Proposed Priorities for Amendment Cycle, 31409-31410 [2014-12619]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 105 / Monday, June 2, 2014 / Notices
collect input from academic, industry,
and government experts on national
security implications of the U.S.
bilateral trade and economic
relationship with China. The hearing
will examine economic, political, and
security developments in cross-Strait
and China-North Korea relations. It will
assess the opportunities and risks
arising from closer cross-Strait
economic integration for Taiwan and
the United States, and it will examine
Taiwan’s ability to defend against
military coercion by China. The hearing
will also address whether China’s views
and policies toward North Korea have
changed in recent years and the
implications for U.S. security interests.
The hearing will be co-chaired by
Commissioners Daniel M. Slane and
Katherine C. Tobin, Ph.D.. Any
interested party may file a written
statement by June 05, 2014, by mailing
to the contact below. A portion of each
panel will include a question and
answer period between the
Commissioners and the witnesses.
Location, Date and Time: Room 608,
Dirksen Senate Office Building, 1st
Street Southeast, Washington, DC.
Thursday, June 05, 2014, 8:30 a.m.–2:15
p.m. Eastern Time. A detailed agenda
for the hearing will be posted to the
Commission’s Web site at
www.uscc.gov. Also, please check our
Web site for possible changes to the
hearing schedule. Reservations are not
required to attend the hearing.
Any
member of the public seeking further
information concerning the hearing
should contact Reed Eckhold, 444 North
Capitol Street NW., Suite 602,
Washington DC 20001; phone: 202–624–
1496, or via email at reckhold@uscc.gov.
Reservations are not required to attend
the hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: Congress created the U.S.-China
Economic and Security Review Commission
in 2000 in the National Defense
Authorization Act (Pub. L. 106–398), as
amended by Division P of the Consolidated
Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (Pub. L.
108–7), as amended by Public Law 109–108
(November 22, 2005).
Dated: May 28, 2014.
Michael Danis,
Executive Director, U.S.-China Economic and
Security Review Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–12746 Filed 5–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1137–00–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:59 May 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
UNITED STATES SENTENCING
COMMISSION
Proposed Priorities for Amendment
Cycle
United States Sentencing
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; Request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As part of its statutory
authority and responsibility to analyze
sentencing issues, including operation
of the federal sentencing guidelines, and
in accordance with Rule 5.2 of its Rules
of Practice and Procedure, the United
States Sentencing Commission is
seeking comment on possible priority
policy issues for the amendment cycle
ending May 1, 2015.
DATES: Public comment should be
received on or before July 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to
the Commission by electronic mail or
regular mail. The email address is
pubaffairs@ussc.gov. The regular mail
address is United States Sentencing
Commission, One Columbus Circle NE.,
Suite 2–500, South Lobby, Washington,
DC 20002–8002, Attention: Public
Affairs—Priorities Comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanne Doherty, Public Affairs Officer,
202–502–4502, jdoherty@ussc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial
branch of the United States
Government. The Commission
promulgates sentencing guidelines and
policy statements for federal sentencing
courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The
Commission also periodically reviews
and revises previously promulgated
guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o)
and submits guideline amendments to
the Congress not later than the first day
of May each year pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
994(p).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(g), the
Commission intends to consider the
issue of reducing costs of incarceration
and overcapacity of prisons, to the
extent it is relevant to any identified
priority.
The Commission provides this notice
to identify tentative priorities for the
amendment cycle ending May 1, 2015.
The Commission recognizes, however,
that other factors, such as the enactment
of any legislation requiring Commission
action, may affect the Commission’s
ability to complete work on any or all
of its identified priorities by the
statutory deadline of May 1, 2015.
Accordingly, it may be necessary to
continue work on any or all of these
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31409
issues beyond the amendment cycle
ending on May 1, 2015.
As so prefaced, the Commission has
identified the following tentative
priorities:
(1) Continuation of its work with
Congress and other interested parties on
statutory mandatory minimum penalties
to implement the recommendations set
forth in the Commission’s 2011 report to
Congress, titled Mandatory Minimum
Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice
System, including its recommendations
regarding the severity and scope of
mandatory minimum penalties,
consideration of expanding the ‘‘safety
valve’’ at 18 U.S.C. 3553(f), and
elimination of the mandatory ‘‘stacking’’
of penalties under 18 U.S.C. 924(c), and
to develop appropriate guideline
amendments in response to any related
legislation.
(2) Continuation of its work on
economic crimes, including (A) a
comprehensive, multi-year study of
§ 2B1.1 (Theft, Property Destruction,
and Fraud) and related guidelines,
including examination of the loss table,
the definition of loss, and role in the
offense; (B) a study of offenses involving
fraud on the market; (C) a study of
antitrust offenses, including
examination of the fine provisions in
§ 2R1.1 (Bid-Rigging, Price-Fixing or
Market Allocation Agreements Among
Competitors); and (D) consideration of
any amendments to such guidelines that
may be appropriate in light of the
information obtained from such studies.
(3) Continuation of its multi-year
study of statutory and guideline
definitions relating to the nature of a
defendant’s prior conviction (e.g.,
‘‘crime of violence,’’ ‘‘aggravated
felony,’’ ‘‘violent felony,’’ ‘‘drug
trafficking offense,’’ and ‘‘felony drug
offense’’) and the impact of such
definitions on the relevant statutory and
guideline provisions (e.g., career
offender, illegal reentry, and armed
career criminal), possibly including
recommendations to Congress on any
statutory changes that may be
appropriate and development of
guideline amendments that may be
appropriate.
(4) Implementation of the directive to
the Commission in section 10 of the Fair
Sentencing Act of 2010, Public Law
111–220 (enacted August 3, 2010)
(requiring the Commission, not later
than 5 years after enactment, to ‘‘study
and submit to Congress a report
regarding the impact of the changes in
Federal sentencing law under this Act
and the amendments made by this
Act’’).
(5) Study of the operation of § 3B1.2
(Mitigating Role) and related provisions
E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM
02JNN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
31410
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 105 / Monday, June 2, 2014 / Notices
in the Guidelines Manual (e.g., the
‘‘mitigating role cap’’ in § 2D1.1(a)(5)),
and consideration of any amendments
to the Guidelines Manual that may be
appropriate in light of the information
obtained from such study.
(6) Study of the guidelines applicable
to immigration offenses and related
criminal history rules, and
consideration of any amendments to
such guidelines that may be appropriate
in light of the information obtained from
such study.
(7) Continuation of its comprehensive,
multi-year study of recidivism,
including (A) examination of
circumstances that correlate with
increased or reduced recidivism; (B)
possible development of
recommendations for using information
obtained from such study to reduce
costs of incarceration and overcapacity
of prisons; and (C) consideration of any
amendments to the Guidelines Manual
that may be appropriate in light of the
information obtained from such study.
(8) Continuation of its multi-year
review of federal sentencing practices
pertaining to violations of conditions of
probation and supervised release,
including possible consideration of
amending the policy statements in
Chapter Seven of the Guidelines
Manual.
(9) Continuation of its work with the
legislative, executive, and judicial
branches of government, and other
interested parties, with respect to the
Commission’s December 2012 report to
Congress, titled The Continuing Impact
of United States v. Booker on Federal
Sentencing, and development of
appropriate guideline amendments in
response to any related legislation.
(10) Continuation of its work with
Congress and other interested parties on
child pornography offenses to
implement the recommendations set
forth in the Commission’s December
2012 report to Congress, titled Federal
Child Pornography Offenses, including
(A) possible development of appropriate
guideline amendments in response to
any related legislation; and (B) possible
development of guideline amendments
on the issue of victim restitution in light
of Paroline v. United States, llU.S.
ll, 134 S.Ct. 1710 (2014).
(11) Consideration of amending the
policy statement pertaining to
‘‘compassionate release,’’ § 1B1.13
(Reduction in Term of Imprisonment as
a Result of Motion by Director of Bureau
of Prisons).
(12) Beginning a multi-year effort to
simplify the operation of the guidelines,
including a review of (A) cross
references in the Guidelines Manual, (B)
the use of relevant conduct in offenses
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:59 May 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
involving conspiracies, (C) the use of
acquitted conduct in applying the
guidelines, and (D) the use of
departures.
(13) Implementation of any crime
legislation enacted during the 113th
Congress warranting a Commission
response.
(14) Resolution of circuit conflicts,
pursuant to the Commission’s
continuing authority and responsibility,
under 28 U.S.C. 991(b)(1)(B) and
Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344
(1991), to resolve conflicting
interpretations of the guidelines by the
federal courts.
(15) Study of the availability of
alternatives to incarceration.
(16) Consideration of any
miscellaneous guideline application
issues coming to the Commission’s
attention from case law and other
sources.
The Commission hereby gives notice
that it is seeking comment on these
tentative priorities and on any other
issues that interested persons believe
the Commission should address during
the amendment cycle ending May 1,
2015. To the extent practicable, public
comment should include the following:
(1) A statement of the issue, including,
where appropriate, the scope and
manner of study, particular problem
areas and possible solutions, and any
other matters relevant to a proposed
priority; (2) citations to applicable
sentencing guidelines, statutes, case
law, and constitutional provisions; and
(3) a direct and concise statement of
why the Commission should make the
issue a priority.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. § 994(a), (o); USSC
Rules of Practice and Procedure 5.2.
Patti B. Saris,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2014–12619 Filed 5–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–40–P
UNITED STATES SENTENCING
COMMISSION
Requests for Nominations; Victims
Advisory Group
United States Sentencing
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In view of existing vacancies
in the membership of the Victims
Advisory Group, the United States
Sentencing Commission hereby invites
any individual who has knowledge,
expertise, and/or experience in the area
of federal crime victimization to apply
to be appointed to the membership of
the advisory group. Applications should
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be received by the Commission not later
than July 2, 2014. Applications may be
sent to the Commission as indicated in
the addresses section below.
Applications for membership of
the Victims Advisory Group should be
received not later than July 2, 2014.
DATES:
Applications for
membership of the Victims Advisory
Group should include a letter of interest
and resume, and be sent to the
Commission by electronic mail or
regular mail. The email address is
pubaffairs@ussc.gov. The regular mail
address is United States Sentencing
Commission, One Columbus Circle NE.,
Suite 2–500, South Lobby, Washington,
DC 20002–8002, Attention: Public
Affairs.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanne Doherty, Public Affairs Officer,
202–502–4502, jdoherty@ussc.gov. More
information about the Victims Advisory
Group is available on the Commission’s
Web site at www.ussc.gov/advisorygroups.
The
Victims Advisory Group of the United
States Sentencing Commission is a
standing advisory group of the United
States Sentencing Commission pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 995 and Rule 5.4 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure. Under the charter for the
advisory group, the purpose of the
advisory group is (1) to assist the
Commission in carrying out its statutory
responsibilities under 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(o); (2) to provide to the
Commission its views on the
Commission’s activities and work,
including proposed priorities and
amendments, as they relate to victims of
crime; (3) to disseminate information
regarding sentencing issues to
organizations represented by the
Victims Advisory Group and to other
victims of crime and victims advocacy
groups, as appropriate; and (4) to
perform any other functions related to
victims of crime as the Commission
requests. Under the charter, the advisory
group consists of not more than nine
members, each of whom may serve not
more than two consecutive three-year
terms. Each member is appointed by the
Commission.
The Commission invites any
individual who has knowledge,
expertise, and/or experience in the area
of federal crime victimization to apply
to be appointed to the membership of
the Victims Advisory Group by sending
a letter of interest and a resume to the
Commission as indicated in the
ADDRESSES section above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM
02JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 105 (Monday, June 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31409-31410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12619]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
Proposed Priorities for Amendment Cycle
AGENCY: United States Sentencing Commission.
ACTION: Notice; Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of its statutory authority and responsibility to
analyze sentencing issues, including operation of the federal
sentencing guidelines, and in accordance with Rule 5.2 of its Rules of
Practice and Procedure, the United States Sentencing Commission is
seeking comment on possible priority policy issues for the amendment
cycle ending May 1, 2015.
DATES: Public comment should be received on or before July 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the Commission by electronic mail
or regular mail. The email address is pubaffairs@ussc.gov. The regular
mail address is United States Sentencing Commission, One Columbus
Circle NE., Suite 2-500, South Lobby, Washington, DC 20002-8002,
Attention: Public Affairs--Priorities Comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanne Doherty, Public Affairs
Officer, 202-502-4502, jdoherty@ussc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial branch of the United States
Government. The Commission promulgates sentencing guidelines and policy
statements for federal sentencing courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a).
The Commission also periodically reviews and revises previously
promulgated guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o) and submits
guideline amendments to the Congress not later than the first day of
May each year pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(p).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(g), the Commission intends to consider
the issue of reducing costs of incarceration and overcapacity of
prisons, to the extent it is relevant to any identified priority.
The Commission provides this notice to identify tentative
priorities for the amendment cycle ending May 1, 2015. The Commission
recognizes, however, that other factors, such as the enactment of any
legislation requiring Commission action, may affect the Commission's
ability to complete work on any or all of its identified priorities by
the statutory deadline of May 1, 2015. Accordingly, it may be necessary
to continue work on any or all of these issues beyond the amendment
cycle ending on May 1, 2015.
As so prefaced, the Commission has identified the following
tentative priorities:
(1) Continuation of its work with Congress and other interested
parties on statutory mandatory minimum penalties to implement the
recommendations set forth in the Commission's 2011 report to Congress,
titled Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice
System, including its recommendations regarding the severity and scope
of mandatory minimum penalties, consideration of expanding the ``safety
valve'' at 18 U.S.C. 3553(f), and elimination of the mandatory
``stacking'' of penalties under 18 U.S.C. 924(c), and to develop
appropriate guideline amendments in response to any related
legislation.
(2) Continuation of its work on economic crimes, including (A) a
comprehensive, multi-year study of Sec. 2B1.1 (Theft, Property
Destruction, and Fraud) and related guidelines, including examination
of the loss table, the definition of loss, and role in the offense; (B)
a study of offenses involving fraud on the market; (C) a study of
antitrust offenses, including examination of the fine provisions in
Sec. 2R1.1 (Bid-Rigging, Price-Fixing or Market Allocation Agreements
Among Competitors); and (D) consideration of any amendments to such
guidelines that may be appropriate in light of the information obtained
from such studies.
(3) Continuation of its multi-year study of statutory and guideline
definitions relating to the nature of a defendant's prior conviction
(e.g., ``crime of violence,'' ``aggravated felony,'' ``violent
felony,'' ``drug trafficking offense,'' and ``felony drug offense'')
and the impact of such definitions on the relevant statutory and
guideline provisions (e.g., career offender, illegal reentry, and armed
career criminal), possibly including recommendations to Congress on any
statutory changes that may be appropriate and development of guideline
amendments that may be appropriate.
(4) Implementation of the directive to the Commission in section 10
of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Public Law 111-220 (enacted August
3, 2010) (requiring the Commission, not later than 5 years after
enactment, to ``study and submit to Congress a report regarding the
impact of the changes in Federal sentencing law under this Act and the
amendments made by this Act'').
(5) Study of the operation of Sec. 3B1.2 (Mitigating Role) and
related provisions
[[Page 31410]]
in the Guidelines Manual (e.g., the ``mitigating role cap'' in Sec.
2D1.1(a)(5)), and consideration of any amendments to the Guidelines
Manual that may be appropriate in light of the information obtained
from such study.
(6) Study of the guidelines applicable to immigration offenses and
related criminal history rules, and consideration of any amendments to
such guidelines that may be appropriate in light of the information
obtained from such study.
(7) Continuation of its comprehensive, multi-year study of
recidivism, including (A) examination of circumstances that correlate
with increased or reduced recidivism; (B) possible development of
recommendations for using information obtained from such study to
reduce costs of incarceration and overcapacity of prisons; and (C)
consideration of any amendments to the Guidelines Manual that may be
appropriate in light of the information obtained from such study.
(8) Continuation of its multi-year review of federal sentencing
practices pertaining to violations of conditions of probation and
supervised release, including possible consideration of amending the
policy statements in Chapter Seven of the Guidelines Manual.
(9) Continuation of its work with the legislative, executive, and
judicial branches of government, and other interested parties, with
respect to the Commission's December 2012 report to Congress, titled
The Continuing Impact of United States v. Booker on Federal Sentencing,
and development of appropriate guideline amendments in response to any
related legislation.
(10) Continuation of its work with Congress and other interested
parties on child pornography offenses to implement the recommendations
set forth in the Commission's December 2012 report to Congress, titled
Federal Child Pornography Offenses, including (A) possible development
of appropriate guideline amendments in response to any related
legislation; and (B) possible development of guideline amendments on
the issue of victim restitution in light of Paroline v. United States,
----U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1710 (2014).
(11) Consideration of amending the policy statement pertaining to
``compassionate release,'' Sec. 1B1.13 (Reduction in Term of
Imprisonment as a Result of Motion by Director of Bureau of Prisons).
(12) Beginning a multi-year effort to simplify the operation of the
guidelines, including a review of (A) cross references in the
Guidelines Manual, (B) the use of relevant conduct in offenses
involving conspiracies, (C) the use of acquitted conduct in applying
the guidelines, and (D) the use of departures.
(13) Implementation of any crime legislation enacted during the
113th Congress warranting a Commission response.
(14) Resolution of circuit conflicts, pursuant to the Commission's
continuing authority and responsibility, under 28 U.S.C. 991(b)(1)(B)
and Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344 (1991), to resolve
conflicting interpretations of the guidelines by the federal courts.
(15) Study of the availability of alternatives to incarceration.
(16) Consideration of any miscellaneous guideline application
issues coming to the Commission's attention from case law and other
sources.
The Commission hereby gives notice that it is seeking comment on
these tentative priorities and on any other issues that interested
persons believe the Commission should address during the amendment
cycle ending May 1, 2015. To the extent practicable, public comment
should include the following: (1) A statement of the issue, including,
where appropriate, the scope and manner of study, particular problem
areas and possible solutions, and any other matters relevant to a
proposed priority; (2) citations to applicable sentencing guidelines,
statutes, case law, and constitutional provisions; and (3) a direct and
concise statement of why the Commission should make the issue a
priority.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 994(a), (o); USSC Rules of Practice
and Procedure 5.2.
Patti B. Saris,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2014-12619 Filed 5-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-40-P