Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of Dengue Virus Serological Reagents, 31021-31023 [2014-12545]
Download as PDF
31021
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 104
Friday, May 30, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 113
[Docket No. APHIS–2014–0033]
In Vitro Tests for Serial Release
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are amending the ‘‘In vitro
tests for serial release’’ regulations by
removing a footnote that refers to one
method to calculate the relative antigen
content of inactivated veterinary
biological products and relative potency
calculation software available from
Veterinary Services’ Center for
Veterinary Biologics (CVB). CVB will no
longer provide or update the software
and the written method for using the
software will no longer be used. This
action will update the regulations.
DATES: Effective May 30, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Donna Malloy, Section Leader,
Operational Support, Center for
Veterinary Biologics Policy, Evaluation,
and Licensing, VS, APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Unit 148, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1231; (301) 851–3426.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR 113.8
provide criteria for acceptable in vitro
potency tests for the serial release of live
and inactivated veterinary biological
products. As provided in the
regulations, the potency of inactivated
products is evaluated by comparing the
relative antigen content of the product
to an unexpired reference using a
parallel line immunoassay or another
acceptable procedure. The footnote in
paragraph (c) of this section refers to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
one method that can be used to evaluate
the relative antigen content using
Supplementary Assay Method (SAM)
318 and relative potency calculation
software available from Veterinary
Services’ Center for Veterinary Biologics
(CVB). CVB is no longer providing or
updating the software, and the written
method for using the software,
described in SAM 318, will no longer be
used. Therefore, we are removing that
footnote.
This rule relates to internal agency
management. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553, notice of proposed
rulemaking and opportunity to
comment are not required, and this rule
may be made effective less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal
Register. Further, since this rule relates
to internal agency management, it is
exempt from the provisions of Executive
Orders 12866 and 12988. Finally, this
action is not a rule as defined by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, and thus is
exempt from the provisions of that Act.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 113
Animal biologics, Exports, Imports,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, 9 CFR part 113 is
amended as follows:
PART 113—STANDARD
REQUIREMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 113
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 151–159; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.4.
§ 113.8
[Amended]
2. In § 113.8, paragraph (c), footnote 1
is removed.
■
§ 113.100
[Amended]
3. In § 113.100, paragraph (f), footnote
2 is redesignated as footnote 1.
■
§ 113.200
[Amended]
4. In § 113.200, paragraph (f), footnote
3 is redesignated as footnote 2.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
May 2014.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–12550 Filed 5–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0429]
Medical Devices; Immunology and
Microbiology Devices; Classification of
Dengue Virus Serological Reagents
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying
dengue virus serological reagents into
class II (special controls). The special
controls that will apply to the device are
identified in this order, and the codified
language for the dengue serological
reagents classification will include the
identification of the special controls that
will apply to this device. The Agency is
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) because special
controls, in addition to general controls,
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective June 30,
2014. The classification was applicable
April 8, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beena Puri, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5553, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6202.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28,
1976 (the date of enactment of the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976),
generally referred to as postamendments
devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
31022
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate
device that does not require premarket
approval. The Agency determines
whether new devices are substantially
equivalent to predicate devices by
means of premarket notification
procedures in section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part
807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by section 607 of the Food and
Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144, July 9,
2012), provides two procedures by
which a person may request FDA to
classify a device under the criteria set
forth in section 513(a)(1). Under the first
procedure, the person submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified and,
within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act,
the person requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2). Under the
second procedure, rather than first
submitting a premarket notification
under section 510(k) and then a request
for classification under the first
procedure, the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon
which to base a determination of
substantial equivalence and requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act. If the person submits a
request to classify the device under this
second procedure, FDA may decline to
undertake the classification request if
FDA identifies a legally marketed device
that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with
the device or if FDA determines that the
device submitted is not of ‘‘lowmoderate risk’’ or that general controls
would be inadequate to control the risks
and special controls to mitigate the risks
cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a
device under either procedure provided
by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act,
FDA will classify the device by written
order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial
classification of the device. Within 30
days after the issuance of an order
classifying the device, FDA must
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing this classification.
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, FDA issued an order on
October 8, 2010, classifying the InBios
DENV Detect IgM Capture ELISA into
class III, because it was not substantially
equivalent to a device that was
introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce for commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, or a
device which was subsequently
reclassified into class I or class II. On
October 20, 2010, InBios International
Inc., submitted a request for de novo
classification of the InBios DENV Detect
IgM Capture ELISA under section
513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the
device be classified into class II.
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
request for de novo classification in
order to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. FDA
classifies devices into class II if general
controls by themselves are insufficient
to provide reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness, but there is
sufficient information to establish
special controls to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device for its intended use. After
review of the information submitted in
the request, FDA determined that the
device can be classified into class II
with the establishment of special
controls. FDA believes these special
controls will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
The device is assigned the generic
name dengue virus serological reagents,
which are identified as devices that
consist of antigens and antibodies for
the detection of dengue virus and
dengue antibodies in individuals who
have signs and symptoms of dengue
fever or dengue hemorrhagic fever. The
detection aids in the clinical laboratory
diagnosis of dengue fever or dengue
hemorrhagic fever caused by dengue
virus.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated with this type of
device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks:
TABLE 1—IDENTIFIED RISKS TO HEALTH AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks to health
Mitigation measures
A false positive test result for an individual may lead to unnecessary
treatment and possibly a less thorough laboratory evaluation for the
true cause of illness; a false positive result may lead to unnecessary
initiation of mosquito vector control measures.
Device Description Containing the Information Specified in the Special
Control Guideline.
Performance Characteristics.
Labeling.
Postmarket Measures.
Device Description Containing the Information Specified in the Special
Control Guideline.
Performance Characteristics.
Labeling.
Postmarket Measures.
Labeling.
A false negative test result may lead to inappropriate use of antibiotics
or a delay in treatment to prevent death due to dengue hemorrhagic
fever or dengue shock syndrome or a false negative result may lead
to delay in initiation of mosquito vector control measures.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
An error in the interpretation of the results ..............................................
FDA believes that the measures set
forth in the special controls guideline
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guideline: Dengue Virus Serological
Reagents’’ are necessary, in addition to
general controls, to mitigate the risks to
health described in table 1.
Therefore, on April 8, 2011, FDA
issued an order to the petitioner
classifying dengue virus serological
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
reagents into class II. FDA is codifying
this device type by adding § 866.3945).
Following the effective date of this
final classification order, any firm
submitting a 510(k) premarket
notification for this device type will
need to comply with the special
controls.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification
is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. Therefore, this type of
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
device is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who
intend to market this type of device
must submit to FDA a premarket
notification, prior to marketing the
device, which contains information
about the dengue virus nucleic acid
amplification test reagents they intend
to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final administrative order
establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of
information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 820 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0073; and the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 801 and
21 CFR 809.10 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is
amended as follows:
PART 866—IMMUNOLOGY AND
MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 866 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
2. Section 866.3945 is added to
subpart D to read as follows:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
§ 866.3945
reagents.
Dengue virus serological
(a) Identification. Dengue virus
serological reagents are devices that
consist of antigens and antibodies for
the detection of dengue virus and
dengue antibodies in individuals who
have signs and symptoms of dengue
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
fever or dengue hemorrhagic fever. The
detection aids in the clinical laboratory
diagnosis of dengue fever or dengue
hemorrhagic fever caused by dengue
virus.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control is FDA’s
guideline entitled ‘‘Class II Special
Controls Guideline: Dengue Virus
Serological Reagents.’’ For availability
of the guideline document, see
§ 866.1(e).
Dated: May 27, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–12545 Filed 5–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0544]
Microbiology Devices; Reclassification
of Nucleic Acid-Based Systems for
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex
in Respiratory Specimens
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2013–N–
0544, by any of the following methods:
ADDRESSES:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper submissions): Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0544 for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janice A. Washington, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5554,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–6207.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory Authorities
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is reclassifying
nucleic acid-based in vitro diagnostic
devices for the detection of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in
respiratory specimens from class III
(premarket approval) into class II
(special controls). FDA is also issuing
the special controls guideline entitled
‘‘Class II Special Controls Guideline:
Nucleic Acid-Based In Vitro Diagnostic
Devices for the Detection of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in
Respiratory Specimens.’’ These devices
are intended to be used as an aid in the
diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.
DATES: This rule is effective June 30,
2014.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
31023
Sfmt 4700
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976
(the 1976 amendments) (Pub. L. 94–
295), the Safe Medical Devices Act of
1990 (Pub. L. 101–629), the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 (Pub. L. 105–115), the Medical
Device User Fee and Modernization Act
of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–250), the Medical
Devices Technical Corrections Act (Pub.
L. 108–214), the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (Pub. L. 110–85), and the Food and
Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144)
establish a comprehensive system for
the regulation of medical devices
intended for human use. Section 513 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c)
establishes three categories (classes) of
devices, reflecting the regulatory
controls needed to provide reasonable
assurance of their safety and
effectiveness. The three categories of
devices are class I (general controls),
class II (special controls), and class III
(premarket approval).
Under the FD&C Act, FDA clears or
approves the three classes of medical
devices for commercial distribution in
the United States through three
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 104 (Friday, May 30, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31021-31023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12545]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0429]
Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices;
Classification of Dengue Virus Serological Reagents
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying dengue
virus serological reagents into class II (special controls). The
special controls that will apply to the device are identified in this
order, and the codified language for the dengue serological reagents
classification will include the identification of the special controls
that will apply to this device. The Agency is classifying the device
into class II (special controls) because special controls, in addition
to general controls, will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective June 30, 2014. The classification was
applicable April 8, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beena Puri, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5553, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6202.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were
not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred
to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA
[[Page 31022]]
rulemaking process. These devices remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until the device is classified or
reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues an order finding the
device to be substantially equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate device that does not require
premarket approval. The Agency determines whether new devices are
substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means of premarket
notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as amended by section 607 of the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-
144, July 9, 2012), provides two procedures by which a person may
request FDA to classify a device under the criteria set forth in
section 513(a)(1). Under the first procedure, the person submits a
premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act for a
device that has not previously been classified and, within 30 days of
receiving an order classifying the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2). Under the second procedure, rather than first
submitting a premarket notification under section 510(k) and then a
request for classification under the first procedure, the person
determines that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base
a determination of substantial equivalence and requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. If the person
submits a request to classify the device under this second procedure,
FDA may decline to undertake the classification request if FDA
identifies a legally marketed device that could provide a reasonable
basis for review of substantial equivalence with the device or if FDA
determines that the device submitted is not of ``low-moderate risk'' or
that general controls would be inadequate to control the risks and
special controls to mitigate the risks cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a device under either
procedure provided by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA will
classify the device by written order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial classification of the device. Within
30 days after the issuance of an order classifying the device, FDA must
publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing this
classification.
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, FDA issued an
order on October 8, 2010, classifying the InBios DENV Detect IgM
Capture ELISA into class III, because it was not substantially
equivalent to a device that was introduced or delivered for
introduction into interstate commerce for commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, or a device which was subsequently reclassified
into class I or class II. On October 20, 2010, InBios International
Inc., submitted a request for de novo classification of the InBios DENV
Detect IgM Capture ELISA under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the device be classified into class II.
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the request for de novo classification in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of
the FD&C Act. FDA classifies devices into class II if general controls
by themselves are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After
review of the information submitted in the request, FDA determined that
the device can be classified into class II with the establishment of
special controls. FDA believes these special controls will provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
The device is assigned the generic name dengue virus serological
reagents, which are identified as devices that consist of antigens and
antibodies for the detection of dengue virus and dengue antibodies in
individuals who have signs and symptoms of dengue fever or dengue
hemorrhagic fever. The detection aids in the clinical laboratory
diagnosis of dengue fever or dengue hemorrhagic fever caused by dengue
virus.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated with
this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks:
Table 1--Identified Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks to health Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A false positive test result for an Device Description Containing
individual may lead to unnecessary the Information Specified in
treatment and possibly a less thorough the Special Control Guideline.
laboratory evaluation for the true Performance Characteristics.
cause of illness; a false positive Labeling.
result may lead to unnecessary Postmarket Measures.
initiation of mosquito vector control
measures.
A false negative test result may lead Device Description Containing
to inappropriate use of antibiotics or the Information Specified in
a delay in treatment to prevent death the Special Control Guideline.
due to dengue hemorrhagic fever or Performance Characteristics.
dengue shock syndrome or a false Labeling.
negative result may lead to delay in Postmarket Measures.
initiation of mosquito vector control
measures.
An error in the interpretation of the Labeling.
results.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes that the measures set forth in the special controls
guideline entitled ``Class II Special Controls Guideline: Dengue Virus
Serological Reagents'' are necessary, in addition to general controls,
to mitigate the risks to health described in table 1.
Therefore, on April 8, 2011, FDA issued an order to the petitioner
classifying dengue virus serological reagents into class II. FDA is
codifying this device type by adding Sec. 866.3945).
Following the effective date of this final classification order,
any firm submitting a 510(k) premarket notification for this device
type will need to comply with the special controls.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act if FDA determines that premarket notification is
not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this type of
[[Page 31023]]
device is not exempt from premarket notification requirements. Persons
who intend to market this type of device must submit to FDA a premarket
notification, prior to marketing the device, which contains information
about the dengue virus nucleic acid amplification test reagents they
intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final administrative order establishes special controls that
refer to previously approved collections of information found in other
FDA regulations. These collections of information are subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of
information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification
submissions have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR part 820 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21
CFR part 801 and 21 CFR 809.10 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
866 is amended as follows:
PART 866--IMMUNOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 866 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
0
2. Section 866.3945 is added to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 866.3945 Dengue virus serological reagents.
(a) Identification. Dengue virus serological reagents are devices
that consist of antigens and antibodies for the detection of dengue
virus and dengue antibodies in individuals who have signs and symptoms
of dengue fever or dengue hemorrhagic fever. The detection aids in the
clinical laboratory diagnosis of dengue fever or dengue hemorrhagic
fever caused by dengue virus.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control is FDA's guideline entitled ``Class II Special Controls
Guideline: Dengue Virus Serological Reagents.'' For availability of the
guideline document, see Sec. 866.1(e).
Dated: May 27, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-12545 Filed 5-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P