Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the Powered Surgical Instrument for Improvement in the Appearance of Cellulite, 31859-31861 [2014-12814]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 106 / Tuesday, June 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your
proposal to: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, FAA,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email
robert.grant@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
(g) Additional Information
HHS.
(1) Agusta Bollettino Tecnico (BT) No.
109–137 for Model A109A, A109A II and
A109C helicopters; BT No. 109EP–131 for
Model A109E helicopters; BT No. 109K–59
for Model A109K2 helicopters; BT No. 109S–
056 for Model A109S helicopters; BT No.
109SP–070 for Model AW109SP helicopters;
and BT No. 119–062 for Model A119 and
AW119 MKII helicopters, all Revision 0 and
dated October 29, 2013, which are not
incorporated by reference, contain additional
information about the subject of this AD. For
service information identified in this AD,
contact AgustaWestland, Product Support
Engineering, Via del Gregge, 100, 21015
Lonate Pozzolo (VA) Italy, ATTN: Maurizio
D’Angelo; telephone 39–0331–664757; fax
39–0331–664680; or at https://
www.agustawestland.com/technicalbullettins. You may review a copy of the
service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth Texas
76137.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Emergency AD No. 2013–0265–E, dated
October 30, 2013. You may view the EASA
AD on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA–
2014–0336.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6200 Main Rotor System.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 21,
2014.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–12719 Filed 6–2–14; 8:45 am]
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Jun 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0576]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic
Surgery Devices; Classification of the
Powered Surgical Instrument for
Improvement in the Appearance of
Cellulite
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Food and Drug Administration,
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
powered surgical instrument for
improvement in the appearance of
cellulite into class II (special controls).
The Agency is classifying the device
into class II (special controls) in order
to provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective July 3,
2014. The classification was applicable
on July 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jitendra Virani, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G459, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28,
1976 (the date of enactment of the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976),
generally referred to as postamendments
devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate
device that does not require premarket
approval. The Agency determines
whether new devices are substantially
equivalent to predicate devices by
means of premarket notification
procedures in section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part
807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by section 607 of the Food and
Drug Administration Safety and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31859
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144, July 9,
2012, 126 Stat. 1054), provides two
procedures by which a person may
request FDA to classify a device under
the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1)
(a de novo request). Under the first
procedure, the person submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified and,
within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act,
the person requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2). Under the
second procedure, rather than first
submitting a premarket notification
under section 510(k) and then a request
for classification under the first
procedure, the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon
which to base a determination of
substantial equivalence and requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act. If the person submits a
request to classify the device under this
second procedure, FDA may decline to
undertake the classification request if
FDA identifies a legally marketed device
that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with
the device or if FDA determines that the
device submitted is not of ‘‘lowmoderate risk’’ or that general controls
would be inadequate to control the risks
and special controls to mitigate the risks
cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a
device under either procedure provided
by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act,
FDA will classify the device by written
order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial
classification of the device. In
accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the
FD&C Act, FDA issued an order on
March 14, 2011, classifying the
Cabochon System into class III, because
it was not substantially equivalent to a
device that was introduced or delivered
for introduction into interstate
commerce for commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, or a device which
was subsequently reclassified into class
I or class II. On October 29, 2011,
Cabochon Aesthetics, Inc., submitted a
request for classification of the
Cabochon System under section
513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the
device be classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act. FDA classifies devices into class II
if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
31860
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 106 / Tuesday, June 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its
intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the de novo
request, FDA determined that the device
can be classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
believes these special controls, in
addition to general controls, will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on July 12, 2013, FDA
issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding § 878.4790.
Following the effective date of this
final classification administrative order,
any firm submitting a premarket
notification (510(k)) for a powered
surgical instrument for improvement in
the appearance of cellulite will need to
comply with the special controls named
in the final administrative order.
The device is assigned the generic
name powered surgical instrument for
improvement in the appearance of
cellulite, and it is identified as a
prescription device that is used for the
controlled release of subcutaneous
tissue for improvement in the
appearance of cellulite. The device
consists of a cutting tool powered by a
motor and a means for instrument
guidance to control the areas of
subcutaneous tissue cutting underneath
the cellulite depressions or dimples.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated with this type of
device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks:
TABLE 1—POWERED SURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE APPEARANCE OF CELLULITE RISKS AND
MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Mechanical Injury (excessive treatment or treatment of non-intended
areas).
Infection ....................................................................................................
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Electrical Shock ........................................................................................
Electromagnetic Interference ....................................................................
Adverse Tissue Reaction .........................................................................
Use Error ..................................................................................................
FDA believes that the following
special controls, in addition to the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness:
(1) Non-clinical testing must be
performed to demonstrate that the
device meets all design specifications
and performance requirements, and to
demonstrate durability and mechanical
integrity of the device.
(2) In vivo evaluation of the device
must demonstrate device performance,
including the safety of the release
methodology and blood loss at the
treatment sites.
(3) All elements of the device that
may contact the patient must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Electrical safety and
electromagnetic compatibility of the
device must be demonstrated.
(5) The labeling must include a
summary of in vivo evaluation data and
all the device specific warnings,
precautions, and/or contraindications.
(6) Sterility and shelf-life testing for
the device must demonstrate the
sterility of patient contacting
components and the shelf life of these
components.
Powered surgical instruments for
improvement in the appearance of
cellulite are prescription devices
restricted to patient use only upon the
authorization of a practitioner licensed
by law to administer or use the device.
(Proposed § 878.4790(a) (21 CFR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Jun 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
Non-clinical Testing.
In Vivo Evaluation.
Sterility Assurance Testing.
Shelf-life Testing.
Electrical Safety Testing.
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Testing.
Biocompatibility Testing.
In Vivo Evaluation.
Labeling.
878.4790(a)); see section 520(e) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360j(e)) and
§ 801.109 (21 CFR 801.109)
(Prescription devices.).) Prescription use
restrictions are a type of general controls
as defined in section 513(a)(1)(A)(i) of
the FD&C Act.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification
is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. Therefore, this device
type is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who
intend to market this type of device
must submit to FDA a premarket
notification prior to marketing the
device, which contains information
about the powered surgical instrument
for improvement in the appearance of
cellulite they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final administrative order
establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of
information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120, and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
IV. Reference
The following reference has been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and is available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov.
1. K101231: De Novo Request per 513(f)(2)
pursuant to the Agency’s NSE Determination,
dated March 14, 2011, from Cabochon
Aesthetics, Inc., dated October 29, 2011.
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 106 / Tuesday, June 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 878 is
amended as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 3280
[Docket No. FR–5787–F–01]
RIN 2502–AJ21
PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC
SURGERY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 878 continues to read as follows:
Manufactured Housing Constructions
and Safety Standards: Correction of
Reference Standard for Anti-Scald
Valves
AGENCY:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 878.4790 to subpart E to read
as follows:
■
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 878.4790 Powered surgical instrument
for improvement in the appearance of
cellulite.
(a) Identification. A powered surgical
instrument for improvement in the
appearance of cellulite is a prescription
device that is used for the controlled
release of subcutaneous tissue for
improvement in the appearance of
cellulite. The device consists of a
cutting tool powered by a motor and a
means for instrument guidance to
control the areas of subcutaneous tissue
cutting underneath the cellulite
depressions or dimples.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Non-clinical testing must be
performed to demonstrate that the
device meets all design specifications
and performance requirements, and to
demonstrate durability and mechanical
integrity of the device.
(2) In vivo evaluation of the device
must demonstrate device performance,
including the safety of the release
methodology and blood loss at the
treatment sites.
(3) All elements of the device that
may contact the patient must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Electrical safety and
electromagnetic compatibility of the
device must be demonstrated.
(5) The labeling must include a
summary of in vivo evaluation data and
all the device specific warnings,
precautions, and/or contraindications.
(6) Sterility and shelf-life testing for
the device must demonstrate the
sterility of patient contacting
components and the shelf life of these
components.
Dated: May 23, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–12814 Filed 6–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Jun 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
This final rule amends the
Federal Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards by
incorporating the correct reference
standard for anti-scald devices designed
for bathtubs and whirlpool tubs without
showers, ASSE 1070–2004, Performance
Requirements for Water Temperature
Limiting Devices. Anti-scald valves
mitigate the danger of serious burns and
other hazards caused by bursts of hot
water resulting from sudden changes in
water pressure. In a final rule published
on December 9, 2013, HUD incorporated
ASSE 1016–2005, an anti-scalding
device designed for showers and tubshower combinations. HUD failed to
incorporate, however, ASSE 1070–2004,
which is designed for fixtures such as
bathtubs and whirlpool tubs that do not
have showers. To correct this and
ensure the safety of occupants of
manufactured homes with bathtubs and
whirlpool tubs without showers, this
final rule incorporates ASSE 1070–2004.
DATES: Effective Date: July 3, 2014. The
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of July 3, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela Beck Danner, Administrator,
Office of Manufactured Housing
Programs, Room 9168, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC
20410; telephone number 202–708–6423
(this is not a toll-number). Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–
8389 (this is a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The National Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards Act
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401–5426) (the Act)
authorizes HUD to establish and amend
the Federal Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31861
codified in 24 CFR part 3280. The Act
was amended in 2000 by the
Manufactured Housing Improvement
Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–569), by
expanding its purposes and creating the
Manufactured Housing Consensus
Committee (MHCC).
As amended, the purposes of the Act
(enumerated at 42 U.S.C. 5401) are: ‘‘(1)
To protect the quality, durability, safety,
and affordability of manufactured
homes; (2) to facilitate the availability of
affordable manufactured homes and to
increase homeownership for all
Americans; (3) to provide for the
establishment of practical, uniform, and,
to the extent possible, performancebased Federal construction standards for
manufactured homes; (4) to encourage
innovative and cost-effective
construction techniques for
manufactured homes; (5) to protect
residents of manufactured homes with
respect to personal injuries and the
amount of insurance costs and property
damages in manufactured housing
consistent with the other purposes of
this section; (6) to establish a balanced
consensus process for the development,
revision, and interpretation of Federal
construction and safety standards for
manufactured homes and related
regulations for the enforcement of such
standards; (7) to ensure uniform and
effective enforcement of Federal
construction and safety standards for
manufactured homes; and (8) to ensure
that the public interest in, and need for,
affordable manufactured housing is duly
considered in all determinations
relating to the Federal standards and
their enforcement.’’
II. This Final Rule
On December 9, 2013, at 78 FR 73966,
HUD published a final rule that
amended the Federal Manufactured
Home Construction and Safety
Standards at 24 CFR part 3280 by
adopting certain recommendations
made to HUD by the MHCC, as modified
by HUD. Among other changes, HUD’s
December 9, 2013, final rule revised the
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards by updating the
incorporated reference standards that
establish the standards for the various
components of a manufactured home.
Most of HUD’s changes codified existing
building practices or conformed HUD
standards to HUD interpretive bulletins
or existing building codes.
One update codified by HUD’s
December 9, 2013, final rule was to
require that shower, bath, and tubshower combination valves be either
balanced pressure, thermostatic, or a
combination of mixing valves that
conforms to the requirements of ASSE
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 106 (Tuesday, June 3, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31859-31861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12814]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0576]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices;
Classification of the Powered Surgical Instrument for Improvement in
the Appearance of Cellulite
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
powered surgical instrument for improvement in the appearance of
cellulite into class II (special controls). The Agency is classifying
the device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective July 3, 2014. The classification was
applicable on July 12, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jitendra Virani, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G459, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-6398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were
not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred
to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain
in class III and require premarket approval, unless and until the
device is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues
an order finding the device to be substantially equivalent, in
accordance with section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. The Agency determines whether
new devices are substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means
of premarket notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as amended by section 607 of the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-
144, July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1054), provides two procedures by which a
person may request FDA to classify a device under the criteria set
forth in section 513(a)(1) (a de novo request). Under the first
procedure, the person submits a premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that has not previously been
classified and, within 30 days of receiving an order classifying the
device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the
person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2). Under the
second procedure, rather than first submitting a premarket notification
under section 510(k) and then a request for classification under the
first procedure, the person determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial
equivalence and requests a classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act. If the person submits a request to classify the device
under this second procedure, FDA may decline to undertake the
classification request if FDA identifies a legally marketed device that
could provide a reasonable basis for review of substantial equivalence
with the device or if FDA determines that the device submitted is not
of ``low-moderate risk'' or that general controls would be inadequate
to control the risks and special controls to mitigate the risks cannot
be developed.
In response to a request to classify a device under either
procedure provided by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA will
classify the device by written order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial classification of the device. In
accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, FDA issued an order
on March 14, 2011, classifying the Cabochon System into class III,
because it was not substantially equivalent to a device that was
introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce for
commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or a device which was
subsequently reclassified into class I or class II. On October 29,
2011, Cabochon Aesthetics, Inc., submitted a request for classification
of the Cabochon System under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the device be classified into class II
(Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. FDA
classifies devices into class II if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
[[Page 31860]]
assurance of safety and effectiveness, but there is sufficient
information to establish special controls to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its
intended use. After review of the information submitted in the de novo
request, FDA determined that the device can be classified into class II
with the establishment of special controls. FDA believes these special
controls, in addition to general controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on July 12, 2013, FDA issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding Sec. 878.4790.
Following the effective date of this final classification
administrative order, any firm submitting a premarket notification
(510(k)) for a powered surgical instrument for improvement in the
appearance of cellulite will need to comply with the special controls
named in the final administrative order.
The device is assigned the generic name powered surgical instrument
for improvement in the appearance of cellulite, and it is identified as
a prescription device that is used for the controlled release of
subcutaneous tissue for improvement in the appearance of cellulite. The
device consists of a cutting tool powered by a motor and a means for
instrument guidance to control the areas of subcutaneous tissue cutting
underneath the cellulite depressions or dimples.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated with
this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks:
Table 1--Powered Surgical Instrument for Improvement in the Appearance
of Cellulite Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mechanical Injury (excessive treatment Non-clinical Testing.
or treatment of non-intended areas). In Vivo Evaluation.
Infection.............................. Sterility Assurance Testing.
Shelf-life Testing.
Electrical Shock....................... Electrical Safety Testing.
Electromagnetic Interference........... Electromagnetic Compatibility
(EMC) Testing.
Adverse Tissue Reaction................ Biocompatibility Testing.
Use Error.............................. In Vivo Evaluation.
Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes that the following special controls, in addition to
the general controls, address these risks to health and provide
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness:
(1) Non-clinical testing must be performed to demonstrate that the
device meets all design specifications and performance requirements,
and to demonstrate durability and mechanical integrity of the device.
(2) In vivo evaluation of the device must demonstrate device
performance, including the safety of the release methodology and blood
loss at the treatment sites.
(3) All elements of the device that may contact the patient must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility of the
device must be demonstrated.
(5) The labeling must include a summary of in vivo evaluation data
and all the device specific warnings, precautions, and/or
contraindications.
(6) Sterility and shelf-life testing for the device must
demonstrate the sterility of patient contacting components and the
shelf life of these components.
Powered surgical instruments for improvement in the appearance of
cellulite are prescription devices restricted to patient use only upon
the authorization of a practitioner licensed by law to administer or
use the device. (Proposed Sec. 878.4790(a) (21 CFR 878.4790(a)); see
section 520(e) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360j(e)) and Sec. 801.109
(21 CFR 801.109) (Prescription devices.).) Prescription use
restrictions are a type of general controls as defined in section
513(a)(1)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act if FDA determines that premarket notification is
not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this device type is not exempt from premarket notification
requirements. Persons who intend to market this type of device must
submit to FDA a premarket notification prior to marketing the device,
which contains information about the powered surgical instrument for
improvement in the appearance of cellulite they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final administrative order establishes special controls that
refer to previously approved collections of information found in other
FDA regulations. These collections of information are subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of
information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification
submissions have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120, and
the collections of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling,
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
IV. Reference
The following reference has been placed on display in the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and is available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov.
1. K101231: De Novo Request per 513(f)(2) pursuant to the
Agency's NSE Determination, dated March 14, 2011, from Cabochon
Aesthetics, Inc., dated October 29, 2011.
[[Page 31861]]
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
878 is amended as follows:
PART 878--GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 878 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 878.4790 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 878.4790 Powered surgical instrument for improvement in the
appearance of cellulite.
(a) Identification. A powered surgical instrument for improvement
in the appearance of cellulite is a prescription device that is used
for the controlled release of subcutaneous tissue for improvement in
the appearance of cellulite. The device consists of a cutting tool
powered by a motor and a means for instrument guidance to control the
areas of subcutaneous tissue cutting underneath the cellulite
depressions or dimples.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Non-clinical testing must be performed to demonstrate that the
device meets all design specifications and performance requirements,
and to demonstrate durability and mechanical integrity of the device.
(2) In vivo evaluation of the device must demonstrate device
performance, including the safety of the release methodology and blood
loss at the treatment sites.
(3) All elements of the device that may contact the patient must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility of the
device must be demonstrated.
(5) The labeling must include a summary of in vivo evaluation data
and all the device specific warnings, precautions, and/or
contraindications.
(6) Sterility and shelf-life testing for the device must
demonstrate the sterility of patient contacting components and the
shelf life of these components.
Dated: May 23, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-12814 Filed 6-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P