Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Section 905(j) Reports: Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence for Tobacco Products, 33196-33197 [2014-13434]

Download as PDF 33196 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 111 / Tuesday, June 10, 2014 / Notices ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Type of respondents Form name General population .......................................... CMEP-Respect grantees ................................ General Population ......................................... CMEP-Respect grantees ................................ 90-Day Follow-Up Survey .............................. 90-Day SDN Submission ............................... 180-day Follow-up Survey ............................. 180-Day SDN Submission ............................. Leroy Richardson, Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr., PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. [FR Doc. 2014–13396 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff on Section 905(j) Reports: Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence for Tobacco Products—(OMB Control Number 0910– 0673)—(Extension) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2013–N–1558] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Section 905(j) Reports: Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence for Tobacco Products AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July 10, 2014. SUMMARY: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–7285, or emailed to oira_ submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910–0673. Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES ADDRESSES: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:38 Jun 09, 2014 Jkt 232001 On June 22, 2009, the President signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the Tobacco Control Act) (Pub. L. 111–31) into law. The Tobacco Control Act amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) by adding a new chapter granting FDA authority to regulate the manufacture, marketing, and distribution of tobacco products to protect the public health generally and to reduce tobacco use by minors. Section 905(j) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 387e(j)) authorizes FDA to establish the form for the submission of information related to substantial equivalence. In a level 1 guidance document issued under the Good Guidances Practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115), FDA provides recommendations intended to assist persons submitting reports under section 905(j) of the FD&C Act and explains, among other things, FDA’s interpretation of the statutory sections related to substantial equivalence. In the Federal Register of December 27, 2013 (78 FR 78974), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. Six comment submissions were received, some of which included multiple comments. Two of the six comment submissions were in favor of FDA’s regulation of tobacco products. Three comment submissions were considered to contain PRA-related comments and three comment submission were not considered to contain PRA-related comments. The three comment submissions not considered to contain PRA-related PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 320 4 320 4 Number of responses per respondent 1 12 1 12 Average burden per response (in hrs) 18/60 5/60 18/60 5/60 comments are beyond the scope of this Federal Register notice. (Comment 1) One commenter supported FDA in its mission to regulate tobacco products for the benefit of public health and safety and indicated that language in the guidance be strengthened to assist in FDA reviews. The commenter also suggested that the respondents provide additional information to minimize future Freedom of Information Act requests. (Response 1) FDA agrees that the request in this collection of information is necessary to fulfill the requirements of the FD&C Act. The type of data for a given new product may vary depending on whether the characteristics of the product are the same or different from a predicate tobacco product, and the information is needed to allow FDA to make informed decisions when reviewing a substantial equivalence application. (Comment 2) Several commenters indicated that FDA has improperly implemented the substantial equivalence provisions of the statute (the FD&C Act, as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA)), and maintain that FDA is asking for reports that are neither authorized nor relevant to a substantial equivalence determination. (Response 2) FDA disagrees with the comment. The information FDA is requesting is related to new products using the substantial equivalence pathway to assist FDA in making a determination of whether a product is substantially equivalent. (Comment 3) Several commenters asserted that FDA was not asking for enough information, while other commenters asserted that FDA was asking for too much information. (Response 3) FDA believes that the collection of information is necessary and the burden estimates are appropriate and reflect the amount of time a respondent would need to prepare a substantial equivalence submission. (Comment 4) One commenter noted that under FDA’s interpretation, every new, including modified, product E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1 33197 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 111 / Tuesday, June 10, 2014 / Notices automatically will be evaluated. Other commenters questioned FDA’s implementation and Congress’ intent of the FSPTCA and its definition of substantial equivalence and new products. (Response 4) The FD&C Act as amended by the FSPTCA establishes the definition of ‘‘new tobacco product’’ and the premarket pathways, of which substantial equivalence is one. FDA believes the information collection estimates are appropriate and reflect estimates of the time it would take to put together and report the information needed in a substantial equivalence submission required by the statute. (Comment 5) One commenter stated that the commenter believes that substantial equivalence reports should be exempt from environmental assessment requirements. (Response 5) The National Environmental Policy Act and FDA implementing regulations require environmental assessment requirements. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1 FD&C Act sections Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Total annual responses Average burden per response Total hours 905(j)(1)(A)(i) and 910(a) ..................................................... 1,000 1 1,000 360 360,000 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection of information set forth in this document. With respect to the following collection of information, FDA invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA’s functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology. Food and Drug Administration Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This notice solicits comments on information collection requirements for humanitarian use devices (HUDs). DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection of information by August 11, 2014. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE–14526, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, PRAStaff@ fda.hhs.gov. [Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0619] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in This collection of information implements the HUD provision of section 520(m) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(m)) and subpart H, part 814 (21 CFR part 814). Under section 520(m) of the FD&C Act, FDA is authorized to exempt an HUD from the effectiveness requirements of sections 514 and 515 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360d and 360e) provided that the device: (1) Is used to treat or diagnose a disease or condition that affects fewer than 4,000 individuals in the United States; (2) would not be available to a FDA has based these estimates on information it now has available from interactions with the industry, information related to other regulated products, and FDA’s expectations regarding the tobacco industry’s use of the section 905(j) pathway to market their products. Table 1 describes the annual reporting burden as a result of the implementation of the substantial equivalence requirements of sections 905(j) and 910(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 387j(a)). FDA estimates that it will receive 1,000 section 905(j) reports each year and that it will take a manufacturer approximately 360 hours to prepare a report of substantial equivalence for a new tobacco product. Therefore, FDA estimates the burden for submission of substantial equivalence information will be 360,000 hours. Dated: June 4, 2014. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–13434 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Medical Devices; Humanitarian Use Devices AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the Agency. Under the SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:55 Jun 09, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Medical Devices; Humanitarian Use Devices—21 CFR 814 (OMB Control Number 0910–0332)—Extension E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 111 (Tuesday, June 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33196-33197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1558]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office 
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance for Industry 
and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Section 905(j) Reports: 
Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence for Tobacco Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July 
10, 2014.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are 
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, 
FAX: 202-395-7285, or emailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All 
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0673. 
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of 
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, 
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville, 
MD 20850, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has 
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for 
review and clearance.

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff on Section 
905(j) Reports: Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence for Tobacco 
Products--(OMB Control Number 0910-0673)--(Extension)

    On June 22, 2009, the President signed the Family Smoking 
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the Tobacco Control Act) (Pub. L. 
111-31) into law. The Tobacco Control Act amended the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) by adding a new chapter granting 
FDA authority to regulate the manufacture, marketing, and distribution 
of tobacco products to protect the public health generally and to 
reduce tobacco use by minors. Section 905(j) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
387e(j)) authorizes FDA to establish the form for the submission of 
information related to substantial equivalence. In a level 1 guidance 
document issued under the Good Guidances Practices regulation (21 CFR 
10.115), FDA provides recommendations intended to assist persons 
submitting reports under section 905(j) of the FD&C Act and explains, 
among other things, FDA's interpretation of the statutory sections 
related to substantial equivalence.
    In the Federal Register of December 27, 2013 (78 FR 78974), FDA 
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed 
collection of information. Six comment submissions were received, some 
of which included multiple comments. Two of the six comment submissions 
were in favor of FDA's regulation of tobacco products. Three comment 
submissions were considered to contain PRA-related comments and three 
comment submission were not considered to contain PRA-related comments. 
The three comment submissions not considered to contain PRA-related 
comments are beyond the scope of this Federal Register notice.
    (Comment 1) One commenter supported FDA in its mission to regulate 
tobacco products for the benefit of public health and safety and 
indicated that language in the guidance be strengthened to assist in 
FDA reviews. The commenter also suggested that the respondents provide 
additional information to minimize future Freedom of Information Act 
requests.
    (Response 1) FDA agrees that the request in this collection of 
information is necessary to fulfill the requirements of the FD&C Act. 
The type of data for a given new product may vary depending on whether 
the characteristics of the product are the same or different from a 
predicate tobacco product, and the information is needed to allow FDA 
to make informed decisions when reviewing a substantial equivalence 
application.
    (Comment 2) Several commenters indicated that FDA has improperly 
implemented the substantial equivalence provisions of the statute (the 
FD&C Act, as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco 
Control Act (FSPTCA)), and maintain that FDA is asking for reports that 
are neither authorized nor relevant to a substantial equivalence 
determination.
    (Response 2) FDA disagrees with the comment. The information FDA is 
requesting is related to new products using the substantial equivalence 
pathway to assist FDA in making a determination of whether a product is 
substantially equivalent.
    (Comment 3) Several commenters asserted that FDA was not asking for 
enough information, while other commenters asserted that FDA was asking 
for too much information.
    (Response 3) FDA believes that the collection of information is 
necessary and the burden estimates are appropriate and reflect the 
amount of time a respondent would need to prepare a substantial 
equivalence submission.
    (Comment 4) One commenter noted that under FDA's interpretation, 
every new, including modified, product

[[Page 33197]]

automatically will be evaluated. Other commenters questioned FDA's 
implementation and Congress' intent of the FSPTCA and its definition of 
substantial equivalence and new products.
    (Response 4) The FD&C Act as amended by the FSPTCA establishes the 
definition of ``new tobacco product'' and the premarket pathways, of 
which substantial equivalence is one. FDA believes the information 
collection estimates are appropriate and reflect estimates of the time 
it would take to put together and report the information needed in a 
substantial equivalence submission required by the statute.
    (Comment 5) One commenter stated that the commenter believes that 
substantial equivalence reports should be exempt from environmental 
assessment requirements.
    (Response 5) The National Environmental Policy Act and FDA 
implementing regulations require environmental assessment requirements.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as 
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                         Number of
                         FD&C Act sections                              Number of      responses per     Total annual   Average  burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses       per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
905(j)(1)(A)(i) and 910(a).........................................           1,000                1            1,000              360          360,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    FDA has based these estimates on information it now has available 
from interactions with the industry, information related to other 
regulated products, and FDA's expectations regarding the tobacco 
industry's use of the section 905(j) pathway to market their products. 
Table 1 describes the annual reporting burden as a result of the 
implementation of the substantial equivalence requirements of sections 
905(j) and 910(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 387j(a)). FDA estimates 
that it will receive 1,000 section 905(j) reports each year and that it 
will take a manufacturer approximately 360 hours to prepare a report of 
substantial equivalence for a new tobacco product. Therefore, FDA 
estimates the burden for submission of substantial equivalence 
information will be 360,000 hours.

    Dated: June 4, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-13434 Filed 6-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.