Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Revolving Loan Fund Reporting and Compliance Requirements, 34284-34285 [2014-13938]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
34284
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Notices
companies will receive a mailed
notification letter containing their User
ID and password, and directed to
respond via Centurion through the
Census Bureau’s Business Help Site.
The online reporting instrument is an
electronic version of the paper data
collection instrument, and based on the
company’s diversity of operations and
number of industries with payroll.
Companies operating in only one
industry will access an ICT–1(S) form or
electronic instrument. These companies
will not be asked to report ICT
expenditures by industry, this will
eliminate the need for industry self
coding. Companies operating in more
than one, but less than nine industries
will access an ICT–1(M) form or
electronic instrument. Companies that
operate in nine or more industries will
access an ICT–1(L) form or electronic
instrument. Companies will be able to
print the form through online services
or request a paper form by mail.
The Census Bureau will continue to
ask companies to respond to the survey
within 30 days. Reminder letters and/or
telephone calls encouraging
participation will continue to go to all
companies that have not responded by
the designated time.
For the 2014 and 2015 ICTS data
collection, the Census Bureau will
determine whether to use the same data
collection strategy based upon the
electronic response rate for the 2013
ICTS.
The ICTS is an important part of the
Federal Government’s effort to improve
and supplement ongoing statistical
programs. The Bureau of Economic
Analysis (BEA), Federal Reserve Board,
Bureau of Labor Statistics and industry
analysts use these data to evaluate
productivity and economic growth
prospects. In addition, the ICTS
provides improved source data
significant to BEA’s estimate of the
investment component of Gross
Domestic Product, capital stock
estimates, and capital flow tables. Other
Federal agencies, private industry
organizations, and academic researchers
use the survey results for analyzing and
studying past and current economic
performance, short-term economic
forecasts, productivity, long-term
economic growth, tax policy, capacity
utilization, business fixed capital stocks
and capital formation, international
competitiveness and competitiveness
and trade policy, market research, and
financial analysis.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit, Not-for-profit institutions.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 Jun 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
Legal Authority: The Census Bureau
conducts this survey under the authority of
Title 13 of the United States Code, Sections
131 and 182. Sections 224 and 225 make the
survey mandatory.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.OIRA Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: June 10, 2014.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–13884 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Revolving Loan
Fund Reporting and Compliance
Requirements
Economic Development
Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to: Philip Saputo, Program
Analyst, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Economic Development Administration
Performance and National Programs
Division, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Suite 71030, Washington, DC
20230, Phone: 202–400–0662, Email:
PSaputo@eda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Abstract
The mission of the Economic
Development Administration (EDA) is
to lead the federal economic
development agenda by promoting
innovation and competitiveness,
preparing American regions for growth
and success in the worldwide economy.
One of EDA’s economic development
tools is the Revolving Loan Fund (RLF)
program. Under the RLF program, EDA’s
regional offices award competitive
grants to units of state and local
government, institutions of higher
education, public or private non-profit
organizations, EDA-approved economic
development district organizations, and
Indian Tribes to establish RLFs.
Following grant award, an RLF grantee
disburses money from the RLF to make
loans at interest rates that are at or
below the current market rate to small
businesses or to businesses that cannot
otherwise borrow capital. On occasion,
RLFs also make loans to finance public
infrastructure. As the loans are repaid,
the grantee uses a portion of interest
earned to pay administrative expenses
and adds the remaining principal and
interest repayments to the RLF’s capital
base to make new loans. An RLF award
that is well managed is actively used to
make loans to eligible businesses and
entities, continues to revolve funds, and
does not have a termination date.
One of the unique features of the
program is that, by law, EDA must
exercise fiduciary responsibility over its
RLF portfolio in perpetuity—a
significant challenge since many RLF
grants date back to 1979. EDA’s
regulations therefore require EDA RLF
grantees to submit an ED–209, Semiannual Report to EDA, every six months
for each RLF they operate. In addition,
EDA RLF grantees must submit an ED–
209I, RLF Income and Expense
Statement, if either of the following
conditions applies to their RLF: (a) Total
administrative expenses for the 6-month
period exceed $100,000, or (b)
administrative expenses for the 6-month
period exceed 50 percent of RLF income
for the 6-month period. EDA requires
that both of these reports be completed
using EDA authorized and provided,
standardized, auto calculable Fillable
PDF (Portable Document Format) Forms,
instead of using the web-based
electronic reporting system previously
available, known as Revolving Loan
Fund Management System (RLFMS). As
of January 24, 2012, EDA terminated
network services, including RLFMS, in
response to a significant information
technology security incident and has
suspended use of RLFMS and will use
a digital fillable PDF of the ED–209 and
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Notices
ED–209I in lieu of the RLFMS web
based ED–209 and ED209I.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
II. Method of Collection
[Docket B–26–2014]
Electronically via use of standardized
auto calculable PDF forms, provided by
the EDA and sent via email.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0610–0095.
Form Number(s): ED–209 and ED–
209I.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Affected Public: Not for-profit
institutions; state or local governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,460.
Estimated Time per Response: ED–
209, 3 hours; and ED–209I, 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,796.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: June 10, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 39—DallasFort Worth, Texas Application for
Production Authority; CSI Calendering,
Inc. (Rubber Coated Textile Fabric);
Comment Period on Submission of
New Evidence
On March 18, 2014, an application
was submitted by the Dallas/Fort Worth
International Airport Board, grantee of
FTZ 39, requesting production authority
on behalf of CSI Calendering, Inc. (CSI),
located in Arlington, Texas. The
proposed activity involves calendering,
slitting, and laminating of certain RFL
(resorcinol formaldehyde latex) textile
fabrics (79 FR 16278–16279, 3–25–
2014). Comments on the proposal were
submitted by interested parties on May
27, 2014. Currently, the FTZ Board is
inviting public comment on new
evidence provided by CSI as part of its
rebuttal comments submitted on June 6,
2014, on which there has not been an
opportunity for public comment.
The comment period on CSI’s June 6
submission is open through July 16,
2014. Submissions shall be addressed to
the FTZ Board’s Executive Secretary at
the following address: Office of the
Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade
Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230–0002.
A copy of CSI’s June 6, 2014,
submission will be available for public
inspection at the address above, and in
the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ
Board’s Web site, which is accessible
via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further
information, contact Pierre Duy at
Pierre.Duy@trade.gov or (202) 482–1378.
Dated: June 9, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–14062 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–916]
[FR Doc. 2014–13938 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]
Laminated Woven Sacks From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 Jun 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34285
On February 27, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
Preliminary Results 1 of the 2012–2013
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on laminated
woven sacks (‘‘sacks’’) from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The period
of review (‘‘POR’’) is August 1, 2012,
through July 31, 2013. We gave
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the Preliminary Results,
but we received none. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for
the PRC-wide entity is listed in the
‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section
below.
DATES: Effective Date: June 16, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–6905.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
We received no comments from
interested parties on our Preliminary
Results which published on February
27, 2014. The Department conducted
this administrative review in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is laminated woven sacks. Laminated
woven sacks are bags or sacks consisting
of one or more plies of fabric consisting
of woven polypropylene strip and/or
woven polyethylene strip, regardless of
the width of the strip; with or without
an extrusion coating of polypropylene
and/or polyethylene on one or both
sides of the fabric; laminated by any
method either to an exterior ply of
plastic film such as biaxially-oriented
polypropylene (‘‘BOPP’’) or to an
exterior ply of paper that is suitable for
high quality print graphics; 2 printed
with three colors or more in register;
with or without lining; whether or not
closed on one end; whether or not in
roll form (including sheets, lay-flat
1 See Laminated Woven Sacks From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 79 FR 11075 (February 27, 2014)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 ‘‘Paper suitable for high quality print graphics,’’
as used herein, means paper having an ISO
brightness of 82 or higher and a Sheffield
Smoothness of 250 or less. Coated free sheet is an
example of a paper suitable for high quality print
graphics.
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 115 (Monday, June 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34284-34285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13938]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Revolving Loan
Fund Reporting and Compliance Requirements
AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to: Philip Saputo, Program Analyst, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Economic Development Administration Performance and National
Programs Division, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Suite 71030,
Washington, DC 20230, Phone: 202-400-0662, Email: PSaputo@eda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The mission of the Economic Development Administration (EDA) is to
lead the federal economic development agenda by promoting innovation
and competitiveness, preparing American regions for growth and success
in the worldwide economy. One of EDA's economic development tools is
the Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) program. Under the RLF program, EDA's
regional offices award competitive grants to units of state and local
government, institutions of higher education, public or private non-
profit organizations, EDA-approved economic development district
organizations, and Indian Tribes to establish RLFs. Following grant
award, an RLF grantee disburses money from the RLF to make loans at
interest rates that are at or below the current market rate to small
businesses or to businesses that cannot otherwise borrow capital. On
occasion, RLFs also make loans to finance public infrastructure. As the
loans are repaid, the grantee uses a portion of interest earned to pay
administrative expenses and adds the remaining principal and interest
repayments to the RLF's capital base to make new loans. An RLF award
that is well managed is actively used to make loans to eligible
businesses and entities, continues to revolve funds, and does not have
a termination date.
One of the unique features of the program is that, by law, EDA must
exercise fiduciary responsibility over its RLF portfolio in
perpetuity--a significant challenge since many RLF grants date back to
1979. EDA's regulations therefore require EDA RLF grantees to submit an
ED-209, Semi-annual Report to EDA, every six months for each RLF they
operate. In addition, EDA RLF grantees must submit an ED-209I, RLF
Income and Expense Statement, if either of the following conditions
applies to their RLF: (a) Total administrative expenses for the 6-month
period exceed $100,000, or (b) administrative expenses for the 6-month
period exceed 50 percent of RLF income for the 6-month period. EDA
requires that both of these reports be completed using EDA authorized
and provided, standardized, auto calculable Fillable PDF (Portable
Document Format) Forms, instead of using the web-based electronic
reporting system previously available, known as Revolving Loan Fund
Management System (RLFMS). As of January 24, 2012, EDA terminated
network services, including RLFMS, in response to a significant
information technology security incident and has suspended use of RLFMS
and will use a digital fillable PDF of the ED-209 and
[[Page 34285]]
ED-209I in lieu of the RLFMS web based ED-209 and ED209I.
II. Method of Collection
Electronically via use of standardized auto calculable PDF forms,
provided by the EDA and sent via email.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0610-0095.
Form Number(s): ED-209 and ED-209I.
Type of Review: Regular submission (extension of a current
information collection).
Affected Public: Not for-profit institutions; state or local
governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,460.
Estimated Time per Response: ED-209, 3 hours; and ED-209I, 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,796.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: June 10, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-13938 Filed 6-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-24-P