Truth in Savings (Regulation DD), 30711-30713 [2014-12356]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
notice of address discrepancy
provisions in the FCRA.
2. Summary of issues raised by
comments in response to the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis. The
Board did not receive any comments on
the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
3. Small entities affected by the final
rule. The final rule amends the
definition of ‘‘creditor’’ in the Board’s
Regulation V to conform to the revised
definition of that term in the
Clarification Act. The definition
continues to refer to the FCRA
definition of ‘‘creditor,’’ which
references the ECOA definition of
‘‘creditor,’’ but limits the application of
the red flags provisions to only those
creditors that regularly and in the
ordinary course of business: (a) Obtain
or use consumer reports in connection
with a credit transaction; (b) furnish
information to consumer reporting
agencies in connection with a credit
transaction; or (c) advance funds to or
on behalf of a person, based on an
obligation of the person to repay the
funds or repayable from specific
property pledged by or on behalf of the
person. 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)(A).
However, small entities that are
financial institutions are still subject to
the requirements, regardless of whether
they meet the revised definition of
creditor. Consequently, the revisions do
not affect the scope of the Board’s rules,
which only apply to state member banks
and other financial institutions, so no
small entities are affected.
The final rule also updates a crossreference in the Red Flags rule to reflect
the CFPB’s rulemaking authority for the
notice of address discrepancy
provisions in the FCRA. This revision
has no effect on small entities because
there is no substantive difference
between the Board’s definition of a
‘‘notice of address discrepancy’’ and the
CFPB’s definition.
4. Recordkeeping, reporting, and
compliance requirements. The final rule
does not impose any new
recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance
requirements on small entities. Small
entities that no longer meet the
narrower definition of ‘‘creditor’’ would
not have to comply with the
requirements of the Red Flags rule.
However, small entity financial
institutions would still be required to
comply with the Red Flags rule,
regardless of whether they meet the
revised definition of creditor. Thus, the
revisions do not affect the scope of the
Board’s rules, which only apply to state
member banks and other financial
institutions. In addition, the updated
cross-reference in the final rule that
reflects the CFPB’s rulemaking authority
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
30711
for the notice of address discrepancy
provisions in the FCRA is not a
substantive change.
5. Significant alternatives to the final
revisions. Because the amendments in
the final rule will have no impact, there
are no significant alternatives that
would further minimize the economic
impact of the final rule on small
entities.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, May 22, 2014.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
[Docket No. R–1482]
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3506; 5 CFR Part 1320, Appendix A.1),
the Board reviewed the rule under the
authority delegated to the Federal
Reserve by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). The final rule
contains no requirements subject to the
PRA.
RIN 7100 AE12
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 222
Banks, banking, Consumer protection,
Safety and soundness, and State
member banks.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board amends Regulation
V, 12 CFR part 222, as set forth below:
PART 222—FAIR CREDIT REPORTING
(REGULATION V)
1. The authority citation for part 222
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1681b, 1681c, 1681m
and 1681s; Secs. 3, 214, and 216, Pub. L.
108–159, 117 Stat. 1952.
2. Amend § 222.90 by revising
paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows:
■
§ 222.90 Duties regarding the detection,
prevention, and mitigation of identity theft.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) Creditor has the same meaning as
in 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend Supplement A to Appendix
J by revising example 3. to read as
follows:
■
Appendix J to Part 222—Interagency
Guidelines on Identity Theft Detection,
Prevention, and Mitigation
*
*
*
*
*
Supplement A to Appendix J
*
*
*
*
*
3. A consumer reporting agency provides a
notice of address discrepancy, as defined in
12 CFR 1022.82(b).
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00009
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2014–12358 Filed 5–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 230
Truth in Savings (Regulation DD)
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board) is
repealing its Regulation DD, 12 CFR part
230, which was issued to implement the
Truth in Saving Act (TISA). Title X of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank
Act) transferred rulemaking authority
for a number of consumer financial
protection laws, including TISA, from
the Board to the Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection (Bureau). In
December 2011, the Bureau published
an interim final rule establishing its
own Regulation DD to implement TISA
(Bureau Interim Final Rule). The Bureau
Interim Final Rule substantially
duplicates the Board’s Regulation DD.
Under section 1029 of the Dodd-Frank
Act, the Board retains authority to issue
rules for certain motor vehicle dealers
that offer consumer financial services
and are not subject to the Bureau’s
regulatory authority. The Board is not
aware of any entities that are motor
vehicle dealers engaging in activities
subject to TISA that would be subject to
the Board’s rulemaking authority under
section 1029 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Accordingly, the Board is repealing its
Regulation DD.
DATES: The final rule is effective June
30, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vivian W. Wong, Counsel, Division of
Consumer and Community Affairs, at
(202) 452–3667, Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C
Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551. For
users of Telecommunications Device for
the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263–
4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Board) historically
implemented the Truth in Savings Act
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
30712
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(TISA), 12 U.S.C. 4301 et seq., in
Regulation DD, published at 12 CFR part
230. The purpose of the act and
regulation is to assist consumers in
comparing deposit accounts offered by
depository institutions, principally
through the disclosure of fees, the
annual percentage yield, the interest
rate, and other account terms. An
official staff commentary interprets the
requirements of the Board’s Regulation
DD (12 CFR part 230 (Supp. I)). Credit
unions are governed by a substantially
similar regulation issued by the
National Credit Union Administration
(NCUA) at 12 CFR part 707.
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Dodd-Frank Act) 1 transferred
rulemaking authority for a number of
consumer financial protection laws from
the Board to the Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection (Bureau), effective
July 21, 2011. In connection with the
transfer of the Board’s rulemaking
authority for TISA, the Bureau
published an interim final rule to
establish its own Regulation DD, 12 CFR
part 1030, to implement TISA (Bureau
Interim Final Rule).2 The Bureau
Interim Final Rule substantially
duplicated the Board’s Regulation DD
and made only certain non-substantive,
technical, formatting, and stylistic
changes. The Bureau Interim Final Rule
did not impose any new substantive
obligations on regulated entities.
Under section 1029(a) of the DoddFrank Act, the Bureau may not exercise
any rulemaking, supervisory,
enforcement or any other authority over
a motor vehicle dealer that is
predominantly engaged in the sale and
servicing of motor vehicles, the leasing
and servicing of motor vehicles, or both,
subject to certain exceptions.3 However,
that provision does not apply to any
motor vehicle dealer to the extent the
dealer offers or provides a consumer
financial product or service not
involving or related to the sale,
financing, leasing, rental, repair,
refurbishment, maintenance, or other
servicing of motor vehicles, motor
vehicle parts, or any related or ancillary
1 Public
Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376.
FR 79276 (Dec. 21, 2011). Section 1100B of
the Dodd-Frank Act did not grant the Bureau TISA
rulemaking authority over credit unions or repeal
the NCUA’s TISA rulemaking authority over credit
unions under 12 U.S.C. 4311.
3 Section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act states:
‘‘Except as permitted in subsection (b), the Bureau
may not exercise any rulemaking, supervisory,
enforcement, or any other authority * * * over a
motor vehicle dealer that is predominantly engaged
in the sale and servicing of motor vehicles, the
leasing and servicing of motor vehicles, or both.’’
12 U.S.C. 5519(a).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
2 76
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
product or service.4 Section 1029(c) of
the Dodd-Frank Act further provides
that nothing in the Dodd-Frank Act
should be construed to modify, limit, or
supersede the authority of the Board
with respect to a motor vehicle dealer
described in section 1029(a) of the
Dodd-Frank Act.5
Accordingly, to the extent that a
motor vehicle dealer described in
section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act
was subject to one of the Board’s
consumer financial service regulations,
the Board’s regulation would continue
to apply, provided that the consumer
financial product or service is one that
involves or is related to the sale,
financing, leasing, rental, repair,
refurbishment, maintenance, or other
servicing of motor vehicles, motor
vehicle parts, or any related or ancillary
product or service.
In February 2014, the Board
published a proposal to repeal its
Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 230
(Proposed Rule) based on the Board’s
belief that there are no motor vehicle
dealers engaging in activities subject to
TISA that would be subject to the
Board’s authority under section 1029 of
the Dodd-Frank Act.6 The Board
received five comments on the Proposed
Rule.
II. Legal Authority
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act
transferred rulemaking authority for
TISA from the Board to the Bureau,
effective July 21, 2011. Pursuant to
Section 1029 of the Dodd-Frank Act,
however, the Board retains rulemaking
authority for consumer financial
protection laws to the extent that such
laws could cover motor vehicle dealers
identified in section 1029(a) of the
Dodd-Frank Act, subject to the
limitations in section 1029(b) of the
Dodd-Frank Act.
4 Section 1029(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act states:
‘‘Subsection (a) shall not apply to any person, to the
extent such person (1) provides consumers with any
services related to residential or commercial
mortgages or self-financing transaction involving
real property; (2) operates a line of business (A) that
involves the extension of retail credit or retail leases
involving motor vehicles; and (B) in which (i) the
extension of retail credit or retail leases are
provided directly to consumers and (ii) the contract
governing such extension of retail credit or retail
leases is not routinely assigned to an unaffiliated
third party finance or leasing source; or (3) offers
or provides a consumer financial product or service
not involving or related to the sale, financing,
leasing, rental, repair, refurbishment, maintenance,
or other servicing of motor vehicles, motor vehicle
parts, or any related or ancillary product or
service.’’ 12 U.S.C. 5519(b).
5 12 U.S.C. 5519(c).
6 79 FR 9647 (Feb. 20, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
III. Discussion
As the Board discussed in the
Proposed Rule, TISA and the Board’s
Regulation DD apply only to depository
institutions. See 12 U.S.C. 4301; 12 CFR
230.1(c). For this purpose, the term
‘‘depository institution’’ includes ‘‘an
institution defined in Section
19(b)(1)(A)(i) through (vi) of the Federal
Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 461), except
credit unions defined in Section
19(b)(1)(A)(iv).’’ 12 U.S.C. 4313(6); 12
CFR 230.2(j). Depository institutions are
generally subject to restrictions on the
types of activities in which they may
engage as principal. See e.g., 12 U.S.C.
24(Seventh) and 12 U.S.C. 1831a. These
activities are restricted to those that are
necessary to carry on the business of
banking and other limited financial
activities. Based on these restrictions,
the Board believes that motor vehicle
dealers, as defined in section 1029(a) of
the Dodd-Frank Act, that are
predominantly engaged in the sale and
servicing of motor vehicles, the leasing
and servicing of motor vehicles, or both,
could not also be depository institutions
subject to TISA.
The Board requested comment in the
Proposed Rule on whether any motor
vehicle dealers identified in section
1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act are or
could become depository institutions for
purposes of TISA. The commenters did
not address that issue. Four commenters
supported the Board’s proposal to repeal
its Regulation DD in order to avoid
confusion and duplication. One
commenter, however, suggested that the
regulation should be retained in case
there is new legislation and the law
changes.
Based on the lack of evidence that
there are any motor vehicle dealers
identified in section 1029(a) of the
Dodd-Frank Act that are or could
become depository institutions subject
to the Board’s rulemaking authority for
purposes of TISA, the Board is repealing
its Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 230.
IV. Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) generally
requires an agency to perform an
assessment of the impact a rule is
expected to have on small entities.
Based on its analysis, and for the
reasons stated below, the Board believes
that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
1. Statement of the need for, and
objectives of, the final rule. Title X of
the Dodd-Frank Act transferred
rulemaking authority for a number of
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 103 / Thursday, May 29, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
consumer financial protection laws from
the Board to the Bureau, effective July
21, 2011, including TISA. The Bureau
issued the Bureau Interim Final Rule to
implement TISA in connection with the
transfer of TISA rulemaking authority to
the Bureau. Pursuant to section 1029 of
the Dodd-Frank Act, however, the Board
retains rulemaking authority for
consumer financial protection laws to
the extent that such laws could cover
motor vehicle dealers identified in
section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Board does not believe that any
motor vehicle dealers identified in
section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act
are or could become depository
institutions engaged in activities that
would be subject to the Board’s
rulemaking authority under TISA.
Consequently, the Board is repealing the
Board’s Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 230.
2. Summary of issues raised by
comments in response to the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis. The
Board did not receive any comments on
the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
3. Small entities affected by the final
rule. The Board does not believe that
any motor vehicle dealers identified in
section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act
are or could become depository
institutions engaged in activities that
would be subject to the Board’s
rulemaking authority under TISA.
Therefore, the Board believes the final
rule would not affect any entity,
including any small entity.
4. Recordkeeping, reporting, and
compliance requirements. The final rule
repeals the Board’s Regulation DD, 12
CFR part 230, and would therefore not
impose any recordkeeping, reporting, or
compliance requirements on any
entities.
5. Significant alternatives to the final
revisions. Because the repeal of the
Board’s Regulation DD (12 CFR part
230) will have no impact, there are no
significant alternatives that would
further minimize the economic impact
of the final rule on small entities.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3506; 5 CFR Part 1320, Appendix A.1),
the Board reviewed the rule under the
authority delegated to the Federal
Reserve by the Office of Management
and Budget. The final rule contains no
collections of information under the
PRA. See 44 U.S.C. 3502(3).
Accordingly, there is no paperwork
burden associated with the final rule.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 230
Advertising, Banks, Banking,
Consumer protection, Reporting and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 May 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
30713
recordkeeping requirements, Truth in
savings.
Background
Authority and Issuance
Validated End-Users (VEUs) are
designated entities located in eligible
destinations to which eligible items may
be exported, reexported, or transferred
(in-country) under a general
authorization instead of a license. The
names of the VEUs, as well as the dates
they were so designated, and their
respective eligible destinations and
items are identified in Supplement No.
7 to part 748 of the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR).
Under the terms described in that
supplement, VEUs may obtain eligible
items without an export license from the
Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS),
in conformity with Section 748.15 of the
EAR. Eligible items vary between VEUs,
but may include commodities, software,
and technology, except those controlled
for missile technology or crime control
reasons on the Commerce Control List
(CCL) (part 774 of the EAR).
VEUs are reviewed and approved by
the U.S. Government in accordance with
the provisions of Section 748.15 and
Supplement Nos. 8 and 9 to part 748 of
the EAR. The End-User Review
Committee (ERC), composed of
representatives from the Departments of
State, Defense, Energy, and Commerce,
and other agencies, as appropriate, is
responsible for administering the VEU
program. BIS amended the EAR in a
final rule published on June 19, 2007
(72 FR 33646) to create Authorization
VEU.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, based on the transfer of
authority under 12 U.S.C. 5581, the
Board removes and reserves Regulation
DD, 12 CFR part 230.
PART 230—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, May 22, 2014.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014–12356 Filed 5–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 748
[Docket No. 140506409–4409–01]
RIN 0694–AG15
Amendments to Existing Validated
End-User Authorizations in the
People’s Republic of China: Samsung
China Semiconductor Co. Ltd and
Semiconductor Manufacturing
International Corporation
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this rule, the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) amends the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) to revise existing authorizations
for Validated End-Users (VEUs)
Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd.
(Samsung China) and Semiconductor
Manufacturing International
Corporation (SMIC) in the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). Specifically,
BIS amends Supplement No. 7 to part
748 of the EAR to change the address of
the facility used by Samsung China. In
addition, BIS adds a facility to the list
of eligible destinations and an item to
the list of eligible items for SMIC.
DATES: This rule is effective May 29,
2014.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User
Review Committee, Bureau of Industry
and Security, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; by
telephone: (202) 482–5991, fax: (202)
482–3991, or email: ERC@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authorization Validated End-User
Amendments to Existing Validated EndUser Authorizations in the People’s
Republic of China (PRC)
Revision to the List of ‘‘Eligible Items
(By ECCN)’’ for Validated End-User
Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd
(Samsung China)
This final rule amends Supplement
No. 7 to part 748 of the EAR to change
the address of the Samsung China
facility to which eligible items may be
exported, reexported or transferred (incountry) using Authorization VEU. BIS
makes this change pursuant to a request
from Samsung China advising BIS that
Samsung China received verification of
the final address of its facility from the
Chinese government. Samsung China’s
VEU-eligible facility, which is located in
an area being newly developed for
corporate use, has not moved. The list
of eligible items for Samsung China
remains the same. BIS added Samsung
China as a VEU in Supplement No. 7 to
part 748 in a rule published in the
Federal Register on July 10, 2013 (78 FR
41291).
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 103 (Thursday, May 29, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30711-30713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12356]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 230
[Docket No. R-1482]
RIN 7100 AE12
Truth in Savings (Regulation DD)
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board)
is repealing its Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 230, which was issued to
implement the Truth in Saving Act (TISA). Title X of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act)
transferred rulemaking authority for a number of consumer financial
protection laws, including TISA, from the Board to the Bureau of
Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau). In December 2011, the Bureau
published an interim final rule establishing its own Regulation DD to
implement TISA (Bureau Interim Final Rule). The Bureau Interim Final
Rule substantially duplicates the Board's Regulation DD.
Under section 1029 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Board retains
authority to issue rules for certain motor vehicle dealers that offer
consumer financial services and are not subject to the Bureau's
regulatory authority. The Board is not aware of any entities that are
motor vehicle dealers engaging in activities subject to TISA that would
be subject to the Board's rulemaking authority under section 1029 of
the Dodd-Frank Act. Accordingly, the Board is repealing its Regulation
DD.
DATES: The final rule is effective June 30, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vivian W. Wong, Counsel, Division of
Consumer and Community Affairs, at (202) 452-3667, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets NW., Washington, DC
20551. For users of Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) only,
contact (202) 263-4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board)
historically implemented the Truth in Savings Act
[[Page 30712]]
(TISA), 12 U.S.C. 4301 et seq., in Regulation DD, published at 12 CFR
part 230. The purpose of the act and regulation is to assist consumers
in comparing deposit accounts offered by depository institutions,
principally through the disclosure of fees, the annual percentage
yield, the interest rate, and other account terms. An official staff
commentary interprets the requirements of the Board's Regulation DD (12
CFR part 230 (Supp. I)). Credit unions are governed by a substantially
similar regulation issued by the National Credit Union Administration
(NCUA) at 12 CFR part 707.
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) \1\ transferred rulemaking authority
for a number of consumer financial protection laws from the Board to
the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau), effective July
21, 2011. In connection with the transfer of the Board's rulemaking
authority for TISA, the Bureau published an interim final rule to
establish its own Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 1030, to implement TISA
(Bureau Interim Final Rule).\2\ The Bureau Interim Final Rule
substantially duplicated the Board's Regulation DD and made only
certain non-substantive, technical, formatting, and stylistic changes.
The Bureau Interim Final Rule did not impose any new substantive
obligations on regulated entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376.
\2\ 76 FR 79276 (Dec. 21, 2011). Section 1100B of the Dodd-Frank
Act did not grant the Bureau TISA rulemaking authority over credit
unions or repeal the NCUA's TISA rulemaking authority over credit
unions under 12 U.S.C. 4311.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Bureau may not
exercise any rulemaking, supervisory, enforcement or any other
authority over a motor vehicle dealer that is predominantly engaged in
the sale and servicing of motor vehicles, the leasing and servicing of
motor vehicles, or both, subject to certain exceptions.\3\ However,
that provision does not apply to any motor vehicle dealer to the extent
the dealer offers or provides a consumer financial product or service
not involving or related to the sale, financing, leasing, rental,
repair, refurbishment, maintenance, or other servicing of motor
vehicles, motor vehicle parts, or any related or ancillary product or
service.\4\ Section 1029(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act further provides that
nothing in the Dodd-Frank Act should be construed to modify, limit, or
supersede the authority of the Board with respect to a motor vehicle
dealer described in section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act states: ``Except as
permitted in subsection (b), the Bureau may not exercise any
rulemaking, supervisory, enforcement, or any other authority * * *
over a motor vehicle dealer that is predominantly engaged in the
sale and servicing of motor vehicles, the leasing and servicing of
motor vehicles, or both.'' 12 U.S.C. 5519(a).
\4\ Section 1029(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act states: ``Subsection
(a) shall not apply to any person, to the extent such person (1)
provides consumers with any services related to residential or
commercial mortgages or self-financing transaction involving real
property; (2) operates a line of business (A) that involves the
extension of retail credit or retail leases involving motor
vehicles; and (B) in which (i) the extension of retail credit or
retail leases are provided directly to consumers and (ii) the
contract governing such extension of retail credit or retail leases
is not routinely assigned to an unaffiliated third party finance or
leasing source; or (3) offers or provides a consumer financial
product or service not involving or related to the sale, financing,
leasing, rental, repair, refurbishment, maintenance, or other
servicing of motor vehicles, motor vehicle parts, or any related or
ancillary product or service.'' 12 U.S.C. 5519(b).
\5\ 12 U.S.C. 5519(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, to the extent that a motor vehicle dealer described in
section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act was subject to one of the Board's
consumer financial service regulations, the Board's regulation would
continue to apply, provided that the consumer financial product or
service is one that involves or is related to the sale, financing,
leasing, rental, repair, refurbishment, maintenance, or other servicing
of motor vehicles, motor vehicle parts, or any related or ancillary
product or service.
In February 2014, the Board published a proposal to repeal its
Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 230 (Proposed Rule) based on the Board's
belief that there are no motor vehicle dealers engaging in activities
subject to TISA that would be subject to the Board's authority under
section 1029 of the Dodd-Frank Act.\6\ The Board received five comments
on the Proposed Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 79 FR 9647 (Feb. 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Legal Authority
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act transferred rulemaking authority for
TISA from the Board to the Bureau, effective July 21, 2011. Pursuant to
Section 1029 of the Dodd-Frank Act, however, the Board retains
rulemaking authority for consumer financial protection laws to the
extent that such laws could cover motor vehicle dealers identified in
section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, subject to the limitations in
section 1029(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
III. Discussion
As the Board discussed in the Proposed Rule, TISA and the Board's
Regulation DD apply only to depository institutions. See 12 U.S.C.
4301; 12 CFR 230.1(c). For this purpose, the term ``depository
institution'' includes ``an institution defined in Section
19(b)(1)(A)(i) through (vi) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 461),
except credit unions defined in Section 19(b)(1)(A)(iv).'' 12 U.S.C.
4313(6); 12 CFR 230.2(j). Depository institutions are generally subject
to restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage as
principal. See e.g., 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh) and 12 U.S.C. 1831a. These
activities are restricted to those that are necessary to carry on the
business of banking and other limited financial activities. Based on
these restrictions, the Board believes that motor vehicle dealers, as
defined in section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, that are
predominantly engaged in the sale and servicing of motor vehicles, the
leasing and servicing of motor vehicles, or both, could not also be
depository institutions subject to TISA.
The Board requested comment in the Proposed Rule on whether any
motor vehicle dealers identified in section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank
Act are or could become depository institutions for purposes of TISA.
The commenters did not address that issue. Four commenters supported
the Board's proposal to repeal its Regulation DD in order to avoid
confusion and duplication. One commenter, however, suggested that the
regulation should be retained in case there is new legislation and the
law changes.
Based on the lack of evidence that there are any motor vehicle
dealers identified in section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act that are or
could become depository institutions subject to the Board's rulemaking
authority for purposes of TISA, the Board is repealing its Regulation
DD, 12 CFR part 230.
IV. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA)
generally requires an agency to perform an assessment of the impact a
rule is expected to have on small entities. Based on its analysis, and
for the reasons stated below, the Board believes that this final rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
1. Statement of the need for, and objectives of, the final rule.
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act transferred rulemaking authority for a
number of
[[Page 30713]]
consumer financial protection laws from the Board to the Bureau,
effective July 21, 2011, including TISA. The Bureau issued the Bureau
Interim Final Rule to implement TISA in connection with the transfer of
TISA rulemaking authority to the Bureau. Pursuant to section 1029 of
the Dodd-Frank Act, however, the Board retains rulemaking authority for
consumer financial protection laws to the extent that such laws could
cover motor vehicle dealers identified in section 1029(a) of the Dodd-
Frank Act. The Board does not believe that any motor vehicle dealers
identified in section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act are or could become
depository institutions engaged in activities that would be subject to
the Board's rulemaking authority under TISA. Consequently, the Board is
repealing the Board's Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 230.
2. Summary of issues raised by comments in response to the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis. The Board did not receive any comments
on the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
3. Small entities affected by the final rule. The Board does not
believe that any motor vehicle dealers identified in section 1029(a) of
the Dodd-Frank Act are or could become depository institutions engaged
in activities that would be subject to the Board's rulemaking authority
under TISA. Therefore, the Board believes the final rule would not
affect any entity, including any small entity.
4. Recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance requirements. The final
rule repeals the Board's Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 230, and would
therefore not impose any recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance
requirements on any entities.
5. Significant alternatives to the final revisions. Because the
repeal of the Board's Regulation DD (12 CFR part 230) will have no
impact, there are no significant alternatives that would further
minimize the economic impact of the final rule on small entities.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR Part 1320, Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the
rule under the authority delegated to the Federal Reserve by the Office
of Management and Budget. The final rule contains no collections of
information under the PRA. See 44 U.S.C. 3502(3). Accordingly, there is
no paperwork burden associated with the final rule.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 230
Advertising, Banks, Banking, Consumer protection, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Truth in savings.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, based on the transfer of
authority under 12 U.S.C. 5581, the Board removes and reserves
Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 230.
PART 230--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, May 22, 2014.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-12356 Filed 5-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P