Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes, 30748-30751 [2014-12448]
Download as PDF
30748
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 103
Thursday, May 29, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0290; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–210–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model L–
1011 series airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by reports of cracked rib
cap castellations. This proposed AD
would require repetitive inspections for
castellation and skin clips cracked or
damaged between stringers and cracked
stringer clips of the wing box pylon
back-up structure, and front spar to rear
spar, repetitive inspections for cracking,
damage, or failure of the pylon back-up
torque box structure; repetitive
inspections for cracking or damage of
the wing box external areas at the drag
brace aft wing fitting; and repetitive
inspections of the outer surface of the
wing upper and lower skins for cracks
or damage along the rib attachment at
the fastener holes and between the two
rows of attachment; and corrective
actions if necessary. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct cracked or
damaged rib cap castellations, which
could degrade the structural capabilities
of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company, L1011 Technical
Support Center, Dept. 6A4M, Zone
0579, 86 South Cobb Drive, Marietta,
GA 30063–0579; telephone 770–494–
5444; fax 770–494–5445; email
L1011.support@lmco.com; Internet
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/
tools/TechPubs.html. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0290; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–
474–5605; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2014–0290; Directorate Identifier 2012–
NM–210–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received multiple reports of
cracked rib cap castellations on Model
L–1011–385–1 airplanes. The
predominance of cracked castellations
have been found on the upper cap at
inboard wing station (IWS) 555.0.
Cracked castellations were also found
on the lower cap at IWS 555.0, and at
a few locations on the upper caps at
IWS 529.4 and 503.76. Castellation
cracks may propagate into the rib cap
proper, and with several castellations
cracked and the rib cap severed, fail safe
capability cannot be analytically
proven. Continued operation in this
condition can result in severe additional
damage and loss of stiffness in the pylon
back-up structure creating a potential
flutter hazard. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in degraded
structural capabilities of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Lockheed Service
Bulletin 093–57–207, Revision 5, dated
November 14, 2008. This service
bulletin describes procedures for:
• A repetitive detailed inspection of
the wing box pylon back-up structure,
front spar to rear spar, for castellation
and/or skin clips cracked or damaged
between stringers and cracked stringer
clips.
• A repetitive general visual
inspection for cracking or damage of the
pylon back-up torque box structure.
• A repetitive general visual
inspection for cracking, damage, or
failure of the wing box external areas at
the drag brace aft wing fitting.
• A repetitive general visual
inspection for cracking or damage of the
outer surface of the wing upper and
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
lower skins for cracks or damage along
the rib attachment at the fastener holes
and between the two rows of
attachments.
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–57–
207, Revision 5, dated November 14,
2008, describes corrective actions as
replacing cracked clips with a new clip,
and stop drilling a single cracked
castellation with a crack that is no
longer than three quarters of an inch,
provided the two adjacent castellations
on either side are crack free (i.e., every
third castellation may be cracked and
stop drilled). Additionally, this service
bulletin specifies that if more than two
consecutive castellations are cracked,
the airplane should be modified by
installing new rib caps or the cracked
castellations repaired by replacing a
segment of the rib cap using cap splices.
This service bulletin states that all other
damaged structural items should be
repaired in accordance with the best
shop practices, following procedures in
Structural Repair Manual 57–12–00 and
to advise Lockheed of all such repairs.
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–57–
207, Revision 5, dated November 14,
2008, describes a compliance time of
before the accumulation of 15,000 total
flight cycles or 27,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first. The repetitive
inspection interval is described as not to
exceed 3,600 flight cycles or 7,200 flight
hours, whichever occurs first.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Information.’’ This
proposed AD also requires sending a
report of crack findings during any
inspection required by this AD to the
Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification
Office.
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Information
Although Lockheed Service Bulletin
093–57–207, Revision 5, dated
30749
November 14, 2008, specifies that
operators may contact the manufacturer
for disposition of certain repair
conditions, this proposed AD would
require operators to repair those
conditions in accordance with a method
approved by the FAA.
Related AD
This proposed AD is related to AD
94–05–01, Amendment 39–8839 (59 FR
10275, March 4, 1994). For Model L–
1011–385 series airplanes, serial
numbers 1002 through 1188, paragraph
(c) of AD 94–05–01 specifies that doing
the modification specified in Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093–57–207, Revision
3, dated November 22, 1991, constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive
inspection requirements of that service
bulletin. We have determined that the
modification no longer constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections, and this proposed AD
would require repetitive inspections.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 26 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Inspections ................
41 work-hours × $85 per hour = $3,485 per
inspection cycle.
$0
$3,485 per inspection
cycle.
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary repairs that would be
required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. We have no way of
Cost on U.S. operators
$90,610 per inspection cycle.
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these repairs:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Modification (Up to 12 rib
caps per airplane).
Labor cost
Parts cost
96 work-hours × $85 per hour = $8,160 per rib cap .........
$15,000 per rib cap .............
Other than the modification stated
above, we have received no definitive
data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the crack repair
actions specified in this proposed AD.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information
required by this AD is 2120–0056. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
paperwork cost associated with this AD
has been detailed in the Costs of
Compliance section of this document
and includes time for reviewing
instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to the FAA at 800
Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
DC 20591. ATTN: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per product
$23,160 per rib cap.
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
30750
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
as identified in Lockheed Service Bulletin
093–57–207, Revision 5, dated November 14,
2008.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
(d) Subject
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company: Docket
No. FAA–2014–0290; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–210–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 14,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Model L–1011–385–1, L–1011–
385–1–14, L–1011–385–1–15, and L–1011–
385–3 airplanes, certificated in any category,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracked rib cap castellations. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct cracked or
damaged rib cap castellations, which could
degrade the structural capabilities of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Repetitive Wing Inspections
For Model L–1011–385–1, L–1011–385–1–
14, L–1011–385–1–15, and L–1011–385–3
airplanes, serial numbers 1189 and
subsequent: At the applicable compliance
time specified in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2),
and (h)(3) of this AD, do the inspections
specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4)
of this AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 3,600 flight cycles
or 7,200 flight hours, whichever occurs first.
(1) Do a detailed inspection for castellation
and skin clips cracked or damaged (including
cracks, loose or missing fasteners, oversized
and missed drilled fastener holes, corrosion,
dents, scratches and other signs of distress)
between stringers and cracked stringer clips
of the wing box pylon back-up structure, and
front spar to rear spar, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093–57–207, Revision 5,
dated November 14, 2008.
(2) Do a general visual inspection for
cracking or damage (including cracks, loose
or missing fasteners, oversized and missed
drilled fastener holes, corrosion, dents,
scratches and other signs of distress) of the
pylon back-up torque box structure, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin
093–57–207, Revision 5, dated November 14,
2008.
(3) Do a general visual inspection for
cracking, damage (including cracks, loose or
missing fasteners, oversized and missed
drilled fastener holes, corrosion, dents,
scratches and other signs of distress), or
failure of the wing box external areas at the
drag brace aft wing fitting, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–57–207,
Revision 5, dated November 14, 2008.
(4) Do a general visual inspection for
cracking or damage (including cracks, loose
or missing fasteners, oversized and missed
drilled fastener holes, corrosion, dents,
scratches and other signs of distress) of the
outer surface of the wing upper and lower
skins for cracks along the rib attachment at
the fastener holes and between the two rows
of attachments, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093–57–207, Revision 5,
dated November 14, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(h) Compliance Times for Paragraph (g) of
This AD
(1) For airplanes that have not
accomplished the inspections described in
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–57–207 prior
to the effective date of this AD: at the later
of the compliance times specified in
paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and (h)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total
flight cycles or 27,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
(ii) Within 1,800 flight cycles or 3,600
flight hours, whichever occurs first, after the
effective date of this AD.
(2) For airplanes that have accomplished
the inspections described in Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093–57–207 prior to the
effective date of this AD: Within 3,600 flight
cycles or 7,200 flight hours, whichever
occurs first, after the competition of the most
recent inspections, except as specified in
paragraph (h)(3) of this AD.
(3) For rib caps that have been modified as
described in Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–
57–207: Before the accumulation of 15,000
total flight cycles or 27,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first, for that rib cap only.
(i) Corrective Action
If any cracking, damage, or failure is found
during any inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD: Before further flight, do all
applicable corrective actions, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–57–207,
Revision 5, dated November 14, 2008, except
where this service bulletin specifies that all
other damaged structural items should be
repaired in accordance with the best shop
practices, following procedures in Structural
Repair Manual 57–12–00, this AD requires
repairing the damage before further flight, in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be
approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the Manager’s
approval letter must specifically refer to this
AD.
(j) Reporting
Submit a report of positive findings of the
inspection for cracking required by this AD
to the Manager, Atlanta ACO, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1)
or (j)(2) of this AD. The report must include
the inspection results, a description of the
discrepancies found, the airplane serial
number, and the number of landings and
flight hours on the airplane.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Submit the
report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD.
(k) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden
Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this
information collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per
response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to
this collection of information are mandatory.
Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the
burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC
20591, Attn: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, AES–200.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093–57–207, Revision 3,
dated November 22, 1991.
(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(n) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–474–
5605; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company, L1011 Technical Support Center,
Dept. 6A4M, Zone 0579, 86 South Cobb
Drive, Marietta, GA 30063–0579; telephone
770–494–5444; fax 770–494–5445; email
L1011.support@lmco.com; Internet https://
www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/
TechPubs.html. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 15,
2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–12448 Filed 5–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0287; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–247–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702)
airplanes, Model CL–600–2D24
(Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and
Model CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series
1000) airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report that certain parts
of the aft baggage door did not conform
to the design specifications and were of
degraded strength. This proposed AD
would require repetitive inspections for
cracking and deformations of certain
stop fittings and striker plates of the aft
baggage bay door; and replacement,
which would terminate the repetitive
inspections. We are proposing this AD
to prevent cracking and deformations of
certain stop fittings and striker plates,
which may result in the opening of the
aft baggage bay door and rapid
decompression or reduced
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30751
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0287; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ricardo Garcia, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems,
ANE–171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone (516) 228–7331; fax
(516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2014–0287; Directorate Identifier
2013–NM–247–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–37,
dated November 28, 2013 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–
600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701,
& 702) airplanes, Model CL–600–2D24
(Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and
Model CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series
1000) airplanes. The MCAI states:
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 103 (Thursday, May 29, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30748-30751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12448]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 30748]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0290; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-210-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Model L-1011 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports
of cracked rib cap castellations. This proposed AD would require
repetitive inspections for castellation and skin clips cracked or
damaged between stringers and cracked stringer clips of the wing box
pylon back-up structure, and front spar to rear spar, repetitive
inspections for cracking, damage, or failure of the pylon back-up
torque box structure; repetitive inspections for cracking or damage of
the wing box external areas at the drag brace aft wing fitting; and
repetitive inspections of the outer surface of the wing upper and lower
skins for cracks or damage along the rib attachment at the fastener
holes and between the two rows of attachment; and corrective actions if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracked or
damaged rib cap castellations, which could degrade the structural
capabilities of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, L1011 Technical
Support Center, Dept. 6A4M, Zone 0579, 86 South Cobb Drive, Marietta,
GA 30063-0579; telephone 770-494-5444; fax 770-494-5445; email
L1011.support@lmco.com; Internet https://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0290; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: 404-
474-5554; fax: 404-474-5605; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0290;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-210-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received multiple reports of cracked rib cap castellations
on Model L-1011-385-1 airplanes. The predominance of cracked
castellations have been found on the upper cap at inboard wing station
(IWS) 555.0. Cracked castellations were also found on the lower cap at
IWS 555.0, and at a few locations on the upper caps at IWS 529.4 and
503.76. Castellation cracks may propagate into the rib cap proper, and
with several castellations cracked and the rib cap severed, fail safe
capability cannot be analytically proven. Continued operation in this
condition can result in severe additional damage and loss of stiffness
in the pylon back-up structure creating a potential flutter hazard.
This condition, if not corrected, could result in degraded structural
capabilities of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207, Revision 5, dated
November 14, 2008. This service bulletin describes procedures for:
A repetitive detailed inspection of the wing box pylon
back-up structure, front spar to rear spar, for castellation and/or
skin clips cracked or damaged between stringers and cracked stringer
clips.
A repetitive general visual inspection for cracking or
damage of the pylon back-up torque box structure.
A repetitive general visual inspection for cracking,
damage, or failure of the wing box external areas at the drag brace aft
wing fitting.
A repetitive general visual inspection for cracking or
damage of the outer surface of the wing upper and
[[Page 30749]]
lower skins for cracks or damage along the rib attachment at the
fastener holes and between the two rows of attachments.
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207, Revision 5, dated November
14, 2008, describes corrective actions as replacing cracked clips with
a new clip, and stop drilling a single cracked castellation with a
crack that is no longer than three quarters of an inch, provided the
two adjacent castellations on either side are crack free (i.e., every
third castellation may be cracked and stop drilled). Additionally, this
service bulletin specifies that if more than two consecutive
castellations are cracked, the airplane should be modified by
installing new rib caps or the cracked castellations repaired by
replacing a segment of the rib cap using cap splices. This service
bulletin states that all other damaged structural items should be
repaired in accordance with the best shop practices, following
procedures in Structural Repair Manual 57-12-00 and to advise Lockheed
of all such repairs.
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207, Revision 5, dated November
14, 2008, describes a compliance time of before the accumulation of
15,000 total flight cycles or 27,000 total flight hours, whichever
occurs first. The repetitive inspection interval is described as not to
exceed 3,600 flight cycles or 7,200 flight hours, whichever occurs
first.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously, except as discussed
under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service
Information.'' This proposed AD also requires sending a report of crack
findings during any inspection required by this AD to the Manager,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office.
Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Information
Although Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207, Revision 5, dated
November 14, 2008, specifies that operators may contact the
manufacturer for disposition of certain repair conditions, this
proposed AD would require operators to repair those conditions in
accordance with a method approved by the FAA.
Related AD
This proposed AD is related to AD 94-05-01, Amendment 39-8839 (59
FR 10275, March 4, 1994). For Model L-1011-385 series airplanes, serial
numbers 1002 through 1188, paragraph (c) of AD 94-05-01 specifies that
doing the modification specified in Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-
207, Revision 3, dated November 22, 1991, constitutes terminating
action for the repetitive inspection requirements of that service
bulletin. We have determined that the modification no longer
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections, and this
proposed AD would require repetitive inspections.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 26 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections........................ 41 work-hours x $85 per $0 $3,485 per inspection $90,610 per inspection cycle.
hour = $3,485 per cycle.
inspection cycle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection. We
have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
repairs:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification (Up to 12 rib caps 96 work-hours x $85 per $15,000 per rib cap $23,160 per rib cap.
per airplane). hour = $8,160 per rib
cap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other than the modification stated above, we have received no
definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the
crack repair actions specified in this proposed AD.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120-
0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in
the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for
reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA
at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591. ATTN: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
[[Page 30750]]
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company:
Docket No. FAA-2014-0290; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-210-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 14, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Model L-1011-385-1, L-1011-385-1-14, L-1011-385-
1-15, and L-1011-385-3 airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207, Revision 5,
dated November 14, 2008.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracked rib cap
castellations. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracked
or damaged rib cap castellations, which could degrade the structural
capabilities of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Repetitive Wing Inspections
For Model L-1011-385-1, L-1011-385-1-14, L-1011-385-1-15, and L-
1011-385-3 airplanes, serial numbers 1189 and subsequent: At the
applicable compliance time specified in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2),
and (h)(3) of this AD, do the inspections specified in paragraphs
(g)(1) through (g)(4) of this AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 3,600 flight cycles or 7,200 flight
hours, whichever occurs first.
(1) Do a detailed inspection for castellation and skin clips
cracked or damaged (including cracks, loose or missing fasteners,
oversized and missed drilled fastener holes, corrosion, dents,
scratches and other signs of distress) between stringers and cracked
stringer clips of the wing box pylon back-up structure, and front
spar to rear spar, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207, Revision 5,
dated November 14, 2008.
(2) Do a general visual inspection for cracking or damage
(including cracks, loose or missing fasteners, oversized and missed
drilled fastener holes, corrosion, dents, scratches and other signs
of distress) of the pylon back-up torque box structure, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service
Bulletin 093-57-207, Revision 5, dated November 14, 2008.
(3) Do a general visual inspection for cracking, damage
(including cracks, loose or missing fasteners, oversized and missed
drilled fastener holes, corrosion, dents, scratches and other signs
of distress), or failure of the wing box external areas at the drag
brace aft wing fitting, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207, Revision 5,
dated November 14, 2008.
(4) Do a general visual inspection for cracking or damage
(including cracks, loose or missing fasteners, oversized and missed
drilled fastener holes, corrosion, dents, scratches and other signs
of distress) of the outer surface of the wing upper and lower skins
for cracks along the rib attachment at the fastener holes and
between the two rows of attachments, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207,
Revision 5, dated November 14, 2008.
(h) Compliance Times for Paragraph (g) of This AD
(1) For airplanes that have not accomplished the inspections
described in Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207 prior to the
effective date of this AD: at the later of the compliance times
specified in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and (h)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles or
27,000 total flight hours, whichever occurs first.
(ii) Within 1,800 flight cycles or 3,600 flight hours, whichever
occurs first, after the effective date of this AD.
(2) For airplanes that have accomplished the inspections
described in Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207 prior to the
effective date of this AD: Within 3,600 flight cycles or 7,200
flight hours, whichever occurs first, after the competition of the
most recent inspections, except as specified in paragraph (h)(3) of
this AD.
(3) For rib caps that have been modified as described in
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207: Before the accumulation of
15,000 total flight cycles or 27,000 total flight hours, whichever
occurs first, for that rib cap only.
(i) Corrective Action
If any cracking, damage, or failure is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further
flight, do all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-207,
Revision 5, dated November 14, 2008, except where this service
bulletin specifies that all other damaged structural items should be
repaired in accordance with the best shop practices, following
procedures in Structural Repair Manual 57-12-00, this AD requires
repairing the damage before further flight, in accordance with a
method approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be approved by the
Manager, Atlanta ACO, as required by this paragraph, the Manager's
approval letter must specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Reporting
Submit a report of positive findings of the inspection for
cracking required by this AD to the Manager, Atlanta ACO, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD.
The report must include the inspection results, a description of the
discrepancies found, the airplane serial number, and the number of
landings and flight hours on the airplane.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.
(k) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
[[Page 30751]]
Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid
OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information
collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of
information is estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and
reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this
collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW.,
Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Lockheed Service Bulletin
093-57-207, Revision 3, dated November 22, 1991.
(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph
(n)(1) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(n) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Carl Gray,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
Georgia 30337; phone: 404-474-5554; fax: 404-474-5605; email:
carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company,
L1011 Technical Support Center, Dept. 6A4M, Zone 0579, 86 South Cobb
Drive, Marietta, GA 30063-0579; telephone 770-494-5444; fax 770-494-
5445; email L1011.support@lmco.com; Internet https://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 15, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-12448 Filed 5-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P