Special Conditions: Airbus Model A350-900 Series Airplane; Composite Fuselage In-Flight Fire/Flammability Resistance, 33677-33679 [2014-13665]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 113 / Thursday, June 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Side-Facing Seats Conditions
(HIC) assessments are only required for
head contact with the seat and/or
adjacent structures.
2. Body-to-Wall/Furnishing Contact:
Under the load condition defined in
§ 25.562(b)(2), the seat must be installed
aft of a structure such as an interior wall
or furnishing that will support the
pelvis, upper arm, chest, and head of an
occupant seated next to the structure. A
conservative representation of the
structure and its stiffness must be
included in the tests.
3. Thoracic Trauma: Under the load
condition defined in § 25.562(b)(2),
thoracic-trauma index (TTI) injury
criterion must be substantiated by
dynamic test or by rational analysis
based on previous test(s) of a similar
seat installation. Testing must be
conducted with a side-impact dummy
(SID), as defined by Title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 572,
subpart F, or its equivalent. TTI must be
less than 85, as defined in 49 CFR part
572, subpart F. The SID TTI data must
be processed as defined in Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
part 571.214, section S6.13.5.
4. Pelvis: Under the load condition
defined in § 25.562(b)(2), pelvic lateral
acceleration must be shown, by
dynamic test or by rational analysis
based on previous test(s) of a similar
seat installation, to not exceed 130g.
Pelvic acceleration data must be
processed as defined in FMVSS part
571.214, section S6.13.5.
5. Shoulder Strap Loads: Where upper
torso straps (shoulder straps) are used
for occupants, tension loads in
individual straps must not exceed 1,750
pounds. If dual straps are used for
restraining the upper torso, the total
strap tension loads must not exceed
2,000 pounds.
6. Neck Injury Criteria: The seating
system must protect the occupant from
experiencing serious neck injury. In this
regard, neck injury must be evaluated to
the criteria provided in Policy
Statement PS–ANM–25–03–R1,
Attachment 1, Section 2.f.
7. Leg Injury Criteria: Axial rotation of
the upper leg must be limited to 35
degrees in either direction from the
nominal seated position.
8. Spine: The shoulders must remain
aligned with the hips throughout the
impact sequence, or until the spinal
loads (in either tension or compression)
drop below the value that would be
injurious.
Proposed Injury Criteria
1. Existing Criteria: All injuryprotection criteria of § 25.562(c)(1)
through (c)(6) apply to the occupant of
a side-facing seat. Head-injury criterion
General Test Guidelines
1. Longitudinal test(s), as necessary
with the SID anthropomorphic test
dummy (ATD), or as necessary EuroSID
ATD, undeformed floor, no yaw, and
configuration nor is this configuration
specifically addressed by policy
statement PS–ANM–25–03–R1 (which is
intended to address fully side-facing
seats i.e., 90 degree installation angle).
However, we believe the occupantinjury criteria conveyed in this policy
statement is germane to this type of
configuration when it comes to
evaluating neck and leg injuries. Due to
the unique seat installation angle, the
revised special conditions also include
spinal-loading injury criteria.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Boeing
Model 787–9 airplane. Should Boeing
apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
Under standard practice, the effective
date of final special conditions would
be 30 days after the date of publication
in the Federal Register; however, as the
certification date for the Boeing Model
787–9 airplane is imminent, the FAA
finds that good cause exists to make
these special conditions effective upon
publication in the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the type-certification
basis for Boeing Model 787–9 airplanes
modified by Boeing.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:18 Jun 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33677
with all lateral structural supports
(armrests/walls).
Pass/fail injury assessments: TTI
pelvic acceleration, neck, leg, and spine
injury.
2. One longitudinal test with the
Hybrid II ATD, deformed floor, with 10
degrees yaw, and with all lateral
structural supports (armrests/walls).
Pass/fail injury assessments: HIC; and
upper torso restraint load, restraint
system retention, and pelvic
acceleration.
3. Vertical (14g) test is to be
conducted with modified Hybrid II
ATDs with existing pass/fail criteria.
Note: Boeing must demonstrate that the
installation of seats via plinths or pallets
meets all applicable requirements.
Compliance with the guidance contained in
FAA Policy Memorandum PS–ANM–100–
2000–00123, dated February 2, 2000, titled
‘‘Guidance for Demonstrating Compliance
with Seat Dynamic Testing for Plinths and
Pallets,’’ is acceptable to the FAA.
Inflatable Lapbelt Conditions
If inflatable lapbelts are installed on
single-place side-facing seats, the
inflatable lapbelt(s) must meet special
conditions 25–431–SC.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 12,
2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–13664 Filed 6–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0898 Special
Conditions No. 25–526–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A350–900 Series Airplane; Composite
Fuselage In-Flight Fire/Flammability
Resistance
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for Airbus Model A350–900
series airplanes. These airplanes will
have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with the in-flight fire and
flammability resistance of the composite
fuselage. Experience has shown that
eliminating fire propagation on the
surface of interior and insulating
materials enhances survivability since
the threats from an in-flight fire (e.g.,
toxic gas emission and smoke
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
33678
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 113 / Thursday, June 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
obscuration) are typically by-products of
a propagating fire. The Airbus Model
A350–900 series airplanes must provide
protection against an in-flight fire
propagating along the surface of the
fuselage. Special conditions are needed
to address this design feature. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective July 14, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Gardlin, FAA, Airframe/Cabin Safety,
ANM–115, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington, 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–2136; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied
for a type certificate for their new Model
A350–900 series airplane. Later, Airbus
requested and the FAA approved an
extension to the application for FAA
type certification to June 28, 2009. The
Model A350–900 series has a
conventional layout with twin wingmounted Rolls Royce Trent engines. It
features a twin aisle 9-abreast economy
class layout, and accommodates side-byside placement of LD–3 containers in
the cargo compartment. The basic
Model A350–900 series configuration
will accommodate 315 passengers in a
standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with
a Maximum Take-Off Weight of 602,000
lbs.
Experience has shown that
eliminating fire propagation on the
surface of interior and insulating
materials enhances survivability since
the threats from an in-flight fire (e.g.,
toxic gas emission and smoke
obscuration) are typically by-products of
a propagating fire. The Airbus Model
A350–900 series airplane must provide
protection against an in-flight fire
propagating along the surface of the
fuselage.
In the past, fatal in-flight fires have
originated in inaccessible areas of the
aircraft where the thermal/acoustic
insulation located adjacent to the
aluminium aircraft skin has been the
path for flame propagation and fire
growth. Concern over the fire
performance of thermal/acoustic
insulation was initially raised by five
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:18 Jun 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
incidents in the 1990’s which revealed
unexpected flame spread along the
insulation film covering material. In all
cases, the ignition source was relatively
modest and, in most cases, was
electrical in origin (e.g., electrical short
circuit, arcing caused by chafed wiring,
ruptured ballast case). From 1972 until
2003 these materials were required to
comply with a basic ‘‘Bunsen burner’’
requirement per Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.853(a),
25.855(d), and part 25, Appendix F, part
I, paragraph (a)(1)(ii). These
requirements prescribed that insulation
materials must be self-extinguishing
after having been subjected to the flame
of a Bunsen burner for 12 seconds, in
accordance with the procedures defined
in part 25, Appendix F, part I, paragraph
(b)(4). The average burn was not to
exceed eight inches and the average
flame time after removal of the flame
source was not to exceed 15 seconds.
Drippings from the test specimen were
not to continue to flame for more than
an average of five seconds after falling.
Further concern with the flammability
of thermal/acoustic insulation was
raised by the Transportation Safety
Board (TSB) of Canada during their
investigation of the fatal Swiss Air MD–
11 in-flight fire accident that occurred
in September 1998 and involved 229
fatalities. TSB investigators reported
that the fatal fire appeared to have been
confined to the area above the cockpit
and forward cabin ceiling and involved
the insulation blankets. On August 21,
2001, the TSB recommended that
flammability standards for interior
materials should be based on realistic
ignition scenarios and prevent the use of
materials that sustain or propagate a
fire.
In 1996, the FAA Technical Center
began a program to develop new fire test
criteria for insulation films directly
relating to the resistance of in-flight fire
propagation. The current test standard
was evaluated as well as another smallscale test method that has been used by
airplane manufacturers to evaluate
flame propagation on thermal/acoustic
insulation materials. An inter-laboratory
comparison of these methods revealed a
number of deficiencies. Other smallscale tests developed by the FAA
Technical Center did demonstrate that
some insulation films would ignite and
propagate flame in a confined space. As
a result, a series of large-scale fire tests
were conducted in a mock-up of the
attic area above the passenger cabin
ceiling. In a confined space, ignition
and flame propagation may occur
because of more extensive radiating heat
and the trapping of melted film/scrim.
Temperature (heat release) data was
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
recorded and the degree of flame
propagation was observed from the
large-scale tests. A radiant panel test
standard for flooring materials was a test
method that provided good correlation
to the large-scale model. The test
method involved subjecting a material
to a pilot flame while the material is
heated by a radiant panel.
The previously described
development program resulted in a new
test method (radiant panel test) and test
criteria specifically established for
improving the in-flight fire ignition/
flame propagation of thermal/acoustic
insulation materials. A new part 25
airworthiness standard, § 25.856,
became effective in September 2003,
Amendment 25–111, requiring that all
thermal/acoustic insulation materials
installed in the fuselage must comply to
this flammability and flame propagation
requirement. The standards are
intended to ‘‘reduce the incidence and
severity of cabin fires, particularly those
ignited in inaccessible areas where
thermal acoustic insulation materials
are typically installed.’’
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus must
show that the Model A350–900 series
airplane meets the applicable provisions
of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–129.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model A350–900 series because
of a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would also apply to the other
model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model A350–900 series
must comply with the fuel-vent and
exhaust-emission requirements of 14
CFR part 34 and the noise-certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory
adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92–
574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, under § 11.38,
and they become part of the typecertification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 113 / Thursday, June 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
special conditions are adopted as
proposed.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350–900 series
airplane incorporates the following
novel or unusual design features:
Fuselage fabricated with composite
materials.
Applicability
Discussion
The Airbus Model A350–900 series
airplane makes extensive use of
composite materials in the fabrication of
the majority of the wing, fuselage skin,
stringers, spars, and most other
structural elements of all major subassemblies of the airplane. Despite the
major change from aluminum to
composite material for the fuselage, the
Model A350–900 series must have inflight survivability such that the
composite fuselage does not propagate a
fire. A methodology for assessing the inflight fire survivability of an allcomposite fuselage is therefore needed.
The FAA believes that one way to
assess the survivability within the cabin
of the Model A350–900 series airplane
is to conduct large-scale tests. This
large-scale test would utilize a mock-up
of an Airbus Model A350–900 series
airplane fuselage skin/structure section
of sufficient size to assess any tendency
for fire propagation. The fire threat used
to represent the realistic ignition source
in the airplane would consist of a 4″ x
4″ x 9″ polyurethane foam block and 10
ml of Heptane. This ignition source
provides approximately three minutes
of flame time and would be positioned
at various points and orientations
within the mocked up installation to
impinge on those areas of the fuselage
considered to be most crucial.
This fire threat was established based
on an assessment of a range of potential
ignition sources, coupled with possible
contamination of materials. The FAA
considers this a severe fire threat,
encompassing a variety of scenarios.
However, should ignition or fire sources
of a greater severity be identified, the
special condition or its method of
compliance would need to be modified
in order to take the more severe threat
into account.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
As discussed above, these special
conditions apply to Airbus Model
A350–900 series airplanes. Should
Airbus apply later for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0882; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NE–29–AD; Amendment 39–
17864; AD 2014–12–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Turbofan
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on the Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes. It is
not a rule of general applicability.
SUMMARY:
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the type certification
basis for Airbus Model A350–900 series
airplanes.
■
Composite Fuselage In-Flight Fire/
Flammability Resistance
In addition to the requirements of
§ 25.853(a) governing material
flammability, the following special
condition applies:
The Airbus Model A350 composite
fuselage structure must be shown to be
resistant to flame propagation under the
fire threat used to develop § 25.856(a). If
products of combustion are observed
beyond the test heat source, they must
be evaluated and found acceptable.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on: April
22, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–13665 Filed 6–11–14; 8:45 am]
Notice of proposed special conditions
No. 25–13–33–SC for the Airbus Model
A350–900 series airplanes was
published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on
November 15, 2013 (78FR68775). No
comments were received, and the
Jkt 232001
Federal Aviation Administration
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
14:18 Jun 11, 2014
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Conclusion
Discussion of Comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
33679
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG
(RRD) BR700–725A1–12 turbofan
engines. This AD requires removal of
affected fuel metering units (FMUs) on
RRD BR700–725A1–12 engines. This
AD was prompted by reports of wear on
the receptors of the double-ended
unions in the FMU housing on BR700–
725A1–12 engines causing fuel leakage.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the FMU, which could lead to
damage to one or more engines and
damage to the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact RollsRoyce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG,
Eschenweg 11, Dahlewitz, 15827
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone:
49 0 33–7086–1883; fax: 49 0 33–7086–
3276. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–
7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2013–
0882; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM
12JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 113 (Thursday, June 12, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33677-33679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13665]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0898 Special Conditions No. 25-526-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model A350-900 Series Airplane;
Composite Fuselage In-Flight Fire/Flammability Resistance
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Airbus Model A350-900
series airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual design
feature associated with the in-flight fire and flammability resistance
of the composite fuselage. Experience has shown that eliminating fire
propagation on the surface of interior and insulating materials
enhances survivability since the threats from an in-flight fire (e.g.,
toxic gas emission and smoke
[[Page 33678]]
obscuration) are typically by-products of a propagating fire. The
Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes must provide protection against
an in-flight fire propagating along the surface of the fuselage.
Special conditions are needed to address this design feature. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective July 14, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Gardlin, FAA, Airframe/Cabin
Safety, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington, 98057-3356;
telephone (425) 227-2136; facsimile (425) 227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied for a type certificate for their
new Model A350-900 series airplane. Later, Airbus requested and the FAA
approved an extension to the application for FAA type certification to
June 28, 2009. The Model A350-900 series has a conventional layout with
twin wing-mounted Rolls Royce Trent engines. It features a twin aisle
9-abreast economy class layout, and accommodates side-by-side placement
of LD-3 containers in the cargo compartment. The basic Model A350-900
series configuration will accommodate 315 passengers in a standard two-
class arrangement. The design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with a Maximum
Take-Off Weight of 602,000 lbs.
Experience has shown that eliminating fire propagation on the
surface of interior and insulating materials enhances survivability
since the threats from an in-flight fire (e.g., toxic gas emission and
smoke obscuration) are typically by-products of a propagating fire. The
Airbus Model A350-900 series airplane must provide protection against
an in-flight fire propagating along the surface of the fuselage.
In the past, fatal in-flight fires have originated in inaccessible
areas of the aircraft where the thermal/acoustic insulation located
adjacent to the aluminium aircraft skin has been the path for flame
propagation and fire growth. Concern over the fire performance of
thermal/acoustic insulation was initially raised by five incidents in
the 1990's which revealed unexpected flame spread along the insulation
film covering material. In all cases, the ignition source was
relatively modest and, in most cases, was electrical in origin (e.g.,
electrical short circuit, arcing caused by chafed wiring, ruptured
ballast case). From 1972 until 2003 these materials were required to
comply with a basic ``Bunsen burner'' requirement per Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.853(a), 25.855(d), and part 25,
Appendix F, part I, paragraph (a)(1)(ii). These requirements prescribed
that insulation materials must be self-extinguishing after having been
subjected to the flame of a Bunsen burner for 12 seconds, in accordance
with the procedures defined in part 25, Appendix F, part I, paragraph
(b)(4). The average burn was not to exceed eight inches and the average
flame time after removal of the flame source was not to exceed 15
seconds. Drippings from the test specimen were not to continue to flame
for more than an average of five seconds after falling.
Further concern with the flammability of thermal/acoustic
insulation was raised by the Transportation Safety Board (TSB) of
Canada during their investigation of the fatal Swiss Air MD-11 in-
flight fire accident that occurred in September 1998 and involved 229
fatalities. TSB investigators reported that the fatal fire appeared to
have been confined to the area above the cockpit and forward cabin
ceiling and involved the insulation blankets. On August 21, 2001, the
TSB recommended that flammability standards for interior materials
should be based on realistic ignition scenarios and prevent the use of
materials that sustain or propagate a fire.
In 1996, the FAA Technical Center began a program to develop new
fire test criteria for insulation films directly relating to the
resistance of in-flight fire propagation. The current test standard was
evaluated as well as another small-scale test method that has been used
by airplane manufacturers to evaluate flame propagation on thermal/
acoustic insulation materials. An inter-laboratory comparison of these
methods revealed a number of deficiencies. Other small-scale tests
developed by the FAA Technical Center did demonstrate that some
insulation films would ignite and propagate flame in a confined space.
As a result, a series of large-scale fire tests were conducted in a
mock-up of the attic area above the passenger cabin ceiling. In a
confined space, ignition and flame propagation may occur because of
more extensive radiating heat and the trapping of melted film/scrim.
Temperature (heat release) data was recorded and the degree of flame
propagation was observed from the large-scale tests. A radiant panel
test standard for flooring materials was a test method that provided
good correlation to the large-scale model. The test method involved
subjecting a material to a pilot flame while the material is heated by
a radiant panel.
The previously described development program resulted in a new test
method (radiant panel test) and test criteria specifically established
for improving the in-flight fire ignition/flame propagation of thermal/
acoustic insulation materials. A new part 25 airworthiness standard,
Sec. 25.856, became effective in September 2003, Amendment 25-111,
requiring that all thermal/acoustic insulation materials installed in
the fuselage must comply to this flammability and flame propagation
requirement. The standards are intended to ``reduce the incidence and
severity of cabin fires, particularly those ignited in inaccessible
areas where thermal acoustic insulation materials are typically
installed.''
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus
must show that the Model A350-900 series airplane meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-
129.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model A350-900 series because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model A350-900 series must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise-
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19,
under Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis
under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
[[Page 33679]]
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350-900 series airplane incorporates the
following novel or unusual design features: Fuselage fabricated with
composite materials.
Discussion
The Airbus Model A350-900 series airplane makes extensive use of
composite materials in the fabrication of the majority of the wing,
fuselage skin, stringers, spars, and most other structural elements of
all major sub-assemblies of the airplane. Despite the major change from
aluminum to composite material for the fuselage, the Model A350-900
series must have in-flight survivability such that the composite
fuselage does not propagate a fire. A methodology for assessing the in-
flight fire survivability of an all-composite fuselage is therefore
needed.
The FAA believes that one way to assess the survivability within
the cabin of the Model A350-900 series airplane is to conduct large-
scale tests. This large-scale test would utilize a mock-up of an Airbus
Model A350-900 series airplane fuselage skin/structure section of
sufficient size to assess any tendency for fire propagation. The fire
threat used to represent the realistic ignition source in the airplane
would consist of a 4'' x 4'' x 9'' polyurethane foam block and 10 ml of
Heptane. This ignition source provides approximately three minutes of
flame time and would be positioned at various points and orientations
within the mocked up installation to impinge on those areas of the
fuselage considered to be most crucial.
This fire threat was established based on an assessment of a range
of potential ignition sources, coupled with possible contamination of
materials. The FAA considers this a severe fire threat, encompassing a
variety of scenarios. However, should ignition or fire sources of a
greater severity be identified, the special condition or its method of
compliance would need to be modified in order to take the more severe
threat into account.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions No. 25-13-33-SC for the
Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes was published in the Federal
Register on November 15, 2013 (78FR68775). No comments were received,
and the special conditions are adopted as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions apply to Airbus Model
A350-900 series airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a change to
the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to
that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on the Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Airbus Model A350-900 series
airplanes.
Composite Fuselage In-Flight Fire/Flammability Resistance
In addition to the requirements of Sec. 25.853(a) governing
material flammability, the following special condition applies:
The Airbus Model A350 composite fuselage structure must be shown to
be resistant to flame propagation under the fire threat used to develop
Sec. 25.856(a). If products of combustion are observed beyond the test
heat source, they must be evaluated and found acceptable.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on: April 22, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-13665 Filed 6-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P