Visas: Documentation of Immigrants Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended, 32481-32482 [2014-13091]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 108 / Thursday, June 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
109–162, codified at 8 U.S.C.
1154(a)(1)(A)(vii), created an immigrant
visa classification for the parents of U.S.
citizens, and the parents of former U.S.
citizens who, within the past two years,
have lost or renounced U.S. citizenship
status related to an incident of domestic
violence or died.
The Department currently identifies
applicants for this status using the
‘‘IB5’’ symbol, an existing symbol used
for parents of U.S. citizens who are at
least 21 years old. The unique IB5
classification symbol will facilitate the
Department’s ability to identify
applicants for such status in various
immigrant visa information databases.
(m) Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
(n) Neisseria meningitidis.
(o) Non-tuberculous mycobacteria
species.
(p) Pseudomonas species.
(q) Staphylococcus aureus.
(r) Streptococcus agalactiae.
(s) Streptococcus pneumoniae.
(t) Streptococcus pyogenes.
(u) Vibrio cholerae.
Dated: May 29, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–13023 Filed 6–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Regulatory Findings
22 CFR Part 42
A. Administrative Procedure Act
[Public Notice: 8755]
Since this rule concerns the
administration of visas, which is a
foreign affairs function of the United
States, the Department publishes this
rule as a final rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(1). In addition, since this rule
implements the provisions of the
Violence Against Women and
Department of Justice Reauthorization
Act of 2005, the Department finds that
notice and public comment on this rule
are unnecessary, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B). Accordingly, this rule is
effective immediately.
RIN 1400–AD52
Visas: Documentation of Immigrants
Under the Immigration and Nationality
Act, as Amended
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to the Violence
Against Women and Department of
Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, the
Department of State amends the
immigrant visa classification table listed
in the Department’s regulations to add
a symbol for an immigrant visa issued
to to an alien who: is the parent of a
current U.S.citizen, or the parent of a
former U.S. citizen who, within the twoyear period prior to filing the petition,
lost or renounced U.S. citizenship status
related to an incident of domestic
violence or died; is a person of good
moral character; is eligible to be
classified as an immediate relative
under the Immigration and Nationality
Act; resides, or has resided, with the
U.S. citizen daughter or son;
demonstrates that he or she has been
battered or subject to extreme cruelty by
the U.S. citizen daughter or son; and has
an approved petition from the
Department of Homeland Security.
DATES: This rule becomes effective June
5, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Taylor W. Beaumont, Department of
State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Office
of Visa Services, Legal Affairs, Division
of Legislation and Regulations, 600 19th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20431,
email (BeaumontTW@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
816 of the Violence Against Women and
Department of Justice Reauthorization
Act of 2005, Title VIII of Public Law
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Jun 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
32481
D. The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121. This rule
would not result in an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
E. Executive Order 12866
The Department does not consider
this rule to be a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ within the scope of section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866. Nonetheless,
the Department has reviewed the rule to
ensure its consistency with the
regulatory philosophy and principles set
forth in the Executive Order.
F. Executive Order 13563
The Department of State has
considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563 and affirms that
this regulation is consistent with the
guidance therein.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
G. Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
Because this rule is exempt from
notice and comment rulemaking under
5 U.S.C. 553, it is exempt from the
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements set forth at sections 603
and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). Nonetheless,
consistent with section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), the Department has reviewed
this regulation and certifies that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the rule
have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Orders
12372 and 13132.
C. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532,
generally requires agencies to prepare a
statement before proposing any rule that
may result in an annual expenditure of
$100 million or more by State, local, or
tribal governments, or by the private
sector. This rule will not result in any
such expenditure, nor will it
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
The Department has reviewed the
regulations in light of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
I. Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of
Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
32482
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 108 / Thursday, June 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose information
collection requirements under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 42
Aliens, Foreign officials, Immigration,
Passports and visas.
22 CFR Part 42 is amended as follows:
PART 42—VISAS: DOCUMENTATION
OF IMMIGRANTS UNDER THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
ACT, AS AMENDED
105–51 (1998), 1870 U.N.T.S. 167 (Reg. No.
31922 (1993)); 42 U.S.C. 14901–14954, Pub.
L. 106–279; Pub. L. 111–287; 8 U.S.C. 1101,
124 Stat. 3058; 8 U.S.C. 1154, Pub. Law 109–
162.
1. The authority citation for part 42 is
amended to read as follows:
■
■
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104 and 1182; Pub.
L. 105–277; Pub. L. 108–449; 112 Stat. 2681–
795 through 2681–801; The Convention on
Protection of Children and Co-operation in
Respect of Intercountry Adoption (done at
the Hague, May 29, 1993), S. Treaty Doc.
2. Section 42.11 is amended by adding
an entry for ‘‘IB5’’ after ‘‘IB3’’ under
‘‘Immediate Relatives’’ in the
‘‘Immigrants’’ table to read as follows:
§ 42.11
*
*
Classification symbols.
*
*
*
IMMIGRANTS
Symbol
Class
Section of law
Immediate Relatives
.
*
*
IB5 ........................................................
*
*
*
*
*
Self-petition Parent of U.S. Citizen ...................................................................
*
*
Dated: May 12, 2014.
Michele T. Bond,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Consular
Affairs, Department of State.
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0231]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Monongahela River;
Pittsburgh, PA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Monongahela River mile 68.0 to
mile 68.8. This safety zone is needed to
protect vessels transiting the area and
event spectators from the hazards
associated with the Rices Landing
Riverfest Fireworks Display. Entry into
this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Pittsburgh or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9:15
p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on June 13, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2014–0231. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Jun 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ronald Lipscomb, Marine Safety
Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard, at
telephone 412–644–5808, email
Ronald.c.lipscomb1@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
[FR Doc. 2014–13091 Filed 6–4–14; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
*
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
204(a)(1)(A)(vii)
*
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
not using the NPRM process. The Coast
Guard received notice on March 27,
2014 that this display would take place.
After full review of the event
information and location, the Coast
Guard determined that a safety zone is
necessary. Delaying this rule by
completing the full NPRM process
would unnecessarily delay the safety
zone and be contrary to public interest
because the safety zone is needed to
protect transiting vessels, spectators,
and the personnel involved in the
display from the hazards associated
with fireworks displays taking place
near and over the waterway. The
fireworks display has been advertised
and the local community has prepared
for the event. Completing the full NPRM
process could also unnecessarily delay
the planned event and possibly interfere
with contractual obligations.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying this rule by providing a full 30
days notice would be contrary to public
interest because immediate action is
needed to protect persons and property
in the area during the land-based
fireworks display.
B. Basis and Purpose
On June 13, 2014, as a part of the
Rices Landing Riverfest Fireworks
Display, the Rices Landing Volunteer
Fire Department will sponsor a landbased fireworks display. The display
will take place in the vicinity of Old
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 108 (Thursday, June 5, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32481-32482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13091]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 42
[Public Notice: 8755]
RIN 1400-AD52
Visas: Documentation of Immigrants Under the Immigration and
Nationality Act, as Amended
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Violence Against Women and Department of
Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, the Department of State amends the
immigrant visa classification table listed in the Department's
regulations to add a symbol for an immigrant visa issued to to an alien
who: is the parent of a current U.S.citizen, or the parent of a former
U.S. citizen who, within the two-year period prior to filing the
petition, lost or renounced U.S. citizenship status related to an
incident of domestic violence or died; is a person of good moral
character; is eligible to be classified as an immediate relative under
the Immigration and Nationality Act; resides, or has resided, with the
U.S. citizen daughter or son; demonstrates that he or she has been
battered or subject to extreme cruelty by the U.S. citizen daughter or
son; and has an approved petition from the Department of Homeland
Security.
DATES: This rule becomes effective June 5, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Taylor W. Beaumont, Department of
State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Office of Visa Services, Legal
Affairs, Division of Legislation and Regulations, 600 19th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20431, email (BeaumontTW@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 816 of the Violence Against Women
and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, Title VIII of
Public Law 109-162, codified at 8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(A)(vii), created an
immigrant visa classification for the parents of U.S. citizens, and the
parents of former U.S. citizens who, within the past two years, have
lost or renounced U.S. citizenship status related to an incident of
domestic violence or died.
The Department currently identifies applicants for this status
using the ``IB5'' symbol, an existing symbol used for parents of U.S.
citizens who are at least 21 years old. The unique IB5 classification
symbol will facilitate the Department's ability to identify applicants
for such status in various immigrant visa information databases.
Regulatory Findings
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Since this rule concerns the administration of visas, which is a
foreign affairs function of the United States, the Department publishes
this rule as a final rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). In addition,
since this rule implements the provisions of the Violence Against Women
and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, the Department
finds that notice and public comment on this rule are unnecessary,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Accordingly, this rule is effective
immediately.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
Because this rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking
under 5 U.S.C. 553, it is exempt from the regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements set forth at sections 603 and 604 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). Nonetheless,
consistent with section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), the Department has reviewed this regulation and
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
C. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law
104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may result in an
annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector. This rule will not result in any
such expenditure, nor will it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
D. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for
purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-
121. This rule would not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
E. Executive Order 12866
The Department does not consider this rule to be a ``significant
regulatory action'' within the scope of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866. Nonetheless, the Department has reviewed the rule to ensure its
consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
F. Executive Order 13563
The Department of State has considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563 and affirms that this regulation is consistent
with the guidance therein.
G. Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders 12372 and
13132.
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
I. Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt
tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this rulemaking.
[[Page 32482]]
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose information collection requirements under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 42
Aliens, Foreign officials, Immigration, Passports and visas.
22 CFR Part 42 is amended as follows:
PART 42--VISAS: DOCUMENTATION OF IMMIGRANTS UNDER THE IMMIGRATION
AND NATIONALITY ACT, AS AMENDED
0
1. The authority citation for part 42 is amended to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104 and 1182; Pub. L. 105-277; Pub. L.
108-449; 112 Stat. 2681-795 through 2681-801; The Convention on
Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry
Adoption (done at the Hague, May 29, 1993), S. Treaty Doc. 105-51
(1998), 1870 U.N.T.S. 167 (Reg. No. 31922 (1993)); 42 U.S.C. 14901-
14954, Pub. L. 106-279; Pub. L. 111-287; 8 U.S.C. 1101, 124 Stat.
3058; 8 U.S.C. 1154, Pub. Law 109-162.
0
2. Section 42.11 is amended by adding an entry for ``IB5'' after
``IB3'' under ``Immediate Relatives'' in the ``Immigrants'' table to
read as follows:
Sec. 42.11 Classification symbols.
* * * * *
Immigrants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symbol Class Section of law
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Immediate Relatives
......................................
* * * * * * *
IB5............................................ Self-petition Parent of U.S. Citizen.. 204(a)(1)(A)(vii)
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: May 12, 2014.
Michele T. Bond,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-13091 Filed 6-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P