Multiemployer Plans; Valuation and Notice Requirements, 30459-30463 [2014-12154]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–11047 Filed 5–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4041A, 4231, and 4281
RIN 1212–AB13
Multiemployer Plans; Valuation and
Notice Requirements
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s
(PBGC) multiemployer regulations to
make the provision of information to
PBGC and plan participants more
efficient and effective and to reduce
burden on plans and sponsors. The
amendments reduce the number of
actuarial valuations required for certain
small terminated but not insolvent
plans, shorten the advance notice filing
requirements for mergers in situations
that do not involve a compliance
determination, and remove certain
insolvency notice and update
requirements. The amendments are a
result of PBGC’s regulatory review
under Executive Order 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review).
DATES: Effective June 27, 2014. See
Applicability in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine B. Klion
(klion.catherine@pbgc.gov), Assistant
General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs,
or Daniel Liebman
(liebman.daniel@pbgc.gov), Attorney,
Office of the General Counsel, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005–
4026; 202–326–4024. (TTY/TDD users
may call the Federal relay service tollfree at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
connected to 202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Executive Summary—Purpose of the
Regulatory Action
This final rule amends certain
regulations governing PBGC’s
multiemployer program to make the
provision of information to PBGC and
plan participants more efficient and
effective. This rule is needed to reduce
burden on multiemployer plans and
sponsors and to facilitate potentially
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 May 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
beneficial plan merger transactions. The
rule reduces burden by allowing certain
small terminated but not insolvent plans
to provide valuations less frequently,
easing reporting requirements for plan
sponsors contemplating a merger
transaction, and streamlining and
removing certain notice requirements
for insolvent plans.1 This will reduce
administrative costs and preserve plan
assets that could otherwise have been
used to fund plan benefits.
PBGC’s legal authority for this
regulatory action comes from section
4002(b)(3) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA),
which authorizes PBGC to issue
regulations to carry out the purposes of
title IV of ERISA; section 4041A(f)(2),
which gives PBGC authority to prescribe
reporting requirements for terminated
plans; section 4231(a), which gives
PBGC authority to prescribe regulations
setting the requirements for one or more
multiemployer plans to merge; and
section 4281(d), which directs PBGC to
prescribe by regulation the notice
requirements to plan participants and
beneficiaries in the event of a benefit
suspension.
Executive Summary—Major Provisions
of the Regulatory Action
Annual Valuations
When a multiemployer plan
terminates, the plan must perform an
annual valuation of the plan’s assets and
benefits. This final rule allows
valuations for plans that were
terminated by mass withdrawal but are
not insolvent and where the value of
nonforfeitable benefits is $25 million or
less to be performed every three years
instead of annually as required under
the current regulations.
Filing Requirements for Mergers
Under PBGC’s regulations, a merger or
a transfer of assets and liabilities
between multiemployer plans must
satisfy certain requirements, including a
requirement that plan sponsors of all
plans involved in a merger or transfer
must jointly file a notice with PBGC
before the transaction. This final rule
shortens the notice period from 120
days to 45 days where no compliance
determination is requested.
Insolvency Notices and Updates
Terminated multiemployer plans that
determine that they will be insolvent for
a plan year must provide a series of
notices and updates to notices to PBGC
and participants and beneficiaries,
1 Under 29 CFR § 4041A.2, ‘‘insolvent’’ means
that a plan is unable to pay benefits when due
during the plan year.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30459
including a notice of insolvency. The
final rule eliminates the requirement to
provide annual updates to the notice of
insolvency.
Background
PBGC administers two insurance
programs for private-sector defined
benefit plans under title IV of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA): A single-employer
plan termination insurance program and
a multiemployer plan insolvency
insurance program.
A multiemployer plan is a collectively
bargained pension arrangement
involving several employers that are not
within the same controlled group,
usually in a common industry, such as
construction, trucking, textiles, or coal
mining. By contrast, a single-employer
plan may be sponsored by either one
employer (pursuant or not pursuant to
a collective bargaining agreement) or by
several unrelated employers (but not
pursuant to a collective bargaining
agreement).
ERISA section 4041A provides for two
types of multiemployer plan
terminations: Mass withdrawal and plan
amendment. A mass withdrawal
termination occurs when all employers
withdraw or cease to be obligated to
contribute to the plan. A plan
amendment termination occurs when
the plan adopts an amendment that
provides that participants will receive
no credit for service with any employer
after a specified date, or an amendment
that makes it no longer a covered plan.
Unlike terminated single-employer
plans, terminated multiemployer plans
continue to pay all vested benefits out
of existing plan assets and withdrawal
liability payments. PBGC’s guarantee of
the benefits in a multiemployer plan—
payable as financial assistance to the
plan—starts only if and when the plan
is unable to make payments at the
statutorily guaranteed level.
This final rule reduces certain
requirements for multiemployer plans
that are terminated by mass withdrawal
and mergers and transfers among
multiemployer plans.
On January 18, 2011, the President
issued Executive Order 13563
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ to ensure that Federal
regulations seek more affordable, less
intrusive means to achieve policy goals,
and that agencies give careful
consideration to the benefits and costs
of those regulations. PBGC’s Plan for
Regulatory Review,2 identifies several
2 See https://www.pbgc.gov/documents/plan-forregulatory-review.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
30460
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory areas for review, including
the multiemployer regulations referred
to above. PBGC will continue to review
its regulations with a view to
developing more ideas for improvement.
Public comment on specific proposals
will help PBGC determine whether its
regulatory review process is moving in
the right direction.
On January 29, 2014 (at 79 FR 4642),
PBGC published a proposed rule to
amend these regulations to reduce
burden on plan sponsors. PBGC
received one comment (from a business
federation) on the proposed rule. This
commenter applauded PBGC for the
proposal and encouraged PBGC to
finalize the proposed changes,
remarking that the proposed rule would
noticeably reduce certain reporting
burdens associated with multiemployer
defined benefit plan administration.
The final regulation is unchanged
from the proposed regulation.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Changes
Annual Valuation Requirement
ERISA section 4281(b) provides that
the value of nonforfeitable benefits
under a terminated plan to which
section 4041A(d) applies, and the value
of the plan’s assets shall be determined
in writing as of the end of the plan year
during which section 4041A(d) becomes
applicable, and each plan year
thereafter. Part 4041A of PBGC’s
regulations establishes rules for
notifying PBGC of the termination of a
multiemployer plan and rules for the
administration of multiemployer plans
that have terminated by mass
withdrawal. Subpart C prescribes basic
duties of plan sponsors of plans
terminated by mass withdrawal,
including the annual valuation
requirement at § 4041A.24. Section
4281.11(a) states that the valuation dates
for the annual valuation required under
section 4281(b) of ERISA is the last day
of the plan year in which the plan
terminates and the last day of each plan
year thereafter. The details of the annual
valuation requirement are set forth in
the remainder of Subpart B of Part 4281,
Duties of Plan Sponsor Following Mass
Withdrawal.
The annual valuation requirement
serves the statutory purpose of allowing
the terminated plan to determine
whether it needs to eliminate benefits
that are not eligible for PBGC’s
guarantee. However, once the plan has
reached the point where it has
eliminated all nonguaranteed benefits,
further valuations serve only to help
PBGC estimate the liabilities it will
incur when the plan becomes insolvent.
While measuring PBGC’s liabilities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 May 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
annually provides PBGC with
information needed to understand its
potential exposure, the requirement to
do so results in the plan using scarce
resources, at a potentially significant
cost, for a limited purpose.3 This may
result in a faster diminution of assets
that could lead to a reduced ability to
pay plan benefits, an earlier insolvency,
and an earlier elimination of any
nonforfeitable benefits that exceed
PBGC’s statutory guarantee.
The final rule amends § 4041A.24 to
ensure that PBGC has reasonably
reliable data to measure its liabilities
without significantly depleting plan
assets. Under the amendment,
terminated plans that are not insolvent
and where the value of nonforfeitable
benefits is $25 million or less (as of the
valuation date of the most recent
required valuation), are required to
perform the next valuation in
accordance with Subpart B of Part 4281
within three years instead of within one
year as under the unamended
regulation. To comply with the statutory
requirement that there be a written
determination of the value of
nonforfeitable benefits each year, such
plans may use the most recently
performed valuation for the next two
plan years.
All other plans will continue to be
required to perform valuations in
accordance with Subpart B of Part 4281
annually.4 Plans can move in and out of
the three-year or annual valuation cycle,
as applicable, as the value of
nonforfeitable benefits changes. Thus, a
plan that has been performing new
valuations every three years will be
required to perform valuations annually
if the next valuation indicates that the
value of nonforfeitable benefits exceeds
$25 million. Similarly, a plan that has
been performing the valuation annually
will have three years to do the next
valuation in accordance with Subpart B
of Part 4281 if the most recent valuation
shows the value of nonforfeitable
benefits to be $25 million or less.
This amendment targets the plans that
expose PBGC to larger liability, while
3 Once a plan terminates, professional and
administrative costs of paying plan benefits and
continuing regulatory compliance come out of plan
assets without additional contributions being made
by the former employers as would be the case prior
to termination. Thus, with the exception of the
potential inflow of some funds from withdrawal
liability recoveries, plan assets continue to decrease
in a wasting trust.
4 There are two other exceptions to the
requirement that a valuation be performed annually
that are preserved from the unamended regulation.
No valuation is required for a plan year (1) for
which the plan receives financial assistance from
PBGC under section 4261 of ERISA, or (2) in which
the plan is closed out in accordance with subpart
D of Part 4041A.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
reducing burden on plans that present
smaller exposure. PBGC believes that
this amendment appropriately balances
PBGC’s need to fairly measure its
exposure with minimizing the cost to
plans and potentially to participants.
Advance Notice of Multiemployer
Mergers
ERISA section 4231 sets forth the
statutory requirements for mergers of
two or more multiemployer plans and
transfers of plan assets or benefit
liabilities among two or more
multiemployer plans, including a
requirement that a plan must give 120
days’ advance notice of a merger or
transfer to PBGC. Part 4231 of PBGC
regulations implements this statutory
requirement.
29 CFR § 4231.8 provides that plan
sponsors of all plans involved in a
merger or transfer, or their duly
authorized representatives, must jointly
file a notice with PBGC in advance of
the transaction. Before the amendment,
this notice was due to PBGC 120 days
prior to the transaction. The notice must
include information about the plans, the
plan sponsors, the transaction, the
proposed effective date, a copy of each
provision stating that no participant’s or
beneficiary’s accrued benefit will be
lower immediately after the effective
date of the transaction than the benefit
immediately before that date, and
various actuarial and plan asset and
benefit valuation information.
The purpose of the notice provision is
to confirm that plan sponsors have met
the four criteria listed in section 4231(b)
for a statutory transaction.5 Plan
sponsors may request a determination
from PBGC that a merger or transfer that
may otherwise be prohibited by sections
406(a) or (b)(2) of ERISA satisfies the
requirements of ERISA section 4231.6
Under § 4231.8(f), PBGC may waive the
statutory notice requirement.7
5 The four criteria under ERISA section 4231(b)
are:
(1) The 120-day notice requirement is met.
(2) No accrued benefits will be lower immediately
after the transaction’s effective date than
immediately before that date.
(3) Benefits are not reasonably expected to be
subject to suspension under ERISA section 4245.
(4) The applicable actuarial valuation of assets
and liabilities of each affected plan has been
performed.
6 See § 4231.3(b). Plan sponsors requesting a
compliance determination must submit the
information required by § 4231.9 in addition to the
information required by § 4231.8.
7 In 1998, PBGC amended its regulations to
expand the applicability of the waiver of this notice
under § 4231.8(f). Prior to that amendment, the
requirement for 120 days’ notice could be waived
only if PBGC was satisfied that failure to complete
the transaction in a shorter time would harm
participants or beneficiaries. However, at the time
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
However, PBGC now believes that the
interests of PBGC and plan participants
involved in such transactions are
adequately protected by other parts of
ERISA, particularly Title I, and there is
little benefit to having such a long
period to merely confirm that the notice
requirements have been met.
Thus, to reduce burden, the final rule
shortens the advance notice period to 45
days for transactions that do not involve
a compliance determination under
§ 4231.9. PBGC’s experience has been
that many merger requests are received
by PBGC with less than 120 days’ notice
and ask for a waiver of the notice
requirement so that the merger can
proceed as of the end of the plan year.
The change to 45 days avoids the need
for a waiver and still allows PBGC
enough time to review these later-filed
requests. PBGC believes the change to
45 days strikes the appropriate balance
to better accommodate work flows and
end-of-year rushes for both plan
sponsors and PBGC staff. The current
reporting requirements will remain in
effect where a compliance
determination is requested, as well as
for transactions involving a transfer of
plan assets or benefit liabilities, because
those transactions may require a
substantive investigation by PBGC that
may well require more than 45 days to
complete.8
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Annual Notice Updates Following Mass
Withdrawal
When a multiemployer plan
terminates by mass withdrawal under
ERISA section 4041A(a)(2), the plan’s
assets and benefits are required to be
valued annually and plan benefits may
have to be reduced or suspended to the
extent provided in ERISA section
4281(c) or (d). Before being amended,
part 4281 of PBGC’s regulations
required a terminated multiemployer
plan that determines that it will be
insolvent for a plan year to provide a
series of notices and updates to notices
to PBGC and participants and
beneficiaries.
PBGC was typically completing its reviews in 60 to
90 days, and there was usually no reason to wait
the full 120 days. Thus, the regulation was
amended to also permit a merger or transfer to be
consummated if PBGC determined that the
transaction complied with ERISA section 4231, or
PBGC completed its review of the transaction. See
63 FR 24421 (May 4, 1998).
8 Transfers take more time for PBGC to analyze
than mergers, primarily because of the need to
perform a rigorous solvency test that is not needed
for merger transactions. Because assets are leaving
a plan, PBGC analyzes a transfer to make sure there
are adequate assets available to fund the remaining
benefit obligations and the receiving plan can
adequately fund its obligations. In a merger, the
assets and liabilities are combined and therefore the
same types of concerns are not present.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 May 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
Once the plan projects that it can only
pay benefits at the PBGC guarantee
level, ERISA section 4281.43(b) requires
the plan to issue a notice of insolvency
and annual updates to PBGC and plan
participants and beneficiaries. Subpart
D of Part 4281 of PBGC’s regulations
sets forth the notice requirements for a
terminated plan when plan assets are
sufficient to pay PBGC guaranteed
benefits, but not sufficient to pay at the
promised plan level. In such situations,
the plan sponsor must determine what
benefits the assets will cover, and
suspend benefits above that amount. At
all times, however, the plan has a
‘‘floor’’ benefit set at the PBGC
guarantee level (i.e., benefits cannot be
suspended to an amount that would pay
less than the guarantee).9
When PBGC first issued this
regulation, PBGC anticipated that a
plan’s insolvency would be short in
duration and that it could financially
recover. However, PBGC’s experience
has been that once a multiemployer
plan becomes insolvent, it will remain
so. Thus, once a plan has made the
initial notices, there is little need to
require similar subsequent notices. After
reviewing the regulation, PBGC now
believes that eliminating such annual
updates will not pose any increase in
the risk of loss to PBGC or to plan
participants.
These notice requirements can be
detrimental to plan participants because
the costs of compliance may deplete
assets that otherwise would be available
to pay plan benefits. PBGC’s experience
is that the rules for annual updates to a
notice of insolvency can be confusing to
practitioners. While the incremental
cost to the plan is small, PBGC believes
that the professional time spent
understanding the rules and other costs
in the actual compliance would be
better spent on benefits.10
Consequently, for these reasons this
final rule eliminates the annual updates
to the notice of insolvency.11
Applicability
The amendment to § 4041A.24 that
changes the annual valuation
requirement for terminated but not
insolvent plans where the value of
nonforfeitable benefits is $25 million or
less is applicable to the first posttermination valuation after June 27,
2014.
The amendment to § 4231.8 that
changes the notification requirements
9 The floor benefit is set for each participant at the
participant’s retirement.
10 See footnote 2 above.
11 The final rule also makes a minor change to the
insolvency notice’s content by deleting an outdated
reference to IRS Key District offices.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30461
for a proposed merger is applicable to
mergers planned to be consummated on
or after the 45th day after June 27, 2014.
The amendment to § 4281.43 that
eliminates the annual update notices to
PBGC and participants and beneficiaries
is applicable as of June 27, 2014.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
PBGC has determined that this rule is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule is
associated with retrospective review
and analysis in PBGC’s Plan for
Regulatory Review issued in accordance
with Executive Order 13563.
Under Section 3(f)(1) of Executive
Order 12866, a regulatory action is
economically significant if ‘‘it is likely
to result in a rule that may . . . [h]ave
an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities.’’ PBGC
has determined that this final rule does
not cross the $100 million threshold for
economic significance and is not
otherwise economically significant.
As explained below, PBGC estimates
that aggregate annual savings from the
combined regulatory changes will be
about $460,000.
Annual Valuation Requirement
PBGC has estimated the value of this
final rule on the annual valuation
requirement for plans terminated by
mass withdrawal. As of the end of its
2012 fiscal year, PBGC’s total estimated
liability for nonforfeitable benefits of the
61 mass withdrawal-terminated plans
that were not insolvent was $1.7 billion.
Of that total, there were 23 plans in the
over $25 million category; such plans
constituted nearly 80 percent of such
liabilities in all 61 terminated plans,
thus preserving a high degree of
exactitude for PBGC’s measurement of
its financial contingencies. At the same
time, each year that the 38 plans where
the value of nonforfeitable benefits was
$25 million or less will not have to do
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
30462
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
an annual valuation, there will be an
annual aggregate savings of
approximately $399,000 (assuming an
annual valuation cost of $10,500 per
plan) to these plans. These savings will
grow as the terminated plan universe
grows.
Advance Notice of Multiemployer
Mergers
PBGC believes that reducing the
required notice period in advance of a
proposed merger transaction from 120
days to 45 days prior to the effectiveness
of the merger will result in a small
decrease in administrative burden on
plan sponsors. By reducing the notice
period, PBGC expects that there will be
less interaction between plan sponsors,
their representatives, and PBGC staff to
address timing and approval issues.
PBGC estimates that 18 plans submit
advance notice of a merger in a given
year. PBGC further estimates that an
affected plan will save about onequarter hour of professional time, at
$350 per hour, and one-quarter hour
managerial time, at $115 per hour,
resulting in an aggregate annual savings
of $2,093, as a result of the reduced
length of the notice period.
Annual Notice Updates Following Mass
Withdrawal
PBGC estimates that the annual
aggregate cost of conducting the annual
insolvency update is $61,425. This
estimate is based on an estimated 54
plans required to issue the update
annually at 12.5 hours of combined
professional, clerical, and managerial
time at an average rate of $91 per hour.
Eliminating the annual update will save
plan sponsors approximately $1,138
each per year and $61,425 in the
aggregate.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
imposes certain requirements with
respect to rules that are subject to the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act and that are likely to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Unless an agency determines that a
proposed rule is not likely to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act requires that the agency present an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis at
the time of the publication of the
proposed rule describing the impact of
the rule on small entities and seeking
public comment on such impact. Small
entities include small businesses,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 May 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
organizations and governmental
jurisdictions.
For purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act requirements with
respect to this final rule, PBGC
considers a small entity to be a plan
with fewer than 100 participants. This
is the same criterion PBGC uses in other
aspects of its regulations involving
small plans, and is consistent with
certain requirements in Title I of ERISA
and the Internal Revenue Code, as well
as the definition of a small entity that
the Department of Labor (DOL) has used
for purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.12 Using this definition,
less than one percent of the 27,000 of
plans covered by Title IV of ERISA in
2011 were small multiemployer plans.13
Generally, it is only after a plan
terminates and employers withdraw
from the plan that a plan might reduce
in size to fewer than 100 participants.
Thus, PBGC believes that assessing the
impact of the proposal on small plans is
an appropriate substitute for evaluating
the effect on small entities. The
definition of small entity considered
appropriate for this purpose differs,
however, from a definition of small
business based on size standards
promulgated by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201)
pursuant to the Small Business Act.
On the basis of its definition of small
entity, PBGC certifies under section
605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that the
amendments in this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Based on data for the 2012 fiscal year,
PBGC estimates that 61 plans, very few
of which are considered a small plan,
will be required to do the valuation
requirement (19 will be required to
perform the valuation annually while 42
will do so every three years). Seventeen
plans, very few of which are considered
a small plan, will be required to submit
a notice of proposed merger. Fifty-four
plans, very few of which are considered
a small plan, will be relieved of the
burden to issue an annual insolvency
update. Accordingly, as provided in
section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), sections 603
and 604 do not apply.
12 In the proposed rule, PBGC requested
comments on this size standard. No comments were
received on this issue.
13 Although PBGC does not have data on
multiemployer plans with fewer than 100
participants, approximately 165 multiemployer
plans have 250 participants or fewer. See https://
www.pbgc.gov/documents/pension-insurance-datatables-2011.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Paperwork Reduction Act
PBGC is submitting the information
requirements under this final rule to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The collection of information in Part
4231 is approved under control number
1212–0022 (expires May 31, 2014).
PBGC estimates that there will be 21
respondents each year and that the total
annual burden of the collection of
information will be about 5 hours and
$6,900.
The collection of information in Part
4281 is approved under control number
1212–0032 (expires May 31, 2014).
PBGC estimates that there will be 378
respondents each year and that the total
annual burden of the collection of
information will be about 6,160 hours
and $43,050.
The collection of information in Part
4041A is not affected by this final rule.
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4041A
Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
29 CFR Part 4231
Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
29 CFR Part 4281
Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons given above, PBGC is
amending 29 CFR parts 4041A, 4231,
and 4281 as follows:
PART 4041A—TERMINATION OF
MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS
1. The authority citation for part
4041A continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1341a,
1441.
2. Amend § 4041A.24 by:
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Revising paragraph (a); and
c. In the first sentence of paragraph (b)
introductory text, removing the word
‘‘annual’’.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
■
■
§ 4041A.24 Plan valuations and
monitoring.
(a) Annual valuation. The plan
sponsor shall determine or cause to be
determined in writing the value of
nonforfeitable benefits under the plan
and the value of the plan’s assets, in
accordance with part 4281, subpart B.
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
This valuation shall be done not later
than 150 days after the end of the plan
year in which the plan terminates and
each plan year thereafter except as
provided in this paragraph. A plan year
for which a valuation is performed is
called a valuation year.
(1) If the value of nonforfeitable
benefits for the plan is $25 million or
less as determined for a valuation year,
the plan sponsor may use the valuation
for the next two plan years and, subject
to paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this
section, perform a new valuation
pursuant to this paragraph for the third
plan year after the previous valuation
year.
(2) No valuation is required for a plan
year for which the plan receives
financial assistance from PBGC under
section 4261 of ERISA.
(3) No valuation is required for the
plan year in which the plan is closed
out in accordance with subpart D of this
part.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 4231—MERGERS AND
TRANSFERS BETWEEN
MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS
§ 4281.43
Notices of insolvency.
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1411.
4. Amend § 4231.8 by:
a. Revising the first sentence of
paragraph (a)(1) introductory text; and
■ b. In paragraph (f)(1) by removing the
words ‘‘120 days after filing the notice’’
and adding in their place the words ‘‘the
applicable notice period set forth in
paragraph (a) of this section’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
§ 4281.44 Contents of notices of
insolvency.
I. Purpose of This Regulatory Action
a. This rule assigns responsibilities and
establishes policies and procedures for a
uniform DLA Freedom of Information
Act program pursuant to the provisions
of the Freedom of Information Act.
b. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552
II. Summary of the Major Provisions of This
Regulatory Action
This rule implements changes to conform
to the requirements of the Electronic
Freedom of Information Act
Amendments of 1996, Public Law 104–
231, and the OPEN Government Act of
2007, Public Law 110–175.
III. Costs and Benefits of This Regulatory
Action
This regulatory action imposes no
monetary costs to the Agency or public.
The benefit to the public is the accurate
reflection of the Agency’s FOIA Program
to ensure that policies and procedures
are known to the public.
*
*
*
§ 4281.46
*
*
[Amended]
8. In § 4281.46, paragraph (a)
introductory text is amended by
removing the words ‘‘§ 4281.44(a)(1)
through (a)(5) and (a)(7) through (a)(11)’’
and adding in their place the words
‘‘§ 4281.44(a)(1) through (4) and (a)(6)
through (10)’’.
■
[Amended]
9. In § 4281.47, paragraph (c)
introductory text is amended by
removing the reference ‘‘(a)(5)’’ and
adding in its place the reference
‘‘(a)(4)’’.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
May, 2014.
Joshua Gotbaum,
Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2014–12154 Filed 5–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Notice of merger or transfer.
(a) Filing of request—(1) When to file.
Except as provided in paragraph (f) of
this section, a notice of a proposed
merger or transfer must be filed not less
than 120 days, or not less than 45 days
in the case of a merger for which a
compliance determination under
§ 4231.9 is not requested, before the
effective date of the transaction. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Office of the Secretary
PART 4281—DUTIES OF PLAN
SPONSOR FOLLOWING MASS
WITHDRAWAL
Defense Logistics Agency Freedom of
Information Act Program
5. The authority citation for part 4281
continues to read as follows:
ACTION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1341(a),
1399(c)(1)(D), and 1441.
6. Amend § 4281.43 by:
a. Revising the section heading; and
b. Removing paragraphs (b), (d), and
(f) and redesignating paragraphs (c) and
■
■
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 May 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
32 CFR Part 300
Defense Logistics Agency
32 CFR Part 1285
[Docket ID: DOD–2012–OS–0019]
RIN 0790–AI87
Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
■
Effective Date: This rule is
effective June 27, 2014.
DATES:
■
3. The authority citation for part 4231
continues to read as follows:
Amendments of 1996, and the OPEN
Government Act of 2007. In addition,
part 1285 will be redesignated as part
300.
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 4281.44 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading;
■ b. Removing paragraph (a)(4) and
redesignating paragraphs (a)(5) through
(13) as paragraphs (a)(4) through (12),
respectively; and
■ c. Removing paragraphs (c) and (d).
The revision reads as follows:
*
§ 4281.47
■
§ 4231.8
(e) as paragraphs (b) and (c),
respectively.
The revision reads as follows:
30463
The Defense Logistics Agency
(DLA) is revising and updating its
existing rule concerning the DLA
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
Program. This rule implements changes
to conform to the requirements of the
Electronic Freedom of Information Act
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Ms.
Deborah Teer, (703) 767–5247.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
supplements 32 CFR part 286 to
accommodate specific requirements of
DLA’s FOIA Program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Executive Summary
REGULATORY PROCEDURES
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
300 does not: (1) Have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or more
or adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive orders.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that 32 CFR
part 300 is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act because it would not, if
promulgated, have significant economic
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 28, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30459-30463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12154]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4041A, 4231, and 4281
RIN 1212-AB13
Multiemployer Plans; Valuation and Notice Requirements
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation's (PBGC) multiemployer regulations to make the provision of
information to PBGC and plan participants more efficient and effective
and to reduce burden on plans and sponsors. The amendments reduce the
number of actuarial valuations required for certain small terminated
but not insolvent plans, shorten the advance notice filing requirements
for mergers in situations that do not involve a compliance
determination, and remove certain insolvency notice and update
requirements. The amendments are a result of PBGC's regulatory review
under Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review).
DATES: Effective June 27, 2014. See Applicability in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine B. Klion
(klion.catherine@pbgc.gov), Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory
Affairs, or Daniel Liebman (liebman.daniel@pbgc.gov), Attorney, Office
of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026; 202-326-4024. (TTY/TDD users may
call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to
be connected to 202-326-4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary--Purpose of the Regulatory Action
This final rule amends certain regulations governing PBGC's
multiemployer program to make the provision of information to PBGC and
plan participants more efficient and effective. This rule is needed to
reduce burden on multiemployer plans and sponsors and to facilitate
potentially beneficial plan merger transactions. The rule reduces
burden by allowing certain small terminated but not insolvent plans to
provide valuations less frequently, easing reporting requirements for
plan sponsors contemplating a merger transaction, and streamlining and
removing certain notice requirements for insolvent plans.\1\ This will
reduce administrative costs and preserve plan assets that could
otherwise have been used to fund plan benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under 29 CFR Sec. 4041A.2, ``insolvent'' means that a plan
is unable to pay benefits when due during the plan year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PBGC's legal authority for this regulatory action comes from
section 4002(b)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 (ERISA), which authorizes PBGC to issue regulations to carry out
the purposes of title IV of ERISA; section 4041A(f)(2), which gives
PBGC authority to prescribe reporting requirements for terminated
plans; section 4231(a), which gives PBGC authority to prescribe
regulations setting the requirements for one or more multiemployer
plans to merge; and section 4281(d), which directs PBGC to prescribe by
regulation the notice requirements to plan participants and
beneficiaries in the event of a benefit suspension.
Executive Summary--Major Provisions of the Regulatory Action
Annual Valuations
When a multiemployer plan terminates, the plan must perform an
annual valuation of the plan's assets and benefits. This final rule
allows valuations for plans that were terminated by mass withdrawal but
are not insolvent and where the value of nonforfeitable benefits is $25
million or less to be performed every three years instead of annually
as required under the current regulations.
Filing Requirements for Mergers
Under PBGC's regulations, a merger or a transfer of assets and
liabilities between multiemployer plans must satisfy certain
requirements, including a requirement that plan sponsors of all plans
involved in a merger or transfer must jointly file a notice with PBGC
before the transaction. This final rule shortens the notice period from
120 days to 45 days where no compliance determination is requested.
Insolvency Notices and Updates
Terminated multiemployer plans that determine that they will be
insolvent for a plan year must provide a series of notices and updates
to notices to PBGC and participants and beneficiaries, including a
notice of insolvency. The final rule eliminates the requirement to
provide annual updates to the notice of insolvency.
Background
PBGC administers two insurance programs for private-sector defined
benefit plans under title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA): A single-employer plan termination insurance
program and a multiemployer plan insolvency insurance program.
A multiemployer plan is a collectively bargained pension
arrangement involving several employers that are not within the same
controlled group, usually in a common industry, such as construction,
trucking, textiles, or coal mining. By contrast, a single-employer plan
may be sponsored by either one employer (pursuant or not pursuant to a
collective bargaining agreement) or by several unrelated employers (but
not pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement).
ERISA section 4041A provides for two types of multiemployer plan
terminations: Mass withdrawal and plan amendment. A mass withdrawal
termination occurs when all employers withdraw or cease to be obligated
to contribute to the plan. A plan amendment termination occurs when the
plan adopts an amendment that provides that participants will receive
no credit for service with any employer after a specified date, or an
amendment that makes it no longer a covered plan. Unlike terminated
single-employer plans, terminated multiemployer plans continue to pay
all vested benefits out of existing plan assets and withdrawal
liability payments. PBGC's guarantee of the benefits in a multiemployer
plan--payable as financial assistance to the plan--starts only if and
when the plan is unable to make payments at the statutorily guaranteed
level.
This final rule reduces certain requirements for multiemployer
plans that are terminated by mass withdrawal and mergers and transfers
among multiemployer plans.
On January 18, 2011, the President issued Executive Order 13563
``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' to ensure that Federal
regulations seek more affordable, less intrusive means to achieve
policy goals, and that agencies give careful consideration to the
benefits and costs of those regulations. PBGC's Plan for Regulatory
Review,\2\ identifies several
[[Page 30460]]
regulatory areas for review, including the multiemployer regulations
referred to above. PBGC will continue to review its regulations with a
view to developing more ideas for improvement. Public comment on
specific proposals will help PBGC determine whether its regulatory
review process is moving in the right direction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See https://www.pbgc.gov/documents/plan-for-regulatory-review.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 29, 2014 (at 79 FR 4642), PBGC published a proposed rule
to amend these regulations to reduce burden on plan sponsors. PBGC
received one comment (from a business federation) on the proposed rule.
This commenter applauded PBGC for the proposal and encouraged PBGC to
finalize the proposed changes, remarking that the proposed rule would
noticeably reduce certain reporting burdens associated with
multiemployer defined benefit plan administration.
The final regulation is unchanged from the proposed regulation.
Regulatory Changes
Annual Valuation Requirement
ERISA section 4281(b) provides that the value of nonforfeitable
benefits under a terminated plan to which section 4041A(d) applies, and
the value of the plan's assets shall be determined in writing as of the
end of the plan year during which section 4041A(d) becomes applicable,
and each plan year thereafter. Part 4041A of PBGC's regulations
establishes rules for notifying PBGC of the termination of a
multiemployer plan and rules for the administration of multiemployer
plans that have terminated by mass withdrawal. Subpart C prescribes
basic duties of plan sponsors of plans terminated by mass withdrawal,
including the annual valuation requirement at Sec. 4041A.24. Section
4281.11(a) states that the valuation dates for the annual valuation
required under section 4281(b) of ERISA is the last day of the plan
year in which the plan terminates and the last day of each plan year
thereafter. The details of the annual valuation requirement are set
forth in the remainder of Subpart B of Part 4281, Duties of Plan
Sponsor Following Mass Withdrawal.
The annual valuation requirement serves the statutory purpose of
allowing the terminated plan to determine whether it needs to eliminate
benefits that are not eligible for PBGC's guarantee. However, once the
plan has reached the point where it has eliminated all nonguaranteed
benefits, further valuations serve only to help PBGC estimate the
liabilities it will incur when the plan becomes insolvent. While
measuring PBGC's liabilities annually provides PBGC with information
needed to understand its potential exposure, the requirement to do so
results in the plan using scarce resources, at a potentially
significant cost, for a limited purpose.\3\ This may result in a faster
diminution of assets that could lead to a reduced ability to pay plan
benefits, an earlier insolvency, and an earlier elimination of any
nonforfeitable benefits that exceed PBGC's statutory guarantee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Once a plan terminates, professional and administrative
costs of paying plan benefits and continuing regulatory compliance
come out of plan assets without additional contributions being made
by the former employers as would be the case prior to termination.
Thus, with the exception of the potential inflow of some funds from
withdrawal liability recoveries, plan assets continue to decrease in
a wasting trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule amends Sec. 4041A.24 to ensure that PBGC has
reasonably reliable data to measure its liabilities without
significantly depleting plan assets. Under the amendment, terminated
plans that are not insolvent and where the value of nonforfeitable
benefits is $25 million or less (as of the valuation date of the most
recent required valuation), are required to perform the next valuation
in accordance with Subpart B of Part 4281 within three years instead of
within one year as under the unamended regulation. To comply with the
statutory requirement that there be a written determination of the
value of nonforfeitable benefits each year, such plans may use the most
recently performed valuation for the next two plan years.
All other plans will continue to be required to perform valuations
in accordance with Subpart B of Part 4281 annually.\4\ Plans can move
in and out of the three-year or annual valuation cycle, as applicable,
as the value of nonforfeitable benefits changes. Thus, a plan that has
been performing new valuations every three years will be required to
perform valuations annually if the next valuation indicates that the
value of nonforfeitable benefits exceeds $25 million. Similarly, a plan
that has been performing the valuation annually will have three years
to do the next valuation in accordance with Subpart B of Part 4281 if
the most recent valuation shows the value of nonforfeitable benefits to
be $25 million or less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ There are two other exceptions to the requirement that a
valuation be performed annually that are preserved from the
unamended regulation. No valuation is required for a plan year (1)
for which the plan receives financial assistance from PBGC under
section 4261 of ERISA, or (2) in which the plan is closed out in
accordance with subpart D of Part 4041A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This amendment targets the plans that expose PBGC to larger
liability, while reducing burden on plans that present smaller
exposure. PBGC believes that this amendment appropriately balances
PBGC's need to fairly measure its exposure with minimizing the cost to
plans and potentially to participants.
Advance Notice of Multiemployer Mergers
ERISA section 4231 sets forth the statutory requirements for
mergers of two or more multiemployer plans and transfers of plan assets
or benefit liabilities among two or more multiemployer plans, including
a requirement that a plan must give 120 days' advance notice of a
merger or transfer to PBGC. Part 4231 of PBGC regulations implements
this statutory requirement.
29 CFR Sec. 4231.8 provides that plan sponsors of all plans
involved in a merger or transfer, or their duly authorized
representatives, must jointly file a notice with PBGC in advance of the
transaction. Before the amendment, this notice was due to PBGC 120 days
prior to the transaction. The notice must include information about the
plans, the plan sponsors, the transaction, the proposed effective date,
a copy of each provision stating that no participant's or beneficiary's
accrued benefit will be lower immediately after the effective date of
the transaction than the benefit immediately before that date, and
various actuarial and plan asset and benefit valuation information.
The purpose of the notice provision is to confirm that plan
sponsors have met the four criteria listed in section 4231(b) for a
statutory transaction.\5\ Plan sponsors may request a determination
from PBGC that a merger or transfer that may otherwise be prohibited by
sections 406(a) or (b)(2) of ERISA satisfies the requirements of ERISA
section 4231.\6\ Under Sec. 4231.8(f), PBGC may waive the statutory
notice requirement.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The four criteria under ERISA section 4231(b) are:
(1) The 120-day notice requirement is met.
(2) No accrued benefits will be lower immediately after the
transaction's effective date than immediately before that date.
(3) Benefits are not reasonably expected to be subject to
suspension under ERISA section 4245.
(4) The applicable actuarial valuation of assets and liabilities
of each affected plan has been performed.
\6\ See Sec. 4231.3(b). Plan sponsors requesting a compliance
determination must submit the information required by Sec. 4231.9
in addition to the information required by Sec. 4231.8.
\7\ In 1998, PBGC amended its regulations to expand the
applicability of the waiver of this notice under Sec. 4231.8(f).
Prior to that amendment, the requirement for 120 days' notice could
be waived only if PBGC was satisfied that failure to complete the
transaction in a shorter time would harm participants or
beneficiaries. However, at the time PBGC was typically completing
its reviews in 60 to 90 days, and there was usually no reason to
wait the full 120 days. Thus, the regulation was amended to also
permit a merger or transfer to be consummated if PBGC determined
that the transaction complied with ERISA section 4231, or PBGC
completed its review of the transaction. See 63 FR 24421 (May 4,
1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 30461]]
However, PBGC now believes that the interests of PBGC and plan
participants involved in such transactions are adequately protected by
other parts of ERISA, particularly Title I, and there is little benefit
to having such a long period to merely confirm that the notice
requirements have been met.
Thus, to reduce burden, the final rule shortens the advance notice
period to 45 days for transactions that do not involve a compliance
determination under Sec. 4231.9. PBGC's experience has been that many
merger requests are received by PBGC with less than 120 days' notice
and ask for a waiver of the notice requirement so that the merger can
proceed as of the end of the plan year. The change to 45 days avoids
the need for a waiver and still allows PBGC enough time to review these
later-filed requests. PBGC believes the change to 45 days strikes the
appropriate balance to better accommodate work flows and end-of-year
rushes for both plan sponsors and PBGC staff. The current reporting
requirements will remain in effect where a compliance determination is
requested, as well as for transactions involving a transfer of plan
assets or benefit liabilities, because those transactions may require a
substantive investigation by PBGC that may well require more than 45
days to complete.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Transfers take more time for PBGC to analyze than mergers,
primarily because of the need to perform a rigorous solvency test
that is not needed for merger transactions. Because assets are
leaving a plan, PBGC analyzes a transfer to make sure there are
adequate assets available to fund the remaining benefit obligations
and the receiving plan can adequately fund its obligations. In a
merger, the assets and liabilities are combined and therefore the
same types of concerns are not present.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Notice Updates Following Mass Withdrawal
When a multiemployer plan terminates by mass withdrawal under ERISA
section 4041A(a)(2), the plan's assets and benefits are required to be
valued annually and plan benefits may have to be reduced or suspended
to the extent provided in ERISA section 4281(c) or (d). Before being
amended, part 4281 of PBGC's regulations required a terminated
multiemployer plan that determines that it will be insolvent for a plan
year to provide a series of notices and updates to notices to PBGC and
participants and beneficiaries.
Once the plan projects that it can only pay benefits at the PBGC
guarantee level, ERISA section 4281.43(b) requires the plan to issue a
notice of insolvency and annual updates to PBGC and plan participants
and beneficiaries. Subpart D of Part 4281 of PBGC's regulations sets
forth the notice requirements for a terminated plan when plan assets
are sufficient to pay PBGC guaranteed benefits, but not sufficient to
pay at the promised plan level. In such situations, the plan sponsor
must determine what benefits the assets will cover, and suspend
benefits above that amount. At all times, however, the plan has a
``floor'' benefit set at the PBGC guarantee level (i.e., benefits
cannot be suspended to an amount that would pay less than the
guarantee).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The floor benefit is set for each participant at the
participant's retirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When PBGC first issued this regulation, PBGC anticipated that a
plan's insolvency would be short in duration and that it could
financially recover. However, PBGC's experience has been that once a
multiemployer plan becomes insolvent, it will remain so. Thus, once a
plan has made the initial notices, there is little need to require
similar subsequent notices. After reviewing the regulation, PBGC now
believes that eliminating such annual updates will not pose any
increase in the risk of loss to PBGC or to plan participants.
These notice requirements can be detrimental to plan participants
because the costs of compliance may deplete assets that otherwise would
be available to pay plan benefits. PBGC's experience is that the rules
for annual updates to a notice of insolvency can be confusing to
practitioners. While the incremental cost to the plan is small, PBGC
believes that the professional time spent understanding the rules and
other costs in the actual compliance would be better spent on
benefits.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See footnote 2 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consequently, for these reasons this final rule eliminates the
annual updates to the notice of insolvency.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The final rule also makes a minor change to the insolvency
notice's content by deleting an outdated reference to IRS Key
District offices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicability
The amendment to Sec. 4041A.24 that changes the annual valuation
requirement for terminated but not insolvent plans where the value of
nonforfeitable benefits is $25 million or less is applicable to the
first post-termination valuation after June 27, 2014.
The amendment to Sec. 4231.8 that changes the notification
requirements for a proposed merger is applicable to mergers planned to
be consummated on or after the 45th day after June 27, 2014.
The amendment to Sec. 4281.43 that eliminates the annual update
notices to PBGC and participants and beneficiaries is applicable as of
June 27, 2014.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
PBGC has determined that this rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule is associated with retrospective review and
analysis in PBGC's Plan for Regulatory Review issued in accordance with
Executive Order 13563.
Under Section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866, a regulatory action
is economically significant if ``it is likely to result in a rule that
may . . . [h]ave an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities.'' PBGC has determined that this final rule does not cross
the $100 million threshold for economic significance and is not
otherwise economically significant.
As explained below, PBGC estimates that aggregate annual savings
from the combined regulatory changes will be about $460,000.
Annual Valuation Requirement
PBGC has estimated the value of this final rule on the annual
valuation requirement for plans terminated by mass withdrawal. As of
the end of its 2012 fiscal year, PBGC's total estimated liability for
nonforfeitable benefits of the 61 mass withdrawal-terminated plans that
were not insolvent was $1.7 billion. Of that total, there were 23 plans
in the over $25 million category; such plans constituted nearly 80
percent of such liabilities in all 61 terminated plans, thus preserving
a high degree of exactitude for PBGC's measurement of its financial
contingencies. At the same time, each year that the 38 plans where the
value of nonforfeitable benefits was $25 million or less will not have
to do
[[Page 30462]]
an annual valuation, there will be an annual aggregate savings of
approximately $399,000 (assuming an annual valuation cost of $10,500
per plan) to these plans. These savings will grow as the terminated
plan universe grows.
Advance Notice of Multiemployer Mergers
PBGC believes that reducing the required notice period in advance
of a proposed merger transaction from 120 days to 45 days prior to the
effectiveness of the merger will result in a small decrease in
administrative burden on plan sponsors. By reducing the notice period,
PBGC expects that there will be less interaction between plan sponsors,
their representatives, and PBGC staff to address timing and approval
issues. PBGC estimates that 18 plans submit advance notice of a merger
in a given year. PBGC further estimates that an affected plan will save
about one-quarter hour of professional time, at $350 per hour, and one-
quarter hour managerial time, at $115 per hour, resulting in an
aggregate annual savings of $2,093, as a result of the reduced length
of the notice period.
Annual Notice Updates Following Mass Withdrawal
PBGC estimates that the annual aggregate cost of conducting the
annual insolvency update is $61,425. This estimate is based on an
estimated 54 plans required to issue the update annually at 12.5 hours
of combined professional, clerical, and managerial time at an average
rate of $91 per hour. Eliminating the annual update will save plan
sponsors approximately $1,138 each per year and $61,425 in the
aggregate.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act imposes certain requirements with
respect to rules that are subject to the notice and comment
requirements of section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act and
that are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Unless an agency determines that a proposed
rule is not likely to have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act requires that the agency present an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis at the time of the publication of the proposed
rule describing the impact of the rule on small entities and seeking
public comment on such impact. Small entities include small businesses,
organizations and governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requirements with
respect to this final rule, PBGC considers a small entity to be a plan
with fewer than 100 participants. This is the same criterion PBGC uses
in other aspects of its regulations involving small plans, and is
consistent with certain requirements in Title I of ERISA and the
Internal Revenue Code, as well as the definition of a small entity that
the Department of Labor (DOL) has used for purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.\12\ Using this definition, less than one percent of
the 27,000 of plans covered by Title IV of ERISA in 2011 were small
multiemployer plans.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ In the proposed rule, PBGC requested comments on this size
standard. No comments were received on this issue.
\13\ Although PBGC does not have data on multiemployer plans
with fewer than 100 participants, approximately 165 multiemployer
plans have 250 participants or fewer. See https://www.pbgc.gov/documents/pension-insurance-data-tables-2011.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generally, it is only after a plan terminates and employers
withdraw from the plan that a plan might reduce in size to fewer than
100 participants. Thus, PBGC believes that assessing the impact of the
proposal on small plans is an appropriate substitute for evaluating the
effect on small entities. The definition of small entity considered
appropriate for this purpose differs, however, from a definition of
small business based on size standards promulgated by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) pursuant to the Small Business
Act.
On the basis of its definition of small entity, PBGC certifies
under section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) that the amendments in this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Based on
data for the 2012 fiscal year, PBGC estimates that 61 plans, very few
of which are considered a small plan, will be required to do the
valuation requirement (19 will be required to perform the valuation
annually while 42 will do so every three years). Seventeen plans, very
few of which are considered a small plan, will be required to submit a
notice of proposed merger. Fifty-four plans, very few of which are
considered a small plan, will be relieved of the burden to issue an
annual insolvency update. Accordingly, as provided in section 605 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), sections 603 and
604 do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
PBGC is submitting the information requirements under this final
rule to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The collection of information in Part 4231 is approved under
control number 1212-0022 (expires May 31, 2014). PBGC estimates that
there will be 21 respondents each year and that the total annual burden
of the collection of information will be about 5 hours and $6,900.
The collection of information in Part 4281 is approved under
control number 1212-0032 (expires May 31, 2014). PBGC estimates that
there will be 378 respondents each year and that the total annual
burden of the collection of information will be about 6,160 hours and
$43,050.
The collection of information in Part 4041A is not affected by this
final rule.
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4041A
Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
29 CFR Part 4231
Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
29 CFR Part 4281
Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons given above, PBGC is amending 29 CFR parts 4041A,
4231, and 4281 as follows:
PART 4041A--TERMINATION OF MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 4041A continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1341a, 1441.
0
2. Amend Sec. 4041A.24 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Revising paragraph (a); and
0
c. In the first sentence of paragraph (b) introductory text, removing
the word ``annual''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4041A.24 Plan valuations and monitoring.
(a) Annual valuation. The plan sponsor shall determine or cause to
be determined in writing the value of nonforfeitable benefits under the
plan and the value of the plan's assets, in accordance with part 4281,
subpart B.
[[Page 30463]]
This valuation shall be done not later than 150 days after the end of
the plan year in which the plan terminates and each plan year
thereafter except as provided in this paragraph. A plan year for which
a valuation is performed is called a valuation year.
(1) If the value of nonforfeitable benefits for the plan is $25
million or less as determined for a valuation year, the plan sponsor
may use the valuation for the next two plan years and, subject to
paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section, perform a new valuation
pursuant to this paragraph for the third plan year after the previous
valuation year.
(2) No valuation is required for a plan year for which the plan
receives financial assistance from PBGC under section 4261 of ERISA.
(3) No valuation is required for the plan year in which the plan is
closed out in accordance with subpart D of this part.
* * * * *
PART 4231--MERGERS AND TRANSFERS BETWEEN MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS
0
3. The authority citation for part 4231 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1411.
0
4. Amend Sec. 4231.8 by:
0
a. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (a)(1) introductory text;
and
0
b. In paragraph (f)(1) by removing the words ``120 days after filing
the notice'' and adding in their place the words ``the applicable
notice period set forth in paragraph (a) of this section''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 4231.8 Notice of merger or transfer.
(a) Filing of request--(1) When to file. Except as provided in
paragraph (f) of this section, a notice of a proposed merger or
transfer must be filed not less than 120 days, or not less than 45 days
in the case of a merger for which a compliance determination under
Sec. 4231.9 is not requested, before the effective date of the
transaction. * * *
* * * * *
PART 4281--DUTIES OF PLAN SPONSOR FOLLOWING MASS WITHDRAWAL
0
5. The authority citation for part 4281 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1341(a), 1399(c)(1)(D), and
1441.
0
6. Amend Sec. 4281.43 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading; and
0
b. Removing paragraphs (b), (d), and (f) and redesignating paragraphs
(c) and (e) as paragraphs (b) and (c), respectively.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 4281.43 Notices of insolvency.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 4281.44 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Removing paragraph (a)(4) and redesignating paragraphs (a)(5)
through (13) as paragraphs (a)(4) through (12), respectively; and
0
c. Removing paragraphs (c) and (d).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 4281.44 Contents of notices of insolvency.
* * * * *
Sec. 4281.46 [Amended]
0
8. In Sec. 4281.46, paragraph (a) introductory text is amended by
removing the words ``Sec. 4281.44(a)(1) through (a)(5) and (a)(7)
through (a)(11)'' and adding in their place the words ``Sec.
4281.44(a)(1) through (4) and (a)(6) through (10)''.
Sec. 4281.47 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec. 4281.47, paragraph (c) introductory text is amended by
removing the reference ``(a)(5)'' and adding in its place the reference
``(a)(4)''.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 19th day of May, 2014.
Joshua Gotbaum,
Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2014-12154 Filed 5-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-02-P