2 of this chapter.
Subpart D—Effectiveness
§ 169.301 When will a right-of-way
document be effective?
A right-of-way document will be
effective on the date we approve the
right-of-way document, even if an
appeal is filed under part 2 of this
chapter.
§ 169.302 Must a right-of-way be
recorded?
(a) Any right-of-way document must
be recorded in our LTRO with
jurisdiction over the affected Indian
land.
(1) We will record the right-of-way
document immediately following our
approval or granting.
(2) In the case of assignments that do
not require our approval under
§ 169.207(b), the parties must provide us
with a copy of the assignment and we
will record the assignment in the LTRO
with jurisdiction over the affected
Indian land.
(b) The tribe must record right-of-way
documents for the following types of
rights-of-way in the LTRO with
jurisdiction over the affected Indian
lands, even though BIA approval is not
required:
(1) Grants on tribal land for a tribal
utility that is not a separate legal entity
under § 169.004;
(2) Grants on tribal land under a
special act of Congress authorizing
grants without our approval under
certain conditions.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 169.304 What happens if BIA does not
meet a deadline for issuing a decision on
a right-of-way document?
(a) If a Superintendent does not meet
a deadline for granting or denying a
right-of-way, renewal, amendment,
assignment, or mortgage, the parties
may file a written notice to compel
action with the appropriate Regional
Director.
(b) The Regional Director has 15 days
from receiving the notice to:
(1) Grant or deny the right-of-way; or
(2) Order the Superintendent to grant
or deny the right-of-way within the time
set out in the order.
(c) The parties may file a written
notice to compel action with the BIA
Director if:
(1) The Regional Director does not
meet the deadline in paragraph (b) of
this section;
(2) The Superintendent does not grant
or deny the right-of-way within the time
set by the Regional Director under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section; or
(3) The initial decision on the rightof-way, renewal, amendment,
assignment, or mortgage is with the
Regional Director, and he or she does
not meet the deadline for such decision.
(d) The BIA Director has 15 days from
receiving the notice to:
(1) Grant or deny the right-of-way; or
(2) Order the Regional Director or
Superintendent to grant or deny the
right-of-way within the time set out in
the order.
(e) If the Regional Director or
Superintendent does not grant or deny
the right-of-way within the time set out
in the order under paragraph (d)(2), then
the BIA Director must issue a decision
within 15 days from the expiration of
the time set out in the order.
(f) The parties may file an appeal from
our inaction to the Interior Board of
Indian Appeals if the Director does not
meet the deadline in paragraph (d) or (e)
of this section.
(g) The provisions of 25 CFR 2.8 do
not apply to the inaction of BIA officials
with respect to a granting or denying a
right-of-way, renewal, amendment,
assignment, or mortgage under this
subpart.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34472
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 169.305 Will BIA require an appeal bond
for an appeal of a decision on a right-of-way
document?
(a) If a party appeals our decision on
a right-of-way document, then the
official to whom the appeal is made may
require the appellant to post an appeal
bond in accordance with part 2 of this
chapter. We will not require an appeal
bond if the tribe is a party to the appeal
and requests a waiver of the appeal
bond.
(b) The appellant may not appeal the
appeal bond decision. The appellant
may, however, request that the official
to whom the appeal is made reconsider
the bond decision, based on
extraordinary circumstances. Any
reconsideration decision is final for the
Department.
Subpart E—Compliance and
Enforcement
§ 169.401 What is the purpose and scope
of this subpart?
This subpart describes the procedures
we use to address compliance and
enforcement related to rights-of-way on
Indian land. Any abandonment, nonuse, or violation of the right-of-way
grant, including but not limited to
encroachments beyond the defined
boundaries, accidental, willful, and/or
incidental trespass, unauthorized new
construction or changes in use, and late
or insufficient payment may result in
enforcement actions.
§ 169.402 May BIA investigate compliance
with a right-of-way?
BIA may investigate compliance with
a right-of-way.
(a) If an Indian landowner notifies us
that a specific abandonment, non-use, or
violation has occurred, we will
promptly initiate an appropriate
investigation.
(b) We may enter the Indian land
subject to a right-of-way at any
reasonable time, upon reasonable
notice, and consistent with any notice
requirements under applicable tribal
law and applicable grant documents, to
protect the interests of the Indian
landowners and to determine if the
grantee is in compliance with the
requirements of the right-of-way.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 169.403 May a right-of-way provide for
negotiated remedies?
(a) The tribe and the grantee on tribal
land may negotiate remedies for the
event of a violation, abandonment, or
non-use. The negotiated remedies must
be stated in the tribe’s consent to the
right-of-way grant. The negotiated
remedies may include, but are not
limited to, the power to terminate the
right-of-way grant. If the negotiated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
remedies provide one or both parties
with the power to terminate the grant:
(1) BIA approval of the termination is
not required;
(2) The termination is effective
without BIA cancellation; and
(3) The Indian landowners must
provide us with written notice of the
termination so that we may record it in
the LTRO.
(b) The Indian landowners and the
grantee to a right-of-way grant on
individually owned Indian land may
negotiate remedies, so long as the
consent also specifies the manner in
which those remedies may be exercised
by or on behalf of the Indian
landowners of the majority interest
under § 169.107 of this part. If the
negotiated remedies provide one or both
parties with the power to terminate the
grant:
(1) BIA concurrence with the
termination is required to ensure that
the Indian landowners of the applicable
percentage of interests have consented;
and
(2) BIA will record the termination in
the LTRO.
(c) The parties must notify any surety
or mortgagee of any violation that may
result in termination and the
termination of a right-of-way.
(d) Negotiated remedies may apply in
addition to, or instead of, the
cancellation remedy available to us, as
specified in the right-of-way grant. The
landowners may request our assistance
in enforcing negotiated remedies.
(e) A right-of-way grant may provide
that violations will be addressed by a
tribe, and that disputes will be resolved
by a tribal court, any other court of
competent jurisdiction, or by a tribal
governing body in the absence of a tribal
court, or through an alternative dispute
resolution method. We may not be
bound by decisions made in such
forums, but we will defer to ongoing
actions or proceedings, as appropriate,
in deciding whether to exercise any of
the remedies available to us.
§ 169.404 What will BIA do about a
violation of a right-of-way grant?
(a) In the absence of actions or
proceedings described in § 169.403
(negotiated remedies), or if it is not
appropriate for us to defer to the actions
or proceedings, we will follow the
procedures in paragraphs (b) and (c) of
this section.
(b) If we determine there has been a
violation of the conditions of a grant,
other than a violation of payment
provisions covered by paragraph (c) of
this section, we will promptly send the
grantee a written notice of violation.
(1) We will send a copy of the notice
of violation to the tribe for tribal land,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
or provide constructive notice to Indian
landowners for individually owned
Indian land.
(2) The notice of violation will advise
the grantee that, within 10 business
days of the receipt of a notice of
violation, the grantee must:
(i) Cure the violation and notify us,
and the tribe for tribal land, in writing
that the violation has been cured;
(ii) Dispute our determination that a
violation has occurred; or
(iii) Request additional time to cure
the violation.
(3) The notice of violation may order
the grantee to cease operations under
the right-of-way grant.
(c) A grantee’s failure to pay
compensation in the time and manner
required by a right-of-way grant is a
violation, and we will issue a notice of
violation in accordance with this
paragraph.
(1) We will send the grantees a
written notice of violation promptly
following the date on which the
payment was due.
(2) We will send a copy of the notice
of violation to the tribe for tribal land,
or provide constructive notice to the
Indian landowners for individually
owned Indian land.
(3) The notice of violation will require
the grantee to provide adequate proof of
payment.
(d) The grantee will continue to be
responsible for the obligations in the
grant until the grant expires, or is
terminated or cancelled.
§ 169.405 What will BIA do if the grantee
does not cure a violation of a right-of-way
grant on time?
(a) If the grantee does not cure a
violation of a right-of-way grant within
the required time period, or provide
adequate proof of payment as required
in the notice of violation, we will
consult with the tribe for tribal land or,
where feasible, with Indian landowners
for individually owned Indian land, and
determine whether:
(1) We should cancel the grant;
(2) The Indian landowners wish to
invoke any remedies available to them
under the grant;
(3) We should invoke other remedies
available under the grant or applicable
law, including collection on any
available performance bond or, for
failure to pay compensation, referral of
the debt to the Department of the
Treasury for collection; or
(4) The grantee should be granted
additional time in which to cure the
violation.
(b) Following consultation with the
tribe for tribal land or, where feasible,
with Indian landowners for individually
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
owned Indian land, we may take action
to recover unpaid compensation and
any associated late payment charges.
(1) We do not have to cancel the grant
or give any further notice to the grantee
before taking action to recover unpaid
compensation.
(2) We may still take action to recover
any unpaid compensation if we cancel
the grant.
(c) If we decide to cancel the grant, we
will send the grantee a cancellation
letter by certified mail, return receipt
requested, within 5 business days of our
decision. We will send a copy of the
cancellation letter to the tribe for tribal
land, and will provide Indian
landowners for individually owned
Indian land with actual or constructive
notice of the cancellation. The
cancellation letter will:
(1) Explain the grounds for
cancellation;
(2) If applicable, notify the grantee of
the amount of any unpaid compensation
or late payment charges due under the
grant;
(3) Notify the grantee of the grantee’s
right to appeal under part 2 of this
chapter, including the possibility that
the official to whom the appeal is made
may require the grantee to post an
appeal bond;
(4) Order the grantee to vacate the
property within 31 days of the date of
receipt of the cancellation letter, if an
appeal is not filed by that time; and
(5) Order the grantee to take any other
action BIA deems necessary to protect
the Indian landowners.
(d) We may invoke any other
remedies available to us under the grant,
including collecting on any available
performance bond, and the Indian
landowners may pursue any available
remedies under tribal law.
§ 169.406 Will late payment charges,
penalties, or special fees apply to
delinquent payments due under a right-ofway grant?
(a) Late payment charges and
penalties will apply as specified in the
grant. The failure to pay these amounts
will be treated as a violation.
(b) We may assess the following
special fees to cover administrative
costs incurred by the United States in
the collection of the debt, if
compensation is not paid in the time
and manner required, in addition to the
late payment charges that must be paid
to the Indian landowners under the
grant:
The grantee will pay . . .
For . . .
(1) $50.00 ...........................................................................
(2) $15.00 ...........................................................................
(3) 18 percent of balance due ...........................................
Any dishonored check.
Processing of each notice or demand letter.
Treasury processing following referral for collection of delinquent debt.
§ 169.407 How will payment rights relating
to a right-of-way grant be allocated?
The right-of-way grant may allocate
rights to payment for any proceeds,
trespass damages, condemnation
awards, settlement funds, and other
payments between the Indian
landowners and the grantee. If not
specified in the grant, applicable policy,
order, award, judgment, or other
document, the Indian landowners or
grantees will be entitled to receive these
payments.
§ 169.408 What is the process for
cancelling a right-of-way for non-use or
abandonment?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
34473
cancellation letter from us, or 41 days
from the date we mailed the letter,
whichever is earlier.
(b) The cancellation decision will not
be effective if an appeal is filed unless
the cancellation is made immediately
effective under part 2 of this chapter.
While a cancellation decision is
ineffective, the grantee must continue to
pay compensation and comply with the
other terms of the grant.
§ 169.410 What will BIA do if a grantee
remains in possession after a right-of-way
expires or is terminated or cancelled?
apply to appeals from right-of-way
cancellation decisions.
(b) The grantee may not appeal the
appeal bond decision. The grantee may,
however, request that the official to
whom the appeal is made reconsider the
appeal bond decision, based on
extraordinary circumstances. Any
reconsideration decision is final for the
Department.
§ 169.412 What if an individual or entity
takes possession of or uses Indian land
without a right-of-way or other proper
authorization?
If a grantee remains in possession
after the expiration, termination, or
cancellation of a right-of-way, we may
treat the unauthorized possession as a
trespass under applicable law in
consultation with the Indian
landowners. Unless the Indian
landowners of the applicable percentage
of interests under § 169.106 or 169.107
have notified us in writing that they are
engaged in good faith negotiations with
the holdover grantee to renew or obtain
a new right-of-way, we may take action
to recover possession on behalf of the
Indian landowners, and pursue any
additional remedies available under
applicable law, such as a forcible entry
and detainer action.
If an individual or entity takes
possession of, or uses, Indian land
without a right-of-way and a right-ofway is required, the unauthorized
possession or use is a trespass. An
unauthorized use within an existing
right-of-way is also a trespass. We may
take action to recover possession,
including eviction, on behalf of the
Indian landowners and pursue any
additional remedies available under
applicable law. The Indian landowners
may pursue any available remedies
under applicable law.
§ 169.409 When will a cancellation of a
right-of-way grant be effective?
§ 169.411 Will BIA appeal bond regulations
apply to cancellation decisions involving
right-of-way grants?
(a) A cancellation involving a right-ofway grant will not be effective until 31
days after the grantee receives a
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, the appeal bond
provisions in part 2 of this chapter will
A right-of-way is not required for
service lines. Service line agreements
are for the purpose of supplying the
owners (or authorized occupants or
users, as demonstrated by a lease or
tribal authorization) of tribal or
(a) We may cancel, in whole or in
part, any rights-of-way granted under
this part 30 days after mailing written
notice to the grantee at its latest address,
for any of the following causes:
(1) A nonuse of the right-of-way for a
consecutive 2-year period for the
purpose for which it was granted; or
(2) An abandonment of the right-ofway.
(b) If the grantee fails to correct the
basis for cancellation by the 30th day
after we mailed the notice, we will issue
an appropriate instrument cancelling
the right-of-way and transmit it to the
office of record pursuant to 25 CFR part
150 for recording and filing.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart F—Service Line Agreements
§ 169.501 Is a right-of-way required for
service lines?
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
34474
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
individually owned Indian land with
utilities for use by such owners (or
occupants or users) on the premises. A
service line agreement should address
the mitigation of any damages incurred
during construction and the restoration
of the premises at the termination of the
agreement.
§ 169.502 What are the consent
requirements for service line agreements?
(a) Before the applicant may begin any
work to construct service lines across
tribal land, the applicant and the tribe
(or the legally authorized occupants or
users of the tribal land and the tribe)
must execute a service line agreement.
(b) Before the applicant may begin
any work to construct service lines
across individually owned land, the
applicant and the owners (or the legally
authorized occupants or users) must
execute a service line agreement.
§ 169.503 Is a valuation required for
service line agreements?
We do not require a valuation for
service line agreements.
§ 169.504 Must I file service line
agreements with the BIA?
The parties must file an executed
copy of service line agreements, together
with a plat or diagram, with us within
30 days after the date of execution for
recording in the LTRO. The plat or
diagram must show the boundary of the
ownership parcel and point of
connection with the distribution line.
When the plat or diagram is placed on
a separate sheet it must include the
signatures of the parties.
Dated: June 2, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
expand the approximately 33-square
mile ‘‘Fair Play’’ viticultural area in El
Dorado County, California, by
approximately 1,200 acres
(approximately 2 square miles). The
established Fair Play viticultural area
and the proposed expansion area are
located entirely within the larger El
Dorado and Sierra Foothills viticultural
areas. TTB designates viticultural areas
to allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they
may purchase. TTB invites comments
on this proposed addition to its
regulations.
Comments must be received by
August 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
on this notice to one of the following
addresses:
• Internet: https://www.regulations.gov
(via the online comment form for this
notice as posted within Docket No.
TTB–2014–0005 at ‘‘Regulations.gov,’’
the Federal e-rulemaking portal);
• U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; or
• Hand Delivery/Courier In Lieu of
Mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite
200–E, Washington, DC 20005.
See the Public Participation section of
this notice for specific instructions and
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing or view or obtain
copies of the petition and supporting
materials.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2014–13964 Filed 6–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–6W–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Background on Viticultural Areas
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
TTB Authority
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2014–0005; Notice No.
143]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 1513–AC07
Proposed Expansion of the Fair Play
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jun 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01 (Revised),
dated December 10, 2013, to the TTB
Administrator to perform the functions
and duties in the administration and
enforcement of this law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and the use
of their names as appellations of origin
on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved American viticultural
areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to its geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing the
establishment of an AVA and provides
that any interested party may petition
TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Petitioners may use the
same procedures to request changes
involving existing AVAs. Section 9.12 of
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes standards for petitions for
modifying established AVAs. Petitions
to expand an established AVA must
include the following:
• Evidence that the region within the
proposed expansion area boundary is
nationally or locally known by the name
of the established AVA;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
expansion area;
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 116 (Tuesday, June 17, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34455-34474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13964]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 169
[Docket ID: BIA-2014-0001; DR.5B711.IA000814]
RIN 1076-AF20
Rights-of-Way on Indian Land
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would comprehensively update and streamline
the process for obtaining BIA grants of rights-of-way on Indian land,
while supporting tribal self-determination and self-governance. This
proposed rule would also further implement the policy decisions and
approaches established in the leasing regulations, which BIA finalized
in December 2012, by applying them to the rights-of-way context where
applicable. This publication also announces the dates and locations for
tribal consultation sessions to discuss this proposed rights-of-way
rule.
DATES: Comments on this rule must be received by August 18, 2014.
Comments on the information collections contained in this proposed
regulation are separate from those on the substance of the rule.
Comments on the information collection burden should be received by
July 17, 2014 to ensure consideration, but must be received no later
than August 18, 2014. Please see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice for dates of tribal consultation sessions.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
--Federal rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov. The rule is
listed under the agency name ``Bureau of Indian Affairs.'' The rule has
been assigned Docket ID: BIA-2014-0001.
--Email: consultation@bia.gov. Include the number 1076-AF20 in the
subject line.
--Mail or Hand Delivery: Elizabeth Appel, Office of Regulatory Affairs
& Collaborative Action, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street
NW., MS 4141, Washington, DC 20240. Include the number 1076-AF20 on the
envelope.
Please note that we will not consider or include in the docket for
this rulemaking comments received after the close of the comment period
(see DATES) or comments sent to an address other than those listed
above.
Comments on the information collections contained in this proposed
regulation are separate from those on the substance of the rule. Send
comments on the information collection burden to OMB by facsimile to
(202) 395-5806 or email to the OMB Desk Officer for the Department of
the Interior at OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Please send a copy of
your comments to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this notice.
Please see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice for
addresses of tribal consultation sessions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action, (202) 273-4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov. You may review the information collection
request online at https://www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to
review Department of the Interior collections under review by OMB.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary of Rule
This is a proposed rule to comprehensively update and streamline
the process for obtaining BIA grants of rights-of-way on Indian land.
The current regulations were promulgated in 1968, and last updated in
1980. In December 2012, the Department issued final regulations
comprehensively reforming residential, business, and wind and solar
leasing on Indian land and streamlining the leasing process. Given the
supportive response to the leasing regulatory revisions, we are
updating 25 CFR 169 (Rights-of-Way) to mirror those revisions to the
extent applicable in the rights-of-way context. Highlights of the
proposed rights-of-way revisions include:
[cir] Eliminating the need to obtain BIA consent for surveying in
preparation for a right-of-way;
[cir] Establishing timelines for BIA review of rights-of-way
requests;
[cir] Clarifying processes for BIA review of right-of-way
documents;
[cir] Allowing BIA disapproval only where there is a stated
compelling reason;
[cir] Providing greater deference to Tribes on compensation for
rights-of-way;
[cir] Clarifying the authority by which BIA approves rights-of-way;
and
[cir] Eliminating outdated requirements specific to different types
of rights-of-way.
Together, these revisions will modernize the rights-of-way approval
process while better supporting Tribal self-determination. This rule
also updates the regulations to be in a question-and-answer format, in
compliance with ``plain language'' requirements.
II. Summary of All Revisions to 25 CFR Part 169
The following table summarizes revisions to part 169, by showing
where the substance of each section of the current rule is in the
proposed rule and describing the changes.
[[Page 34456]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current 25 CFR Sec. Current provision Proposed 25 CFR Sec. Description of change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
169.1......................... Definitions of 169.002...................... Revises the definition
``Secretary,'' of ``tribe'' to be
``individually owned ``Indian tribe'' and
land,'' ``tribe'', to refer to the
``tribal land,'' and Federal List Act.
``Government owned Simplifies the
land.''. remaining definitions.
Adds definitions for
``abandonment,''
``assignment,''
``avigation hazard
easement,'' ``BIA,''
``compensation,''
``constructive
notice,''
``easement,''
``fractional
interest,'' ``grant,''
``grantee,''
``immediate family,''
``Indian,'' ``Indian
land,'' ``in-kind
compensation,''
``legal description,''
``LTRO,'' ``map of
definite location,''
``market value,''
``right-of-way,''
``right-of-way
document,'' ``Section
17 corporation,''
``service line,''
``trespass,'' ``tribal
authorization,''
``trust account,''
``trust account
encumbrance,'' ``trust
and restricted
status,'' ``Uniform
Standards for
Professional Appraisal
Practice (USPAP),''
and ``us/we/our.''
169.2(a), (c)................. Purpose and scope of 169.001...................... Updates the purpose of
regulations. the regulations to
provide that BIA will
use its general
statutory authority
for granting rights-of-
way.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.003-169.010.............. New sections. Specify
what land part 169
applies to, when a
right-of-way is
needed, what types of
rights-of-way are
covered by part 169,
whether part 169
applies to rights-of-
way applications
submitted before this
version of the rule,
that tribes may
compact or contract
for certain BIA realty
functions related to
rights-of-way, what
laws apply to rights-
of-way, what taxes
apply to rights-of-
way, and how BIA
provides notice of its
actions related to
rights-of-way.
169.2(b)...................... Appeals................. 169.011...................... Adds exceptions to part
2 appeals and
clarifies ``interested
party'' to make
consistent with
availability of
appeals in the leasing
context.
169.3(a)...................... Tribal consent required. 169.106...................... No substantive change.
169.3(b)-(c).................. Individual Indian 169.107, 169.108............. Adds a requirement for
landowner consent BIA to provide 30-day
required. notice to landowners
on whose behalf it
will consent.
Reorganizes to
establish whom BIA can
consent on behalf of.
Updates to comply with
statutory authorities
that have been updated
since the last
regulatory revision.
169.4......................... Permission to survey.... 169.101(b)................... Removes the requirement
for BIA approval to
survey, but retains
the requirement for
obtaining landowner
consent to survey.
169.5......................... Application for right-of- 169.101-169.102, 169.121..... Removes requirement for
way. duplicate filing and
statutory citation.
Consolidates
provisions and
provides that they
will be issued in the
grant, rather than
requiring grantee to
submit them in a
stipulation with the
application. Clarifies
that application must
identify the affected
tract, right-of-way
location, purpose, and
duration, and
ownership of any
permanent
improvements. Adds
that the following
must accompany the
application: legal
description, bond, and
information necessary
to comply with
environmental laws.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.105...................... Establishes requirement
for due diligence in
construction of
permanent
improvements.
169.6......................... Maps. Requires maps of 162.102(b)................... Removes specific
definite location on requirements for
tracing linen or other format of map of
``permanent and definite location
reproducible (e.g., tracing linen),
material.'' Requires a scale, etc. Adds
separate map for each requirement that map
20 miles, a specific be signed by a
scale, and the parcels, professional surveyor
sections, townships, or engineer.
and ranges affected.
169.7......................... Field notes. Requires N/A.......................... Deleted.
field notes either on
map or submitted
separately.
[[Page 34457]]
169.8......................... Public survey. Requires 169.002...................... Definition of map of
terminal of line of definite location
route to be fixed to requires it to include
nearest corner of reference to a public
public survey and, if survey.
terminal is on
unsurveyed land, be
connected with corner
of public survey < 6
miles away.
169.9......................... Connection with natural N/A.......................... Deleted. Legal
objects. Requires description and map
connection with natural make this unnecessary.
object or permanent
monument if distance to
an established corner
of the public survey is
> 6 miles.
169.10........................ Township and section 169.002...................... Definition of map of
lines. Requires map to definite location
show distance to requires it to include
nearest corner if line reference to a public
of survey crosses a survey
township or section
line of public survey.
169.11........................ Affidavit and 169.102(b)(2)................ Maintains the
certificate. Requires requirement for an
map to include an engineer to sign the
affidavit by engineer map, but adds that a
and certificate by surveyor may sign the
applicant on accuracy. map instead. Deletes
Requires BIA-built requirement for
roads transferred to applicant to sign a
county or State to certificate regarding
include affidavit by the map's accuracy,
BIA engineer and State because the rule
officer on accuracy. otherwise requires
that the map be
accurate. Deletes the
section on maps
covering BIA roads to
be transferred to a
county or State.
169.12........................ Consideration for right- 169.109-169.111.............. Provides that the
of-way grants. Requires Secretary will defer
fair market value and to the tribe's
requires the Secretary negotiated
to obtain and advise compensation for
landowner of appraisal tribal land. Maintains
information. requirement for fair
market value and a
valuation for
individually owned
Indian land, but adds
exceptions. Allows for
market value to be
determined by several
methods (in addition
to, or instead of,
appraisals).
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.112-169.117.............. New sections. Clarify
when compensation
payments may be due
for a right-of-way,
allowing for
agreements to make
payment at times other
than upon application,
require the right-of-
way grant to specify
how payment occurs
(direct pay or to BIA)
and put limits on
availability of direct
pay, allow for non-
monetary (e.g.,
discount internet
service) and varying
types of compensation,
clarify whether BIA
will notify when a
payment is due, and
clarify when right-of-
way grant must provide
for compensation
reviews or
adjustments.
169.13........................ Other damages. Requires 169.118...................... Adds other charges that
grantee to pay all grantee may be subject
damages incident to the to.
survey or construction
or maintenance of the
facility for which the
right-of-way is granted.
169.14........................ Deposit and disbursement 169.103...................... Requires estimated
of consideration and damages payment to be
damages. Requires in the form of a bond
applicant to deposit or alternative
total estimated security. Deletes
consideration and reference to ``special
damages with deposit'' accounts,
application. Requires because the specific
amounts to be held in accounts into which
``special deposit'' compensation would be
accounts. deposited is outside
the scope of this
regulation.
165.15........................ Action on application. 169.119-169.120.............. Establishes the process
Provides that Secretary and criteria by which
may grant right-of-way, BIA will grant a right-
with attached maps of of-way. Establishes
definite location. deadlines for BIA
Allows Secretary to action. Maintains
issue one document for flexibility for
all tracts traversed by Secretary to issue one
the right-of-way, or document or separate
separate documents. documents for multiple
tracts.
169.16........................ Affidavit of Completion. N/A.......................... Deleted.
Requires applicant to
file an affidavit of
completion once a right-
of-way is constructed.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 161.122...................... New section. Clarifies
that a right-of-way
grant may include a
preference for
employment of tribal
members.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 161.123...................... New section. Clarifies
when a new right-of-
way is required for a
new use within or
overlapping an
existing right-of-way.
169.17........................ Change of location. 169.124...................... Allows flexibility for
Requires a new right-of- BIA to determine
way, including consent, whether a new right-of-
amended maps, etc., if way and/or consent,
a change from the amended maps, etc.,
location in the grant are required based on
is necessary due to whether the use is
engineering provided for or is
difficulties or within the same scope
otherwise. of use provided for in
the original grant.
[[Page 34458]]
169.18........................ Tenure of approved right- 169.201...................... Provides guidance to
of-way grants. Provides BIA staff for
that rights-of-way determining
under 1948 Act may be appropriate duration
without limitation as of a right-of-way
to term of years, based on purpose of
except as stated in the the right-of-way.
grant, but all others Eliminates distinction
may not exceed 50 between rights-of-way
years, as determined by under the 1948 Act and
BIA. others
169.19........................ Renewal of right-of-way 169.202...................... Allows a renewal
grants. Allows without consent if the
applications for original grant
renewal where no change provides for it.
in location or status,
with consent and
consideration. Requires
new right-of-way
application if there is
any change to the size,
type, or location.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.203...................... New section. Clarifies
when a right-of-way
may be renewed
multiple times.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.204-169.206.............. New sections. Clarify
the circumstances in
which a right-of-way
may be amended, and
the process for
amending.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.207-169.209.............. New sections. Clarify
the circumstances in
which a right-of-way
may be assigned, and
the process for
assigning.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.210-169.212.............. New sections. Clarify
the circumstances in
which a right-of-way
may be mortgaged, and
the process for
mortgaging.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.301-169.305.............. New sections. Clarify
when a right-of-way is
effective and must be
recorded, what happens
if BIA denies the
right-of-way or does
not meet a deadline
for issuing a decision
on a right-of-way, and
whether appeal bonds
are required.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.401-169.402.............. New sections. Clarify
when BIA may
investigate compliance
with a right-of-way.
169.20........................ Termination of right-of- 169.403-169.405.............. Allows landowners to
way grants. Provides provide for negotiated
that the Secretary may remedies, including
terminate a right-of- termination without
way with 30-day notice BIA concurrence (where
for certain causes. tribe is landowner) or
with BIA concurrence
(where individual
Indians are
landowners). Provides
that BIA will consult
with the landowners
before determining
whether to cancel the
grant.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.406-169.407.............. New sections. Specify
what late payment
charges and fees apply
to delinquent payments
and how payment rights
will be allocated.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.408-169.409.............. New sections. Specify
the process by which
BIA will cancel a
right-of-way and when
cancellation is
effective.
N/A........................... N/A..................... 169.410-169.412.............. New sections. Specify
what BIA will do if a
grantee remains in
possession after a
right-of-way expires
or is terminated or
cancelled, what appeal
bond regulations apply
to cancellation
decisions, and what
happens if someone
uses Indian land
without a right-of-way
or other proper
authorization.
169.21........................ Condemnation actions N/A.......................... Deleted.
involving individually
owned lands. Requires
that BIA report
condemnation actions to
Interior.
169.22........................ Service lines. Requires 169.002, 169.501-169.505..... Clarifies in definition
execution of service that a service line is
line agreements. Limits only a utility line
service lines to running from a main
certain voltage. line to provide
Requires tribe's landowners/occupants
governing body to with utility service
consent to service line and deletes provisions
agreements for tribal restricting service
land. Requires only a lines to a specific
plat or diagram showing voltage.
location, size and
extent of line.
Requires filing of
agreement with
Secretary within 30
days of execution.
169.23........................ Railroads. Lists N/A.......................... Deleted. These
specific statutory provisions are
authorities for unnecessary because
railroads and other the general right-of-
rights-of-way, and way authority in 25
includes specific U.S.C. 323-328 is
requirements for being relied upon,
railroad right-of-ways. rather than specific
authorities.
169.24........................ Railroads in Oklahoma. N/A.......................... Deleted. These
Lists specific provisions are
statutory authorities unnecessary because
for railroad rights-of- the general right-of-
way in Oklahoma. way authority in 25
U.S.C. 323-328 is
being relied upon,
rather than specific
authorities.
[[Page 34459]]
169.25........................ Oil and gas pipelines. N/A.......................... Deleted. These
Lists specific provisions are
statutory authorities unnecessary because
and requirements for the general right-of-
oil and gas pipeline way authority in 25
rights-of-way. U.S.C. 323-328 is
being relied upon,
rather than specific
authorities. Specific
requirements for oil
and gas pipelines are
unnecessary because
they are already
addressed in
applicable State and
Federal laws.
169.26........................ Telephone and telegraph N/A.......................... Deleted. These
lines; radio, provisions are
television, and other unnecessary because
communications the general right-of-
facilities. Lists way authority in 25
specific statutory U.S.C. 323-328 is
authorities and being relied upon,
requirements for rather than specific
telephone and telegraph authorities.
lines, etc.
169.27........................ Power projects. Lists N/A.......................... Deleted. These
specific statutory provisions are
authorities and unnecessary because
requirements for power the general right-of-
project rights-of-way. way authority in 25
U.S.C. 323-328 is
being relied upon,
rather than specific
authorities.
169.28........................ Public highways. Allows N/A.......................... Deleted. These
State and local provisions are
authorities to apply unnecessary because
under these regulations the general right-of-
for rights-of-way for way authority in 25
open public highways on U.S.C. 323-328 is
Indian land. Allows being relied upon,
authorities in Nebraska rather than specific
or Montana to open authorities.
highways without right-
of-way, under specific
statutory authority.
Cross-references 25 CFR
256.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The core processes for obtaining landowner consent and BIA approval
are the same as for obtaining a lease. The timelines this proposed rule
would establish for rights-of-way approvals mirror those for business
leases at 25 CFR subpart D, allowing for a 60-day review of right-of-
way applications, and 30-day review of amendments, assignments, and
mortgages. If BIA does not act within those established deadlines, the
parties could elevate the application to the Regional Director or
Director of BIA, as appropriate, for action.
We are interested in all comments regarding this rule, but also
would specifically like comment on the bonding provisions and whether
the proposed durations for different types of rights-of-way set out in
section 169.201 are appropriate.
III. Tribal Consultation Sessions
We will be hosting several tribal consultation sessions throughout
the country to discuss this proposed rule. The dates and locations for
the consultation sessions are as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Time Location Venue
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, August 5, 2014............ 8 a.m.-12 p.m. (Local Bismarck, North Dakota Bismarck Civic Center,
time). Prairie Rose, Room 101,
315 S. 5th Street,
Bismarck, ND 58504.
Wednesday, August 6, 2014.......... 1 p.m.-5 p.m. (Local Scottsdale, Arizona... Talking Stick Resort, 9800
time). E. Indian Bend Rd.,
Scottsdale, AZ 85256.
Thursday, August 7, 2014........... 1 p.m.-4 p.m. Eastern Teleconference........ Call-in number: (888) 989-
Time. 7589, Passcode: 208-1244.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The E.O. directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with
regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking
process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of
ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent with these
requirements. This rule is also part of the Department's commitment
under the Executive Order to reduce the number and burden of
regulations and provide greater notice and clarity to the public.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. The
rule's requirements will not result in a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic regions. Nor will this rule have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of the U.S.-based enterprises
to compete with foreign-based
[[Page 34460]]
enterprises because the rule is limited to rights-of-way on Indian
land.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rule does not
affect individual property rights protected by the Fifth Amendment nor
does it involves a compensable ``taking.'' A takings implication
assessment is therefore not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, this rule has no
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. This rule
only concerns BIA's grant of rights-of-way on Indian land.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule has been reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and written to minimize litigation; and is written in clear
language and contains clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments,'' Executive Order 13175 (59 FR 22951, November 6, 2000),
and 512 DM 2, we have evaluated the potential effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes and Indian trust assets. We will be consulting
with Indian tribes during the public comment period on this rule.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains information collections requiring approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The
Department is seeking approval for a new OMB Control Number.
OMB Control Number: 1076-NEW.
Title: Rights-of-Way on Indian Land.
Brief Description of Collection: This information collection
requires applicants for, and recipients of, right-of-way grants to
cross Indian land to submit information to the Bureau of Indian
Affairs.
Type of Review: Existing collection in use without OMB control
number.
Respondents: Individuals and entities.
Number of Respondents: 550 on average (each year).
Number of Responses: 3,300 on average (each year).
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour (for applications); 0.5 hours
(for responses to notices of violation); 0.5 hours (for responses to
trespass notices of violations); and 0.25 hours (for filing service
line agreements).
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 2,500 hours.
Estimated Total Non-Hour Cost: $2,200,000.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment because these are
``regulations . . . whose environmental effects are too broad,
speculative, or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis
and will later be subject to the NEPA process, either collectively or
case-by-case.'' 43 CFR 46.210(j). No extraordinary circumstances exist
that would require greater NEPA review.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
L. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ``COMMENTS'' section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences
are too long, the sections where you believe lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
M. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 169
Indians--lands, Rights-of-way.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, proposes to revise 25 CFR part 169
to read as follows:
PART 169--RIGHTS-OF-WAY OVER INDIAN LAND
Subpart A--Purpose, Definitions, General Provisions
Sec.
169.001 What is the purpose of this part?
169.002 What terms do I need to know?
169.003 To what land does this part apply?
169.004 When do I need a right-of-way to authorize possession over
or across Indian land?
169.005 What types of rights-of-way does this part cover?
169.006 Does this part apply to right-of-way grants I submitted for
approval before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS]?
169.007 May tribes administer this part on BIA's behalf?
169.008 What laws apply to rights-of-way approved under this part?
169.009 What taxes apply to rights-of-way approved under this part?
169.010 How does BIA provide notice to the parties to a right-of-
way?
169.011 May decisions under this part be appealed?
169.012 How does the Paperwork Reduction Act affect this part?
Subpart B--Obtaining a Right-of-Way
Application
169.101 How do I obtain a right-of-way across tribal or individually
owned Indian land?
169.102 What must an application for a right-of-way include?
169.103 What bond must accompany the application?
169.104 What is the release process for a performance bond or
alternate form of security?
169.105 What requirements for due diligence must a right-of-way
grant include?
[[Page 34461]]
Consent Requirements
169.106 Must I obtain tribal consent for a right-of-way across
tribal land?
169.107 Must I obtain individual Indian landowners' consent to a
grant of right-of-way across individually owned land?
169.108 Who is authorized to consent to a right-of-way?
Compensation Requirements
169.109 How much monetary compensation must be paid for a right-of-
way affecting tribal land?
169.110 How much monetary compensation must be paid for a right-of-
way affecting individually owned Indian land?
169.111 How will BIA determine market value for a right-of-way?
169.112 When are monetary compensation payments due under a right-
of-way?
169.113 Must a right-of-way specify who receives monetary
compensation payments?
169.114 What form of monetary compensation payment is acceptable
under a right-of-way?
169.115 May the right-of-way provide for non-monetary or varying
types of compensation?
169.116 Will BIA notify a grantee when a payment is due for a right-
of-way?
169.117 Must a right-of-way grant provide for compensation reviews
or adjustments?
169.118 What other types of payments are required for a right-of-
way?
Grants of Rights-of-Way
169.119 What is the process for BIA to grant a right-of-way?
169.120 How will BIA determine whether to grant a right-of-way?
169.121 What will the grant of right-of-way contain?
169.122 May a right-of-way contain a preference consistent with
tribal law for employment of tribal members?
169.123 Is a new right-of-way grant required for a new use within or
overlapping an existing right-of-way?
169.124 What is required if the location described in the original
application and grant differs from the construction location?
Subpart C--Term, Renewals, Amendments, Assignments, Mortgages
Term & Renewals
169.201 How long may the term of a right-of-way grant be?
169.202 Under what circumstances will a grant of right-of-way be
renewed?
169.203 May a right-of-way be renewed multiple times?
Amendments
169.204 May a grantee amend a right-of-way?
169.205 What is the approval process for an amendment of a right-of-
way?
169.206 How will BIA decide whether to approve an amendment of a
right-of-way?
Assignments
169.207 May a grantee assign a right-of-way?
169.208 What is the approval process for an assignment of a right-
of-way?
169.209 How will BIA decide whether to approve an assignment of a
right-of-way?
Mortgages
169.210 May a grantee mortgage a right-of-way?
169.211 What is the approval process for a mortgage of a right-of-
way?
169.212 How will BIA decide whether to approve a mortgage of a
right-of-way?
Subpart D--Effectiveness
169.301 When will a right-of-way document be effective?
169.302 Must a right-of-way be recorded?
169.303 What happens if BIA denies a right-of-way document?
169.304 What happens if BIA does not meet a deadline for issuing a
decision on a right-of-way document?
169.305 Will BIA require an appeal bond for an appeal of a decision
on a right-of-way document?
Subpart E--Compliance and Enforcement
169.401 What is the purpose and scope of this subpart?
169.402 May BIA investigate compliance with a right-of-way?
169.403 May a right-of-way provide for negotiated remedies if there
is a violation?
169.404 What will BIA do about a violation of a right-of-way grant?
169.405 What will BIA do if the grantee does not cure a violation of
a right-of-way grant on time?
169.406 Will late payment charges or special fees apply to
delinquent payments due under a right-of-way grant?
169.407 How will payment rights relating to a right-of-way grant be
allocated?
169.408 What is the process for cancelling a right-of-way?
169.409 When will a cancellation of a right-of-way grant be
effective?
169.410 What will BIA do if a grantee remains in possession after a
right-of-way expires or is terminated or cancelled?
169.411 Will BIA appeal bond regulations apply to cancellation
decisions involving right-of-way grants?
169.412 What if an individual or entity takes possession or uses
Indian land without a right-of-way or other proper authorization?
Subpart F--Service Line Agreements
169.501 Is a right-of-way required for service lines?
169.502 What are the consent requirements for service line
agreements?
169.503 Is a valuation required for service line agreements?
169.504 Must I file service line agreements with the BIA?
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 62 Stat. 17 (25 U.S.C. 323-328), 25
U.S.C. 2218, and other acts cited in the text.
Subpart A--Purpose, Definitions, General Provisions
Sec. 169.001 What is the purpose of this part?
(a) This part is intended to streamline the procedures and
conditions under which we will approve (i.e., grant) rights-of-way over
and across tribal lands, individually owned Indian lands, and
Government-owned lands, by providing for the use of the broad authority
under 25 U.S.C. 323-328, rather than the limited authorities under
other statutes.
(b) This part specifies:
(1) Conditions and authorities under which we will approve rights-
of-way on or across Indian land;
(2) How to obtain a right-of-way;
(3) Terms and conditions required in rights-of-way;
(4) How we administer and enforce rights-of-ways;
(5) How to renew, amend, assign, and mortgage rights-of-way; and
(6) Whether rights-of-way are required for service line agreements.
(c) This part does not cover rights-of-way on or across tribal
lands within a reservation for the purpose of Federal Power Act
projects, such as constructing, operating, or maintaining dams, water
conduits, reservoirs, powerhouses, transmission lines or other works
which must constitute a part of any project for which a license is
required by the Federal Power Act.
(1) The Federal Power Act provides that any license that must be
issued to use tribal lands within a reservation must be subject to and
contain such conditions as the Secretary deems necessary for the
adequate protection and utilization of such lands (16 U.S.C. 797(e)).
(2) In the case of tribal lands belonging to a tribe organized
under the Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 984), the Federal Power Act
requires that annual charges for the use of such tribal lands under any
license issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission must be
subject to the approval of the tribe (16 U.S.C. 803(e)).
(d) This part does not apply to grants of rights-of-way on tribal
land under a special act of Congress authorizing grants without our
approval under certain conditions.
Sec. 169.002 What terms do I need to know?
Abandonment means the grantee has affirmatively relinquished a
right-of-way (as opposed to relinquishing through non-use).
Assignment means an agreement between a grantee and an assignee,
whereby the assignee acquires all or part of the grantee's rights, and
assumes all
[[Page 34462]]
of the grantee's obligations under a grant.
Avigation hazard easement means the right, acquired by government
through purchase or condemnation from the owner of land adjacent to an
airport, to the use of the air space above a specific height for the
flight of aircraft.
BIA means the Secretary of the Interior or the Bureau of Indian
Affairs within the Department of the Interior and any tribe acting on
behalf of the Secretary or BIA under Sec. 169.007 of this part.
Compensation means something bargained for that is fair and
reasonable under the circumstances of the agreement.
Constructive notice means notice:
(1) Posted at the tribal government office, tribal community
building, and/or the United States Post Office; and
(2) Published in the local newspaper(s) nearest to the affected
land and/or announced on a local radio station(s).
Easement means an interest in land owned by another person,
consisting of the right to use or control, for a specific limited
purpose, the land, or an area above or below it.
Encumbered account means a trust fund account where some portion of
the proceeds are obligated to another party.
Fractional interest means an undivided interest in Indian land
owned as tenancy in common by individual Indian or tribal landowners
and/or fee owners.
Government land means any tract, or interest therein, in which the
surface estate is owned and administered by the United States, not
including Indian land.
Grant means the formal transfer of a right-of-way interest by the
Secretary's approval.
Grantee means a person or entity to whom the Secretary grants a
right-of-way.
Immediate family means, in the absence of a definition under
applicable tribal law, a spouse, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece,
nephew, first cousin, lineal ancestor, lineal descendant, or member of
the household.
Indian means:
(1) Any person who is a member of any Indian tribe, is eligible to
become a member of any Indian tribe, or is an owner as of October 27,
2004, of a trust or restricted interest in land;
(2) Any person meeting the definition of Indian under the Indian
Reorganization Act (25 U.S.C. 479) and the regulations promulgated
thereunder; and
(3) With respect to the inheritance and ownership of trust or
restricted land in the State of California under 25 U.S.C. 2206, any
person described in paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition or any
person who owns a trust or restricted interest in a parcel of such land
in that State.
Indian land means any tract in which any interest in the surface
estate is owned by a tribe or individual Indian in trust or restricted
status and includes both individually owned Indian land and tribal
land.
Indian landowner means a tribe or individual Indian who owns an
interest in Indian land.
Indian tribe or tribe means an Indian tribe under section 102 of
the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C.
479a).
Individually owned Indian land means any tract, or interest
therein, in which the surface estate is owned by an individual Indian
in trust or restricted status.
In-kind compensation means payment is in goods or services rather
than money.
Legal description means that part of the conveyance document of
land or interest in land, which identifies the land or interest to be
affected.
LTRO means the Land Titles and Records Office of BIA.
Map of definite location means a survey plat showing the location,
size, and extent of the right-of-way and other related parcels, with
respect to each affected parcel of individually owned land, tribal
land, or Government land and with respect to the public surveys under
25 U.S.C. 176, 43 U.S.C. 2, and 1764.
Market value means the amount of compensation that a right-of-way
would most probably command in an open and competitive market.
Right-of-way means a legal right to cross tribal land, individually
owned Indian land, or Government land for a specific purpose, including
but not limited to building and operating a line or road. This term may
also refer to the land subject to the grant of right-of-way.
Right-of-way document means a right-of-way grant, renewal,
amendment, assignment, or mortgage of a right-of-way.
Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior or an authorized
representative.
Section 17 corporation means an Indian corporation federally
chartered under section 17 of the Act of June 18, 1934, 25 U.S.C. 476.
Service line means a utility line running from a main line that is
used only for supplying owners or authorized occupants or users of land
with telephone, water, electricity, gas, internet service, or other
home utility service.
Trespass means any unauthorized occupancy, use of, or action on
tribal or individually owned Indian land.
Tribal authorization means a duly adopted tribal resolution, tribal
ordinance, or other appropriate tribal document authorizing the
specified action.
Tribal land means any tract, or interest therein, in which the
surface estate is owned by one or more tribes in trust or restricted
status, and includes such lands reserved for BIA administrative
purposes. The term also includes the surface estate of lands held in
trust for an Indian corporation chartered under section 17 of the Act
of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 988; 25 U.S.C. 477).
Trust account means a tribal account or Individual Indian Money
(IIM) account for trust funds maintained by the Secretary.
Trust or restricted status means:
(1) That the United States holds title to the tract or interest in
trust for the benefit of one or more tribes or individual Indians; or
(2) That one or more tribes or individual Indians holds title to
the tract or interest, but can alienate or encumber it only with the
approval of the United States because of limitations in the conveyance
instrument under Federal law or limitations in Federal law.
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) means
the standards promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of the
Appraisal Foundation to establish requirements and procedures for
professional real property appraisal practice.
Us/we/our means the BIA.
Sec. 169.003 To what land does this part apply?
(a) This part applies to Indian land and Government land.
(1) We will not take any action on a right-of-way across fee land
or collect compensation on behalf of fee interest owners. We will not
condition our grant of a right-of-way across Indian land or Government
land on the applicant having obtained a right-of-way from the owners of
any fee interests. The applicant will be responsible for negotiating
directly with and making any payments directly to the owners of any fee
interests that may exist in the property on which the right-of-way is
granted.
(2) We will not include the fee interests in a tract in calculating
the applicable percentage of interests required for consent to a right-
of-way.
[[Page 34463]]
(b) This paragraph (b) applies if there is a life estate on the
land proposed to be subject to a right-of-way.
(1) Unless otherwise provided in a will creating the life estate,
when all of the trust or restricted interests in a tract are subject to
the same life estate (created by operation of law), the life tenant may
grant a right-of-way over the land without the consent of the owners of
the remainder interests or our approval, for the duration of the life
estate.
(i) The right-of-way will terminate upon the expiration of the life
estate.
(ii) The life tenant must record the right-of-way in the LTRO.
(iii) The grantee must pay compensation directly to the life tenant
under the terms of the right-of-way unless the whereabouts of the life
tenant are unknown, in which case we may collect compensation on behalf
of the life tenant.
(iv) We may monitor the use of the land, as appropriate, and will
enforce the terms of the right-of-way on behalf of the owners of the
remainder interests, but will not be responsible for enforcing the
right-of-way on behalf of the life tenant.
(v) We will not grant a right-of-way on behalf of the owners of the
remainder interests or join in a right-of-way granted by the life
tenant on behalf of the owners of the remainder interests except as
needed to preserve the value of the land.
(2) Unless otherwise provided in a will creating the life estate,
when less than all of the trust or restricted interests in a tract are
subject to a particular life estate (by operation of law), the life
tenant may grant a right-of-way for his or her interest without the
consent of the owners of the remainder interests, for the duration of
the life estate, but the applicant must obtain the consent of the co-
owners and our approval.
(i) The right-of-way over the life interest will terminate upon the
expiration of the life estate.
(ii) We will not grant a right-of-way on the life tenant's behalf.
(iii) The right-of-way must provide that the grantee pays the life
tenant directly, unless the life tenant's whereabouts are unknown in
which case we may collect compensation on behalf of the life tenant.
(iv) The right-of-way must be recorded in the LTRO.
(v) We may monitor the use of the land, as appropriate, and will
enforce the terms of the right-of-way on behalf of the owners of the
remainder interests, but will not be responsible for enforcing the
right-of-way on behalf of the life tenant.
(3) We may grant a right-of-way for longer than the duration of a
life estate with the consent of a majority of the owners of the
remainder interests, and may consent on behalf of undetermined owners
of remainder interests.
(4) Unless otherwise provided in a will creating the life estate,
where the owners of the remainder interests and the life tenant have
not entered into a right-of-way or other written agreement approved by
the Secretary providing for the distribution of rent monies under the
right-of-way, the life tenant will receive payment in accordance with
the distribution and calculation scheme set forth in Part 179 of this
chapter.
(5) The life tenant may not cause or allow permanent injury to the
land.
(6) The life tenant must provide a copy of their right-of-way
consent to us and must record any right-of-way granted under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section in the LTRO.
Sec. 169.004 When do I need a right-of-way to authorize possession
over or across Indian land?
(a) You need an approved right-of-way under this part before
crossing Indian land if you meet one of the criteria in the following
table, unless you are authorized by a land use agreement not subject to
this part (e.g., under 25 CFR part 84) or a lease under 25 CFR part
162, 211, 212, 225, or similar, tribe-specific authority.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
then you must obtain a right-of-
If you are . . . way under this part . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) A person or legal entity (including from us, with the consent of
an independent legal entity owned and the owners of the majority
operated by a tribe or Federal, State, interest in the land before
or local governmental entity) who is crossing the land or any
not an owner of the Indian land. portion thereof.
(2) An Indian landowner of a fractional from us, with the consent of
interest in the land. the owners of other trust and
restricted interests in the
land, totaling at least a
majority interest, unless all
of the owners have given you
permission to cross without a
right-of-way.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) You do not need a right-of-way to cross Indian land if:
(1) You are an Indian landowner who owns 100 percent of the trust
or restricted interests in the land; or
(2) You meet any of the criteria in the following table.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You do not need a right-of-way if you but the following conditions
are . . . apply . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) A parent or guardian of a minor We may require you to provide
child who owns 100 percent of the evidence of a direct benefit
trust or restricted interests in the to the minor child and when
land. the child is no longer a
minor, you must obtain a right-
of-way to authorize continued
possession.
(ii) Authorized by a service line You must file the agreement
agreement to cross the land. with us under Sec. 169.504.
(iii) Otherwise authorized by law You must comply with the
(e.g., a statute, judicial order, or requirements of the applicable
common law authorizes access). statute, judicial order, or
common law.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 169.005 What types of rights-of-way does this part cover?
(a) This part covers rights-of-way over and across Indian or
Government land, for uses including but not limited to the following:
(1) Railroads;
(2) Public roads and highways;
(3) Access roads;
(4) Service roads and trails essential to any other right-of-way
purpose;
(5) Public and community water lines (including pumping stations
and appurtenant facilities);
(6) Public sanitary and storm sewer lines (including sewage
disposal and treatment plant lines);
(7) Water control and use projects (including but not limited to,
flowage easements, irrigation ditches and canals, and water treatment
plant lines);
(8) Oil and gas pipelines;
[[Page 34464]]
(9) Electric transmission and distribution lines (including poles,
towers, and appurtenant facilities);
(10) Telecommunications, broadband, fiber optic lines;
(11) Avigation hazard easements; or
(12) Conservation easements not covered by 25 CFR 84, Encumbrances
of Tribal Land--Contract Approvals, or 25 CFR 162, Leases and Permits.
(b) BIA will grant rights-of-way using the authority in 25 U.S.C.
323-328, and relying on supplementary authority such as 25 U.S.C. 2218,
where appropriate, and this part covers all rights-of-way granted under
that statutory authority. This part also covers existing rights-of-way
that were granted under other statutory authorities prior to the
effective date of this rule, except that if the provisions of the
preexisting right-of-way document conflict with this part, the
provisions of the preexisting right-of-way document govern.
Sec. 169.006 Does this part apply to right-of-way grants I submitted
for approval before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS]?
This part applies to all right-of-way documents. If you submitted
your right-of-way document to us for granting or approval before
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS], the qualifications in paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section also apply.
(a) If we granted or approved your right-of-way document before
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS], this part applies to that right-of-way
document; however, if the provisions of the right-of-way document
conflict with this part, the provisions of the right-of-way document
govern.
(b) If you submitted a right-of-way document but we did not approve
or grant it before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS], then:
(1) We will review the right-of-way document under the regulations
in effect at the time of your submission; and
(2) Once we grant or approve the right-of-way document, this part
applies to that right-of-way document; however, if the provisions of
the right-of-way document conflict with this part, the provisions of
the right-of-way document govern.
Sec. 169.007 May tribes administer this part on BIA's behalf?
A tribe or tribal organization may contract or compact under the
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450f
et seq.) to administer any portion of this part that is not a grant,
approval, or disapproval of a right-of-way document, waiver of a
requirement for right-of-way grant or approval (including but not
limited to waivers of market value and valuation), cancellation of a
right-of-way, or an appeal.
Sec. 169.008 What laws apply to rights-of-way approved under this
part?
(a) In addition to the regulations in this part, rights-of-way
approved under this part:
(1) Are subject to all applicable Federal laws;
(2) Are subject to tribal law, subject to paragraph (b) of this
section; and
(3) Are not subject to State law or the law of a political
subdivision thereof except that:
(i) State law or the law of a political subdivision thereof may
apply in the specific areas and circumstances in Indian country where
the Indian tribe with jurisdiction has made it expressly applicable;
(ii) State law may apply in the specific areas and circumstances in
Indian country where Congress has made it expressly applicable; and
(iii) State law may apply where a Federal court has expressly
applied State law to a specific area or circumstance in Indian country
in the absence of Federal or tribal law.
(b) Tribal laws generally apply to land under the jurisdiction of
the tribe enacting the laws, except to the extent that those tribal
laws are inconsistent with these regulations or other applicable
Federal law. However, these regulations may be superseded or modified
by tribal laws, as long as:
(1) The tribe has notified us of the superseding or modifying
effect of the tribal laws;
(2) The superseding or modifying of the regulation would not
violate a Federal statute or judicial decision, or conflict with our
general trust responsibility under Federal law; and
(3) The superseding or modifying of the regulation applies only to
tribal land.
(c) Unless prohibited by Federal law, the parties to a right-of-way
may subject that right-of-way to State or local law in the absence of
Federal or tribal law, if the Indian landowners expressly agree, in
writing, to the application of State or local law.
(d) An agreement under paragraph (c) of this section does not waive
a tribe's sovereign immunity unless the tribe expressly states its
intention to waive sovereign immunity in its consent to the right-of-
way on tribal land.
(e) A right-of-way is an interest in land, but title does not pass
to the grantee. Unless otherwise expressly stated in its consent to the
right-of-way for tribal land, or in a tribal authorization for a right-
of-way for individually-owned Indian land, the Secretary's grant of a
right-of-way does not diminish to any extent:
(1) The Indian tribe's jurisdiction over the land subject to the
right-of-way;
(2) The power of the Indian tribe to tax the land, any improvements
on the land, or any activity related to, and not inconsistent with, the
right-of-way;
(3) The Indian tribe's authority to enforce tribal law of general
or particular application on the land subject to the right-of-way, as
if there were no grant of right-of-way;
(4) The Indian tribe's inherent sovereign power to exercise civil
jurisdiction over non-members on tribal land by regulating, through
taxation, licensing, or other means, the activities of non-members who
enter into consensual relationships with the Indian tribe or its
members; or
(5) The character of the land subject to the right-of-way as Indian
country under 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Sec. 169.009 What taxes apply to rights-of-way approved under this
part?
(a) Subject only to applicable Federal law, permanent improvements
in a right-of-way, without regard to ownership of those improvements,
are not subject to any fee, tax, assessment, levy, or other charge
imposed by any State or political subdivision of a State. Improvements
may be subject to taxation by the Indian tribe with jurisdiction.
(b) Subject only to applicable Federal law, activities under a
right-of-way grant are not subject to any fee, tax, assessment, levy,
or other charge (e.g., business use, privilege, public utility, excise,
gross revenue taxes) imposed by any State or political subdivision of a
State. Activities may be subject to taxation by the Indian tribe with
jurisdiction.
(c) Subject only to applicable Federal law, the right-of-way or
possessory interest is not subject to any fee, tax, assessment, levy,
or other charge imposed by any State or political subdivision of a
State. Possessory interests may be subject to taxation by the Indian
tribe with jurisdiction.
Sec. 169.010 How does BIA provide notice to the parties to a right-
of-way?
(a) When this part requires us to notify the parties of the status
of our review of a right-of-way document (including but not limited to,
providing notice to the parties of the date of receipt, informing the
parties of the need for additional review time, and informing the
parties that an application package is not complete):
[[Page 34465]]
(1) For rights-of-way affecting tribal land, we will notify the
grantee and the tribe by mail; and
(2) For rights-of-way affecting individually owned Indian land, we
will notify the grantee by mail and, where feasible, the individual
Indian landowners by constructive notice or mail.
(b) When this part requires us to notify the parties of our
determination to approve or disapprove a right-of-way document, and to
provide any right of appeal:
(1) For rights-of-way affecting tribal land, we will notify the
applicant and the tribe by mail; and
(2) For rights-of-way affecting individually owned Indian land, we
will notify the applicant by mail and the individual Indian landowners
by constructive notice, mail, or electronic mail.
Sec. 169.011 May decisions under this part be appealed?
(a) Appeals from BIA decisions under this part may be taken under
part 2 of this chapter, except:
(1) Our decision to disapprove a right-of-way may be appealed only
by an Indian landowner.
(2) Our decision to disapprove any other right-of-way document may
be appealed only by the Indian landowners or the applicant.
(b) For purposes of appeals from BIA decisions under this part,
``interested party'' is defined as any person whose own direct economic
interest is adversely affected by an action or decision.
Sec. 169.012 How does the Paperwork Reduction Act affect this part?
The collections of information in this part have been approved by
the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and
assigned OMB Control Number 1076-NEW. Response is required to obtain a
benefit. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
Subpart B--Obtaining a Right-of-Way
Application
Sec. 169.101 How do I obtain a right-of-way across tribal or
individually owned Indian land?
(a) To obtain a right-of-way across tribal or individually owned
Indian land, you must submit a complete application to the BIA office
with jurisdiction over the land covered by the right-of-way.
(b) If you must obtain access to Indian land to prepare information
required by the application (e.g., to survey), you must obtain the
consent of the Indian landowners in the following manner before
accessing the land, but our approval to access is not required.
(1) For tribal land, you must obtain written authorization or a
permit from the tribe.
(2) For individually owned Indian land, you must notify all Indian
landowners and obtain the consent of the Indian landowners of the
majority interest under Sec. 169.107. Upon written request, we will
provide you with the names, addresses, and percentage of ownership of
individual Indian landowners, to allow you to obtain the landowners'
consent to survey.
(3) If the BIA will be granting the right-of-way across Indian land
under Sec. 169.107(b), then the BIA may grant permission to access the
land.
Sec. 169.102 What must an application for a right-of-way include?
(a) An application for a right-of-way must identify:
(1) The applicant;
(2) The tract(s) or parcel(s) affected by the right-of-way;
(3) The general location of the right-of-way;
(4) The purpose of the right-of-way;
(5) The duration of the right-of-way: and
(6) The ownership of permanent improvements associated with the
right-of-way and the responsibility for constructing, operating,
maintaining, and managing permanent improvements under Sec. 169.105.
(b) The following must be submitted with the application:
(1) An accurate legal description of the right-of-way, its
boundaries, and parcels associated with the right-of-way;
(2) A map of definite location of the right-of-way and existing
facilities adjacent to the proposed project, signed by a professional
surveyor or engineer (this requirement does not apply to easements
covering the entire tract of land);
(3) A bond meeting the requirements of Sec. 169.103;
(4) Record of consent for the right-of-way meeting the requirements
of Sec. 169.106 for tribal land, and Sec. 169.107 for individually
owned Indian land;
(5) If applicable, a valuation meeting the requirements of Sec.
169.111;
(6) If the applicant is a corporation, limited liability company,
partnership, joint venture, or other legal entity, except a tribal
entity, information such as organizational documents, certificates,
filing records, and resolutions, demonstrating that:
(i) The representative has authority to execute the application;
(ii) The right-of-way will be enforceable against the applicant;
and
(iii) The legal entity is in good standing and authorized to
conduct business in the jurisdiction where the land is located;
(7) Environmental and archeological reports, surveys, and site
assessments, as needed to facilitate compliance with applicable Federal
and tribal environmental and land use requirements.
(c) There is no standard application form.
Sec. 169.103 What bond must accompany the application?
(a) You must include payment of a performance bond or alternative
form of security with your application for a right-of-way in an amount
that covers:
(1) The highest annual rental specified in the grant, unless
compensation is a one-time payment;
(2) The estimated damages resulting from the construction of any
permanent improvements;
(3) The operation and maintenance charges for any land located
within an irrigation project; and
(4) The restoration and reclamation of the premises to their
condition at the start of the right-of-way or some other specified
condition.
(b) The performance bond or other security must be deposited with
us and made payable only to us, and may not be modified without our
approval, except for tribal land in which case the bond or security may
be deposited with and made payable to the tribe, and may not be
modified without the approval of the tribe.
(c) The grant will specify the conditions under which we may adjust
the security or performance bond requirements to reflect changing
conditions, including consultation with the tribal landowner for tribal
land before the adjustment.
(d) We may require that the surety provide any supporting documents
needed to show that the performance bond or alternative form of
security will be enforceable, and that the surety will be able to
perform the guaranteed obligations.
(e) The performance bond or other security instrument must require
the surety to provide notice to us at least 60 days before canceling a
performance bond or other security. This will allow us to notify the
grantee of its obligation to provide a substitute performance bond or
other security before the cancellation date. Failure to provide a
substitute performance bond or security is a violation of the right-of-
way.
[[Page 34466]]
(f) We may waive the requirement for a performance bond or
alternative form of security if the Indian landowners of the majority
of the interests request it and we determine a waiver is in the Indian
landowners' best interest. For tribal land, we will defer, to the
maximum extent possible, to the tribe's determination that a waiver of
a performance bond or alternative form of security is in its best
interest.
(g) We will accept a performance bond only in one of the following
forms:
(1) Certificates of deposit issued by a federally insured financial
institution authorized to do business in the United States;
(2) Irrevocable letters of credit issued by a federally insured
financial institution authorized to do business in the United States;
(3) Negotiable Treasury securities; or
(4) Surety bonds issued by a company approved by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury.
(h) We may accept an alternative form of security approved by us
that provides adequate protection for the Indian landowners and us,
including but not limited to an escrow agreement and assigned savings
account.
(i) All forms of performance bonds or alternative security must, if
applicable:
(1) Indicate on their face that BIA approval is required for
redemption;
(2) Be accompanied by a statement granting full authority to BIA to
make an immediate claim upon or sell them if the grantee violates the
right-of-way;
(3) Be irrevocable during the term of the performance bond or
alternative security; and
(4) Be automatically renewable during the term of the right-of-way.
(j) We will not accept cash bonds.
Sec. 169.104 What is the release process for a performance bond or
alternative form of security?
Upon expiration, termination, or cancellation of the right-of-way,
the grantee may ask BIA in writing to release the performance bond or
alternative form of security. Upon receiving the grantee's request, BIA
will:
(a) Confirm with the tribe, for tribal land or, where feasible,
with the Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land, that the
grantee has complied with all grant obligations; and
(b) Release the performance bond or alternative form of security to
the grantee, unless we determine that the bond or security must be
redeemed to fulfill the contractual obligations.
Sec. 169.105 What requirements for due diligence must a right-of-way
grant include?
(a) If permanent improvements are to be constructed, the right-of-
way grant must include due diligence requirements that require the
grantee to complete construction of any permanent improvements within
the schedule specified in the right-of-way grant or general schedule of
construction, and a process for changing the schedule by mutual consent
of the parties. If construction does not occur, or is not expected to
be completed, within the time period specified in the grant, the
grantee must provide the Indian landowners and BIA with an explanation
of good cause as to the nature of any delay, the anticipated date of
construction of facilities, and evidence of progress toward
commencement of construction.
(b) Failure of the grantee to comply with the due diligence
requirements of the grant is a violation of the grant and may lead to
cancellation of the right-of-way under Sec. 169.408.
(c) BIA may waive the requirements in this section if such waiver
is in the best interest of the Indian landowners.
Consent Requirements
Sec. 169.106 Must I obtain tribal consent for a right-of-way across
tribal land?
The applicant must obtain tribal consent, in the form of a tribal
authorization, to a grant of right-of-way across tribal land.
Sec. 169.107 Must I obtain individual Indian landowners' consent to a
grant of right-of-way across individually-owned land?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the
applicant must notify all individual Indian landowners and must obtain
consent from the owners of the majority interest in each tract affected
by the grant of right-of-way.
(b) We may issue the grant of right-of-way without the consent of
any of the individual Indian owners if:
(1) The owners of interests in the land are so numerous that it
would be impracticable to obtain consent;
(2) We determine the grant will cause no substantial injury to the
land or any landowner;
(3) We determine that all of the landowners will be adequately
compensated for consideration and any damages that may arise from a
grant of right-of-way; and
(4) We provide notice of our intent to issue the grant of right-of-
way to all of the owners at least 30 days prior to the date of the
grant using the procedures in Sec. 169.010.
(c) For the purposes of this section, the owners of interests in
the land are so numerous that it would be impracticable to obtain
consent, where there are:
(1) 50 or more, but less than 100, co-owners of undivided trust or
restricted interests, and no one of such co-owners holds a total
undivided trust or restricted interest in the parcel that is greater
than 10 percent of the entire undivided ownership of the parcel; or
(2) 100 or more co-owners of undivided trust or restricted
interests.
(d) The right-of-way will not bind a non-consenting Indian tribe,
except with respect to the tribally owned fractional interest, and the
non-consenting Indian tribe will not be treated as a party to the
right-of-way. Nothing in this paragraph affects the sovereignty or
sovereign immunity of the Indian tribe.
(e) Successors are bound by consent granted by their predecessors-
in-interest.
Sec. 169.108 Who is authorized to consent to a right-of-way?
(a) Indian tribes, adult Indian landowners, and emancipated minors,
may consent to a right-of-way affecting their land, including undivided
interests in fractionated tracts.
(b) The following individuals or entities may consent on behalf of
an individual Indian landowner:
(1) An adult with legal custody acting on behalf of his or her
minor children;
(2) A guardian, conservator, or other fiduciary appointed by a
court of competent jurisdiction to act on behalf of an individual
Indian landowner;
(3) Any person who is authorized to practice before the Department
of the Interior under 43 CFR 1.3(b) and has been retained by the Indian
landowner for this purpose;
(4) BIA, under the circumstances in paragraph (c) of this section;
or
(5) An adult or legal entity who has been given a written power of
attorney that:
(i) Meets all of the formal requirements of any applicable law
under Sec. 169.008;
(ii) Identifies the attorney-in-fact; and
(iii) Describes the scope of the powers granted, to include
granting rights-of-way on land, and any limits on those powers.
(c) BIA may give written consent to a right-of-way, as long as we
determine that the grant will cause no substantial injury to the land
or any landowner, and that consent must be counted in the majority
interest under Sec. 169.107, on behalf of:
(1) The individual owner, if the owner is deceased, and the heirs
to, or devisees of, the interest of the deceased owner have not been
determined;
(2) An individual whose whereabouts are unknown to us, after we
make a
[[Page 34467]]
reasonable attempt to locate the individual;
(3) An individual who is found to be non compos mentis or
determined to be an adult in need of assistance who does not have a
guardian duly appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction, or an
individual under legal disability as defined in part 115 of this
chapter;
(4) An orphaned minor who does not have a guardian duly appointed
by a court of competent jurisdiction; and
(5) An individual who has given us a written power of attorney to
consent to a right-of-way of their land.
Compensation Requirements
Sec. 169.109 How much monetary compensation must be paid for a right-
of-way affecting tribal land?
(a) A right-of-way affecting tribal land may allow for any payment
amount negotiated by the tribe, and we will defer to the tribe and not
require a valuation if the tribe submits a tribal authorization
expressly stating that it:
(1) Has negotiated compensation satisfactory to the tribe;
(2) Waives valuation; and
(3) Has determined that accepting such negotiated compensation and
waiving valuation is in its best interest.
(b) The tribe may request, in writing, that we determine market
value, in which case we will use a valuation in accordance with Sec.
169.111. After providing the tribe with the market value, we will defer
to a tribe's decision to allow for any compensation negotiated by the
tribe.
(c) If the conditions in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section are
not met, we will require that the grantee provide for market value
based on a valuation in accordance with Sec. 169.111.
Sec. 169.110 How much monetary compensation must be paid for a right-
of-way affecting individually owned Indian land?
(a) A right-of-way affecting individually owned Indian land must
require payment of not less than market value before any adjustments,
based on a fixed amount, a percentage of the projected income, or some
other method, unless paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section permit a
lesser amount. The grant must establish how the fixed amount,
percentage, or combination will be calculated and the frequency at
which the payments will be made. Compensation will include market value
and may include additional fees, such as throughput fees, severance
damages, franchise fees, avoidance value, bonuses, or other factors.
(b) We may approve a right-of-way affecting individually owned
Indian land that provides for the payment of nominal compensation, or
less than a market value, if:
(1) The Indian landowners execute a written waiver of the right to
receive market value; and
(2) We determine it is in the Indian landowners' best interest,
based on factors including, but not limited to:
(i) The grantee is a member of the immediate family, as defined in
Sec. 169.002, of an individual Indian landowner;
(ii) The grantee is a co-owner in the affected tract;
(iii) A special relationship or circumstances exist that we believe
warrant approval of the right-of-way; or
(iv) We have waived the requirement for a valuation under paragraph
(d) of this section.
(c) We will require a valuation, unless:
(1) 100 percent of the Indian landowners submit to us a written
request to waive the valuation requirement; or
(2) We waive the requirement under paragraph (d) of this section.
(d) The grant must provide that the non-consenting Indian
landowners, and those on whose behalf we have consented under Sec.
169.108(c), or granted the right-of-way without consent under Sec.
169.107(b), receive market value, as determined by a valuation, unless
we waive the requirement because the tribe or grantee will construct
infrastructure improvements benefitting the Indian landowners, and we
determine it is in the best interest of all the landowners.
Sec. 169.111 How will BIA determine market value for a right-of-way?
(a) We will use a market analysis, appraisal, or other appropriate
valuation method to determine the market value before we grant a right-
of-way affecting individually owned Indian land or, at the request of
the tribe, for tribal land.
(b) We will either:
(1) Prepare, or have prepared, a market analysis, appraisal, or
other appropriate valuation method; or
(2) Use an approved market analysis, appraisal, or other
appropriate valuation method from the Indian landowners or grantee.
(c) We will use or approve use of a market analysis, appraisal, or
other appropriate valuation method only if it:
(1) Has been prepared in accordance with USPAP or a valuation
method developed by the Secretary under 25 U.S.C. 2214 and complies
with Departmental policies regarding appraisals, including third-party
appraisals; or
(2) Has been prepared by another Federal agency.
Sec. 169.112 When are monetary compensation payments due under a
right-of-way?
(a) If compensation is a one-time, lump sum payment, the grantee
must make the payment within 10 days of our grant of the right-of-way.
(b) If compensation is to be paid in increments, the right-of-way
grant must specify the dates on which all payments are due. Payments
are due at the time specified in the grant, regardless of whether the
grantee receives an advance billing or other notice that a payment is
due. Increments may not be more frequent than quarterly.
Sec. 169.113 Must a right-of-way specify who receives monetary
compensation payments?
(a) A right-of-way grant must specify whether the grantee will make
payments directly to the Indian landowners (direct pay) or to us on
their behalf.
(b) The grantee may make payments directly to the Indian landowners
if:
(1) The Indian landowners' trust accounts are encumbered accounts;
(2) There are 10 or fewer beneficial owners; and
(3) One hundred percent of the beneficial owners (including those
on whose behalf we have consented) agree to receive payment directly
from the grantee at the start of the right-of-way.
(c) If the right-of-way document provides that the grantee will
directly pay the Indian landowners, then:
(1) The right-of-way document must include provisions for proof of
payment upon our request.
(2) When we consent on behalf of an Indian landowner, the grantee
must make payment to us on behalf of that landowner.
(3) The grantee must send direct payments to the parties and
addresses specified in the right-of-way, unless the grantee receives
notice of a change of ownership or address.
(4) Unless the right-of-way document provides otherwise, payments
may not be made payable directly to anyone other than the Indian
landowners.
(5) Direct payments must continue through the duration of the
right-of-way, except that:
(i) The grantee must make all Indian landowners' payments to us if
100 percent of the Indian landowners agree to suspend direct pay and
provide us with documentation of their agreement; and
(ii) The grantee must make an individual Indian landowner's payment
to us if that individual Indian landowner dies, is declared non compos
mentis, owes a debt resulting in an encumbered account, or his or her
whereabouts become unknown.
[[Page 34468]]
Sec. 169.114 What form of monetary compensation is acceptable under a
right-of-way?
(a) Our preferred method of payment is electronic funds transfer
payments. We will also accept:
(1) Money orders;
(2) Personal checks;
(3) Certified checks; or
(4) Cashier's checks.
(b) We will not accept cash or foreign currency.
(c) We will accept third-party checks only from financial
institutions or Federal agencies.
Sec. 169.115 May the right-of-way provide for non-monetary or varying
types of compensation?
(a) A right-of-way grant may provide for the following, subject to
the conditions in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section:
(1) Alternative forms of compensation, including but not limited
to, in-kind consideration and payments based on throughput or
percentage of income; or
(2) Varying types of compensation at specific stages during the
life of the right-of-way grant, including but not limited to, fixed
annual payments during construction, payments based on income during an
operational period, and bonuses.
(b) For tribal land, we will defer to the tribe's determination
that the compensation under paragraph (a) of this section is in its
best interest, if the tribe submits a signed certification or tribal
authorization stating that it has determined the compensation under
paragraph (a) of this section to be in its best interest.
(c) For individually owned land, we may grant a right-of-way that
provides for compensation under paragraph (a) of this section if we
determine that it is in the best interest of the Indian landowners.
Sec. 169.116 Will BIA notify a grantee when a payment is due for a
right-of-way?
Upon request of the Indian landowners, we may issue invoices to a
grantee in advance of the dates on which payments are due under the
right-of-way. The grantee's obligation to make these payments in a
timely manner will not be excused if invoices are not issued,
delivered, or received.
Sec. 169.117 Must a right-of-way grant provide for compensation
reviews or adjustments?
(a) For a right-of-way grant affecting tribal land, no periodic
review of the adequacy of compensation or adjustment is required,
unless the tribe negotiates for reviews or adjustments.
(b) For a right-of-way grant of individually owned Indian land, no
periodic review of the adequacy of compensation or adjustment is
required if:
(1) Payment is a one-time lump sum;
(2) The term of the right-of-way grant is 5 years or less;
(3) The grant provides for automatic adjustments; or
(4) We determine it is in the best interest of the Indian
landowners not to require a review or automatic adjustment based on
circumstances including, but not limited to, the following:
(i) The right-of-way grant provides for payment of less than market
value;
(ii) The right-of-way grant provides for most or all of the
compensation to be paid during the first 5 years of the grant term or
before the date the review would be conducted; or
(iii) The right-of-way grant provides for graduated rent or non-
monetary or varying types of compensation.
(c) If the conditions in paragraph (b) of this section are not met,
a review of the adequacy of compensation must occur at least every
fifth year, in the manner specified in the grant. The grant must
specify:
(1) When adjustments take effect;
(2) Who can make adjustments;
(3) What the adjustments are based on; and
(4) How to resolve disputes arising from the adjustments.
(d) When a review results in the need for adjustment of
compensation, the Indian landowners must consent to the adjustment in
accordance with Sec. 169.107, unless the grant provides otherwise.
Sec. 169.118 What other types of payments are required for a right-
of-way?
(a) The grantee may be required to pay additional fees, taxes, and
assessments associated with the use of the land, as determined by
entities having jurisdiction, except as provided in Sec. 169.009. The
grantee must pay these amounts to the appropriate office.
(b) In addition to the compensation for a right-of-way provided for
in paragraph (a) of this section, the applicant for a right-of-way will
be required to pay all damages incident to the survey of the right-of-
way or incident to the construction or maintenance of the facility for
which the right-of-way is granted.
Grants of Rights-of-Way
Sec. 169.119 What is the process for BIA to grant a right-of-way?
(a) Before we grant a right-of-way, we must determine that the
right-of-way is in the best interest of the Indian landowners. In
making that determination, we will:
(1) Review the right-of-way application and supporting documents;
(2) Identify potential environmental impacts and ensure compliance
with all applicable environmental laws, land use laws, and ordinances;
and
(3) Require any modifications or mitigation measures necessary to
satisfy any requirements including any other Federal or tribal land use
requirements.
(b) Upon receiving a right-of-way application, we will promptly
notify the applicant whether the package is complete. A complete
package includes all the information and supporting documents required
under this subpart, including but not limited to, an accurate legal
description for each affected tract, NEPA review documentation and
valuation documentation, where applicable.
(1) If the right-of-way application package is not complete, our
letter will identify the missing information or documents required for
a complete package. If we do not respond to the submission of an
application package, the parties may take action under Sec. 169.304.
(2) If the right-of-way application package is complete, we will
notify the parties of the date of our receipt of the complete package.
Within 60 days of that receipt date, we will grant or deny the right-
of-way, return the package for revision, or inform the applicant in
writing that we need additional review time. If we inform the applicant
in writing that we need additional time, then:
(i) Our letter informing the applicant that we need additional
review time must identify our initial concerns and invite the applicant
to respond within 15 days of the date of the letter; and
(ii) We have 30 days from sending the letter informing the
applicant that we need additional time to grant or deny the right-of-
way.
(c) If we do not meet the deadlines in this section, then the
applicant may take appropriate action under Sec. 169.304.
(d) We will provide any right-of-way grant or denial and the basis
for the determination, along with notification of any appeal rights
under part 2 of this chapter to the parties to the right-of-way. If the
right-of-way is granted, we will provide a copy of the right-of-way to
the tribal landowner and, upon written request, make copies available
to the individual Indian landowners.
[[Page 34469]]
Sec. 169.120 How will BIA determine whether to grant a right-of-way?
(a) We will grant a right-of-way unless:
(1) The required consents have not been obtained from the parties
to the right-of-way under Sec. 169.106 and Sec. 169.107;
(2) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
(3) We find a compelling reason to withhold the grant in order to
protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
(b) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian
landowners' determination that the right-of-way is in their best
interest.
(c) We may not unreasonably withhold our grant of a right-of-way.
(d) We may grant one right-of-way for all of the tracts traversed
by the right-of-way, or we may issue separate grants for one or more
tracts traversed by the right-of-way.
Sec. 169.121 What will the grant of right-of-way contain?
(a) The grant will incorporate the conditions or restrictions set
out in the consents obtained pursuant to Sec. 169.106 for tribal land
and Sec. 169.107 for individually owned Indian land
(b) The grant will state that:
(1) The grantee has no right to any of the products or resources of
the land, including but not limited to, timber, forage, mineral, and
animal resources, unless otherwise provided for in the grant;
(2) BIA may treat any provision of a grant that violates Federal
law as a violation of the grant; and
(3) The grantee must:
(i) Construct and maintain the right-of-way in a professional
manner consistent with industry standards;
(ii) Pay promptly all damages and compensation, in addition to the
performance bond or alternative form of security made pursuant to Sec.
169.103, determined by the BIA to be due the landowners and authorized
users and occupants of land as a result of the granting, construction,
and maintenance of the right-of-way;
(iii) Restore the land as nearly as may be possible to its original
condition, upon the completion of construction, to the extent
compatible with the purpose for which the right-of-way was granted,
unless otherwise negotiated by the parties;
(iv) Clear and keep clear the land within the right-of-way, to the
extent compatible with the purpose of the right-of-way, and dispose of
all vegetative and other material cut, uprooted, or otherwise
accumulated during the construction and maintenance of the project;
(v) Comply with all applicable laws and obtain all required
permits;
(vi) Not commit waste;
(vii) Repair and maintain improvements consistent with the right-
of-way grant;
(viii) Build and maintain necessary and suitable crossings for all
roads and trails that intersect the improvements constructed,
maintained, or operated under the right-of-way;
(ix) Restore land to its original condition, as much as reasonably
possible, upon revocation or termination of the right-of-way, unless
otherwise negotiated by the parties;
(x) At all times keep the BIA informed of the grantee's address;
(xi) Refrain from interfering with the landowner's use of the land,
provided that the landowner's use of the land is not inconsistent with
the right-of-way; and
(xii) Comply with due diligence requirements under Sec. 169.105.
(4) Unless the grantee would be prohibited by law from doing so,
the grantee must also:
(i) Hold the United States and the Indian landowners harmless from
any loss, liability, or damages resulting from the applicant's use or
occupation of the premises; and
(ii) Indemnify the United States and the Indian landowners against
all liabilities or costs relating to the use, handling, treatment,
removal, storage, transportation, or disposal of hazardous materials,
or release or discharge of any hazardous material from the premises
that occurs during the term of the grant, regardless of fault, with the
exception that the applicant is not required to indemnify the Indian
landowners for liability or cost arising from the Indian landowners'
negligence or willful misconduct.
(c) The grant must attach or incorporate by reference maps of
definite location reviewed in accordance with the Standards for Indian
Trust Land Boundary Evidence.
Sec. 169.122 May a right-of-way contain a preference consistent with
tribal law for employment of tribal members?
A grant of right-of-way over Indian land may include a provision,
consistent with tribal law, requiring the grantee to give a preference
to qualified tribal members, based on their political affiliation with
the tribe.
Sec. 169.123 Is a new right-of-way grant required for a new use
within or overlapping an existing right-of-way?
(a) If you propose to use all or a portion of an existing right-of-
way for a use not specified in the original grant of the existing
right-of-way, or not within the same scope of the use specified in the
original grant of the existing right-of-way, you must request a new
right-of-way within or overlapping the existing right-of-way for the
new use.
(b) We may grant a new right-of-way within or overlapping an
existing right-of-way if it meets the following conditions:
(1) The applicant follows the procedures and requirements in this
part to obtain a new right-of-way.
(2) The new right-of-way does not interfere with the use or purpose
of the existing right-of-way or the applicant has obtained the consent
of the existing right-of-way grantee. The existing right-of-way grantee
may not unreasonably withhold consent.
(3) If the existing right-of-way was granted under the Act of March
3, 1901, 25 U.S.C. 311, to a State or local authority for public
highways, before the effective date of this part, we may grant the new
right-of-way only if it is not prohibited by State law.
Sec. 169.124 What is required if the location described in the
original application and grant of right-of-way differs from the
construction location?
(a) If there were engineering or other complications that prevented
construction within the location identified in the original application
and grant, we will determine whether the change in location requires
one or more of the following:
(1) An amended map of definite location;
(2) Landowner consent;
(3) A valuation;
(4) Additional compensation; and/or
(5) A new right-of-way grant.
(b) If we grant a right-of-way for the new route or location, the
applicant must execute instruments to extinguish the right-of-way at
the original location identified in the application.
(c) We will transmit the instruments to extinguish the right-of-way
to the LTRO for recording.
Subpart C--Term, Renewals, Amendments, Assignments, Mortgages
Sec. 169.201 How long may the term of a right-of-way grant be?
(a) All rights-of-way granted under this part are limited to the
time periods stated in the grant.
(b) For tribal land, we will defer to the tribe's determination
that the right-of-way term, including any renewal, is reasonable.
(c) For individually owned Indian land, we will review the right-
of-way
[[Page 34470]]
term, including any renewal, to ensure that it is reasonable, given the
purpose of the right-of-way. We will use the following table as
guidelines for what terms are reasonable given the purpose of the
right-of-way:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose Term
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Railroads....................................... In Perpetuity.
Public roads and highways....................... In Perpetuity.
Access roads.................................... 25 years, with renewal option.
Service roads and trails essential to any other Consistent with use.
right-of-way purpose.
Public and community water lines (including In Perpetuity.
pumping stations and appurtenant facilities).
Utility Gas Lines............................... In Perpetuity.
Public sanitary and storm sewer lines including In Perpetuity.
sewage disposal and treatment plants.
Water control and use projects (including but In Perpetuity.
not limited to dams, reservoirs, flowage
easements, irrigation/ditches and canals and
water treatment plants).
Oil and gas pipelines........................... 20 years.
Electric power projects, generating plants, 50 years.
switchyards, electric transmission and
distribution lines (including poles, towers,
and appurtenant facilities).
Telecommunication lines......................... 30 years.
Broadband or fiber optic lines.................. 30 years.
Avigation hazard easements...................... 20 years.
Conservation easements.......................... Consistent with use.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Unless the right-of-way grant provides otherwise, a right-of-
way may not be extended by holdover.
Sec. 169.202 Under what circumstances will a grant of right-of-way be
renewed?
(a) The grantee may request a renewal (an extension of term without
any other change) of an existing right-of-way grant and we will renew
the grant as long as:
(1) The original right-of-way grant allows for renewal and
specifies any compensation;
(2) The grantee provides us with a signed attestation that there is
no change in size, type, location, or duration of the right-of-way; and
(3) The grantee provides us with confirmation that landowner
consent has been obtained, unless it is not required under paragraph
(b) of this section.
(b) Consent is not required if the original right-of-way grant
allows for renewal without the owners' consent.
(c) We will record any renewal of a right-of-way grant in the LTRO.
(d) If the proposed renewal involves a change in size, type,
location, or duration of the right-of-way, the grantee must reapply for
a new right-of-way, in accordance with Sec. 169.101, and we will
handle the application for renewal as an original application for a
right-of-way.
Sec. 169.203 May a right-of-way be renewed multiple times?
There is no prohibition on renewing a right-of-way multiple times.
Amendments
Sec. 169.204 May a grantee amend a right-of-way?
(a) A grantee may request that we amend a right-of-way grant if the
grantee meets the consent requirements in Sec. 169.106 for tribal land
or Sec. 169.107 for individually owned Indian land and obtains our
approval, except that a grantee may request that we amend a right-of-
way to correct a legal description or make other technical corrections
without meeting consent requirements.
(b) An amendment is required to change any provisions of a right-
of-way grant or to accommodate a change in the location of permanent
improvements to previously unimproved land within the right-of-way
corridor.
Sec. 169.205 What is the approval process for an amendment of a
right-of-way?
(a) When we receive an amendment for our approval, we will notify
the parties of the date we receive it. If our approval is required, we
have 30 days from receipt of the executed amendment, proof of required
consents, and required documentation (including but not limited to a
corrected legal description, if any, and NEPA compliance) to approve or
disapprove the amendment or inform the parties in writing that we need
additional review time. Our determination whether to approve the
amendment will be in writing and will state the basis for our approval
or disapproval.
(b) Our letter informing the parties that we need additional review
time must identify our initial concerns and invite the parties to
respond within 15 days of the date of the letter. We have 30 days from
sending the letter informing the parties that we need additional time
to approve or disapprove the amendment.
(c) If we do not meet the deadline in paragraph (a) of this
section, or paragraph (b) of this section if applicable, the grantee or
Indian landowners may take appropriate action under Sec. 169.304.
Sec. 169.206 How will BIA decide whether to approve an amendment of a
right-of-way?
(a) We may disapprove a request for an amendment of a right-of-way
only if at least one of the following is true:
(1) The Indian landowners have not consented;
(2) The grantee's sureties have not consented;
(3) The grantee is in violation of the right-of-way grant;
(4) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
(5) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order
to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
(b) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian
landowners' determination that the amendment is in their best interest.
(c) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of an amendment.
Assignments
Sec. 169.207 May a grantee assign a right-of-way?
(a) A grantee may assign a right-of-way by meeting the consent
requirements in Sec. 169.106 for tribal land or Sec. 169.107 for
individually owned Indian land and obtaining our approval, or by
meeting the conditions in paragraph (b).
(b) A grantee may assign a right-of-way without BIA approval only
if:
(1) The original right-of-way grant allows for assignment without
BIA approval; and
(2) The assignee and grantee provide a copy of the assignment and
supporting documentation to BIA for recording in the LTRO.
Sec. 169.208 What is the approval process for an assignment of a
right-of-way?
(a) When we receive an assignment for our approval, we will notify
the
[[Page 34471]]
parties of the date we receive it. If our approval is required, we have
30 days from receipt of the executed assignment, proof of required
consents, and required documentation to approve or disapprove the
assignment. Our determination whether to approve the assignment will be
in writing and will state the basis for our approval or disapproval.
(b) If we do not meet the deadline in this section, the grantee or
Indian landowners may take appropriate action under Sec. 169.304.
Sec. 169.209 How will BIA decide whether to approve an assignment of
a right-of-way?
(a) We may disapprove an assignment of a right-of-way only if at
least one of the following is true:
(1) The Indian landowners have not consented and their consent is
required;
(2) The grantee's sureties have not consented;
(3) The grantee is in violation of the right-of-way grant;
(4) The assignee does not agree to be bound by the terms of the
right-of-way grant;
(5) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
(6) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order
to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
(b) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian
landowners' determination that the assignment is in their best
interest.
(c) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of an assignment.
Mortgages
Sec. 169.210 May a grantee mortgage a right-of-way?
A grantee may mortgage a right-of-way by meeting the consent
requirements in Sec. 169.106 for tribal land or Sec. 169.107 for
individually owned Indian land and obtaining our approval.
Sec. 169.211 What is the approval process for a mortgage of a right-
of-way?
(a) When we receive a right-of-way mortgage for our approval, we
will notify the parties of the date we receive it. We have 30 days from
receipt of the executed mortgage, proof of required consents, and
required documentation to approve or disapprove the mortgage. Our
determination whether to approve the mortgage will be in writing and
will state the basis for our approval or disapproval.
(b) If we do not meet the deadline in this section, the grantee or
Indian landowners may take appropriate action under Sec. 169.304.
Sec. 169.212 How will BIA decide whether to approve a mortgage of a
right-of-way?
(a) We may disapprove a right-of-way mortgage only if at least one
of the following is true:
(1) The Indian landowners have not consented;
(2) The grantee's mortgagees or sureties have not consented;
(3) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
(4) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order
to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
(b) In making the finding required by paragraph (a)(4) of this
section, we may consider whether:
(1) The mortgage proceeds would be used for purposes unrelated to
the right-of-way purpose; and
(2) The mortgage is limited to the right-of-way.
(c) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian
landowners' determination that the mortgage is in their best interest.
(d) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of a right-of-way
mortgage.
Subpart D--Effectiveness
Sec. 169.301 When will a right-of-way document be effective?
A right-of-way document will be effective on the date we approve
the right-of-way document, even if an appeal is filed under part 2 of
this chapter.
Sec. 169.302 Must a right-of-way be recorded?
(a) Any right-of-way document must be recorded in our LTRO with
jurisdiction over the affected Indian land.
(1) We will record the right-of-way document immediately following
our approval or granting.
(2) In the case of assignments that do not require our approval
under Sec. 169.207(b), the parties must provide us with a copy of the
assignment and we will record the assignment in the LTRO with
jurisdiction over the affected Indian land.
(b) The tribe must record right-of-way documents for the following
types of rights-of-way in the LTRO with jurisdiction over the affected
Indian lands, even though BIA approval is not required:
(1) Grants on tribal land for a tribal utility that is not a
separate legal entity under Sec. 169.004;
(2) Grants on tribal land under a special act of Congress
authorizing grants without our approval under certain conditions.
Sec. 169.303 What happens if BIA denies a right-of-way document?
If we deny the right-of-way grant, renewal, amendment, assignment,
or mortgage, we will notify the parties immediately and advise the
landowners of their right to appeal the decision under part 2 of this
chapter.
Sec. 169.304 What happens if BIA does not meet a deadline for issuing
a decision on a right-of-way document?
(a) If a Superintendent does not meet a deadline for granting or
denying a right-of-way, renewal, amendment, assignment, or mortgage,
the parties may file a written notice to compel action with the
appropriate Regional Director.
(b) The Regional Director has 15 days from receiving the notice to:
(1) Grant or deny the right-of-way; or
(2) Order the Superintendent to grant or deny the right-of-way
within the time set out in the order.
(c) The parties may file a written notice to compel action with the
BIA Director if:
(1) The Regional Director does not meet the deadline in paragraph
(b) of this section;
(2) The Superintendent does not grant or deny the right-of-way
within the time set by the Regional Director under paragraph (b)(2) of
this section; or
(3) The initial decision on the right-of-way, renewal, amendment,
assignment, or mortgage is with the Regional Director, and he or she
does not meet the deadline for such decision.
(d) The BIA Director has 15 days from receiving the notice to:
(1) Grant or deny the right-of-way; or
(2) Order the Regional Director or Superintendent to grant or deny
the right-of-way within the time set out in the order.
(e) If the Regional Director or Superintendent does not grant or
deny the right-of-way within the time set out in the order under
paragraph (d)(2), then the BIA Director must issue a decision within 15
days from the expiration of the time set out in the order.
(f) The parties may file an appeal from our inaction to the
Interior Board of Indian Appeals if the Director does not meet the
deadline in paragraph (d) or (e) of this section.
(g) The provisions of 25 CFR 2.8 do not apply to the inaction of
BIA officials with respect to a granting or denying a right-of-way,
renewal, amendment, assignment, or mortgage under this subpart.
[[Page 34472]]
Sec. 169.305 Will BIA require an appeal bond for an appeal of a
decision on a right-of-way document?
(a) If a party appeals our decision on a right-of-way document,
then the official to whom the appeal is made may require the appellant
to post an appeal bond in accordance with part 2 of this chapter. We
will not require an appeal bond if the tribe is a party to the appeal
and requests a waiver of the appeal bond.
(b) The appellant may not appeal the appeal bond decision. The
appellant may, however, request that the official to whom the appeal is
made reconsider the bond decision, based on extraordinary
circumstances. Any reconsideration decision is final for the
Department.
Subpart E--Compliance and Enforcement
Sec. 169.401 What is the purpose and scope of this subpart?
This subpart describes the procedures we use to address compliance
and enforcement related to rights-of-way on Indian land. Any
abandonment, non-use, or violation of the right-of-way grant, including
but not limited to encroachments beyond the defined boundaries,
accidental, willful, and/or incidental trespass, unauthorized new
construction or changes in use, and late or insufficient payment may
result in enforcement actions.
Sec. 169.402 May BIA investigate compliance with a right-of-way?
BIA may investigate compliance with a right-of-way.
(a) If an Indian landowner notifies us that a specific abandonment,
non-use, or violation has occurred, we will promptly initiate an
appropriate investigation.
(b) We may enter the Indian land subject to a right-of-way at any
reasonable time, upon reasonable notice, and consistent with any notice
requirements under applicable tribal law and applicable grant
documents, to protect the interests of the Indian landowners and to
determine if the grantee is in compliance with the requirements of the
right-of-way.
Sec. 169.403 May a right-of-way provide for negotiated remedies?
(a) The tribe and the grantee on tribal land may negotiate remedies
for the event of a violation, abandonment, or non-use. The negotiated
remedies must be stated in the tribe's consent to the right-of-way
grant. The negotiated remedies may include, but are not limited to, the
power to terminate the right-of-way grant. If the negotiated remedies
provide one or both parties with the power to terminate the grant:
(1) BIA approval of the termination is not required;
(2) The termination is effective without BIA cancellation; and
(3) The Indian landowners must provide us with written notice of
the termination so that we may record it in the LTRO.
(b) The Indian landowners and the grantee to a right-of-way grant
on individually owned Indian land may negotiate remedies, so long as
the consent also specifies the manner in which those remedies may be
exercised by or on behalf of the Indian landowners of the majority
interest under Sec. 169.107 of this part. If the negotiated remedies
provide one or both parties with the power to terminate the grant:
(1) BIA concurrence with the termination is required to ensure that
the Indian landowners of the applicable percentage of interests have
consented; and
(2) BIA will record the termination in the LTRO.
(c) The parties must notify any surety or mortgagee of any
violation that may result in termination and the termination of a
right-of-way.
(d) Negotiated remedies may apply in addition to, or instead of,
the cancellation remedy available to us, as specified in the right-of-
way grant. The landowners may request our assistance in enforcing
negotiated remedies.
(e) A right-of-way grant may provide that violations will be
addressed by a tribe, and that disputes will be resolved by a tribal
court, any other court of competent jurisdiction, or by a tribal
governing body in the absence of a tribal court, or through an
alternative dispute resolution method. We may not be bound by decisions
made in such forums, but we will defer to ongoing actions or
proceedings, as appropriate, in deciding whether to exercise any of the
remedies available to us.
Sec. 169.404 What will BIA do about a violation of a right-of-way
grant?
(a) In the absence of actions or proceedings described in Sec.
169.403 (negotiated remedies), or if it is not appropriate for us to
defer to the actions or proceedings, we will follow the procedures in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b) If we determine there has been a violation of the conditions of
a grant, other than a violation of payment provisions covered by
paragraph (c) of this section, we will promptly send the grantee a
written notice of violation.
(1) We will send a copy of the notice of violation to the tribe for
tribal land, or provide constructive notice to Indian landowners for
individually owned Indian land.
(2) The notice of violation will advise the grantee that, within 10
business days of the receipt of a notice of violation, the grantee
must:
(i) Cure the violation and notify us, and the tribe for tribal
land, in writing that the violation has been cured;
(ii) Dispute our determination that a violation has occurred; or
(iii) Request additional time to cure the violation.
(3) The notice of violation may order the grantee to cease
operations under the right-of-way grant.
(c) A grantee's failure to pay compensation in the time and manner
required by a right-of-way grant is a violation, and we will issue a
notice of violation in accordance with this paragraph.
(1) We will send the grantees a written notice of violation
promptly following the date on which the payment was due.
(2) We will send a copy of the notice of violation to the tribe for
tribal land, or provide constructive notice to the Indian landowners
for individually owned Indian land.
(3) The notice of violation will require the grantee to provide
adequate proof of payment.
(d) The grantee will continue to be responsible for the obligations
in the grant until the grant expires, or is terminated or cancelled.
Sec. 169.405 What will BIA do if the grantee does not cure a
violation of a right-of-way grant on time?
(a) If the grantee does not cure a violation of a right-of-way
grant within the required time period, or provide adequate proof of
payment as required in the notice of violation, we will consult with
the tribe for tribal land or, where feasible, with Indian landowners
for individually owned Indian land, and determine whether:
(1) We should cancel the grant;
(2) The Indian landowners wish to invoke any remedies available to
them under the grant;
(3) We should invoke other remedies available under the grant or
applicable law, including collection on any available performance bond
or, for failure to pay compensation, referral of the debt to the
Department of the Treasury for collection; or
(4) The grantee should be granted additional time in which to cure
the violation.
(b) Following consultation with the tribe for tribal land or, where
feasible, with Indian landowners for individually
[[Page 34473]]
owned Indian land, we may take action to recover unpaid compensation
and any associated late payment charges.
(1) We do not have to cancel the grant or give any further notice
to the grantee before taking action to recover unpaid compensation.
(2) We may still take action to recover any unpaid compensation if
we cancel the grant.
(c) If we decide to cancel the grant, we will send the grantee a
cancellation letter by certified mail, return receipt requested, within
5 business days of our decision. We will send a copy of the
cancellation letter to the tribe for tribal land, and will provide
Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land with actual or
constructive notice of the cancellation. The cancellation letter will:
(1) Explain the grounds for cancellation;
(2) If applicable, notify the grantee of the amount of any unpaid
compensation or late payment charges due under the grant;
(3) Notify the grantee of the grantee's right to appeal under part
2 of this chapter, including the possibility that the official to whom
the appeal is made may require the grantee to post an appeal bond;
(4) Order the grantee to vacate the property within 31 days of the
date of receipt of the cancellation letter, if an appeal is not filed
by that time; and
(5) Order the grantee to take any other action BIA deems necessary
to protect the Indian landowners.
(d) We may invoke any other remedies available to us under the
grant, including collecting on any available performance bond, and the
Indian landowners may pursue any available remedies under tribal law.
Sec. 169.406 Will late payment charges, penalties, or special fees
apply to delinquent payments due under a right-of-way grant?
(a) Late payment charges and penalties will apply as specified in
the grant. The failure to pay these amounts will be treated as a
violation.
(b) We may assess the following special fees to cover
administrative costs incurred by the United States in the collection of
the debt, if compensation is not paid in the time and manner required,
in addition to the late payment charges that must be paid to the Indian
landowners under the grant:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The grantee will pay . . . For . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) $50.00........................ Any dishonored check.
(2) $15.00........................ Processing of each notice or demand
letter.
(3) 18 percent of balance due..... Treasury processing following
referral for collection of
delinquent debt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 169.407 How will payment rights relating to a right-of-way grant
be allocated?
The right-of-way grant may allocate rights to payment for any
proceeds, trespass damages, condemnation awards, settlement funds, and
other payments between the Indian landowners and the grantee. If not
specified in the grant, applicable policy, order, award, judgment, or
other document, the Indian landowners or grantees will be entitled to
receive these payments.
Sec. 169.408 What is the process for cancelling a right-of-way for
non-use or abandonment?
(a) We may cancel, in whole or in part, any rights-of-way granted
under this part 30 days after mailing written notice to the grantee at
its latest address, for any of the following causes:
(1) A nonuse of the right-of-way for a consecutive 2-year period
for the purpose for which it was granted; or
(2) An abandonment of the right-of-way.
(b) If the grantee fails to correct the basis for cancellation by
the 30th day after we mailed the notice, we will issue an appropriate
instrument cancelling the right-of-way and transmit it to the office of
record pursuant to 25 CFR part 150 for recording and filing.
Sec. 169.409 When will a cancellation of a right-of-way grant be
effective?
(a) A cancellation involving a right-of-way grant will not be
effective until 31 days after the grantee receives a cancellation
letter from us, or 41 days from the date we mailed the letter,
whichever is earlier.
(b) The cancellation decision will not be effective if an appeal is
filed unless the cancellation is made immediately effective under part
2 of this chapter. While a cancellation decision is ineffective, the
grantee must continue to pay compensation and comply with the other
terms of the grant.
Sec. 169.410 What will BIA do if a grantee remains in possession
after a right-of-way expires or is terminated or cancelled?
If a grantee remains in possession after the expiration,
termination, or cancellation of a right-of-way, we may treat the
unauthorized possession as a trespass under applicable law in
consultation with the Indian landowners. Unless the Indian landowners
of the applicable percentage of interests under Sec. 169.106 or
169.107 have notified us in writing that they are engaged in good faith
negotiations with the holdover grantee to renew or obtain a new right-
of-way, we may take action to recover possession on behalf of the
Indian landowners, and pursue any additional remedies available under
applicable law, such as a forcible entry and detainer action.
Sec. 169.411 Will BIA appeal bond regulations apply to cancellation
decisions involving right-of-way grants?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the appeal
bond provisions in part 2 of this chapter will apply to appeals from
right-of-way cancellation decisions.
(b) The grantee may not appeal the appeal bond decision. The
grantee may, however, request that the official to whom the appeal is
made reconsider the appeal bond decision, based on extraordinary
circumstances. Any reconsideration decision is final for the
Department.
Sec. 169.412 What if an individual or entity takes possession of or
uses Indian land without a right-of-way or other proper authorization?
If an individual or entity takes possession of, or uses, Indian
land without a right-of-way and a right-of-way is required, the
unauthorized possession or use is a trespass. An unauthorized use
within an existing right-of-way is also a trespass. We may take action
to recover possession, including eviction, on behalf of the Indian
landowners and pursue any additional remedies available under
applicable law. The Indian landowners may pursue any available remedies
under applicable law.
Subpart F--Service Line Agreements
Sec. 169.501 Is a right-of-way required for service lines?
A right-of-way is not required for service lines. Service line
agreements are for the purpose of supplying the owners (or authorized
occupants or users, as demonstrated by a lease or tribal authorization)
of tribal or
[[Page 34474]]
individually owned Indian land with utilities for use by such owners
(or occupants or users) on the premises. A service line agreement
should address the mitigation of any damages incurred during
construction and the restoration of the premises at the termination of
the agreement.
Sec. 169.502 What are the consent requirements for service line
agreements?
(a) Before the applicant may begin any work to construct service
lines across tribal land, the applicant and the tribe (or the legally
authorized occupants or users of the tribal land and the tribe) must
execute a service line agreement.
(b) Before the applicant may begin any work to construct service
lines across individually owned land, the applicant and the owners (or
the legally authorized occupants or users) must execute a service line
agreement.
Sec. 169.503 Is a valuation required for service line agreements?
We do not require a valuation for service line agreements.
Sec. 169.504 Must I file service line agreements with the BIA?
The parties must file an executed copy of service line agreements,
together with a plat or diagram, with us within 30 days after the date
of execution for recording in the LTRO. The plat or diagram must show
the boundary of the ownership parcel and point of connection with the
distribution line. When the plat or diagram is placed on a separate
sheet it must include the signatures of the parties.
Dated: June 2, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-13964 Filed 6-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-6W-P