Federal Acquisition Regulation; Repeal of the Recovery Act Reporting Requirements, 31193-31195 [2014-12393]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
‘‘Highest-level owner’’ and ‘‘Immediate
owner’’;
■ d. Removing from the second
paragraph of (b)(2) ‘‘(c) through (o)’’ and
adding ‘‘(c) through (p)’’ in its place;
and
■ e. Adding paragraph (p).
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
lllllllllllllllllllll
Highest-level owner legal name:
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Do not use a ‘‘doing business as’’ name)
31193
section 1512(c) of Division A of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) (Pub. L. 111–
5). Starting February 1, 2014, future
reporting is not required. A message has
(End of provision)
been posted at
*
*
*
*
*
www.federalreporting.gov notifying
[FR Doc. 2014–12387 Filed 5–29–14; 8:45 am]
Federal contractors of this change. As of
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
March 20, 2014, the Web site is closed
for future reporting.
52.212–3 Offeror Representations and
Section 627 also amended section
Certifications—Commercial Items.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
1512(d) to replace the requirement that
*
*
*
*
*
agencies make publicly available the
GENERAL SERVICES
information previously reported by
Offeror Representations and
ADMINISTRATION
contractors under section 1512(c) with
Certifications—Commercial Items (Nov
the requirement that each agency that
2014)
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
made recovery funds available to any
The Offeror shall complete only paragraph
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
recipient, make publicly available
(b) of this provision if the Offeror has
detailed spending data as prescribed by
completed the annual representations and
48 CFR Parts 4, 42, and 52
the Office of Management and Budget
certification electronically via the System for
and pursuant to the Federal Funding
[FAC 2005–74; FAR Case 2014–016; Item
Award Management (SAM) Web site
Accountability and Transparency Act of
accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov. II; Docket No. 2014–0016, Sequence No. 1]
2006 (FFATA) (Pub. L. 109–282).
If the Offeror has not completed the annual
RIN 9000–AM77
Although Federal contractors and
representations and certifications
electronically, the Offeror shall complete
agencies are not required after January
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Repeal 31, 2014, to comply with future
only paragraphs (c) through (p) of this
of the Recovery Act Reporting
provision.
reporting requirements of the Recovery
Requirements
(a) * * *
Act, which were implemented in FAR
Highest-level owner means the entity that
subpart 4.15, 42.15, and the clause at
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD),
owns or controls an immediate owner of the
General Services Administration (GSA), 52.204–11, American Recovery and
offeror, or that owns or controls one or more
Reinvestment Act—Reporting
and National Aeronautics and Space
entities that control an immediate owner of
Requirements, contractors and agencies
Administration (NASA).
the offeror. No entity owns or exercises
are still required to continue their
control of the highest level owner.
ACTION: Final rule.
FFATA reporting on existing contracts,
Immediate owner means an entity, other
than the offeror, that has direct control of the SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA have
as implemented in FAR subpart 4.14
offeror. Indicators of control include, but are
and clause 52.204–10, Reporting
adopted as final, with changes, two
not limited to, one or more of the following:
Executive Compensation and First-Tier
interim rules amending the Federal
Ownership or interlocking management,
Subcontract Awards.
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to revise
identity of interests among family members,
To notify the acquisition community
the clause on Recovery Act reporting
shared facilities and equipment, and the
of this change the following steps were
procedures. This final rule implements
common use of employees.
taken: (1) The Civilian Agency
a section of the Consolidated
*
*
*
*
*
Acquisition Council (CAAC) issued
Appropriations Act, 2014, by repealing
(p) Ownership or Control of Offeror.
CAAC letter 2014–02 titled ‘‘Class
the reporting requirements of the
(Applies in all solicitations when there is a
Deviation from the Federal Acquisition
American Recovery and Reinvestment
requirement to be registered in SAM or a
Regulation (FAR) to Repeal the
Act of 2009.
requirement to have a DUNS Number in the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
solicitation.
DATES: Effective: May 30, 2014.
Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act)
(1) The Offeror represents that it [l] has
Applicability: In accordance with FAR
Reporting Requirement’’ on February
or [l] does not have an immediate owner.
1.108(d)(3), Contracting Officers may, at
If the Offeror has more than one immediate
20, 2014; and (2) DoD issued a deviation
their discretion, modify existing
owner (such as a joint venture), then the
titled ‘‘Class Deviation-Repeal of the
contracts to amend 52.204–11 in
Offeror shall respond to paragraph (2) and if
Recovery Act Reporting Requirements’’
applicable, paragraph (3) of this provision for paragraph (c) to add a statement that
dated March 11, 2014.
‘‘Starting February 1, 2014, future
each participant in the joint venture.
(2) If the Offeror indicates ‘‘has’’ in
II. Discussion and Analysis
reporting is not required.’’
paragraph (p)(1) of this provision, enter the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an
following information:
Curtis E. Glover, Sr., Procurement
interim rule under FAR Case 2009–009,
Immediate owner CAGE code:
Analyst, at 202–501–1448 for
American Recovery and Reinvestment
lllllllllllllllllllll
clarification of content. For information Act of 2009 (Recovery Act)—Reporting
Immediate owner legal name:
pertaining to status or publication
Requirements, in the Federal Register at
lllllllllllllllllllll schedules, contact the Regulatory
74 FR 14639 on March 31, 2009, and
(Do not use a ‘‘doing business as’’ name)
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite notices published at 74 FR 42877 on
Is the immediate owner owned or
FAC 2005–74, FAR Case 2014–016.
August 25, 2009, and at 74 FR 48971 on
controlled by another entity: [l] Yes or [l]
September 25, 2009. DoD, GSA, and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
No.
NASA published in the Federal Register
(3) If the Offeror indicates ‘‘yes’’ in
I. Background
a separate interim rule under FAR Case
paragraph (p)(2) of this provision, indicating
2010–008, Recovery Act Subcontract
Section 627 of Division E of the
that the immediate owner is owned or
Reporting Procedures, at 75 FR 38684
controlled by another entity, then enter the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014
following information:
(Pub. L. 113–76), repealed the contractor on July 2, 2010, and a correction
published at 75 FR 43090 on July 23,
Highest-level owner CAGE code:
reporting requirements that were in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:36 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30MYR2.SGM
30MYR2
31194
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
2010. Responses to the interim rule
published under 2009–009 were
received from 39 respondents, and one
respondent commented on the interim
rule published under FAR Case 2010–
008.
The CAAC and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council
(DARC) reviewed the public comments
received.
However, due to the repeal of the
Recovery Act reporting requirements,
the two FAR cases under which the
interim rules were published have been
closed into this FAR Case 2014–016,
which adopts the interim rules as a final
rule, with changes. This final rule
deletes the obsolete text at FAR subpart
4.15 and 52.204–11 and makes
conforming changes at 42.1501(a)(5) and
52.212–5(b)(5).
Therefore, the comments received
with regard to the two previously
published interim rules that addressed
applicability, definitions, Web sites, the
reporting requirements, paperwork
burden, and impact on small business,
are no longer relevant.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared
a final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The
FRFA is summarized as follows:
The objective of this final rule is to delete
the reporting requirements at FAR subpart
4.15 and the clause at 52.204–11, American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act Reporting
Requirements. The two prior interim rules
(2009–009 and 2010–008), which established
the current FAR coverage, have been closed
into this final rule. This is necessary because
section 627 of Division E of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2014, amended Title XV
of Division A of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act, FY 2014 (Pub. L. 111–5),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:36 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
including repeal of the contractor reporting
requirements.
Although comments were received on the
two prior interim rules, these comments are
no longer relevant, because the reporting
requirements have been deleted, and there is
no further burden on any entity, small or
large, that is associated with Recovery Act
reporting.
An initial report, with quarterly updates,
was required from all Federal contractors that
received awards funded by the Recovery Act.
As of March 15, 2010, the Federal
Procurement Data System (FPDS) indicated
that there were 36,680 Recovery Act awards,
including modifications, totaling
$43,716,219,816. Of the Recovery Act prime
contract awards, 39.5%, or 14,501 were made
to small businesses. The number of first-tier
subcontractors estimated to participate in
Recovery Act awards was 73,360. Of these
73,360 Recovery Act first-tier subcontractors,
it was estimated that 40%, or 29,344, were
small businesses.
Performance of most contracts awarded
using Recovery Act funds is already
complete. Therefore, we estimate that not
more than several hundred small entities will
be positively impacted by the elimination of
the reporting requirements.
The reports being deleted were probably
prepared by a company contract
administrator or contract manager or a
company subcontract administrator. The
information required in the report was
primarily information that companies would
maintain for their own business purposes
including, but not limited to, contract or
other award number, the dollar amount of
invoices, the supplies or services delivered,
a broad assessment of progress towards
completion, the estimated number of new
jobs created or retained resulting from the
award, and first-tier subcontract information
(or aggregate information if the subcontract is
less than $25,000, or the subcontractor is an
individual or had gross income in the
previous tax year of less than $300,000).
While most of the data elements imposed
only one-time burden collection, some
required quarterly updates.
Deletion of the Recovery Act reporting
requirements from the FAR has eliminated
all economic impact of the two prior interim
FAR rules on small entities.
Interested parties may obtain a copy
of the FRFA from the Regulatory
Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat
has submitted a copy of the FRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). This final rule repealed the
contractor reporting requirements that
were in section 1512(c) of Division A of
the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery
Act) (Pub. L. 111–5). Therefore, a
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
request will be submitted to OMB to
cancel OMB clearances 9000–0166,
9000–0167, 9000–0168, 9000–0169, and
9000–0176. As a result of this action,
the public burden for reporting recovery
actions has been reduced by 419,019
hours. However, even though Federal
contractors and agencies are not
required after January 31, 2014, to
comply with future reporting
requirements of the Recovery Act,
which were implemented in FAR
subparts 4.15 and 42.15, and the clause
at 52.204–11, American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act—Reporting
Requirements, both groups are still
required to continue their FFATA
reporting on existing contracts, as
implemented in FAR subpart 4.14 and
clause 52.204–10, Reporting Executive
Compensation and First-Tier
Subcontract Awards and that reporting
requirement is covered under a separate
collection.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 4, 42,
and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 22, 2014.
William Clark,
Acting Director, Office of Government-wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Interim Rules Adopted as Final With
Changes
Accordingly, the interim rules
amending 48 CFR parts 4 and 52, which
were published in the Federal Register
at 74 FR 14639, March 31, 2009, and at
75 FR 38684, July 2, 2010, are adopted
as final with the following changes:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 4, 42, and 52 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PART 4—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
Subpart 4.15 [Removed and Reserved]
■
2. Remove and reserve Subpart 4.15.
PART 42—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
42.1501
[Amended]
3. Amend section 42.1501 by
removing from paragraph (a)(5)
‘‘subparts 4.14 and 4.15’’ and adding
‘‘subpart 4.14’’ in its place.
■
E:\FR\FM\30MYR2.SGM
30MYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 104 / Friday, May 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.204–11
[Removed and Reserved]
4. Remove and reserve section
52.204–11.
■ 5. Amended section 52.212–5 by—
■ a. Revising the date of the clause; and
■ b. Removing and reserving paragraph
(b)(5).
The revised text reads as follows:
■
52.212–5 Contract Terms and Conditions
Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial Items.
*
*
*
*
*
Contract Terms and Conditions
Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial Items
(May 2014)
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–12393 Filed 5–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 31 and 52
[FAC 2005–74; FAR Case 2012–017; Item
III; Docket No. 2012–0017, Sequence No.
1]
RIN 9000–AM38
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Expansion of Applicability of the
Senior Executive Compensation
Benchmark
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
adopting as final, without change, an
interim rule amending the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act of 2012. This
section expands the application of the
senior executive compensation
benchmark to a broader group of
contractor employees on contracts
awarded by DoD, NASA, and the Coast
Guard. The senior executive
compensation benchmark amount limits
the reimbursement of contractor
employee compensation costs.
DATES: Effective: May 30, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edward N. Chambers, Procurement
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:36 May 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
Analyst, at 202–501–3221 for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FAC 2005–74, FAR Case 2012–017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an
interim rule in the Federal Register at
78 FR 38535, on June 26, 2013 to
implement section 803 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012. The interim rule required in
FAR 31.205–6(p) that the incurred
compensation costs for all contractor
employees on all DoD, NASA, and Coast
Guard contracts awarded on or after
December 31, 2011, be subject to the
senior executive compensation amount.
The reference to 31.205–6(p) in FAR
52.216–7 was also updated to reflect
this revision in 31.205–6(p).
Section 803(c)(2) stated that the
expanded reach of the compensation
cap ‘‘shall apply with respect to costs of
compensation incurred after January 1,
2012, under contracts entered into
before, on, or after the date of the
enactment of this Act’’ (which was
December 31, 2011). This final rule
addresses only the prospective
application of section 803, i.e., to
contracts awarded on or after its
enactment (December 31, 2011). A
separate proposed rule (FAR Case 2012–
025) was published in the Federal
Register at 78 FR 38539, on June 26,
2013 to address the retroactive
application of section 803 to contracts
that had been awarded before its
enactment.
A technical correction was published
in the Federal Register at 78 FR 70481,
on November 25, 2013, correcting the
dates in 31.205–6(p)(2)(ii).
Three respondents submitted
comments on the interim rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The Civilian Agency Acquisition
Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils)
reviewed the public comments in the
development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments is provided
as follows:
A. Summary of Significant Changes
Based on a review of the public
comments, discussed below, the
Councils have concluded that no change
to the interim rule is necessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
31195
B. Analysis of Public Comments
1. Retroactive Application of Rule Not
Appropriate
Comment: Respondents submitted
comments stating that it was
inappropriate to retroactively apply the
rule. These comments included:
(a) The interim rule creates a breach
of contract per case law cited in the
General Dynamics and ATK Launch
Systems decisions. Thus, the effective
date of the interim rule should be June
26, 2013 (the effective date of the
interim rule) and not the date of the
statute (January 1, 2012).
(b) The interim rule’s premise that
section 803 of the NDAA must
automatically prevail for contracts
signed prior to the effective date of the
rule but after enactment of the NDAA is
incorrect. It is well established in the
Federal Courts that a contract that
conflicts with Federal statute should
still be honored.
(c) Case law has established that
statutory language which explicitly
requires the issuance of implementing
regulations is not self-executing but
instead takes effect upon the
promulgation of implementing
regulations.
(d) The Government was mistaken in
its conclusion that the holdings in the
General Dynamics and ATK Launch
Systems decisions cited in the preamble
would impact only contracts awarded
before the effective date of the statute.
A close reading of those decisions
reveals the Government would also be
in breach of FAR 52.216–7 in
implementing this interim rule because
it attempts to impose its requirements
on contracts awarded before the
published date of the interim rule (June
26, 2013).
(e) The retroactive application of this
rule is expressly prohibited per FAR
1.108(d).
Response: Section 803(c)(2) states that
the expanded reach of the compensation
cap ‘‘shall apply with respect to costs of
compensation incurred after January 1,
2012, under contracts entered into
before, on, or after the date of the
enactment of this Act’’ (which was
December 31, 2011). This final rule
addresses only the prospective
application of section 803, i.e., to
contracts awarded on or after its
enactment (December 31, 2011). A
separate proposed rule (FAR Case 2012–
025) was published in the Federal
Register at 78 FR 38539 on June 26,
2013 to address the retroactive
application of section 803 to contracts
that had been awarded before its
enactment.
E:\FR\FM\30MYR2.SGM
30MYR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 104 (Friday, May 30, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31193-31195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12393]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 4, 42, and 52
[FAC 2005-74; FAR Case 2014-016; Item II; Docket No. 2014-0016,
Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000-AM77
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Repeal of the Recovery Act
Reporting Requirements
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA have adopted as final, with changes, two
interim rules amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
revise the clause on Recovery Act reporting procedures. This final rule
implements a section of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, by
repealing the reporting requirements of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009.
DATES: Effective: May 30, 2014.
Applicability: In accordance with FAR 1.108(d)(3), Contracting
Officers may, at their discretion, modify existing contracts to amend
52.204-11 in paragraph (c) to add a statement that ``Starting February
1, 2014, future reporting is not required.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Curtis E. Glover, Sr., Procurement
Analyst, at 202-501-1448 for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-74, FAR Case 2014-
016.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 627 of Division E of the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2014 (Pub. L. 113-76), repealed the contractor reporting requirements
that were in section 1512(c) of Division A of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) (Pub. L. 111-5). Starting
February 1, 2014, future reporting is not required. A message has been
posted at www.federalreporting.gov notifying Federal contractors of
this change. As of March 20, 2014, the Web site is closed for future
reporting.
Section 627 also amended section 1512(d) to replace the requirement
that agencies make publicly available the information previously
reported by contractors under section 1512(c) with the requirement that
each agency that made recovery funds available to any recipient, make
publicly available detailed spending data as prescribed by the Office
of Management and Budget and pursuant to the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) (Pub. L. 109-282).
Although Federal contractors and agencies are not required after
January 31, 2014, to comply with future reporting requirements of the
Recovery Act, which were implemented in FAR subpart 4.15, 42.15, and
the clause at 52.204-11, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act--
Reporting Requirements, contractors and agencies are still required to
continue their FFATA reporting on existing contracts, as implemented in
FAR subpart 4.14 and clause 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation
and First-Tier Subcontract Awards.
To notify the acquisition community of this change the following
steps were taken: (1) The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC)
issued CAAC letter 2014-02 titled ``Class Deviation from the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to Repeal the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act) Reporting Requirement'' on
February 20, 2014; and (2) DoD issued a deviation titled ``Class
Deviation-Repeal of the Recovery Act Reporting Requirements'' dated
March 11, 2014.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an interim rule under FAR Case 2009-
009, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act)--
Reporting Requirements, in the Federal Register at 74 FR 14639 on March
31, 2009, and notices published at 74 FR 42877 on August 25, 2009, and
at 74 FR 48971 on September 25, 2009. DoD, GSA, and NASA published in
the Federal Register a separate interim rule under FAR Case 2010-008,
Recovery Act Subcontract Reporting Procedures, at 75 FR 38684 on July
2, 2010, and a correction published at 75 FR 43090 on July 23,
[[Page 31194]]
2010. Responses to the interim rule published under 2009-009 were
received from 39 respondents, and one respondent commented on the
interim rule published under FAR Case 2010-008.
The CAAC and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (DARC)
reviewed the public comments received.
However, due to the repeal of the Recovery Act reporting
requirements, the two FAR cases under which the interim rules were
published have been closed into this FAR Case 2014-016, which adopts
the interim rules as a final rule, with changes. This final rule
deletes the obsolete text at FAR subpart 4.15 and 52.204-11 and makes
conforming changes at 42.1501(a)(5) and 52.212-5(b)(5).
Therefore, the comments received with regard to the two previously
published interim rules that addressed applicability, definitions, Web
sites, the reporting requirements, paperwork burden, and impact on
small business, are no longer relevant.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared a final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq. The FRFA is summarized as follows:
The objective of this final rule is to delete the reporting
requirements at FAR subpart 4.15 and the clause at 52.204-11,
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Reporting Requirements. The
two prior interim rules (2009-009 and 2010-008), which established
the current FAR coverage, have been closed into this final rule.
This is necessary because section 627 of Division E of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, amended Title XV of Division
A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, FY 2014 (Pub. L.
111-5), including repeal of the contractor reporting requirements.
Although comments were received on the two prior interim rules,
these comments are no longer relevant, because the reporting
requirements have been deleted, and there is no further burden on
any entity, small or large, that is associated with Recovery Act
reporting.
An initial report, with quarterly updates, was required from all
Federal contractors that received awards funded by the Recovery Act.
As of March 15, 2010, the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS)
indicated that there were 36,680 Recovery Act awards, including
modifications, totaling $43,716,219,816. Of the Recovery Act prime
contract awards, 39.5%, or 14,501 were made to small businesses. The
number of first-tier subcontractors estimated to participate in
Recovery Act awards was 73,360. Of these 73,360 Recovery Act first-
tier subcontractors, it was estimated that 40%, or 29,344, were
small businesses.
Performance of most contracts awarded using Recovery Act funds
is already complete. Therefore, we estimate that not more than
several hundred small entities will be positively impacted by the
elimination of the reporting requirements.
The reports being deleted were probably prepared by a company
contract administrator or contract manager or a company subcontract
administrator. The information required in the report was primarily
information that companies would maintain for their own business
purposes including, but not limited to, contract or other award
number, the dollar amount of invoices, the supplies or services
delivered, a broad assessment of progress towards completion, the
estimated number of new jobs created or retained resulting from the
award, and first-tier subcontract information (or aggregate
information if the subcontract is less than $25,000, or the
subcontractor is an individual or had gross income in the previous
tax year of less than $300,000). While most of the data elements
imposed only one-time burden collection, some required quarterly
updates.
Deletion of the Recovery Act reporting requirements from the FAR
has eliminated all economic impact of the two prior interim FAR
rules on small entities.
Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the
Regulatory Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy
of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). This final rule
repealed the contractor reporting requirements that were in section
1512(c) of Division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (Recovery Act) (Pub. L. 111-5). Therefore, a request will be
submitted to OMB to cancel OMB clearances 9000-0166, 9000-0167, 9000-
0168, 9000-0169, and 9000-0176. As a result of this action, the public
burden for reporting recovery actions has been reduced by 419,019
hours. However, even though Federal contractors and agencies are not
required after January 31, 2014, to comply with future reporting
requirements of the Recovery Act, which were implemented in FAR
subparts 4.15 and 42.15, and the clause at 52.204-11, American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act--Reporting Requirements, both groups are still
required to continue their FFATA reporting on existing contracts, as
implemented in FAR subpart 4.14 and clause 52.204-10, Reporting
Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards and that
reporting requirement is covered under a separate collection.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 4, 42, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 22, 2014.
William Clark,
Acting Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office
of Government-wide Policy.
Interim Rules Adopted as Final With Changes
Accordingly, the interim rules amending 48 CFR parts 4 and 52,
which were published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 14639, March 31,
2009, and at 75 FR 38684, July 2, 2010, are adopted as final with the
following changes:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 4, 42, and 52 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 4--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
Subpart 4.15 [Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve Subpart 4.15.
PART 42--CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
42.1501 [Amended]
0
3. Amend section 42.1501 by removing from paragraph (a)(5) ``subparts
4.14 and 4.15'' and adding ``subpart 4.14'' in its place.
[[Page 31195]]
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.204-11 [Removed and Reserved]
0
4. Remove and reserve section 52.204-11.
0
5. Amended section 52.212-5 by--
0
a. Revising the date of the clause; and
0
b. Removing and reserving paragraph (b)(5).
The revised text reads as follows:
52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes
or Executive Orders--Commercial Items.
* * * * *
Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders--Commercial Items (May 2014)
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-12393 Filed 5-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P